THE TRANSACTION PARTIES Indy Mac INDX Mortgage Loan-2006AR8 Indy Mac Bank FSB (Seller/Sponsor)

Mortgage loans

Cash

The Mortgage Loans were Traded/Sold for $ by the Entities involved without borrowers knowledge
The borrower signs a note that is never actually given to the investor. & The investor receives a mortgage bond or actually evidence of a mortgage bond that was never disclosed, seen or signed by the borrower.

Indy Mac MBS Inc Indy Mac ABS Inc Depositor L O A N S

Cash
Certificates

Lehman Brothers Inc Security Underwriter

Offered Certificates Cash Dealers/Agents
Offered Certificates

Certificates

Indy Mac INDX mortgage loan-2006AR8 Issuing Entity Deutsche Bank converted these Notes into Certificates/Bonds
ISSUING ENTITITY WAS ESTABLISHED BY DEPOSITORS

Cash

INVESTORS

PARTIES INVOLVED IN TRANSACTION

The Transaction Parties Indy Mac Bank FSB originated substantially all of the mortgage loans and currently services all of the mortgage loans. Prior to the closing date(5/31/2006), the sponsor(Indy Mac Bank FSB) purchased all of the mortgage loans from the originators(Indy Mac Bank FSB). On the closing date sponsor sold the mortgage loans to the depositor (Indy Mac MBS Inc & Indy Mac ABS Inc) for cash, Depositor in turn deposited them into a New York common law trust(Indy Mac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust-2006AR8 as per pooling and servicing agreement, dated as of the cut-off date(05/01/2006) which is the issuing entity and the issuing entity converted these loans into certificates/Bonds. The issuing entity gave these certificate/Bonds to Depositor, who sold them to Lehman Brothers the securities underwriter The Certificates/Bonds were sold by the Depositor(Indy Mac MBS Inc& Indy Mac ABS Inc)to the Security Underwriter (Lehman Brothers Inc) for cash. The Security Underwriter(Lehman Brothers Inc) sold these certificates to Investors through the Dealers and Agents for cash. The TRUE Sale is from the Depositor, (Indy Mac MBS & Indy Mac ABS) to the Securities Underwriter, Lehman Brothers and not to TRUSTEE.

SECURITIZATION FLOW CHART Indy Mac Bank FSB Originator/Sponsor/Seller

Mortgage Loans

CASH Offered Certificates

Lehman Brothers Inc Securities Underwriters

CASH

Indy Mac MBS Inc & Indy Mac ABS Inc DEPOSOTOR (Created Issuing Entity)

Mortgage Related documents

Certificat es/Bond s
OFFERED CERTFICATES
CASH

Certifica tes/Bon ds

AGENTS
CASH CASH

DEALERS

Created by

the
Deposit ors

Indy Mac INDX Mortgage Loan 2006AR8 ISSUING ENTITY CONVERTED LOANS TO CERTIFICATES/BONDS

Certificate s/Bonds

CASH

Certificate s/Bonds

INVESTORS

Loan application

BROKER GREENWAY
Yield Spread Premimums CASH

AGENTS

SELLER Indy Mac Bank FSB

NEXT SLIDE WILL EXPLAIN ABOUT Chronology of the Events What Happened

LOANS CASH

SECURITIES UNDERWRITER (Lehman Brothers Inc) (Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc) (Lehman Brothers special Financing Inc)

DEPOSITOR Indy Mac MBS Inc Indy Mac ABS Inc

Certificates/Bonds LOAN DOCUMENTS

ISSUING ENTITY
Indy Mac INDX Loan Trust2006AR8

Certificates/Bonds

Indy Mac Bank FSB Servicer

ORIGINATOR Indy Mac Bank FSB SPONSOR Indy Mac Bank FSB CASH

DEALERS

Certificat es/Bonds

BAD LOAN

CERTIFICATES/BONDS

Borrowers RAJAS
CASH

INVESTORS

SOME EXHIBITS OF 8K SHOWING DEEP INVOLVEMENT OF LEHMAN BROTHERS Inc LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC LEHMAN BROTHERS SPECIAL FINANCING INC

8K EXHIBIT-99.2 FILED WITH SEC, FILE #333-132042-07, ACCESSION # 905148-6-4445, FILED ON 06/15/2006 , SHOWING LEHMAN BROTHERS TRANSACTION

Exhibit-99.2 of 8K

Lehman Brothers

Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc PARTY-A In the Deal

Transaction Between Deutsche Ba & Lehman Broth Special Financ Inc On 05/31/20

Deutsc Bank PartyIn the D

GLOBAL DEAL ID #

PAYMENT INSTRUCTION IN US $ In Deutsche Bank Account#01419663

Signed BY DEUTSCHE BANK

Signed BY Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc

Trust Filed On

SEC Accession # SEC File#

EXHIBIT 99.3 Of 8K

LEHMAN BROTHERS TRANSACTION DATED 06/14/2006

Transaction Date 06/14/2006 Transaction between Deutsche Bank and Lehman Brothers TRADE Date Is 05/23/2 006

Payment to Deutsche Bank In Account# 01419663

Payment to Lehman Brothers IN Account #066143543 JP Morgan Chase Bank

Signed by Lehman Brothers

Signed by Deutsche Bank

Another Lehman Brothers Transaction

Exhibit-99.4 of 8K

Lehman Brothers Transaction dated 06/14/2006

Deutsche Bank & Lehman Brothers

Deutsche Bank Account# 01419663

Signed by Lehman Brothers

Exhibit-99.5 of 8K Shows involvement of Indy Mac MBS & Indy Mac ABS As DEPOSITORS

Indy Mac MBS & Indy Mac ABS As Depositor sold Mortgage Backed Securities & Asset Backed Securities to Lehman Brothers for CASH

SHOWING INVOLVEMENT OF INDY MAC MBS & INDY MAC ABS as DEPOSITORS

Indy Mac Bank FSB Originator Sponsor Seller

Investors Loan File Indy Mac MBS Inc Indy Mac ABS Inc ABIG TRANSFER OF WEALTH BY FRAUD DEPOSITORS

Certif icates /Bon ds

Indy Mac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust 2006AR8 (Deutsche Bank) Deutsche Bank just converted loans into certificates/B onds

Dealers & Agents

LEHMAN BROTHERS Securities

Exhibit-99.6 of 8K Guaranty of Payments by Lehman Brothers

GUARANTY OF LEHMAN BROTHERS

Guaranty of Lehman Brothers For Payments to Deutsche Bank

CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS WHAT HAPPENED

They created SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) Issued Certificates Got the certificate rated (AAA) Bought the Credit Default Swaps (30 bets on each loan) Sold Certificates to Investors (CREDITORS) who ARE SPREAD OUT ACROSS THE WORLD? Collected/aggregated the money from the investors (Money went to the aggregator) Aggregator placed demand down line on the Securitization Chain to Mortgage Brokers that he needs 100 million dollars loans or so and here are the terms of the loans in category ( At this point they did not have any loan, so they created TRANCHES A,B,C etc. without the loan). In other words they were selling forward which means they were selling what they did not have. They attached the Spread sheets with the documents, referred them as populated data by sample data, which was false and said will be replaced with the actual loans, which were fictional at this time. So they placed the demand to the brokers, who could not satisfy the demand then the aggregator created different companies to originate loans in mass production without caring about any criteria whether the borrowers qualify for loan or not. At this point the money is still with the aggregator NEXT SLIDE

 Now they signed Pooling and Servicing Agreement(PSA) and Assignment Assumption Agreements Now the Aggregator funds the loan from the money he received from the investor by selling the certificates (They sold forward and sold a thing which they did not own). The aggregator sent the various false dubious reports and the accuracy of those dubious reports is questionable. He filled some false data and said will be replaced or changed later, which they did as they have the passwords and can log in any time and the change the data as per their fraudulent wishes and requirements using MERS or internal devices. They have MERS and a Shadow MERS, whether you have MERS or not still you have effects of MERS. They replaced the data with the false information as per their own wishes through MERS. These Trustees and Service Companies or others is just a need to funnel them to make sure that it rarely happens that the same property or the same borrower have been foreclosed upon at same time by more than one supposed lender. They do not know who owns the loan and do not care. They only care that two people do not make claim to do that at the same time on the same property Then they created these outsourcing companies for foreclosure services (LPS, FIS, DOCEX etc.) to fabricate the documents to show that Deutsche Bank is the Owner of the loan, when in fact way before when Deutsche Bank entered into the picture, the security was sold to the investor thereby locking in all rights under the Assignment and Assumption Agreement and Pooling and Servicing Agreement, before even the loan took place or the borrower signed the settlement papers and borrowers did not know this and none of these entities disclosed this to the borrower, which gives the borrowers extended rights for rescission

 By operation of law these already existed and money changed hands. When borrowers signed the loan papers, the borrowers signed with the investor and this was not disclosed to the borrowers. You cannot execute any other document after the sale to investor, every other document in place is fixed and no one has authority without going to all the investors for permission and none of these thieves went to the investors and many of these thieves do not know the whereabouts of the investors. Deutsche Bank was so down and dirty as to be lying directly for their position. So all foreclosures are knocked down until they come out with the truth (WHICH IS VERY DIFFICULT FOR THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE ACTING ULTRA VIRUS) Note that the issuance of the bonds/notes are non-recourse which further corroborates the fact that the issuer (SPV/REMIC) is NOT the debtor, it is the homeowners who were funded out of the pool of money solicited from the investors, part of which was used to fund mortgages and a large part of which was kept by the investment bankers as profit. (YIELD SPREAD PREMIMUM TIER-II)There is no language indicative that anyone other than the investors owns the notes from homeowner/borrowers/debtors. Thus the investors are the creditors and the homeowners are the debtors. Without the investors there would have been no loan. Without the borrowers, there would have been no investment. Hence, a SINGLE TRANSACTION.

1 BORROWER Greenway
1 2

Indy Mac Bank FSB Originator/Sponsor/Seller

3 4 4

MBS ABS
5 5

INVESTORS

 Borrower signs a note to ABC Corp., which says it is the lender but isnt. So you start right away with the wrong party named on the note and mortgage (deed of trust) PLUS the use of a meaningless nominee on the mortgage (deed of trust) which completely invalidates the documents and clouds the title. Meanwhile the lender gets a mortgage bond NOT SIGNED BY THE BORROWER.

(borrower signed a note but the lender received a bond from a party not involved in the borrowers closing, it all falls into place) The bond says that this new entity (which usually they

never bothered to actually form) will pay them from receivables. The receivables include but ARE NOT LIMITED TO the payments from the borrower who accepted funding of a loan. These other parties are there to justify the fact that the loan was sold at a huge premium to the lender without disclosure to either the borrower or the lender. (The tier 2 Yield Spread Premium that raises some really juicy causes of action under TILA, RESPA and the 10b-5 actions, including treble damages, attorney fees and restitution).

There is no

nexus between borrower and lender without recognizing the obvious there were parties, documents, agreements and
corresponding duties and obligations existing in the UNDISCLOSED MIDDLE.

The common thread is they were lying. They lied when they said these were AAA rated liquid investments based upon industry standard underwriting standards for residential mortgages They lied when they said this property is worth more than the principal that was borrowed. They lied when they said these loans are in default They lied when they said they were giving a complete accounting for the transaction They lied when they said I have personal knowledge And they are lying now when they say the contents of the fraudulent documents are true but the person was wrong.

It is as simple as this the borrower signed a note and the lender received a bond. Those are two different things. If you let them continue with this fraud you are giving houses to brokers who never put up a dime for the funding of the loan.

True Sale from Indy Mac MBS to Lehman Brothers

Traded for $

PSA Section 2.01

Deutsche Bank cannot be Trustee or own the Note

True Sale Prospectus Page S-107

PROSPECTUS Indy Mac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust2006AR8

Motion to substitute Deutsche Bank for Indy Mac Bank FSB was false The court was misled and FRAUD UPON COURT WAS COMMITTED Para 4 of Motion

LEHMAN BROTHERS

THE TRUE SALE IS FROM DEPOSITOR TO SECURITIES UNDERWRITER & NOT TO TRUSTEE Page S-107 of the Prospectus 424(b)5 says under METHOD OF DISTRIBUTION Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Underwriting Agreement between the depositor and Lehman Brothers Inc (Lehman or the Underwriter) the depositor (Indy Mac MBS & Indy Mac ABS) has agreed to sell the offered certificates to the underwriter(Lehman) and underwriter(Lehman) has agreed to purchase from the Depositor(Indy Mac MBS,ABS) the offered certificates. The Lehman Brothers then sold to Investors through the Dealers and Agents.(THE TRUE SALE IS FROM DEPOSITOR TO UNDERWRITER & NOT TO

TRUSTEE) ADMISSION.. Indy Mac Bank FSB> Indy Mac MBS> Lehman Brothers

Deutsche Bank admits that the beneficial owners of these loans are investors & trustee does not itself have an economic interest in the loans

A corporate trustee for the mortgage backed securities (MBS) only serves an administrative role, but has no ownership stake nor beneficial interest in the underlying loans of the securitization.

DEUTSCHE BQANK has NO ECONOMIC Interest in Legal proceedings and in the loans., Nor Does it initiate FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS or Mortgage properties in FORECLOSURE

All foreclosures in the name of the defunct trust are bogus the loan has been long likely sold to a very unfriendly hedge fund. This is aside from the fact of no proper documentation to the original SPV the foreclosure attorney claims to represent.

A Claim of Champerty & Maintenance The Attorney Representing Deutsche Bank, must disclose who is signing his Pay Check and from where the checks are coming?

Constitute a claim of Champerty & Maintenance

Under the TRUSTEE; DEUTSCHE BANK SAYS Performs a variety of functions, among them acting as TRUSTEE for the Securitization Trust and sometimes CUSTODIAN FOR THE MORTGAGE DOCUMENTS. A corporate trustee for the mortgage backed securities (MBS) only serves an administrative role, but has no ownership stake nor beneficial interest in the underlying loans of the securitization. ROLE OF TRUSTEE IN A FORECLOSURE Deutsche Bank in its capacity as trustee holds certain mortgage loans for MBS transactions. The BENEFICIAL OWNERS of these loans are INVESTORS in MBS, typically large institutions such as pension funds, mutual funds and insurance companies. Although the trustee of MBS is legal owner of record of mortgage loans. THE TRUSTEE DOES NOT ITSELF HAVE AN ECONOMIC INTEREST IN THE LOANS. Moreover the trustee is only NOMINALLY involved in the foreclosure process. This is in direct contradiction to actual testimony and proffers by counsel in the courtroom. Both the investors and the borrowers were cheated and defrauded through outright lies, deception and hundreds of pages of documents with conflicting provisions.

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated 05/01/2006 Also Support that The MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE Deutsche Bank for Indy Mac Bank FSB is based on Falsification, misleading the court & FRAUD UPON COURT by the Attorneys PARA 4 of the motion

Para 4 of Motion to Substitute Deutsche Bank False

How these attorneys, misled the court with the Fake, fabricated and illegal assignment after 1129 Days, in VIOLATION of PSA, PROSPECTUS and REMIC??

The on the Note is not legal

Investor

Indy mac bank FSB

Agents

Indy Mac MBS/ABS Inc

Dealers

Lehman Brothers Inc

Prospectus Page S-107

PaGE-43 OF PSA

PAGE-44 OF PSA

Attorneys Misled the Court, Falsified & Committed Fraud Upon Court In Motion to Substitute Deutsche Bank For Indy Mac on 07/09/2009 PARA-4 of the Motion

COURT can ask these Attorneys WHY FALSIFICATION OF TRUE FACTS

FALSIFICATION& HID TRUE FACTS FROM THE COURT

The Sanction of Dismissal is warranted in this Case. Defendants have filed many documents with the Court in complete disregard of the truth or falsity of their factual underpinnings. Under the Courts general civil contempt powers, the Court is authorized and entitled to sanction the BANKSs misconduct and those who assisted in this fraud in concealing known fraud abuses. The Defendants knew what was going on and had total disregard for the consequences

No Mortgage can be added in the Trust after the Cut off date(05/01/2006) BUT This Fake, Fabricated and illegal assignment was executed on 06/04/2009 AFTER 1129 DAYS Which is a violation of PSA, Prospectus and REMIC

This was signed by Ms. Erica A. Johnson Seck, who has been noticed by various courts for her involvement in Frauds & on each document her signatures were not identical

Capacity to maintain Judicial Action is and was QUESTIONABLE

Indy Mac Bank FSB was inactive institution as of 07/11/2008

Indy Mac federal bank FSB was created on 07/11/2008 & was an Inactive institution from 07/11/2008 t0 03/19/2009 and was under receivership of FDIC ( It was created as a Bridge Bank

Indy Mac Federal Bank FSB Was a Bridge Bank

1) Closing with the borrower took place in the middle of the chain of securitization and within the context of the securitization documents executed without the borrower, before the borrower existed even as a prospective customer for the loan product. 2) The assignment is near the end of the securitization chain in practice, contrary to the usual conditions and prohibitions contained in the original enabling documents that created the securitization structure and process 3) The assignment is barred by a cutoff date in the securitization documents. 4) Thus even if there is an assignment, it is fake, fabricated and illegal and cannot be accepted. 5) Trustee under an alleged securitization structure that a party making a claim on an assignment is unaware of the absence of acceptance or even that there is no authority for the Trustee to accept the assignment.

UNDERSTANDING THE EVOLVING PROCESS

1. First transactions that occurred was the sale of securities to unsuspecting investors. 2. The second transaction that occurred was that the investor money was put into an account at an investment banking firm. 3. Third transaction was that the investment banker divided the money between 4. Fourth transaction was the closing with the borrower. (YSP created, hidden fees, NO DISCLOSURE) 5. The fifth was the assignment AND ACCEPTANCE of the loan (See below) into between 1 and 3 6. The sixth was the receipt of insurance or counter-party payments on behalf of the pool pursuant to the documents creating the securitization structure. 7. The seventh was the re-securitization of the pooled assets many times. 8. The eighth was the federal bailout payments and receipts allocable to the balances owed on the loans that were claimed to be part of the pool. 9. The ninth is the foreclosures by parties who never handled any money who allegedly represent investors who no longer have any interest in the loan By definition, the documents creating the securitized pool usually prohibit such an assignment from being accepted into the pool. Therefore, although an assignment was executed, it is entirely possible that it accomplished nothing of legal consequence.

OPPOSING PARTY NEEDS TO PROVE 1. The putative creditor in case at bar is claiming their standing by virtue of an assignment. (Their Own Documents BAR Them) 2. Assignment only exists by virtue of a larger structure of securitization in which the documents describe the conditions under which such an assignment is acceptable and further conditions if the loans ceases to perform. 3. . Provisions requiring insurance, credit default swaps, credit enhancements, and others add co-obligors to the borrowers transaction which takes place not at the beginning of the chain, but rather in the middle of the chain. 4. Closing documents between loan originators, servicers, Special Purpose Vehicles, aggregators, etc. including the pooling and services agreement, the assignment and assumption agreement, the Master Services Agreement [if separate], none of which includes the borrower as party or references any specific debtor or borrower because the debtor is unknown when the securitization structure is created 5. There is a steadfast refusal to respond appropriately to a qualified written request or a debt verification letter 6. There is a steadfast refusal to respond to discovery. 7. It has repeatedly been shown that the intermediary parties in securitization have clearly fabricated the documents of transfer solely for the purpose of supporting their position in litigation based on falsification, misleading the court. 8. The intermediary securitization parties steadfastly refused to account for third-party payments.

She is signing for Deutsche Bank, but does not work for Deutsche Bank

Not Identical

MORE FAKE ASSIGNMENTS BY Erica A. Johnson ON NEXT SLIDES

Vice President for Deutsche Bank??

Signatures of Notary Also not Identical

Here she became VP One west Bank FSB

Compare these signatures with the previous

These signatures are also not Identical

MORE FAKE ASSIGNMENTS BY Erica A. Johnson ON NEXT SLIDES

Another Different Signatures

Please see the signature & Compare with her other signatures

The signatures are also not identical

More Different Signatures

Please compare her signatures With the other Assignments Executed By her

Notarization Without Erica A. Johnsons signatures ??????

Another Different Signature s ????

Compare his signatures with the others?? HERE Ms. Erica A. Johnson Seck Signing for MERS As Vice President & She Does not work For MERS ???

Another Different Signatures

Mr. Troy Lazzaras Signatures Not Identical

ALTE

ALTER EGO DOCTRINE: Pierce the Corporate Veil

piercing the corporate veil has to do with the corporation through its officers and through the board of directors NOT acting in compliance with the corporation articles of incorporation and corporate bylaws require. And when they do that, they do that at the peril of the officers and the board of directors.

CORPORATE HATS

Another Lady Christina Allen was used by

Indy Mac Bank FSB, Indy Mac MBS Inc, Indy Mac ABS Inc, Indy Mac Bank Securities, One West Bank FSB, MERS, Lehman Brothers family (Lehman Brothers Inc, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc, Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc) and Deutsche Bank Securities and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al. She was wearing too many hats for Financial and non-financial institutions, the assignments/Affidavits signed by her are shown in next few slides
MS. CHRISTINA ALLEN IS NOT WORKING FOR ANY OF THE ABOVE ENTITIES . She is working as a CLERK for LPS LENDING PROCESSING SERVICES

1. On 12/03/2008 signed as AVP of Indy Mac Bank FSB, a deceased unit as per FDIC Certificate # 29730 & OTS Order # 24-2008 both dated in a case in Loudoun County Circuit Court case no. CL-55523, submitted by attorneys, Mr. Joseph F. Cunningham, Mr. Eric P. Burns and Mr. Thomas K. Tessmer, representing Deutsche Bank. 2. On 12/03/2008 signed as AVP of Indy Mac Bank FSB, a deceased unit as per FDIC Certificate # 29730, in a case in United States bankruptcy Court Eastern District of Virginia Alexandria Division case no. 0818049-SSM, submitted by Ms. Diann E. Green (wife of Mr. Eric P. Burns) 3. On 02/09/2009 signed as Attorney in Fact for JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association. This affidavit was submitted in Fair Fax County Court by the attorney Shapiro 7 Burson LLP in a case of Mr. Baker. 4. Signed as Assistant Secretary for MERS and as nominee for Indy Mac Bank FSB 5. Signed on 09/04/2008 as Attorney in Fact for HSBC Mortgage services, Inc. 6. Signed as Assistant Secretary for Indy Mac Bank FSB a deceased financial institution. 7. Signed for MERS as nominee for Flick Mortgage Investors Inc. 8. Signed as Assistant Secretary for MERS and as nominee for Indy Mac Bank FSB 9. Signed as Assistant Secretary MERS, as nominee for Indy Mac Bank FSB 10. Signed as vice President Option One Mortgage Corporation. 11. Again signed as vice president for MERS and as nominee for Indy Mac Bank FSB 12. Signed as Assistant Secretary for MERS and as nominee for Indy Mac Bank FSB a deceased financial institution. 13. Mortgage assignments are being created out of whole cloth just for the purposes of showing a transfer from one entity to another, it has become impossible to establish when a mortgage was sold, and to whom, so the servicers (Indy Mac Bank FSB now One West Bank FSB) are trying to recreate the paperwork as per instructions from DEUTSCHE BANK, right down to the stamps that financial companies use to verify when a note has changed hands.

Indy Mac Bank FSB never existed on 12/03/2008 & it was a deceased and inactive institution as Of 07/11/2008 FDIC Certificate No.29730 & OTS Order N0. 24-2008 Both dated 07/11/2008

A Tale of Too Many HATS

Here CHRISTINA Allen Signs for JP Morgan Chase National Association

A TALE OF TOO MANY HATS ???

Here She signs for HSBC Mortgage Services,Inc On 09/04/2008 But She signed for Indy Mac Bank FSB On 12/03/2008 ???

A TALE OF TOO MANY HATS ?

for Money tree financial Corporation MERS & Indy Mac Bank FSB

A Tale of TOO,TOO MANY HATS ??? ?? ?

Here she signs For MERS Quicken Loans & Indy Mac Bank FSB

A Tale of Too Many HATS ???? ??? ?? ?

For MERS Indy Mac Bank FSB & Deutsche Bank National Trust

VP & Asst. Secretary

A Tale of Too, Many HATS

A TALE OF TOO MANY HATS

Wearing Hats For Indy Mac Bank FSB Deutsche Bank Washington Mutual Bank & Long Beach Mortgage Company

Too, Many HATS

For MERS Quicken Loans Inc & Indy Mac Bank FSB As Vice president

A Tale of Uncountable HATS

MERS Indy Mac Bank FSB Casa Blanca Mortgage Inc Shearson Mortgage Casa Blanca Mortga ge Inc

For MERS Flick Mortgage Investors Inc & Indy Mac Bank FSB

This assignment after the Foreclosure sale was recorded By Ms. Diann E. Green Esq.

Please see the signature of this Notary On the next SLIDE ?

Why the signature of the Notary are not identical The Answer lies with the Attorney, whose signatures were notarized?????

Same Notary With Different Signatures & Different Attorney Mr. Thomas K. Tessmer Esq.

The signature of this Notary are not identical on each document ?????

The mystery of these different signatures can be solved By Ms. Diann E. Green Esq. & Mr. Thomas K. Tessmer Esq. Both are working for the same Law Firm

Same Notary with another different signature Answer to these lies with only two Diann E. Green Esq & Thomas K.Tessmer Esq.

It appears that someone is using the stamp of this Notary It raises a question which need to be solved

Same Attorney & Same Notary WITH Different Signature LOOKS LIKE SOMEONE IS USING NOTARY STAMP WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE NOTARY ????? ???? ??? ?? ?

HISTORY REPEATES ITSELF Same Attorney & Same Notary Again with Different Signature

Who is using the Notary Stamp ?

Same Attorney & Same Notary & Every time with Different Signature ?

WHO IS GOING TO SOLVE THIS ???

Diann E. Green Esq.

N O T A R Y

???? ??? ?

Thomas K. Tessmer Esq.

Mr. Roger Stotts Vice President OF Deutsche Bank Was found signing DIFFERENT IN NEXT SLIDE ???

This Instrument was also recorded by Mr. Thomas K. Tessmer Esq. & Diann E. Green Esq. THEY MIGHT HAVE AN ANSWER

Please See the other Signatures of Mr. Roger Stotts on next Slide

Deutsche Bank et al

A BIG TRANSFER OF WEALTH BY FRAUD ???

Please see and Compare the signatures of Mr. Roger Stott on the previous (51) and on Next slide (53) This was recorded by Diann E. Green & Thomas K. Tessmer

WHO RECORDED THIS INSTRUMENT IN LOUDOUN COUNTY LAND RECORDS ANSWER Ms. Diann E. Green Esq. & Mr. Thomas K. Tessmer Esq. Diann E. Green Esq. & Thomas K. Tessmer Work for this Firm

A lady Ms. Erica A. Johnson Seck Fond of Too Many HATS & Every Time She Signs Different WHY FRAUD CLOSURE

This Instrument was recorded BY

Thomas K Tessmer Esq

Diann E. Green Esq.

NOTARY

Please Solve This ???

Notary Stamp Was used by ? Without Notarys Knowledge & Permission

Please See the Signature of This Notary On the Next Slide

We have to solve this

THE SIGNATURE OF THIS NOTARY ARE NOT IDENTICAL

Deutsche Bank A KING Of F O R E C L O S U R E

Here the largest (by far) originator of foreclosure process in the country who is now doing so in its own name is, in writing,. disclaiming any interest, ownership or rights to the loans, much the same as MERS. & This is in direct contradiction to actual testimony and proffers by counsel in the courtroom.

Deutsche Bank is being accused of similar activity to Goldman Sachs. The German bank's sizable business in structuring CDOs make it a prime target for U.S. investigators, who are now broadening their search. Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/winners-losers-goldman-sec-charges-20104#loser-deutsche-bank-12#ixzz0mGfm98vF

HOW MUCH DEUTSCHE BANK RECEIVED

2.8 Billion + 5.7 Billion = 8.5 Billion Deutsche Bank also received money from Different Insurance companies

Rule 10b-5: Employment of Manipulative and Deceptive Practices By Deutsche Bank et al It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails or of any facility of any national securities exchange, (a) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, (b) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or (c) To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, In connection with the purchase or sale of any security. the violation of 10b-5 is blatant.

This is why Goldman Sachs is going to have a hard time defending this case. There is a big Light on Wall Street DEUTSCHE BANK et al, accommodated, conspired, and executed a deceptive and fraudulent act A company can not isolate a transaction and the employee from Fraud done in the name of Deutsche Bank et al.

DEUTSCHE BANK PEELING BACK THE LAYERS

You cannot be a Trustee or investor or own the note, lest it become a partnership with the certificate holders Deutsche Bank is also acting under the various layers 424(b) (5) Prospectus, Pooling & Servicing Agreement (PSA) filed by the KING OF FORECLOSURE with the SEC. of Trustees, without any specific description, where One Trustee ends and other Trustee Begins. It is classic obfuscation and musical chairs Note that Deutsche Bank is identified as trustee but the usual language of under the terms of that certain trust dated.etc are absent. This is because there usually is NO TRUST AGREEMENT designated as such and NO TRUST. In fact, as stated here it is merely an agreement between the co-issuers and Deutsche Bank, which it means that far from being a trust it is more like the operating agreement of an LLC) DEUTSCHE BANK cannot be a Trustee or investor or own the note, less, it becomes a partnership with the certificate holders(Who bought the certificates and invested money).

a). Investor and Trustee as per MERS member Org. ID # 1001425. Deutsche Bank cannot be a trustee and investor. If it has both then it has a partnership with the Certificate holders. b).. Interim Funder and Trustee as per MERS member Org, ID # 1002959 c). Document Custodian, Trustee and Collateral Agent as per MERS member Org. ID # 1000649 d). Investor and Trustee as per MERS member ORG. ID # 1001426 e). Servicer, Subservicers, Investor, Document Custodian, Trustee, Collateral Agent as per MERS member Org. ID # 1000648 The address of Deutsche Bank from a-e above is the same 1761 East St. Andrew Pl. Santa Ana CA 92705-4934

SOME 48 TRUSTS IN WHICH PLAINTIFFS LOAN OF

$491,250.00
WAS SOLD FIVE TIMES IN EACH TRUST FOR

$ 91,662,688.32

SEC FILE #

Sold before closing

This Trust they admitted This was a Shell Trust