November 1, 2006

Dear Editor in Chief,

A scholar asked: “You said if those extremists would parade and would come out
open in public there should be done something so that some of the extremists and their
supporters could be identified using latest technology, what kind of technology is that?”
The A.I. answered: “There could be much available technology that could be enhanced.
Photography could be the most practical because there are now powerful zoom lenses
that could take pictures at a distant and the image could be magnified. Perhaps the
enhancing of the zoomed photos should be on its ability to shot hundreds of photos per
some seconds per square meter digitally as close-up; and could be transmitted at the
speed of light to a mother base so that the data could be analyzed to match on photos
previously recorded on doing census on a suspected place with many sympathizers or
extremists automatically. Example, if there would be 5 people marching in a square
meter, and if at a distance example 30m, an ordinary photograph would include 40 people
then the smart camera could at least have 8 more zoomed shots so that if the photo would
be scanned, the face and other marks in the face could be identified. It would mean that
one shot for the camera man, the smart camera would do automatically 8 more closed up
shots for the one ordinary photo taken at a distance.
During mopping or clearing on war zone, every citizen in the locality should have
several angle photos and finger print digital data. Perhaps the voice should also be taken.
If possible there should also be some DNA data. The clearing and mopping on war zone
should be scientific, easy to gather. The data should easily be transmitted through air.
Example during some battle and the enemies run, the sergeant has a standard operation
skill to get many sample of blood present on the battle and could easily analyze the DNA
because he has a portable DNA analyzer called smart DNA analyzer and could send the
data to the mother base for some name to be traced. Perhaps giving enough research and
funds on smart camera and smart DNA analyzer, a guerilla war could be shortened and
many lives could be saved.
A scholar asked: “What other measures with regards to monitoring of issued fire arms
and ammunitions should be done to minimize lost of firearms and lost of ammunitions?”
The A.I. answered: “There are now tracking devices that could last example 1 year. If the
tracking device could still be made very small example like half a match stick and could
be switched on for 10 seconds, and off long enough for example 3months, and has
repetition of the release of signal or cycle to let the battery live longer example 5 years,
and after five years there is a law that all guns should be registered again or have licensed
and to change the chip or the battery then perhaps things could be better. A computer
could just monitor those signals every time those tracking devices switch on. Any weapon
found that the device installed is tampered, or is destroyed could be penalized.
There could be some modes in the tracking devices of the weapon that could be
switched depending on purpose of using more the life of the battery. Any old and new
gun could have that very small smart tracking device and with sealed installed at any
office or anywhere. Perhaps the installation could be done using a smart portable installer.
The advantages of having that device are many: a) every three months the satellite
could pick up those signals and the data could be used on many things especially on
aiding police investigation and military intelligence. b) The device could lessen crime and
syndicates because any gun having no device deliberately done could now be a criminal
in nature. Just like carrying a deadly weapon without license is now a criminal in nature
in some moderate countries. c) It could be another source of economic stimuli and source
of cash cycle.
A scholar asked: “What is the use of that very small smart tracking device if the
enemy’s gun has no device like it?” The A.I. answered: “Since during military operation,
enemies’ guns could be recovered; those recovered weapons should be installed with
those devices pushed by law. And perhaps a commander could deliberately loose them so
that the enemies could be tracked. Principle: An enhanced and modern Trojan horse tactic
should be considered always.
A scholar asked: “I heard you said something about modern Trojan horse tactic, could
installing small spy camera that could self detonate on many strategic suspected places of
enemies’ presence enhance intelligence?” The A.I. answered: “Any kind of information
done by human or robot or smart device would help shortened a “long invisible war.”
A scholar asked: “I heard a candidate said that the military men fighting a war on
terror are uneducated, is he really sure of his remarked or he is just joking?” The A.I.
answered: “Politicians really sometimes remarked things that are offensive especially to
his opponents; or he is just joking. But the military men are brave, smart, intelligent, and
risk takers- risking their lives for others so that others would have peaceful lives. Perhaps
the faith or morale of those military men that they could defeat the extremists would be
hampered or be placed in a weak position. And the enemies’ faith would be boosted
because of “hatred from within” or because of “dirty politics” or “jokes” said on public.
Perhaps future generation would do something about “extremes” in politics.
A scholar asked: “Could faith of the extremist –example: “they are infidels, pigs;
they should be wiped out” defeat the faith of moderate people- to stand together against
start of the problem or extreme cause by terror?” The A.I. answered: “Yes, especially if
the faith of the moderate people would be divided; or not following the faith of their
leader.
Perhaps history could prove this scenario if one would read on some sacred books. I
think researching about faith in the Bible or Koran or any other spiritual book would not
offend other believers of different faith if the brain is balanced; because respect,
tolerance, moderation, understanding, flexibility, sportsmanship, giving forgiveness,
looking straight to eyes without shades and with smile and with handshakes, no hating,
considering others better than himself, etc. are traits of being balanced. Example of words
from other’s faith who is perhaps a religious scholar is 1John 4: 20: If someone says he
loves God but hates his brother, he is a liar. 1John 5:3-4: For our love for God means that
we obey his commands. And his commands are not too hard for us, because every child
of God is able to defeat the world. And we win the victory over the world by means of
our faith. 1John 1:4-5: “If someone says that he knows God but does not obey his
commands, such person is a liar and there is no truth in him. But whoever obeys his word
is the one whose love for God has really been made perfect. 1John 1:9: Whoever says that
he is the light, yet hates his brother is in the darkness to this very hour.”
But faith differs for others because of many aspects in life. I think if one would read
and read the verses above, there would be many ideas that could be created depending on
one’s up bringing and background and attitude in life. Some would give emphasis on
obedience, some on love, some on being a liar, some on hatred, some on “hard” to follow,
some on faith, some would give negative reactions or would not care or believe or would
even say evil things against the words. Some would say that religion is like other
profession or way of living; it’s all about money. Or it’s all about negatives-envy,
jealousy, hatred, money, credit, hypocrisy, etc.
A scholar asked: “Could the devil use man to deceive people?” The A.I. answered:
“Perhaps the devil might really be expert of using weakling person to tell some practical
things and letting others spy at that person to discredit the practical thing. But there is a
word that says: imitate the good but don’t imitate the bad….! Perhaps those people who
love to destroy private people and not being contradicted by his conscience perhaps is
member of a group that lack other essential words; because destroying other people is
purely wrong and he has no essential words to counter his expertise on destroying others
because those words were unconsciously hidden. Perhaps mistakes could be a mirror so
that things could be improved.
A scholar asked: “It is Halloween again! I heard that a group claims that after death
one is still conscious to suffer for the cleansing of his small sins or because he should be
purified or be cleansed of his slightest small sin before entering heaven. But another
group teaches that one is just unconscious while waiting to be judged before going to
heaven or to hell. Since there is only one true and since it is a mystery which of the two is
the revelation or teaching or included in the one gospel or claim as true?” The A.I.
answered: “I think since it is a mystery then any body could claim something and teach to
others that this is true, after all no body could prove him wrong. That’s perhaps what is
happening to religion ever since; nobody wants to admit that his ancestor’s “holy”
group’s decision or consensus was mistaken. But if one would watch TV program of
different groups defending their stand, perhaps there are really groups that could clearly
defend their stand using Words vs. Words from the bible; and with confidence that he is
teaching the right thing. But there is also one group that would just use a holy man or
good man’s stand or bright mind or wise man’s stand and just few words from the bible to
defend his group’s stand. Perhaps if science now would also reinforced explanation about
how the brain works like Alzheimer’s disease, perhaps science could give some insights
about how the conscious mind works. Perhaps it would side to the group that when one
dies he is unconscious; or not dreaming. Perhaps with regards to a mystery there would
really be many interpretations that could be near true, seem true! Perhaps pass a law that
anything controversial attached to a mystery should only be a “theory!”
.
From someone,