Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
171 654
and AIDS Registry (Table 1). This was a 11% increase
Asymptomatic Cases 168 644 5,802
compared to the same period last year (n=154 in 2010)
AIDS Cases 3 10 867
[Figure 1].
Males 165 608 5,307*
Most of the cases (96%) were males. The median age Females 6 46 1,351*
was 27 years (age range:17-60 years). The 20-29 year Youth 15-24yo 46 180 1,393
Children <15yo 0 2 57
(64%) age-group had the most number of cases. Fifty-
Reported Deaths due to AIDS 0 1 324
five percent (94) of the reported cases were from the
National Capital Region (NCR). *Note: No data available on sex for eleven (11) cases.
Reported mode of transmission was sexual contact Figure 1. Number of New HIV Cases per Month (2008-2011)
(165) and re-using needles among injecting drug users 175
2010 143 130 120 154 153 109 131 108 153 104 112 174
Of the 171 HIV positive cases, three were reported as 2011 152 159 172 171
70% 52
43
Eleven of the 171 (6%) reported cases were OFWs 60%
[Figure 9, page 3]. All were males. The median age was 50%
1283
31 years (age range: 24-40 years). All cases acquired
40%
0%
A p r i l 2 0 11 A p r i l 2 0 10 C umul at i ve
Figure 3. Number of HIV/AIDS Cases Reported in the Philippines by Year, Jan 1984 to April 2011 (N=6,669)
1650
1500
1350
1200
1050
900
750
600
450
300
150
0
'84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11
T OT A L 2 10 29 38 32 39 66 85 72 102 118 116 154 117 189 158 123 174 184 193 199 210 309 342 528 835 1591 654
A s y mpt omat i c 0 6 18 25 21 29 48 68 51 64 61 65 104 94 144 80 83 118 140 139 161 171 273 312 506 806 1571 644
A I DS 2 4 11 13 11 10 18 17 21 38 57 51 50 23 45 78 40 56 44 54 38 39 36 30 22 29 20 10
Deat h 2 4 10 12 9 8 15 13 13 11 19 24 27 10 16 17 9 20 11 11 8 16 18 10 *7 1 2 1
*Five initially asymptomatic cases reported in 2008, died due to AIDS that same year. 1
Philippine HIV/AIDS Registry April 2011
AIDS Cases (1984-2011) Fig 4. Proportion of Modes of Transmission of AIDS Cases by Year,
Jan 1984—April 2011
Of the 654 HIV positive cases in 2011, ten were reported as
AIDS cases. Ninety percent were males. Ages ranged from
100%
Proportion of Cases
From 1984 to 2011, there were 867 AIDS cases reported, 71% 50%
contact (278) then bisexual contact (78). Other modes of Blood Trans fusion 10 0 0 0 0
IDU 3 1 0 0 0
transfusion (10), injecting drug use (4), and needle prick Bisex ual Contac t 60 4 8 4 2
injuries (2) [Figure 4]. Three percent (28) of the AIDS cases Homos exual Contac t 234 10 14 14 6
years old (median 28 years). The 20-29 year old age group
(61%) had the most number of cases for 2011. For the male 75%
age group, the most number of cases were found among the
20-24 years old (27%), 25-29 years old (35%) and 30-34 50%
Proportion of Cases
male and female cases reported. Eighty percent (5,307) were 35-49y o 23 1 95 14
males. Ages ranged from 1-73 years (median 30 years). The 25-34y o 91 5 325 23
age groups with the most number of cases were: 20-24 years
15-24y o 46 0 174 6
1-14y o 0 0 0 2
Figure 6. Comparison of the Distribution of Male and Female HIV Cases by Age-Group and Certain Highlighted Years
50 & o lder 1984-2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
45-49yo
40-44yo
35-39yo
30-34yo
25-29yo
20-24yo
15-19yo
Number of Male Cases <15yo Number of Female Cases
1500 1250 1000 750 500 250 0 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500
<15y o 15-19y o 20-24y o 25-29y o 30-34yo 35-39yo 40-44y o 45-49y o 50 & ol der <15y o 15-19yo 20-24y o 25-29y o 30- 34y o 35-39y o 40-44y o 45- 49y o 50 & ol der
2007 6 1 36 74 54 43 30 15 19 2007 3 0 4 16 12 14 6 5 3
1984-2006 21 14 121 300 360 321 249 170 157 1984-2006 18 33 187 209 190 140 84 30 41
2
Philippine HIV/AIDS Registry April 2011
Number of Cases
transmission. The age range of those infected through 200
transmission are listed in Table 2. No data is available for Heterosexual Contact - Female - - - 6 23 13 1
6% (395) of the cases. Cumulative data shows 43% Heterosexual Contact - Male - - - 8 38 21 6
(2,601) were infected through heterosexual contact, 36% Bisexual Contact - - - 52 128 30 1
90%
60%
Needle Prick Injury 0 0 3 Het er os ex ual 1 7 24 24 16 19 35 30 41 47 58 56 81 82 138 114 93 128 129 129 123 131 193 139 160 216 271 116
No Data Available 2 15 395 Homos ex ual 0 1 4 3 4 6 8 15 5 16 20 21 30 25 36 30 17 32 46 40 27 47 81 107 215 336 677 305
Table 3. Reported Mode of HIV Transmission Among OFWs Figure 9. Number of OFWs Compared to Non-OFWs by Year (1984-2011*)
1400
Mode of Transmission Apr 2011 Jan– Apr 2011 Cumulative
n= 11 n= 74 N=1,596 1200
1000
200
Blood/Blood Products 0 0 10
0
Injecting Drug Use 0 0 1 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11*
No Data Available 0 0 48 Non-OFW 1 8 29 35 23 34 56 78 58 73 87 92 119 90 138 91 63 95 88 99 111 116 179 236 406 671 1417 580
% of OFW 50% 20% 0% 8% 28% 13% 15% 8% 19% 28% 26% 21% 23% 23% 27% 42% 49% 45% 52% 49% 44% 45% 42% 31% 23% 20% 11% 11%
For April 2011, out of the 74 blood units referred for HIV confirmation, Monthly Report 2011
20 units were positive for HIV and 53 units were negative for HIV; Blood units* Positive Indeterminate
referred
1 unit had an indeterminate result [Table 4].
January 85 11 0
February 67 15 2
Figure 10. HIV Positive Blood Units by Month & Year (2008-2011) March 76 14 1
25 April 74 20 1
May
20 June
July
15
August
September
10
October
5 November
December
0
J an Feb M ar A pr M ay J un Jul A ug Sep Oc t Nov Dec T ot al Total for the year
302 60 4
10 7 4 8 8 2 9 6 7 7 4 2 74
(Jan –April only)
2008
2009 5 5 10 10 7 5 7 7 9 12 3 9 89 * One blood donor can donate more than one blood unit.
2010 9 12 15 15 9 17 11 6 10 20 11 11 146 ** These are HIV positive blood units, not donors. Donors of HIV positive blood units
2011 11 15 14 20 60 may or may not be in the HIV & AIDS Registry.
The Registry is a passive surveillance system. Except for HIV confirmation by the
NRL, all other data submitted to the Registry are secondary and cannot be veri-
fied. An example would be an individual’s reported place of residence. The
Registry is unable to determine if this reported address is where the person got
infected, or where the person lived after being infected, or where the person is
presently living, or whether the address is valid. This limitation has major implica-
tions to data interpretation. Thus, readers are cautioned to carefully weigh the
data and consider other sources of information prior to arriving at conclusions.