DCPL-2011-R-0007 Attachment J.12 Existing Building Condition Survey

Northeast Neighborhood Library
District of Columbia Public Library

330 7
th
Street NE Ward 6
Washington D.C. 20002

Interior Facility Condition Assessment and
Cost Benefit Analysis
FINAL REPORT
January 24, 2011

Prepared by:

Architect:
McKissack & McKissack
1401 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 900 Washington DC 20005

Structural Engineer:
Structural Engineering Group, Inc.
21135 Whitfield Place, Suite 201 Sterling, VA 20165

MEP Engineer:
TM/R
1220 North Fillmore Street, Suite 350 Arlington, VA 22201

Environmental:
Advantage Environmental Consultants, LLC
8610 Washington Blvd, Suite 217 Jessup, MD 20794

Cost Estimator:
DMS
5500 Sterrett Place, Suite 300 Columbia, MD 21044

Northeast Neighborhood Library Facility Condition Assessment &
District of Columbia Public Library Cost Benefit Analysis

Page 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
2 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE 6
3 EXISTING CONDITIONS SUMMARY 7
3.01 General Building Summary 7
3.02 Description of Existing Space Usage 7
3.03 Existing Space Usage Breakdown 8
3.04 Existing Area Comparison to the Generic DC Library Program Draft 10
4 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RENOVATION RECOMMENDATIONS 12
4.01 Structural Systems 15
4.02 Building Code Compliance 19
4.03 ADA/ADAAG Compliance 24
4.04 Interior Construction and Finishes 26
4.05 Conveying System: Elevator 30
4.06 Mechanical Systems 31
4.07 Electrical Systems 34
4.08 Plumbing Systems 37
4.09 Fire Detection, Alarm and Suppression Systems 39
4.10 Security System 40
4.11 Furniture and Fixtures (F&F) 41
4.12 Hazardous Materials 43
5 BUILDING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT LIFE CYCLE COST 45
6 LEED SILVER FACILITY REQUIREMENT 49
7 CONSTRUCTION COST EVALUATION 50
8 APPENDIX: EXISTING CONDITION PHOTOS 53
9 EXHIBIT A: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS REPORT AND
EXHIBIT B: PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT AND
EXHIBIT C: PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
EXHIBIT D: CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 62


Page 2

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD LIBRARY
FACILITIES CONDITION ASSESSMENT

The McKissack & McKissack Team conducted a Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) of the
Northeast Neighborhood Library to serve as a basis for a renovation plan that will bring the
current facility to a more up-to-date and functional level and meet a 30-year life span requirement.
The renovation plan is intended to reduce deterioration of the building components, to comply
with current building code and current accessibility guidelines, and to allow the building to better
comply with the District of Columbia Public Library (DCPL) Generic Building Program Draft dated
February 16, 2010. A cost/benefit analysis is included to support the estimated cost of
renovation.

The Northeast Neighborhood Library is located in a dense suburban setting, surrounded by row
homes, in the Stanton Park Area of Washington DC at 330 7
th
Street. The building was built in
1932 and is one of the oldest DC libraries still in operation. It is a two-story Georgian Revival
style brick building with a partially finished below-grade level and an attic level that is used as
mechanical space. The buildings original architect was Albert Harris, the citys municipal
architect at the time. Some of the interior original dark woodwork was designed by Harris,
complimenting the Georgian Revival style exterior architecture.

According to DCPL, the Northeast Neighborhood Library is the only operating pre-1940s DC
library to which DCPL has not made significant and necessary interior improvements. The library
is a significant public asset for the surrounding neighborhood. It is used for typical library
activities and also serves as a meeting place for the community. The new and highly-used
exterior patio along with the comings and goings of persons of all ages in and out of the library,
seem to activate the community. This added pedestrian activity may contribute to the
surrounding communitys value and safety.

The exterior faade of the building is in excellent condition because of recent exterior renovations
and improvements completed in early 2010. However, these exterior improvements did not
address interior building code or accessibility deficiencies. The interior of the building has not
had major renovations to date except for the addition of a new elevator in the 1980s.

Since the library has already undergone exterior improvements, the Facility Condition
Assessments scope of work is for the interiors only. Typical of older buildings, the assessment
shows that major accessibility improvements, building code and egress improvements, and
building component improvements are required.

Due to the age of the building it is not unusual to find that some portions of the building do not
meet current ADA accessibility requirements. It is essential that these shortcomings be
addressed so that all persons have accessibility to all public areas of the library. The major
accessibility renovation recommendations include adding a new fully accessible elevator, adding
new public restrooms, repairing and or replacing doors and door hardware, and adding new
signage.

The building also has serious code issues, including major egress shortcomings, which will need
to be addressed for life safety reasons. The major code renovation recommendations include
adding a new code-compliant egress stair and renovating and updating an existing stair, adding a
fire suppression (sprinkler) system, and adding a second means of egress from higher occupancy
spaces.


Page 3

In addition to building code and accessibility renovations, the major building systems require
improvements and repairs. The buildings mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems are
outdated and therefore will need to be completely replaced. Most building interior finishes are
worn and will need to be upgraded.

The overall building structure appears in fairly good condition. However there are two areas of
concern in this regard. The first area is the existing steel framing on part of the mezzanine level
and part of the second floor. The existing configuration of this structure causes major structural
stability concerns. Therefore, we highly recommend the removal of the mezzanine and a portion
of the second floor that is supported by it, followed by the reconstruction of the removed portion of
the second floor as necessary. The second area of concern is the structure framing on the attic
level. It is currently inadequate to transfer lateral loads under current building code. The addition
of horizontal diagonal braces between the steel beams is highly recommended to ensure a stable
floor diaphragm in resisting lateral loads such as those caused by high winds or earthquakes.

For purposes of the cost estimate, the renovation recommendations can be categorized into the
following three parts:

1. Minimum required renovation recommendations: Some of these upgrades must be
implemented to achieve building code and accessibility compliance. Other upgrades
must be performed because the component is worn or aged.

2. Full renovation recommendations: These upgrades are in addition to the minimum
required renovation recommendations. They are strongly recommended to bring the
facility to a more up-to-date level and replace building systems that are nearing the end
of their anticipated life-cycle.

3. Programmatic renovation recommendations: These upgrades would bring the library
in closer compliance with DCPL standards as defined by the DCPL Generic Building
Program. This level of renovation would be necessary to provide library services at this
location that are commensurate with those that are found at other new and recently-
renovated DCPL neighborhood libraries.

A summary of the key requirements for each recommendation category is as follows:

1. The minimum required renovation recommendations would address building code
and accessibility shortcomings. Note that performing only these items would not create a
library of commensurate quality to other new and recently-renovated DCPL neighborhood
libraries. These recommendations are:

New passenger elevator
New restrooms facilities on two levels, to comply with accessibility and code
New egress stair and egress path to comply with current building code
Install fire suppression (sprinkler) system per code
General ADA/ADAAG Compliance and Building Code Compliance
Major electrical improvements
Major lighting improvements
Complete replacement of plumbing system
LEED Silver Rating
Structural modifications of attic framing
Demolition of existing mezzanine floor slab and partial second floor slab (stacks area)
and construction of a new, independent floor structure
Hazardous material abatement


Page 4
Some roof repairs to isolate and eliminate leaks
New furniture and fixtures (F&F)
Swing Space and storage during the renovation process
Partial renovation of finishes, trims and woodwork
Partial replacement of the HVAC System and repair and maintenance on existing
cooling tower

2. The full renovation recommendations would address building code and accessibility
shortcomings, gain life-cycle cost benefits, and receive the considerable cost benefit of
making necessary upgrades to aging building systems as part of a major renovation.
These recommendations are:

Note: Additional items not listed above in the Minimum required renovation
recommendations are noted with an asterisk (*):

New passenger elevator
New restrooms facilities on two levels, to comply with accessibility and code
New egress stair and egress path to comply with current building code
Install fire suppression (sprinkler) system per code
General ADA/ADAAG Compliance and Building Code Compliance
Major electrical improvements
Major lighting improvements
Complete replacement of plumbing system
LEED Silver Rating
Structural modifications of attic framing
Demolition of existing mezzanine floor slab and partial second floor slab (stacks area)
and construction of a new, independent floor structure
Hazardous material abatement
Some roof repairs to isolate and eliminate leaks
New furniture and fixtures (F&F)
Swing Space and storage during the renovation process
Full renovation and/or replacement of finishes and trims *
Full replacement of the HVAC System*
Restoration and/or replacement of original interior woodwork*
New security system*

3. The recommended programmatic renovation recommendations would allow this
library to meet current DCPL standards, optimize the use of space, and generally bring
the library to a level commensurate with other new and recently-renovated DCPL
neighborhood libraries. These recommendations are:

Partial demolition and reconfiguration of some interior spaces to better meet the
needs set forth in the DCPL Generic Building Program Draft
Reallocate most of basement level to finished public space including a new,
approximately 100 person meeting room, foyer space, and kitchenette as well as new
staff support space and public restrooms
Reconfigure first level Foyer and Stack Area
Reconfigure first level Reference Room and adjacent public restroom area
Demolish entire mezzanine level.
Reconfigure second level Foyer and Stack Area
Reconfigure second level Meeting Room and adjacent restroom and office area
Relocate Boiler room and/or Chilled Water Generation and Distributing Systems


Page 5
Increase capacity of Chilled Water Generation and Distributing Systems
New AV/PA system throughout

The total cost analysis outlines separately the cost for the minimum required renovation, the full
renovation, and the programmatic renovations. Both the minimum requirement renovation
recommendations and the full renovation requirement recommendations have the ability to
resolve code deficiencies and comply with current building code and ADA/ADAAG guidelines.
However, the full renovation recommendations will better meet the needs set forth in the DCPL
Generic Building Program and better accommodate a 30-year life span requirement.

This librarys current useable space satisfies approximately 65% of DCPLs standard for optimal
useable space. Nearly 20 percent of the librarys area is not currently assigned for library
programmatic use. We strongly recommend programmatic design changes in the renovation to
optimize the librarys use of space. In order to be consistent with the DCPLs standards, program
requirements, concerns of the building users and the community, improve operational efficiency,
circulation patterns, grade level adjacencies, and administrative control it is recommended that
programmatic renovation recommendations be implemented.

Therefore it is our strong professional recommendation that the full renovation plus the
programmatic renovations be given full consideration.

The estimated total cost of renovation is as follows:

Recommended full renovation costs $7,297,934

Additional: Recommended programmatic renovation costs $1,671,015

TOTAL RECOMMENDED RENOVATION COSTS $8,968,948

In summary, the McKissack and McKissack Team believe the building merits the best possible
interior renovations. DCPL has already invested in exterior improvements, thus warranting further
investments in this librarys interiors. In addition, the Northeast Neighborhood Librarys
significance as a contributing structure to the Capitol Hill Historic District makes full replacement
of the structure undesirable and impractical. For these reasons the full renovation is necessary to
transform this library into a state-of- the-art facility that will better serve the community for many
years to come.


Page 6

2 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE

The McKissack and McKissack Teams findings and conclusions in this report are based on the
following:

Visits to the site and non-destructive observations of the facility
Conversations with DCPL
The 2000 Building Condition Assessment dated December, 2000
The DCPL Generic Library Building Program Draft dated February 16, 2010
Original building construction drawings dated April, 1931, as made available

The Northeast Neighborhood Library building conditions may change after the date of this report.
Therefore this report states our professional opinion as of the date of this report.

The findings and recommendations only cover the interiors of the Northeast Neighborhood
Library.

Program analysis and/or design suggestions are not part of this FCA report. Instead the report
lists the major program shortcomings that will need to be addressed during renovation.


Page 7

3 EXISTING CONDITIONS SUMMARY

Summary of Governing Regulations in the District of Columbia

CODE TITLE
Building Code 2006 International Building Code and DC
Supplements *
Accessibility Code ADA / ADAAG *
Mechanical Code 2006 International Mechanical Code *
Electrical Code 2005 National Electric Code *
Plumbing Code 2006 International Plumbing Code *
Fire Prevention Code 2006 International Fire Prevention Code *
Energy Code 2006 International Energy Conservation Code *

* Renovation must comply with applicable code at the time or renovation if different than listed
above.

3.01 General Building Summary

General Building Summary

Project Name Northeast Neighborhood Library, DC Public Library
Current Address 330 7
th
Street NE Washington D.C. 20002
Zoning R-4
Square 0864
Existing Use and Occupancy A-3 Assembly and S-2 Storage
Height and Area Limits 3-story per zoning regulations
Construction Type 2B
Year Constructed Circa 1931
Known Renovations Elevator Addition circa 1980
Exterior Renovations and Improvements 2009/2010
Sprinkler System NONE

3.02 Description of Existing Space Usage

The Northeast Library buildings first level, part of the mezzanine level, and the second level are
open to public use. The first level use is primarily adult programmatic uses, including a reading
room, a reference room, and stacks. Part of the mezzanine level that opens onto the first level


Page 8
entry foyer is dedicated to teen use. The second level is primarily dedicated to children
programmatic uses but does include one public multi-purpose meeting room and several librarian
offices and work spaces.

The buildings basement level is not open to the public. A portion of the basement level
programmatic use is mechanical rooms and custodial work/office spaces. Two large rooms are
currently not used for library purposes, but instead these rooms are used for storage by Friends
of the Library. Therefore these two rooms are not to be considered as library allocated space.

The building has an attic space that houses mechanical systems. This level is in poor condition
and not easily accessible for public programmatic space but can be used as support space.

Vertical circulation in the building is only possible by a complicated combination of stairs and one
elevator. The elevator serves the first, mezzanine, second, and basement level but not the attic.
The main public stair serves the first and second levels, but not the basement, mezzanine, or
attic. The non-public stair serves all levels, including the attic. An additional open public stair
connects the first level entry foyer and the mezzanine level. Proper egress, as mandated by
building code, is one of the buildings several code violations.

3.03 Existing Space Usage Breakdown

Note: All square footage, as calculated from the available drawings, is approximate and shall not
to be used as a square footage take off of the building.

The following is an approximation of the gross square footage (within the inside perimeter of the
exterior walls) of the current use of space per level:

Workshop *** 1390 SF
Storage *** 1020 SF
Boiler Room * 600 SF
Fuel Room * 230 SF
Janitor Closet * 30 SF
Toilet Room * 80 SF
Garage *** 310 SF
Custodial Office * 240 SF
Elevator ** 60 SF
Elevator Machine Room * 60 SF
Circulation 1 (north of stair) ** 230 SF
Circulation 2 (south of stair) ** 130 SF
Non Public Stair ** 90 SF
SUBTOTAL 4470 SF
Public Space 0 SF
Support Space* 1240 SF
Circulation** 510 SF
Unallocated Space*** 2720 SF
Basement Level


Page 9
Foyer 740 SF
Stack Room 570 SF
Adult Reading room 1420 SF
Reference Room 620 SF
Toilet: Women 250 SF
Toilet:Men 170 SF
Utility Closet * 10 SF
Elevator ** 60 SF
Corridor 1 (to Reference Room) ** 50 SF
Corridor 2 (to Toilet Rooms) ** 60 SF
Public Stair ** 170 SF
Stair to Mezzanine ** 40 SF
SUBTOTAL 4250 SF
Public Space 3770 SF
Teen Area 570 SF
Librarian Office * 60 SF
Toilet * 40 SF
Dining Room * 150 SF
Kitchen * 70 SF
Elevator ** 60 SF
Corridor ** 160 SF
Stair to Mezzanine ** 40 SF
SUBTOTAL 1250 SF
Public Space 570 SF
Stair Vestibule 60 SF
Children's Area Foyer 770 SF
Children's Reading Room 1420 SF
Stacks (near elevator) 190 SF
Librarian Work Area * 390 SF
Meeting Room 620 SF
Corridor 1 (to Meeting Rm.) ** 50 SF
Office * 80 SF
Toilet 90 SF
Librarian's Office * 250 SF
Corridor (to Librarian's Office) ** 60 SF
Elevator ** 60 SF
Public Stair ** 110 SF
SUBTOTAL 4250 SF
Public Space 3150 SF
First Level (Entry Level)
Second Level
Mezzanine Level


Page 10

Elevator Overrun * 80 SF
Corridor * 190 SF
Support Space * 330 SF
SUBTOTAL 690 SF
Public Space 0 SF
Circulation** 90 SF
14910 SF
7490 SF
2910 SF
1790 SF
2720 SF Total Unallocated Square Footage
Attic Level
Total Support Space Square Footage
Total Circulation Square Footage
Total Public Space Square Footage
Total Building Space Square Footage

The following observations can be made based on the above space usage breakdown:

1. Approximately 50% of the total area is dedicated to public library use, including a meeting
room, reading rooms, stacks, and public restrooms.

2. Support Space area, or non-public space area, such as staff support rooms and building
systems rooms, is close to 20% of the total area of the building.

3. Staff support room area, such as offices, work spaces, kitchen, and the dining area, is
1280 square feet and is equivalent to almost 9% of the total area of the building.

4. 13% of the total building area is used for circulation.

5. The remaining area not currently being used directly for library purposes is equivalent to
18% of the total building area. This area could be reassigned to library programmatic use
to better optimize the needs of the library.

3.04 Existing Area Comparison to the Generic DC Library Program Draft

The Generic DC Library Program gross square footage target is 21,288 square feet, with a net
program assignable square footage of 16,392 square feet. The Generic DC Library Program
assumes that 77% of the gross area of the overall building will be assignable for library use and
23% of the gross area will be non-assignable space, dedicated to building circulation and building
mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems.

If these same percentages are applied to the Northeast Library building area, then the
renovations net assignable square footage is approximately 11,500 square feet with the
remainder of the area dedicated to non-assignable area. Therefore only 2/3 of the generic library
program can fit in the existing footprint of the Northeast Library building.


Page 11
During the future renovation design process, DCPL will work with the design team to fine tune
and fit the program requirements within the physical limits of this building. Programmatic design
changes during the renovation process would better optimize this librarys use of space without
having to add to the Northeast Librarys footprint.

The major program shortcomings of the existing spaces are:

The librarys Adult Services area is only 45 percent of the ideal Generic Library
Program. The shortcomings include two conference rooms and six study/tutor rooms.

A 100 person meeting room and pre-function space is not provided. The existing
meeting room on second level does not accommodate 100 persons. By code the
existing meeting room can only accommodate less than 50 persons.

The librarys Teen Services area is only 75 percent of the ideal Generic Library
Program. Renovation recommendations, stated later in this report, will suggest
demolition of the mezzanine level. Therefore the library may need to relocate all
100% percent of the area dedicated to Teen services.

The librarys Children Services area is only 75 percent of the ideal Generic Library
Program.

The current librarys staff support space is only 90 percent of the ideal Generic
Library Program. Because renovation recommendations, stated later in this report,
will suggest demolition of the mezzanine level, the remaining staff support space
area would be only 2/3rds of the Generic Library Program. However, because the
overall Northeast Neighborhood Library useable area is approximately 2/3rds of the
Generic Library Program, 2/3rds of the Generic Library program staff space should
serve the library well.


Page 12

4 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RENOVATION RECOMMENDATIONS

The FCA reports findings and renovation recommendations are broken into categories relative to
Structural Systems, Architectural Systems, Code and ADA Compliance, Engineering Systems
and Hazmat Removal.

Within each category, findings and the respective renovation recommendations are organized
into three parts:

1. Observations and findings of the existing conditions;

2a. Minimum required renovation recommendations:

Some of these upgrades must be implemented to achieve building code and accessibility
compliance. Other upgrades must be performed because the component is worn or
aged.

All system specific recommendations are listed in their respective category. However, it
is important to note the recommendations that affect more than one category.

These recommendations are as follows:

a. Install new fire suppression (sprinkler) system and modify building structure and
other building components if required.

b. Provide new restroom facilities on two levels, to comply with accessibility and
code. To allow for future design flexibility, the renovation should plan on a new
location of these facilities.

c. Provide a new egress stair and egress path to comply with current building code.
Assume demolition of one existing stair along with renovation of one existing stair
to meet fire rating requirements. Location of the new stair relative to the existing
stair to remain shall meet code requirements. Therefore, the cost estimate shall
plan on a new location for the stair and infill of one existing stair shaft.

d. Provide a new ADA compliant elevator. To allow for future design flexibility, the
cost estimate shall plan on a new location for the new elevator and infill of the
existing elevator shaft.

2b. Full renovation recommendations:

These upgrades are in addition to the minimum required renovation recommendations
that address building code and accessibility shortcomings. Additional renovations are
strongly recommended to gain life cycle cost benefits, bring the facility to a more up- to-
date level, and receive the considerable cost benefit of making necessary upgrades to
aging building systems as part of a major renovation.


Page 13

3. Programmatic renovation recommendations of existing spaces, walls and program
adjacencies to better meet the DCPLs General Building Program and optimize use of
space:

The renovations program may assume the following:

The future design shall not assume that any of the existing programmatic
functions will need to remain in their current locations.

The existing unallocated space shall be converted to useable space that
addresses the major program shortcomings.

The teen area and the support staff area that are located on the mezzanine level
will need to be relocated because it is recommended that the entire mezzanine
level be demolished. This new location for the teen area will allow for a more
efficient space.

Additionally the recommended programmatic changes per level are as follows:

A. Basement Level:

1. Assume complete programmatic reconfiguration of spaces with most of the
square footage being reallocated to finished public space.

2. For cost estimating purposes, the design should consider (but will not be
held to ) placement of a new 100 person meeting room, pre-function space,
and kitchenette as well as new library staff support space and public
restrooms in this level.

B. First Level:

1. Assume that the entrances into the building will remain in their current
configuration. The ADA entrance is on the west side of the building and the
main entrance is on the east side into the foyer.

2. Assume programmatic reconfiguration of the Foyer and Stacks area. The
circulation and information desk shall be reconfigured and relocated with or
without the option of reuse of the existing desk. The desk will need to be
restored and reconfigured to meet DCPL standards. The Stacks area shall
be reconfigured due to the recommended demolishing of the mezzanine
level above this space (see Mezzanine Level below).

3. Assume restoration and possible reconfiguration of the Reference Room
area and the adjacent public restroom area. For cost estimating purposes,
the future design should consider (but will not be held to) relocation of the
public restrooms to the lower level so that this area can be reconfigured as
public space adjacent and possibly open to the Reference Room.

C. Mezzanine Level:

1. For the purpose of the cost estimate, assume demolition of the entire
mezzanine level. The structural observations, stated later in this report,
state that the stack area both for the mezzanine level and the second level
above warrant renovation due to instability of the structural system of
supports and floor framing. Additionally DCPLs experience with


Page 14
mezzanine levels is that they are costly because these areas are difficult to
program and staff properly. As stated earlier the teen area will need to be
relocated. This new location for the teen area will allow for a more efficient
space.

D. Second Floor:

1. Assume programmatic reconfiguration of the Foyer, Stacks Area, and
Librarian Work area. The information desk shall be reconfigured and
relocated with or without the option of reuse of the existing desk. For cost
estimating purposes, the future design should consider reassigning the
Stacks Area and Library Work area to public space, open to the Foyer
area.

2. Assume programmatic reconfiguration of the Meeting Room and the
adjacent restroom and Office area. For cost estimating purposes, the
future design should consider reassigning the restroom and office area to
public space that is possibly open to the area that is currently the Meeting
Room. However it is likely that some restroom facilities will need to be
accommodated on this level.

E. Attic:

1. Assume that the attic is to be used solely for mechanical purposes and not
for public access.


Page 15

4.01 Structural Systems

4.01.1 Structural Assessment of Existing Building

The existing structural system of the library building consists of dual system with concrete frames
and masonry bearing walls around the perimeter of the building. Concrete beams and concrete
one way joists were used on the first floor slab, partial mezzanine and partial second floor slabs.
Structural steel frames were constructed in the attic level and the roof. Concrete slabs were
supported by the roof steel beams.

The existing floor structure in part of mezzanine floor and 2
nd
floor was framed by 2 to 3 deep
steel angles and steel tubes. These steel angles and tubes were bolted to the existing 6
masonry partition walls at one end and were welded to the existing steel stacks at the other end.
The 6 masonry partition walls and the steel stacks appear to be resting on the first floor concrete
slab. This floor framing raises stability and safety concerns because it does not meet current
structural design standards and practices. Additionally any future alterations of the walls and the
stacks would impact the structural integrity of the floor framing.

The attic floor structure consisted of open steel frames with a small concrete slab area in the
south west corner. The wide flange steel beams were framed to steel columns. Some steel
beams support steel posts that support the gable roof framing. However, the steel frames are
without any horizontal diagonal braces causing major integrity concerns for the floor diaphragm
on this level in resisting lateral forces such as earthquake load and wind load. Since adopting
International Building Code in 2000, Seismic design has been mandatory in building structure
designs in Washington DC and its surrounding area.

The one story basement was constructed with concrete basement walls and concrete columns
and slabs. Shallow foundations were used to support bearings and columns of the building.

Based on our visual observation, the existing building structure appeared to be in fairly good
condition. No major distress and excessive deformation were observed. Exterior masonry walls
were in excellent condition. No cracks were observed on the exterior walls. According to the
representative of DCPL, the exterior faade was renovated late 2009/early 2010.

4.01.2 Minimum Required Structural Renovation Recommendations to correct existing
building deficiencies

Based on our observation and review of the existing available structural drawings, we offer the
following recommendations to correct existing structural issues and address other deficiencies
that have structural implications:

a. Mezzanine and Second Floor Steel Framing:

Because the steel frames on part of the Mezzanine Floor and part of the Second
Floor were supported by existing 6 masonry wall partition walls and on existing
steel stacks, it causes concern that the floor structure may be in unstable
condition should any alterations of the partition wall and the stacks have occurred
in the past. Depending on how the partition walls and the stacks were connected
to the First Floor structure, the lateral stability of the exterior masonry wall on
West elevation may have been compromised based on the current design
standards.


Page 16
It is our strong opinion that the floor frames should be independent from the
partition walls, and especially should be independent from the stacks. The floor
frames should be supported only on bearing walls, structural columns and
structural beams that are the permanent structural components of the building.
Therefore, we highly recommend that DCPL consider removing the Mezzanine
floor and the Second floor in this area and reconstruct the floor framing for this
part of the second level.

b. Structural Diaphragm on Attic Level:

The basic seismic force resisting system for this building appears to be ordinary
masonry shear wall system. It is critical to have sufficient floor diaphragm to
transfer the seismic load and wind load to the shear walls. Only small portion of
the attic floor had concrete slab. The remaining area of attic structure was open
steel frames with no horizontal diagonal braces. To transfer the lateral forces
such as seismic and wind to the shear walls at the attic level, we strongly
recommend installing horizontal diagonal steel angles between the existing steel
beams.

c. New Stair, Location to be determined

To minimize significant impact on the existing structure, we recommend locating
one stair at north-west corner of the stack room. As indicated above, the existing
mezzanine floor and existing second floor in this area should be removed and
they should be reframed to make the floor structures independent from the
existing stacks and existing partitions. Therefore, a new stair opening can be
easily incorporated into the design of the new floor framing. Should the new stair
extend to the basement, the existing first floor joists and slab need to be cut and
steel frames will be used to support the floor slab and joists around the opening.

Subject to future design, we recommend keeping one existing stair at the existing
location in the new program in order to reduce the structural strengthening cost,
while to locate the second stair at the north-west corner of the stack area. For
cost estimating purposes, assume one of the existing stairs to be demolished
and infill of the existing shaft opening.

It would require significant structural work if the new stairs is to be located in the
north portion of the building (currently reading room on the first floor and
workshop in the basement). It also required major structural work should the new
stairs to be located in south east of the building where the boiler room is currently
located.

d. New Elevator Opening

If feasible, we recommend keeping the elevator at the current location. The
elevator opening can be enlarged. Since the mezzanine floor and the second
floor in this area are required to be reframed, the cost impact to enlarge the
elevator opening should be less significant comparing cost of a new elevator
opening at a different location.

e. Floor Penetrations for MEP Ducts and Pipes

Existing floor slab consists of concrete one way joists spacing approximately 3-
0 on center. To minimize the impact to the existing floor structure, all new
penetrations shall be considered to be located in between the existing concrete
joists. Depending on the size of the opening, the concrete slab between the joists


Page 17
can be cut with no or little reinforcing. In case of large openings required, the
existing floor joists can be cut with additional steel reinforcing to support the
joists.

f. Structural supports for New Air Handlers in Attic Space

The attic space was framed with steel beams and steel columns. New air
handlers can be placed in the attic space. Depending on the weight of the units,
the existing beams maybe reinforced by wielding steel plates on the bottom of
the beams. The optimal locations of the new mechanical units are area adjacent
to the columns.

g. New catwalks to equipment in Attic Space

New catwalks can be installed in the Attic Space. Most of the existing steel
beams may be able to support the new catwalks without additional reinforcing.
The catwalks can be framed with steel angles spanning between existing beams
and with steel bar gratings.

4.01.3 Structural Implications of Renovation Recommendations to Accommodate
Programmatic Changes

1. New Programmatic Space in Basement Level

Existing concrete columns in the work shop and in the storage rooms in the basement
can be removed to create an open space for the new programmatic space. New steel
beams would be introduced to support the existing first floor of the area. Transportation
and installation of the long steel beams would be challenge for construction but they can
be done with careful planning of the installation.

To support the new steel beams, new steel columns may be required in adjacent to the
existing concrete columns that new steel beams would bear on. Reinforcing of the
existing footings for the increased loads need to be considered.

2. Mezzanine Floor Removal

The mezzanine floor structure over stack area can be removed without any impact to the
existing structure. The steel angles and steel tubes were bolted to the existing stacks.
They are required to be removed or reframed should the area be rearranged.

3. Reconfiguration of the Stack Area

The existing floor frames were supported by the existing steel stacks. The floor frames of
the stack area on the second floor need to be removed and reframed should the
reconfiguration of the stack area are to be implemented. New steel frames with concrete
slabs can be installed in this area. The existing steel columns may need to be reinforced
for the added load.

4. Structural supports for new cooling tower, Location to be determined

If feasible, the new cooling tower shall be located outside of the building. Steel frames
can be designed to support the cooling tower. The new cooling tower can also be located
on the garage roof at the rear of the library building. The existing concrete beam and slab
may need to be reinforced depending the size and weight of the cooling tower. We do not


Page 18
recommend locating the cooling tower in the attic space because construction of
strengthening the existing steel frames can be costly.


Page 19

4.02 Building Code Compliance

The minimum building code requirements for the building are as follows per IBC 2006:

Applicable Conditions

Automatic Sprinkler Systems (section 903.2.1.3) An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided
for Group A-3 Occupancies where one of the
follow exists:
1. The fire area exceeds 12,000 sf.
2. The fire area has an occupancy load of
300 or more.
3. The fire area is located on a floor other
than the level of exit discharge.
Maximum Common Path of Egress Travel (section 1014.3) 75 ft. except for fixed seating areas for assembly;
100 ft. for storage or business if occupancy is no
more than 30
Minimum number of exits for occupant load (table 1019.1)
1 to 500 persons occupant load (persons per story)
501 to 1,000 persons occupant load (persons per story)

Min 2 exits (per story)
Min 3 exits (per story)
Minimum Separation distance of two required exits Doors shall be placed a distance apart equal to
not less than one-half of the length of the
maximum overall diagonal dimension of the
building or area to be service measured in a
straight line between exit doors or exit access
doorways.
Exception: With sprinklers the separation
distance shall be not less than one-third the
length of the maximum overall diagonal
dimension of the area served.
Maximum Exit Access Travel distance (table 1016.1) 200 ft. without sprinkler system;
250 ft. with sprinkler system
Minimum exits from any space:
Less than 50 persons occupant load
50 to 500 persons occupant load
501 to 1,000 persons occupant load
More than 1,000 occupant load

1 means of egress (table1015.1)
2 means of egress (table 1019.1)
Maximum Dead Ends (section 1017.3) 20 ft.
Minimum egress Ceiling Height (1003.2) Not less than 7 feet and 6 inches
Exit Stair Fire Rating (section 1020.1) 1 hour connecting three stories or less;
2 hour connecting more than three levels (number
of stories includes any basements but not any
mezzanines)


Page 20

4.02.1 Code Assessment of Existing Building Configuration:

The Northeast Library buildings configuration does not meet many code requirements, including
egress requirements, and therefore poses life safety concerns.

The following building conditions have been observed as they relate to current building code
requirements for this public building:

A. General:

1. No automatic sprinkler system exists. One is required.

B. Basement:

1. Current Classification of use and occupancy of the basement is
Storage/Mechanical.

2. Two code compliant means of egress from the basement level are required and
none are provided.

3. The exits to the exterior thru the Garage and the Boiler Room cannot be
considered a means of egress for the level.

4. The private stair cannot be considered a code compliant means of egress because
it is not enclosed.

5. Confirm required wall construction fire ratings and door ratings of all basement
rooms are met.

C. First Level (Entry level)

1. Current Classification of use and occupancy of the first level is primarily Assembly.

2. Two separate means of egress are required out of the Adult Reading Room if the
occupant load is more than 50 persons. Only one means of egress is provided.
An exception can be made allowing one means provided that the furniture layout
shows a portion of the room as assembly and a portion as stacks, limiting the
occupancy load to less than 50 persons.

3. The ceiling height in the southwest corner of the level (toilets, office, and corridor)
does not meet the 7-6 min height required by code.

4. Confirm required wall construction fire ratings and door ratings of the stair
enclosure are met.

D. Mezzanine Level

1. The Teen Area and the area in the southwest corner of the level (dining room,
kitchen and office) can be classified as a mezzanine with interpretation of the intent
of the code.

2. Because the mezzanine occupancy is less than 50 persons, the space only
requires one means of egress.

3. The open stair down to the Foyer meets the egress requirement for the Teen Area.


Page 21

4. The path of egress travel from the Kitchen (the remote part of the floor) to the
bottom of the open private stair exceed the code maximum common path of travel,
therefore this portion of the level does not meet egress requirements.

5. The height of the guardrail in the Teen Area does not meet code requirements.

E. Second Level

1. Current Classification of use and occupancy of the second level is primarily
Assembly.

2. Two code compliant means of egress from the second level are required and none
are provided.

3. Both stairs cannot be considered as a means of egress because they are not
enclosed with the proper one hour fire rating requirements per code. The private
stair is not fully enclosed with walls on all levels. The public stair doors do not
meet the code required fire rating.

4. Even if both stairs were properly enclosed, they do not meet the required minimum
separation distance.

5. Two separate means of egress are required out of the Childrens Reading Room if
the occupant load is 50 persons or more. Only one means of egress is provided.
An exception can be made allowing one means provided that the furniture layout
shows a portion of the room as assembly and a portion as stacks, limiting the
occupancy load to less than 50 persons.

6. Two means of egress are required for the Meeting Room because its occupant
load is more than 50 persons. Only one means of egress is provided.

F. Attic Level

1. The current classification of the attic is Storage/Mechanical.

2. Because the occupancy load of the space is less than 10 persons, only one means
of egress is required from the space and none is provided.

3. The private stair cannot be considered a means of egress because it is not
enclosed all the way down to the level of discharge.

4. Catwalks to mechanical equipment are not code compliant as they are combustible
wood without the proper guardrails.

5. Confirm required wall construction fire ratings and door ratings of the perimeter of
the usable space.

4.02.2 Minimum Required Renovation Recommendations to Meet Current Applicable
Building Codes:

The renovation will need to bring the building up to current building code requirements and any
and all conditions that do not meet current code, either listed above or observed by other
professionals, will need to be corrected. We recommend that a full code analysis be conducted by


Page 22
a code specialist during the renovation process to validate these findings and other deficiencies
that may not be listed above.

The following renovation recommendations should be considered:

A. General:

1. Add Automatic Sprinkler system throughout building

2. Provide a new egress stair and egress path to comply with current building code.
Stair should service all levels. Location of the stair shall meet the minimum
separation distance from the existing public stair.

3. Provide fire rated doors at the public stair to meet the fire rating requirement of an
egress stair.

B. Basement:

1. Two means of egress for the floor will need to be added with careful consideration
of travel distances, separation distance between the two exits, and common path of
travel distances.

2. Code compliant stair access (one hour fire rated enclosure) to the basement will be
added with the new egress stair.

3. Improve fire rating of walls and doors where needed.

C. First Level (Entry level)

1. Add a second means of egress for the Adult Reading room or apply for a code
exception.

2. Increase ceiling height of southwest corner of level by demolishing the mezzanine
floor above this area only. Demolition of the mezzanine floor is a desired
programmatic change by DCPL, as stated earlier in the report.

D. Mezzanine Level

1. For cost estimating purposes, demolish this level in its entirety. Demolition of the
Mezzanine floor is a desired programmatic change by DCPL, as stated earlier in
the report.

E. Second Level

1. Two means of egress for the floor will need to be added with careful consideration
of travel distances, separation distance between the two exits, and common path of
travel distances.

2. Add a second means of egress for the Childrens Reading room or apply for a code
exception.

3. Add a second means of egress for the Meeting Room or apply for a code
exception. Placement of a wall plaque at the room entrance that clearly states that
occupancy limit as less than 50 persons would qualify for an exception.


Page 23
F. Attic Level

1. Add a means of egress for the floor with careful consideration of travel distances.

2. Provide new catwalks to service mechanical equipment that meets current code
standards. Egress path will need to take into consideration required clearance
area around equipment.

4.02.3 Code Implications of Renovation Recommendations to Accommodate

If the future design increases or changes the amount of public usable space, the renovation must
review and address any additional egress requirements.


Page 24

4.03 ADA/ADAAG Compliance

4.03.1 ADA/ADAAG Assessment of Existing Building:

The recent exterior improvements to the building have provided an accessible entrance to the
building on the west side, opposite the main entrance vestibule. In general the building is
accessible but there are areas where the building is either not accessible or violates some of the
ADA guidelines.

The following ADA observations can be made:

1. The elevator provides access to the public floors but the cab and controls are not
ADA compliant.

2. The stair railings lack compliant extensions.

3. All restrooms, whether for public use or staff use, require some if not full renovation
because the path to the restroom is not accessible, the restroom dimensions prohibit
accessibility, and/or the fixtures and or accessories do not meet ADA guidelines.

4. The corridor width to the public restrooms on both the first floor and the second floor
do not allow for the required 5 foot diameter wheel chair turning space.

5. The water fountains are not ADA compliant.

6. Doors do not have ADA compliant hardware and closures.

7. Many doors are difficult to push or pull therefore exceeding the max forces for
pushing and pulling doors per ADA.

8. Compliant graphics signage and way finding signage is not provided.

9. Visual and audible alarms are limited or non-existent.

4.03.2 Minimum Required Renovation Recommendations to Meet ADA/ADAAG
Guidelines:

ADA has specific use requirements for library buildings such that all public areas of a library
including but not limited to reading rooms, study areas, stacks, reference rooms, displays and
check out areas are accessible. The design must adhere to these guidelines and all other ADA
guidelines.

The following renovation recommendations can be made:

A. Elevator

1. Elevator must have an ADA approved Door Protective and Reopening Devise.

2. New Elevator must meet all ADA requirements including ADA call buttons, hall
lanterns, Braille floor designations, car controls and indicators, minimum dimensions
of Elevator Cars, and emergency communication.


Page 25

B. Stairs

1. Replace handrails or apply for an exception.

C. Restrooms

1. New restrooms to meet ADA guidelines.

D. Water Fountains

1. New water fountains to meet ADA guidelines.

E. Doors

1. Remove all inaccessible door hardware and provide ADA compliant accessible lever
type hardware and closures to all doors.

2. Repair or replace existing doors that exceed the max forces for pushing and pulling
doors.

F. Furniture:

1. Add ADA accessible checkout lane at desk.

2. Confirm required minimum percentage of furniture is ADA accessible.

G. Signage:

1. Provide directional graphics signage and way finding signage, including accessible
Braille signage for all permanent rooms.


Page 26

4.04 Interior Construction and Finishes

4.04.1 Assessment of existing building interior construction and finishes

In general the finishes in most spaces of the building are in fair to poor condition. Additionally,
the restrooms are insufficient, outdated, and do not meet accessibility guidelines.

The assessment of the condition of the interior construction and finishes is as follows:

Interior construction Description Condition Remarks
Walls:
Public Spaces Painted Plaster Fair Paint peeling and flaking off
Staff Support Spaces Painted Plaster Fair Paint peeling and flaking off
Restrooms Ceramic Tile on Concrete
Masonry Unit
Fair Worn
Basement Painted Plaster, Painted CMU,
Painted Concrete
Poor Paint peeling and flaking off ;
Evidence of water damage at
various locations
Floors:
Public Spaces Carpet Poor Worn
Staff Support Spaces Carpet, Wood Poor Worn
Restrooms Ceramic Tile Poor Worn
Basement Painted Concrete Poor Paint flaking off
Ceilings:
Public Spaces Painted Plaster Fair
Staff Support Spaces Painted Plaster Fair
Restrooms Painted Plaster Fair
Basement Painted Concrete Fair
Crowns Plaster Poor Missing sections, finish
damaged
Doors Wood Poor Missing trim, finish damaged,
do not easily open and close
Wainscots and
decorative door and
opening trims
Wood Poor Missing trim, nicks, finish
damaged
Built-in Millwork and
shelving
Wood Poor Missing trim, nicks, finish
damaged
Window Wood Trims
(interior only)
Wood Poor Missing Trim, Nicks, Finish
damaged
Public Stair:
Floors Terrazzo Floor, Stone Steps Fair Requires Refinishing
Walls Painted Plaster Walls with Tile
Wainscot
Fair Tiles require cleaning
Ceiling Painted Fair
Railings Metal and Wood Parts Fair Finish damaged, Lacks
proper ADA extensions
Private Stair:
Floors Metal, Vinyl Treads Poor Finish worn
Railing Metal and Wood parts Poor Finish damaged, Lacks
proper ADA extensions


Page 27

4.04.2a Minimum Required Recommendations of Interior construction and finishes to
correct existing building deficiencies:

Component Description and
Locations
Recommended Work
General:
1. Window Wood Trims Replace 20% of trim and Repair and refinish all remaining trim
associated with the jamb, head, and sill
2. Doors Repair and refinish, replace hardware, meet ADA standards
Reading and Book Stack Areas and Meeting Room:
1. Walls Repair, scrape and repaint
2. Floors and base Replace with carpet and wood base or DCPL recommended finish
3. Ceiling Repair, scrape and repaint
4. Crowns Repair and refinish
5. Wainscots and decorative
door and opening trims
Repair and refinish
6. Built-in Millwork and
shelving
Repair and refinish
Office and Support Staff Work Areas:
1. Walls Repair and repaint
3. Ceiling Repair and repaint
Restrooms Complete replacement required
Basement Scrape and repaint; Prep for programmatic space reconfiguration
Stairs:
1. Private Stair Demolish (New egress stair to be added per code
recommendations.)
2. Public Stair Repair and refinish and repaint

4.04.2b Full Renovation Recommendations of Interior construction and finishes to better
meet the needs set forth in the DCPL Generic Building Draft Program and receive
the best value for the project since the building is already undergoing substantial
renovations:

Component Description and
Locations
Recommended Work
General:
1. Window Wood Trims Replace 60% of trim and Repair and refinish all remaining trim
associated with the jamb, head, and sill
2. Doors Replace all doors in kind with high, heavy-duty quality finish for cost
estimation purposes
Reading and Book Stack Areas and Meeting Room:
3. Ceiling Replacement in kind with high, heavy-duty quality finish for cost
estimation purposes; Reuse and restore when possible.
4. Crowns Replacement in kind with high, heavy-duty quality finish for cost


Page 28
5. Wainscots and decorative
door and opening trims
Replacement in kind with high, heavy-duty quality finish for cost
6. Built-in Millwork and
shelving
Replacement in kind with high, heavy-duty quality finish for cost
Office and Support Staff Work Areas:
3. Ceiling Replace
Restrooms Complete replacement required
Basement Scrape and repaint; Prep for programmatic space reconfiguration
Stairs:
1. Private Stair Demolish (New egress stair to be added per code
recommendations.)
2. Public Stair Total upgrade with same historical character and high, heavy-duty
quality finish

4.04.3 Interior construction and Finishes Renovation Recommendations to
accommodate programmatic changes

The renovation design intent is to provide finishes that are durable and suitable to the style of the
1931 historical character of the building. The finishes specified shall reflect the intent of the
DCPLs Generic Building Program. Refer to the DCPL Generic Building Program for specific
program intent and direction. Because this report is not intended to serve as a design guide, a
cost per square foot allowance for interior construction and finishes can be applied based on the
use or type of room.

In addition to the guidelines listed in the DCPL Generic Building Program, the following design
guidelines were used to determine the cost per square foot allowance:

A. General:

1. Level of finish for all public spaces to be high, heavy-duty quality.

2. Add new window seat millwork below the windows at future design determined
locations to replicate the design (profiles and finishes) of the existing window seat on
the second floor meeting room and the design intent of the 1931 original plans.
Window seat locations may follow the locations in the 1931 original plans.

3. Add new and /or repair, refinish, and reuse existing base millwork below windows to
encase new HVAC system. Millwork should reflect the historic character of the 1931
buildings interior including decorative grilles to accommodate air flow. In many
locations new window seats will need to be incorporated with the HVAC system.

4. New wood and finish to match existing wood and finish to remain. A control sample
should be submitted for review and approval.

5. Repaint all walls and ceilings with new DCPL approved color scheme. Paint must be
highly durable, mark resistant, and easy to clean.

6. Repair and refinish all doors to remain. New doors and hardware should match the
historical character of existing doors. Kick plates and doors stops should be
considered anywhere doors are subject to damage.


Page 29

7. The future design of new ceilings that abut or are adjacent to existing plaster ceilings
and crowns should be in line with the historical character of the space(s).

8. All new flooring to follow the recommendation of the DCPL Generic Building
Program Draft on page 12.

E. Public Spaces:

1. Circulation Services Public Areas
a. Circulation desk, see section 4.11 of this report
b. Integrated Book Drop

2. Reading Rooms and Stack areas:
a. High level of finishes to complement existing historical trim to remain.

3. Meeting Rooms:
a. Tackable surface on some or all of walls, cork strip to hang pictures, and felt pen
screen/board
b. Chair rail on walls

4. Kitchenette to serve Meeting Room
a. Deep sink
b. 8 feet long medium grade base cabinets with solid surface counter and back
splash

5. Restrooms:
a. Wall hung plumbing fixtures and toilet accessories
b. Ceiling hung stainless steel partitions or similar
c. Auto sensors for the lavatories
d. Mirror and shelf
e. High quality (stainless steel) baby changing stations

B. Support Spaces:

1. Staff Work Areas
a. Acoustical ceilings
b. Office type wall finishes

2. Staff Lounge
a. Tile floor
b. 8 feet long medium grade base cabinets with solid surface counter and back
splash
c. Sink

3. Staff Restroom
a. Unisex


Page 30

4.05 Conveying System: Elevator

4.05.1 Assessment of Existing Elevator

The overall condition of the elevator is fairly poor. It is slow to operate. The interior finishes of
the elevator cab are worn. The elevator is not ADA compliant.

A new accessible elevator would require a larger shaft than currently provided.

4.05.2 Minimum Required Elevator Renovation Recommendations to meet ADA and
correct building deficiencies

1. Provide a new accessible elevator. Increase the size of the existing shaft or provide a new
shaft in a different location.

2. Provide ADA compliant elevator controls and communication devises.

3. Provide durable elevator cab finishes that are comparable to the high level of finish in the
other public spaces of the building. The elevator will be used for both passenger and
freight transport.

4. Elevator cab should be well lit but not of an industrial type.

5. The KONE Machine Room-Less (MLR) elevator technology is the DCPL preferred
standard.


Page 31

4.06 Mechanical Systems

4.06.1 Condition Assessment of Existing Mechanical Systems

4.06.1.1 Assessment of Steam and Hot Water Generation and Distribution Systems

The building is currently served by a few heating systems. Steam is generated at the facilitys main 900
MBH boiler located in the boiler room. Originally, the building was served by a coal-fired boiler. The present
boiler was installed in 2003 and contains a natural gas burner. Steam is distributed to radiators and
convectors on the first and second floors located below the windows. The convectors were originally built
into a wooden bench. One of these benches has been restored at the second level. The remaining bench
enclosures have been removed and replaced with simple wooden box enclosures. The original inlet and
supply grilles have been restored and reinstalled in the new enclosures. Steam is also supplied to a ceiling-
hung steam-hot water converter. Hot water is distributed to the building from this point by an in-line hot
water pump also located at the ceiling. This hot water system serves ceiling-mounted fan-coil units at the
basement level and the air handling units at the attic space. The attic AHUs are also served by a separate
30-galloin (domestic style) electric hot water heater and recirculation pump specifically for freeze protection
of the coils.

The boiler appears in fair condition. The steam heating distribution systems appear to be in fair-poor
condition. The boiler should be able to serve the building for another 13 years. However, if the building is
switched from steam to hot-water heating, a boiler replacement would be advisable. Based on the age of
the steam distribution piping, it is a good candidate for removal or replacement.

Hot water piping throughout the facility is a mixture of black steel and copper. The condition of the piping
was not specifically tested, but it appears to be in fair-poor condition. These systems are also good
candidates for replacement.

4.06.1.2 Assessment of Chilled Water Generation and Distribution Systems

Cooling is provided to the building by a water-cooled electric chiller located just off the heating plant, in what
used to be the fuel (coal) delivery room. This room also contains the chilled water distribution pump, the
condenser water pump, and a swing pump for redundancy. A forced-draft cooling tower, located on the roof
of the garage, serves the chiller with condenser water. The chiller is a 50-ton water-cooled reciprocating
model, manufactured in 2001. It appears to have been appropriately maintained and is in fair condition. It
should be able to serve the building for another 11 years. The pumps and distribution piping appears to be
in fair-poor condition. The cooling tower appears to be in fair condition. It was reported by Library staff that
the fan belts at the tower squeal upon starting, and are responsible for numerous complaints from the
neighbors. It is recommended that the entire system chiller, pumps, piping, and cooling tower be replaced
under the renovation program.

4.06.1.3 Assessment of Ventilation and Air Distribution Systems

Heating and cooling is provided to the main public spaces throughout the facility by the two main air
handling units located in the attic. Supply and return ductwork from these units is extended down through
shafts to the second and first floors. The units have 2-pipe (Heating or Cooling) coils in them which are
manually switched on a seasonal basis. Outside air is provided to the units from attic-level intake louvers.

The air handling units date from the early 1980s and have outlived their useful service life. The attic space
that houses these units has been made minimally accessible. The units should be replaced, and the service
accessibility issues should be corrected under the renovation.

4.06.1.4 Assessment of Exhaust Systems

Some toilet and general exhaust is provided by one centrifugal fan mounted in the attic apartment janitor
closet. The fan did not appear to be operable. Additional through-the-wall type exhaust fans are located in
various toilet rooms throughout the facility.


Page 32
All of the exhaust systems appear to have outlived their useful life and should be replaced under the
renovation.

4.06.2 Minimum Required Mechanical Renovation Recommendations to Correct
Existing Building Deficiencies

4.06.2.1 Minimum Required Renovation Recommendations for Steam and Hot Water
Generation and Distribution Systems

The boiler and steam heating distribution systems should be entirely demolished and replaced. It is
recommended that the steam boiler be replaced with one that generates hot water. A new boiler, hot water
distribution pumps, and piping should be provided. The existing boiler location is well suited to handle the
requirements of a new boiler; therefore it is recommended that the boiler room remain in its current location.
Radiators throughout the building should be removed and convectors converted for hot water service.

4.06.2.2a Minimum Required Renovation Recommendations for Chilled Water

The chilled water generation and distribution systems should be serviced and maintained as a minimum
recommendation. Additionally acoustical upgrades and a screen wall should be added around the cooling
tower to mitigate complaints from neighbors that the equipment is loud and an eye sore. Since the chiller
has useful remaining service life, replacement would only be recommended if it was determined that it did
not have ample capacity to serve the new HVAC systems. This minimal recommendation may prove to be a
short term fix and may not be adequate for future programmatic changes to the library.

4.06.2.2b Full Renovation Recommendations for Chilled Water Generation and
Distribution Systems

It is strongly recommended that the chilled water generation and distribution systems be replaced in their
entirety. A new chiller, chilled water pump, condenser water pump, swing pump, chilled water piping,
condenser water piping, and cooling tower should be provided. It is recommended that the existing 2-pipe
(heating or cooling) system be replaced with a 4-pipe (heating and cooling) system. Convectors in the main
space should be studied for the possibility of conversion to house 4-pipe fan coil units. If this is possible,
condensate drainage piping to these units would need to be provided. Survey of the existing building did not
yield an alternate location for the chilled water plant that is presently or could be made suitable without major
reconstruction or construction of additional space. For this reason it is recommended that the chilled water
plant remain in its existing location. Additionally acoustical upgrades and a screen wall should be added
around the cooling tower to mitigate complaints from neighbors that the equipment is loud and an eye sore.

4.06.2.3 Minimum Required Renovation Recommendations for Ventilation and Air
Distribution Systems

The air handling units at the attic should be replaced with new units that contain separate heating and
cooling coils. Outside air quantities should be specified to accommodate current code requirements.

4.06.2.4 Minimum Required Renovation Recommendations for Exhaust Systems

Exhaust systems should be replaced in accordance with the new architectural plans for the toilet facilities
and other public and private spaces.


Page 33

4.06.3 Mechanical Implications of Renovation Recommendations to
Accommodate Programmatic Changes

4.06.3.1 Relocation of Boiler Room to accommodate programmatic changes

Under the renovation program, it is recommended that the basement be considered for a complete re-
planning and change of use from utility space to public space. A new location for the hot-water boiler will
require a flue for the natural gas burner, easy access from the building exterior, and ample service access
inside the building to allow appropriate maintenance procedures. Because the existing boiler location is well
suited to handle these requirements, it is recommended that the existing boiler plant remain in its current
location. Survey of the existing building did not yield an alternate location that is presently or could be made
suitable without major reconstruction or construction of additional space. However, to allow for future design
flexibility, an option for this relocation is included.

4.06.3.2 Relocation of Chilled Water Generation and Distribution Systems to
accommodate programmatic changes

Under the renovation program, it is recommended that the basement be considered for a complete re-
planning and change of use from utility space to public space. Since the chiller has useful remaining service
life, replacement would only be recommended if it was determined that it did not have ample capacity to
serve the new HVAC systems. Survey of the existing building did not yield an alternate location that is
presently or could be made suitable without major reconstruction or construction of additional space. For
this reason, it is recommended that the chilled water plant remain in its existing location. However, to allow
for future design flexibility, an option for relocation is included.

The cooling tower was not accessible at the time of survey; however it appears to be in fair condition, and
was likely installed at the same time as the chiller (2001). In order to address the neighborhood complaints
associated with the cooling tower, acoustic upgrades could be made at the garage roof (present location), or
the tower could be relocated to the attic or old elevator machine room with appropriate structural and roof
modifications.

4.06.3.3 Increased Capacity of the Chilled Water Generation and Distribution
Systems to accommodate programmatic changes

If future design increases the amount of load due to programmatic changes, the renovation must
consider the need for increased capacity of the chiller and cooling tower.


Page 34

4.07 Electrical Systems

4.07.1 Condition Assessment of Existing Electrical Systems

4.07.1.1 Assessment of Electrical Service and Distribution Systems

The electrical service supplied to the building by the utility company, is 120/208 Volts, 800 Amperes, 3
Phase, 4 Wire through a C/T cabinet supplied by the utility company. The service includes a main switch,
which is manufactured by ITE (Catalog #SN4271). The switch is U.L. listed for use as service equipment.
There is also a kWh meter, which is owned by the utility company for billing purposes.

The main distribution panel is 800 Amperes, 120/208 Volts, 3 Phase, 4 Wire and is located in the boiler
room, in the basement level. It serves larger mechanical loads, elevator, and branch circuit panels at 208
volts, 3 phase. There are branch circuit panelboards located on each floor. The panelboards are fed from
the original panelboard backboxes through a close nipple in the interior of the panels. These panelboards
serve lighting and power loads on their respective floors at 120 volts, single phase. Feeders and branch
circuits are installed in concealed conduit, MC cable and various surface metal raceways.

The existing electrical service equipment including the underground service conductors, the kWh meter, the
800 ampere, 240 volt 3 pole main line switch and other associated service equipment appear to be in fair-
poor condition.

4.07.1.2 Assessment of Lighting System

Most of the interior spaces are illuminated using pendant or surface mounted 2 x 4 fluorescent acrylic
wraparound fixtures with 34 watt energy saving T12 fluorescent lamps. The main lobby is served by
pendant mounted globe type fixtures with compact fluorescent energy saving lamps. Utility areas utilize
surface mounted fluorescent strip fixtures, also with 34 watt energy saving T12 fluorescent lamps. There
were no emergency lighting fixtures observed in the building interior.

There are illuminated exit signs at each point of egress, at least half of which are not operational. The exit
sign are illuminated by two incandescent lamps and have no internal battery backup.

4.07.1.3 Assessment of Emergency Power Generation and Distribution Systems

The building utility power is backed up by an existing 35 kW pad mounted emergency generator which is
located in the garage area. The generator is manufactured by Katolight Corporation S/N-68120 and is
fueled by the natural gas service to the building and supplies 208/120 volt 3 phase power to the emergency
system, including the 100 ampere, 240 volt 3 pole automatic transfer switch manufactured by Zenith
Controls, S/N-111210 and the 100 ampere, 240 volt emergency main safety disconnect.

4.07.1.4 Assessment of Telephone System

The existing telephone service from the telephone company is terminated on terminal blocks inside a wall
mounted cabinet, which is located in the boiler room on the basement level.

4.07.2 Minimum Required Electrical Renovation Recommendations to Correct
Existing Building Deficiencies

4.07.2.1 Minimum Required Renovation Recommendations for Electrical Service
and Distribution Systems

The existing electrical service equipment including the underground service conductors, kWh meter, and
other associated service equipment (on the PEPCO side) appear to be in fair condition. This equipment
should be evaluated further and should receive planned preventative maintenance procedures to ensure
reliability in the future.


Page 35

The main (800A) distribution panel is over 35 years old. It cannot be considered reliable due to continued
deterioration and needs to be replaced. The branch circuit panelboards located on each floor, are of the
same vintage as the main distribution panel. Their condition also warrants replacement to ensure the
reliability of the electrical system. Existing feeders and branch circuits which are installed in concealed
conduit, MC cable and various surface metal raceways should be removed and replaced to conceal them in
the existing structure.

4.07.2.2 Minimum Required Renovation Recommendations for Lighting System

Most of the existing pendant or surface mounted 2 x 4 fluorescent acrylic wraparound fixtures have either
missing or broken lenses and have either T12 or T8 fluorescent lamps. They should be replaced with
architecturally appropriate pendant mounted fixtures employing T5 fluorescent lamps, to help realize energy
savings. All incandescent fixtures should be replaced with more efficient compact fluorescent or LED
fixtures. The lobby areas pendant mounted globe type fixtures should be retained after being rebuilt and
retrofit with compact fluorescent or LED lamps. Surface mounted fluorescent strip fixtures serving utility
areas should also be replaced with fixtures utilizing T5 fluorescent lamps.

All of the existing illuminated exit signs are illuminated by two incandescent lamps and have no internal
battery backup. The existing exit sign should be replaced with energy saving LED types.

Survey of the existing facility did not discover any evidence of emergency egress lighting. This is required
by code, and should be provided under the renovation program.

4.07.2.3 Minimum Required Renovation Recommendations for Emergency Power

The existing 35 kW pad mounted emergency generator appears as if it has not been adequately maintained
over the years. It was installed in 1984. It has also come to our attention that it has not been regularly
exercised which is a requirement to maintain emergency system reliability. The generators location inside
of the garage area is not appropriate. This increases the potential for overheating and is not optimal for its
performance. An exterior location should be considered.

The 100 ampere, 240 volt 3 pole automatic transfer switch appears to be in good condition, but should be
tested and inspected further to ensure reliability for the future.

4.07.2.4a Minimum Required Renovation Recommendations for the Telephone /Data
System

The existing telephone service from the telephone company is terminated on terminal blocks inside a wall
mounted cabinet, which is located in the boiler room on the basement level. The existing telephone cabinet
installation is in disarray and needs to be rearranged and/or organized neatly in a new enclosure.

4.07.2.4b Full Renovation Recommendations for the Telephone /Data System

An option for total replacement of telephone/Data system is included. The total replacement of
the system includes conduit rough-ins only. Data, telephones, wiring and equipment are to be
provided by owner.

4.07.3 Electrical Implications of Renovation Recommendations to Accommodate

4.07.3.1 Renovation recommendations for Electrical Systems due to Programmatic
changes


Page 36
If programmatic renovations are made, it is likely that the building services would require a
heavy- up of electrical upgrades to service all new spaces, including the addition of a building-
wide, zoned Public Address System and specialized A/V systems as required by DCPL
standards.


Page 37

4.08 Plumbing Systems

4.08.1 Condition Assessment of Existing Plumbing Systems

4.08.1.1 Assessment of Gas Service and Distribution Systems

The building is served by a 2-1/2 low pressure natural gas service that has recently been updated with a
gas meter located on the South East exterior wall just outside the boiler room. The meter has a capacity
rating of 2,300 CFH @ 1/2 and 5,000 CFH @ 2 differential pressures. The 2-1/2 gas line enters the
basement boiler room at the ceiling level with a 1-1/2 feed to a steam heating boiler; a 1 feed to the
domestic water heater; and a 1-1/4 feed to the emergency generator in the garage. The remaining gas
piping is 3/4 that has been capped near equipment in the basement work room and a gas range located in
the mezzanine level kitchen and are no longer in use. The exterior piping material is welded steel with
flanged fittings while the interior piping is black steel with threaded fittings.

4.08.1.2 Assessment of Domestic Water Service and Distribution Systems

The domestic water service is original to the building and enters the basement boiler room on the Southeast
side of the structure. The service piping and appurtenances is comprised of 2 galvanized steel with flanged
connections, a 2 bypass with a gate valve and a 2 Rockwell turbine water meter with service valve. A
backflow preventer is not serving the library. The distribution piping is the buildings original galvanized steel
with treaded fittings and consists of 2 cold water, 1-1/2 hot water and 3/4" circulating hot water leaving the
basement boiler room and provides domestic water throughout the building. There is not a circulating pump
installed on the circulating hot water system. The domestic cold water serves the central heating hot water
boiler, the cooling tower makeup line, the domestic water heater, the plumbing fixtures, (3) exterior hose
bibbs and the landscaping irrigation system. The cooling tower makeup water has a reduced pressure zone
(RPZ) type backflow preventer while the irrigation system has a pressure vacuum breaker assembly. Some
of the original galvanize domestic water piping in the basement has been replaced as needed with copper
piping. Most of the original asbestos piping insulation has been replaced with fiberglass insulation over the
galvanized piping however some asbestos insulation remains, particularly on the piping inside walls.

4.08.1.3 Assessment of Combined Sanitary and Storm Water Drainage System

The buildings storm water drainage is original to the structure and comprises of wrap-around gutters with
interior cast iron conductors embedded within cavities of the perimeter walls and connects to the combined
building drain below the basement slab. The West wall has (2) - 4 conductors, the North wall with (1) - 4
conductor and the East wall with (2) - 4 conductors. Each conductor has a cleanout plug at the base and is
exposed in the wall at the basement level. The storm system originates from the North half of the building
and drains to the South below the basement floor slab. The wrap around gutter has been repaired as part of
the recent exterior phase renovation however; the building engineers have reported recent water damage to
the North and Northeast interior walls at the second floor level after the heavy snow fall of this past winter.

There are (8) perimeter area wells and (1) stairwell, each are served by a 3 area drain with strainer. The
garage and driveway are each served by a 4 area drain running through a storm water interceptor before
connecting to the combined building drain below the South basement slab. The cooling tower drain line and
garage roof gutter discharge above grade into the areaway drain near the 1
st
floor exist and handicap ramp
on the Northwest side of the building.

The sanitary drainage system is original to the building and comprises of hub and spigot cast iron drainage
piping with galvanized threaded steel vent piping with lead and oakum joints. The sanitary system in the
North half of the building serves a staff lounge and toilet room on the 3
rd
floor and a utility sink in the
basement and connects to the storm system to form a 4 combined building sanitary/storm drain branch.
Most of the sanitary system is located in the South end of the building where the toilet rooms are stacked
from the attic space down to the basement level. This 4 sanitary system connects to the storm system at
the South end of the basement to form a 5 combined building sanitary/storm drain branch. The North and
South branches converge below the floor of the basement boiler room and increases to a 6 combined
sanitary/storm drain before exiting the Southeast wall below the basement boiler room. The building
engineers have reported frequent blockages in the sanitary system.


Page 38

4.08.1.4 Assessment of Domestic Hot Water Generation and Distribution Systems

The existing water heater is a natural gas direct fired storage type unit located in the basement boiler room
and provides domestic hot water to the entire library. It is less than five years old, in good condition and has
a 40,000 btu/h input, a 50 gallon storage capacity with 42 GPH recovery rate and a natural draft exhaust.
The new exhaust duct from the water heater is 4 stainless with a transition connection to the existing 6
galvanized steel exhaust duct that exits the flue at the roof. Although there is not a circulating pump installed
on the circulating hot water system, a lack of hot water has not been reported by the building engineers.

4.08.1.5 Assessment of Sump Pumps

There is a simplex sump pump with a 1-1/2 discharge located in the fuel room that receives the discharge
from equipment in this room. This sump is functional but appears to be at or near the end of its useful life.
The sump discharges into a service sink in the adjacent janitors closet and the force of the pump causes
water to spill onto the floor.

4.08.1.6 Assessment of Plumbing Fixtures

The plumbing fixtures are original to the building, functional but in poor condition. The fixtures serving the
public consist of floor mounted water closets with flush valves; wall mounted urinals with flush valves; and
wall mounted lavatories with 4 centerset faucets. The fixtures in the basement are is the worst condition
with the toilet room fixtures consisting of floor mounted water closets with flush valves; floor mounted urinals
with flush valves; and wall mounted lavatories with 8 center faucets. Sinks throughout the basement are in
poor condition and the service sink located in the janitors closet constantly receives the sump pump
discharge which the splashes onto the floor.

The attic level comprise of a private bathroom that once served the live-in building engineer consisting of a
water closet, shower and lavatory that have since been abandoned. Also at the attic level is a staff toilet
room, kitchen and lounge. Fixtures in the staff toilet room are in good working condition and consist of a floor
mounted water closet with flush valve and a wall hung lavatory. The fixtures in the staff kitchen are new and
consist of a drop-in stainless steel sink with a two handle faucet, side sprayer, and waste disposer.

Fixtures throughout the library leak and consume more water than the current plumbing code permits with
the exception of the staff kitchen fixtures at the attic level.

4.08.1.7 Assessment of Drinking Water Systems

Wall hung electrical water coolers are provided on every floor serving the public and a freestanding unit is
located in the staff lounge at the attic level. Most units appear to need updating.

4.08.2 Minimum Required Plumbing Recommendations to Correct Existing Building
Deficiencies

It is recommended that the entire plumbing system, from Domestic Water Service Entrance and meter to the
Sanitary and Storm Water Drainage system be completely demolished and replaced, as the age of the
system in almost all areas has exceeded it useful service life.

4.08.3 Plumbing Implications of Renovation Recommendations to Accommodate

New plumbing systems and equipment should be provided to support the new toilet facilities. This includes
a new service entrance with DC WASA-approved backflow preventer and meter, a new domestic water
pressure booster pump if required, new domestic hot water heater(s), new hot water recirculation pumps,
new distribution piping, new plumbing fixtures, new drainage piping, new electric water coolers, new sump
pumps, a new natural gas service entrance with Washington Gas-approved meter and valves, and new
natural gas distribution piping.

If the basement is converted to public space, additional toilet facilities, drinking water, and kitchenette
facilities should be provided in accordance with the program.


Page 39

4.09 Fire Detection, Alarm and Suppression Systems

4.09.1 Condition Assessment of Existing Fire Alarm and Suppression Systems

4.09.1.1 Assessment of Fire Alarm System

The Fire Alarm System is relatively new. It was installed in 2008. The fire alarm system is manufactured by
Simplex. It consists of a fire alarm control panel, Simplex model 4100U, which is located on the basement
level. It also includes a strobe extender panel Simplex model NAC 4009, located on the second level.
The fire alarm is a low voltage addressable system consisting of smoke detectors, strobes, horns and
manual strike stations.

4.09.1.2 Assessment of Fire Suppression (Sprinkler) System

The Building is not currently protected by a Fire Suppression System.

4.09.2 Minimum Required Fire Alarm and Suppression Renovation
Recommendations to Correct Existing Building Deficiencies

4.09.2.1 Minimum Required Renovation Recommendations for the Fire Alarm
System

The Fire Alarm System should be expanded as required to integrate with the new fire suppression system.

4.09.2.2 Minimum Required Renovation Recommendations for the Fire Suppression
(Sprinkler) System

Under the renovation program, a completely new wet-pipe fire suppression and standpipe system should be
designed and installed.

4.09.3 Fire Alarm and Suppression Implications of Renovation Recommendations
to Accommodate Programmatic Changes

4.09.3.1 Renovation Recommendations for the Fire Alarm System to accommodate
Programmatic changes

The Fire Alarm System should be expanded as required by the renovation program. New initiating and
notification devices in accordance with current code and ADA guidelines should be provided.

4.09.3.2 Renovation Recommendations of Fire Suppression (Sprinkler) System to
accommodate Programmatic changes

New wet-pipe fire suppression and standpipe piping should be installed throughout the building. Horizontal
sprinkler system distribution piping should be added at the ceiling and vertically in the stairwells. A new fire
department connection should be provided at a DCFD-approved exterior location. The program should also
require an investigation of the existing water service residual pressure under fire flow and an analysis of the
suitability of the service for the intended sprinkler system. This analysis may recommend the addition of a
fire pump.


Page 40

4.10 Security System

4.10.1 Condition Assessment of Security System

The existing security system is functioning but does not meet the DCPL standards.

4.10.2a Minimum Required Renovation Recommendations of Security System

Because the existing security system is functional, no renovations must be done but instead are
considered an option. Refer to section 4.10.2b below.

4.10.2b Full Renovation Recommendations of Security System

Provide new security system as per DCPL guidelines.

Additionally, the following guidelines should be considered:

1. All emergency only exit doors shall be alarmed to alert staff of they are opened without
authorization.

2. Any area not easily observed by desk staff may require monitoring by a security
camera. Placement of cameras will be determined by DCPL.

3. All service desks shall have a panic button to alert staff in the workrooms that help is
needed at the desk.

4. All public entrances and exits shall have a materials security system to alert staff that
items that have not been checked out are being taken out of the building.


Page 41

4.11 Furniture and Fixtures (F&F)

4.11.1 Assessment of Existing Building Furniture and Fixtures (F&F)

The general condition of the furniture, fixtures, and equipment in the building is fair. Much of the
F&F does not match in styles. It can be further described as follows:

Description and/or
Locations
Condition Remarks
Furniture:
Tables Misc. Styles and sizes Fair No matching style, worn
Chairs Misc. Styles and sizes Fair/Good No matching style
Stacks: Built-in Wood, Original to building Poor Missing trim, nicks, finish
damaged
Stacks : Freestanding Misc. Styles and sizes Poor Outdated and worn
Fixtures:
Signage Misc. Styles, sizes and
mounting heights
Poor Outdated; Does not meet
ADA guidelines
Clocks Fair

4.11.2 Renovation Recommendations

The renovation design intent is to provide all new, durable furniture and fixtures that complement
the style of the 1931 historical character of the building. The new F&F selection should reflect the
intent of the DCPLs Generic Building Program. Refer to the DCPL General Building Program for
specific program intent and direction. Because this report is not intended to serve as a design
guide, a cost per square foot allowance for F&F can be applied based on the use or type of room.

In addition to the guidelines listed in the DCPL Generic Building Program, the following design
guidelines were used to determine the cost per square foot allowance:

A. General:

1. Add code required graphic signage and way finding signage to meet ADA
requirements and to follow new DCPL design standards for signage.

2. Provide clocks, waste paper baskets, and recycling bins throughout all major areas
and in each staff area.

B. Public Spaces:

1. Circulation Services Public area
a. ADA accessible Information desk large enough for two persons with solid surface
countertop and wood side panels to reflect the historical character of the building.
Restore and reuse any or all of the material from the existing information desk.
Cable and power cord management is required.
b. Seating Requirements for the service desks are quantified on page 40 of the
DCPL General Building Program Draft.
c. Flat screen, wall mounted monitor
d. New updated security gates for book/materials at both main entrances
e. Tackable information bulletin boards


Page 42
f. Slat wall for flyers and pamphlets

2. Reading Rooms and Stack areas (Adults, Children and Teens):
a. Original wood reading room table in Adult Reading room to be temporarily stored
and reused. All new adult reading tables to match original reading table with wire
management built into the table.
b. Seating Requirements (tables and chairs) for these public spaces are quantified
on page 40 of the DCPL Generic Building Program Draft.
c. All shelving that is not the original 1931 wood shelving to be removed.
d. Restore and Refinish all original wood shelving along the perimeter of the rooms.
e. All New shelving shall be metal shelving (that meets the parameters in the DCPL
Generic building Program) with wood end caps that reflect the historical
character of the building
f. Step stools for the stacks
g. New book carts

3. 100 Person Meeting Room should include but not limited to:
a. Light weight rectangular tables (foldable)
b. Herman Miller Caper Chairs (stacking with glide) or similar
c. Mechanized ceiling hung projection screen
d. Blackout Window covering(s) if required
e. (2) carts

C. Support Spaces:

1. Staff work areas
a. Seating Requirements (tables and chairs) for the staff work areas are quantified
on page 40 of the DCPL Generic Building program Draft.

2. Staff Lounge
a. Seating Requirements (tables and chairs) for these public spaces are quantified
on page 40 of the DCPL Generic Building program Draft.
b. Refrigerator
c. Microwave oven
d. Lockers
e. Coat rack


Page 43

4.12 Hazardous Materials

4.12.1 Findings

Advantage Environmental Consultants, LLC (AEC) performed a Hazardous Materials Survey of the
Northeast Library building. As a result of this survey, asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) were
identified at the Site. The surveyed materials included asbestos-containing materials (ACMs),
polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) containing light ballasts, mercury-containing devices and painted
surfaces containing lead. AEC full Hazardous Materials Survey is included as Exhibit A at the back
of this report.

4.12.2 Conclusions and Recommendations

Based upon the work conducted for this survey and AECs understanding of the project, AEC
concludes and recommends the following:

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

Category I non-friable ACM was identified in the form of various floor tiles and associated
mastics, and roof flashing sealant. These materials were observed to be in good condition.
The EPA regulates Category I non-friable materials (e.g., resilient floor coverings, asphalt
roof products, gaskets, and packings) only when they are rendered friable. AEC
recommends that any Category I non-friable materials be removed by a District of Columbia-
licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to demolition activities that would result in their
disturbance.

Category II non-friable ACM was identified in the form of white HVAC duct mastic, beige pipe
end cap mastic, and assumed ACM fire doors. These materials were observed in good
condition. Suspect ACM enclosed within fire doors was not assessed in order to preserve the
integrity and fire rating of the doors. Category II non-friable ACM must be removed by a
District of Columbia-licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovation activities that
would result in their disturbance.

Friable ACM was identified in the form of white fibrous pipe insulation and air cell pipe
insulation. These materials were observed in poor condition. Friable ACM must be removed
by a District of Columbia-licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovations or
demolition activities that would result in their disturbance.

AEC recommends an Asbestos Operations and Maintenance Plan detailing maintenance
procedures to maintain ACMs in good condition.

The OSHA Construction Asbestos Standard requires building and/or facility owners to notify
the following persons of the presence, location and quantity of ACM or material presumed to
be ACM, at the work sites in their buildings and facilities:

(A) Prospective employers applying or bidding for work whose employees
reasonably can be expected to work in or adjacent to areas containing such material;
(B) Employees of the owner who will work in or adjacent to areas containing such
material;


Page 44
(C) On multi-employer worksites, all employers of employees who will be performing
work within or adjacent to areas containing such materials; and
(D) Tenants who will occupy areas containing such material.
(E) Any additional suspect materials not previously sampled should be assumed to
contain asbestos until further testing proves otherwise.

The quantities of ACMs estimated during this survey are for informational and reference
purposes only. All quantities must be field verified by a District of Columbia-licensed
asbestos abatement contractor(s) prior to demolition/renovation. This report was not
prepared to be utilized as an asbestos abatement bidding document or abatement
specification document.

POLYCHLORINATED BYPHENYLS-CONTAINING LIGHT BALLASTS

AEC noted ballasts labeled as non-PCB-containing present throughout the site building;
however, some ballasts may not have No PCBs labels. Ballasts without this label must be
assumed to contain PCBs and handled accordingly. It is likely that original ballasts for these
fixtures were PCB-containing and were periodically replaced as their service life ended. AEC
recommends that all ballasts be inspected prior to their disposal, which should be completed
according to all applicable district and federal regulations.

AEC observed universal hazardous wastes (i.e., fluorescent light tubes, exit sign batteries,
and security lights) within the Site building. Universal wastes are common wastes with
hazardous properties that have special management provisions intended to facilitate
recycling. Prior to redevelopment activities, AEC recommends that the aforementioned
universal wastes be segregated and transported to an approved recycling facility.

PAINT-CONTAINING LEAD

Laboratory analytical results for the collected paint chip samples indicated the presence of
detectable levels of lead in each of the five paint chip samples collected. Construction or
renovation activities that result in disturbance of the lead-containing paint in any
concentration (i.e. via sanding, scraping, cutting, grinding, welding, drilling, or other activities
potentially generating airborne lead dust), must be performed by a qualified contractor in
accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62, OSHAs Safety and Health Regulations for Construction
(Lead Exposure in Construction), using lead-safe work practices.

OPINION OF COST: $90,000 to $140,000


Page 45

5 BUILDING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT LIFE CYCLE COST

Overview:

The purpose of this analysis is to determine the cost effectiveness of the proposed energy
efficiency recommendation and to establish the cost effectiveness of implementing the proposed
energy conservation measures. It also helps identify the ratio between maintenance costs of this
system versus their respective replacement costs. This analysis will identify excessive
maintenance costs and compare it with its replacement cost.

This analysis focuses on a major component of the existing facility that deals with the energy
efficiency, the Chilled water Generation & Distribution system (refer to Exhibit D). Due to the age
of the other building components described in the existing conditions report of the facility, the
requirements to resolve code deficiencies and have the facility comply with current building code
and ADA/ADAAG guidelines, the building components such as the replacement of the conveying
system, replacing the existing boiler, structural upgrades are necessary.

For the purpose of this study, all maintenance costs and construction costs are projections and
do not include contingencies, design fees and other soft costs. (Please refer to Exhibit D for
detailed estimate)

Maintenance costs:

Maintenance costs are scheduled costs associated with the upkeep of this component. An
example is the maintenance cost of annual inspection and servicing of the existing chiller. This
task is a scheduled event intended to keep the chiller in service. For simplicity, this cost is
assumed to be incurred annually and it includes utility costs/charges, insurances, equipment
efficiencies, necessary repair costs and inflation. Below is an example of an analysis of the
maintenance cost;


Page 46

Replacement costs

Replacement costs are anticipated expenditures related to the replacement of the equipment.
Typically the replacement cost is generated for a component that has reached the end of its
useful life. Below is an example of an analysis of the replacement cost;


Page 47

Comparative/Life Cycle Analysis:


Page 48

Conclusions and Recommendations

The result of this comparative Life cycle cost report which shows that there is a slight advantage
to early retirement of the existing chilled water generation and distribution system. However, the
simple payback is in year 12, which may not qualify as a good investment. Generally a
reasonable payback is between <=7 years and <=10years.
The energy savings and the emissions reduction realized during the remaining life cycle of the
existing system are higher compared to the new installation.

Therefore it is the recommendation of this study that the systems be replaced now even though
the payback is a bit far out, as there is additional benefit in the energy savings, emissions
reduction realized during the remaining life cycle of the existing system and savings in relocation
costs while the entire building is under construction vs. having to do the build-out in an occupied
building later.


Page 49

6 LEED SILVER FACILITY REQUIREMENT

The design and renovation of the Northeast Library shall meet the requirements of a LEED silver
facility.

The District of Columbia Public Library does not have a preferred direction as to how the required
points are achieved.

Meeting the LEED Requirements, including the filings and submissions are to be part of the
general contractors requirements.


Page 50

7 CONSTRUCTION COST EVALUATION

Overview:

The purpose of this feasibility study is to explore the renovation options that will accommodate
DCPLs requirements for bringing existing North East Neighborhood Library to a more up to date
and functional level and to meet a 30 year life span requirement. The renovation plan is intended
to reduce deterioration of the building components, to comply with current building code and
ADA/ADAAG guidelines, and to adhere better to the District of Columbia Public Library (DCPL)
Generic Building Program Draft dated February 16, 2010.

The existing facility is a 2-storey brick building with a finished below grade basement level and an
attic space. This feasibility study develops 2 design alternatives with related costs for the interior
renovations and a Programmatic requirement to meet the needs set forth in the DCPL Generic
Building Program draft. The design alternatives are analyzed in consideration of DCPLs
specification, objectives of Library and community, physical limitation of the existing building and
applicable codes and regulations.

The feasibility study has been developed into two (2) renovation recommendations and an
Optional Programmatic renovation recommendation independent of the 2 major renovation
recommendations:

1. Minimum renovations recommendations: This involves a minor renovation and upgrades
to the interior finishes, minimal interior wall constructions, construction of a new egress
stair and pathway, replacement of the existing passenger elevator, replacement of
existing plumbing system, minimal renovation to the existing HVAC system, installation of
a new Fire suppression (Sprinkler) and Electrical systems upgrades. This renovation
option addresses the deficiencies of the building as regards Building Codes and
accessibility compliance. Other upgrades within this design option aims to address
components of the building that is outdated and worn. The projected estimated cost of
construction for this recommendation is $5,889,359 (refer to Exhibit D)

2. Full renovations recommendations: This encompasses an extensive building renovation
to involve a complete renovation of the interior finishes, replacement of major Mechanical
(Plumbing & HVAC) systems, installation of a new Fire suppression (Sprinkler) and
Electrical systems upgrades. This renovation addresses the deficiencies of the building
as regards Building Codes and accessibility compliance. It also aims to addressing
components of the building that is outdated and worn. The projected estimated cost of
construction for this recommendation is $7,297,934 (refer to Exhibit D)

3. Programmatic requirements renovations recommendations: These are upgrades that are
intended to better meet the needs set forth in the DCPL Generic Building Program draft.
It involves the partial demolition and reconfiguration of some interior spaces, demolishing
entire mezzanine level, and a replacement of the Mechanical (Plumbing & HVAC), Fire
suppression (Sprinkler) and Electrical systems to suit these spaces. These upgrades
while independent of the Minimum Renovation requirement and the Full Renovation
requirement aims to address upgrades to better meet the needs set forth in the DCPL
Generic Building Program Draft. The projected estimated cost of construction for this
recommendation is $1,671,015 (refer to Exhibit D).


Page 51

NORTH-EAST NEIGHBORHOOD LIBRARY
District of Columbia Public Library
Interior Facility Conditions Assessment
MASTER SUMMARY GSF 16,401 GSF 16,401 GSF 16,401 GSF 16,401
Cost/ SF Cost/ SF Cost/ SF Cost/ SF
Total for Foundations: $0 $0.00 $7,500 $0.46 $27,000 $1.65 $34,500 $2.10
Total for Substructure: $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00
Total for Superstructure: $302,854 $18.47 $302,854 $18.47 $151,875 $9.26 $454,729 $27.73
Total for Exterior Closure: $17,050 $1.04 $17,050 $1.04 $0 $0.00 $17,050 $1.04
Total for Roofing: $30,000 $1.83 $52,000 $3.17 $25,000 $1.52 $77,000 $4.69
Total for Interior Construction: Partitions & Doors $94,000 $5.73 $249,100 $15.19 $90,500 $5.52 $339,600 $20.71
Total for Interior Construction: Finishes $106,607 $6.50 $262,416 $16.00 $246,015 $15.00 $508,431 $31.00
Total for Interior Construction: Specialties $59,123 $3.60 $126,527 $7.71 $57,763 $3.52 $184,290 $11.24
Total for Conveying: $130,500 $7.96 $130,500 $7.96 $0 $0.00 $130,500 $7.96
Total for Plumbing Systems: $294,398 $17.95 $294,398 $17.95 $17,000 $1.04 $311,398 $18.99
Total for HVAC Systems: $747,889 $45.60 $963,016 $58.72 $258,725 $15.77 $1,221,741 $74.49
Total for Fire Protection systems: $80,554 $4.91 $80,554 $4.91 $0 $0.00 $80,554 $4.91
Total for Electrical Installations: $714,508 $43.56 $972,731 $59.31 $204,005 $12.44 $1,176,736 $71.75
Total for Equipment/Furnishings: $5,200 $0.32 $2,200 $0.13 $0 $0.00 $2,200 $0.13
Total for Sitework/Demolition (includes HAZMAT abatement): $379,614 $23.15 $379,614 $23.15 $32,802 $2.00 $412,416 $25.15
Subtotal (Trades) $2,962,297 $180.62 $3,840,460 $234.16 $1,110,685 $67.72 $4,951,146 $301.88
Add: Premium for LEED Silver Certification 2.0% NIC $0.00 $76,809 $4.68 $22,214 $1.35 $99,023 $6.04
Subtotal $2,962,297 $180.62 $3,917,270 $238.84 $1,132,899 $69.07 $5,050,169 $307.92
Add: Price and Design Contingency 15.0% $444,345 $27.09 $587,590 $35.83 $169,935 $10.36 $757,525 $46.19
Subtotal $3,406,642 $207.71 $4,504,860 $274.67 $1,302,834 $79.44 $5,807,694 $354.11
Add; General Conditions, Insurance and Bonds 10.0% $340,664 $20.77 $450,486 $27.47 $130,283 $7.94 $580,769 $35.41
Subtotal $3,747,306 $228.48 $4,955,346 $302.14 $1,433,117 $87.38 $6,388,463 $389.52
Add: Overhead and Profit 6.0% $224,838 $13.71 $297,321 $18.13 $85,987 $5.24 $383,308 $23.37
Subtotal $3,972,144 $242.19 $5,252,667 $320.27 $1,519,104 $92.62 $6,771,771 $412.89
Add: Construction Contingency 10.00% 397,214 $24.22 $525,267 $32.03 151,910 $9.26 677,177 $41.29
Add: Utility company charges (A/E design allowance) Lump sum 70,000 $4.27 $70,000 $4.27 - $0.00 70,000 $4.27
Add: Escalation allowance (excluded) 0.00% $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00
Projected Estimated Construction Cost: $4,439,359 $270.68 $5,847,934 $356.56 $1,671,015 $101.88 $7,518,948 $458.44
Others Project associated Costs
1 FF & Costs (by owner) ALLOWANCE $500,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000 $0
2 Swing Space / Interim Space cost for Leasing and Build out ALLOWANCE $950,000 $950,000 $0 $0 $950,000 $0
Overall Project Cost: $5,889,359 $359.09 $7,297,934 $444.97 $1,671,015 $101.88 $8,968,948 $458.44
Full Renovation & Minimum Renovation Full Renovation Programmatic Requirements only
and Cost Benefit Analysis Programmatic Requirements


Page 52

Each recommendation option represent raw construction cost and does not include
contingencies, furnishings, fixtures and (FF), design fees and other soft costs. (Please refer to
Exhibit D for detailed estimate)

Conclusions and Recommendations

While both the Minimum requirement renovation and the Full renovation requirement
recommendations have the ability to resolve code deficiencies and have the facility comply with
current building code and ADA/ADAAG guidelines, reduce deterioration of the building
components, they both do not fully resolve upgrades to better meet the needs set forth in the
DCPL Generic Building Program Draft. Therefore, an additional overall project cost that includes
the cost for the full renovation plus the programmatic requirements has been added as a
recommendation.


Page 53

8 APPENDIX: Existing Condition Photos

First Level: Foyer and Stacks

First Level: Foyer Circulation Desk


Page 54

First Level: Stacks

First Level: Adult Reading Room


Page 55

First Level: Corridor to Reference Room Beyond

First Level: Reference Room


Page 56

First Level: Corridor to Public Restrooms

First Level: Womens Public restroom

First Level: Mens Public Restroom


Page 57

Mezzanine Level: Teen Area

Mezzanine Level: Staff Area


Page 58

Second Level: Foyer

Second Level: Childrens Reading Room


Page 59

Second Floor: Meeting Room

Second Level: Stacks Area


Page 60

Second Level: Childrens Public Restroom

Second Level: Librarians Work Room


Page 61

Basement Level: Unallocated Space

Basement Level: Toilet Room


Page 62

9 EXHIBIT A: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS REPORT and
EXHIBIT B: PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT and
EXHIBIT C: PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SUBSURFACE
INVESTIGATION
EXHIBIT D: CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

See attached reports.

Advantage Environmental
Consultants, LLC

Hazardous Materials Survey

330 7
th
Street, N.E.
Washington, DC

AEC Project No. 10-147
September 28, 2010

Prepared for:

1401 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005
Attention: Ms. Ellen Wright

Prepared by:

Advantage Environmental Consultants, LLC
8610 Washington Boulevard, Suite 217
Jessup, Maryland 20794
TEL: (301) 776-0500 FAX: (301) 776-1123

September 28, 2010

Ms. Ellen Wright
Architect
1401 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005

Subject: Hazardous Materials Survey
330 7
th
Street, N.E.
Washington, DC
AEC Project No. 10-147

Dear Ms. Wright:

Advantage Environmental Consultants, LLC (AEC) performed a Hazardous Materials Survey of the
above-referenced library building located in Washington, DC (i.e., the Site). The work was
performed in accordance with AEC Proposal No. 10-149 dated July 1, 2010. The Site consists of a
two-story brick building with a basement. This report includes the procedures and methods for the
testing along with testing results, recommendations and supporting documentation. The services
were performed on September 15, 2010.

As a result of this survey, asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) were identified at the Site. AEC
has provided conclusions and/or recommendations regarding these materials within the report.

We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to McKissack & McKissack. If you should have any
questions regarding this report, please contact Mr. Philip C. Medenbach, Jr. at (301) 776-0500.

Sincerely,
ADVANTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC

D Da av vi id d F F. . S Sv vr rj jc ce ek k P Ph hi il li ip p C C. . M Me ed de en nb ba ac ch h, , J Jr r. .
S Se en ni io or r P Pr ro oj je ec ct t M Ma an na ag ge er r S Se en ni io or r P Pr ro oj je ec ct t M Ma an na ag ge er r

Attachments

i
Table of Contents

Table of Contents i
1.0 Purpose and Scope of Service 1
1.1 Asbestos Containing Materials 1
1.2 Suspect PCB- and Mercury-Containing Equipment 1
1.3 Lead Containing Paint 2
2.0 Survey Findings 3
2.1 Asbestos Containing Materials 3
2.2 Suspect PCB- and Mercury-Containing Equipment 5
2.3 Lead-Containing Paint Screen 6
3.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 7

APPENDIX A Asbestos and Lead Laboratory Analytical Results and Chain of
Custody Documentation
APPENDIX B Certification of Professional

Northeast Neighborhood Library Hazardous Materials Survey
330 7
th
Street, N.E. AEC Project No. 10-147

1
1.0 Purpose and Scope of Service

The purpose of this project was to complete a Hazardous Materials Survey of the
building located at 330 7
th
Street, N.E., in Washington, DC (i.e., the Site). The
surveyed materials included asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), polychlorinated
biphenyl (PCB) containing light ballasts, mercury-containing devices and painted
surfaces containing lead. The Site building encompasses approximately 30,000 square
feet of floor area.

1.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

The ACM Survey was conducted in accordance with the following scope of work:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certified asbestos inspectors conducted
the survey of building materials suspected to contain asbestos. The survey was
conducted in accordance with EPA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) requirements and Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA)
guidelines for the locations and number of samples collected.

AEC collected bulk samples from each homogeneous area in accordance with
OSHA and EPA guidelines.

The samples were analyzed for asbestos fiber content at EMSL, Inc. (EMSL),
which is a laboratory accredited under the National Voluntary Laboratory
Accreditation Program (NVLAP). The samples were analyzed by polarized light
microscopy (PLM) using EPA analytical method 600/M4-82-020 and/or 600/R-
93/116.

Based upon the analytical results and field data, the approximate amounts, types,
locations, and conditions of accessible ACM were determined.

1.2 Suspect PCB- and Mercury-Containing Equipment

An Industrial Hygienist conducted a visual survey for accessible PCB-containing light
ballasts and suspect mercury-containing light tubes and thermostats. The survey was
conducted in accordance with generally accepted industry practices and included a
visual inspection of representative light ballasts and fixtures. Representative light
ballasts were inspected for No PCBs markings. Ballasts that were free of markings or
missing labels were assumed to contain PCBs. Thermostat covers were removed and
inspected for the presence of free mercury.

330 7
th

2
1.3 Lead-Containing Paint

The Lead Paint Screening was performed in order to identify the possible presence of
lead-containing paint on predominant painted surfaces. The Lead Paint Screening was
conducted in accordance with the following scope of work:

Prior to collecting any samples, a sampling strategy was developed. Based on the
size of the area to be sampled and the professional judgment of the inspector, AEC
collected five representative paint chip samples from predominant painted surfaces.

The paint chip samples were analyzed using EPA Analytical Methods SW 846
3050B and 7420. The samples were analyzed by Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc.
(SAI) in Greensboro, North Carolina. A copy of the laboratory analytical report and
chain-of-custody form are included in Attachment 3.

Any paint that contains greater than 0.5% lead by weight is considered to be lead-
based paint and must be handled according to the Occupational Health and Safety
Act (OSHA), EPA, and applicable local regulations. In addition, painted surfaces
identified as being covered with paint containing lead, in any concentration, must be
handled in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62, OSHAs Safety and Health
Regulations for Construction (Lead Exposure in Construction).

AEC collected the five paint chip samples from predominant painted substrates using a
chisel to ensure that all layers of paint were included in the sample. The paint chips
were placed in a labeled plastic bag and mailed by AEC personnel under chain-of-
custody to SAI for lead content analysis.
330 7
th

3
2.0 Survey Findings

2.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

The asbestos survey was performed by AEC Inspector Mr. Philip C. Medenbach, Jr., on
September 15, 2010 in order to identify ACMs that may be impacted by future demolition
activity. Mr. Medenbachs Asbestos Inspector certificate is included within Appendix B of
this report.

The following is a list of suspect ACM identified and sampled in 330 7
th
Street, N.E. during
the inspection:

Two-Coat Plaster
Various Baseboard Materials and Associated Mastics
Brown Flooring Material with Woven Backing
Sheet Linoleum
Various Floor Tiles and Associated Mastics
Various Carpet Mastics
Brown Flooring Materials with Black Mastics
White Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Duct Mastic
Residual Black Mastic beneath Carpets
Spray-Applied Fireproofing Material
Pipe End Cap Mastic
White Fibrous Pipe Insulation
Interior Window Caulk
Stairtread Material and Associated Mastic
Black Flooring Material with Woven Backing
Paper and Foil Covering over Fiberglass Pipe Insulation
Aircell Pipe Insulation
Beige Pipe Insulation Mastic
Interior and Exterior Window Glazing
Rope/Woven Boiler Gasket Material
Residual Black Baseboard Mastic
Door Caulk
Tar Roof Flashing Sealant (on flat, lower HVAC pad roof)
Roof Core (on flat, lower HVAC pad roof)
Fire Doors (Assumed)

Any material that contains greater than one percent asbestos is considered an ACM
and must be handled according to OSHA, EPA and applicable local regulations. Prior
to collecting any samples, homogeneous areas were identified and listed to develop a
sampling strategy. A homogeneous sampling area can be described as one or more
areas of material that are similar in appearance and texture and that have the same
installation date and function. The actual number of samples collected from each
330 7
th

4
homogeneous sampling area may vary, based on the type of material and the
professional judgment of the inspector.

AEC collected a total of 60 bulk samples of suspect ACM from the Site, resulting in 83
laboratory analyses due to multiple material layers and stop-positive analytical
techniques. EMSL, located in Beltsville, Maryland, analyzed the samples using PLM
according to EPA analytical method 600/R-93/116. EMSL participates in the NVLAP
and is accredited by the National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST).

ACMs were identified in the building as referenced in the following table:

330 7
th
Street, N.E., Washington, DC

Material Location Condition
Friable
Yes/No
Sample ID
Estimated
Quantity
ACM Content EPA Class
Black Mastic
Associated
with 12 x 12
Beige Mottle
Floor Tiles
Second Floor
Elevator Lobby
Good No
915PM11-Floor
Tile and
915PM11- Mastic
9,900 S.F.*
10%
Chrysotile in Black
Mastic, NAD in
Beige Mottle Floor
Tiles

Category I
Non-
Friable
12 x 12 Tan
Mottle Floor
Tiles and
Associated
Brown Mastic
Second Floor
Stairwell by
Elevator (top
layer of floor
tiles)
Good No
915PM13-Floor
Tiles 2 and
915PM13-Mastic
600 S.F.
8%
Chrysotile in Tan
Mottle Floor Tiles,
<1% Chrysotile in
Associated Brown
Mastic

Category I
Non-
Friable
Brown
Flooring
Material and
Associated
Black Mastic
Second Floor
Stairwell by
Elevator (Bottom
Layer of
Flooring
Material)
Good No
915PM14-
Flooring,
915PM14-Mastic
200 S.F.
7%
Chrysotile in Brown
Flooring Material,
NAD in Associated
Black Mastic

Category I
Non-
Friable
12 x 12 Aqua
Floor Tiles and
Associated
Black and
Yellow Mastics
Second Floor
Reading Room
Good No
915PM16-Floor
Tiles, 915PM16-
Black Mastic and
915PM16
Yellow mastic
9,900 S.F. *
NAD in Aqua Floor
Tiles, and Yellow
Mastic, 2%
Chrysotile in
Associated Black
Mastic
Category I
Non-
Friable
Black 9 x 9
Floor Tiles and
Associated
Black Mastic
Second Floor
Reading Room
Good No
915PM17- Floor
Tile and
915PM17-Mastic
9,900 S.F. *
12% Chrysotile in
Black Floor Tiles,
5% Chrysotile in
Associated Black
Mastic
Category I
Non-
Friable
White HVAC
Duct Mastic
Attic Mechanical
Room and
Throughout
HVAC System
Good No
915PM20,
915PM32, and
915PM33
Throughout
HVAC System
3-18% Chrysotile
Category II
Non-
Friable
Beige Pipe
End Cap
Mastic
Attic Mechanical
Room and
HVAC System
Good No
915PM29,
915PM30 and
915PM31
Throughout
HVAC System
15%
Chrysotile
Category II
Non-
Friable
White Fibrous
Pipe Insulation
Attic Janitors
Closet by
Shower Stall
Poor Yes
915PM34,
915PM35 and
915PM36
700 L.F.
Throughout
Building within
Plaster Wall
Chases (total
40%
Chrysotile
Friable
330 7
th

5
Material Location Condition
Friable
Yes/No
Sample ID
Estimated
Quantity
ACM Content EPA Class
estimated
quantity of
ACM pipe
insulation)
Light Green
Floor tiles of
Undetermined
Size (Bottom
Layer) and
Associated
Black Mastic
Mezzanine
Level Kitchen
Area
Good No
915PM38-Floor
Tile and
915PM38-Mastic
590 S.F.
12%
Chrysotile in Floor
Tiles, 10%
Chrysotile in
Associated Black
mastic
Category I
Non-
Friable
Brown
Flooring
Material
(Bottom Layer)
and
Associated
Black Mastic
First Floor
Reading Area
Good No
915PM42-
Flooring and
915PM42-Mastic
9,900 S.F. *
10%
Chrysotile in Brown
Flooring Material,
8% Chrysotile in
Associated Black
mastic
Category I
Non-
Friable
Air Cell Pipe
Insulation
First Floor
Janitors Closet
inside Plaster
Wall
Poor Yes
915PM48,
915PM49 and
915PM50
700 L.F.
Throughout
Building within
Plaster Wall
Chases (total
estimated
quantity of
ACM pipe
insulation)
4%
Chrysotile
Friable
Roof Flashing
Sealant
Flat Exterior
HVAC Roof
Good No
915PM59 80 L.F.
5%
Chrysotile
Category I
Non-
Friable
Fire Doors
Throughout
Building
Good No
N/A 32 Doors Assumed
Category II
Non-
Friable

S.F. = Square Feet
L.F. = Linear Feet
NAD = No Asbestos Detected
* Total estimated quantity of asbestos-containing black floor tile mastic

The laboratory analysis reports and Chain of Custody, located in Appendix A, contain a
listing of all analyzed samples, sample locations, and analytical results. Results are
reported in percent asbestos by volume and indicate the type(s) of asbestos. Other
common non-asbestos components may also be noted on the analytical report.

2.2 Suspect PCB- and Mercury-Containing Equipment

AEC inspected representative light fixtures within the site building for suspect PCB
ballasts. All representative light ballasts inspected by AEC at the time of the survey
were labeled as non-PCB-containing. AEC observed approximately 210 suspect
fluorescent light fixtures and/or ballasts within the Site building. No mercury-containing
thermostats were observed at the Site building.

330 7
th

6
2.3 Lead-Containing Paint Screen

The laboratory analytical results for the paint chip samples collected at the Site is
detailed in the following table:

PAINT CHIP ANALYTICAL RESULTS
330 7
th
Street, N.E., Washington, DC

Sample ID Material Location/Substrate Lead Content
915PMPC1 White Paint Chip
Basement Mechanical Room Concrete Wall
0.037% wt
915PMPC2 Tan-Yellow Paint Chip
Second Floor North Plaster Wall
0.18% wt
915PMPC3 Green Paint Chip
Second Floor Metal Radiator
0.42% wt
915PMPC4 Tan-Yellow Paint Chip
First Floor East Plaster Wall
0.057% wt
915PMPC5 Brown Paint Chip
First Floor West Metal Window Sill
0.67% wt

As shown in the above table, laboratory analysis indicated the presence of paint
containing lead. Conclusions and recommendations regarding the sample results are
included in Section 3.2. The lead laboratory analytical report and chain-of-custody form
is included Appendix A.
330 7
th

7
3.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

Based upon the work conducted for this survey and AECs understanding of the project,
AEC concludes and recommends the following:


Category I non-friable ACM was identified in the form of various floor tiles and
associated mastics, and roof flashing sealant. These materials were observed to be
in good condition. The EPA regulates Category I non-friable materials (e.g., resilient
floor coverings, asphalt roof products, gaskets, and packings) only when they are
rendered friable. AEC recommends that any Category I non-friable materials be
removed by a District of Columbia-licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to
demolition activities that would result in their disturbance.

Category II non-friable ACM was identified in the form of white HVAC duct mastic,
beige pipe end cap mastic, and assumed ACM fire doors. These materials were
observed in good condition. Suspect ACM enclosed within fire doors was not
assessed in order to preserve the integrity and fire rating of the doors. Category II
non-friable ACM must be removed by a District of Columbia-licensed asbestos
abatement contractor prior to renovation activities that would result in their
disturbance.

Friable ACM was identified in the form of white fibrous pipe insulation and air cell
pipe insulation. These materials were observed in poor condition. Friable ACM
must be removed by a District of Columbia-licensed asbestos abatement contractor
prior to renovations or demolition activities that would result in their disturbance.

AEC recommends an Asbestos Operations and Maintenance Plan detailing
maintenance procedures to maintain ACMs in good condition.

The OSHA Construction Asbestos Standard requires building and/or facility owners
to notify the following persons of the presence, location and quantity of ACM or
material presumed to be ACM, at the work sites in their buildings and facilities:

(A) Prospective employers applying or bidding for work whose employees
reasonably can be expected to work in or adjacent to areas containing
such material;
(B) Employees of the owner who will work in or adjacent to areas containing
such material;
(C) On multi-employer worksites, all employers of employees who will be
performing work within or adjacent to areas containing such materials; and
(D) Tenants who will occupy areas containing such material.
(E) Any additional suspect materials not previously sampled should be
assumed to contain asbestos until further testing proves otherwise.

330 7
th

8
The quantities of ACMs estimated during this survey are for informational and
reference purposes only. All quantities must be field verified by a District of
Columbia-licensed asbestos abatement contractor(s) prior to demolition/renovation.
This report was not prepared to be utilized as an asbestos abatement bidding
document or abatement specification document.

POLYCHLORINATED BYPHENYLS-CONTAINING LIGHT BALLASTS

AEC noted ballasts labeled as non-PCB-containing present throughout the site
building; however, some ballasts may not have No PCBs labels. Ballasts without
this label must be assumed to contain PCBs and handled accordingly. It is likely
that original ballasts for these fixtures were PCB-containing and were periodically
replaced as their service life ended. AEC recommends that all ballasts be inspected
prior to their disposal, which should be completed according to all applicable district
and federal regulations.

AEC observed universal hazardous wastes (i.e., fluorescent light tubes, exit sign
batteries, and security lights) within the Site building. Universal wastes are common
wastes with hazardous properties that have special management provisions
intended to facilitate recycling. Prior to redevelopment activities, AEC recommends
that the aforementioned universal wastes be segregated and transported to an
approved recycling facility.

PAINT-CONTAINING LEAD

Laboratory analytical results for the collected paint chip samples indicated the
presence of detectable levels of lead in each of the five paint chip samples collected.
Construction or renovation activities that result in disturbance of the lead-containing
paint in any concentration (i.e. via sanding, scraping, cutting, grinding, welding,
drilling, or other activities potentially generating airborne lead dust), must be
performed by a qualified contractor in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62, OSHAs
Safety and Health Regulations for Construction (Lead Exposure in Construction),
using lead-safe work practices.

330 7
th

9

APPENDIX A

Asbestos and Lead Laboratory Analytical Results and Chain of Custody
Documentation
Sample Description Appearance % Type
Asbestos Non-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
Advantage Environmental (AEC)
8610 Baltimore/Washington Blvd.
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
NE NEIGHBORHOOD LIBRARY/10-147
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
9/21/2010 Analysis Date:
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
10768 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705
Phone: (301) 937-5700 Fax: (301) 937-5701 Email: beltsvillelab@emsl.com
915PM-01-Skim
Coat
191009354-0001
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-2ND
FL READING RM
White
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other) 100%
915PM-01-Rough
Coat
191009354-0001A
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-2ND
FL READING RM
Brown
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Synthetic 5% Non-fibrous (other) 35%
Quartz 50%
Mica 10%
915PM-01-Joint
Compound
191009354-0001B
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-2ND
FL READING RM
Cream
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Mica 15%
915PM-02-Skim
Coat
191009354-0002
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-2ND
FL "LOCKER"
AREA
White
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-02-Rough
Coat
191009354-0002A
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-2ND
FL "LOCKER"
AREA
Brown/Gray
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Mica 10%
Quartz 40%
915PM-02-Joint
Compound
191009354-0002B
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-2ND
FL "LOCKER"
AREA
Cream
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Mica 20%
1
Joe Centifonti, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
Analyst(s)
Test Report PLM-7.21.0 Printed: 9/22/2010 8:20:26 AM
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL
bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be
used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a
problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. 10768 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville MD NVLAP Lab Code 200293-0
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
Initial report from 09/21/2010 12:55:02
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-03-Skim
Coat
191009354-0003
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-
CENTRAL 2ND
FL BY DESK
White
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-03-Rough
Coat
191009354-0003A
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-
CENTRAL 2ND
FL BY DESK
Gray
None Detected
this rough coat looks different from the others in this set
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Perlite 30%
Gypsum 60%
915PM-04-Skim
Coat
191009354-0004
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-2ND
FL EXHIBIT RM
White
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-04-Rough
Coat
191009354-0004A
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-2ND
FL EXHIBIT RM
Brown
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Quartz 25%
915PM-05-Skim
Coat
191009354-0005
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-2ND
FL CLST BY
RESTRM
White
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-05-Rough
Coat
191009354-0005A
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-2ND
FL CLST BY
RESTRM
Gray
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
2
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-06-Skim
Coat
191009354-0006
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-
MEZZ, DINING
RM
White
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-06-Rough
Coat
191009354-0006A
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-
MEZZ, DINING
RM
Gray
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-07-Skim
Coat
191009354-0007
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-
MEZZ, RESTRM
White
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-07-Rough
Coat
191009354-0007A
2-COAT PLSTR
(BRN/WHT)-
MEZZ, RESTRM
Gray
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-08-
Baseboard
191009354-0008
BLK BSBD W/
YELL MSTC-2ND
FL READING RM
Black
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-08-Mastic
191009354-0008A
BLK BSBD W/
YELL MSTC-2ND
FL READING RM
Yellow
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
3
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-09-
Baseboard
191009354-0009
BRN BSBD W/
BRN MSTC-2ND
FL BY DESK
Brown
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-09-Mastic
191009354-0009A
BRN BSBD W/
BRN MSTC-2ND
FL BY DESK
Brown
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Glass 5%
Wollastonite 3%
915PM-10-flooring
191009354-0010
BRN FLOORING
MAT'L OF
UNKNOWN SIZE-
2ND FL DESK
Brown
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-10-Mastic
191009354-0010A
BRN FLOORING
MAT'L OF
UNKNOWN SIZE-
2ND FL DESK
Brown/White
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-11-Floor Tile
191009354-0011
12X12 BEIGE
MOTTLE VT'S W/
BLK MSTC-BY
2ND FL ELEV
White
None Detected
non-detected, suggest EM
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-11-Mastic
191009354-0011A
12X12 BEIGE
MOTTLE VT'S W/
BLK MSTC-BY
2ND FL ELEV
Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile 10% Non-fibrous (other) 90%
4
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-12
191009354-0012
YELL
CARPET/MSTC-
2ND FL EXHIBIT
RM
Yellow
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-13-Floor
Tile 1
191009354-0013
12X12 TAN
MOTTLE VT'S W/
BRN MSTC-2ND
FL STAIRWELL
White
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-13-Mastic
191009354-0013A
12X12 TAN
MOTTLE VT'S W/
BRN MSTC-2ND
FL STAIRWELL
Yellow
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-13-Floor
Tile 2
191009354-0013B
12X12 TAN
MOTTLE VT'S W/
BRN MSTC-2ND
FL STAIRWELL
Brown
this is a second tile type that was mistaken in the chain for a brown mastic.....it has its own mastic
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-13-Mastic
191009354-0013C
12X12 TAN
MOTTLE VT'S W/
BRN MSTC-2ND
FL STAIRWELL
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile <1% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) 95%
915PM-14-Flooring
191009354-0014
BRN FLRING W/
BLK MSTC-2ND
FL STAIRWELL
BY ELEV
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
5
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-14-Mastic
191009354-0014A
BRN FLRING W/
BLK MSTC-2ND
FL STAIRWELL
BY ELEV
Black
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose 4% Non-fibrous (other) 96%
915PM-15-Linoleum
191009354-0015
BLK SHEET LINO-
2ND FL READING
RM BY
FIREPLACE
Black
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-15-paper
layer
191009354-0015A
BLK SHEET LINO-
2ND FL READING
RM BY
FIREPLACE
Brown
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-16-Floor Tile
191009354-0016
12X12 AQUA
MOTTLE VT'S W/
BLK MSTC ON
BOT TAN CRPT
Green
None Detected
non-detected, suggest EM
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-16-Black
mastic
191009354-0016A
12X12 AQUA
MOTTLE VT'S W/
BLK MSTC ON
BOT TAN CRPT
Black/Cream
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-16-Carpet
mastic
191009354-0016B
12X12 AQUA
MOTTLE VT'S W/
BLK MSTC ON
BOT TAN CRPT
Yellow
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
6
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-16--brwn
floor under black m
191009354-0016C
12X12 AQUA
MOTTLE VT'S W/
BLK MSTC ON
BOT TAN CRPT
Brown
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-17-Floor Tile
191009354-0017
9X9 VT'S W/ BLK
MSTC-2ND FL
READING RM
Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-17-Mastic
191009354-0017A
9X9 VT'S W/ BLK
MSTC-2ND FL
READING RM
Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-18
191009354-0018
GRAY CARPET
MSTC-2ND FL
READING RM
Gray
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-19-Floor Tile
191009354-0019
WHT 12X12 VT'S-
2ND FL READING
RM
White
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-19-Mastic
191009354-0019A
WHT 12X12 VT'S-
2ND FL READING
RM
Tan
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
7
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-20
191009354-0020
WHT HVAC DCT
MSTC
FIBERGLASS
DUCT INS-2ND
FL HATCH
Tan/White/Silver
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile 18% Glass 20%
Cellulose 15%
915PM-21
191009354-0021
RESIDUAL BLK
MSTC UNDER
CRPT-
THRESHOLD TO
2ND FL
Black
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-22
191009354-0022
SPRAY-ON
FIREPROOFING-
ATTIC HVAC
DUCTS/DEBRIS
Beige
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Glass 95% Non-fibrous (other) 5%
915PM-23
191009354-0023
SPRAY-ON
FIREPROOFING-
ATTIC HVAC
DUCTS/DEBRIS
Beige
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-24
191009354-0024
SPRAY-ON
FIREPROOFING-
ATTIC HVAC
DUCTS/DEBRIS
Beige
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
8
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-25
191009354-0025
SPRAY-ON
FIREPROOFING-
ATTIC HVAC
DUCTS/DEBRIS
Beige
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-26
191009354-0026
SPRAY-ON
FIREPROOFING-
ATTIC HVAC
DUCTS/DEBRIS
Gray
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-27
191009354-0027
SPRAY-ON
FIREPROOFING-
ATTIC HVAC
DUCTS/DEBRIS
Gray
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-28
191009354-0028
SPRAY-ON
FIREPROOFING-
ATTIC HVAC
DUCTS/DEBRIS
Gray
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-29
191009354-0029
PIPE END OF
CAP MSTC,
BEIGE-ATTIC
White/Beige
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile 15% Glass 20% Non-fibrous (other) 65%
915PM-30
191009354-0030
PIPE END OF
CAP MSTC,
BEIGE-ATTIC
Stop Positive (Not
Analyzed)
9
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-31
191009354-0031
PIPE END CAP
MSTC, BEIGE-
ATTIC MECH
SYSTEM
Stop Positive (Not
Analyzed)
915PM-32
191009354-0032
HVAC WHT
DUCT MSTC-
ATTIC MECH
SYSTEM
Tan/White/Silver
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile 3% Wollastonite 18% Non-fibrous (other) 79%
915PM-33
191009354-0033
HVAC WHT
DUCT MSTC-
ATTIC MECH
SYSTEM
Stop Positive (Not
Analyzed)
915PM-34
191009354-0034
WHT PIPE INS-
JANITOR'S CLST
BY SHOWER,
VERT PIPE
White
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-35
191009354-0035
WHT PIPE INS-
JANITOR'S CLST
BY SHOWER,
VERT PIPE
Stop Positive (Not
Analyzed)
915PM-36
191009354-0036
WHT PIPE INS-
JANITOR'S CLST
BY SHOWER,
VERT PIPE
Stop Positive (Not
Analyzed)
10
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-37
191009354-0037
RESIDUAL BLK
MSTC-MEZZ
BOOK SHELF
AREA
Black
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-38-Floor Tile
191009354-0038
LT GRN VT'S W/
BLK MSTC
UNDER TAN
MOTTLE VT'S-
MEZZ
Green
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-38-Mastic
191009354-0038A
LT GRN VT'S W/
BLK MSTC
UNDER TAN
MOTTLE VT'S-
MEZZ
Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-39
191009354-0039
INT WINDOW
CAULK, WHT -
MEZZ
Gray/White
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Mica 15%
915PM-40-Stair
Tread
191009354-0040
STAIRTREAD
MAT'L, BLK W/
BEIGE MSTC-
MEZZ
Black
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
11
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-40-Mastic
191009354-0040A
STAIRTREAD
MAT'L, BLK W/
BEIGE MSTC-
MEZZ
Yellow
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-41-flooring
191009354-0041
BLK FLRING W/
BLK
MSTC/WEAVE
TOP LYR-PER
OF 1ST FL
Black
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-41-Mastic
191009354-0041A
BLK FLRING W/
BLK
MSTC/WEAVE
TOP LYR-PER
OF 1ST FL
Tan/Black
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-42-Flooring
191009354-0042
BRN FLRING W/
BLK MSTC BOT
LYR-PER OF 1ST
FL
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-42-Mastic
191009354-0042A
BRN FLRING W/
BLK MSTC BOT
LYR-PER OF 1ST
FL
Black
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
12
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-43
191009354-0043
PAPER/FOIL
OVER
FIBERGLASS
PIPE INS-1ST FL
Silver/Cream
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose 40%
Glass 20%
915PM-44
191009354-0044
PAPER/FOIL
OVER
FIBERGLASS
PIPE INS-1ST FL
White/Silver/Cream
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose 50%
Glass 20%
915PM-45
191009354-0045
PAPER/FOIL
OVER
FIBERGLASS
PIPE INS-1ST FL
Silver/Cream
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-46-Floor Tile
191009354-0046
12X12 ROSE
VT'S W/ YELL
MSTC-TOP LYR
HALLWAY
Pink
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-46-Mastic
191009354-0046A
12X12 ROSE
VT'S W/ YELL
MSTC-TOP LYR
HALLWAY
Yellow
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-47-Floor Tile
191009354-0047
ROSE VT'S W/
YELL MSTC-BOT
LYR HALLWAY
OUTSIDE
Pink
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
13
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-47-Mastic
191009354-0047A
ROSE VT'S W/
YELL MSTC-BOT
LYR HALLWAY
OUTSIDE
Yellow
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-48
191009354-0048
AIRCELL PIPE
INS-HALLWAY
OUTSIDE
JANITOR'S CLST
Gray/Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile <1% Cellulose 50%
Synthetic 18%
915PM-49
191009354-0049
AIRCELL PIPE
INS-HALLWAY
OUTSIDE
JANITOR'S CLST
Gray
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile 4% Cellulose 50%
Synthetic 20%
915PM-50
191009354-0050
AIRCELL PIPE
INS-HALLWAY
OUTSIDE
JANITOR'S CLST
Stop Positive (Not
Analyzed)
915PM-51
191009354-0051
PIPE INS MSTC-
BSMT BOILER RM
White
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Glass 8%
Wollastonite 10%
915PM-52
191009354-0052
PIPE INS MSTC-
BSMT BOILER RM
Beige
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Wollastonite 10%
Glass 18%
14
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-53
191009354-0053
PIPE INS MSTC-
BSMT BOILER RM
White/Silver
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-54
191009354-0054
WINDOW
GLAZING-WHT,
PAINTED BRN
White/Black
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-55
191009354-0055
ROPE/WOVEN
BOILER GASKET-
BOILER,
EXPOSED SIDE
White/Red
None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-56
191009354-0056
RESIDUAL BLK
BSBD MSTC -
BSMT
CUSTODIAN'S
OFFICE
Black
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
915PM-57
191009354-0057
DOOR CAULK,
WHT-FRONT ENT
White
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose <1%
Synthetic <1%
915PM-58
191009354-0058
EXT WINDOW
GLAZING-FRONT
WINDOW
White
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
15
Analyst(s)
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
191009354
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
915PM-59
191009354-0059
ROOF FLASHING
TAR SEALANT-
REAR MECH
ROOF, FLAT
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
915PM-60
191009354-0060
ROOF CORE-
REAR MECH
ROOF, FLAT
Black
None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
16
Analyst(s)
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.
Alexis Turner (13)
Emily Baker (70)
Client Sample Description Concentration Lab ID Analyzed
Lead
Collected
191009406
Attn:
Phil Medenbach
#217
Jessup, MD 20794
Customer PO:
Received: 09/17/10 9:35 AM
10-147 N.E. NEIGHBORHOOD LIBRARY
Customer ID: ADVT63
Fax: (301) 776-1123 Phone: (301) 776-0500
Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B*/7000B)
Site: PAINT CHIP
0001 915PMPC1 0.037 % wt 9/20/2010 9/16/2010
Site: PAINT CHIP
0002 915PMPC2 0.18 % wt 9/20/2010 9/16/2010
Site: PAINT CHIP
0003 915PMPC3 0.42 % wt 9/20/2010 9/16/2010
Site: PAINT CHIP
0004 915PMPC4 0.057 % wt 9/20/2010 9/16/2010
Site: PAINT CHIP
0005 915PMPC5 0.67 % wt 9/20/2010 9/16/2010
Page 1 of 1
Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.21.0 Printed: 9/20/2010 10:38:18 AM
Reporting limit is 0.01 % wt. The QC data associated with these sample results included in this report meet the method quality control requirements, unless specifically indicated
otherwise. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected . This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written
approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities.
* slight modifications to methods applied Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Quality Control Data associated with this sample set is within acceptable limits,
unless otherwise noted
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. 10768 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville MD AIHA-LAP, LLC--ELLAP Lab 102891
330 7
th

10

APPENDIX B

Certification of Professional

A
E
R
O
S
O
L

M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G

&

A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
,

I
N
C
.

T
h
i
s

i
s

t
o

c
e
r
t
i
f
y

t
h
a
t

P
H
I
L
I
P

c
.

h
a
s

m
e
t

t
h
e

a
t
t
e
n
d
a
n
c
e

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s

a
n
d

s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
l
y

c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d

t
h
e

c
o
u
r
s
e

e
n
t
i
t
l
e
d

4
-
f
{
o
u
r

E
P
A

A
f
{
E
R
A

I
n
a
p
e
a
-
o
r

R
e
f
Y
e
#
t
e
r

F
o
r
A
c
c
r
e
d
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

U
n
d
e
r

T
S
C
A

T
i
t
l
e

1
1
.

9
/

9
/

2
0
1
0

9
/
9
/
2
0
1
1

R
O
N

R
O
M
I
N
S
K
I

C
o
u
r
s
e

D
a
t
e

E
x
a
m

D
a
t
e

E
x
p
i
r
a
t
i
o
n

D
a
t
e

P
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r

1
0
9
3
0
2

V
A
1
0
9
3
0
2

E

R
U
S
H

B
A
R
N
E
T
T

C
e
r
l
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

N
o
.

V
i
r
g
i
n
i
a

C
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

N
o
.

C
o
u
r
s
e

D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r

1
3
3
1

A
s
h
t
o
n

R
o
a
d

P
.
O
.

B
o
x

6
4
6

M
D

2
1
0
7
0

P
:

4
1
0
-
6
8
4
-
3
3
2
7

F
:

4
1
0
-
6
8
4
-
3
7
2
4

w
w
w
.
a
m
a
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
.
c
o
m

C
o
u
r
s
e

D
a
t
e

1
0
9
3
0
0

A
E
R
O
S
O
L

M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G

&

A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
,

I
N
C
.

T
h
i
s

i
s

t
o

c
e
r
t
i
f
y

t
h
a
t

r
O
M

I
I
I

h
a
s

m
e
t

t
h
e

a
t
t
e
n
d
a
n
c
e

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s

a
n
d

s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
l
y

c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d

t
h
e

c
o
u
r
s
e

e
n
t
i
t
l
e
d

4
-
f
{
o
u
r
E
P
A

A
f
{
E
R
A

F
o
r

A
c
c
r
e
d
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

U
n
d
e
r

T
S
C
A

T
i
t
l
e

I
I
.

9
/
9
/
2
0
1
0

9
/
9
/
2
0
1
1

R
O
N

R
O
M
I
N
S
K
I

E
x
a
m

D
a
t
e

E
x
p
i
r
a
t
i
o
n

D
a
t
e

P
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r

V
A
l
0
9
3
0
0

E
.

R
U
S
H

B
A
R
N
E
T
T

C
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

N
o
.

V
i
r
g
i
n
i
a

C
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

N
o
.

C
o
u
r
s
e

D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r

1
3
3
1

A
s
h
t
o
n

R
o
a
d

P
.
O
.

B
o
x

6
4
6

H
a
n
o
v
e
"

M
D

2
1
0
7
6

P
:

4
1
0
-
6
8
4
-
3
3
2
7

F
:

4
1
0
-
6
8
4
-
3
7
2
4

w
w
w
.
a
m
a
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
.
c
o
m

DCPL-2011-R-0007 Attachment J.12 Existing Building Condition Survey

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Descrizione originale:

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

DCPL-2011-R-0007 Attachment J.12 Existing Building Condition Survey

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Northeast Neighborhood Library

District of Columbia Public Library

Potrebbero piacerti anche