Integrated Project Evaluation1.1

Integrated Project Evaluation - Rubrics
Evaluation Buckets Weightage 10 10 10 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 100
Design Work Code Development Project Deployment Soft Skills
Requirement Analysis Document Design Documents - Low Level & High Level Test Plans - UTP & ITP Source Code Development Coding Standards Code Review - Self & Peer Testing - Unit & Integration Integration and built Project Execution Bugs and Crashes Meets SRS Team Work Leadership Quality Team Interaction Tracking Team Activities Project Presentation Total
Excellent Competent Scope for Improvement Needs Efforts
Student Roll No 1
Scale Score #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Student Roll No 2
3 2 1 0
Student Roll No 3
Student Roll No 4
Student Roll No 5
Integrated Project Evaluation - Guidelines fo

Excellent Design Documents Requirement Analysis Document Design Documents - Low Level & High Level Test Plans - UTP & ITP Captures both functional and non-functional requirements All the modules are identified with description of input/output parameters and algorithm design Captures all the test cases for both functional and non-functional as identified in RA document
Code Development
Source code
functionality is implemented capturing all the validations;code is optimized as per code tuning techniques; Code Re-usability is applied
Naming variables, Header-footer for file and for every function, proper documentation and Indentation is followed COMPLETE code review is done along with Code Review - Self & Peer ALL considerations Coding Standards followed All test cases written in UTP and ITP are tested and fixed the defects; Defect tracking sheet is maintained to log all defects and defects are fixed front end connects with back end and exe is generated; Output is perfect with no errors or warnings NO Bugs and Crash Free project development Implements both functional and non-functional requirements as captured in RA document Better quality work than expected with significant and in time contribution. Demonstrates EXCELLENT leadership qualities
Unit & Integration testing Project Deployment Soft Skills
Integration and built project Execution Bugs and Crashes
Meets SRS Team Work Leadership Quality
Team Interaction
Possess Listening Skills and communication among teammates, Participates in brainstorming, Open for new ideas and feedback Keeps the team on track by giving specific, timely, and constructive feedback
Tracking Team Activities
S Project Presentation
EXCELLENT documentation, communication and presentation Skills Excellent
Integrated Project Evaluation - Guidelines for Using RubricsScales

Competent Scope for Improvement
Captures only functional and one/two non-fn one or two modules are not identified which leads to Re-work on the design
captures only functional requirements more than 2 modules are not identified which leads to Re-work
Captures the test cases for functional and few Captures the test cases for functional non-functional as identified in RA document requirements
functionality is implemented capturing all the validations; Re-usability is achieved but only one or two code tuning techniques is applied
functionality is implemented capturing all the validations with Re-usability; No code tuning techniques is applied;
Naming variables, Header-footer for file and for Naming variables, Header-footer for file and for every function, proper documentation is written every function, proper documentation and but Indentation is not appropriate Indentation is not appropriate GOOD Code review is done All major test cases in UTP and ITP are tested but cosmetic defects are not fixed; Defect tracking sheet is maintained to log all defects and defects are fixed front end connects with back end and exe is generated; it takes more time for integration; Output is perfect with no errors and there are few warnings NO Bugs and with some incedents of crashes Implements functional and one or two nonfunctional requirements as captured in RA document Good quality work as per expectations with timely contribution Good in leading the team PARTIAL code review is done All test cases written in UTP and ITP are tested and fixed the defects; Defect tracking sheet is maintained to log all defects and only one or two defects are fixed front end connects with back end but exe is not generated Output is partially correct with no errors and there are few warnings FEW Bugs and crashes Implements only functional requirements as captured in RA document Good quality work as per expectations without meeting timelines Average leading abilitites with scope for improvement
Possess Listening Skills and communication among teammates, Needs improvements on brainstorming and acceptance to new ideas and feedback
Possess Listening Skills and needs improvement on communication among teammates,brainstorming and acceptance to new ideas and feedback
Keeps the team on track by giving specific and timely feedback Gives specific feedback, not on timelines
GOOD communication and presentation Skills Needs Improvement in communication and with good documentation skills presentation Skills, Competent Scope for Improvement
Needs Efforts could not capture functional requirements as given in the project specification
Complete Re-work on the design document Test cases are not complete as per the validations given in the project specification functionality is not implemented as per the validations given in the project specification; No code tuning techniques is applied and Reusability
No coding standards followed NO code review is done
No test case has passed; Defect tracking sheet is not maintained to log all defects
integration has many errors and warnings No output; Project is not in Executable stage due to Bugs and crashes
Both are not implemented
NO quality work and without meeting timelines NO Leadership Qualities
Needs improvement on Listening Skills and communication among teammates,brainstorming and acceptance to new ideas and feedback
NO feedback
POOR communication and presentation Skills Needs Efforts

Integrated Project Evaluation1.1

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Integrated Project Evaluation1.1

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Integrated Project Evaluation - Rubrics

Evaluation Buckets Weightage 10 10 10 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 100

Design Work Code Development Project Deployment Soft Skills

Excellent Competent Scope for Improvement Needs Efforts

Integrated Project Evaluation - Guidelines fo

Unit & Integration testing Project Deployment Soft Skills

Integration and built project Execution Bugs and Crashes

Meets SRS Team Work Leadership Quality

Tracking Team Activities

EXCELLENT documentation, communication and presentation Skills Excellent

Integrated Project Evaluation - Guidelines for Using RubricsScales

No coding standards followed NO code review is done

Both are not implemented

NO quality work and without meeting timelines NO Leadership Qualities

POOR communication and presentation Skills Needs Efforts

Potrebbero piacerti anche