Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA DELANEY DEVELOPMENT, INC. , DELANEYS, INC. and YESTER OAKS APARTMENTS * * CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-307 * * VERSUS * JUDGE: * ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE COMPANY * MAGISTRATE: ************************************************************************ COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES NOW INTO COURT, through undersigned counsel, comes plaintiffs, Delaney Development, Inc., Delaneys, Inc. and Cabana Apartments, who respectfully represent as follows in this Complaint for Damages: I. Made plaintiffs herein are: DELANEY DEVELOPMENT, INC., a corporation organized under the laws of Alabama and with its principal place of business in Alabama; DELANEYS, INC., a corporation organized under the laws of Alabama and with its principal place of business in Alabama; and YESTER OAKS APARTMENTS, a corporation organized under the laws of Alabama and with its principal place of business in Alabama.
II. Made defendant herein is: ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, an insurance company authorized to do and doing business within Alabama and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court. III. Jurisdiction herein is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332 as the parties citizenships are completely diverse and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs. IV. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(a)(2) because a substantial part of the events giving rise to this claim occurred in Mobile, Alabama within the Southern District of Alabama. V. Defendant is justly and truly indebted to Plaintiffs herein for damages, together with legal interest thereon from the date of judicial demand until paid, and for costs in these proceedings, for the following, to-wit: VI. Plaintiffs, Delaney Development, Inc. and Delaneys, Inc., own a residential apartment building located in Mobile, Alabama, namely, Yester Oaks Apartments. VII. Plaintiffs contracted with Illinois Union Insurance Company (hereinafter Illinois Union) to insure its apartment building. Y05J0093522. The Illinois Union policy bears policy number
VIII. On June 11, 2005, a fire erupted in Yester Oaks Apartments. The fire caused widespread devastation to the plaintiffs property. IX. The extensive damage caused by the fire temporarily rendered the property unable to be occupied and necessitated massive repairs. X. Plaintiffs timely notified Illinois Union of its loss after the fire caused damage to Plaintiffs property. XI. Shortly after the fire, Illinois Union began sending adjusters to Plaintiffs property to determine the scope of damage to Plaintiffs property. performed inspections of the damaged property. XII.
As of the date of the filing of this Complaint, Illinois Union has not tendered Delaney Development, Inc., Delaneys Inc., and/or Yester Oaks Apartments a sufficient amount to adequately compensate Plaintiffs for their losses from the fire.
XIII. At all times pertinent hereto, Illinois Union provided insurance coverage for the matters, risks, and things involved herein. XV. Plaintiffs commercial insurance policy issued by Illinois Union provided coverage for loss or damage caused by the peril of fire. 3
XVI. Despite having been provided with satisfactory proof of loss, and despite conducting its own thorough investigation of the damages Plaintiffs incurred from the fire, Illinois Union has not adequately paid for any or all of the damage sustained to Plaintiffs property caused by this covered loss. XVII. Illinois Union is liable unto Plaintiffs under the following legal theories: a. b. c. Breach of contract; Breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing; and Any and all other legal theories which may be found through discovery and proven at trial in this matter, including but not limited to, bad faith adjusting. XVIII. Illinois Union has committed other acts of negligence, breach of contract, and breach of its duty of good faith and fair dealing, all of which will be shown and proven at the trial of this matter. XIX. As a result of Illinois Unions actions, Plaintiffs have suffered the following nonexclusive list of damages: a. b. c. d. e. Loss of use of insured property; Loss of enjoyment of insured property; Loss of business income; Loss of movable goods; Diminution in value of the property; 4
f. g. h. i. j.
Permanent repair and remediation expenses; Temporary repair and remediation expenses; Attorneys fees; Costs of this litigation; and All other losses that will be proven at the trial of this matter. XX.
Plaintiffs reserve the right to supplement and amend this Complaint for Damages. XXI. Plaintiffs pray for trial by jury. WHEREFORE, plaintiffs herein, Delaney Development, Inc., Delaneys, Inc. and Yester Oaks Apartments pray that the defendant, Illinois Union Lines Insurance Company be served with a copy of this Complaint and be duly cited to appear and answer the same, and that after expiration of all legal delays and due proceedings, there be judgment rendered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant, in an amount that will fully compensate Plaintiffs for its damages pursuant to the evidence and in accordance with the law; all sums with legal interest thereon from the date of judicial demand until fully paid, for all costs of these proceedings, and for all general and equitable relief. Respectfully submitted, /s/C. Bennett Long__________________ C. Bennett Long (Bar No. LON0046 ) 116 East I-65 Service Road North, Ste. A Mobile, AL 36607 Telephone: (251) 639-4100 Facsimile: (251) 476-1042 Email: bennett@lwpc.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS SERVICE WILL BE ISSUED VIA LONG ARM SERVICE 5
\\ - bo1- N
TheJS44civi|coversheetandlheinformationcontainedhcrcinneithcrreplacenorsupplenrentrhcf|ingan{-serviceofplea
H,'3i;1?J:i,",rJn"#
i;
I. (T) PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS
lllinois Union lnsurance Compeny
(b)
plainriff
Mobile.
..
Coung ofResidencc ofFirst Listed Defendant unltnown (lN u,s. PLATNTTF CASES ONLY) NOTE: lN LAND CONDEMNATTON CASES, USETHeLOCATTON
LAND INVOLVED.
OF THE
(%,Atfi
Attorncys 0f Knom)
tI. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (prace an ,.X- in onc Box onty) 0l U.S. Govemmcnr t 3 Fedcral Question
Plaintiff
(U.S. Govemmmt Not
III.
CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL
(For Diversity Case6 Only)
PARTIE$tptapo an.,X"
Party)
Citian of This
Srate
rtF Dt
DEF
ol
Inoorporated or Principal
PTF Place A 4
DEF
a2
U.S.
Govcrnment
Ct 4
Divenity
(lndicate Cidzonship of Parries in lrem
Defendmt
CitizenofAnotherState O2 lll)
Citizen or Subjecr
o? o3
Incorporaledazy'hincipalplace
ofBusines8 ln Another Statc
d S OJ tr6 06
ofa
ForeignNalion
o
o o o
l0
Insurance
120 Marine 130 Miller Act 140 Negoliable lo$trumsnt | 50 Reoovcry ofOverpaymrt
EI
lJl MedicaeAct
& Ellforsement of
(Excl. Veicrans)
El
o n
D
153 Recovery ofovrpaymant of Veter.an's Benefits 160 Stockiolders' Suits 190 O*er Contract
o
O
t96
Product Med. Malpnctice Lirbility O 363 Personal Injury product Liabilitv 320 Aosault, Libcl & $lander O 368Asbestmpcrsonal O 330 Federal Employors' lnjury produot Liability Liabitity Cl 340Muine PERSONALPROpERTY 345 Mrrine Pmduct O 310 Ohcr Fraud Liability O 371 Trurh in Lending 350 Motor Vehicle O 380 Other penonal propsrty Danega 3I5 Molor Vehicle Itoduct ftoduct Liability O 38j hoperty Darnago o 385 product Liabilirv 3600therPcnonel
315 Airplone 442 Employm.nr 443 Housing/ 510 Motions to Sentoncc
Drlg
400 Srate &eapponionmft 410 Antitrust 430 Bmls and Buking 450 Commerce
0 ll
830 Palen!
S40Trademark
O O
O
490crbldSarTv Sl0Selectiveservie
850 Soourities/Commoditiev
Exchalgc
?20 Labor/Mgmt. Relalions 73 0 Labor/Mgmt.Rcponing 862 Black Lung (923) 863 DIWCTDIwW (a05(g)) 864 SSID Tirle XVI
ST5 CustomcrC.hatlenge
& DisclosursAct
?40 Railway Lrbor Act ?90 Ot$er Labor Litigadon Cl 791 Empl. Rei. Inc. Security Act
t2 usc 1410 890 Othcr Starurory Acrions 891 Agrieultural Acts 892 Economio SlabilizatioI| Acl 893 Snvirormental Maners &94 Enorgy Allocalion Act
895 Freedom of Infonnation
& Ejsrmenl
O O O
240 Torts to Land 245 Tort hoduct Liabi)ity 290 All Othcr Real Properry
Haber! Corpusl
J30 Csnersl S35 De6th Pildty 540 Mandanw & Othcr 550 Civil Rights 555 PrisoD Condition
Acmmmod&tions
444 Wplfare
871
Act
9oOAppeal of Fe Derennitratiol Under Equal Access lo Justige 950 Constiturionaliry of Slate Statures
445 Amer. VDisabiliries.Employment 446 Amer. w/Disabiliries Other 440 Othcr Civil Rights
Acliolls
I I
V. ORIGIN
Original
Proceeding
(Place an
El 2
"X"
Removed
StatF Court
from
n I
Remanded &om
Appcllate Court
ll4Reinstatcdor
Keopened
ft
to Distfict from
VI. CAUSEOFACTION
REQUESTED
T
strttster
diversity):
description ofcauser
COMPLAINT:
VTTL RELATED CASE(S)
DEMAND $
JURYDEMANDI
DOCKETNUMBER
dYes
DNo
IFANY
JUDGE
RECEIPT #
AMOUNT
APPLYING IFP
MAC,JUDGE