Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Grateful acknowledgment also to Michèle Ruess, for permission to quote from diaries,
essays, and letters belonging to the Ruess family.
The Utah State Historical Society kindly granted permission to quote
from the papers of Harry LeRoy Aleson.
The blockprints at the head of each chapter are reproduced
from originals by Everett Ruess.
ISBN 978-0-307-59176-0
eISBN 978-0-307-59178-4
1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2
First Edition
J O N K R A K AU E R
I’ve decided that I’m going to live this life for some time to
come. The freedom and simple beauty of it is just too good
to pass up.
And here are a couple of lines from a letter Ruess sent in November
1934, shortly before he vanished without a trace:
Standing on the canyon floor, pondering the precise spot where Ruess
cooked his beans and grazed his burros and slept under the stars, I
hoped to divine something from the particulars of the setting—some
clue about his essence—that would by extension shed some light,
however obliquely, on McCandless. I was not disappointed. My visit
to Davis Gulch motivated me to learn as much as I could about Ruess,
and ultimately led me to include a chapter describing his abbreviated
life and baffling disappearance in Into the Wild.
At the time, the best source of published information was Ever-
ett Ruess: A Vagabond for Beauty. Now, twenty-eight years after the
Jon Krakauer
The title of this book carries a deliberate double meaning. Since 1998,
when I first visited the Escalante country in a concerted effort to see if
there was anything new that could be learned about the fate of Everett
Ruess, I have cherished the hope that the passionate wilderness wan-
derer who disappeared so enigmatically in 1934, at the age of twenty,
might actually be found. Or if the remains of his body could not be
discovered, that enough clues could be ferreted out of the desert and
the canyons so that we might be able to determine just how and where
the young man met his untimely end.
I was hardly alone in that quest. During the more than seven de-
cades that have elapsed since Everett vanished, all kinds of dedicated
sleuths (and not a few mystical wackos) have made it a personal goal
to solve the riddle of the vagabond’s disappearance. The cult of Ev-
erett Ruess, which has steadily grown over the years, centers on that
riddle. Every devotee who responds to the romantic intensity of Ever-
ett’s writing or the visionary rapture of his paintings and blockprints
wants to know what happened to him after he headed into Davis
Gulch in November 1934.
Yet at the same time, steeping myself in the writings and artwork
served another purpose, which was to “find” Everett Ruess in the
maze of his moods and contradictions. What made him tick? What
was he ultimately after? Why did he need such unrelenting solo ad-
ventures in the wilderness to test himself? And if he had a goal beyond
endless wandering, how close did he come to fulfilling it?
Then, for more than a year, between the summer of 2008 and the
xv
Opposite page: The first page of a letter from Everett Ruess to his brother,
Waldo, the last he wrote before his disappearance. Special Collections Dept. J.
Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah
Said he was goin’ down in the Desert to spend the winter. I can see it
like it was yesterday.”
“Last night he was here,” Norm Christensen recounted, “he took
some of us kids to the picture show. It was called Death Takes a Holi-
day. Probably cost ten cents. Everett treated us.”
Christensen shook his head. “I still remember him wavin’ next
morning as he passed on down the river.”
“I’ve thought about him quite a bit over the years,” Melvin Alvey
confessed. “Whenever it gets cold. To go down there and draw as an
artist, in November, when you only got three–four hours of decent
weather in the day . . . I think he had some plans that nobody knew.”
From Escalante that November, Everett set out southeast down
the Hole-in-the-Rock Trail. The path had been blazed during the
winter of 1879–80 by a remarkable band of Mormon pioneers, as
they crossed the Colorado River, forged their way through labyrin-
thine canyons and mesas, and finally established the town of Bluff on
the San Juan River, the first Mormon stronghold in southeast Utah.
Fifty-four years after the pioneers, Everett gradually left behind the
piñon-juniper forest that sheltered Escalante and its outskirts, as he
passed through an increasingly barren landscape of slickrock and
drifting orange sand—the badlands that the locals simply called the
Desert.
A week down the trail, more than fifty miles out of Escalante,
Everett ran into a pair of sheepherders at the head of Soda Gulch, a
short, dry tributary of the Escalante River. Addlin Lay and Clayton
Porter invited the young man to share their campfire. He stayed two
nights, during which he quizzed the sheepherders about the canyons,
trails, and prehistoric ruins to the east. Lay and Porter offered Everett
a quarter of mutton, but the young man said he didn’t have room
for it in his burros’ saddlebags. He had plenty of food of his own, he
insisted.
* * *
At the time of his disappearance, Ruess was unknown in the larger
world. Seventy-seven years later, he is the object of an intense and
romantic cult that has no parallel in the long annals of the American
Southwest.
Beginning in March 1935, a series of search parties scoured the
wilderness, looking for clues to the wanderer’s whereabouts—or, as
seemed increasingly likely, to his demise. The first of those parties
quickly discovered what has been regarded ever since as Everett’s
last known campsite, in Davis Gulch, a far-eastern tributary of the
Escalante River. But the odd assemblage of objects those searchers
found on the ground remains tantalizing and ambiguous today. In
the end, none of the parties came close to solving the mystery of the
young man’s disappearance. And in the absence of a definitive answer,
all kinds of theories about what happened to Everett after November
1934 were thrust onto the stage—theories that are still fiercely de-
bated by Ruess devotees today.
The cult of Everett Ruess owes much to the mystery of his vanish-
ing. Yet in the long run, it is the writings, paintings, and engravings
the young man produced before his twenty-first birthday that anchor
and validate his lasting fame—the very fame he longed so passionately
to achieve. Whether or not Everett Ruess, had he lived, might have
become a major writer or artist is another question that his partisans
debate endlessly. But in a sense, it is beside the point. The Ruess cult
ultimately springs from the young man’s ecstatic vision of the wilder-
ness, tied to an insatiable wanderlust that drove him to one solitary chal-
lenge and ordeal after another, as he traversed the deserts and canyons
of what in the 1930s was the wildest landscape in the United States.
Although other writers and artists profoundly influenced Everett—he
was a voracious reader and a habitué of art galleries and museums—the
vision that transfixed him was uniquely of his own making.
Not every aficionado of the Southwest subscribes to the Ruess
mystique. Skeptics and realists tend to hold his effusions at arm’s
length, as the fevered strivings of a precocious but self-conscious ide-
alist. Yet for the thousands of lovers of the outdoors who hold up
Everett as a poet-saint, his utterings have an aphoristic glory. Quota-
tions from his letters and diaries are recited today with all the rever-
ence accorded to Henry David Thoreau’s apothegms or Mark Twain’s
bons mots. Everett’s blockprint engravings have been stenciled onto
T-shirts, printed on the covers of blank notebooks, and embossed
onto refrigerator magnets. The world of his devotees has expanded
beyond the borders of the Southwest, even beyond the boundaries
of the United States. Today, Everett counts among his acolytes men
and women as far away as Russia and Japan, few of whom have ever
visited the canyons and mesas where the young adventurer walked
and rode with his burros into the mystical wild that cost him his life.
* * *
Grief-stricken at the loss of their son, Everett’s parents, Christopher
and Stella, determined to keep alive his memory. Since childhood, the
boy had written letters to his parents and to his brother, Waldo, every
time they were apart for as short a stretch as a day or two. During the
years of his vagabondage, from 1930 to 1934, those letters steadily
deepened in thought and feeling. His family kept every page, and later
collected many of the letters Everett had written to his best friends
back home.
13
Four years later, Stella got pregnant again. Still mourning Chris-
tella, she wished fervently for a girl. She had, in fact, already named
her unborn daughter.
On April 2, 1914, Stella wrote in her anniversary record:
Edward Everett Hale, who died in 1909, is best known today for
his scarifying patriotic allegory, “The Man Without a Country.”
It was the family’s compulsively literary bent that led the parents
to encourage Waldo and Everett to keep regular diaries from an early
age on, as well as to copy long passages from those diaries into the
letters they wrote to their parents whenever they were separated from
them, no matter how briefly. Some observers of the Ruess ménage
have seen Christopher and Stella as overly involved with their sons’
private lives, to the point of intrusiveness. According to this view,
Everett’s vagabondage was motivated in large part by a need to flee
the family’s stifling intimacy. In his early twenties, Waldo moved to
China, where he took a job as secretary for a religious mission. Other
jobs followed, as he stayed in China for several years. In the volu-
minous correspondence between father and son during this period,
Waldo occasionally bridles at his father’s neediness and insistence on
giving advice about everything from marriage to career.
But in the surviving letters from Everett to his parents, there is
scarcely a hint of annoyance at Christopher and Stella’s involvement
in his life. In a few instances he explicitly seeks out their guidance,
Dear Grandma—
Today I am three years old, and 38–1/2 inches tall, and 32
pounds heavy. Papa often says he wishes he had a phonograph
record of my prattle, so Mother decided to write down some
of my remarks today, just to smile over when I’m big. . . .
I had a ride on Pegasus, too. That’s my velocipede. I
couldn’t play with my Astronomy Game, because we lost
it one day. Mama says I knew about 25 names like Leo
and Lepus, Cassiopeia, Hercules, Persus [sic], Virgo, Aries,
Cygnus and Delphinus. She thought it was funny when I
named her Indian clubs Pollux and Castor, but it’s because
they were twin brothers.
Fourteen years later, Everett would name one of his burros Pegasus.
Prattle, indeed, must have been the three-year-old’s forte, if Stella’s
rendering of it does it justice:
The small “Duck Bab” was always finding every wet and
muddy spot in the neighborhood. Several times he ran away
so that I came to rope him to the porch. Once he went a
mile, over the bridge and the railroad tracks. I telephoned the
police station and found he had been reported.
Stella’s ride on the back of a mule (not a horse), while, as she put
it, “E’s impressions were all from the rim where he stayed with our
English traveling acquaintances,” probably marked the last occasion
on which the mother proved more adventurous than her son.
The longest entry in Everett’s 1923 diary is devoted to the
several-day trip to Yosemite, where mother and son slept outdoors
at Camp Curry. (Everett makes no mention of nearly drowning in
the Merced River.) The young diarist briefly notes his first view of El
Capitan, the nearly vertical 2,700-foot precipice of sheer granite that
commands the valley, but he was more interested in the wildlife. “On
the way [to Camp Curry] we saw chipmunks, as numerous as the fall-
ing leaves almost, peering at us from every nook and cranny, we saw
a fawn and some deer.”
Several days later:
After supper I fed a deer whose name was Jenny. She was a
female, but the males would not come near you. The males
have horns, but the females do not. I tried to pet Jenny but
she balked, and would not let me. Jenny was very greedy
and took large bites of biscuits, and I was soon back for
more. One lady put a biscuit in her mouth and Jenny walked
up and took it out.
For the nine-year-old, the high point of the trip was the nightly
tourist stunt performed by Park Service officials well into the 1960s,
before it was terminated as an ecological atrocity. Everett describes it
with unfeigned awe:
There was a great camp fire, and moving pictures were shown.
Then there was a signal from the top of Glacier Point, and
every one craned their necks upward. Someone whispered—
“The firefall.” Then a stream of dazzling brightness issued
from out the sky it seemed. One could not distinguish the
outline of Glacier Point from the Darkness. Then it ended.
The spectacle was concocted by setting a huge red fir tree trunk
on fire, then pushing it off Yosemite Falls. As it fell, the tree blazed a
glowing path, spangled with water-spray, through the night.
By the end of the summer, Stella and Everett were back in New
Jersey. The next year, Christopher was once again reassigned by the
Chautauqua Art Desk Company, this time to a job in Chicago. The
family packed up and moved to Valparaiso, Indiana, from which town
Christopher commuted fifty miles to work. He was hardly an absent
father, however. On August 5, 1924, already installed in his Chicago
office but awaiting the arrival of his wife and sons, Christopher wrote
to Everett:
You will also love many little girls as you grow up in that
way, and some day when you are older and more of a man
and able to earn money and build a home, you will marry
as Mother and I did and have beautiful sons and daughters,
of whom you will be as proud as I am of you and of Waldo,
and as Mother is.
Christopher’s letters to his sons were always loving, but they carry
an undertone of stern demand that the boys live up to the highest
moral and intellectual standards. “Dear Leonardo da Vinci Everett,”
Christopher saluted his son in another 1924 letter. “If you were like
him and Waldo were like Ben Franklin, than [sic] would make a great
pair of great men from our little family.” A year earlier, while Everett
was still only nine, Christopher admonished the “laddie”:
You may let Mother read this letter, too, if she will promise to
hug you for me, or spank you, as the occasion may suggest. . . .
You know President Coolidge has two boys now, and
the whole world is watching those boys. They are regular
fellows too. They know how to work and how to play.
March 20: Today I was all happy inside and could hardly keep
from yelling for tomorrow I am going to Chicago. I don’t like
to do homework. It never does you any good anyhow.
Sept. 10: Today I and Harold and Sheldon went out tonight.
I honked horns of autos and rang doorbells. We set water
traps too.
A paradox that would lie at the core of Everett’s being during the
wandering years of his late adolescence may have had its genesis in
Valparaiso. The boy was by nature gregarious and outgoing, so much
so that in California in his late teens he would think nothing of going
up to the homes of such famous artists as the photographers Edward
Weston and Ansel Adams, knocking on the front door, and introducing
himself as a fledgling protégé. Yet on his extended journeys with pack
animals across the Southwest, Everett would conclude, “After all the
lone trail is best”—partly, as he put it, “because I’m a freakish person.”
In Indians, Everett found what for a while seemed the perfect solu-
tion to those contradictory tensions. Indians were people, but around
Valparaiso it was not living natives that caught the lad’s fancy, but the
prehistoric relics they had left behind. In those Indiana forests, Everett
found his first arrowheads.
In Valparaiso, he wrote a pair of poems about arrowhead discov-
eries that are remarkably accomplished for his age. The better of the
two, written in November 1927 at the age of thirteen, was titled “The
Relic.”
How far this chisled piece of stone leads back the mind!
By careful Indian craftsman it was wrought,
For many purposes had it been sought.
To me it was a very precious treasure find.
The story is only two and a half typed pages long, but the prose
vividly evokes the desert landscape that would become Everett’s cho-
sen wilderness. The unnamed artist’s mission is a three-day stagger in
search of an epiphany. At last it comes:
But the turnaround comes too late. Out of water on the third
day, the man crawls atop a lonely butte to die. A torrential rainstorm
sweeps the landscape.
The rain passed, leaving the desert glorious and cool. As the
vultures poised in the air and came to tear him to pieces, he
looked toward the horizon. All that was left of his anguish
now vanished, and a light shone in his eyes, as he saw the
dying sun flood the waste lands with splendor. The last
thing he saw was the burnished bronze of a vulture’s wings,
glinting in the sunlight, as it snatched his eyes out.
He did not feel the pain. A moment later, the blood-hued
sunset passed swiftly to night.
* * *
In June 1930, at the age of sixteen, while still a student at Hollywood
High School, Everett set out on the first of his five annual expeditions,
as he hitchhiked up the coastal highway from Los Angeles to Carmel.
The diary that Everett kept during that first rambling trip may be ir-
revocably lost. What we know of the 1930 outing (the least ambitious
of the five that Everett would undertake) comes from some sixteen
letters he wrote to his parents and to Waldo, and a single letter to his
high-school friend Bill Jacobs.
In Carmel, one of the first things Everett did was to find the studio
of the famous photographer Edward Weston, knock on the door, and
introduce himself. “A man who gave me a ride near Morro Bay had
told me about him,” Everett wrote to his mother.
Weston was forty-four years old that summer. He had already
taken some of his most celebrated photographs, including many of
the nudes and still lifes that would become his hallmark achievements.