Nove

mber 28, 2005

Dear Editor in Chief,
Then the scholar asks if the free will of man is the architect or the result of
history of man; or perhaps prophesy written in the bible are just coincidence; or
others might not happen. The A.I. remarks: since freewill is not absolute, it is like
tolerance, and there is always room or space for some actions that could be allowed
to happen but not damaging or altering the future course of history. Even our
breathing would stop if God allow it to stop; it is like the story of Ananias- the
heart stop because of corruption in the church financial aspect during the time of
Apostle Peter. Or, the other way around that there is really absolute free will. God
doesn’t intervene with the out come of the future; the prophesy is just the result of
the “replaying” of the recorded unedited filming of reality but because God could
travel through time so he could prophesy the “future” by just “rewinding” the
event. Perhaps prophesying is like a man after watching the movie he is now
telling some account of the movie to the people who are about to watch the movie
without telling them that he watched already the movie but he just want to
“impress” others that what he is telling are going to happen; or perhaps it like the
movie “back to the future.”
Perhaps human freewill is not absolute. Perhaps God is like a film director
where the actor has all the leeway to act what he wants but if the director feels that
it should not be done or be part of the scene the director decided to edit it. Perhaps
he could take another shot. Then perhaps predestination could be possible as what
had been described about some stories in the book of Genesis. Perhaps on some
occasion predestination is true but not true to all. Others extremist teachers pick up
some words example predestination and focus only to those words or exemptions
and not considering other words so his teachings create misunderstanding and
sometimes conflicts. Perhaps these teachers are on the extremism side.
Perhaps to play according with the rules or programs of the Ultimate Director is
the good way; and so also to enjoy life to the most. Example on specifics like how
to play according to the rule on how to enjoy riding the motor bike: One should
read first the manufacturer’s manuals, have drivers license, and learn the rules and
laws of the locality. But if one would go to the city without much skill in driving;
or without driver’s license, one has a great chance to meet an accident or be
reprimanded. So the key to enjoy life is to study first the rules especially the
specifics. Then the scholar ask if the Ultimate Creator or God who knows every
thing seconds before a bad thing happens could he pre-empt things not to happen
so that any bad thing would not happen and there would be peace. Or if God is
good and if he knows that Satan is the brain or the master mind of all these evils
why aim first the one who is giving the order? The A.I. explains that Satan is just
words opposite of the universal word; it is the free will that makes things happens.
And God does not want human to loose his free will because man would no longer
be human instead a robot or a tool or a machine. The scholar ask if human is
perfect and does not do anything wrong or already like a machine perhaps being
human is no longer human; or instead, it is more of a machine.
Then the scholar asks the A.I. if corrupt official doesn’t really know that
corruption is bad. So the A.I. talks again about corruption. The A.I. said the truth
is: at first, the conscience condemns his bad action even if just one dollar is
involved; or stolen. But sometimes the official contradicts his conscience by
saying: others are doing it clean and they are becoming rich! It’s like weather; now
they have chance to do it, later they don’t …! The corrupt person thinks that if he
has the opportunity to do it…why not…; others would surely do it if given a
chance. The motto is: It is just weather…opportunity knocks once- when it’s
gone…it is gone! The A.I. remarks that the enemy of a corrupt mind is his
conscience- his friends are words that kill the conscience!
The A.I. continue to give his own opinion taken from books about words that
might cause people to be crooked: Perhaps an expert on giving gift to some
politicians and expert on contradicting his conscience called person “A.” is
victimized by the word “only.” So, perhaps person “A” would attempt to befriend a
new elected innocent young politician “B” because “A’s former contacts had been
defeated in the last election. For “A”, befriending a new elected official is an art
and teaching the innocent politician about “business strategies” means lot of
“blessings”. And when there is bonding and trust developed, “A” would propose
this and that. One of the many favorite things that “A” has expertise is to teach the
innocent politician that all is “weather…weather; or it’s our time now”. There are
many words that “A” wants to teach “B” likes: a) appoint this and that. b) Promote
this and transfer that c) Let him retire and place this “good” man here; or be
creative in making networks, pipes, connections; “an ounce of loyalty is more than
a pound of cleverness.” But behind the mind of “A”…the ability to make
“connections” is an art or “blessings”. Person “A” even offers offerings to his God
to make his expertise be more refine and be safer! The word “only” could let “A”
be experts example on: a) having dummy construction license by just borrowing
active license in exchange for future cooked project; or some percentage, e) having
dummy business or contractor’s licenses during open bidding where the innocent
bidding committee personnel seem “impressed” of the outcome that nothing is
going fishy, f) having connection inside: example there is a bidding that all
innocent hard working people were really trying to do everything to win even
using cam recording during pre-bidding conference and praying hard. But after the
bidding because of some technicalities and maneuvering inside, a defeated
contractor with dummy license wins by technicalities but deep in it, the new
winner is “A”; because “A” has secret juicy agreement with “B” because of
“words” or “spirits” perhaps because of the power of word “Only”.
However the A.I. remarks that to check and balance the word “only” perhaps
another words like “also” opposite of the word “only” should enter the mind so
that there would be a new struggle or the conscience is stimulated to function well
again. But the scholar reacted that if “also” is the balancing word for example
“only” untouchable then many would become “also” untouchable. Then the A.I.
admits its mistakes and reprogrammed itself and perhaps corrects the mistake that
the word example “also” untouchable could do to damage the computer program.
So when “only” is used to describe a negative thing, the word “only” is changed to
“should not be” and erase the words “is the.” Example “A” is the “only” powerful,
untouchable, corrupt contractor!-extreme! To check the extreme, the wordings
should be changed to: “A” should not be powerful, untouchable, corrupt
contractor-balanced!
Then the A.I. comment: This “only” or “also” negative case is not always the
case. There would be other techniques in balancing any extreme like retrieval of
question/answer data -example: Perhaps just pass a law that there would be always
three sets of teams for bidding committee even if each team has no experience yet
about how to conduct bidding as long as each member of the team has some
common sense. Or each team has checklist of possible maneuvering techniques
and the specifics on how to avoid those maneuvering are laid in prints. During the
time of bidding conference, the raffle of the three bidding committee teams would
be conducted, so that any secret business dealing conducted to any of the bidding
committee member could have a chance to be raffled, changed, stopped; or be
replaced.
Some of the A.I. suggestions or keys are found on commercially available
books on how to combat manipulation by “only” untouchable, corrupt people and
here are some quotations or words derive from them: How would the checklist of
keys guide the mind of the member of the bidding committee sense that there is a
maneuvering happening: a) Perhaps, one key is that the attendance or people
attended “before the pre bidding- conference” are using letter of authorization of
the managers, of the engineers, of the owners. Perhaps the participants in the pre-
bid conference are just the secretaries, drivers, paid people just to have attendance,
etc. b) the people attending the bidding conference are having difficulties in asking
questions; seem not well prepared about the documents. And there is just one
person who monopolizes the knowledge or the problem; and most probably the
person who is knowledgeable or does most of the talking would win the bidding. c)
Granting that during the conference all contractors were genuine but there is
someone who would try to persuade the participants to give way to him for a
certain price. The price is example 3% of the total cost of the project divided by all
the participants. Each participant would just let his bid become higher and be
defeated in the bidding and the one who bought them has the lowest bid so he wins
the bid. Perhaps to balance the loop hole is to let a spy by using cell phone
technology to check any person wanting to buy the bid. Or give a reward to
somebody who would report that someone is trying to buy the bids of the entire
participant; or to cook the bidding procedures. d) their bottom line is cooked the
bid and all are paid and just wait for some time so that one could also do the
cooking vs. let bid be open and all would dive even not to have profit and if there
is future problem all could be fixed under a new agreement. Their idea of bidding
is on the extremes of negative and positive; anywhere you go it is wrong; theirs is
the “only” right way-cooked the bidding.
Then the scholar ask the A.I to give some further explanation about a)
crocodile syndrome-excessive free market mind set vs. b) Socialism mind set- vs.
c) ant’s teamwork or automation mind set favoring the smart people only vs. d)
well orchestrated balanced free or world economy or balanced Globalization! For:
a) it is the traditional where the talented, the lucky, the bright, the strongest gets the
most and the weak the least. For b) it is very ideal but in reality people are just
pushed not to give its best and people are just waiting for others to do the job; so
nothing is done, c) Smart people are using automation for their advantages but not
considering those that are left behind d) it is considering almost all aspects of
humanity world wide- good teachings, law, the blessing of automation where the
very rich become smart charitable; and the poor becomes more cooperative and
grateful and thankful; or the computer systems could also compete with smart
human to protect weak human from the powerful humans. Balancing does not
mean always averaging or moderation or flexible, it is sometimes progressive or
always one step forward or ahead in almost all aspects; or what is left behind is
being pulled up in a new hierarchy or level. It is letting the smartest human become
number one as long as he is also a smart charitable man either through law,
technology or/and good teachings so that those left behind are pulled up.
It is like a tank design to have a) armor b) mobile ability c) weapons d)
convenient & comforts to the operators, e) could easily be fabricated. If the
thickness of the armoring would be increased the weight would be affected and its
mobility. The designer would see to it that the designs are all considered to be the
number one tank among other tanks. Perhaps governments should also be like a
tank designer. If country “A” is good as the armoring make it the best armoring.
And if country “B” is good to be its engine for having the best mobility be it that
way…and so on! There is one ultimate designer and all are cooperating so that the
world could have the best management, designer to let human enjoy life to the
most according to good teachings, and protected by law or the majority! Rather if
country “A” is good as the armor, country “B” want also to be the good armor; and
so on an so forth; crab mentality mind set- there is no ultimate grand design to
balance the world. So balanced globalization is the key for the world to enjoy life
to the most based from good teachings, blessed by the majority of the whole world
and help by automation!

From someone who might

be dreaming