Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1. Brazil
2.Mexico
Issues to consider:
-Patent Regulation (WIPO)
-Weak regulation in Latin American-health and environmental risks
-Lack of public information, debate and participation in decision making
-Research agendas focused on competitiveness, not on social needs
-Macro-economic success=less poor? Mexican Case
Nanotechnology & Society in Latin America
Thank you
Questions? / Comments
Edgar Zayago Lau
Doctoral Candidate in Development Studies.
Universidad Autonoma de Zacatecas, Mexico.
NanoforumEULA Visiting Researcher at University of Twente,
Coordinated by MESA+, Located at STeHPS.
Member of the Latin American Network on Nanotechnology and Society (ReLANS).
www.estudiosdeldesarrollo.net/relans
www.zayagolau.com
Email: edzlau@yahoo.com
Nanotechnology & Society in Latin America
Bibliography
Científica (2007). Half Way to the Trillion-Dollar Market? A Critical Review of the Diffusion of Nanotechnologies.
http://www.cientifica.eu/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=68&Itemid=111
Den Boer, Duncan & Rip, Arie (2008). Scripting Possible futures of Nanotechnologies: A Methodology that
Enhances Reflexibility.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (2007). Situacion Actual Perspectivas y
Desafios de la Economía Latinoamérica. Presentación Instituto BArcelona de Estudios Internacionales.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (2008). Casi 60 millones carecen de agua.
Jornada Enero 10. Retrieved January 15, 2008 from: http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2008/01/10/index.php?
section=sociedad&article=043n1soc
ETC Group. (2005). Nanotech’s Second Nature Patents: Implications for the Global South, 87 & 88. Comunicados
1, 5 (Mar./Apr. & May/June)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2008). Casi 60 millones carecen de agua.
Jornada Enero 10. Retrieved January 15, 2008 from: http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2008/01/10/index.php?
section=sociedad&article=043n1soc
Foladori , Guillermo e Invernizzi , Noela (2005). Nanotechnology and the Developing World: Will
Nanotechnology Overcome Poverty or Widen Disparities? Nanotechnology Law & Business Journal. 2 (3), 1-10.
Juma, Calestous & Yee-Cheong, Lee (Coord.). (2005). Innovation: applying knowledge in development. UN
Millennium Project. Task Force on Science, Technology, and Innovation. London, Sterling,Va.: Earthscan. Consultado,
Septiembre 13, 2007 desde: http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/documents/Science-complete.pdf
Lux Research (2007). Nanomaterial Forecast:Volumes and Applications. NewYork: Lux Research Inc
Meridian Insitute. (2005). Nanotechnology and the Poor: Opportunities and
Risks. Accesado Agosto 10, 2007, desde: http://www.meridian-nano.org/gdnp/NanoandPoor.pdf
Rip, Arie; Misa, Thomas & Schot, Johan (1995). Managing Technology in Society.The Approach of Constructive Technology
Assesment. Pinter: London.
Rip, Arie & Te Kulve, Haico (2007). Socio-Technical Scenarios to Support Reflexive Co-evolution: The Approach of
Constructive TA. Chapter for Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society coordinated by the CNS at AZU.
Salamanca, Buentello, F.; Persad, D. L.; Court, E. B.; Martin, D. K.; Daar, A. S.; Singer, P. (2005). Nanotechnology and
the Developing World. PLoS Medicine, 2 (5). Accesado Agosto 10, 2007 desde: http://medicine.plosjournals.org/
perlserv/?request=getdocument&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020097