CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

Las Colinas Elementary

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2010-2011

Abby McCone, Principal

Vision Statement: Las Colinas Elementary is dedicated to preparing students to become compassionate, critical thinkers, and life long learners who are responsible, global citizens that are helping to create a better and more peaceful world.

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Plans

Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

CIC MEMBERS
Name Ben Kneupper Rachel Langston Michelle Martinez Annissa Mitchell Abby McCone Stephanie Flores Esther Gonzalez Diana Dunn Marlana Dumas Stephanie Ariens Erin Gibson Sandy Flores Katie Cannon Natasha Grider Michelle Howard Wendi Greenwood Liz Ortiz Stephanie Courtney Ranika Klipsch Katie Myers Position Math IF IB Coordinator ESL IF Counselor Principal Special Education Teacher Activity Teacher Kindergarten Teacher 1st Grade Teacher 2nd Grade Teacher 3rd Grade Teacher 4th Grade Teacher 5th Grade Teacher Librarian/Parent Activity Teachers Parent Parent Parent Parent Parent Years Served 3 3 4 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Signature

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

PLANNING PROCESS

Needs Assessment
The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus, business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educational plans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides this work. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievement indicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance, graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics (e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered. The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253): 1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system. 2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs populations, including students in special education. 3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student. 4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan. 5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan. 6. Timelines for reaching goals. 7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives. 8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus. 9. Program for encouraging parental involvement. 10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data, student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged that ensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity. Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campus goals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment to excellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campuses receiving Title 1 funds must address Title 1 targets in campus plans and indicate where Title 1 funds will be spent.

Title I --Targeted Assisted (TA)

Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standards TA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planning TA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based research TA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programs TA 5. Highly qualified teachers TA 6. Professional Development TA 7. Increase Parental Involvement TA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)

TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessment TS 2. School-wide reform strategies TS 3. Highly qualified teachers TS 4. Professional development TS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schools TS 6. Parental involvement TS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs TS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments TS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basis TS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievement A. TEA Recognized/Exemplary District B. Recognized/Exemplary Schools C. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) D. Achievement Gap E. Special Populations F. TAKS Commended Scores (all students) Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff A. Out of School Suspensions B. DAEP Placements C. Attendance Rate Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness A. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST) B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instruction C. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 payments D. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usage E. Overtime hours F. Highly Qualified Teachers G. Teacher Classroom Attendance Rate H. All Staff Attendance Rate I. Teacher Turnover Rate J. Availability of Critical Technology Systems Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system A. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality Together B. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed) C. Staff Survey (to be developed)

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

RESULTS GOAL
Should identify what is desired in terms of performance after, or as a result of, putting new processes in place or improving existing processes.

SMART GOAL
Goal should be Strategic and specific, Measurable, Attainable, Resultsbased, and Time-bound.

INDICATOR
Standards and objectives (weak areas for students)
3 Grade TAKS Math 2010 Sub Pop Score All 96.1 A 100 AA 81.3 H 100 W 100 ED 90 LEP 100 SpEd *
rd

MEASURES
Tools well use to determine where students are now and whether they are improving.

TARGETS
The attainable performance level we would like to see.
90% of all sub-populations in grades 3, 4, 5 will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS Math. 90% of all students tested will attain a scores of 70% or higher.

Improve student performance on Math TAKS.

By the end of the 20102011 school years, at least 92% of all subpopulations in grades 3, 4, 5 will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS Math.

TAKS Math Test

4 Grade TAKS Math 2010 Sub Pop Score All 95.2 A 100 AA 88.9 H 84.6 W 100 ED 77.8 LEP 100 SpEd 90.9

th

End of Unit Assessment

End of Unit Performance Task

90% of students tested will meet the standard on the performance tasks.

5 Grade TAKS Math 2010 Sub Pop Score Universal All 98.1 Screener A 100 AA 87.5 H 100 W 100 ED 100 LEP * Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be a SpEd 100

th

Universal Screening 90% of ALL students tested will attain a score of 70 or higher.

- Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline (1990)

goal worthy of commitment.

SMART GOALS (Example) 90% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS Reading Obj. 1 Basic Understanding 85% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS Math Obj. 1 Numbers, Operations, and Quantitative Reasoning Obj. 6 Mathematical Processes and Tools 6

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Las Colinas Elementary

Campus Goals & Objectives

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA 2011 GOALS

All Students INDICATOR 2010 Data Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies All Tests Graduation 2009 Graduation 2010 Goal Participation: Reading/Language Arts Participation: Math Attendance 100 100 96.8 100 100 98 95.2 96.4 95.1 90.4 2011 Goal 98 98 98 95

African American 2010 Data 87.5 84.8 77.8 75.0 2011 Goal 92 92 92 92

Hispanic 2010 Data 93.1 93.1 100 66.7 2011 Goal 95 95 100 92 2010 Data 97.2 100 95.7 95.8

White 2011 Goal 98 100 98 98

Special Ed 2010 Data 84.2 90.0 80.0 50.0 2011 Goal 92 92 92 92

Economically Disadvantaged 2010 Data 88.6 88.9 87.5 75.0 2011 Goal 92 92 92 92 2010 Data 95.0 100 100 *

LEP 2011 Goal 98 100 100 100

100 100 96.4

100 100 98

100 100 95.8

100 100 98

100 100 97.1

100 100 98

100 100 97

100 100 98

100 100 96.2

100 100 98

100 100 97.3

100 100 98

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Las Colinas Elementary Campus Goals

2010 Percentage of Commended Students 2011 Goals
All Students INDICATOR Campus Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies 33.8 51.9 28.6 71.1 State 35 37 30 44
Diff. from state

African American 2011 Goal 36 52 35 75 Campus 57.1 50.0 * * State 25 23 21 28

Diff. from state

Hispanic 2011 Goal 60 55 30 35 Campus 27.1 39.5 22.6 63.9 State 28 31 25 36

Diff. from state

White 2011 Goal 35 45 30 70 Campus 44.7 78.9 36.8 100.0 State 48 47 38 59

Diff. from state

2011 Goal 50 80 40 100

1.2 14.9 1.4 27.1

32.1 27 * *

.9 8.5 2.4 27.9

3.3 31.9 1.2 41

Special Ed. INDICATOR Campus Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies 0.0 31.3 16.7 60.0 State 17 17 11 24
Diff. from state

Economically Disadvantaged 2011 Goal 25 35 25 65 Campus 28.0 44.1 23.1 62.5 State 26 28 22 33
Diff. from state

LEP Campus 15.6 21.2 12.5 66.7 State 23 25 20 20

Diff. from state

2011 Goal 32 48 28 65

2011 Goal 25 25 25 70

17 14.3 5.7 36

2 16.1 1.1 29.5

7.4 3.8 7.5 46.7

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Las Colinas Elementary 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement
Campus Focus # 1
Improve student achievement

Criteria for Success

At least 92% passing standard for all sub groups on TAKS math At least 92% passing standard for all sub groups on TAKS reading At least 92% passing standard for all sub groups on TAKS writing At least 92% passing standard for all sub groups on TAKS science 10% increase in all commended scores

Performance Measure
D, E D, E D, E D, E F

District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff
Campus Focus # 2
Improve school climate

Criteria for Success

5% reduction in bullying reports 2% increase in attendance

Performance Measure
A C

District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Campus Focus #3
Improve use of Technology

Criteria for Success

100% of Kindergarten teachers will use iPADs with students for differentiated instruction

Performance Measure
J

District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system
Campus Focus #4
Increase parental confidence

Criteria for Success

25% increase in African American volunteers Increase parental approval of academics on annual survey by 10%

Performance Measure
A, B, C A, B

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2010-2011

Title Target Area 1 2 3 4 x x x x x x x FORMATIVE MEASURE Conduct IB Parent Training Elementary High School Recruit African American parents to serve as volunteers Improve the website and post newsletters monthly Implement R Time Increase participation in morning and afternoon clubs Analyze assessments to identify students needs during and discuss at SNAP ASSESSMENT TIMELINE Meeting Agenda Sign in Register Newsletter saved in a file on computer Classroom schedules Rosters and attendance sheets Schedule of grade level meetings RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) February, 2011 September, 2010 September, 2010 June, 2011 October, 2010 October, 2010 May, 2011 September, 2010 May, 2011 COST/RESOURCES Rachel Langston, IF Natasha Grider, Librarian Marlana Dumas, Teacher Ben Kneupper, IF Annissa Mitchell, Counselor Ben Kneupper, IF Abby McCone, Principal Ben Kneupper, IF Annissa Mitchell, Counselor Rachel Langston, IF Michelle Martinez, IF Rachel Langston, IF Ben Kneupper, IF Abby McCone, Principal $200 Staff Time Staff Time Staff Time $500 sub cost Staff Time Staff Time

x x

x x x

Do goal setting with MAP reading and math data Increase whole school involvement in Professional Learning Communities with a focus on discourse and Learning with and Through Others Conduct Math Parent Training Night Go, Slow, & Whoa foods labeled in cafeteria line Students will participate in a daily structured 30 minute PE class Support to grade level teams in math and IB unit planning, inquiry based instruction, and curriculum integration Monitor the use of Exemplary Lessons, Community of Learners, IB Attitudes and Profile Train teachers on iPads for instructional use

Lesson plan Walk Through and meeting schedules

November, 2010 September, 2010 May 2011

Staff Time Staff Time $500 sub cost

Agenda Labels Lesson Plans

November, 2011 On-going On-going

Ben Kneupper, IF Deborah Scarborough, Cafeteria Manager Kimbo Rushing, PE Coach

$500 manipulatives Staff Time Catch Activities LCE PE Manuals Catch Activities Staff Time IB Attitudes and Learner Profile, Principals of Teaching and Learning, Standards Based Inst. Sys. Staff Time

Lesson Plans IB Vertical planning time schedule

Bi-Weekly

Ben Knuepper, IF Rachel Langston, IF

Lesson Plans

August May

Rachel Langston, IF

PO and training schedule

October, 2010

Rachel Langston, IF Linda Roach, IS

$5,000 technology money

Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Plans

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

11