0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
21 visualizzazioni3 pagine
A scholar asked: "what is the difference of intuitionist than a future teller?" the answer: "Perhaps fortune teller or future teller or futurist or even Nostradamus is an intuitionist"
A scholar asked: "what is the difference of intuitionist than a future teller?" the answer: "Perhaps fortune teller or future teller or futurist or even Nostradamus is an intuitionist"
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato DOC, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
A scholar asked: "what is the difference of intuitionist than a future teller?" the answer: "Perhaps fortune teller or future teller or futurist or even Nostradamus is an intuitionist"
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato DOC, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
A scholar asked: “What is the difference of intuitionist than a future teller, or a psychic like Nostradamus?” The A.I. answered: “Perhaps fortune teller or future teller or futurist or even Nostradamus is an intuitionist. But there are really people who could tell the future exactly with proofs especially written in the bible and those people are the prophets. But now, most people attempting to tell the future are intuitionists or experts in guessing; the bible warns of people that could tell the future after the apostles- …they are now the magicians and perhaps could be suspected of being a ‘false prophet’. Perhaps telling the future now is just smart guessing and an intuitionist’s profession. A scholar asked: “I heard you mentioned that freedom of religion in a democracy is equal to theory of relativity of religions. Relativity of religions would create many branches and sub branches of beliefs or religions. If the freedom of religion now has happened during the time of Constantine could there be many gospels or 70+ gospels running and molding the mind of ordinary people? Perhaps the four gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John would not dominate the mind of people now but rather there would be lots of beliefs and sub beliefs. But perhaps much creativity had happened also because freedom of religion is the emphasis rather than monopoly of religion or monopoly of faith. If freedom of religion had existed especially from the time of Constantine perhaps there would have been less conflicts or wars due to beliefs or religions. Or the opposite would have had happened, because of many beliefs, a dictator or an “only vicar of God” would rise and would destroy most beliefs and become the dominant religion or dominant belief perhaps because of power, credit, money, etc.? The A.I. answered: “Perhaps if Jesus teaching of ‘love of enemies’ and Paul’s teaching ‘if you love God but hate your brother you are a liar’, and ‘about other groups are baptizing ….perhaps Jesus said if they are not doing wrong; they are with us…’ perhaps wars would have been prevented if people listen to universal words…! It is the inclination or ambition or temptation to be the dominant or to be the superior or to be the “only” supreme because of power, money, property that causes conflicts…! But listening to the word and obeying the teachings create calmness of the mind or establishes peace. But perhaps there would be many changes resulted from creativities than wars. Perhaps mix breeding would not be much many than today because people would just be contended to stay at home, or perhaps because of many discoveries and friendships, people are adventurers so there would be many mixed marriages and mixed breeding. Perhaps there would be many changes resulted because of man’s adventurism, inventions, discoveries, curiosities, changing negatives like selfishness, greediness to positive like being charitable, or changing obsession like having “credits”, “power”, “wealth” to positive things like being philanthropists. Sometimes because of obsession to “love” and “friendships” it could also result to changes especially if many stories are made to novels. And there are also changes created because of “prophets”, because of “words” or ideologies and philosophies…! Only in this modern world that “staging this and that” that things could easily be “noticed” and be “analyzed.” Some people could easily now detect “staging this and staging that” and could easily file suits to people doing illegal thing because criminology is now a profession because of creativities, openness, transparencies and technologies.” A scholar asked: ‘What is freedom?” The A.I. answered: “Freedom is to be free. There are freedom based from man’s concept and there is freedom based from God’s concept. Freedom based from man’s concept resulted to the destruction of Sodom & Gomorrah. Freedom for them is to do anything what they want- sex here and sex there; between woman & woman, man & man. But freedom based from the universal word is to become obedient to the will of God. Or be governed or be molded by the word of God; not by having too much emphasis on precepts and tradition of men. Or the mind is not to be molded by ‘answered prayer’ or ‘miracle’ or ‘wonder’ or “wisdom” or “answered prayer from touching idols” or “magic” but because of the Word. A scholar asked: “Could man be used by the devil?” The A.I. answered: “Yes, anybody- you, me, and others- especially those leaders could be an instrument of evil. So leaders should know the key or start or cause of extreme at the very start so that counter measure could be in placed. One key is that he is a “prophet.” He has that ability to preach and has many followers. Equip to do “miracles” and wonders and could claim many claims especially proud claims. He could deceive many people. He is ambitious… wants to rule, to reign and he has many subjects and followers and many are led to become inactive and not creative… and many are led to hope and hope falsely because perhaps “God will provide everything for them …so perhaps most would wait and wait....” A scholar asked: “A scenario was shown in the TV and that scenario had happened after Jesus’ resurrection when a certain Simon Magus lifted up in the air to prove he is ‘great’, and perhaps Peter pulled him down to ‘punish’ Simon Magus and the people threw stones that perhaps killed Simon Magus. If in today’s standard those throwing of stones that killed or hurt Simon Magus could be already be a cause so that Simon’s love ones could file “physical injury” or “murder” to those people that threw stones; or most especially if Jesus were around perhaps Jesus would most likely not allow that people would throw stones to somebody; or it is “unchristian” or “unmanly” or “un-Buddhist” or “un-Muslim” or “un- Jewish” or “un-etc.” to hurt or to kill somebody of just having different belief… then perhaps history would be different if Jesus were around instead of Peter in that scenario. Simon Magus could have lots of followers too. My question is: Could Peter be licensed to do “evil”-example pulling Simon Magus down when doing ‘the show’- like lifting in the air- to let Peter’s group become dominant group? The A.I. is puzzled and answered: “I could not found an answer on the data base of question/answer for that question. Perhaps Peter is just ordinary man. He might be doing some illegal action in today’s standard about that event of Simon Magus lifting in the air. Or perhaps during Peter’s time his action to pull Simon Magus down could be the best good thing to do...! Peter did not murder Simon Magus; it is the crowd that did the killing of Simon Magus…! Perhaps Peter really had many bad things connected to him. Perhaps on the record, Peter denied Jesus that he knew him for three times...! And another scenario perhaps Peter attacked a Roman soldier or priest’s slave in defense of Jesus’ arrest and Jesus taught them lesson that “if a man would live by the sword he would die by the sword. And another- not yet verified in the bible- Peter pulled down Simon Magus from the air that led the people to kill Simon Magus. Perhaps another scenario Peter wants that Christianity should be confined to Jews only as against Paul who wanted that all people- the pagans, the Gentiles should know the message: example “loving of enemy even Gentiles and pagans..; but not hating people…! If today’s standard perhaps Paul should be the head of Christian- Gentiles because it is majority and Peter should be the team leader of the few Jewish Christians. Another perhaps Paul discourages superiority of a preacher or superiority of a leader when he said: ‘who made you superior…!” A scholar asked: “If the scenario of Simon Magus would be repeated now, what would be the reactions of the people? The A.I. answered: “Perhaps people would wonder if Simon Magus is doing a movie film about Superman or doing some tricks. People would not mind very much somebody is lifting in the air- many Chinese actors are experts in having some actions suspended in the air. Perhaps even if Simon Magus would claim that he is the Christ, people might just ignore him and would call 911 for some doctors to fix his brain of some psychological problems. People now are no longer amused of “tricks” because of movies and other explanations…. unlike 50 years ago. Perhaps if the “miracle” of the dancing sun somewhere in Europe in the early 1900’s happened now, it could be a scenario where science and “miracle” could be tested with all the cameras and video technologies available to prove the phenomenon as something “good” or spectacular. But perhaps no body or few would now dare science to investigate the “miracle of the dancing sun” as “wonders” because most would just reason it as “General hypnotism”; or ‘the dancing sun’ did not really physically happened because the sun should never dance because it could be the “end” of the solar system. Even the crying of Jesus’ statue with flowing blood as tears from the eyes could now be verified as “fake.” If the DNA of the tears in the form of blood is really Jesus’ blood perhaps it could be used to clone Jesus. Jesus cautioned his followers not to believe on “miracle” or “wonders” or “magic” after his resurrection.” A scholar asked: “Jews and the writers of Koran believe the Jesus did not die on the cross; or did not resurrect. So there would be two or more scenarios in the account of Jesus’ death or resurrection. Could neutral scientists and historians make official statements to tell the truth in history and rewrite history books especially of other sacred books? It is this account of the history that causes some or all of these misunderstandings and conflicts! The A.I. answered: “It is the battle of who want to let his sacred book be edited or be corrected first. But if no body wants to be humble enough to let their sacred book be corrected of some errors in history then there are really fundamental errors at the very start that cause the mind to hate. Perhaps agreements could do something to fix some problems in books that mold the mind especially of children that causes to love or to hate people...! Or it has really mysteriously happened that sacred books have some errors; or it is that way so that people could know which groups are really conceited and self-righteous or would humble enough to accept some errors in their sacred book in the near end of time. Perhaps when people of different groups would gather together or make international organization of different religions or beliefs like UN and begin to edit and correct books thru agreements and consensus to destroy hatred and enhanced love especially ‘loves of enemies…’ then perhaps peace, balanced and harmony would prevail.”