Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Bulletin from Greg Hands M.P. #300 Date: Monday, 13 June 2011 12:34:36 United Kingdom Time From: To: Greg Hands M.P. news@greghands.com
In this edition:
Greg Hands M.P.s Diary Website of the Week: FRODO Photo news: Romanian Foreign Minister Protecting our NHS for tomorrow Review will help families allow children to be children Celebrating Fulham Week Transformed Elm Park Gardens brings new housing to Chelsea Hands in the papers: Balls under fire from Tories and Blairites: 'Project Volvo' reaction Hands in the papers: Boris aide is like Mladic, says Ken; Livingstone is accused of bad taste for 'beast' attack on Lister Hands in the papers: MP's Column How to contact Greg Hands M.P.
www.frodokids.org
The website of the Foundation for the Relief of Disabled Orphans, FRODO, which campaigns for better conditions for disabled orphans in Romania. Greg is a trustee of FRODO. Why not get involved?
Photo news:
Greg Hands M.P. in Bucharest last week, meeting Romanian Foreign Minister Teodor Baconschi, at the Romanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Speaking after the conclusion of the listening exercise last week, the Prime Minister thanked the independent group that had overseen it. "The whole listening exercise has been overseen by the NHS Future Forum an independent group of the country's leading NHS professionals and patient representatives, led by the eminent Professor Steve Field," he said. "I'm hugely grateful to Steve and the whole team for all the work they are doing." The NHS Future Forum will report its conclusions shortly. Commenting, Greg Hands MP said: We are increasing spending on the NHS. This is really important for our local hospitals like Chelsea & Westminster and Charing Cross, but the extra money wont be enough to meet future challenges without reforming the bureaucracy involved with PCTs. The Government has been listening to professionals to ensure we get the details absolutely right. Thats sensible and responsible, as this is too important to leave anything to doubt. We all rely on the NHS. We rely on our GPs and hospitals, including specialised services like those at the Royal Marsden and Royal Brompton. In other words, we rely on doctors and nurses not an empty bureaucracy that often stops them doing whats best for patients.
Reg Bailey said: Society has become increasingly full of sexualised imagery. This has created a wallpaper to childrens lives. Parents feel there is no escape and no clear space where children can be children. I want to put the power back in parents hands so they can better manage the pressures on their children and make it easier for them to bring up their children the way they want. Parents need encouragement to feel they can change things and that their voices will be heard. Regulators, businesses and broadcasters should do more to connect with parents its not enough for them to work out what is acceptable from what people complain about afterwards. I hope that they see that its good business if you look out for families. Then we can all help to make Britain a more family friendly place. Many of the actions suggested in the report are for businesses and regulators rather than for the Government. The Government will monitor the implementation of his recommendations and undertake an audit in 18 months time. To ensure that progress is made quickly, the Prime Minister is inviting a wide range of businesses and regulators into Downing Street in October to ask them to report on the steps they have taken.
"Elm Park Gardens has always been amongst the very best council housing in the country. That we have been able to add more affordable properties there, all funded by new homes for sale, is a source of real pride to us at the Royal Borough." Elm Park Gardens is a Victorian Square, with some post-war additions. Its former residents include Joyce Grenfell, Vladimir Nabokov, Laurie Lee and Elizabeth Frink.
Balls under fire from Tories and Blairites: 'Project Volvo' reaction
Nicholas Watt, The Guardian Saturday 11 th June 2011 Ed Balls came under fire from the combined forces of the Conservative party and supporters of Tony Blair after the leaking of a cache of private correspondence that implicates him in a plot to remove Blair. As the shadow chancellor admitted that the handover of power to Gordon Brown "could have been done better", Michael Gove led the Tory assault after Balls appeared to implicate him in the leak. Gove, a close David Cameron ally, turned on Balls after the cabinet secretary, Sir Gus O'Donnell, sanctioned an investigation into the leak. This followed a complaint by Balls who told David Bell, permanent secretary at the education department, that he last saw the leaked documents in a file on his desk in the department just before he left to campaign in last year's general election. The documents, published by the Daily Telegraph, show that Balls was the key figure in "Project Volvo", designed to unseat Blair and prepare Brown for the premiership. Gove is confident his office will be cleared of leaking the documents after Whitehall sources indicated an internal Labour feud was behind the breach of security. A source close to Gove told the Guardian: "Like with [former Haringey council children's services boss] Sharon Shoesmith, Ed Balls is pathetically trying to blame officials." Supporters of Blair, who was dismissed in the documents by Brown as "shallow", "inconsistent" and "muddled", were scathing about Balls. "Ed Balls is a poisonous figure who agitated against a sitting prime minister," one figure said. Balls launched a strong defence of his conduct as Brown's chief lieutenant, a position he maintained in an informal capacity after his election as a Labour MP at the 2005 election. The documents chronicle how Brown's circle intensified its campaign after the 2005 election to unseat Blair who had said the 2005 election would be his last as Labour leader. "There is nothing here to justify claims of a plot," Balls told the BBC outside his home. "We did pull off that stable and orderly transition, but the allegation that there was a plot, that there was nastiness, brutality - it's just not true. It's not justified, either, from reading the documents which I saw last night." But Balls did acknowledge there had been tensions and that the Brown circle could have done a better job during the transition. "It was hard, the relationship was under stress. People will look back and say, it could have been done better. I agree with that. There was no nasty edge at all, but I am not going to deny to you that there weren't tensions, there weren't arguments." Senior figures in Whitehall are sceptical of Balls's claim that he left sensitive documents, including annotations by the then-prime minister, in a file on his desk. The formal explanation of the inquiry indicated that O'Donnell does not necessarily accept Balls's claim, let alone that they were then leaked by an official or someone from the office of his successor, Gove. The prime minister's spokesman explained the investigation, saying: "The Cabinet Office is looking into, first, whether these papers were in the possession of any department. And second, if so, whether there have been any breaches of document security within government." One Whitehall source said of the Balls complaint: "This all has a familiar ring to it. Ed Balls loves inquiries." The source speculated that Balls may have leaked the documents himself. "This has the feel of desk-clearing about it. Ed Miliband is struggling a bit, Ed Balls must be eyeing up the Labour leadership. So why not get all this out on his terms so this stuff is not released at a more difficult moment?" Gove and other senior Tories have a different view. They believe that a former member - or members - of the Brown circle leaked the papers to damage Balls at the moment that he is emerging as a pivotal figure in the Labour party. Greg Hands, parliamentary aide to George Osborne, tweeted: "Worth noting how leaky Labour has become under the Two Eds, with a steady stream of docs seemingly from both their offices." In an attempt to implicate the Tories in the leak, Balls said the publication was "an attempt to take attention away from what is going on in this country". Ed Miliband said: "I think what you are seeing is an overhyped version of history and, frankly, the era of Blair and Brown is over." On a lighter note, Volvo issued a statement taking issue with comparisons between Brown and its cars. The leaked documents showed that Deborah Mattinson, Brown's pollster, compared him to a Volvo on the grounds that he was "steadfast" and "robust". Volvo said its vehicles were actually "dynamic, agile and innovative", adding for political effect that the British economy would be in better shape if Labour had performed like its cars.
Boris aide is like Mladic, says Ken; Livingstone is accused of bad taste for 'beast' attack on Lister
Peter Dominiczak, The Evening Standard Thursday 2 nd June 2011 Ken Livingstone was accused of "extremism and poor taste" today after comparing Boris Johnson's new chief of staff to Serbian war crimes suspect Ratko Mladic. Labour's mayoral candidate came under fire for branding Eddie Lister "the Mladic of local government". Mladic is due to appear before judges at The Hague tomorrow accused of ordering the killing of 8,000 Muslim men and boys in Srebrenica in 1995, the worst massacre of civilians in Europe since the Second World War. The "Butcher of Bosnia" faces 11 war crime charges, including those committed during the four-year siege of Sarajevo from 1992 to 1995 during which 10,000 civilians died. Mr Livingstone today refused to apol- ogise for his comments, which were dismissed by the Mayor as "jibes" and "insults". At a public "Tell Ken" event in Bromley on Tuesday, Mr Livingstone said: "In the first term, he [Mr Johnson] had a real deputy mayor, Simon Milton a decent one-nation Tory who actually recognised you can't just ignore the poor and so on. He died, sadly, and has been replaced by sort of the Ratko Mladic of local government." Mr Lister, ex-leader of Wandsworth council, took over as the Mayor's chief of staff and deputy mayor for planning after Sir Simon died in April. In his 19-year reign at Wandsworth he gained a reputation as a fearsome cost-cutter. Mr Livingstone also called him "the beast of Wandsworth" during an interview earlier in the day. He said: "If Boris gets re-elected he'll be trying all he can to please the Tory grassroots, because they're the ones who'll pick their next leader. "That's why he got the beast of Wands- worth unleashed. Eddie Lister - the Ratko Mladic of local government." Chelsea and Fulham Tory MP Greg Hands said today: "This is yet another sign of extremism and poor taste from Ken Livingstone. "To compare a long-standing and well respected London council leader to an alleged war criminal plumbs new depths of bad taste. It's time for Ed Miliband to take action." Mr Johnson discussed Mr Livingstone's comments with Nick Ferrari on LBC today. He said his experience of London politics "has taught me not to deal with the jibes hurled at me by any opponents, let alone my Labour opponent. "So I think all such insults I will pass over. I will let them pass me by as the idle wind, which I regard not." Mr Livingstone refused to apologise and said he used "colourful" language when "standing up" for the people of Wandsworth. His spokesman said: "With recent changes to his team, Boris Johnson has promoted the Conservative Party wing that trail-blazed policies to move less well-off Londoners out. "Ken's phrasing is always colourful but as ever he is standing up for parents who face charges for their children to use playgrounds, in a borough where affordable housing has been disregarded, and for millions of Londoners who are losing police from their streets and paying higher fares."
MP's Column
Greg Hands M.P., Hammersmith & Fulham Chronicle Friday 10 th June 2011 Opposition to the Super Sewer is growing across London and the whole Thames Water region. To re-cap, Thames Water want to build a huge sewer under the River Thames, from Hammersmith to Beckton, at a cost of 3.6 billion. Thames Water says that the intention is to prevent sewage from entering the Thames. The cost will be met by all Thames Water bill payers, to the tune of an estimated 65 a year each for the indefinite future, according to independent estimates by Ofwat. My objection is this: sewage in the Thames is a problem, but more than 95% of it is actually rainwater, according to Thames Water itself. That figure is often nearer 99%. So there is not very much human waste going into the River. The fact that there is any at all is a real issue, but is it a 3.6 billion problem? Thanks to the Coalition Government, a lot of extra money is being spent on infrastructure in the coming years, like Crossrail and the new High Speed line to Birmingham. 3.6 billion to be spent on a sewer is about five times the cost of electrifying the main line to Cardiff. Its a lot of money, and money which will be paid for through water bills, not by the general taxpayer. Water bills are an extremely regressive way of paying for a project, as the impact falls much more on the poorest. What is more, the project will devastate large parts of Fulham and Chelsea. H&F Council has been vocal in opposition to the scheme, and now K&C Council believes that now is not the right time to be pressing ahead with this project. I agree. Contact me to get involved in the campaign or to find out more about the Thames Tideway Tunnel (or Super Sewer).
www.greghands.com
More news from Greg Hands M.P., coming soon Please forward this email on to anyone you think may be interested. If you have had this email forwarded to you and would like to be added to the mailing list, please send an email to: news@greghands.com with JOIN in the subject heading. To unsubscribe from this news@greghands.com with heading. list, please return an e-mail to "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject