CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

Bernice Chatman Freeman

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2010-2011
Walter Peterson, Principal
Vision Statement: Freeman Elementary School, in partnership with our families and community, will develop students who meet or exceed the local and state standards needed to successfully transition to middle school and to take advantage of the highest educational opportunities available. The student will: 1) Achieve at the proficient or commended level on TAKS. 2) Engage in powerful learning opportunities which use research based instructional strategies, maximize learning time, and incorporate technology. 3) Work collaboratively and demonstrate civic responsibility.
October 1, 2010

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Plans

Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

CIC MEMBERS
Name Mary Michaels Brandi Burns Jenna Petty Talitha Basom Eddie Reed Pam Spencer John Lee Sara Ashead LaDonna Conner Walter Peterson Carolyn Bibbs Position Kindergarten Teacher First Grade Teacher Second Grade Teacher Third Grade Teacher Fourth Grade Teacher Fifth Grade Teacher Specials Teacher Special Education Teacher ITS Principal Assistant Principal Years Served 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 2 Signature

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

PLANNING PROCESS

Needs Assessment
The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus, business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educational plans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides this work. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievement indicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance, graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics (e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered. The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253): 1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system. 2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs populations, including students in special education. 3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student. 4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan. 5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan. 6. Timelines for reaching goals. 7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives. 8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus. 9. Program for encouraging parental involvement. 10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data, student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged that ensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity. Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campus goals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment to excellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievement A. TEA Recognized/Exemplary District B. Recognized/Exemplary Schools C. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) D. Achievement Gap E. Special Populations F. TAKS Commended Scores (all students) G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores) H. SAT I. PSAT/NMSQT J. Advanced Placement K. Graduation Data Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff A. Out of School Suspensions B. DAEP Placements C. Attendance Rate Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness A. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST) B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instruction C. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 payments D. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usage E. Overtime hours F. Highly Qualified Teachers G. Teacher Classroom Attendance Rate H. All Staff Attendance Rate I. Teacher Turnover Rate J. Availability of Critical Technology Systems Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system A. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality Together B. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed) C. Staff Survey (to be developed)

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Bernice Chatman Freeman

Campus Goals & Objectives

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA 2011 GOALS

All Students INDICATOR 2010 Data Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies All Tests Graduation 2009 Graduation 2010 Goal Participation: Reading/Language Arts Participation: Math Attendance 100 100 96.4 100 100 98 97 93 95 91 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100

African American 2010 Data 92 83 90 88 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100

Hispanic 2010 Data 95 90 100 82 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100 2010 Data 100 100 88 na

White 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100

Special Ed 2010 Data 89 89 na na 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100

Economically Disadvantaged 2010 Data 95 87 88 81 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100 2010 Data 95 91 88 na

LEP 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100

100 100 96.9

100 100 98

100 100 96.2

100 100 98

100 100 95.2

100 100 98

100 100 na

100 100 na

100 100 na

100 100 na

100 100 na

100 100 na

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Bernice Chatman Freeman Campus Goals

2010 Percentage of Commended Students 2011 Goals
All Students INDICATOR Campus Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies 50 53 45 55 State 35 37 30 44
Diff. from state

African American 2011 Goal 80 80 80 80 Campus 39 34 30 19 State 25 23 21 28

Diff. from state

Hispanic 2011 Goal 80 80 80 80 Campus 25 25 20 55 State 28 31 25 36

Diff. from state

White 2011 Goal 80 80 80 80 Campus 42 42 25 na State 48 47 38 59

Diff. from state

2011 Goal 80 80 80 80

+ + + +

+ + + -

Special Ed. INDICATOR Campus Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies 22 22 na na State 17 17 11 24
Diff. from state

Economically Disadvantaged 2011 Goal 80 80 80 80 Campus 32 25 27 23 State 26 28 22 33

Diff. from state

LEP Campus 33 38 25 na State 23 25 20 20

Diff. from state

2011 Goal 80 80 80 80

2011 Goal 80 80 80 80

+ +

+ + -

+ + +

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Bernice Chatman Freeman 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement
Campus Focus # 1
Improve student achievement

Criteria for Success

100% of all students in each sub-pop will pass TAKS, TAKS-Acc, TAKS-M or TAKS-Alt on each academic assessment 80% or more of our students will achieve at Commended level on their TAKS test Receive a campus rating of Exemplary from TEA 100% of staff will be highly qualified 100% of staff will receive their ESL and G/T certification Maintain a 0% teacher turnover rate

Performance Measure
B, C, D, E, F B, C, D, E, F A A, E A, C, D, E A, E, G

Campus Focus #2
Improve overall number of fitness tests passed from previous year

Criteria for Success

Increase student fitness tests passed (by 3%) for all students

Performance Measure
G

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Bernice Chatman Freeman 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff
Campus Focus #3
Decrease the number of office referrals for the year

Criteria for Success

100% of the classrooms will implement Character Education traits; R-Time, Achiever McBeaver, Bully Prevention, TNN, classroom guidance counseling

Performance Measure
A

Campus Focus #4
Increase attendance and decrease number of students who are students

Criteria for Success

Increase attendance rate by .5%

Performance Measure
B, C

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Bernice Chatman Freeman 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness
Campus Focus #5
Continue to improve Green Team effort to conserve energy

Criteria for Success

Reduce monthly energy consumption by 2%. Implement a recycling program in 100% of the classrooms.

Performance Measure
A, F F

Campus Focus #6
Develop Budget Committee to address campus spending

Criteria for Success

Decrease amount of overtime hours of paraprofessional employees by 10%

Performance Measure
F C, F

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Bernice Chatman Freeman 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system
Campus Focus #7
Improve and increase community involvement

Criteria for Success

Increase PTA membership by 10% Increase the number of business partners with the school by 3 businesses Increase the number of parents at nine week award programs by 5 parents each nine weeks Increase attendance at Coffee Talk meetings with parents by 2%

Performance Measure
B, C, D, E, F, G B, C, D, E, F, G B, C, D, E, F, G B, C, D, E, F, G

10

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2010-2011

Campus Focus
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

ACTION STRATEGY Meet with each teacher to plan training for ESL/G-T certification Implement 6-Step Discipline Chart for student behavior and parent communication Decrease the number of students who are tardy each day by implementing tardy policy Hold community outreach meetings with parents to gain their support and partnership Grow the Green Team efforts for conserving and recycling on campus Increase parent volunteers

FORMATIVE MEASURE Certificates

ASSESSMENT TIMELINE September, 2010 through July, 2011 September, 2010 through June, 2010 September, 2010 through June, 2010 Once every 9 weeks

RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Walter Peterson

COST/RESOURCES District reimbursement for ESL certification None

Discipline chart with student, teacher and parent signatures Daily sign-in sheets

Classroom Teacher Walter Peterson

Sign-in sheets

Walter Peterson Erika Welch Mike Mango

All Call System Formal Letters Detention staff members District Staff support

Weight of recycled items Volunteer hours recorded Attendance Sheets September, 2010 through June, 2011 September, 2010 through June, 2011 Every nine week grading period Daily

Waste Management System

Walter Peterson Karen Woodward Walter Peterson Erika Welch Tristie Loyd Walter Peterson Carolyn Bibbs Classroom Teacher

Raptorware System

Plan and hold Coffee Talk parent sessions Hold Award Programs

Coffee supplies Copies of handouts Ribbons and awards

Attendance

All students will attend tutoring sessions, when applicable, to ensure high achievement on TAKS tests Students will achieve Commended Performance on TAKS tests

Daily Attendance

Software support (if needed) Manipulatives (if needed)

TAKS Results

May, 2011

Classroom Teacher G/T Liasion

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Plans

Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

RESULTS GOAL
Kindergarten Students should identify what is desired in terms of performance after, or as a result of, putting new processes in place or improving existing processes.

SMART GOAL
Goal should be Strategic and specific, Measurable, Attainable, Resultsbased, and Time-bound.

MEASURES INDICATOR
Standards and objectives (weak areas for students) Tools well use to determine where students are now and whether they are improving.

TARGETS
The attainable performance level we would like to see.

Math Solve Story Problems using understanding, strategies and communication. LA improve story comprehension when reading.

100% of students will be able to 1) retell and comprehend stories 2) solve a math word problem by drawing and explaining their strategy.

Draw a model of the story problem

Word Problems Text book & teacher assess.

100% = show their thinking by using numerals & i t 100% - explain the strategy used

Explain the strategy used to solve the math problem. Determine the problem and solution in a story Use graphic organizers to retell a story and show the problem/solution to Readers Response Journals Story Maps

100% - tell the characters and setting 100% - tell the problem & solution

12

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

RESULTS GOAL
Should identify what is desired in terms of performance after, or as a result of, putting new processes in place or improving existing processes.

SMART GOAL
Goal should be Strategic and specific, Measurable, Attainable, Resultsbased, and Time-bound.

MEASURES INDICATOR
Standards and objectives (weak areas for students) Tools well use to determine where students are now and whether they are improving.

TARGETS
The attainable performance level we would like to see.

Math Journals

First Grade students will improve academic achievement in math.

100% of students will pass the district end of the year exam in math. In addition, 100% of students will achieve commended performance

- Concepts of money
Unit Assessment

100% will achieve commended performances.

- Fractions and probability

100% of students will pass the district end of the year exam in math. Tutoring

- Equations

Calendar Math

13

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

RESULTS GOAL
Should identify what is desired in terms of performance after, or as a result of, putting new processes in place or improving existing processes.

SMART GOAL
Goal should be Strategic and specific, Measurable, Attainable, Resultsbased, and Time-bound.

INDICATOR
Standards and objectives (weak areas

MEASURES
Tools well use to determine where students are now and whether they are improving.

TARGETS
The attainable performance level we would like to see.

Connections
Reading TEK 110.4.10 (D), 9(A) Math TEK 111.14 (12)

Students will use literacy thinking strategies in math and reading. The students will improve their writing in math and reading as a result of learning the strategies.

100% of all students will use strategies to better their writing in reading and math.

Fountas and Pinnel Fountas and Pinnel Open Ended Writing Test

Visualization
Reading TEK 110.4. 9(E) Math TEK111.14.12 (A) (B)(C) (D)(E) TEK 111.14.13 (A) (B)

All students will achieve a Level M on Fountas and Pinnel Students will achieve 88100% on the OE Test. All students will achieve 90% or higher Students will receive a 90% or higher. Students will receive a 90% or higher.

Prediction/Inferrences
Reading
TEK 110.4.9(F)

Math
TEK 111.14(a)2 Questions
Reading TEK 110.4.12(A) Math TEK 111.14.12 (A) (B)(C) (D)(E) TEK 111.14.13 (A) (B)

Universal Screening Problem Solving Assessment

Determining Importance
Reading TEK 110.4.9(F)
Math TEK 111.14.12 (A) (B)(C) (D)(E) 111.14.13 (A) (B)

INDICATOR

MEASURE

Targets
14

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Results Goal
Improve students reading comprehension skills and applying it to mathematical problem solving.

SMART GOAL
100% of Third Grade students will pass both the Reading and the Math TAKS.

Students comprehend a variety of texts drawing on useful strategies as needed. The student applies Grade 3 mathematics to solve problems connected to everyday experiences and activities in and outside of school.

Open ended testing and ups check (determining importance, prediction, synthesizing) end of unit assessments Story problems Interactive notebooks Released TAKS Open ended testing and ups check (schema, connections, visualizing) end of unit assessments Story problems Interactive notebooks Released TAKS Open ended testing and ups check (inferring, questioning)

100% of students will achieve 85% or higher on the post test at the end of the year.

100% of students will achieve 85% or higher on the post test at the end of the year.

Students understand, make inferences and draw conclusions about the varied structural patterns and features of literary nonfiction and respond by providing evidence from text to support their understanding.

100% of students will achieve 85% or higher on the post test at the end of the year.

end of unit assessments Story problems Interactive notebooks Released TAKS

15

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

RESULTS GOAL
Should identify what is desired in terms of performance after, or as a result of, putting new processes in place or improving existing processes.

SMART GOAL
Goal should be Strategic and specific, Measurable, Attainable, Resultsbased, and Time-bound.

MEASURES INDICATOR
Standards and objectives (weak areas for students) Tools well use to determine where students are now and whether they are improving.

TARGETS
The attainable performance level we would like to see.

Students in 4 grade should have a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts resulting in a stronger confidence when solving more complex mathematical problems.

th

By the end of the school year 2011, 91% of the students in the 4th Grade will be at Proficient or Advanced levels on the state math assessme nt test (TAKS).

Objective 1 4.1A, 4.3A, 4.4D, 4.5A/B Objective 2 4.6 B/C

End of Unit Test, Math Notebooks, Origo/Navigator/Rive rdeep/ Teacher Assmt. End of Unit Test, Math Notebooks, Origo/Navigator/Rive rdeep/ Teacher Assmt. End of Unit Test, Math Notebooks, Riverdeep/Origo/ Navigator, Teacher Assmt. End of Unit Test, Math Notebooks, Riverdeep/ Origo/ Navigator, Teacher Assmt.

Increase TAKS scores from 82% to 92%.

Increase TAKS scores from 82% to 92%.

Objective 4 4.11A/B

Increase TAKS scores from 81% to 92%

Objective 6 4.14 B/C 4.16 A

Increase TAKS scores from 76% to 92%

Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be a goal worthy of commitment. - Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline (1990)

16

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

RESULTS GOAL
Should identify what is desired in terms of performance after, or as a result of, putting new processes in place or improving existing processes.

SMART GOAL
Goal should be Strategic and specific, Measurable, Attainable, Resultsbased, and Time-bound.

MEASURES INDICATOR
Standards and objectives (weak areas for students) Tools well use to determine where students are now and whether they are improving.

TARGETS
The attainable performance level we would like to see.

5th grade students will improve their understanding of Earth Sciences.

By the end of the school year, 100% of 5th grade students will master Objective 4 (Earth Sciences) on the Science TAKS test.

.Objective 4 78% in 2009

Science Unit Tests Science Benchmarks/MAP

Increase Objective 4 from 84% in 2010 to 100% in 2011.

Objective 4 84% in 2010 Science TAKS Release Tests

17