Sei sulla pagina 1di 278
Reliance of the U.S. Catholic Church on the Discredited Field of "Human Sexuality" and on
Reliance of the U.S. Catholic Church
on the Discredited Field of "Human
Sexuality" and on Sexology Advisors
Whose "Scientific" and Moral
Foundation Deviates Radically From
That of the Church
by
Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D.
The Institute for Media Education 6 2002
With Particular Focus on
Three Key Sexuality "Reassessment"
Institutions, Research, Methodologies
And Agents of Change
A WORK IN PROGRESS
1981 NAMBLA: nGayliberationists in general, and boy-lovers in particular should know Kinsey 's work and
1981
NAMBLA: nGayliberationists in general, and boy-lovers
in particular should know Kinsey 's work and hold a
dear
[I@plicit
in Kinsey isthe struggle weBght today.
1991
The Journal of Paedophilia: "So, you would attack the
whole basis from which age-of-consent laws are
constructed, in other words."
Dr. John
Money: "Icertainly think that's where we have
"'
to begin
1994
Dr. Fred Berlin: "Pedophilia
can
be effectively
controlled with appropriatepsychiatric intervention
,,3
1 Excerpted kom NAMBLA (The North American Man/Boy Love Association) "The Case for Abolishmg the Age of
Consent Laws" in The Age Taboo, Ed. Daniel Tsang, Gay Men's Press, Boston, 1981 p. 96.
Statement by Dr. John Money, co-founder with Dr. Fred Berlin of the Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic-the
premier clinic that couflsels Catholic bishops, pedophiles
and pederasts. Final sentence in "Interview: John
Money" in Paidika: The Journal ofPaedophilia, Spring 1991, p. 13 (see attachment 12 for the full interview).
Dr. Fred S. Berlin, John Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic, advertising his baining program "The Cycle of Sexual
Trauma," in the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,
February 10-12, 1994 (see attachment 10 for more detail).
A Note About the Following Materials Letter & Attachments Delivered to The Holy Father Circa
A Note About the Following Materials
Letter & Attachments Delivered to The Holy Father Circa July 29,2002
Letter to A Select Group of Bishops from Rebecca Messall, J.D., June 2(102
Executive Summary "Reliance of the US. Catholic Church on Sexuality Advisors
"
Attachment 1: The Church's Fraudulent "Sexperts"
Excerpts from 1985 Doyle-Mouton-Peterson Paper That Relied on Johns Hopkins Experts: Drs.
Berlin and Money
"The Smoking Gun:" Reporting Child Sexual Abuse May Cause "Divorce, Suicide"
A Short Summary of Some Problems Surrounding Doyle-Moulton-Peterson
The History of "Scientific" Sexology-Flon Chart
1985 Paper Recommended Sexology to Church
'-Sexual Attitude Reassessment" for Clergy. Seminarians
Sex Abuse Quotes from Church's Sesperts
The "Position Statement of the Catholic Medical Association on 1nl)atient Treatment and
Outpatient Psychiatric Evaluation Programs for Priests and Religious"
Attachment 2: The Kinsey-Catholic Connection
"Advises Bishops: Sue your Experts"
Social Justice Revie14 of Kinst.?
Crirue~&
consequence^
"Catholics Learning Sex from Kinsej's Disciples"
"Institutions and Underworld Academics"
"Pedophile Science"
"The APAs: 'Academic Pedophile Advocates"'
"Kinsey, Rockefeller and the Nazi Doctors"
"Kinsey's Legal Legacy"
-'Kinseq Crimes"
"Author Challenges Kinsey Sex Research"
"New Book Exposes Kinsey Research"
"Sex Teaching Based on Pervert's Reports." The London Sundq Times
"'Grand Scheme' Advanced by Father of Sexual Revolution"
"Woman's crusade: debunking Kinsey"
"The Crime of the Century"
"Unmasking Alfred Kinsey"
"Killing the Last Taboo"
Book Reviews: Sex The Measure of ,411 Things: .4 L$e of Alfred C. Kinsey
"America's Original Dirty Old Man"
"Pedophile's diaries basis for Kinsey report on children"
"Kinsey's Fraud ~nvadesthe Church"
"Biography Claims Kinsey's Sex Life Tainted His Research"
"Shocking New Look At Kinsey"
"Buchanan vs Kinsey: Round Two"
"Assaulting The Most Vulnerable" Editorial. The Indianapolis Star
"Acclaimed' Book Deserves Our Disgust"
Tinie. Colliers. Look Illustrations:
Representative Examples of Kinsey's Early. On-going, Mass Media Publicity Blitz
Attachment 3: Pornographic Sexuality Courses Spread to Catholic Seminarians! Goodbye! Good Men Quotes on the
Attachment 3: Pornographic Sexuality Courses Spread to Catholic Seminarians!
Goodbye! Good Men Quotes on the SAR Used To Teach Seminarians
"It's Academic" Newsweek on SF State University Course by John DeCecco
"John DeCecco Course Reader" (Title Page)
"John DeCecco Course Reader" (Table of Contents)
"A Child's Sexual Bill of Rights" From DeCecco7sCourse Reader
A Student Testimony on the DeCecco Pedagogy
Chart: History of Sexology, Central Role of SAR in Sexuality Training
Study: 21% College Men Sexually Attracted to Children
.
<
cL<n7' .
Attachment 4: The Sexology-Pedophilia-Pederasty Link
Forming Accredited Sexology Graduates
"The A.L.I. Model Penal Code Removes Protections" (Flow Chart)
Publicity On Kinsey 1948 Book Jacket "Why and How This
Study Was Made"
"Sexology: An Authoritative Guide to Sex Education:" Kinsey on Sex Response in Children"
"Attacking the Last Taboo" Time Magazine
"Cradle-to-Grave Intimacy" Time Magazine
IASHS on SARguide
IASHS Sexology "Courses of Study" (SAR, etc.) for Sexology Degrees: (These Credentialed Authorities
Used by Planned Parenthood, SIECUS, CDC, Sex Education Courses, Seminars, Programs, Grant
Proposals, Legislative Testimonies on "Sexuality" Issues (e.g., Obscenity, Marriage, Homosexuality,
Sodomy, Sex Education, Sex Laws, Hate Crimes, Diversity, Library Filters, etc.).
Attachment 5: Sexology Strategy for "Sexual Attitude Restructuring"
"IASHS Did Seminary Training On Sexuality"
Excerpts from Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences on the SAR & Accreditation
"Sexology - Therapy Or Titillation?" British Journal of Sexual Medicine
"Kinseyan Human Sexuality: Academics, Professionals & Associations"
"Table 34. Examples of multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males" (Kinsey)
IASHS: "Course Announcement: Sensory Awareness Massage
"X-Rated Homework" Time Magazine
.Self
Erotic
Massage"
Attachment 6: Dr. Pomeroy, Kinsey's Co-AuthorISexPartner Directs IASHS "Course Work"
"Pomeroy Was IASHS Academic Dean and Kinsey's Lover"
Some Examples of The Kinsey Team Animus Toward Catholicism
Attachment 7: A Conflict of Interest: Sexologists Take Money From Pornographers
"Pomeroy Sought Funds From Adult Film Association"
"A 'Who's Who7 In Sexology" on Board of Penthouse Forum
IASHS Sold Its Child Pornography Photos To Hustler Magazine
Attachment 8: Sexologists As Pornographers
"IASHS Faculty, Staff, Students Pose In Sexual Scenes For Its Photo Series
The IASHS Meditations On The Gift Of Sexuality
The Summer S.A.R. [Sexual Attitude Restructuring]
Michael P. Farris On Wardell Pomeroy's Pornography Homosexual Bias
Attachment 9: Church Still Listening to "Sexperts"
Dr. Berlin advises Cardinal Law and NCCB [April 30,20021 The Advocate
"Abuse panel says it will seek change" The Boston Globe
"Media Briefings by Sexual Abuse Experts Part of Dallas Meeting"

3

Attachment 10: Berlin-Money and Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Fred Berlin On Effective Treatment And Control
Attachment 10: Berlin-Money and Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders
Fred Berlin On Effective Treatment And Control of
Pedophiles, Rapists
More On History of Sex Clinic. Berlin, Money And Johns Hopkins
Attachment 11: Sexperts Excuse Pedophilia and Pederasty
"John Money is Fred Berlin's 'Mentor"'
"The Pied Pipers of Sex" on John Money Pioneering Pornography for Sex T~aining
June Reinisch: "What You Must Know to be Sexually Literate" on Money as "Mentor '
"Cover-up at American University?:" Richard Berendzen at BerlinIMoney C linic
"Calls Called 'Life-Altering'" Pedophile Nature Of Berendzen Phone Calls
"Not A 'Victim' To His Victim'' No Apologies From Clinic's "Cured" Bere~idzen
Johns Hopkins On Berendzen Admission to the Sex Disorders Clinic
"Pedophilia Steps Into the Daylight," quotes from Money et al.
Attachment 12: Peterson's Sexpert Money Advocates PederastyIPedophilia
John Money confesses to "Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia"
Paidikn The Jouri~uloj'Paedophilia "Statement of Purpose"
Money's Belief in "Evolutionary Bisexuality"
Attachment 13: Peterson's Sexpert Berlin "Shielding Child Molesters"
Dr. Berlin in the Press: "Stop Shielding Child Molesters" [Blurred text reids Berlin would not
report "even when their crimes continue during treatment
At
least eight men have been
convicted of sexually abusing Maryland children while under treat tient there" (at Johns
Hopkins)].
"Doctor [Berlin] Skirts Reporting Law On Sex Crimes"
"When Doctors Know Better"
"Priests Less Likely To Repeat Offenses Than Tqpical Molesters, Experts S,t>"
USA T0da.v On Homosexuals And The Sex Abuse Scandals
Attachment 14: Reisman Vitae & Key Authorities
Judith A. Reisman (curriculum vitae)
"Really, Dr. Kinsey?" The Lancet
"Sex. Lies and Kinsey" The Anlerica~lSpectator
"Mortal Sins" National Review
"Smoking and Sex" National Review
Letter from Dr. Laura to PBS Requesting Secrecy of The Yorkshire Television L)ocunieutinp
"Kinsey's Paedophiles."
Commentary By Judith A. Reisman on Berlin. et al: "Pederasty vs Pedophil a"
NOTE:
Witnesses and admissible documentation for a potential Church legal action againstfraudulent sex
scientistsfor medical malpractice arefound tl~rougkoutthis document.
A NOTE ABOUT THE ATTACHED MATERIALS The attached information, prepared for a select group of
A NOTE ABOUT THE ATTACHED MATERIALS
The attached information, prepared for a select group of Catholic Bishops
attending the June 2000 Dallas meeting, has been slightly elaborated. The Bishops
conference focused upon the sexual crimes and misconduct carried out by a subculture of
Catholic priests, Bishops and other clergy. The collected documents herein would draw
the attention of the reader to the well documented role of mental health professionals in
guiding and directing the Catholic clergy and laity in its "new" sexuality since at least the
mid 1980s.
The December 15, 1973 decision by the American Psychiatric Association to
normalize homosexuality--largely based on citations to the authority of the fraudulent
"data" compiled by Alfred C. Kinsey and his team for Sexual Behavior in the Human
Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953)-would be the high-
water point for sexual revolution in the Catholic Church.
There is evidence of no field of "sexuality" in existencepre-Kinsey. By the early
1960s, sexology "institutions" and organizations emerge, training educators, clergy,
mental health professionals, criminologists and most social service providers in the new
Kinseyan "science."
Roughly two decades later, Catholic Bishops, like most religious
denominations, are relying upon these nascent "human sexuality experts" to direct, train,
teach, counsel and evaluate clergy, and to train the children in their religious schools.
The fraudulent schooling of these bogus professionals in pseudo sexual science is the
especial issue under preliminary study here.
Judith Reisman, Ph.D. The Institute for Media Education Voice 916 797 0307 jareisrnan@surewest.net Fax916 7972544
Judith Reisman, Ph.D.
The Institute for Media Education
Voice 916 797 0307
jareisrnan@surewest.net
Fax916 7972544
drjudithreisman.org
July 20,2002
His Holiness Pope John Paul I1
Apostolic Residence
Vatican City State
Europe
Your Holiness:
Greetings from one of your many admirers in California.
My name is Judith Reisman. My doctorate is in Communications, and I have spent
nearly 30 years in post-doctoral investigation of the profoundly influential, pseudo-sci2ntific
field of secular "sexology" and the related phenomenon of pornography. My findings establish
that the scientific authority of secular "sexology" is "pseudo-science."
Indeed, sexology turns
out to be as scientific as Lysenkoism or the racial "science" of the Nazi theorists.
Holy Father, the evidence shows that secular "sexology" is based on false premises and
fraudulent "researchT'--which involved barbaric sex crimes against hundreds of infant:, and children--
directed by the infamous American sex "researcher" Prof. Alfred C. Kinsey. In your extraordinary
work, Love and Responsibility you ingeniously identify the fundamental struc-tureof secular
"sexology:
Some doctors have a narrowly biological view of things formed under the influence
of the 'myth of orgasm' which causes them to give advice completelq at variance
with ordinary human knowledge and experience of sexual matters. (p 287).
It is within this legal framework of medical malpractice, that of a pro 'ession ":ompletely
variance with ordinary human knowledge and experience of sexual matters" that the following
materials should be considered.
at
No field of "sexuality" can be documented as existing pre-Kinsey. P .of. Kinsey, who
launched the "myth of orgasm" in 1948, was an anti-Christian, bisexual/homosexual :-evolutionary
and pederast-collaborator whom I exposed in my enclosed book, Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences
(2000).
These findings on Kinsey's frauds and crimes and his role in encouraging the current
pederast and pedophile movement are validated by the British medical journd The Llzncet and by
Catholic and non-Catholic academics in various disciplines. Some of their names appear on the
accompanying material.
"Scientific" sexology has displaced Judeo-Christian ethics as the authority on sex in our American universities,
"Scientific" sexology has displaced Judeo-Christian ethics as the authority on sex in our
American universities, medical schools, law schools and public schools, from kindergarten
through doctoral level. Secular sexologists totally control the "credentialing" (licensing) of
teachers who teach about sex in all institutions. American sexologists thus set the sexual
standards for the world-standards
that violate the principles laid down in the Pontifical Council
for the Family's profound document, The Truth and Meaning of Human Sexuality.
Sexual abuse of children by priests is much in the news today. Yet leading secular
sexologists have asserted that adult sex with children is normal in their writings, teaching,
credentialing and counseling, in schools and seminaries of all denominations. Moreover, secular
sexology, touting the "myth of orgasm," provides the "scientzfic" authority for radical Catholics'
promotion of amoral sex, homosexuality, sex "education," abortion "rights," divorce, pornography,
etc. These "rights" are, of course, diametrically opposed to 2,000 years of Catholic teaching.
Led by the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University, America's secular sexologists are
guilty of grave professional malpractice against the Catholic Church. Two of the leading
centers of this malpractice have been (a) the Sexual Disorders Clinic at Johns Hopkins
University in Maryland and (b) The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in
San Francisco (IASHS).
Your Holiness, Dr. Fred Berlin of the Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic is the chief
advisor to the Catholic bishops of the USA in matters of child sexual abuse. While Dr. Berlin
was telling the Church that his Clinic could "cure" pedophiles, his Clinic co-founder and
mentor, Dr. John Money, was promoting pedophilia as beneficial. Money, a well-documented
pedophilia advocate (see attached) is infamous for leading the medical team that surgically
mutilated a young boy in an attempt to turn him into a "girl," against the boy's wishes (see
attached). Meanwhile, San Francisco's IASHS sexologists mal-trained, mal-counseled and mal-
evaluated hundreds of Catholic seminarians and priests, nationwide.
The American experience has shown that only professionals with a Judeo-Christian
philosophical belief (alongside such groups as Courage and Sexaholics Anonymous) may
successfully aid sexual addicts or offenders who have completed their incarceration.
Instead of following the authority of the Magisterium, credentialed secular sexologists
"cured sexual predators and returned them to parishes, where they molested other youngsters. On
the one hand, these sex crimes have opened the bishops to costly lawsuits. On the other hand, the
secular sexologists who advertised themselves to the bishops as human sexuality "authorities" and
"experts" are themselves liablefor medical malpractice, fraud and misrepresentation to the
bishops and the Catholicfaithful.
Your Holiness, I respectfully urge you to call upon all bishops to sever their ties with secular
sexology and those trained by pseudo-"sex scientistsm--fromcounseling to primary school education
to university level. I believe you will see the urgency of such an action, and its importance to the
Church's worldwide mission, when you peruse the documentation that accompanies this letter.
In closing, please note the signatures of my esteemed colleagues who have endorsed this international
In closing, please note
the signatures of my esteemed colleagues who have endorsed
this international endeavor. And allow me to thank you for courageously defending decency,
chastity, children, the family and God's Commandments. May God bless, strengthen, guide and
console you always!
Sincerely yours,
Judith Reisman, Ph.D.
Initial Endorsers (Full List to Follow)
William A. Donohue, President, Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, New York, New York
Richard P. Fitzgibbons, M.D., Member, Catholic Medical Association
Barbara B. Henkels, Board of Directors, Franciscan University of Steubenville and The International
Theological Institute on Marriage and the Family, Gaming, Austria
Paul M. Henkels, Chairman, REACH (Road to Educational Achievement Through Choice)
Dale O'Leary, author, The Gender Agenda: Redefining Equality, and Gender: The Deconstruction of Women
Onalee McGraw, Ph.D., President, Educational Guidance Incorporated, Fort Royal, Virginia
Charles P. Prezzia M.D., MPH, Immediate Past-President Catholic Medical Association and General
Manager, Health Services and Medical Director United States Steel Corporation
Charles Rice, Esq., Professor Emeritus, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana
Robert J Saxer, M.D., President, Catholic Medical Association
Charles R. Solis, Jr, Founder and President, The REACH Family Institute
Mercedes Arzu Wilson, Founder and President, Family of the Americas Foundation
P.S. Below kindly note an article by my Catholic associate Dr. Dennis Jarrard, entitled The
P.S. Below kindly note an article by my Catholic associate Dr. Dennis Jarrard, entitled The Porn Profs '
Plans for Your Kids,which shows how powerful and "respectable" sexology
pr3fessors have become.
The
"Position Statement of the Catholic Medical Association" on this issue appears in Attachment 1.
PORNOGRAPHY
-
The porn profs' plansforyourkids
I recently spent a day in Hell.I anended
increase in sex-related pathologies since
dlenl In large t~~uurr,pou can thnlrtbe
tbrW~pbyConfvtna(~- ~,mdocumntedbyDr.Mid~l&iananm le at this a~nfa;cnrc.
cism md The First hendmmt") at the
inhcrbook-
Crbnasond~
12Lclpcrkra dcfinitdydidnutbrhgup
Sheraton Univusll Hotd in LorAngela.
Dr. Rkmm's 31)yan ofmd indobow
I was probabky the only pro-decency
Dz~drmoostntath.tKnacy'sw*
ir a hudiadviq hundmia ofwc aimn
.grinrtchildnnGriffittwcr#inseyaaa
rh~~dog)rtochtia.adtaQr-
putidpant at the oonfrb, whichdrrwporn
accrsditingbguidea hnrrnnbrtuiwiw
~fromufarawayuRu+64~a-
fineluarcbU,.ral~t~~
tduaton hm our dddrds churoo-
.
.
pm. South Afric~.md AuWr. For eight
and teachingabout sex.
throughruch d +a u their cbnummn
A C.Lfomia Sbtt Uniwmty rt Long
on Acaeditatic n.
Beach proftuor told how he brought porn
Thew rupprwdky unbiued aadanics
stusiatob~rnuguast~Hr
did not wuit to ducurr Dr.Rrismdc
talduthis~hirnhmdinctcritidPa
chronicle of he dunage done by the
Kirucylns through thr aplorian of ra
crima and vurncrl dirarr (not to men-
tiwMDS)thth.sa~urrairinccthr1950r,
dkuded the mwie decency codc in tbe
1960s.
hndan.adon~~Tkrr#uch
to accept tbe now-dhdited Prof. Alfred
Kiny.'s anything-go- approachto JDU u
the buir for granting tudhg crrd+ntirlr
to dl rucduaton Inboth public md re
eduabra wh,ut tcuhixq our chh
ligibue achoolr.
t&t coadomr ahodd xtplu* cbutity,thm
Wt these intellcctuds said should
hutuktba thlcm
fri&tm citizens into ution I fkrt heard
Thedrmqpth.tthe'urxpemmuc&
GUNS libruirn u rhc described effortl
ingtoourba)r.ndgidtirnokuhumful
to protect the public univdry'r porn col-
thntbrtdortbySwictmdNazieducl-
lection. Next, I hard a proksmr quoting
mx-5uppcmdrruucbaDr.Ed-
toninthe 19:&01dlWh.lnthoacwa,
pseudo-scicimze id m tbr datha of mil-
of Unhrtnfty of CAforni. at Smta Bar-
of 'supcrts'
such u Kinuy, Muten md
b;onrJnouro>untry,,nacml~AIDS,
ha D(mnerrtcin.wh0rmni w that orrty
]ohown,.nd Wudelt Pomervy h being
rape, mda, mdat.tka incat, .a;d-
violence in porn i~ dmgtrout, did not
peddled cndldy. It comes from Vem
dictiopand t! xe other c&aof"hUmbcrL
mention the racuch funding he hu re-
ceived from %boy md other pornogn-
BuUoqWs Gnta for Sa Ratuch.hm
phy intcratr.
Dr. William Grimtt of Krnsu State
Uniwtiq informed w that porn cam
ac~~HcciMthe~ud,
.
.
A(=LU-P&ti.l-
on Pomognphy (1970) u &owing mini-
mrl C&Ett from mdckg and bg porn,
When I oaLed about the more meat
md theit wealthy porn au pattom.
%qm*
Pnridmtid Conmidon that
Did you knuw that 25% of aIJ 11-
found porn huroful,he dknjucd it u
sold and tad in the United Stam lut
yur~ponrvi~ortbrrorpntcd
politranrinrpirrd~OllfigYdDdLOcd~
he ofthe link bstWMl porn .ad puuc
uimc con-
9096of the dirtnition of
health md safety pmblaar such u rap,
porn videor in America, induding thw
vend dirart,AIDS, iscta mid ~UI-
in pus fritPd)g ruburbanvideo :tom?Or
that the Qia-
dm, child moi&tion
ad ra addiction.
hbinkathn endedd-
He crid not a word .bout the enormoor
most dlfodarlpn#tcutionr of porn pd-

aamurtdcs\~the~-donc~~

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RELIANCE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ON SEXUALITY ADVISORS WHOSE MORAL FOUNDATION DIFFERS MARKEDLY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RELIANCE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ON SEXUALITY ADVISORS
WHOSE MORAL FOUNDATION
DIFFERS MARKEDLY FROM THAT OF THE CHURCH
Unfortunately, Catholic institutions have long naively relied on sexuality professionals whose
advice and counsel has been based on hudulent science that had as its sole purpose the sweeping
aside of the traditional generative view of American--indeed Catholic--morality. This misplaced trust
afforded to fraudulent sex "science7' appears to be at the heart of much of the Church's recent
difficulties. Specifically, many of the church's key sexuality advisors are associated with the views
advanced by Dr. Alfied Kinsey and the Kinsey Institute at the University of Indiana via Kinsey's
seminal research, SexualBehavior in the Human Male (1948) and Female (1953).
The scientific experiments that underlie the "research" published by the Kinsey Institute are
constructed from fraudulent survey methods, non-existent data, and even from criminal acts against
infants and children in order to reach what friendly biographers have documented as Kinsey's bias.
More important, any "new studies" supporting Kinsey's findings can be shown to be run by the same
tainted sexologists, some of whom currently advise Bishops on priestly sexual disorders.
Kinsey is perhaps best known for his assertion that approximately 10%to 37% of the
population is homosexual; a number which no serious researcher has since been able to replicate, and
which is now acknowledged to have been based on a disproportionately aberrant number of prison
inmates, homosexuals and sex offenders.' Additionally, the Kinsey team advocated legalizing
various other behaviors, such as fornication, adultery, bestiality, sodomy and pedophilia, then
commonly illegal and viewed as immoral and harmful.
Michael Rose's new book, Good bye! GoodMen, documents some consequences of using
Kinseyan-tainted sexology in Catholic institutions, particularly in seminaries. Sexually harassed or
dismissed seminarians represent a class of potential plaintiffs for acts suffered under the auspices of
Kinseyan-tainted materials used in admissions criteria, psychological testing, teaching, textbooks and
'counseling.' Since there is almost no legal defense against such indefensible conditions or actions,
the best measure the Church can take is a pro-active, assertive tactic against those who Msely held
themselves out as human sexuality experts.
The extent of Kinsey's fraud was not known at the time and his work and theories, in the guise
of science, spawned an international field of "sexology" and sex education. However, at least since
1981, through the work of researchers such as Dr. Judith Reisman, the truth had come to light, and
many began to rethink sexual assumptions that owe their origin to Kinsey. In reviewing the early
work of Dr. Reisman and her colleagues, the prestigious British medical journal, The Lancet wrote:
Dr. Judith A. Reisman and her colleagues demolish the foundations of the two reports
Kinsey et al
questioned an unrepresentative proportion of prison inmates and sex offenders in a
survey of "normal" sexual behavior. Presumably some at least of those offenders were also the
sources of information on stimulation to orgasm in young children that can only have come from
pedophiles--or so it must be
Kinsey hasleft his former co-workers some explaining to do. 2
1 JudithReisman, Kinsey, Crimes& Consquemes,The Institute for MediaEducation,Crestwood,KY, 1998,2000,Chapter 5
"Eliminating Fathers,"pp 87-105.
2 The Lancet Vol. 337: March 2,1991, p. 547.
While there are my others, two examples stand out to illustrate how the Church's response
While there are my others, two examples stand out to illustrate how the Church's
response to sexuality issues has Men into the wrong hands. On the evidence, some
seminarian$have been trained in sexuality via programs called "Sexual Attitude Restructuring7'
or "~eassessment"~created by The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality
(IASHS) in San Francisco. (Attachment 5: Sexology's 'Sexual Attitude Restructuringn)
IASHS former Academic Dean, Wardell Pomeroy, (now deceased) was a Kinsey co-author and,
according to a recent sympatheticKinsey biographer, Kinsey's sometime sex partner.4
(Attachment 6: IASELS "Course Workn)
Dr. Pomeroy is on record as seeking hds from the "Adult Film Association annual
cbnvention in February of 1979" to produce child pornography at the IASHS (which produced
pornography for sale to Hustler magazine, Falonna v. ~ustleJ)(Attachment 7: Sexology &
the Pornographers) Pomeroy's IASHS staff, fkulty and students also performed group,
couple and lone illegal sexual conduct for sexually explicit photos--including child
pornography-published
by the IASHS as Meditations on the GiJi of Sexuality (1977).~
(Attachment 8: Sexologish as Pornographers)
According to The Boston Globe and The Advocate (a homosexual periodical), one of
Cardinal Law's Boston commission advisors on child sex abuse issues is Fred Berlin, M.D.~
(Attachment 9: Church Still Listening to 'Sexperts")
In 1994 Dr. Berlin was Course
Director for a training program offered to judges, "health professionals," lawyers, legislators,
police officers and child advocacy workers teaching, among other things, that "pedophilia
can be effectively controlled with appropriate psychiatric intervention." (Attachment 10:
Berlin-Money and Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders)
Dr. Berlin and John Money, Ph.D., co-founded a celebrated sexual training and treatment
center, The Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic. Dr. Berlin described Dr. Money as "one of
his most important mentor^."^ (Attachment 11: Sexperts Excuse Pedophilia and Pederasty)
Dr. Money, as it turns out, was a dedicated Kinsey disciple, the mentor for June Reinisch (the
third Kinsey Institute director) and on the advisory board of the Kinsey ~nslitute.~Additionally,
in an interview with the pedophile periodical, The Journal of Paedophilia, John Money offered
his professi~nalcounsel that adult sex with children is normal and often beneficial.
(Attachment 12: Peterson's Sexpert Money Advocates PederastylPedophilia)
Dr. Money went on to say in the pedophile interview that the BerlidMoney Sexual
Disorders Clinic was designed to offer "leeway to judges" to free convicted child abusers.I0 For
Money, "'decided regarding paedophilia [sic]that I would never report anybody."" While my
other eye opening details regarding Dr. Money's career could be listed, the above should suffice
to illustratethe problem facing the Church. In addition to Cardinal Law's reported reliance on
Dr. Berlin, the problem is compounded in that the founder of St. Luke's Institute, Rev. Michael
R. Peterson, M.D. (who later died of ADS), urges the church to rely on Berlin, and Money in a
1985 paper, after warning the clergy that:
3
MichaelRose, Goodbye! GoodAden, Aquirtas Publishing,Ltd.,Cincinnati, Ohio, 2002, pp. 284,294.
4
James Jones, Ahd C. Kinsqr; A PuMMWafe Life. W.W. Norton, New York, 199; Reisman, Mmey, Wmes &
Consequences, Chapter 2.
5
Commonwealth ofKentuckyvs. HqpyDay, Inc., et al., Campbell Disbict Court, 1980, pp. W304,783.
6
Id, Reisnan,pp. 82,172-175.
7
The AoVocafe, Apnl30.2002, p. 30; The Boston Gfobe, "Abuse Panel Says It Will Seek Change,"MeWegion
March 17,2002.
8 John Colapinto, As Nafure Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised
as a Girl, HatpefColl~ns,New Yak, 2000, p. 29.
9 See discussion of the Reinisch-Money connection in Reisnan, et at., Kimey, Sex & Fraud, Huntington House, Lafayette, IA, 1990.
10 Paidika: The Journal ofPaedopMlia, DrukkerijTen Brink Meppel k,Meppel, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Spnng 1991, p 12.
II Supra, The JournalofPaedophr7ia.
[Mlalpractice cases involve situations where clerics give advice which is considered by the civil courts
[Mlalpractice cases involve situations where clerics give advice which is considered by the
civil courts to be beyond their sphere of expertise or competence. This advice allegedly
causes catastrophic consequences (divorce, suicide) resulting in civil s~its."'~
>>>>
[Money and Berh,] the two mental health professionals are considered by me and most
people in the field as the two U.S. experts and ones who have had good success in treatment
of the paraphilic disorders in the past ffieen years " (circa 1970) at their ~linic.'~
Church advisers like Peterson, Money, Berlin and their institutional sponsors such as
Johns Hopkins University, The Kinsey Institute at Indiana University, the Institute for the
Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, etc., are possibly subject to civil liability for medical
malpractice, hud, negligence and other claims.
Several articles fiom Maryland papers are
attached identifjmg Berlin's efforts to "exempt specialists fi-omreporting pedophiles even when
their crimes continue during treatment."14 Berlin's claims of success would mislead Church
officials regarding the safety of returning "eated
pederasts and pedophiles to work. Indeed,
the Government Accounting Office's 1996 report on sex offenders--spanning 50 years and 500
therapeuticprograms--found no form of psychotherapy that actually stopped sexual predators.'s
Still, in the admissions protocol for their program, Berlin and Money guaranteethose
engaged in past, present or hre child sexual abuse, 'We will not, however, report to your
Probation Officer information you tell us as a part of the normal doctor-patient privileged
relationship." l6 By 1988 "at least eight men [were] convicted of sexually abusing Maryland
children while under treatment" at the Johns Hopkins clinic." l7 (Attachment 13: Peterson's
Sexpert Berlin "Shielding Child Molesters"), supportingthe Maryland Attorney General's
rejection of Dr. Berlin's effort to cover-up ongoing child abuse. Moreover, Dr. Paul McHugh, as
former Johns Hopkins director of psychiatry and a member of the Baltimore Archdiocese's
Independent Review Board on Child Sexual Matters was fully supportive of Berlin's efforts to
protect even active pedophiles in treatment at Johns ~o~kins.'~
As you may know, St Luke's is one of the primary Catholic treatment centers for priests
battling personal sexuality issues.lg It is disturbing, to say the least, that the founder of the
institution has such high praise and regard for men such as Drs. Money and Berlin. In short, our
Lord long ago warned of wolves in sheep's clothing and, as detailed above, Kinseyan wolves
have provided guidance to the Church in therapeutically managing homosexual priests. Since
the 50s, the criminaljustice system has adopted the same Kinseyan view of sex offenders and
therapeutic management as has the Church, with the same disappointing and destructive results.
12 "The Problem of Sexual Molestation by
Roman Catholic Clergy: Meeting the Problem in
a Comprehensive and Responsible
Manner." This statement appears in "General Discussion" p. 9 of the co-written report.
13 Thomas P. Doyle, F. Ray Mouton, Michael R. Peterson, "The Problem of Sexual Molestationby Roman Catholic Clergy:
Meeting the Problem in a Comprehensiveand Responsible Manner," 1985, (unpaginated) p. 2.
l4The Capital Givde,"Our say: Stop shieldingchildmolesters," Editorial,March 23, 1988,A-18 (dateandpage somewhat blurred).
15 See, "Sex Offender Treahent: Research Results Inconciusive About What Works to Reduce Recidivism," Government
AccountingOffice, GGD-96-137, June 21,1996.
16 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Clinic, Biosexual Psychohormonal Clinic, patient agreement
pages,
unpaginated, page 26 of the
DoyleMouton-Petersondocument.
lbid, The CapitalGazette.
18 The Sun, "Doctor skirts repwhng law on sex crimes" see page titled, "attempt to circumvent law on reporting sex crimes,"
March4,1990.
19 "Founded in 1981 by a priest-psychiatist who later died of AIDS, St. Luke is one of a handful of such clinics. The Washingon
Post, Caryle Murphy,"Treatingthe Priest," May 11,2002,Metro,A1.

1

3

4

5

Attachment I-:- The Church's Fraudulent "Sexperts"

Attachment I - : - The Church's Fraudulent "Sexperts"
EXCERPTS FROM AND COMMENTARY ON THE 1985 MOUTON/DOYLE/PETERSON DOCIJMENT (Reisman) THE PROBLEH OF SEXUAL
EXCERPTS FROM AND COMMENTARY ON THE
1985 MOUTON/DOYLE/PETERSON DOCIJMENT
(Reisman)
THE
PROBLEH
OF
SEXUAL
HOLESTATXON
BY
ROHAN CATHOLIC CLERGY :
MEETING THE PROBLEM
IN A
COMPREHENSIVE
AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER
+-&&
/&- -7z29
(Rev
Hichael
R.
Peterson,
H.D.'
President
Saint
Luke Institute,
Inc.
This confidential document had
its
rerno1.e
beginnings
in
January
of
1985
as
a
resu1.t
of the consequences of the unfortunate :.n-
cidents in Louisiana.
The
three major
parts of the final draft were prepared
in Hay of 1905 and
this
final
draft vss
compiled On June 8-9, 1985
by Xr. F. Rsy
Mouton,
J.D.
and
Rev.
Thomas
P,
Doyle,
S.P.
J.C.D
"The Smoking Gun:" Reporting Child Abuse May Cause "Divorce, Suicides' Mouton, J.D., (attorney for
"The Smoking Gun:"
Reporting Child Abuse May Cause
"Divorce, Suicides'
Mouton, J.D., (attorney for Father Gilbert Gauthe), Doyle and Rev. Michael R.
Peterson, M.D., (St. Luke President who later died of AIDS) informed the church they
should turn over all responsibility for counseling sex offenders to sexuality experts. If
not, the church could do "catastrophic" harm, yielding huge civil penalties as well as
possible "divorce or suicide." These atypical words reappear together again on 60
Minutes, "Catholic Priest Sexual Abuse Scandal," on June 12,2002 when the father of
one of Gauthe's boy victims states, on camera:
They came forward and they said, you know, if you make this public and
you get others involved and someone hurts themselves or there's a divorce
or a suicide, all of this guilt is on your shoulders. Now, this is a priest
telling me this
These exact words, threatening to cause "divorce or suicide," is the fingerprint of
the sexuality profession, its DNA, its instruction to priests and bishops on the right
response to child sex abuse charges The infamous 1985 document was given to Bishop
Quinn, who had been sent by the Vatican to investigate these crimes.
The charge that disaster would stalk the victim and offender if child sex abuse
was exposed was originally encoded as "sex science" fact by Alfred Kinsey. Kinsey's
two following quotes are reprinted in Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences.
In many instances the law, in the course of punishing the offender, does more
damage to more persons than was ever done by the individual in his illicit
sexual activity
[and] may ruin the lives of the married couple who had lived
as useful and honorable citizens through half or more of a century.
When children are constantly warned by parents and teachers against contacts
with adults
they
are ready to become hysterical as soon as any older person
approaches, or stops and speaks to them in the street, or fondles them, or
proposes to do something for them, even though the adult may have had no
sexual objective in mind. Some of the more experienced students ofjuvenile
problems have come to believe that the emotional reactions of the parents, police
officers, and other adults who discover that the child has had such a contact,
may disturb the child more seriously than the sexual contacts themselves. The
current hysteria over sex offenders may very well have serious effects on the
ability of many of these children to work out sexual adjustments some years later
in their marriages. (Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences at 136)
A SHORT SUMMARY OF SOME PROBLEMS WITH PETERSON- MOUTON-DOYLE AS TO WHY THE CHURCH WOULD
A SHORT SUMMARY OF SOME PROBLEMS WITH PETERSON-
MOUTON-DOYLE AS TO WHY THE CHURCH WOULD HAVE
FOLLOWED INSURIOUS SEXUALMEDICAL ADVICE
In their 1985 tome to the Church hierarchy. Mouton- Doyle-Peterson warn
that the church
could be guilty of "clergy malpractice" if orthodox clerics counsel sexual wrongd,~ers.
Sexual advice
from clergy (say
the three
A
GENERAL DISCUSS ION:
authorities in law,
orthodoxy and
sexuality)
\
developing areas of jurisprudence vhich
allegedly
"causes
example is the ncvly developing area
catastrophic
consequences
of
Clerqy malpractice.
Suits are being filtd against Protestant
(divorce,
suicide)
Hinisters and Catholic Clergy. These malpractice cases involve
resulting in civil
suits." (p. 9)
Why?
situations vhere clerics aive advice vhich is considered by the
civil courts to be beyond their .sphere.
of ex~ertlseor com~tence
----
Because, say these
This advice allegedly causts catast~hic~onscquenccr(divorce,
experts,
clergy go
suicLdd resulting in civil suits. This docurent rccoanizes that
"beyond their
sphere of
expertise or
competence" if
they try to advise
r vast number of such
issues exist separate and apart from sexual
molestation, have been dfrcusred in -the confidential consultations
and meetings referred to above.
sexual offenders.
After disparaging
"extreme moral judgmentalism" for impeding the cure of pedophiles, thc three authors offer their
solution in the paragraph excerpts cited below praising the "Johns Hopkin:; Program." Peterson
-
-
says:
m
o The Johns Hopkins Hospital Sexual Disorders Clinic run by Dr. Jot-n Money and Dr.
Fred Berlin is probably the "authority" [sic] scientific community. I know personally
both of these highly respected scientists and I am very appreciative of their efforts to
bring this psychiatric disorder out of the shadows and into the "scie ltific daylight" so
that we can begin to see the disorder as a psychiatric disease and not a moral
weakness .I am professionally working with Dr. Fred Berlin, both in his research
endeavors with this disease and clinically with respect to legal testimony in different
jurisdictions to help educate the court jurisdictions about the "hope'
rehabilitation of persons with this disease'' (page 4).
for treatment and
Peterson states as a "careful "thinker" and an expert, that he is well aware "of the scientific
research" and concludes that "the etiology of this disorder [child molesting: is likely
biological" and while environment might contribute, the "disease" likely occurs "in utero."
He adds that he "
m

It is contemplated that the Project

o copied for you the literature packet that is given to potential patients in the
o
copied for you the literature packet that is given to potential patients in the Sexual
Disorders Clinic which is Co-Directed by Dr. John Money and Dr. Fred Berlin;
these two mental health professionals are considered by me and most people in the
field as the two U.S. experts and ones who have had good success in treatment of the
paraphiliac disorders in the past fifteen years." (page
).
0
Mouton- Doyle-Peterson single out the Johns Hopkins' Sexual Disorders Clinic co-founders Money
and Berlin (both of whom refuse to report the ongoing crimes of child molesters in their care) as "the
two U.S. experts," in the "field" of sexuality. Mouton- Doyle-Peterson falsely claim proofs of the
Hopkins sexperts "success in treatment" in "fifteen years," including in their joint document,
application forms for those who wish to enter the Money-Berlin center for sex counseling.
On the one hand, MoneyIBerlin threaten the offender with a report to his "Probation Officer" if he is
c'non-compliant" and does not attend his costly counseling session. On the other hand, MoneyIBerlin
promise not to report those who are engaged in ongoing sexual crimes against adults or children.
"We will not, however report to your Probation Officer information [read, sexually criminal acts] you
tell us as part of the normal doctor-patient privileged relationship." (The full document is available in
this author's archive).
notifyyourProbationOfficerthat youhavebeennon-compliant. ,'it ?ill ~t,however,
rewrt to
Probtion-fO
ymnoml doctor
~~ti~&.l.uivilrrrdi~n~Ifhiwe~felt. that in the absence of thir rvir UL
A
recent study conducted by a task force for The Catholic Medical Association found that those
in
"treatment" in one such unnamed facility reported ongoing efforts by their therapists to tell the
offenders that anti-Catholic sexual conduct, including homosexual sodomy, was both normal and
correct (see attached study in these materials). Moreover, based on this researchers experience,
the bishops would have been told by the sexperts that children commonly forget sexual
violations and that to reveal child sexual abuse to the authorities would harm the child more than
would the original crime. This has been the sexology position since Kinsey stated it in Sexual
Behavior in the Human Male (1948).
Bishops would never have been informed that Dr. Money, the leading expert counseling
these offenders and the expert who trained Dr. Berlin and other disciples, was on record as
saying pedophilia, even incest, was normal and that Dr. Berlin was on record as saying they
could "cure" such men, as above, refusing to reveal the crimes being committed while
undergoing Hopkins drug and psychological medical therapies;
Some bishops would have been told that pedophilia was normal and that the distress of the
children was a function of the disorder of their parents, also a common sexology position.
This is also very possible and would again constitute malpractice;
Some bishops would have been told that "science" proved children forget sexual abuse
quickly but are damaged when police, parents, counselors and clergy make a fuss. They
would have been warned that the child was especially damaged should the offender be
prosecuted;
Some bishops would have been told that prosecution was the worst action to take -
Some bishops would have been told that prosecution was the worst action to take - not only
would it ruin the life of a perfectly fine man of God but it would irreparably damage the
child's psyche!
Some bishops also would have been told that children are commonly complicit, seductive in
these cases, though he or she was sometimes unaware of their complicity.
There is no reason bishops or priests should have doubted the expertise of these men and the
"human sexuality" field anymore than have senators, congressmen,judges, juries who have
made bad rulings based on their testimony or the universities that hired them to train our
national leaders;
There would be NO Way bishops or priests would suspect the "experts" on pedophilia were
themselvespromotingpedophilia and writing that the problem with adult sex with children was with
the "anti-sexual" nature of religion. In "Attacking the Last Taboo: Researchers are lobbying against
the ban on incest," Time wrote of John Money's view on incest saying "One who commits incest is
like a "'religious deviant in a one-religion society"' - thus neatly planting the notion that opposition
to incest is quite like religious intolerance." (Time, 4/14/80, p. 72)
Fred Berlin, still an advisor to Cardinal Law on child sexual abuse matters, has never renounced
Money's views;
Also, Michael Rose's claim that perhaps hundreds of seminarians were deeply coarsened and
compromised by viewing the Sexual Attitude Restructuring programs, the "SAR appears to be
verified by this researcher's own experience in this field, pending discovery of the facts.
.
-
The "SAR are pornography
shows called the "fu--arama
T
I
know
the
institute
of
.+avanced
Seaoiog)
rclio
'
avilv on destnsitising procedures including what you
by Wardell Pomeroy, the &
Academic Dean of the
Institute for the Advanced
Study of Human Sexuality
(IASHS) which created the
SAR. The SAR included
bestiality and child
pornography in their non-
church settings until some
I a 'fuckararna'. Is that really necessary? I'\T
seen one
and it seemed quire unncccssap to me.
p
We think it is ~hcrapeutic.Let me explain. -4spart of
our inrcnsivt courtcs wt project several films on ro a
series of screens simultaneously. They vary in context
Porn 'hard porn' homosexualiry to milder loving themes.
After the session the audience breaks up into small groups
for discussion. The results are very inreresting and useful.
time in
the late 1980s. Right
C .r
Thir seems bizarre and possibly oliensive ro most
is an excerpt from the British Lrirish tastes. Don't people get upset. hurt or even rather
Journal of Sexual Medicine
disgusted?
(1182) in
which the Pomeroy
P
This is the idea of the rnultiplc screens. \\'e
tell our
explains its definition.
s:udcnts ro watch what [he\- find most
interesting. not
Remember, all "accredited"
Lr~~cahjwrnd .,I
Srauaj \ttdlclnr. Ianuar\
8:
sex education reflects this
monopolistic sexuality training program. There is only one accepted "scientific" teaching of human
sexuality that is credentialed and that training is anti Judeo-Christian and anti Catholic.
Sex as "science" entered education in 1948 with Kinsey. Since then, general medical practitioners,
Sex as "science" entered
education in 1948 with Kinsey.
Since then, general medical
practitioners, psychologists,
psychiatrists, social workers, sex
counselors as well as most
mental health practitioners,
justice professionals, etc, study
sex under sex "experts," (those
"outside their discipline") just as
one studies math or literature
under a math or lit specialist for
required course credits, etc. It is
fair to say that the church also
relied on such trained "sexperts."
Sclentitlc Authortty tor Human Sexuallty Education
In the Second Half of the 20th century
FUNDING
ACADEMIC
RESEARCHERS
Original Sexuality
Private
Researchers
INDIANA
Fundom
Educrtors
UNIVERSITY
RootrWkr
Ki.ury. Ponwroy
NU. R#urrh
THC KYISEY INSTITLITE
-hard,
Mn.
Cwn. Cmnm.
Gm nm Y.-
k
1938
on lkwrsh
&n&n
-,
4-.
purapy)
slmon. &hll).r.
I
Public
u.1-bYzh
A
Funders
Dr. AIM C. Kinaey
c.ld"wood
-.
,u,,-r
Sckntltlc
sum, FUSO~~I
LICIIvonlu. Mb.N
T~X-
Authortty tor
"The Klnmoy Model"
Kolodny, We.
(-,
Hun-
of
Klnuy Yod.l
rn.Clp(rr)
I THE FIRST INSTITUTIONS GRANTING
~-
~
HUMAN SEXUALIN
DEGREES IN TEACHING, COUNSELING
RESEARCH. Ph.D.a, LUSTERS. EDUCATION - DEOREES. SAFE SEX TRAINERS. ETC.
I
-
NYU
-
IASHS'
-
U Penn
EdMealth
SFlCal
EdMwlth
-
1964
lsse
I=
However, although universities
can be said to malpractice by
teaching fraudulent sexuality
information, those who used that
fraud to counsel offenders now
face lawsuits because the
fraudulent information did not
"work." Although the bishops
are properly faulted, medical
malpractice and fraud in "sex
science" or "sexology" remains
the source, the font, of the
ongoing crime.
7
1971
Sexual Annudo Rostructurtng (SAR)
(G-
-rd.
on SAR )or LFSWIRE: 77fE END OF SEX n. 24.)
I
EXAMPLES OF OTHER COURSE WORK
TO FULFILL DEGREE PROORALllS
clotk
s.n uwrr srx
courr
rnPlraum-bm
P-"--
5.x SU~ur In nmrApy.,-.F
omrrs Smx0)ogy
,
SAR Wnd Educrtorr. Thln Dommrd. From Grulw Sehoolm
to m-,
wgh schod, JI. H-
schooi, m ~rlmvym.
I
--
I ASSECT m~bmthe Klnaey IA&
am momberm wrvs the gonerml
puMic t
1
ugh wbrach .g.nckm li*. Planned Parenthood.
I
onirrlng rchoo-m,
courtroomm, etc.
I
Public, private and parochial schools:
Sex Education; Abstinence Plus; AIDS Prevention;
Safe Sex; Hate Crimes Prevention, etc., programs
I
TheKinseyCadreTrains CShRlProfessionalsin "Sciemifie"Sexualinr rom Indiana University, today's ex
TheKinseyCadreTrains
CShRlProfessionalsin
"Sciemifie"Sexualinr
rom Indiana University, today's
ex reformation is launched in
ree academic centers that then
grant Human Sexuality degrees,
certificates and continuing
education credits. The IUlKinsey
cadre crafts a bogus sexuality
field that first "aids" medicine
and psychiatry then all mental
health professions, clergy,
teachers, police, family & child
development, seminarians,
schools, colleges and textbooks
while testifying as experts in
courts & legislatures.
--- son-
4
TheInfamous 1985 Document
In "The Problem of Sexual Molestation
by Roman Catholic Clergy: Meeting the
Problem in a Comprehensive and
Responsible Manner," Doyle-Mouton-
Peterson call for the Catholic Church to
yield their moral authority to sex
"disease" specialists
"In 1991, the mandated, pornographic seminary text was Our Sexuality, by Crooks and Baur, allegedly
"In 1991, the mandated,
pornographic seminary
text was Our Sexuality,
by Crooks and Baur,
allegedly "'good
Catholic authors
who quote Kinsey's
chapter affirming infant
and child sex with
adults.
"For at least ten years (1978-
l988), seminarians and many
others attend[ed] the
pornographic program at [one]
diocesan center entitled
"'Sexual Attitude
99,
Reassessment"'
sex
workshops
in San
Francisco"which screened
legal and illegalheterosexual
and homosexualobscenity
and pornography,group,
Michael Rose, Aquinas Pubkhing., Cincinnati, 2002,p.
284, 149. Mt. Angel Seminary, St. Benedict, Oregon.
single, etc.
The "SAR"Trains,"Reforms" +100,000
Professionals:Clergy,Military,Mental
Health,Education,Justice
On 17 screens, simultaneously: "The sensory overload
culminated
in a multi-mediaevent called the F-korama
.in
the dark
images
of human beings
even animals
wails,
squeals, moans, shouts
[set
to] Tchaikovsky
l
found myself
becoming
disoriented .By the end .[nlothing was shocking
but
[nlothing
was sacred either
love
had not been
mentioned a single time
Wardell Pomeroy, IASHSAcademic Dean, Kinsey sex partner
& co-author, solicits funds from the "Adult Film Association" to
produce IASHSchild pornography. The SAR, begun in Kinsey's
attic with faculty and staff, continues in Meditations (1977).
."
CammnealhdKenbrjolvs(BCWDay, hc,etd,Cen*bellDWCcut ilEBO,pp 30W04,RU(Febnarydl979) kc, 173 GeageM, Esquiw,(IW
Rev.MichaelPeterson,M.D., St. LukeClinic President In 1985, Peterson--whodied of AIDS--warned the Church:
Rev.MichaelPeterson,M.D.,
St. LukeClinic President
In 1985, Peterson--whodied
of AIDS--warned the Church:
"[Mlalpractice cases involve
situations where clerics give
advice which is considered by
the civil courts to be beyond
their sphere of expertise or
competence. This advice
allegedly causes catastrophic
consequences (divorced,
suicide) resulting in civil suits."
* Rely instead on Money
and Berlin: "mental
health
considered by me and
most people in the field as
the two U.S. experts and
ones who have had good
success in treatment of
the paraphilic disorders in
the past fifteen years "at
their Clinic.
Mal~ractice,ConsumerFraud,
HumanEx~erimentationWithout
InformedConsent,Discrimination
WHO WERE THE CHURCH SEXPERTS & HOW
WERE THEY TRAINED?
ODrs. Fred Berlin & John Money; Johns Hopkins
University Medical School;
~Pomery,Mcllvenna, Sutton; Institute for the
Advanced Study of Human Sexuality,
l Gebhard, Reinisch, Bancroft; Kinsey lnstitute
& All Other Accredited "Sexuality" Agents.
FredBerlin in: Theadvocate "Berlin, associate professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University and a member
FredBerlin in: Theadvocate
"Berlin, associate professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins
University and a member of a commission appointed by
Law to set guidelines for the church response to abuse
allegations" says:
- "There is no evidence whatsoever that .homosexual [men]
are any more a threat to boysthan [men] who are
heterosexual are a threat to girls."
"We will not, however, report to your Probation Officer
information you tell us [re: on-going child sex abuse] as a
part of the normal doctor-patient privileged relationship."
Dr.John Money,SSSSPresident,
Saysin The/ourna/OfPedophilia
"[Elnd
the
age of consent.cl3
Pedophilia is "erotic
pair bonding," 13,
would never report a
If "a couple
make
a death
pact
and
one of them
dies
during a sex ceremony
the
pedophile." via' his
JH Sexual
key
is consent." (7-8)
Disorders clinic:
'1 can do something in the way
of treatment that gives some
leeway to judges" to keep
child molesters out of prison.clz,
Money joins the Board of the
'Bereaved Parents Association,
advises that they hide the
recurrent role oipornography in
their boys' deaths.
Spring 1991, Money is Professor Emeritus at JH, on the Kinsey Board, the Penthouse Board, over 400 peer
approved scientitic papepers, etc.
Position Statement of the Catholic Medical Association on Inpatient Treatment and Outpatient Psychiatric Evaluation
Position Statement of the Catholic Medical Association on
Inpatient Treatment and Outpatient Psychiatric Evaluation
Programs for Priests and Religious
Questions have been raised in regard to the quality and appropriateness of psychiatric and
psychological evaluation and care at treatment centers for priests and religious in the
United States and in regard to the psychological evaluation of candidates for priesthood
and the psychological retesting of seminarians. A task force was established by the
Catholic Medical Association to evaluate these issues, with the hope that this evaluation
will result in needed corrections and in improvements in the treatment for priest and in
the evaluation of seminarians.
BACKGROUND: An evaluation had been performed at one of the treatment centers by
a committee of three priests, only one of whom was a mental health professional, none of
whom were associated with the Catholic Medical Association. This present report is the
product of a task force composed of eight physicians, four of whom are psychiatrists, a
consulting psychologist and a moral theologian.
GOAL:
To evaluate the inpatient treatment of sexual disorders, affective and mood
disorders and the reintegration approach to return to ministry. The follow-up programs
and the outpatient evaluation programs associated with these institutions were evaluated
also.
I. INPATIENT TREATMENT
A. CRITERIA FOR ADMISSION: The facilities evaluated admitted priests who did
not meet the usual and customary criteria for inpatient care. In some cases inpatient
hospitalization for priests was requested by religious superiors and personnel directors.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Patients are admitted for inpatient care when the patient is a
danger to self or others; the patient is so disabled that the basic needs such as nourishment
and personal hygiene are not met; the patient is unable to function so as to meet the
demands of daily life; the patient may need high doses of psychotropic medications which
require daily monitoring in a hospital setting. There is rarely a need for admission to the
hospital for treatment of paraphilias (sexual disorders).
RECOMMENDATION: Catholic facilities that provide inpatient psychiatric treatment
for priests and religious should only admit patients that meet the usual and
customary criteria for inpatient care
B. LOCATION OF FACILITIES: Priests are regularly sent to facilities away from the
support of friends and family.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Outpatient treatment in their own environment is the preferred
treatment for support and recovery for most patients.
RECOMMENDATION: Except for unusual circumstances, a priest should not be sent to
some facility far away from friends and family. Also, they should not be held
covertly from their friends unless they specifically request this. C. PATIENT RIGHTS: There are reports
covertly from their friends unless they specifically request this.
C. PATIENT RIGHTS: There are reports that priests have not been treated in accord
with their basic civil rights or accorded the rights due to any patient in a health care
facility.
STANDARD PRACTICE: The patient must be given the option of informed consent
which includes alternatives to the treatment offered at the facility. This would include
treatment at a specialized inpatient hospital with a length of stay consistent with the
standards of care in the mental health field. The patient must have the right of choice in
regard to a psychiatrist or psychologist for treatment and the right to change psychiatrists
or psychologists during treatment. The patient must be given the opportunity for a second
opinion which must be acknowledged and given reasonable consideration by the facility.
The patient must have the right to be transferred to another facility of his choice if he so
desires.
RECOMMENDATION: The priest is entitled to patient rights and the mandated civil
rights of a United States citizen. Without a civil commitment, no priest may be held
against his will. In addition a priest should not to be held in the hospital under coercion
including threats of loss of faculties.
D. LENGTH OF STAY: The evaluated facilities routinely keep priest patients for 4 to 6
months regardless of the diagnosis or severity of their problem.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Current practice calls for short term inpatient treatment
whenever possible An extended LOS of 4-6 months regardless of diagnosis or severity of
illness is not acceptable and deviates from the standards for care in the mental health
field.
RECOMMENDATION: The Hospital Length of Stay (LOS) should be kept to a
minimum in accord with current standards of care in the United States. These are
medical decisions to be made between the treating mental health professionals and the
patient. It is acknowledged that the patient's Bishop or superior will have the ultimate
decision about the return to duty. However, the patient is not to be held in the hospital
because a superior or Bishop is not ready to take him back. Superiors, personnel directors
and bishops should not be involved with decisions regarding LOS and discharge date.
E. PATIENT CONFIDENTIALITY: There are reports that mental health professionals
at the evaluated facilities report confidential communications to the priests superiors or
bishops.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Optimal treatment of a patient requires a confidential
relationship between the physician and the patient.
RECOMMENDATION: A priest who is a patient must be treated with the same dignity
and respect as a lay patient. The priest must not be required, pressured or coerced to
waive rights of privileged communication.
11. TREATMENT OF SEXUAL DISORDERS
Diagnostic categories would include sexual acting-out behaviors with adults of the opposite or same sex
Diagnostic categories would include sexual acting-out behaviors with adults of the
opposite or same sex and the more serious disorders of sexual behaviors with adolescents
(ephebophilia) and with children (pedophilia).
A. LENGTH OF STAY: In the Church sponsored treatment centers each of these
categories are treated for approximately the same length of time; that is, at six months or
more of inpatient treatment
STANDARD PRACTICE: According to current mental health standards adults are not
usually treated in an inpatient setting for a consenting sexual relationship with another
adult unless the behavior is viewed as being sexually addictive. For example, the length
of stay (LOS) at the Meadows in Arizona, one of the few inpatient treatment centers for
those with sexually addictive behaviors in the United States, is four weeks. A stay of six
months not only deviates from accepted standards in the mental health field, but it is not
clinically indicated, and may, in fact, be harmful to patients.
RECOMMENDATION: The length of stay for priests should be consistent with standard
practice.
B. MORAL TEACHING: Many former patients of the Church related treatment
programs have stated that the staff at these centers for priests and religious do not support
the teachings of the Church on homosexuality and other areas of sexuality as detailed in
the Catechism of the Catholic Church and by the Magisterium. In fact, they often
criticize patients who do adhere to the Church's moral teaching. A number of former
patients with homosexual attractions and behaviors reported they were counseled to
accept themselves as homosexuals and to be discreet in their sexual activities. Also, at
one of these treatment centers patients are brought regularly to attend alcoholics
anonymous meetings for those with homosexual attractions and behaviors.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Patients' religious beliefs are to be respected by the therapists.
It is unethical for a mental health professional to try to change a patient's moral code as
stipulated by their religious beliefs.
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the Ordinaries in the dioceses of these
centers require the priests, religious and mental health professionals who work in them to
sign a loyalty statement that they do support the teachings of the Church in regard to
sexual morality and, in particular, homosexuality and that they personally view all sexual
acts outside of marriage as being immoral. Bishops and religious superiors should avoid
sending priests and religious to any center which does not support the Church's teaching
on homosexuality.
C. FALSE INFORMATION: Professionals at the evaluated facilities reportedly told
patients that homosexuality is unchangeable and untreatable. Patients who state the belief
that their homosexual attractions and behaviors are a result of specific trauma, for
example, with a distant or critical father or with harsh or rejecting peers, are regularly told
that they are in denial of their homosexuality or that they are homophobes.
STANDARD PRACTICE: While it is true that various mental health organizations have
taken the position that homosexuality per se is not a disorder, a careful reading of the
journal articles on the subject reveals an acceptance of the fact that therapy can effectively
be used to change attractions and behaviors. The position taken by the major mental health
be used to change attractions and behaviors. The position taken by the major mental
health organizations on therapy is based on: either a neutrality on the morality of
homosexual acts; or a belief that homosexual acts are morally equal to heterosexual acts.
Such beliefs are not compatible with Catholic health care.
RECOMMENDATION: Those mental health professionals responsible for the care of
priests and religious suffering from sexual disorders need to be educated on the causes
and treatment of homosexuality and other sexual disorders. There is ample evidence that
homosexuality can be successfully treated in any patient who sincerely desires change.
Furthermore, while not all patients will be able to function heterosexually and to marry
successfully, this obviously is not a concern for priests. The general prediction of therapy
success is that 30% will achieve a resolution of homosexual attractions and heterosexual
function and an additional 30% will achieve freedom from unwanted homosexual
behavior. (A full bibliography of research documenting the positive results of therapy is
appended.)
D. INFORMED CONSENT: Priests experiencing homosexual attractions are not
informed that their condition can be treated and that there is every reason for them to
expect to be able to achieve full freedom from sexual acting-out. In fact they often receive
the false information that homosexuality is untreatable and homosexual attractions must
be accepted and integrated into the personality.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Clients have a right to know of all types of therapy available
for the condition from which they suffer and the research on outcomes of treatment.
RECOMMENDATION: A pamphlet outlining the outcomes of research and the various
types of treatment for sexual disorders should be prepared and given to all patients
suffering from these problems in all Catholic mental health facilities. CMA is willing to
provide such information.
E. FAILURE TO PROVIDE CONTACT WITH SUPPORT GROUPS: Patients are
rarely referred to Courage, the only recovery program in the Church supported by the
Pontifical Council for the Family.
STANDARD PRACTICE: It is standard practice for treatment centers to avail themselves
of appropriate support groups, and to encourage participation in such groups.
RECOMMENDATION: Patients should be given the opportunity to attend Courage
meetings.
111. MOOD AND AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
A. LENGTH OF STAY:
Priests with anxiety and mood disorders who are referred to
the inpatient treatment programs under review are regularly told that they will be
institutionalized for six months.
STANDARD PRACTICE: According to current standards in the mental health field, patients with depression and
STANDARD PRACTICE: According to current standards in the mental health field,
patients with depression and anxiety disorders are rarely hospitalized for longer than four
weeks because of the effectiveness of the new generation of antidepressants. For decades
prolonged institutionalization has been viewed in the mental health field as an option that
is not in the best interest of the patient since it can result in damage to a person's sense of
self-esteem, in painful feelings of isolation and in sense of being sicker than really are.
RECOMMENDATION: Length of stay for priest patients with mood or affective
disorders should not exceed standard practice.
B. DISCHARGE POLICY: After release from the hospital, priests report being
subjected to the indignity of 'reintegration' into his parish or work location, during which
a representative of the hospital escorts the priest back to his work area and sets up
committees to oversee the his adjustment. Furthermore, hospital staff often attempt to
control the choice of outpatient mental health professionals.
STANDARD PRACTICE: When patients are discharged from the hospital, they return
home unaccompanied by hospital employees. Confidential material is not divulged to
others. The patient's adjustment is followed by the treating mental health professional.
Hospitals entrust the follow up treatment to qualified mental health professionals who are
chosen by the patient, not by the hospital.
RECOMMENDATION: After discharge the priest must be allowed to choose a mental
health professional of his own choice. The mental health professional should be
knowledgeable of and in agreement with the Church's moral teaching. The priest's
confidentiality must be respected and committee oversight should be abolished.
C. FOLLOW-UP TREATMENT: At some treatment centers patients are required to
return every six months for five years for a 5 day stay and to meet with a team of
individuals for evaluation. Former patients regularly complain that they never see their
former therapists and that these meetings accomplish nothing and are a waste of time and
money. At other centers patients are asked to return for outpatient visits even though they
are under the care of their own outpatient therapists.
STANDARD PRACTICE: This type of follow-up deviates markedly from the standards
of care of the mental health field. Patients do not return to psychiatric hospitals for follow
up care. Also, the requirement of discharged patients to meet with a team of individuals
on a regular basis is not supported by anyone in the mental health field. Follow-up to
inpatient treatment is normally conducted between the psychiatrist or psychologist and the
patient. There is no need for the patient to share personal and confidential history with a
team of individuals.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Priests should not be required to return to treatment centers
after their discharge. Follow-up programs at inpatient treatment centers should be
discontinued. Appropriate follow-up to inpatient treatment should involve regular reports,
perhaps 3 or 4 times yearly, to the Bishop or religious superior from the mental health
professional who is treating the priest or religious.
D. OUTPATIENT EVALUATIONS
Some of the centers insist that evaluations of outpatients occur in the context of a
Some of the centers insist that evaluations of outpatients occur in the context of a one or
two week inpatient stay. Also, priests and religious are regularly denied the right to
choose their evaluators. If they have done so, the reports of these mental health
professionals often are not accepted by the superior or bishop who usually insist upon an
evaluation performed by mental health professionals employed by inpatient treatment
centers.
STANDARD PRACTICE: A comprehensive psychological and psychiatric evaluation
should take no more than two or three days and can be accomplished on an outpatient
basis. One or two week inpatient stays can be psychologically detrimental to the client.
Inpatient stays are reserved for those with serious disorders and not for psychological
evaluations. These one and two weeks stays are to the detriment of the priest and to the
financial benefit of the hospital
Also, all patients have the legal right to choose the
mental health professionals who will evaluate them.
RECOMMENDATION: Priests should not be sent for one or two week hospital stays for
evaluations which are routinely done on an outpatient basis. Also, strict criteria should be
in place to determine whether an individual should be sent for evaluation. If the
evaluation done by the therapist chosen by the priest is deemed to be unsatisfactory, then
the religious superior, personnel director or Bishop has the right to ask for a second
opinion.
E. CONFLICT OF INTEREST BETWEEN OUTPATIENT EVALUATION
PROGRAMS AND INPATIENT TREATMENT CENTERS: Currently mental health
professionals who are employees of the inpatient facility conduct outpatient evaluations
on priests
The result of these evaluations is usually a recommendation for inpatient
treatment at the facility at which the mental health professional is employed.
STANDARD PRACTICE: This practice clearly represents a conflict of interest. A
number of reports have raised concerns that treatment facilities determine the length of
stay of clients on the ability to pay, increasing the institution's income by lengthening the
stay
RECOMMENDATION: Outpatient evaluations should be conducted by mental health
professionals who are not associated with treatment centers to which priests might be
referred.
F. UNNECESSARY HOSPITALIZATION: Inpatient hospitalization is recommended
for issues which are regularly treated in the mental health field on an outpatient basis.
STANDARD PRACTICE: The hospitalization of patients who do not need to be
hospitalized creates a false sense of the gravity of illness in the patient; and places an
unnecessary economic burden on the institution paying for the services. Unnecessary
hospitalization creates an unrealistic "burden of illness" in the patient's mind.
RECOMMENDATION: Priests should not be hospitalized unless they meet the standard
criteria for hospitalization. There should be clearly established and published criteria for
which an individual is selected for hospitalization
These criteria should be approved by
clergy, mental health professionals, and physicians. Second opinions given on these
priests by mental health professionals regularly do not support the need for inpatient
treatment.
G. CONFLICT OF INTEREST BETWEEN THE TREATMENT CENTERS AND CHURCH AUTHORITIES: There are reports of
G. CONFLICT OF INTEREST BETWEEN THE TREATMENT CENTERS AND
CHURCH AUTHORITIES: There are reports of undue influence upon the mental
health professionals by those in authority in the Church to whom these therapists are
beholden.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Therapists must be able to put the interests of their patients
first.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Bishops and superiors must assure that the facilities to which
they send priests support the teaching of the church and sound mental health practices. On
the other hand they should not use mental health professionals as disciplinarians for
priests who have sinned. This is a violation of the patientltherapist relationship. The
practice of suspending or threatening to suspend priests who refuse to follow the advice
of the outpatient evaluation program at these treatment centers to be hospitalized for six
months should be ended.
H. STAFF AT TREATMENT CENTERS: Concerns have been expressed by many
former patients about the spiritual program in these centers. For example, the spiritual
director at one center is a former priest who is now married. The decision to place a
married former priest in such an important position would appear to convey a strong
psychological message that priestly celibacy is problematic and not psychologically
healthy.
RECOMMENDATIONS: The spiritual directors at these centers should be carefully
chosen and should be priests and religious who model for troubled patients a loving and
fulfilling spiritual life as a celibate.
IV. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
A. ALTERNATIVES TO INPATIENT TREATMENT
Priests have moved into the geographic areas of mental health professionals with long
histories of successfully treating priests and have lived in a rectory or with a family while
participating in intensive outpatient therapy three times weekly, as well as in spiritual
direction. This approach provides the priest with a state of the art treatment program and
helps to maintain his dignity as a priest. The value of maintaining some semblance of a
normal daily life cannot be underestimated. The re-integration of a patient (except the
most severely affected) into his normal social environment from the unrealistic world of
inpatient "life" is more difficult than treating the patient in his environment and teaching
him to function in a world where difficulties and imperfections are the norm.
B. ALTERNATIVE OUTPATIENT EVALUATION PROGRAMS
Many Catholic mental health professionals who are not employed by inpatient
treatment programs and who have extensive experience over many years working with
priests and religious are available to evaluate priests and religious. These professionals
would be preferable to the current system of referring to treatment centers for evaluations. The
would be preferable to the current system of referring to treatment centers for evaluations.
The Catholic Medical Association could serve as a referral source to provide the names of
psychiatrists and psychologists in different parts of the country.
C. PHILOSOPHY OF TREATMENT CENTERS
Catholic psychiatric hospitals should operate in accordance with the principles of the
teachings of the Church. In particular, all staff members should agree with the Church's
teachings that homosexual activity is morally wrong and those experiencing homosexual
temptations can achieve chastity. The opinion of the American Psychiatric Association
(APA) and similar groups is based on a false anthropology, which has been detrimental
and confusing to adults and youth. Catholic psychiatric hospitals should avail themselves
of the abundant scientific literature which supports the Church's view of homosexuality.
The Catholic Medical Association could provide this literature.
V. CHOICE OF MENTAL HEALTH EVALUATORS FOR CANDIDATES FOR
SEMINARY
There are numerous reports that mental health professionals who do not
support the teachings of the Catholic Church on sexuality have been chosen to evaluate
candidates for the priesthood and reject candidates who do accept the Church's
teachings on the grounds that they are "rigid." There are also reports that some
mental health professionals do not report homosexual attractions and conflicts in
candidates for priesthood to diocesan officials or religious superiors.
STANDARD PRACTICE:
The choice of mental health professionals for the evaluation of candidates for the
seminary who do not accept Church teaching on sexuality may be based on the belief that
such persons would be more "objective." There is,howeve, growing recognition that in
the mental health field an objective or neutral approach to the evaluation of a person's
mental health is probably not possible nor advantageous. Every one brings cultural bias to
their work. Therefore, there is a growing trend which recognizes the value of matching
the therapist to the client. Shared background and culture can be extremely helpful in
evaluating mental health. For example, behavior which in one culture might be viewed as
pathological, such as the excessive expression of anger, in another, is viewed as expected
and normal.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Mental health professionals chosen to evaluate candidates for the
priesthood should as far as possible share the cultural background of the devout, faithful, mature
priesthood should as far as possible share the cultural background of the devout,
faithful, mature candidates they are to evaluate. The professionals should be Catholics in
good standing, who support the Church's teaching on sexuality, life, contraception,
homosexuality, celibacy of the priesthood, the ordination of only men, and the
hierarchical structure of the Church. The CMA will be happy to assist Bishops and
religious superiors in this activity by preparing a list of qualified mental health
professionals who meet this criteria.
Non-Catholics and Catholics who do not support the teachings of the
Church should not be employed in this task.
VI. RETESTING OF SEMINARIANS
There are reports that seminarians who during their course of studies
expressed support for the teaching of the Magesterium, the Catechism, and Sacred
scripture, particularly on issues of sexuality and on homosexuality, were told they were
rigid and divisive and needed new psychological evaluations. A number of these
seminarians were either told that they should go to a church related treatment center for
evaluation or were sent there, even though only a few years early they had passed their
psychological testing. Some of the seminarians who were retested were diagnosed as
having serious psychological problems and were dismissed from the seminaries.
STANDARD PRACTICE:
Unless there are signs of a severe mental breakdown, there should be no
need to retest a person who has been evaluated within the past 5 years. The basic
personality structure does not change.
RECOMMENDATION:
It should be made clear to seminary faculty that adherence to the teaching
of the Church on sexuality and particularly on homosexuality is not a sign of rigidity or
mental illness, but of mental health. The faculty need to be informed concerning the
causes and treatment of homosexual attractions and behaviors and other psychosexual
problems. The CMA will be willing to provide speakers and consultants to work with
seminaries in this area.
No seminarian should be refereed for retesting because they support
Catholic teaching. No seminarian should be retested unless they showed clinically
significant evidence of a serious mental disorder.

1

52

3

4

Attachment 2:

Attachment 2: The Kinsey-Catholic Connection

The Kinsey-Catholic Connection

HANDS DOWN, THE REAL DIG DADDY OF fEDOPHILIPL CHIC COULD ONLY BE THE 'RESEARCHER ALFRED
HANDS DOWN, THE
REAL DIG DADDY
OF fEDOPHILIPL
CHIC COULD ONLY
BE THE
'RESEARCHER
ALFRED C, KINSEX
Dr.Judith
Advises Bishops: SueYour Experts
By PAUL LlKOUDlS
A.s thc
S
bishops were pre-
a court of law that the bishops -
"It is only the biblical model,
Ll
y;wir~gfor their summer plenary
and the American peoplt- - were
icswrnbly ~n Dallas io chart thelr
~bdythrough a minefield of rx-
lied to by the top experts In the sex
education/counscling/therapy
which the bishops were advlscd to
reject hy the late Fr. Mlchael Peter-
rn-
ploding clrrrcal sex abuse scan-
dals, some medlzal and legal ex-
perts, in~lud:ngDT Judith Rcis
dustry.
"Through this scandal."Dr.Re-
son [coauthor of the 1985 Pctcr-
son-Doyle-Moulon report on cler-
isman said in an extensive telc-
gy sex a,buse], that protected wom-
cn and children from this massive
man. ituthnr of K~rr.vey.C~~mes&
T~rt;s+yur~r~-~,~.have advised thc
phone interview with The Wandrr-
er. "God has Bvcn rhc blshops a
pandemic assault visited upon us
all by the 'experts in human brxu-
bishops to take lcgcll action against
thei~cxpns who oftered ?hemthc
disa.strous advice that brought
thcri~tu thc prescnt crisis.
great opportu~ty- 1don't know if
they desctve ~t - to show in a court
of Inw that they and the nation havc
ality.'
"I fear they will not xczpr the
opportunq God has given them."
been lied to for at least four ox five
she said a day before the bishops'
8trr Dr. Reisrnlul. the r~ation's
decades abut human sexuality; that
iradln:
iiuthaiaity on rhe sexual
they and the nation were misled.
scheduled meeting
"If they would challenge the
psychopaths who created and ws-
malpracliced,Tbe 'human sexuali-
system in a courtroom, they would
lain the so -cdIcd "human sexuali-
ly cduc;tt~on"indus~ry,fears the
ty' field is not a field, the cxperts we
not experts, the emperor [Kjnsey]
do such a good decd for the world.
for this sexual rcvolution is a hor-
bistlnps will miss ir gulden, "God-
had no clothes and hc was a bugger
Sae
g~vcrl"opportunity to establish in
to boot.
"sue your experts" p. 8
The Wanderer: National Catholic Weekly June20,2002, (coat. p 1) fraudulent sex 'science' appears to be
The Wanderer:
National
Catholic
Weekly
June20,2002, (coat. p 1)
fraudulent sex
'science' appears to be
at the heart of much
of the Church's recent
difficulties.
Specifically, many of
the Church's key
sexuality advisors are
associated with the
views advanced by Dr.
Alfred Kinsey and the
Kinsey Institute at the
University of Indiana
via Kinsey's seminal
research; Sexual
Behavior in the Human
Male (1948) and
Sexual Behavior in the
Human Female
harassed or dismissed
seminarians who
"suffered under the
auspices of Kinseyan-
tainted materials used
in admissions criteria,
psychological testing,
teaching, textbooks
and 'counseling.'
ible plague. But I
fear they don't have
the commitment to
do that, and this
enormous
opportunity, just
like the children who
have been abused,
will be discarded."
(1953)."
The paper written
by Reisman and
others, submitted to
a select group of
bishops, is titled,
"Reliance of the
Catholic Church on
Sexuality Advisors
Whose Moral
Foundation Differs
Markedly from that
of the Church."
Kinseys assertion that
ten-to-40 percent of
the male population is
homosexual at one
stage in life was based
on his study of
incarcerated,
predominantly
homosexual, sex
offenders, and that
Kinsey and his
colleagues were the
driving force behind
the legalization of
fornication, adultery,
bestiality, pedophilia
and other immoral,
harmful behaviors.
"Since there is almost
no legal defense
against such
indefensible conditions
or actions, the best
measure the Church
can take is a pro-
active, assertive tactic
against those who
falsely held
themselves out as
human sexuality
experts," the report
states.
For more than two
decades, the report
continues, since
Reisman's
groundbreaking work,
Kinsey, Sex & Fraud:
It informs the
bishops that
"Catholic institutions
have long naively
relied on sexuality
professionals whose
advice and counsel
has been based on
fraudulent science
that had as its sole
purpose the
sweeping aside of
the traditional
generative view of
American -- indeed
Catholic -- morality.
The Indoctrination of a
People, honest,
legitimate
professionals have
known that Kinsey and
his peers, financed
through the
foundations (especially
the Rockefeller
Foundation), organized
vice and the
pornography racket,
were engaged in a
grand and diabolical
scheme to replace
traditional, Judeo-
Christian sexual
morality with sexual
libertinism.
1 NO LEGAL DEFENSE
"This misplaced
trust afforded to
The paper also advises
the bishops that a
potential pool of
plaintiffs for a class-
action suit against the
sex
education/counseling/t
herapy industry -
whose major
institutions are Johns
Hopkins University in
Baltimore, Indiana
University, home of
the Kinsey Institute,
and the Institute for
the Advanced Study of
Human Sexuality in
San Francisco - can be
found in the sexually
The report also
provides two examples
that "illustrate how the
Church's response to
sexuality issues has
fallen into the wrong
hands.
"First some seminarians have been trained in sexuality via a program sometimes called Sexual Attitude
"First
some
seminarians have been
trained in sexuality via
a program sometimes
called Sexual Attitude
Reassessment created
by The Institute for
the Advanced Study of
Human Sexuality
(IASHS). IASHS'
former Academic
Dean, Wardell
Pomeroy, (now
deceased) was a
Kinsey co-author and,
according to a recent
sympathetic Kinsey
biographer, Kinsey's
sometime sex partner.
(James Jones, Alfred
C. Kinsey; A
Public/Private Life,
W1.W. Norton, New
York, 1997)
and others are
immersed in intense
"attitude
readjustment"
techniques designed to
break down traditional
moral beliefs and
behaviors, and often
have as their goal the
acceptance and
practice of
homosexuality.
individuals who are
interested in honing
their skills and
enhancing their
confidence as a
presenter and/or
trainer on gay and
transgender
issues
The
'Train the
Typical of such
programs is that
offered in the
corporate world by
Brian McNaught, a
longtime homosexual
activist and former
editor of the Michigan
Catholic, who as long
ago as 1980 was
pushing the gay
agenda in the Church
in the pages of U.S.
Catholic. (See "Is Our
Church Big Enough for
Gay Catholics?" June
1980, p. 10, cited by
Fr. Enrique Rueda in
The Homosexual
Network, p. 111).
Trainer' session occurs
on the last day of the
Annual Workshop on
Sexuality," which itself
is "designed for every
person who wishes to
become more
knowledgeable and
comfortable with the
multiple aspects and
expressions of human
sexuality
"
"Dr. Pomeroy is on
record as seeking
funds from the Adult
Film Association
annual convention in
February of 1979 to
produce child
pornography at the
IASHS (which
produced pornography
for sale). Pomeroy's
IASHS staff and
faculty also performed
group, couple and
single person illegal
sexual conduct--
including child
pornography -- for the
IASHS photographic
book, Meditations on
the Gift of Sexuality
Brian McNaught
associates offer such
intensive programs as:
This latter program is
especially designed for
teachers,
administrators,
students, diversity and
human resources
professionals, family
life educators, health
and counseling
personnel, mental
health specialists,
nurses, physicians,
and clergy.
LAW STILL TAKING
BAD ADVICE
(1977)."
TRAINING THE
The Reisman, et. al.
report to the bishops
also points out (as
does the web site of
the United States
Conference of Catholic
Bishops) that Dr. Fred
Berlin is still advising
Cardinal Bernard Law
and the U.S. bishops.
TRAINERS
SAR workshops,
seminars and
programs are typically
two, three or even
five-day events where
groups of students,
employees, managers,
corporate executives
"Understanding Gay
Issues In The
Workplace," which
"explores the impact
of anti-gay behaviors
on productivity and
examines the means
of eliminating
unprofessional conduct
at work"; "Managing
Gay Issues In The
Workplace," which
aims "at building the
confidence and
competence of
managers and
associates in their
response to gay issues
in the workplace";
"Train the Trainer," a
full-day workshop
"designed for
Indeed, Berlin was
scheduled to address
reporters during the
bishops' Dallas
meeting.
"In 1994," the report
states, "Dr. Berlin was
Course Director for a
training program offered to judges, 'health professionals,' lawyers, legislators, police officers and child
training program
offered to judges,
'health professionals,'
lawyers, legislators,
police officers and
child advocacy
workers teaching,
among other things,
claims.
that 'pedophilia
can
be effectively
controlled with
appropriate psychiatric
Dr. Berlin, the problem
is compounded in that
the founder of St.
Luke's Institute, Rev.
Michael R. Peterson,
M.D. (who later died of
AIDS), urges the
Church to rely on
Berlin, and Money in a
1985 paper, after
warning the clergy
that:
"Several articles from
Maryland papers are
attached identifying
Berlin's efforts to
'exempt specialists
from reporting
pedophiles even when
their crimes continue
during treatment.'
intervention.'
"Dr. Berlin and John
Money, Ph.D., co-
founded a celebrated
sexual training and
treatment center, The
Johns Hopkins Sexual
Disorders Clinic. Dr.
Berlin described Dr.
Money as 'one of his
most important
mentors.' Dr. Money,
as it turns out, was a
dedicated Kinsey
disciple, the mentor
for June Reinisch (the
third Kinsey Institute
director) and on the
advisory board of the
Kinsey Institute.
Additionally, in an
interview with the
pedophile periodical,
The Journal of
Paedeophilia, John
Money offered his
professional counsel
that adult sex with
children is normal and
often beneficial.
[Mlalpractice cases
involve situations
where clerics give
advice which is
considered by the civil
courts to be beyond
their sphere of
expertise or
competence. This
advice allegedly
causes catastrophic
consequences
(divorce, suicide)
resulting in civil
suits
[Money and
Berlin,] the two
mental health
professionals are
considered by me and
most people in the
field as the two U.S.
experts and ones who
have had good success
in treatment of the
paraphilic disorders in
the past fifteen years
(circa 1970) at their
Clinic."
"Berlin's claims of
success would mislead
Church officials
regarding the safety of
returning 'treated'
pederasts and
pedophiles to work.
Indeed, the
Government
Accounting Office's
1996 report on sex
offenders -- spanning
50 years and 500
therapeutic programs -
- found no form of
psychotherapy that
actually stopped
sexual predators."
"Dr. Money went on to
say in the pedophile
interview that the
BerlinIMoney Sexual
Disorders Clinic was
designed to offer
'leeway to judges' to
"Still, in the
admissions protocol
for their program,
Berlin and Money
guarantee those
engaged in past,
present or future child
sexual abuse, 'We will
not, however, report
to your Probation
Officer information you
tell us as a part of the
normal doctor-patient
privileged
relationship.'
free child abusers. For
Money, 'decided
regarding paedohilia
[sic] that I would
never report
anybody'
In
addition
to Cardinal Law's
reported reliance on
"Church advisers like
Peterson, Money,
Berlin and their
institutional sponsors
such as Johns Hopkins
University, The Kinsey
Institute at Indiana
University, the
Institute for the
Advanced Study of
Human Sexuality,
etc.," the report
continues, "are
possibly subject to civil
liability for medical
malpractice, fraud,
negligence and other
"By 1988 'at least
eight men [were]
convicted of sexually
abusing Maryland
children while under
treatment' at the
Johns Hopkins clinic,'
supporting the
Maryland Attorney
General's rejection of
Dr. Berlin's effort to
cover-up ongoing child abuse. 1 KEELER'S EXPERT "Moreover, Dr. Paul McHugh, as former Johns Hopkins
cover-up ongoing child
abuse.
1 KEELER'S EXPERT
"Moreover, Dr. Paul
McHugh, as former
Johns Hopkins director
of psychiatry and a
member of the
Baltimore
Archdiocese's
Independent Review
Board on Child Sexual
Matters was fully
supportive of Berlin's
efforts to protect even
active pedophiles in
treatment at Johns
Hopkins
"
According to Dr.
Reisman, the troubles
the Church is currently
buried in date back to
the 1930s and '40s,
when Kinsey and his
cohorts and their
financial backers
promoted themselves
as the possessors of a
new, scientific
understanding of
human sexuality, and
positioned themselves
as the educators of
countless teachers,
social workers and
clerics, including
Catholic bishops and
priests.
"We know," she
explained in her
Wanderer interview,
"that the whole basis
of the human sexuality
education programs
delivered to clergy of
every denomination -
not just Catholics -
was based on the most
massive cover-up of
child sexual abuse in
the history of
American science, and
the cover-up is
continuing.
"The Kinsey institute
from the start was
created to normalize
pedophilia. So in
Kinsey we have a
sado-masochistic, bi-
homosexual,
pornography and
masturbation addict, a
mysogynist who forced
his wife and the wives
of his staff to perform
sex for him and his
camera in his attic,
who directed
pedophiles to sexually
molest children as
young as two months
of age for his 'scientific
human sexuality data,'
who directed a
member of the
Gestapo in Nazi
Germany in child
sexual abuse
techniques, who - as
his laudatory
biography reported --
climbed into a bathtub
to circumcise himself
without anesthesia,
and who ritualistically
hung himself by his
testicles from a pole at
the university until he
fell unconscious: this
clinically definable
sexual psychopath is
the educator who
trained your
psychiatrists,
psychologists, some of
your bishops and
priests, and other
mental health officials
in what is normal
human sexuality.
Law Institute's Model
Penal Code, which
itself was influenced
by Kinsey and his
cohorts."
Kinsey, Reisman
further explained, was
an adoring disciple of
Britain's "great beast,"
Alastair Crowley,
considered the
"prophet of pedophilia"
and a known satanist.
"Kinsey visited
Crowley's lair or
'abbey' in Sicily, as a
pilgrim who goes to a
religious place of holy
worship. Crowley, we
know was involved in
ritualistic sacrifices of
various kinds,
including the ritualistic
sexual abuse, and
deaths, of children.
Kinsey went to
Crowley's lair to adore
Crowley's images of
people in copulatory
positions.
"Kinsey's promotion of
children as sexual
objects for adults to
consume is of a piece
with Crowley 's concep
t of satanic human
sacrifice. Clearly, we
sacrifice our children
when we engage in
sex with them. Those
who do it, know it.
"Pedophilia, or more
commonly, pederasty,
is a form of human
sacrifice. Anyone who
"There was no field of
human sexuality
before Kinsey, and it
was Kinsey who
educated all of our
legislators to change
our sex laws, to
liberalize them
following the call, in
1955, of the American
assaults a child
sexually knows they
are not only killing
that child's soul, but
some would say, from
a psychotherapeutic
perspective, they are
turning that child into
a dysfunctional, self-
destructive individual,
and they know the child-victim will also act out on other children, perhaps hundreds, the
and they know the
child-victim will also
act out on other
children, perhaps
hundreds, the rest of
his life, and so the
human destruction is
perpetuated.
Reisman also
described as "double-
edged" claims by
bishops that they
didn't fully understand
the terrible physical,
emotional and spiritual
damage caused by sex
abusers, because they
were seeking, and
accepting, advice from
"experts" who insisted
they had the right to
"treat pedophiles
without turning them
over to law
enforcement for jury
trials.
for decades, are the
people regarded as the
experts. If you think
that they would have
suggested there is
something wrong with
pederasty, you would
be mistaken. These
are the people
directing the Church.
which can lead to
serious emotional,
spiritual and physical
illness."
"Should Church
authorities have
believed such experts?
I think that should be
up to a jury to decide.
"What should Catholic
parents - and others -
think about programs
in Catholic and public
schools that promote
tolerance and
acceptance of
homosexual activity?"
The Wanderer asked.
Reisman responded:
"The experts, like Fred
Berlin who advises
Bernard Cardinal Law,
as we speak, and
others at Johns
Hopkins," she said,
"were the men who
argued before the
Maryland legislature
that, not only should
they have a right to
treat pedophiles
without turning them
over to law
enforcement for jury
trials, but Berlin even
insisted he should
have the right to treat
pederasts even while
they are sexually
assaulting and raping
children, and not turn
them in!
"To me, this is a case
of massive medical
malpractice by those
in the human sexuality
field, as well as
consumer fraud, as
well as a broad
spectrum of other
things for the lawyers
to sort out. But I
believe it has to be
sorted out. It is
important to
understand it is not
just the priests and
the abused children
and the Church that
have been so
damaged, but
educators, counselors,
social workers, law
enforcement officials
and others throughout
the whole system who
have been trained in
Kinsey, and are
teaching children and
doing social and law
enforcement work
everywhere.
"First, everyone has to
understand that the
beliefs most people
have about sex today
are based on bogus,
fraudulent, criminal
activities mislabeled as
science, created by a
group of sexual
psychopaths at
Indiana University.
"These so-called
'human sexuality
educators' have been
teaching behaviors
that cause
dysfunction, that are
anti-authority and
anti-Church, and they
are teaching children -
and adults -- sexually
perverse behaviors
"People should
understand that if a
nation follows the
model of sexuality
designed by a group of
sexual psychopaths,
that nation can
anticipate a massive
increase in sexual
psychopathology.
Remember, Kinsey is
the father of the
sexual revolution, and
he is also considered
the father of the
homosexual
movement by
homosexuals and the
pornography industry,
both of which are
always reaching for
the children.
"Berlin, and Money,
and the experts at the
Institute for Advanced
Study of Human
Sexuality in San
Francisco, who have
been training clergy
"Catholics must
understand that all the
AIDS programs, all the
sex education
programs, all the
tolerance programs, all
the 'safe school'
programs have the
same goal: recruit. They are recruitment programs for promiscuous sexual activity, either heterosexual or
same goal: recruit.
They are recruitment
programs for
promiscuous sexual
activity, either
heterosexual or
homosexual. They
don't belong in any
home, much less any
school. They are
dysfunctional for
adults as well as
children. Anyone
teaching those
programs is suspect.
Nobody talks about
these 'sexual issues' to
children without
having an ulterior
motive.
educators, for cultural
diversity, for the
training on hate
crimes, for the training
on STD prevention and
human relations in our
schools. Everybody,
anywhere, who needs
the three units of sex
education for
professional licensing -
- psychiatrists,
psychologists, social
workers, counselors,
criminologists, expert
witnesses in courts,
teachers -everyone
must get their training
from those who come
out of the Kinsey
model.
"It has been my
argument for decades
that some of the most
destructive, toxic
people are those in the
field of human
sexuality, and who are
therefore responsible
for the training of
military chaplains and
counselors, for AIDS
"There was no other
model for human
sexuality, except the
biblical one."
When the interview
with Dr. Reisman
concluded, she said
she is "seriously
looking" for people
who want to sue the
leaders of the human
sexuality education
field and their agents,
such as Johns
Hopkins, the Kinsey
Institute, the Institute
for Advanced Study of
Human Sexuality,
AASECT (Association
of Sex Educators and
Therapists), SIECUS
(Sex Information and
Education Council of
the United States), the
SSSS (Society for the
Scientific Study of
Sex) and Planned
Parenthood, just for
starters. She is also
interested in meeting
lawyers who would like
to represent injured
parties in class action
suits against the
above named
associations.
To contact Dr.
Reisman, email her at
iareisman0surewest.n
- et
.
Social Justice Review JanuaryIFebruary 2000 KINSEE CREME AND CONSEQUENCES: THE RED QUEEN AND THE GRAND
Social Justice Review
JanuaryIFebruary 2000
KINSEE CREME AND CONSEQUENCES: THE
RED QUEEN AND THE GRAND SCHEME by
Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D. (Arlington,Va: The Institute
for Media Education, Inc.,1998 [order from IFME, inc.
P.O. Box 1136, Crestwood, KY 40014)) 323 pp,
soficover $24.95.
Dr. Reisman's current book is fully illustrated with
historical visual images and well-researched commentary
of which she considers "
a
work in progress." ~nd
progress it has been! She has spent over 30 years of her life
dedicated to exposing the rmth and deleterious motives
behind the world's most famous sex researcher, Dr. AlFred
C. Kinsey. A zoologist by training, Kinsey went from
studying Gall Wqs to scudying human sexual behavior.
Then on to being hailed as the 'Tather of the Sexual
Revolution." Posing as a "typical, friendly, middle-
American university professor," he claimed his motive For
studying sexuality was to benefit inquisitive students in a
"mamiage course" at Indiana University. But what he
produced was the publication of two landmark studies:
Sexual Behavior in the Human Male followed by Sexual
Behavior in the Hum Female. These Kinsn, Reports,
according to Reisman, grossly challenged the morality and
values of society. Although published decades ago, they
still have a profound lasting effect. Leaving behind an
insalubrious legacy, fostered by the present day Kinsey .
lnstinrie on Sex. Gender and Repduction located at
lndiana University, sdll keeping in full Kinseyan tradition.
As you read his book,you will begin to see that Kinsey's
motives had little to do with answering curious student's
questions about mavimonial sex at a midwestern university.
But rather, as Reisman exchims, he used his data, LLITo]
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples Page 1 of 12 WEDNESDAY JUNE 12 2002
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples
Page 1 of 12
WEDNESDAY
JUNE 12
2002
SUFFER THE CHILDREN
Catholics learning sex from
Kinsey's disciples
Late reputed-pedophile professor's
teaching created environment for
scandals
ShopNetDaily
Page 1 News
Page 2 News
LocalNetDaily
Commentary
Classified Ads
Letters
People Search
SportsNetDaily
Health
Weather
TV Guide
Movies
Business
Stocks
Posted: June 12,2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern
Editor's note: Descriptions of sexuality classes,
books and techniques in this story may be ofensive
to some readers.
rn FBI braces for
more internal
bombshells
By Art Moore
Who's winning
the Net war?
O 2002 WorldNetDaily.com
The US. Catholic bishops' latest proposal to
create "safe environments"for children
through an "Officeof Child and Youth
Protection"offers little comfort to some
members who closely monitor the Church's
gatekeepers.
rn U.S. firms buying
stolen
Zimbabwean
tobacco?
rn College settles
suit on free
speech
White House
reporter on radio
show
For lay activists who have documented
corruption in the church hierarchy over the
past several decades, it comes as no surprise
that the radical, anything-goes philosophy of
famed "sexologist"Alfred Kinsey, a reputed
pedophile, has triumphed over traditional
teaching in Catholic institutions across the
U.S., creating a flourishing environment for
priests who abuse teens and children.
Terrorist expert
blasts Condi Rice
Stewardess' kin
plan to sue
American
COMMENTARY:
Smoking trousers
By Ann Coulter
"It'slike fighting cancer with a topical
medication,"said Stephen Brady, president of
Why I am not a
liberal
By Joseph Farah
WorldNetUaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples Page 2 of 12 the lay group Roman
WorldNetUaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples
Page 2 of 12
the lay group Roman Catholic Faithful. "They
are not addressing the problem - but they can't
because many of these bishops are
compromised and waiting to be exposed [for
abuse] themselves."
WhyIama
libertarian
By Harry Browne
The influence of the "father of the sexual
revolution" on the Church can be easily
illustrated in a course called "SexualAttitude
Restructuring," which urges participants to
rethink "restrictingattitudes" acquired in their
religious upbringing and adopt a lifestyle of
free sexual expression.
Sponsor
a Child
Today!
The course is a staple of an institute started
nearly 30 years ago by Kinsey disciples that
directly or indirectly influences nearly every
sex education and therapy program in the
country. The San Francisco-based Institute for
Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, or
IASHS, requires its students to complete the
SAR, where participants have been known to
strip down and interact sexually with each
other while surrounded by multiple screens
that display hard-core pornographic films.
In her book, "Kinsey,Crimes and
Consequences," Judith Reisman, a noted
researcher of Kinsey's legacy, documents the
IASHS leaders' characterization of the course
contents as the "f---orama."
It's like
fighting cancer
with a topical
medication.
They are not
addressing the
problem - but
they can 't
because many
of these
bishops are
compromised
and waiting to
be exposed
[for abuse]
themselves.
The SAR and its X-rated theater - perhaps
missing only the in-class "labwork" - was
offered to parishioners for 10 years by the
Milwaukee Archdiocese under Rembert G.
Weakland, who recently took early retirement
after admitting to a $450,000 payment by the
archdiocese that settled a complaint by a
young man with whom he had an
"inappropriate"relationship.
--Stephen Brady,
president of Roman
Catholic Faithful,
commenting on the
Church's attempts to
deal with sex-abuse
scandal
Lay activists, including Roman Catholic
Faithful, have documented Weakland's legacy
of amoral values and homosexuality in
diocesan schools and in pastoral and lay
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples Page 3 of 12 training. Activist Thomas Phillips
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples
Page 3 of 12
training.
Activist Thomas Phillips says in the preface to
a dossier he collected on the archdiocese: "It is
within this climate of lax sexual mores set by
Rembert Weakland that proclivities toward
sexual abuse have grown and festered, until
giving rise to an explosion of pedophilia cases,
criminal convictions and lawsuits."
That was written nearly 10 years ago when
seven priests had been accused of abuse. Since
then, more cases have arisen, leading up to the
present media focus on a crisis that afflicts not
only Milwaukee, but the entire U.S. Church.
Brady states what is obvious to fellow
Catholics who have connected the dots
between the kind of environment created by
Weakland and the current sex scandal.
"Whenyou break down sexual barriers and
open people to not being sensitive or ashamed,
then you start to make them vulnerable to sin,"
he told WorldNetDaily.
Widespread problem
How many dioceses have inculcated the kind
of amoral atmosphere seen in Milwaukee?
I think some
of the bishops
in this country
are so
committed to
social
acceptance of
homosexuality
that they don't
care about
anything else.
That's their
No. 1 thing in
life, because
that is what
they are
spending most
of their
resources on.
About 90 percent, according to Paul Likoudis,
the author of an upcoming book that examines
the origins of the current scandal and a news
editor of the Catholic newspaper 'The
Wanderer.
--Paul Likoudis,
author and news
editor of The
Wanderer
In "AmchurchComes Out: The U.S. Bishops,
Pedophile Scandals and the Homosexual
Agenda," Likoudis asserts that homosexuals
and pedophiles controlled the post-Vatican I1
liturgical reform in the United States and
Canada.
Along with Weakland, he names Archbishop
Roger Mahony of Los Angeles, Bishop
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples Page 4 of 12 Matthew Clark of Rochester,
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples
Page 4 of 12
Matthew Clark of Rochester, Bishop Howard
Hubbard of Albany and Bishop John Curnmins
of Oakland as among the biggest promoters of
homosexuality in the US. Church.
"I think some of the bishops in this country are
so committed to social acceptance of
homosexuality that they don't care about
anything else," Likoudis told WorldNetDaily.
"That'stheir No. 1 thing
in life, because that is
what they are spending most of their resources
on."
Weakland is among six or seven U.S. bishops
who have been exposed for same-sex abuse,
said Brady.
"You can bet there are probably 15 or 20 more
waiting for the shoe to drop," he said. "Onecan
only imagine how nervous [Weakland] was
when this [national scandal] started breaking.
A lot of bishops are sweating bullets. There is
probably a lot of check-writing going on."
Reshaping attitudes
At the Milwaukee Archdiocese's Cousins
Center, participants in the course "Reassessing
our Sexual Attitudes," held in the 1980s,
watched a National Sex Forum film of
"leisurelyand active lovemaking"in which a
couple moves
"freely from one activity to
the
next, engaging in several positions, some with
a vibrator."
The National Sex Forum (earlier known as the
National Sex and Drug Forum) is the group
that launched the San Francisco Institute on the
Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in the
1970s.Other NSF film titles include "Jimand
Vern," which shows a "widerange of
homosexual activity," and "Reflections- Sexual
Patterns with Multiple Partners," a "discussion
starter showing what group sex is like and
how some people feel about it."
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples Page 5 of 12 The institute says its
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples
Page 5 of 12
The institute says its "films, slides, audio and
videotapes are used by more than 8,000
professionals and institutions throughout the
world."
Explicit films are common in Church
institutions, said Brady, noting the showing of
a production at a Notre Dame all-girls school
that included sadomasochism.
One of the founders of the Institute on the
Advanced Study of Human Sexuality was
Wardell Pomeroy, "dean of American
sexologists"and co-author with Kinsey of the
1950s tomes regarded as the textbooks of the
sexual revolution. Researcher Reisman has
documented Kinsey's and
Pomeroy's
pedophiliac predilections, as demonstrated by
their notorious sexual experiments on children,
the vast majority of whom were boys.
Gnsey taught that children are sexual from
birth but are hindered from freely engaging in
sexual activity with their peers or adults
because of Judeo-Christianrepression.
Pomeroy publicly sought funds from the
pornography industry to produce child porn,
says Reisman.
The IASHS website spells out the institute's
assertion of "BasicSexual Rights," which
include "freedom of any sexual thought,
fantasy or desire" and "the right to sexual
entertainment, freely available in the
marketplace, including sexually explicit
materials dealing with the full range of sexual
behavior."
It further calls for "The recognition by society
that every person, partnered or unpartnered,
has the right to the pursuit of a satisfying
consensual sociosexual life free from political,
legal or religious
"
Lead us not into temptation
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples Page 6 of 12 A brochure for the
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples
Page 6 of 12
A brochure for the Milwaukee-run "Sexual
Attitude Restructuring" course said the
program begins with "examininghow we were
trained (or not trained) to hold restricting
attitudes about our sexuality. Rev. Andrew
Nelson will trace the influence of our religious
tradition on this thinking and some current
attitudes toward sexuality."
A parishioner who completed the program
wrote to Weakland, wondering if the prelate
knew what was going on in the classes.
"I asked Father Andrew Nelson if watching
those four films with nude men and women
demonstrating various sexual actions is an
occasion of sin,"he wrote. "Hisreply was, 'No.'
"Why then do we pray in the Our Father 'and
lead us not into temptation
archbishop?"
' I ask you,
Weakland largely ignored such complaints,
which were strong and frequent, according to
Roman Catholic Faithful.
Brady says that while the SAR program itself
may not be replicated among many Catholic
institutions, the explicit, amoral teaching is
common.
"Theyserve the same purpose - to break down
inhibitions and resistance, making them more
vulnerable for abuse," he said.
"ValuingYour Sexuality," a sex education
course Weakland initiated for Catholic schools,
teaches there is "noright and wrong" regarding
sexuality and marriage and that "each student
decides on his/her own" the "appropriate"age
to engage in "masturbating
having
intercoursebefore marriage, having sex with a
family member."
An activity called "charades"was listed in a
course content schedule published by the
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples Page 7 of 12 archdiocese in 1980.It asks
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples
Page 7 of 12
archdiocese in 1980.It asks students to draw
depictions of words for students to guess, such
as orgasm, vagina, penis, sexual intercourse,
homosexual, masturbation, erection and
clitoris. All of these "human sexuality"
instruction "techniques"for breaking down
inhibitions, says Reisman, can be found to have
originated first in Kinseyan training seminars
for teachers, clergy, military, law enforcement
and other health professionals.
Weakland served as co-chairman of the
Milwaukee AIDS project, a co-sponsor of
events such as the GayILesbian Film Festival
and distributor of condoms and information on
"safesex." A brochure on the subject suggests
"BrightIdeas" homosexuals can enjoy without
fear of AIDS, such as "massages,fantasy,
videos, phone sex, romance"and "mutual
masturbation," which "spreadsnotlung but
happiness.I'
The Milwaukee archbishop received repeated
protests over a four-week course offered in the
1980s by Father James Arimond, called
"Homosexualityand its Impact on the Family,"
said to be a "factual,nonjudgmental
presentation about homosexuality,"according
to a March 1,1987, article in the Milwaukee
Journal.
Arimond, the Journal said, defined a pervert as
someone who goes against his or her sexual
tendency. If a homosexual acted
heterosexually, that would be a perversion, he
said, asserting that homosexuality is "God's
gdt." All of these views are fully expressed in a
1977sexually explicit photo book entitled
"Meditationson the Gift of Sexuality,"
featuring IASHS faculty, staff and students,
says Reisman.
On July 23,1990, Arimond pleaded no contest
to charges of sexual contact with a teen-age
boy and was sentenced to 18 months probation
and 45 days in the House of Correction.
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples Page 8 of 12 Weakland was warned in
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples
Page 8 of 12
Weakland was warned in writing about
Arimond twice before the priest is alleged to
have abused the boy in the summer of 1988,
according to documents obtained by the group
Roman Catholic Faithful.
In February 1987, a group of lay orthodox
Catholics wrote to Weakland, urging him to
stem the "pro-homosexualmovement within
the Catholic Church in the Milwaukee
Archdiocese,"singling out Arimond for his
class on homosexuality and his statements.
The lay group got the opposite response it
desired. On Dec. 19,1987, Weakland promoted
Arimond to pastor of St. Frederick Parish,
Cudahy.
In his recent groundbreaking book, "Goodbye,
Good Men," Michael Rose shows how
homosexuality has become an orthodoxy
among the gatekeepers at Catholic seminaries,
drumming out priests who believe in
traditional morals.
Rose argues that most were kicked out by
psychologists who evaluated the priests as
being sexually repressive, based on "scientific
data" that invariably comes from Kinsey and
his successors, Reisman's research shows.
Likoudis notes that two of those gatekeepers,
for seminarians in Seattle, are Sister Fran
Ferder and Father John Heagle, co-directors of
Therapy and Renewal Associates. The
counselors, who treat abusive priests, have
ridiculed the Church's traditional teaching on
sexual purity, dismissing it as evidence of the
Vatican's fixations at an adolescent
psychological level.
Not a moral weakness
Weakland acknowledged in 1995that a raft of
abuse cases had cost the archdiocese $5.5
million, depleting its financial reserves. About
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples half a million was designated for therapy. Richard
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples
half a million was designated for therapy.
Richard Sipe, a psychologist and ex-priest,
estimates the Church has spent at least $50
million to treat abusive clergy in the past 25
years, according to the Boston Globe.
What kind of therapy are many priests getting?
Again, the link to Kinsey can be found.
The church's most well-known center, the St.
Luke Institute in Maryland, was founded by
the Rev. Michael Peterson, who died of AIDS
in 1987.Just two years before his death,
Peterson co-authored a report with Father
Thomas P. Doyle and Ray Mouton that warned
of the problem of clergy abuse.
The 93-page document titled The Problem of
Sexual Molestationby Roman Catholic Clergy:
Meeting the Problem in a Comprehensive and
Responsible Manner," which was sent to every
U.S. bishop, has resurfaced 17years later amid
the current scandal as a prescient warning. But
most media have ignored its admission of the
contra-Catholic doctrine that underlies the
institute's understanding of humanity and how
people's lives can be transformed.
Peterson cites the Johns Hopkins Hospital
Sexual Disorders Clinic, then run by Dr. John
Money - a Kinsey devotee and adviser to
Indiana University's Kinsey Institute - and Dr.
Fred Berlin, as "probablythe 'authority' (in the)
scientific community" on the subject of
pedophilia.
"I know personally both of these highly
respected scientists,and I am very appreciative
of their efforts to bring this psychiatric
disorder out of the shadows and into the
'scientific daylight' so that we can begin to see
the disorder as a psychiatric disease and not a
moral weakness," Peterson wrote.
Hailed as a cornerstone of 1970sfeminism and
"gayN-rightsliberation, Money gave an
WorldNetDaily : Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples Page 10 of 12 interview in 1991to
WorldNetDaily : Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples
Page 10 of 12
interview in 1991to the Amsterdam-based
PAIDIKA: The Journal of Paedophilia.
A Rolling Stone article said of him: "Having
lost his faith in his early 20s, Money
increasingly reacted against what he saw as the
repressive religious structures of his
upbringing and, in particular, the anti-
masturbatory, anti-sexual fervor that went
with them. The academic study of sexuality,
which removed even the most outlandish
practices from moral consideration and placed
them in the 'pure' realm of scientific enquiry,
was for Money an emancipation."
The professor emeritus became a cause celebre
for orchestrating a sex change for a boy whose
genitals were damaged at birth, supposedly
backing his assertion that nurture trumps
nature. That assertion took a hit, however,
when the boy, named Brenda and raised as a
girl, later - having exposed Money's claims as
fraudulent all along - insisted on being David,
became a husband and adopted children.
Money said in his Journal of Paedophilia
interview: "IfI were to see the case of a boy
aged 10 or
11 who's intensely erotically
attracted toward a man in his 20s or 30s, if the
relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding
is genuinely totally mutual
then
I would not
call it pathological in any way."
Berlin, director of the Johns Hopkins clinic,
testified in the infamous Jeffrey Dahmer case in
Milwaukee that the cannibal killer could not
control his conduct because he was suffering
from paraphilia, a mental disease.
According to Reisman, it was Money who
promoted the word "paraphilia"in order to
refer to "aberrantsexual conduct such as
necrophelia, sexual sadism, bestiality,
cogroghilia, urophilia and pedophilia in a
manner less clear and offensive to readers.''
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples Page 11 of 12 Berlin has defended St.
WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples
Page 11 of 12
Berlin has defended St. Luke's therapeutic use
of the "penileplethysmograph," a device
attached to the penis that measures arousal
when the subject is shown pornographic
images.
Same old same old
When the U.S. bishops meet tomorrow in
Dallas, the hierarchy's promotion of
homosexuality and sexual deviancy will not be
on the agenda, which means the problem will
only grow, insists Brady.
"I don't think we are anywhere close to rock
bottom yet," he said. "Nothingwill change
until we get new bishops in there. The same
old boys causing the problems are wanting us
to accept them as the ones to solve it.''
A longtime observer of the church - a political
and social activist in California who asked that
his name not be used - summarized the
upcoming bishops' conference this way:
"The church is like a sick man who has a
terribly ugly wart on the end of his nose," he
said. "All of this posturing and correction is
related to the wart and not to the cancer, heart
disease, tuberculosis and diabetes he is
suffering from, which is being simply ignored."
The shocking but still relatively small
percentage of priests abusing young people is a
serious problem, but it is only a symptom, he
says, of something much deeper.
Related stories:
'Gay' culture in Church grows
Confab pushes homosexuality in Church
\&'hen sex changes arc involuntary
'WorldNetDaily:Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples Page 12 of 12 'Nothing new' in book
'WorldNetDaily:Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples
Page 12 of 12
'Nothing new' in book coi~doningchild sex
Rey ort: Pedophilia more common among
'gays'
Related special offers:
mnsey: Crimes & Consequences"
The upcoming Julyedition ofWorldNetDailyts
popular Whistleblozi~ermagazine null be titled,
"GAY RIGHTS' SECRETAGENDA: Horu and
why the homosexual activist movement has targeted
America's children." Subscribe to Whistleblower at
-- WND's online store,
ShopNetDaily.
Art itloore is a news editor with
WorldNetDaily.corn.
-- ,--
El
' E-mail to a Friend
Printer-friendly version
-I'
O 2002 WorldNetDaily.com. Inc.
Contact WND
WorldNetDaily: Tnstitutions and undenvorld academics FRIDAY MARCH 5 1999 Institutions and underworld academics
WorldNetDaily: Tnstitutions and undenvorld academics
FRIDAY
MARCH 5
1999
Institutions and underworld
academics
ShopNetDaily
Page 1 News
Page 2 News
LocalNetDaily
Commentary
Classified Ads
People Search
TalkNetDaily
Thanks to state legislator Woody Burton, the
Indiana legislature is currently debating whether
to defund its famous Kinsey Institute at Indiana
University. It is becoming more embarrassing to
the people of the great state of Indiana as more
people understand that Kinsey'sfraudulent sex
research was based on his team's solicitation and
use of child molesters as child sexuality
"experts." These "experts" foundedand have
largely shaped and directed the entire field of
human sexuality since Kinsey and continue to do
Introducing
WND Books and
author Michael
Savage
Letters
New Mideast war
front: American
newspapers
SportsNetDaily
News editor
talks media bias
Health
Nickelodeon
Weather
'promoting'
N Guide
homosexuality?
Movies
SO.
Business
Slepian softens
before his death
Stocks
Today the discredited Kinsey Institute staff and
alumni,togetherwith a cadre of admitted
pedophiles and pederasts, control the field of
sexology through the nation's several human
sexuality "accrediting"agenaes. Kinsey's bogus
Pakistan
bombing blunder
by militants?
Intelligence
source says
Worl&NetDaily: Institutions and underworld academics sex findings are increasingly spread by these Saddam has
Worl&NetDaily: Institutions and underworld academics
sex findings are increasingly spread by these
Saddam has
disciples, yet on Jan.30, the Kinsey Institute
nuke
director,
to the In!'
sychiatristJohnBancroft, announced
anapolis Star: "We don't have a
COMMENTARY:
monopoly on sex research anymore.
Who will help the
children?
By Bill O'Reilly
True, the expose of the Institute's hstory of
&Id sex abuse andfraud has caused concern in
the field and thus a shift of the sexology
epicenter from Indiana University to less
notorious universities. Thepower of the Kinsey
Institute seems to be diffusing as two key new
sexresearch "centers"are in the news more
frequently. The first, a more"respedab1e" branch
was the University of Chicago, where Robert
Michael, Edward Laumann and former Kinsey
Institute staffer and Bancroft buddy, John
Gagnon, published their wobbly research, Sex in
America(l994).These 1992data were re
and appeared in February 1999as a p2$~:e
on "sexual dysfunction." The authors tipped
Dereliction of
duty
By Thomas
lipping
Djl Sexism in
Hollywood?
By Larry Elder
their flag inpraise of their indis tKe ensable
cornerstone, Dr. Kinsey when
article on
"sexual dysfunction" was published in the
respectable Journal of theAmerican Medical
Association.
The second runner up to the Kinsey Institute
crown is the unknown Center for Sex Research at
California State University, Northridge, dubbed
the "Kinsey Institute of the West." The
Northridge Center for SexResearch founder,
Vern Bullough, a self-confessed pedophile and
editorof the "academic"Journal of Paedo hilia,
is in the sexology mainstream seeking toPegalize
adult sex with infants and children.
Northridge University's Center for Sex Research
is continuing the example set by the Kinsey
Institute as an academic institution in bed with
pedophiles and pornographers. It is a scenario
right out of theGodfather: Academics need
money and have respectability. Pedophiles and
pornographers of the underworld need
respectability and have money. The Mafioso-like
relationship between academic institutions and
pornographers/ pedophiles begun at Indiana
University continues at Northridge.
To illustrate how this collegial arrangement
works betweenrespectableacademics and the
WorldNetDaily: Institutions and underworld academics underworld of pedophiles andpornographers,
WorldNetDaily: Institutions and underworld academics
underworld of pedophiles andpornographers,
Northndgeuniversity's Center for Sex Research
used its good state supportedoffices to boldly
organize an annual "World Pornography
Conference,"August 6-9,1998. Led by the
Center for Sex Research Director, James E. Ellias,
pornography industry leaders and performers
met together withtheir
"academic" pornogra iP hy
colleagues to share and shape futurenation
pornography and pedophile strategies. In
addition to pedophileBullough, the World
Pornography Conference starred Bullough's self-
confessed pedophile colleagues John DeCecco,
Daniel Tsang and Wayne Dynes, all professors at
other major American colleges and editors of The
Journalof Paedophilia.
Among the list of "unique"presenters was Ralph
Underwager, Journalof Paedophilia interviewee
and child custod
"expert,"who insists
"Pedophiles can ioldly and courageously affirm
what they choose
thebest way to love," for an
appreciative and growing pedophile audience.
Ted Mcnvema, another conference speaker and
founder of the Institutefor the Advanced Study
of Human Sexuality in northern California,
contributed an article back in 1977on "child
sexuality"to Hustlerma azine urging
legalization of incest
an%adult sex with children.
c zyy
McIIvenna's Institute most generously su
Hustler's adult userswith graphic nude
photographs published alongside the article. The
child porno raphy is published again in
Institute pu8lication entitled "Meditationson the
Gift of Sexuality"and published in 1977.A nude
professor McIlvenna appears in photographs
alongside nude Institute faculty, staff and
students in varied combinations of group sexual
congress. These groupings, sans academic
euphemisms, are more commonly known as
orgies. Of the 180reporters said to have covered
thepornography conference, none mentioned
the Northridge University's Center for Sex
Research ties to the underworld culture of child
abuseassociated with pedophiles and
pornography.
an
There is nothing exceptional about the
pornograph
indus
'sfinancial ties to sex
science acazemics. TtXe Kinsey Institute took
fundsfrom pornographers for years and
pornographers have funded sex research as well

WorldNetDaily: Institutions and underworld academics

as sizable salaries to academicians to serve on their advisoryboards or as expert witnesses in

courtrooms and legislaturesmakin

setting dangerous precedents whi& injure

law and

children. Perjury is astock event in sex "science"

history. Whle quietly collecting porno raphy payola, Kinsey Institute members falsefy told

courts andlegislaturesthat they used a "random"sample of Americans and found both pornography and adult sex with children harmless. But Kinsey's 1,400 male sex offenders, 200 sexual psychopaths and hundreds of radical homosexuals hardIy constituted a "random sample"of 1940sAmerican men.

For decades the Institute for the Advanced

Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco, led by "academic dean," Kinsey co-author and sex partner Wardell Pomeroy, made and sold

orno

aphy. Pomeroy publiclysought funds

iom tg;',pornography industry to make chdd pornographyhimself. Pornography is part of the academicprogram of the sexologist. Coarsening

and conditioning"SexualAttitude Restructuring" ornographic fiIms and videos were mandateif' as course work for sexology studentssince early 1980. The repetitious

viewin

(Sexuahttitude Restructuring), compulsory by

of violent and degrading pornography

1982forgraduation and accreditation, had "desensitized" over 100,000 sexology students by

1988.

The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality givesstudents course credit for class participation in "erotic massage," "masturbation," "fantasy," and similar, uhhh,studies. The products ofthis grim brainwashing become the fadty who design and teach the sex education currida for our children, the cultural, political and publicpolicy leaders of our nation. With such sex "education"filtering down from the university to general society - post Kinsey 1948 - is it anywonder that our judges routinely give custody of children to knowmexual abusing parents, as law and public policy become more acceptin of what pedophiles call the "last taboo," &at is, adults having legal access to our chiIdren for sexuaI purposes?

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.p?ARCLE TD==16072

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR qzzq May 4,2002 -Bethlehem Church Standoff Agreement Reached Pront Pase Nation/Pollticr
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
qzzq
May 4,2002
-Bethlehem Church
Standoff Agreement
Reached
Pront Pase
Nation/Pollticr
World
*Maryland Gov. Sets
Moratorium on Executions
Commentary
Oplnlon/Editoriai
*IsraeliTanks Move
Matropolitrn
Toward Gaza
sports
Pedophile science
Bu~iness
Nore Srnail Mallbox
Technology
Bombs Called 'Pranks'
Entertainment
Culture
Even as the nation's largest religious denomination is
rocked by thescandal of pedophile priests, Judith Levine, in
Weather
herbook"HarmfirltoMinors,"ismakingex~:uses~r
*DNA Heips in Probe of
Anthrax Source
pedaphilia.This ishardlyacoincidence.AcademicJudith
Reii author of "Kinsey: Crimes & Consequehces," says
Family Tlmes
pro-pedophile "sexperts" such as those lionized in Miss
Auto Weekend
Levine'sbookhavecounseledthe RomanCatholicChurch
Wash. Weekend
Updated at 4:30 p.m.
Books
and other denominations for at least two decadesabout the
Home Guide
harmlessness of pedophilia.
Arts
=Dealon Bethlehem
church is stalled again
As themt media darlingofthe "anythinggoes"sexual
Nat'l Weekly Edlffon
revolution (howmany authorsget apro-pedophile-Edvorable
*Lawyer denies student's
photo storyinthe New YorkTimes?),Miss Levinegets ink
role in Sept 11
and ample space to disparage anyone who difEm with her
Gift Guide
- such as Mrs. Reisnan, whn findschildrenworthy of
Touti6t Ouida
protectionratherthansexual exploitaton
0400 kllled in Nepals
Maoist vloience
Int'l Speclot Reports
Employment Extm
Miss Levine's letter to the editor in The Washington Times
isas misguided and inaccutilte as her collection of statistics
*Analysis: US flghts Cen.
Asian militants
on sex, incest, cbil-
hamosermality, sex~ffender
recidivism,pedophileabuse,etc.drawnfromnotorious
*ACLU challenges
pedophile advocates('"Chilharesexual,' saysauthor,"
abstinence program
April25).
Mrs. Reisman finds at least 12 pedophile advocates
among the "credible"scholars Miss Levine quotes in ha
*Feature:Enron demise
on message board
book, four of whom are editorsof the Journal of Paedophilia:
US. sounds note for
VernBullough,EdwardBmngersma,The0Sandfortand
Israeli restraint
Lawnce Stanley, whom Miss Levine cites as an expert
who CO~that childpomgraphyisa "myih."Amfiling
tothe ColumbiaJournalismReview,Mr. Stanleyalsois
atfihkdwith Uncommon-
whichdescn'bes Was a
magazine "abut girl-love, erotic desks, censorshipandthe
police state."
In her letter, Miss Levine trots out the oft-repeated and
well-worncharges ofthesexindustryandradicalleft-wing
academicsagainstMrs. Reisnan Coincidentally,tk charges
Miss Levine makes alsowere made in 1994 by "gayrights"
attorneys defending Joe Stem in SkfZm vs. Peny.Their
accusations were rejected based on evidence presented to
the highestappeals corn inthe land, the U.S.Court of
Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit,. As long as Mrs. Reisman is alive, Miss Levine and
Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit,.
As long as Mrs. Reisman is alive, Miss Levine and her
prcyxdophilia comrades cannot ignore AEai Kinsey, the
founder of what Miss Levine calls "dsex research" Kinsey
biographerJamesH.Jones labeled him a "covertcrusader"
inthe New Yorker in 1997.
Kinsey, who hadamassive pornography collection,
declared children sexual from bid based on experiments
documented in his 1948 study "Sed Behavior in the
Human Male," page 180, Table 34. Inthis "study," at least
3 17 hfhts and children, some as yoq as 2 morrths old,
wax "orallyandmanually"sodomizedmud the clock,
usingstopwatches.
Miss Wine complainsthatMrs. Reisnan "dmonized"
Kinsey's science, but Table 34 does that by itself. The 1998
British television documentary "Kinsey'sPaedophiles"
validatedall ofMrs.Reisman'shliqp about Kinsey's
pedophile experiments and discovered that someof Kinseyts
child data came fbm a. German Nazi pedophile "xsemher."
Inher University of Mmesotataappmvedtract,Miss
Levine saysKinsey, whoseFesearchmderksthe entire field
ofhuman dty astaught andpracticed today,
misidentifiedchildren's"infdebucking,strainin&and
relaxation"as "orgasm."As a reporter, Miss Levine should
quoteKinsey, who insteadwrote thatthechildren
experienced:''Exbemetensionwith violent convulsion
twitchingviolent convulsions of the whole body sobbing, or
more vioIent cries, sometimes with an abundance ofteam
(especially among younger children) sadistic or masochistic
reactionscollapse fainring excruciatingpain"andthey would
even "fight away hm thepartner))' to "avoidclimax."Kinsey
concludedthe childrenenjoyed the experience.
Thanks toMrs. Reisman, we know the entireaccredited
'%human sexw field"descendsfromKinsey'sresearch.
Today's "realsex researchers" are using ivory-tower
positions to explodethe last taboo - adultshaving sex with
children.IfMiss Levineandher pedophile-advocate
comradeshave their way, tho-
of pamts wiU find
themselves helpless toprotect their childrenfiompredatory
adults.
STEVEBAU)WIN
Executive dimtor
Councilfor NationalPolicy
Fairfax, Va.
Chemical-makers reap benefits of genetically
tweaked canola
Inthe April 29 Op-Ed piece ''kt them eat canola,"Eric
Peters attempts to make the casethatgenetidy en,gineered
canola seedsthataremade more resistant to
specific
herbiciciqlresutt in "less spmying by faren d less

FRIDAY

MARCH 26

1999

ShopNetDaily Page Z News

Page 2 News

LocalNetDaily

Commentary

CllassPfied Ads

Letters

People Search TalkNetDaily SportsNetDaily

Health

Weather

N Guide

Movies

Business

Stocks

The APAs: 'Academic

Pedophile Advocates'

In 1977 1first dashed with a group of peo le I

call"AcademicPedophile Advocates"at &

British PsychologicalAssociation's "Conference on Love and Attraction"at Swansea University inWales.Ostensibly an "academic"conference, the meeting attracted outragedpresscoverage

when the leader of the Pedophile Information

ExchangefPIE),Tom O'Carroll, announced he

had been invited to lecture onpositive adult-

child sex.

At that conference, an old colleague of Dr.

Alfred Kinsey, (authorofsexual Behavior in the

Human M&) whispered con£identidyto me thatKinseywas a pedophile.While I was

shocked at the time, later research confumed that

Kinsey had s awned today'sAcademic Pedophile A !ivocates.8~1987 m a n y such

academicians came out as pedo hiles in their pseudo scholarfy, publicabon, fhe Joumdof

Paedophiliawhile professors inmajor

universities worked covertly to gain unlimited sexual access totheir children, and ours.

Radio host Dr. Laura Schlessinger recently

exposed such pedophileadvocacy in the

WNDTdff14 lryhl&h~c

NEWS:

Introducing

WND Books and

author Michael

Savage

New Mideast war front: American newspapers

News editor

talks madla bias

@j Nlckelodmn

'promoting'

homosexuality?

Slspian softens

before his death

Pakistan

bombing blunder

by militants?

01) Intelligence

source says

Saddam has

nuke

COMMENTARY:

Who will help the

children?

By Bill O'Rellly

Dereiictlon of owerful American Psychological Association's duty Fsychological Bulletin. Jipping6y Thomas A
Dereiictlon of
owerful American Psychological Association's
duty
Fsychological Bulletin.
Jipping6y Thomas
A Temple University psychology professor, a
wism in
University offennsylvaniaeducationteacher
Hollywood?
By
arry Elder
and a psychology professor at theuniversity
of
Michigan claim they investigated 59 "studies"on
childsexual abuse of college students. Imagine!
Sex with children could be funsaid the APA
authors, so "willing"child sex abuse should be
OK.
Dr. Laura concluded that the APA, representing
155,000 members, had " one soft"on child
molesters. "I'm scared As study could be used
to normalize pedophilia, to change the legal
system
like
it didhomosexuality."
True, but the National Association for Research
and Therapy ~Momosexuality(NARTH),noted
that"theAmerican PsychiatricAssociation
already set the stage
[in]the
latest diagnostic
manual (DSMIV),a
erson no longer has a
psychological disorier simply because he
molestschildren."Thusthe APA created
psychologically normal"paedophiles.
The NARTH article concludes, "If ps chology
indeed recognizesconsensual pedoph'liaas
harmless, then civillaw and social norms will be
under pressure to follow the lead of social
science as indeed theydid on the issue of
homosexuality."
Farberman, the APA publicist denied that
publication inthe PsychologicalBulletin implies
APA endorsement."Weare a scientific
We try to create a lot of
dialogue."But when Dr.Laura worried the APA
was si
aling an "attemptto normalize
pedop&a,"
the APA spokeswoman found that
dialogue "ridiculous,"citinga pal
2.8 journal
artides per year for nine ears as?PA1s
commitment "toprotect chdren and
families."
Is the recent APA Academic Pedophile
Advocacy article, one of the 26they printed "to
rotect
children
and
families"?Perhaps.
Eisterx~arbermansays "childsexual abuse is
harmful." She does not say "child-adultsex" is
harmful. The oxymoron, "consensud"adult-
chtld sexhas been promoted in sychoiogy and sexology circles since Kinsey. I& surprise that this
chtld sexhas been promoted in
sychoiogy and
sexology circles since Kinsey. I& surprise that
this "study"finds the "negativepotential"of
sexualabuse is "overstated."
These authors claim up to 37 percent of abused
boys and 11 percent ofabused girls whom they
inte~ewed,reported their abuse as "positive."
Pornographers can put money in the bank ating
those "data."
The APA is a reprise of Kinsey's fraudulent
"study," which took 50years to begin to expose.
Kinsey used child ra ists in 1948 who "proved"
their victims enjoyeJ"being raped. When
children fainted .and had convulsions during
molestation, Kinsey (a sado-masochist)reported
theirtorture as "pleasure"and "orgasm."He
claimed the "hysterical
emotional
reactions of
the parents, police officers, and others" to
molestation, created child trauma. The APA
authors a ree. Absentmoralism, say the APA
authors, aldren would be untroubled by sexual
molestation.
Despite the desire for "dialogue"neither of the
APAs ever confessedKinsey'sfraud or the
sexual psycho athology of the Kinsey team.
Indeed,both A%As tram students in Kinsefs
"consensualsex" model. Like Kinseyts,this
phony "study" will also ap
ar in courtrooms,
dassroornsand bedrooms. 6pitting in the face of
massive data to the contrary, APA's Academic
Pedophile Advocates claim child sexual abuse is
lesshHmful than physical abuse, neglect and
verbal abuse!The goaI?"Classifyinga behavior
as abuse simply because it is generally viewed as
immoral or defined as illegal is problematic."
,SaidSchlessinger to her listeners. "I've read ths
so many times,l'm sick" "Psychology has
become
a god to the general
If
pedophilia is not a mental disorder, what is it?"
Later we'll talk about how Academic Pedophle
Advocates are bringinga "pedophileabduction
rights"bill to a theater near you. For example, in
1994Oregon Senate Bill 586 proposed that
anyone who "establishedemotional ties with
chtld may file
for
custody, guardianship,
visitation"if they had "a relationship
within
the six months
through
interaction,
companionshp,,interplay and mutuality."Stay tuned. Anyone smell an APA rat? Dr.Reisman, president ofthe Institutefor
companionshp,,interplay and mutuality."Stay
tuned. Anyone smell an APA rat?
Dr.Reisman, president ofthe Institutefor Media
Education in Crestwood, Ky., is the autbr of
"Kiwey,Crimes t3Consequmces."
mz~-rna~ito a Frrend
a printer-friendly version
0 1999WorldNeti)aily.com, Inc.
Contact WND
Kinsey, Rockefeller and the Nazi doctors Reisman's latest research on the man who seducedAmerica presents
Kinsey, Rockefeller and the Nazi doctors
Reisman's latest research on the man who seducedAmerica presents sinister material
KINSEY CRIMES& CONSEQUENCES: entific conclusions" were concocted to
TheRed Queen & TheGrandScheme advanceit. The referenceis to the Red Queen
were carefully phrased to obscure the fact
that words like "contacts," "partners" and
By Judith A. Reisman in Alice in Wonderland who wanted
the sen-
TheInstituteFor Media Education, tence (beheading) carried out first and the
Arlington, Va ' verdict pronounced afterwards.
326pages; softcover; US$24.95 Disturbing information about Kinsey's
"sex play" could signify grown men sodom-
izing children. He was also both racist and
cautiousabouthis colleagues,avoidingJews,
blacks and moral traditionalists. Dr. Reis-
man quotes Kinsey co-author Wardell
T he 1960s' sexual revolu-
tion was based on the most
work and private life has been
accumulating since his death in
1956at age62. (The officialcause
Pomeroy (Kinsey and The Institute for
Sex
Research, Harper & Row, 1972),on his hir-
elaborateand carefullycrafted was pneumonia due to overwork,
ing technique: "As usual
we
took his sex-
scientificfraud of this century,
writes author Judith Reisman.
Early sexologist Alfred C.
Kinsey, with his two famous
reportsjust 50 years ago,seem-
but his extensivehomosexual and
sado-masochisticactivitieswere
likely contributors.) Dr. Reisman
revealed much of it in 1990,for
example, in Kinsey, Sex and
ual history first
[Then] Kinsey put down
his pen and said, 'I don't think you want to
ingly legitimized both profli- Fraud. Even last year's reso-
gacy and deviancy, and thus
lutelynon-condemnatorybiog-
established "the sexual licence raphy by fellow Indiana Uni-
he [personally] espoused." Sex- versity scholarJames H. Jones-AlJi-ed
work for us.' 'But 1 do,' the researcher
insisted. 'Well, Kinsey observed, 'you have
just said that premarital intercourse might
lead to later difficulties in marriage, that
extramarital relations would break up a mar-
riage, that homosexuality is abnormal, and
intercoursewith animalsis ludicrous.Appar-
ual Behaviour in the Human Male (1948)
and its female equivalent (1953) kicked off
no-fault divorce, the wife-swapping era,
the gay rights movement,classroomsex edu-
cation, sex "therapy" as a growth industry,
explicit imagery in the media and entertain-
ment industry, and an avalanche of pornog-
C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life (Nortont
is replete with gruesomely shocking details.
Kinsey: Crime and Consequences cannot
be described as non-condemnatory. Its cen-
tralfigure, Dr. Reisman asserts,"fits the clas-
sic definition of a sexual psychopath." Had
the public known that he "and his male pop-
raphy and obscenity. ulation were sexually abnormal, the popular
Although Kinsey was a sexual revolu-
tionary, Dr.Reisman contends,he was falsely
portrayed by
worked, and
Indiana University where he
the Rockefeller Foundation
which funded him, "as just a normal Amer-
ican guy/husband/family man who simply
'discovered' that 'really' most American
use of their data to change [our] law, edu-
cation and public policy would have come
to a screeching halt." He was able, however,
to blackmail into silenceassociateswho knew
about "his extensive use of deviants,his large
prison population or, worse, his active child
molesters."
'No man of our century may
have contributed so much to the
public acceptance of his own private
disordered imagination, and harmed
America and all of its citizens, as
much as Indiana University
sexologist Alfred C. Kinsey
America's pioneering sexologist
practised what he preached.'
men commonly engaged in sexually aber- Still, she thinks his "findings" should have
ently you have all the answers
Whydo
you
rant and outlaw behaviour. Kinsey's 're-
search' alleged that 10%of American males
roused suspicion. "When I first read In-
seylsresearch, I thought this man is not report-
were homosexual, that all of us were bisex- ing on America-he's reporting on himself
ual, that children were sexual from birth and
could engage in sexual
activitywith adultswithout
harm, plus a whole broad
spectrum of things taught
today in our schools and
practised today in courts of
law as fact and as true &
was fraud then, it is fraud
now and it revolutionized
this nation and turned us
into Kinsey's [psycholog-
ical] clones."
His "Grand Scheme" was
to eliminate normal fami-
lies in favour of selective
breeding predicated upon
racial and sexual eugenics,
and then projectingthat onto the nation. Kin-
seyprostituted hls own wife
Clara
into acts of sodomy
with fellow 'researchers,'
which Kinsey filmed. He
seduced his own students
at Indiana University-
male, not female students.
He devised sexual activi-
ties with his 'co-workers,'
who then became his co-
authors. He [personally]
engaged in violent sadis-
tic activity, in which he
harmed himself terribly
and appears to have died,
want to do research?"'
Biographer Jones describes Kinsey as "one
of the scholarly eugenicists of pre-WW 11"
who favoured mass sterilization for the low-
er classes and selective breeding for the
"better classes." Moreover, Judith Reisman
emphasizes, the Rockefeller Foundation
was early interested in population control
and in using the media to popularize it. The
Reece Committee, investigating U.S. tax-
exempt foundations in 1953-54,concluded
that this "plutocratic control" was accom-
plished by "funding the 'right' university
research by the 'right' researchers, then by
funding mass media dissemination of the
'right' science data to the public." Kinsey's
numbers made him a perfect fit for anyone
.
frankly, as a result of the
trauma to his body."
she charges, and his "sci- Author Reisman: Condemnatory But his
famed-reports
eager to alter what he would call human
"breeding patterns."
Dr. Reisman, a specialist in content anal-
ysis studies of written and visual media,
lostmany family membersin theHolocaust.
Alberta Report
June 29,1998
37
In that context sheraises further sinisterques- tions about Kinsey's data. For instance, who was the
In that context sheraises further sinisterques-
tions about Kinsey's data. For instance, who
was the "lone pedophile," the "elderly gen-
tleman" cited by Kinsey for his sexual
molestation of 800 children?Who were 'The
Children of Table 34" and what became of
them? How did Kinsey's "technically trained"
observers gain access to the claimed 1,800
American children for illegal genital exper-
iments? "To this day," sheobserves,"the Kin-
sey Institute and Indiana University have
repeatedly
refused to reveal any names of
the subjects or the experimenters." Nor has
any one of these childrenever come forward,
althoughthe institute seemsan excellenttar-
get for lawsuits.
Evenin the destitute 1930s,at the citedrate
of a dollar a day, she doubts that children as
young as three months were obtainablein such
numbers around Bloomington,Indiana. She
suggests an ominous but credible alterna-
tive: a collaborativelinkbetween Kinseyand
NaziGermany,then apolice statewhere such
"experimentation" could easily be conduct-
ed "as part of an ongoing collegial,cross-cul-
turd, multinational, 'fact-finding' research
project." She cites significantlinks, such as
one George SylvesterViereck, who worked
for the German embassy in Washington,
D.C., in those years, setting up Nazi front
groups,and who is knownto have been a Kin-
sey correspondent.Furthermore,the Rocke-
feller Foundation was simultaneouslyfund-
ing eugenics projects in Berlin.
Kinsey consistentlykept secrethis hypothe-
ses and the basic facts upon which his con-
clusions rested, Dr. Reisman charges.
"Neither Kinsey nor any of his team can
rightlybe termed 'scientists.' Theirmethod-
ology was not scientific, for it was neither
ableto be replicated nor validated.Their data
was anonymous, forced, secretly altered at
will. and fraudulent. With the aid of the elite
academicworld and institutionsandthe sup-
port of public funds and the social plan-
ning foundations,Kinsey andhis associates,
who served as his own private male harem,
conductedthousands of sexual interviewsto
present a false view of American sexual
behaviours."
Amazingly, however, use of Kinsey data
as authoritativehas neverbeen seriously chal-
lenged-until now. It must not continue, Dr.
Reisman declares: "There [must] be a full
and open public investigation into Kinsey's
fraudulent data and its impact upon law-
makers, the military, the church, the press,
the academic world, the family and all our
institutions."
-Kevin
E. Abrams
Vancouver writer Kevin E. Abrams is co-author of
The Pink Swastika: HomosexualityInThe Nazi Party.
"Kinsey, Crimes and Consequences can be ordered by calling
1-800837-0544.
38 June 29,1998
Alberta Report
Kinsey's Legal Legacy merica's post-World War I1 generation lived through the sexual revolution of the
Kinsey's Legal Legacy
merica's post-World War I1
generation lived through the
sexual revolution of the 1960s.
Now, sadly, most of them are living with
the consequences of its devastation: abor-
tion, skyrocketing disease, divorce, and
sexual dysfunction. Most Americans are
unaware that their nation's moral founda-
tion was supplanted, nor do they appreci-
ate that a deliberate effort was
engineered to derail American com-
mon law, which was constructed on
biblical principles to protect and order
society's most important building
blocks - marriage and family.
Fifty years ago this month, Indiana
University zoologist and Rockefeller
grantee Alfred Kinsey, the widely ac-
knowledged "father of the sexual
revolution," published his unprec-
edented report on human sexuality,
Sexual Behavior in the Human Male.
Kinsey's theme of "free love" was re-
inforced by a well-timed media blitz,
and the American public was recep-
tive. For the next decade, Kinsey was
one of the nation's most popular ce-
lebrities (until his premature death in
1956). Cole Porter's hit song popular-
ized Kinsey's sexual liberating anthem
of "Anything Goes." But over the sec-
ond half of the 20th century, America
and the Western world learned the
hard lesson that, seductive though it be,
free love is not free.
In 1954, Tennessee Congressman B.
Carroll Reece could clearly see that revo-
lutionary changes were forming on the ho-
rizon of our nation's social landscape, and
and government are to be deemed in-
violate, that everything, including ba-
sic moral law, is subject to change,
and that it is the part of the social sci-
entists to take no principle for granted
as a premise in social or juridical rea-
soning, however fundamental it may
hereto have been deemed to be under
our Judeo-Christian moral system.
other criminal acts. Those acts were then por-
trayed by Kinsey as both commonplace and
natural. Kinsey's mission, Jones writes in
Alji-ed Kinsey: A PublidPrivate Life, was to
free America from Victorian "repression."
But his wider goal was an amoral new or-
der - possible only if human life is un-
hinged from the divine.
Kinsey, like Margaret Sanger and
population planners of the early 20th
century, was a eugenicist who es-
chewed biblical standards of morality.
According to one Kinsey associate:
"Kinsey knew a great deal about the
Judeo-Christian tradition and he was
indignant about what it had done to
our culture."
How did the acceptance of crimi-
nal sexual behaviors and perversions
begin in America? Kinsey's studies
were accepted as "scientific authority"
to alter the American common law
view of marriage. Life's most intimate
and personal act was equated with de-
generative behaviors as long as it was
done between "consenting adults."
Kinsey found help in his effort from
liberal French lawyer Rene Guyon of
"
sex by age eight or else it's too late"
rIL infamy. Dr. Hany Benjamin, an inter-
B 0
-
5
national sexologist and an associate of
4
Kinsey: Working for an amoral new order.
Kinsey was a vital agent in the trans-
formation of America. The Russian, Ger-
man, and French revolutions were all
both Kinsey and Guyon, wrote in the
introduction to Guyon's 1948 book
Sexual Ethics:
Many
sex activities, illegal and
that a principal source of the chan,oe was
foundation grants exouraging collectivism
and internationalism. When Reece began
to investigate Kinsey's report and the back-
ground of its funding, he discovered a trail
leading back to the Rockefeller Foundation.
Whlle the Reece Committee was stopped by
preceded by an embrace of sexual anar-
chy. In such revolutionary models, mar-
riage is undermined first, then the family,
followed by private property and gov-
ernments. Kinsey facilitated, with the
fraudulent data of his "studies," the aban-
donment of absolutes in the "social or
juridical reasoning" of America's "Judeo-
Christian moral system."
immoral, but widely practiced, are
recorded by both investigators
Guyon speaking as a philosopher,
and Kinsey, judging merely by em-
pirical data
[upset] our most cher-
ished conventions. Unless we want
to close our eyes to the truth or im-
prison 95% of our male population,
we must completely revise our legal
A recent Kinsey biography by James H.
and moral codes
It probably comes
a
bipartisan effort from further investigation,
it
did offer the following warning regard-
ing the enlarging mission of social scien-
tists in changing our society:
as a jolt to many, even open-minded
people, when they realize that chas-
tity cannot be a virtue because it is
not a natural state.
that there are no absolutes, that ev-
erything is indeterminate, that no
standards of conduct, morals, ethics,
Jones, a Rockefeller grantee and folmer
adviser to the Kinsey Institute, reveals that
Kinsey himself was a sado-masochistic
homosexual on a perverted mission. Troll-
ing through homosexual bars and night-
clubs, Kinsey gathered the subjects for his
research, drawing disproportionately from
those participating in sexual perversions and
With such philosophical inspiration,
Guyon developed a deconstructed legal
theory, fortifying it with Kmsey's "scien-
THE NEW AMERICAN / JANUARY 19,1998
tific" data. It was put into the hands of le- gal radicals like Morris Ernst,
tific" data. It was put into the hands of le-
gal radicals like Morris Ernst, an advocate
for the new sexual order, who handled
revolutionary cases in his war against the
American legal order.
Emst was well credentialed as a legal
radical for his service as the American
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) attorney for
Alfred Kinsey, the Kinsey Institute, the
Sex Information and Education Council of
the United States (SIECUS), and Planned
Parenthood of America. He had close ties
to Supreme Court Justices Brandeis,
Brennan, and Frankfurter, and Judge
Learned Hand - all influential progres-
sives in moving American law away from
the absolute "Judeo-Christian moral sys-
tem" which protected the
sanctity of life, marriage,
legislatures for their consideration, with
plenty of authoritative support for its
implementation provided by Kinsey's
flawed scientific analysis. Adoption of the
Model Penal Code eliminated and/or
trivialized prior sex offenses, eventually
aiding the ~educrionof penalties for abor-
tion, rape, wife and child battery, deser-
tilon, seduction. adultery, prostitution,
contributing to the delinquency of a mi-
nor, soliciting for masturbation, sodomy,
public sexual exhibitions, "unfit" parent-
been apprehended. This recognition
that there is nothing very shocking or
abnormal in the sex offender's be-
havior should lead to other changes
in sex legislation
Penalties should
be lightened. In the first place, it
should lead to a downward revision
of the penalties presently imposed on
sex offenders.
age, alienation of affection, and obscenity,
as well as infanticide, premeditated AIDS/
STD transmission, etc.
At the very time the ALI's Model Pe-
nal Code was being developed, there was
Biographer James Jones reports that
Kinsey died believing that his crusade to
promote more enlightened sexual attitudes
had not succeeded. Yet in 1957, a year after
Kinsey's death, the Supreme Court in Roth
v. US., a case handled by Ernst, relaxed
the once protective American legal defi-
nition of obscenity. In
1961, Illinois became the
and family.
In Ernst's 1948 book
Trolling through homosexual bars flrst state to repeal its
sodomy statute, and today
Amel-ican Sexual Behnv-
ior and the Kinsey Re-
and nightclubs, Kinsey gathered
the subjects for his research,
port, Kinsey colleague
Robert Dickinson noted
that "an era of hush-and-
pretend in the life of our
nation may end" through
less than half of the states
retain sodomy statutes. In
1973, Dr. Mary Calde-
drawing disproportionately from rone, a leading Kinseyan,
was cited in the Roe v.
those pifrtidpating in sexual Wade decision which le-
galized abortion. Since
perversions and other criminal acts.
Kinsey's Sexual Behavior
in the Human Male and
that "virtually every page
of the Kinsey Report touches on some sec-
a growing public outcry for tightening,
tion of the legal code
a reminder that
the law, like
our social pattern, falls la-
Roe a staggering 34 mil-
lion babies have been
aborted. Also in 1973, the
American Psychiatric Association re-
moved homosexuality from its list of psy-
chopathologies, and in 1995, pedophilia
mentably short of being based on a knowl-
edge of facts."
Ernst expkined in Scientific Morzrhly
why the Kinsey reports were making ma-
jor inroads in changing American law:
not loosening, sexual psychopath laws.
But respected magistrate Morris Plas-
cowe, the model code's principal author,
argued (based on Kinsey's findings of
course) that "When a total clean-up of sex
offenders is demanded, it is, in effect, a
proposal to put 95 percent of the male
"[Rlecently law has reached for scientific
population in jail
Of the total male
tools to aid in its search for truth
I now
say that the Kinsey Report is the single
"
was removed. Today, Kinsey's finger-
prints are all over the current literature of
law, medicine, and the social sciences.
For example, in Westlaw, a database of
the major national law journals, during the
period 1982-96, 499 authors cite Kinsey
versus 71 citations for the more recent
Kinseyans, Masters and Johnson. In the
greatest contribution of science to the
Science Citation and Social Science Cita-
rule-making part of the law in my life-
time
The Kinsey Report broke through
a mass of taboo."
Emst advised that every bar association
in the country "should establish a Com-
mittee on the Laws of Sexual Behavior
and consider its own State's legal system
tion Indices, Kinsey rates thousands of
listings, twice as many as Freud.
Continued belief in and use of Kinsey's
data may be viewed as a contributing fac-
tor to the current exhaustion of our crirni-
nal justice system. Authorities who permit
the killing of the unborn and release sadis-
in this field
"
Soon Committees were es-
population 85 percent has had pre-marital
intercourse
As America's common law was sup-
planted, legal penalties were "lightened"
and new sentencing guidelines were de-
veloped. For example, prior to Kinsey rape
was extremely serious, a death sentence
being required in three states and life in
prison in over 18 states. But Plascowe in-
troduced to the legal profession what Kin-
sey and Guyon had certainly envisioned:
tablished with funding from the Rocke-
feller Foundation in an effort to overturn
the American way of life.
In 1955, the Model Penal Code was
completed under the auspices of the
Carnegie- and Rockefeller-seeded Ameri-
can Law Institute (ALI), the education
arm of the American Bar Association.
This "model" was then submitted to state
One of the conclusions of the
Kinsey report is that the sex offender
tic rapists/murderers back into society, to
typically repeat their crimes, represent a
system adrift in an amoral abyss and bent
on anarchy and national destruction. H
IS not a monster
but an individual
- COL.RONALDD. RAY,USMC (RET.)
who is not very different from others
In his social group, and that his be-
havior is similar to theirs. The only
difference is that others in the
offender's social group have not
Col. Ray, a former Depury Assrsrant Secreta~yof
Defense, is the author of Military Necessity and
Homosexuality. In writing this artrcle, the author
largely dreh. fr-om Dr. Judirh Re~s~na~r'sdejinirive
book on Kinsey, whrch is scheduled for release in
early 1998.
THE NEWAMERiCAN / JANUARY 19. 1998

Kinsey Crimes

By Lawrence 1[:Newman:

During World War IT, Nazi doc-

iGrs twk young.

inn~xcdcluldrm

;utd suhjcctcd &.c:ttl

to eruct, pep

vcrtcd n~cdidexperinrents. Ac- - curding to thc do~torsthe brture of tllcsa cluldrcn WQJ valid and accept- able, bcui~scit ws done for the

lrdvsncmentofscintifickn~ldge.

ARcr all. it was all dorm in the nmc

of scicncc. Vdidating cihkid bc- llavior tva? part of the Nazi crd, but thmkfully would never be ac- cepted iit hisrica, right?

Not fu hotn shcre you livc, you u~llfind thc Kin~cyInstitute for Re- search in Sex, Gcndcr,~dRepta- ductiorr Located in Rluon~gton, Indima, it IS pai-t of Indiana Utliver- slty. Ohe OF thc lcadcr~in higher cducat~onin tlre state. It1 sotnequar- trrs, the Kintey Iristitute is also dccmcd as a Icadcr in hlucation, obtain~nefinx&l support from the National Inshtute of Ment~lHdh, the Rockcfcllcr Foundation, and the N.1riorl.11 Rt.scarch Council, among othcr rcc~~r~itedorgani.ritiotrs , The Kioscy Iristitutc ig nand for AIfrcd Kinsey.szm~ogisttchotwncd to thc tie13 of sex research in the

1YWs

Kmcp published wd

&h-,iot intlref-lwnaoMalein 1948, follo;r.cd by Scxual Bchavior in$J$ &pn Fcmale in 1953 Kirisey doctrlnc strongly $uppods arty md all forms of sex, d~ethcrlegal or illcg:il Tcday,dlevalidityof ICltucy's research into human sexual~tyis un-

dcr cotistxit attack.

"SCIE~I~~~~Csubjects,"

Alfrcd C Kniseve-

Kinsey's adult

accorduig to

uscd stc7p\vatchcs in order (0ma-

$urc tht children's smu31 rtspnSd.

Thc duldrcn'z rcactioru, acwding to Kimey, wfrc amixtue of"^- be, sobbiq, or more violent cna,

s~nd.mqwiCh thc abundance of

~MTS.''

We may iwtt krww all hc dczai1.a

of how Kinscy really obl;lined his

dab about chiidrar, but wc do know this: Kinsey was, atthc minimum,a

knoshgpartnainsyfitn\aticcrimi-

nal acts against children. Unja today's IbW, F;insey and his mi- lugucs would be guilty of scow of

children, 31 thc

criminal acb ag&

shte, fdcral, and intemaliod lev-

els.

Thc following is a list ofthc crimcs under ;day's Inciiana criminal stat-

utm that art part and parcel of

Kinsey's reseatch:kol~;stin~.child rxplailstion, ricariou~sexual pti- ftcation, child solichatim, child se-

duction,

conduct with a mhr, inm ?&kt of3depcndenf ~~rirm,and chi-

nal reck~rsm~ss.

sexual hmry.sexual mis-

Nationally, all 50 dates have out-

lawd the many behaviorsglorified

by Kinzey in his publication:.

note ar* the crimts af profes4anal voyeurism, which is defined ;~sthe exminxtian ofa person for &a pur-

pose of sexualarousd, gratification.