Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
3. Company Analysis
SWOT Analysis
Examination of Firms: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats.
10
Similarly:
By substitution:
Ct +1 Ct + 2 IVt + 2 IVt = + + 2 (1 + k ) (1 + k ) (1 + k ) 2
and so on Thus, IV is the PV of all future cash flows and terminal price. What are the possible forms of cash flows available to shareholders?
SA: Fundamental Analysis (3) 11
Discounted Cash-flow: An example1 CashSP Plc paid a dividend of 2.93 per share today. 4 years ago it was only 2. It is expected that the companys dividends would grow at this rate for next 3 years. Thereafter the growth in dividend is expected to be only 5% per year. The required rate of return is 20% and the current market price per share is 24. (Assume that dividend is the only cash-flow available to shareholders). Ms Salford approached you for your advice with the above information. Should Ms Salford be buying these shares at the current market price of 24.
12
Discounted Cash-flow: An example2 CashD(t-4) = Dt = G1 = G2 = R = 2.00 2.93 10.0% 5.0% 20.0% Dividend 4 years ago Dividend today Dividend growth rate during the past 4 years and expected for the next 3 years Dividend growth rate after 3 years Required rate of return
1 4
1 4
14
Discounted Cash-flow: An example3 CashIn year 4, the dividend per share is expected to be 4.10. Now, estimate the price of the share at the end of year 3 based on the dividend of year 4 and a constant growth rate of 5%. This is estimated as:
Discounted Cash-flow: An example4 CashFinally, to get the current intrinsic value of the share add the PV of dividend receivable during the next 3 years (7.41) and the PV of the price at the end of year-3 (15.82) together. Thus, IV is 23.23, (7.41+15.82). The current market price (24.00) of this share is higher than its intrinsic (IV < MV). It is overpriced! Ms Salford should not buy these shares.
16
17
E ROE * bE g= = = ROE * b E E
18
19
20
Overall, the challenge to security analysts is to estimate IV. Analysts should consider global & domestic macroeconomic, industry, and firm specific factors in valuing the common stocks.
SA: Fundamental Analysis (3) 21
Essential Readings
Bodie, Z., A. Kane and A. J. Marcus, (2008), Investments, Irwin (BKN). Chapter 18 Davies, R., P. Draper, S. Unni and K. Paudyal (1999), The Cost of Equity Capital, The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants. Reilly, F. K., and K. C. Brown (2006), Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management, Thomson South-Western, Chapter 14. See Supplementary Reading list for further references.
22
Seminar questions
1. The discounted cash-flow method sounds logical in valuing cash-
a year and its management is confident that this will be maintained in the future from existing production facilities. Though the firms general policy is to pay-out 100% of its payearnings it plans to retain 1/3 of its earnings for the next 3 years. The new investments are expected to generate 20% return p.a. in perpetuity. Once these investment opportunities are exploited the firm will return to its policy of 100% pay-out. The required rate of return is 10%. You are payrequired to estimate the value of the firm.
SA: Fundamental Analysis (3) 23
24
The Issue: How to estimate the value (or the Cost of Capital) when historical prices are not available?
SA: Valuing a Private Company 25
The Pure-Play approach1 PureThe concept: Find some publicly traded firms that compete in the same line of business as your unlisted firm Estimate the s of those (listed) firms Use these s to estimate of your private firm.
27
The Pure-Play approach2 PureSome issues: 1. What if s of pure-play firms are far apart? Fuller and Keer (1981) suggest using median 2. Can you actually find a pure-play firm? Bower and Jenks (1975) suggest that finding pure-play firm is not easy.
28
FullFull-Information Approach-1
The Basis: The overall beta of a firm is the weighted average of divisional s of a division is constant There should be more firms (M) than divisions (N) in the sample.
29
FullFull-Information Approach-2
Consider the following equation:
M , j = sW j , s + j
s =1
Where: Mj = Over all market of firm j wjs = weight of each segment in company j s = of segment s (a parameter to estimate) Market of firms is the dependent variable and weights for the divisions are the explanatory variables.
SA: Valuing a Private Company 30
Performance of Full-Information Approach FullEhrhardt and Bhagwat (1991): Main results (Using 2-digit SIC code of segment) Adj. R2 = 0.69 4 of 70 estimates are not statistically significant Generates with tighter confidence interval than the pure-play method. Explains higher proportion of variation in Is the superiority of Full-Information approach is robust? Robust to alternative measures of segment weight, and Robust to 3-digit SIC classification.
SA: Valuing a Private Company 31
Summary
Lack of market value makes valuation of unlisted firms or divisions difficult. Difficulties in finding pure play firms limits the applicability of Pure-play approach PureFullFull-information method utilizes information content in mutimuti-divisional firms.
32
Essential Readings
Ehrhardt, M. C. (1994), The Search for Value: Measuring the Companys Cost of Capital, Harvard Business School Press. Chapter 4. Ehrhardt, M.C. and Y.N. Bhagwat (1991), A FullInformation Approach for Estimating Divisional Betas, Financial Management 20, 60-69. Fuller, R. J. and H. S. Kerr (1981), Estimating the Divisional Cost of Capital: An Analysis of the Pure-Play Technique, Journal of Finance 36, 997-1009. See Supplementary Reading list for further references.
33