Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Page 1 of 13
As Grace re-vamps its website, may I suggest the following three “technologies” which I
consistently find unquestionably helpful:
• Prayer
• Patience
• Persistence
Also, Rosemary and I are here to serve. We can work with you and your content
material to make it “web-ish”.
Grace Community Church uses a website service called E-zekiel. Because of this, we
don’t have total and access to the entire page space as shown in the table below.
Page 2 of 13
Know Your Target Audience
The most successful websites are those designed with their target audience clearly in
mind. Whether one is defining, designing, deploying or updating a website one thing is
in common with regard to success – know your target audience. This greatly enhances
content appropriateness.
Good church websites are hard to create because they must reach two primarily distinct
target audience segments:
1. The current church membership (existing members)
2. Prospective individuals/families which the church hopes to reach (visitors)
The chart below shows the differences between these two audiences.
Page 3 of 13
Scanners and Searchers
At the same time, web viewers fall into two primary viewing modes scanning or
searching. It’s a lot like how we go shopping at a department store. We either scan
(browse) or search.
• Scanners (Browsers): consider the act of seeking to be fulfilling within its own
right. The person may not have specific items in mind to find, but rather considers
the shopping process to be formative, educational or even entertaining. The looking
is an end unto itself. Exploring may be fun, but wasting time isn’t.
• Searchers: consider finding specific item(s) to be the objective. Success/pleasure
comes from finding what is being sought in as little time as possible.
Page 4 of 13
Don’t Make Me Think; Ch 2; pg. 23
Jakob Nielsen, the Godfather of website usability design puts it quite well back in his
October 1997 Alertbox column “How Users Read on the Web”… “They Don’t”.
Nielsen’s research found that website viewers scanned pages by picking out eye
catching words, phrases and individual sentences. Only 16% of viewers tested would
read word-for-word.
With the web, less is more. People are either browsers or searchers and in either case,
words for the most part get in the way. Web usability folk will recommend editing
general communications material content down by a half and in many cases even half
that again (a 50 – 75% reduction in word count). The foundation draws back to E.B.
White’s 17th rule in The Elements of Style: Omit needless words.
Steve Krug in his book Don’t Make Me Think supports stating that while it may sound
excessive, one should be ruthless in their cutting of needless words. He sites the
benefits to be:
• Reduced page noise level
• Increases useful content prominence
• Shortens pages allowing users to see more at a glance without scrolling
• Gets rid of the sociable, content free “small talk” which adds no value
• Removes self-congratulatory promotional content
Page 5 of 13
Here’s an example of Steve editing a site survey’s text:
At the bottom of this form you can choose to leave your name, address, and telephone
number. If you leave your name and number, you may be contacted in the future to
participate in a survey to help us improve this site.
If you have comments or concerns that require a response please contact Customer
Service.”
Please select your answers from the Most users don't need to be told how to fill the
drop-down menus and radio buttons ones who do won't know what "radio button"
below. are anyway.
The questionnaire should only take At this point, I'm still trying to decide whether to
you 2-3 minutes to complete. bother with this questionnaire, so knowing that
it's short is useful information.
At the bottom of this form you can This instruction is of no use to me at this the
choose to leave your name, address, end of the questionnaire where I can only
and telephone number. If you leave effect is to make the instructions look
your name and number, you may be
contacted in the future to participate
in a survey to help us improve this
site.
If you have comments or concerns The fact that I shouldn't use this form if I want
that require a response please an answer is useful and important information.
contact Customer Service. Unfortunately, though, they don't bother telling
me how I contact Customer Service-or better
still, giving me a link so I can right here.
After: 41 Words
Please help us improve the site by answering these questions. It should only take you
2-3 minutes to complete this survey.
NOTE: If you have comments or concerns that require a response don't use this form.
Instead, please contact Customer Service.
Page 6 of 13
Jakob Nielsen provides us with another example of how different content writing style
can make a significant impact on a web page’s usability.
Improvement
Content Style Sample Paragraph (relative to control
condition)
Promotional writing Nebraska is filled with internationally recognized attractions
(control condition) that draw large crowds of people every year, without fail. In
using the "marketese" found on 1996, some of the most popular places were Fort Robinson
many commercial websites State Park (355,000 visitors), Scotts Bluff National
0%
Monument (132,166), Arbor Lodge State Historical Park &
(by definition)
Museum (100,000), Carhenge (86,598), Stuhr Museum of
the Prairie Pioneer (60,002), and Buffalo Bill Ranch State
Historical Park (28,446).
Page 7 of 13
Above The Fold
Its interesting that with regard to web site content generation, those that have grown
through newspaper editorial experience have a good sense of many of the web site
composition fundamentals, but not all….
They understand:
• the critical importance of knowing your target audience
• planting the hook and then drawing in the viewer
• Managing content in a restricted presentation space. Web site content works
across screen scrolls. Newspaper content works across page folds.
Tabloid layout has also taught us to place something of interest, a bait, to draw the
viewer to go below the fold. To flip the page and read the rest. For example:
• Table of contents on front page
• Todays weather on front page
• Sidebar margin article traversing fold causing reader to “flip-to-follow”
With web pages the fold line is where your screen stops. If you scroll down, you’ve just
moved below the fold. Viewer scrolling is work, effort, it diminishes their desire to
continue looking. Its not so much that folks are lazy, well, maybe they are, but what is
really playing in their head is the perception of time lost. Also, search engines have
engrained viewers to think that what’s down is… less. Unless it’s clearly a
reference/archival page one should strive to keep it within two or three screen scrolls if
possible.
What is different is how web content is based upon the hyperlink paradigm. Thus
referencing or rather referring to body copy elsewhere is utilized to the max. Why
duplicate content when hyperlinks easily provide for primary content to only be a single
click away. Don’t waste your web page real estate with content that you can instead
simply refer to elsewhere via a hyperlink. For example:
Page 8 of 13
• Highlight events and activities by title and phrase summary (what) and date/time
(when) and use this as a hyperlink to another page that goes into more detail about
that event/activity.
• Hyperlink to existing church website reference pages (ex.: How To Contact Us)
• Leverage shared ministry programs/project pages through by reference (ex.: one
Indoor Park web page could be linked to from PCTW as well as Childrens Ministry
pages).
• Link other website content rather then reiterating it within page’s body content.
• Etc…
To put some of this together, lets now take a look at an example, hypothetical ministry
web page: Chess For Christ. In taking a look at it we note the following:
• Not too long ~ 2.5 screen scrolls in length.
• Key info is in first screen: what its about, contact info
• Eye catching event of interest to target audience
• And… the “You Solve It” bait in the bottom screen providing interesting, dynamic
(regularly changing, fresh) content
Page 9 of 13
Full
Screen
Full
Screen
Semi - Full
Screen
Page 10 of 13
Here’s another view taking into account design elements which have been discussed.
Page 11 of 13
• Content is compartmentalized, explicitly sectioned off (description vs. contact vs.
events/activities, etc…). Sometimes referred to as “ice-cubing”.
• A multi column approach is used to best maximize content/space utilization and
viewing behavior.
• Graphics used carefully. Market data shows 2/3rd to 3/4th of WWW users still on
56Kb modems. What’s your target audience using?
• Little or no prose – if article, expose, testimonial content is desired, link to it.
Web pages do best when the information being provided is well organized. Good web
pages are not like our infamous kitchen drawer with batteries, rubber bands, tape, stuff,
etc… all just thrown in there. Facilitate quick and easy “search and seizure” of
information.
Design layouts that can be replicated from page to page make navigation and usage
much easier for the viewer. Consistent look and feel is the keynote enabler for efficient
and effective viewing and is one of the most significant contributions of excellent
websites (and yet overlooked by so many).
With all that said, the reality of church website development is evolutionary, rarely
revolutionary. Two key, aspects of this website development process are:
• It’s design and layout, taking into account esthetics and usability.
• The policies, procedures, and resources for the site’s content development,
submission, institution and maintenance.
Most often during the early stages of deployment leverage is the name of the game.
Initial content will come from existing elements such as brochures, bulletins, sermon
slides, newsletters, etc…As a result of this “content re-packaging”, the website’s target
audience is typically skewed more towards the existing member rather than visitor.
We in essence get ourselves on our feet with a new look and feel while re-packaging
existing content to our existing members. We may want to re-package what we already
have, tweak it a bit and spice it up, or…. chuck it and say “this web stuff is totally
different, I need to start over.” Over time we can walk and then run by expanding
incremental content contribution that is welcomingly targeted towards the inquiring
visitor audience. It simply takes time and patience.
Page 12 of 13
• Represent description as benefits organized by the GCC four commitments if
possible (note how this was done in the Chess For Christ Ministry page)
Looking to get out, have some fun, meet some friends? Super! Loving People
Sportsmanship, competition and fellowship.
Page 13 of 13