Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Ramesh Kodali
Global Head SAP Practice
Agenda
Status of ERP Systems Lessons learnt Cost of ERP and approach to optimize Case studies
75% of the implementations have failed to achieve the benefits and promises
associated with successful ERP.
Additionally Only 5 % of ERP implementations were successful in terms of finishing on time, within budget & without serious technical problems A majority (58%) of companies did not manage to integrate their ERP solution with existing systems 23% of respondents said the integration procedure were unsuccessful An overwhelming 71% did not attempt to incorporate their applications as integrations are a complex, costly and a time consuming process
Management did not take the time to answer the question, How do we want to run the business?
Pre-implementation activities were not well understood and often not done IT concentration may have been on technical wizardry and not focused on business excellence issues Education and training was rushed and did not bridge the gap from software to the day-to-day requirements of the operation Mapping of the old legacy systems to the new system was based on technology requirements, not users current and future needs Validation of data is not on time
When optimizing your ERP system, the focus must be aligning the application During the ERP optimization process, provide answers to the following:
Is ERP helping you to improve customer satisfaction? to contribute in increasing market share? to decrease your operational expenses? in reducing/optimizing your inventory? in reducing your order-to-delivery cycle time? to shorten your time-to-market? in achieving a competitive advantage? in giving information and metrics you need?
Cost spread
Industry Vertical process expertise Reduced efforts during requirement gathering and design stage Reduces risk of successful delivery Path for ROI Stable post go-live scenario
Fixed time
Post implementation Support
Blueprint
Design
Build
Cut-over
Assess Risk
Time
Classical Project
Project Preparation
Business Blueprint
Realization
Go-Live Preparation
Project Timeline
Reduced Implementation Effort by 30% to 50% Reduced Project Duration by 30% to 50%
Preconfigured Approach
Done by Zensar-as per requirements (Only 15-20%) Developed by Zensar- Preconfiguration of scenariosup to 80-85%
Provided by SAP
Life Sciences
Manufacturing Med-devices R&D
Retail
High fashion Groceries
Textiles
Manufacturing Merchandizing Apparel
Engineering
Discrete Component manufacturing
Food
Dairy Fast foods Beverages Packaging
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:
Implementation: Vapi, Gujrat Head Office: Delhi Year of Implementation:2007
Modules: FI, CO, MM, PP, QM, SD, EMS
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:
Implementation:Bhilwara,Rajasthan
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:
Implementation: Jammu, Gujarat
Head Office: Mumbai Year of Implementation:2007-2008
Modules: FI, CO, MM, PP, QM, SD, EMS
The Only Indian Case 2007 SAP ASUG Vienna RPG-LS runs SAP on ZENlife
33 Manufacturing Plants
Implementation time 12 Months
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS:
Implementation: Aurangabad Head Office: Aurangabad
Team Size 12
Solution Zensars Preconfigured SAP Certified Solution
Year of Implementation:2005
Modules: FI, CO, MM, PP, QM, SD, EMS
Implementation Duration 8
Team Size 12
Indian Immunologicals
Conclusions
Identify critical processes and ask the vendor for demo of these processes
3-4 day scope study prior to contract signing to avoid cost overrun Previous Industry experience of the vendor A sample and demo run of the training program
Thank You