Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
55.00
Proficiency Rate
53.00
51.00 49.00 47.00 Schools Districts
45.00
Pre Year Post Year
Consistent pattern:
Despite schools beginning at a disadvantage, by year 2 they not only close the gap, but surpass their districts.
Pre Year Post Year Improvement Pct Change
Statistical Significance Contrasting Schools with Districts
Schools Districts 46.98 51.67 56.12 55.12 9.15 3.45 19.5% 6.7%
p<.001 p<.001 p<.001
Data imply that improvements in schools boosted performance for the districts within which they were nested. School improvement outpaced the districts within which they were nested.
2
NOTE: Statistical significance is affected by sample size, wherein significance is achieved with smaller increases given larger samples or numbers of students.
Proficiency Rate
54.00
52.00 50.00 48.00 46.00 Schools
Districts
44.00
Pre Year Post Year
Consistent pattern:
Despite schools beginning at a disadvantage, by year 2 they not only close the gap, but surpass their districts.
Schools Districts 48.23 51.66 56.46 53.25 8.24 1.59 17.1% 3.1%
p<.001 p<.001 p<.001
Data imply that improvements in schools boosted performance for the districts within which they were nested. School improvement outpaced the districts within which they were nested.
3
NOTE: Statistical significance is affected by sample size, wherein significance is achieved with smaller increases given larger samples or numbers of students.
Reading Advantages
Districts gained 21.2%, while PD-360 Schools gained 30.5% for a 9.3% advantage (p<.001)
Reading Advantages
The Districts rose 0.1%, while PD-360 Schools gained 4.8% for a 4.6% advantage* (p<.001)
Sta t Signif
p<.001 ns p<.001
For questions please contact Steven H. Shaha, PhD, DBA, steve.shaha@att.net, 801-879-5543. Dr. Shaha is an independent program evaluator, Professor at University of Utah and lecturer at Harvard University.
High Utilizing Schools improved by 4.9% over the District benchmark (p<.001) and Low Utilizing School improved by 2.0% (p<.01)
High Users Low Users
High Utilizing Schools significantly outperformed the collective district benchmark by 10.3% (p<.001) High Utilizing Schools significantly outperformed the Low Utilizing Schools by 2.9% (p<.01)
High Users Low Users
68.0
66.0
64.0
62.0 60.0 Prior Year District Benchmark Post-PD 360 Year
Low Utilizing Schools significantly outperformed the collective district benchmark by 7.2% (p<.001)
54.0
53.0
High Utilizing Schools improved by 4.9% over the District benchmark (p<.001) and Low Utilizing School improved by 2.6% (p<.01)
High Users Low Users
52.0
51.0 50.0 Prior Year District Benchmark Post-PD 360 Year
10
PD 360 Utilizing Schools significantly outperformed the collective district benchmark by 8.3% (p<.001) While the district fell by 3.2%
(p<.001)
High Utilizing Schools significantly outperformed collective district change between years to create a performance gap of 11.9%
(p<.001)
11