Ector County ISD - Odessa High School Table of Q18A by q1 Q18A(RECENT MARIJUANA USE) Col Pct Never Heard/Used

In Your Lifetime Since School Began In the Past Month Total q1(GENDER) Female 60.34 14.58 6.74 18.34 638 Male 55.83 19.03 8.98 16.16 557 1195 Total

Frequency Missing = 19

Table of Q18A by q2 Q18A(RECENT MARIJUANA USE) Col Pct Never Heard/Used In Your Lifetime Since School Began In the Past Month Total q2(GRADE) Grade Grade Grade Grade 9 10 11 12 25.00 30.00 5.00 40.00 20 58.19 16.57 7.90 17.34 519 60.52 14.41 6.92 18.16 347 58.06 18.39 8.71 14.84 310 1196 Total

Frequency Missing = 18

Table of Q18A by q3 Q18A(RECENT MARIJUANA USE) Col Pct Never Heard/Used In Your Lifetime Since School Began In the Past Month Total q3(LIVE WITH BOTH PARENTS) No Yes

Total

49.14 64.37 20.04 14.31 10.78 5.91

20.04 15.41 464 727 1191

Frequency Missing = 23

The frequencies have been weighted so that the analysis reflects the distribution of students by grade level Copyright 2010, Texas A & M University All rights reserved.

Ector County ISD - Odessa High School Table of Q18A by q5 Q18A(RECENT MARIJUANA USE) Col Pct Never Heard/Used In Your Lifetime Since School Began In the Past Month Total q5(ETHNICITY) African/American Asian/American Mexican/American Native/American Other White 70.73 7.32 14.63 7.32 41 70.59 17.65 5.88 5.88 17 Frequency Missing = 43 56.07 17.55 7.85 18.53 815 84.62 59.26 62.79 7.69 18.52 13.95 0.00 11.11 6.98 Total

7.69 11.11 16.28 13 27 258 1171

Table of Q18A by q6 Q18A(RECENT MARIJUANA USE) Col Pct Never Heard/Used In Your Lifetime Since School Began In the Past Month Total q6(ON AVERAGE WHAT GRADES DO YOU GET) Total Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly A's B's C's D's F's 77.57 9.81 4.67 7.94 214 61.88 15.94 6.56 15.63 640 40.22 23.91 13.41 22.46 276 30.56 22.22 8.33 38.89 36 34.78 4.35 0.00 60.87 23 1189

Frequency Missing = 25

Table of Q18A by q7 Q18A(RECENT MARIJUANA USE) Col Pct q7(LENGTH OF TIME IN THIS DISTRICT) <1 2-3 >4 year years years

Total

Never Heard/Used 46.09 51.35 60.85 In Your Lifetime 25.22 18.92 15.38 Since School Began 7.83 8.78 7.74

In the Past Month 20.87 20.95 16.03 Total 115 148 917 1180

Frequency Missing = 34

The frequencies have been weighted so that the analysis reflects the distribution of students by grade level Copyright 2010, Texas A & M University All rights reserved.

Ector County ISD - Odessa High School Table of Q18A by q10 Q18A(RECENT MARIJUANA USE) Col Pct q10(EITHER PARENT COLLEGE GRADUATE) Total Don't Know No Yes

Never Heard/Used 59.29 55.01 63.64 In Your Lifetime 16.43 17.04 15.51 Since School Began 7.86 8.07 7.22

In the Past Month 16.43 19.88 13.64 Total 140 669 374 1183

Frequency Missing = 31

Table of Q18A by q11 Q18A(RECENT MARIJUANA USE) Col Pct Never Heard/Used In Your Lifetime Since School Began In the Past Month Total q11(QUALIFY FOR FREE/REDUCED PRICE LUNCH) Don't Know No Yes

Total

57.96 59.93 56.09 17.96 15.66 16.75 8.57 6.38 9.39

15.51 18.03 17.77 245 549 394 1188

Frequency Missing = 26

Table of Q18A by q31d Q18A(RECENT MARIJUANA USE) Col Pct Very Somewhat Never Heard/Used 81.16 In Your Lifetime 11.41 Since School Began In the Past Month Total 2.17 5.25 552 q31d(DANGEROUS FOR KIDS TO USE MARIJUANA) Not very Not Don't at all know Total

46.80 31.01 16.56 70.59 25.62 21.52 19.87 15.69 12.81 17.72 11.26 14.78 29.75 52.32 203 158 151 3.92 9.80 51 1115

Frequency Missing = 99

The frequencies have been weighted so that the analysis reflects the distribution of students by grade level Copyright 2010, Texas A & M University All rights reserved.

Ector County ISD - Odessa High School Table of Q18A by q39c Q18A(RECENT MARIJUANA USE) Col Pct Never Heard/Used In Your Lifetime Since School Began In the Past Month Total q39c(PARENTS FEEL ABOUT KIDS USING MARIJUANA) Strong Mild Mildly Strongly Don't disapprove disapprove Neither approve approve know 64.53 16.98 6.28 12.21 860 32.05 15.38 15.38 37.18 78 30.14 19.18 15.07 35.62 73 23.53 23.53 11.76 41.18 17 37.50 59.65 6.25 15.79 6.25 7.02 Total

50.00 17.54 16 57 1101

Frequency Missing = 113

The frequencies have been weighted so that the analysis reflects the distribution of students by grade level Copyright 2010, Texas A & M University All rights reserved.