Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
THE HINDU
15
BUSINESS REVIEW
he saga of energy shortage will continue for one more year. This is the broad picture that the Central Electricity Authority (CEA)s annual report on the countrys power supply position gives. In the nancial year that just went by, all regions suffered shortage, both in terms of energy and peak demand. The western and northern regions were the worst hit, as they recorded energy shortages of 13.3 per cent and 8 per cent respectively. For the current year, the CEA has projected that the country will have an energy shortage of 10.3 per cent and a peak demand shortage of 12.9 per cent. While the highest energy shortage of 11 per cent
will be in the western region, the maximum peak demand decit, 14.5 per cent, will be felt by the southern region. According to the CEA, the hydel-rich States having run of river schemes on the Himalayan rivers Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, and Uttarakhand will be surplus in energy during south west monsoon (JuneSeptember) but they will face severe shortages during the winter low-inow months when the generation from hydro schemes will dwindle to the minimum. Delhi, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Sikkim would have both peaking and energy surplus on an annual basis. Though Himachal Pradesh will witness peak demand decit from November 2011 to March 2012, the
States overall position in meeting the peak demand for the year is expected to be surplus with 7.1 per cent. In the south, Karnataka and Puducherry will be energy surplus with 4.7 per cent and 4.8 per cent respectively. Other energy-surplus States will be Chhattisgarh, Mizoram and Tripura whereas Orissa will be in a comfortable position in peak demand. All other States and Union Territories will have electricity shortages of varying degrees both in terms of energy and peak demand. Twentyve of them will have energy decit, of which four Jammu and Kashmir, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Daman and Diu will fall under the category of energy decit of over 20 per cent;
nine under the category of 1020 per cent and six each in the groups of 5-10 per cent and less than 5 per cent.
Deviations highlighted
One may ponder over the accuracy of the CEAs projections. To be fair to the Authority, the annual report clearly indicates the areas of deviation with regard to the projections for the previous year. Although the Authoritys forecast for the entire country saw only a minor deviation, its projections for some States, particularly those in the South, were well off the mark. Compared to the anticipated gures, the actual energy availability and peak demand met in the South were higher by 8.9 per cent and 9.4 per cent respectively whereas the actual energy requirement and peak demand were lower by 1.3 per cent and 2.8 per cent. Similarly, the actual energy shortage in the region was 5.2 per cent against the forecast of 14.1 per cent. The actual energy shortage in Andhra Pradesh was 3.2 per cent (anticipated shortage: 11.6 per cent); Karnataka 7.6 per cent (13.3 per cent); Kerala 1.4 per cent (10.1 per cent); Tamil Nadu 6.5 per cent (18.4 per cent) and Puducherry 4 per cent (5.7 per cent). The actual peak demand and energy shortage was less than the anticipated due to higher load factor, demandside management, lower requirement and higher availability of energy.
CHRONIC SHORTAGE: Cooling towers of a super thermal power plant. FILE PHOTO
One more reason was that most of the southern Stateswent on in an aggressive way to purchase power on a temporary and daily basis. As a result, what was sold at Rs. 8 or Rs. 9 per unit in the early part of 2010-11 got almost doubled in the later part of the year. At one stage, the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation bought power daily at an overall cost of Rs. 50 crore. Still, the authorities had resorted to load shedding of 1,500 MW daily. What policy makers and administrators have to realise is that fundamental and chronic problems cannot be overcome through shortterm measures. Additional capacity has to be created in a sustained and rapid manner. There is no short-cut to this option. During 2010-11, about 12,161 MW only could be added against the target of around 21,440 MW. This year, it has been planned to add nearly 17,200 MW. It appears that the country will not even meet the revised target of about 62,300 MW. When the XII Plan ends, the achievement could be around 50,000 MW. All these only reinforce the need for focussed attention on capacity addition.
T. RAMAKRISHNAN
Food ination
Food ination is showing signs of inching up adding to the core ination pressures. Further, another hike in fuel prices is also imminent. However, the silver lining is that the current expectation on monsoon is closer to 98 per cent normal. Though the policy tightening since March 2010 would show its impact in the next few quarters, the RBIs focus will remain on controlling ination while keeping a close watch on growth numbers.
OOMMEN A. NINAN
units to depreciate their capital assets in a straightline method at the same rate at which it is reimbursed by the State Electricity Board under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, it is proposed to make amendment in Sec. 32 of the Income-tax Act. With this amendment, there will be lower tax reimbursed by the State Electricity Board, consequently, a lower power tariff rate. What is applicable only to such assessees could have no application for others like those who produce power by windmills or solar energy. There is, therefore, no question of any option. The Tribunal in Dy. CIT v SAMKRG Pistons & Rings Ltd. (2009) 34 SOT 401 (Hyd) has held that block concept continues to apply to all others not governed by Indian Electricity Act. In K.K.S.K. Leather Processors (P) Ltd. v ITO (2010) 126 ITD 215 (Chennai), it was decided on assumption of requirement of option for straightline depreciation that an assessee by claiming depreciation under Appendix I at 80 per cent should be treated to have exercised
option for such depreciation. In K. Ravi v Asst.CIT (2010) 2 ITR (Trib) 752 (Chennai), on the erroneous view that assessee running a windmill was entitled to straightline method of depreciation, the option should be exercised in a return led in time and that a delayed return will forfeit right to normal depreciation not only in the year of late return but also for later years. Since the law in the Statement of Objects and Reasons, the clarication, the statutory provision and the Rule would make available straightline depreciation only for electricity companies and not to others, the question of exercise of option by ling a return would not arise. The Board is better advised to correct the wrong inference drawn even by the Tribunal and some of the assessing ofcers so as to avoid litigation in the light of the objective of enhanced rate of depreciation meant as an incentive for power generation.
S. RAJARATNAM
............................. AN ACTUARY WITH 15 YEARS EXPERIENCE OR, AN APPOINTED ACTUARY, IS AT PRESENT GETTING ABOUT THREE TIMES THE REMUNERATION OFFERED BY THE GOVERNMENT. ..............................
introduce complex products similar to mutual fund products but with one important difference. While mutual fund products do not give any guarantee, life insurance products provide long-term guarantees. How to quantify the liabilities arising from such guarantees? Is the insurance company properly equipped to meet these guarantees? Is the underlying rate of return
guaranteed to the policyholder commensurate with the investment environment and the expected long-term movements in interest rates? Is there any mismatch between the assets held and the liabilities underwritten? Are the assumptions made regarding operational expenses realistic or will they result in expense over-run and need for unsustainable levels of capital infusion? These are the aspects to be periodically looked into by the IRDA to ensure security for the policyholders money. So, in the last two decades, the actuarial science has progressed from simple algebraical and statistical techniques to broader and highly complicated issues of nance and investment. Deriving actuarial formulas to represent various situations mentioned above is not difcult and can be done by the Actuarial Department of the IRDA. These formulas, however, involve many parameters and assigning appropriate values to these parameters is a really tough task. At this point the decision maker steps in and, for making the right decisions, he should have good knowledge and experience in nance and investment as well as principles and practices of life insurance. Knowledge of actuarial techniques can be of
additional help, but not absolutely essential. The qualications required for a member (actuary) are: good knowledge of nance and investment; at least 20 years of all-round experience (underwriting, policy servicing, accounts and marketing) in life insurance; actuarial knowledge and software skills can be important additional qualication; good academic record with aptitude for mathematics and statistics; and holding a fairly senior position in a life insurance organisation. For the remuneration being offered, there would be good response from persons satisfying the above criteria and the insurance industry will be the ultimate beneciary. At present, the member (actuary) looks after life and general insurance. The requirements of the two elds of insurance are vastly different and it is almost impossible to nd a person with good experience in both elds. It is, therefore, advisable to have a separate member (actuary) for general insurance. Prociency in statistics and all-round experience in the general insurance industry should be the basis for selection.
R. RAMAKRISHNAN
(Actuary)
...ND-ND