Reliance of the U.S.

Catholic Church
on the Discredited Field of "Human
Sexuality" and on Sexology Advisors
Whose "Scientific" and Moral
Foundation Deviates Radically From
That of the Church

by
Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D.
The Institute for Media Education 6 2002

With Particular Focus on

Three Key Sexuality "Reassessment"
Institutions, Research, Methodologies
And Agents of Change

A WORK IN PROGRESS

1981 NAMBLA: nGayliberationists in general, and boy-lovers

in particular should know Kinsey 's work and hold a
dear...[I@plicit in Kinsey is the struggle weBght today.

1991 The Journal of Paedophilia: "So, you would attack the

whole basis from which age-of-consent laws are
constructed, in other words."
Dr. John Money: "Icertainly think that's where we have
to begin

"'

1994 Dr. Fred Berlin: "Pedophilia....can be effectively

controlled with appropriate psychiatric intervention...,,3

Excerpted kom NAMBLA (The North American Man/Boy Love Association) "The Case for Abolishmg the Age of
Consent Laws" in The Age Taboo, Ed. Daniel Tsang, Gay Men's Press, Boston, 1981 p. 96.
Statement by Dr. John Money, co-founder with Dr. Fred Berlin of the Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic-the
premier clinic that couflsels Catholic bishops, pedophiles and pederasts. Final sentence in "Interview:John
Money" in Paidika: The Journal ofPaedophilia, Spring 1991, p. 13 (see attachment 12 for the full interview).
Dr. Fred S. Berlin, John Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic, advertising his bainingprogram "The Cycle of Sexual
Trauma," in the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,
February 10-12, 1994 (see attachment 10 for more detail).

A Note About the Following Materials

Letter & Attachments Delivered to The Holy Father Circa July 29,2002
Letter to A Select Group of Bishops from Rebecca Messall, J.D., June 2(102
Executive Summary "Reliance of the U S . Catholic Church on Sexuality Advisors ..."
Attachment 1: The Church's Fraudulent "Sexperts"
Excerpts from 1985 Doyle-Mouton-Peterson Paper That Relied on Johns Hopkins Experts: Drs.
Berlin and Money
"The Smoking Gun:" Reporting Child Sexual Abuse May Cause "Divorce, Suicide"
A Short Summary of Some Problems Surrounding Doyle-Moulton-Peterson
The History of "Scientific" Sexology-Flon Chart
1985 Paper Recommended Sexology to Church
'-Sexual Attitude Reassessment" for Clergy. Seminarians
Sex Abuse Quotes from Church's Sesperts
The "Position Statement of the Catholic Medical Association on 1nl)atient Treatment and
Outpatient Psychiatric Evaluation Programs for Priests and Religious"

Attachment 2: The Kinsey-Catholic Connection

"Advises Bishops: Sue your Experts"
Social Justice Revie14 of Kinst.?.. Crirue~& consequence^
"Catholics Learning Sex from Kinsej's Disciples"
"Institutions and Underworld Academics"
"Pedophile Science"
"The APAs: 'Academic Pedophile Advocates"'
"Kinsey, Rockefeller and the Nazi Doctors"
"Kinsey's Legal Legacy"
-'Kinseq Crimes"
"Author Challenges Kinsey Sex Research"
"New Book Exposes Kinsey Research"
"Sex Teaching Based on Pervert's Reports." The London S u n d q Times
"'Grand Scheme' Advanced by Father of Sexual Revolution"
"Woman's crusade: debunking Kinsey"
"The Crime of the Century"
"Unmasking Alfred Kinsey"
"Killing the Last Taboo"
Book Reviews: Sex The Measure of ,411 Things: .4 L$e of Alfred C. Kinsey
"America's Original Dirty Old Man"
"Pedophile's diaries basis for Kinsey report on children"
"Kinsey's Fraud ~nvadesthe Church"
"Biography Claims Kinsey's Sex Life Tainted His Research"
"Shocking New Look At Kinsey"
"Buchanan vs Kinsey: Round Two"
"Assaulting The Most Vulnerable" Editorial. The Indianapolis Star
"Acclaimed' Book Deserves Our Disgust"
Tinie. Colliers. Look Illustrations:
Representative Examples of Kinsey's Early. On-going, Mass Media Publicity Blitz

Attachment 3: Pornographic Sexuality Courses Spread to Catholic Seminarians!

Goodbye! Good Men Quotes on the SAR Used To Teach Seminarians

"It's Academic" Newsweek on SF State University Course by John DeCecco
"John DeCecco Course Reader" (Title Page)
"John DeCecco Course Reader" (Table of Contents)
"A Child's Sexual Bill of Rights" From DeCecco7sCourse Reader
A Student Testimony on the DeCecco Pedagogy
Chart: History of Sexology, Central Role of SAR in Sexuality Training
. <
Study: 21% College Men Sexually Attracted to Children
c L<n7' .
3

Attachment 4: The Sexology-Pedophilia-Pederasty Link

Forming Accredited Sexology Graduates
"The A.L.I. Model Penal Code Removes Protections" (Flow Chart)
Publicity On Kinsey 1948 Book Jacket "Why and How This Study Was Made"
"Sexology: An Authoritative Guide to Sex Education:" Kinsey on Sex Response in Children"
"Attacking the Last Taboo" Time Magazine
"Cradle-to-Grave Intimacy" Time Magazine
IASHS on SARguide
IASHS Sexology "Courses of Study" (SAR, etc.) for Sexology Degrees: (These Credentialed Authorities
Used by Planned Parenthood, SIECUS, CDC, Sex Education Courses, Seminars, Programs, Grant
Proposals, Legislative Testimonies on "Sexuality" Issues (e.g., Obscenity, Marriage, Homosexuality,
Sodomy, Sex Education, Sex Laws, Hate Crimes, Diversity, Library Filters, etc.).

Attachment 5: Sexology Strategy for "Sexual Attitude Restructuring"

"IASHS Did Seminary Training On Sexuality"
Excerpts from Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences on the SAR & Accreditation
"Sexology - Therapy Or Titillation?" British Journal of Sexual Medicine
"Kinseyan Human Sexuality: Academics, Professionals & Associations"
"Table 34. Examples of multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males" (Kinsey)
IASHS: "Course Announcement: Sensory Awareness Massage.. .Self.. .Erotic Massage"
"X-Rated Homework" Time Magazine

Attachment 6: Dr. Pomeroy, Kinsey's Co-AuthorISex Partner Directs IASHS "Course Work"
"Pomeroy Was IASHS Academic Dean and Kinsey's Lover"
Some Examples of The Kinsey Team Animus Toward Catholicism

Attachment 7: A Conflict of Interest: Sexologists Take Money From Pornographers

"Pomeroy Sought Funds From Adult Film Association"
"A 'Who's Who7 In Sexology" on Board of Penthouse Forum
IASHS Sold Its Child Pornography Photos To Hustler Magazine

Attachment 8: Sexologists As Pornographers

"IASHS Faculty, Staff, Students Pose In Sexual Scenes For Its Photo Series
The IAS HS Meditations On The Gift Of Sexuality
The Summer S.A.R. [Sexual Attitude Restructuring]
Michael P. Farris On Wardell Pomeroy's Pornography Homosexual Bias

Attachment 9: Church Still Listening to "Sexperts"

Dr. Berlin advises Cardinal Law and NCCB [April 30,20021 The Advocate
"Abuse panel says it will seek change" The Boston Globe
"Media Briefings by Sexual Abuse Experts Part of Dallas Meeting"

Attachment 10: Berlin-Money and Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders

Fred Berlin On Effective Treatment And Control of Pedophiles, Rapists.. .
More On History of Sex Clinic. Berlin, Money And Johns Hopkins

Attachment 11 : Sexperts Excuse Pedophilia and Pederasty

"John Money is Fred Berlin's 'Mentor"'
"The Pied Pipers of Sex" on John Money Pioneering Pornography for Sex T~aining
June Reinisch: "What You Must Know to be Sexually Literate" on Money as "Mentor
"Cover-up at American University?:" Richard Berendzen at BerlinIMoney C linic
"Calls Called 'Life-Altering'" Pedophile Nature Of Berendzen Phone Calls
"Not A 'Victim' To His Victim'' No Apologies From Clinic's "Cured" Bere~idzen
Johns Hopkins On Berendzen Admission to the Sex Disorders Clinic
"Pedophilia Steps Into the Daylight," quotes from Money et al.

'

Attachment 12: Peterson's Sexpert Money Advocates PederastyIPedophilia

John Money confesses to "Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia"
Paidikn The Jouri~uloj'Paedophilia "Statement of Purpose"
Money's Belief in "Evolutionary Bisexuality"

Attachment 13: Peterson's Sexpert Berlin "Shielding Child Molesters"

Dr. Berlin in the Press: "Stop Shielding Child Molesters" [Blurred text reids Berlin would not
report "even when their crimes continue during treatment.. .At least eight men have been
convicted of sexually abusing Maryland children while under treat tient there" (at Johns
Hopkins)].
"Doctor [Berlin] Skirts Reporting Law On Sex Crimes"
"When Doctors Know Better"
"Priests Less Likely To Repeat Offenses Than Tqpical Molesters, Experts S,t>"
USA T0da.v On Homosexuals And The Sex Abuse Scandals

Attachment 14: Reisman Vitae & Key Authorities

Judith A. Reisman (curriculum vitae)
"Really, Dr. Kinsey?" The Lancet
"Sex. Lies and Kinsey" The Anlerica~lSpectator
"Mortal Sins" National Review
"Smoking and Sex" National Review
Letter from Dr. Laura to PBS Requesting Secrecy of The Yorkshire Television L)ocunieutinp
"Kinsey's Paedophiles."
Commentary By Judith A. Reisman on Berlin. et al: "Pederasty vs Pedophil a"

NOTE: Witnesses and admissible documentation for a potential Church legal action against fraudulent sex
scientists for medical malpractice are found tl~rougkoutthis document.

A NOTE ABOUT THE ATTACHED MATERIALS

The attached information, prepared for a select group of Catholic Bishops
attending the June 2000 Dallas meeting, has been slightly elaborated. The Bishops
conference focused upon the sexual crimes and misconduct carried out by a subculture of
Catholic priests, Bishops and other clergy. The collected documents herein would draw
the attention of the reader to the well documented role of mental health professionals in
guiding and directing the Catholic clergy and laity in its "new" sexuality since at least the
mid 1980s.
The December 15, 1973 decision by the American Psychiatric Association to
normalize homosexuality--largely based on citations to the authority of the fraudulent
"data" compiled by Alfred C. Kinsey and his team for Sexual Behavior in the Human
Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953)-would be the highwater point for sexual revolution in the Catholic Church.
There is evidence of no field of "sexuality" in existencepre-Kinsey. By the early
1960s, sexology "institutions" and organizations emerge, training educators, clergy,
mental health professionals, criminologists and most social service providers in the new
Kinseyan "science." Roughly two decades later, Catholic Bishops, like most religious
denominations, are relying upon these nascent "human sexuality experts" to direct, train,
teach, counsel and evaluate clergy, and to train the children in their religious schools.
The fraudulent schooling of these bogus professionals in pseudo sexual science is the
especial issue under preliminary study here.

Judith Reisman, Ph.D.

The Institute for Media Education
Voice 916 797 0307
jareisrnan@surewest.net

Fax916 7972544
drjudithreisman.org

July 20,2002
His Holiness Pope John Paul I1
Apostolic Residence
Vatican City State
Europe
Your Holiness:
Greetings from one of your many admirers in California.

My name is Judith Reisman. My doctorate is in Communications, and I have spent

nearly 30 years in post-doctoral investigation of the profoundly influential, pseudo-sci2ntific
field of secular "sexology" and the related phenomenon of pornography. My findings establish
that the scientific authority of secular "sexology" is "pseudo-science." Indeed, sexology turns
out to be as scientific as Lysenkoism or the racial "science" of the Nazi theorists.
Holy Father, the evidence shows that secular "sexology" is based on false premises and
fraudulent "researchT'--which involved barbaric sex crimes against hundreds of infant:, and children-directed by the infamous American sex "researcher" Prof. Alfred C. Kinsey. In your extraordinary
work, Love and Responsibility you ingeniously identify the fundamental struc-tureof secular
"sexology: ..
Some doctors have a narrowly biological view of things formed under the influence
of the 'myth of orgasm' which causes them to give advice completelq at variance
with ordinary human knowledge and experience of sexual matters. (p 287).
It is within this legal framework of medical malpractice, that of a pro 'ession ":ompletely at
variance with ordinary human knowledge and experience of sexual matters" that the following
materials should be considered.
No field of "sexuality" can be documented as existing pre-Kinsey. P .of. Kinsey, who
launched the "myth of orgasm" in 1948, was an anti-Christian, bisexual/homosexual :-evolutionary
and pederast-collaborator whom I exposed in my enclosed book, Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences
(2000).
These findings on Kinsey's frauds and crimes and his role in encouraging the current
pederast and pedophile movement are validated by the British medical journd The Llzncet and by
Catholic and non-Catholic academics in various disciplines. Some of their names appear on the
accompanying material.

"Scientific" sexology has displaced Judeo-Christian ethics as the authority on sex in our
American universities, medical schools, law schools and public schools, from kindergarten
through doctoral level. Secular sexologists totally control the "credentialing" (licensing) of
teachers who teach about sex in all institutions. American sexologists thus set the sexual
standards for the world-standards that violate the principles laid down in the Pontifical Council
for the Family's profound document, The Truth and Meaning of Human Sexuality.
Sexual abuse of children by priests is much in the news today. Yet leading secular
sexologists have asserted that adult sex with children is normal in their writings, teaching,
credentialing and counseling, in schools and seminaries of all denominations. Moreover, secular
sexology, touting the "myth of orgasm," provides the "scientzfic " authority for radical Catholics'
promotion of amoral sex, homosexuality, sex "education," abortion "rights," divorce, pornography,
etc. These "rights" are, of course, diametrically opposed to 2,000 years of Catholic teaching.
Led by the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University, America's secular sexologists are
guilty of grave professional malpractice against the Catholic Church. Two of the leading
centers of this malpractice have been (a) the Sexual Disorders Clinic at Johns Hopkins
University in Maryland and (b) The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in
San Francisco (IASHS).
Your Holiness, Dr. Fred Berlin of the Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic is the chief
advisor to the Catholic bishops of the USA in matters of child sexual abuse. While Dr. Berlin
was telling the Church that his Clinic could "cure" pedophiles, his Clinic co-founder and
mentor, Dr. John Money, was promoting pedophilia as beneficial. Money, a well-documented
pedophilia advocate (see attached) is infamous for leading the medical team that surgically
mutilated a young boy in an attempt to turn him into a "girl," against the boy's wishes (see
attached). Meanwhile, San Francisco's IASHS sexologists mal-trained, mal-counseled and malevaluated hundreds of Catholic seminarians and priests, nationwide.
The American experience has shown that only professionals with a Judeo-Christian
philosophical belief (alongside such groups as Courage and Sexaholics Anonymous) may
successfully aid sexual addicts or offenders who have completed their incarceration.
Instead of following the authority of the Magisterium, credentialed secular sexologists
"cured sexual predators and returned them to parishes, where they molested other youngsters. On
the one hand, these sex crimes have opened the bishops to costly lawsuits. On the other hand, the
secular sexologists who advertised themselves to the bishops as human sexuality "authorities" and
"experts" are themselves liable for medical malpractice, fraud and misrepresentation to the
bishops and the Catholic faithful.
Your Holiness, I respectfully urge you to call upon all bishops to sever their ties with secular
sexology and those trained by pseudo-"sex scientistsm--fromcounseling to primary school education
to university level. I believe you will see the urgency of such an action, and its importance to the
Church's worldwide mission, when you peruse the documentation that accompanies this letter.

In closing, please note the signatures of m y esteemed colleagues who have endorsed
this international endeavor. And allow m e to thank you for courageously defending decency,
chastity, children, the family and God's Commandments. May God bless, strengthen, guide and
console you always!
Sincerely yours,

Judith Reisman, Ph.D.

Initial Endorsers (Full List to Follow)

William A. Donohue, President, Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, New York, New York
Richard P. Fitzgibbons, M.D., Member, Catholic Medical Association
Barbara B. Henkels, Board of Directors, Franciscan University of Steubenville and The International
Theological Institute on Marriage and the Family, Gaming, Austria
Paul M. Henkels, Chairman, REACH (Road to Educational Achievement Through Choice)
Dale O'Leary, author, The Gender Agenda: Redefining Equality, and Gender: The Deconstruction of Women
Onalee McGraw, Ph.D., President, Educational Guidance Incorporated, Fort Royal, Virginia
Charles P. Prezzia M.D., MPH, Immediate Past-President Catholic Medical Association and General
Manager, Health Services and Medical Director United States Steel Corporation
Charles Rice, Esq., Professor Emeritus, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana
Robert J Saxer, M.D., President, Catholic Medical Association
Charles R. Solis, Jr, Founder and President, The REACH Family Institute
Mercedes Arzu Wilson, Founder and President, Family of the Americas Foundation

P.S. Below kindly note an article by my Catholic associate Dr. Dennis Jarrard, entitled The Porn Profs '
Plans for Your Kids,which shows how powerful and "respectable" sexology pr3fessors have become.
The "Position Statement of the Catholic Medical Association" on this issue appears in Attachment 1.

PORNOGRAPHY

The porn profs' plans for your kids

I recently spent a day in Hell.I anended increase in sex-related pathologies since dlenl In large t ~ ~ u u pou
r r , can thnlrtbe
t b r W ~ p b y C o n f v t n a ( ~~ -, m d o c u m n t e d b y D r . M i d ~ l & i a n a nm
l
e at this a~nfa;cnrc.
cism md The First hendmmt") at the inhcrbookC r b n a s o n d ~ 12Lclpcrkra dcfinitdydidnutbrhgup
Sheraton Univusll Hotd in Lor Angela. D z ~ d r m o o s t n t a t h . t K n a c y 'w*
s
Dr. R k m m ' s 31)yan ofm dindo bow
I was probabky the only pro-decency ir a h u d i a d v i q hundmia ofwc aimn r h ~ ~ d o g ) r t o c h t i a . a d t a Q r putidpant at the oonfrb, which drrwporn .grinrtchildnnGriffittwcr#inseyaaa accrsditingbguideahnrr nnbrtuiwiw
~
~ f r o m u f a r a w a y u R u + 6 4 ~ a -f i n e l u a r c b U , . r a l ~ t ~tduaton
h m our d d d r d s churoo..
pm. South Afric~.
md A u W r . For eight and teaching about sex.
through ruch d +a u their cbnummn
A C.Lfomia S b t t Uniwmty rt Long on Acaeditatic n.
Beach proftuor told how he brought porn
Thew ruppr wdky unbiued aadanics
s t u s i a t o b ~ r n u g u a s t ~ H did
r not w u i t to ducurr Dr. Rrismdc

t a l d u t h i s ~ h i r n h m d i n c t c r i t i d P a chronicle of he dunage done by the

Kirucylns through thr aplorian of r a
crima and vurncrl dirarr (not to mentiwMDS)thth.sa~urrairinccthr1950r,
d k u d e d the mwie decency codc in tbe
1960s.

hndan.adon~~Tkrr#uch
to accept tbe n o w - d h d i t e d Prof. Alfred

Kiny.'s anything-go- approach to JDU u

the buir for granting t u d h g crrd+ntirlr
to dl r u cduaton In both public md re
ligibue achoolr.
Wt these intellcctuds said should
fri&tm citizens into ution I fkrt heard
GUNS libruirn u rhc described effortl
to protect the public univdry'r porn collection. Next, I h a r d a proksmr quoting
mx-5uppcmd rruucbaDr.Ed
of Unhrtnfty of CAforni. at Smta Barh a D(mnerrtcin.wh0 r
m
n
i wthat orrty
violence in porn i~ dmgtrout, did not
mention the racuch funding he hu received from %boy
md other pornognphy intcratr.
Dr. William Grimtt of Krnsu State
U n i w t i q informed w that porn cam

aamurtdcs\~the~-donc~~

eduabra wh ut tcuhixq our c h h

coadomr ahodd xtplu* cbutity,thm
hutuktba t h l c m

t&t

Thedrmqpth.tthe'urxpemmuc&
ingtoourba)r.ndgidtirnokuhumful
thntbrtdortbySwictmdNazieducltoninthe 19:&01dlWh.lnthoacwa,
pseudo-scicimze i d m tbr datha of mil-

of 'supcrts' such u Kinuy, Muten md b;onrJnouro>untry,,nacml~AIDS,

]ohown, .nd Wudelt Pomervy h being rape, m d a , m d a t . t k a incat, .a;dpeddled cndldy. It comes from Vem dictiop and t! xe other c&aof"hUmbcrL
BuUoqWs Gnta for S a Ratuch.h m

a c ~ ~ H c c i M t h e ~ u d ,
A(=LU-P&ti.l-

on Pomognphy (1970) u &owing minimrl C&Ett from mdckg and b g porn,

When I oaLed about the more meat md theit wealthy porn au pattom.
Did you knuw that 25% of aIJ 11%qm* Pnridmtid C o n m i d o n that
found porn huroful,he dknjucd it u sold and t a d in the United Stam lut
politranrinrpirrd~OllfigYdDdLOcd~y u r ~ p o n r v i ~ o r t b r r o r p n t c d
9096 of the dirtnition of
h e ofthe link bstWMl porn .ad p u u c uimc conhealth md safety pmblaar such u r a p , porn videor in America, induding thw
v e n d dirart,AIDS, iscta mid ~ U I - in p u s fritPd)g ruburbanvideo :tom?Or
d m , child moi&tion a d ra addiction. that the Qia- h b i n k a t h n ended dHe crid not a word .bout the enormoor most dl fodarl pn#tcutionr of porn p d -

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RELIANCE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ON SEXUALITY ADVISORS
WHOSE MORAL FOUNDATION
DIFFERS MARKEDLY FROM THAT OF THE CHURCH
Unfortunately, Catholic institutions have long naively relied on sexuality professionals whose
advice and counsel has been based on hudulent science that had as its sole purpose the sweeping
aside of the traditional generative view of American--indeed Catholic--morality. This misplaced trust
afforded to fraudulent sex "science7' appears to be at the heart of much of the Church's recent
difficulties. Specifically, many of the church's key sexuality advisors are associated with the views
advanced by Dr. Alfied Kinsey and the Kinsey Institute at the University of Indiana via Kinsey's
seminal research, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Female (1953).
The scientific experiments that underlie the "research" published by the Kinsey Institute are
constructed from fraudulent survey methods, non-existent data, and even from criminal acts against
infants and children in order to reach what friendly biographers have documented as Kinsey's bias.
More important, any "new studies" supporting Kinsey's findings can be shown to be run by the same
tainted sexologists, some of whom currently advise Bishops on priestly sexual disorders.
Kinsey is perhaps best known for his assertion that approximately 10% to 37% of the
population is homosexual; a number which no serious researcher has since been able to replicate, and
which is now acknowledged to have been based on a disproportionately aberrant number of prison
inmates, homosexuals and sex offenders.' Additionally, the Kinsey team advocated legalizing
various other behaviors, such as fornication, adultery, bestiality, sodomy and pedophilia, then
commonly illegal and viewed as immoral and harmful.
Michael Rose's new book, Good bye! Good Men, documents some consequences of using
Kinseyan-tainted sexology in Catholic institutions, particularly in seminaries. Sexually harassed or
dismissed seminarians represent a class of potential plaintiffs for acts suffered under the auspices of
Kinseyan-tainted materials used in admissions criteria, psychological testing, teaching, textbooks and
'counseling.' Since there is almost no legal defense against such indefensible conditions or actions,
the best measure the Church can take is a pro-active, assertive tactic against those who Msely held
themselves out as human sexuality experts.
The extent of Kinsey's fraud was not known at the time and his work and theories, in the guise
of science, spawned an international field of "sexology" and sex education. However, at least since
1981, through the work of researchers such as Dr. Judith Reisman, the truth had come to light, and
many began to rethink sexual assumptions that owe their origin to Kinsey. In reviewing the early
work of Dr. Reisman and her colleagues, the prestigious British medical journal, The Lancet wrote:
Dr. Judith A. Reisman and her colleagues demolish the foundations of the two reports ...
Kinsey et al ... questioned an unrepresentativeproportion of prison inmates and sex offenders in a
survey of "normal" sexual behavior. Presumably some at least of those offenders were also the
sources of information on stimulation to orgasm in young children that can only have come from
pedophiles--or so it must be hoped. Kinsey....has left his former co-workers some explaining to do. 2
Consquemes,The Institute for Media Education,Crestwood, KY, 1998,2000, Chapter 5
"Eliminating Fathers,"pp 87-105.
2 The Lancet Vol. 337: March 2,1991, p. 547.
1 Judith Reisman, Kinsey, Crimes &

While there are m y others, two examples stand out to illustrate how the Church's
response to sexuality issues has M e n into the wrong hands. On the evidence, some
seminarian$have been trained in sexuality via programs called "Sexual Attitude Restructuring7'
or "~eassessment"~
created by The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality
(IASHS) in San Francisco. (Attachment 5: Sexology's 'Sexual Attitude Restructuringn)
IASHS former Academic Dean, Wardell Pomeroy, (now deceased) was a Kinsey co-author and,
according to a recent sympathetic Kinsey biographer, Kinsey's sometime sex partner.4
(Attachment 6: IASELS "Course Workn)
Dr. Pomeroy is on record as seeking h d s from the "Adult Film Association annual
cbnvention in February of 1979" to produce child pornography at the IASHS (which produced
pornography for sale to Hustler magazine, Falonna v. ~ u s t l e J(Attachment
)
7 : Sexology &
the Pornographers) Pomeroy's IASHS staff, fkulty and students also performed group,
couple and lone illegal sexual conduct for sexually explicit photos--including child
pornography-published by the IASHS as Meditations on the GiJi of Sexuality (1977).~
(Attachment 8: Sexologish as Pornographers)
According to The Boston Globe and The Advocate (a homosexual periodical), one of
Cardinal Law's Boston commission advisors on child sex abuse issues is Fred Berlin, M.D.~
(Attachment 9: Church Still Listening to 'Sexperts") In 1994 Dr. Berlin was Course
Director for a training program offered to judges, "health professionals," lawyers, legislators,
police officers and child advocacy workers teaching, among other things, that "pedophilia . . .
can be effectively controlled with appropriate psychiatric intervention." (Attachment 10:
Berlin-Money and Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders)
Dr. Berlin and John Money, Ph.D., co-founded a celebrated sexual training and treatment
center, The Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic. Dr. Berlin described Dr. Money as "one of
his most important mentor^."^ (Attachment 11: Sexperts Excuse Pedophilia and Pederasty)
Dr. Money, as it turns out, was a dedicated Kinsey disciple, the mentor for June Reinisch (the
third Kinsey Institute director) and on the advisory board of the Kinsey ~nslitute.~
Additionally,
in an interview with the pedophile periodical, The Journal of Paedophilia, John Money offered
his professi~nalcounsel that adult sex with children is normal and often beneficial.
(Attachment 12: Peterson's Sexpert Money Advocates PederastylPedophilia)
Dr. Money went on to say in the pedophile interview that the BerlidMoney Sexual
Disorders Clinic was designed to offer "leeway to judges" to free convicted child abusers.I0 For
Money, "'decided regarding paedophilia [sic] that I would never report anybody."" While m y
other eye opening details regarding Dr. Money's career could be listed, the above should suffice
to illustrate the problem facing the Church. In addition to Cardinal Law's reported reliance on
Dr. Berlin, the problem is compounded in that the founder of St. Luke's Institute, Rev. Michael
R. Peterson, M.D. (who later died of ADS), urges the church to rely on Berlin, and Money in a
1985 paper, after warning the clergy that:
3 Michael Rose, Goodbye! Good Aden, Aquirtas Publishing, Ltd., Cincinnati, Ohio, 2002, pp. 284,294.
4 James Jones, A h d C. Kinsqr; A PuMMWafe Life. W.W. Norton, New York, 199; Reisman, Mmey, Wmes & Consequences,Chapter 2.
5 CommonwealthofKentuckyvs. HqpyDay, Inc., et al., Campbell Disbict Court, 1980, pp. W304,783.
6 Id, Reisnan, pp. 82,172-175.
7 The AoVocafe, Apnl30.2002, p. 30; The Boston Gfobe, "Abuse Panel Says It Will Seek Change," MeWegion March 17,2002.
8 John Colapinto, As Nafure Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl, HatpefColl~ns,New Yak, 2000, p. 29.
9 See discussion of the Reinisch-Money connection in Reisnan, et at., Kimey, Sex & Fraud, Huntington House, Lafayette, IA, 1990.
10 Paidika: The Journal ofPaedopMlia, DrukkerijTen Brink Meppel k,Meppel, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Spnng 1991, p 12.
II Supra, The Journal ofPaedophr7ia.

[Mlalpractice cases involve situations where clerics give advice which is considered by the
civil courts to be beyond their sphere of expertise or competence. This advice allegedly
causes catastrophic consequences (divorce, suicide) resulting in civil s~its."'~

>>>>

[Money and Berh,] the two mental health professionals are considered by me and most
people in the field as the two U. S. experts and ones who have had good success in treatment
of the paraphilic disorders in the past ffieen years " (circa 1970) at their ~linic.'~
Church advisers like Peterson, Money, Berlin and their institutional sponsors such as
Johns Hopkins University, The Kinsey Institute at Indiana University, the Institute for the
Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, etc., are possibly subject to civil liability for medical
malpractice, h u d , negligence and other claims. Several articles fiom Maryland papers are
attached identifjmg Berlin's efforts to "exempt specialists fi-om reporting pedophiles even when
their crimes continue during treatment."14 Berlin's claims of success would mislead Church
officials regarding the safety of returning "eated pederasts and pedophiles to work. Indeed,
the Government Accounting Office's 1996 report on sex offenders--spanning 50 years and 500
therapeutic programs--found no form of psychotherapy that actually stopped sexual predators.'s
Still, in the admissions protocol for their program, Berlin and Money guarantee those
engaged in past, present or h r e child sexual abuse, 'We will not, however, report to your
Probation Officer information you tell us as a part of the normal doctor-patient privileged
relationship." l6 By 1988 "at least eight men [were] convicted of sexually abusing Maryland
children while under treatment" at the Johns Hopkins clinic." l7 (Attachment 13: Peterson's
Sexpert Berlin "Shielding Child Molesters"), supporting the Maryland Attorney General's
rejection of Dr. Berlin's effort to cover-up ongoing child abuse. Moreover, Dr. Paul McHugh, as
former Johns Hopkins director of psychiatry and a member of the Baltimore Archdiocese's
Independent Review Board on Child Sexual Matters was fully supportive of Berlin's efforts to
protect even active pedophiles in treatment at Johns ~ o ~ k i n s . ' ~
As you may know, St Luke's is one of the primary Catholic treatment centers for priests
battling personal sexuality issues.lg It is disturbing, to say the least, that the founder of the
institution has such high praise and regard for men such as Drs. Money and Berlin. In short, our
Lord long ago warned of wolves in sheep's clothing and, as detailed above, Kinseyan wolves
have provided guidance to the Church in therapeutically managing homosexual priests. Since
the 50s, the criminal justice system has adopted the same Kinseyan view of sex offenders and
therapeutic management as has the Church, with the same disappointing and destructive results.

12 "The Problem of Sexual Molestation by Roman Catholic Clergy: Meeting the Problem in a Comprehensiveand Responsible
Manner." This statement appears in "General Discussion" p. 9 of the co-written report.
13 Thomas P. Doyle, F. Ray Mouton, Michael R. Peterson, "The Problem of Sexual Molestationby Roman Catholic Clergy:
Meeting the Problem in a Comprehensiveand Responsible Manner," 1985, (unpaginated) p. 2.
l4
The Capital G i v d e , "Our say: Stop shielding child molesters," Editorial, March 23, 1988, A-18 (date and page somewhat blurred).
15 See, "Sex Offender Treahent: Research Results Inconciusive About What Works to Reduce Recidivism," Government
Accounting Office, GGD-96-137, June 21,1996.
16 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Clinic, BiosexualPsychohormonalClinic, patient agreement
pages, unpaginated, page 26 of the DoyleMouton-Petersondocument.
lbid, The Capital Gazette.
18 The Sun, "Doctor skirts repwhng law on sex crimes" see page titled, "attempt to circumvent law on reportingsex crimes,"
March 4,1990.
19 "Founded in 1981 by a priest-psychiatistwho later died of AIDS, St. Luke is one of a handful o f such clinics. The Washingon
Post, Caryle Murphy, "Treating the Priest," May 11,2002, Metro, A1.

Attachment I:The Church's Fraudulent

"Sexperts"
-

EXCERPTS FROM AND COMMENTARY ON THE

1985 MOUTON/DOYLE/PETERSON DOCIJMENT
(Reisman)

T H E P R O B L E H OF

SEXUAL HOLESTATXON

ROHAN CATHOLIC CLERGY

MEETING T H E P R O B L E M I N

AND R E S P O N S I B L E

BY

COMPREHENSIVE
MANNER

/&--7z29

+
&
&

H i c h a e l R . P e t e r s o n , H.D.'
President
Saint Luke I n s t i t u t e , Inc.
(Rev

T h i s c o n f i d e n t i a l d o c u m e n t h a d i t s rerno1.e
beginnings

i n J a n u a r y of 1 9 8 5 a s a r e s u 1 . t

o f t h e c o n s e q u e n c e s o f t h e u n f o r t u n a t e :.ncidents

in Louisiana.

p a r t s of t h e f i n a l

The three major

d r a f t were prepared

i n Hay of 1 9 0 5 a n d t h i s f i n a l d r a f t
compiled
Mouton,
J.C.D

On

J.D.

June 8-9,
and Rev.

1985

vss

b y Xr. F. R s y

T h o m a s P, D o y l e ,

S.P.

"The Smoking Gun:"

Reporting Child Abuse May Cause
"Divorce, Suicides'
Mouton, J.D., (attorney for Father Gilbert Gauthe), Doyle and Rev. Michael R.
Peterson, M.D., (St. Luke President who later died of AIDS) informed the church they
should turn over all responsibility for counseling sex offenders to sexuality experts. If
not, the church could do "catastrophic" harm, yielding huge civil penalties as well as
possible "divorce or suicide." These atypical words reappear together again on 60
Minutes, "Catholic Priest Sexual Abuse Scandal," on June 12,2002 when the father of
one of Gauthe's boy victims states, on camera:
They came forward and they said, you know, if you make this public and
you get others involved and someone hurts themselves or there's a divorce
or a suicide, all of this guilt is on your shoulders. Now, this is a priest
telling me this ....

These exact words, threatening to cause "divorce or suicide," is the fingerprint of

the sexuality profession, its DNA, its instruction to priests and bishops on the right
response to child sex abuse charges The infamous 1985 document was given to Bishop
Quinn, who had been sent by the Vatican to investigate these crimes.
The charge that disaster would stalk the victim and offender if child sex abuse
was exposed was originally encoded as "sex science" fact by Alfred Kinsey. Kinsey's
two following quotes are reprinted in Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences.
In many instances the law, in the course of punishing the offender, does more
damage to more persons than was ever done by the individual in his illicit
sexual activity.... [and] may ruin the lives of the married couple who had lived
as useful and honorable citizens through half or more of a century.

When children are constantly warned by parents and teachers against contacts
with adults.. .they are ready to become hysterical as soon as any older person
approaches, or stops and speaks to them in the street, or fondles them, or
proposes to do something for them, even though the adult may have had no
sexual objective in mind. Some of the more experienced students ofjuvenile
problems have come to believe that the emotional reactions of the parents, police
officers, and other adults who discover that the child has had such a contact,
may disturb the child more seriously than the sexual contacts themselves. The
current hysteria over sex offenders may very well have serious effects on the
ability of many of these children to work out sexual adjustments some years later
in their marriages. (Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences at 136)

A SHORT SUMMARY OF SOME PROBLEMS WITH PETERSONMOUTON-DOYLE AS TO WHY THE CHURCH WOULD HAVE
FOLLOWED INSURIOUS SEXUALMEDICAL ADVICE
In their 1985 tome to the Church hierarchy. Mouton- Doyle-Peterson warn that the church
could be guilty of "clergy malpractice" if orthodox clerics counsel sexual wrongd,~ers.
Sexual advice
from clergy (say
the three
A G E N E R A L DISCUSS ION:
authorities in law,
orthodoxy and
sexuality)
d e v e l o p i n g a r e a s of j u r i s p r u d e n c e v h i c h
allegedly "causes
e x a m p l e i s t h e ncvly d e v e l o p i n g area
catastrophic
consequences
of C l e r q y m a l p r a c t i c e .
S u i t s a r e b e i n g filtd a g a i n s t P r o t e s t a n t
(divorce, suicide)
H i n i s t e r s and C a t h o l i c C l e r g y . T h e s e m a l p r a c t i c e c a s e s i n v o l v e
resulting in civil
suits." (p. 9)
s i t u a t i o n s v h e r e c l e r i c s a i v e a d v i c e v h i c h is c o n s i d e r e d by the
Why?

c i v i l c o u r t s t o be b e y o n d t h e i r .s.p h e r e o f e---x ~ e r t l s eo r c o m ~ t e n c e

Because, say these

T h i s a d v i c e a l l e g e d l y c a u s t s c a t a s t ~ h i c ~ o n s c q u e n c c r(divorce,
experts, clergy go
s u i c L d d r e s u l t i n g i n c i v i l suits. This docurent r c c o a n i z e s that
"beyond their
sphere of
r v a s t number o f s u c h i s s u e s e x i s t s e p a r a t e and apart f r o m sexual
expertise or
m o l e s t a t i o n , h a v e b e e n d f r c u s r e d in -the confidential c o n s u l t a t i o n s
competence" if
and m e e t i n g s r e f e r r e d t o above.
It is contemplated that t h e Project
they try to advise
sexual offenders.
After disparaging
"extreme moral judgmentalism" for impeding the cure of pedophiles, thc three authors offer their
solution in the paragraph excerpts cited below praising the "Johns Hopkin:; Program." Peterson
says:
-

o The Johns Hopkins Hospital Sexual Disorders Clinic run by Dr. Jot-n Money and Dr.
Fred Berlin is probably the "authority" [sic] scientific community. I know personally
both of these highly respected scientists and I am very appreciative of their efforts to
bring this psychiatric disorder out of the shadows and into the "scie ltific daylight" so
that we can begin to see the disorder as a psychiatric disease and not a moral
weakness.. .I am professionally working with Dr. Fred Berlin, both in his research
endeavors with this disease and clinically with respect to legal testimony in different
jurisdictions to help educate the court jurisdictions about the "hope' for treatment and
rehabilitation of persons with this disease'' (page 4).

Peterson states as a "careful "thinker" and an expert, that he is well aware "of the scientific
research" and concludes that "the etiology of this disorder [child molesting: is likely
biological" and while environment might contribute, the "disease" likely occurs "in utero."
He adds that he "
m

o copied for you the literature packet that is given to potential patients in the Sexual
Disorders Clinic which is Co-Directed by Dr. John Money and Dr. Fred Berlin;
these two mental health professionals are considered by me and most people in the
field as the two U.S. experts and ones who have had good success in treatment of the
paraphiliac disorders in the past fifteen years." (page ).
0

Mouton- Doyle-Peterson single out the Johns Hopkins' Sexual Disorders Clinic co-founders Money
and Berlin (both of whom refuse to report the ongoing crimes of child molesters in their care) as "the
two U.S. experts," in the "field" of sexuality. Mouton- Doyle-Peterson falsely claim proofs of the
Hopkins sexperts "success in treatment" in "fifteen years," including in their joint document,
application forms for those who wish to enter the Money-Berlin center for sex counseling.
On the one hand, MoneyIBerlin threaten the offender with a report to his "Probation Officer" if he is
c'non-compliant" and does not attend his costly counseling session. On the other hand, MoneyIBerlin
promise not to report those who are engaged in ongoing sexual crimes against adults or children.
"We will not, however report to your Probation Officer information [read, sexually criminal acts] you
tell us as part of the normal doctor-patient privileged relationship." (The full document is available in
this author's archive).

notify your Probation Officer that you have been non-compliant. ,'it ?ill ~ t however,
,
rewrt to Probt ion-fO
y
m noml doctor
~~ti~&.l.uivilrrrdi~n~hi~.
If we felt that in the absence of thir rvir UL
A recent study conducted by a task force for The Catholic Medical Association found that those
in "treatment" in one such unnamed facility reported ongoing efforts by their therapists to tell the
offenders that anti-Catholic sexual conduct, including homosexual sodomy, was both normal and
correct (see attached study in these materials). Moreover, based on this researchers experience,
the bishops would have been told by the sexperts that children commonly forget sexual
violations and that to reveal child sexual abuse to the authorities would harm the child more than
would the original crime. This has been the sexology position since Kinsey stated it in Sexual
Behavior in the Human Male (1948).
Bishops would never have been informed that Dr. Money, the leading expert counseling
these offenders and the expert who trained Dr. Berlin and other disciples, was on record as
saying pedophilia, even incest, was normal and that Dr. Berlin was on record as saying they
could "cure" such men, as above, refusing to reveal the crimes being committed while
undergoing Hopkins drug and psychological medical therapies;
Some bishops would have been told that pedophilia was normal and that the distress of the
children was a function of the disorder of their parents, also a common sexology position.
This is also very possible and would again constitute malpractice;
Some bishops would have been told that "science" proved children forget sexual abuse
quickly but are damaged when police, parents, counselors and clergy make a fuss. They
would have been warned that the child was especially damaged should the offender be
prosecuted;

Some bishops would have been told that prosecution was the worst action to take - not only
would it ruin the life of a perfectly fine man of God but it would irreparably damage the
child's psyche!
Some bishops also would have been told that children are commonly complicit, seductive in
these cases, though he or she was sometimes unaware of their complicity.
There is no reason bishops or priests should have doubted the expertise of these men and the
"human sexuality" field anymore than have senators, congressmen, judges, juries who have
made bad rulings based on their testimony or the universities that hired them to train our
national leaders;
There would be NO Way bishops or priests would suspect the "experts" on pedophilia were
themselves promotingpedophilia and writing that the problem with adult sex with children was with
the "anti-sexual" nature of religion. In "Attacking the Last Taboo: Researchers are lobbying against
the ban on incest," Time wrote of John Money's view on incest saying "One who commits incest is
like a "'religious deviant in a one-religion society"' - thus neatly planting the notion that opposition
to incest is quite like religious intolerance." (Time, 4/14/80, p. 72)
Fred Berlin, still an advisor to Cardinal Law on child sexual abuse matters, has never renounced
Money's views;
Also, Michael Rose's claim that perhaps hundreds of seminarians were deeply coarsened and
compromised by viewing the Sexual Attitude Restructuring programs, the " S A R appears to be
verified by this researcher's own experience in this field, pending discovery of the facts.
.The " S A R are pornography
T I know the institute of .+avanced Seaoiog) r c l i o
shows called the "fu--arama
avilv on destnsitising procedures including what you
by Wardell Pomeroy, the
I a 'fuckararna'. Is that really necessary? I'\T seen one
Academic Dean of the
and i t seemed quire unncccssap to m e .
Institute for the Advanced
p We think i t is ~hcrapeutic.Let me explain. -4spart of
Study of Human Sexuality
our inrcnsivt courtcs w t project several films on ro a
(IASHS) which created the
series of screens simultaneously. T h e y vary in context
SAR. The SAR included
Porn 'hard porn' homosexualiry to milder loving themes.
bestiality and child
After the session the audience breaks up into small groups
pornography in their nonfor discussion. The results are very inreresting and useful.
church settings until some
C
time in the late 1980s. Right
Thir seems bizarre and possibly oliensive ro most
is an excerpt from the British
Lrirish tastes. Don't people get upset. hurt o r even rather
Journal of Sexual Medicine
disgusted?
(1182) in which the Pomeroy
This is the idea of the rnultiplc screens. \\'e tell our
explains its definition.
s:udcnts ro watch what [he\- find most interesting. not

&'

.r

Remember, all "accredited"

Lr~~cah
j w r n d .,I Srauaj \ttdlclnr. Ianuar\ 8:
sex education reflects this
monopolistic sexuality training program. There is only one accepted "scientific" teaching of human
sexuality that is credentialed and that training is anti Judeo-Christian and anti Catholic.

Sex as "science" entered

education in 1948 with Kinsey.
Since then, general medical
practitioners, psychologists,
psychiatrists, social workers, sex
counselors as well as most
mental health practitioners,
justice professionals, etc, study
sex under sex "experts," (those
"outside their discipline") just as
one studies math or literature
under a math or lit specialist for
required course credits, etc. It is
fair to say that the church also
relied on such trained "sexperts."

Sclentitlc A u t h o r t t y tor Human Sexuallty Education

In the Second Half of the 20th century
FUNDING

ACADEMIC

Private
Fundom
RootrWkr

Ki.ury. Ponwroy
-hard,
M n .
Gm n m Y.k
&n&n
-,
slmon. &hll).r.

THC KYISEY INSTITLITE

C w n . Cmnm.

1938

on l k w r s h
purapy)

Public
Funders

u.1-bYzh

-.

Dr. A I M C. Kinaey
Sckntltlc
Authortty tor
"The Klnmoy M o d e l "

s u m , FUSO~~I
T~X-

Original Sexuality
Researchers
Educrtors

INDIANA
UNIVERSITY

NU. R # u r r h

4-.

RESEARCHERS

c.ld"wood

,u,,-r
LICIIvonlu. Mb.N..
Kolodny, We.
(-,
Hunof
K l n u y Yod.l
rn.Clp(rr)

THE FIRST INSTITUTIONS GRANTING

~HUMAN SEXUALIN DEGREES IN
COUNSELING

TEACHING,
~

RESEARCH. Ph.D.a, LUSTERS. EDUCATION DEOREES. SAFE SEX TRAINERS. ETC.

However, although universities

can be said to malpractice by
teaching fraudulent sexuality
information, those who used that
fraud to counsel offenders now
face lawsuits because the
fraudulent information did not
"work." Although the bishops
are properly faulted, medical
malpractice and fraud in "sex
science" or "sexology" remains
the source, the font, of the
ongoing crime.

NYU
EdMealth
1964

IASHS'
SFlCal

lsse

U Penn
EdMwlth

I=

1971
Sexual Annudo Rostructurtng (SAR)
(G-

-rd.

on SAR )or LFSWIRE: 77fE END OF SEX n. 24.)

I

EXAMPLES OF OTHER COURSE WORK

clotk
,

5.x S

TO FULFILL DEGREE PROORALllS

s.n u w r r srx

Uu

r In nmrApy.
~
,-.F

P
-"--

courr

rnPlraum-bm

omrrs Smx0)ogy

SAR Wnd Educrtorr. Thln Dommrd. From Grulw Sehoolm

to m-,
wgh schod, JI. Hschooi, m ~rlmvy
m.

I1

--

ASSECT m
puMic t

b the
m Klnaey IA&
am momberm wrvs the gonerml
ugh wbrach . g . n c k m li*.Planned Parenthood.
onirrlng rchoo-m,
courtroomm, etc.

Public, private and parochial schools:

Sex Education; Abstinence Plus; AIDS Prevention;
Safe Sex; Hate Crimes Prevention, etc., programs

I
I

The Kinsey Cadre Trains

CShRl Professionals in
"Sciemifie"Sexualinr

--son-

rom Indiana University, today's

ex reformation is launched in
ree academic centers that then
grant Human Sexuality degrees,
certificates and continuing
education credits. The IUlKinsey
cadre crafts a bogus sexuality
field that first "aids" medicine
and psychiatry then all mental
health professions, clergy,
teachers, police, family & child
development, seminarians,
schools, colleges and textbooks
while testifying as experts in
courts & legislatures.

The Infamous 1985 Document

In "The Problem of Sexual Molestation
by Roman Catholic Clergy: Meeting the
Problem in a Comprehensive and
Responsible Manner," Doyle-MoutonPeterson call for the Catholic Church to
yield their moral authority to sex
"disease" specialists.. .

"In 1991, the mandated,

pornographic seminary
text was Our Sexuality,
by Crooks and Baur,
allegedly "'good
Catholic authors.. .
who quote Kinsey's
chapter affirming infant
and child sex with
adults.
99,

Michael Rose, Aquinas Pubkhing., Cincinnati, 2002,p.

284, 149. Mt. Angel Seminary, St. Benedict, Oregon.

"For at least ten years (1978l988), seminarians and many

others attend[ed] the...
pornographic program at [one]
diocesan center entitled
"'Sexual Attitude
Reassessment"' ... sex
workshops ...in San
Francisco" which screened
legal and illegal heterosexual
and homosexual obscenity
and pornography, group,
single, etc.

The "SAR" Trains, "Reforms" +100,000

Professionals: Clergy, Military, Mental
Health, Education,Justice...
On 17 screens, simultaneously: "The sensory overload
culminated.. .in a multi-media event called the F-korama.. .in
the dark...images of human beings.. . even animals.. .wails,
squeals, moans, shouts...[set to] Tchaikovsky.. . l found myself
becoming disoriented.. .By the end.. .[nlothing was shocking
but.. .[nlothing was sacred either.. ..love had not been
mentioned a single time.. ."
Wardell Pomeroy, IASHS Academic Dean, Kinsey sex partner
& co-author, solicits funds from the "Adult Film Association" to
produce IASHS child pornography. The SAR, begun in Kinsey's
attic with faculty and staff, continues in Meditations (1977).
CammnealhdKenbrjolvs(BCWDay, hc,etd,Cen*bellDWCcut ilEBO,pp 30W04,RU(Febnarydl979) k c , 173 G e a g e M , Esquiw,(IW

Rev. Michael Peterson,M.D.,

St. Luke Clinic President
In 1985, Peterson--whodied
of AIDS--warned the Church:
"[Mlalpractice cases involve
situations where clerics give
advice which is considered by
the civil courts to be beyond
their sphere of expertise or
competence. This advice
allegedly causes catastrophic
consequences (divorced,
suicide) resulting in civil suits."

* Rely instead on Money

and Berlin: "mental

health professionals. ..
considered by me and
most people in the field as
the two U.S. experts and
ones who have had good
success in treatment of
the paraphilic disorders in
the past fifteen years "at
their Clinic.

Mal~ractice,Consumer Fraud,
Human Ex~erimentationWithout
Informed Consent, Discrimination
WHO WERE THE CHURCH SEXPERTS & HOW
WERE THEY TRAINED?
ODrs. Fred Berlin & John Money; Johns Hopkins
University Medical School;
~ P o m e r y Mcllvenna,
,
Sutton; Institute for the
Advanced Study of Human Sexuality,
Gebhard, Reinisch, Bancroft; Kinsey lnstitute
& A l l Other Accredited "Sexuality" Agents.
l

Fred Berlin in: Theadvocate

"Berlin, associate professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins
University and a member of a commission appointed by
Law to set guidelines for the church response to abuse
allegations" says:
- "There is no evidence whatsoever that.. .homosexual [men]
are any more a threat to boys than [men] who are
heterosexual are a threat to girls."

"We will not, however, report to your Probation Officer

information you tell us [re: on-going child sex abuse] as a
part of the normal doctor-patient privileged relationship."

Dr. John Money, SSSS President,

Says in The/ourna/OfPedophilia
Pedophilia is "erotic.. .
pair bonding," 13,
would never report a
pedophile." via' his JH Sexual
Disorders clinic:
'1 can do something in the way
of treatment that gives some
leeway to judges" to keep
child molesters out of prison.clz,

"[Elnd ...the age of consent.cl3

If "a couple...make a death
pact...and one of them ...dies ...
during a sex ceremony.... the
key...is consent." (7-8)
Money joins the Board of the
'Bereaved Parents Association,
advises that they hide the
recurrent role oipornography in
their boys' deaths.

Spring 1991, Money is Professor Emeritus at JH, on the Kinsey Board, the Penthouse Board, over 400 peer
approved scientitic papepers, etc.

Position Statement of the Catholic Medical Association on

Inpatient Treatment and Outpatient Psychiatric Evaluation
Programs for Priests and Religious
Questions have been raised in regard to the quality and appropriateness of psychiatric and
psychological evaluation and care at treatment centers for priests and religious in the
United States and in regard to the psychological evaluation of candidates for priesthood
and the psychological retesting of seminarians. A task force was established by the
Catholic Medical Association to evaluate these issues, with the hope that this evaluation
will result in needed corrections and in improvements in the treatment for priest and in
the evaluation of seminarians.
BACKGROUND: An evaluation had been performed at one of the treatment centers by
a committee of three priests, only one of whom was a mental health professional, none of
whom were associated with the Catholic Medical Association. This present report is the
product of a task force composed of eight physicians, four of whom are psychiatrists, a
consulting psychologist and a moral theologian.
To evaluate the inpatient treatment of sexual disorders, affective and mood
GOAL:
disorders and the reintegration approach to return to ministry. The follow-up programs
and the outpatient evaluation programs associated with these institutions were evaluated
also.
I. INPATIENT TREATMENT
A. CRITERIA FOR ADMISSION: The facilities evaluated admitted priests who did
not meet the usual and customary criteria for inpatient care. In some cases inpatient
hospitalization for priests was requested by religious superiors and personnel directors.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Patients are admitted for inpatient care when the patient is a
danger to self or others; the patient is so disabled that the basic needs such as nourishment
and personal hygiene are not met; the patient is unable to function so as to meet the
demands of daily life; the patient may need high doses of psychotropic medications which
require daily monitoring in a hospital setting. There is rarely a need for admission to the
hospital for treatment of paraphilias (sexual disorders).
RECOMMENDATION: Catholic facilities that provide inpatient psychiatric treatment
for priests and religious should only admit patients that meet the usual and
customary criteria for inpatient care

B. LOCATION O F FACILITIES: Priests are regularly sent to facilities away from the
support of friends and family.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Outpatient treatment in their own environment is the preferred
treatment for support and recovery for most patients.
RECOMMENDATION: Except for unusual circumstances, a priest should not be sent to
some facility far away from friends and family. Also, they should not be held

covertly from their friends unless they specifically request this.

C. PATIENT RIGHTS: There are reports that priests have not been treated in accord
with their basic civil rights or accorded the rights due to any patient in a health care
facility.
STANDARD PRACTICE: The patient must be given the option of informed consent
which includes alternatives to the treatment offered at the facility. This would include
treatment at a specialized inpatient hospital with a length of stay consistent with the
standards of care in the mental health field. The patient must have the right of choice in
regard to a psychiatrist or psychologist for treatment and the right to change psychiatrists
or psychologists during treatment. The patient must be given the opportunity for a second
opinion which must be acknowledged and given reasonable consideration by the facility.
The patient must have the right to be transferred to another facility of his choice if he so
desires.
RECOMMENDATION: The priest is entitled to patient rights and the mandated civil
rights of a United States citizen. Without a civil commitment, no priest may be held
against his will. In addition a priest should not to be held in the hospital under coercion
including threats of loss of faculties.
D. LENGTH OF STAY: The evaluated facilities routinely keep priest patients for 4 to 6
months regardless of the diagnosis or severity of their problem.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Current practice calls for short term inpatient treatment
whenever possible An extended LOS of 4-6 months regardless of diagnosis or severity of
illness is not acceptable and deviates from the standards for care in the mental health
field.
RECOMMENDATION: The Hospital Length of Stay (LOS) should be kept to a
minimum in accord with current standards of care in the United States. These are
medical decisions to be made between the treating mental health professionals and the
patient. It is acknowledged that the patient's Bishop or superior will have the ultimate
decision about the return to duty. However, the patient is not to be held in the hospital
because a superior or Bishop is not ready to take him back. Superiors, personnel directors
and bishops should not be involved with decisions regarding LOS and discharge date.
E. PATIENT CONFIDENTIALITY: There are reports that mental health professionals
at the evaluated facilities report confidential communications to the priests superiors or
bishops.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Optimal treatment of a patient requires a confidential
relationship between the physician and the patient.
RECOMMENDATION: A priest who is a patient must be treated with the same dignity
and respect as a lay patient. The priest must not be required, pressured or coerced to
waive rights of privileged communication.
11. TREATMENT OF SEXUAL DISORDERS

Diagnostic categories would include sexual acting-out behaviors with adults of the
opposite or same sex and the more serious disorders of sexual behaviors with adolescents
(ephebophilia) and with children (pedophilia).
A. LENGTH O F STAY: In the Church sponsored treatment centers each of these
categories are treated for approximately the same length of time; that is, at six months or
more of inpatient treatment
STANDARD PRACTICE: According to current mental health standards adults are not
usually treated in an inpatient setting for a consenting sexual relationship with another
adult unless the behavior is viewed as being sexually addictive. For example, the length
of stay (LOS) at the Meadows in Arizona, one of the few inpatient treatment centers for
those with sexually addictive behaviors in the United States, is four weeks. A stay of six
months not only deviates from accepted standards in the mental health field, but it is not
clinically indicated, and may, in fact, be harmful to patients.
RECOMMENDATION: The length of stay for priests should be consistent with standard
practice.

B. MORAL TEACHING: Many former patients of the Church related treatment

programs have stated that the staff at these centers for priests and religious do not support
the teachings of the Church on homosexuality and other areas of sexuality as detailed in
the Catechism of the Catholic Church and by the Magisterium. In fact, they often
criticize patients who do adhere to the Church's moral teaching. A number of former
patients with homosexual attractions and behaviors reported they were counseled to
accept themselves as homosexuals and to be discreet in their sexual activities. Also, at
one of these treatment centers patients are brought regularly to attend alcoholics
anonymous meetings for those with homosexual attractions and behaviors.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Patients' religious beliefs are to be respected by the therapists.
It is unethical for a mental health professional to try to change a patient's moral code as
stipulated by their religious beliefs.
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the Ordinaries in the dioceses of these
centers require the priests, religious and mental health professionals who work in them to
sign a loyalty statement that they do support the teachings of the Church in regard to
sexual morality and, in particular, homosexuality and that they personally view all sexual
acts outside of marriage as being immoral. Bishops and religious superiors should avoid
sending priests and religious to any center which does not support the Church's teaching
on homosexuality.
C. FALSE INFORMATION: Professionals at the evaluated facilities reportedly told
patients that homosexuality is unchangeable and untreatable. Patients who state the belief
that their homosexual attractions and behaviors are a result of specific trauma, for
example, with a distant or critical father or with harsh or rejecting peers, are regularly told
that they are in denial of their homosexuality or that they are homophobes.
STANDARD PRACTICE: While it is true that various mental health organizations have
taken the position that homosexuality per se is not a disorder, a careful reading of the
journal articles on the subject reveals an acceptance of the fact that therapy can effectively

be used to change attractions and behaviors. The position taken by the major mental
health organizations on therapy is based on: either a neutrality on the morality of
homosexual acts; or a belief that homosexual acts are morally equal to heterosexual acts.
Such beliefs are not compatible with Catholic health care.
RECOMMENDATION: Those mental health professionals responsible for the care of
priests and religious suffering from sexual disorders need to be educated on the causes
and treatment of homosexuality and other sexual disorders. There is ample evidence that
homosexuality can be successfully treated in any patient who sincerely desires change.
Furthermore, while not all patients will be able to function heterosexually and to marry
successfully, this obviously is not a concern for priests. The general prediction of therapy
success is that 30% will achieve a resolution of homosexual attractions and heterosexual
function and an additional 30% will achieve freedom from unwanted homosexual
behavior. (A full bibliography of research documenting the positive results of therapy is
appended.)
D. INFORMED CONSENT: Priests experiencing homosexual attractions are not
informed that their condition can be treated and that there is every reason for them to
expect to be able to achieve full freedom from sexual acting-out. In fact they often receive
the false information that homosexuality is untreatable and homosexual attractions must
be accepted and integrated into the personality.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Clients have a right to know of all types of therapy available
for the condition from which they suffer and the research on outcomes of treatment.
RECOMMENDATION: A pamphlet outlining the outcomes of research and the various
types of treatment for sexual disorders should be prepared and given to all patients
suffering from these problems in all Catholic mental health facilities. CMA is willing to
provide such information.
E. FAILURE T O PROVIDE CONTACT WITH SUPPORT GROUPS: Patients are
rarely referred to Courage, the only recovery program in the Church supported by the
Pontifical Council for the Family.
STANDARD PRACTICE: It is standard practice for treatment centers to avail themselves
of appropriate support groups, and to encourage participation in such groups.
RECOMMENDATION: Patients should be given the opportunity to attend Courage
meetings.

111. MOOD AND AFFECTIVE DISORDERS

A. LENGTH O F STAY: Priests with anxiety and mood disorders who are referred to
the inpatient treatment programs under review are regularly told that they will be
institutionalized for six months.

STANDARD PRACTICE: According to current standards in the mental health field,

patients with depression and anxiety disorders are rarely hospitalized for longer than four
weeks because of the effectiveness of the new generation of antidepressants. For decades
prolonged institutionalization has been viewed in the mental health field as an option that
is not in the best interest of the patient since it can result in damage to a person's sense of
self-esteem, in painful feelings of isolation and in sense of being sicker than really are.
RECOMMENDATION: Length of stay for priest patients with mood or affective
disorders should not exceed standard practice.

B. DISCHARGE POLICY: After release from the hospital, priests report being
subjected to the indignity of 'reintegration' into his parish or work location, during which
a representative of the hospital escorts the priest back to his work area and sets up
committees to oversee the his adjustment. Furthermore, hospital staff often attempt to
control the choice of outpatient mental health professionals.
STANDARD PRACTICE: When patients are discharged from the hospital, they return
home unaccompanied by hospital employees. Confidential material is not divulged to
others. The patient's adjustment is followed by the treating mental health professional.
Hospitals entrust the follow up treatment to qualified mental health professionals who are
chosen by the patient, not by the hospital.
RECOMMENDATION: After discharge the priest must be allowed to choose a mental
health professional of his own choice. The mental health professional should be
knowledgeable of and in agreement with the Church's moral teaching. The priest's
confidentiality must be respected and committee oversight should be abolished.
C. FOLLOW-UP TREATMENT: At some treatment centers patients are required to
return every six months for five years for a 5 day stay and to meet with a team of
individuals for evaluation. Former patients regularly complain that they never see their
former therapists and that these meetings accomplish nothing and are a waste of time and
money. At other centers patients are asked to return for outpatient visits even though they
are under the care of their own outpatient therapists.
STANDARD PRACTICE: This type of follow-up deviates markedly from the standards
of care of the mental health field. Patients do not return to psychiatric hospitals for follow
up care. Also, the requirement of discharged patients to meet with a team of individuals
on a regular basis is not supported by anyone in the mental health field. Follow-up to
inpatient treatment is normally conducted between the psychiatrist or psychologist and the
patient. There is no need for the patient to share personal and confidential history with a
team of individuals.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Priests should not be required to return to treatment centers
after their discharge. Follow-up programs at inpatient treatment centers should be
discontinued. Appropriate follow-up to inpatient treatment should involve regular reports,
perhaps 3 or 4 times yearly, to the Bishop or religious superior from the mental health
professional who is treating the priest or religious.

D. OUTPATIENT EVALUATIONS

Some of the centers insist that evaluations of outpatients occur in the context of a one or
two week inpatient stay. Also, priests and religious are regularly denied the right to
choose their evaluators. If they have done so, the reports of these mental health
professionals often are not accepted by the superior or bishop who usually insist upon an
evaluation performed by mental health professionals employed by inpatient treatment
centers.
STANDARD PRACTICE: A comprehensive psychological and psychiatric evaluation
should take no more than two or three days and can be accomplished on an outpatient
basis. One or two week inpatient stays can be psychologically detrimental to the client.
Inpatient stays are reserved for those with serious disorders and not for psychological
evaluations. These one and two weeks stays are to the detriment of the priest and to the
financial benefit of the hospital.. Also, all patients have the legal right to choose the
mental health professionals who will evaluate them.
RECOMMENDATION: Priests should not be sent for one or two week hospital stays for
evaluations which are routinely done on an outpatient basis. Also, strict criteria should be
in place to determine whether an individual should be sent for evaluation. If the
evaluation done by the therapist chosen by the priest is deemed to be unsatisfactory, then
the religious superior, personnel director or Bishop has the right to ask for a second
opinion.
E. CONFLICT O F INTEREST BETWEEN OUTPATIENT EVALUATION
PROGRAMS AND INPATIENT TREATMENT CENTERS: Currently mental health
professionals who are employees of the inpatient facility conduct outpatient evaluations
on priests.. The result of these evaluations is usually a recommendation for inpatient
treatment at the facility at which the mental health professional is employed.
STANDARD PRACTICE: This practice clearly represents a conflict of interest. A
number of reports have raised concerns that treatment facilities determine the length of
stay of clients on the ability to pay, increasing the institution's income by lengthening the
stay..
RECOMMENDATION: Outpatient evaluations should be conducted by mental health
professionals who are not associated with treatment centers to which priests might be
referred.

F. UNNECESSARY HOSPITALIZATION: Inpatient hospitalization is recommended

for issues which are regularly treated in the mental health field on an outpatient basis.
STANDARD PRACTICE: The hospitalization of patients who do not need to be
hospitalized creates a false sense of the gravity of illness in the patient; and places an
unnecessary economic burden on the institution paying for the services. Unnecessary
hospitalization creates an unrealistic "burden of illness" in the patient's mind.
RECOMMENDATION: Priests should not be hospitalized unless they meet the standard
criteria for hospitalization. There should be clearly established and published criteria for
which an individual is selected for hospitalization.. These criteria should be approved by
clergy, mental health professionals, and physicians. Second opinions given on these
priests by mental health professionals regularly do not support the need for inpatient
treatment.

G. CONFLICT OF INTEREST BETWEEN THE TREATMENT CENTERS AND

CHURCH AUTHORITIES: There are reports of undue influence upon the mental
health professionals by those in authority in the Church to whom these therapists are
beholden.
STANDARD PRACTICE: Therapists must be able to put the interests of their patients
first.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Bishops and superiors must assure that the facilities to which
they send priests support the teaching of the church and sound mental health practices. On
the other hand they should not use mental health professionals as disciplinarians for
priests who have sinned. This is a violation of the patientltherapist relationship. The
practice of suspending or threatening to suspend priests who refuse to follow the advice
of the outpatient evaluation program at these treatment centers to be hospitalized for six
months should be ended.

H. STAFF AT TREATMENT CENTERS: Concerns have been expressed by many

former patients about the spiritual program in these centers. For example, the spiritual
director at one center is a former priest who is now married. The decision to place a
married former priest in such an important position would appear to convey a strong
psychological message that priestly celibacy is problematic and not psychologically
healthy.
RECOMMENDATIONS: The spiritual directors at these centers should be carefully
chosen and should be priests and religious who model for troubled patients a loving and
fulfilling spiritual life as a celibate.

IV. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS

A. ALTERNATIVES TO INPATIENT TREATMENT

Priests have moved into the geographic areas of mental health professionals with long
histories of successfully treating priests and have lived in a rectory or with a family while
participating in intensive outpatient therapy three times weekly, as well as in spiritual
direction. This approach provides the priest with a state of the art treatment program and
helps to maintain his dignity as a priest. The value of maintaining some semblance of a
normal daily life cannot be underestimated. The re-integration of a patient (except the
most severely affected) into his normal social environment from the unrealistic world of
inpatient "life" is more difficult than treating the patient in his environment and teaching
him to function in a world where difficulties and imperfections are the norm.

B. ALTERNATIVE OUTPATIENT EVALUATION PROGRAMS

Many Catholic mental health professionals who are not employed by inpatient
treatment programs and who have extensive experience over many years working with
priests and religious are available to evaluate priests and religious. These professionals

would be preferable to the current system of referring to treatment centers for evaluations.
The Catholic Medical Association could serve as a referral source to provide the names of
psychiatrists and psychologists in different parts of the country.

C. PHILOSOPHY OF TREATMENT CENTERS

Catholic psychiatric hospitals should operate in accordance with the principles of the
teachings of the Church. In particular, all staff members should agree with the Church's
teachings that homosexual activity is morally wrong and those experiencing homosexual
temptations can achieve chastity. The opinion of the American Psychiatric Association
(APA) and similar groups is based on a false anthropology, which has been detrimental
and confusing to adults and youth. Catholic psychiatric hospitals should avail themselves
of the abundant scientific literature which supports the Church's view of homosexuality.
The Catholic Medical Association could provide this literature.

V. CHOICE OF MENTAL HEALTH EVALUATORS FOR CANDIDATES FOR

SEMINARY
There are numerous reports that mental health professionals who do not
support the teachings of the Catholic Church on sexuality have been chosen to evaluate
candidates for the priesthood and reject candidates who do accept the Church's
teachings on the grounds that they are "rigid." There are also reports that some
mental health professionals do not report homosexual attractions and conflicts in
candidates for priesthood to diocesan officials or religious superiors.
STANDARD PRACTICE:
The choice of mental health professionals for the evaluation of candidates for the
seminary who do not accept Church teaching on sexuality may be based on the belief that
such persons would be more "objective." There is,howeve, growing recognition that in
the mental health field an objective or neutral approach to the evaluation of a person's
mental health is probably not possible nor advantageous. Every one brings cultural bias to
their work. Therefore, there is a growing trend which recognizes the value of matching
the therapist to the client. Shared background and culture can be extremely helpful in
evaluating mental health. For example, behavior which in one culture might be viewed as
pathological, such as the excessive expression of anger, in another, is viewed as expected
and normal.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Mental health professionals chosen to evaluate candidates for the

priesthood should as far as possible share the cultural background of the devout,
faithful, mature candidates they are to evaluate. The professionals should be Catholics in
good standing, who support the Church's teaching on sexuality, life, contraception,
homosexuality, celibacy of the priesthood, the ordination of only men, and the
hierarchical structure of the Church. The CMA will be happy to assist Bishops and
religious superiors in this activity by preparing a list of qualified mental health
professionals who meet this criteria.
Non-Catholics and Catholics who do not support the teachings of the
Church should not be employed in this task.

VI. RETESTING OF SEMINARIANS

There are reports that seminarians who during their course of studies
expressed support for the teaching of the Magesterium, the Catechism, and Sacred
scripture, particularly on issues of sexuality and on homosexuality, were told they were
rigid and divisive and needed new psychological evaluations. A number of these
seminarians were either told that they should go to a church related treatment center for
evaluation or were sent there, even though only a few years early they had passed their
psychological testing. Some of the seminarians who were retested were diagnosed as
having serious psychological problems and were dismissed from the seminaries.
STANDARD PRACTICE:
Unless there are signs of a severe mental breakdown, there should be no
need to retest a person who has been evaluated within the past 5 years. The basic
personality structure does not change.
RECOMMENDATION:
It should be made clear to seminary faculty that adherence to the teaching
of the Church on sexuality and particularly on homosexuality is not a sign of rigidity or
mental illness, but of mental health. The faculty need to be informed concerning the
causes and treatment of homosexual attractions and behaviors and other psychosexual
problems. The CMA will be willing to provide speakers and consultants to work with
seminaries in this area.
No seminarian should be refereed for retesting because they support
Catholic teaching. No seminarian should be retested unless they showed clinically
significant evidence of a serious mental disorder.

Attachment 2:
The Kinsey-Catholic
Connection

HANDS DOWN, THE

REAL DIG DADDY
OF fEDOPHILIPL
CHIC COULD ONLY

BE THE
'RESEARCHER
ALFRED C, KINSEX
Dr. Judith Reisman. . .

Advises Bishops: Sue Your Experts

By PAUL LlKOUDlS
A.s thc Ll S bishops were prey;wir~g for their summer plenary
icswrnbly ~n Dallas io chart thelr
~ b d yt h r o u g h a minefield of r x -

ploding clrrrcal sex abuse scandals, some medlzal and legal experts, in~lud:ngDT Judith Rcis
man. ituthnr of K~rr.vey.C ~ ~ m &
es
T ~ r t ; s + y u r ~ have
r ~ - ~ advised
,~.
thc
bishops to take lcgcll action against
thei~c x p n s who oftered ?hemthc
disa.strous a d v i c e that brought
thcri~tu thc prescnt crisis.
8 t r r Dr. Reisrnlul. the r~ation's
iradln: iiuthaiaity on rhe sexual
psychopaths who created and w s lain the so -cdIcd "human sexualil y cduc;tt~on"i n d u s ~ r y ,fears the
bistlnps will miss ir gulden, "Godg~vcrl"opportunity to establish in

a court of law that the bishops and the American peoplt- - were
lied to by the top experts In the sex
education/counscling/therapy rndustry.
"Through this scandal." Dr.Reisman said in an extensive telcphone interview with The Wandrrer. "God has Bvcn rhc blshops a
great opportu~ty 1don't know if
they desctve ~t -to show in a court
of Inw that they and the nation havc
been lied to for at least four ox five
decades a b u t human sexuality; that
they and the nation were misled.
malpracliced, Tbe 'human sexuality' field is not a field, the cxperts we
not experts, the emperor [Kjnsey]
had no clothes and hc was a bugger
to boot.

"It is only the biblical model,

which the bishops were advlscd to
reject hy the late Fr. Mlchael Peterson [coauthor of the 1985 Pctcrson-Doyle-Moulon report on clergy sex a,buse], that protected womcn and children from this massive
pandemic assault visited upon us
all by the 'experts in human brxuality.'
"I fear they will not x c z p r the
opportunq God has given them."
she said a day before the bishops'
scheduled meeting
"If they would challenge the
system in a courtroom, they would
do such a good decd for the world.
for this sexual rcvolution is a horSae

"sue your experts" p. 8

The Wanderer:
National
Catholic
Weekly
June2 0 , 2 0 0 2 , (coat. p 1 )
ible plague. B u t I
f e a r t h e y d o n ' t have
the commitment to
d o that, a n d t h i s
enormous
opportunity, j u s t
like t h e children w h o
h a v e been abused,
will b e discarded."
T h e paper w r i t t e n
b y Reisman a n d
others, s u b m i t t e d t o
a select g r o u p of
bishops, is titled,
"Reliance o f t h e
Catholic Church o n
Sexuality Advisors
Whose Moral
Foundation Differs
Markedly f r o m t h a t
o f t h e Church."

It informs t h e
bishops t h a t
"Catholic institutions
have long naively
relied o n sexuality
professionals whose
advice and counsel
has been based o n
fraudulent science
t h a t had as i t s sole
purpose t h e
sweeping aside o f
t h e traditional
generative view o f
American -- indeed
Catholic -- morality.

NO LEGAL DEFENSE
"This misplaced
t r u s t afforded t o

fraudulent sex
'science' appears to be
at the heart of much
of the Church's recent
difficulties.
Specifically, many of
the Church's key
sexuality advisors are
associated with the
views advanced by Dr.
Alfred Kinsey and the
Kinsey Institute at the
University of Indiana
via Kinsey's seminal
research; Sexual
Behavior in the Human
Male (1948) and
Sexual Behavior in the
Human Female

(1953)."
Kinseys assertion that
ten-to-40 percent of
the male population is
homosexual at one
stage in life was based
on his study of
incarcerated,
predominantly
homosexual, sex
offenders, and that
Kinsey and his
colleagues were the
driving force behind
the legalization of
fornication, adultery,
bestiality, pedophilia
and other immoral,
harmful behaviors.
The paper also advises
the bishops that a
potential pool of
plaintiffs for a classaction suit against the
sex
education/counseling/t
herapy industry whose major
institutions are Johns
Hopkins University in
Baltimore, Indiana
University, home of
the Kinsey Institute,
and the Institute for
the Advanced Study of
Human Sexuality in
San Francisco - can be
found in the sexually

harassed or dismissed
seminarians who
"suffered under the
auspices of Kinseyantainted materials used
in admissions criteria,
psychological testing,
teaching, textbooks
and 'counseling.'
"Since there is almost
no legal defense
against such
indefensible conditions
or actions, the best
measure the Church
can take is a proactive, assertive tactic
against those who
falsely held
themselves out as
human sexuality
experts," the report
states.
For more than two
decades, the report
continues, since
Reisman's
groundbreaking work,
Kinsey, Sex & Fraud:
The Indoctrination of a
People, honest,
legitimate
professionals have
known that Kinsey and
his peers, financed
through the
foundations (especially
the Rockefeller
Foundation), organized
vice and the
pornography racket,
were engaged in a
grand and diabolical
scheme to replace
traditional, JudeoChristian sexual
morality with sexual
libertinism.
The report also
provides two examples
that "illustrate how the
Church's response to
sexuality issues has
fallen into the wrong
hands.

"First ....some
seminarians have been
trained i n sexuality via
a program sometimes
called Sexual Attitude
Reassessment created
by The Institute for
the Advanced Study of
Human Sexuality
(IASHS). IASHS'
former Academic
Dean, Wardell
Pomeroy, (now
deceased) was a
Kinsey co-author and,
according t o a recent
sympathetic Kinsey
biographer, Kinsey's
sometime sex partner.
(James Jones, Alfred
C. Kinsey; A
Public/Private Life,
W1.W. Norton, New
York, 1997)
"Dr. Pomeroy is on
record as seeking
funds from the Adult
Film Association
annual convention in
February of 1979 to
produce child
pornography a t the
IASHS (which
produced pornography
for sale). Pomeroy's
IASHS staff and
faculty also performed
group, couple and
single person illegal
sexual conduct-including child
pornography -- for the
IASHS photographic
book, Meditations on
the Gift of Sexuality
(1977)."
TRAINING THE
TRAINERS
SAR workshops,
seminars and
programs are typically
two, three or even
five-day events where
groups of students,
employees, managers,
corporate executives

and others are

immersed in intense
"attitude
readjustment"
techniques designed to
break down traditional
moral beliefs and
behaviors, and often
have as their goal the
acceptance and
practice of
homosexuality.
Typical of such
programs is that
offered in the
corporate world by
Brian McNaught, a
longtime homosexual
activist and former
editor of the Michigan
Catholic, who as long
ago as 1980 was
pushing the gay
agenda in the Church
in the pages of U.S.
Catholic. (See "Is Our
Church Big Enough for
Gay Catholics?" June
1980, p. 10, cited by
Fr. Enrique Rueda in
The Homosexual
Network, p. 111).
Brian McNaught
associates offer such
intensive programs as:
"Understanding Gay
Issues I n The
Workplace," which
"explores the impact
of anti-gay behaviors
on productivity and
examines the means
of eliminating
unprofessional conduct
at work"; "Managing
Gay Issues I n The
Workplace," which
aims "at building the
confidence and
competence of
managers and
associates in their
response t o gay issues
in the workplace";
"Train the Trainer," a
full-day workshop
"designed for

individuals who are

interested in honing
their skills and
enhancing their
confidence as a
presenter and/or
trainer on gay and
transgender
issues ....The 'Train the
Trainer' session occurs
on the last day of the
Annual Workshop on
Sexuality," which itself
is "designed for every
person who wishes t o
become more
knowledgeable and
comfortable with the
multiple aspects and
expressions of human
sexuality ...."
This latter program is
especially designed for
teachers,
administrators,
students, diversity and
human resources
professionals, family
life educators, health
and counseling
personnel, mental
health specialists,
nurses, physicians,
and clergy.
LAW STILL TAKING
BAD ADVICE
The Reisman, et. al.
report t o the bishops
also points out (as
does the web site of
the United States
Conference of Catholic
Bishops) that Dr. Fred
Berlin is still advising
Cardinal Bernard Law
and the U.S. bishops.
Indeed, Berlin was
scheduled t o address
reporters during the
bishops' Dallas
meeting.
"In 1994," the report
states, "Dr. Berlin was
Course Director for a

training program
offered to judges,
'health professionals,'
lawyers, legislators,
police officers and
child advocacy
workers teaching,
among other things,
that 'pedophilia ....can
be effectively
controlled with
appropriate psychiatric
intervention.'
"Dr. Berlin and John
Money, Ph.D., cofounded a celebrated
sexual training and
treatment center, The
Johns Hopkins Sexual
Disorders Clinic. Dr.
Berlin described Dr.
Money as 'one of his
most important
mentors.' Dr. Money,
as it turns out, was a
dedicated Kinsey
disciple, the mentor
for June Reinisch (the
third Kinsey Institute
director) and on the
advisory board of the
Kinsey Institute.
Additionally, in an
interview with the
pedophile periodical,
The Journal of
Paedeophilia, John
Money offered his
professional counsel
that adult sex with
children is normal and
often beneficial.
"Dr. Money went on to
say in the pedophile
interview that the
BerlinIMoney Sexual
Disorders Clinic was
designed to offer
'leeway to judges' to
free child abusers. For
Money, 'decided
regarding paedohilia
[sic] that Iwould
never report
anybody' ....I n addition
to Cardinal Law's
reported reliance on

Dr. Berlin, the problem

is compounded in that
the founder of St.
Luke's Institute, Rev.
Michael R. Peterson,
M.D. (who later died of
AIDS), urges the
Church to rely on
Berlin, and Money in a
1985 paper, after
warning the clergy
that:
[Mlalpractice cases
involve situations
where clerics give
advice which is
considered by the civil
courts to be beyond
their sphere of
expertise or
competence. This
advice allegedly
causes catastrophic
consequences
(divorce, suicide)
resulting in civil
suits .....[Money and
Berlin,] the two
mental health
professionals are
considered by me and
most people in the
field as the two U.S.
experts and ones who
have had good success
in treatment of the
paraphilic disorders in
the past fifteen years
(circa 1970) at their
Clinic."
"Church advisers like
Peterson, Money,
Berlin and their
institutional sponsors
such as Johns Hopkins
University, The Kinsey
Institute at Indiana
University, the
Institute for the
Advanced Study of
Human Sexuality,
etc.," the report
continues, "are
possibly subject to civil
liability for medical
malpractice, fraud,
negligence and other

claims.
"Several articles from
Maryland papers are
attached identifying
Berlin's efforts to
'exempt specialists
from reporting
pedophiles even when
their crimes continue
during treatment.'
"Berlin's claims of
success would mislead
Church officials
regarding the safety of
returning 'treated'
pederasts and
pedophiles to work.
Indeed, the
Government
Accounting Office's
1996 report on sex
offenders -- spanning
50 years and 500
therapeutic programs - found no form of
psychotherapy that
actually stopped
sexual predators."
"Still, in the
admissions protocol
for their program,
Berlin and Money
guarantee those
engaged in past,
present or future child
sexual abuse, 'We will
not, however, report
to your Probation
Officer information you
tell us as a part of the
normal doctor-patient
privileged
relationship.'
"By 1988 'at least
eight men [were]
convicted of sexually
abusing Maryland
children while under
treatment' at the
Johns Hopkins clinic,'
supporting the
Maryland Attorney
General's rejection of
Dr. Berlin's effort to

cover-up ongoing child

abuse.

KEELER'S EXPERT
"Moreover, Dr. Paul
McHugh, as former
Johns Hopkins director
of psychiatry and a
member of the
Baltimore
Archdiocese's
Independent Review
Board on Child Sexual
Matters was fully
supportive of Berlin's
efforts to protect even
active pedophiles in
treatment at Johns
Hopkins...."
According t o Dr.
Reisman, the troubles
the Church is currently
buried in date back to
the 1930s and '40s,
when Kinsey and his
cohorts and their
financial backers
promoted themselves
as the possessors of a
new, scientific
understanding of
human sexuality, and
positioned themselves
as the educators of
countless teachers,
social workers and
clerics, including
Catholic bishops and
priests.
"We know," she
explained in her
Wanderer interview,
"that the whole basis
of the human sexuality
education programs
delivered to clergy of
every denomination not just Catholics was based on the most
massive cover-up of
child sexual abuse in
the history of
American science, and
the cover-up is
continuing.

"The Kinsey institute

from the start was
created to normalize
pedophilia. So in
Kinsey we have a
sado-masochistic, bihomosexual,
pornography and
masturbation addict, a
mysogynist who forced
his wife and the wives
of his staff to perform
sex for him and his
camera in his attic,
who directed
pedophiles to sexually
molest children as
young as two months
of age for his 'scientific
human sexuality data,'
who directed a
member of the
Gestapo in Nazi
Germany in child
sexual abuse
techniques, who - as
his laudatory
biography reported -climbed into a bathtub
to circumcise himself
without anesthesia,
and who ritualistically
hung himself by his
testicles from a pole at
the university until he
fell unconscious: this
clinically definable
sexual psychopath is
the educator who
trained your
psychiatrists,
psychologists, some of
your bishops and
priests, and other
mental health officials
in what is normal
human sexuality.
"There was no field of
human sexuality
before Kinsey, and it
was Kinsey who
educated all of our
legislators to change
our sex laws, to
liberalize them
following the call, in
1955, of the American

Law Institute's Model

Penal Code, which
itself was influenced
by Kinsey and his
cohorts."
Kinsey, Reisman
further explained, was
an adoring disciple of
Britain's "great beast,"
Alastair Crowley,
considered the
"prophet of pedophilia"
and a known satanist.
"Kinsey visited
Crowley's lair or
'abbey' in Sicily, as a
pilgrim who goes to a
religious place of holy
worship. Crowley, we
know was involved in
ritualistic sacrifices of
various kinds,
including the ritualistic
sexual abuse, and
deaths, of children.
Kinsey went to
Crowley's lair to adore
Crowley's images of
people in copulatory
positions.
"Kinsey's promotion of
children as sexual
objects for adults to
consume is of a piece
with Crowley 's concep
t of satanic human
sacrifice. Clearly, we
sacrifice our children
when we engage in
sex with them. Those
who do it, know it.
"Pedophilia, or more
commonly, pederasty,
is a form of human
sacrifice. Anyone who
assaults a child
sexually knows they
are not only killing
that child's soul, but
some would say, from
a psychotherapeutic
perspective, they are
turning that child into
a dysfunctional, selfdestructive individual,

and they know the

child-victim will also
act out on other
children, perhaps
hundreds, the rest of
his life, and so the
human destruction is
perpetuated.
Reisman also
described as "doubleedged" claims by
bishops that they
didn't fully understand
the terrible physical,
emotional and spiritual
damage caused by sex
abusers, because they
were seeking, and
accepting, advice from
"experts" who insisted
they had the right to
"treat pedophiles
without turning them
over t o law
enforcement for jury
trials.
"The experts, like Fred
Berlin who advises
Bernard Cardinal Law,
as we speak, and
others at Johns
Hopkins," she said,
"were the men who
argued before the
Maryland legislature
that, not only should
they have a right to
treat pedophiles
without turning them
over to law
enforcement for jury
trials, but Berlin even
insisted he should
have the right to treat
pederasts even while
they are sexually
assaulting and raping
children, and not turn
them in!
"Berlin, and Money,
and the experts at the
Institute for Advanced
Study of Human
Sexuality in San
Francisco, who have
been training clergy

for decades, are the

people regarded as the
experts. I f you think
that they would have
suggested there is
something wrong with
pederasty, you would
be mistaken. These
are the people
directing the Church.
"Should Church
authorities have
believed such experts?
Ithink that should be
up to a jury to decide.
"To me, this is a case
of massive medical
malpractice by those
in the human sexuality
field, as well as
consumer fraud, as
well as a broad
spectrum of other
things for the lawyers
t o sort out. But I
believe it has t o be
sorted out. It is
important to
understand it is not
just the priests and
the abused children
and the Church that
have been so
damaged, but
educators, counselors,
social workers, law
enforcement officials
and others throughout
the whole system who
have been trained in
Kinsey, and are
teaching children and
doing social and law
enforcement work
everywhere.
"These so-called
'human sexuality
educators' have been
teaching behaviors
that cause
dysfunction, that are
anti-authority and
anti-Church, and they
are teaching children and adults -- sexually
perverse behaviors

which can lead to

serious emotional,
spiritual and physical
illness."
"What should Catholic
parents - and others think about programs
in Catholic and public
schools that promote
tolerance and
acceptance of
homosexual activity?"
The Wanderer asked.
Reisman responded :
"First, everyone has to
understand that the
beliefs most people
have about sex today
are based on bogus,
fraudulent, criminal
activities mislabeled as
science, created by a
group of sexual
psychopaths at
Indiana University.
"People should
understand that if a
nation follows the
model of sexuality
designed by a group of
sexual psychopaths,
that nation can
anticipate a massive
increase in sexual
psychopathology.
Remember, Kinsey is
the father of the
sexual revolution, and
he is also considered
the father of the
homosexual
movement by
homosexuals and the
pornography industry,
both of which are
always reaching for
the children.
"Catholics must
understand that all the
AIDS programs, all the
sex education
programs, all the
tolerance programs, all
the 'safe school'
programs have the

same goal: recruit.

They are recruitment
programs for
promiscuous sexual
activity, either
heterosexual or
homosexual. They
don't belong in any
home, much less any
school. They are
dysfunctional for
adults as well as
children. Anyone
teaching those
programs is suspect.
Nobody talks about
these 'sexual issues' to
children without
having an ulterior
motive.
" I t has been my
argument for decades
that some of the most
destructive, toxic
people are those in the
field of human
sexuality, and who are
therefore responsible
for the training of
military chaplains and
counselors, for AIDS

educators, for cultural

diversity, for the
training on hate
crimes, for the training
on STD prevention and
human relations in our
schools. Every body,
anywhere, who needs
the three units of sex
education for
professional licensing - psychiatrists,
psychologists, social
workers, counselors,
criminologists, expert
witnesses in courts,
teachers -everyone
must get their training
from those who come
out of the Kinsey
model.
"There was no other
model for human
sexuality, except the
biblical one."
When the interview
with Dr. Reisman
concluded, she said
she is "seriously
looking" for people

who want to sue the

leaders of the human
sexuality education
field and their agents,
such as Johns
Hopkins, the Kinsey
Institute, the Institute
for Advanced Study of
Human Sexuality,
AASECT (Association
of Sex Educators and
Therapists), SIECUS
(Sex Information and
Education Council of
the United States), the
SSSS (Society for the
Scientific Study of
Sex) and Planned
Parenthood, just for
starters. She is also
interested in meeting
lawyers who would like
to represent injured
parties in class action
suits against the
above named
associations.
To contact Dr.
Reisman, email her at
iareisman0surewest.n
et .
-

Social Justice Review

JanuaryIFebruary 2000

KINSEE CREME AND CONSEQUENCES: THE

RED QUEEN AND THE GRAND SCHEME by
Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D. (Arlington,Va: The Institute
for Media Education, Inc.,1998 [order from IFME, inc.
P.O. Box 1136, Crestwood, KY 40014)) 323 pp,
soficover $24.95.

Dr. Reisman's current book is fully illustrated with

historical visual images and well-researched commentary
of which she considers "...a work in progress." ~ n d
progress it has been! She has spent over 30 years of her life
dedicated to exposing the rmth and deleterious motives
behind the world's most famous sex researcher, Dr. AlFred
C. Kinsey. A zoologist by training, Kinsey went from
studying Gall W q s to s cudying human sexual behavior.
Then on to being hailed as the 'Tather of the Sexual
Revolution." Posing as a "typical, friendly, middleAmerican university professor," he claimed his motive For
studying sexuality was to benefit inquisitive students in a
"mamiage course" at Indiana University. But what he
produced was the publication of two landmark studies:
Sexual Behavior in the Human Male followed by Sexual
Behavior in the H u m Female. These Kinsn, Reports,
according to Reisman, grossly challenged the morality and
values of society. Although published decades ago, they
still have a profound lasting effect. Leaving behind an
insalubrious legacy, fostered by the present day Kinsey .
lnstinrie on Sex. Gender and Repduction located at
lndiana University, sdll keeping in full Kinseyan tradition.
As you read h i s book,you will begin to see that Kinsey's
motives had little to do with answering curious student's
questions about mavimonial sex at a midwestern university.
But rather, as Reisman exchims, he used his data, LLITo]

WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples

Page 1 of 12

WEDNESDAY
JUNE 12
2002

SUFFER THE CHILDREN

Catholics learning sex from

Kinsey's disciples
Late reputed-pedophile professor's
teaching created environment for
scandals
ShopNetDaily
Page 1 News
Page 2 News
LocalNetDaily
Commentary
Classified Ads
Letters
People Search
SportsNetDaily
Health
Weather
TV Guide
Movies
Business
Stocks

Posted: June 12,2002

1:00 a.m. Eastern

Editor's note: Descriptions of sexuality classes,

books and techniques in this story may be ofensive
to some readers.
By Art Moore
O 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

The US. Catholic bishops' latest proposal to

create "safe environments" for children
through an "Office of Child and Youth
Protection" offers little comfort to some
members who closely monitor the Church's
gatekeepers.
For lay activists who have documented
corruption in the church hierarchy over the
past several decades, it comes as no surprise
that the radical, anything-goes philosophy of
famed "sexologist"Alfred Kinsey, a reputed
pedophile, has triumphed over traditional
teaching in Catholic institutions across the
U.S., creating a flourishing environment for
priests who abuse teens and children.
"It'slike fighting cancer with a topical
medication," said Stephen Brady, president of

rn FBI braces for

more internal
bombshells
Who's winning
the Net war?

rn U.S. firms buying

stolen
Zimbabwean
tobacco?

rn College settles
suit on free
speech
White House
reporter on radio
show
Terrorist expert
blasts Condi Rice
Stewardess' kin
plan to sue
American

COMMENTARY:
Smoking trousers
By Ann Coulter
Why Iam not a
liberal
By Joseph Farah

Page 2 of 12

WorldNetUaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples

the lay group Roman Catholic Faithful. "They

are not addressing the problem - but they can't
because many of these bishops are
compromised and waiting to be exposed [for
abuse] themselves."

Sponsor
a Child
Today!

WhyIama
libertarian
By Harry Browne

The influence of the "father of the sexual

revolution" on the Church can be easily
illustrated in a course called "Sexual Attitude
Restructuring," which urges participants to
rethink "restricting attitudes" acquired in their
religious upbringing and adopt a lifestyle of
free sexual expression.
The course is a staple of an institute started
nearly 30 years ago by Kinsey disciples that
directly or indirectly influences nearly every
sex education and therapy program in the
country. The San Francisco-based Institute for
Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, or
IASHS, requires its students to complete the
SAR, where participants have been known to
strip down and interact sexually with each
other while surrounded by multiple screens
that display hard-core pornographic films.

In her book, "Kinsey, Crimes and

Consequences," Judith Reisman, a noted
researcher of Kinsey's legacy, documents the
IASHS leaders' characterization of the course
contents as the "f---orama."
The SAR and its X-rated theater - perhaps
missing only the in-class "lab work" - was
offered to parishioners for 10 years by the
Milwaukee Archdiocese under Rembert G.
Weakland, who recently took early retirement
after admitting to a $450,000 payment by the
archdiocese that settled a complaint by a
young man with whom he had an
"inappropriate"relationship.
Lay activists, including Roman Catholic
Faithful, have documented Weakland's legacy
of amoral values and homosexuality in
diocesan schools and in pastoral and lay

I t ' s like
fighting cancer
with a topical
medication.
They are not
addressing the
problem but
they can 't
because many
of these
bishops are
compromised
and waiting to
be exposed
[for abuse]
themselves.

--Stephen Brady,
president of Roman
Catholic Faithful,
commenting on the
Church's attempts to
deal with sex-abuse
scandal

WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples

Page 3 of 12

training.
Activist Thomas Phillips says in the preface to
a dossier he collected on the archdiocese: "It is
within this climate of lax sexual mores set by
Rembert Weakland that proclivities toward
sexual abuse have grown and festered, until
giving rise to an explosion of pedophilia cases,
criminal convictions and lawsuits."
That was written nearly 10 years ago when
seven priests had been accused of abuse. Since
then, more cases have arisen, leading up to the
present media focus on a crisis that afflicts not
only Milwaukee, but the entire U.S. Church.
Brady states what is obvious to fellow
Catholics who have connected the dots
between the kind of environment created by
Weakland and the current sex scandal.
"When you break down sexual barriers and
open people to not being sensitive or ashamed,
then you start to make them vulnerable to sin,"
he told WorldNetDaily.

Widespread problem
How many dioceses have inculcated the kind
of amoral atmosphere seen in Milwaukee?
About 90 percent, according to Paul Likoudis,
the author of an upcoming book that examines
the origins of the current scandal and a news
editor of the Catholic newspaper 'The
Wanderer.
In "AmchurchComes Out: The U.S. Bishops,
Pedophile Scandals and the Homosexual
Agenda," Likoudis asserts that homosexuals
and pedophiles controlled the post-Vatican I1
liturgical reform in the United States and
Canada.
Along with Weakland, he names Archbishop
Roger Mahony of Los Angeles, Bishop

I think some
of the bishops
in this country
are so
committed to
social
acceptance of
homosexuality
that they don't
care about
anything else.
That's their
No. 1 thing in
life, because
that is what
they are
spending most
of their
resources on.

--Paul Likoudis,
author and news
editor of The
Wanderer

WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples

Matthew Clark of Rochester, Bishop Howard

Hubbard of Albany and Bishop John Curnmins
of Oakland as among the biggest promoters of
homosexuality in the US. Church.
"I think some of the bishops in this country are
so committed to social acceptance of
homosexuality that they don't care about
anything else," Likoudis told WorldNetDaily.
"That'stheir No. 1thing in life, because that is
what they are spending most of their resources
on."
Weakland is among six or seven U.S. bishops
who have been exposed for same-sex abuse,
said Brady.
"You can bet there are probably 15 or 20 more
waiting for the shoe to drop," he said. "One can
only imagine how nervous [Weakland] was
when this [national scandal] started breaking.
A lot of bishops are sweating bullets. There is
probably a lot of check-writing going on."

Reshaping attitudes
At the Milwaukee Archdiocese's Cousins
Center, participants in the course "Reassessing
our Sexual Attitudes," held in the 1980s,
watched a National Sex Forum film of
"leisurely and active lovemaking" in which a
couple moves "freely from one activity to the
next, engaging in several positions, some with
a vibrator."
The National Sex Forum (earlier known as the
National Sex and Drug Forum) is the group
that launched the San Francisco Institute on the
Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in the
1970s. Other NSF film titles include "Jimand
Vern," which shows a "wide range of
homosexual activity," and "Reflections - Sexual
Patterns with Multiple Partners," a "discussion
starter showing what group sex is like and
how some people feel about it."

Page 4 of 12

WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples

The institute says its "films, slides, audio and

videotapes are used by more than 8,000
professionals and institutions throughout the
world."
Explicit films are common in Church
institutions, said Brady, noting the showing of
a production at a Notre Dame all-girls school
that included sadomasochism.
One of the founders of the Institute on the
Advanced Study of Human Sexuality was
Wardell Pomeroy, "dean of American
sexologists" and co-author with Kinsey of the
1950s tomes regarded as the textbooks of the
sexual revolution. Researcher Reisman has
documented Kinsey's and Pomeroy's
pedophiliac predilections, as demonstrated by
their notorious sexual experiments on children,
the vast majority of whom were boys.
Gnsey taught that children are sexual from
birth but are hindered from freely engaging in
sexual activity with their peers or adults
because of Judeo-Christianrepression.
Pomeroy publicly sought funds from the
pornography industry to produce child porn,
says Reisman.
The IASHS website spells out the institute's
assertion of "Basic Sexual Rights," which
include "freedom of any sexual thought,
fantasy or desire" and "the right to sexual
entertainment, freely available in the
marketplace, including sexually explicit
materials dealing with the full range of sexual
behavior."
It further calls for "The recognition by society
that every person, partnered or unpartnered,
has the right to the pursuit of a satisfying
consensual sociosexual life free from political,
legal or religious interference. ... "
Lead us not into temptation

Page 5 of 12

WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples

A brochure for the Milwaukee-run "Sexual

Attitude Restructuring" course said the
program begins with "examininghow we were
trained (or not trained) to hold restricting
attitudes about our sexuality. Rev. Andrew
Nelson will trace the influence of our religious
tradition on this thinking and some current
attitudes toward sexuality."
A parishioner who completed the program
wrote to Weakland, wondering if the prelate
knew what was going on in the classes.

"I asked Father Andrew Nelson if watching

those four films with nude men and women
demonstrating various sexual actions is an
occasion of sin," he wrote. "His reply was, 'No.'
"Why then do we pray in the Our Father 'and
lead us not into temptation ... ' I ask you,
archbishop?"
Weakland largely ignored such complaints,
which were strong and frequent, according to
Roman Catholic Faithful.
Brady says that while the SAR program itself
may not be replicated among many Catholic
institutions, the explicit, amoral teaching is
common.
"They serve the same purpose - to break down
inhibitions and resistance, making them more
vulnerable for abuse," he said.
"ValuingYour Sexuality," a sex education
course Weakland initiated for Catholic schools,
teaches there is "no right and wrong" regarding
sexuality and marriage and that "each student
decides on his/her own" the "appropriate"age
to engage in "masturbating ... having
intercourse before marriage, having sex with a
family member."
An activity called "charades"was listed in a
course content schedule published by the

Page 6 of 12

WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples

archdiocese in 1980. It asks students to draw

depictions of words for students to guess, such
as orgasm, vagina, penis, sexual intercourse,
homosexual, masturbation, erection and
clitoris. All of these "human sexuality"
instruction "techniques"for breaking down
inhibitions, says Reisman, can be found to have
originated first in Kinseyan training seminars
for teachers, clergy, military, law enforcement
and other health professionals.
Weakland served as co-chairman of the
Milwaukee AIDS project, a co-sponsor of
events such as the GayILesbian Film Festival
and distributor of condoms and information on
"safe sex." A brochure on the subject suggests
"Bright Ideas" homosexuals can enjoy without
fear of AIDS, such as "massages, fantasy,
videos, phone sex, romance" and "mutual
masturbation," which "spreads notlung but
happiness.I'
The Milwaukee archbishop received repeated
protests over a four-week course offered in the
1980s by Father James Arimond, called
"Homosexualityand its Impact on the Family,"
said to be a "factual, nonjudgmental
presentation about homosexuality,"according
to a March 1,1987, article in the Milwaukee
Journal.
Arimond, the Journal said, defined a pervert as
someone who goes against his or her sexual
tendency. If a homosexual acted
heterosexually, that would be a perversion, he
said, asserting that homosexuality is "God's
gdt." All of these views are fully expressed in a
1977 sexually explicit photo book entitled
"Meditations on the Gift of Sexuality,"
featuring IASHS faculty, staff and students,
says Reisman.

On July 23,1990, Arimond pleaded no contest

to charges of sexual contact with a teen-age
boy and was sentenced to 18 months probation
and 45 days in the House of Correction.

Page 7 of 12

WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples

Weakland was warned in writing about

Arimond twice before the priest is alleged to
have abused the boy in the summer of 1988,
according to documents obtained by the group
Roman Catholic Faithful.
In February 1987, a group of lay orthodox
Catholics wrote to Weakland, urging him to
stem the "pro-homosexual movement within
the Catholic Church in the Milwaukee
Archdiocese," singling out Arimond for his
class on homosexuality and his statements.
The lay group got the opposite response it
desired. On Dec. 19,1987, Weakland promoted
Arimond to pastor of St. Frederick Parish,
Cudahy .
In his recent groundbreaking book, "Goodbye,
Good Men," Michael Rose shows how
homosexuality has become an orthodoxy
among the gatekeepers at Catholic seminaries,
drumming out priests who believe in
traditional morals.
Rose argues that most were kicked out by
psychologists who evaluated the priests as
being sexually repressive, based on "scientific
data" that invariably comes from Kinsey and
his successors, Reisman's research shows.
Likoudis notes that two of those gatekeepers,
for seminarians in Seattle, are Sister Fran
Ferder and Father John Heagle, co-directors of
Therapy and Renewal Associates. The
counselors, who treat abusive priests, have
ridiculed the Church's traditional teaching on
sexual purity, dismissing it as evidence of the
Vatican's fixations at an adolescent
psychological level.
Not a moral weakness
Weakland acknowledged in 1995 that a raft of
abuse cases had cost the archdiocese $5.5
million, depleting its financial reserves. About

Page 8 of 12

WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples

half a million was designated for therapy.

Richard Sipe, a psychologist and ex-priest,
estimates the Church has spent at least $50
million to treat abusive clergy in the past 25
years, according to the Boston Globe.
What kind of therapy are many priests getting?
Again, the link to Kinsey can be found.
The church's most well-known center, the St.
Luke Institute in Maryland, was founded by
the Rev. Michael Peterson, who died of AIDS
in 1987. Just two years before his death,
Peterson co-authored a report with Father
Thomas P. Doyle and Ray Mouton that warned
of the problem of clergy abuse.
The 93-page document titled The Problem of
Sexual Molestation by Roman Catholic Clergy:
Meeting the Problem in a Comprehensive and
Responsible Manner," which was sent to every
U.S. bishop, has resurfaced 17 years later amid
the current scandal as a prescient warning. But
most media have ignored its admission of the
contra-Catholic doctrine that underlies the
institute's understanding of humanity and how
people's lives can be transformed.
Peterson cites the Johns Hopkins Hospital
Sexual Disorders Clinic, then run by Dr. John
Money - a Kinsey devotee and adviser to
Indiana University's Kinsey Institute - and Dr.
Fred Berlin, as "probably the 'authority' (in the)
scientific community" on the subject of
pedophilia.

"I know personally both of these highly

respected scientists, and I am very appreciative
of their efforts to bring this psychiatric
disorder out of the shadows and into the
'scientific daylight' so that we can begin to see
the disorder as a psychiatric disease and not a
moral weakness," Peterson wrote.
Hailed as a cornerstone of 1970s feminism and
"gayN-rightsliberation, Money gave an

WorldNetDaily : Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples

interview in 1991 to the Amsterdam-based

PAIDIKA: The Journal of Paedophilia.
A Rolling Stone article said of him: "Having
lost his faith in his early 20s, Money
increasingly reacted against what he saw as the
repressive religious structures of his
upbringing and, in particular, the antimasturbatory, anti-sexual fervor that went
with them. The academic study of sexuality,
which removed even the most outlandish
practices from moral consideration and placed
them in the 'pure' realm of scientific enquiry,
was for Money an emancipation."

The professor emeritus became a cause celebre

for orchestrating a sex change for a boy whose
genitals were damaged at birth, supposedly
backing his assertion that nurture trumps
nature. That assertion took a hit, however,
when the boy, named Brenda and raised as a
girl, later - having exposed Money's claims as
fraudulent all along - insisted on being David,
became a husband and adopted children.
Money said in his Journal of Paedophilia
interview: "If I were to see the case of a boy
aged 10 or 11who's intensely erotically
attracted toward a man in his 20s or 30s, if the
relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding
is genuinely totally mutual ... then I would not
call it pathological in any way."
Berlin, director of the Johns Hopkins clinic,
testified in the infamous Jeffrey Dahmer case in
Milwaukee that the cannibal killer could not
control his conduct because he was suffering
from paraphilia, a mental disease.
According to Reisman, it was Money who
promoted the word "paraphilia"in order to
refer to "aberrant sexual conduct such as
necrophelia, sexual sadism, bestiality,
cogroghilia, urophilia and pedophilia in a
manner less clear and offensive to readers.''

Page 10 of 12

WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples

Berlin has defended St. Luke's therapeutic use

of the "penile plethysmograph," a device
attached to the penis that measures arousal
when the subject is shown pornographic
images.
Same old same old

When the U.S. bishops meet tomorrow in

Dallas, the hierarchy's promotion of
homosexuality and sexual deviancy will not be
on the agenda, which means the problem will
only grow, insists Brady.
"I don't think we are anywhere close to rock
bottom yet," he said. "Nothingwill change
until we get new bishops in there. The same
old boys causing the problems are wanting us
to accept them as the ones to solve it.''
A longtime observer of the church - a political
and social activist in California who asked that
his name not be used - summarized the
upcoming bishops' conference this way:
"The church is like a sick man who has a
terribly ugly wart on the end of his nose," he
said. "All of this posturing and correction is
related to the wart and not to the cancer, heart
disease, tuberculosis and diabetes he is
suffering from, which is being simply ignored."
The shocking but still relatively small
percentage of priests abusing young people is a
serious problem, but it is only a symptom, he
says, of something much deeper.

Related stories:
'Gay' culture in Church grows

Confab pushes homosexuality in Church

\&'hen sex changes arc involuntary

Page 11 of 12

'WorldNetDaily: Catholics learning sex from Kinsey's disciples

'Nothing new' in book coi~doningchild sex

Rey ort: Pedophilia more common among
'gays'

Related special offers:

m n s e y : Crimes & Consequences"

The upcoming July edition ofWorldNetDailyts

popular Whistleblozi~ermagazine null be titled,
" GAY RIGHTS' SECRET AGENDA: Horu and
why the homosexual activist movement has targeted
America's children. " Subscribe to Whistleblower at
-W
- N D ' s online store, ShopNetDaily.

itloore is a news editor with

WorldNetDaily.corn.

Art

--E-mail t o a Friend
,-

E l

'

-I'

Printer-friendly version

O 2002 WorldNetDaily.com. Inc.

Contact WND

Page 12 of 12

WorldNetDaily: Tnstitutions and undenvorld academics

FRIDAY
MARCH 5
1999

ShopNetDaily
Page 1 News
Page 2 News
LocalNetDaily
Commentary
Classified Ads
Letters
People Search
TalkNetDaily
SportsNetDaily
Health
Weather
NGuide
Movies
Business
Stocks

Institutions and underworld

academics

Thanks to state legislator Woody Burton, the

Indiana legislature is currently debating whether
to defund its famous Kinsey Institute at Indiana
University. It is becoming more embarrassing to
the people of the great state of Indiana as more
people understand that Kinsey'sfraudulent sex
research was based on his team's solicitation and
use of child molesters as child sexuality
"experts." These "experts" f oundedand have
largely shaped and directed the entire field of
human sexuality since Kinsey and continue to do
SO.

Today the discredited Kinsey Institute staff and

alumni, togetherwith a cadre of admitted
pedophiles and pederasts, control the field of
sexology through the nation's several human
sexuality "accrediting" agenaes. Kinsey's bogus

Introducing
WND Books and
author Michael
Savage
New Mideast war
front: American
newspapers
News editor
talks media bias
Nickelodeon
'promoting'
homosexuality?
Slepian softens
before his death
Pakistan
bombing blunder
by militants?
Intelligence
source says

Worl&NetDaily: Institutions and underworld academics

sex findings are increasingly spread by these

disciples, yet on Jan.30, the Kinsey Institute
director, sychiatristJohnBancroft, announced
to the In anapolis Star: "We don't have a
monopoly on sex research anymore.

!'

Saddam has

nuke

COMMENTARY:
W h o will help the
children?

True, the expose of the Institute's hstory of

&Id sex abuse andfraud has caused concern in
the field and thus a shift of the sexology
epicenter from Indiana University to less
notorious universities. Thepower of the Kinsey
Institute seems to be diffusing as two key new
sexresearch "centers" are in the news more
frequently. The first, a more"respedab1e" branch
was the University of Chicago, where Robert
Michael, Edward Laumann and former Kinsey
Institute staffer and Bancroft buddy, John
Gagnon, published their wobbly research, Sex in
America(l994).These 1992 data were re
and appeared in February 1999 as a p2$~:e
on "sexual dysfunction." The authors tipped
their flag inpraise of their indis ensable
cornerstone, Dr. Kinsey when e article on
"sexual dysfunction" was published in the
respectable Journal of theAmerican Medical
Association.

tK

The second runner up to the Kinsey Institute

crown is the unknown Center for Sex Research at
California State University, Northridge, dubbed
the "Kinsey Institute of the West." The
Northridge Center for SexResearch founder,
Vern Bullough, a self-confessed pedophile and
editorof the "academic"Journal of Paedo hilia,
is in the sexology mainstream seeking to egalize
adult sex with infants and children.

Northridge University's Center for Sex Research

is continuing the example set by the Kinsey
Institute as an academic institution in bed with
pedophiles and pornographers. It is a scenario
right out of theGodfather: Academics need
money and have respectability. Pedophiles and
pornographers of the underworld need
respectability and have money. The Mafioso-like
relationship between academic institutions and
pornographers/ pedophiles begun at Indiana
University continues at Northridge.
To illustrate how this collegial arrangement
works betweenrespectable academics and the

By Bill O'Reilly
Dereliction of

duty
By Thomas
lipping

Djl Sexism in
Hollywood?
By Larry Elder

WorldNetDaily: Institutions and underworld academics

underworld of pedophiles andpornographers,

Northndgeuniversity's Center for Sex Research
used its good state supportedoffices to boldly
organize an annual "World Pornography
Conference,"August 6-9,1998. Led by the
Center for Sex Research Director, James E. Ellias,
pornography industry leaders and performers
met together withtheir "academic" pornogra hy
colleagues to share and shape futurenation
pornography and pedophile strategies. In
addition to pedophileBullough, the World
Pornography Conference starred Bullough's selfconfessed pedophile colleagues John DeCecco,
Daniel Tsang and Wayne Dynes, all professors at
other major American colleges and editors of The
Journal of Paedophilia.

iP

Among the list of "unique"presenters was Ralph

Underwager, Journalof Paedophilia interviewee
and child custod "expert," who insists
"Pedophiles can oldly and courageously affirm
what they choose ... thebest way to love," for an
appreciative and growing pedophile audience.
Ted Mcnvema, another conference speaker and
founder of the Institutefor the Advanced Study
of Human Sexuality in northern California,
contributed an article back in 1977 on "child
sexuality" to Hustlerma azine urging
legalization of incest an adult sex with children.
McIIvenna's Institute most generously su
Hustler's adult userswith graphic nude c
photographs published alongside the article. The
child porno raphy is published again in an
Institute pu lication entitled "Meditations on the
Gift of Sexuality" and published in 1977. A nude
professor McIlvenna appears in photographs
alongside nude Institute faculty, staff and
students in varied combinations of group sexual
congress. These groupings, sans academic
euphemisms, are more commonly known as
orgies. Of the 180 reporters said to have covered
thepornography conference, none mentioned
the Northridge University's Center for Sex
Research ties to the underworld culture of child
abuseassociated with pedophiles and
pornography.

zyy

There is nothing exceptional about the

pornograph indus 'sfinancial ties to sex
science aca emics. T e Kinsey Institute took
fundsfrom pornographers for years and
pornographers have funded sex research as well

z tX

WorldNetDaily: Institutions and underworld academics

as sizable salaries to academicians to serve on

their advisoryboards or as expert witnesses in
courtrooms and legislatures makin law and
setting dangerous precedents whi& injure
children. Perjury is astock event in sex "science"
history. Whle quietly collecting porno raphy
payola, Kinsey Institute members false y told
courts andlegislatures that they used a
"random"sample of Americans and found both
pornography and adult sex with children
harmless. But Kinsey's 1,400 male sex offenders,
200 sexual psychopaths and hundreds of radical
homosexuals hardIy constituted a "random
sample" of 1940s American men.

For decades the Institute for the Advanced

Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco, led
by "academic dean," Kinsey co-author and sex
partner Wardell Pomeroy, made and sold
orno aphy. Pomeroy publiclysought funds
iom
pornography industry to make chdd
pornographyhimself. Pornography is part of the
academic program of the sexologist. Coarsening
and conditioning "Sexual Attitude
Restructuring" ornographic fiIms and videos
were mandateif' as course work for sexology
studentssince early 1980. The repetitious
viewin of violent and degrading pornography
(Sexuahttitude Restructuring), compulsory by
1982 forgraduation and accreditation, had
"desensitized" over 100,000 sexology students by
1988.

tg;',

The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human

Sexuality givesstudents course credit for class
participation in "erotic massage," "masturbation,"
"fantasy," and similar, uhhh,studies. The
products ofthis grim brainwashing become the
f a d t y who design and teach the sex education
currida for our children, the cultural, political
and publicpolicy leaders of our nation. With
such sex "education"filtering down from the
university to general society - post Kinsey 1948
- is it anywonder that our judges routinely give
custody of children to knowmexual abusing
parents, as law and public policy become more
acceptin of what pedophiles call the "last
taboo," &at is, adults having legal access to our
chiIdren for sexuaI purposes?

http://www. worldnetdaily .com/news/article.p?ARCLE TD==16072

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

qzzq

May 4,2002

-Bethlehem Church
Standoff Agreement

Reached

Pront Pase
Nation/Pollticr
World
Commentary
Oplnlon/Editoriai
Matropolitrn

sports
Bu~iness
Technology
Entertainment
Culture
Weather

Family Tlmes
Auto Weekend
Wash. Weekend
Books
Home Guide
Arts
Nat'l Weekly Edlffon

Gift Guide
Touti6t Ouida
Int'l Speclot Reports
Employment Extm

*Maryland Gov. Sets

Moratorium on Executions
*Israeli Tanks Move
Toward Gaza

Pedophile science
Even as the nation's largest religious denomination is
rocked by the scandal of pedophile priests, Judith Levine, in

herbook"HarmfirltoMinors,"ismakingex~:uses~r
pedaphilia.This is hardly a coincidence. Academic Judith
R e i i author of "Kinsey: Crimes & Consequehces," says
pro-pedophile "sexperts" such as those lionized in Miss
Levine's book have counseled the Roman Catholic Church
and other denominations for at least two decades about the
harmlessness of pedophilia.
As the m t media darling of the "anything goes"sexual
revolution (how many authors get a pro-pedophile-Edvorable
photo story in the New York Times?), Miss Levine gets ink
and ample space to disparage anyone who difEm with her
-such as Mrs. Reisnan, whn finds childrenworthy of
protection rather than sexual exploitaton
Miss Levine's letter to the editor in The Washington Times
is as misguidedand inaccutilte as her collection of statistics
on sex, incest, cbilhamosermality, sex~ffender
recidivism, pedophile abuse,etc. drawn from notorious
pedophile advocates ( ' " C h i l h are sexual,' says author,"

N o r e Srnail Mallbox
Bombs Called 'Pranks'
*DNA Heips in Probe of
Anthrax Source

Updated at 4:30 p.m.

=Dealon Bethlehem
church is stalled again
*Lawyer denies student's
role in Sept 11

0400 kllled in Nepals

Maoist vloience

*Analysis: US flghts Cen.

Asian militants
*ACLU challenges

abstinence program

April 25).

Mrs. Reisman finds at least 12 pedophile advocates

among the "credible"scholars Miss Levine quotes in ha
book, four of whom are editors of the Journal of Paedophilia:
Vern Bullough, Edward Bmngersma, The0 Sandfort and
Lawnce Stanley, whom Miss Levine cites as an expert
who C
O that child
~
pomgraphy is a "myih."Amfiling
to the Columbia Journalism Review, Mr. Stanley also is
atfihkdwith Uncommonwhichdescn'bes W a s a
magazine "abut girl-love, erotic desks, censorship and the
police state."

In her letter, Miss Levine trots out the oft-repeated and

well-worn charges of the sex industry and radical left-wing
academics against Mrs. Reisnan Coincidentally,t
k charges
Miss Levine makes also were made in 1994 by "gayrights"
attorneys defending Joe Stem in SkfZmvs. Peny.Their
accusations were rejected based on evidence presented to
the highest appeals corn in the land, the U.S.Court of

*Feature: Enron demise

on message board
U S . sounds note for
Israeli restraint

Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit,.

As long as Mrs. Reisman is alive, Miss Levine and her
prcyxdophilia comrades cannot ignore AEai Kinsey, the
founder of what Miss Levine calls "d
sex research" Kinsey
biographer James H.Jones labeled him a "covertcrusader"
in the New Yorker in 1997.
Kinsey, who had a massive pornography collection,

declared children sexual from b i d based on experiments

documented in his 1948 study " S e d Behavior in the
Human Male," page 180, Table 34. Inthis "study," at least
3 17 hfhts and children, some as y o q as 2 morrths old,
wax "orallyand manually"sodomizedmudthe clock,
using stopwatches.
Miss Wine complains that Mrs. Reisnan "dmonized"
Kinsey's science, but Table 34 does that by itself. The 1998
British television documentary "Kinsey's Paedophiles"
validated all ofMrs. Reisman'shliqp about Kinsey's
pedophile experiments and discovered that some of Kinseyts
child data came f b m a. German Nazi pedophile "xsemher."
In her University of Mmesotataappmvedtract,Miss
Levine says Kinsey, whose Fesearch m d e r k s the entire field
ofhuman d t y as taught and practiced today,
misidentified children's" i n f d ebucking,strainin& and
relaxation"as "orgasm."As a reporter, Miss Levine should
quote Kinsey, who insteadwrote that the children
experienced:''Exbeme tension with violent convulsion
twitching violent convulsions of the whole body sobbing, or
more vioIent cries, sometimes with an abundance ofteam
(especially among younger children) sadistic or masochistic
reactions collapse fainring excruciatingpain" and they would
even "fight away h m the partner))' to "avoidclimax."Kinsey
concluded the children enjoyed the experience.
Thanks to Mrs. Reisman, we know the entire accredited
'%human s e x w field"descends from Kinsey'sresearch.
Today's "real sex researchers" are using ivory-tower
positions to explode the last taboo -adults having sex with
children. IfMiss Levine and her pedophile-advocate
comrades have their way, thoof pamts wiU find
themselves helpless to protect their children fiom predatory
adults.

STEVEBAU)WIN
Executive dimtor
Council for National Policy
Fairfax, Va.

Chemical-makers reap benefits of genetically

tweaked canola

In the April 29 Op-Ed piece ' ' k t them eat canola," Eric
Peters attempts to make the case that genetidy en,gineered
canola seeds that are made more resistant to specific
herbiciciqlresuttin "less spmying by faren d less

FRIDAY
MARCH 26

1999

The APAs: 'Academic

Pedophile Advocates'
WND Tdff
14 lryhl&h~c
ShopNetDaily
Page Z News
Page 2 News

LocalNetDaily
Commentary
CllassPfied Ads

Letters
People Search
TalkNetDaily
SportsNetDaily

Health
Weather

N Guide
Movies
Business
Stocks

NEWS:
Introducing

In 1977 1first dashed with a group of peo le I

call "AcademicPedophile Advocates"at
British Psychological Association's "Conference
on Love and Attraction"at Swansea University
in Wales.Ostensibly an "academic"conference,
the meeting attracted outragedpress coverage
when the leader of the Pedophile Information
ExchangefPIE),Tom O'Carroll, announced he
had been invited to lecture onpositive adult-

&

child sex.

WND Books and

author Michael
Savage

New Mideast war

front: American
newspapers

News editor

talks madla bias

@j Nlckelodmn
'promoting'
homosexuality?

At that conference, an old colleague of Dr.

Alfred Kinsey, (author ofsexual Behavior in the

Slspian softens
before his death

Human M&) whispered conidentidyto me

Pakistan
thatKinsey was a pedophile. While I was
bombing blunder
by militants?
shocked at the time, later research confumed that
Kinsey had s awned today's Academic
01) Intelligence
Pedophile A vocates.8~1987 many such
source says
academicians came out as pedo hiles in their
Saddam has
nuke
pseudo scholarfy, publicabon, he Joumdof
Paedophilia while professors in major
COMMENTARY:
universities worked covertly to gain unlimited
sexual access totheir children, and ours.
Who will help the

!i

Radio host Dr. Laura Schlessinger recently

exposed such pedophileadvocacy in the

children?
By Bill O'Rellly

Dereiictlon of

owerful American Psychological Association's

Fsychological Bulletin.

duty
Jipping
6 y Thomas

A Temple University psychology professor, a

w i s m in

University off ennsylvania education teacher

and a psychology professor at theuniversity of
Michigan claim they investigated 59 "studies"on
childsexual abuse of college students. Imagine!
Sex with children could be fun said the APA
authors, so "willing"child sex abuse should be

OK.

Dr. Laura concluded that the APA, representing

155,000 members, had " one soft" on child
molesters. "I'm scared A s study could be used
to normalize pedophilia, to change the legal
system ... like it didhomosexuality."
True, but the National Association for Research
and Therapy ~Momosexuality(NARTH), noted
that "the American Psychiatric Association
already set the stage ... [in]the latest diagnostic
manual (DSMIV), a erson no longer has a
psychological disor er simply because he
molestschildren."Thus the APA created
psychologically normal"paedophiles.

The NARTH article concludes, "If ps chology

indeed recognizesconsensual pedop 'lia as
harmless, then civil law and social norms will be
under pressure to follow the lead of social
science as indeed theydid on the issue of
homosexuality."

Farberman, the APA publicist denied that

publication in the Psychological Bulletin implies
APA endorsement. "Weare a scientific
organization. ... We try to create a lot of
dialogue."But when Dr.Laura worried the APA
was si aling an "attemptto normalize
pedop&a," the APA spokeswoman found that
dialogue "ridiculous,"citinga pal 2.8 journal
artides per year for nine ears as?PA1s
commitment "toprotect c dren and families."

...

Is the recent APA Academic Pedophile

Advocacy article, one of the 26they printed "to
rotect ... children and ... families"?Perhaps.
Eisterx~arbermansays "childsexual abuse is
harmful." She does not say "child-adultsex" is
harmful. The oxymoron, "consensud"adult-

Hollywood?
By arry Elder

chtld sexhas been promoted in sychoiogy and

sexology circles since Kinsey. I&
surprise that
this "study" finds the "negativepotential" of
sexualabuse is "overstated."

These authors claim up to 37 percent of abused

boys and 11 percent ofabused girls whom they
i n t e ~ e w e dreported
,
their abuse as "positive."
Pornographers can put money in the bank ating
those "data."

The APA is a reprise of Kinsey's fraudulent

"study," which took 50years to begin to expose.
Kinsey used child ra ists in 1948 who "proved"
their victims enjoye being raped. When
children fainted .and had convulsions during
molestation, Kinsey (a sado-masochist)reported
theirtorture as "pleasure"and "orgasm." He
claimed the "hysterical ... emotional reactions of
the parents, police officers, and others" to
molestation, created child trauma. The APA
authors a ree. Absentmoralism, say the APA
authors, aldren would be untroubled by sexual
molestation.

J"

Despite the desire for "dialogue" neither of the

APAs ever confessedKinsey's fraud or the
sexual psycho athology of the Kinsey team.
Indeed,both A As tram students in Kinsefs
"consensual sex" model. Like Kinseyts,this
phony "study"will also ap ar in courtrooms,
dassroornsand bedrooms. pitting in the face of
massive data to the contrary, APA's Academic
Pedophile Advocates claim child sexual abuse is
lesshHmful than physical abuse, neglect and
verbal abuse!The goaI?"Classifyinga behavior
as abuse simply because it is generally viewed as
immoral or defined as illegal is problematic."

,Said Schlessinger to her listeners. "I've read t h s

so many times,l'm sick" "Psychology has
become a god to the general public. ... If
pedophilia is not a mental disorder, what is it?"

Later we'll talk about how Academic Pedophle

Advocates are bringinga "pedophileabduction
rights"bill to a theater near you. For example, in
1994 Oregon Senate Bill 586 proposed that
anyone who "establishedemotional ties with
chtld may file ...for custody, guardianship,
visitation"if they had "a relationship ...within
the six months ...through interaction,

companionshp,,interplay and mutuality."Stay

tuned. Anyone smell an APA rat?

Dr.Reisman, president ofthe Institute for Media

Education in Crestwood, Ky., is the autbr of

"Kiwey,Crimes t3 Consequmces."
mz~-rna~i
to a Frrend

a printer-friendly version

0 1999 WorldNeti)aily.com, Inc.

Contact WND

Kinsey, Rockefeller and the Nazi doctors

Reisman's latest research on the man who seduced America presents sinister material
KINSEY CRIMES & CONSEQUENCES:
The Red Queen & The Grand Scheme
By Judith A. Reisman
The Institute For Media Education,
Arlington, Va '
326 pages; softcover; US$24.95

entific conclusions" were concocted to

advance it. The reference is to the Red Queen
in Alice in Wonderland who wanted the sentence (beheading) carried out first and the
verdict pronounced afterwards.
Disturbing information about Kinsey's
work and private life has been
he 1960s' sexual revoluaccumulating since his death in
tion was based on the most
1956at age 62. (The official cause
elaborateand carefully crafted
was pneumonia due to overwork,
scientificfraud of this century,
but his extensivehomosexual and
writes author Judith Reisman.
sado-masochistic activities were
Early sexologist Alfred C.
likely contributors.) Dr. Reisman
Kinsey, with his two famous
revealed much of it in 1990, for
reports just 50 years ago, seemexample, in Kinsey, Sex and
ingly legitimized both profliFraud. Even last year's resogacy and deviancy, and thus
lutely non-condemnatory biogestablished "the sexual licence
raphy by fellow Indiana Unihe [personally] espoused." Sexversity scholar James H. Jones-AlJi-ed
ual Behaviour in the Human Male (1948) C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life ( N o r t o n t
and its female equivalent (1953) kicked off is replete with gruesomely shocking details.
no-fault divorce, the wife-swapping era,
Kinsey: Crime and Consequences cannot
the gay rights movement, classroom sex edu- be described as non-condemnatory. Its cencation, sex "therapy" as a growth industry, tralfigure, Dr. Reisman asserts, "fits the clasexplicit imagery in the media and entertain- sic definition of a sexual psychopath." Had
ment industry, and an avalanche of pornog- the public known that he "and his male popraphy and obscenity.
ulation were sexually abnormal, the popular
Although Kinsey was a sexual revolu- use of their data to change [our] law, edutionary, Dr. Reisman contends, he was falsely cation and public policy would have come
portrayed by Indiana University where he to a screeching halt." He was able, however,
worked, and the Rockefeller Foundation to blackmail into silenceassociates who knew
which funded him, "as just a normal Amer- about "his extensive use of deviants, his large
ican guy/husband/family man who simply prison population or, worse, his active child
'discovered' that 'really' most American molesters."
men commonly engaged in sexually aberStill, she thinks his "findings" should have
rant and outlaw behaviour. Kinsey's 're- roused suspicion. "When I first read I n search' alleged that 10% of American males seylsresearch, I thought this man is not reportwere homosexual, that all of us were bisex- ing on America-he's reporting on himself
ual, that children were sexual from birth and and then projecting that onto the nation. Kincould engage in sexual
sey prostituted hls own wife
Clara...into acts of sodomy
activity with adults without
harm, plus a whole broad
with fellow 'researchers,'
which Kinsey filmed. He
spectrum of things taught
today in our schools and
seduced his own students
practised today in courts of
at Indiana Universitymale, not female students.
law as fact and as true..&
was fraud then, it is fraud
He devised sexual activinow and it revolutionized
ties with his 'co-workers,'
who then became his cothis nation and turned us
into Kinsey's [psychologauthors. He [personally]
ical] clones."
engaged in violent sadistic activity, in which he
His "Grand Scheme" was
to eliminate normal famiharmed himself terribly.. .
lies in favour of selective
and appears to have died,
breeding predicated upon
frankly, as a result of the
racial and sexual eugenics,
trauma to his body."
she charges, and his "sci- Author Reisman: Condemnatory
But his famed-reports

were carefully phrased to obscure the fact

that words like "contacts," "partners" and
"sex play" could signify grown men sodomizing children. He was also both racist and
cautious about his colleagues, avoiding Jews,
blacks and moral traditionalists. Dr. Reisman quotes Kinsey co-author Wardell
Pomeroy (Kinsey and The Institute for Sex
Research, Harper & Row, 1972), on his hiring technique: "As usu al... we took his sexual history first ...[Then] Kinsey put down
his pen and said, 'I don't think you want to
work for us.' 'But 1 do,' the researcher
insisted. 'Well, Kinsey observed, 'you have
just said that premarital intercourse might
lead to later difficulties in marriage, that
extramarital relations would break up a marriage, that homosexuality is abnormal, and
intercourse with animals is ludicrous. Appar-

'No man of our century may

have contributed so much to the
public acceptance of his own private
disordered imagination, and harmed
America and all of its citizens, as
much as Indiana University
sexologist Alfred C. Kinsey ..
America's pioneering sexologist
practised what he preached.'
ently you have all the answers ....Why do you
want to do research?"'
Biographer Jones describes Kinsey as "one
of the scholarly eugenicists of pre-WW 11"
who favoured mass sterilization for the lower classes and selective breeding for the
"better classes." Moreover, Judith Reisman
emphasizes, the Rockefeller Foundation
was early interested in population control
and in using the media to popularize it. The
Reece Committee, investigating U.S. taxexempt foundations in 1953-54, concluded
that this "plutocratic control" was accomplished by "funding the 'right' university
research by the 'right' researchers, then by
funding mass media dissemination of the
'right' science data to the public." Kinsey's
numbers made him a perfect fit for anyone
eager to alter what he would call human
"breeding patterns."
Dr. Reisman, a specialist in content analysis studies of written and visual media,
lostmany family membersin theHolocaust.
Alberta Report June 29,1998

37

In that context she raises further sinister questions about Kinsey's data. For instance, who
was the "lone pedophile," the "elderly gentleman" cited by Kinsey for his sexual
molestation of 800 children?Who were 'The
Children of Table 34" and what became of
them? How did Kinsey's "technically trained"
observers gain access to the claimed 1,800
American children for illegal genital experiments? "To this day," she observes, "the Kinsey Institute and Indiana University have
repeatedly...refused to reveal any names of
the subjects or the experimenters." Nor has
any one of these children ever come forward,
although the institute seems an excellent target for lawsuits.
Evenin the destitute 1930s,at the citedrate
of a dollar a day, she doubts that children as
young as three months were obtainable in such
numbers around Bloomington, Indiana. She
suggests an ominous but credible alternative: a collaborative link between Kinsey and
Nazi Germany, then a police state where such
"experimentation" could easily be conducted "as part of an ongoing collegial,cross-culturd, multinational, 'fact-finding' research
project." She cites significant links, such as
one George Sylvester Viereck, who worked
for the German embassy in Washington,
D.C., in those years, setting up Nazi front
groups, and who is known to have been a Kinsey correspondent.Furthermore, the Rockefeller Foundation was simultaneouslyfunding eugenics projects in Berlin.
Kinsey consistentlykept secret his hypotheses and the basic facts upon which his conclusions rested, Dr. Reisman charges.
"Neither Kinsey nor any of his team can
rightly be termed 'scientists.' Theirmethodology was not scientific, for it was neither
able to be replicated nor validated. Their data
was anonymous, forced, secretly altered at
will. and fraudulent. With the aid of the elite
academic world and institutionsand the support of public funds and the social planning foundations, Kinsey and his associates,
who served as his own private male harem,
conducted thousands of sexual interviews to
present a false view of American sexual
behaviours ."
Amazingly, however, use of Kinsey data
as authoritativehas never been seriously challenged-until now. It must not continue, Dr.
Reisman declares: "There [must] be a full
and open public investigation into Kinsey's
fraudulent data and its impact upon lawmakers, the military, the church, the press,
the academic world, the family and all our
institutions."
-Kevin E. Abrams
Vancouver writer Kevin E. Abrams is co-authorof
The Pink Swastika: HomosexualityIn The Nazi Party.
"Kinsey, Crimes and Consequences can be ordered by calling
1-800837-0544.

38 June 29,1998

Alberta Report

Kinsey's Legal Legacy

and government are to be deemed inmerica's post-World War I1
violate, that everything, including bageneration lived through the
sic moral law, is subject to change,
sexual revolution of the 1960s.
and that it is the part of the social sciNow, sadly, most of them are living with
entists to take no principle for granted
the consequences of its devastation: aboras a premise in social or juridical reation, skyrocketing disease, divorce, and
soning, however fundamental it may
sexual dysfunction. Most Americans are
hereto have been deemed to be under
unaware that their nation's moral foundaour Judeo-Christian moral system.
tion was supplanted, nor do they appreciate that a deliberate effort was
engineered to derail American common law, which was constructed on
biblical principles to protect and order
society's most important building
blocks - marriage and family.
Fifty years ago this month, Indiana
University zoologist and Rockefeller
grantee Alfred Kinsey, the widely acknowledged "father of the sexual
revolution," published his unprecedented report on human sexuality,
Sexual Behavior in the Human Male.
Kinsey's theme of "free love" was reinforced by a well-timed media blitz,
and the American public was receptive. For the next decade, Kinsey was
one of the nation's most popular celebrities (until his premature death in
1956). Cole Porter's hit song popularized Kinsey's sexual liberating anthem
of "Anything Goes." But over the second half of the 20th century, America
Kinsey: Working for an amoral new order.
and the Western world learned the
Kinsey was a vital agent in the transhard lesson that, seductive though it be,
formation
of America. The Russian, Gerfree love is not free.
man,
and
French revolutions were all
In 1954, Tennessee Congressman B.
preceded
by
an embrace of sexual anarCarroll Reece could clearly see that revochy.
In
such
revolutionary models, marlutionary changes were forming on the horiage
is
undermined
first, then the family,
rizon of our nation's social landscape, and
that a principal source of the chan,oe was followed by private property and govfoundation grants exouraging collectivism ernments. Kinsey facilitated, with the
and internationalism. When Reece began fraudulent data of his "studies," the abanto investigate Kinsey's report and the back- donment of absolutes in the "social or
ground of its funding, he discovered a trail juridical reasoning" of America's "Judeoleading back to the Rockefeller Foundation. Christian moral system."
A recent Kinsey biography by James H.
Whlle the Reece Committee was stopped by
a bipartisan effort from further investigation, Jones, a Rockefeller grantee and folmer
it did offer the following warning regard- adviser to the Kinsey Institute, reveals that
ing the enlarging mission of social scien- Kinsey himself was a sado-masochistic
homosexual on a perverted mission. Trolltists in changing our society:
ing through homosexual bars and nightclubs, Kinsey gathered the subjects for his
... that there are no absolutes, that evresearch, drawing disproportionately from
erything is indeterminate, that no
those participating in sexual perversions and
standards of conduct, morals, ethics,
THE NEW AMERICAN / JANUARY 19, 1998

other criminal acts. Those acts were then portrayed by Kinsey as both commonplace and
natural. Kinsey's mission, Jones writes in
Alji-ed Kinsey: A PublidPrivate Life, was to
free America from Victorian "repression."
But his wider goal was an amoral new order - possible only if human life is unhinged from the divine.
Kinsey, like Margaret Sanger and
population planners of the early 20th
century, was a eugenicist who eschewed biblical standards of morality.
According to one Kinsey associate:
"Kinsey knew a great deal about the
Judeo-Christian tradition and he was
indignant about what it had done to
our culture."
How did the acceptance of criminal sexual behaviors and perversions
begin in America? Kinsey's studies
were accepted as "scientific authority"
to alter the American common law
view of marriage. Life's most intimate
and personal act was equated with degenerative behaviors as long as it was
done between "consenting adults."
Kinsey found help in his effort from
liberal French lawyer Rene Guyon of
0
"
B
sex by age eight or else it's too late"
IL
r
infamy.
Dr. Hany Benjamin, an inter54 national sexologist and an associate of
both Kinsey and Guyon, wrote in the
introduction to Guyon's 1948 book
Sexual Ethics:
Many . .. sex activities, illegal and
immoral, but widely practiced, are
recorded by both investigators . ..
Guyon speaking as a philosopher,
and Kinsey, judging merely by empirical data . . . [upset] our most cherished conventions. Unless we want
to close our eyes to the truth or imprison 95% of our male population,
we must completely revise our legal
and moral codes .... It probably comes
as a jolt to many, even open-minded
people, when they realize that chastity cannot be a virtue because it is
not a natural state.
With such philosophical inspiration,
Guyon developed a deconstructed legal
theory, fortifying it with Kmsey's "scien-

tific" data. It was put into the hands of le- legislatures for their consideration, with
been apprehended. This recognition
gal radicals like Morris Ernst, an advocate plenty of authoritative support for its
that there is nothing very shocking or
for the new sexual order, who handled implementation provided by Kinsey's
abnormal in the sex offender's berevolutionary cases in his war against the flawed scientific analysis. Adoption of the
havior should lead to other changes
Model Penal Code eliminated and/or
American legal order.
in sex legislation .... Penalties should
Emst was well credentialed as a legal trivialized prior sex offenses, eventually
be lightened. In the first place, it
should lead to a downward revision
radical for his service as the American aiding the ~educrionof penalties for aborof the penalties presently imposed on
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) attorney for tion, rape, wife and child battery, desersex offenders.
Alfred Kinsey, the Kinsey Institute, the tilon, seduction. adultery, prostitution,
Sex Information and Education Council of contributing to the delinquency of a mithe United States (SIECUS), and Planned nor, soliciting for masturbation, sodomy,
Biographer James Jones reports that
Parenthood of America. He had close ties public sexual exhibitions, "unfit" parent- Kinsey died believing that his crusade to
to Supreme Court Justices Brandeis, age, alienation of affection, and obscenity, promote more enlightened sexual attitudes
Brennan, and Frankfurter, and Judge as well as infanticide, premeditated AIDS/ had not succeeded. Yet in 1957, a year after
Learned Hand - all influential progres- STD transmission, etc.
Kinsey's death, the Supreme Court in Roth
At the very time the ALI's Model Pe- v. U S . , a case handled by Ernst, relaxed
sives in moving American law away from
the absolute "Judeo-Christian moral sys- nal Code was being developed, there was the once protective American legal defitem" which protected the
nition of obscenity. In
1961, Illinois became the
sanctity of life, marriage,
flrst state to repeal its
and family.
Trolling through homosexual bars
sodomy statute, and today
In Ernst's 1948 book
less than half of the states
Amel-ican Sexual Behnvand nightclubs, Kinsey gathered
retain sodomy statutes. In
ior and the Kinsey Rethe subjects for his research,
1973, Dr. Mary Caldeport, Kinsey colleague
rone, a leading Kinseyan,
Robert Dickinson noted
drawing disproportionately from
was cited in the Roe v.
that "an era of hush-andthose pifrtidpating in sexual
Wade decision which lepretend in the life of our
galized abortion. Since
nation may end" through
perversions and other criminal acts.
Roe a staggering 34 milKinsey's Sexual Behavior
lion babies have been
in the Human Male and
aborted. Also in 1973, the
that "virtually every page
of the Kinsey Report touches on some sec- a growing public outcry for tightening, American Psychiatric Association retion of the legal code . . . a reminder that not loosening, sexual psychopath laws. moved homosexuality from its list of psythe law, like . . . our social pattern, falls la- But respected magistrate Morris Plas- chopathologies, and in 1995, pedophilia
mentably short of being based on a knowl- cowe, the model code's principal author, was removed. Today, Kinsey's fingerargued (based on Kinsey's findings of prints are all over the current literature of
edge of facts."
Ernst expkined in Scientific Morzrhly course) that "When a total clean-up of sex law, medicine, and the social sciences.
why the Kinsey reports were making ma- offenders is demanded, it is, in effect, a For example, in Westlaw, a database of
jor inroads in changing American law: proposal to put 95 percent of the male the major national law journals, during the
"[Rlecently law has reached for scientific population in jail .... Of the total male period 1982-96, 499 authors cite Kinsey
tools to aid in its search for truth .... I now population 85 percent has had pre-marital versus 71 citations for the more recent
Kinseyans, Masters and Johnson. In the
say that the Kinsey Report is the single intercourse...."
As America's common law was sup- Science Citation and Social Science Citagreatest contribution of science to the
rule-making part of the law in my life- planted, legal penalties were "lightened" tion Indices, Kinsey rates thousands of
time .... The Kinsey Report broke through and new sentencing guidelines were de- listings, twice as many as Freud.
Continued belief in and use of Kinsey's
veloped. For example, prior to Kinsey rape
a mass of taboo."
Emst advised that every bar association was extremely serious, a death sentence data may be viewed as a contributing facin the country "should establish a Com- being required in three states and life in tor to the current exhaustion of our crirnimittee on the Laws of Sexual Behavior prison in over 18 states. But Plascowe in- nal justice system. Authorities who permit
and consider its own State's legal system troduced to the legal profession what Kin- the killing of the unborn and release sadistic rapists/murderers back into society, to
in this field ...." Soon Committees were es- sey and Guyon had certainly envisioned:
typically repeat their crimes, represent a
tablished with funding from the Rockesystem adrift in an amoral abyss and bent
One of the conclusions of the
feller Foundation in an effort to overturn
on anarchy and national destruction. H
Kinsey report is that the sex offender
the American way of life.
IS not a monster . . . but an individual
- COL.RONALD
D. RAY,USMC (RET.)
In 1955, the Model Penal Code was
who is not very different from others
completed under the auspices of the
Col. Ray, a former Depury Assrsrant S e c r e t a ~ yof
In his social group, and that his beCarnegie- and Rockefeller-seeded AmeriDefense, is the author of Military Necessity and
Homosexuality. In writing this artrcle, the author
havior is similar to theirs. The only
can Law Institute (ALI), the education
r's
largely dreh. fr-om Dr. Judirh R e ~ s ~ n a ~dejinirive
difference is that others in the
arm of the American Bar Association.
book on Kinsey, whrch is scheduled for release in
offender's social group have not
This "model" was then submitted to state
early 1998.
THE NEWAMERiCAN / JANUARY

19. 1998

Kinsey Crimes
By Lawrence 1[: Newman:
During World War IT, Nazi dociGrs twk young. i n n ~ x c dcluldrm
;utd suhjcctcd &.c:ttl to eruct, pep
vcrtcd n ~ c d i dexperinrents. Ac- curding to thc d o ~ t o r the
s brture of
tllcsa cluldrcn WQJ valid and acceptable, b c u i ~ s ci t ws done for the

uscd stc7p\vatchcs in order

lrdvsncmentofscintifickn~ldge.
ARcr all. it was all dorm in the n m c
of scicncc. Vdidating c i h k i d bcllavior tva? part of the Nazi c r d ,
but thmkfully would never be accepted iit hisrica, right?
Not fu hotn shcre you livc, you
u ~ l find
l thc Kin~cyInstitute for Research in Sex, G c n d c r , ~ dReptaductiorr Located in R l u o n ~ g t o n ,
Indima, it IS pai-t of Indiana Utliverslty. Ohe OF thc lcadcr~in higher
cducat~onin tlre state. It1 sotne quartrrs, the Kintey Iristitute is also
dccmcd as a Icadcr in hlucation,
obtain~nefinx&l support from the
National Inshtute of Ment~lHdh,
the Rockcfcllcr Foundation, and the
N.1riorl.11 Rt.scarch Council, among
othcr r c c ~ ~ r ~ iorgani.ritiotrs
ted
,
The Kioscy Iristitutc ig n a n d for
AIfrcd Kinsey.szm~ogisttchotwncd
to thc tie13 of sex research in the
1 Y W s K m c p published w d
&h-,iot in tlref-lwnao Malein 1948,
follo;r.cd by Scxual Bchavior in$J$
&pn
Fcmale in 1953 Kirisey
doctrlnc strongly $uppods arty md
all forms of sex, d ~ e t h c rlegal or
illcg:il Tcday,dlevalidityof ICltucy's
research into human sexual~tyis undcr cotistxit attack. Kinsey's adult
" S C I E ~ I ~subjects,"
~~~C
accorduig to
Alfrcd C Kniseve-

We may i w t t krww all hc dczai1.a

of how Kinscy really obl;lined his
dab about chiidrar, but w c do know
this: Kinsey was, atthc minimum,a
knoshgpartnainsyfitn\atic criminal acts against children. U n j a
today's IbW, F;insey and his milugucs would be guilty of scow of
criminal acb ag& children, 31 thc
shte, fdcral, and intemaliod lev-

(0 m a -

$urc tht children's smu31 r t s p n S d .

Thc duldrcn'z rcactioru, acwding t h ~crimcs a p i n s t childrcn

to Kimey, wfrc a mixtue

of"^- fimd

be, sobbiq, or more violent c n a ,

s~nd.mqwiCh thc abundance of
~MTS.''

els.

Thc following is a list ofthc crimcs

under ;day's Inciiana criminal statutm that art part and parcel of

Kinsey's reseatch:kol~;stin~.
child
rxplailstion, ricariou~sexual p t i ftcation, child solichatim, child seduction, sexual hmry.sexual misconduct with a m h r , i n m ?&kt
of3depcndenf ~ ~ r i r and
m c, h i -

nal reck~rsm~ss.
Nationally, all 50 dates have outlawd the many behaviors glorified
by Kinzey in his publication:. Of
note ar* the crimts a f profes4anal
voyeurism, which is defined ; ~ the
s
exminxtian ofa person for &a purpose of sexual arousd, gratification.
or stimulation, including a mental
healthprof~simalvieuingapzsnn's
private anatomy; sexud conduct by
a pubtic senant. which is defined u
conduct of a sexual nature committed
by a public servant a&g under
Lifc by wcll.rcpardccl historian James
the color of his office; md abuse of
11. Jones, "tvere pcoplc rvtio were
citllcr on thc rrtargit~sor beyond the position of trust or authority, which
of errpaging in sexual conp d ~hotr~oscsuals,
:
s a d o t r ~ a s ~ l ~ ~cotrsists
ts,
d
u
c
t
~
~
iachild
t h where the adult is in
voyeurs, cshibitionists, pcdophiIes,
a position of trust or authority o m
transsexuals, trmsvestitcal fetishists.
"Pedcplrilc" is the scicn[ific~wrdfor thc child.
Federal laws similarly impost
chrld n~olcstcr.
What tvas Kinscy's interest in child lrcavy penalties for sexual acts against
nrolcstcrs? &ult Boha\ior it1 thq children of the kind comnrittcd in
l l u r n a ~hhlc features 5 tabtcs dc- Kinscy's research. It i s an aggrascribing the sesual stitnulation of vated felony under federal law lo
pre.adolescentchildren, beginnirlg at engage in a sexual act or sexual
tlic age of t\\a motiths. Kitiscy never contact with anyone under the agc of
revcaicd tl~csource of his rrscarch. 12. A persot) comnrits the federal
Nearly 50 },cars later, Kinsey col- felony of aggravated sexual abuse
Icagues claim that the information by causing another person to engage
came from onc or morc pcdophilcs in a scxual act by forcc, or by thrcstintervicwd by I ( I I ) ~ cAccording
~.
cning or placing that other person in
to t l ~ tcyotts.
s
thc child nioltstcrs fear that hemill besubjcctcd to death,

September 20,1997

5:rious bodily hjury, or kidnapping

tntcrnational la:) also stric~lyban;
nhich

the b z h for Kinsey's restarch For hampIe, ~e I n t m a timd~oimmt

onCivi1 and PoIiticaI
Rjghls, a United Nations a g m t n t
approvcd by thc Unitd Statcs and
many ofher nations of h e world,
prohibits d i c a l or scientific expetirnentationon hum? kings. the
activities prmcribd include torture,
c ~ e and
l degrading treatment, and
d i c a l md scimtific exptrirncntatim without frtt conscnt.
Tablc 34 in Kinscy's S e v d Behavior in the Human hfale words
the timcd rnult~plcsc.*ual rrsponscs
of an 11-monthold infanr in a pcricd
of 38 minutes. How rimy crimes
r w c c o r d t t c d in order to gahcr
t h ~ sinformation? %%at horrors did
that infant child s u f f ~for
r thc 5d.e of
experinrerWion? Why havcn't the
criminaJs who torturcd chtldrm evcr
btxn brought to justicc? Why docs
Nfid Kwcy's I q a c y l i ~ ~ m t h r o u g f ~
rn organintion uhich is sup~wr~cd
by !a7pa)er futlrfs ;urd by one of our
nation's ic~dinguni~srs~t~cs''
On Octobcr 23,1997, national and

sweleaden niil Imd a rally against

ihc Kinxy Institute st thc Bloomington Courthwst at 1;00 p.m. loin
those who stand unitcd against thc
docbin6 of Kinscy Institute, nhich
tvtrc built upon scxual crirncs inf l i d d upon childrcn in the narnc of
scicncc.

TNDLANA HERALD

Herald Times
BLOOMINGTON,
INDIANA
OCTOBER
28,1997

1997/10/26 CONSERVATIVE GROUP AlTACKS KINSEY DATA Consewtive group attacks Kinsey data - with photo
Speakers demand research methods be investigated, want institute closed
By Mike Wright Sunday Herald-Times
Claiming Indiana University and Kinsey Institute officials haw lied about
the origins of 50-year-old data on sewal responses of children, Concerned
Women for America speakers continued their call Saturday for a congressional
investigation of Kinsey.
CWA sponsored the rally at the Monroe County Courthouse "to expose and
close Kinsey." About 100 attended, including some 10 to 20 displaying signs
fawring Kinsey or opposing CWA.
In a few cases, those trying to display signs fawring a different agenda
than CWA's or to wice questions were confronted and arguments became heated.
After the speakers concluded, several debates and confrontations occurred in
several spots around the courthouse lawn.
The focus of the speakers at the rally continued to be institute founder
Alfred Kinsey's chapter in Sewal Behavior in the Human Male, published in
1948, regarding sewal responses of preadolescent males, particularly the
information in table 34 of the book that documents orgasms.
"We believe the information in that table was fraudulently and criminally
derisd," said Carmen Pate, i c e president of CWA. "We believe it is time to
say enough is enough."
Similar questions were raised in 1995, based on a book by Judith Reisman,
when the Family Research Council urged congressional inquiry into the issue.
A bill by Texas Republican Steve Stockman headed in that direction but the
measure failed to mow forward.
CWA has redwd the issue and is conducting rallies around the country to
try to bring it up in Congress once again.
Reisman said the Kinsey Institute's assertions that all information in
Kinsey's book came from intenn'ews and that the institute has n e w
experimented or sanctioned experiments with children is a lie.
In her talk Saturday, Reisman cited Kinsey's own work that suggests "nine
of our adult male subjects have obsetwd such orgasm." And, she asked, how
did Kinsey obtain juvenile sperm?
Kinsey Institute John Bancroft said Saturday that the nine male subjects
were inteniew subjects who told about their observations and experiences.
Information from those men was used in the chapter on preadolescents, but not
in the table 34, he said.
Information in table 34 came from one individual, Bancroft said, contrary
to conflicting statements about the source.
"There is no doubt in my mind that (information on) the kids reported on
in those tables all came from one man," he said. "There was no indication
that he did any of this at the request of Kinsey. All he did was make the
information amilable for Kinsey to use."
And while the nine men may have been technically trained, as CWA claims,
there is no evidence they were trained by Kinsey, Bancroft said. Finally, he
said Kinsey did not collect preadolescent sperm
"He got data from scientists around the world," Bancroft said. "He didn't
collect it himself. They've been trying to pin this on Kinsey, but they are
barking up the wrong tree."
CWA maintains, howewr, that flawed Kinsey data is responsible for many of
today's social ills, including the high divorce rate and increased numbers of
rape.
Bancroft has called those assertions "ridiculous."
"Kinseyism is a failure," said rally speaker Eunice Ray, founder of RSVP
America (Restore Social Virtue and Purity to America). "There are still
absolutes and standards for conduct and Kinsey lying won't change that"

Author Challenges Kinsey Sex Research

and grandparents had been
DI: Alfred Kinsey shocked
America in 1948 when he
doing all along, we would have
released Sexual Behavior in the
better marriages in this country
Human Male, a massive report
We would have lower rates of
offering scientific evidence that
venereal disease, fewer out-ofthe sexual hahabits of Americans
wedlock pregnancies, all our
were wildly at odds with prevail- measures of sexual health
ing moral standards. The impact
would increase and our meaof his research is such that he is
today regarded as the undisputed sures of sexual ill health would
decrease.
father of the sexual revolution.
But KinseySfacts, it now
How did America react?
appears, werefalse. DI:Judith
It was above the fold in
brnan
acposes Kinalmost every newspaper in t h
sey's "grand
country The scientific commuscheme" to
nity largely embraced him.
f;(ndamental- There were some serious critly reshape
ics, but even the most serious
American sexof his critics &dn't question
ual standards
h
m as an aberrant person.
Dr. Judith Reisman
in the justThey
were sure that he had
released book, Kinsey: crimes
tried
to
do a scientifically valid
and Consequences.
study No one could believe
What conclusions did Kinsey that a sexual psychopath could
have created t h book.
reach in Sexual Behavior in
the Human Male?
And yet his research was funHe concluded that 95 percent
damentally flawed?
of American males engaged in
Well, his research was not
some form of sexual offense
just
significantly flawed, his
and that most males engaged in
research
was fraudulent.
sex prior to marriage. He also
Fraudulent,
meaning that it
said his findings proved that
was
purposefully
deceitful. He
children were sexual from
made up numbers.
birth--that little infants could
be orgasmic-and that sex
When we look around
education ought to begin as
early as possible. He said that
w, the sexual psychoalmost 17 percent of males
pathology that radiates
were engaged in some form of
sexual interaction with animals. everywhere can be seen
What he really was saying
to be a reflection OJDK
was that every sexual value we
Kinsey.
had in the United States of
America up to 1948 was a lieWhat do we know about the
our parents were engaged in
men
he interviewed?
illicit, illegal sexual activity
If
we
even say that he had
There was no harm that came
over
4,000
males, then we
from that, outside of frustration
know
that,
at minimum, 86
because they were so idubited
percent
of
those
men were sexthat they didn't tell people what
ual deviants. We know that he
they were doing.
admits to having at least 1,400
He claimed that if we
sex offenders in his research
allowed ourselves to admit all
of these thngs that our parents population. I have identified
May 1998

Dr. Alfred Kinsey, far right, works on the manuscript for his Sexual
Behavior in the Human Female in this 1953 newsphoto. Its original caption proclaimed he had "divulged the scientific facts contained in his
new book
that, under their 'NEW FREEDOM,' American women are
ripping apart the old tradition of chastity before marriage and faithfulness after the ceremony."

...

just under 1,000,but it certainly could have been significantly

more who were homosexuals
in the most active sense.

What do we know about Kinsey's own sexual behavior?

He was a compulsive man
who engaged in very sexually
destructive conduct. He did
these h g s at a very early age.
Hisbiographer now has called
h m a homosexual. This is a
man who seduced those
around h m into these disordered behaviors.
He, by forming the basis of
sex education and therapy in
the United States of America,
by altering our sex laws and
public policies-which he
absolutely did by shaping the
American Law Institute model
penal code on sex offenders-helped to put us where we are
in terms of rape, chdd rape and
in terms of general sexual disorder. When we look around
us, the sexual psychopathology
that radiates everywhere can be
seen to be a reflection of Dr.
Kinsey

Coral Ridge Ministries

The Kinsey Institute has

barred you h m its archives?
Yes, they certainly have
barred me. In fact, they have
barred anyone who might in
any way be analytical instead of
euphoric about what Kinsey
has done.
What do you hope to see
happen as a consequence of
your book?
I would certainly like to see
the Kinsey Institute forced to
open its doors. I would want to
see all that material made available for examination. There is a
great deal hidden in there.
There is a lot that could come
out of thisshould the American
public be [made]aware and
become part of the active
movement to expose the finsey research.

To obtain Kinsey: Crimes G

Consequences
please see the
enclosed
resourcesflya
3

N E W S OF INTEREST

New book exposes Kinsey research

Fifty years ago, Indiana University professor Dr. Alfred C. Kinsey began publishing his research about human sexuality in
the U.S., laying the groundwork for the sexual
revolution that has brought misery to countless people. But according to a new book,
Kinsey's work was based on deception, inept science and even child abuse, and now
the record must be set straight.
Dr. Judith Reisman, president of The Institute for Media Education in Arlington,
Virginia, has been a consultant to three U.S.
Department of Justice administrations. She
has been studying Kinsey for 30 years, and
her book, Kinsey: Crimes ei. Consequences,
is the result.
Kinsey's major theses about the sexual
proclivities of Americans were developed
by collecting the "sex histories" of thousands of individuals. In 1948, Kinsey published his data collected from men in a book
entitled Sexual Behavior in the Human Male.
According to Reisman, Kinsey's work
claimed to reveal some shocking realities,
namely that: 95% of American men violated sex crime laws which would have landed
them in jail; 85% had had premarital sex;
69% had patronized prostitutes; 45% had
committed adultery; and 17% had had sex
with animals. Obviously, "dear old dad" was
not the saint that society expected.
Although since discredited numerous
times by other studies, Kinsey's research
also provided the familiar figure, so often
quoted by gay activists, that 10% of people
in the U.S. are homosexuals.
The conclusions of Kinsey's research were
spread by what Reisman's book calls "a well
planned mass media campaign" by the elites
who agreed with Kinsey.As a result, his views
became accepted and entrenched in the
major institutions of American public life.
Reisman, however, demolishes Kinsey
and his work. Kinsey: Crimes ei.Consequences
reveals his research to be biased, his methodology and statistics to be totally unreliable, and his results skewed to produce the
desired outcome.
For example, Reisman demonstrates that
"roughly 86% of the 4,120 male population [used in Kinsey's research for Sexual
Behavior in the Human Male] were sexual
deviants,"such as homosexuals, sex offenders,
AFA JOURNAL AUGUST, 1998

pimps and male prostitutes.

Kinsey considered these deviants to be
"average" and thus representative of the rest
of American males. Then Kinsey used the

results of these sex histories to extrapolate

to the rest of the U.S. adult male population, attributing to it these same sexual habits.
In a letter, Kinsey admitted later that he
had deliberately covered up the true character of the men in his sexual histories in
order to prevent his conclusions from being dismissed.
In his follow-up to the book on male
sexuality, Kinsey published Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Again, using data
obtained from fringe sectors of society, like
strippers, "burlesque performers," and pros-

titutes (even those who had had sex with

animals), Kinsey then promoted the resulting
sexual histories as being representative of
the normal, average American woman.
One of Kinsey's most callous conclusions, according to Reisman, was when he
"claimed to have found sexual abuse of young
girls to be harmless, claiming that adult
women were never traumatized by childhood sexual abuse and incest." (Emphasis
in original.)
The intellectual fraud committed by
Kinsey is outrageous, but it is nothing compared to the monstrous evil performed by
his researchers in obtaining information
about the sexuality of children - some as
young as infants.
According to Kinsey: Crimes ei. Consequences, Reisman documents human sexual
experiments that were performed on anywhere between 3 17 and 2,000 children. These
experiments, which will not be described
here, were often perpetrated by pedophiles
hired as sex researchers.
Reisman concludes,"The time has come
to dismantle the elite's ' Grand Scheme'based
upon Kinsey's fraudulent model of human
sexuality from our national establishments
and from the lives of our children. The time
is now. It is critical to our national health
and survival to restore social virtue and purity
to America."
Kinsey: Crimes ei.Consequences,published
by The Institute for Media Education, Inc.,
is available at bookstores or by calling tollfree 1-800-837-0544.

AFA SUPPORTS PURITY CAMPAIGN

As a result of Kinsey's research and subsequent published material, the foundations of morality and human sexuality as defined by the Judeo-Christian tradition
have been largely eroded in the U.S.
In order to launch an effective counterattack, Eunice Ray, president of First Principles
Press, and Concerned Women for America (CWA) have co-founded a campaign to
make people aware of the findings of Dr. Reisman's research. Restoration of Social
Virtue and Purity to America (RSVP America), as it is being- called, hopes to make
parents, pastors and state legislators
d deceptions committed by Kinsey and his research te
AFA has been supportive of this effort even in the earlier stages of Dr. Reisman's
research. "From the very beginning, we have deemed it critical for Kinsey's fraudulent and virulent work to be exposed," said AFA vice president Tim Wildmon. "We
strongly urge all believers who love the truth to get involved with this campaign."
If you have read Kinsey: Crimes ei. Consequences, and would like to become involved in the RSVP America campaign, call 1-800-458-8797.

Sex teaching base

on pervert's repo
THE credibility of the Kinsey
Report, which has been the basis of sex education around the
world for decades, has been
called into question after the
disclosure last week that some
of its findings were cr~lledfrom
records kept by a paedojhi1e
who assaulted young boys.
The flaws in Alfred Kinscy's
report were acknowledged last
week by the Kinsey Institute,
following pressure from politicians and child abuse experts
to explain how detailed research on the sex lives of children could have been carried out
legally.
At the forefront of the campaign was Judith Reisman, a
child abuse expert, who wrote a
book in 1990 attacking Kinsey's methods. "The sex industry will be shaken to its
foundations," said Reisman.
"Whole shelves of books will
h l t l p I"

h m rr.wn-illen "

'The Kinscy Report, published in 1948 and .suppnsedly

based on exhaustive studies of
the sexual behaviour of men,
c n a n g e d rile wa,y s o c i e t y
viewed sex.
in one of the most controversial parts of the report, known
as Table 34, Kinscy sliowed
that children ;IS ynung ;IS tll~ec
- -

Kinsey: credibility questioned

cil has produced a video called
The Children of Table 34 intended to mobilise opposition
to sex education.
The video, introduced by
Efrem Zimbalist, a former star
of the television series Hawaii
Five-0, claims that Kinsey's

that research
legitirnise the
tion of childre
Steve Stoc
lican congre
troduced a bi
congressional
find out if
tematic sexua
ren" in the re
by Kinsey.
"To ask
a b o u t sexua
children is lik
about sexua
women," said
as we shou
concentratio
done by Nazi
should we us
based on the p
ual abuse of c
Stockman w
Accounting O
ment's watch
detailed repor

A=,:,

May 1

by James Adams
Washington
months old could experience
orgasm, while a 13-year-old
boy was observed experiencing
26 orgasms in 24 hours.
For years the Kinsey Institute had refused to reveal
how its research was conducted, saying only that nine
researchers had been involved
and 317 boys observed. Rut
last week the insti(ute acknowledged that the data had been
obtained from the diary of a
paedophile, who had routinely
sexually abused young boys.
John Bancroft, director of the
Kinsey Institute for Research in
Sex, Gender and Reproduction
at Indiana University in Bloomington, said: "The material in
the tables comes from one man,
with incredible numbers of sex1121

~ r ~ r r i ~ n on
r e r

whirh hp

kept very careful notes." The

identity of the man is being
kept secret. It is known only
that he was a forestry worker
wno died in i9S.5.
American conservatives are
using the exposure of Kinsey's
fraud as a reason for questioning sex education in America.
The Family Research Coun-

havp

In
ICP~

IC

foundation for government polKinsey's s

that the stat
icy towards sex and children.
"There has been a gross mis- activity of you
use of power in the pursuit of part of a much
scien~ific researcn and aca- w o r k w n i c n
demic recognition," said Dee tarnished and
Jepsen, president of Enough is after Kinsey st
Enough!, a conservative lobby- sex histories.
ing group. "The tragedy has female sex hi
continued through the years :IS duced in 1953

THE SUNDAY TIMES OF

'Grand Scheme'
Advanced by
Father of Sexual

n 1948, after the publication of

Sexual Behavior in the Human Male
(SBHM), Indiana University zoologist Alfred C. Kinsey became the undisputed father of the sexual revolution.
Author Gore Vidal, a Kinsey interviewee, claimed Kinsey was the "the most
famous man in America, in the world,
for a decade," and although Kinsey has
been dead since 1956, Kinsey: Crimes and
Consequences demonstrates why the Kinseyan influence is even skonger in 1998,
than it was in 1948.
A recent Kinsey biographer working
closely with the Kinsey Institute has
finally revealed what the Institute has
long known. Kinsey was not the conventional and objective unbiased scientist Indiana University proclaimed. Kinsey
was a sadomasochist and a homosexual.
He "skewed his data and was a "covert
crusader" intent on releasing human
sexuality from the constraints of American morality and law which had largely
helped to protect women anu children.
Like Lewis Carroll's Red Queen, it is now
revealed that Kinsey had the "sentence"
in mind for America long before his
research was compiled and decades before the people's "verdict" could be rendered. At the heart of l n s e y ' s Reports
was his desire to advance what his coauthor called a "grand scheme." For all
the revolutionary talk of sexual freedom
and "any thing goes," the real target was
marriage, the single most important
building block of society
Kinsey was a eugenicist and his
"grand scheme" included an undcmocratic plan for altering American life justified by his fraudulent research. By
1953, Kinsey's scheme and his sensational research caught the attention of a
congressional investigation looking into
philanthropies including Kinsey's taxexempt sponsor, The Rockefeller Foundation. The Congressional committee
came under crushing pressure from
monied "special interests" and was shut
down oLrer its zttternpted inquiry into
the Kinsey reportr;.
h o ~ \ .far
But the ~ l i ~ e s t ~renuin,
on

did Kinsey and his supporters go to remake America's way of life? Reisman
has revealed that the K m e y team collaborated in human sexual experiments
on children to which their children
could not consent. But how could these
human experiments on thousands of little children have happened in America
during the 1930s and 1NOS? Or were the
experiments even conducted in America?
The brush with Congressional scrutiny caused The Rockefeller Foundation
to cease its funding of Kinsey. However,
with the knowledge that Kinsey's data
were hopelessly flawed, the Foundation
continued the "grand scheme." One avenue was through funding the American
Law Institute's Model Penal Code which
recommended major changes in American law largely based on the fraudulent
authority of Kinsey's sex research. Referring to SBHM, gynecologist and l n s e y
colleague Dr. Dickinson victoriously declared, in a 1948 book by ACLU lawyer
Morris Ernst, "A book can end an cia."
In Crimes C. Consequences, Reisman reveals how Kinsey's research was used
by ,men in the law like Ernst and others,
and in medicine by Dickinson and others, to permanently alter the American
Way of Life.
A book can end an era of "hush and
pretend." In Kinsq: Crimes and Coilscquences, Judith Reisman finally exposes
Kinsey's crimes masquerading as science and "hushed" up for 50 years as
Indiana University and his funders
"pretended" Kinsey was a conventional,
trustworthy, middle-American academic. Dr. Reisman has made it possible for
America to understand the Kinsey
cadre's deception, the deliberate misrepresentation of the Indiana zoologist, his

research, and its stunning consequences

for women, children and the men who
love them.
The generation most effected by
Kinsey's fraudulent data is the Baby
Boom generation born after World War
I1 and which came of age during the 60s
While this generation possesses an intimate kno~vledgeof the sexual revolution, they remain woefully ignorant of
Kinsey and h o w his research was used
in the trusted professions to change
them and America. After 50 years of living with I n s e y ' s sentence, Reisman has
gathered the evidence of Kinsey's crimes
and the verdict is now yours to render
for the sake of generations to come.

(1990) and the U S. De-

partment of Justice study,

"Images of Children, Crrrne
nd Violence in Playboy,

being of children. Dr. Reisman IS the

president of The institute for Media
Education, author of Soft Porn Plays
Hardball (1991). Kinsey Sex and Fraud

s, as well as the
ucation and the
US. Department of Health and Human
Services. Dr Reisman's scholarly drscoverres have had trternatlonal leg~slative
and sc~entificmport

Woman's crusade: debunking Kinsey

A t ~ ~ on
k ssexual researcher's 'Siaud' find sL~pportin Brikh documentary

Institute president J ~ ~ Ba~isroft

III
did not even n~entionevidence of
scie~~tific
fraud in Kinseyi 19413
11dit11A. R ~ I S I I II~as
~ I Ispent
"Sexual llrhavior In the-1-Iuman
nearly two decades exposing Male" and i u accompanying volwhat she calls scientific ume on female sexuality published
fraud commined by pioneer in 1953.
sex researcher Alfred C. Kinsey,
In England, however, Mrs. Reisthe man known as "the father of man's work got substantial publicIhe sexual revolution?'
ity last year when Channel Four
Despite her evidence, Mrs. aired "Kinsey's Paedophiles:' a
Reisman says American scientists documentary by Tim 'Ibte. The
have "steadfastly refused" to ad- hourlong film identified "Mr. X"mil that the famous Kinsey Re- a pedophile whose accounts of
ports were fi~nclamenrallyflawed hundredsofsexual "contacts" with
-u5ing unl epresenlative samples children were used in the Kinsey
and invalid methodology, and even Reports
as a federal Forestry
accepting "data" on children re- Service employee named Rex
ported by I~abitualchild molesten. King.
"The father of human sexuality
Mr. lbte interviewed Mrs. Reiseducation was, really, a sexual psy- man and Kinsey institute omcials
chopath," says Mrs. Relsman, au- for the British documentary. It also
lhor of two books on Kinsey's detailed Kinsey's use of reports by
fraud, including "Kinsey: Crimes a Nazi officer who sexually abused
and Consequences:' published last children in occupied Poland duryear. She calls Kinsey's fraud "the ing World War 11.
major sclentjfic scandal of our naMr. ' M e says he is ."disaption."
pointed" his Kinsey documentary
A I997 biography of Kinsey by hasn't been shown in the United,
James If. Jones detailed Kinsey's States yet.
'
. .
lexual involvement wilh associ"It sirikes me that there must be
ares at the Kinsey Institute at Indi- a number of ~ i o p l se h o are$dulg4,
ma Universfy; 'which-iiitllrded , ;nowwho & e n viabf Rex Ring..
Slming sex a ts betwe& Kinsey, who have no idea what was done
31s wife, his staffen and their with the information:' Mr. 'hte
wives in various combinations.
says, noting that King's victims are
"I thhk [Kinsey] was dramati- pmbably now 50 to 75 years old.
In her book, Judilh A. Relsman (above) argues lhal Ihe lamous ~ l n g Re
e ~ports used unrepresenlallve samples
:ally d r ~ v hy
e ~his
~ own scxual perKina's reaorts were "used by
tersions:' Mrs Iteismnn says.
Kinsty. . . 1; suggest that children
tlve scientist:'
"It was a Madison Avenue c'am- rock bottom:' she says, when rates
Instead of de~louncingKlnsey, can edoy their abuse:' Mr. Tare
"People can believe the most
~ i t odied in 1956, American sex says. "Unless that film is shown [in paign to normalize Kinsey's view of divorce and unwed births were
amazing things, if it comes under
-esearchers have turned on M n . the United States] those adults of sexuality," Mrs. Reisman says. low, and most people considered
the
rubric of a scientific instituThat
view
including
the
claim
sex outside marriage immoral.
Xeisman. She "has been vilified won't know. I think they have a
that "children are sexual from
tion, a university, and comes
Kinsey shocked the country by
'ram coast to coast," according to right to know."
cloaked in scientific, objective lanIle National Renew.
One reason American broad-; birth" - had a major impact be- claiming that "95 percent of AmerKinsey's research continues to casters may be reluctant to inves. cause Kinsey was depicted as a sci- ican men were engaged in some guage:' she says.
Kinsey's reputation as a sclenentist
at
a
time
when
"the
nation
form
of
illegal
sexual
conduct:'
1e cited as authoritative by educa- . tigate Kinsey, Mrs. Reisman says,
tist is undermlned, Ma.Reisman
ional and legal journals, and influ- is that many hnve forgotten how was really enamored of science Mrs. Relsman says, "that most
says, by the fact that much of hls
married people had had premarimces bo01 public attitudes and much impact the Kinsey Reports and scientists:' she says.
data was drawn from Interviews
The first Kinsey Report was tal sex, that .the majority ot men
~ u b l i c policies, Mrs. Reisman 'had a half-century ago.
with
rlsoners, that his Interview
published
just
three
years
aRer
the
went
to
prostitutes,
that
homosex.
ays. For example, Kinsey was re- ': ,With a publicity campaign fundtechn?ques were biased, and that
>eatedlycited in a 1993 Rand Cor. ed by the Rockefeller Fbundation, end o t World War 11. "The A-bomb uality was common . . . that adulhe used unverlfled "reports" from
)oration report that supported the she says, rhe reports made news- had ended the war, brought the tery was common!'
child molesters.
I)oys home," Mrs. Reisman says.
This claim that Americans were
'clo~~'t
nsk, don't tell" policy loward : paper he;~dlil~cs
ncruss the coun.
Klnsey "jud ed our happiness
"all
hyl~ocrites"
nbuut
sex
was
ac.
"Tbe
scir~~tists
had
become
the
he11~rncr~exu.11~
in l l ~ emilitary.
Iry. Kinsey was rcalured in a Tililr
as a human be%!
the number
cepted. Mrs. Heismon snys, beThe n ~ e d ~has
n also largely lg- magazine bver story that pur- roes."
of
orgasms you gaJm Mrs. Reiscause
Kinsey
whose
original
T
l
~
e
first
Kinsey
Report
was
is~uretlflaws in Kinsey's work. Mrs. trayed him as "a 11oble nlan Who
man says and h ~ view
s of sexuality
leisman says. Last month, a New was a scie tist . . . a family man," sued at a time when "every mea- field of expertise was the shrdy of
has been'so widely accepted that
sure of sexual dysfunction was at insects - was seen as an "objec!ork Times interview wilh ffinsey she says.
o e o ~ l e"have forgotten that we
I
kerkn't always like this."
Mn.Reismm's latest book documenta that Khsey's research w
used to persuade m u m m d legialeturea to change or abolish law8
against extramarital sex, Including
child sexual abuse. Kinsey'a research also formed the basis of
modern sex education, which he
considered "one of the most important aspects of his work:' M n .
R q p a n says.
Kinsey insisted that children
~ h n a , l An n n ~ in
n ~S P Y invf~~llv"
C ~

'

The Crime of the Century

Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences, by
Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., Arlington, VA:
Institute for Media Education, 1998, 324
pages, paperback, $24.95. Available from
American Opinion Book Services, P.O.
Box 8040, Appleton, WI 54913. Add $3.00
for shipping and handling.

he greatness of truly great men

comes from the fact that they do
great things and make great changes
in the course of history, motivated in

in American society about human sexuality have undergone rapid, revolutionary

changes. And while Americans received a
systematic indoctrination in Kinsey's radical sexual ideology, traditional views of
human sexuality and traditional sexual
mores came under incessant attack by Kinseyans, who characterized them as repressive and unhealthy, and who heaped scorn
on them as obsolete, pharisaical, and "unscientific."

inspire are destructive in nature, producing

lasting change in the direction of evil. In
this second category of men falls Alfred C.
Kinsey, the man whose life is evaluated in
the present work.
Patriarch of Perversion
Kinsey, the founder of the Kinsey Institute for Sex Research at Indiana University in Bloomington, was born in New Jersey in 1894. He began his professional career as a zoologist, with a special interest
in insect taxonomy. Later he branched out
into "researching" human sexuality, and
through his well-known books, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953),
he was touted as "the father of the American sexual revolution."
Indeed, since the appearance of those
two books, and most particularly after the
popular media took up Kinsey's banner
and disseminated, in propagandistic fashion, distillations of the supposedly scientific material from his volumes, attitudes

are concerned, Kinsey was a scientific

quack, that his research was rife with
fraudulent statistics and scientifically
worthless data. and that many of his methods, involving a significant portion of the
data he collected. were blatantly criminal.
"Looking back 50 years with the benefit of hindsight," writes Reisman. "it seems
astonishing that the American public accepted any of Kinsey's revolutionary findings, all of which not only conflicted
dramatically with the public health report data but also with what Americans
saw, heard. touched and knew about
their homes, schools, friends and
neighbors, children. wives. husbands,
mothers. fathers. sisters, and brothers." What seems to have happened
was that many Americans allowed
their critical faculties to be anesthetized by the word "science,"
which they had been conditioned to
believe was synonymous with truth,
hard facts, and accuracy.
Fraud as Science
It is an elementary principle of
the scientific method that scientific results, based on particular formulas, procedures, or methods,
can always be duplicated by other
scientists, as long as the prescribed formulas. procedures, or
methods are followed precisely.
That any experiment can be repeated, with the same results, by
another scientist is what makes an
experiment scientific. Such is not the case
with Kinsey's findings, however, for the
simple reason that they are fraudulent.
Were one to duplicate what Kinsey claims
were his methods, wholly different results
would be obtained.
One might begin by noting that the results of Kinsey's research were officially
asserted to be based on a representative
sampling of the American population.
That, however, was a lie. The truth is that
a substantial portion of the study was based
on material collected in interviews with
criminals, prison inmates, and sex offenders. Kinsey and his cohorts sought out and
interviewed the worst sex deviates and insisted, without the slightest justification,

,-., w.

Moreover, in contrast to the ceaseless drumbeat of support

for K m e y and his ideology by the mainstream media and the educational establishment, serious questions by honest scientists and scholars about Kinsey's procedures, methodology, statistics, evidence,
and motives have been largely ignored.
Yet, putting aside traditional morality for
the moment, there are some grave problems with Kinsey and his studies, problems
that a relentless media whitewash campaign has done little to allay.
Dr. Judith A. Reisman, having studied
Kinsey's life and work for many years, has
made some startling judgments, among
which are that, insofar as his sex studies

THE NEW AME7ICAN / JANUARY 4. 7999

that Kinsey claimed to believe that there

was a high incidence of "cover-up" in the
sexual histories he gathered by interview.
To "correct" for this phenomenon, Kmsey
used several techniques. If the answer desired by Kinsey and his team members was
not forthcoming, that is if the subject denied committing certain sexual acts, the
subject would be verbally intimidated, and,
conversely, if the interviewer got the answer he wanted he "courted and smiled"
on the subject. If the subject persisted in

38

denying certain sexual acts, the interview

would be terminated and the data disregarded. Sometimes, writes Reisman, "if
hls subject stubbornly refused to say that
he committed acts recited by the interviewer, the team could just change the answers to what they thought 'really' happened." With that kind of methodology,
one can obviously prove anything and
reach whatever preconceived conclusions
one wishes. This was outright statistical
chicanery.

Criminal Abuse
Now let us address the most controversial aspect of Kinsey's "research": child
sex experimentation. First. we learn from
Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences that
there exists considerable evidence that
Kinsey humelf. along with some of his associates, participated in, or observed, sexual experiments involving children. Dr.
Reisman calls these incidents "genital experiments" and remarks that they involved
"observing, recording, and filming of

THE NEW AMERICAN / JANUARY 4 , 1999

revolution, divorce, venereal diseases (in- will be the final consequence of Kinsey's
cluding AIDS), rape, sexual brutality to- crimes. Dr. Reisman has performed a magwards children, illegitimacy, suicide, psy- nificent service in writing her book and in
chological maladies, and hosts of other in- exposing Kinsey for the charlatan he undividual and social disorders have in- questionably was.
It must be emphasized that, although this
creased sharply, while the birth rate among
middle-class Americans has fallen below overview of Kinsey: Crimes and Consereplacement level. Those are some of the quences is lengthy as book reviews go, we
consequences of Kinsey's crimes. Our en- have only touched the surface of the nutire society has become coarse, tasteless, merous issues discussed by the author, and
rude, and tawdry to an extent that would of the many aspects and ramscations of
have been utterly beyond the imagination Kinsey's sex revolution and its disastrous
of the citizens of this land in the halcyon influence on modem American life. The
book is published in large-format (7'k10"),
days of 1948.
is composed of ten chapters, and includes
numerous photos, tables, and charts, along
Temporary Condition
There are other consequences. The ris- with footnotes citing the author's sources.
Finally, it is necessary to warn readers
ing moral anarchy of our time, which has
been and is actively encouraged by a cor- that Dr. Reisman has been forced by cirrupt and corrupting ruling elite, can never cumstances to present information in her
be a permanent situation. Anarchy is al- valuable book that is clinically explicit,
ways a temporary condition. Before im- and often shocking, repugnant, and horriposing a dictatorship on Russia, the Com- fying. Unhappily, there is no way to premunists countenanced just such moral sent the case against Kinsey and his Instichaos, releasing hordes of criminals from tute, and expose their crimes, without such
jails, malung divorce easy, and abolishing details. It would appear that our poor counlaws against adultery, homosexuality, and try has sunk so deeply into slime that. in
various sexual crimes. That anarchy served order to pull her out, we are compelled to
to justify the subsequent repression. A to- put aside our squeamishness.
- FR.JAMESTHORNTON
talitarian scenario, if it comes to pass here,

R ALFRED KINSEY, author

of the famous Kinsey Report,
was quite the interviewer. His
~iographer,James H. Jones, writing in
he Aug. 25 New Yorker, describes
bow Kinsey, inquiring into the most
rivate and secret se a1 histories of
is subjects, would
querdons in
taccato style so as to deny the interiewee the chance to think of a:lie.
Questions . presupposed the behavior inquired
about. It was; "At
what age did you
begin masturbating?'- not "Do
you masturbate?"
When asked how
he could tell
when a subject
was covering up,
MONA
boasting or lying,
CNAREN
Kinsey retorted,
"As well ask a
horse b-ader how
he knows when
o close a bargain."
For thousands of hours, year after
rear, Kinsey i n t e ~ e w e dthousands
)f people about their sex htories. It
Mas all supposed to be very scientific.
Zertainly, the language suggested
igorous scientific method. But there
uere no written records of the interflews, certainly no audio or video-.
.apes. There was no formal questionmire, just a personal code Kinsey designed to recall what subjects had
old him.
Sexual Behavior in the Human
Male - sounds downright antkopoogical, doesn't it? - created a sensaion when it was published with themprimatur of the Rockefeller Founjation. America embraced Kinsey ariently and uncritically. He asserted
:hat deviant sexual behavior was abjolutely endemic among teen-age
4merican males, and America believed him
thus undermining the
vrery concept of deviance. (Despite
h e title, the report did not attempt to

study "human" males, only American

males growing up in a few East Coast
states.) Kinsey made the claim that
10 percent of males were practicing
homosexuals, a figure that was widely accepted for two generations. But
in 1994, the University of Chicago's
National Health and Social Life Survey found that only 2.8 percent of
American men could be called bisexual or homosexual.
Though Kinsey was at pains to
present himself as a tweedy, middleAmerican professor and family man,
Jones reveals, he was in fact a missionary whose goal it was to release

America from the grip of "Victorian"

inhibitions about sex. Why? Because
Kinsey - wife and four children notwithstanding - was a serious sexual
deviant himself.
The truth is about as tawdry and
pathetic as Kinsey critics could possibly have imagined in their wildest
dreams. Kinsey was not only interested in homosexual encounters - and
he had many - but also in sadism
and masochism. Jones, who had
served as a scientific adviser to Kinsey's Institute for Sex Research, reveals that Kinsey, far from the antiseptic researcher serving science,
was actually more of a panting voyeur, pursuing wilder and stranger

sexual exploits as his life unfolded;'

He trolled through homosexualbars and nightclubs, supposedly'
seeking subjects for scientific research, but also seeking more private
thrills. The subjects of his research
were drawn disproportionately from
among homosexuals. He had a par?
",
ticular interest in masochists.
At the Institute for, Sex ~esearzh,
Kinsey attempted to create a private
sexual utopia, where everyone could
have sex with everyone else. Kinsejr's
wife, Clara, who reportedly worshipped him, acquiesced, apparently
even agreeing to be photographed
masturbating and having sex with a
staff member. There was, according
to the wife of another employee,
"sickening pressure" to agree to having sex on film.
As for the great man himself, he
liked to be filmed - from the neck
down - performing masochistic acts
on his penis, like inserting pipe
cleaners or swizzle sticks.
Toward the end of his life, Kinsey
came to believe that there was nothing inherently wrong with sexual encounters between adults and children. It was society's attitude toward
such contact that caused trouble.
In the 50 years since the Kinsey
Report was published, Americans
have behaved more or less as Kinsey
would have wished, erasing centuries' old stigmas, jumping into sexual
activity at a young age and placing
sexual pleasure near the top of the
hierarchy of life's goals.
Americans worship experts of every stripe - even to the point of
abandoning common sense. Kinsey
donned a lab coat and told us that all
sexual behavior was "natural" and
therefore beyond the reach of traditional morality. It was an absurd
claim on its face theft and murder
are natural, too - and now we know
that even the data he used were
fraudulent. Jones has shown that Alfred Kinsey began the project we
now call "defining deviancy down."

For More Information Contact:

RSVP America - 5021241-5552

'

Creators Syndicate, Inc.

nrnnar

nIVI

ncrunl

Published by A C C U W Y IN MEDIA, INC.

4455 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 330
Washington. DC 20008 Tel:(202)364-4401 Fau: (202)364-4098
E-mail:ar@aim.org H o m e Page:www.aim.org

Reed Irvine, Editor

KILLING THE LAST TABOO

By Cliff Kincaid
The decline of standards in American society, especially in

academia, has gone so far that even 60 ~ i n u t e recently

s
exposed
dubious "Gay and Lesbian Studies" courses. ' ~ c c & c ~
in
Acadesa (AM) h& carried this further with 2 & o c h g story in
its publication, CampG ~ e p expos&g
h
an assault at Cornell
University on the last sexual taboo, sex between adults and small
children. How far Cornell has been willing to go in its p k u i t of
diversity under President Hunter R: Raylings IlI, is illustrated by
a.course called "The Sexual Child." The following is an excerpt
from Michael Capel's article about this course in Campus
Report.
The syllabus for this course reads like a veritable who's-who
of pro-pedophilia academics and activists. Among the
authors presented in the course are Theo ~&dfort,formerly
on the board of directors of Paidika, a pro-pedophilia
magazine based in Amsterdam; Daniel Tsang, the author of
AIDS Taboo, who purports to deliver an "academic"
analysis of pedophilia; Pat Califia, a self-proclaimed
"sexual outlaw" -and author of the essay 'The Age of
Consent: The Great Kiddy-Porn Panic of '77" and the book
Macho Sluts; and Havelock Ellis, author of The School
Friendships of .Girls. Other materials-in .the course include
the pro-pedophilia book Child-Loving; the essay 'The
Hysteria of Child Pornography and Pedophilia;" For a Lost
Soldier, a German Nm about the relationship between a
twelve-year-old Dutch boy and an American soldier; and
Sally Mann's photographs of naked children. Students are
enlightened with such lectures as "The Child as Sexual
Object and Sexual Subject," "Big Bad Wolves," "Loving
Children," and "Having Children" (for which one of the
readings is Nabokov's Lolita).
'

The Professor's Candid Confession

English Professor Ellis Hanson, the course instructor, told
Campus Report, "The erotic fascination with children is
ubiquitous. One could hardly read a newspaper or turn on a
television without feeling obliged to accept, study, and celebrate
it" He said the coursewas designed to '(undermine preconceived
notions about what a child is, what sexuality is, and what it means

to love or desire a child." He told Michael Cape1that the course

was balanced in all areas of its treat- ment of the subject, with the
goal of "seekling] to complicate our understanding of child
sexuality." Capel gave an example of one of the course readings
that provided balance, Gayle Rubin's 'Thinking Sex." Here is
Capel's description of it.
"This article advances a pro-pedophile agenda w i h
academia," declaring that "those whose eroticism transgresses
generational boundaries are not to be judged or condemned."
Cape1 says that Rubin, a feminist anthropologist, declares that
"different sexual cultures" are to be celebrated as "unique
expressions of human inventiveness." Her stated goal, he writes,
is to construct a "radical theory of sex" that "must idenafy,
describe, explain, and denounce erotic injustice and sexual
oppression" that so victimizes "the community of men who love
underaged youth." Rubin writes, "Contemporary sexual politics
should be reconceptualized in terms of the emergent ongoing
development of this system, its social relations, the ideologies
which interpret if and its characteristic modes of conflict."
Professor Hanson denies that his course is pro-pedophilia
propaganda even though it obviously challenges the belief that
adult sex with children is an evil that cannot be tolerated by a
civilized society. One wonders if Cornell alumni and trustees are
aware of what is going on at their a h a mater. On the Cornell web
site, H. Laurance Fuller, chairman and CEO of Amoco
Corporation, is quoted as saying, "As an alumnus of Cornell
University, I am very proud of its academic reputation and its
abdity to k4.n leaders in business, academic and public service
disciplines." CEOs of other big companies who would be
shocked to learn that the training includes indoctrination in
pedophilia have similar endorsements on Cornell's web site.

But Cornell is not alone. Campus Report quotes New York University Press's Out of the Closets, a widely used text in
homosexual studies courses, as saying, "Face it, nice bodies and
young bodies are attributes, they're groovy." The author, Carl
Wittman, says that "kids can take care of themselves, and are
sexual beings way earlier than we'd like to admit. Those of us
who began cruising in early adolescence know this, and we were
doing the cruising, not being debauched by dirty old men."

In Lavender Culture, another New York University Press

text, Gerald Hannon writes, 'The age of consent law is a law
that we must fight to abolish. That we must be seen to fight
to abolish. A fight that must involve the energies and talents
of young people themselves."
Campus Report says, "Having won acceptance of homosexuality, adultery, cross-dressing, and a number of other
behaviors previously condemned as perversions, homosexual
activists are now setting their sights on what they view as the
final frontier: pedophilia." It points out that in her essay,
"Thinking Sex," one of the readings in Cornell's course on
"The Sexual Child," Gayle Rubin makes it clear that her call
for tolerance of adultkhild sex is not Limited to primitive
societies.

She writes, "Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s,

boy lovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find
defenders for their civil liberties, let alone erotic orientation.
Come-quently, the police have feasted on them. Local police,
the FBI and watchdog postal inspectors have joined to build a
huge apparatus whose sole aim is to wipe out the community
of men who love underaged youth. In twenty years or so, when
some of the smoke has cleared, it will be much easier to show
that these men have been the victims of a savage and
undeserved witch hunt. A lot of people will be embarrassed by
their collaboration with this persecution, but it will be too late
to do much good for those men who have s p e d their lives in
prison."
But adultlchild sex is not all they have in mind. Campus
Report quotes :pat Califia attacking parents who "make
sentimental speeches about the fleeting innocence of
childhood and the happiness of years unburdened by carnal
lust-and exhaust themselves policing the sex lives of their
children." He says,
"Children are celibate because their
parents prevent them from playing with other little kids or
adults."

Crimes & ConsequencesOf Kinsey

The moral rot this represents is not limited to academia. In
1995 Calvin Klein ran what critics said amounted to kiddie
porn ads for its products. The ads showed girIs and boys in
sexually provocative poses. The federally-funded National
Endowment for the Arts came under heavy criticism for
underwriting exhibits of photographs of nude children. The
photographs were part of a posthumous exhibit of the work of
Robert Mapplethorpe, a homosexual who died of AIDS.

Senator Dianne Feinstein, who says she is offended by

President Clinton's lies about his relationship with Monica
Lewinsky, pressed hard for Senate confirmation of the
ambassadorial appointment of openly homosexual activist
James C. Hormel. His $500,000 grant to the San Francisco
Main Library for a Gay and Lesbian Center has underwritten
the display of pro-pedophilia tracts and homosexual
pornography. Hormel has also funded pro-homosexual
campaigns directed at youth.

The attack that we are witnessing today on the adultkhild sex

taboo is the result of a 50-year campaign launched by Alfred
Kinsey to redefine normality in sexual practices. An explosive
new book by Dr. Judith Reisman, Kimey: Crimes &
Consequences, examines in detail how sex researcher Kinsey
and his allies, in groups such as the ACLU, undermined'
America's moral and legal foundations. Kinsey's books
launched the 1960s sexual revolution that now has the nation
in its grip. She provides the definitive proof that Kinsey
himself relied on cruel and sadistic sexual experiments
conducted by pedophiles on children as young as only a few
months.

Fifty years after Kinsey's first book, Sexual Behavior in the

Human Male, was published, many people are still not aware
that Kinsey used pedophiles for his "research." His disciples
at theKinsey Institute at IndianaUniversity do not dispute this
anymore, admitting that Kinsey's research was based, in part,
on "a small number of adult men who had engaged in sexual
contacts with childrk." The institute plaj.i do- or ignores
the evidence that children were harmed by these "contacts"
and continues to insist that Kinsey did "pioneeringwork [that]
has contributed to more open discussion of sexual issues."
But in view of what is contained in the Stan Report about
President Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky,
many people-liberals
and conservatives alike-are
now
questioning the value of all of this "open discussion."
Regardless of where they stand on Clinton's impeachment,
many are expressing the view that such talk-and behaviorshould be put back in the cultural closet. Before this is done,
however, America would be well-advised to confront the truth
about Kinsey himself. He was, to use old-fashioned jargon, a
dlrty old man. More than that, however, he was a pervert who
protected and advised pedophiles.

One of Kinsey's leading disciples in the U.S. today is Hugh

Hefner, founder of Playboy magazine, whose graduate work
in sociology at Northwestern University included a term paper
analyzing U.S. sex laws in the light of Kinsey's research.
Besides making his magazine the first example of "coffeetable pornography" in the U.S., his Playboy Foundation
poured millions of dollars into the ACLU, the homosexual and
abortion rights movements, the drug legalizationmovement,
and other liberal-left groups. It is noteworthy that Reisman
produced a federally-supported 1989 study of the various
leading "men's magazines," entitled, "Images of Children,
Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler,"
which found that Playboy has run numerous images and even
cartoons depicting children as sexual objects or enjoying
themselves as sexual partners of adults.

No Scandal Here
Despite their intense interest in some sex scandals, the media have
continued to refuse to provide the details about this one. 'This is a sex
story," comments Robea Knight of the Family Research Council,
"and it should be a huge story." One explanation for the cover-up may
lie in the realization among supporters of Kinsey that the

discrediting of him and his "research" would undermine the easy

access to and discussion of sex that underpins the abortion,
pornography, sex education and entertainment industries. In short,
the discrediting of Kinsey would undermine the case for sexual
promiscuity.

Several conservative-oriented publications, including Nationul

Review, Reader's Digest, and The American Spectator, have run
excellent articles about Reisman's revelations. And the Family
Research Council and Concerned Women for America have
both highlighted Reisman's disclosures in their own national
educational campaigns. But the establishment media, with few
exceptions, have been noticeably silent. It was left to a British
documentary producer, T i Tate, to confirm Dr. Reisman's
research, identifying at least two of Kinsey's pedophiles,
including a Nazi storm trooper, and identifying one of Kinsey's
victims. This documentary, 'Xinsey's Pedophiles," aired in
Great Britain on August 10,1998. Even though it is about an
American's exposure of the damage done by the bad science of
one of the most influential Americans in this century, it is not
clear whether it will be televised in the U.S.
Kinsey's best-selling 1948 book and his follow-up 1953 volume,
Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, gave rise to the dubious and
false notions that illicit and deviant sexual behavior was normal,
that 10 percent of America's population was homosexual, and that
children were sexual beings h m birth. This disinformation,
disseminated to the h e r i c a n people through the mass media and
academia, helps explain the rise in sexual promiscuity, adultery,
homosexual activism, and even pedophilia.

However, it wasn't until 1981 that Kinsey's sex data were

critically examined in detail. It was then that Dr. Reisman
announced at an international conference that her investigations of Kinsey's research had revealed that a series of tables in
a chapter of the book on child sexuality was based on sexual
experiments on children conducted by pedophiles. In 1990,
Reisman's findings were published in the book, Kinsey, Sex and
Fraud, published by a small Louisiana firm, Huntington House
(now Vital Issues F'ress.) By 1994, the Family Research Council
had released its own video, The Children of Tabk 34, based

publicized serves to illustrate how America's political, academic

and media elites have become accessories to Kinsey's assault. In
contrast to the massive publicity campaign that greeted the
publication of Kinsey's work back in 1948, a husband-and-wife
team, Ron and Eunice Ray, have carried the load, working tirelessly
with Judith Reisman personally to get out the truth about Kinsey's
record. A great deal of credit is owed to them. Ron is well-known to
many as a decorated Vietnam veteran and expert on military affairs
who played a key role in defeating President Clinton's plan to force
open homosexuals into the military. Eunice founded RSVP
(Restoring Social Virtue and Purity) America to highlight
Reisman's evidence against Kinsey.
The British documentary takes the Reisman book, using her
information in a dramatic way, and then expands on if adding some
extraordinary details. One of the most interesting but controversial
aspects of the film is the platform that is given to supporters of
Kinsey, including some of his co-workers. Paul Gebhard, a former
Kinsey associate, confirms that they h e w at the time that their
reliance on data from pedophiles "was illegal, and we knew it was
illegal." Nevertheless, they used the data and kept the sources
hidden.

Information from one of the pedophiles, identified for the first

time as "Rex King," a U.S. Government land examiner, was
originally provided to Kinsey by his mentor, Dr. Robert
Dickenson. Gebhard confirms that Dickenson had advised King
how to "scientifically" measure sexual activity in children by
using a stopwatch to time orgasms and measuring the size of
their genitalia as they are aroused. These were recorded in
diaries provided to Kinsey, who used them in his research. One
of the notations from one of the diaries read simply,
"Experimented with baby." One of King's descriptions of the
activity went as follows: "Extreme tension with violent
convulsion. Often involving the sudden heaving and jerking of
the whole body. Groaning, sobbing or more violent cries,
sometimes with an abundance of tears, especially among young
children."
These diaries became the ''proof' in his book, in a series of statistical
tables, that children were sexual beings from birth. Table 34

largely on Reisman's research.-This'le&-tothe only major

included notes on the time it-took him to bring the children

network coverage of the matter, a special "Eye on America"

segment by correspondent Wyatt Andrews, which aired on the
CBS Evening News in 1995. Bob Knight, the writer and
producer of the FRC 6lm, called the CBS News story a "very
good report" but has been aghast that there has been no followup by any other major media outlet.

multiple orgasms. One child, a four year old-boy, was masturbated

26 times over a 24-hour period. Interviewed in the film, Reisman
calls this practice by its correct name: sexual torture. What's more,
the documentary demonstrates that this was not just old data,
accumulated before Kinsey made contact with King. It shows that
Kinsey continued receiving pedophile data until 1954, one year
after his second volume on human sexuality was published.

Kinsey's Pedophiles Exposed

This is where the matter lay until this year, when Reisman's Institute
for Media Education self-published Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences. Reisman was forced to go the route of self-publication
because several major book publishers declined to get involved
with the project This rejection illustrates the influence that
Kinsey's allies stiU exercise in the media, entertainment and
publishing industries. Reisman's 323-page book is a monumental
work that is more than a scholarly analysis of subversion of our
culture. The manner in which it was published and how it has been

to

Clarence Tripp, who was hired by Kinsey to make sex films,

expresses satisfaction, even pride, in Kinsey's reliance on these
pedophiles. Tripp insists that all of King's victims "thought he
was wonderful" but then corrects himself to say that some young
girls who agreed to the sexual contacts found them very painful
"and yelled out" when the sexual contact took place. He said this
was because they "were very young and had small genitalia and
[King] was a grown man with enormous genitalia And there
was a fit problem."

Kinsey's Monstrous Role Models

a b h a r d describes King in matter-of-fact terms this way: "Sex
was his main hobby in life. Anything was a sexual object to him.
He was interested in having sex with men, women, animals, and
children. And he was curious to see what would happen." Tripp
adds, "His first sexual contact was overt intercourse with his
grandmother. He had looked up his family t r e e t h e r e were 33
or 38 members. He had had almost all of them. He had had
intercourse with hundreds upon hundreds of males and females
of every conceivable age. My memory is that it exceeded 600..."
Curiously, however, Tripp defends King, saying that he was an
"extremely conservative" individual, "there was never a charge
against him," and he was never arrested for anything.
Such statements by Kinsey's sympathizers illustrate the totally
debased moral standards that they have sought to promote. Their
inclusion in Tate's documentary might be seen by some as an
endorsement of Kinsey's amoralization of sex. They could be
interpreted as an acknowledgment that Kinsey's research had
scientific value and that he was justified in using data supplied to
him by individuals such as King who appeared to lead normal lives.
This was clearly not Tate's intention. He commented that he was
"struck by the seemingly rational way Tripp makes his
extraordinary claims." He said that as he worked on the film, "I had
to consult the t a k s again 'to be sire we had transcribed them
correctly.' When I did, I'c&e to the reluctant conclusion that it
wasn'f I&'who had suffered d h a g e to mental faculties."
r >%3
r:,4. .J- a
- 7 r .
.5
:
... ,

--

defense of Kinsey, Bancroft claims that he never instructed

pedophiles about what they should do to children and that he
only passively received data &om others.

But this is proven false in another part of the f

ilm which
examines the case of another of Kinsey's pedophiles, a former
German Nazi commandant, Fritz von Balluseck. A senior
Nazi party official and storm trooper, von Balluseck during
World W a r n commanded a ghettoin an occupiedPolish town.
During this time, and in the years that followed, he sexually
abused hundreds ofboys and girls,recording these activitiesin
diaries that were turned overto Kinsey. When one of his victims
was murdered, he was investigated by the German police, who
discovered his contacts with Kinsey. Von Balluseckwas never
charged with murder but pleaded guilty to sexually abusing
more than 30 children. At the trial, the judge criticizedKinsey
by name for failing to report an activepedophile to the police.
Under questioning by the judge, von Balluseck testified that
Kinsey had told him how to perform certain activities on the
children.
The final answer to the question of Kmsey's personal
involvement in pedophilia may lie in the diaries of von
Balluseck and others that are locked-up and under the control
of the Kinsey Institute today. The Institute refuses to release
them, even though they would undoubtedly iden* some of the
victims and clanfy the matter of Kmsey's personal involvement
in pedophilia.

Th& is BBieferenceto &a~&&T i i Tate from the defenders of the

sex& re~olutii;n^~r&od
by'&&y.

~ h eobviodfhew
j
him as
they ehein:. He h i beehlac&y of suffering from %curable
brain damage;" &d he has b&n labdeb an ally of "America's
rabid Christian rightVIfhehas an a g e d ' it is reflected in one of
the final segments of the film, where a victim of one of Kinsey's
pedophiles, Esther White, is intemewed. Breaking down in tears,
she recalls how her father abused her as a child and recorded the
"data" for Kinsey. She calls for an official investigation of Kinsey
and hisinstitute and expresses astonishmentthat bothKinsey books
are being republished.
Kinsey, who was presented to the public in the 1940's and 50's as a
devoted husband, father, and family man, is unmasked in the film
as an active but closeted homosexual who even developed a taste for
films showing sexual masochism. He was so twisted sexually that he
circumcised himself with a pocket knife without anesthesia.

Kinsey and his colleagues feared exposure. Even today, Gebhard is

shown in the film complaining that a "Senator from Texas" and a
"Senator Burton" had urged congressional scrutiny of the Kinsey
Institute and its records, to identify and prosecute the pedophiles.
He is referring to Steve Stockman, a former Congressman from
Texas, and StateSenatorWoody Burton of Indiana, who had urged
such a probe. Dozens of members of Congressjoined with them in
that effort
In an extraordinary exchange, Kinsey Institute director John
Bancroft is asked about the cost of receiving data from pedophiles
and therefore putting more chddren at risk of being sexually abused.
"Consider the cost of remaining in ignorance," he responds in part. In

The German connection suggests something even more

ominous: were some of these victims Jewish children from
Nazi slave labor and death camps? In the final chapter of her
book, Reisman strongly suggests this may have been the case.
She focuses on Kinsey's association with another controversial individual, biologist Herman J. Muller, a communist
sympathizer who worked on medical experiments with the
Nazis during and after Hitler's rise to power. Muller, who also
lived in Russia, was on the faculty of Indiana University and
worked with Kinsey in the 1940s.

What You Can Do

Send the enclosed cards or your own cards or letters to Cornell
University President Hunter R. Rawlings Ill, Mr. Peter C.
Meinig, chairman of the executive committee of Cornell's
board of trustees, and Harvey Kinzelberg, a member of
Cornell's board of trustees and amajor donor to the university.
Use the fourth card enclosed to order Judith Reisman's new
book, Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences, from AIM for $19.95
plus $350 for shipping and handling.

AIM REPORT is published twice monthly by Accuracy In Media,

4455 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington DC 20008, and is
free to AIM members. Membership dues are $35 a year. Dues and
contributions to AIM are tax deductible. Corporate membership is

Book Reviews
Sex the &leaswe ofAll Things: A Life ofAlfred C. Kinsry.By Jonathan
Gathorne-Hardy. (Bloornington: Indiana University Press, 2000.
Pp. xi, 5 13.Illustrations, appendices, notes, bibliography, index.
$39.95.)

Alfred C. finsey, whose 'Kinsey Reports," S e m a l Behavior in

the Hunzan M a l ~(1948) and Sema2 Behavior irz the H u n m t Female
(19531,made Indiana university into a center for research on hunmn
sexual behavior, was a cor~troversinlfigure in the 1950s because of
his outspoken challenges to official codes of sexual conduct, Hi-s SUCcesv depended upon staunch support from Indiana University president Herman B Wells and the f i n a n c i a l backing of the National
Research Council and the Rockefeller Foundation. Voted "Hoosier of
the Year" by the Sons of Indiana in 1954, Knsey convinced leading
scientists that h u m a n sexual behavior could and should be studied
scientifically and that thc rcsults should inform discussion of public
policy, At the end of the twentieth century, however, Kinsey remains
a polarizing symbol. He has become the patron saint of gay liberation
for his outspoken defense of homosexual acts and, in t u r n , is demonincd by Christian fundamentalists as a sexual predator who used
the cloak of science to Iegitimate personal mis~onduct.
Jonathan Gathornc-H,udq/s biography of Kinsey, first published
in Great Britain in 1998, reflects the contemporary struggles to expropriate Kinsey for service in our culture wars. Apparently GathorneHardy's goal is t o explain and defend a "great man" whose work
remains the best that we have on human sexual behavior. Following
in the wake of James H, Jones's deeply researched A l f i - ~ dC. K i ~ z s e ~ :
A PubLicIPriuate Life (1997), Gathorne-Hardy has fcw f:x:ta t o add
to the record, but he seeks to counter scholars who have written about
Kinscy and failed to appreciate him with adequate enthusiasm. The
result;is R chatty biography in which the narrative is often intern p t e d both by critiques of Jones and Paul Robinson (whose The Modernization of Sex [I9891 included an interpretation of Kinsey) and by
forays into the philosophy of science. Gathorne-Hardy's
case for Kinsey is strong on some issues, including fisey's n-dA~odology and the place of his increasingly compulsive persor~alsexual
within his research, but the argument is weak on the institutional a d
contexts that Jones carefully explains
that are
essential t o this story.
Gathome-Hardy justifies another longbiography of Kinsey
by
claiming that "Jones' Kinsey was a man appnllingly wax-ped and disdriven by vicious pcrsond 'dcrnons,' to such a degree and i n
that eventuaUy he almost ceased t o be a nloral bcing7
and largely ccascd'to be an objective rescrrchcr, his data 'shwcd'
and 'flawed' t o such an extent that, in effect, e s ~ e n t i 3 y ~ofa ~
hist ~

torted,

50 many ways

science were fraudulent" (p. viii). However, Gathor~le-Harc?yls

Ytotally different Kinsey" is basically the same man as the one portrayed
by Joncs. Jones certainly tried to make clear his respect both for Kinsey the pioneer sex researcher and for the man whose "great accomplishment was to take his pain and suffering and usc it t o transform
himself into an instrument of social reform . . . . (Jones, p. 77%).
Gathorne-Hardy is clearly more sympathetic to thc private Kinsey
whose homosexual sad masodlistic acts posed dangers fir his research
project and ultimately his health, but that spccial cmpat,hy is a poor
substitute for the critical pcrspective that Kiilsey conlmands as one
of th,c modern, world's most inlportant advocates of sexual rcfor~n.
3)

JAMESW. RICBD,pr~Ic!ssorof history at Rutgcrs University-Ncr Brung~yiek,New Jersey, is the author of Thc Birth Co~rrrolMo~*emcnt
arid Americn~~
Socir.tj9: FIorn Private Iricc to Public Vinur (1988)and is currently nt work on "The Road to Viogra:
Bionwdical Scx Resriirch and Am:rican Society."

_-.---,
S
>-T,

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMW 8, 1993 .,,

POST INSIGHT, OPINION & VIEWS

OLD

fl intefestingFirst Amend-

ment case cropped up this

weekend.
The North American Man Boy
Love Association. the nation's
~ r e m i e rchampion of pedophil-

ual behavior but to alter attitudes. to undermine the traditional norms of morality. And .
that he did.
As Dr. Judith Reisman wrote a '
decade ago, in his chapter on '
Child Sexuality in "Sexual-'
Behavior in the ~merican.'
Male" Kinsey & Co. claimed,
co-uuthors, shown in 1953.
that, based on scientifically
validated methods, theq; had
contained- nine malea with
proven that children, including
known histories of child molesinfants. "sought adult sexual attation. and b) Of the 317 children
tention naturally and that they
subjected to "varied and repeat- '
were generally unharmed by
ed" sexual stimulation (three of.
adult and child sexual acts -inthem for 24 hours straight).
clusive of fondling' and inter;
many
trembled.
wept.
course
and that in man
screamed, fainted, went into
sakes children were benefit&
convulsions and fought their
and enriched thereby:'
"pPrtners" (Klneey'h term for
Here, wrote Dr. Reisinan, i s
the criminals sexually abusing
the root of the idea that "chil- . them):
I
dren are viable sex objects" ~ h & eare only two ways Kinthe idea NAMBLA wants writs e y could have confirmed the
ten into law. .
precise reactions of those chilReisman's own analysis of Dr.
dren. One is to have collaboKinsey's work found that: a)
rated in molesting ihem. in
The experimental team used a t
which case Kinsey ought to
the Indiana Institute for Sex Rehave been horsewhipped. The
search (now Kinsey Institute)
second is to have relied on the
testimony of pedo~hiles.whose
reports abouf the responses of
Dr. Alfred K;nsey,
children they molested a r e
about a s scientificahy valid as
N A W A rnes&h,
the testimony of a rapist about
was U charlatan, .:
how much his victim "enjoyed"
the assualt.
a fraud and very '
In a new book, "Degenerate
Moderns" (Ignatius Press), E.
possibly U serjd
Michael Jones further investigates Dr. Alfred Klnsey.
child molester.
In the name of science. Jones
writes, A1 Kinsey gathered the

--

promoter ' b l a n d Stevenson. "we

don't want society t~ exploit
them."
Asked by The Washington
Times if exploitation might not
have been involved in a local
scandal where two grown men
lured an 11-year-old boy into
acts of sex. Stevenson said: "If it
was what the 11-year-old
wanted to do, you have to ask,
did he ask for it? Did he enjoy
it?"
To locate the source of such
mlluted ideas, we need not go
ar.
They sprang full-blown from
he mind of the grand old man
)f American "sexology," Dr. A1red Kinsey himself.
In his new book. "The Fifties."

Prmf that Kinsey was a mountebank comes with confirmation

that, in his survey of American
males, he rigged his numbers by seeking out ex-convicts and
known deviates. To assess the
sexual behavior of the average
American male in the conservative '40s. A1 headed straight foe
the tenderloin district. His famous 10 percent figure for the
share of adult males who are
homosexual has been exposed
as bogus, The correct figure,
published lately on page one of
David Halberstam's old New
York Times, is 1 percent or 2
percent.
Kinsey was no scientist; he
was a propagandist. His purpose
was not just to learn about sex-

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.

To view this item online, visit http:~www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky excomm/20000315 xex kinseys fraushtml

limdd~@%DenjS!
Wednesday, March 15, 2000

Kinsey's fraud invades the Church

by Eunice Van Winkle Ray

The sexual revolution was based on a lie. Judith Reisman has spent thirty years
uncovering the fmth. (National Review, May 19,1997)
The truth she uncovered is that the revolution began with Dr. Alfred Kinsey in
1948. Moreover, all accreditation in the field of American sexology flows from
his fraudulent data. Dr. Reisman's primary interest in Kinsey's sexuality data is
its toxic impact on chldren -- as revealed in her latest book, "Kinsey, Crimes &
Consequences."
The main pipeline for dispensing Kinseyan sexuality to American school
children has been the public schools. Their teachers are meticulously trained by
the Sex and Information Council of the United States (SIECUS). Founded in 1964
at the Kinsey Institute in Bloomington, Indiana, SIECUS was created by leading
Kinseyan proponents of the emerging American sexuality field. Sex industry
entrepreneurs like Hugh Hefner eagerly bankrolled SIECUS. As a result,
accredited academic sexperts now uniformly testify before juries and judges that
pornography -- once considered a vice -- is harmless today, and even therapeutic.
Tlus week the emerging rival to SIECUS, the National Abstinence Clearinghouse
(NAC), telegraphed a startling announcement: After 12 years as president and
CEO of SIECUS, Debra Haffner will resign on May 31,2000. Ms. Haffner is
returning to the seminary. But Haffner's dash to the seminary must not be
misread as repentance. She is not retreating. Rather, this move is calculated to
advance her revolutionary faith. She plans to further "educate"the Church with
the SIECUS "anything goes" philosophy. This includes Kinsey's fraudulent claim
that, "children are sexual from birth." As a Kinseyan disciple, Haffner's mission
has always been to liberate cluldren for sexual activity by:
Stimulating youngsters with "teaching aids" like SIECUS-sanctioned
pornography
Training students in methods for "safer sex"
Dispensing condoms in elementary school
h t t p : / / w w w . w o r l d n e t d a i l y . c o m / r e a d e r s e ~ O O 15
3 -xex-kinseys-fiau. shtm 311 5/00

Kinsey's fraud invades the Church

Page 2 of 3

Providing post-puberty abortion services

In 1996, Ms. Haffner took a six-month sabbatical from SIECUS to work as a
Research Fellow at the Yale Divinity School. There she conducted independent
research on scriptural sex. According to a 1997 SIECUS newsletter, Haffner
began her career in sexology 21 years ago. She had been active in a liberal
religious faith for more than a decade. But in her first seminary month, she
"profoundly realized" that sexology was her "calling."From that experience, she
authored "A Time to Speak." h this controversial booklet, Haffner reinterprets
scripture to condone Kinsey's "free sex" - popularized to children by SIECUS.

Coincidentally, while Kmsey's scientific authority is being discredited, Haffner

feels "called to a more formalized ministry." She will pursue full-time seminary
studies "in order to build the foundation to develop a national ministry on
sexuality and religion." Furthermore, Haffner says, "I feel a sense of grace that I
am accepting God's call for the next steps in my vocation."
Haffner leaves the SIECUS coffers full and its support base intact. Recently, the
government joined pornographers in support of SIECUS' Kinseyan mission. The
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Adolescent and School
Health have granted SIECUS a five-year cooperative agreement to continue its
work to promote "school health" across the country.
Concerned citizens ask, "Why?"After more than two decades of the SIECUS
brand of "safe sex," sexually transmitted diseases among juveniles have reached
epidemic proportions. "Today there are more than 12 million new cases
annually" (The Washington Times, Jan. 25,2000). Half are incurable. But SIECUS
keeps hidden the fact that condoms do not protect against Human Papilloma
Virus (HN).
Peter Brandt, spokesman for the National Coalition of Abstinence Education,
explains why there is no campaign to protect the health of our children from
these deadly, misguided government policies. " [Blecause ultimately for groups
like the Center for Disease Control and Planned Parenthood to come out and say
that condoms do not prevent the spread of HW would really be an admission
that they have been operating for years under failed public-health policy." So it
is not just professional pride that keeps them silent. The real bottom line is
money. If the programs fail and people know it, millions of government dollars
flowing into Kinseyan-based programs would dry up.
Since feeling the threat of the National Abstinence Clearinghouse, SIECUS has
"gotten religion." NAC has emerged as a major challenge to SIECUS' control
over the minds and bodies of our children. To preserve children's health and
well-being, NAC is developing "no-condom" policies and is distributing real
health-based, abstinence-only curricula to schools.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/readerservice/printer-friendl.../20000315-xex -kinseys-fiau.shtrn 3115/00

Kinsey's fiaud invades the Church

Page 3 of 3

Despite NAC's healthy results, SIECUS receives the lion's share of government
funding. Backed by the folks at CDC, SIECUS is charging ahead of the
competition with a new National School Health Education Clearinghouse. This
agency will provide access to so-called "model"programs and policies, curricula
and curricula evaluations, sexuality education, and teacher training. In short, the
same failed Kinseyan-based programs are being recycled. Twenty years ago,
doctors in "good communities" might treat one case of venereal disease in a
month. However, since the advent of SIECUS, many doctors see such cases daily
-- the majority suffering from cancer-producing HPV.
But Ms. Haffner is not satisfied with mainlining Kinsey to our children in
school. She is now bringng her "anything goes" gospel into the Church. Yet
Christ's teachings on purity, marriage and family living are clear. Only the
marital act is sanctioned by Scripture -- which leaves no argument for Haffner's
perverted sexuality theories.
For Haffner's tactics bring us back full circle to zoologist Kinsey. In 1948 -- as
Reisman discovered -- he simply repackaged the ancient theology for modern
sensibilities under a "scientific"covering. Beginning in the post-World War II
generation, Kinsey espoused its tenets: Man, as creator, is the measure of all
things. Therefore, humans are unbound by moral or biological constraints. In
fact, SIECUS' first director, Mary Calderone, called Kinsey's sexual liberation
gospel a "new religion." Kinsey caustically berated the negative effect of the
"inaccuracies"and "paranoia"fostered by the narrow Christian religion. Now
Haffner's missior is to correct these "inaccuracies."Like the proverbial wolf in
sheep's clothing, Haffner will minister to the Church the ancient worship of the
male and female generative powers -- all in the name of sexuality and
reproductive rights.
The aftermath of the Sexual Revolution of the 60s is now painfully obvious.
Kinsey has subverted American culture. He called his method science, but
religion was always his goal. His pseudo science opened the door to the
toleration of more and more perversity in the body politic. And many in the
Church have been compromised. Now the high priestess of sexuality training,
Debra Haffner, will use the covering of seminary to gain the credentials
necessary to complete Kinsey's mission within the Church body.

Eunice Van Winkle Ray is the founder of RSVP America. To read more articles like this one, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com~

http:l/www.worldnetdaily.com/readerse~
-friendl...I200003 15-xex-kinseys-fi-au.shtm 311 5/00

C'ography claims Kinsey7ssex Me tainted

By Gerry Lanosga
STAFF WRITER

The late Alfred Klnsey, who was

Ia:med and villfied for his research

human sexuality. Is portrayed In
:LW
blography as a crusader for
. ~ a lliberation whose work was
:ked by his own unusual sexual
IC vities
T>e book, by the well-regarded Uniwry of Houston historian James H.
nes. Is excerpted in an artlcle -3

KlNSEY
continued from Page

titled Dr. Yes - in The New Yorker's

latest edition. whlch hit newsstands
Mondav.
~ h e ~ s o m e t l m esordid
s
account Is
sure to relgntte debate about Klnsey
at a time when hls namesake. lndlana
University's Kinsey Institute, h a s ,
been working hard to move beyond
the controversies that have dogged It.
Aljred C. Klnsey: A Publlc/Private
Lye Is to be published in October the same month the Klnsey Instltute
for Research In Sex, Gender and Re-

and 1950s are credited with. In

Bancroft's words, demystlfylng
sex and maklng It somethlng that
can be openly talked a b u t in US.
society.
Klnsey died In 1956.
But hls work in recent years
has been strongly attacked by
scholars questlonlng its methodologies and some rellglous conservatlves complaining about Its em' p h a s i s o n "deviant" s e x u a l
practices.
Jones' book throws fuel on both
fires.
Whlle he echoes Bancroft's contention about Kinsey's legacy and
adds that he was a devoted husband and sGcessfu~father. Jones
also deplcts' th'e renowned sclentlst a s a homosexual and masoch1st "who, a s he grew older, purs u e d a n Interest In extreme
sexuality wlth increasing compulsiveness."

Those pursuits. according to

Jones, included:
Kinsey. hls wife. Clara, and
others havlng sex with at least
one of the subjects of hls studles.
a young professional man whom
Jones does not Identify.
Klnsey's decree that members of his close circle of friends
and researchers could have extramarital sexual lialsons of all
stripes, a s long a s he approved
first.
The filmlng of varlous sex
acts In the attlc of Klnsey's Bloomington home. Including Klnsey engaging in "masochistfc masturbation."
J o n e s writes that one staff
member's wife talked of feeling
"sickenlng pressure" to have sex
on film to protect her husband's
career a t the instltute.
Jones, who has been researching Klnsey for 25 years, argues
that the sclentlst's own sexuallty
carried over Into hls work and
affected hls findlngs.
"The Americans who most persistently engaged Kinsey's atten-

production Is planning to observe its

50th anniversary In the field of sex
research.
Institute Director John Bancroft
sald he welcomed the book as a valuable histortcal contribution, but he
worried about how condensed versions Hke The New Yorker's might be
used to carlcature Kinsey.
"It's 900 pages long." Bancroft sald
of the book. "lt wiU get bolled down.
people will take thlngs out of context,
and they'll use It In their ongolng

tion were people who were either

on the margins or beyond the
pale: homosexuals, sadomasochlsts. voyeurs, exhibitionlsts, pedophiles. transsexuals, transvestites, fetishlsts," Jones wrltes.
IU offlclals have steadfastly defended Kinsey over the years, but
Bancroft and some former assoclates have acknowledged problems with Klnsey's statistical
samplings.
But Bancroft takes Issue wlth
Jones' statement that Kinsey's
"methodology and his sampllng
technlque virtually guaranteed
that he would flnd what he was
lmklng for."
"(Kinsey] was a very principled
scientist." Bancroft sald.
He said that whlle Klnsey's
methods may not be acceptable by
today's standards, he thought he
was doing the right thing a t the
time.
Stlll, Bancmft sees Jones' book
a s a valuable one.
"It tells us that clearly (Klnsey]
had a very troubled sexual development hlmself, whlch I think we

attacks on Klnsey, whom they see a s

a sort of Antlchrfst. a sort of architect
of American decllne.
"That's grossly unjustifled. . . .
He's an Important figure In the 20th
century. I thlnk the majority of the
people wiU recognize that Importance
even If they don't like everything h e
did."
Klnsey's ploneering studles of human sexual behavior in the 1940s
See KlNSEY Page 2

probably all were aware of but

didn't have I t documented In so
)much detail," he sald. "(And) I
don't think It In any way detracts
from his reputation a s a ploneer."
Paul Gebhard, a close colleague
of Klnsey's whom Jones quotes
about the attic fllming sesstons.
refused to comment on those matters Monday.
"One of the cardlnal rules of
the Instltute has always been that
we cannot discuss the sexual acflvltles of anyone." he sald.
Gebhard did acknowledge being
interviewed by Jones and sald the
author Is a reputable scholar.
But he seconded Bancroft's concern about aspects of the h k
being distorted.
'There can't be much context if
you have it In a short journal
article." he said.
Jones, who served on the Kinsey lnstltute's science advisory
board, recelved his doctorate in
history at 1U on the strength of a
dissertation about the institute.

Details of the
late AMed Kinmy's personal
sex life are discussed in a

new b i i p h y .
The Indianapolis Star
Tuesday, August 19, 1997

For More Information:

Contact RSVP America

jO2/24 1-5552

7Yir K111.q I I I . S ~ ~ / Ii.tI ~ hoki/~g

V
fir
WoPk ulho uww h/rtvitwwl by [he Late
Dr. A b d C. Kinsq for bir studies ojtht
~ c m dbehavior of MI and women.
Hit research, conducted in the lale Fwties. resdted'in the firnow K i n s q report.
Dr. Kinsq questioned about l8,OOO persons; 8000 a n thought lo be still living.
The inrtilule wants to conduct fillmu-up
mearch and mLr ht'& w m l
it~lnvitweeswile to The Kituey Instdutq
Monism Hall, Indiana Universj ,
Blomningion, Indiana 47405. and givt
name. aa&u, klcpAunr number, birth
dale, year of thr origitd intenlicicr nnd
the cily in wlrick it rtws rr~~rrltcclrrl.

D R ALFRED Klrucy,
By PATRICKI
celebrated author of the
" K l r w r Rewrtr" of'
In a critlcd chapter d
thmo h e a d t i a m w u
d t b u a ~ l t t t t l n cfraud h t nr.1 book oa chlld
w
oollaboralqr la ~ a & l l t y *W
y ud
' cdmlnd chlld LkUd
w1kague.a
contended
Elther b. n a l r e d hlr UtrZ bucd u p thelr
data ocr achlCd wxuallty" dentlffc.1Iy vIlldc(ed
from k n o r n chlld molu- method.,
thor
had
that ehlldrea
to v l d n ru

! chlatry ptrmltkd known

! n r dfmderr k crlrnl/ nally akrw chlldnn la
8
bl. ccu(dy. 24 d whom

--

cblld .aru.d u!ta

l8clwlve d I F h g md

b l u c o ~ ~
md L h . 1
y c u c r chlldraa

la w

I.to k p d h b d b ~ ~ ..umaurl
r .
d Klawy-8
Judltb A Rdraug
p(d)

0-d----yL.

Ir

-1-

/m7 ?By

*-

Wd-

-fa

dl,.

eorer,hrdk.sdtdlw
&- tho kdan d a gather-

y ~ lh . ' h a n h W l d a

YorrJ #
H.kauaboaQaqt,W

that-FhlL(iu,*labk
nu

W ~ k d r t O . l H I , ~
t b r m m e d t h e ~ took---d..
R,p&,-&,",dBcb.*.
#tbtrutb.adeilu-

b r l a t h a H u m u ~ "d..chlcrldetlm

&Atd

cr q u q co

.doum?u

mymk
-fa
,mck om cbW wrurllty.
c - : t 2 #.I

i. : .;
. 11. .
I . .

. . a

Assaulting

the 'most
vulnerable

PBCl

88 'ON

THE DAILY OKbAHOMAN

April 12, 11(99
P. 4

Point of View

'Acclaimed' Book Deserves Our Disgust

By Kenneth L.;Ervin 11

HE U.S. Customs Service perFormed a great mice in 1998

when it conducted $use raids on
sus ted members f the Wonderlan club, an int rnational Internet child pornography ring. In a
fivamonth investigation spanning
22 states and 14 natiabs, agents uncovered a database containing
over 1 0 0 , ~pornogpphic photo.
graphs of young ys and girls
that were traded ike baseball
cards.
A good question would be.
"-at is America coming to?" But
America has enough doomsayers
to last us until, well, doomsday.To
get at the problem, iQ1sgood to attack the root. So thq question we
should be asking is, ''What are we
coming hm?"The answer to that
question is simple: Alfred C. Kin.
sey.
In 1948, Kinsey - a zpologist -

released Sexual Behbulor m the

Human Male, a sex survey that

A good questwni to ask

about the recently wposed child o m ruphy
t is
ring would e: A
America coming td?" But
the question we shQuld
be asking is, V h a t are
we coming from?" The
answer to that question
is sim le: sex rese+cher
Alfkcfc.Kinsey. .

Kinsey's book
th chapter on
CWsexuality- is s eeped in pe-

dophilia Chapter EWe cantams

key tables that graphically detaU
the sexual abuse of children some as young as 2 months old.
The data, gleaned from the diaries
of serial pedophiles, is scientiticaIly calculated and recorded.

According to data, m y of the

chfldren were moIegted for 24
hours at a time.
Dr. Kinsey should qave handed
this information over tD the proper
authorities ao they co d use it to
prosecute me
who torhmd these children, bbt he didn't.
He kept thek identitieg a mmt.

a d

to strang& +use
it
might frighten them. He claimed
m t tmisodrtll disappmd of sor
acts between adults and
posed more hum to the
than the acts themselves. I
to

dophilia.
In fact, one of the chapters in

pedophile with whom Kinsey had

worked, Bancroft instead claimed
the kind of confidentiality applied
to doctorlpatient relationships an absurd claim considering the
fact that the pedophiles were never
patients of b y .
To date, the clamor over Kinsey
has gone largely unnoticed in the
media - the U.S. media that is.
Thanks to a recent British TV documentary, however, we now know
the names of two major pedophile
contributors to Klosey's child sexuality data.
Secret History: KKinsey's PaedoMiles reveals that Kinsey, in his
relentless efforts to aint children
as s d creatures
biab. collaborated with a Nazi pedophile
who was later convicted of molesting 30 children.
The former senior Nazi storm
trooper, Dr. Fritz Von Ball&,
was convicted in 1957 in a Berlin
trial in which hi8 corm
with Kinsey drew major eadlines
in Britain - but not in America.
(Thirty years later, the British m e
dia is once agah abuzz with news
of Kinsey's PeQOpbfle contacts,
while their Amerhm counterparts
can lay claim to less than a handhrlof articles.)
In an essay ublished tn the London Sunda~bb6erver, Tim Tat@,
producer the documentary that
aired last A
I0 on Y o r k d h
. ~e~e'itzsion%
U e i d 4, .vte,
"When. wij'set a b u t h v
how such a respected sc entist
came to publish accounts of child

gem

9"""

%E

Thirtyone
later. a1lone red e r , Ju th R+mq, Ph.D.,
began drawing attenhon td the fact
that the tables in Kinsey's Chapter
Five translated to little more than

open the files on

To his credit,
one of the tables - No. 34

Tt"
abuse chi1
that
by ffPhiles
n 4 o y sex
evidence
with
adults, we discovemdthat Kiasey's
la

detail-

relptiomhips with h b i u a d
molesters wem considerably more
extensive than had aver been revepled. curio*,
Klnse 8 all e a p s did no! want to
his
relationships with pedophiles, they

d;oy

name that

wanted to ceIebrate tnem,"

-1LFRED KINSEY
Reflections in the mirror

of

Venus

Russia Threaten!
Our Sea Power
BY GEORGE FIELDING ELIOT

LOOK Magazine, r

3-

r;.His 3 fe-x JT~o~:))!;,

:he A,: .?r:,:.>n ptlbJ~c
:, .!' :-p :'.j.~fp.&
by sna:?-c ', outh: r.ak o?
.)S K C R .

Free, .Z;:rsr\ C ,l i i r a e y h.ri.3 \:i!. .:!,!.9~glles

t..,q~\:il)& :rle fiyfi1 (?.. : i : + s
t i :.L r > P X lK9k
,'J; ~jC)('.~i0!
:',i;
i l<':. ;m,4,:e2 k???urc

!.,

;,iilg

\he t. : i q

,..,

per

S~rre
3 r~l!;r.i.ts01;
th2 R l ~ s e y
. r q i r>
tu:n
. ot.:w:.i
T~IG
.ri;-,t-r,

t n r?ic
,:. r;bvil:r, a: b , ;
3r.:- "?:!';
1;: 3 . r ; t : .

:,I

,, ,
, ):

. ,

1 !:,:. . . .

;:, .' ~ . iI : !

5,

:.I:;, .:

;.I

7:i;
l!ii!!,

..:uj-

. .of I),,:

,ti
)

. .:T,:A

,,!-,,,<,..tt:);bj

;,~

;,{

rt?prl

5 WI.,,~

.hnc.:. cf .;h?

!.~.!i: ;

t;:.

-.,;-.:i,

i,-::, ..r.,. -. .~:,,5:ic.r, ?!i1yrerf.it>.

;..{,*:i:

,?<,

yL,-o?";:

ht:,

1,':

E~~.I:..I:~

-\

!.I'

:I1 Wh'

;.'s Ir;cr;3;:
':-,,;. Ii,,,>.$+L!
t:.! r j ~ r , i + :kc! , ! I t o? !-.i* !:*<r
*ill
;1 < i R.!
Yi ,, .r,ri<'7-.c:,a,
: ;:3">,'
.:,;:,, : , ? ~ l + % *K;rx.?!,
.
' & ;r:.f. 2 , : :%!:.:
-21r ? V ,
.
;r.,k+:,];.
.,.:i: y , , , , r.,>,.;) t ( , < , r , ~ , % ~ i . , 7 F..
!:L:>l>; L! k:i:
: r , 1 c.,,
/ T I ~ msc
,
: >!<: .-.:.,3v
s.
: ~ , > l l i , : - < ) , <:;y,
5. :JW!:-, . < I . ! Y;.. 2 ,
: . {!.
; ! ~;,<r '::!:;gcy
RS:!y::.;" ,: :',<.
:i) in
,. ..
' ,- :'t,c !:rbl
t x < e v.:,li.i!~5 . *.I;:
I +;re.,
,!,-I: ,an.:
tc,r!:tj :'" i!.?, ,-,I .,. :-;h dg!2 !i.:
. , ,:hi:t,:31 ~,:r.?:?fi,
t'
' 1 '!, ?,,I.: I::,'. h~

.~:ri.:, ;+=,T.:

s,,

5: fui

>,,.>.>I:
1,1,

, I

(<.y#,&:*s

L'** \ C I ,

iL
.

.n.
,,>*,

n;yi,.:I.

i.: :'r+r-~'~!r~:?n..

L;:!

,'

;..,

:.:

'.

s.;,.-;...-

*-.+, .>-:

F?c,~:.L..Lt!iil:..., I.:<.

;1&
rr. .?.,1, i o - l L ~ 1 ; ? 1 i , .
+ F , L ,,Y, <.,FCC:! !:I!: l l , ? I.;;:,.

.,

i;

4:;*

.-.-<- -

=;?.b'

?,;:!:

- ,'I,,

i ;

! .a'??.

: ! . , T;]; I!?

:. ?;,
.s

l!:;.>;.

..ir..:l:j:;

294

SEX: F R O M NO-NO'S T O A N Y T H I N G G O E S

Attachment 3:
Pornographic Sexuality Courses
Spread to Catholic
Seminarians!

GOODBYE! G O O

GOODBYE! GOOD MEN

How Catholic Semivtaries
Turned Away Two Generations of
Vocations From the Priesthood

Michael S. Rose
Foreword by
Alice von Hildebrand

Rather, it is loss of faith and lack of

the source of this loss of faith or
leads to sexual aberration? Those
bacy is the cause of all the ills in t
ten consider the actions of bishops
of authority in Catholic dioceses
destructive behaviors among their
one such as Archbishop Weakland
lier, Weakland believes that one o
seminarians today - the few that h
had "multiple sex experiences" be
seminary. This might easily be co
his contempt for priestly celibacy
archbishop routinely allowed sem
what any normal person would c
program at his diocesan center titl
assessment," so seminarians coul
on sexuality to conform with wha
ers to be his more positive attitud
tration form promised to examine
(or not trained) to hold restricti
sexuality." 174 For at least ten yea
ans and many others attending th
a series of expiicit movies produce
distributor of other "educational
and Fancy Penises," "Hookers,"
Strategies of Black Lesbians") in

AQUINAS PUBLISHING LTD

CINCINNATI

174 Flyers and registration form from 1988

titudes" workshop conducted at Archdio
waukee.

Newsweek
November 1, 1993

P-

It's Academic?
-AN

FRANCISCO STATE UNI-

&ersity officials are refking

comment about revelations that
John DeCecco, a popular psychology teacher, serves as an
adviser to a Dutch magazine
that advocates
sex with children.
The campus paper, the Golden
Gater, broke the
story last week
that DeCecco sits
on the editorial
board of Paidikay
The Journal of - The journal
Paedophilia-a
small,*Lnsterdam-based,
avowedly pro-pedophha maga&e with a scholar& bent. ~ e Cecco told NEWSWEEK pedophdia is "not intrinsically"
wrong, and that U.S. views are
skewed by cases of adults preying on chddren: "Are we going
to let the sickos run society?
Are we going to deny children,
and adults, freedom to enjoy in
Me what could benefit them?"
He says h s interest in the journal is purely academic.
GREGORYC E R I Oand
L U C YH O W A R D
with bureau reports

Dececco
Course Reader

1 FRANCISCAN
SHOPS
NEW TEXT

'!

uam H B X U ~ / P
4-333-02237-8

HMSX 490

~ Y ~ H J

126

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pages
Origins and Uses of the Word Fuck

.....................................................1

Tropical Fish Sex Survey .........................................................................2

The Second American Revolution (Vidal) .........................................3-12
The Medical Model (Weeks)...................................................................13-23
The Erotic Comedies (Vassi) ..................................................................25-37
Myth .&kSexual Compulsivit> (LevineITroiden)............................39-55
A Sentimental Priesthood (Hiramelfarb) ...........................................57-58
Dismantling Gender Polarizcrion and
Compulsory Heterosexuality (Bsm).....................................................
59-64
Invention of Heterosexuality (I'atz)

....................................................65-82

Instruction and Advice for thc Young Bride ...................................83-84

Heterosexuality Questionnaire ..............................................................85
Scientists Discover the Gene for Heterosexuality in Men ..........87
Sexual Orientation is not Primarily a Biological
Phenomenon (Stein)..................., ..............................................................89-99
Masculinity. Law and the Far-lily (Collier) .....................................1 0 1 .112
House Prevents Gay Divorce (Morse)................................................. 113
The Manying Kind (Appiah) .................................................................
114-123

WHEREAS

a c h i l d ' r r e x u a l i t y i s j u s t a s m u c h a p a r t of cclm whole p e r s o n

f r o m b i r t h a r the blood t h a t flows in c o s vein., m a k i r g c o r
a e x u a l r i g h t r inhe r e n t and i n a l i e n a b l e , a n d W k e r e a s t h e Unlted
N a t i o n s O r g a n i z a t i o n p r o c l a i m e d a Unive r s a l 1 3 e c l a r a t i o n of
Human Rights i n 1948, r t a t i n g e v e r y o n e i a e n t ~ t l e dt o a l l the
r i g h t r and f r e e d o m s e n c o m p a s r e d in t h i s D e c l a r a t i o n without
d i r c r i m i n a t i o n 3f a n y kind, such a s r a c e , c o l o r , r e x , l a n g u a g e , :.eligioua opanlon,
n a t i o n a l o r r o c j a l o r i g i n , b i r t h o r o t h e r s t a t u r , and W h e r e a r a Dcsclaration of the
Righta of t h e Cllild w a r p r o c l a i m e d by UNO in 1959, but no m c n t i c ~ nw a r m a d e of
t h e s e x t m l n e e d s and r i g h t r of c h i l d r e n , and W h e r e a a a child not i.llowed to exp r e s s a l l t h e i n s t i n c t i v e d e s i r e r n a t u r e endowed c o with b e c o m e s an unhappy.
. - ,
f r u s t r a t e d , ant: - s o c i a l being and p o t e n t i a l c r i m i n a l , and Wherean i t i a t i m e t h e
people nf t h e U,uted S t a t e r and t h e i r l a w m a k e r s r e c o g n i z e t h e s e f i ~ c t rof l i f e and
a c t acc o r d i n g l y , T h e r e f o r e , the following i n a l i e n a b l e r i g h t s a r e s p e c l f i c a l l y s e t
f o r t h , t s be i m > l e m e n t e d by a p p r o p r i a t e l e g i s l a t i o n on a n a t i o n a l ,ind s t a t e l e v e l ,
a n d m e i l s u r e s taken f o r the r e - e d u c a t i o n of the c i t i z e n r y i n e v e r y
. p a r t of t h e
United S t a t e s , ,:his e d u c a t i o n to be a v a i l a b l e f r e e to e v e r y c i t i z e n , w h e t h e r school
child o ra a d u l t :
-

A CHILD'S SEXUAL BILL OF RIGHT:;

LEGAL P R CITEC TION
Eve:-y c h i l d r h a l l be l e g a l l y p r o t e c t e d
Ln c o s s c x u l r i g h t s r e g a r d l e s s of a g e
o r status a s a legal minor.
CHILD'S RII;HT T O COS O W N
PERSON
E a c h c h i l d 11ast h e right to p r i v a c y f o r
c o s crwn p e r s o n a l thoughtr, i d e a s ,
d r e a m s and e x p l o r a t i o n of con own
bod) without a n y kind of adult interf e r e n c e , d1lsectly o r i n d i r e c t l y
expressed.
SEX INFOR U T I O N
E v e ry c h i l d h a s t h e r i g h t to a c c u r a t e
s e x i n f o r m a t i o n and to be p r o t e c t e d
f r o m r e x m ~ s i n f o r m a t i o na r r o o n aa c o
i s at& t o rurderrtand t h i s l d o r m a tlon in s l m r l e t e r m s .
E MOTIONA L GROWTH
E a c 9 child i ~ a st h e right t o grow
mentally, payslcally, emotionally
a n d sparltually a a a f r e e , u n c r i p p b d
happy p e r s c n In a e c u r l t y s o co w i l l be
tole r a n t anc a p p r c c l a t l v e of o t h e r
~ n ddi d u a l s a n d t h e i r s e x u a l i t y .

SENSUAL I LEASURES
Eac .r c h i l d Iran t h e right t o fully e n j o y
t h e r e n a u a l p l e a s u r e . c o m a y feel
w i t h o u t *ha n e o r g u i l t .

LEARNING THE A R T O F L O V E
A U c h i l d r e n h a v e t h e right to l e a r n
the art of love beg.nning at a n y a g e
c o i s able to u n d e r s t a n d , j u s t a s c o
is e n t i t l e d to l e a r n a n y o t h e r a r t o r
skill.
CHOICE O F A SEX P A R T N E R
E v e r y child h a s tht: r i g h t t o loving
r e l a t i b n r h i p s , including sc!xual,
with a parent, sibling o r o t h e r re s p o n s i b l e adult o r c h i l c , and s h a l l b e
p r o t e c t e d and aidetl i n doing so by
being provided wit11 c o n t r a c e p t i v e s
and a i d s t o p r e v e n t v e n e r e a l disease.

PROTECTION FRCtM SEX

4-

SUPPRESSION
E a c h child has t h e r i g h t to be
protected from any form of s e x
r u p p r e s s i o n a t h o n e o r i n s o c i e t y so
t h a t in adulthood cc w i l l bc ca-pablr
of living c o s s e x 1i:'e a c c o r d i n g t o
c o s n a t u r a l d e s i r e : and no: a c c o r d ing t o the d i c t a t e s o f tradition.
OPPORTUNITY TC1A C K N O W L-

EDGE SEXUALITY
C h i l d r e n should halre t h e o:?portunlty
t o acknowledge what t h e y know and
feel about t h e i r ncxuaKty

(hthe Bill the new u n i r e x u a l pronouns a r e

umed:

c o f o r he /she / h i m / h e r and co. f o r h i * / h e r s )

( R e y i s e d January 1977)
CSC
F O B 5164. Sari-Diego, Ca. 92105, USA

.e

November gth:1998

To whom it may concern:

I Catherine Wr~ght,formerly Catherine Kohn, participated In the course, "Varratlons In
Human Sexualrty" (HMSX400 or PSY450), taught by John C. Dececco, In the fall of 'i996 The
followrng materrai was oilr- course reader The faculty presented no verbal or written opposrng
vrewpornt to the content n t h ~ sreade- Any alternatrve pro-family viewpornt came from
students disgusted w~ththe content, never from the faculty.
Th~sclass "Varratlons rn Human Sexuai~ty",is part of a "ciuster" In order g-aduate
from San Francsco State University, students are required to take three classes from any one
cluster There are usually seven to twelve classes available to choose from within each
disc~pline
Many stucfimts nalurally take Human Sexuality because of interest, and because they
think rt will be easy Presmtly, this class attracts up to seven hundred or more stude~tsper
semester The sttidents later discover- they are exposed to several hour-long video
presentations featurmg h 3rd-core pornography, bestiality, masturbatioil, homosexuat sex, and
lesbian sex One ;lass is devoted to a demonstration of a mrld form of sado-rnasochrsm There
are no pub114stucent evaluatrons of class content.
My opintom 1s that I hts class is brased, un-academ~c,insultrng to the religious community,
and simply aimed at forming popular opinion towards the agenda of the sex industry and
homosexual comniunity
Catherine Wright

UNIVERSITY MALES' SEXUAL INTEREST IN

CHILDREN: PREDICTING POTENTIAL INDICES CW
"PEDOPHILIA" IN A IVONFORENSIC SAh/[PLE
JOHS BRIERE.PKD.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavionl Sc:ences. L'niversiry of Southern California Schno of Medic1r.e

MARSHA
RUKTZ,M.A.
li'nibersity of Manitoba

survey was administered ro 193 male undergraduate studenrs regarding their sexual i lteres: in children.
we!l as their responses to a number of questions theoretically relevant to pedophilia. In tot: 1. 21% of subjects
reported sexual atfraction to some small children. 9 5 described sesual fantasies involving c h ~ l d n.
r ~5 % admitted to
kaving masturbated to such fantasies. and 7 @indicated
~
some likzlihooj of having sex with a child if they could avoid
c?e:cc:ion and punishment. These sexual interens were associated with negative early sexual experiences, masrurba:ion to pornography, self-reported likelihood of raping s woman, frequent sex partners. sexual can lifts, and a.titudes
supponive of sexuai dominance over women. The d a u did not, however. s u p p n clinical theofits rqarding sexual
repression or impulse-control problems among potential pedophiles.

,\bstrsct-A
3s

SEXUAL VICTIMIZATION of chiidren by adults is now acknowledged to : x a significant

social problem in North America. Xlost modern surveys of the prevalence 2f sesual child
abuse in the general population. for instance, indicate that 23% to 45% ofadult women experienced some form of contact sesual victimization as children [ I ] . Informarion c n male v.ctimization is more sparse, although the likelihood of such abuse appears to range f -om 6% t 1 2 1 3%
[2-41. Recent studies indicate that this form of child abuse has both short- and long-term
negative psychological effects [j-lo]? which appear to occur regardless of victirn gender [ l 11.
.Aithough a considerable amount has been learned about abuse victims, surprising!!: little
is known about the perpetrators of sexual molestation. Quinsey [12], for exa~nple.describes
rht. m a n y dificulties involved in estimating the actual prevalence of abusers in our sccie:y.
o r of determining reliable differences between child molesters and similar, b l t not abusive.
~ndividuals.Most significant of these research problems appear to be ( 1 ) the widely varying
motivations for molestarion. such that a modal "profile" ofsex offenders is unlikely: (2) & ) e v e i r m r reluctance ro fully disclose the extent of their ilkgal acts: and (3) bias nherent in the
ust: af poiicr statistics 2 n d heterogeneous incarcerated samples to study abuse rues and :.buser
c h m c teristics.
Despite these dificultirs, some progress has been made in defining theoreti.c 11 model: from

EducatLon B a s e

Indiana
University

Planned

Parenthood lnt.

Research

Founded in New
York 1916
Foilnded
Nationally 1971

Kinsey Institute
1938
-

I
I

Kin sey
Porneroy
Wein berg

Gebhard

Gagnon
Martin

Simon

Bell et. al.

Alan
--

Guttmachq
inst.
Founded N e w
York

Masters

Technical

Johnson
1959

Assistance
Branch of PPFA
I968

SSSS

circa I978

11

1964

11

1968

IThousands of "Accredited" Human I

I

Sexuality StudentsKeachers

-Phvsicians. psychologists, psychiatrists, sexologists, therapists? awnseiors, teachers, cot/ e g e ~ p m f e s s c k , ~ n u cler@x-researchers,

rse~
socia workers, health e ducatom, persons wodfmg in family planning canters and paraprofessionals and students in all the above areas."
(JASIfS Brochure 19$4

To Receive a Human Sexuality Degree, Certification, Credential, etc., All Applicants Are
Required to Undergo the SAR (Sexual Attitude Restructuring) a "Model" Program of
Massive Pornography/Obscenity, its Stated Mission One of "Desensitization."

ri--l
1
1
Educatm 0-ase

Planned

1nd
a
;i
University

'Credentialing"

parenthood lnt.

Founded in New
York 1916

Founded
Nationally 1971

1
I

Kinsey Institute

1938
Simon

Bell et al.

Alan
Gutbnache~

irrst.

Founded New

York
Technical
Assistance
Branch of PPFA
1968

circa 1978
The Mandated SAR

1964

1968

1-

Thousands of "Accredhed" Human

'Physicians psych-

Sexuaiiiy Students/Tbachers
I

t s , s 8 x d o g i s 4 t h & r a p k i 3 , 0 ~ 1 ) ? ~ ~ ~ ~

+ep~rsrnurna~psyEhretrfs~~-rfirers.~.rkrra*p.non.~.

~ g m ~ ~ p I m M g e w H a v s a n d ~ a n d ~ h r N m s b o v s i v l s s k "

W-f*

Attachment 4:
The SexoIogy-PedophiIiaPederasty Link

FORMING ACCREDITED SEXOLOGY GRADUATES

The IASHS Mission Statement of "Basic Sexual Rights" claims that one has (3)
"the right to not be exposed to sexual material or behavior." This "right"
automatically excludes those applicants who are unwilling (due to conscience,
religious or other problems or concerns) to view days or months of pornography
(The SAR) as a fundamental pedagogical tool for accreditation by the IASHS and
all other "sexological" accrediting institutions. The "Basic Sexual RightsJJ
Mission
Statement (below) is included in all IASHS brochures outlining its aims and
instruction for IASHS student candidates.
BASIC SEXUAL RIGHTS
1. The freedom of any sexual thought fantasy or desire.
2. The right tosexual entertainment freely available in the marketplace, including sexually explicit materials dealing with the full range of sexual behavior.
3. The right not t o be exposed to sexual material or behavior.
4. The right t o sexual self determination.
5. The right t o seek out and engage in conrrmual sexual aalvtty.
6. The right t o engage in l u u a l acts or activities of any kind whatsoever, providingthey
do not Involve nomonmrual acts, violence, constraint, coercion or fraud.
7. The right t o be free of pmccution w societal Intervention in private sexual behavior.
8. The recognition by sockty that enrypcrson, partnerad or unpartnued, has the right
t o the pursuit of a satisfying c o n r c n s ~ a l ~ 0 3life,
~ wfree
l from political, kpal or
mligious Interference and that there mcck to be mechankms In society where the
opportunities of sociai-urual activities are available t o the following: disabled pcrchronically111 p e w those i m r c e r m d in prisons, hmpitals or institutions: those
disadvantagedbecause of age. lack of physical attractiveness, or lack of social skills
the poor and the lonely.
9. The basic right of all panom who are sexually dysfunctional t o have available nonjudgmental sexual health an.
10. The rfght to control conception.

On the other hand, "Basic Sexual Right" number 8 (below) is also quite specific.
Since the IASHS advocates full sexual "rights" for children in its course studies,
the following "right" can be read for what it states-adults and children should not
be sexually "disadvantaged because of age." Graduates are expected to agree
that a child of any age ("every person") has the "right" to "consensual' sex with
other children or adults, familial or strangers, etc., whether in pornographic
activity, general sexual activity or in pecuniary sexual acts defined as prostitution.

8. The recognition by society that every person, partnered or unpartnered, has the right
to the purwit of a satisfying consensuaI socio-sexual life, free from political, legal or
religious interference and that there needs to be mechanisms in society where the
opportunities of social-sexual activities are available to the following: disabled persons; chronically ill persongthose incarcerated in prisons, hospitalsor institution^ those
disadvantaged because of age, lack of physical attractiveness, or lack of social skills;
the poor and the lonely.

MV

WHV and HOW

This Study Was lllade
.

.-

Dr. Alfred C. k n s e y , the &or author, is Professor of Zoology a t

Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
.

. .

.A graduate of Harvard University, he has been on the faculty of

Indiana for 2 7 years, specializing for many years in population studies
and having been signally honored for his research.

SEXURL
BEHAVIOR
In THE

Humun
IIlRLE

In.the course of his teaching, Dr. Kinsey found his students frequently asking questions on sex, a fact which impressed him increasingly
with the inadequacies of material existing on the subject.
As a resul~,he became 'convinced of the necessity for a s w e y of
sexual behavior, and most especially a survey of such detailed and comprehensive scope that its accuracy and validity would stand up under
the most penetrating scrutiny.
Nine years ago, therefore, and despite innumerable difficulties
amounting at t i m a to downright opposition, he launched his tremendous study.
Assisted by Wardell B. Pomeroy, clinical ps&hologist, Clyde E.
Martin, who is in charge of the statistical work, and a staff trained in
psychology, animal behavior, anthropology and related fields, Dr.
Kinsey has travelled the United States, coast to coast, border to border,
interviewing and gathering the data presented in this book and lecturing
before countless professional and lay groups.
The securing of interviews has carried the authors into all socioeconomic groups under the widest variety of circumstances. T o gain the
confidence of t h a e various groups, to get full cooperation in conducting
the interviews, has required endless effort and ingenuity. The development of interviewing technics has'been worked and reworked to assure
perfection, the l a t a t refinements in public-opinion polling methods
being utilized to best advantage.
It is no exaggeration to .claim this to be tho most difficult mass
interviewing project ever undertaken. Nationally known feature writers
on scientific subjects have already laid significant stress on M *.
Scientius, thunselva, describe it as one of the most valuable conuibutions made to date to the factual knowledge of human sexual behavior.
It is certain to be one of the most provocative books of our tima.
MADE IN US..\.

KINSEY

POMEROY
MARTIN

An Authoritzlti~c
Guide to Sa Edwtion
KINSEY ON SEX RESPONSE IN CHILDREN
ANY a

"M

child who knows nothing about (sex) reproduction. or about the

differcnces between the male and the female, has developed e f i n ~ t eatof two or tl~rrc, says Dr.
titudes and responses toward sex a t the
Alfred R i n y , famous sexologist and director of the Institute ?f Scs Rcscarch at
Indiana Unlverslty. Many interestmg discoveries about sex rcactlons in young children ncre reported by Dr. Kinsey rccently before an assembly of the Fcdcration
d Jewish Philanthropies in New York. H e particularly notcd >hat-"parents arc
more interested in the adjustment of their childrcn to marriagc than in their
own mar~taladjustment."
Studies made by Dr. Kinsey and his staff on scs rcactions in scwral I~ui~Jrcd
childrcn under the ace of fivejeveal that by the time an averaae boy or p~riI S '
two to three years olg, their future personality odju.ctmtnt (foy marriage) has
already bccn .seriously influenced; that is, so far as parcntal qu~Qanrc,m d psychological tralnlng factors arc concerned.. Says Dr. Rinscy-"\Vlicn
more than a fen rnontlis clzpsc without suitable t r w (sex education), YOU h a \ ~:ost c ~ n .~ c
2 your v a l u a b l e ~ u n i t i c s . By two or three vc3r. (of apc) the basic influences 11a;.c k i i laid. By the middfe teens, the ultimate adjustnicnt to marriage
has been developed."
Children arc far more difficult t o study in rclation to scs reactions than olctcr
people; but some interesting and surprising results Iiavc bccn obtained. n r e
youngsters are asked simple questions about scx and boy-pirl relations by parcnts.
teach.crs and scientists while engaped in games. a?d sports. From thc answcrs.
rxrtain conc~iisions can be drawn. Vcry young cli"
two to tnrcc vcars
havc shown that they are capable-ot liavrng S C ~ C of S a siniil:.r~naturc to
tho* experienced by adults. Strangcr still is thc discovcry that it is ossible for
tinv infants onlv two to three & old to respond to scr
of othcr invcstlmanner a s tntrnrr a * t h a t - b v _ t h a r t u d ; c s
?tors of child sex-reactions have shown similar results. "From Sigmund Frcud'o
theories about sexual responses in infants we havc come to rccognizc thc imprtancc of what happens to vcrF younq chydrcn." said Dr. Kinscy. His rcscarch
on early sex activity confirms Frcud's vicws on child sex bchavior.
Thc marital rcactions of thc individual (~vlrrnIic or shc rcaclics adulthood)
often arc a reflection of the affection and pcneral emotional relationship bctwccn
mothcr and child during babyhood. If thc baby was uninhibited wlirn cuddlcd
.!b its mother (or father) and rcspnndcd likewisc in 3 spontancnas manher.
this unrcstrained healthy attitudc could. quite conceivably. persist through the
p a r s of childhood into the adult marriage stagc.
rcsponse
\\'hen the formative carly pcriod is influenccd by an unwholcso:~~~
hetween mother and child. thc child may k o m c tense and shy. with thesc patrcms esprcssinc thcmsclvcs in somc mays in latcr marital lifc.. It is prcmaturc to
r llc
state permanent conclusions as yct. but it is clear that thc
start
education: the morc chancc they d l 1 d
n dcve~~urtcd
Wsonar~t~cs
and wholcsomc attitudes toward scxual bchavior.

MAY, 1954

VOLXX

HUGO GERNSBACK
Editor

S E X O L O G Y
25 W e s t B r o a d w a y
N e w Y o r k 7. N. Y.

NO.10

CInrllbt US4 by Sudm Y a ~ u l n n

Sexes

/
\

/ Attacking the Last Taboo

I Researchers are lobbying against the ban on

ex researchers love to shock the public. Trouble is, the public is b e a m - .
ing more and more d%cult to shock,
and researchers are running out of myths
to attack. Perhaps that accounts for the
latest-and what may be the most r e p
rehensibie yet-trend in the field: wellknown researchers and a few allies in
! academe are conducting a campaign to
undermine the strongest and most universa1 of sexual proscriptiom, tbe t a b
against incest.
Most of the chipping away at the
taboo is still cautious and limited.
Says John Money of Johns Hovkins,
one of the best-known sex researchers in the nation: "A childhood sexual experience, such as being the
partner of a relative or of an older
person, need not necessarily affect
the child adversely." Money and
-Author
Gertrude Williams _cornplain in their forthcoming book
Traumatic Abuse and LVeglectof Chiidren about the public attitude that
"no matter how benign, any adultchild interaction that may be can! strued as even iemntely sexual; qual- :
ifies, a priori, as traumatic and T.
abusive." One who commits incest, L - I my the authors, is like "a r e u o u s
deviant in a one-religion society"
--thus neatly planting the notion
that opposition to incesr is quite like
rehgious intolerance.
Wardell Pomeroy, co-author of
the original Kinsey reports on males
and females, is far more blunt. "It is
time to admit that incest need not be
! a perversion or a symptom of mental
illness," he says. "Incest between . . .
children and adults . . . can sometimes be beneficial." Lndeed the new
pro-incest literature is filled with the
stupefying idea that opposition to in-

I!

incest

thing, the piece in fact depicted the taboo

as a mindless prejudice. Wrote the author, James W. Ramex "We are roughly
in the same p i t i o n today regarding incest as we were a hundred years ago with
respect to our fears of masturbation." Ramey, a researcher who has worked with
many of the leasex investigators, says
the incest taboo owes something to "a peculiarly American problem-the
withdrawal of all touching contact." With a
Little more toucbing in the home, he
thinks, the nation might not be facing "the

ow did the 'lobby against the taboo come about? One strain ofits
H
philosophy springs from the fringes

I
/

family members. Writes Antbroplomour Parker of the Univ

Uta?:utiously:
"It is questionable I the
cost. (of the incest taboo)in gdt and unear; -distancing between intimates are
necessary or desirable. What a x the benefits of linking a mist of discomfort to the
spontaneous warmth of the affectionate
kiss and touch between family members?"
T e SIE US Re ort, the publication of
the Sex Information an Education Cowcil of the United States and an iinfailing
i indicator of fads and fashions in the sex
research world, published a major ankle
! attacking the incest taboo. Though the
journal's editor,Marv Calderon_e,and her
colleagues ran an ingenuous ed~torialdenying that the article was a d v o c a a any-

i1

TIME. A P R n 14. 1980

'

---

of the childfen's -rights movement.

which insists that small children be
granted all the rights of adults. Some
have taken that to mean the right to
be sexually active withany.partner at
all. Says L a m Constantine.
tant clinical professor in psychiatry
at Tufts, one such self-styled sexual
radical: "Children have the right tc
express themselves sexually, even
with members of their own family."
But most of the pro-incg
thought rises logically enough from
the premises of the sex-research establishment: all forms of consensual
sexuality are good,or at least neutral;
problems arise not from sex. but from
gtult, fear and repression. That kind
of faith is bound to lead its believers
in crusades against all sexual prohibitions, including incest.
Traditional academics have
tended to look down on sex researchers as pushy, ham-handed amateurs,
and the arguments for incest will do
little to change that view. The literature shows absolutely no attention to
psychological realities: that often an adolescent and surely a small child can hardly produce anything Like informed consent to an adult it depends on for life
and guidance; or that the Wting of the,
incest barrier would invite the routine
exploitation of children by disturbed parents. The sex researchers may get the
shocked public reaction they expect. but
their arguments are truly tos simpleminded to earn it. Critic ynjamin DeMott, professor of Englis at Amhersr,
feels that outrage is not, the proper response to what might be called the proincest lobby. Says he: "These voices cry
outloudestforpity." - .+
gr B

an-

need to form peranal aU+nces and trade

agieements beyond the family. Since that
is no longer necessary, he 'yys, "human
history suggests that the Incest tab06
may indeed be obsolete." Joan N e l m
a Cahfornian who holds an M.A. in psyi
chology from Antioch, has a special interest in the subject. She has launched
the Institute for the Study of Sexual Behavior, and has passed out questionnaires
looking for "good or bad" incestuous
experiences.
For whatever reason, public interest
in incest as a subject seems to have increased. Hollywood provides a good
index; one survey shows there were six
movies about incest m the 15ZGs, 79 in
the '60s. The n p b e r s are still growing.
Recent films on the subject include Chinatown, Luna and ihe made-for-TV
Flesh and Blood. But probing a sensitive subject for better understanding is one thing, and justifying incest is quite another.

of present rash of feverish adolescent sex[ ual activity outside the home."

As in any propaganda campaign?the

words and terms used to describe incest
are beginning to change. The phrase
1 "child abuse" is distinguished from "consensual incest" involving a parent, and
incest" is dserent from "pot.-

or two that allows

incest, or arguing that the incest L a b
I is dying of Its own irrelevance. Rutgers
AnthromloRist Yehudi Cohen offers a
. sirnpliiied pseudo-historical argument:
the tabm is a holdever of a primitive

--

53

Sexes

---

Cradile-to-Grave Intimacy
-

Floyd hlartlnson of M l m e s o l a ' ~G u s t a w s

Xdo!phus College a h i d s s d d t s involved
in affect~onatesexual relatlonslups with
tors should not go to jail. "Lntimate human
relations arc important and precious,'' he
fecls. "I'd U e to sec as iew restrictions
piaccd on them as possible." Psychoiogls!
h u g l a s Powell of the H a n a r d Health
S e m c c says: "I have not seen anyonc
harmed by this so long as ~t occurs in a re1ationshp with sumeOody who reail)
cares a b u t the child."

--

---

Some i-esca:chers openly argue that "anyrir ing goes ' ; P Ochildren
~

he preacfllngs of ~ e x s l i ~on
a ~c tu~d - ~ t people
h
older than themsei\es " What
r ~bu-and fireT h m d hav: not chang:d m d c a d e s sex iabout older mcn ~ r e ) l on
e d u c a t ~ o nm !ht schools o g m d g u l r , re- year-olds7 ConsLactlne u o d d argue that
prcsslon and p u u r h m e ~t for m a n u r b a - il cluldren u e r e properlr educated a b u t
tlon are bad. Now, h o w ver. a dtsturbing sex, s c h i d u h 3 61d i c t u a n t sex couid aiid- E.gamin.: currency , r i , h i ; i T i E - u a j s u ) no
bG'gE
Uou;eTi
Z i s )--h(,------~ ~ ~ ~ g c % d f i A
o h~mdr aU s e x o i o ~ puabcij
l~
swtc
y r y i ; i - a p e d . ~ that they o;.pox adult-sMd sex. but
? o ~ ? h i c I n f d sex c u i e ~ o m
~ rt e r l e r z t
number o f r e s u r c n e r s m a m u m that such
?roSp~i-Xi~a3-----"sex 1s basically ha,rxless to the child h o r - 7 h ~ a < i r d y p G e n t e d duectlyucgian Ps)iholoyst Thore L i n ~ f e l d ut ) s
most of the re:xzrchen. d x t o r s and coun- that a r l v s c ~ u a stm-dat~on
!
-o --m ,
seiors u ho believe 11 ha\: .he wit to
keep a low p r ~ . l ea n d \ L C \ . the ~ d u
away neat!). In a longer rlore w n vent~onalspeech or a n i i e The sug-

_*

the rheronc of the ~ x o l o g s uand

children s nghts a d ~ o c a t a D ~ _ \ l d
Thorstaa h~mm~cxm
and-&knt
J
G Z e s m a n for thc pedoghdnc movem-ys
he _LS - & h i 7 ~ lor;' the
theu o u n
righk of ihl1d:en L O conu:l
M l e s " Replies Sancb Kaii.er-<
ment. chddren arc sexual 2 , who
lesbian soiurruut "Lct Thorsmd and
need to develop skiUs w r : y
Lie.
b s corYFrcresat least 53y %hat the reai
T h e child has a fundamc r + dm t ,
m u e n that ihcy u a n t to (copulate
s i y s ?44~& C 2 i l d e r 2 . I ea3 of the
u ~ t h l chddren Prepubescent chdhfiuential Sex Id5rmatio.1 xnd Edudren are nor w h b e r a w ttus 1s 3
cation Council cf the U S . , '15 h o w
sex-negatike s m c t y , but k c a u x
about sexuality and to b e s : : . u l . "
they can be ph}slcaUy hurt and m a y
In general. rhese sex01 3.3515 conbc psychologicallg mjurcd as well by
sider Freud's "latency ~x ridw--a
sexual mllmacy H I & adulk "
time of low s e x u i intcrest : r ~m a t o u t
/ Unfonunately, few responsible
age four 10 pubc r:y-to be i . n>Thimchdd experts nake rwcled then [hat
posed by a p r u i o h sexier:,. Some of
bluntly so far to the radical u n r m g on
the sexolo_mts are fond c i pinc u d sex One who has 1s Chdd Psyout that the b c y ' s s e x u rcspanse
c h a ! m t Leon ElxnccrgofChddren s
toys get
system kgms early-mfa:;
Hosplwl hledical Ccntcr. B x t o n
e r e d o n s and the vaginas ~f d a n t
" P r c m t u r c sexual k h a w o r among
w l s lubncate .%ppa>entlr the re- A Picmrc Bookoi Scx fix Ctiildxn and P~icnrs chddren m Itus s x c t y almost always
searchers b e h e i : that s u : ~
leads to psychoiogml dficultles kconstitute a q o u s f @ = ~ n ~ ~ m Pr h o r o ~ r l p h ! nnd C;ryrion< hv \Sfill h!cDridc cause you h a \ e a c u d actmg out kd s e x Eken j ranger ls l,e theory Espl.ui:m~n.?;;sc
b\- Hci-2 Fii.i~.l~i:.~t~;r-H.ir,lchahlur for u h x h he u noL cogmtnely
-c M
--that chAdren u ~ grow
1
up askew ~f
or cmotlonally ready " Pwple who
they do not have m r l y sex., Sexolo- Cover of the controversial children'sb w k Show Me!
trunk small cfizidre; a x capable of
makrng free dcclsions about sex uith
A
includmg
of miants by a d d & , he adds. "are full of crap."
-.
- - the-.mastubation
- - .-most cerwin th:.~h u m a n b : m g s . LLitc the adults m some p n ; r G ~ @ e ~ C u % s ." d e 6
In the world of s e x o l o g . presuge usuother pnmates, rrqurre a F:n d ci a r l y Iltely-sot
F ~ J O - h a m the:child?'
ally comes from a t u c h n g k w o s and resexual rehears31 :>lay." Ancrher re%ain is h E-G- e y Z a ~ ~ s ? haayto u g s t c : ' ~ " r e h a r s - pression. not from assessmg the psych*
that scxual l i b e r ~ u o nc a n n o . be w t h h e l d a1 play" with a d l i b "aEecrs them k n e S - logcal damage of the ideas unleashed.
from the young. ' Western s:ciety h a un- ciaUy." : V a @ P o e o co-author of And icw sexo1oe;lsts are tramed to assess
dergone a r c v o l ~tion rn sex . A vaiues but
the on(sna1 h e y r e p n s , wys m c F t such damage. Psychorncrac~stS i p Lpi- ~ ~ ~
"can sorneumes b e ~ ~ n e t i c l ato
l " cTil??ienI- nus, ~ _ u L ~ - b oro k-. T~
has tried to appl:. it exclusi\ : ly to adults."
aurnor 'oT7 ~ . 2 0 c e ~ ~ s-t-h?!
Fnri
A n t n i ~ p o i c ~ ~l lbscth a r d C u : n e r wrore m DGtCFFFPFy?holoFmi
q s s- p x p l e who
o i numerous anlcies and h i i t s on ~ d c - L e r e seduced early m Me :'go t,h.rough
H u m a n Benavio "and t h ralher arblphiila, says a d u l t - c u d sex u oslcally ~ 1 - the m o ~ i o n sof linng and may seem all
trary restriction :: simply nc! w o r k u . ~ . "
One of ihe more m t e l i e c , u l l y dishev- nocent and adds t h - t t h t ciuldren he has right. bui they-are damaged. I see-these
eled of the new apostles o c u d sex is studied "are not more neuro::c than tne people year after year in Lherapy."
U.C.L.A. .Ps@i.l--+~
Eduard-Rleo _also
Family the rap^:. La=-C
n5rantme of average Dutchman." O n e csnven!lonal
AcLon. Mass.. u G s e vlcu,i i X i X l ' 3 t e a argument is that the fuss r u e d by parents says that rnu&of&~yor&-is_with c @ u t u e on how to raise child -en. Says he: after adult-chdd sex-and nor the sex it- d r e T u j h 5 have been involved in caia"Children really ;!re a dlsenf 3nchised mi- self-is what h a r m rhc child.
Another corrmcn ~ 5 e r n rs
e that a d d [ norlcy. They sho Id have ih . right to express themselves sexually, , ~ h c hm u n s child sex must De ] d e e d by tne quaL!y of
that they ma); o . may not lave contact the relatlcnsrip mvolved. Lxlologst

Dr.

&%;;a;

'

THE INSTITUTE

FOR ADVANCED STUDY

OF HUMAN SEXUALITY
A private, non-sectarian graduate school

April 14, 1980

TO:

FROM:

June Personal Sexual Enrichment/Education Participants (PSE/E) , #571

Maggi Rubenstein, Director of Practicum Studies

PSE/E, a month-long process usually offered one evening a week f o r four weeks
using-the guide-for a Better S& Life, video and sharing about homework,
will be offered i n a shortened form June 16-20 from 2:30-6 p.m. To prepare
for t h i s greatly speeded up process, please do the following before t h e group
begins:
Read the entire SARquide thoroughly and do a l l the homework possible before
coming t o PSE/E. G i v e yourself a t l e a s t a month. Begin t o keep a journal as
described i n the SARguide. Make your personal contract t o work on anything
that is real for you sexually.
1 of the week we will give you some brief one-to-one time with the group
lea-? e r as well as cover expectations and sharing of your at-home experiences.

On Da

Days 2 through 5 will be held as i f they are one week apart. Homework will be
repeated each night and shared the next morning.
Video will be utilized as i t
i s stated i n t h e - S ~ ~ q u i d e .

as possible, 8-1 5 persons, i n keeping with

However, i f absolutely necessary more people can be

We want t o keep the group a s small

the concept of PSE/E.

added.

Remember, the value of PSE/E r i s e s i n direct proportion t o the faithfulness

with which you do your homework.
If by chance you do not have a SARguide you may order one from the National Sex
Forum f o r $3.57 p l u s $1 .Ei shipping and hand1 ing.

Maggi ~ u b e n s t e ~D.x A.
Director, Practi cum Studies

1523 FRANKLIN STREET / SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94109 1 (415) 928-1133

CAW&rx

#31-,

For the 29Ih year the Institute proudly announces

its exciting 7-day Sexual Attitude Restructuring
program. SAR XXXIX will be held from June 26 July 2, 1999. SAR is an intense learning event
designed for people who are working in the field of
sexology or who wish to better understand their
O:NF ~ f i : i i i a l /aiid
i ~ iJ,ai IJ[ uiiie;5, ti i~2 ;!y!uy!a!::
dedicated to fulfilling the need fur advan~ed
training in human sexuality and incorporating
instructions in safe sex practices. SAR provides
innovative and practical information. skills and
tools of value to everyone.
Didactlc and
experiential, SAR offers each person the
information, training and skills necessary for more
competent, sensitive, professional and personal
functioning.

with j check for the full amount or a deposit of

$300 per person. If a deposit is sent. the balance
is due by June 12. A late charge of $50 w ~ l lbe
added to the balance due if received after this
date.
No registrations will be accepted by
telephone.

FOR FURTHER INFO

THE EX

1523 FRA

SAN FRANCI
(415) 928-1 133

CONTlNUiNG EDUCA rlON

CONTINUING EDUCATION CREDIT and graduate academ~ccredit are available fo

attendance is required, plus $10 fee, for credit. Approved CE hours and graduate credi
course description. The Institute's degrees and certificates are fully approved by th
Postseconda~yEducation, and it IS accredited by the Nat'onal Association of Private,
Colleges. For nurses, courses are approved by the Calfornla Board of Registered
01190. Graduate credit is accepted by the California Bokrd of Behavioral Sciences
Psychology Examiners for required instruction in human sexuality. Courses meet
licensure and license renewal

RENEWAL. CANCELL ATION AND REF UNO POLICIE

Unless othelwise noted, ail courses require registration at least 10 days prior to the co
canceled in writing 10 days before the scheduled course date (except SAR XXXI
cancellation notice), the entire amount paid will b e refunded. If cance!ed less than 10
h t ~ t$50 will be refundcd for 15-hour courses, $75 for courses #561 and #571. For SAR
professionally a r c physicians, ~ s j c h o l o ~ i s t s ,
mean a refund less $275. No refunds will be made once a course has started.
psychiatrists, sexologists, thera~ists. C O U ~ S ~ ~ O ~ S .In the unlikely event a course is canceled for lack of registration, participants will
teachers, college professors, nurses. cle-rgy,
possible, or by mail no later than 10 days before the course date; and fees will be re
researchers, social workers, health educators,
assumes no liabilities regarding travel reservations, housing accommodations, etc
persons working in the family planning centers.
and paraprofessionals and students in all the
ABOUT THE INSTITUTE
above areas.
THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY OF HUMAN SEXUALITY, a graduate schoo
; I , S~iuimrui i X 6 . its concepr was the outgrowth ot the methodologies developed
through the Sexual Attitude Restructuring (SAR) Process, a revolutionary method for e
SAR will present information on a broad range of
people do sexually and how they feel about it.
sexual topics through lectures, small and large
group discussions, visual media, exercises, role
The lnstitute offers four academic degrees, a number of courses of study 1e.ading to
play and psychodrama.
program of independent study courses on videotape for home study, and the Con
contained in this brochure for people working in the hclpihg professions and for anyo
E a c h person who completes SAR XXXIX will
knowledge about human sexual behavior.
receive a certificate of completion of the program.
Your certificate will be made out in advance exactly
CONTINUING EDUCATION FACULTY
as your name is shown on your registration form.

SAP, carries 50 CF hours ot 4 its yr adua!e

credit.
For a sealed transcript, check your
registrabon form and add the $10 fee to your
registration total.

Fee for SAR XXXIX is $725 per person, $1,305 for

_couwles. To reqister, send the reqistration form

JP.I\IICE EPP, Ph.D., Girei-.lor 111Spvia1izt.d Studies

ROUCRT

THEODORE

Mc

President
MARGUERITE RUBENSTEIN, Ph.0.. Dean of Students

LAIRD SUTTON. Ph.0.. Direc

CLARK L. TAYLOR, Ph.D., Ed.D , Assoc. Prof. of Sexology

WARDELL B. POMEROY, Ph

J. DUDLEY CHAPMAN. D.O., M.D.. D.Sc., Ph.D., ASSIX. Proles-

ARTHUR WELLS. Jr , J D., Le

sor of Sexual Physiology, Anatomy and Endocrinokqy

fmstitute%r Advanced Study of Human Sexudity

ASSOCIATE IN SEX EDUCATION

and
CLINICAL SEXOLOGY CERTIFICATE
Courses of Study
These interrelated certificate courses are designed to furnish
professionals in disciplines other than Sexology with in-depth
knowledge and skills necessary for working effectively with the
wide range of sexual questions and problems which arise during the
ordinary course of treatment or work.
The design and content of these certificate programs are based upon
over twenty five years of teaching and clinical experience by the
Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality.
The Institute is internationally recognized as being in the
forefront of graduate education in the field of Sexology. The
Institute is approved by the State of California Office of Private
Postsecondary Education and the certificate certifies that the
recipients have received professional training in the field of
human sexuality.
The courses of study are divided into two sections:

A.

The first leads to an Associate in Sex Education certificate

which prepares professionals to answer sexual questions and
provide relevant sex education to their respective clientele.
This certificate program may be taken alone.

B.

The second course of study, when combined with the first,

leads to a certificate in Clinical Sexology. This certificate
prepares the professional outside the field of sexology to
provide advice and guidance in the solution of common sexual
problems, especially those relevant to the recipients1 primary
training.

As one of the most powerful elements in our lives sex touches

almost every aspect of our thoughts and actions. For this reason,
the certificate program, like the field of Sexology itself, is
eclectic. It is placed within the context of the history and
culture of the 20th century with special emphasis upon the most
current advances and insights in educational and clinical sexual
science.

THE INSTITUTE FOR

ADVANCEDSTUDYOF
HUMAN SEXUALITY
A Private Freestanding School of
Sexology
Providing the Finest in Academic
Training in Sexology through its
Library, Faculties and Advisors
Clinical Sexological Training through
its Staff of Expert Clinical Sexologists
Erotology Scholarship through the
Resources of the Largest and Most
Comprehensive Collection of Sexual
Artifacts and Materials

.
.

DEGREES
Credit may be given for prior work and
experience
Master of Human Sexuality
Completion of 3 trimesters of graduate
study plus one trimester for preparation
of a thesis; completion of a Basic
Research
Project:
passing
the
Comprehensive
Examinations;
completion of Master's thesis or project.

Master of Public Health in Sexology Designed for persons in the helping

profession who wish to add sexological
expertise. Completion of 2 trimesters of
graduate study plus one trimester for

preparation of a project; completion of

courses in Public Administration and
Epidemiology; completion of project.
Doctor of Education
For those who wish to teach or design
educational programs; completion of 5
trimesters of graduate study plus one
trimester for preparation of a doctoral
project; completion of a Basic Research
Project; passing the Comprehensive
Examinations; completion of doctoral
project.
Doctor of Human Sexuality
For those with a background in therapy or
counseling; completion of 5 trimesters of
graduate study plus one trimester for
preparation of doctoral project; completion
of a Basic Research Project; passing
Comprehensive Examinations; completion
of doctoral project.
Doctor of Philosophy
Analytical, original and independent
investigation; completion of 5 trimesters
graduate study plus one trimester for
preparaiiun of a dzlctoral dissertation;
completion of a Basic Research Project;
passing Comprehensive Examinations;
ccrnpieiicn uf dijl;ior~f dissertaticn.

Cost of full enrollment tuition is currently

$4,150 per trimester or $12,450 per year.

C
Associate in
prepares prof
questions an
education to th
required i5Z
education vide
developmenta
life span. Co
required for
Certificate. T

Clinical Sex
additional 15
following
implications o
and physiolo
erotology, se
treatment, sex
issues plus a
weekend cou
Institute. Tu
together with
Education Ce

Erotology C
graduate co
rninirn~mnf 1

Sexological
A!DS!STrZ Pr
upgrade the
AIDS or other
approximately
Tuition is $1,6

CONTINUING EDUCATION COURSES

Basic courses in human sexuality open
to the public as well as advanced
courses for professionals. All approved
for continuing education credit. Costs
vary.

THE INSTITUTE
The mission of the lnstitute is to train
sexologists. The general objectives of
the lnstitute are:
* To provide a faculty of persons who are
both
academically
trained
and
professionally competent in the field of
human sexuality.
* To provide the means whereby people
working in the area of human sexuality
may receive additional academic and
professional training.
* To provide suitable rescjurce materials
consisting of a large library of films,
slides, audio and videotapes, a research
and basic source library.
* To provide academic guidance to
projects and dissertations.
* To create materials.
* To create an archive of historical and
contemporary sexoiogical materials to
sort, catalog and preserve it for the
future.
e
nrough viciec and aucfic; ie~oidifig,
io
record the history of our own Institute
and contemporary history of our field.
These recordings include formal,
scientific
presentations
and
autobiographical and anecdotal material
l - l

by important contributors to sexology.

* To create an environment for the
objective study of human sexuality
independent of outside interference; and
to provide protectisn ?c pecplz an3
materials in the field of sexology.

IN
[ ]

Please send me a catalog on the

Academic Degree Programs

[ ]

Please send me individual course

and Continuing Education
information

[ ]

Please send me information on the

Certificate Programs

AD
S

SE

Name
Address

a
.

Direct all inquiries to:

THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED
STiiD'u' OF HUMAN SEXUALITY
1523 Franklin Street
San Francisco, California 94109-4522
415.928.1 133
email: info@iashs.edu
CopyroghM1999

ACADE
0

PROFE

CONTIN

AN OVERVIEW OF CERTIFICATE REQUIREMENTS

REQUIREMENTS FOR ASSOCIATE IN SEX EDUCATION CERTIFICATE
The required 150 hours of credit will focus on the following program areas:
1.
2.
3.

The SAR Guide and Sex Education Videos which portray a range of human sexuality
The History of Sexology: Its basic concepts and terminoloav
~evelo~mental
sexology-Throughout the if e Span.

The 150 hours will include the reading of a Work Book composed of the SAR Guide with
integrated video viewing, personal exercises and monographs by Loretta Haroian and Erwin
Haeberle. Also there is reading of basic t e x t books and optional texts, the viewing of
select-edvideo tape materials and self testing.

HOURS
The following is a schedule of the approximate division of the 150 hours of credit for the

Associate in Sex Education Certificate.

Guide, personal exercises and videos ............ 55
Readlng Basic Texts ................................. 39
~eadingLoretta Haroian monograph.. .................12
Self-testing about monograph ...................3
Vlewing Loretta Haroian video. ...................... 15
Self-testing about video ....................... 3
Readlng for History of Sexology ......................8
Video Viewing for liistory of Sexology
12
Self Testing about History of Sexology .........3
SAR

...............
Total

hours
hours
hours
hours
hours
hours
hours

d'

hours
hours

150 hours

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Candidates for this certificate must complete and file with the Institute for Advanced Study
of Human Sexuality a report of their completion of the Work Book, reading of the basic texts
and materials from the recommended reading list, videos viewed, self-tests taken and
evaluatxon o m s found in the Work Book.

CERTIFICATE AWARD
upon completion of the above requirements an appropriate certificate,
will be awarded.

REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CLINICAL SEXOLOGY CERTIFICATE

The 150 additional hours will focus on the following program areas:
Socio-cultural Implications of Sexology
Erotology
Sexual Anatomy and Physiology
Sexual Concerns and their Treatment
Sexual Spectrum
Legal/Ethlcal Issues
Health Perspectives

Associate in Sex Education

There must also be attendance at either:

a one week, clinically focused, Wardell Pomeroy Basic Lecture Serles in February

1.

0r

a one week Sexual Attitude Restructurinq (SAR) proqram I n June

or
two weekends, uniquely designed to flt the nature of your primary profession in
the area of Clinical Sexology. These two weekends are to be a minimum of 4 months
apart during which all of the required reading, video viewing and self-testing
is to be completed.

2.
3.

HOURS
The following is a schedule of the approximate division of the 150 hours of credit for
the Clinical Sexology Certificate.
hours
hours
hours
hours
hours
hours
hours

Socio-cultural Implications video viewing.

Erotology video viewing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Anatomy and Physiology video viewing . . . . . .
Sexual Concerns and their Treatment video.
Health Perspectives video viewing,

.......

Course Attendance ....................................

Total

hours

156 hours

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Candidates for this certificate must conplete and file with the Institute for Advanced
Study of Human Sexuality a report of their reading of -the baslc texts and material from
the recommended reading list, videos viewed, self-tests taken, attendance at courses and
evaluation forms found In the work book.

CERTIFICATE AWARD
Upon completion of the above requirements an appropriate Certificate ill
be awarded.

C l h k d StZ010gy will

COSTS
Tuition for each program is $1,600.00. When taken together, the total cost is $3,000.00
or Yhe cost of one full trimester registration at the Institute. (This does not include
the $100 Application fee.)
The student must apply to and be accepted by the Institute.
materials must be sent to the Registrar:

The following application

1. An application form.
2. An application fee of $100.00 (non-refundable).
3. A resume including education and work in the field of human sexuality.
4. A letter of intent and interest briefly stating reasons for applying, education
and learning goals and a statement on human sexuality.
5. A current photograph.
6. Graduate and undergraduate transcripts from schools attended.
7.
Two letters of recommendation.
For more information, please contact Dr. Ted McIlvenna at 1523 Franklin Street, San
Francisco, California 94309, (415) 928-1133.
Copyright ( c ) 1996

Attachment 5:
Sexology Strategy for
"Sexual Attitude Restructuring"

THE IASHS CREATED SEMINARY SEXUALITY

TRAINING

GOODBYE! GOOD MEN

H o w Catholic Seminortes
Turned A w a y T w o Generations of
Voccltions From the Priesthood

Michael S . Rose
Foreword b y
Altce von Hlldebrand

The following sections from

Michael Rose's book (left) cite to the
"SAR" (Sexual Attitude Restructuring,
later changed to "Reassessment" as in the
following training) and to "human
sexuality" training designed originally by
the IASHS and pioneered at The Kinsey
Institute.
The number of dioceses using the
SAR to train their future clergy and the
number of schools using such materials
to train children is unknown at this time.

AQUINAS PUBLISHING L T D
CINCINNATI

Also consider that the

archbishop routinely allowed seminary students to view,
what any normal person would consider a pornographic
program at his diocesan center titled, "Sexual Attitude Reassessment," so seminarians could "rethink" their views
on sexuality to conform with what the archbishop considers to be kus more positive attitude. The program's registration form promised to examine "how we were trained
(or not trained) to hold restricting attitudes about our
sexuality." 174 For at least ten years (1978-1988), seminarians and many others attending the sex workshops viewed
a series of explicit movies produced by Multi-Focus, Inc. (a
distributor of other "educational movies" such as "Plain
and Fancy Penises," "Hookers," and "Women in Love:
Strategies of Black Lesbians") in San Francisco. These

174 Flyers and registration form from 1988 "Reassessment of Sexual Attitudes" workshop conducted at Archdiocesan Cousins Center in Milwaukee.

A SELF-FULFILLING PROPHECY

showcased on the big screen male and female m3sturba.tion, heterosexual and homosexual intercourse, and variations in oral sex. One particular film, entitled A iiipple qF
Time, depicted a 56-year-old woman and a 63- rear-old
man engaging in sexual games with a vibrator. ?'he program was protested for years, but it was not un5l 1988,
when a local Christian television station exposed rhe program during Milwaukee's prime time that the c:ourt o:f
public opinion forced the archdiocese to shut it dovm.
Weakland also endorsed and permitted, at l e ~ s since
t
1980, a four-week series titled "Homosexuality anti Its Impact on the Family," to be taught in his archdiozese for
many years, even after being repeatedly asked to cancel
the program, which did not at all reflect a Catholic, understanding or response to the issues of homosexualjty. This
sex workshop was taught by Milwaukee priest Fathe].
James Arimond, who also served as the chaplaix~of the
Milwaukee Dignity175 chapter, and was a regular columnist for Wisconsin Light, a member publication of -:he Gay.
and Lesbian Press Association. A two-page pron~otiona:.
flyer co-authored by Arimond and Leon Konieczn-y stated.
that the Catholic Church's moral theologians held "differ-.
ing viewpoints on the morality of homosexual acts. Wher.
making a moral decision.. .ultimately it is the indi.~idual'$
conscience which must be his or her guide. A Cathc~licmay
in good conscience make a decision not in total agi.eement
with Church teaching and still remain within the Cmrch if

Dignity is a pro-homosexual group that w a s banned by thl Vaticm

in 1986 because the group failed to adhere to Catholic teaching on sexual morality.

'75

Scientific A u t h o r i t y for H u m a n S e x u a l i t y Education

in t h e Second Half of the 2 0 t h C e n t u
rv
~,

As of this w r i t i l ~ the
~ , Sex Iristi-

Lute offer: 3 doctor tte of education.

four giaduare programs. and seven
basic crec.entiais (i!lcluding a "Safe
Sex Certificate") which can be obtained sw;ftl!: wirh iittie or no prior
training. Ponlero;,. the Institute's
then-academic deal], acknowledged
that adva ~ c e dsex t legree applicants
are acceptd "offrhe street," provided
that the? do not ha\ e traditional preconceptions about s :sud mores. The
demand f ~ Kinseya-only
r
standards
is evidenl in the Irstirure's codified
"Basic Sexual h g i ts" ethical oath,
which legitimizes :he Kinsey New
Biology nlodel of "c~nsensual"adultchild sex, incest, c j d d prostitution,
and child pornography.
The Sex Institure's degree program includes "ad~~anced
pduate"
studies such "erocic sensate and massage [hen.py.'?and focuses most of its
scholarly training o 1 student viewing
(and making) of"er tic" films. Other
key credi,: courses i~icludehow to use
sex surrogates (prosricu~es)in sex
therapy and an ana ysis of the Kinsey
reports including (:hapter 5 on the
children. The Ir.stitu~eprovides
[raining i n the desi>;nand implementation of "sex education curricula' for
ail ages argely di x t i n g America's
ciassroom sex educarion. Dr.
Pomeroy. an originzl SIECUS oficial.
reaches c lild sexua.!ity. "Forensic sexology' is a popula~course. And "accredited' Sex Institute "esFerts" are
:rained t~ restih o I behalf of sex offenders and busine ;scs which specidize in the producric n of obscenity and
pornography.'01

INSTITUTIONS
Private
Funders

RESEARCHERS
c

I Original
Sexuality
Researchers

INDIANA

Educators

Rockeleller

(Later. Playboy)
Calderone. Ramey.

Public

State, Federal
Taxes

THE FIRST INSTITUTIONS GRANTING

HUMAN SEXUALITY DEGREES IN TEACHING. COUNSELING
RESEARCH, Ph.O.s. MASTERS, EDUCATION OEGREES. SAFE SEX TRAINERS. ETC.

1971
Sexual Attitude Restructuring (SAR)
(George Leonard, on SAR for ESOUIRE. THE END OF SEX. p. 24.)

EXAMPLES OF OTHER COURSE WORK

TO FULFILL DEGREE PROGRAMS

SAR T r a ~ n e dEducators, Train Downward F r o m Graduate Schools

lo College. High School, Jr High School, to Primary Grades.

l ~ r o t l cMassage. Self Massage, Sex Educstlon ~ o i s Design

e
(L Implernenlatlon.
r Therapy. Fantasy. Masturbatcm F0rens.c Sexology
Sex Sbrrqate Use o

.+-

SSSS
Study of Sex

Porneroy. Caldelwood.
Kwkendall, Gagnon
Money. Relss, Masters
&Johnson, Bell,
Marmor, Rub~n,
Christenson. etc

SSSS Board.
Founders
Pomeroy, Ellis, Beigei,
Gue, LeMekK Benjamm
George. Money,

SlECUS

(Sex lntorrnatlon 6 Educat~on

Counc~lot the Un~tedStates)
1964

Comrnlsslon
on Accreditation

Programs

"G"kYdaZ&%Z
Coleman. TlaQe,Amelar.
Upps, Hartman.
LOP!cG&, Moshw,S t y
Bvme. Schwartr

Sex Education
Curricula
Wardell Pomeroy

Wardelt Porneroy

Bryck Caldetwocd

Delyck Caldemood
Roberl Mclkenna
Mary Caiderone
Alan Bell
Lester Krrkendall

Paul Gebhard
Kenneth George
Vern Bullough

ASSECT applies the Kinsey Model as members serve the general

public through outreach agencies like Planned Parenthood,
enterino schoolrooms. coutlrooms. etc.

PLANNED PARENTHOOD
1942
,I.mi.'L

ASSECT

Amerncan Sacaty for Sex Eduutors.

Coundon 6 Thsraplrr

c,-.

American Assoc.
of Marrlage & Family
Counselors

In 1 380, Ponl zroy himself resrified on hehalf o f : pornographer in

---

--

--

THE CHILD EXPERIMENl S

-171

Kinsey Institute &

The Human Sexuality Researchers

I
I

',

'

FUNDING
m
Original
Private
Funders
Rockefeller
Nil. Research
Coun. Cornm.
on Research
(Later. Playboy)

Public
Funders
State, Federal
Taxes

INDIANA
UNIVERSITY
THE KINSEY INSTITUTE

1938

Por xroy adn?itred undi.r 03rh tha: hi' had

sou$ir funds Fro111 the
sex industry [o produl:e his o\xr~:chiid
por nograph?.

INSTITUTIONS

'
1

h'h!)pjlD ~ IiY. ii,?~t~/(.k~:

a cc )im casc . n which

Dr. Alfred C. Kinsey

Scientific
Authority for
"The Kinsey Model"

Original Sexuality
Researchers
Educators
Kinsey. Pomeroy
Gebhard, Martin,
Gagnon, Masters &
Johnson. Money,
Simon. Schiller,
Caiderone, Ramey,
L~ef.Ellis, Benjamin
Calderwood. Tripp,
Reiss. Builough,
Mcllvenna, Haberlae.
Kolodny. etc.
(Later, Hundreds of
Kinsey Model
Disciples)

"'

The hl.11ch 191)1

"D :partmen: of De-

f~;-nie
Report on Homcwxualiry m d Perso~;nelSecur n:' cited
Ki:ise!r,
P3mero)-,
Gebhard, Martin.
Ga :non, For'l, Beach,
an( Bell as PloD coniI
THE FIRST INSTITUTIONS GRANTING
su1:anrs. a i c nz wirh
HUMAN SEXUALITY DEGREES IN TEACHING, COUNSELING
1 RESEARCH. Ph.D.s. MASTERS, EDUCATION DECREES, SAFE SEX TRAINERS, ETC.
joz, m n i of Z ' d o p h i h
edi:or Vsrn Suilo~igh
anci pedoph le advocar: John &[onry.
Su:h men Ilt i p d give
a c nrer of"si ience" ro
the subsequenr D o D decision ro recommend the acceptancr of homosexuais in t. le militar;: A 199.3
Rand study of homosesualiry in rhe armed forces was similarly based in large p m on Kinseys data
and conclusions.
I
I

'"'

Manv of the Sex Instirure's sex films and videos have been disrribured by Focr s Inrernar.ona1 (FI)
ro universities and colleges narionwide. .enon? i t ; other "ert~ric"media. FI offers "The Kmsey Three (Herero, Homo ck Bisexua;ity)" and
"Abour Your Sexuality'' (for junior high children) Tht: iartcr frarures
scenes of condomless heterosexual and hon~osexu:lloral and anal sodom!-. All three centers (Sex Iilstiture, NkV, an l rhe Universiry of
Pennsylvania) have Long raughr sex using rhe Sexu 11 hrrirud~:Restrucr u i n s (SAN technique. Dr. Pomeroy has noreci, "The S,iR is designed ro desensirize?" that is to disinhibir. all viewers.

Journal of Paedophilia boasts major

leaders in American sexology. All of
its editors are self-admitted
pedophiles. The magazine is
published in Amsterdam.

SEXUAL ATTITUDE RESTRUCTURING (!iA R )

In December 138'. George Leonard reported his Sexual Xrl it~ideRestructuring (SAR) experience at The Insrirure for he Advan sed Study
of Human Sexualin (IASHS) in Ciquiw magazine. Noti!lg that at
least 60,000 people had been trained in colleges and uni~.cxsiriesb!rhe SAR sincs the early 1980s, Leonard viewec his exy $ricnce as
typical:

--p-p--.----p--.--..--.

172

KINSEY C R I M E S & C O N Z Q U E N C E S

CHAPTER 7

l ' h c sr~lso~-!
ovcrload cuiminarcd on Sarurdav nighr in a mulrinirdia evenr c ~ l l r drhr F-koramn. . . i n the drirhess.. . images
of ili~manb .inss-and somrtinics even animals-engagin? in
e /cry conce;vabic s e s ~ acr.
d accompanied by wails. squeals,
nloans. sho! rs. .uid rhc firsr movement of rhe'Tcbaik~vsi,~
ioiin Con<erto. Some swsnreen sim~ilraneousmoving
picrures.. .. Over a psriod of several hours. there came a
nionlenr whrn riie four Images on [he wall were of a gay malr
ic>ilple.a srr ughr c o u p i ~ a, lesbian couple, and a besrial group.
The subjrcr: wrsr nude.. . . I felr myself beconling disorie!~red... waz she kissing a mail or a woman? I srruggled ro
.force rhe acr; 1 WAS ~wrchinginro rheir proper boxes.. . and
i13u 1 could 1'1 rzrnrnlbe~-which was which. Wasn'~I supposed
ro make [he. e discrimina[ions? I searched for ciuss. There were none. I 'began ro feel
~i ~comiorral~lr.
Soon I realizcd,rhar ro avoid verUgo and nausea I W O L I haw
~ ~
ro give up
\a

tllc arrempi :o ciiscrirninarc. and simpiy surrendzr ro ehz csperiencc.. . . The differences $0;
I\ lish lii-ch 1 .we bee11 xiincd. werc. nor on11 rri~ial.bur invisible. By the end.. . Inlothing
w : shockin;:.
~
. . [blur n o r h ~ n LVJS
s sacred either. Bur as I drovc home, I began ro grr 3
sl ghrly uneasy &ding. ir u-as almost as if I had been conned. .. by my own condlrioned
rcsponse of raking rhe motr liberared posirion.. . nkarever my deeper feelings.. . love had
m ~ bcen
t
menrioned a single rime during rhe entire weekend.
T h e $AT; has s r v e d as a critical tool t o reshape views o f h u m a n sexualir): T h e N e w R i o l c p
media, an orgy o f [lornographic couplings o n film a n d video, is regularly utilized i n academia to
restructure srudenrs inodest sexual attitudes i n t o t h e bizarre EClnseyan alrernative. To understand
h o w this v:orks, it is useful t o study the mechanics of the SAR i n desensitizing a n d disinhibiting rhe
h u m a n b s l i n t o alIc\v a shift i n pedagogical attitude a n d performance. T h e SAP, literally scars rhs
viewer's blain as i t circ~inwencs,short-circuirs, his o r h e r cognition a n d conscience. Xeuroscienrisr
Dr. G a r y ..,ynch s a y ; o f all high resonance stimuli: "Whar me're saying here is that a n event which
lasts half a second. r .irhin iive or ren minutes has produced a srructural change thar is i n s o m e \v;lys
as proi-;,ui-ci as rhc s .rui.curai changr. o n e sees in (brain) damage.'"@'

SAR AS SEX EDUCATION IN

"THE DECADE OF THE BRAIN"
T h e 1990; werc detriared "The Decade o f rhe Brain" by t h e U.S.
Congress. M o r e ha: been learned abouc this viral organ d u r i n g rhe
last three decades thin in a11 prior history. Of special i m p o r t to the
discussion of classroom sexuaiity curricula is rhar t h e brain knows no
presenr. ilelevanr experience "conjures u p images o f scenes
witnessed. .in rhe pa: r." What does it mean for sex education courses,
then. if "z.zhibirion" rarher rhan "excitatiorz" is t h e hallmark of rhe
h e a l ~ h ybr:iin.'Oi
Funcrionallv s p i a h n g . t h e SAR.(and t o a lesser degree. vet wirh
m o r e cunslsrenc?,, coiay's mass media) breaks down :he "inhibitions"

of "the healthy brain." The SAR is effecti.ive because all human brains obey wi lar neurol x j s a call "3
i:w of strengrh." Simply put, rhis means rhar novel, scar!: exciting srirnuli h o n rhe o u r s J e world are
proccsscd faster and with more force than non-threatening, pieasant srimuli. Neurochtmicai pathways in the brain are chemically imprinted by herero-and homo-erotic n x d i i srimuli; hence. they
fuse sex, violence, fear, and anxiety into one felt emotion. T h e SAR reprogra ns studzn~sin educarion, medicine. psycholos~, criminals srxolo,qv and so on? by reconfiguring t h i r neurochemistrytheir human "narurev-producin,o a cadre of educated leaders who are part of Kinseyan deviance.
T h e effect of television experiences. and orher modern media srimuii on th :deveiopi 1g brains of
children, is addressed convincin& by educational psychologist Dr. Jane Henl! in her bcok. Eizdnngred itlimk (l984).'"" The nc~~rochemical
impact of sexualized media, wl ether conimercial or
rducauve, upon children's nascent brains, minds, and memories, is producing a new brsed of children, hence a new breed of adults and a new type ofsociety.

In The Bmin ( I 9QLi.),'07Richard Resrak reported thar a visual image passes from the c yc through
the brain in three-ten~hsof a second. The brain is srrucrurally clianged and I-~emories:Ire created.
We literally "grow new brain"'" with each eqxrience, and we have 110 choice in rhe maxer: we are
designed ro believe what we see. W'hat sexologists and pornographers calI sex~iai"fanrasv" is sexual
realir)- to the human brain. Visual data are processed as memories and emotions. and as such they are
real!y neurochemicailv etched into the pathvcays of the brain as real.
O u r brain controls our bod)., as weil as our emotional and physical he: lrh, so "f.dse" visual
srimuii recorded as "reai" can change our vital signs (heart rate, perspiration, i ~tensifiedbreathing.
m.'i rhe same as "real" images. Neuropsy~holo~ist
Margaret Kemeny states:
[Alnyrime we feel anything...rhink anythin%...imaginea n ~ r h i nrherc
~ . is acrk ir)-in the
brain that 1s rahng place ... rhar can rhen lead KO a cascade of changes thar ham. an lmpacl
on healrh. ' "
O n e wonders how have days and nights of SAR films portraying a n d and or 11 sodomy bestiality
and sadistic sex (as weil as homosexual, heterosexual, group, child, and child-adulr coitus1 affected
and changed the brains of the medical professionals, psychologists. criminologists, educ:.tors, sociologists, ministers, and sex "experts" exposed?

THE PROFESSIONAL SEX FIELD ACCREDITING AGENCIES AND SOClEI1ES

Human Sexuality Programs at the three major academic centers mentioned at ove are dtsipned to
produce SAR-conditioned sevperts and sexoiogisrs from all pertinent disciplines Sexualin. "experts"
have generared dozens, rhen hundreds, then rhousands of chree-unit AIDS prevt ntion anc other sex
accreditation seminars, schools, and conferences. The Society for the Scientific 5tudy of Ses (SSSS)
established a Commission of Accreditation for the field, originaliy controlled by key Kinseyan: Pomeroy
Gebhard, George, Cdderwood. and Bullough.
Founded in 1957, the Sociery for the Scientific Study of Sex (SSSS) is an intrr ~acional
organizarion of professionals dedicated to rhc advancement of sexual knowied~e...ir
publishes the Journal of Sex Research, sponsors programs ro award research ex( ellencc,
holds annual and regional conferences ro promore interdisciplinary cooperario.~anlong
researchers, educators and clinicians.!"'

---174

KlNSEY CRIMES & CON: EQUENCES

--

CHAPTER 7

Gro,ving our f the Lnsej- model, this sexology monopoly set standards in the field ofsrxoloy:
It annua I? grants he Alfred C. Kinsey Award for Excellence in Scientific Scudv. Operationall?. the
(

SSSS iar;:ely direct; and conuols who is, or is nor, recognized as a sexology professional. It influe~~ces
who is h.red, fired. 01. promoted within academia. In !989, homosexual advocate Kenneth Ceorgc
headed tach the S S S board of direcrors and rhe Gnivzrsiry of I'ennsylvania'~ Human Sexu.Jir>
Program
Tod;): studenis hoping ro advance in fieids dealing wirh issues relaced to human sexuaii? are
expecred to ackno~vled~e
agreemenr with Kinsefs scientjfic-variant view of sexuality, as taught i n
their schools. This for all practical purposes, has long eliminated from [he s e x ~ ~ afield
l i ~those ~ v h o
mighr imisr on manraining a virtuous. moral srandard of sexualiry.
Let us close ollr brief look ar rhe SSSS by noting that during ~ t s1987 AIDS conferenccx in
Atlanta, c;eorgia, i successfully jumped onto the AIDS gravy train, giving SSSS access ro copiou
AIDS prtvention ri:search funds. Sexology fundamentailv promotes all of the sexiial activirv said to
result in AIDS, including anal sodomy. For years their sexology films produced ar San Francisco's Sex
Institute .nodeled and promoted unprotected multiple hererosesual and homosexual sex acrs, inr:lusive of bcth sodom!es. Under the guise of ,UDS education, this profession has become even more
aggressive in modejing its varianr-seuualiry standard for our nation's schoolchildren. For exampie.
rhe late Dsryck Ca1,lenvood. a onetime SSSS president who headed New York Universiv's Schoo! of
Educatioi~Sexualiy, Department, creared a curriculum for middle-school children (subsequend?- a
film-strip and video) entitled, About Your Sex-rmli~-which graphicdiy glamorized unprorccred homosexual anti heterosexual anal sodomy As nored in the n'eu York 7i*zbuns, Calderwood. who died
young of .-\IDS, wa "a disKinseyan Professional Sexological
Societies & Accrediting Agents
ciple of srx pioneel Alfred
&nseY 10) believt:d,with
SSSS
)I / SSSS Board.
Society For the Scientif~c
Founders '
Kinsey, n 3 type of sexual
SlECUS Board, )
stu?y-?ISex
I .
Pomerov
Ellis
- .- .- ,, -.
..- , Beiael.
- -. =- ,
Founders
behavior is a b n o r n a l or
/ Guze, Lehfekn,Benjamin,
George, Money,
Pomeroy, Calderwood,
Bulbugh,R e j i , Shetwirl,
pathological."
Kirkendall, Gagnon,
Green, Davls, Schaefer
Money, Reiss, Masters
SIECUS
Coleman, Tietze, Amelar,
& Johnson, Bell,
(Sex Information & Education
Anork er accredi :ing orLippes, Hartman,
Council of the United States)
Marmor, Rubin,
Lopiccolo, Mosher, Storr
Christenson, etc.
ganizatior!, the Anmican
Bvme. Schwark
Socierv of' Sex Educators, ,
1
Sex Education
Counselors and Th(:rapists Human Sexuality
on Accreditation
Curricula
(ASSECT', was iorlned in
Wardell ~omeroy
Wardell Pomeroy
Deryck Calderwood
Deryck Caldewood
1967 b), D s . Phyllis :;chiller
Paul Gebhard
Robert Mcllvenna
Kenneth George
Mary Calderone
and Aibeir Ellis. A! SECT
"ern ~ u ~ i o u g h
j Lester Kirkendall
has also long uri1iz:d the
SAR technique as a desenASSECT applies the Kinsey Model as members serve the general
sitizing ec.ucariOna r O o i
~ublic
throush outreach asencier like Planned Parenthood.
e n k i n g s c h o o ~ ~ o mcourtrooms,
s,
etc.
Dr. Ellis ssrved on rht board
of Penthouie Fol-zrm. Both
[he SSSS a n d AS:;ECT
1942
isanger 6 caldaronel
joined together ro sjjonsor
American Assoc.
the 1998 i'TX/~dd
P0r lograAmerican Society
ASSECT
for Sex Educators,
of Marriage & Family
Counselors 8 Therapis!
phy Confc.renceX h.ld at
1967
Counselors
a

-.

--

-- - - - .-

THE CHILD EXFERIMENTS

--

------ -- - -

- - -- -175

Korrhridse, which was branded, by the

Dernocl-a:-conrroiled California legislac i w commirree rhar investigated irs ori:ins, a "pornograph!- rrade show."
Hard]!- surpl-ising, the CSL'N's "Center
for Sex Research" had been dubbed "The
Kinsey Instirure of the Wsr." Irs director, James Elias, is a Kinsev Insticure and
Insriture for the Advanced Srudv of Huinan Sexualin, alumnus. Its founder,
Vcrn Bullough senr threatening lerrers to
this aurhor for identifiring him as a pedophile editor of Pnidika: The-[nzcmnl of
at

PERCENTAGE O F U.S. TEENAC E G I R L S N H O

HAVE SAiD THEY H A D P R E -MAUITAaINTERCOURSE.
PREAND POST KfNSEY 7 >48-7987

P~zedop/7iiitz.
Kinse);s data laid the groundwork for
h e academic pornography produced by
gynecolo~isrWiiliarn blasters who iefi his
wife to
Virginia Johnson. By 1957, ucilirarian research on orgasms 1r.a.s t eins pubiicl!; advocared b!, the Lnseyire first couple of sex rherapY (now divorced) at TS(5shington J n i ~ ~ r n i nMedical
's
School. The Masrers 8r Johnson studies fell into disfavor r'oliov,-ing a spousd 131nuir which publicly
cspossd their use of rher~peuricprosdru~es(called "sex s~irrogares"by sexoloeisrs).
I11 [he 19SOs, rhe h4asters and Johnson, Plallboy Foundation granr recipirnrs, appeared in Plav60y
.
ro sevcal rheir finding that "some" women (seven anonymous female subjecrs idt:ntified e1:;etvhereas
probabiy prostitutes) enjoy anal sodomy (the key known source for AIDS). Man Pltz~i70~~
<.onsumers
arho undoubtedly read this as an oral and anal sodomy endorsement, would hme been ingr); and
resenrful ar wives or
who did not respond " p r o p e r l ~to rhc dangerous. painful and historically unnatural act as "love."

SIECUS
In 1964, the Sex Informarion and Education Council of the Unired Smes (SIEC J S ) was launched at
the Kinsey Instirure. Ics objective was ro reach Kinseyan ideolog!, ;is sex education in o1.r schools.
SIECUS (which now calls itself [he Sexualizy Information and Educarion Co.inci1 of r l e United
Stares) imprinted tile new Kinsey variant standard on almosr all ses education curricula Its carl!.
leader. Dr. Mary Calderone (past medical direcror of Planned Parenthood) \?:a; the dime link bcw r e n Kinscfs university-based research. Planncd Parznthood's grassroots out1 tach. and SIECUS.
SIECUS was a "Resource Center {operatind Specialized Programs to Disrriburi. Informal ion about
Human sesualiry [through] learned journals. research studies, rraining materials for health professionals and sample classroom curricula.""'

IS THE SIECUSIPLAYBOY PARTNERSHJP A RICO CASE I N THE AflAKING?

As SIECUS is regularly fimded by the Stare! questions need ro be asked a b o ~r the Tan~~ary
1979
Annzral Plqboj which announced that "PIayboj~Foundarion provide[d] the firsr of sewral major
- -176

--

--

--

KlNSEY CRIMES & C o b SEQUENCES

CHAPTER 7

Sexology -therapy or titillation?

Eric Trimmer speaks t o Wardell B Pomeroy

T

I've heard it said that, perhaps because he was

basically an entomologist, Kinsey was more interested in
insects than in people. Your name has been linked with
Kinsey for very nearly 40 years now and you must have
known him better than anybody. Is there anything in that
criticism?
P No, there is not. Kinsey was fundamentally a taxonomist, he collected things. H e had a fantastic collection of
all sons of things-including music and records. But
when I met him in 1943 he had started applying his skills
in taxonomy to the collecting of sex histories. And when
he started he really worked at it with extraordinary
enthusiasm, energy and dedication. H e was deeply interested in people and in his work. In fact he worked 18
hours a day.. srx days a week. H e had started all thiLin
1938, before I methim.

What sort of man was he? H e comes over rather d&

and astute in his defin~tiveworks.
No, hc wasn't like this. H e was a family man with a
verv loyal wife. H e had three children. In fact he hag
four-one child died rather tragrcally. Dedicated to stating the facts about everything, he always said, 'I've three
children alive-one died', if anyone raised the point.

T
P

Not a sexologist?
No, he never considered himself a sexologist. I'm the
sexologist.

T Yes, that's right, you were very much involved in the

magazine Sexology, weren't you?
P Yes, I've been on its editorial board since 1964. You
see, I believe in sexology. M y basic professional background is psychology But I've worked in the field of sex
foi 38 years, first as a therapist, now marnly as an
educator and an academic. Soon after the
Institute of Advanced
Sexology was founded
(five years ago), I was
approached and willingly dragged out of
retirement to be a part
rime academic. I work
an unusual ' p a n time'
week-I'm at my desk
at 8 am five days a
week!
T

Tell me, how do

you see your function
as a sexologist?
P Sexologists deal
with sexual dysfunction and teach people
to treat i t

Was that the mark of the man? Was he the precise

recorder in every way?
P Well. he could be obtuse at times.

T
P

In what way?
Weil, for instance at a cocktail party we were both
attending, somebody asked Kinsey if some sexual histories were more difficult to take than others. Kinsey said
'No'. I was furious! But we had an agreement never to
argue or disagree in public. But wheh I got him alone I
said 'ProK why did you say that? You know it's not true'.
(ProK was his nickname, a contraction of Professor
Kinsey).

Wardell Pomeroy: W e concentrate on

sexual enrichment, working with fantaw.

T
.

You are practisrng what we call sexual

medicine then?

What did he say?

H e denied he'd been misleading. 'Some sexual
historiesare catin to take than others' he said. That's the
s o n of man he was. H e made difficult things easy.

P Not really. W e do not believe in the treatment of

sexual problems bv using the medical 'sickness' model.
y e use differen: :ec!xiques sxch as bcdy s::.-rcr.ees,
touching, sensual experience, enhancement and v s a g e
to help people come to terms with what they feel. We
make them feel good about sex. Therapy i s then prescribed eclectically at a personal level.

T
P

I've also heard i t said that selection of subjects in the

two reportsT was in some way biased towards the middle
class, the easy talkers about sex. Critics allege that this
bias makes the books less valid than was originally
suggested. Would you go along with that?
P Definitely not! W e spread our net widely and indiscriminately. W e went out to schools, churches, the
community. Kinsey was an excellent organiser and a wise
researcher. H e would not allow his studies to be slanted.
He was a scientist primarily.

But what about the pathology? T h e medical model is

necessary here surely?
P Yes, of course, we have to filter out the pathology
and refer it to the medical doctors to deal with. W e
concentrate on sexual enrichment, working with fantasy.
W e shift our patients from goal oriented situations to
enhancement of their feelings.

T
P

Do you use surrogates to do this?

Yes, we do, whenever this is necessan

This diagram illustrates

how Planned
Parenthood, standing
on the authority of the
fraudulent Kinseyan
view of human
sexuality, distributes
Kinsey's flawed
science to the grass
roots through sex
education and AIDS
Education, all of which
sanctions and suppprts
its massive
contraception and
abortion services.

--

NEW

Proof of Sex Crimes Against Infants And Children For Kinsey's

Fraudulent Child Sexuality Data Are Found In Kinsey's Two
Books; Sexual Behavior In The Human Male (1948) And Sexual
Behavior In The Human Female (1953). Below Is The Infamous
"Table 34" Claiming 26 "Orgasms" in "24 Hrs" For a "4 yr." Old
Boy, Experimentally Tested Around The Clock. The Kinsey
Institute Will Reveal Nothing About Their Little Victims.

NO. OF

AGE

AGE

ORGASMS

5 mon.
11 mon.
11 moo.

1 hr.

3s nin.
9 min.
65 min.
2 min.
5 min.
10 hr.
24 hr.

2 yr.

2+yr.
4 yr.
4

yr.

4 yr.

7 yr.
8 yr.
9 yr*
10 yr.
10 )T.

NO. OF
ORGASMS

I 1 yr.
1 l yr.
12 yr.
12 yr.

12 yr.
12 yr.
13 yr.

2 hr.

2 hr.
1 hr.
24 min.
2.)hr.
8 hr.
70 scc.

3 hr.

13 yr.
13 yr.

2 hr.
68 min.

13 yr.

s hr.

14 yr.

21 hr.
4 hr.

52 min.
I

I hr.
1 hr.
3 hr.
3 min.

24 hr.

Table 34. Examples of multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males

Some instances of higher frequencies.

An Andvsis o f A B I78SA. A A.e&torls

P r d n Bill

Dr. Judith A. Rwman

Auerut. ZOO0

RE: SEXUAL ORIENTATION INSTRUCTORS

The bulk of
IASHS training
is via video
tapes, the
majority of
which are
various forms
of
pornography.

T H E lNSnRlTE
FOR ADVANCED STUDY
OF HUMAN SEXUALITY

Or'rce of the Registrar

Apr l 2 5 , 1979

A private. nomectarh graduate school

( 5 7 5 , nu8.n- rad nouy 'mchlipuas, SAY stuhbs.

A 3 -unit course for A \inimun of 6 , oudmrn of 20, studmnt..
Stc 3ents to provide own oil ud M.1.
COLrsa

Friday,
-

July 6 , 10 a.m.

norday,
Ser sory

J u l y 9 , 10 a.m.

.ow A w l r u u u

Smr

11

will mnsFct of thr follov+llg s u t i o n a :

to 6 p.m.
lW88Agm I

to 6 P.m.

W u u r e s m Xa8ugr I1

---Wetnosday.
Sei

J u l y 18, 1 0 a.m- to 6 Pea.

sow Awuenass M a ~ u q emvim m d Acce%s0ri~8

Pr day. ~ u l y20. 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

S u sate Focru hchniqums

I
I

Sa--day,
-

July 21, 10 a.m.

En,. r w U a 8 u q m

to 6 p.m.*

Ragistaring for dad-couru for 1 d

(July 21 rad 22 0lCZ.Y)

The Itutituu For M&

Eh&n

The SAR
(Sexual
Attitude
Restructuring)
is the
foundation of
the sex
education here
and elsewhere.
The SAR is a
series of
"sexual
orientation"
films (largely
"hard-core"
pornography)
designed t o
radically
restructure the
student's
moral values.
Left are some
of the credit
courses for
these "sexual
orientation"
experts: 9 days
of "Sensory
Awareness
Massage,
Erotic
Massage," etc.,
for 3 units of
college credit,
(bring your
own towel and
oil).

25

An Anah& of AB 1765 h A Aedatur'~Ifolcdion Bill

Dr. Ju&h A. Rcisman

Aupruf 2000

SEXUAL ORIENTATION TRAINERS--CONTINUED

These are the "educators"
remember, who the State
would empower to retrain,
restructure, children--from
their parents and faith-the
experts the State would
have substitute their
"knowledge" about sexuality
for parental knowledge.
The Kinsey Canon
dominates all sexual
orientation, all human
sexuality training. Kinsey
was the foundation of both
the homosexual movement
and the pederast, pedophile
movement.

ANALYSIS O F T H E KINSEY
REPORTS
I Unit
Wardell B..Pomeroy d t c u s s u
m t h e H m a n M a k (1948) and -1
#79I

--

ths H

s
-

a n (1953) chapter b y
chapter, summarizing and explaining the dataM a l e and female clam are compared in terms
of age. educational level. age aF puberty. pre-

IQL x n

pubescent sexudity. rural and urban differetc.

Both volumes should be read
before taking the coune-

ences.
#SO1

-- 1 Unit

TXE SEXUAL VARIATIONS

A n -examination of how people have organized

their zsxur1 l i f a r t y l o s including c o m m u n a l
living. swinging. S/M. eroup marriage and
l i v i n g ~ i n g l e -A videotape come.

The Institwe For Media Enkcdon

Wardell Pomeroy, as Dean

of the IASHS, taught the
Kinsey Reports-IASHS
students did not learn, nor
have any written about or
challenged, the child sexual
abuse protocol which was
the foundation of all of
Kinsey's "research."

The North American

Man/Boy Love
Association (NAMBLA)
1981 states:
"Gay liberationists in
general, and boy-lovers in
particular, should know
Kinsey's work and hold it
dear.... implicit in Kinsey is
the struggle we fight
today.'' "

26

TIME, June 7, 1982, p. 49

6
8

10

Attachment 6:
Dr. Wardell Pomeroy,
Kinsey Co-Author, Sex Partner,
Directs
IASHS "Course Work"

POMEROY-ONE OF KINSEY'S YOUNGER SEX

PARTNERS--BECOMES IASHS ACADEMIC DE,AN AND
TRAINS, ACCREDITS THOUSANDS IN HUMAN
SEXUALITY
(pp. 603,491 in James Jones/ 1997 Biography helow)

PRIMARY INSTIUTE FOR THE ADVANCED SrrUDYOF

HUMAN SEXUALITY (IASHS) FACULTY AND STAFF
POMEROY, ACADEMIC DEAN

Administrative Staff
tosis E. I)rahun,Ed.D.,M.Th..mafStudarts
Lontb Hadan, Ph.l).Y.A., Dean of Rofessiorul

Em

L p . w..
Rqwtm

Pfuidmt

'"ik& Mclhe-.

h.D.,M.Div..

Warden B. Punems PkD., Academic Dean

AidKIT Wens.Jr., J.D., tcgol Counsel

ERPin J. H l t b a k . PhD.,Ed.D.,&MOTof Hisorial R e s a x h

m t c Rubenstein. Ph.D.. Director of h a iCImSrudics

@.I Suam Ph.D.$.TM.. Directat. of 1-ml

Medu

SAMPLES OF SOME OF THE KINSEY AUTHORSS

ANIMUS TOWARD CATHOLICISM
(Jones, pp. 576,525,714)
Kinsty's most v d e m u s critics wcrt deeply relig;lcous pcoplc who h t d
that his work would undermine traditional morality Hc had anticipated a
rough meption h m o o ~ a v Catholics,
e
and he got onc. 'Ihc R@t
RtYtrrnd Monsignor Maurice S h a ofWishinpn's Catholic University
of America, denounced h w d B&/mior in tbc Himam MkCG as "tht most
ant~~L@ous
book ofour times," chPrgurg that it %as made du most dcvastadng inroads on Chrirtan morality in this ccnnqm whik an #litorial in the GddicMinl dc110~~,ccd
KLtgCY tbr being"at war against purity,
against moralim qqbst $ic W p r

Lcss than a we& afkx Wclls's strong statement hit rhc press, the Indiana hvincial Caundl of Catholic Women asked him to dvify his position. "Inthe name ofmorc than 150,000 women-rnost ofthem mothcrs,
..

..

The coundl dernandcd, Wd our sons

urd daughters be exposed to the ideas ofDr. Kinsty?Dan we risk placing
them in the charge of a university that sccrns tr, be willing to dcpade sciencc for the s a k of ematioal p ~ b l i a t y ? ~

6
7

10

Attachment 7:
A "Conflict of Interest. "
Sexology Takes Money From
Pornographers

DR. POMEROY SOUGHT FUNDS FROM ADULT FILM

ASSOCIATION
(3 Pages of testimony follow; pp. 803-805)

CAMPBELL DISTRICT COURT

COMMOWEALTH OF KENTUCKY,
Plaintiff,

1
1

-VS-

HAPPY DAY, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

NOS.

1
1

80-Mi-1582
80-M-1332
80-M-1266
80-M-1350
80-M-1351
80-M-1267

WITNESSES FOR COMMOMJEALTH AND

WIFOR DEFENDANTS

WIZWSS FOR DEFENDANTS (Tsken out of crder)

WARDELL 8. -?mExwY

D F r e c t mmfnation
mws mamifiaCion

---------------

---------------------L-

755

801

JAR

wit3 tha

-3 ax tt3 academic dean a the

Cpbc*s*oq

I n s t f t u t s f o r Advanced Study f o r W u M n Sururlftv ,

is bf s

miit

where is i!: foca::ad?

SsnPrsncf sco

Pnd how lung have you boon a r s w i a t e d

A3mt

b yoor

with that Institute, do )rou

four and a h 1 P p a r s .
capacity b e i n g n f i f i a t s d

mcalf

~ a ~ t t c i p a nor
t attending the bdutt

a;ttmdirzg,

&.

Yes. f

Qwq

PO,

wohr

f t was in California?

Yes.

it was

F S Za~s o c i e t 5 a ~annual

-04

Paumq

lww

in LosAngehs.

05/29/02

WED ;5:ll FAX 9167972544

JAR

drttSacntat eect of those types of rcrivkies?

?wou

w ~ h t

M a t types oe rcttviries?

(7

Child prtticipattm in poraogrrphic

~$wf@s,
sewaf ly explicit

Ammy

M O W ~ ~i E
S

yau w i l l ?

No, my posktLtm

is t h a t ur ham rt,

wouL$ be a d S clrs u e y anxmrrr at, do that resear& my$elZ.

uehr

Ad. did yau request

You donqt rccatl ever

dffecenco iC such o study e r e done?

be.

tbw W

tcstifyhg

7J

05/29/02.

WED 15:11 FAX

8167972544

JAR

Fedrral case ia Q c v c l r n d i n L978 d a r e t k s t tatter: was

T t o c u l l baing in Clevrlaiwl, y e s .

PENTHOUSE FORUM, FEBRUARY 1984

'WHOS WHO IN SEXOLOGY' AS PAID PORNOGRAPHY "ADVISERSvA "CONFLICT OF INTEREST" AS MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS

'THE FORUM INTERNATIONAL BOARD OF PHYSICIANS,

PSYCHIATRISTS, PSYCHOLOGISTS, SEXOLOGISTS,
AND THERAPISTS

INTERNATIONAL EDITORS

The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human

Sexuality sold sexually explicit photographs of
IASHS secretary, Linda Fredrickson, and her two
children to Hustler magazine. The child
pornography images, taken by IASHS founder
Laird Sutton, illustrate a pro-child molestation
and pro-incest article written by IASHS' faculty
member, Dr. Erwin J. Haeberle i n the December,
1978 Hvstler. All Hustler's pornographic child
images are redacted here by the author.

CHILDREN,
SEX AND
SOCIETY
B
Y
~
~
J
M
Ta sonbury Rwrprvchwd tht rightJ
of Dr. Hukrlr uxl tbr NatioarlSu,Pe
rum and p u W tk SIpC AUQl in 1977.
TbtbXt~~ll~iPnp.llpbobPqnphr

ofKoIlymdBMQar&ubbpy,pbom
-of
B n w b a drl.narmrl) phew
prpbroftb.trocbi]dr,n~.

'
1

A l r o i n l ~ , t & N ~ & P w ~ r a
8 bodt -tit)rd'MUIG@qfS*nditn~hicbaoot.i#dI
nu& pbobgrrph oi Rdrkbwm aad tbr
tromimn. Prhrtopub)iarion.So#oa
m@t
.pd wuI.d ~
' pvrmL

I#bpblibtbrphom,.Itbaryhh
dridPlaorp~ulro*ru~lr~ofthr

prticPLOboQ~pLMdtoow.Ahr.
~
o
i
~
fmmd tbB &I-, 8 wtb&t raiaLtrt

3ia-i-

oildJI.-*-

of1

6
8

10

Attachment 8:
Sexologists A s Pornographers

IASHS staff posed in sexual scenes for its photo-series,

Mediations on The GM of Sexuality (1 977).
O U I IUN

E.g., A nude "Ted"

Mcnvenna above right,
LASRS President,
carrying a nude female
staff member. Left, a
nude USHS secretary
with her two nude
children. The photos of
her children were sold to
Rustit? magazine for a
pro pedophile articlc,
triggering a lawsuit
against the LASHS by
the aggrieved mother.
Tbe photos are being
purposefully biurred
here.

D R WARDELL POMEROY, COAUTHOR OF THE KINSEY REPORTS

THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY OF HUMAN SEXUALITY'S 1977
BOOK, MEDITATIONS ON THE GIFT OF SEXUALITY: "EROTIC PEDAGOGY"
WITH RELIGIOUS SCRIPTURE AS OF OLD PAGAN SEXUAL GODS:
NATIONWIDE TRAINING OF SEXOLOGISTS, SEX & "SAFE SEX" EDUCATORS
OF A 60- 8 x IIPICTURE-BOOK, MEDITATIONS ON THE GIFT OF
SE.XUALIP/, TAKEN AND PUBLISHED BY THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED
q&.c
STUDY OF HUMAN SEXUALITY (IASHS), NEARLY HALF CONTAIN
-scx!L*
PHOTOGRAPHS OF ILLEGAL SEXUAL CONDUCT (1977) PERFORMED BY
IASHS FACULTYJSTAFF. WHILE THE IASHS WAS AND IS A MAJOR
PRODUCER OF 'HARDCORE" PORNOGRAPHY IN FILM AND
%&I-lrt~n
-*
PHOTOGRAPHS, COMMONLY IN VIOLATION OF OBSCENITY LAWS, ITS
b.~Surraclh~
FACULTY AND GRADUATES TESTIFY AS EXPERTS IN LEGISLATURES AND
COURTS ON THE NEED TO ELIMINATE LAWS AGAINST OBSCENITY AND
MOST SEX CRIMES. THE COERCIVE NATURE OF THE INDOCTRINATION
CRAFTS A SEX EDUCATION MONOPOLY WHICH DE-FACT0
DISCRIMINATES AGAINST MORAL BELIEVERS, AS A PAlTERN IN ALL UNIVERSITY
ACCREDITATION.

N\ediwion\

"
.
I

THE FOLLOWING TWO PHOTOGRAPHS OCCUPY FULL PAGES IN THE BOOK. THEY ARE
INCLUDED AS EVIDENCE OF FORCED 'ORGIASTIC" FACULTY- STUDENT
RELATIONSHIPS, INDOCTRINATING OR PRE-SELECTING ORGIASTIC TEACHERS AND
DOCTORS OF SEXOLOGY WORLDWIDE. THE PHOTOGRAPHS ARE REDACTED AND
REDUCED TO LIMIT THE COARSENING 'SAW IMPACT OF EXPOSURE.

Photo #1: Mrs. Faloona, a secretary at The Institute For Advanced Studv of

IT?-]

Human Sexuahty was asked by Ted Mcllvenna, IASHS Director, to be

photographed with her children, nude for "science," for "education" in a book
like, Meditations on the Gift of Sexuality, p. 61, with other faculty and
students. The IASHS sold the series of nude child photographs to Hustler
magazine, where the nude children appeared. full face, December 1978 in
an &tide called .Children. Sex and ~oc;et)rby IASHS br. Erwin Haebede, advocating
an end to age of consent, adult-child sex, and legalization of incest.

The mother sued IASHS in Faloona v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., No. CA 3-79-0056-R. US
States District Court, (5th Cir. 1986) and lost the case to a judge who said the
photograhs of nude children opening their genitalia to the camera did not constitute
child pornography (now illegal, based on the US Supreme Court ruling in Ferber), and,
ruled the trial judge, the photos were properly bought and hence
properly sold. The photo has been redacted from the explicit original to
limit viewer coarsening while proving the mass IASHS sexual
dysfunction, criminality, including that of pedophila.

Photo #2: Group Sex Orgy of undisclosed IASHA students andlor

faculty. This is one of a series of individual and group sex scenes of
varied sodomies, etc., performed for Meditations on the Gift of Sexuality, p. 54. The
graphic has been redacted but reveals enough to prove the IASHA pedagogical
protocol and to suggest the dysfunctions of those completing said courses.

Certiticate Programs

Page 1 of 1

Judith A. Reisman
Subject: FW: Certificate Programs

Certificate Programs:

THE SUMMER S.A.R.

June 29 - July 5,2002

For the 3 1st year, the Institute will hold the exciting and innovative 7 - day Sexual Attitude
Restructuring (SAR) Program. The SAR is an intense learning event designed for people who are
working in the field of sexology or who wish to better understand their own sexuality and that of others.
It is a program dedicated to fulfilling the need for training in human sexuality and incorporating
instruction in safe sex practices. SAR provides expert and practical information, skills and tools of
value to everyone. Didactic and experiential, SAR offers each person the information, training and
skills necessary for more competent, sensitive and healthy personal and professional functioning.
SAR will present information on a broad range of sexual topics through lectures, small and large group
discussions, visual media, and exercises. Topics will include childhood sexuality, disability,
homosexuality, sex and aging, and transsexuality.
The fee for the SAR is $725 per person, $1,305 for couples, and carries 60 CE hours or four units of
graduate credit.
Go to Registration Form

MICHAEL

1). FARRIS
ATTORNEY AT LAW
HSLD.4 Building
P.O. Bm 159

Paeoninn Sprihgs, Mrginia 221 29

can Betsante

381 High Crest Drive

West MilEord. NJ 07480
Dear Jean,

In 1984, 1 was involved in ~iri~atioh

in California in a highly publicized custody
battle between a Christian mother and a homosoxuai father. I represented the mother,
Bctry Batey.
Wardell Porneroy was called as an: expert witness on behalf of the hamoscxua\

father.
1 had known of rvl "omeroy for years'because of his involvement in a number
'\is inclu:!ed his testimony on behalf of a pornography ..- .
of issues I bad followed.
distriburor in my home town, S,,okanc, Wdhington. His testimony w u that pornography
was healthy and helpful to develop peop\cls sexuality. \This can be verrfted by Ihc
Spokane County Prosecuting At torney, Donald Bmckett. (509)456-3662.]

Upon arriving at his office, 1 saw mar this view was not something he believed in
an abstract or academic manner. When I walked into his store-front officc tha first thing
I noticed was a number of hard core, X-rated videos which were being offered for sale
or rent. (He told me during the deposition that this aspect of his operalion was not
parrlculariy successful and was being closeti.) .
In his personal officc all four walls !were slacked floor to ceiling with books and
hundred) were obscene pornography.
magazines. A great number of these (S~VCTRI
Playboy and Hustler looked like Reader's Digest by way of comparison.
Dr. Pameroy told me that he believtd that (cvcrything else being equal) that he
would also prefer a homosexual to be chosen the custodjnl parent rather than a
Christian. t"nc reason being that the hdmosexual would better help the child with
"healthy" sexual adjustment. He also told me that he would no1 counsel one of his
patients who w u havin sex with a minoi to stop. but would ask them why they felt
guilty about such activit w.

I hope this is helpful to you to set khc record straight about Wardell ~omcrcy.

6
8

10

Attachment 9:
Church Still Listening to
'Sexperts"

Dr. Berlin advises Cardinal Law and NCCB

APRIL 30, 2002

The Boston Globe

Copyright 2002
Sunday, March 17, 2002

ABUSE PANEL SAYS IT WILL SEEK CHANGE

Michael Paulaon, Globe Staff

Pledging to pull no punches in their effort to protect

in the Catholic Church, members of a 15-person commission
Cardinal Bernard F. Law yesterday began work on what they
will be a public report recommending immediate changes in
church responds to allegations of sexual abuse.

..

children
chosen by
promise
how the

"There will be an attempt .

to find out what others have done
so that we can learn from their experiences, and then to try to
build upon that so that the recommendations that are made here can
hopefully help others as time goes along," said another member, Dr.
Fred Berlin, a psychiatry professor at Johns Hopkins University who
is an expert on pedophilia.

U.S. Catholic Bishops - Ofice of Communications

Page 1 of 2

Media Briefings by Sexual Abuse Experts

Part of Dallas Meeting

WASHINGTON
(June 10,2002) - Media briefings on sexual abuse issues will be part of
the Dallas meeting of the U.S. Bishops.
One briefing, on canon law issues, will take place June 12, at 8 p.m.
Four others will take place the afternoon of June 13, and address the psychological aspects
of sexual abuse, the response to victims, the financial structures and prevention programs.
Presenters on canon law include Archbishop John Myers of Newark and Bishop Joseph
Galante, canon lawyers and members of the bishops' Ad Hoc Committee on Sexual Abuse,
and Father John Renkin, of the Diocese of Springfield, Illinois, and a consultant to the ad
hoc committee.
The bishops' meeting also will include presentations for media on related questions on the
psychological aspects of sexual abuse, the response to victims, the "Catholic dollar," and
prevention programs.
Presenters on the Psychological Aspects of Sexual Abuse include Fred Berlin, MD, Ph.D.;
Father Stephen Rossetti, Ph.D.; president and CEO of the St. Luke Institute, a treatment
center in Silver Spring, Maryland, and Conventual Franciscan Father Canice Connors,
president of the Conference of Major Superiors of Men, former president and CEO of the
St. Luke Institute and former director of Southdown Treatment Center in Ontario, Canada.
Presenters on the Response to Victims include Michael Bland, Psy.D., D. Min., ClinicalPastoral Coordinator for the OEce of Assistance Ministry, Archdiocese of Chicago; and
Phyllis Willerscheidt, coordinator of efforts for pastoral outreach to victims of clergy sexual
abuse, Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis.
Presenters on the "Catholic dollar" include Philip Ries, director of finance, Diocese of
Orange in California; Kevin Heffeman, chief financial officer, Diocese of Burlington,
Vermont, and Deacon John Benware, chief financial officer, Diocese of Savannah, Georgia.
Presenters on Prevention include Michael Bemi, president and CEO of the National
Catholic Risk Retention Groups, and Dominican Sister Glenn Anne McPhee, USCCB
Secretary for Education, and Father Edward Bums, director of the USCCB Secretariat for
Vocations and Priestly Formation.

U.S. Catholic Bishops - OEce of Communications

Office of Communications
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
321 1 4th Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20017-1 194 (202) 541-3000

June 10,2002 United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

Page 2 of 2

6
8

10

Attachment 10:
Berlin-Money
and
Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders

ABSENT ANY "PROOFS" OF SUCCESS, DR. BERLIN

STATES "PEDOPHILIA, RAPISM....CAN BE EFFECTIVELY
CONTROLLED WITH APPROPRIATE PSYCHIATRIC
INTERVENTION."

COURSE DESCRIPTIOS

DR. MONEY BEGINS HIS SEXUAL DISORDERS WORK PRE 1966.

MONEY IS JOINED IN 1980 BY DR. BERLIN.
THEY CO-FOUND THE SEX DISORDERS CLINIC.
15 TO 18 "CONTINUING EDUCATION CREDITS" ARE EARNED
FOR THIS JOHNS HOPKINS COURSE.

HISTORY

FACULTY

PROGRAM

Johns Hopkins
Medical Institutions
Department of Psychiatry and
Behavioral Sciences
~ n d

The National Institnte for the Study,

Prevention and Treatment of
Sexual Trauma

The Cycle of
Sexual Trauma:
,..,

.b-

.'

Vi

~ r e a t i the
~ i ~Victim and
Treating the Offender

hehaviar legal cunsequcncw and frmlly dlsruptioc. Tnuc

the elleas of a e m d trauma arc iu reeching Vidirnl of
wxual trauma c e n b c mccensfully vented. Bxhlbltlanlant
voyaerl3m. pcdopliilin, rqpiJm and o!bcr p r a p h i l h r cur
h. :flcctivrly co~:lrolicd with approprlarr psychlatrlc
In:eiventinn. Thtrc ir a neccuuq md ~ l o a er r l a ~ l a l s h i p
&tween !he nlcdirnl er'eblishn~enla d the I& cybtrln
lo provide for reaclutim ol t k s complex problem.

rhii course is d s i g n c d to proviie i d o n n a t i o n t;r jcdges.

lowyrrs. ?wx!slorr. lxiicc olficurs and child s d v m c y
by hcelth cetc
p m i r s r l o ~ l sto Js.WlSoild =cat ! h e caugbl i n t h t r'+e
o! scxuol lrauma. Tnia w w w u,vIll cllw MrJe to .+xlotc
pcychia;rirts, psycholq$sts, %cia1 workats. nurses and
olhcr hralrb yrolcuional> woiklcg In the area.
Live pall-nl
Teaching nrethods wdl inclnCe IccturIntervlcv~s, suliiovisual aids, panel clisctirriunr u r d
cpporiuniiia lor yrolc%rimnlsllaring.
workers u h o ~ t I j e nlelhods used

COURSE OBJECTIVES
U p n co.mpletian d Ihir program the portcipant d l he
r t l c to :tiwuss:
Tllc slepl of lhc rvslualiun proces
T h ~ o r i e sofrhe etlalogy olsexurrl d i s o ~ d c ~ ps r r p h i l i r r :
' @prOpri&te rrtiunuler for t1Camcrl
Blleclivr 1rtat:r.rcI muddilies
'Chc useof plcrhyr~nographyh d h g n o s i r and lrcatrnenl
9 ~ t r c n tr e m r c h In t h t arcd el wxual d ~ w r d i ' r s
Th? Interhce of th? ,crioilnnl
lustice
,
. . . and menlsi
. . . . Ilcslth

Frlday. Febru
8.w
9 IT

iO X
10 J t

9 f l ? 6.
- 10 30 ~

I P r 5 t.

- I ? Oil nw

.
.

~GICIIIS

Fred S. Berlin. M.D., P11.D.

Course Director

Thomas B. Turner Building

Baltimore, Maryland

The incidence and impact of parrphillrs in addesccntr

*'The impart of scxusi trauma on victim<
Oit'cclrve Irrattnetlt o t v;cllnu or sexual trauma
~Elfesliver.css cnd tinling ci b r i n g i ~ g vlcrin11 and
offenders togclhcr
T t e ow end rlfcclivenes of the child reportma Laws
*Tt.e trutrncnt of scmal dimrder5 wllhin rpecirl
pcpultions
' T h e complex elfosls >r g n u a l trawno ou I t e fnnliiy
~ t r u c t u r ean4 luonion
Current rnedltl rnythr about acxut: traurnn and their
~ f i a r t aun w:lciy

Saturday. Fc

8 W
8@
8.
9 ul - 9.45 r.
9.45 10 &
r'

IU 31 - 1Z.M no

.llulpnug u u m r q~ )
ul u o ( ~ ~ n c p101
u e q l u u u u l l u u l l ~ j u u2 ~n d Y u l q a r r q d

ruo!;n.lllh[
,w~!prjy i w + , 9 6 ~wlp! sy; r.: uqrjnron'
qi;?qs L c j ! : r d ~ " , , m >,'y~,~%i
6 ,I{!,t',,S
p,w ,dlq",.eA9
' l ! S U C lii3!Cil~LID3 'uI''! (X.:E i ( 11U.3 U!-.(UqD
'IUqlYH JEU:I] I.illOlU!JP(i jI> 5UZ!l3P:llR ~ U I I ~ Y . ~(USU: 247
uroq I.n.9.e RLw p ~ 8
'~YITI
F U K ~ UX! P~U ! S ~ jo
,bw.inn] e h p a ~
u ca a ~ q ! s w x sI.lla?i!p s! p r q y 3 .
. r . m p ~ ~ s ~ q l r! qu& w , p i l > ) i ; t h n .A!~sJ,;u!
21:. ju I A = U ~
' l ; ~ q A n x ~ ~ f ~ > ! ~. ,y~wx:.w[ lp~mt >j j ni;-~nc?j
w s,nJpnis
.rdLJ

51 %'>!y10<

U(II~,.

m1.f~
IUIV:
ro: .un m:d

.,"",,..
.,.,
.. *.*....,.-,--:4

.a,,
<L,,

7i)~li: p u ~ . < ; ~ q qx o ~ : ! ~ l e ~
IWS 11r1d I w a tx
~.~;:l.!'*'^
I*
' "
Sd

..;,."".,.

'I~URn4!l#U( loJJ-SlOU$ 0 $1 N I ~ ~ U H
ruqor .;!rpd
aq1 01 qc?p,.m #>u a>. Su!pl!ng aaum,,
XI' 01 r*:IJmr.u;
!?Kay,' r S 3 1 d ~pu8l)r.q a47 11 PiJop.4 c!
P . q ~ s :p
l d d o q n r '~p i ! d m ~%!s,dry cutpi t w a r [ p a11101
'I.!H i;W .(lyall) luJq salnl:iUI $1 h a . M o:qalls*I aqnruc
21411qS i p t l l ( ;>lnpt[X ,h.#tq,t!!~ OF10 a[ ;l>!l& .WX&ud
r.AVop)i[: 10 ~ ~ J LO:Ii oI ! ~ d~ ~ n t q ; i m ( . a n o p am
golquu!Sy
rmu Su!~:nd a111 c i 11111;~ [pk same JU!I .JCISI:SIYS~
a n w xi: o; ~ c ! ~mcq
d
: ~ e q a u o% l l l u ! h q ' p p d atu!l
Ihill.ii)~lJ~
0 l o l Ru:.cl!ng.Ji:t~r.ly~
c t . < l s ~ ! pp q q m ~ daq
{I!"
s ~ u d p u t ~r : qi tuo&el~&ilrcc~) ap;oqs 3 ~ p a
3: d ! s j ~
'JJ!lDI1 III'j;LliUIJX2
q)!.+ ~~JP,.IIO, 26 Jpi
NOPnI!(ICI
In,:Pp:
r q d d o " suqcf a111O
; dotu 0 p l w ;pm pan 1
~

I.-. *...,
..-......
-.- ..,..,,
.,' ..
....,,-.-..- ..I-..

-ar

-...-......=.....-I

-.(,--.2..,-..:.,--I.."~YU

......-. ,...-,*
...-...

.r

1rrr1pstq so a::~u~tuu: 1Fwc.9 p:~cl:ny r q t u l r ( r J p;noqr

~:uu+s!Bai ' k p n l o s uo , ~ j . c j9
? .'a: l p p qq.urnrpa aqt ;ol
'sra.u~$ a r i u a a puu l e . q l u 4e
~ ha18.m~ ap11( pun q i n ~
l o n q w a q i P 31qy:ed a m u r . a ~ ! ~ - j jru( q m ) ~ i~ I Uppoqb
r i u u . i ~ r t l a y5 u l 4 m d ,nu.+,.v p u n p l y p ~ ~s s r ~ ~ ~ u ~ a ~ u ~ u c
j o JXIJO I?;+I~~POY iq: IC a a ~ s x . $1
; ) SIPI~H
:runL x l j
pur+qq '.;wl:~.(! 'allua,r
yuqr:a
s u C ! ~ n l l ~Isz?aW
q
CUI)I(~(IH s u p f
8u!pi,!ain r a u l n ~.g s m u : o ~ ~
uoll.=l

11
13

14

15

Attachment 11:
Sexperts Excuse
Pedophilia and Pederasty

John Money is Fred Berlin's "mentor."

AS
NATURE
MADE HIM
=

"-4 chi'dhood sexual experience." he e.xplained to Time

niigazir e :in A p d r 980. 'such as being the pamer of a relatilre or of b older person, need not necessarily affect the child
rclversely.'' He granted an interview to Pnidiko, a Dutch journsl of pedophilia, which carries ads for the Norrh American
Man& g ~ o v eAssociation and orhcr pro-pedophile groups.

The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl

~ o n v k c e dthat embargoes

on certain words promoted

prudery, Money inserted the words fuch, cock, and cmzt into
his regular conversation with colleagues and patients. Dr.Ere4
,-B
a professor of psychiatry at the Johns Hopkns School of
hledicinej and a colleague who considers ,Money one of his
most imjnmanr mentop, defends Money's penchant for sexual
outspokt:$mess. '&cause he thinks it's important to desensitize
people iti .dkcwingsexual issues," Bedin says, "he will somerimes US@ four-letterwords that others might find offensive. Perbps he c h i d be a little more willing to compromise on &at,
bur John is an opinionated person who isn't looking necessarily
to do things differently than the way h e i concluded is best."
- .. - . U
.

THE PIED PIPEW L1F SElX

much extra electrical discharge? Perhaps because

he was no ordinary, garden variety projectionist. To be
well qualified by her group's standards, a projectinlist
'must have the brains of an electrician, the hands of a
mechanic, the flexibility of a juggler, the heart of a
humanist, and the spirit of a n artist."go When someone
like that romps naked, sparks a r e bound to fly.
From its inception this group decided that "the use
~f the media was a key to the success of this educational
model [i.e., teaching by explicit film]. Pornography
appeared to be the most useful a s a part of a multimedia blitz, . . . which explored a broad range of
gexual behavior through multiple projection of films
with no emotional or relationship element^.'^^ If that is
an honest, dignified approach to sex we had better
start revising our dictionaries.
Not content with just the visual aspects of pornography., she "started to pay more attention to the audio
Bpect of the seminars. Hearing 'Pomp and Circumstance' while watching a porno film will do something
quite different to you than acid rock, a Bach Chorale or
a nursery rhyme."" She then went on to say that after
people were saturated they eould "then move beyond
that to investigate a much broader scope of sexuality."
Ls it possible? What could be more broad than watching pornography films to the background music of
'Pomp and Circumstance"?
Kinsey seems to have provided the impetus for show.ngsex movies to medical students and in 1967 they
rot to look at the materials from the archives of the
[nstitute for Sex Research. Soon af?mwards, Professor
fohn Money cornpiledanillustrated presentationcalled
Po'p2sogrcephy in the H e w , which became very popular

Sea: Education

students a t Johns Hopkins Medical

-6,' ,/with
Johns Hopkins enjoys a leadership role a

40

C/

can medical colleges it is not surprising th

ical schools followed its lead in initiating
ual films as part of the curriculum for th
(After all, if it's good enough for Johns Ho
I t might be reassuring for the pub!ic
medical schools are so attentive to the n
students that they provide them with the
education courses; reassuring, that is, un
discovers that the source material for thes
sex courses comes from-of all places-po
The medical schools use material from
festivals, Grove Press eommereial films,
raphy from Denmark, New York and L
Are these educators trymy to convince pe
some convoluted process the diet of pornog
the medical students eventually reaches
patients or the public in the form of "open
dignified" attitudes about sex? It is a re
all over again.
"Emperor's New rl~i$es"
Let us consider another form of sexual in
today's medical siudenta One
hy
ducting se inars for m
-e
t
"they are&
with leaning abouTsyph
orrhea," so in his course, the Pharmacology
Transmissible Diseases, he solved the proble
his medical students watch "a film showi
saving inter&xmcOine of the partners ha
k 7 p e a r e 7 i i ; o be s m
.. i
ing phydcian
readers what h
of his students in order for them to get a n
course. Did they, perhaps, have to be able to

THE

KINSEY

INSTITUTE

NEW REPORT

ON SEX
What You Must Know
t o be Sexuallu Literate
JUNE M. REINISCH, Ph.D.
DIRECTOR
with RUTH BEASLEY, M.L.S.
Edited and compiled by

DEBRA KENT

ST. MARTIN'SPRESS
NEW YORK

THE JOHN MONEY

JUNE R E I N I S C H CONNECTION

The Kinsey Institute New Report on Sex

Virginia Johnson, Robert Jones, William G . Karow, Robert Kolodny Prakash

Kothari, Peter Lee, Jere Levy, Sandra Lieblum, Harold Lief, Joseph LoPiccolo,
Wdmm Masters, Andrew Mattison, Vickie Mays, David McWhirter, john Money Ronald Nadler, Margaret Nichols, Raymond Rosen, Raul Schiavi, Leslie
Shover, Patricia Schreiner-Engel, M. Fini Schulsinger, Pepper Schwartz, George
Semel, Michael Shernoff, Barbara Sherwin, Terry Tafoya, Bruce Voeller, Gorm
Wagner, Jeffrey Wolin, Gail Wyatt, and the hundreds of other researchers,
scholars, and clinicians whose work has been used throughout this book. The
following government agencies and private institutions have also provided
information: AASECT, Abbott Laboratories, American Fertility Society, The Alan
Guttmacher Institute, The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Bseases,
The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Planned
Parenthood, SIECUS, Stone Belt Council for Retarded Citizens, United Cerebral
Palsy Association, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control.
The following agencies have provided grant support to The Kinsey Institute
research projects and programs: The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, The
National Institute on Drug Abuse, The National Institute of Mental Health, and
The Fund for Human Dignity.
My deepest gratitude to my mentors Drs. John Money, Brian Sutton-Smith.
and Herbert Birch and the loving support of my husband, Dr. Leonard Rosenblum
parents, Lillian (Machover) and Mann B. Reinisch; daughter, Karen Reinisch,
and stepchildren Gianine and Doug Rosenblum; Rich Hall, Jennifer Beasley
Jeannette Fisher, and Doshia Hall for their loving support of Ruth Beasley.
Finally, appreciation and thanks to the thousands of individuals from thc
United States and around the world who have written to The Kinsey Institute
with their questions about sex, gender, and reproduction; the 1,974 American:
who most generously participated in The Kinsey InstituteRoper Organizatio~
Sex Knowledge Survey; and the citizens of Bloomington, Indiana, who helpel
us to pilot that survey.
J.M.R.

6.

THE SEXU Z
Readiness fc :
Sexual respons
Involuntary se
Sexual fanta r
Masturbatio. _

Cover-up at American University?

Sex Expert Skeptical of Treatment of Scandalized Former President
When Richard Berendzen left hispost
as president of The American University
(AU) in Washington, D.C.,in May, 1990,
there was an attempt to conceal the fact
that he had been forced to resign due to his
role in making obscene, child-related
telephone calls to womtn in the area
Many specnlated that the revelation of
these facts would berald the end of the
high-profile career that elevated him to
national prominence.
NOW, however, Berendzen's
reputation is in tbe process of being
rehabiitated. He still holds tenure in his
teaching position at AU, and is being
celebrated as a survivor of his own
victimization as a child. In May, 1992, he
will be speaking on his experiences from a
"survivor's perspective" at the National
Symposium on Child Victimization in
Washington, a conference co-sponsored
by several federal agencies.
While media profiles have described
Berendzen as cured, Dr. Judith Reisman,
who has wrinen and lectured extensively

on scxual perversion and pornography,

questions the efficacy of the &. She
points out that Baendzm's conduct
indicates a deepseated psychological
disorder far which there is no simple
remedy. She says that the way the
Berendzen casewas bandiedby AU, Johns
Hoplrins University and the Washington,
D. C. police appears to have been
contrived more-toprotectthan
to cure his perversion.
Susan Anen, a mother wbo tutors
children in her home and had advertised
herservices,receivedobscenephonecalls
during the day from a man who told h a
that he kept a four-year-old girl in a cagein
his basement that he sexually abused. He
also described child pornography to her,
Richard E. Berendzen
sayinghe had a collectionof suchmaterial
Alfen, who had been a victim of incest, in his AU offke.
Reisman, who interviewed both
was determined to catch the caller. She
was aided by her husband, a policeman, M e n and her lawyer, found them to be
who was able to help set up the w i n g of very critical of the response of the police
the calls. They were found to originate
See BERENDZEN, page 5
from President Berendzen'sprivate phone

November 1991

CAMPU:

Berendzen
1
Continned from p g e

and the A U officials. They told her that the

police had failed to investigate
Berendzen's office and home promptly
and seizethe childpornography collection
that he had described on the phone. They
said that rather than arresting Berendzen
promptly, they notified AU officials, who
apparently informed Berendzen that he
was suspected of making the calls. This
gave him time to remove any material that
might further incriminate him and to get
out of town.
Berendzen went to Johns Hopkins
University and was admittedas apatientat
the Sexual Disorders Clinic in
Baltimore,where he remained for three
weeks. He was convicted of making
obscene phone calls in Virginia, where
Allen lives, and was put on probation. AU
bought out his contract as president for a
million dollarsand allowed him to goback
to teaching physics as a tenured professor.
Reisman notes that Dr. John Money,a
professor emeritus at Johns Hopkins who
founded the Office of Psychononnal
Remxh and the GenderIdentity Clinicat
that university, is noted for his h i
views on child sexual abuse. She points
out that Money is closely affiliated with
the Kinsey Institute, which specializes in
research on sexual behavior. The work of
its founder, Dr. Alfred Kinsey, has been
highly iduential in legitimizing sexual
perversions. Dr. Reisman has exposed
Kinsey's dishonest and illegal research
methods in her book, Kinsey, Sex Md
Fraud.
Money was quoted in Paidiku: The
Journal of Paedophilia, as saying,'The
whole idea of the present political xtions
against childhood sexuality, in any of its
manifestations, is really a diabolically
clever ploy to establish anti-sexualism on
a big scale." He also made it clear that he
was opposed to jailing pedophiles. He
said, "I have absolutely no doubt that the
vast majority of pedophiles who are put in
jail have no business being in jail at all.
And some of them have received grossly
unjust punishments." He said that while
he couldn't keep them out of jail, he could
"dosomethingin the way of treatment that
gives leeway to judges."
Reisman saysshe doesn't know what,

if any, role Money played in the Johns

H o p h evaluation of Berendzen,but she
points out that it found nothing wrong with
him. A statement issued by the Johns
Hopkins clinic based on its interviews and
an analysis of Berendzen's taped
conversationwith Allen, said,'"Thephone
calls appeared to have been a troubled
aftempt tomake senseout ofhisown tragic
childhood victimization." It added, 'The
clinic concluded that he does not have a
sexual disorder" and that that he was
"psychologically sound and that his
prognosis was exdent." Reisman says
that according to the criteria the clinic
iseKre1ie-d upon, esrablished by Kenneth
r
g of tbe FBI, Berendzen would be
considered a classic pedophile (one that
does not I l e a s a d y physicany abuse
chilbn).
Far from curing Berendzen's
pedophilia, Johns Hopkins denied that he
was suffering from it and was perfectly
normal. AccrrracyIn AcademiaChainnan
Reed Irvine finds it incredible that in
additionto being allowed to remain on the
AU faculty. BerendZen is now being
treated as an authority on child sexual
abuse. BerendZen is scheduled to address
a National Symposium on Child
Victimization in May 1992 that is
sponsored by the Department of Health
and Human Services Office of Maternal
and Child Health and Public Health
Service, the Office for Substance Abuse
Prevention, the Child WelEare League of
America, The American Professional
Society on the Abuse of
and the
. Children
.
American Bar Assoclanon's Center on
Children and the Law.
Berendzen's talk is entitled.
"Confrontation and Costs: One
Survivor's Perspective." Irvine says that
AIA will seek to have a copy of the
transcript of Berendzen's taped
conversation with Susan Allen made
available to the heads of the sponsoring
arganizations and the participants in the
conference.
Coincidentally,anotherlec~neratthe
symposium will be Isaac Fulwood, Jr., the
Washington, D.C, chief of police,
speaking on "Police Protection of
Children and Communities."

ichard Berendzen, the former American University

president who made years
of obscene and bizarre
phone calls that left a t least one of
his victims feeling terrorized and, in
her words, "verbally raped," is back
in the news. His claims in a new book
that he was sexually abused by his
parents have led to a n explosion of
c,,z7-,:&.,.I,.,.,
-.
-,--.,.-...-..
. . . c ~ t a t,uvtxage,
almost all of which accepts that argument that the alleged child abuse
caused him to make the calls. Typical was Connie Chung on CBS' "Eye
to Eye" (Sept. 9), who called the
abuse, "the awful secret behind the
scandal."
One person who does not buy the
argument or sympathize with Mr.
Berendzen is Susan Allen, the publicized object of his terroristic calls.
"He's not a victim," she says. "Anybody who buys that is one of his victims,""md thepub!ic has Sought it."
Miss Allen is, in h e r words, "incensed." In almost two hours of conversation with us she expressed her
"outrage" at Mr, Rcrendzen, Johns
Hopkins psychiatrists who have
"treated" Mr. Berendzen (particularly Dr. Paul McHugh), the media,
and American University. She maintains that Mr. Berendzen is hardly
the kind and sympathetic soul that
he is painting himself. She remem-

3 '

Richard E. Vatz and Lee S. Weinberg a r e professors a t lbwson State

University and the University of
Pittsburgh respectively. and are associate psychology editors ofUSA7bday maguzine.

Not a 'victim' to his victim

hers fk $CX
;G% ;rill S I U L ~ Sinat
he has made little or no effort to express contrition, save for a brief note
of regret issued through his attorney.
~ r i epsychiatric exculpation i s
particularly galling to Miss Allen.
She says s h e was "so angry I was
shaking" when she learned of Dr.
McHugh's psychiatric analysis of
Mr. Rerendzen, an analysis she sees
a s contemptible and irresponsible.
Indeed, Mr. Berendzen's career
and freedom were saved through
psychiatric rescue. For his terroristic phone calls, Mr. Bcreridzen received in 1990 two 30-day jail terms
that were suspended on the condition he continue to seek psychological "L~.eatrnent,"whlch he underwent
for three weeks a t Johns IIopkins
Hospital's Sexual Disorders Clinic.
Mr. Berendzen was also required to
report to the court on his progress
every 90 days for a year:
The sentence, although not a n unusual one for sex offenders of this
type, left Miss Allen, like many vlctims of terrifying crimes who would
prefer stiffer punishments be inflicted on those who hurt them, outraged and fearful. Much of the public reaction to Mr. Rcrendzen, as his
one-time friend l'ed Koppel conceded on "Nightline," was to say
"What a pile of drivel. IIere is a man
who has been caught and who now is
grasping a t medical straws which
psychiatrists a r e all too eager to deliver."

And Dr. McHugh, chair of psychiatry and behavioral science at Johns

Hopkins Medical School, did deliver.
He stated flatly, "Dr. Berendzen did
rrui &IL.~: ~ i calls
~ e tor prurient interests;" moreover, Dr. McHugh stated,
"I Mr. Rerendzen l was seeking answers to unresolved issues related to
his own abusc." It appalled Miss Al-

A severe penalty by
the law and American
University could have
sent a s i . 1 to people
like Mx Berendzen
thut there will be a
price to pay for
terrorizing people.
Len that just weeks after examination at Johns Hopkins, Mr. Berendzen's psychiatrists said he no
longer had a problem, and his prognosis was "excellent.""I couldn't believe it," she said. "After a few weeks,
they wave a wand and say he's
crlred."
Studies by psychiatrists themselves show noability to predict with
even strong probability, much less
with certainty, whether such behavior will recur: moreover, it is oFten

difficult to ascertain whether recidivism has taken place. In the case of

terroristic phone calls, wherein Mr.
Ra,-""A-.-.--..-..-.. :- ;;JuxtloL;y mure sophisticated now, it may be nearimpossible. Still, Dr. McHugh said
after the weeks of treatment that Mr.
Berendzen will "never indulge in
that behavior again." How did Dr.
MsHugh know?: "He's chastened,
hurt, remorseful - and adamant
that he will never do that again."
"Chastened, hurt, remorseful?"
Mr. Rerendzen himself claimed repeatedly that he did "not consider
the report from Johns Hopkins a s an
excuse a t all . . . I a m making no excuse,'' hut he seemed disingenuous.
He referred to himself as a "victim,"
in such a way a s to fuzz over whether
he was referring to his sexual abuse
o r the fact that h e had an "illness"
that allegedly compelled him to
make obscene phone calls. Most revealing, on the "Nightline" show, he
quoted hisdaughter a s saying to him,
"Daddy, if your body were hurting,
people would send you flowers. Your
mind is hurting, so they throw
bricks." Finally, he repeatedly referred to his behavior a s a health
problem.
Further indicating Mr. Berendzen's lack of contrition was his aggressive negotiating with American
University. As a result of his efforts,
the trustees of the university made
Mr. Berendzen a $1 million severance offer. Student protests, organ-

.,

THE JOI-INS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE

THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL

DEPARWENT OF PS KHIATRY
and

BENA MORAL SCIZNCES

May 1 6 , 1 9 9 0

RE:
~ i c h a r dB e r e n d z e n , Ph.D.,
University.

f o r m e r p r e s i d e n t o f The

American

The f o l l o w i n g s t a t e m e n t i s b e i n g i s s u e d b y a u t h o r i t y o f P a u l R .
McHugh,
M . D 8 , Chairman, Department of p s y c h i a t r y and
Behavioral
S c i e n c e s , The J o h n s H o p k i n s U n i v e r s i t y S c h o o l o f M e d i c i n e ,
The
J o h n s ~ o p k i n sH o s p i t a l .
I t r e p r e s e n t s t h e f i n d i n g s and conclus i o n s of The J o h n s Hopkins c l i n i c a l s t a f f r e s p o n s i b l e f o r e v a l u a t i n g and t r e a t i n g t h e above noted p a t i e n t .
The s t a f f
consists
o f o v e r 20 p ~ . o f e s s i o n a l s .

1. I n t r o d u c t i o n
Dr.
~ i c h a r d B e r e n ' d z e n was e v a l u a t e d a n d t r e a t e d on a n
i n p a t i e n t b e s i s a t The J o h n s H o p k i n s H o s p i t a l b e t w e e n A p r i l 1 0 ,
1 9 9 0 a n d May 4 , 1 9 9 0 .
S e l f - r e f e r r e d , h e was p r e s c r e e n e d f o r
a d m i s s i o n t h r o u g h The J o h n s H o p k i n s S e x u a l D i s o r d e r s C l i n i c o n e
A thorough evalud a y p r i ~ rt o i n i t i a t i o n of h i s i n p a t i e n t s t a y .
ation
d a s r e q u i r e d f o r two p u r p o s e s :
(1) h e h a d ,
f o r reasons
t h a t w e r e i n i t i a l l y u n c l e a r , a l l e g e d l y made p h o n e c a l l s i n w h i c h
t h e theme c e n t e r e d around t h e i s s u e o f c h i l d s e x u a l a b u s e .
These
a b e r r a n , : a c t s seemed o u t of c h a r a c t e r w i t h o t h e r a s p e c t s of h i s
life,
and h? i n d i c a t e d a s t r o n g d e s i r e t o u n d e r s t a n d
h i s own
actions,,
(21
T h e s e a c t s h a d t o some e x t e n t b e c o m e a m a t t e r o f
public recorii, posing a s e r i o u s t h r e a t t o h i s f a m i l y ' s privacy
and s e n s e of
b e i n g , t o h i s academic and p r o f e s s i o n a l c a r e e r ,
and t o h i s p e r s o n a l r e p u t a t i o n .
This, i n turn, resulted
in a
s t a t e of
selrere mental anguish w i t h f e e l i n g s of hopelessness,
a b a n d o m l e n t , i ~ n dd e s p a i r ,
l ~ e l l

Diff e r e n t : . a l ~ i a g n o s i s
A m a j o r 1 ) u r p o s e o f Dr. B e r e n d z e n ' s i n p a t i e n t e v a l u a t i o n
was
t o d e t e r m i n e w h a t h a d m o t i v a t e d h i m t o make t h e p h o n e c a l l s i n
I t was e s p e c i a l l y i m p o r t a n t t o a s c e r t a i n w h e t h e r
they
question.
were a m a n i f e s t a t i o n o f p s y c h i a t r i c c o n f l i c t a n d i m p a i r m e n t ,
or,
i n s t e a d , r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of s e l f - c e n t e r e d misconduct.
Because t h e
c a l l s had c e n t e r e d around c h i l d h o o d s e x u a l abuse, a more p a r t i c u -

lar concern was whether psychiatric morbidity, if present, was related t o an

abnormal sexual orientation towards children (i.e., pedophilia).
Persons can engage in similar behaviors for various reasons. Therefore,
several possibilities related to the phone calls in question were explored. (1) Did
they reflect a more general tendency on the part of Dr. Berendzen t o be
antisocial in his conduct?
(2) Were they a manifestation of a paraphilic
("sexual deviation") disorder such as pedophilia or telephone scatologia?
Telephone scatologia is a compulsive disorder involving recurrent subjectively
experienced erotic cravings t o make "obscene phone calls." (3) Were the calls
an expression of delusional thinking, hallucinations, or some other form of
mental impairment? (4) I n view of the revelation that he apparently had been
the victim of significant childhood sexual abuse, were the calls, perhaps, a
delayed form of post traumatic distress disorder occurring in relationship t o
trauma experienced during childhood, yet still troublesome and confusing to
him? (Post traumatic distress disorders came t o the public's attention with Viet
Nam War veterans. People who have experienced serious trauma, (for
example, due t o war or childhood sexual abuse), may suffer the disorder,
whereby they remember or re-experience trauma long after it has occurred.
An event associated with the original trauma may trigger the disorder.)
3. Data Base
(a)Audiotaped phone call
We reviewed in detail an unedited audiotape of a phone call by him. I t
was a true copy of evidence gathered by the Fairfax County Virginia Police
Department.
The following points were established in studying the tape: (1) The
predominant theme clearly centered around childhood sexual abuse. (2) I n
context, Dr. Berendzen's statements on the tape were fantasy.
(b) "Pedophilic Profile"
Kenneth Lanning, a supervisory special agent for the Federal Bureau
of Investigation, has compiled data from numerous investigations of alleged
pedophilic acts. Agent Lanning advocates use of a "profile" when investigating
suspected cases of child sexual abuse. That profile lists evidence one would
expect to find in relationship to activities of persons afflicted with pedophilic
orientations. I n speaking with Dr. Berendzen's family and in assessing
voluminous additional information about him and his background, we found no
data at all that matched the "pedophilic profile.
(c) Polygraph Testing
To determine whether physiological evidence might suggest Dr.
Berendzen had misrepresented important information to us, he was tested by an
experienced polygrapher. Dr. Berendzen was administered a M .G.Q.T, type
examination; four polygraphs were given including a stem test.

Three key issues were explored by means of the polygraph: (1)

Dr. Berendzen had told us he had never engaged in sexual activity with a child.
(2) He had said that an adult woman who was close to him had sexually abused
him during childhood. (3) He had told us that he himself had never had sexual
desires for children. The polygrapher considered the testing valid and found no
evidence oft deception in
Dr.
Berendzen's answers.
Clinical Interviews with Dr. Berendzen's Family
Dr. Berendzen's wife and two daughters were interviewed
by Clinic Staff. All of these interviews supported Dr. Berendzen's selfdisclosures. Each of his daughters described him lovingly as a good father. One
of them, clearly upset about public allegations about her father, stated " I f he
were hurting physically, people would send flowers. He is hurting mentally and
they throw bricks."
(d)

(e)

Sodium Amytal Interview

Dr. Berendzen was given a sodium amytal interview.
Five hundred milligrams of sodium amytal were slowly injected by means of an
intravenous line. The patient achieved the desired state of sedation. Dr.
Berendzen's answers t o questions while in this state were spontaneous and
appeared uncensored, generally with a short response latency.
I n the interview, Dr. Berendzen indicated that on numerous
occasions as a child he had been emotionally, physically, and sexually abused.
He became conspicuously emotional when recalling these events.
I t seems Dr. Berendzen had controlled and suppressed the pain
and confusion from his e-ly abuse until his father died in 1988. Then he went
t o his childhood home to attend his father's funeral. Dr. Berendzen related how
at age 8 and many times at age 11, he was abused in the very room where his
father had his fatal heart attack.

The phone calls appear t o have been a troubled attempt t o make

sense out of his own tragic childhood victimization. The amytal interview clearly
suggested that he woman on the phone was a surrogate for his own
victimization. Numerous clinical interviews provided additional information-compatible with and confirmatory of this observation. Having been abused as a
child, he wondered what went on in other families and why.
I n his emotionally
troubled way, he was apparently trying t o understand his own tragic abuse and
t o make sense of his victimizer's actions.'
(f) Psychological Testing
Dr. Berendzen was administered the Inventory. This test measures
five dimensions NEO Personality of personality, including neuroticism and
extroversion. He scored high on t h e scales of openness and agreeableness, and
conscientiousness.

Also, A Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory found no

evidence of characterological pathology for Dr. Berendzen.
(g) Mental Status Examinations .
Repeated mental status examinations revealed no evidence of
delusions, hallucinations, or formal thought disorder. Dr. Berendzen was fhfIy
oriented, of high intelligence, spoke coherently, and comprehended adequately.
His memory was intact. He seemed genuinely remorseful about the behavior
(i.e., the phone calls) had upon his family and his university. He did not attempt
t o justify the phone calls in spite of their clear relationship t o his own abuse, and
he seemed sincerely anguished. Also. he was altruistic. His attending
physician counseled him from resigning commissions and boards on which he
serves. Dr. Berendzen did not want t o embarrass them through association with
I_
him.
4. Conclusions

We found no evidence to suggest that Dr. Berendzen's phone calls were a

manifestation of (1) a general tendency to be antisocial, (2) a paraphilic
{"sexual deviation"] disorder, or (3) mental illness involving delusions,
hallucinations, or formal thought disorder. Also, there was no evidence that
the phone calls in question were motivated by prurient interests. I n this sense,
considering them to be obscene would be incorrect. (The Fairfax County Virginia
Police Department called them "indecent," a term we believe is more nearly
accurate than "obscene.") Rather, they apparently represented an emotionally
troubled attempt t o ascertain the extent of childhood sexual abuse and the
motivation for it by seeking out and speaking directly with an adult who might
have acted in such a fashion. Dr. Berendzen's intense need t o do this seems to
have developed out of unanswered and deeply troubling questions related t o his
own tragic sexual and emotional abuse.
Our findings were based upon numerous intensive psychotherapy
sessions, the various steps outlined above, and additional testing and data not
detailed here. That additional testing included psychophysiological assessment
of sexual orientation.
I n summary, these are some of our basic conclusions:
*Dr. Berendzen is not a pedophile and has no pedophilic interests. He
does not have a sexual disorder.
*He is now physically and psychologically sound.
*He appears genuinely remorseful about having made the calls.
*He was sexually and emotionally abused severely as a child.

*He seems to have suppressed and controlled the confusion from this abuse
until his father's death triggered old pain.
*He did not place the calls for prurient interests; rather, in a confused way, he
was seeking answers t o unresolved issues related to his own abuse.
*Finally, his prognosis, now that he understands how t o deal with these-issues is
excellent.
We recommend continued outpatient counseling to help him reestablish a
satisfying and productive life, a goal he undoubtedly will accomplish, in our
judgment.

Pedophilia Steps
Into the Daylight
Leading sex researchers and educators are touting the "benefit
ofadult-child sex and are callingfor more studies to prove it.
by Michnel Ebert

W
this can be a
loving and
thoughtful,
responsible
sexual
activity."
-Wardell Pomeroy,
sex researcher and
author.

liberalizing U.S. laws to allow study

oody Allen's revelation in August that he
was in love with his ex-lover's adopted
research on pedophilia. Others want lower 2
of-consent laws to allow children under 1:
21-year-old daughter shocked America.
Even though the 57-year-old film director is not
have sex with adults. Some suggest that rr
her biological or adoptive father, the girl's sibadults who have sex with children should no
jailed.
lings claimed Allen was a father figure from her
preteen years.
The researchers and educators who p
In April, outrage followed news that
for greater acceptance of adultchild sex cc
Edward Savitz, a Philadelphia businessman
from some of the most prestigious and influ
tial universities in the United States.
with AIDS, was suspected of having sex with
hundreds of boys under the age of 16.
John Money, Ph.D., a retired professo.
medical psychology and pediatrics at Jo
Parents in a San Francisco suburb were furiHopkins University and Hospital in Baltim.
ous last January when they learned that a chapis one of them. Money is a former advise:
ter of the North American Man-Boy Love
Forum, a Pcntlzouse publication, and he has M
Association (NAMBLA) was meeting at a local
ten extensively on the subject of sexual oriel
library where children did homework and
tion and ~arauhilias-love bevond the usual
browsed for books.
The public at large
may be confused about
sexual morality, but it is
still repulsed by pedophilia. What the 'public
doesn't know is that some
"If I were to see
researchers and institutions it respects believe
pedophilia is healthy and
should be legalized and
man ih his twenties
promoted.
thirties, if the relati
"People seem to
ship is totally mutthink that any contact
and the bonding is g
between children and
uinely totally mut
then I would not cai
adults.. . has a bad effect
on the child," said
Wardell Pomeroy, Ph.D.,
who has worked in the
field of sex research and
education for more than
40 years. "I say that this
can be a loving and
thoughtful, responsible
sexual activitv."
his statements, but
is author of John Money, Ph.D.. ol Johns Hopkins University and
declined
intcrv.

pomeroi

Hosp~lal.says mosl pedophiles should not be jailed.

and
requests. Carol Pcar:
the books
and Girls and Srx (Delacourt Press, 1991, third
a spokeswoman for Johns Hopkins, 5
edition), which can be iound in school libraries
Money's views "are his opinions. He rcpresc
himself. What he says doesn't necessarily r c ~
across the country.
Pedophiles are adults who perform sex
sent the university."
with children-ranging from infants to teenAcross the continent, at San Francisco St
agers. hlost are men attracted to bovs, but some
University, J ~ h DeCecco
n
heads the human 5
adult men are attracted to girls and some adult
uality program and teaches a course in "\.a
women are attracted :o boys.
tions" oi sexual behavior. DeCecco tells
students that zdult-child sex is a legitin:
Scholarly Pursuits
expression 01 sexuality.
While many proiessionai researchers con"I do take a position," DeCecco told Ciii:
dernn pedophiiia, others accept it. Some iavor
"I argue more on the side of liberty and kcep

Pomeroy was a n associate of sex reseal

Alfred Kinsey, Ph.D., and is the retired de;
The Institute for Advance Study of H u m a n
uality in San Francisco, which accredits sex
cators.
Lester &rkendalI, Ph.D., now
deceased, was also a SIECUS founding
board member and a professor in the
Department of Family Life a t Oregon State
University. Kirkendall hinted a t the direction sex education is headed on the issue of
adult-chiid sex. In their book Kinsey, Sex
and Frnud, authors Judith Reisman, Ph.D.,
and Edlvard Eichel cite a n article Kirkendall wrote for the \ortrnalof'Sex Education
rind Tllerapy (Spring/Summer 1985).
Kirkendall wrote that in the future,
sex education programs "will probe sexual
expression . . . with same-sex [partners]"
and "even across . . . generational lines.
These patterns will become legitimate."3
Deryck Caldenvood, Ph.D., was
chairperson of the SIECUS board of directors durinc the eariv i980s and headed the
!?urnan seYxual~tvdroeram at N e w York
University. ~ i c h e i tc?d Citize,~ that Ca. derwood's summer classes conducted in Tne
Netherlands included guests who advoclted
pedophilia. One, Edward Brongersma, a foi mer
Dutch legislator, senred time in prison for 7aLring sex with a child.
Caldenvood, \2,ho died in 1986, h t r o d i i c ~ d
an article in a 1983 SlECUS Report by Ernest
Borneman, P11.D.. \vho \\,rote that "LYhcr~,no
one gives the child a bad conscience . . . i~itercourse behveen adults and children cause; no
mental harm." The article also stated :hat
"Where negatiLre ctiects have been obserged,
they are not the results oi intercourse itself but
of adults' suggestions."J
The findings \+.erebased on i?ten.iews .viti?
jailed sex offenders, and Borneman added that
he tvas "unable :o pr0i.e or disprove these a: scrt~ons."
in 1991 the jiECL15 Rcport publishet~an
T h e SIECUS Link
article by john hloney irit~cizing laws that
Many of the researchers and sex educators
require sex therapists to report sex otfenc US.
ivho outspokenly lobby for acceptance ot "interAlthough Money did i:ot spcclfically mention
generational" sex are affiliated \vitli organizapedophilia, he hinted that sex oifenders shc~uid
tions that greatly influence sex e d u a t i o n .
not be considcrea crim~nais.He lamented " v I ~ ~ I Several of these sex proiess~onals have
mology" in sex research and argued that " \ k ~ v o r k e dwith SIECUS, the Sex hiormation and
timizat~onpredicates not onl! \.ictims, but llso
Education Council of the U.S. The organization
perpetrators." kloncy m d " v i c t ~ m o l o g i j ~ s "
writes suidelines that manv public schools use
abandon the Hippocratic oath "completel!.
as a foundation ior their sex-cd curr~cula.The
when the!. treat suspected \.ictimizcrs as pc y c SiECUS Report, a bimonthly journal p~iblished trators or criminals to be reported a n d hanAcd
by SIECUS, discusses developments in the tield
oIrer to the law."j
and offers resources for teachers.
hfary 5. C ~ i i i ~ r o n11.D..
e,
tile SS-\,ear oid
Wardell Pomerov, t!ie Boys <?ird
co-toundcr and tormcr president o: SIECUS.
, ~ u t h o r ,is a SIECUS founding board member.
told Citkcil "i do not a??ro\.e or it," -,\.hen asicii
He told C i t i m ~that adult-child scs can be "\van~ l i i But
about !wr \-ic\\,s si L ~ i ? ~ ~ l t - i hsex.
d e r t ~ i i~ n dbeautiful," adding that the onl!,
Caidcronc later iiaririeii her ansi\.cr.
down side is that the "consequences" soclet!.
"It's not that i i s ii bad thins or a ivic.r&
applies against sucn behavior "can be absolutely
p r t of lii! in
thins, i t j~istsimpl\. 1i:oaid r a t
horrendous." Pomeroy made ~irnilarstatements
general, rii;ht out o n tile s~ilt.\\.aik."
to Time magazine.;
This \.ie~\,IS in s ! q \\.~:i:
Cddcronc's icngPomeroy s a d he tells ch~idrenthat "in the
held assertion that ;;'ot)ii. aiil ~ e x u ~be1755
i
Lase ot adults ha\,ing sex w ~ t hchildren, i f this is
trom the rr,orncnt or concc?:;on anil :hat the . ole
:sund out bv the csmmunltv. <\.en though ~ t ' s a t parents is simp:!. :P :i..?.cnc;;~liircn tne
:oi o n e carctully and iuaiciousiv, even so, there is
~ ~ r ~ a t c nor
c sSs~ Y L I Jrc-r:a\.l?;.
I
,; $reat deal of rrsk In hairins this sexual acti\.;ty.
; polnt this out in :he book."

daors open and options open."

DeCecco, who is a member of the Paidika
editorial board and editor of the journal of Homosexmlity, wants federal government grants to
study pedophilia, and he endorses lower age-ofconsent laws.
"The decision should largely rest in the
hands of the people who are entering into the
relationship," he said. "If I'm 12 a n d I decide to
have sex with a 19-year-old or a 20-year-old or a
50-year-old, that is really a choice I have."
DeCecco said there should be some laws
protecting children from sexual exploitation or
abuse from adults, but not laws that create a n
atmosphere in which such behavior only "surfaces as a complaint and not as a viable experience which thechild could profit by and enjoy."
Wayne Dynes, Ph.D., agrees with DeCecco
that children can benetit from sex with adults.
T l ~ eHunter College professor is also a Paidika
editorial board member. Dynes stated first that
there are some negatives to pedophilia, but
added, "I'm sure that there can be some beneficial effects."
Dynes cited a male friend in Thailand who
has a 17-year-old bovtriend. The relationship is
"character building" for the boy, Dynes said.
"I guess i t shows how far \ve've traveled
from reality that people don't realize that a n
intergenerational sexual relationship could be
and should be character building," he s a d .
Dynes said he was "not sure that a 7-yearold can give informed consent. That doesn't
mean that one should necessarily exclude sexual
relations with them." He joined P;zidrka to study
the issue in "as unprejudiced a \vay as possible."
That's the same reason Vern B u l l o u ~ h ,
Ph.D., a distinguished professor at New York
State University College at Buffalo, signed on
with Paidika. Bullough, who has ivritten extensl\,ely o n homosexual relationships, said "The
question is, at \\,hat age does a child become
able? We used to sav i t ivas 14, now we've raised
i t to 18. I t m ~ g hbe
t closer to 14.''

5
~
7
.
1

-.. .
tbfdry S. Cald?rme, M.D.. co'mnder and i3rnei pies~denlo:

SIECUS

tional sexual
relationship
could be and
should be
character
building.''
-Wayne Dynes,
Hunter College
professor and
Paidika editorial
board member.

PEDOPHILIA (continuedbrn page 71

"There is nothing particularly bad or dangerous or that will hurt in sexual activity,"
Calderone said. "There is just simply activity,
just like any other activity in the human body,
Ithatl has to be used only in

- ..-...-:1
I
--- 1 1

11

x'

-.--.

--..-..----..

kZr-%; 1

I
1

.Ioua%n-l

*.

n
~
wood,
irke end all and Pomeroy
have all been closely associated
with SIECUS. & outlined
above, all have also supported a
more liberal view of
adult-fhild sex in one
way or another.
Cilizen contacted
SIECUS by phone
and in writing to
request an intenriew
wlth Debra Haffner,
organization's
the
executi.ve director.
Haffner stated in
writing that "SIECUS
opposes all sexual
interactions that are
not
consensual.
Adult-child
sexual
relationships are, by definition, exploitative and nonconsensual.
Adult-child
sexual contact is unaccept-

SIECUS Report articles that

seem to endorse pedophilia,
SIECUS's director of library services, James
Shortridge, said, "The reason that those articles
are being published is because they are current
issues being discussed in the field of sexuality.
Things that are put into the SIECUS Report are'
representative of SIECUS as an organization,
but not in the way of what we would agree or
disagree with."
SIECUS guidelines do state that ".A11 persons are scxual," "All persons have the risht and
obligation to makc responsib!c sexual choices,"
and "L~dividualsexpress their sexuality in varied wavs."' But Shortridge denied that such
stateincnts suggest pedophilia is acceptable.
"Thcrc is nothing within our ~uidelines
that
advocates that children can be sexually active,"
Shortridge said. "Our advocacy for . . . giving
children the right. to. learn about sexualit),
doesn't also mean that it's giving them the iight
to have sex with whoever they want."
In an earlier intenliew with Citi;cn, Debra
Haffner also denied that SIECC'S promotes
teenage sexual activity.'

.,

For more information on pedophilia

advocacy within the
academic and sex education community read

K i ~ i s c y . SCx ilild Frnltd:

T h t i l ~ d o c t r i m t i o n of n
Peopic (1990, LochinvarHunrington House). For
a copy, scnd a check for
513.51) (includes shipand handling) to

Locninvar-Huntinton

I Ilousc, P.0. Box

53788,

i Lataycttc, La. 70505 or

I call (SOO) 7194009.

I -1nlervlew mhn Monev ' Pardrka ihe Journar 01 Pdecloondra

i The Nelherlands. 2171, p. 5.
'
2. -Cradle-lo-Grave Inl~rnacy.Some researcners ooenl? argue
!
i ma1 anylh~nggoes. lor cntldren.' T,me. SeoL 7. 1981. o 63
2 Rewnan. 4.A. an0 E~chel.E.W.. n'mey. Sex ano irav.0: itie
~ndoclrmalton
01 a ? w e . Lalayene. La.. 1390: Locr.mvai-nunl~r,g:on
, rouse, p 131
.f Bwnernan. E . 'Progress m Emo~r;cal
Researcil on Zr..!-fen s
S~xua111y.SlECUS .9eo011. 1212). P 2.
5 . Money. i. 'Scio~ogyanalor Scrosoohy i c e S w 3e:ween
Sexual Researcmrs and Re!ormers In H~sror!an0 P:ac:.;e ' 5:ECUS
, sewn. 1913). D 3

f(inseq's Role
Pro-family researcher Judith Reism
traces the origins of the child sexuality moment to Alfred C. Kinsey, ,fhD., whose worl
the basis for much of sex education today. Rc
man points out that Kinsey used data from ad
males who had contact with 196 preadolex
boys ranging in age from two months to 15yea
Kinsey used the daDl,to ddim that bc
regardless of their age, are sekual beiigs capa
of arousal. He argued t h ~children
t
could ben
from adult contacts.
"There are cases of infants under a yea
age who have learned the advantage of spec
manipulation, sometimes as a result of being
manipulated by older pemns," K i w y wrot
The pedophilia movement also owes m
to homosexual rights activists.
"You cannot have a society accept men t
ing sex with boys unless you have them act
homosexuality first," Reisman said.
NAMBLA is a regular participant in ho
sexual marches. NAMBLA is the leadinrr Un
States organization pushing for acce$anc
man-bov sexual relationshios. Internation.
the pedophile Information ~ ; c c h a n (PIE)
~e c
nizes efforts and distributes information or.
topic.
NAMBLA's phone message tells boys,
not despair. Be true to your feelings. Times
change and your oppression will end."
As with homosexuality, pedophilia a,
cates are attempting to legitimize their bcha
by publishing research in professional jourr.
"That's exactly what they're doing,"
DeCecco of San Francisco State, who edit:
Joun~alof Homosexuality. "In a democracy,
form a group of like-minded people, and yo
to put your case across to the public."
Paidika: 7ke lourn1 of Pacdophilia (Euro
spelling), published in The Netherlands, pu
an academic face, but underneath, its object:
similar to NAMBLA's. The journal says its
pose is "to demonstrate that paedophilir.
been, and remains, a legitimate and produ
part of the totality of human experien~
Paidika often contains advertisements tor K
BLA and other pedophile organizations.
Reliable research or not, pedophilia ;
cates are marching forward with their vcrsi
social engineering.
"When the gay rights activists bcgan i
politically active, there wasn't a sufficient
of scientific information for them to base
gay rights activism on," John Money told PC
"You don't have to have a basic body ot'scic
information in order to decide to work ac:
for a particular ideology, as long as ~ o u ' r r
pared to be put in jail. Isn't that how
change has always taken place, re ally?"^^ 1

6. SIECUS. GurdeQnes tar ChnprehensrveSexudl!ly E d ~ i

New York. N.Y.. 1991. 0.5.
7.Hess. T. -They Call This Abstlnence? Beware ol sex e
who say 'abstmence' but mean 'anylh~nggoes ' - c~l~zen.
151. ;
8 Kmsey. A,. Pomeroy. W. and Mart~n.C. Sexual Behavtor
&man Male. Philadelphia. 1948: W.8. Saunders. 0 166. ; :1
9. Ib~d..p. M I .
10 -Stalemen! ol Purpose.' Pa~d~kaThe Journal of Pzeoc
The Nelherlanas. l(1L p. 2.
r 1. 'lnterwew: John Money - Pa~ake. i.?e dournai c
oonrha. The Nelherlands. 2(71, P 9.

11
12

13

14

15

Attachment 12:
Peterson's Sexpert
John Money Advocates
Pederasty/ Pedophilia

Y o h n Money confesses to The Journal of Paedophilia

CONTENTS

'

Docsrr ' I paraphilia conno~pathology?

No. I r docm't The idea that there arc paraphdic

dispos~tions,tendencies, and ~ e s p t i o n in
s
people that are also not pathological is very hard
for people to accept. One exampie I give is that
probably more than 50% of American men
would find orcLnuy heterosexual porno more
stimulaangif the woman had some pieces of underclothmgon, apeclllly a garter belt, or stockings and high-heel shoes. maybe a brassiere, than
ifshe were just complcfely naked One meaning
of normal is that something is the mathematid
or stadsticd norm. If more dun 50% of people
arc attracted toward panidly dressed or undressed women, then that's got to be statistically
average or normal, but it doesn't mean it has to
be ideologicallyn o d .
T h returns us to what we just discussed
above. namely the pejorative meanings of
paedophilia and h o m o s d r y . It nisa the
question of why some of the panphiliv are
value-laden and interpreted as being pejorative.

The ideologrcal norm is not defined statistically.

So by what criterion is it defined? It's d e h e d by
somebody eke's beliefs or ideology. And that
m a n s in the firul analysis it's defined by somebody else's power over somebody else. You can
impose your own ideology if'you have a biggcr
m y or a bigger police force. In dl of the paraphiliv we're dealing with, who r d y sea the
ideological standards for s c d behavior? In
Maryland, where I live. and in Washtngton D.c..
there is an ancient Iaw that romiden ynu a crim14
if you have oral sex with your partner even if
you're married. The h e is only $1000,but the
possible term of imprisonment is ten years. The
law is actually used sometimes under special circumstances when criminal lawyers figure they
can "get" somebody on it. Yet, everybody that
I've talked to regards it as a stupid law and ideoIojgically untenable, but it still stays on the law
books. When it was put there people really were
confirmed in their ideology that it was a good
law, and that people d e h t e l y shouldn't commit
aco of o d sex on one another.

You give vrtm'n charactnistirr to p m a p h k . Onc i.

that the pmon separates lust and love or ic o h w i s c
incapable of romantic lovr. How do you d a t e this &
pacdophifia?

I wouldn't say the pcnon, the paedophile, makc

dm scparanon. I would say the paraphiha docs
Paedophilia is a special instance. There is with&
it a combination of fiectionatc love as well r
the lust fictor. For many paedophiies-I'm no1
going to universalize any statement that I makt
but for many, and probably the vast majority
there is a chronological fraor. The erotic phue:
out sometime d e r the ctrild passes the age o.
puberty. A very long-lasting a6ectionate kind o.
henciship ensues, but the erotic, romantic attraction is hished. There is, in other words, ;
separation between the aEectiomtt and the 1~
factors. Certainly this has been the cue witt
many people I've known through the c h c .
You are sugqesting that the separation bemen lllr
and love in paedophilia, is caused by time, that at onc
point in the refationship they mr together, at anothr
point-because o/ timc-they separate. Most relation.
ships change over time. How does the time farto'
spcn~5rafly
a f a t pedophilia?

There's a special group of paraphilic phenomen;

that can be put together under the category o:
duonophdia. This simply means that the mturt
of that type of pbilia involves an age discrcpanc)
between the partnen. That was established ;
long time ago r e g d m g paedophilia, thou$
somewhat mistakenly. The term paedophh w r
used to encompass &tophilia, meaning someone at the diaper age, and ephebophilia, meaning
teenage relationships. In my experience, a person who's an infintophie m'?
comprehend thc
person who's a paedophilc- d&ed as a penor
interested in children between the ages oflate infincy, let's say, and puberty. Nor, I think,can tht
cphebophile comprehend the interests of either
the paedophile or the &tophilt.
Intelleaually, of course, they can understand each othcl
and not be stupid about it. But genuine, persona
emotional understanding just simply doesn't
exist between people in those categories.

One could also say there's no comprehension

on the part of anyone in those three categories
with someone who can fill in love and have a
s e x d relationship only with someone who is of
a parent's or grandparent's age. That's gerontophib. If the person is coo young there's no erotic
bonding. If there's a big discrepancy, la's say between a twenty-year-old and slxty-year-old,
then the relationship is limited in dmejust simply
by the exigncia ofhumvl existenceand death.
I have a strong impression, although I've never
oroved this, that we wnfitto have a Greek word
ior twentyophila, &ophilcs,
fortyophircs.
I'm impressed by the c m r m e probability that
many i&tionships, inclurLng murkgcs, break
up because the image of the partner in your
lovemap docs not mature dong with your birthday age. Your lovermp age stays put while the
age of the person goes beyond that of the age in
the lovemap. There are a-lot of men and women
who cannot ellplvn why a rektionshrp suddenly
becomes worthless and pcrfbnaory around their
middle thirties or fordes. The explanation might
be, apcclllly when you see someone who ha
broken up with their partner going out with
someone tsn, fifiem or twenty yean younger.
that their aging pvmer no longer cornsponds to
the image in their lovexnap. You might almost
say it's the lucky ones whose lovemap image ages
at the same rate as their duonologicd age.
Well then, how important P age for scxual relationships or erotic attachments, in general, mgardlcss of
paraphilias?

I don't think that there's a universal answer to

hat. I would say though that if I were to see the
cue of a boy a p d ten or deven who's intensely
erotically attracted toward a I&in his twenties
or thmies, if the rclationsbp is t o d y mutual,
and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual,
then I would not-.-.call itpathologtcd
in any way.
At the other exacme, if it's a t o d y m u d relationship between a sixty- or seventy-year-old
and a twenty- to thucy-year-old, then I would
have to say the same thing.
I suspect that there might be a large reservoir
ofdocumented older cases, though I don't know

--

anyone who's txird to document them. If you

tried to document the rektionshp between an
older and younger person in America nght now
you could be prosecuted. You EteralIy c m ' c
even do march on pacdophilia any more.

My own clinical experience up to this point,

which is rchtiveiy limited, is that the &tionships t)ut I've seen benveen boys and men arc for
the boy hero w o s h p and, you might almost say,
adoration. The erotic part of it for the boy is
rather perfunctory. He is going to grow up to be
heterosexual anyway. A lot of the boys that I've
known. or have heard about f b m colleagues. are
quite clear that the relationship has a time limit to
it. By the time they're fifieen or so it will have
changed into a non-sexual fiendship. One
ywng man with whom I did a follow-up interview when he was in his cwentia told me.
"Well, I redly &d it for him. because I knew
what it meant-to him.It really didn't do me any
hum,and it wain't too bad anyway. But I didn't
really totally enjoy it." At the time I was mterviewing him he w u very romantically in Iov:
w t h his &end,
annh3d neverpreviously had
exactly that lurid ofhuman expericnce~That had
not been the putrculv land of experience he had
felt with his man fiend, but he still was very
bonded to him. It's not uncommon to hear.
"Well. he relllv was more ofa fither to me than
my own fither was."
In l l e o Sandfort's book, Boys on Their Conacts
with Men, for which you m t e thr introddon, he
ampoint out tkat somc boys give scxwiity as one of
the food thinfs about the dationrhip with the man.
Do; thk indwte that it is porriblr t k m a n mow boys

intmstrd in the stxual expm'nuc than you may huvc

encountmd at this point?
I would think it's possible, particularly for boys
over puberty who arc feeling the f
d expression
of their own sexuality and eroticism. but I
simply don't know the answer for boys under
puberty and &wise for gub under puberty.
Where twuld you &cute boy-love in your discusion of
homosmcality? For you, is boy-lovcpaedophilia, or is
it homosexuality?

Well, you have to s u n with their dictionary

meanings. "Paedo" implies the age fictor.
"Homo" means two people with penises or vulvas. I'm very meticulous about homosexuality
because h e r all there are people with penises
who were born with two ovaries and they have
an empty scrotum. Whichever way you try to
look at it. the fict is that we ail. throughout
society, define homosexualicy in terms of the
external sex organs. So that if there are two
penises in bed together then it's male homosexuality and ifthere are cwo vulvas in bed together
that's female homosexuzliry. It doesn't matter
what the chromosoma are or what the gonads
internally are or were.
Homoxxuahty means. literally, being sexually attracted to someone of the same sex. You
can divide the usages of the word into a homosexual act or am. and something more abstruse,
that is a homosexual personality o r a homosexual gender identity. Penonality has to be
further qullified. There's what has b o r i c l l l y
been incorrectly idenafied as the o d y form of
homosexuality, associated with a very high
degree of female identification and impenonation. There are still many people who define
homosexuality in tenns of femininity of behavior, ofbody language and a general female disposition. That is, of course, only an extremely
specialized subxcdon of same-sex attraction.
I don't think that boys that idenofy themselves
femininely are more iikeiy to be a m a e d to a
paedophilxc r e l a t i o h p . They tend to be a subcategory unto themselves. They're much more
interested in playing with guk. and not suing

into any sexual play at all, whch makes a certain

amount ofsense to me. The background of t h e e
so-called "sissy boys" is parents who are having
trouble in their own sexual life. Sexuality is a
threatening hng, especully masculine sexuality, so &at they don't express themselves in an
erotic or sexual way at all to anybody, not even
in same-age sexual r c h d play. They arc
special uses.
What I am getting at is that paedophh and
homosexuality are htghIy charged subjects
within the a d v d system of society, law and
morality, with its basic origins back in relqqon.
It's hard to find words that don't uny some sort
ofpejoraave significance to them.

Paedophilia and Society

What value judgments do you p k c on your danipin tmns ofsm'ety, the law, or other
expmions 4th erotir lge.
tion ofpaedophilia

My entire approach is to try and understand

these "other expressions of the erotic life." It's a
scientific appro&h. You know there's an exm o r b a n , Wetence in the basic premises of
thinking &tween science and law.-The law is
adversarial, and that automatically means value
judgments.
The whole logical process ofscience
.
is to ay and find consexks. Aftcl: you have a
scientific consensus there is a proccss of forming
social value judgments. Suenti6c knowledge
and social value judgments are cltvly two
M e r e n t things. My great interest in dl the
manifestations of sexoloaicd.
"
. human functioning is simply to try to undemvld them. The
whole issue of malung a value judgment is
something Merent. I'm not sure that one can
make universal valuejudgments.
With paedophilia, one of the dungs that has
impressed me is the variety ofsoclll, institutionalized, implicit vaiue judgments between one
society and another. You undoubtedly know
that Gilbert Herdt estimated that in 10!% of the
Melanesian societies there is institutionalized
piedophitic bisexuality. This is my term for it,
not the way it is usually described. There's a
period oflife in which the young boy established

~ s e x u drelationship with an older teenager or

young man. When he reaches the tribal maniagc
agc,usually at 19 or 20, that sexual rektionshp
+miha. H e is put into a marriage relationship
which everybody is put into.
The idea of institutionakiw a period of
pa,edophilic v e - s e x relaaonshps is something
z h t members of.our_so+q d y have never
k n able to cope with. By the stan&rds of ourown history. of our own culture, thae people
m judged pervened. That certainly happened
with government administrative people and
/aissionuics in the Melanesian cuiture where
'wtimtiorukzed paedophilia exists.
In order to make a valuejudgment, it seems to
me one needs to know fint of all. as much as one
un about the devdopmenul origins of, in this
panicuiar instance, paedophdia. Then one needs
to know about the ancient culmrai customs or
mores with regard to it in a given sokiecy. What
I'm really saying in so many words is that you
can't make value judgments in a vacuum, so
you've always got to put into your equation
&me consideration of-the historical and contemporary cultural pattern in which you're
obsenring the phenomenon.

In your witings you have derfined a paraphilia as "a

condition ouumng in maks orfemales upon w h d a
pmon is wmpukivcly rrsponsive to and obligativeiy
dependent upon, an unusual andperonally or socially
unaaepkable stimulus, ideation orjantasy for maintenance of s a d arousal." Would thii suggest that
something luould cease to be a paraphilia $ t h ~
stimdus u.wc no longer soaally unauptable? 7'his
seems to h a w hppcncd in the example you just gave
us. When men look atpartially clothed women, that's
on auptable stimulus. People w u l d not say that that
13 a paraphilia, certainly not a pathology. Would thii
be mtc clinically as well, that once the stimulus becoma socially acceptable it ceases to be apamphilia?
Well, you're htting the nail on the head. The
c e n a l problem inherent in defining a paraphilic
phenomenon has to do, as I started to say above.
with dc*g
a statisticalnorm, as opposed to an
ideological nonn. If we cake Gilbert Herdt's example and look at the New Guinean or Mekne-

sian peoples we see that all the boys go through a

stage of explicit homosexual contact with someone already mature enough to ejaculate. Statistically thLs behavior is not going to be defined as
pathological. And, if it's called a paraphiha. it's
going to have to be called a n o d panphdu,
that is, it's stadnicaily n o r d . But even Z i t is
statistically acccpabic the further question is
then. "Is this behavior ideologcaily acceptable
as well?" Even further we would also have to
ask: "To whom?" You could term that "the missionary question." It might be acceptable to the
Melanesian people thcmxlves who've always
had this form of homosuruikcy as part of their
~ d t u r epattern, but it was certainly not
acceptable to the missionary. The question.
then, redly has to do with the imposition of
norms &om without.
How doer all this relate to the discussion on
paedophilia?

Paedophilia is part of the discussion of ideoiogcd norms. It is an issuexf being fair-minded to

people, just as the missionaries were not being
fir-minded but wanted only to impose their
own ideology.
Let me give you an example that is not actually on paedophilia, but I hope we'll be able to
use it to illustrate a point. It is one of the most
&cult examples and test cases I can think of,
one that most ~ e o ~have
l e misundeatood.
Let us tak2twb people who make a death
act, a couple who are sadomasochistic. Thev
eep it totally, t o d y seerct between themselves
and nobody eke, but in one oftheir ceremonies
one of them does finally die. Now here is the
problem: if the person who remains alive is
never suspected, then ideo1op;icaily how do you
define that relationship. The key. I h n k is that
it was t o d y a C O ~ X N U relationsftiP.
~
There is another hctor we have to add.
however, and h a t is that if this person is never
suspected it would almost have to mean that
there was no outside party involved, someone
who would not have shared the ideology, in
other words that nobody else's ideology entered
into it. So, what it comes down to is that the

,/

couple consented to thcir sadomasochistic

acavit~tl.The key to this discussion is consent.
Now. I have come around to what I think is a
furly workable definition of consent I don't
thnk you can enter into a conscpting rclaaoncndmg right
s h p i f y w don't know the
at the beginning. If there is. in other words.
sornethtng totally unpredictabie about it then
vou can't consent to it. And so, the sumvor, in
this particular case. had to build into his consenting part of the rektionshp the possibility
that he would end up in the electric chair. and
that was p u t of his scheme in Me. Now. that's a
complicated example in many ways; it is really
the most difficult example I can dunk of, but ic
docs bring to the fore the very important point
that you can define a consenring relationship. I
would mainnin that it can be defined on the
critcnon of being able to predict a possible
ending from the beginning.
It is hard to scc how thu is a workablc drfinition. For
acampk, can a corcplcgctting mamcd predict the outcome of h r maniagc fiom the beginning 4 the

rriahhip?
They have to know the possible outcomes.
There has to be awareness of risks and ponibilitia to consent properly. Engaged coupla can
know that there's a 50% chance of e n b g up in
divorcc, and they're w d h g to take that chance.
I don't know any better w a y of d e w a consenting relationsfup.
But you asked how dl ttus relates to
pedophilia, so let me try to get back to that.
Before the law was passed in Maryhd that
now obliges me to report every suspiaon or
accusation of a paedophilic relationship, I was
able to work in a t o d y Werent way with
people who came to me with a complaint about
themselves as paedophiies. I'll restrict myself to
discwing men who had boyfriends. I'm also
t a k q about people who w e n self-rcfied,
and not people who were rdemed under p m sure or under legal coercion. I always would say
to them, well, I want to be able to talk to your
boyfriend. And if the situation rully permitted
it, t would want to talk to the boy's parents, be-

cause I found out that very o k n the parents

were implicitly, if not q l i c i t i y aware of the
relationslup. I suppose I could say the parcna
acquiesced; at least, they certainly didn't make a
fiass about the &tionsfup. They were sometima on a very hendly basis with the boy's
older partner.
The one dung that I redly wanted to make
sure of was ttut the boy did not feel trapped in
the relationshiv. In the two instances I srudied I
was convince: the boys did not fid trapped.
They both w m very aware of the fict that they
had a kind of contract with their older p m e r .
At any time they wanted to say "no" &d stop
the sexual relationship that would be acceptable.
That was very important. I've known cases
where the boy's relationdup with his older putn a was forcibly broken u p . - ~ eexperienced that
separation in exactly the same way as if he'd
experienced the death ofhis pumer or of one of
his parents or somebody very dose to him. It's
very importvlt once a relationship has been tstablished on fuch positive and &ectio_~tc
grounds that it should not be broken up precipitouslv. All that needs to be done for the proper
deviopment of that boy's life is that hiknbw
he's not napped. That would work for anybody,
really. Thc general principle, I'm stating here,
the ability of the partner to say no in the relationshp,applies very widely, not just to a
paedophilic relationstup.
This dexripaon is 6r removed tiom the 14ity in the US. nght now, where paedoplh
rektionshps arc outside the law. The parents
having an explicit say in the sexual component
oftheirson's rclationshp, is no longer a question
in the United States. Ifthe parents know about it
then they're committing ;crime ifthey don't
report it and stop i t If a paedophile comes to me
and asks for hdp. I would have to tell him that in
a way he's speaking to the undercover police. If 1
don't report him I would be breaking the law.
That's a m j o r question for every hedth-urc
provider in the United States. It has put all of
in the position of being undercover health-cart
police, instead of followers of Hippomtcs.
awful situation is the product of the
extnordmuy negativism of the America

sociery towards evcrythxng chat pe&

to sex.
Especially to the development of sexuality in
childhood. We force children to keep evcrydung in their sexual lives as secret as possible.
Otherwise. they're ridiculed, dustised. disciplined or punished for anyttung sexual. Even orduury boy@ sexual rchcvul play is something that pvcnrt have been wamed against.
They go berserk when they see it. h a g m e lfyou
were a young boy with a paedophile lover. You
would have to keep it secret for sure. It would be
extremely di&cult to integrate it into your total
Me without its being out in the open, especially
with your M y .

You- rite. wnsidcrablc

evidence to suppofl the vim that
- .
.
-. .

firmd. Doct this mggc(t that cjibts should be made to

drangc the soad opinion ratha than trying to wittrol

pacdophilrc and their behavior? Lc the emphasis in the
wrong dimtion?

I can't consider any aspect of human s e x d and

erotic behvior in a s o d vacuum. One has to
start with &g what is the configuration of the
ideological lovemap in the s o c k 6 in which the
peaon htr been raised. So, the basic issue. and
the answer to your question is: T o what degree
can any of us expect to a t a b h h a community
consensusin order to bring about change?When
you have a small community, not a very krgt
one, &at has the same ideological concepts. then
some things will work within that community
which you will no longer have to keep secret.
You can, for exunp1e. make a rule that paedphiLia can be subject to persod consent. As the
young person. you would be allowed to consent
to it, or not consent to it, without anybody
chvtiring you either way.
We would really need to know more about
the developmental period between early a d hood and h e mid-twenties. to find out the answer that a lot of people want to know, and that
is how acceptable k it in tcnns of chiidhood
growth and development with regard t o e mate sexual health, that they have sexual options

available to them. We simply don't know the

answer to that at the present time, as fu as I'm
concerned. The nearest we have to an answer is
that if you've got the legal courage you could
find some indicaaom of an answer. in the ux of
the KWO boys i mentioned already, I'm sure that
their assumption that their parents knew about
the scx~ulpart of their relatiombps and they
weren't going to make a hs about it was very
important to them. They weren't living in f e u
of some terrible secret being found out that
wouid have thrown them to the lions, thrown
them to the devils.
Why not rely on Tkro Sandfort's mearck h i d ,
shows that rrlationships mn bc bo&dol and not
,kmmbl?

'I do rely on Sandfort's research up to a cemin

extent, but there arc many variables he didn't
investigate. N o w in the U.S. or Britain is
going to be aiiowed to investigate ths without
being arrcsrcd, or violating client confidemidity. This also applies to studies of same-age
sexual rehearsal play in children. No govrmment agency would give you a research gclnt if
you explicitly stated you were going to study
even the developmental sexual behavior of
monkeys, no less children. It's incredibly diScult to study anydung sexual and get grant
money for it at the present time. Unless you're
trying to put people in jail, or be a victimolo-

&Would you f n l that it is rrsrlrrs now in the U.S.to

advocate s o d change simply buausr the smolqicnf
canmunity cannot do the research to d t a i n thepmpa
i n f m t i a n to know h t change to advocate?

Well, when the gay rights activists began being

politically active, there wasn't a d c i e n t body
.of scientiiic information for them to bue their
on't have to
gay rights activism on. So.
have a basic body of scien~cu$ormation in
&r
to decide to work actively for a pudculu
-ideology. As long as you're prepared to be put m
jd.Isn't &at how soad change has always taken
phce, r d y ?

In a prcviorcs intnvinu in Paidih, G u n t n Schmidt

a w e d the sexologid community of cowardin in
standing up togovrnunentprcrsures. Ir them a responsrbilityjor sex ~ c n z to
h protest mom apinrt the
constraints being put on them, and about the conshainrs bcingput on sex ingeneral in society?

There is a division among sexologists as to

whether one should be engaged in either sex rcform or sex research. Tlus argument has r e d y
come home to roost at this present time because
of disclosure laws that are against sex researchers
themselves. There are taboo subjects that you
can't research at all. What's r e a k n e c a s v v a

sabra a t ~ o l o g i c l meedngs.
l
but I don't get
very h.There
not very &y sexologis&r
sex therapists or sex educators, when you put the
whole bunch of ur together. Out of that small
numbcr there's an even smaller number who are
convinced ofthe importance of establishingtheir
scientific right to do research. Otherwise there
would bc a lobby in Waslungton. My favorite
saying about this is: Wherever the herrings are
running, the gulls are overhead. When it becomes possible. as now in the U.S.,to make
money by specializing in the treatment of chdd
abuse, with absolutely no scientific basis to anything that you're doing, then you'll find a lot of
people malung a lot of money. It's where your
paycheck is that dictates a lot of people's activities: that is, whether they will be sex reformists or
sex researchers. A dismal situation, isn't it?
There is a d t f f i m e f i o m country to country in the
childhood sexuality hystnia that's &en going on in
the last several yean, betwen the United States and
England, for &ample, and the Netherlands. Hnr
there's a much more rational diccussion and wen a re... ..-liberalization
.. ..-..
ofthe Lzy. Then is still scxolok~l
cent
researrh going on into child sexuality, and there is the
presence of mmy paedophile work groups. What
would you see as the reason why the hysteria has been
so i n t m c in the United Stater, which is where you
live?

The United States was h d c d by a band of

devil chasers, and they'rc still c k m g deviis. It's
impossible for American politics to exist without
havmg some devil to chase. Communism was
the great devll, but now that Communism is
fadmg away as a devil, it's sex and drugs that
everybody's riled up about.
Amcnca hu a totally M i r e n t cultural and
histoncd background regarding the develop
ment of sex laws than d o n the Netherlands. It
~ M S something to do with the pcnistence of the
pre-Roman imperial i d 4 of marriage as an
arrangement benvten fixdies that unites wealth
and power, and the pre-Roman, very ancient
European system of betrothal, which you still
find torally unaltered only in Iceland Under this
very ancient system, you weren't officially
allowed to get married until you had proved that
you could create a pregnancy. The betrothal
idea meant that young people had to sleep together in order to prove that they were competent to get married. That meant there was a
more open attitude toward the expression of
overt xxud behavior between young people
prior to being married that survived in northern
European areas much, much longer than it did in
south European areas. It's only in northern
Europe that you had enough survival of the
ancient betrothal system that it m t q t automatically a hgh degree of toleration for the rights of
women and for the righrs of young people to
have a sex life. It's the aftermath of that which
you find in Woiland and in the Scandinavian
counaia. It's what Magus Hindrfcld was fighting for 6 o m Hanover when the ~rukianstook
over Hanover and put the severe Prussian antisexual lam over the ones in Hanover which
were as liberal as the ones that survived in Holland.
You have three Luge h a o n you have to take
into consideration: history, culture and pure
science. In other words. we are returning to
another part of our bcussion, that of sexual
ideologies. One can do cross-cutturd comparisons of coune, and then you might be able to
come up with a concepcud plan for revision of
the ideology.

&cr their son disdosed that his father dressed up

You h m brrn dcnhjed witb the use of anticmdrogmic

homwm, a p P M n lDl yr p o - h w a . This was an area
hat w asbad Dr. Schmidt about in his intrrvrku. Hc
mentioned h a t rhe Uniuersity dHambug, where he
teatha, althougk it hrrd been one qf the pioneers in
anriandrogmt r t ~ b n m thas
, now abondoncdit, at least
for long-term usage, bccouse $the advmc side-&ects.
Do you still adwcafe tbc use ofantiandm~endmgs?

First of all, I've followed the side-effects. and it

rcdy seems to me exaggerated to say that you
should abandon treatment because of their sideeffects. They're really very minor, and most of
them are not established as side-effeca. There
were some symptoms recorded as having
occurred in patients being treated who concurrently suffered h r n other &eases such as diabeta. The side-&ects might have occurred
without the treatment anyway.
Around 1965 1 visited Hamburg. They had
had a menally retarded boy who was masturbating constantly wherever he was, including in
pubirc. It was impossible for hun to live outside
of the close supervision of an insricution, which
his parents weren't particularly enamored of.
They would nther have kept him at home. He
wasn't able to stop masturbating by any known
form of internention, u n d they med the new
antiandrogen, Androcure, which was one of the
sex steroidscatdogued by Schering in West Berlin. This gave the boy some respite from whatever it was tiut was driving him into sexual compulsiveness. He was actually injuring his penis. It
made it possible for him to live a different kind of
life nther than be locked up in an hritution
injwing his penis d hxs I&.
The second case that I was told about in Hunburg was of a h e r who was in serious legal
trwble for incest with young girls in his M y .
He had ficely decided to try the drug treatment.
W i b the next year, back in Baltimore, I had a
man for treatment who had already approached
me about acting as a professional advisor for a
c r o s s ~ group
g
that he was setring up for
men in the Baltimore-Washington area. His
wifk was right on the edge of calling the police

as the mother and dressed his son as the daughter

and sometlung or other went on with hu son's
sex organs thac h e y called "television games." I
never f a d out exactly what it was. Fortunately
for the man, and for the whole funily, the mother c d e d me before she called the police. The u p
shot was that the fither wanted some form of
treatment so he would not do it W n , and would
c e d y nor spend a large pan of his life in jail.
Thm wu no form of psychaic treatment of
any kind available, because there was no psyduaaist th;lc I contacted in the entire Baltimore area
who would take on his lund of case. I discussed
the possibility of the hormonal treatment with
two endocrinologists who work with me, and
we decided to help this man out at his request.
He wanted to take a ma1 course of treatment
with the only antiandrogen at that cime dowed
in the United States, D e p o - h v m . I also
worked with the whole fimily. I could do ths.
and I've xaised this issue above, because there
were no reporting laws. The outcome of the case
was really very successfbl. I've kept in touch with
chat man ever since and he has not spent any time
in jail..He did not intrude on fus son's privacy
again either, wfuch hu son really had not liked at
all. The success of the story was that the fimily
was kept together, nobody was persecuted, and
nobody felt that he'd beuayed his bther and bad
hun put in jail for 25 or 30 years. The fither is
very gratefid for what was done. After a couple of
yevs he no longer needed antiandrogen.
The use of antiandrogens redly depends on
how much humanitarian concern you have for
people that arc in trouble. Are you &g
to do
something to try and help them? I knew that this
was not a dangerous hormone, because it had
been used a great deal in pediatric endocrine
health cue with children who were getting into
puberty too early. &omas uriy as 18 months up
to six years ofage.
I know that one of the arguments against its
use is that the law will become Hider-like and
impose the hormone on everybody. That's not
much of an argument against using hormones
for treating people with sexual problems. Any
form of medical treatment can be misused. The

something has been dscovrrrd and

x d out by science dots not dictate how it
.d be used monlly or ethcally. The e h c d
xrnplication of evexythq in medicine hu to be
srud~ed.Even circumcision should be questioned. It is an unnecessary opention, and nobody
has ever collected m y figures as to how many
chddrcn have had adverse comequences inclu&ng toxic shock syndrome.
Quite a p m t f i m the question ofside-ejkts of the drug,
the w e af antiandrogen normally takes place in the

United States with the idea tltnr it will k w e d to

d &tation
ofthc person bang
ckangc thc basic s
treatcd, in this case, thepdophile. And yet you yourstyhave sugpsted in your intmdvaion to l k o Sandfort's book that pacdophilia is an onortation which
cannot be changed o r p m n r n t l y supprrssed. Lm 't the
use ofantiandrogcn a misrcse $it's wuplcd with therapy which has as its goal the alteration 4 a m a l
onrntation?

The underlying issue you are raising is redly

whether people are forced into treatment by the
law. In point of fict, they're usually not forced
h t o it by the law. Usudly. when someone is in
trouble with the hw it is their lawyer who
recommends that they come to the clinic.
1have had some patienn who were sdiciently, and I would say jus&bly, concerned h u t
where heir behavior was going, especialiy the
potential for cruelty or harm to orhm, &at they
referred thcmxlves for hormonal treatment.
The fact is you're simply not allowed to impox
treatment on anybody in psychiatry or sexology.
I think it makes a big Werence ethically when
people come in and give completely d o r m c d
consent.
I'd like to add a few other remarks. You also
have to undenmnd that antiandrogenic treatment is not a liferime treatment,m d its c&co are
reversible. If somebody is finding his rcktionships with younger s c x d partnm extremely
distressing to hun. and realms they may have
extremely negxtive consequences as well, he can
say that he would like some treatment for whatever period of time he wants. In that case I don't
thcnk it's my business to r e h e to treat him.But,

now that I am retired. I don't treat anybody anymore, so I'm spcJung generically. I also decided
-dingpaedophiIia
that I w d d never report
anvbody, so I simply would not even ay to treat a
paedophile, because the very fin that they come
and ask for treatment maka them rcpormblc.
Do p m o in
~ penal institutions rrally have a doice?

PicdophiltJ who have received extremely long

impnsOnmentr don't have my choice about that.
One of my former patients has been electrocuted
m Florida. and he didn't have any choice about
whether he would sit in the electric chw or not.
So,what I am saying is that we're dt7kng wih
very, very basic problems in the law and in legal
d o r m with regard to the sexual kws. One can't
approach tfut problem in a piecemeal fishon. It's
somethtngthat's, wek d y almost too bigfor one
p e w n to deal with. and I'm not sure how we can
approach it ntiondly. I have absolutely no doubt
that the vast majonty ofpacdophila who arc out in
j
d have no businas beingin iaiiatd. Andsome of
them have received g r d y unjust punishments.
But it's t o d v outside ofmv avacitv to kern them
waide ofjail. I can do somethm in the wav of
treatment that gives some leewav to iud~es.Onc
*can w a me&cal trcament iudiciousiv
in a very great and h u m e way some peoplc.
Now, whether you get a wicked prison system that
abuses medicine by giving W ~ ~ ~
to Z
evtry
I S
prisoner in order to turn them into zombies, or
overdoses of hormones to turn them into scxud
zombies, is a H u e n t matter.That hasto be fought
out on a diEenntbattlefield.
?

Have you seen your role as advourting prison d o r m

only in tmnr of giving hormonal mabtunt to consenting individuals? Have you advocated prism nform ingmeral as smngly as thc use of--Rovwa?

Well, I've done my fin share of advocaang law

reform. I wrote "Surud dictatorshp, dissidence
and democracy." My basic work is psychoendocrinology and sexology, not prison reform,
but I do my fiir share, I hnk. At least% my
concept ofmy fiir share.

Paedophilia and the Law

What ir your sentiment regording pedophilia and
various L w s that attempt to control it? For acmnple,
what is your opinion about a g e - o f - w m t laws?
American society r d y has completely contrary
views of childhood s d t y . There is a major
attack on childhood sexuality. People arc very
equivocal about whether or not cbildhood is a
period of sexual innocence, or whether childhood is a period when o r i g i d sin manifests itself. If it is sin. then sex has to be beaten out of
children.
The whole idea of the present political actions
against childhood sexuality, in any of its m a d e stations, is redly a dnboiiully clever ploy to establish anti-sexullirm on a big scale. It's what I
could c d the strategy of the counter-reformationists, who are in the ascendancy now. The
rcformationist period was during the so-called
~ x u a revolution.
l
The counter-refonnationisa
have been quite explicit in tactically recognizing
&at as long as they're attacking the wickedness
>fchildhood sexuality in any form by labelling it
5ddie porn, there will not be anyone of any
tanding in society, and c e d y no legislator.
vho would vote against the protection of childtn. The idea of attacking sex by attacking child-,
tn's sex has been a very explicit tactic in attacksg sex in general. The attack on childhood sex~uiityis an attack on any ideology of se&aIity
whch the dm-conservatives of the counterreformation don't kke.
Part of the result was that Congress in 1984increased the age of the child in pornography from
16 to 18.Thls was specifically requested by the
F.B.I. Congress increased the child's age to 18 to
make it easier for the F.B.I. to identify children
in pornography. Now someone can be fully
grown at 17, no less 18,with a completely adult

d e or female body. and therefore still be defined as a &Id. That blurs the ability to idenrify
what is or is not a child in an image and makes a
lot more m a t e d prosecutable.

17u attack on & U b d sQCYOIityu an

attack on any ideology of stxnak'ty which
the ultto-conxwatiw of the
countrr-r$ormation don't Mu.
My feeling is tfut we're dealing with profound
social and political forces regardmg age of consent. In April, 1990, I read of an Arizona cue: a
sixteen-year-old boy who b;ls been regutmd
for Me as a sex offender because he touched the
breasts of h fourteen-year-old gidhend. Both
of them were living in a sate-sponsored foster
home, and it was by mutual consent. In the
middle '70's. the law in Arizona was changed to
state that anybody, regardless of age or sex. who
touches the breasts of a girl who's not yet
reached her 15th birthday is automatiully a
sexual abuser. Arizona may not change the law,
because it opens a Pmdon's box t o make any
changes in sex laws. That's a very temfylng example of how absurd the law can get. Wherc
does your sexulkty come &om? O n your 18th
birthday? Down on a rocket, or should I say. up
on a rocket?

J
I certainiy think that's where we have to begin. r /
So you would attack the whok baiufrom which ogcqf-consent laws are consmuted, in other words.

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
The starting point of Paidika is necessarily our consciousness of ourselves as paedophiles. It is our intention to publish
an intellectual journal which will examine paedvphilia within
its cultural context, with emphasis on the humanities, history
and social sciences. W e shall be speaking, therefore, not only
to pacdophiles seeking a greater understanding of their identity, but also to members of the academic community open to
objective investigations of the phenomenon.
The ground on which we stand is the emergence and evolution of paedophile consciousness and identity in history. W e
point back to the writings of J. A. Symonds and members of
the early German sexual emancipation movement such as
Benedict Friedlander and John Henry Mackay, where views
of paedophilia as an identity and subculture were proposed.
The contemporary development of this consciousncss is found
in the work of Frits Bernard, Edward Brongersma, Tom
O'Carroll, RenE Schirer and others. We intend to be a forum
for the shaping of this consciousness.
But to speak today of paedophilia, which we understand to

be consensual intergenerational sexual relationships, is to

speak of the politics of oppression. This is the milieu in which
we are enmeshed, the fabric of our daily life and struggle.
There is no country where there are not proscriptions against
even the most innocent consensual paedophile relationships. In
the English-speaking countries, in particular, the facts of this
politics are worsening, and these countries appear determined
to impose their reactionary moral values on other nations. In
thc United States, for example, prison sentences of a century
or more are not uncommon for consensual man/boy relationships, and in the state of Florida the paedophiie can receive the
death penalty for such relationships. Visual images that are
part of a paedophile sensibility are also being assailed: in many
places all nude images of minors are legally defined as pornography. Not only are our lives and culture under attack, but
proposals are afoot in the united States and Canada to criminalizt: even discussions of lowering of the age of consent or the
reporting of research that does not characterize paedophilia as
child abuse.

It is our contention that the oppression of paedophilia is part

of the larger repression of sexuality, and that this repression in
general represents an irrational expression of authority in
government. The oppression of paedophilia is therefore dangerous in a wider sense than simply to paedophilcs. We must
address the reality of this oppression, and while we do not
advocate brhaviour that violates thcse laws, we shall attempt
to counter the hysteria with calmness and reason.
We wnsh then to welcotne and invite our readers'participation. Through publication of scholarly studies, thoroughly
documented and carefully reasoned, we intend to demonstrate
that paedophilia has been, and remains, a legitimate and productive part of the totality of human experience.
The Editors.

Concepts of Sexuul Orientation

Edited by

David I? McWhirter, M.D.

Stephanie A. Sanders, Ph.D.
JuneMachover Reinisch, Ph.D.
New York Oxford
Oxford University Press

1990

Agenda and Credenda

of the Kinsey Scale
John Money

Excerpt :

Evolutionary Bisexuality
Any theory of the genesis of either exclusive homosexuality or exclusive
heterosexuality must address primarily the genesis of bisexuality.
Monosexuality whether homosexual or heterosexual, is secclndag and a
derivative of the primary bisexual or ambisexual potential. Ambisexuality
has its origins in evolutionary biology and in the e&&olcgy of sexual
differentiation.

John Money PhD. Johns Hopkins U . , Baltimore MD Tel. (301) 955 3740
June Machover R e i n i s c h , PhD, D i r e c t o r , Kinsey I n s t i t u t e f o r Research
i n Sex Gender and Reproduction, Bloomington* Indiana Tel. (812) 335-7689

11
13

14

15

Attachment 13:
Peterson's Sexpert
Fred Berlin is
"Shielding Child Molesters"

Dr. Berlin see ks--as an expert mental health professional-to permit on-going, active child rapists in his "treatment" their liberty.
Our saav

Stop shielding

Founded If27
Now I n O u r 2 G l w r Ir'cnr

k8ctng r ~ r r r bvtlh Dr. Berlia. Y eiy

tnsW srek ireaanrenr fmm

SSP

lkCi

m irrers dl).
b r . fierlin an4 o(hrr8;

~l~er+
4 te m n r k s i e r s . Verv 1.r

06/01/02

SAT 0 8 : 4 9 FAX 9167972544

JAR

Dr. Berlin seeks--as an expert mental health professional-to permit on-going, active child rapists in his "treatment" their liberty.

Our

say

Stop shielding
chiZd mozesters

Founded 1727
N o w * I n O u r 2 6 l s r t'cnr

moat dele81 the 8ertla U11 an4 r . g n r e r Irw aruE

s7 tat state Oeptmwnt of Human Resourerr rh
e k n s (he extsllng (~&pMte Iwl))wlc,
Dr. I r t h rdl the earnahtee that pededbfler *n
n u rark lraalm8ab It 8hw k n w U o l r crirslnrl a t
r l be r 8 W . 4 .
Yrt a d mrrs 4 .U she mthc
prrchtrtrlarr 8.4
o r r r r e t o r r -ha r i t e a d o 4 rhl
IrearU~s rgrrrd utlL Dr. Berlin, Wm
mtraadj t e r n mrkrters. Very 1.r
isters rill.
'Ny
{ r g b aamk trearmrnt tram D1. Uerlirr an6 rrlhwtn;

i
3

-noat are m r d w e 4 0

e w r * ~ .So-8

wy*haaWst~

xas uo"

When Doctors Know Better

such may not h UK caw.
Th*t !h!. Ic I!!? ccnt.q! !ssuC !'!x
been amply drmonstratcd by &c

conlmvtrsy over the obllgaiIon of

ffopklns' W u a l IJkoden Cllnlc to
report oflrndrrs under that state's
child-abuse reporllnglaw.
In 1987, when UIC mcasure was
nrsr passcd. kod Bcrlln, the cllnlc's
dlreclor, oNued a mnvtnclng ratlonale Utal thosc who sperlallzr In
a pouwful local Insiltutlon can b a t i n g pcdopl~tlcs. ~lndtrtduels
p u c e epln control In a m y ihal whose scwal adentallon Is Loward
ehMrenl shouM bt cxcmptcd from
[wid make any Whlte House p m
reportlag omnses whlch occurred
6-tary
P&,
In ellhcr case, IIICone-s)lkd prt- prtor to ttcelmmL on the grounds
tniatjon of the mlsmderstood that abusers would simply not seek
help If they knew that legal p m c u ealcn of Ule Suual Mwdch C1111valiantly cndcavdrlngb tzcat &- Uon would llkely result. nut during
thc n r d scsslon d thc General Asfanclcs whlch mlslnfontd 6unral
would only punish sembly other polnts af clew carrlcd
the day end tht voke d the mrnmua genulnr rcspanslbll!ty
me by l l ~ o x l the
n mental-health ntty was e r t p i i s a l In a repea! of tbc
pdwlons: When working wf01 pa- npailng twqtlon.
Fur a tlme, dm. the Sunral Msc e n t s whose very Ulness may mpn5-mt a slgnlfhM pntcnllal for h m orden CUntc ~doptcda p d l q of ado lnnoccnl o(hmIt Is csscnlfal Ulal rlslng pmspectlve patients hat of[reasonable and c o r l d c d bal- f e n s e against children would not
ance k t w m treamnt end m m - 'x rswrted f f (heir taws were rcpunlty safely be matnlalned. The fcmd lo Iht cllnic by a n attorney.
ulatc has a rtght lo expect that. slncc such Information could bc
kd Wy, and heir elrmd repre- proterttd by rhe attorney-client
;cntatlves, rlghtfdly q t s s p e ptldkgc.
Wbcn medlml pmlusknah try
canccrnr whttl they Wnk that

- -By Douglas Peddicord

t
p
c

lo hldc bdllnd lawyers to shleld . McMartlq

(Calllornl? chlld~qbusej c
.
kii3%lcd$ fhii t'ik !edib;rciure / I &
c-asc. which gave him the Wca that ~
s p r c l f l c d ~refused to exempt, it 1s womcn who Ldkc c a n uf babies In a
no1 thrlr cllnld Judgment, hul thc child-cart centers may be abus:ng fu
wltllngness tn cjpuate responsibly klds. Then. as he began rcadlng ads
W t h h rhc pollljcal ~TDC(SF. to act In In rhe newspaper from women do- t
good faJth, that must k quatlontd. Ing day care, h~ got the canfused I
n cr
~
l
l
t. Idea
o that IT
~ he could llnd someone o
bclter" than the publfc has been en who's aboslng Wds, he muld dlsrov- m
cxcuse lor to;, many (ragIc c m n . er why In God's name a woman C
n
s sa
loo an o Inlon wwld LK do samethlng like that, 6
%
;e- . : : : : @
t
and why It happened to him."
m
rng the altornepcllent dudge lo
Howewr eccumle thle expbna- o
makc dear that even the best matt- llon In rerrns of Dr. &rendztn's
b
valrd h d c r s s h d not t q to pkacr
tu
lhdr work he)md the law.
d
Publlc trust In the efficacy. of
treatment for sexual disorders IS as B thts man was conducUng somc
hard to wln, but easy 40 lose. Too benlgn tdcphanc suncy when, as
often, Lhc: rnadlcal communlly Is ICI far a- can be wnnlsed fmm rncdla
wn worst encmy. Tnkr the cast of reports. he was vcnthyl, on a n InnoPlchard Bem
ra n 1 vlctlrn he'd mvcr even mct ex- k
rrcmcly disturbed and dlsturblng ap
ZanIss(cs. seems the klnd of ex post
c
calls.
Jnrlo msonln whlch may crplaln.
As quoted In & I l r l n r a r e . l ) r . cu
but d m not fu 1' tUwnlnak.
.W la deal wRh the m m p l k e In
goes a s follows: "Thfs man had ilons. not b ecknowledgc the un- m
been sexually abused as a kid. Rc- knowns -why In the u d d dld the st
ccntly hls falhrr dkd, and he went bchavlor lake the farm It dld? undcr d
beck lo Ihe mom where he had been whal circumstances rnlght thcrc be
abused by Ulls older woman, shkh a muwenee, and can that be pre
bmught back a lo1 of mtmorfcs. He venttdl
read abau the same ltmc lbmrl the
e or

..

m
-

JUH-22-82

83:53

PM

FIRST

PRINCIPLES

Priests less lil;kly 6repeat offenses

than typical molesters, experts say
Cut~rinucdtrnm IQc 011e

Rut Siyc snid 111srescardl GIIUWS

lhnl snmc priests nrc whal hn woi~ltj
descril~c!its "ir~nfiincll pcdophil~d
Irct-ausc, he $:lid. (heir nflri~clittni n
rhihkcn in 1nrq)uraty an11Jissipa~es
as lhcv nl:lllltc and ECI
trciiltttc-nl

FACTS ADOUT CHILD MOLESTER2

Wltnl i s pcdopl~iliu?

nnrirs, lltcy gent:rnily wcrc #ken liltlc o r no r~ltpnr~lut~ily

l o discuss t l ~ e i r

Suxual aclivily wilh a p r c pobesceni'chlld (11511ally13 o,

scxutll fsnbsics or itryes
yaungor) or recurrcnl, i~.~lense,
involving pro-pubescent c h i l d w t , which l a s l w l leas1 sir
5
nior'rllIS.
Pcdopl~ilOscan b c uxclirsive (also called firalcd). nlearrtny
llW are scvunlly altracled only lo Clrildrun, or nonexclusivo (also
cnlied rcyrosued).
W h r l 1s epllcboplrIli~?
Sexlral ~ t t r a c l i o no r Lwdravior Involviny S R X I I ~ ~aclivily will1 a11
adoluwenl. Can bc oxcluuivo or noncxclusivu.
A r e pcicsla who moles1 buy5 hon~oseauals?
Not rrocoss;rrily, s a i d Richard Sipn. n lormcr prio,*l -.
nrnl
psycholo~jlslwllo 11usslurlisrl ~ l l c s l owllo are oliild niolcolwu.
Mo:4 victims 01 abuoivo priwsls hove boon boys, IIIII many
pricals r ~ i o l e ~ l boys
o d becauoc llmir r c w l a l developtnorrl was
dolsyc~d.no1 hecausc ot honroscrxllnlily. Thoy b o l ~ o v o dlike
a d o l o ~ ~ nboys,
r ~ l who w o cotrilorlsble with ollror h y s ar~cl
JlsdAin girls.

-.....-

qucslinns nl.~utrtrtsiclivisn~.
rnorc likely 1c1h : ~ nllo
!
wily nkcrad
agency's ptngtn~~!.
"Nor rvrrylxidy is Ihc ssmc riskAflcr an .vnr:t~y o f 7K ytarc, 11 1rcn.n~crsi w ~ dto knvc b c k r k n w n
N u l cvcryho'dy ,is I l l c sewc scvcril
l o r e c l ~ul f unlraalntl offcodors llud virtima. Tlicy rcpvrlcd lower scxual
u l u l k ~ ~ d c r snrd
, " I.nui5viltc
'lta8 bean rrarrclilcJ on n sax charge, drivc a ~ t a
d r h i ~ ~ cnl:q!ing
wl
i~fewogisf I k n n i s Wlipncr, wtm s a t ' Illc c o ~ r l p i ~ ~Willr
~ v dIH pcrcanl n l Il111sc cr olhl!(' dcvinrrt I~cl~;iviors.such as
mnjorily hf his rlrhl-ntolcblcr clicrrls w l ~ oh;bd cu~nplclt!tlI l ~ cI r w l r l l c ~ ~ l vv
, ~ l t r l , nor
~ cxl~il~iliunis~r~.
arc nnt pcdopWs.
Thc 2000 nludy n t 259 KFI)IIICLY V:X
7&. University u1T~,ntnlo TI
Wngncr, u'llo IIJS ltcat~!clr!vt!rd olrortdars was dat~eby sslalc CcrnCC-, chialrisls reporlcd ,n n study
pried scx nrlarrdcrs during tltc past liatrs Ucputinicnl psychologisl Jon clctics
m i r i l y C~~(lrolics lhal
IS gcnrs, snid nll tlic liricsls 11c Iras UurnCh.
- tlwy cchit~iledlcss nn!isoc.ial Irchavconnsclcd I~inv!r e q r c r ~ ~ J ~
trt! tIrt:slt
~~
Canr s inr llrntr lyplrnl scx o r f e n d w ~ ,
Stutlias nl cltild r r t o l ~ ~ lill
t t ~ c ~ Ii l c. tIcc:tir~c:Jlo Jiscus~tho spc- ndir i o u ~ ~
H. Karl 111oupl171 ~C~CCIII u ~ r sexually
c
dcs id~ l ~ i l u
rcsulls.
r
crlics of arly CRSP.
Ilnn~utt,;I senior rcscnrch nlfiear vianl. tni~inlyp ~ d q 1 0 i I ~ a .
"My cxl~r:ric:ncc i s thal nrnny pco- with !flu C;I~i;~dic~n
Dcparfmcnlnfthc
Wagner, the h u i s v i l l c 11syc1iolr1very u.cll l o l r c a l ~ r i ~ nSl ~ ~ l i u lGctlcrdl
11le r r r l ~ m d
ur
whn has sludlad m,sail1 Or*! rvilh sumc pricslo, W
'G
I
:t,,td J c v c l q ~irrsigl~lsoboul Ihcmcidiviwl, sirid ti~ulcdur:i whn liuvc f%crissue lios l o do wltlr scoliicafv
sclvcs nnrl llloir lwtiavlor and learn irnrelnwd III~IC
VJCI~IIS
Ot~dw11t) I~RYC
1r;i;ning nnd tlrc nllitudc toward s c i .
I n nlartrgu t l t d l)vl~aviorand L h ~ s c lrcvcr b c c l ~
i n lung-lcrnr rnninnlic urlity wlcclr n l u l ul111c:ic I~CII wcrc
in~pulscs so Ihcy J o ~ t ' l act uul r e ~ i ~ l i u i l b ~ l i u t h a r u ~ l ~ r i ~ l i11f
c s trniticrl. . . N;tli11;11i ~ ~ c i i ~ ~ i l [hl
liwls
ngnln," W n ~ n c csad.
Ihcy I ~ n v ew t . n rliucourngud, n11t1
Mcnrnl hrnllll pyolesslolrols also
n
l
h
c
r
than
lnlk
nl1ni11
how
I
n
clcal
said lht: nvcrnll r n k nf n ~ c ~ l o s t c n
will) i t i n ' i ~ps .chulu~icnllyIrcalthy
r c o t r w t l i t t ~1%
' lawcr i l ~ a t rthe public
way. ~ h . uqw 11s n m w s l i s a w atill
pcrccivcs. Luld ]>coplu . . 'l>nlr'l ex r e r.r our.
*.I'WI one o l t l ~ u s c
whu ngrcc lhnt
sell,
rlnn 1 Illinlc nhnnl il.'
you don't nccd nlr Itr<li~pt~iall~~:tlc
.Vnunl: lrroti ttrml I t , I:,.) into 5cnll.
turpr: r ~ n i t t ncvc~~l~udf.,uuid IJr.
narica whcn ~ h c ywcrc 13, bclurc
!:red tlerlin frrum t-r o ilre Johns
a ;:hcallhy rcnsc:
llcc 1t.d ilcvc-lq~crl
I l r q ~ k i n s~ c k t ~FnJli s o d r r Clinic in
of
*CXII;I~
sclvus, Wu 'lrcr said.
IJullimurc. A W y c a r - o l d pricsl who
TII~.~
w
~
t
olltr!v
~
r
r,,,it?h~kmtln t w
i p a lcctt*
IWJ a brier ~ ~ l ~ t l t u n ! ; hwillt
do no w h t n t l ~ r y:Ire nltlnr, nnJ scmlagar .Illycnrs 4360 lioTcS l i l l l c risk 10nmricr
arc
dnlng
n
hcllcr
jnh 01 Jisd j hc wid.
cussing how to c~pprnprialclychmni u t n c r l m nnd vt11e1:~ m ~ k n h ~ v l and
s dcrrrrr, he
neI D C X U U ~I h u ~ g l ~ L
d j i c l l m i i t is in~pessiblcl o prcdicl
said.
wiftl cerh~inlyw l ~ c l h c ar rclr offend- iloq, howcvcr, llld it Is O
II
clcnc' ll~u!
fiT ST. MLl,,ndD
sclln,li
cr wlll c t ~ ~ n ~;rl\ulllcr
ntl
ilcl o l atwsc.
Iqr chill!
.Thcolo,,, Snulhnrn
wllirlr
'Slnc cslimalct tlml 6 nhrcanl n l nvrrnll rr?ritlivism'rnf~s
Icstcrs con he appliccl': l o prlcsls.
~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ \ ~ , " r $ , " ~ ~
.Sonic. for cxan~plc. may DII i n l o
S i p ' - ~rnnsientcalcgory.
n t saminrrrians lnxr 1.111 was 3 wlllr

-&&

!.I

'

*]~i!

twrEnsoN.

WITH THE

.\IIII~

r'nr.t.o~tir~
L>r.pi~lnrcrrl,
ri~
w i d prievb
alhcr mininccrr have jinlra
l l i r o u g l ~tllc dcl)nrttltctil'n I r i : ~ ~ l ~ n c n l
prn tall1 m t t "we Iiave mrr~mmcnded %at liwy not w o t k y o u r r d Irirls.
. . . It's a high-risk siluatmn for lhcie
lncll."
Slm snit1 rcsnnrch nn sex nffsridcrs
in KrrtlucLy f c ~ i t r ~Lhitf
d
Iho grortp
Illat most closely tt~alchcxnlrwivc
ptlt:s.~s mctr who mulclirccl child r r n untlnr npc 16 wt~rr\r.crc nnl ret n f , ~ f~
I ~hvrtt'... ditl nhl tnre 5I);tiifi.
cnntly I m f c r ;~llurCuing through lrcr
and

By Marilyn Elias
LpaDAY

),~d7 ' ,#~ 3

Many Americans - hclubinl; some officials of the

U S Catholic Church - see a connection between

4 /6, zcar

homosexualtty and the current crisis of child sexuai

abuse by riests.
~ewd'txsh s and cardinals have referred to a
link, and 40%o Catholics think there is one, accmdlo a Le Moyne College/Zo by poll last month.
Scientists aren't sure what causes pedopua
' 7 e r h y 11's an understan able assurn aon, rmce
or why nlost yedophlles are men. but they have
most o the reporred victims of semay abuse by
some lntrigul
priests are boys.
An abnorma ity in the chromosomes 1s one
However, researrhets who study sexual disorders
plausible cause, says Johns Hopklns U i ~ i v e ~ i t y
say Wat homosexuality is not the same as pedophilia
psychiatrist Frederick Berlin. Patients with one
and similar conditions. in which an adult is anracted
type of abnormality have a lugh rate of p e d s
to children or teens.
philia.
Although no large-scale national research has
Brain injury also might trig r the disorder,
been done, several srnaU studies find homosexuals
says Berlin, because frormal a ults h e develarc no more likely than hetemsexuals to molest kids,
oned pedophilia.after suEerirg brain injuries in
says San Diego psychologist Robert Ceffner, editor of
car accidents.
The loma1 of Child Sexqal Abuse. a professional rePedophiles also are more liltel than aver
search journal.
to have sutkred childhood sexua?abu5eeusua y
Still,some groups ut out statistics to the contrary.
by a man. bused 1' 1s may become sexually
One is the ~adonaPAssociationfor Research and
promi$cuous, but' !tI ey don't turn to children,
Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH),a group that
says Berlin.
promotes therapy to.change the sexual orientation
Molested b y $ . hwever, are more like1 to
of homosexuals.
'fixate" at an unmature sexual level, iike a gmNARTH staces art ifs Web site that gay men are
loln CD player thar keeps playing the first few
three times more likely than heterosexuals IDhave
nohs over and over agaul.
sex with minors: it also saysabout 35%of pedophiles
Boys may notice sexual arousal more easily
are m. It attributes these
s to stumes pubthan $irk because rheir penises become erect,
lished in 1984 and 1992 by I urt Freund, a Toronto
"and that may mcu~lizethe childhood exocriresearcher who died a few years aga
ence for them in a way it doesn't for ids "'says
USA TODAY asked experts on pedophilia and sex
Kinsey Institute direcar J O ~ ~a n c ddui
. sex
behavior research to evaluate these studies.
, with an adult makes the~nfeel out of control.
The verdict They don't support a claim that gay
"and there's a attern of reasserting control by
inen are more likely than heterosexuals to abuse nuturning to c ' dnn when they're grown up,"
non. III fact, Rcund ex licitly points this out, says
Bancroft speculates,
phyucian John ~ancmff:direccor of the Krnsey InMen overall are vulnerable to many Inolr
stitute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reprnducsexual fetishes and disorden than women. with
pedophilia just one more biology-based 'way
tion,
freund's sample of sex offenders finds that male
of oing awry,"he sws.
pedophiles are more tikely m molest boys than gir)s.
fhere's been h a d y any research into h e
causes, prevenuon or treatment of pedophiua,
A 'separatesexual orientation'
Berlin says, "We're at the point we were at with
alcoholism a few decades agq the 'bum in the
But NARTH3 claim that 35%of pedophiles are gay
gutter,' re-Betty Ford Cliluc stage where we
stems fiom "a flawed assumption" that men who
see it on\ as a moral jrrue.
prey on yaung boys also are attracted to grown men
"It is a moral issue," he says. " but it's also a
public health problem, and we need to do a lot
says Johns Hopkins University p chiattist Frederick
more research if we're going to stop it."
Berlin, an expert on sexual dsor ers.
Psychologrst joseph Nicolosi. president of NARTH,
By Marilyn Eiias
decl~nedto $Deal<to USA TODAY But when asked
about evidenie of a gay-pedophilia link, publications
director Linda Nicolos~res onded in an e-mail rhac
the link is "hard to track t fown." Many edo hiles, they have no attraction to adults whatsoever."
she raid, "are married men hornowxua& srcfucinn
Bancroft arees. ThwBreme11 intererred in chil
boys. So are they bisexual? ~omose%ual?"
dron. They'rgmore intefested in bws than girls, but
No scientificilly conclusive research exists that they're interested in kids, not adult?
would answer questions about pedophiles sexual Some claim t h a ~most priest abuse cases involve
orientation,says Berlin
adolescent boys, and argue that such intimacy wth
But cli.cal experience with pdophiles r y p teens does suggest a
sexual orientation.
.'it's kind of a rcpar~sexua1orientation,"says avid
Berlin says pfiests%o have one or bm encounFinkelhor,author of bur books on child sexual abuse wxs with alder teens could be gay. 'That's more of a
and director of the Crimes T m s t Childre? Research casedmen g i v e in to terqtation, like a heerosexCenter at the hversity of ew Hampshre. "Often ual man gettrig lnvolved with a 16-year-old girl who

?'

Biology, injury play role

=Y

$"

yw3'

'"
1 1

wkp

wD&

IS homosexuality
to blame for the
child sexual abuse rrids

I-kmphzr'lzesthat enemmd celibacy makes the

priesthood a very dfmmnt sociid mllku from the

Pederasty us Pedophilia
Commentary by Judith Reisman
The attached USA Today article (July 17,
2002) relies upon the usual cast of characters in the
pro-Kinsey, pro-amorality debate. "Pederasty" is
the historical, Greek term for homosexual males
who desire sex with boys. This clear semantic
definition is currently politically incorrect.
Drs. Berlin, Bancroft, Geffner, Finkelhor
(cited herein) and all others in the field of "human
sexuality" are painfully aware that the Catholic
church is dealing with pederast abuse. At a 79%
boy abuse population, homosexual assault is the
standard for this crime. Moreover, on the
evidence, as boys more than girls are loath to
report homosexual assault, the disparity between
girl and boy abuse rates would be much greater
than the 79% cited.
As these same '%experts" cited herein have
written -based on false data--that homosexuality is
normal and non predatory, the Catholic pederast
scandal jeopardizes their authority as "sexperts"
and exposes these practitioners to civil and
criminal liabilities for medical malpractice and
consumer fraud. This reparatory measure for
grievances by society should, in this author's view,
be swiftly pursued.

11
13

14

15

Attachment 14:
A
Reisman Vitae
Citing to:
The Lancet,
The American Spectator,
The National Review
And
Dr. Laura's Letter to PBSTV
Re: "Kinsey's Paedophiles"

Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D.

Speaking to concerned parents, professionals and
citizens. Counseling parliaments, legislatures
and courts worldwide.

Author
Researcher
Lecturer
Educator

.-

"Dr. Reisman has produced a scholarly and

devastating studv reveaiing the ugly andfrighteningly
dangerous pseudo-scientific assault on our children's
innocence."
"Dr. Laura" Schlessinger

"Dr. Reisman's studv supports the conclusion that

Alfred finsey 's research was contrived. ideologically
driven and misleading. Any judge, legislator or other
public oflcial who gives credence to that research is
guilty of malpractice and dereliction of duty. "
Charles E. Rice, Professor, Notre Dame Law School

Dr. Judith Reisman is sought worldwide to speak, lecture, testify, and counsei individuals, organizations,
professionals and governments regarding a) fraudulent sex science, sex education and b) the power and effect of
images and the monopoly media to alter human brain, mind, memory and conduct. The special emphasis of her
work has been and continues to be the negative influence of these change agents upon children and society.

Dr. Reisman is president of The Institute for Media Education, author of the U S . Department of Justice,
Juvenile Justice study, Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler (1989),
Kinsey, Sex and Fraud (Reisman, et al., 1990) and Sop Porn Plays Hardball (1 991), Partner Solicitation
Language as a ReJlection of Male Sexual Orientation (wlJohnson, 1995), and Kinsey, Crimes &
Consequences (1998,2000) and is a news commentator for W0rldNetDaily.com.
She has been a consultant to three U.S. Department of Justice administrations, The U.S. Department of
Education, as well as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dr. Reisman is listed in
numerous Who's Who biographies such as: Who 's Who in Science & Engineering, International Who's
Who in Sexology, International Who's Who in Education, Who 3 Who ofAmerican Women and The World S
Who S Who of Women. Her scholarly findings have had international legislative and scientific import in the
United States, Israel, South Africa, Canada and Australia, while The German Medical Tribune and the
British medical journal, The Lancet demanded that the Kinsey Institute be investigated, saying:
The Kinsey reports (one in 1948 on males and the companion five years later) claimed that
sexual activity began much earlier in life.... and displayed less horror of age differences and
same-sex relationships than anyone at the time imagined. It was as if, to follow Mr. Porter
again, "Anything goes". In Kinsey, Sex and Fraud, Dr. Judith A. Reisman and her
colleagues demolish the foundations of the two reports ... Kinsey et a1 ... questioned an
unrepresentative proportion of prison inmates and sex offenders in a survey of "normal" sexual
behavior. Presumably some at least of those offenders were also the sources of information on
stimulation to orgasm in young children that can only have come from pedophiles--or so it must
be hoped. Kinsey.... has left his former co-workers some explaining to do. The Lancet, (Vol.
337: March 2, 1991, p. 547).

To schedule Dr. Reisman for speaking, consulting and to order books call 1-800-476 0975
Email: jareisman@surewest.net Website: drjudithreisman.org

Dr. Judith Reisman, The Institute for Media Education

A Presence and an Influence in Worldwide Courts and Legislatures
INTERNATIONALLY
SOUTH AFRICA, 1995: The Office of the Attorney General thanks Dr. Reisman for "your knowledge and your expertise.... your assistance in
saving this nation from a potential disaster.... we have achieved a major victory on the pornography front.... which would not have been possible
without the aid of your expert knowledge, books, videos and articles." Dr. Reisman's testimony on the ways graphic, antisocial imagery reconfigures
brain, mind and memory helped pass The Film and Publications Bill of 1995, by an overwhelming majority of 300 votes, prohibiting child
pornography in any form (written. visual. cartoon, "artistic" or pseudo), and prohibiting current types of "adult" pomography.
AUSTRALIA, Parliament 1994 and 1992: Following her April 6, 1992 invited testimony and report on pomography and the harm factor to the
Senate Select Committee on Community Standards, Parliament banned "X" Rated materials from pay cable TV, while her March 1994 research
paper aided Parliament's decision, based on harm, to similarly ban " R Rated materials from pay cable TV.
CANADA, Supreme Court 1992: Dr. Reisman provided briefing materials on pornography and harm, aiding the Canadian Supreme Court's
unanimous decision February 27, 1992 to ban all pornography as "obscene" as it undermines equality by degrading, subjugating and dehumanizing
women. Subsequently. in 1993, Dr. Reisman was tasked by the Ontario Human Rights Commission to produce a research paper, "Pornography in
Neighborhood Convenience Stores: Neurochemical Effects on Women." for a pornography case challenging the new law--results pending.
NEW ZEALAND, Tribunal 1991 and 1989: Dr. Reisman's research was delivered by-proxy via Dr. John Court to the New Zealand Pornography
Commission investigations in 1989. She was again asked for, and delivered, written testimony to the New Zealand Indecency Tribunal in 1991.
ISRAEL, Knesset 1982: Dr. Reisman founded a media monitoring, non-profit foundation in Israel, funded by private and public sources that have
presented findings on Israeli media to the Knesset and throughout Israel. At minimum, major corrections and improvements were made in
controlling advertisements. largely due to Dr. Reisman's data collection, cadre training, and public dissemination of information.
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
MASSACHUSETTS. 1989: Oakes v. Massachusetts. Massachusetts Attorney General. James Shannon cited Dr. Reisman's DoJ, Juvenile Justice
and Delinquency Prevention study in this successful brief and in oral appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Shannon wrote (1/8/90):
I contacted Dr. Reisman in connection with an important child pomography case, Massachusetts v. Oakes...that I argued in the United
States Supreme Court in January 1989... 1 had to convince the court that both nude and sexually explicit photographs of children were
exploitive and harmful. To make the point, I quoted Dr. Reisman's study, "Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy,
Penthouse. and Hustler Magazines," in which she showed that sexually exploitive photographs of children condone and promote a
distorted view of sexuality, often by pairing...sexuality and violence, or depicting children as desiring sexual activity with adults.

OHIO, 1989: Osborne v. Ohio. Amici cited "Neurochemical Evidence Shows That People React Differently To Pictures Than They Do To Words
Raising New First Amendment Considerations" and thanks "Dr. Judith Reisman for her valuable development of this concept" (:23) and, "J.
Reisman's New York Review of Law and Social Change," (1979) where she addressed media, science and civil rights.
On behalf of the Amici in Osborne v. Ohio.... thanks for your invaluable assistance rendered to us in researching and writing this brief. Your
ideas on how the visual images effect people substantially more than the written word is indeed a new concept and could have many significant
ramifications in the area of the First Amendment. If in fact the court and legislatures do believe that visual images. specifically of sexual,
sexually violent and violent material, will have a greater impact on people in general and children in particular, there may be justification for
more strict legislation in these areas than would apply to the written materiai. Moreover, under a First Amendment analysis, since the harm is
greater, there would be more of a compelling state interest to have stricter laws. (H. Robert Showers, 10/12/89).
USA LOWER COURTS
Crmvford v. Lungren, 1996: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the right of California's news rack laws to protect minors in
support of Amici arguments by the National Law Center for Children and Families. Amici cited to Reisman's Canadian paper, "Pornography in
Neighborhood Convenience Stores: Neurochemical Effects on Women," that "Images reach the brain more quickly than print" (: 15).

Stegan v. Perry, 11994 and 1991: The U.S. States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The lower court in 1991, under Judge
Oliver Gash, cited Reisman's book in rejecting Steffan's appeal. Upon challenge in 1994, Colonel Ronald Ray Esq., Ret., and Reisman filed an
Amicus brief on behalf of the Naval Aviation Foundation in support of the Department of Defense ruling, that homosexuality and sexual conduct
cannot be separated. General P.X. Kelley, former member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Commandant of The Marine Corps, wrote of Reisman's
"groundbreaking work in Kinsey, Sex & Fraud, (October 5 , 1994) in recommending she and Colonel Ray enter the Steffan case.
"

United States v. Knox, 1994: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third District, ruled in support of arguments presented in the Institute for Media
Education Amicus and Arnold & Porter written with Colonel Ron Ray and Randall Shaheen, citing Reisman's research on images and for OJJDP, to
protect children from use in child pornography.

Brief Vitae of Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D.

AUTHOR: BOOK PUBLICATIONS
Inzages of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler, US Dep. lustice Grant No. 83-JN-AX-K007. 1986, 1989, 1990.
Kinsey, Sex- and Fraud. Judith Reisman et al., Lafayette LA: Huntington House, 1990.
Soft Porn Plays Hardball, Lafayette: LA. Huntington House, 199 1.
Kinsej: Crimes & Consequences. The Institute for Media Education. Crestwood. KY.. 1998,2000.
EDUCATION
Ph.D. 1980 in Communications. Case Western Reserve University
M.A. 1976 in Communications. Case Western Reserve University
SELECTED INCLUSION/CITATIONS IN SCHOLARLY BOOKS
Mack, D., (1997) -The Assault on Parenthood Simon and Schuster, (citation)
Brennen, W. (1995) Dehumanizing the Vulnerable. Loyola University Press (citation)
Zillmann, D. (1994) Media, Children and The Family. NJ: Erlbaum (article)
Ruggiero. V.R. (1994) Warning, Nonsense is Destro-ving America, Nashville: Nelson (citation)
Hattermer. B. (1 993) Don 't Touch That Dial. Lafayette, LA: Huntington House (article)
Trento, S. (1992) The Power House. NYC: The New Press (citation)
Kincaid, C. (1992) The Playboy Foundation. Washington DC: Capital Research Center (citation)
Bolton, R. (1 992) Cultural Wars. NYC: The New Press (article)
Osaka, F. (1989) Source Book of Pornography. M A : Lexington (citation)
Zimbardo. P. (1 988) Psychology and Life. MA: Scott, Foreman (citation)
Mawyer, M. (1987) Silent Shame. Westchester, IL: Crossways (citation)
Burgess, A. (1986) Sexual Exploitation of Patients. NYC: Garland (article)
McCuen, E. (1985) Pornography and Sexual Violence. WI; Gem (article)
Lederer, Laura (1 981) Take Back the Night. NYC: Bantam (articlelinterview)
Skirball Museum (1 974) A Walk Through the Past. CA: Hebrew Union College (epic poem)
GUEST LECTURER
Princeton University
Georgetown University
American University
University of Jerusalem
University of Haifa
Rutherford Institute
Texas Woman's University
Clarkson College
Notre Dame University
University of Kentucky

Pepperdine University
Council for National Policy
Human Life International
Johns Hopkins University Medical School
Tel Aviv University
Accuracy in Academic
Accuracy in Media
Concerned Women for America
Rutherford Institute
The Abstinence Clearinghouse

American Society of Criminology

North Carolina Psychiatric Association
Israeli Army Air Force Academy, Israel
International Assoc. of Police Women
Criminal Division/Executive US Attorney Office
NOVA. NCASA. CCAVE, NCTV, NET ...
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Vice and Police Organizations
Child Protection Organizations
United States Air Force Academy, Colorado, etc.

ACADEMIC POSITIONS
Adjunct faculty, George mason University, 1990
Research Full Professor, The American University, 1983-85
Asst./Assoc. Prof., (Martze) University of Haifa, Israel, 1981-83
EXPERT WITNESS: COURT, MILITARY, CIVIC HEARINGS
Invited Paper: HR 3300: The Military Honor & Decency Act (Pornography Law) May 1996
lnvited Paper: South Africa Film and Publications Bill of 1995 (Pornography Law) 1995
Briefed: Selected Lansing Michigan Legislators (Pomography Law) May 1994
Briefed: Kirkland & Ellis (Re: Oral Argument, United States v. Knox) April 1994
Briefed: Australian Parliament Standing Committee on Social Issues (Media Effects) 1992, 1994
Invited Paper: Ontario Human rights Commission (Pornography Effects) 1993
Invited Paper: Senate Committee on Armed Services (Homosexuality)July 1993
Briefed: Army Chief of Staff Gordon Sullivan, Senator Malcolm Wallop (Homosexuality in the Military) December 1993
Invited Paper, Testimony: Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces 1992
Briefed: Inspector General Roland Griffith (Homosexuality)December 1993
Expert Research Younger et al.. v. Stroh (Federal Court Sex Harassment) 1992
Testified: Australian Parliament, Senate Select Committee (X & R Rated Effects) April 1992
Invited Paper: Office of US Surgeon General (Mass Media Harms) March 1992
Testified: State of Georgia Senate Ed Committee (Kinsey-Sex Ed Curriculum) February 1992
Testified: Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office: OH (MapplethorpeTrial) August & October 1990
Testified: City Council; Newport News, VA (Nude Dancing & Public Order) June 1986
Invited Paper: US Attorney General Commission on Pornography: NYC (Effects) January 1986
Testified: US Attorney General Commission on Pornography; Miami (Effects) November 1985
Invited Paper: US Attorney general Task Force, Domestic Violence: DC (Effects) August 1985
Testified: Michigan State Senate Juvenile Justice, Corrections: MI (Effects) October 1980

SELECTED GRANTStPOSITIONS
Bureau of Justice Assistance. US Department of Justice: Grant Reviewer 1991
HHS: Administrator for Children, Youth. and Families: Grant Reviewer 1991
Eastern Division Vice Investigators Association: Inservice Trainer 1987-89
HHS Dept. of Substance Abuse Prevention: Research Paper 1989
Skaggs Foundation: Visual Literacy Training Grant 1987-89
Department of Education: "Drug Free Schools" Grant Reviewer 1987
Department of Education: "Drug Free Videos" Grant Reviewer 1985
Georgetown Pediatrics Department: lnservice Training Seminars Grand Rounds 1984
FBI Academy: EroticaPomography Effects: Inservice Training SeminarNideo 1983
OJJDP Missing Children - Serial Murder Task Force: Inservice Trainer 1983-85
DoJ Office of Juvenile Justice: Principal Investigator. Pornography, Media Research 1983-94
Israel Science Ministry Department of Sex Education: Kinsey and Inservice trainer, Media 1980-83
Scholastics Magazine, NYC: Art & Education Writer, Producer 1970-80
Milwaukee Public Museum: Art/Anthropology Television Writer. Producer 1970s
Cleveland Museum of Art: Art/Head Start, Education Videosfcaptain Kangaroo 1970s
Los Angeles Skirball Museum: HistoryIArcheology Educational Videos 1966-81
Captain Kangaroo CBSTV: Segment Producer, Performance Artist 1976-1982
PASTPRESENT ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER
Founder, Institute of Media Education and the Family, Israel
Bereaved Parents Association (Juvenileautoerotic deaths), AZ
Paul & Lisa, Inc. (Child prostitute rescue organization), CT
Accuracy in Academia, Washington. D.C.
PASTIPRESENT SELECTED MEMBERSHIPS
Women ~nNeuroscience
The American Statistical Association
National Association of Scholars
National Council on Family Relations
American Public Health Association
The New York Academy of Sciences
The International Communication Associations
The National Black Child Development Institute
Research Council on Ethnopsychology
The Society for the Scientific Study of Sex
American Society of Composers, Authors and Pub1ishers
The World Association of Infant Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines
American Association for the Advancement of Science
National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality (Fellow)
MEDIAPRESS CITATIONS AND APPEARANCES

SELECTED JOURNAL ARTICLES

The Journal of Human Sexuali~y,(Lewis & Stanley) 1996
Law & Justice: The Christian Law Revrew, ( U K ) 1995
Collected Papers from the National Association for Research
and Therapy of Homosexuality Conference, (NARTH) July
1995
Ethnology and Sociobrology (USA) 1984
New Universities Quarterly: Culture, Education, and Society

(UK) 1981
Journal of Educatronal Thought and Practice In Collectrve
Settlements (Israel) 1983
New York Universiv Review of Law and Socral Change (USA)

1978-79
Women Speaking (UK) July-September 1978

"A Walk Through the Past," Los Angeles Skirball Museum,

(Hebrew Union College) 1974

German Arts Television

Lamy King Live
The Lancet (British Medical Journan
Donahue
Internatronal German Medical tribune
Dutch Television
Faith Daniels (NBC)
The Today Show
Science
Entertainment Tonight
People are Talking
The Screnfist
Sally Jesse Raphael
Geraldo
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Jeny Springer
Crier & Crier
The (Brirish Physicians) Quarterly
Jenny Jones
Crossfire, CNN
TLME
h'ewsweek
The Harvard Peninsula
700 Club, CBN NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS,
BBC,
New Dimensions
The Washington Trmes
The New York T~mes
The Los Angeles Times
The Washington Post
Reader's Digest, April 1997 and The National Review, May 19,1997 'Cover Story" WORLDNETDAILY.com, Correspondant

Ted Beahr Movieguide

The Amer~canSpectator
The Weekly Standard
Frdelrty
The Austrolian
The London Times

SELECTED MEDIA CO-AWARDS

Learning Magazine, Best Filmstrip of Year, w/Scholastics 1981-82
US Industrial Film Festival Gold Camera w/ Scholastics 1982
Dukane Award Outstanding Creative Sound Films wl Scholastics 1982
US Industrial Film Festival Silver Camera w/ Scholastics 1982
ACT Award Children Music wICBSTV Captain Kangaroo 1976-79
1" Place Local PSAfTV series wl Jewish Family Service Assoc. 1974
SELECTED PASTIPRESENT HONORS "Save Our Children Scientist Of The Year For 1993, " The Save Our Children National Allionce
International Who's Who in Education
Who's Who in Science and Engineering
International Who's Who in Sexology
The World Who's Who of Women
Two Thousand Notable Americans
International Book of Honor
Who's Who of American Women
Dr. Reisman receives no "institutional" funding and needs help from the American people. To become a supporter of Dr. Reisman send your tax deductible
donation to (ME,PO Box 7404, Arlington, Virginia 22207

VOL 337: MARCH 2,199 1

THE LANCET

Really, Dr Kinsey?
"Amording to the Kinsey Repon
Every average man you know
Likes his lovey-dovey to court
When the temperature is low.
But when the thermometer goes way up. .."

A lot more than the lyrics of Cole Porter will reed rewiring
unless serious charges against the late m e d C. Kinscly and tlm of

his colleagues are rebutted. The Kinsey reporrs (one in 15148 on

males and the companion f i v e years later) claimed that sexual
activity began much earlier in life, was more vaned and more
frequent, and displayed less honor of age differences and wne-sex
relationships than anyone at that time imagined. 11 was as if, to
follow Mr Porter again, "Anything goes". In Kinsey, .Sex and Fraud
Dr Judith A. Reisman and her colleaguesdemolish the foundations
of the two reports.' At the one-third mark the book alxritches target
to the "liberal" codes of sexual rnolality and sex education that have
been built, it is alleged, on the Kinsey findings. The i r n p o m f
allegations from the saentific viewpoint are im&t&ons
in the
sample and unethical, possibly criminal,observation;.on children.
Any questionnaire survey in a normally private area is :iubjecrr:o bias
from differences in those who respond and those who refuse, and
there is no ready means of checking the information. 1h e book goes
beyond that, however, for Kinsey et a1 qc.estioned an
unrepresentadve propomon of prison inmates and sex offend en in
a survey of "normal" sexual behaviour. Presumably some at l c s t of
those offenders were also the sources of information on stimuiation
to orgasn in young children that can only have come from
paedophiles--or so it must be hoped. Kinsey, im otherwise
harmless student of the gall wasp, has left his former -workers
some explaining to do.

1. Kinxy, sex and h u d : the indomimnion of a pcople. By Judith A. Raiman and

Edward W. Eichel. Edited by Jahn H. Court and J. Gordan M uir. PQB 53788,
Lzfayene, Louisiana: Hundngaon H o w Publishas. 1990. Pp 237. ISBN
0-910311 # I X

PlayboylSexology Political Lobbyist Connection

Playboy
[industry representative, patron]

I
The American Library Association; Freedom to Read
allied with Media Coalition
e.g., ALA v. Reno (1994) advocates against the Child Protection Act
"Friend of the Court" Ferber (1982); legalize child pornography, "...deviat,e sexual
intercourse ...bestiality, sadomasochistic abuse") rejected by U.S. Suprlzrne Ct.
I

THE MEDIA COALITION, Inc.

Public Members:

The Council for Periodical Distributors

'

"400 magazine & book wholesale distributors" Penthouse to &L

&

The International Periodical Distributors Association

"distribute the ovmuhelming majority of magazines and paperbacLs"

The Association of American Publishers

"represents...publishers who produce most of the b o o k sold..toda:r"

The American Booksellers Association

"own or operate more than 4,000 bookstorrs, a majority" in the

US-l"

National Association of College Stores, Inc.

"$60 million budget, most college stores natiom'de, research, sales"

American Civil Liberties Union

Friend of the court, Feber. child pornography, eic
2

Political Lobbyists $1 million (19856) Sway National Law 8 Public Policy

e.g.: see Trento: THE POWER HOUSE: "Robert Keith Gray and the Selling of
Access and Influence in Washington" (1992).

I- . (

Happy Day, Inc. (1980): PomeroylSSSS, falsely testifies re: obsceniq; ~ n o x

'

Unless otherwise stated, dl of the above statements are taken irom the trstlmonv of Michael .I. Bnmbeqer.
General Counsel. The Medin Coalition. Inc.. Subcommittee on Crime. Judiciary Committee US 1Iousr. April 23.
1988, opposing 1988 child protection

by Tom B e t h e l l

Sex, Lies, and knsey

Exposing the father of child abuse.
....

y survey (sample size: three)

shows that the younger generation has not heard of the Kinsev
report. For college students everywhere,
then, I offer an update - Kinsey has been
in the neivs. .-Vfred Kinsey (1894-1956)was
born in Hoboken, New Jersey, a n d
became a zoologist, contrary to his father's
wishes. For a number of years h e studied
nothing b u t gall wasps. H e joined the
zoologv department of Indiana University in 1920 and, tired of wasps, started to
research the sexual behavior of a different animal- humans. It never crossed his
mind that humans were other than animals. W h e n h e added a
to
his Institute for Sex Research in Bloomington, and the university wanted to knonwhy, Kinsey said he wanted to film animal
sex. H e did not tell them humans would
be included, and no doubt didn't think
the omission dishonest. Kinse).'~sex
research was funded by the Rockefeller
Foundation, which paid S+,ooo a year
(real money in those days) until 1954. Kinsey was a ~vorkaholic,went to the office
seven days a week, and died of heart failure aged 62. H e had three children.
Earl>,on, Kinsey's institi~tcbegan collecting pornography. His assistant Wardell
Porneroy called it "the largest collection of
erotica in the world, larger than the British
Pvluseurn's and presumed to b e more
extensive than the legendav Vatican collection." Kinsey often referred to the Vatican collection in his public lectures. In
Degenerate Modems: hfodemity as Rationalized Sexual hfisbehavior ( r g q j ) , E .

TOMBBETIIELLis T h e ,4merican Spectator's Washington correspondent.

Michael Jones brilliantly dissected this

smear, sho~vingthe Vatican rumor to be
without any foundation. A researcher told
Jones that the Institute's collection, unlike
others, was not "for prurient interest." Jones
commented: "If the Vatican were to collect
pornography. their lilterest would be clearly prurient. Wlien sex researchers do tf,e
same thing the! accuse others of, they do
so only from the highest scientific motive.
T h e double standard bespeaks antiCatholic b i g o more
~
than anything else."
ffinsey's first \.olume, Sexual Behavior in
the Human hlale, was published in 1948.
T h e Female volume followed in 19jj. By
Kinsey's report, sexual behavior was more
iwied than belie\.ed. Eightyfive percent of
males had intercourse before marriage.
Ten percent were "more or less exclusively homosexual," i j percent "predominantl!" so; j j percent had had at least one
homosexual experience to orgasm. These
claims were grossl!. exaggerated. Only 2.4
p e r c e ~ofthose
t
sun-eyed in exit polls in thc
1992 presidential election, with a sample
three times larger than knsev's, claimed to
be homosexual or bisexual. "Volunteer
error" and a sample including 25 percent or
more prisoii inmates (many of them sesoffenders) badly ske~vedKinsey's figures.
T h e male volume was based on 5,300subjects. "Several hundred" male prostitutes
and 14oo sex offenders were interviewed,
but Kinsey's constant evasions about the
precise composition of his sample-one
of the most suspicious aspects of his
research - have made it diffiSu1t for statisticians to nail dolvn the error precisely.
T h e volunteer problem was pointed out
by the prominent psychologist Abraham
hiaslow even before Kinsey's report was

published. In 1942,he warned 111 print that

volunteers always include man!. "high dominance people and therefore will show a
falsely high percentage of non-virginit).,
masturbation, prorniscuib, homosexuality, etc.. in the population." 1 M o w then
demonstrated that it had arisen ~viththe
Brooklyn College students whom Kinse).
himself had inteniewed for his survey. 'The
"error was proven, and the whole basis for
Kinsey's statistics was proven to be shaiil-,"
Maslow wrote in a letter to a colleague a few
weeks before his death in 1970.But Kinsey
"refused to publish it and refused even to
mention it in his books, or to mention an):
thing else that I had written. .Ill my work
was excluded from his bibliography."

ow did Kinsev et al. know their

subjects were tellins the truth?
Dr. P o m e r o.~explains
- .
it for us:
T h e Kinsey system of "asking questions
rapidly" m a d e exaggeration "almost
impossible." (People ivouldn't remember
what lie they had told half an hour later.
Sure they wouldn't.) I n s e y assumed that
subjects covered up more than they exaggerated and "inclined to an ethic of abundance," Paul Robinson wrote in The Modernization o f s e x . Kinsey assumed that
everyone had engaged in every type of
activity. " C ~ n s e q u e n t l ~he
, " wrote, "we
always begin by asking when they first
engaged in such activity"-not if
Kmsey undermined the norm by imputing omnifarious activity to normal people.
"Continuous variation," he bvrote, "is the
rule among m e n as well as among
insects.. . . O u r conceptions of right and
wrong, normal and abnormal, are seriously challenged by [these] studies." He subverted moral standards by demonstrating
"scientifically" that they weren't observed in
practice. He legitimized deviance by exaggerating its frequency. Awriter in the Amer-

May

I9 9 6

. T h e American Spectator

ican fournal of Psychiutn cornrncntecl 011 been "irltellect~ialparal!,~is"at thc time,

his "persistent harnrneringat Judeo-Chris- she sa>.snow "No one had the nind-space
tian legal and moral coties." Porncro! lvrotc to recognize \{.hat the? were looking at."
In 1981. she presented a paper 011 Klnin 19-2 that I(lnse!. "knew a great deal about
tile Judeo-Christian tradition, and he was sey's child data at the Fifth World Conindignant about \\.hat it had donc to our gress of S c s o l o p ~in Jerusalem and called
cult~ire.H e often cited the inaccuracies for an investigat~onof the G n s q Institute's
and paranoia in which he asserted it ~vork.She contacted the Hastings Institute
abounded." He was "quite blunt" about "its (ethics),which told her she was being h>.seffect on the sesual lives of people in our terical. "This could ha\,e been compiled by
own time." God did not exist, he \vas con- JoseihIengele, and it %,asdone at the same
fident, and "when j.ou're dead you're dead." time, and I'm beiiis told to go a\va)-,"she
s . Kiiisel- research for the Male
M e n the Kinse). report came ont, reli- ~ 3 ~(AsIo~t
gious people didn't know ]lo\\ to respond. volume \\,as done in 1943-194j.) As -lscl can
prestige at the
They accused Kinsey (to his delight! of see no\%.,science had
time
and
Kinsey
exploited
it. , b y perverad~ocatingwhat he was merely describing.
sion
could
be
concealed
beneath
the sci"This is a report on n,hat people do, which
raises n o question of what they should entist's sn~ockand the posture of detached
do." he told Time. I'm not the moral~st observation. In exploiting that prestige,
(he posed), you are. I'm observing, count- k n s e y helped to undermine it. His "work"
ing, measuring. Keep !.our morals off my on baby-sex and child-sex has never been
statistics. No one at the time k n e ~ vhow replicated; Freud came u p with the theoand
j Kinsey reified it.
misleading the statistics were. And worse ' ~
than misleading; fraudulent-perhaps
eisman's book, Kinsey, Sex and
criminal. No one studied his Chapter j for
Fraud Iu.ith Edward U-.Eichel),
about thirty years.
It dealt with "earlv sesual growth and
appeared in 1990 and questions
activity," and included tables about chil- about the source of the child-sex data
dren no more than four years old whose became more urgent. The Lancet noted
"multiple orgasms" had been "timed with that "the important allegations from the
second hand or stop ivatch." "Actual obser- scientific vie\vpoint are imperfections in
vations" of "climas" were rriade o n 206 the sample and unethical, possibl!. crimmales age between five months and 14 inal, obsenations on children." T h e Fam!ears, according to the Kinsey report. T h e ily Research Council in V~ashingtonhas
~.:imberof bo).s observed under experi- taken up the cause and
an excelnlental sexual stimulation was at least 31.;
lent half-hour video called "The Children
How did Kinsey & Co. obtain this data? ofrTable 34."C B S Evening News did a
W h o were the "technically trained" ston, an article appeared in the Washingobservers? W h o held the stop watches? ton Post. T h e BBC has produced a oneDid parents @\re their consent to these hour documentan, not yet s h o n n Pressed
criminal activities'
by Rep. Ste1.e Stockman (R-?'ex.), ConIn the "moralistic" 1 9 4 0 ' ~a m
~ a z i i ~ g l ~ . ,gress has taken an interest. The Oversight
no one asked these questions. Zor did thev subcommittet., chaired by Rep. Peter
in the 1950's or 1960's. T h e first person to I-Inekst~a(R-Llich.),has jurisdiction. Let's
do so was a graduate student at Case iikst- open rip the Institute, not close it dou-n.
ern Reserve named Judith Reisman. \vho
Kinsq's leading co-workers, Pomeroy,
was writing her Ph.D. thesis on pornog- Clyde hIartin, and Paul Gebhard are still
raphl,. At a conference in 1972, she asked ali!ve, and it would be interesting to hear
xvhy child dbuse was soaring. .'\ Canadian what they n i g h t tell Congress. Their stopsychologist quietly suggested she might ries have been in conflict. From the report
want to look up Kinsey. Reisman diditself \ve learn: "Nine of our adult male
and couldn't believe n.hat she saw. She subjects have observed such orgasm.
did nothing for a uhilc; checked to see S o m e of these adults are technically
what others had ~vritten.Nothing. Yet the trained persons who have kept diaries or
hnerican Statistical "issociation had gone other records \vhich have been put at our
through Kinsey word for word. There had disposal." Kinsey's New York T i m a obit

The American Spectator . M a y r 9 9 6

said: "The interviewers even esamined

the sex life of babies as young as two years,
asking the questions of their mothers."
( T h e mothers used stop watches?)
Porneroy has described a "self-effacing"
man, aged 63, whom he and Kinsey interviewed for 1j hours. This criminal, who
"held a responsible government job,"
claimed to have had sex with 800 children. Pomeroy and K m e y drove for hours
to get his "extraordinary history, and felt
that it had been worth every mile." His
infarmation "was the basis for a fair part of
chapter five."
Gebhard, the second director of the
Institute, told Reisman in 1981: "Some of
these [sources] were parents, mostly college educated, who observed their children and kept notes for us. A few were
nursery school owners or teachers. Others
were homosexual males interested in
older, but still prepubertal children." T h e
Institute had been provided with .film
("cinema"), h e wrote. In December iqq j,
the new director, J o h n Bancroft, said that
the information detailing "multiple
orgasm in pre-adolescent males" came
from a singIe sex criminal. "Kinsey may
have felt that indicating a single source
ma!. have brought undue attention to bear
on that individual," h e wrote.
What do we knom, about Kinsey personally? In 1980, Samuel Steward w o t e an
interesting memoir for the Advocate, the
homosexual magazine. He met Kinsey in
Chicago in 1980, later became his "unofficial collaborator." Steward was a record
keeper and noted that Kinsey had spent
700 hours interviewing him; this despite
Kinsey's frequent complaint that time was
short. more subjects should b e interviewed, a sex history could be taken in
bi.o hours. Steward continued:
41any persons I knew would ask: Is h e
queer? I told [Kinsey] this. "And what do
you answer?" he asked. "Well," I said slowly. "I always say, 'Yes h e is'-but not in the
same way we are. H e is a voyeur and an
auditeur. He likes to look and listen."' Kinscy laughed, but a moment later I caught
him observing me thoughtfully. I may have
hit closer to the truth than I realized.

A voyeur.. . Perfect. Remember, that's

not a moral judgment, Alfred. Just a clinical observation. :W
19

Mortal Sins
The sexuul revolzltion wus bused on d lie.
Judith Reismdn hds spent thirty yeuu
uncovering the truth.

U D I T H Reisman was a "red diaper" baby, born in

1935. Her parents were members of the Communist
Party and for a while she too belonged to a subversive
organization-the Labor Youth League. much later, when
she received a Justice Department grant to examine the role
of pornography in sexual abuse, law-enforcement officials
knew about her background but weren't interested. One
even told her that it would be easier to give the grant to
her than to a white-bread whole-milk member of the Christian Right. Meanwhile the sex-studying, sex-obsessed sexology professionals did see Mrs. Reisman as a threat to their
way of life, and they conducted their own investigation.
But they weren't intcrcsted in her political background
either. Perhaps the whole concept of subversion was too
close to home for rhem.
Judith grew up in Los Angeles in a world of radical politics and bourgeois domesticity. She attended Fairfax High
and L.A. City College, went to picnics on thc beach. "I
lived at a wonderful time," she said. Her father, Matthew
Gelernter, was a Communist Party member and a businessman who later joined the Teamsters Union. H e always
came home, never drank, always loved her and supported
her. Her mother "welcomed me home every day." They
were working for a political revolution but were shocked
by the sexual revolution that ensued. In 1954 Judith married a Polish immigrant and within ten )rears had four
daughters. "The hedge of protection about my life was not
breached until 1966," she recalled.
The Keisman family had moved to Milwaukee, and in
that year she found out that her 10-year-old daughter
Jennie had been raped. The culprit was a 13-year-old boy
who lived in the duplex apartment upstairs. It turned out
that he had perpetrated many sexual assaults on other children. His father eventually packed him off to relatives overseas, even as his younger brother was embarlung on a copycat career of juvenile crime. Mrs. Reisman by then knew
that the boys' fathrr kept a stack of Playboys out in the open
at their home. But she was a good 1960s liberal and didn't
think much of it; tacky, yes; stupid, maybe; exploitative, no
doubt. Rut hey, there is such a thing as the First Amendment.
Jennie didn't want her mother to tell anyone what had
34

NATIONAL REVIEW

/ MAY

19, 1997

happened. Eventually she did tell an aunt, who listened

sympathetically and said: "Well, Judy, she may have been
loolung for this herself. Children arc sexual from birth, you
know." Judy was shocked by this and knew it wasn't true.
Then she spoke to an old school chum who had gone to
Berkeley. "You know," Carole said, "she may have been
loolung for this. Children are sesual from birth."
Judith Reisman had entered the World According to
Kinsev. Chapter five of Kinscy's first volume, Sexual
~ e h a v h in
r the H w m n Male, published in 1948, was titled
"Early Sexual Growth and Activity." It claimed that
orgasms of infants had been recorded and timed by trained
rese~rcherswith stop watches. The Kinsey report was then
and remains to this day the sole "scientific" source of such
claims. But at the time Mrs. Keisman didn't know anything
about this. She produced music videos for public television
and went to work for the popular children's program
Captain I(anjaroo. Her work was well received, and soon
the royalties allowed her to go back to university. She had
become interested in the effect of visual images on young
minds. The family had moved to Cleveland, and so she
enrolled in a PhD program at Case Western Reserve.
One day a male graduate student presented a script for a
pornographic video production. The professor in charge
assured Mrs. Reisman that all the other students had given
their consent. But she couldn't help noticing that although
the female students said the images did not disturb them,
"none of the sex photos got onto the videotape correctly."
Denial, born of a fear of seeming unprogressive, was belied
by the women's inability to do the work properly.
Mrs. Reisman began to concentrate on the impact of
pornography on women and to give lectures on the subject.
In 1977 she was invited to a conference in Swansea, Wales,
the topic being "Love and Attraction." It turned out to be
a veiled gathering of pedophiles. One of the speakers, Tom
O'Carroll, the leader of the Pedophile Information
Exchange, had alrcady received much attention in Britain,
having proselytized mightily on T V on behalf of sexual
relations with children. The university staff went on strike
Mr. Bethell, a n N R contributing editor, is Washington correspondent for The American Spectator.

and said they wouldn't make beds o r cook if he was given

the podium at Swansea.
Judith Reisman's talk, illustrated with eighty slides, documented her findings of images of children in Playboy and
Penthous~.It was as badly received by the professionals as
the advocacy of pedophilia had been by the domestics. As
she was leaving to catch the London train, a Canadian psychologist quietly took her aside. H e said she was probably
right that those images would cause "sexual acting out on
children." But if she was looking for the cause of the childsex-abuse epidemic, she should not neglect Edward
Brecher's book, The Sex Researcher. Particularly the Kinsey
chapter. H e had once worked with Kinsey and Pomeroy,
he said, and he made unflattering allegations about both.
Alfred Kinsey, by the way, died in 1956 at the age of 62,
but his co-authors, Wardell Pomeroy, Clyde Martin, and
Paul Gebhard, are all still alive.

HECKING the Kinsey report, Mrs. Reisman could

hardly believe what she was seeing. Table 34 of the
first volume gave "examples of multiple orgasm in
pre-adolescent males," some five months old. Table 31 -,.
chronicled attempts to bring to orgasm infants of two
months. H o w was this information collected?
According to Kinsey, the researchers were "adult males
who have had sexual contacts with younger boys." In
fact, Kinsey added, "nine of our adult male subjects
have observed such orgasm." Their observations had
been "timed with second-hand or stop watch." Over
three hundred children werc involved. Who
were these children, and who were the adult
males engaged in this activity? This rnatcrial had been available for over thirty
years in one of thc most widely publicized books of the twentieth century.
N o one before Mrs. Reisman had
drawn attention to it.
In the latc 1970s, shc w
offered a job in the sociology
department at Haifa Universit)-. Two of her children had
already moved to Israel, and
so she was happy to go. Jennie by then had married a
young Israeli. But at the age of
22, a year after giving birth to a
daughter, she died of a brain aneurysm. In
1981, Dr. Reisman presented the Kinsey data to a packed
session of the Fifth World Congress on Sexology in Jerusalern. In attendance was the "human sexuality brain-trust
worldwide," she recalled. Her paper was titled: "The Scientist as a Contributing Agent to Child Sex Abuse: A
Preliminary Consideration of Possible Ethics Violations."
She nai'vely imagined that the world community of sex
experts would react as she had. But that afternoon her
assistant from the sociology department returned from
lunch with the news that Judith Reisman, not Alfred Kinsey, was the target of outrage. The conference movers and
shakers had roundly condemned her paper. Everyone the
assistant had spoken t o agreed that children could have

"loving" relationships with adults. So what was the problem ?

Dr. Reisman addressed the conference again two days
later. This time she was interrupted by a prominent sexologist called John Money, with a Harvard PhD in psychology. H e shouted to the podium that she would "set back the
cause of sex education two thousand years," and he told a
Swedish television interviewer that she was "Mrs. Hitler."
Professor Money had founded the Gender Identity Clinic at
Johns Hopkins University, where today he is professor
emeritus. H e has contributed to the Journal ofPaedophilza
(published in Amsterdam), and with parental consent has
overseen sex-change operations on infants. Recently he has
been in the news because a male subject, reconstructed as a
female at eight months and injected with hormones, still
ended up looking and thinlung like a man. (See Washington
Post, March 18; John Leo, U.S. News @ World Report,
March 31.) Professor Money was seeking to validate the
feminist philosophy that major sex differences are not
determined by genes. Such "sex reassignment" operations
have been fairly common, but "the exact numbers are unknown," according to the Washington Post. Judith
Reisman ripostes today that if she is Mrs.
Hitler, then Money is Dr. Mengele.
In 1983 she appeared on Crossfire with
Pat Buchanan and Tom Braden. Wardell
Pomeroy appeared at the studio but then
refused to appear before the cameras. An
official at the Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention at the Justice Department saw the program. H e mentioned it
to his boss,' A1 Regnery, who "signed off" on
a $734,000 grant to investigate the role of
pornography and media violence in sexual
exploitation and in juvenile delinquency. Mr.
Rcgnery recalled that it "causcd us a lot of
grief." Indeed, a great furor erupted at this
hint of social regression. The recipient of the
grant was thc American University, and Dr.
Rcisman, who was given the temporary position of research professor, became the "principal investigator." She received in the end 1 0
per cent of the money.
The university didn't mind the money but was
embarrassed to be associated with a critical look at
porn. The Kinsey Institute threatened lawsuits if it
was implicated by the research, and Dr. Reisman
was ordered by the university t o steer clear of the Kinsey
reports. Congressional committees held three separate
hearings on how such a grant could have been made by the
Justice Department, and in the course of one hearing, Dr.
Reisman for the first time met the university president,
Richard Berendzen. H e seemed particularly unfriendly.
Their subsequent career paths suggest what strange times
we live in.
In 1990 Berendzcn was forced t o resign as president
after he was caught making obscene telephone calls from
his office. One woman (of the 1 5 or so called) happened to
be married to a policeman. The repeated phone calls were
eventually traced t o Berendzen's office. Among many lurid
MAY 19,

1997

NATIONAL REVIEW

35

things, he said that he had a "four-year-old 'sex slave'

imprisoned in his office," and according t o Tim&he discussed in "graphic detail" having sexual relations with children. H e mentioned a child-pornography collection.
Richard Bcrendzen resigned, was admitted t o the Sexual
Disorders Clinic at Johns Hopkins, and kept his tenured

professorship. In the following year he was the university's

highest-paid professor (receiving $261,000). I n 1 9 9 2 he
addressed a national conference o n child victimization, with
particular reference t o "survival techniques." By n o w he
had "discovered" that he was the victim. H i s mother had
sexually abused him when he was a child. I n his book,

boilers in need of socially constructed

safety valves.
Recent goings-on at the Martha Winston Elementary School in Washington,
D.C., suggest that the kids have learned
their lessons. A fourth-grader who
"challenged the authority" of a teacher
Those who are trying to stamp out was sent to an empty classroom. H e
CCORDING to frequent warnings from the government smoking usually disapprove of sexual coaxed several classmates into the room.
health-care complex, a single abstinence. Here's the latest message on According to the Washington Times, they
unguarded act of sexual intercourse can sexually transmitted disease, plastered "disrobed and practiced sexual acts on
expose a person t o a deadly virus that o n buses in several cities earlier this one another." The school's principal
will dismantle the body's immune sys- year: "Abstinence Will Not Cure AIDS. considered that no disciplinary steps
tem. A single cigarette, o n the other Research Will." This was paid for by could be taken because the sexual acts
hand, can d o no such damage. Dcspitc Amfar, a Nc.i\ Yurk--b;isedAIDS foun- --bctwei.n fourth-graders, ranging in
n
has enjoyed much r:oci.ilite agc from 9 to 12-were "consensuil."
these very unequal hazards, smoking is ~ l ~ t i owhicll
For thosc p r c n t s A I I O still don'^ rcalnow fiercely npposcd, wliile sexual ac- support.
I . c ~ d i i ~sex
g e d u c a t x s have encour- izc \'i.hat i~ going on, the point to grasp
tivity of .&nost any dcsa-iption is encourageti--usually as an aid to m4.nt.il aged scxaal cxperimcnration 3r Ln a g ~ is c!~at ~11circhilJren arc vic\t.c~l.is prey.
Iie.~ltli.This happens most s~ib\,er.ii\.el~thnt- \vnulcl causs tchncso cxccuti\ cs to PctIi.iy. th. most striking fcanlre of'scs cd
ro11-~7rds
Thc l~.aclingsex-ell ory.mization is its mcnJaiity. 111 S!arrrhi?~~
in sex-ed clascs, whit.1: 17resiJcnt CL1i- blar~cl~.
is SIECUS, rlle Scwal Infhrmatirm mil Go)mrrali Ruhcrt Bork notes that it
ton's fmmer surgeon gcncral, Joyccl!.n
Elders, thot~ghtsuitable fix children in Educariun Council of the I J n i r ~ dStates. sccms to operate "more as a l l incitcChc:rtcrcd in 1964 by Dr. hlary S. C31- mcnt" than as a caution ngnin~tsexual
kintiergarten.
dcrone,
medical director of Pl;inncd csperilncntation. Abovc all, the dicparity
Smoking is now v i e n d with the
zealous moral dis.ipprov;ll once rc- Parenthood., i t hac promotcd its agenda between rhc littlc that vre redly nccd to
served for tile ancicnt category of sexu- un~lcrthe rul~ricof chilii~en':; rights. A know abnnt intcrcourse a n J the lurid
al deviance. Concern about souls has few years ago Dr. Caliicronc said that array of' ni.ltcrials Jcployed blr the scsobecn transferred to thc body, wirh chilctrcn h,lw 3 fundarncnr~lright to Iatrisrs should warn us o f an undisclosed
mord indignation remaining a constant. "knou~about sesu.llity 311~1to be se~ual.'' a g e n d ~ . ?-hose (~lumerous) cases in
Judith Reisman suggcsts a scparatc par- (I-Iir it-dies.) SIECUS today calls 01: the which parents have becn kcpt in t k
t
is going on, and cspeallcl: Just as the cigarette makers wantc-d national media "to present sexuality as a dark ~ 1 ) o uwhat
cialljrhc
cases
in
which children are not
positive
aspect
~
t
thc:
'
totlil
human
cspeto get the kids hooked on their prodact,
so rhr sexologists w m t to get the kids ricnce at all stncgcs of t h e I[+ ~y-lc." (hIy alltj\\cd tc, opt out of courses, sh0ulcl
i l ~ l i c s . )Yoar t a l dull.ll-r x e at work. teach us the same lesson.
hooked on theirs.
Somr !icd -government posrcrs ciisIs there a conflict between the rising SIECUS boastcd in 19.34 t h t it --as
concern about bodily heal th and encour- "onc of the 24 national reciricnts of a played in classrooms could not possibly
agement of sexual expression? Condonis new fivc-year cooperative agreement be shou.n in this magazine. In fact, the
will square that circle. They "can be with the U.S. Centers for Disease Con- c n ~ h ~ r r a ~ s m eofn t normal peol)lc in
dealing with thib suhjcct has contributed
sexy,'' too, sex e d u c ~ t o r sexult. And like trol and Prevention."
Debra I-Inffncr, SIECUS's exccutivc to a b r m d news-media blackout about
filter-tipped cigarctres they can give a
f,tlse sense of security. Condams h ~ v ea director (lately she has been on sab- the harrible detxils. This has enabled the
batit-a1 at Y ~ l eDivinity School), wrote sex educators t o take advantage of thc
f2ilure rate of over 15 per cent-where
f i l u r e is rncas~~red
by pregnancy; t\\.iie a few years ago that "we need to tell very reticence that they are trjing t o
that where sexually transmitted agents teens ~ h d tthe safest sex doesn't nec- break down. Judith Reisman's parents,
are the test. But don't cxpcct Surgeon css.lrily mean no sex." Her list of old-line Communists, were shocked by
General's warnings any time soon. pressure-relieving activities for kids the sexual revolution. But then, like CornMeanwhile, b ~ a t l o a d sof condoms are included "oral sex" and "mutuai m3S- munists everywhere, they aspired to
being shipped to the Third World. For- turhation." This would "help them "build a new society." The sexologists
eigners whom we trc.it wirh sucll dis- dcldy the onset of scxud intcrcourse 2nd have no such reconstruction in mind.
dain can be forgiven for thinking us its consequences." Sex educators view Their goal-conscious or not-is merely
-Toxi R K ~ H E L I .
kids, dcrncaningly, as high-pressure to dcstrq the old.
morally depraved.

Smoking and Sex

36

NATIONAL REVIEW / MAY 19,

-

1997
-

Cknzc Here: A Man Ol~crcomesthe T w z c Afiemath of Cbildhood Sexual Abuse, he describes his obscenc phone calls as a
form of involuntary "data gathering." Ted Koppel called
the book a "genuinc servicc to anyone who cared about the
roots and consequenccs of chlld abuse." Berendzen finally
became chairman of thc Advisory Board for the National
Center for Survivors of Child Abuse. His wife, Gail, wrote
a "survivors" article for Ladies' Home Journal.
Dr. Reisman-who
stumbled across child abuse in
Kinsey's research, questioned the accuracy of Kinsey's data

T h e old forces of blackballing, ostracism, and

disapproval, once deployed by the orthodox
a~ainstheterodoxy, are now 3ercely arrayed
a~ainstthe counter-revolutionary holdouts.
more generally, and then attempted to examine the adverse
effects of pornography-has been vilified from coast to
coast. She was run out of American University on the day
her grant expired. The money was only half spent and her
research was incomplete; but she was denied access to her
own database, and her half-finished work was rewritten by
unknown hands. For her there was no academic freedom.
She appeared as an effective gladiator on a Donahue show
(Phil Donahue, to his credit, did not stack the deck against
her), and she has not been seen on the big TV shows since.
McNeil-Lehrer taped her, but nothing appeared; Bill Moyers wrote letters-again nothing. Attacks on her appeared
in Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler, and the American Psycho&zcal Association Monitor, in Jack Anderson's column, and
in news stories that had all the detachment of a Herblock
cartoon. Headlines had a way of imputing the prurient
interest in porn to her.
As her experience shows, tolerance is not the all-pervasive
dogma of our day, but is spccifically withdrawn from people and institutions who behave as if no revolution in sexual mores has occurred, or who obstinately question its wisdom. All the old forces of blackballing, ostracism, and
disapproval, once deployed by the orthodox against heterodoxy, are now fiercely arrayed against the counter-revolutionary holdouts. The scattered remnants of orthodoxy
know this and know that they
will be vilified if they dare to
fight. Their prudent instinct is to
withdraw into private enclaves,
home-school their children, and
find a quiet retreat at a safe
I\,
7\\ \ \
remove from crime and the federal judiciary.
Judith Reisman, now a grandmother of nine, is still ready to
stand and fight, however.
Progress has been made in exposing Kinsey's deceptions, she
notes. The Washington Post, The
Lancet, and Reader's DDtgest have
published articles about the role
"Not the serpent
of pedophiles in producing some

'1

, 1

'

of Kinsey's data. The Family Research Council produced

an effective video on the subject, and even CBS Evening
News did a segment. There is a slow, grudging reappraisal
of Kinsey's findings, his methods, and especially his badly
skewed samples (1,400 of his 5,300 male subjects were
imprisoned sex offenders, for example).
Kinsey's big lie-that he was a scientist, not a moralist,
showing what is rather than what ought to be-has at last
come under attack. Pomeroy disclosed in his 1973 book
that Kinsey was engaged in an ideological mission to
undermine the Judaeo-Christian ethic. In 1995, a bill was
introduced calling for a congressional investigation to determine if there was "systematic sexual abuse of children" in
Kinsey's research. Its main sponsor, Rep. Steve Stockman of
Texas, was defeated in the 1996 election, but Rep. Peter
Hoekstra of Michigan is said to be still interested.
I n the United States, at least, there is no doubt that
Kinsey was a more successful revolutionary than Marx or
Lenin. One reason is that he didn't proclaim himself to be
one. Looking back on her parents' heroes, Judith Reisman
thinks that it is very difficult to instill a revolutionary outlook by encouraging young adults to g o to the library and
read books like Das Kapital. "It doesn't change you," she
said. "Not in the way that having an affair can change you.
That can radicalize you." Sexuality "reaches in below the
belt and takes control of your emotions."

HE does not believe that there is such a thing as impartial scientific research into sex. She has no doubt
that the women's-liberation movement was and
endures as a response to the betrayals of the sexual revolution. As for pornography, it "short-circuits the brain" and
precludes rational thought. She is surprised that the women's movement has not produced more opponents of pornography like Andrea Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon.
Judith Reisman's story tells us almost more than we
want to know about the inequality of forces in the cultural
war. In fact, the image of war is itself misleading. "War
implies two opposing armies," Dr. Reisman says. In reality
there is only one. The sexual revolution has resembled an
incoming tide more than a war. Nothing seems able to
resist it, and we can only hope that one day it will turn and
move back out to sea. The cultural wreckage left behind
will be considerable. Meanwhile
the laws have been changed,
good habits undermined, the
string untuned.
"How can we have been so
blind?" Dr. Reisman used to hear
her family and friends say when
she was young, referring t o the
Holocaust. "But look at us," she
says. "People cannot identify
their enemies." Still, she has not
lost the gift of optimism. "This
country is blessed," she says.
"Change is possible. We are supposed to stand up and be counted. Beyond that, it is in God's
in the garden?"
hands."
I7

M A Y 19, 1 9 9 7 / N A T I O N A L R E V I E W

37

do
the
right t tun,.,,1
"!go

January 08,2000

Pat Mitchell
Public Broadcasting System
1320 Braddock Place
Alexandria, Virginia, 223 14

RE:

The Yorkshire Television Prorluction entitled, "Kinsey 's Paeaop

Dear President Mitchell:

Attached please find a video copy of Kinsey 's Paedophiles produced b!. Britain':,
preeminent documentary house, Yorkshire Television and directed by Tim Tate. past wirner of
Amnesty International and UNESCO awards for producer-director.
The contact for use of this documentary is: Secret Histories: Kimey 's i aedophila: Tim
Tate, Channel 4. Yorkshire Television. Television Centre, Leeds. LS3 IJS. Telephone; 41 113
222 86 16 or 44 1 13 233 8283, e-mail, Timtate@granadamedia.com (Tate, Tim). Kinsey ':.
Paedophiles tells of a true and most disturbing part of the life and work of Dr. idfred C. Kinsey.
who is recognized as the "father of the sexual revolution." The fully accurate dxumentary
exposes the questionable source of much of the scholarly "research" and p o p u l ~r belief a3out
child sexuality todaq. Considering the amourit of British material used by PBS. it seems quite in
keeping for you to contact Mr. Tate to see about negotiating a broadcast time fcr his procuction.
Tate received major kudos for Kinsey 's P~redophiles,broadcast August 10. 1998
throughout Great Britain. Some critiques from the British Press follow but mar y others can be
provided to you:
Alfred Kinsey has been called the father of the sexuai revolution, but this deeply
unsettling documentary examines his links with paedophiles. It makes 3 strong case that
he cultivated . . . active and habitual child molester[s] to provide information that Kinsey
presented as scientific data.. ..It also goes on to question the attitudes ol'the Kinszy
Institute, which continues to protect the original research material and, :o an extent. its
founder's tattered reputation. (BBC Radio Times August 10, 1998).
[A]n infinitely ...dismal and painful insight into what academics will do in the name o f
research came in Secret History K i n ~ e 'ys Paedophiles (Channel 4). U e have k own for
some time that the first "scientist" of human sexual behaviour was 2 flawed inan. But
Secrer Histoy laid bare just how shameless and misguided Alfred Kinsey had been to use
the detailed private diaries of a predatory paedophile as the scientifi: evidence for his
claims that children often elljoyed sexual contact with adults. (The Trnzes "Televisioir."
August 1 1 , 1998)

[Tlhe most famous expert in sexology, Professor Alfred Kinsey.. . .[a] mad and
reckless man who was exposed i n last night's Secret History (C-4) as. amongst other
things, a rabid data fetishist, is best remembered for his 1948 mas.num opus. Sexual
Behavior in the Human Male. This terrifying book sent shockwaves in its day around
the civilized world .... What emerged in this deeply shocking prcgramme, was that
Kinsey had enlisted the help of a terrible pervert, a known but unir dicted paedophile,
to collect data for his book. He interfered with hundreds of babies and children and
then passed his odious findings on to Kiusey who offered them to the world as
scientific proof that children were sexual beings from birth.
The proof of that statement may or may not have been evident from the
paedophile's information. What is certainly true, though, is that K insey hirnself was
not only an accessory to child abuse but was also, in himself, a deeply disturbed,
demonic man with a personal interest in every kind of sexual perversion. (Dailj)
Telegraph August 1, 1998)
The findings made from such abhorrent, specious techniques laid the g~.oundworkfor the
sexual revolution, which has left us with AIDS: high rates of STDs and related infertility, and so
many numbers of fatherless children.
Taxpayers expect the PBS to submit to the legal mandates that regulate public
broadcasting by providing real balance in programming and accurate information about
controversial issues. If PBS were willing to present opposing data on all sexua ity issues,
providing prime times and repetition for Kinsey 's Paedophiles would equalize the time and
attention devoted to "It's Elementary," and "Tongues United."

I look forward to a positive response from you.

Sincerely,

cc: Dr. Judith Keisman

Sex
-

L.

Togetacbsedoswpv*w
dUa$&Vviaitcdrwtcd
the cdarhrl way stOticm
a&ng the KlaPl htitr.

Htunan sF.nul;ty101 is bused on a

procens that the ? ~ n r mcnllP SeruPl AttiS
M
v Sdnrrrlity
~
pt Restnwt&i#. The basic idea Q to
mulliqw~yaod
present a caruin unount d usehi s w in.t l u t ~ h u r d c ~ p m ~ n m r a t h Swrn;bjorr;
e
to b f d down stereotypes and
fidddsucobgy. Ths IMCituw is housed in
misconceptions about homosexuats,
,tt#*&dthchandkaqped;
atwl~torybridrkriidingmrhvi&~e ~ t o a J l u l r t u r s l ~ t ekd s-t
not far h i m SM F
~
s
variety
of
sexual
bhavior so that it is no
farbionrbltRcihcHeimdittrialnside
longer
able
to
b
c
k them; urd to present
a r a n d * ( I f f i r H ~ ~ W ~

The~kwAdvulced

ahortuband~*~ltt,a&O&sto~d
with a vibntor detr~rmant,a &my, and
anexfensivec*dcrociem(rrad

tapc3.ThcNstionrlSaFcruDiiroapa.
atesoutdthsbuildingand~m>std

the IIULlmte's sfi& pnwldq C O U I I S C ~ ~:

and sat ed&
k p d d c d a rd

ncm-

minister-tunrcddc-Crknmaker, Sutton's Nma pomrry erotic activity as nmd,fun, somttims funny, and always iresthetically phising. The cumdative e k t ,
P

To Receive a Human Sexuality Degree, Certification, Credential, etc., All Applicants Are
Required to Undergo the SAR (Sexual Attitude Restructuring) a "Model" Program of
Massive Pornography/Obscenity, its Stated Mission One of "Desensitization."

Indiana
University

Education Base

Planned

"Credentialing"
L

Parenthood Int.

I
I

,
I

Founded in New
York 1916

Founded

Nationally I971

I
II

Kinsey Institute
1938

,I

1
1

I
I

Research
Base

Mahad
Gagnon
Martin
Simon

Alan
--

Gut@achel
lnst.
Founded New

Masters

York

Technical

Johnson
1959

Assistance

Branch of PPFA
1968

The Mandated SAR

I,
(I

August 26,2002
Letters to the Editor
Washington Times
Dear Editor,
Howard Fishman's reply to our article about the Catholic bishops taking advice from people
who had covered up criminal sex abuse of children was full of name-calling and irrelevant,
inaccurate arguments, but nowhere did he deny the facts: that Dr. Paul McHugh and Dr. Fred
Berlin had knowingly concealed multiple incidents of child rape and assault from authorities,
despite a Maryland law requiring them to report the crimes.
Fishman (and the bishops) should consult the March 4,1990 Baltimore Sun, which reported
Berlin's actions as head of Johns Hopkins's Sexual Disorders Clinic ("Doctor skirts reporting law
on sex crimes"): "Dr. Berlin acknowledged in two interviews last week that he understood the
legislature's intent but had deliberately skirted the reporting requirements." The article said
Berlin had "vehemently opposedn the new law before the General Assembly.

...

Attorney General J. Joseph Curran, Jr., said, "the language of the law could not be clearer"
and that Berlin, a mental-health provider, was not exempt from it. Sen. Thomas M, Yeager, a
member of the Governor's Council on Child Abuse and Neglect, declared, "The attorney general
should come down on him. He's in violation of the law-it's that simple."
"Dr. Berlin's boss, Dr. Paul R McHugh," the article continued, said the hospital "did agree
with the Sexual Disorders Clinic's interpretation" of the law. "We did what we thought was
appropriate," McHugh stated. Berlin acted with "the blessing of his superiors," said the article.
Fisbman objects to our reporting the close tie between former McHugh subordinate Berlin
and Sexual Disorders Clinic founder John Money. But the tie is revealing. Money told PMDIM:
The Journal of Paedophilia (Spring, 1991) that "the vast majority of paedophiles who are put in jail
have no business being in jail," and that "I would never report anybody" who molested a child. Yet
Berlin co-founded the Clinic with Money and "considers him one of his most important mentors"
(see John Colapinto's As Nature Made Him: The Boy m o Was Raised as a Girl), Both Money and
Berlin claim psychiatry can control child molesters.
The bishops' Web site (www.usccb.org) carries a 1997 interview with Berlin in which he says
priests who have committed sex crimes against children should sometimes be allowed to continue as
priests and should sometimes be sent back to parishes. It is high time the bishops stopped relying
on Berlin and McHugh for advice on pedophilia.
By the way, an Internet search reveals that Fishman has lectured on "child abuse hysterian
and offers himself as an aexpert witness" for those "wrongly accused or convicted, especially of
abuse."
Dr. Judith Reisman
Dr. Dennis Jarrard

Strange bedfellows
August 21,2002

Judith Reisman and Dennis Jarrard

If you found the clergy sex abuse scandal shocking, prepare for another jolt: the Catholic
bishops are getting their "expert" advice on pedophilia from people who have covered up or
even defended sex between men and children.
The bishops recently chose Dr. Paul McHugh, former chairman of the Department of
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at John Hopkins University School of Medicine, as
chief behavioral scientist for their new clergy sex crimes review board. Yet Dr. McHugh
once said Johns Hopkins' Sexual Disorders Clinic, which treats molesters, was justified in
concealing multiple incidents of child rape and fondling to police, despite a state law
requiring staffers to report them.
"We did what we thought was appropriate," said Dr. McHugh, then director of Hopkins'
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, which oversaw the sex clinic. He
agreed with his subordinate, clinic head Fred Berlin, who broke the then-new child sexual
abuse law on the grounds that it might keep child molesters from seeking treatment.
Dr. Berlin admitted he had covered for the sex criminals, angering legislators, childadvocacy groups and state officials. But his actions were not surprising, because "at least
eight men have been convicted of sexually abusing Maryland children while under [Dr.
Berlin's] treatment there," according to the March 23, 1988, issue of the Capital. Despite a
1990 Government Accounting Office study that found no therapy program that stopped sex
offenders, Dr. Berlin said in 1994 that psychiatry can "effectively control" sex criminals.
Dr. Berlin also considers Sexual Disorders Clinic founder John Money, who openly
defends pedophilia, to be one of his most important mentors. Dr. Money once gave an
interview to PAIDIKA -the Journal of Paedophilia, an "academic" publication that
advocates adult sex with children alongside ads for the North American Man-Boy Love
Association (NAMBLA) and other pro-pedophilia groups. He told PAIDIKA that a
"relationship" that is "totally mutual" between a boy of 10 or 11 and an adult male "would
not [be] pathological in any way."
Dr. Money is also notorious for leading the medical team that surgically mutilated a
young boy in a disastrous attempt to turn him into a "girl" (see John Colapinto's book, "As
Nature Raised Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl"). Dr. Money is a dedicated
disciple of sex "researcher" Alfred Kinsey, the bisexual, pornography-addicted, sadomasochistic, anti-Christian sexual revolutionary, who claimed that molestation benefited
children and that any trauma was caused by parental overreaction.
Mr. Kinsey, who insisted that he proved that "children are sexual from birth," is the
father of today's classroom sex e< including much of that found in Catholic schools. The
entire field of secular "sexology" a,: sex "education" descended from his criminal and
fraudulent "research."
Dr. Berlin co-founded the Hopkins sex clinic with Dr. Money, the Kinsey follower. Yet,
it was Dr. Berlin whom the Catholic bishops of the United States chose to be their chief
adviser on child sexual abuse. They even had him speak at their annual meeting in Dallas in
June and showcased him for the media.
But Catholic bishops relying on "sexperts" is nothing new. For years, bishops have sent
seminarians and priests to Kinseyite, anything-goes sexologists who totally reject Catholic
teaching on sex. These professionals mis-evaluated, mis-counseled and mis-trained
hundreds of clergy. They "cured" sexual predators, then returned them to parishes, where
they assaulted more teens and children.
The bishops need to fire their trendy "sexperts" and hold them legally accountable for
their roles in sex crimes against hundreds of children.

Judith Reisman wrote "Kinsey:Crimes and Consequences," "Kinsey,Sex and Fraud," and "Soft
Porn Plays Hardball." Dennis Jarrard served as an adviser to the Los Angeles County Commission
on Obscenity and Pornography (1991-2001)and as chairman of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles
Commission on Obscenity and Pornography (1986-1992).

11
13

14

15

Attachment 15:
GAO Report on Sex Offender
Treatment Failures & DOJ Report
on Child Abductions

TRANSLATION: NO PROGRAMS
ARE PROVEN TO REHABILITATE
SEX OFFENDERS
Of 550 Therapy programs from 1977 to 1996 analyzed by the GAO,
none were proven to reduce sex offender recidivism. The data are
therefore labeled, euphemistically, Inconclusive in that they are not
shown to reduce sex offender recidivism. Sincere thanks to Dr. Linda
Jeffrey for locating this report, buried away in the dustbin of antiquity.

The Best California study Appendix I, p. 15.

Appendix I1

California'sSexual Offendrr Treatment and

Evaluation Proiert: A Treatment Program

--

--

the cnrnlnal jwtlce system The study keeps records and follows up on
part~c~pants
who drop out of the treatment program before corrrplet~on
To date, preliminary results of the evaluation study have not revealed a
statistically significant treatment effect. Overall, offenders completing the
treatment program and the volunteer control group had approximately the
s a n e recidivls~nrate for new sex crimes. The nonvolunteer group had a
somewhat higher recidivism rate, but it was not statistically different from
the other two groups.

Treatment under this sex offender program ended in 1995.However,

follow-up of participants will continue until the year 2000. Upon
completion of the study, it is anticipated that all participants will have
been followed up after release from the institution for a rninirr~umof 5
years and a maximum of 14 years.

Page 17

GAOIGGD-96 137 Sex Oftendrr Treatment

Research Results

Page 2 of the DoJ National Center for Missing

& Exploited Children report, distributed by The
White House in 2002
58,200 Children Kidnapped by Non-Family
Members in 1999
The majority were sexually abused
The majority returned home following their
violations.
35% were boys assaulted largely by males
As pornography and sex education flood the
nation, the response isbased on the evidence-environmentally triggered sexual violence of
pandemic proportions.

Perwnal Safct) 1-0, Cllddl~rih fnpltsh

PDF file format

La Seguridad Personal Dr Los Nilios

en EspaRol
PDF file format

You will tieed the Adobe@ Acrobat@ Reader to vlew these PDF files Download a free copy of
the Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Press Release: National

Center for Missing & IIxploitrd Children To Participate

it] First-Ebrr White House Conference o n Missing, Exploited and Rmla\va>
Children

WorldNetDaily: Film star to portray<bnlsex reformer' Kinsey

http://www.wnd.com/news/pnnter-inendly
.asp'!AK'I'ICLE-IU=W

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.

To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE~ID=29891

Monday, December 9,2002

MEDIA MATTERS

Film star to portray

'sex reformer' Kinsey
Neeson urged to skip role as 'infamous pedophile propagandist'
Posted: December 9,2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Art Moore

One of Hollywood's leading men is risking his reputation with a plan to portray the "father of the
sexual revolution," Alfred Kinsey, contends a chief critic of the late researcher.
The Francis Ford Coppola biographical drama, set to begin production
next spring, has tapped Irish-born star Liam Neeson to bring to life a
man researcher Judith Reisman calls the "most infamous pedophile
propagandist in scientific history."
The screenplay, with the working title "Kinsey'sReport," was written
by Oscar-winner Bill Condon of "Gods and Monsters" fame, who also
will direct the film.
Condon, who says there would be "no Playboy or Dr. Ruth without
[Kinsey's]liberating effects," promises it will not be an "art-house
movie."

"I hope it's one of those movies that speaks about thmgs," he said in an
interview published bv E! online. "It does feel like it's time to remind
people of Kinsey's ideas, which I think are liberating. I hope there's an
exhilarating feeling you get when you come out of the theater."
Open letter
But Reisman, author of "Kinsev: Crimes & Conseauences,"has sent an open letter of warning to
Neeson, asserting that the film will place him in "a hideously inaccurate role, much like playing the
monster Mengele as a mere controversial figure."
She wrote: "Mr. Neeson, an appealing and respected actor like you surely does not wish to be known
for celebrating a man who directed massive child sexual abuse."

WorldNetDaily: Film star to portray<bn'sex reformer' Kinsey

http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-friendly.asp'!AKLl=YY I

An assistant to Neeson's agent Ed Limato said Thursday that Reisman's letter was forwarded to the
actor's "people," but they "cannot guarantee a response."
But later in the day, according to Reisman, Neeson's office requested a copy of a film produced by
Britain's Yorkshire Television called "Kinsey's Paedophiles."
Reisman, who has critiqued Kinsey's research for more than 20 years, says
Kinsey increasingly is discounted by scholars as a "pathetic sexual
psychopath" whose data were derived from an unrepresentative proportion of
the population - mostly prison inmates and sex offenders, including
pedophiles. Kinsey concluded, for example, that 69 percent of white males had
had at least one experience with a prostitute.
Kinsey biographer James H. Jones, former adviser to the Kinsev Institute at
Indiana Universitv, has admitted that Kinsey, the father of three children, was
not the conventional academic and family man the university presented, but
was sexually compromised. In his 1997book "Alfred C. Kinsey: A
Public/Private Life," which was excerpted by New Yorker magazine, the
Alfred C. Kinsev
author describes the sex researcher as; sad&nasochistic homo>exual on a
perverted mission. Kinsey produced pornography in his attic - filming his wife, male staff and their
wives as performers - and sexually harassed his male students.
Reisman notes that Kinsey, who died in 1956, is praised by the North American Man-Boy Love
Association for creating the "data"that support "the struggle we fight today." She finds his work as
the basis for weakened laws and cultural norms that have helped foster a sharp rise in sex crimes
against children, noting that 58,200 abductions by non-family members were recorded by the FBI in
1999, most of which involved sexual victimization.
In 1981, Reisman delivered a paper to the 5th World Congress on Sexuality, charging that the Kinsey
Reports contained a record of human experiments conducted by pedophiles on hundreds, perhaps
thousands, of children. The Kinsey study has been used to support the contention that sexual activity
in children is natural and healthy and should not be repressed.
She points to pages 160-161of Kinsey's 1948 book "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male," in which the
children's "screams," their "convulsions,"their "hysterical weeping," "fighting"and "striking the
partner (adult)"are judged by Kinsey as reflecting "definite pleasure from the situation."
Kinsey Institute director John Bancroft maintains that the institute "has never carried out sexual
experiments on children, either during Alfred Kinsey's time as director or since."
He has acknowledged, however, that the data on "speed of orgasm" and other details in Tables 31-34
of Kinsey's 1948book could only have been collected through illegal activity. In a 1998 paper by
Bancroft called "Kinsey and Children," he says the information "came from the carefully documented
records of one man." Kinsey referred to the man as "Mr. Green," a pedophile who kept meticulous
records of the 800 boys he molested between 1917 and 1948.
Reisman maintains, however, that the 1998 documentary "Kinsey's Paedophiles," which has never
been shown in the U.S., documented that Kinsey solicited information from and directed the data
gathering of many pedophiles.

vlrorldNetDaily: Film star to portraycbn'sex reformer' Kinsey

http://www.wnd.com~news/printer-friendly.asp:'AK'I
ICLb-lD=2989

"Mr. Bancroft eagerly dodges the fact that whether Kinsey used one rapist to tell the world that child
sex is normal, or whether he recruited many rapists - which he did - it doesn't change the fact that
there isn't a shred of scientific data that would support the notion of child sexuality," Reisman told
WND.
In response to a 1998 resolution by the Indiana state legislature urging the assembly to not
appropriate public funds to the institute, Bancroft said of Kinsey:
"He can be criticized for making use of information about children's sexual responses obtained from
individuals who were criminally involved with those children, not because it was improper to do so,
but because of the uncertain validity of such information. But the large part of his work remains a
supreme example of dedicated scientific research which continues to be important and useful to all of
those who are researching in the field."
Bancroft maintained that "however much Kinsey's scientific curiosity may have misled him, he did
nothing wrong, 'criminal,' or 'fraudulent.' Some have criticized him for not reporting this man to the
police. Any tendency to do such a thing, with this research subject or any other, would have been
contrary to the whole ethical basis of his project, in which he persuaded people to share their sexual
secrets in return for a guarantee of confidentiality."

Playing real people

Empire Online, which calls itself the UK's No. 1 film website, savs of the Kinsev movie: "With
production ready to start next March, ready yourself for a touch of sexual perversity, a measure of
gender confusion and every kind of reproductive action. All in the name of scientific research, of
course."
A recent interview with Neeson in the London Observer newspaper noted that the actor's best roles
have been historical and eponymous figures, such as Oskar Schindler in "Schindler'sList." When the
interviewer described characters Neeson has played - such as Schindler, Rob Roy and Michael
Collins - as men "struggling to do the right thing, despite their predisposition, usually in the face of
societal constraints," the actor replied:

"In fact, next year, I'm gonna play Alfred Kinsey, the guy who did all the research on sexuality and
sexual politics in America in the '50s. His results,were astounding. Really big stuff. He got on the
cover of Time magazine."
Neeson said he does not set out to play real people.
"What usually motivates me is the quality of the writing," he said. "But yeah, I guess I may
subconsciously seek them out. These are people who stand for something, something that is good to
remind audiences of. They had a code of ethics that you perhaps don't find anymore."

Big stars
Academy Award-winning actors Russell Crowe, Tom Hanks, Kevin Spacey and Harrison Ford "all
flirted with the lead role in one of the hottest scripts making the rounds," according to Anderson
Jones in his "Movie Scoops" column on E! online. George Clooney was asked to take the Kinsey role,

!-,*&

WorldNetDaily: Film star to portraycbr>'sexreformer' Kinsey

http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-friendly .asp'!AKI'ICLE-lD=2989

but passed, according to Jones, who called the film project "a provocative, erotic and potentially
controversial movie."
"Kinsey is this amazing character," said director Condon, according to Jones' report, "very, very
complicated. It's an interesting, difficult part to cast. When it comes to sex, people come with a lot of
baggage, and the challenge will be getting the baggage that fits Kinsey's. You need an actor who will
bring you inside this character."
Condon said he also considered Ralph Fiennes, Jeff Bridges and Michael Douglas for the role.
Jones commented that the Kinsey film "appeals to actors looking for a challenge, because it's craftily
structured around a series of flashbacks and flash-forwards, features explicit discussions about
sexuality and hints of Kinsey's widely reported bisexuality."
The script is not new, Jones said. About 10 years ago, screenwriter Michael Davis wrote another
script called Kinsey, which turned out to be a "practically unreadable light comedy that mined laughs
from Dr. Kinsey's 'embarrassing' sexual peccadilloes."
The film, financed by Myriad Pictures, will be released in the U.S. by MGM's United Artists division.
"Kinsey"is one of five Myriad-financed films to be produced by Coppola's American Zoetrope
studios. The Hollywood Reporter notes that three of the five come from openly homosexual artists,
including Condon.
Much at stake
For the Kinsey Institute, according to Reisman, the film likely will be seen as a boon to the institute's
attempts to bolster Kinsey's reputation in the face of mounting criticism of his character and work.
"The Kinsey Institute is in very serious rehabilitation mode," Reisman said, noting that at a 50th
anniversary celebration of Kinsey's first book, in 1998, an academic in the field of "sexology"stated
that if Kinsey were undermined, it would "undermine everything we had been working on for all
these years."
Bancroft announced in 1998 that the Ford Foundation had supplied a grant to help fund a
media-relations firm to plan "a proactive strategy to counter the ongoing campaign to shut down the
Kinsey Institute and discredit its founder."
I

I..ku"

In her book "Kinsey, Crimes, & Consequences," Reisman shows how Kinsey and his sex reports of
1948 and 1953undergird the entire modem academic sexology field, including institutions such as
Planned Parenthood and SIECUS, the Sex Information and Education Council of the U.S., which
helped launch sex education in schools when it was founded in 1964.
The Kinsey Institute is clearly uneasy about probes into the Kinsey archive, according to one of
Kinsey's most recent biographers, Englishman Jonathan Gathorne-Hardy.

In the Yorkshire film production on Kinsey, produced by award-winner Tim Tate, Gathorne-Hardy
tells how he was given access to Kinsey's March 1956 files, which show the sex researcher's use of
pedophiles.

WorldNetDaily: Film star to portraycbn'sex reformer' Kinsey

http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-fnendly.asp'!AKl'lCL~~l

Describing the Kinsey Institute as "nervous"because "its funding depends a lot on its reputation,"
Hardy said director Bancroft demanded that Hardy swear he never personally saw the documents.
Hardy's typewritten notes regarding the exchange with Bancroft said:
Must be written as if information got from [former director] Paul [Gebhard] and Bancroft.
... Don't reveal that [Kinsey] wenton gathering histories [from these pedophiles] until
1954.
Hardy's notes on the file indicate several active pedophiles on Kinsey's list of aides:
[Kinsey] was deeply influenced by five pedophile headmasters who were quite clear they
had very warm relationships, loving relationships with young adolescent boys of 12 or 13.
In her letter to Neeson, Reisman warned that Yorkshire Television would want to reissue its
"unflattering documentary should you make this film."
"Please disengage yourself from this unworthy production, and please feel free to contact me should
you want to talk or to see the extant documentation on any and all of the statements above," Reisman
wrote. "Thank you."

Related stories:
Catholics learning sex from Kinsev's disciples
'Nothing new' in book condoning child sex

Related special offer:

"Kinsev:Crimes & Conseauences"

Art Moore is a news editor with Wor1dNetDaily.com.