Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Kunal Shridhar
The advantages of performing social network analysis is that it helps people understand how to share professional knowledge in an efficient manner and to evaluate the performance of the individuals, groups, organizations or even entire social network. Researchers are busy studying how these social networks affect the performance of individuals and teams. Individuals are often influenced by the behavior of their peers. Studies have shown that an individual puts more effort and improves his/her performance when he/she is working with more able teammates. Research shows that an individuals job performance is a function of his/her network position in actual work settings. Results show that higher the centrality of an individual, the better is his/her performance. A central individual has more means to obtain resources and important information needed for completing a job than a less central individual. High centrality implies the power and independency on others. A highly central individual gains expertise in his/her field much more quickly than less central individuals. This happens only when relationships among actors in network are positive. Negative relationships also exist in workplace. In that case, centrality is negatively related to an individuals performance. Lack of cooperation and teamwork is the result of negative relations which causes performance to go down. One special class of social networks is structurally diverse networks. Social network theory indicates that these structurally diverse networks have positive effects on work performance. These networks are low in cohesion and high in structural holes. Holes in a social network refer to the absence of ties that would otherwise connect unconnected parts together. Individuals who bridge these holes get early exposure to novel information and are responsible for information flow between unconnected clusters. This structural holes theory is based on betweenness centrality. To study the effects of social networks on team performance, the density of network is accessed. Density of network indicates the overall level of interaction in the team. In case of advice networks, the density is positively related to the team performance. In case of hindrance networks, density is negatively related to the team performance. Despite of the usefulness of Social Network Analysis in fields of social sciences, biology, communication sciences, information theory and numerous other fields, there has been significant amount of criticism and problems associated with the field. The field is criticized for being too much methodological and too little theoretical. One very serious problem associated with Social Network Analysis is that we dont yet have sufficient computing resources that can handle large datasets. We cant allow network to grow too large while performing SNA since we wont be able to handle such a large amount of data with the currently available computing resources for SNA.