American Association of Teachers of Slavic and East European Languages

L. N. Tolstoj's Master and Man - A Symbolic Narrative Author(s): Elizabeth Trahan Source: The Slavic and East European Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3 (Autumn, 1963), pp. 258-268 Published by: American Association of Teachers of Slavic and East European Languages Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/305336 . Accessed: 07/09/2011 11:41
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

American Association of Teachers of Slavic and East European Languages is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Slavic and East European Journal.

http://www.jstor.org

L. N. Tolstoj's Master and Man-A

Symbolic Narrative

By Elizabeth Trahan University of Pittsburgh In his essay What is Art ? (1897), Tolstoj rejects contemporary art as involved, and obscure (Ch. X). affected He attacks the French Symbolists for their incomprehensibility and heaps (ibid.) ridicule on Richard Wagner for his use of myths and leitmotifs (Ch. Good art, Tolstoj suggests, must express universally valid XIII). religious or at least humanitarian feelings, experienced by the author and transmitted through direct emotional infection, as is accomplished in the great religious writings, in folk legends, fairy tales and folk songs. When reviewing his own writings from this critical position, He can only Tolstoj is forced to reject all his literary masterpieces. find two instances of "good" art, two of his Tales for Children Prisoner of the Caucasus" and "God Sees the Truth (1872)--"The but Waits. " we may find the essay on art, we Today, however interesting will hardly use it as a basis for evaluating Tolstoj's works. Not "The Prisoner of the Caucasus" or "God Sees the Truth but Waits" but War and Peace, Anna Karenina, The Death of Ivan I'ic, and Master and Man are generally considered Tolstoj's best works. Yet, in one respect the bias of Tolstoj's theoretical posiparadoxically, tion seems to have affected most critics. Tolstoj is usually discussed in terms of his "realism" or as a moralist, and is rarely Yet already War and given credit for any formal experimentation. Peace (1865-69) and Anna Karenina(1873-77) make use of certain such as interior monologue, free association, strucformaldevices, tural patterns based on parallels and contrasts, significant detail, even some symbolic, i. e., open metaphors. The Death of Ivan II'ic in addition, uses "leitmotifs" (1886), very much in Richard Wagof a directness or ner's manner, and contains sensory associations subtlety very close to that emphasis on nuances and depth which 258 SEEJ,Vol. VII, No. 3 (1963)

Tolstoj's

Master and Man-A

Symbolic

Narrative

259

characterizes Baudelaire and the French Symbolists. Finally, Master and Man (1894), one of Tolstoj's last stories, is, as I will try to show, a truly modem symbolic narrative. The plot of Master and Man is simple. Vasilij Andreid Brexunov, the master, and Nikita, his man, set out on a business trip to a village some seven miles away. They are confronted by a blizzard, lose their way and are finally forced to spend the night repeatedly in their sledge. Brexunov freezes to death but saves Nikita by stubborn bully, he shielding him with his body. Initially a selfish, now dies willingly and gladly, with a vision of Christ and a belief in the unity of all life.1 Nikita's life is saved, and he quietly lives out his lifespan. The juxtaposition of two contrasting characters and their ways and views of life had been a favorite device of Tolstoj's ever since Three Deaths, written in 1858. But only on the most immediate level is Master and Man the story of Brexunov and his servant Nikita. While Nikita does not change throughout the story, Brexunov underThe indifferent churchwarden begoes a complete transformation. comes a true believer; the greedy and self-confident a egotist, humble and self-effacing human being. Master and Man is actually Brexunov's story, for he emerges as both master and man. As a tale of moral regeneration and religious consolation, the story is thematically close to mary of Tolstoj's popular tales, and to his conception of "good" art. Moreover, the detached, simple folk idiom used-much of its charm is, unfortunately, lost in transthe story the naivete and wisdom of a folk legend.2 At lation-gives the same time, even a superficial reading reveals a certain mysteriCertain ous, magic quality which suggests additional dimensions. words are repeated like incantations. The howling of the wind and the circling of the snow provide an ominous refrain. The sledge and its occupants move in circles which they seem unable to break through. The number "three" occurs some fifteen times in the story, suggesting a bewitched, alien world. And close attention to the text reveals the presence of metaphors and symbols which not only deepen and transform the surface reality of the plot but which form connected patterns and provide additional levels of meaning. Through these symbols, Brexunov's religious awakening becomes a pilgrimage from the village of Kresty (The Crosses) to the Cross, almost a reiteration of Christ's Road to Calvary. The personal crisis of Brexunov, the Liar- brexat' is "to tell lies" -becomes the experience of an existential moment, the culmination of man's struggle with nature both withoutandwithin. Brexunov's final insight not only bestows meanof the syming upon his existence but, through the correspondence bols used, reveals Brexunov's essence to be a reflection of the essence of that external force which he had challenged. The setting for the story may have been suggested to Tolstoj by a personal experience. During the winters of 1891-92 and 1892-93, he was engaged in famine relief work in the district of Rjazan'. Mme.

260

The Slavic

and East European

Journal

Raevskaja, at whose estate he was staying, describes how on February 15, 1892, worried about Tolstoj's long absence during a blizzard, they set out after him and found him crossing a snowy field on foot, left behind by his horse.3 Once before, Tolstoj had written a story based on his own experience of a blizzard during a twentyThe Snowstorm (1856) describes two hour trip in January of 1854. an all-night ride, in which the horses instinctively find realistically their way to safety. If contrasted to the early story, the formal emof Master and Man becomes phasis and achievement immediately apparent. The immediate incentive for the story must have been provided by Flaubert's Legende de Saint Julien l'Hospitalier. Tolstoj wrote Master and Man only a few months before two introductions, one to the works of Guy de Maupassant, the other to S. T. Semenov's Peasant Stories. Both introductions reveal Tolstoj's preoccupation with literary criticism. The criteria stated later in What is Art? are here anticipated by Tolstoj's emphasis on the significance and universality of the theme, on the proper relation of form to content, and on the author's "sincerity." In the introduction to Semenov's stories, Tolstoj points to Flaubert's tale as an example of an author's lack of sincerity: "The last episode of the story which ought to be the most touching represents Julien lying on a bed together with a leper and ... The whole thing is described with warming him with his body. great skill, but in reading this story I am always left perfectly cold and indifferent. I feel that the author would not have done and would not have cared to do what his hero did, and I therefore have no desire to do 4 it, and experience no emotion on reading of this marvellous exploit." Tolstoj's criticism of Flaubert's story shows not merely the inbut his lack of insight into adequacy of his criterion of "sincerity" A comparison with Master and Man again beFlaubert's approach. comes illuminating: La Legende de Saint Julien l'Hospitalier was written as a deliberate-and to probably eminently sincere-attempt re-create the mood and spirit of the Middle Ages. It is filled with miracles and coincidences, set allegorical objects and animals, stable universe. The story proagainstthe backdrop of a medieval, vides an excellent example of what Erich Kahler calls "descending symbolism" -a symbolism dependent on and determined by a preestablished on the other hand, becomes Tolstoj's reality. story, modem both by its emphasis on psychological character treatment and by its "ascending" Here a set of freelycreated symbolism. of the author's unique forms achieves a consummate representation vision. In contrast to Flaubert's story, the intensity of the vision now absorbs the communicative purpose, and the story's message can no longer be separated from the work itself.5 The comparison of Brexunov and his man, Nikita, is achieved as well as Tolstoj's long favored delargely by direct description, vices of parallelism andcontrast, often used to reflect ironic ambivalences. But since this comparison forms the story's basis, it must

Tolstoj's be

Master

and Man-A

Symbolic

Narrative

261

at least briefly before we can turn to Brexunov's traced psychoand its symbolic significance. logical development of the Second Church Elder and Merchant Brexunov, Initially, the world entirely in terms of his personal power and Guild, views economic success. both wife and child Though his estate thrives, are "thin and pale. " Brexunov's tone toward his wife is rude and for him merely as a personal heir. and his son exists condescending, Nor is Brexunov's attitude toward Nikita positive, though he conresiders himself benefactor. As shown by his taunting Nikita's marks about the cooper and by his attempt to sell Nikita a bad horse, is as indifferent Brexunov to Nikita's and to his financial feelings plight as to his physical well-being. Nikita's on the other hand, are relations with his environment, harmonious. little boy loves him, the mistress worries The master's whether he will be warm enough, and he pleases everyone by his cheerful and obliging manner. He has the peasant's straightforward and fatalism, his closeness Noneto nature and animals. simplicity a habitual he is called Nikita is no saint. When drunk-and theless, a veritable can become fiend. drunkard early in the story-he But while his master his departure imbibes both before and in freely all temptation, sober and thus more Nikita resists remains GriSkino, aware of the hazards and necessities of their situation. two fur-lined coats do not save just as Brexunov's Ironically, him while in his thin coat, so Brexunov's Nikita survives personal than the simacumen turn out far less effective energy andbusiness of those around him. Nikita would have chosen the ple reasoning instinct trusted the horse's spent the saferroad, and, undoubtedly, at Taras' house. does night safely nagging Only upon his wife's Brexunov take Nikita This step might have saved his life, along. had he paid attention to Nikita from the start. It saves his soul when he finally does. ironic that, while Nikita derives Itis similarly real comfort from placing his sins and fate into God's hands, Brexunov, in religion. he the Church Elder, can find no consolation Instead, in the memory of his own achievements and vainly seeks reassurance of future goals. the excitement We do not know whether Nikita would have survived the night without but we know that he was ready Brexunov's self-sacrifice; without any reproach toward his master or God. It almost for death, that Nikita is permitted a reward for his unswerving seems loyalty traditionalsolemn to die his own death-nastojascaja smert'-the at home in his bed, surrounded death of the believer, by his family and with a lighted taper in his hand. to Nikita, and is devoted Master Even though the last paragraph Man is not his story. the comparison The ending merely completes to and attitudes between him and his master, beyond their actions their actual death experience. Nikita is more posiIn many ways, in contrast seem tive. His actions and decisions, to Brexunov's, of life in all and "right. " By his fatalistic appropriate acceptance

262

The Slavic

and East European

Journal

its manifestations, he reminds us of Natal'ja Savisna in Childhood, the coachman Fedor in Three Deaths, Platon Karataev in War and
Peace, Gerasim in The Death ofIvan Il'c. All of them are contrasted

positively to men of greater individuality who are assailed by doubts, fears, and temptations. In Platon, the type finds it's culmination. He is less a person than a symbol, a "personification of the spirit of simplicity and truth" (War and Peace, Part Twelve, Ch. XIII). He does nottake thecenterof the stage, but the secret of his happiness is coveted by Pierre Bezuxov as much as that of the peasant-whose name, incidentally, is again Platon-by Konstantin Levin. In The Death of Ivan II'ic, the balance begins to shift. Ivan Il'ic incorporates to some extent Gerasim's humble and joyful submissiveness into his own world view. In Master and Man, the change is completed. However "right" Nikita's attitude and however peaceful his death, not he, the just man, is exalted but Brexunov, the repentant sinner, who, after a desperate struggle with nature, submits to it and finds God. The contrast between Nikita and Brexunov is extended into their attitude toward nature. While Nikita accepts it even in its extreme manifestation-the cold and pitiless fury of the blizzard-Brexunov challenges it as he had challenged everything around him before. But while he had been able to impose his will on men and animals, he suffers defeat when he confronts nature with the same ruthless disregard. When Brexunov's path is blocked by the ravine, he suffers the first decisive defeat, the defeat of his actions. When he vainly seeks reassurance in memories of the past and dreams of the future, he suffers the defeat of his achievements. Finally, when he, no longer master of himself but driven by fear and the instinct of selfpreservation, makes one more attempt at physical escape, he suffers the defeat of his values. But like Dostoevskij's Ridiculous Man who, on his dream flight, is stripped of layer upon layer of the armor with which he had fortified himself against life, so Vasilij Brexunov, facin a nightmarish and awesome no-man's land, ing non-existence moves step by step toward the core of his existence. He faces his existential crisis alone, weak, unable to muster the support of any ethical, moral, or religious consolations. But now, untrammeled by shackles of conventions and prejudices, a deep inner strength surges up in him. Brexunov begins to find a new self and new values. Brexunov's attempt to revive Nikita may initially have been due to his fear of being left alone again, of having to submit to death and acknowledge defeat. But the "peculiar joy such as he had never felt before," the "strange and solemn tenderness," and the "joyous condition" which he experiences, bear witness to the fact that a change is taking place within him. Now his thoughts circle around Nikita and the peasant's image fuses with that of the past. Finally, Brexunov sees himself back in the past, when he is immobile, unable to react to his old environment. That this fact does not fill him with

Tolstoj's

Master and Man-A

Symbolic

Narrative

263

fear or indignation, again shows how profoundly he has changed. Formerly an impatient and irascible master, he is now waiting patiently and joyfully for his own Master. His submission is complete: he acknowledges the merit for the good deed as not his but Christ's and follows Him with humility. The religious theme which asserts itself so powerfully at the end, is latently present from the very beginning. Brexunov lives in avillage called The Crosses and, as it turns out, indeed in the shadow of the Cross. His challenge takes place on the second day of the feast of St. Nicholas, who is not only the saint of all Russia and specifically of peasants, merchants and wayfarers, but also of temperance-and a wonderworker. Nikita, who has taken a vow of abstinence and who successfully resists all temptation on the crucial day, is obviously under the protection of St. Nicholas. But on Brexunov the Saint works his miracle. Initially Brexunov is a sinner. Though a church elder, he ignores the holy day and desecrates church funds by borrowing them for private gain. In Griskino, he sits down at the head of the table for what becomes his last supper. To be sure, with his "protruding, hawk-like eyes, " his three thousand rubles and his greed for gain he is still closer to Judas than to Christ. His answer to the anguished complaints of the old man about his son's greed is unconcerned. Brexunov does not realize that his own test has begun. It is interesting that a counting of heads reveals the presence of thirteen adults in Taras' house: the old couple, two of their sons and one grandson-PetruSa-with his wife, Taras' four daughtersin-law, theneighbor, Brexunov, andNikita. Butthough such detailed account is given of all twenty-two members of Taras' household as to suggest a purpose, the allusion is again blurred by the fact that only the men sit around the table.6 Several other, similarly marginal references occur. The sledge which Brexunov overtakes is driven by one Simon who, however casually encountered, might have shared Brexunov's burden, had he chosen to accept his help. The man who opens the gate to Taras' house for them and again guides them onto their way is called Peter and, forall his willingness, he turns back at the crucial moment and abandons them, if unknowingly, to their fate. These allusions gain weight, as Brexunov recalls one Sebastian who froze to death. The uncommon name clearly evokes the Saint and the possibility of martyrdom and glory. Even more direct is the allusion to treason when Brexunov thinks he hears a cock crow. Not much later, he abandons Nikita with the sacrilegious words: "He won't grudge his life but I, thank God, have something to live for..." 7 When Brexunov sets out alone for the wilderness-the wormwood becomes its appropriate symbol-his punishment seems imminent. Though there is little resemblance betweenBrexunov's flightintothe snowy waste and Christ's withdrawal into the Garden of Gethsemane, Brexunov, notunlikeChrist, experiences supreme anguish. He, too,

264

The Slavic

and East European

Journal

turs to prayer asking that the cup be taken away from him, only to realize the vanity of such prayer. When Brexunov returns to Nikita, he is ready for his burden. As he lies down on his servant with his arms spread out, he, in a sense, mounts the Cross. During the moment of extreme anguish Brexunov recalled the recent church service and the tapers which he would sell and resell. Lying on Nikita he again recalls service and tapers, but now their images merge with that of Nikita. In sacrificing himself forthis man, Brexunov reiterates Christ's sacrifice, and in his last vision Christ comes for him in person and thereby accepts the sacrifice. Even though Brexunov's symbolic death is somewhat similar to Billy Budd's he is no Christ figure like Billy Budd or like Prince Myskin. Nordoes his wrong-doing approach the scope of that of St. Julien. Brexunov is merely a sinner who through suffering returns to love and through love to Christ. Franz Kafka, in A Country Doctor, a ride through a blizzard, and the doctor, too, likewise describes lies down to warm a dying human being. There, however, the symbols are used with savage The country doctor lies down irony. and attempts to escape as soon as he can-only to find willingly, his escape turn into a trap, an eteral pilgrimage through "the frost of this most unhappy of ages. " Brexunov's religious development, on the otherhand, remains thematically entirely within the framework a fitting illustration of Luke 15:7: "I say of traditional Christianity, unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance. " The symbolic presentation, however, gives Brexa scope and significance unov's finalgesture which by far transcends his actual transformation into a humble and dedicated servant of Christ. The religious symbolism of Master and Man represents only one strand in the symbolic pattern of the story. With its use of allegorical names and its actual depiction of a religious vision, it remains to some extent superimposed The nature imagery, on upon the story. the other hand, becomes so intrinsic a part of the narrative, permeates it so completely and intensively that the story becomes an excellent example of what, earlier, I called "ascending" symbolism. The circle becomes the key symbol of the story. It is menace and trap, futility and despair, but it also represents the unity of life and death, the Chain of Being. The snow whirls around master and man, the wind circles around them, their road turns into circles. Brexunov, by defying the circle as long as he can, rejects every road leading out of it, until there remains only the one leading into its heart of nature and the self. Darkness and the abyss verycenter-the provide its signposts. Though Brexunov fails to recognize their deeper significance, stop his outer journey, and the they effectively inner journey to the core of the self can begin. Again Brexunov's in circles, those of his thoughts, then those of his last questmoves trip. Finally Brexunov reaches the innermost circle, in which the I and the Thou merge.

Tolstoj's

Master

and Man-A

Symbolic

Narrative

265

The circular symbol is enhanced by the continual recurrence of the number "three, " which also adds a supernatural dimension to the reality of the plot. Brexunov starts out during the third hour, Three times they set out. with three thousand rubles in his pocket. Three times Nikita takes over. Three times they see the same cluster of moaning willows, three times they pass the frozen wash, three times wormwood is mentioned. They have three encounters-with Isaj, the horse thief, the three peasants whom they overtake, and Taras Petrusa speaks of three domestic and his household in Griskino. councellors. Three times Nikita climbs out to search for the path, the third time reappearing three sazhens further. Three times Brexunov tries to light a cigarette and, after succes sfully lighting three matches, he is unable to light the last three.8 Other secondary images likewise support and extend the symbolic The frozen wash which "is struggling, " "fluttering desstructure. perately in the wind," and the white shirt which "in particular struggled desperately, waving its sleeves around" -not only reflect the of fury of the storm but become portents of doom, of man in distress, a shroud, a frozen body, perhaps even a crucifixion.9 The willows are moaning "dismally" and "desperately, " "swaying" and "whis tossed about by a pititling"; the wormwood which is "desperately less wind" fills Brexunov with utmost terror and seems tohim his own reflection, swift and meaningless as he "awaits an inevitable, death." These images call to mind Pascal's pensee on man as a reed, "le plus faible de la nature,'; l0 they also suggest Job 21: 18: "They are as stubble before the wind, and as chaff that the storm carrieth away. " l sounds provides the aural backdrop for A series of frightening the visual imagery and fills the air with the clamor appropriate for Judgment Day: the wild whistling of the wind, the threatening howl of a wolf, the eerie and pitiful cry of the frightened horse. The poem which Petrusa quotes with such joy at its aptnessit is a colloquialized version of the first stanza of Puskin's Winter the Protean power cf the storm: expresses Evening-indeed
Storms Snowy with mist the sky conceal, wild. circles wheeling

Now like savage beast 'twill howl, And now 'tis wailing like a child. (Tr. by Aylmer Maude.) Brexunovdies only thirty sazhens (70 feet) off the road and half averst (about one-third mile) from the village, trapped by the blizNor can man zard in a magic circle which he cannot break through. break through nature's circle of life and death; he can only transcend And while Brexunov follows it by leaving the realm of nature, of life. its His call, around his dead body the snowstorm once more asserts "All around the snow was whirling as before. symbol of the circle: The same snow squalls were circling about, covering the dead Vasilij Andreic's fur coat. . * 1l

266

The Slavic

and East

European

Journal

The blizzard has lifted Brexunov out of time and space-the time and space of his everyday life-into the vastness of nature, pure, stripped of sham values and comforts, and enbare, and invincible, compassing both life and death in close proximity. The business trip, begun with a disregard for nature's power, continued as one man's becomes a desperate struggle against the element until challenge, to accept itself. It forces Brexunov to acquiesce, nature asserts death at its hands; but it also enables him to understand its secret in love. An almost mys and essence and to find his own existence tical union with nature through a supreme act of love becomes his "Nikita is alive so I too am alive, " is Brexultimate fulfillment. and unselfish affirmation of life. This is not unov's finalunreserved merely a creed based on the Christian virtues of humility and brotherly love, but a belief in the eternal flow and transfer of life, a Buddhist Kate Hamburger, in her excellent rather than Christian concept. study on Tolstoj, sees the unique accomplishment of Master and Man act of love, which by far transcends inthisvisually accomplished Yet even Master and the token gesture of love made by Ivan Il'ic.13 Man, if more faintly than Tolstoj's other works, echoes its author's Brexunov does not come own inner split. Despite his self-sacrifice, to terms with death nor does he, in Rilke's words, "die his own death. " Of all of Tolstoj's heroes, only Prince Andrej comes close to dying his own death, aside from such "children of God, " as Natal'ja Prince Andrej turns away from Platon Krataev, or Nikita. SaviSna, life with the same aloofness with which he had turned awayfrom Neither Ivan Il'ic nor Brexunov each successive phase of his life. dies his own death. Ivan Il'ic's dying is awful far beyond the sins of his lifetime, while Brexunov, petty sinner that he was, dies an Nor does either of them beautiful and glorious death. undeservedly of death-ever come -in fact, none of Tolstoj's fictional challengers to terms with it. Even Prince Andrej cannot face death squarely. He "an awakening from life" -an turns it from an end into a beginning, Brexunov's story in many ways parallels that of Ivan Il'ic. escape. and Confronted by death, both men face the crisis of their existence, both are forced to reject the values of their past. Yet neither is able to accept death-they merely dismiss or ignore it. For Ivan Il'i6 it "ceases to exist," as the immense relief after an almostunbearable suffering floods his entire being till nothing else has room. Brexunov of finds a dual escape from facing death: the Christian consolation a personal immortality and a-basically on contradictory-emphasis with all life. the abandonment of individuality in an identification In neither case is death accepted as part of life, as its end.14 He lives by feelings Brexunov is much simpler than Ivan Il'ic. and even his act of love and suband urges rather than thoughts, mission takes place on the same instinctive level, brought about by a moment of overwhelming fear rather than a crisis of consciousness. whereas Ivan Il'ic He rejects his past afterhe has found new values,

Tolstoj's

Master

and Man-A

Symbolic

Narrative

267

his entire life before he had found anything to take its dismissed place. Ivan I' iC was battered and tossed about by his pain until the last shreds of his strength and dignity were gone. Therefore, his of death an final gesture of love may be weak, and his dismissal his courage and his suffering give him a heroic scope escape, yet which Brexunov lacks. though Master and Man was prompted by Tolstoj's Ironically, to achieve a direct emotional ineffort to demonstrate " sincerity," the impact of the story cannot compare to the impact of Ivan fection, II' i's terrible struggle with death. Tolstoj's own fear of death proved Master or God. However, esthetically, strongerthan his loveofman and Man evokes a serenity and pleasure as none of Tolstoj's other works do. The story not only occupies a unique place in Tolstoj's creative output and points to an unsuspected range of his talent, but, both complex and superbly simple, it becomes the most nearly perfect of his works of art.

NOTES 1. Though Christ is not named directly, the references seem obvious enough To be sure, in one critical study the "Someone" not torequire lengthy justifications. and "He" is interpreted as "Love"; the author was probably unaware of the fact that, in Russian, love is feminine in gender. (See Jacqueline de Proyart de Baillescourt, "La representation de la mort dans 1'oeuvre litteraire de Tolstoj," For Roman Jakobson, The Hague, 1956.) the ending with its detached, ironic legend style: "Is he 2. Compare, e.g., better orworse off there where he awoke after this death of his ? was he disillusioned We will all soon find out. " (All or did he find there exactly what he expected? translations of passages from Master and Man are my own. ) Lev Nikolaevi6 Tolstoj sredi golodaju3cix, " Letopisi 3. See E. I. Raevskaja, Gosudarstvennogo literaturnogo museja,Vol.. II (M., 1938). 4. L. N. Tolstoj, Sobranie socinenij (1928), XVIII, 17-18. 5. For the terminology used see Erich Kahler's "The Nature of the Symbol," the introductory chapterto Symbolism in Religion and Literature, ed. Rollo May (New It seems far more satisfactory than the customary, socially oriented York, 1950). and ratherrigiddivision into a "traditional" or "conventional" symbolism as against a "private" symbolism, or the vague psychological distinction of a "literary" or "artificial" as against a "natural" symbolism. 6. Every detail is blended so skillfully into the story line and setting that a symbolic interpretation may seem arbitrary and far-fetched until the entire pattern is perceived. Therefore, Miss McCarthy is hardly the only one to insist on Tolstoj's unintentional, at best "natural" symbolism (Literary Symbolism,ed. Maurice Beebe Even though "intention" is a highlyquestion[San Francisco, 1960], pp. 50-51). able esthetic criterion and rarely supported by satisfactory evidence, a comparison of the various drafts and proofs for Master and Man (thirteen exist; one or two are lost) seems to bear out my suggestion of a deliberate stylization: Almost all symbolic details emerge only in the final drafts.

268

The Slavic

and East

European

Journal

7. Actually there is a threefold betrayal: first, wnen Brexunov leaves Nikita outside in the snow while settling in the sledge, a second time when, despite the thought that Nikita might die, he does not get up to cover him. The third instance is, of course, the most striking manifestation of the betrayal and the crucial one. 8. Like most symbols occurring in the story, the number "three" can be interYet byitsveryvaguepreted on various levels and should not be overemphasized. ness and ambivalence it contributes depth to the symbolic pattern. 9. I am indebted to Professor Wellek for calling my attention to the symbol of the cross suggested by Brexunov's dead body with its outstretched arms, and antiIt was this starting point that cipated by the white shirt with its frozen sleeves. suggested to me the complex structure of religious symbols underlying the story. 10. Tolstoj was a great admirer of Pascal. Cf. his diary entry cf 23 Dec. 1895 Knopf 1917, P. 15) and his essay on Pascal (The Journal of LeoTolstoy, 1895-99,
in Krug Ctenija za 1906oj god (Berlin, 1923). Tolstoj's essay Life (1887) uses

as its motto Pascal's maxim on man's resemblance to a reed. 11. 16-20. The entire first part of the story can be read as an illustration of Job. 27:

12. Acomparisonof the various drafts for Master and Man shows that the symbol of the circle only gradually reached its full impact. In the first draft it emerges only in its main features: the return to Griskino and the circling along the edge of the ravine. In the second draft, we find Brexunov's attempt to reach the village on horseback-of which, incidentally, he informs Nikita, who wishes him Godspeed. Similarly, not before the final drafts is there any mention of Petrusa's poem, of the reappearing willows and wormwood, of the frozen wash, nor is there any reiteration of the circling of snow and wind. The number "three" occurs only once, very casually, when Nikita reappears "about three sazhens" from the sled. Nor are there any religious symbols. Brexunov takes no church money; Nikita has made no vow to abstain. The Crosses are, inconspicuously, called Mikolskoe, the Gorjackin ( i. e., Burning Man's) Forest, more prosaically, Pirogov's. Isaj is not a horse thief, merely a peasant. No encounter with Simon and the other two peasants is mentioned, and instead of a Sebastian there is a Egor Fedorovic. Similarly, Brexunov's religious apotheosis emerges only gradually. In the first version, he merely feels awkward about leaving Nikita outside, and lies down upon him so that both may have room in the sledge. The change in him-" something completely different which cannot even be named" -occurs suddenly, and "he entered into it." In the second version a humanitarian motive emerges. Brexunov turns the horse back to the sledge when he hears a wolf howl. Realizing that Nikita is dying, he feels guilty and sorry for him, lies down on him to keep him warm and is happy. He dies like a traditional believer, following His call and finding "that all is well now, thanks be to God. " Only the final version contains his insight into the circle of being, the unity of all life and the meanir of self-sacrificing love. (Cf. Polnoe
Sobranie Socinenij, XXIX, 295-324. )

13.

Kate Hamburger, Tolstoi.

Gestalt und Problem

(Bern, 1950), pp. 139-149.

14. Cf. the following, closely corresponding passage from Life, in which Tolstoj expressed his own views: "But if a man could place his happiness in the happiness of other beings, i. e., if he would love them more than himself, then death would not represent to him that discontinuance of happiness and life, such as it does represent to a man who lives only for himself. Death to the man who should live only for others could not seem to be a cessation of happiness and of life, because the happiness and the life of other beings is not only not interrupted with the life of a man who serves them, but is frequently augmented and heightened by the sacrifice of his life. " (Ch. XVIII, tr. I. Hapgood.)