Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
By Nancy Kachingwe
Political Economy Unit - TWN-Africa [1]
The EPA negotiations are taking place while the Government of Ghana is formulating
a national trade policy. Through a series of contributions and debates, local
actors from agriculture, industry, services and financial sectors presented a list
of concerns and issues that should inform both government�s position in EPA
negotiations as well as the content of the national trade policy. Beyond getting
the right set of policies, changes in many practices on the part of the
authorities are required as well.
The poultry issue clearly begs the question to what extent is government in
control of policy making and how committed is it to the local farming sector? -
Adhering to WTO, World Bank and IMF policies is a questionable path if the end
result is the death of the agricultural sector as a result of free-for-all
imports. The emphasis on exports may make sense on paper, but it may be much more
beneficial for us to focus on domestic and regional markets, rather than
international markets only.
Local stakeholders also stated repeatedly that the issue of competitiveness vis-�-
vis foreign imports had been grossly misrepresented. When it comes to
competitiveness both in terms of price and in terms of quality, it is not clear
cut that local products are automatically inferior, as tends to be the stereotype.
Similarly the price differences were frequently the result of export and other
subsidies that industrialised countries are able to provide their producers.
Low quality imports disadvantage local producers that have a competitive advantage
in quality. Worse still, they affect consumer health and safety. Liberalising
markets, without equipping regulatory institutions, such as the Ghana Standards
Board is disadvantaging the country in both ways. The private sector would be
prepared to support the effort to strengthen these institutions as a way of
ensuring that low quality imports are not put on the Ghanaian market.
In some services areas such as cargo handling, Ghanaian companies have developed
expertise and are well established. Cargo handling is a valuable earner of foreign
currency for the country and so considerations to open up to external operators
has to be viewed in that light. Different sectors have to make their views known
to clarify the direction in which services can be liberalised or otherwise.
However, over and above the national constraints the fisheries sector is in
difficulty because it has benefited from special preferences to EU markets. Now
that the EU has been providing similar trade preferences to other developing
regions, the position of the sector in leading the drive in non-traditional
exports was being compromised, particularly when measures are taken without
warning. This means that in the EPA negotiations, the Ghanaian government should
try to secure a predictable margin of trade preferences over a predictable
timeframe before they are phased out.
All in all, the preliminary documents presented by the Ministry of Trade as the
basis for formulating the national trade policy were welcomed as useful,
particularly as they provided relevant data and information to enable stakeholders
to assess options. The fear was that recommendations from local stakeholders that
did not get the nod from donors would not be accepted. Secondly, there were many
problems of administrative inefficiency and corruption that needed to addressed.
Finally it was stressed that without looking at some fundamental problems - such
as electricity supply - there was never any hope for the country to become
competitive. Electricity privatisation had been undertaken and yet problems still
persisted.
While there are losses and gains in any liberalisation exercise, the country has
to be assured of net gains. Furthermore, tariff reduction needed to be accompanied
by measures to cushion the costs - particularly training people to work in other
sectors. Just the literacy rate now estimated now at less than 50% indicates the
level of the challenge to deal with the human resource challenges.
The data needed to undertake an adequate cost-benefit analysis of EPAs was not
sufficient to negotiate competently. It was pointed out that impact assessments
that had been conducted had not been satisfactory, and in fact there had not been
any training of local capacity in impact assessments which was an extremely
difficult discipline. Some institutions such as UNCTAD had developed tools to
assist countries to conduct such assessments, but the training in these tools
still needed to be undertaken. There is heavy reliance on external consultants to
do such work. The quality of their work is not guaranteed. Furthermore, since they
are commissioned by donors most frequently, their terms of reference do not
prioritise the needs of the country. Building local capacity in the public sector
to service these needs is further hampered by the caps on public spending and
hiring that donors insist on. These practical questions make it difficult to
negotiate successfully in the timelines that are given.
Already the negotiations have hit a stumbling block in ECOWAS because the road map
does not clearly spell out that the EU is prepared to pledge additional financing
to help bear the costs of EPA-FTA liberalisation. The European trade commission
has stated that it only has a mandate to negotiate trade issues not financial
packages. ECOWAS on the other hand is insistent that additional financing is the
only way to make EPAs meaningful to support programmes to enhance the
competitiveness, compensate for tax revenues, and deal with �adjustment costs� of
economic sectors that will be negatively affected by liberalisation.
Therefore with so many challenges and questionable benefits, how should Ghana deal
with the EPA negotiations? Should we negotiate EPAs or not? For all intents and
purposes, the governments have already committed to negotiations and therefore it
was not possible to backtrack. Some organisations are clearly against an
arrangement of reciprocal trade with the EU particularly given that the coverage
area will be between 75% and 90% of all trade between the two. Others feel that
there is no point in avoiding negotiations; it is better to deal with the
difficulties and ensure that the set up negotiated maximises potential advantages
and minimises the costs. However a consensus emerged that the timelines are too
short for the country to undertake meaningful negotiations, and there is a need to
slow the process down, particularly to make informed decisions about the positions
that the country should take.
The debate on EPAs needs to be a public debate involving all stakeholders. It was
important to prevent a situation where government is under pressure to sign an
agreement that will be to the detriment to the national economy. For this to
happen, different sectors have to come together and engage with the government so
that it is moving forward with a mandate that reflects the consensus of the
various national stakeholders, small and big.