Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Evaluation of a qualitative method usually involves comparison between a new method and an established method to determine if the same results are obtained using both methods. The problem with comparison between qualitative methods is that it may be difficult to determine which result is correct and which is not correct. Any discordant samples should be repeated by both methods for confirmation. A fourfold table can be constructed to compare the two methods. The table, as shown on the right, contains two variables (the new method and the established method), each with two levels of variables (positive and negative). The calculation shown below the table can be used to evaluate the correlation. Acceptable correlation is often considered to be > .95, or 95%. In the example that is shown below the calculation formula, the measurement of agreement appears to be satisfactory. The two discrepant results in the example may be attributed to chance variation between methods. The two discrepant results could also be explained, for example, by a difference in test sensitivity. Reviewing the manufacturers' package inserts may reveal differences between test sensitivity and specificity. For a qualitative procedure, sensitivity is not the detection limit, as it is with quantitative tests. Rather, it is the point at which a test is considered positive (the cutoff). The specificity of the test is the ability of the method to accurately report a negative value when the test is indeed negative (below the cutoff).