Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
MSC IN ECONOMICS
ISCTE-IUL
HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT
STRUCTURE
1. Some ‘transitional’ authors
(William Petty, Richard Cantillon, David Hume)
2. Physiocracy
a) Context
b) Main ideas ( naturalist rationalism, economic liberalism,
agriculture, tax reform)
c) Quesnay and Turgot
1
10/13/2023
Theory of value: human labour was central in the process of value and
wealth creation, but land also played an essential role: «Labour is the Father
and active principle of Wealth, as Lands are the Mother» (quoted in Roll
1950: 106).
2
10/13/2023
2. PHYSIOCRACY: CONTEXT
The first ‘school’ of economic thought, strictly speaking: group of authors
who lived in the same time and place, unity of principles and topics of
analysis, self-categorization as ‘phisiocrates’ and ‘les économistes’.
Origin of the word: Physis (nature) + Kratos (power). ‘Physiocracy’ would
therefore mean the ‘power of nature’.
3
10/13/2023
Naturalist rationalism
Influenced by the advancements in natural philosophy (Descartes,
Newton), which showed that ordering and associating
phenomena led to the ‘discovery’ of stable relations, of ‘natural
laws’, the program of the physiocrats was to establish a logical
system of (natural) laws covering economic/social phenomena.
Economic liberalism
In opposition to mercantilist interventionism and protectionism, liberty
of production, circulation, work. If everyone is free to pursue his
own advantage, this will liberate hidden energies and lead to the
best possible aggregate outcome. The best policy option was
therefore non-intervention; the free operation of markets would
spontaneously lead to a ‘natural order’ in the economy. This is
best captured by the famous dictum, ‘laissez-faire, laissez-passer’.
In this context, the role of the state was to provide the framework
for the natural order: protecting private property, securing
contracts, removing obstacles to freedom of production and
commerce.
4
10/13/2023
Tax reform
France in 18th century, was marked by a complex, oppressive and
arbitrary structure of taxation, with pressing needs to finance wars and
the luxury of élites (royal court at Versailles). In this context, the
physiocrats defended a single tax on the only productive activity,
agriculture; this tax would be paid by landowners (additionally would
have the advantage of fighting absentee ownership).
5
10/13/2023