Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Chongno-ro 1910
8.0%
Percent
7.0%
6.0%
5.0%
4.0%
1998
1995
1996
1997
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Source: Data used to prepare EIA Annual Energy Outlook, March 2009
2008
The scenario on the left (A1B) assumes a business as usual approach to carbon dioxide emissions, with growth in the A 4 C rise threatens begin to diverge dramatically after the middle of the century. By 2055 they are already more than The two projections permafrost across the Northern Hemisphere, the Greenland ice sheet is under pressure, the Amazon population, the economy and in fossil fuel use, leading to an approximate rise of 4 C by 2100. faces twinapart. of fire and drought, and sea levels could be up by 80cm (4 C scenario) putting coastal populations at a degree threats The scenario on the right (E1) represents what may happen if swift action is taken to constrain emissions. It assumes greater risk of flooding. that they will start to fall from 2015 onwards and that the global average temperature will rise by about 2C by 2100.
Russia
South Korea
Japan
Western Europe
3.3
Sub-Saharan Africa
India Population
CEEP research (Byrne et al, 1998, Energy Policy v. 26, n. 4: 335-343) established the benchmark for an equitable and sustainable climate future: 3.3 tons per person per year. The United States is the leading emissions debtor, exceeding the sustainable & equitable emissions limit by more than 500%.
23.7
GT CO2-e
7.8
New Emissions Above 1990
-15
-25
* Other includes 1.1 Gt CO2-e reduced through several options including: carbon capture & storage; waste & wastewater management; new nuclear power plant designs. Source: IPCC 2007. Fourth Assessment Report, WG III Report, Mitigation of Climate Change. Supporting Sources: Olivier et al 2005 & 2006; WBCSD 2004.
4,000
3,000
2,000
0 1960
EIA, 2009 State Energy Data System (SEDS); U.S. Census Bureau, 2007, 2000, 1990
not consuming
The cost of saving energy is significantly less than electricity rates throughout the U.S.
Source: Erhardt-Martinez & Laitner (2008) The Size of the U.S. Energy Efficiency Market. ACEEE.
Todd Litman, Victoria Transport Policy Institute. 2010. Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs
Exajoules
2,000 1,500
Exajoules
2,500
50 40 30 20 10 0 Hydropower Ocean
1,000
500 0
Solar
Wind
Geothermal
Biomass
* Assumes current technology conversion efficiencies. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy
30
25 20
15
10 5 0
PV Potential in Seoul
67 MW 101 GWh (1%) 134 MW 201 GWh (2%) 197 MW 296 GWh (2%)
Population = 12 million Total Available Rooftop Real Estate: 2005 City Electricity Use: 2005 City Peak Demand: 130.8 million m2
40.5 TWh
18.8 GW
Solar Potential Electricity Supply: 10.0 TWh (36%) Solar Potential Peak Shaving:
6.7 GW (51%)
Educational Industrial Other
Assumptions: 40% of flat rooftop area used to collect solar energy; PV module efficiency = 20%; Inverter efficiency: 95% Sources: Columbia University, 2006; SEIA website.
Residential
Commercial Public
4 12-15
RENEWABLE ENERGY
Solar Thermal Solar Electric (PV) Wind Geothermal 19.0 15.7 11.9 10.5
10-19
18-26
Sources: Erhardt-Martinez & Laitner, The Size of the U.S. Energy Efficiency Market. ACEEE. 2008. American Solar Energy Society (ASES). Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency: Economic Drivers for the 21st Century. 2007.Singh & Fehrs, The Work that Goes into Renewable Energy. REPP. 2001. London School of Economics (LSE) and the information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF). The UKs Digital Road to Recovery. 2009. ICT job creation does not include network effects.
Leading PV Manufacturers
2006
World Solar Cell Production = ~1,700 MW
2008
World Solar Cell Production = ~4,100 MW
JAPAN
52%
CHINA
60%
CHINA
11%
JAPAN
25%
Sources: Prometheus Institute, 2009, PV News (April); Japan PV Energy Association, 2010; IEA PVPS, 2010.
ENERGY OBESITY
United States California
Per capita residential electricity use 1960-2006
European Union