Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Company Introduction
A longtime leader in the cement manufacturing industry, Fauji Cement Company, headquartered in Islamabad, operates a cement plant at Jhang Bahtar, Tehsil Fateh Jang, District Attock in the province of Punjab. The company has a strong and longstanding tradition of service, reliability, and quality that reaches back more than 10 years. Sponsored by Fauji Foundation the Company was incorporated in Rawalpindi in 1992. The cement plant operating in the Fauji Cement is one of the most efficient and best maintained in the country and has an annual production capacity of 1.165 million tons of cement. The quality portland cement produced at this plant is the best in the Country and is preferred the construction of highways, bridges, commercial and industrial complexes, residential homes, and a myriad of other structures needing speedy strengthening bond, fundamental to Pakistan's economic vitality and quality of life.
Company History
Fauji Cement Company Limited was sponsored by Fauji Foundation and incorporated as a public limited company on 23 November 1992. It obtained the Certificate of Commencement of Business on 22 May 1993. The company has been setup with primary objective of producing and selling Ordinary Portland Cement. For the purpose of selection of sound process technology, state of the art equipment, civil design and project monitoring, Local and Foreign Consultants were engaged. The company entered into a contract with World renowned cement plant manufacturers M/s F.L. Smith to carry out design , engineering, procurement, manufacturing, delivery, erection, installation, testing and commissioning at site of a new, state of the art, cement plant including all auxiliary and ancillary equipment, complete in all respects for the purpose of manufacturing a minimum of 3,000 tdp clinker and corresponding quantity of Ordinary Portland Cement as per Pakistan/British Standard Specifications. The contract came into force on January, 1, 1994. Physical work on the project started in August 1994. Commissioning activities started in May 1997 generally remained smooth and trouble free, which enabled first batch of clinker production on 26 September 1997 followed by cement production in November 1997. Subsequently in 2005, the Plant Capacity has been raised to 3,700 tons of clinker per day i.e. 3,885 tons of cement per day.
Corporate Profile
Board of Directors
Lt Gen Syed Arif Hasan, HI (M) (Retd) Lt Gen Javed Alam Khan, HI (M) (Retd) Mr. Qaiser Javed Mr. Riyaz H. Bokhari, IFU Brig Arif Rasul SI (M) (Retd) Qureshi, Brig Rahat Khan, SI (M) (Retd) Dr. Nadeem Inayat Brig Liaqat Ali (Retd) Brig Munawar Ahmed Rana (Retd) Brig Shabbir Ahmed (Retd) Chairman Chief Executive Director Director Director Director Director Director Director Secretary
Audit Committee
Mr. Qaiser Javed Mr. Riyaz H. Bokhari Brig Rahat Khan (Retd) Dr. Nadeem Inayat Brig Shabbir Ahmed (Retd) President Member Member Member Secretary
Technical Committee
Brig Rahat Khan (Retd) Brig Arif Rasul Qureshi (Retd) Brig Liaqat Ali (Retd) President Member Member 2
Secretary
Mission Statement
FCCL while maintaining its leading position in quality of cement and through greater market outreach will build up and improve its value addition with a view to ensuring optimum returns to the shareholders.
Our Vision
To transform FCCL into a role model cement manufacturing Company fully aware of generally accepted principles of corporate social responsibilities engaged in nation building through most efficient utilization of resources and optimally benefiting all stake holders while enjoying public respect and goodwill.
Our Objective
The company has been set up with the primary objective of producing and selling ordinary Portland cement. The finest quality of Cement is available for all type of customers whether for Dams, Canals, industrial structures, highways, commercial or residential needs using latest state of the art dry process Cement manufacturing process.
Our Values
Customers: We listen to our customers and improve our product to meet their present and future needs.
People: Our success depends upon high performing people working together in a safe and healthy work place where diversity, development and team work are valued and recognized.
Accountability: We expect superior performance and results. Our leaders set clear goals and expectations, are supportive and provide and seek frequent feed back.
Citizen Ship: We support the communities where we do business, hold ourselves to the highest standards of ethical conduct and environment responsibility, and communicate openly with FCCL people and the public.
Financial Responsibility: We are prudent and effective in the use of the resources entrusted to us.
Product
Ordinary Portland Cement
Clinker 94-95%
Gypsum 5-6%
Quality Policy
EMPHASIS ON 100% CUSTOMER SATISFACTION. 100 % EFFECTIVE UTILIZATION OF PLANT CAPACITIES. EMPHASIS ON 100% TOP QUALITY HUMAN RESOURCES. EMPHASIS ON 100% QUALITY CULTURE.
Factory Overhead
Rent Rate & Taxes Fuel Consumed Power Consumed Depreciation Other F.OH Total F.OH Total Manufacturing Cost Work in Process Cost of goods manufactured Finished goods Cost of Sales
15,408 2,933 12,117 7,917 38,375 7,992 1,209 1,149 1,737 2,930 15,017 0 122,215
21,817 2,053 1,655 14,542 40,067 12,011 1,144 1,850 2,296 3,116 20,417 0 680,341
21,835 3,320 3,148 13,991 42,294 11,085 1,172 2,590 2,101 4,386 21,334 40,493 977,456
35,663 4,769 3,490 22,706 66,628 21,388 1,112 2,376 2,866 3,953 31,695 94,127 1,998,662
42,439 3,487 2,281 23,095 71,302 20,651 1,353 2,871 2,029 13,741 40,645 58,098 921,450
Operating Profit(EBIT)
Horizontal Analysis
Fauji Cement Co Ltd Income Statement (Horizontal Analysis) For the Year Ended 30 June, 2003 To 2007 2003 2004
SALES Less: Sales tax and excise duty NET SALES
2005
157.55 110.01 188.33 180.68 133.37 156.24 148.02 134.85 102.54 127.22 132.12 135.01 42.92 132.42 343.30 132.09 615.91
2006
228.34 142.84 283.71 271.71 217.57 290.48 178.50 159.76 106.44 168.63 157.67 167.33 -218.20 156.49 -115.49 156.92 1247.74
2007
192.05 134.60 229.24 310.83 204.87 250.91 207.09 175.10 112.41 184.62 176.50 185.75 -57.31 178.92 986.22 177.64 621.56
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
130.46 97.22 151.99 152.08 139.80 107.94 119.42 125.78 98.91 123.94 117.17 120.34 -58.36 115.31 -635.98 116.50 421.87
Factory Overhead
Rent Rate & Taxes Fuel Consumed Power Consumed Depreciation Other F.OH Total F.OH Total Manufacturing Cost Work in Process Cost of goods manufactured Finished goods Cost of Sales
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
106.35 135.96 556.68 140.06 150.63 30.02 8307.11 501.28 347.03 18.67 0.00 90.35 44.07 398.91 46.45 7286.78 -60.87
149.69 142.07 799.78 56.23 43.04 377.28 662.69 131.54 315.63 57.25 102.52 24.03 49.55 0.00 -144.93 3248.99 -98.92
134.91 211.06 1635.37 509.20 170.89 103.34 1849.75 508.08 14.94 82.73 25.79 5.52 57.03 0.00 -339.43 7502.63 -233.25
468.98 270.66 753.96 1001.90 170.89 7.94 1401.27 865.90 14.94 65.35 18.35 3.48 44.69 0.00 -150.50 1854.34 -125.24
Vertical Analysis
Fauji Cement Co Ltd Income Statement ( Vertical Analysis) For the Year Ended 30 June, 200
SALES Less : Sales tax and excise duty NET SALES Raw Material Direct Labor
2003 100.00%
39.30 60.70 3.04 2.62
2004 100.00%
29.29 70.71 3.55 2.81
2005 100.00%
27.45 72.55 3.49 2.22
2006 100.00%
24.59 75.41 3.62 2.50
2007 100.00%
27.55 72.45 4.92 2.80
Factory Overhead Rent Rate & Taxes Fuel Consumed Power Consumed Depreciation Other F.OH Total F.OH Cost of Sales Gross Profit General & Admin Expenses Salary, wages and benefits Traveling and entertainment Legal and Professional charges Other General and Admin Expenses Total Selling and Distribution Expenses Salary, wages and benefits Rent Rate & Taxes Communication Expenses Advertisement and sales Promotion Other selling expenses Total Operating Profit Less Financial charges Fee and charges on Loans Interest on Long term loans Mark up on Short term loans from Associations Interest on short term loans
7.06 0.62 0.12 0.49 0.32 1.54 0.32 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.12 0.60 4.91 0.13 12.34 0.00 0.17
22.81 0.67 0.06 0.05 0.45 1.23 0.37 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.10 0.63 20.95 0.36 1.77 0.03 0.00
27.58 0.56 0.08 0.08 0.36 1.08 0.28 0.03 0.07 0.05 0.11 0.54 24.93 0.27 4.48 0.08 0.11
38.55 0.63 0.08 0.06 0.40 1.17 0.38 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.56 35.17 0.01 4.47 0.01 0.02
22.83 0.89 0.07 0.05 0.48 1.49 0.43 0.03 0.06 0.04 0.29 0.85 19.28 0.01 4.20 0.00 0.02 10
Others Total
5.98 18.62
4.14 6.29
0.91 5.86
0.14 4.65
0.11 4.33
2005 1,113,721,603 603,109,660 8,235,163 55,931,122 18,468,968 11,624,101 2,588,053 5,110,066,731 4,717,315,487
2006 1,579,381,610 847,590,378 2,836,409 145,090,210 28,011,800 93,670,852 23,407,558 4,576,776,382 4,563,115,282
2007 1,953,527 423,133 858,758 183,309 23,931 115,221 44,157 4,447,161 4,392,450
46,611,000 9,000,000 1,137,589,149 552,995,000 308,876,433 275,717,716 2,567,217,891 2,522,005,000 45,212,891 2,449,624,461 2,449,624,461 6223788334 3774163873 6223788334
46,611,000 9,000,000 1,207,427,336 550,000,000 236,353,099 421,074,237 1,648,292,490 1,425,000,000 7,911,808 3,282,616,746 3,282,616,746 6198107892 2915491146 6198107892
46,611 8,100 1,393,957 550,000 375,510 468,447 1,223,195 875,000 8,277 3,735,206 3,735,206 6400688 2665482 6400688 11
2005 154.00% 310.00% 14.00% 116.00% 182.00% 200.00% 81.00% 91.00% 103.00% 215.80% 22.50% 255.00% 402.00% 1941.00% 86.40% 61.00% 60.00% 164.70% 150.74% 150.74% 98.58% 80.50% 98.58%
2006 219.00% 437.00% 5.00% 302.00% 276.00% 1610.00% 73.00% 82.00% 99.60% 215.80% 22.50% 268.00% 400.00% 148.00% 132.00% 39.00% 34.00% 28.00% 202.00% 202.00% 98.17% 62.00% 98.17%
2007 0.27% 0.22% 1.4% 0.38% 0.24% 2% 14% 0.08% 0.09% 0.02% 0.02% 0.31% 0.40% 2.4% 0.15% 0.03% 0.02% 0.03% 0.23% 0.23% 0.1013% 0.05% 0.1013%
12
Owner's Equity
Ratio Analysis
Liquidity ratios
Current Ratio
The current ratio determines short term debt paying ability and is computed as follows Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities
Current Ratio Years Current Assets Current Liabilities Current Ratio in Times
1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 2003 1.53
0.92 Series1
2004
2005 Years
2006
2007
Interpretation
In the above table the ratio is increasing in the first years that mean the company has more funds to pay its current liabilities. But in the coming year there is a decrease in the ratio. That affects the companys debt paying ability. In the last two years the ratio increased due to increase in the current assets. So that is the positive sign for the company. It increases the short term, liquidity of the company and it attracts the short term loan providers on the cost of profitability.
13
Quick Ratio
Quick Ratio = (Current Assets Inventory) / Current Liabilities
Quick Ratio Years Current Assets Inventory Current Liabilities Acid Test Ratio
2003
2004
2005 Years
2006
2007
Interpretation
In the above table we can see that there is a decrease in the ratio. This ratio is taken on the basis of quick assets The main reason of the decline is the increase in the current liabilities. The other reason is increase in the inventory that decreases the required ratio.
14
Activity ratios
Inventory turnover
This ratio indicates the liquidity of the inventory. The formula is as follow, Inventory Turnover = Cost of Goods Sold / Average Inventory
Inventory Turnover Years Cost of Goods Sold Ending Inventory Inventory Turnover (Times)
(Times/Year)
Interpretation As shown in the table there is an increase in 2004 as compared to the base year. Whereas there is a decline in the inventory turnover in the following two years. On the other hand there is a slight rise in the ratio in last year. It is better for the company to have a high inventory turnover ratio .
Interpretation
As shown in the table in 2005 the average age of inventory is high as compared to base year. Whereas the average age of turnover in 2004 is lowes 15
Average collection period Years Account Receivable Net Sales Days Sale in Account Receivable(Days)
25.00 19.21 20.00 15.00 10.00 3.79 3.21 2.30 2.94 5.00 0.00 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Years
Series1
Interpretation
This ratio gives an indication of the length of time that the receivables have been outstanding at the end of the year. Shortening the credit terms indicates that there will be less risk in the collection of future receivables and a lengthening of the credit terms indicates a greater risk. In the above data we see that in year 2003 the days sales in account receivable is very high and it was not good for the company but after 2003 there is a great decrease in the days sales in inventory which show the good performance of the companys management and it shows a less risk in the collection of future receivables.
16
Interpretation It measures the activity of the assets and the ability of the firm to generate sales through the use of assets. The ratio is increasing and we can conclude that the cement company is efficiently using its assets to generate more sales and more profits.
Debt Ratio Total Liabilities Total Assets Debt Ratio 2003 4,688,270 6313256 74.26% 2004 3,971,219 5910353 67.19% 2005 3,774,164 6223788 60.64% 2006 2,915,491 6198107 47.04% 2007 2,665,482 6400688 41.64%
17
80.00% 70.00%
60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 2003 2004 2005 Years 2006 2007
Interpretation
This table shows the current and past debt paying ratio of the company. The ratio in 2003 was 74.26% which was very high but after that till 2007 it is decreasing continuously and in 2007 it is 41.64% this decreasing trend shows the company is in better position as compare to 2003.
Leverage Ratios
Times interest earned ratio
Times interest earned ratio = EBIT/Interest
Interest Earned Ratio EBIT Interest Earned Interest Earned Ratio (Times) 2003 122,215 6,874 18 2004 680,341 9,636 71 2005 977,456 3,855 254 2006 1,998,662 34,735 58 2007 921,450 68,214 14
254
18
Interpretation
The above table indicates the Time interest earned ratio which shows the firm will able to meet his obligation or not in 2003 interest earned was 18 times of operating profit but in 2004 it was 71 times and it increase further to 254 times in 2005 at that time company was strong in meeting its obligation but after 2005 it was decreased to 58 times in 2006 and 14 times in 2007 this shows company losing its position to meet the obligation.
Profitability Ratios
Gross profit Margin
Gross profit equals the difference between net sales revenue and the cost of goods sold. Gross profit Margin = Gross profit / Net sales Gross profit margin analysis helps a number of users. Managers budget gross profit levels into their predictions of profitability. Gross profit margin is also use in cost control. Gross profit margin can also be used to estimate inventory involved in insured loses.
Gross Profit Margin Gross Profit Net Sales Gross Profit Margin 2003 175,607 1,510,738 11.62% 2004 740,825 2,296,231 32.26% 2005 1,081,577 2,845,144 38.01% 2006 2,191,112 4,286,139 51.12% 2007 1,091,495 3,463,283 31.52%
Interpretation
In this table the gross profit margin has inclined substantially over the 1st four years from 2003 to 2006 after that in 2007 the Gross profit Margin decreased by 31.52%.The increase in Gross profit margin is due to increase in Net sales and Gross profit.
Interpretation
It include only operating income in the numerator. After checking table we can say that there is an increasing trend in operating profit margin the coming three years. But it declined in the last year due to increase in the cost of sales. Management must focus on the cost to control in order earn more profits.
Interpretation
This ratio gives a measure of net income dollars generated by each dollar of sales. While it is desirable for this ratio to be high, competitive forces within an industry, economic conditions, use of debt financing, and operating characteristics such as high fixed cost will cause the net profit margin to vary between and within industries.
Interpretation
20
It measures the firms ability to utilize its assets to create profits by comparing profits With the assets which generate the profits. In the base year the ratio is negative that is the bad sign for the company. But later wards it is increasing till the third year and it slope downwards in the last year. The reason behind that increase is the effective use of assets. The cement company is utilizing its assets in a better way to get more earnings.
Interpretation
In the above the Return on Total equity in 2003 is -31.76% but in 2004 to 2006 there is an increasing trend but after that in 2007 it again decreases to 17.30% from 36.67%. the reason behind this that companys long term debt decreases over five years. Also there is an increasing trend in Total equity in five years. Net income also increases from 2003-06.
21