Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2 9/8/11
Chapter 2 - Science as a Way of Knowing: Critical Thinking about the Environment 1. a. This statement is a scientific statement because it can be proven through experiments. There can be a data of percents of carbon dioxide increasing. b. This statement is not a scientific statement because it is a personal choice. c. This is a scientific statement because it can be proven through a data of how many condors are remaining compared to how many there were before. d. This statement is a scientific statement because it is not a belief or a religious view. e. This statement is not a scientific statement because it is a belief. f. This statement is scientific if it can be proven and if it is reasonable. It can be tested by seeing if people can make crop circles. 2. The control in an experiment is the variable that is kept constant in the experiment that does not mean that the variable is the same as another tested experiments variable. In a controlled experiment, the duplicate of the original experiment has the same, exact variables with the variable that is being tested different. 3. A ruler cannot show a precise measure, so if I reported a distance measured to be 0.3900 inches, it would be inaccurate because I did not actually know a number that specific. 4. a. The rate of breathing is the dependent variable and the amount of exercise is the independent variable. b. The grades is the dependent variable and the study time is the independent variable. c. The likelihood of the people is the dependent variable and the other people is the independent variable. 5. Scientific statements must be falsified because of the method disprovability. If it cannot be disproved, it is not scientific. 6. The probability of a fish surviving is 14/25. 7. a. It is quantitative. b. It is qualitative. c. It is qualitative. d. It is quantitative. 8. Another word for the manipulated variable is the dependent variable or responding variable. 9. The major claim of the article is that the number of frogs with deformities are increasing. 10. The evidence the author provides is from inferences such as Michael Lannoo. Lanno claims that there are many more frogs with deformities and there were in 1750. 11. The evidence is based on the source of the evidence and unbiased because the author puts no authority of himself in the article. He continuously uses he says and Lannoo says because he is not the one who directly saw the increasing number of deformed frogs. 12. The argument for the claim is not logical because the only one person is cited in the article. Also, the deformities of the frogs could be triggered from the weather or the timing. 13. I would reject this claim because there needs to be more experiments from more than one person and it should be based on regions and time.