Sei sulla pagina 1di 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Inter Operator Benchmarking Report


Hyderabad

Report Compiled by
Muhammad Adeel Ahmed

RF South

Confidential

Page 1 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................
................................................................................................
..................................................3
1.1 NETWORKS UNDER TEST ................................
................................................................................................
............................................3
1.2 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY ................................
................................................................................................
.........................................3
1.3 DRIVE TEST LOCATION................................
................................................................................................
...............................................4
2.0 MANAGEMENT
MENT SUMMARY ................................................................................................
.................................5
2.1 DRIVE TEST CALL SUMMARY ................................
................................................................................................
......................................5
2.2 BENCHMARKING SUMMARY ................................
................................................................................................
........................................5
3.0 NETWORK
ORK ACCESSIBILITY (I
(IDLE MODE) ................................................................
........................................6
3.1 RXLEV PLOTS ................................
.............................................................................................................................
.............................6
3.2 RXLEV VALUES AND DISTRIBUTIONS ................................................................
.........................................................8
3.3 C/I PLOTS ................................
...............................................................................................................................
............................... 10
3.4 C/I VALUES AND DISTRIBUTIONS ...........................................................................................
........................... 12
4.0 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY
ILITY ................................................................................................
.................................. 14
4.1 CALL SETUP SUCCESS RATE ................................
................................................................................................
..................................... 14
4.2 CALL SETUP TIME ................................
................................................................................................
..................................................... 15
5.0 NETWORK RETAINABILITY
ILITY ...............................................................................................
............................... 15
5.1 RXQUAL PLOTS ................................
........................................................................................................................
........................ 16
5.2 RXQUAL VALUES AND DISTRIBUTIONS ................................................................
.................................................... 18
5.3 DROPPED CALL LOCATIONS................................
................................................................................................
...................................... 20
5.4 DROPPED CALL VALUES................................
................................................................................................
............................................ 22
5.5 SPEECH CODEC VALUES ................................
................................................................................................
............................................ 24
6.0 CONCLUSION................................
........................................................................................................................
........................ 28

RF South

Confidential

Page 2 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

1.0 Introduction
This report provides results of inter o
operator benchmarking against QOS parameters for voice
calls from field measurements conducted for all GSM operators in Hyderabad.

1.1 Networks under Test

Area

Operator

Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Hyderabad

Telenor
Mobilink
Ufone
Warid

1.2 Sampling Methodology

Type of Measurement

Duration of Call ((Sec)

Idle Time (Sec)

Equipment Used

Idle Mode
Dedicated Mode Short Call

NA
120

all
10

Tems 8.0 without


out external antenna
Tems 8.0 without external antenna

RF South

Confidential

Page 3 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

1.3 Drive Test Location


Drive Test Route of Hyderabad City is shown below on a Google Earth Raster Image.

RF South

Confidential

Page 4 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

2.0 Management Summary


The testing for QOS parameters was divided into three distinct categories:
categories Network
Accessibility, Service Accessibility and Network Sustainability. Network Accessibility typically
means that Network should have sufficient radio conditions (Typically Level and C/I) so that
mobile can camp onto the Network without going into emergency mode. Service Accessibility
is user perceived successful call attempts (typically problems like open and closed loop no
audios , not responding, error in connection, Network Busy) and Network Retainability
Re
is
that once the subscriber is using the Network what kind of quality of service he/she
he/
experiences
on the Network (specifically
specifically focusing o
on
n drops after call is connected and breakups).
breakups

2.1 Drive Test Call Summary


Events
Call Attempts
Successful Call Setup
Blocked Call
Dropped Call

Telenor
251
246
5
6

Mobilink
274
266
8
18

Ufone
267
253
14
21

Warid
265
247
18
10

Note*: Successful call setup = Call Attempts Blocked Calls.

2.2 Benchmarking Summary

Rxlev >-75dbm
C/I >= 12
RxQual Sub < 5
Avg Call SetupTime (secs)
Dropped Call Rate
Handover Success Rate
Call Setup Success Rate

RF South

Telenor
80.7%

Mobilink
74.9%

Ufone
83.4%

Warid
86%
%

61.9%
75.5%

53.4%
80.7%

81.6%
87.2%

82.7%
82.7
90%
%

12.0
2.4%
94%
98.0%

6.0
6.8%
96%
97.1%

6.0
8.3%
98.7%
94.7%

6.0
.0
4%
%
97.5%
97.5
93.2%
93.2

Confidential

Page 5 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

3.0 Network Accessibility (Idle Mode)


3.1 RxLev Plots
Legends RxLev
0 to -67
-67 to -75
-75 to -85
-85 to -95
-95 to -110

Telenor

RF South

Confidential

Page 6 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Mobilink

Ufone

RF South

Confidential

Page 7 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Warid

3.2 RxLev Values and Distributions

0 to -67
-67 to -75
-75 to -85
-85 to -95
-95 to -110

RF South

Telenor
53.3%
27.4%
17.3%
1.9%
0%

Mobilink
45.7%
29.2%
20.7%
4.0%
0.4%

Confidential

Ufone
60.0%
23.3%
14.5%
2.1%
0%

Warid
61.3%
24.7%
13%
1%
0%

Page 8 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Rx Level (dBm)
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Telenor

RF South

Mobilink

Confidential

Ufone

Warid

Page 9 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

3.3 C/I Plots


Legends C/I Plots
12 to 31
9 to 12
4 to 9
0 to 4

Telenor

RF South

Confidential

Page 10 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Mobilink

Ufone

RF South

Confidential

Page 11 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Warid

3.4 C/I Values and Distributions


C/I
12 to 31
9 to 12
4 to 9
0 to 4

RF South

Telenor
61.9%
18.6%
14.8%
4.7%

Mobilink
53.4%
17.4%
18.6%
10.5%

Confidential

Ufone
81.6%
10.4%
6.5%
1.5%

Warid
82.7%
9.8%
5.9%
1.5%

Page 12 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

C/I Worst
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Telenor

RF South

Mobilink

Confidential

Ufone

Warid

Page 13 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

4.0 Service Accessibility


Service Accessibility is user perceived successful call attempts (typically problems like open and
closed loop, no audios, not responding, error in connection, Network Busy)
Busy).

4.1 Call Setup Success Rate


Event
Call Setup Success Rate

Telenor
98.0%

Mobilink
97.1%

Ufone
94.7%

Warid
93.2%

Call Setup Success Rate


99%
98%
97%
96%
95%
94%
93%
92%
91%
90%
Telenor

RF South

Mobilink

Confidential

Ufone

Warid

Page 14 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

4.2 Call Setup Time


Event
Call Setup Time ( Secs)

Telenor
12.0

Mobilink
6.0

Ufone
6.0

Warid
6.0

Call Setup Time (sec)


14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Telenor

Mobilink

Ufone

Warid

5.0 Network Retainability


Network Retainability
tainability is that once the subscriber is using the Network what kind of quality of
service he/she experiences on the Network (specifically focusing on drops after call is connected
and breakups.

RF South

Confidential

Page 15 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

5.1 RxQual Plots


RxQual Legend

0 to 4
5 to 6
6 to 7

Telenor

RF South

Confidential

Page 16 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Mobilink

Ufone

RF South

Confidential

Page 17 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Warid

5.2 RxQual Values and Distributions


Quality
0 to 4
5 to 6
6 to 7

RF South

Telenor
75.5%
8.7%
15.8%

Mobilink
80.7%
9.8%
9.5%

Confidential

Ufone
87.2%
5.3%
7.4%

Warid
90%
4.2%
5.8%

Page 18 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Rx Quality
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Telenor

RF South

Mobilink

Confidential

Ufone

Warid

Page 19 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

5.3 Dropped Call Locations


Dropped Calls are marked with red arrows on the raster image.
Note: These Dropped calls are taken from long call samples only.

Telenor

RF South

Confidential

Page 20 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Mobilink

Ufone

RF South

Confidential

Page 21 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Warid

5.4 Dropped Call Values


These values are taken from short calls
calls.
Event
Dropped Calls

RF South

Telenor
6

Mobilink
18

Confidential

Ufone
21

Warid
10

Page 22 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Number of Dropped Calls


25

20

15

10

0
Telenor

RF South

Mobilink

Confidential

Ufone

Warid

Page 23 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

5.5 Speech Codec Values

HR
FR
EFR
AMR HR
AMR FR

Telenor

RF South

Confidential

Page 24 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Mobilink

Ufone

RF South

Confidential

Page 25 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Warid

Channel Type
HR
FR
EFR
AMR HR
AMR FR

RF South

Telenor
0%
0%
0%
53.9%
46.1%

Mobilink
32.1%
0%
67.9%
0%
0%

Confidential

Ufone
0%
0%
0%
27.7%
72.3%

Warid
0%
0%
2.9%
1.2%
95.9%

Page 26 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

Speech Codec
120

100

80

60

40

20

0
Telenor

RF South

Mobilink

Confidential

Ufone

Warid

Page 27 of 28

Inter-operator Benchmarking

6.0 Conclusion
It can be seen from the report Telenor leads the other operators in terms of DCR and CSSR, However
Howe
rd
Telenor is ranked 3 in Quality and Rxlev
Rxlevels. So it can simply be concluded that Telenor is Best Network
in Hyderabad city in terms of DCR and CSSR
CSSR.

RF South

Confidential

Page 28 of 28

Potrebbero piacerti anche