Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Proposed de Gran
and
Sergio
Falcon,
Universidad
de Las Palmas
The k-Fibonacci numbers Fn = Fk,n satisfy Fk,n+2 > 1 be a fixed integer. Prove that
kFk,n+1
+ Fk,n, Fk,o =
0, Fk,1
1. Let
Fk
Please submit all new problem proposals and their solutions to the Problems Editor, DR. RUSS EULER, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Northwest Missouri State University, 800 University Drive, Maryville, MO 64468, or by email at reuler@nwmissouri.edu. All solutions to others' proposals must be submitted to the Solutions Editor, DR. JA WAD SADEK, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Northwest Missouri State University, 800 University Drive, Maryville, MO 64468. If you wish to have receipt of your submission acknowledged, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope. Each problem and solution should be typed on separate sheets. Solutions to problems in this issue must be received by August 15, 2011. If a problem is not original, the proposer should inform the Problem Editor of the history of the problem. A problem should not be submitted elsewhere while it is under consideration for publication in this Journal. Solvers are asked to include references rather than quoting "well-known results". The content of the problem sections of The Fibonacci Quarterly are all available on the web free of charge at www.fq.math.ca;.
[~]
'\"
n (n - J)
.
F2n-3).
The Fibonacci
numbers
Ln satisfy 0, F1
Fn+2
Also, a
(1
VS)/2, (3 =
= =
Fn+1 + Fn, Fo
= =
= L1 =
1;
k= 1
I: V~+
n
F2
) Fk
IT (1 + Fl) k=1
n
1/2n :S FnFn+l
an
+ (3n
Proposed Sciences, by Carsten Elsner' Hannover, Germany. and Martin Stein, University of Applied
2n
+ ()n] -1
Let qo = 1, ql
a1 and qn
anqn-1
+ qn-2
A. Hillman,
University
of South
Carolina
Sumter,
Sumter,
B-1061
Berlin,
Germany
Fn+2
1 4g ;) [() n
+2
- 7g(n
1) - 9g(n ))
=;)1 [2 n+4 4F
1 = ;)[4(3Fn+1
+ 2Fn)
- 3(2Fn+1
+ Fn)
- 12(Fn+1 + Fn)
- 16F~+1 - 9F~] 1 2 = ;)[-4Fn+1 Solution by Jay Hendel, University of Pardubice, Towson University, The Czech Republic Towson, MD and (independently). Jaroslav Seibert, = -[F~+l = -(Fn+1
=
12Fn+1Fn
- 8Fnl
- 3Fn+1Fn - 2Fn)(Fn+1
+ 2F~1
-
Fn)
We will prove the given formula by induction on n. side of the equality. It is easy to see that S(I) = p,F?
Let S(n) denote the sum on the left 1. Suppose that the equality is true
Fn-2}'n-1.
is the product of two consecutive Fibonacci numbers,
1) - 9g(n)J!4
S(n+l)=
(s(n)+(_lr~IJFn+l)}~+l= Fn+2
= =
using Cassini's
I
(_I)Ln2IJFn+l
F
n+2
(FnFn+2 F2
n+J
lI
n+l
(_I)ln2IJFn+1(F
n+2
n n+2
_ F2
n+1
Also solved by Brian Beasley, Scott Brown, Paul S. Bruckman, Charles Cook, Kenneth Davenport, Sergio Falcon and Angel Plaza (jointly), G. C. Greubel, Jay Hendel, Harris Kwong, Jaroslav Seibert, David Terr, and the proposer.
(_I)Ln2
J(_1)1I+1 F +1
FlI+2 ([1]; identity (29))
=
identity
B-1063
(_I)lni J
(-I)l~J
the proof
and
if n is odd
then
Proposed by Jose Luis Dfaz-Barrero, Barcelona, Spain (Vol. 48.1, February 2010) Prove that
2
Universidad
Politecnica
de Cataluiia,
which completes
1+ 8
Also solved by Paul S. Bruckman, Greubel, and the proposer. Falcon proposal. and Plaza Sergio Falcon and Angel Plaza (jointly), G. C.
k=l
F L __ Lk F~ +
2k_
<3
(FnFlI+1
+ 1)(LnL +2
lI
1).
of Mathematics,
Solution by Angel Plaza and Sergio Falcon (jointly), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain of this inequality that will appear as a separate
Department
have a generalization
p,2 B-1062 Proposed by M. N. Deshpande, (Vol. 48.1, February 2010) Nagpur, India 1
+ 8~
F1 +L1 1 1+8--
<
for n ::,.O. For every n ::,. 2, show that is a product of two consecutive Fibonacci
numbers.
1+ 1 1+4
3 4 < -6
-(F1F2
+ 1)(L1L3
1)
<
3 8.
1 - a3n I-a3
-~
1 - (33n
<
+4~
(1 - (33) (1 - a3n) - (1 - ~3) (1 - (33n) (1 - (3)(1 - (33) _ a3 _ (33 _ (a3n _ (33n) +'(a(3)3(a3n-3 _ (33n-3) 1 - (a3 + (33) + (a(3)3 (a - (3)(13n a(a2
(1
1).
+ 13n-3 + 3)
- h)
Taking into account that for n > 1,4 <:: 1(FnFn+1 + 1), the proof is done. It should be noted that for n 2: 2, the following stronger inequality holds. For any integer
+ a)[1
n 2: 2,
_ a - (3 + -
- (_(3)n] - (1 + (3)[(1 - (_a)n)] (1 + a)(1 + (3) (_I)n[(an - (3n) - (an-I - (3n-I)] I+(a+(3)+a(3
(a - (3)[h
+ (-I)n(Jn
- fn-I)]
ff3 B-1064 Proposed by N. Gauthier, Kingston, ON, Canada (Vol. 48.1, February 2010) k=O k
(13n
+ 13n-3 - 13 a(a2+3)
3[h
+ (_1)n(Jn
a fn-Il
- fn_I)])
+ 2a2 + 8
afn+1
+ fn
for n 2: O. If n is a positive
integer,
Also solved by Paul S. Bruckman, Charles Cook, Sergio Falcon and Angel Plaza (jointly), G. C. Greubel, Jay Hendel, and the proposer.
B-1065
Let a
(a
va
+ 4)/2, and
(3 = (a -
N+4)/2
ak - (3k a-(3
The Binet's
form for fk is
Proposed by Br. J. Mahon, Australia (Vol. 48.1, February 2010) Pn satisfy Pn+2
+ (3 =
a, a(3
n-1 3
-1, and a - (3 =
va
=
f
r=!
2Pn+1
I
+ Pn,
Po
__
0, PI
1. Prove
that
+ 4.
1
I-Ience,
1_
- 125
n-!(ak_(3k)3. k=O
~ fk = ~
k=O
a2
+4
n-!(ak_(3k)3 ~ a - (3 k=O
. Given N natural
1
let T(N)
LNr=l
(-JY-
1P 6r+3
J
P:jrPlr-t-3
and let T
"'= 0r=!
(-!y-
1 P6T+3
plrPlr+3
limT(N)
for
satisfy
the following
relations
= ---
un - vn u-v pin
)2, v
1 - )2;
~ k k3 L.,(a - (3 ) k=O
I_a = ---
3n
1 - a3
I-(33n - --
1 - (33
+3
[I-(-(3)n --1 + (3
- - ...-----
I-(-a)n]. 1+a
+ pin+3
= 5P6n+3;
~ ~
P~
u2n
-+ 0 as n -+
00.
Equations (1), (2), an(~ (4) are well-known; (3) is derived similarly Binet formulas) and using the fact that P3 = 5. Then N 1 N - '\' (_1)r-l{p2 3r +p2} 3,+3 = _ '\' {(_1)r-l
the
T(N) -0
r=1 is readily
5P3rP3r+3 evaluated 1
-2 -
5 as (_1)N
(_l)r} _
P3r+3
2 '
r=1
P3, (_l)N
-2-
a telescoping
sum that
EDITED
BY
FLORIAN
LUCA
T(N) =
Using (4), we see that
-2-
5P3
5P3N+3 with T =
= 1~5
125
5P3N+3
T does exist,
Also solved by Sergio Falcon and Angel Plaza Jaroslav Seibert, and the proposeI'.
A late solution to Problem B-1058 by Zbigniew
(jointly),
Kenneth
Davenport,
Jakubczyk
was received.
Please send all communications concerning ADVANCED PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS to FLORIAN LUCA, IMATE, UNAM, AP. POSTAL 61-3 (XANGARI), CP 58 089, MORELlA, MICHOACAN, MEXICO, or bye-mail at fiuca@matmor.unam.mx as files of the type tex, dvi, ps, doc, html, pdf, etc. This department especially welcomes problems believed to be new or extending old results. Proposers should submit solutions or other information that will assist the editor. To facilitate their considemtion, all solutions sent by regular mail should be submitted on separate signed sheets within two months after publication of the problems.
[~L
a) Show that [
n-kf(
n]
[n]
kf(
m(n, k) is a positive
integer.
H-698 Proposed
i) Prove that
00 (
~Ff
1 )-1
)
-I
(_1)n
=Fn-1Fn--3-+O
integers
(1)
F~
ii) Is it true
that
00
FkFk+m
implied
r;
FkFk+m
+ 3Fm-2(-I)"
0 might depend
+0
(F~
'
where
the constant
by the above
on m?
H-699
Proposed by Ovidiu Furdui, Cluj, Romania and Huizeng Qin, China Let k :::: be a natural number and let (.Tn)nEN be the sequence defined by
Shandong,
.Tn
0-(3
= 2(0 - (3) 1 2(0-(3) 1 = 2U,.ls
r (- 2k +
(-I)n1
D
(-(2k
r (- 2k + +
1) +
D. D
r (-2k + ~) + 1) +
(( o"+s _ (3r+s
((0" - {3r)(os
+ or
(38 _ OS (3")
+ (o'+s
_ {3r+s _ Or (3s
+ OS (3r))
r (-(2k
+ (3S) +
(OS - (3s)(or
+ (3'))
(-(2k
1) +~),
+ fslr),
to prove.
5,
which is what we wanted 2. For integers For the proof, f,.-8 H-680 Proposed by N. Gauthier, Kingston, ON (Vol. 46, No.4, November 2008) For .T oJ 0 an indeterminate and for an integer 17. :::: 0, consider the generalized Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials Un}n and {In}n, respectively, given by the following recurrences In+2
= ~(3
0-
rand
= (-~)'Uris
-- fslr).
(o,-s
- (3r-s) _ oS(3r(o(3)-s)
=
=
_1_
(0 - (3)
(0"(38(0(3)-S
OS (3'") _ (o'+s
_ {3r+s _ or (3s
+ OS (3r))
.Tln+l
+ In + In
17.
::::
0, 0,
where where
17. ::::
10 = 10 =
0,
2, II
II = 1; = .T.
_ (OS _ (3s)(or
+ (3"))
(_1)8
= -2-U,.ls which is what we wanted - fsl,), to prove.
(a) f(_l)kn
k=l (b)f(-I)kn 1 k=O (c) f(-I)kn k=l
__
1 __
Tn,
17. ::::
1;
Now, with (17.,k) integers, put r := n(k+ 1) and 5 := nk in the above formulas and rearrange the results in either one of the following forms, by dividing by fn(k+l)fnk or by In(k+l)lnk> as the case may be, to get that:
(la)
Tn, 17.::::1;
= ~ (~
2 fnk
In(k+l)) fn(k+l)
n> 1 k>
, ' , ' -, -,
(d)
f(
(lb)
Tn, 17.::::0;
= ~
2
fnk) Ink
17.> Ok> 0 -, -,
17.
_1)kn
(2a) ----
1 = - (Ink -
kn f(2k+l)nlf(2k+l)n
+ f~l
14
kn
In(k+l)) - -In(k+l)
>1
-,
14
(k+l)n
'
(2b)
Ink
17.>0 -,
Solution
by the
proposer
To find the sought closed forms, we first invoke (2a) and sum the resulting telescoping This gives the desired closed form for sum (a) upon division of (2a) by In: Closed form for (a):
The characteristic equations for the given recurrences are identical and have roots 0 = ~(.T + V.T2 + 4), (3 = ~(.T - V.T2 + 4), with 0(3 = -1 and 0 + (3 =.T. The Binet form for the terms of the generalized Fibonacci sequence is In = (on - f3n)/(o - (3) and for the Lucas sequence is In = on + (3n. Vie first prove two results that will simplify the proofs. 1. For integers rand
5,
f(
k=l
_l)nk
1 In(k+l)/nk similarly
_ In(k+l)) In(k+l)
Tn:::: 1, 17.::::1.
we have Ir+s
= ~UTls
+ Islr)
We proceed
In,
that:
Closed
f)_1)nk k=O
_ Ink) Ink
fn(m+l) 2fnlnlm+I)'
m ~ 0, n ~ 1.
H-681
Proposed by N. Gauthier, Kingston, ON (Vol. 47, No.1, February 2009/2010) For a real variable z oJ consider the sets of generalized Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials, {In = fn(z) : n E 2:} and {In = In(z) : n E Z}, given by the recurrences
= ~
4
(I~(k+l) _ I;k).
fn(k+l) fnk
fn+2
Zfn+l
+ fn,
and
In+2
Zln+1
+ In,
for all
n E 2:,
Dividing this result by fn then gives the summand Closed form for (c):
~(_I)nk k=l
with fo = 0, a nonnegative
!J =
(_1)n+1
fn and Ln
(-I)nln.
Let
l'
be
fn(2k+l) = f2 f2 4f n(k+l) nk n
_1_ (1;(m+l) _
2
I;)
2
fn(m+l)
fn
m ~ 1, n ~ 1.
",,(_I)kk(r)fkfr-kl k L
k~O
p p+q qk -
( - l)q+l r f p j'r-II q
pr-(p+q)'
(b) Find a general formula for L,k~O( _I)kkm Solution by the proposer
G) f;
g+;lqk
integer m.
k=O
, I)
m ~ 0, n ~ I.
The characteristic equations for the given recurrences are identical and have roots 0 = 2 + 4), {3 = ~(z 2 + 4), with 0{3 = -I ~(z + and 0 + {3 = The Binet form for the terms of the generalized Fibonacci sequence is In = (on - {3n)/(o - {3) and for the Lucas sequence is In = on + {3n. To prove identity (a), we use the following lemmas.
vz
vz
z.
(2b).
Lemma
l'
a nonnegative
integeT, we have
=~
4
((fn(k+J) In(k+l)
fnk)2 Ink
(fn(k+l) In(k+l)
Multiplication
(6) (_I)"Jnfn(2k+41JU~(k~+1)
+ f~)
= ~ (f;(k+l)
_ f}k)
G)
dx
(1 + x)k = xr,
In(k+l)lnk 8 In(k+l) Ink This gives the summand in sum (e) upon division by fn and we get the desired result due to the collapsing of the series:
which follows from the binomial expansion of x" = (-I apply the differential operator (1
+ (1 + x))"
in powers of (I + x).
Then
+ x)!
Closed
)nkfn(2k+J)(J~(k+l)
14
14
nk
+ f~)
f~(m+J)
4 '
L(-lrkkG)(1
m ~ 0, n ~ 1.
k~O
+ xl
r 1 TX -
(1
+ x);
r ~
0, 0 equations
n(k+l)
fnln(m+l)
which proves Lemma 1. Lemma 2. FaT positive integeTs (p,q), the solution of the following simultaneous
1 + uoP
wo-q,
fp+q'
(-I)LlL
fp+q
Proof.
+ uap+q
== w == f3Q + uf3p+q Q
Hence, since p
+q #
0, we
get that
((1 + :7;)
x)
(1
+ x)k =
km(1
+ X)k
_-.1:L
Jp+q'
(1 + X)!) dx
m x generates an m
T
+ I-term
1',
expansion in {xr-"(l m:
+ x)"
Similarly, one can see that -a-P + wa-(p+q) == u == -f3-P the Binet formula for the Fibonacci polynomials that
a-P-f3-P w == -----a-(p+q) - f3-(P+Q) _J-P J _(p+q)
+ wf3-(P+Q)
~(-Ir-kkm k?O
G)
(1
+ x)k
= f(r)"a~m)x"-"(1 ,,=0
+ x)".
We now prove summation formula (a). To do so, first note that af3 == -1 implies that == (-I)qf3q We use Lemma 1 and 2 with
x == uaP == -
The unknown coefficients, {a~m) : 0 ::; m,O ::; n ::; m}, are to be determined following linear recurrence:
by solving the
-.1:LaP,
JP+Q
(1 + x) == wa-q
== (-I)qwf3q
== J.Lf3q,
Jp+q
~(_lr-kk(r) k?O
(JLf3q)k Jp+q
l'
(_-.1:Lap)'-1
Jp+q
To prove the above claim, note that it is true for m = 0 if we convene that kO k 2: O. So, assuming that the above formula is true for m, consider
(J.Lf3q) Jp+q d) ( (l+x)dx m+ I x"=(I+x)dx d (( (l+x)dx d ) m T) x .
1 for all
-.1:L f3P
Jp+'I
for
d ( (1 + x) dx )m+J
m
and of
(d(1 + x) dx )m
xT
in
+ xl/x,
we get that
~(_1)T-kk(~) k?O
Finally, add these last two results together and multiply the resulting equation by (-1 J;+q to get identity (a):
"'( - l)kk(r)fkfT-kl P p+q qk - ( - l)Q+l l' J P j"'-Il P"-(q+J), L k q k?O
l'
m+l.
~
n=O
(r)"a~m+I)X'-"(1
+ x)" =
(1
m
+ x)
dx ~(r)na~")xT-n(l
n=O
>_ 0
== ~(r)"a~m)
n=O
m
(1' -
n)x,-n-l(1
+ x)n) + x)"
To generali;e;e the problem as requested in part (b), we will use the following lemma. Lemma 3. For x an arbitrary
~(_1)T-kkm k?O where kind, variable and for an integer
l'
~(r)n+la~m)xT-(n+l)(1
n=O
+ x)n+l + ~
"=0
n(r)na~m)x"-"(l
0, we have
G)
m+J
+ x)",
== ~
n=O
(r)n (a~':':)l
+ na~n))
xT-n(l
+ :)".
{S~m) 0::; m,O ::; n ::; m} is the augmented set of Stirling numbers oj the second m including the n = 0 elements, S6 ) = om,o, Also, by definition, Jar n 2: 1, (1')" = 1'(1' - 1) (r - n + 1) and Jar n == 0, (1')0 == 1.
( 1+
G)
X)!) dx
To go from the penultimate line to the last one above, we shifted the summation index in the first sum by one unit. Then we defined a~~) = 0, a~J == 0 and extended the limits of both sums from 0 to m + 1. This result then gives the recurrence for the unknown coefficients, which is the recurrence for the augmented Stirling numbers of the second kind, S~m). We therefore conclude that {a~m) == S~m) : 0 ::; m, 0::; n ::; m} and Lemma 3 is proved. 0 Now, to obtain the generalization requested in (b) of the problem statement, we invoke Lemmas 2 and 3 and proceed as we did to prove identity (a). We then get the following two
(l
+ x)k
= x"
SUSTAINING MEMBERS
A. Adelberg C. K Cook C. Cooper M. Elia N. Gauthier *H. W. Gould G. C. Greubel P. Hagis, Jr. H. Harborth *A. F. Horadam F. T. Howard S. Kar R. E. Kennedy *C. H. Kimberling R. Knott T. Komatsu H. Kwong J. Lahr *C. T. Long F. Luca W. L. McDaniel F. U. Mendizabal J. L. Moser D. Redmond D. L. Schweizer A. G. Shannon L. W. Shapiro L. Somer P. Spears P. K. Stockmeyer D. R. Stone M. N. S. Swamy *D. Thoro J. C. Turner W. A. Webb C. Witzgall P. Young
Charter Members
equations: ~(-Ir-kkm(~)
k?O k
if
(JLf3q)n Jp+q
P. G. Anderson
. ...
~
',~.
S. Ando J. L. D. Barrero A. T. Benjamin J. G. Bergart G. Bergum *M. Bicknell-Johnson P. S. Bruckman G. D. Chakerian H. Chen .
= "'(_l)(Q+l)n+r(1') n=O
m
fnr-n S(m)_p_q_expr-(p+q)n.
11
fT
~(-lr-kkm
k?O
( )
~ +ex
Jk qk
rr= ~(_1)(q+])n+r(1')nS~m)2...f---f3p1.-(p+q)n
n
p+q
Jp+q
n=O
Jp+q
Adding together these two equations and multiplying the result by (-It J;+q then gives the sought generalization
"'(_I)kkm
k?O
])n(1') s(m)fnJr-nl n n p q
pr-(p+q)n
This result agrees with the identity in (a) when m = 1 since Also solved by Paul S. Bruckman and Kenneth
S~l)
Davenport.
KUWAIT UNIVERSITY
Basel, Switzerland
UNIVERSITE DE MONTREAL
Quebec, Canada
UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE
Callaghan,
JOHN F MORRISON
Essex, Maryland
KLEPCO, INC.
Reno , Nevada