0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
17 visualizzazioni1 pagina
Study examines differences in disease prevalence and treatment rates between the u.s. And European countries. Authors attribute higher per capita health care spending to poorer population health. Project will use National Quality Forum measures as the basis and integrate measures related to cost of care.
Study examines differences in disease prevalence and treatment rates between the u.s. And European countries. Authors attribute higher per capita health care spending to poorer population health. Project will use National Quality Forum measures as the basis and integrate measures related to cost of care.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
Study examines differences in disease prevalence and treatment rates between the u.s. And European countries. Authors attribute higher per capita health care spending to poorer population health. Project will use National Quality Forum measures as the basis and integrate measures related to cost of care.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
Brought to you by Thomas Jefferson University’s Department of Health Policy
Volume II, Number 37
Gaps in Prevalence of Chronic Disease Between the U.S. and Europe
The United States spends more on health care than any other European country. A study published in Health Affairs on October 2nd examined differences in disease prevalence and treatment rates for ten of the most costly conditions when treated in the U.S. and a selection of ten European countries. Based on the 2004 study data, the authors concluded that for many of the most costly chronic conditions, both disease prevalence and treatment rates were higher in the U.S. The authors attribute the higher per capita health care spending in the U.S. to more than poorer population health, but also to a more aggressive approach to diagnosis and treatment of patients with mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic disease. (Health Affairs Web Exclusive, US News & World Report, 10/2/07) RWJF Supports Disparities Research The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) will provide nearly $16 million in grants to develop and test a single national approach to bring consistency to measurement and reporting efforts on quality and cost of care. The project will use National Quality Forum (NQF) measures as the basis and integrate measures related to cost of care. The work being supported through the RWJF will support the vision of the Quality Alliance Steering Committee (QASC). The QASC was formed through the collaboration of the AQA Alliance with the Hospital Quality Alliance for the purpose of developing a framework for effective use of quality and cost measures. The information gained through this project will be used to identify and assess disparities in care. It will also make more information about quality available through AHRQ; thus, driving improvement in care. This project will be led by QASC Co-Chair Mark McClellan, M.D., Ph.D., who is the former administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. He now works for the Engelberg Center which was formed to was formed to address the challenges of access, quality and financing that face the U.S. health care system today. (RWJF, 10/3/07) Gaps in Trauma Care You are involved in an accident that requires immediate care but there is not a trauma center in the local hospital, what do you do? Many patients in the U.S. who are severely injured have this experience. Trauma from injuries including accidents, falls and violence is the leading cause of death for Americans under the age of 44, claiming more than 140,000 lives and permanently disabling 80,000 people annually. In certain instances the presence of a trauma center isn’t the only problem, but coordination to transfer patients who require trauma care also contributes to a delay in care. According to the American College of Surgeons, only one in four lives is served by a coordinated system to transfer patients to designated trauma centers from less-equipped hospitals. Only eight state trauma systems met nationally recommended preparedness levels in a study by the federal government after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. While some progress has been made, many states remain woefully unprepared, trauma experts say. Efforts are underway to create a national trauma system to transfer patients when necessary. For more information about how to locate your local trauma center visit the American College of Surgeons website, which has a list of verified trauma centers and the level of care they provide (www.facs.org/trauma/verified.html). (Wall Street Journal, 10/3/07)
Any questions regarding this newsletter can be directed
to Valerie Pracilio at valerie.pracilio@jefferson.edu or Bettina Berman bettina.berman@jefferson.edu.