CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

Creekview High School

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2010-2011

Joseph LaPuma, Principal

Vision Statement: The mission of Creekview High School is to inspire a creative, challenging, and caring community in which all students will graduate within four years prepared to pursue post-secondary education and become productive citizens.

October 1, 2010

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Plans

Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

CIC MEMBERS
Name Joseph LaPuma Ginny Biggs Kimberly Guinn Phyllis Reed Diane Jouana Sandra Gipson John Herrick Dan Marek Donna Middlekauf Emily Seeman Ronelle Eddings Sandra Parker Kathy Sechrist Stacy Lovett Amy Fusco Lee Huseman Steve Hamberger Position Principal Associate Principal Assistant Principal Assistant Principal LOTE/ESL Teacher Math Teacher Social Studies Teacher Science Teacher Math Teacher ELA Teacher Dance Teacher/Dept Mgr CATE Teacher/Dept Mgr Special Ed Teacher Counselor Paraprofessional/Parent/Community PTSA President/Parent/Community Business/Community Years Served NA NA NA NA 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 1 2 1 3 Signature

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

PLANNING PROCESS

Needs Assessment
The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus, business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educational plans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides this work. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievement indicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance, graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics (e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered. The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253): 1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system. 2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs populations, including students in special education. 3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student. 4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan. 5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan. 6. Timelines for reaching goals. 7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives. 8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus. 9. Program for encouraging parental involvement. 10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data, student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged that ensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity. Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campus goals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment to excellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campuses receiving Title 1 funds must address Title 1 targets in campus plans and indicate where Title 1 funds will be spent.

Title I --Targeted Assisted ( TA )

Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standards TA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planning TA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based research TA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programs TA 5. Highly qualified teachers TA 6. Professional Development TA 7. Increase Parental Involvement TA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)

TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessment TS 2. School-wide reform strategies TS 3. Highly qualified teachers TS 4. Professional development TS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schools TS 6. Parental involvement TS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs TS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments TS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basis TS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievement A. TEA Recognized/Exemplary District B. Recognized/Exemplary Schools C. Adequately Yearly Progress (AYP) D. Achievement Gap E. Special Populations F. TAKS Commended Scores (all students) G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores) H. SAT I. PSAT/NMSQT J. Advanced Placement K. Graduation Data Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff A. Out of School Suspensions B. DAEP Placements C. Attendance Rate Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness A. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST) B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instruction C. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 payments D. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usage E. Overtime hours F. Highly Qualified Teachers G. Teacher Classroom Attendance Rate H. All Staff Attendance Rate I. Teacher Turnover Rate J. Availability of Critical Technology Systems Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system A. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality Together B. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed) C. Staff Survey (to be developed)

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Creekview High School

Campus Goals & Objectives

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA 2011 GOALS

All Students INDICATOR 2010 Data Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies All Tests Graduation 2009 Graduation 2010 Goal Participation: Reading/Language Arts Participation: Math Attendance 99. 99 95.6 92.7 100 100 100 95.2 82.9 -91.7 97.8 94 99 2011 Goal 97 87

African American 2010 Data 94.9 74.0 -87.4 98.8 90 100 2011 Goal 97 80

Hispanic 2010 Data 94.4 72.8 -86.3 95.6 90 98 2011 Goal 97 80 2010 Data 97.7 90.5 -96.8 99.9

White 2011 Goal 99 93

Special Ed 2010 Data 79.8 41.2 -99 100 71.7 94.7 75 97 2011 Goal 90 70

Economically Disadvantaged 2010 Data 92.4 74.8 -85.4 96.5 90 99 2011 Goal 95 80 2010 Data 61.8 57.7 -65.9 85.4

LEP 2011 Goal 70 70

70 88

94.9 100 100 98 100 100

85.5 100 98 98 100 100

95.5 100 99 100 100 100

71.4 100 95 98 100 100

92.9 100 98 99 100 100

69.0 100 100 100 100 100

10

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Creekview High School Campus Goals

2010 Percentage of Commended Students 2011 Goals
All Students INDICATOR Campus Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies 27.6 32.3 -31.8 66.2 State 19 22 -17 49
Diff. from state

African American 2011 Goal 33 37 -37 71 Campus 19.2 13.3 -14.9 52.3 State 13 10 -8 34
Diff. from state

Hispanic 2011 Goal 25 18 -20 57 Campus 16.2 18.6 -17.3 54.4 State 14 15 -10 38
Diff. from state

White 2011 Goal 21 24 -22 59 Campus 38.4 43.4 -42.4 75.5 State 27 32 -27 61
Diff. from state

2011 Goal 43 48 -47

8.6 10.3 -14.8 17.2

6.2 3.3 -6.9 18.3

2.2 3.6 -7.3 16.4

11.4 11.4 -15.4 14.5

Special Ed. INDICATOR Campus Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies 4.8 4.9 -9.4 29.8 State 3 3 -3 14
Diff. from state

Economically Disadvantaged 2011 Goal 10 10 -14 35 Campus 17.0 21.1 -19.5 52.1 State 13 13 -9 35
Diff. from state

LEP Campus 2.6 12.8 -7.3 19.5 State 2 5 -2 10

Diff. from state

2011 Goal 22 26 -25 57

2011 Goal 8 18 -12 25

1.8 1.9 -6.4 15.8

4.0 8.1 -10.5 17.1

.6 7.8 -5.3 9.5

11

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Creekview High School 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement
Campus Focus # 1
Increase student achievement

Criteria for Success

80% of all subpops will pass Math TAKS in 2011 80% of all subpops will pass Reading/ELA in 2011 80% of all subpops will pass Science TAKS in 2011 5% increase TAKS commended percentage (all students) Meet AYP with 65% passing in Math Meet APY with 65% passing in Reading Campus rating of Recognized from TEA in 2011

Performance Measure
D, E D, E D, E F D, E D, E

Campus Focus #2
Increase number of students reading on grade level

Criteria for Success

All students increase Lexile score by 1 grade-level.

Performance Measure
B, C

Campus Focus #3
Increase achievement for advanced academic measures on PSAT, SAT & ACT, AP test

Criteria for Success

Increase participation by 10% (ACT and SAT) Increase ACT scores by 0.5 Increase combined SAT scores 1550 Increase AP test participation by 10% Increase students earning a 3 on AP test by 5%

Performance Measure
H, I H, I H, I J J

12

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Creekview High School 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff
Campus Focus #4
Improve school climate

Criteria for Success

10% reduction in office discipline referrals from 2009-10 10% increase in student participation in extra-curricular activities from 200910 5% decrease in student tardies from 2009-2010 5% decrease in ISS placement from 2009-2010 5% decrease in OSS placement from 2009-2010 5% decrease in DAEP placement from 2009-2010

Performance Measure
A C C C C C

Campus Focus

Criteria for Success

Performance Measure

Campus Focus

Criteria for Success

Performance Measure

13

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Creekview High School 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness
Campus Focus #5
Decrease energy consumption

Criteria for Success

3% reduction in electricity usage per month

Performance Measure
D

Campus Focus

Criteria for Success

Performance Measure

Campus Focus

Criteria for Success

Performance Measure

14

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Creekview High School 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously stakeholder confidence and support of our school system
Campus Focus #6 Criteria for Success Performance Measure
A A A Improve parental involvement Increase PTA membership by 10% from 2009-10 Increase parent-community survey effectiveness rating by at least .5 Increase parent participation in teacher/student registration by 5%

Campus Focus #7
Improve teacher satisfaction

Criteria for Success

Stakeholder survey

Performance Measure
B,C

Campus Focus

Criteria for Success

Performance Measure

15

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2010-2011

Campus Focus
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Title Target Area T.A. 6

ACTION STRATEGY
Create and support Professional Development Calendar for core departments for collaborative, ongoing core planning After analysis of data from each progress monitoring period, determine/ implement instructional adjustments Non core teachers will continue to support SMART school wide goal through identified vocabulary words/focus Math, Science, Reading/ELA and Social Studies SSI mini-camps.

FORMATIVE MEASURE

ASSESSMENT TIMELINE

RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S)

COST/RESOURCES

X X X

On a 3 6 week basis

Ongoing 9/28 10/2 11/9 11/13 12/7 12/11 2/15 2/19 Benchmark dates fall between 9/28 2/19

LaPuma, Biggs, Guinn, & Reed

X X

T.A. 1,3

By dept., create, implement, & monitor benchmark items Collect campus benchmark data at a minimum of 4 times

LaPuma, Biggs, Guinn, & Reed

X X X

T.A. 1,3,4

LaPuma, Biggs, Guinn, & Reed Core Department Managers $20,000

X X

T.A. 1,2,3

On a 9 week basis (8 hours/grade-level, per 9 weeks)

Ongoing

LaPuma, Biggs, Guinn, & Reed

X X X

T.A. 3

X X X

T.A. 3

Target Marzanos scientifically researched based 9 Instructional Strategies That Work, Thinking Maps and Content Literacy Strategies. Require teachers to implement these strategies in their instructional practices. Writing Across the Curriculum

Documentation in Teachers lesson plans Observation by administrators and teachers Student Perfomance On a 9 week basis (one writing summative in all core subject areas, per 9 weeks) UbD documents from Curriculum Department Monthly charts of electricity usage Calendar events submitted to District

Aug-May

LaPuma, Biggs, Guinn, & Reed

Ongoing

LaPuma, Biggs, Guinn, & Reed

X X X

T.A. 1,3,6

T.A. 8

Teachers will utilize Understanding by Design (UbD) for planning and implementing instruction Implement Watt Watchers awareness Submit at least 70% of our school calendar events to the District to be

PD Period

Core Department Managers LaPuma, Biggs, Guinn, & Reed LaPuma, Biggs, Guinn, & Reed
Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Ongoing August 2010 through June 2011,

T.A. 7,8

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Plans

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

T.A. 7

included in the District Calendar epublication Parent Conferences Parents will come to the school and pick-up their students grade report and visit with teachers Host the AVID Parent Night and the AVID Introduction Ceremony. The Parent Night will provide an opportunity for parents to become more aware and get involved in the AVID Program. Maintain appropriate document of HQ status of teachers and paraprofessionals; thereby focusing on the importance of hiring only HQ teachers and teachers assistants who are HQ Closely monitor the master schedule to ascertain that the teachers have been assigned to teaching fields in which they are highly qualified.

calendar

Ongoing $1000

Documented on School schedule

March 2011

LaPuma, Biggs, Guinn, & Reed

T.A. 1,7

$700 LaPuma, Biggs, Guinn, & Reed

School Calendar

September, April

T.A. 5

Number of HQ teachers and HQ teacher assistants hired

August 2009 May 2010, Ongoing

LaPuma, Biggs, Guinn, & Reed

T.A.5

Master schedule review

July August 2009 Ongoing

LaPuma, Biggs, Guinn, & Reed

17

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

18