Sei sulla pagina 1di 12

IBM Global Business Services Financial Management

White Paper

Supporting IFRS Compliance


with SAP Enterprise
Resource Planning System
IBM Global Business Services 3

IFRS – An Overview • Property plant & equipment

• Inventory
What is IFRS?
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are • Financial reporting (planning & budgeting, as well as
globally accepted accounting standards established by the statutory) and disclosures
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and its
interpretative body, the International Financial Reporting • Segment reporting
Interpretations Committee (IFRIC).
• Consolidation accounting/joint ventures

Many of the standards forming IFRS are known by the older • Construction contracts/project accounting
name of International Accounting Standards (IAS). IAS were
issued between 1973 and 2001 by the board of the Interna- • Share based payments/management compensation and
tional Accounting Standards Committee (IASC). In April 2001, reporting
IASB adopted all outstanding IAS issued by the IASC. Those
• Revenue recognition
standards continue to be in force to the extent they are not
amended or withdrawn by the IASB. New Standards issued by • Goodwill, intangible assets, asset impairments, provisions
the IASB are known as IFRS. When referring collectively to
IFRS, that term includes both IAS and IFRS. • Hyperinflationary accounting/FX

IFRS standards are destined to become the world’s common • Leases


financial reporting language for investors, analysts and regula- • Government grants
tors. The overriding advantage to the participants of global
IFRS adoption is enhanced comparability of like entities • Fair value
anywhere in the world. And for any entity, better access to
international capital, funding and investment opportunities. This document is the first in a series of white papers planned
to address the IT impacts of the key topics stated above. The
The adoption of IFRS standards requires high-quality, focus of this paper is on handling the IFRS Fixed Assets/
transparent and comparable information demanded by Property, Plant & Equipment (PP&E) requirements, as well
investors, creditors, financial analysts and other users of as parallel reporting needs for companies using SAP as their
financial statements. A broad range of potential high impact ERP system.
areas are summarized in the following list:
4 Supporting IFRS Compliance with SAP Enterprise Resource Planning System

Compliance Data • Do ledgers and business systems


contain the necessary data and if
Requirements availability so, how are they provided?
• How will the new • Which processes must be
reporting Proces
changed to capture and report
requirements be redesign new data?
applied?
• What additional Systems scalability • How many adjustments are
necessary to meet the additional
information will be & architecture
requirements arising from IFRS?
required?
IFRS Organization • Is there a sufficient number of
suitable and trained employees
Business design working in the right position?
Implications Product design • Will profitability be sustained
• What are the wider & pricing under the new regulations?
implications on how
the business is Profitability & • What impact will the
managed? implementation of IFRS have on
solvency the P&L and the balance sheet?
• What are the impacts
on P&L and Balance Regulatory • What impact will IFRS have on
sheet? reporting regulatory requirements incl tax?

IFRS - Beyond changing the numbers On the other hand, the adoption of new accounting principles
The move to IFRS is far more significant than just changing will lead to changes in the financial results of companies and
certain accounting practices in the finance organization. It has will have related tax implications. This can have ripple affects
a far reaching impact on how you measure your business, such on risk reporting, management reporting, budgeting, forecast-
as the P&L and balance sheets. It also impacts how you ing, product pricing and employee benefits.
manage budgeting and forecasting, product pricing, opera-
tional processes, IT systems and internal controls. Lastly, the adoption of IFRS will require impacted enterprises
to report under IFRS and local Generally Accepted Accounting
When applying the new accounting principles to meet the Principles (GAAP) in parallel for a period of at least one year
reporting and disclosure requirements, organizations have before the final change-over date. This not only requires
experienced significant impact on processes, systems and multi-GAAP accounting and reporting capabilities in the
people within the Finance function and in the operational finance systems, but it places an additional requirement for
functions that provide transactional information to finance. critical and knowledgeable resources.
IBM Global Business Services 5

Assessing the Impact Considering the present environment, SAP recommends the
The first step towards a successful IFRS transition is a robust use of parallel ledgers provided in the New GL (SAP version
Impact Assessment phase to gain a high level understanding of ECC 6.0 or later) or the account-based configuration for the
the business/accounting affects of IFRS. They will be further transactional layer, depending on the need of the client or
translated into impacts on processes, systems and data. The version of software in use.
Impact Assessment phase should cover a reasonable level of
detail, as differences that appear relatively minor could cause a Implementing IFRS using the New GL with parallel ledgers is
significant impact. Further, addressing the collection of the most transparent approach. It provides an independent set
additional data required by IFRS should commence at the of books and is the cleanest option for clients on SAP ECC
earliest stages, so that the integrity of financial results under version 6.0 or later. With this approach, the entity should
IFRS can be assessed and improved. adopt IFRS as the leading ledger and use the non-leading
ledger to meet local reporting requirements.
Based on our experience with organizations in Europe, a
significant part of the IFRS conversion effort went towards IT The account-based approach is recommended when relatively few
implementation. In particular, the core accounting or enter- IFRS differences exist that can be handled in one ledger. Although
prise resource planning (ERP) underwent significant change. it is the quickest and least expensive option to implement, it can
This paper aims to provide an appreciation of certain major lead to a more complex Chart of Account (COA).
IFRS impact areas, and the potential approaches for companies
using an SAP ERP application. In some unique circumstances, the use of parallel company
codes and special ledgers may still be workable, but they are
Parallel Reporting not recommended from a sustainability perspective.
IFRS transition requires parallel reporting in local GAAP and
IFRS for at least one year. Multi-GAAP accounting functional- Property Plant and Equipment
ity is required and needs to be implemented in the ERP IFRS prescribes rules regarding the recognition, measurement
system. and disclosures relating to property, plant, and equipment
(often referred to as fixed assets) that would enable users of
There are four options available within SAP to support parallel financial statements to understand the extent of an entity’s
reporting needs: 1) Parallel ledgers using the new functionality investment in such assets and the movements therein.
that supports multiple ledgers (New GL), 2) Account-based
general ledger (GL) configuration, 3) Use of special ledgers, The principal IFRS impacts include componentization of
and 4) Parallel company codes. assets, basis of valuation, depreciation, and impairment. The
following section elaborates the impacts and approaches to
Local Close SAP R/3 9classic SAP ECC 6.0 address them within SAP ERP.
GL) (New GL)
Parallel Ledgers ü Key Differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS - Assets
Componentization of assets
Parallel Account ü ü
Physical assets may have various significant subcomponents.
Parallel Special
Under existing local GAAPs, such assets may have been treated
Purpose Ledgers
as a single asset. However, under IFRS, these components
Parallel Company
should be recognized, tracked and depreciated separately.
Codes

SAP Recommended Approach


6 Supporting IFRS Compliance with SAP Enterprise Resource Planning System

Basis of valuation of an asset Change in depreciation method based on the useful life of
IFRS provides an option to use either the revalued amount or individual components
the historical cost as a basis for measurement. Revalued Under IFRS, each component of a physical asset must be
amount is fair value at the date of revaluation less subsequent depreciated separately depending on its useful life.
accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Under the
U.S. GAAP, use of revalued amount is not permitted.

The Impacts
Key Difference Impact How to address in SAP
1 Difference in the The value of one asset could be SAP allows for multiple ‘depreciation areas’ for valuation of
value of an asset different within IFRS, U.S. GAAP assets. These deprecation areas may have different
due to different statutory accounts, fiscal accounts. depreciation keys (i.e., depreciation calculation rules) and
accounting Assets therefore may have multiple different useful lives for each individual asset. In
methods under valuations. addition, transactions such as capitalization, retirements,
different write-up, write-downs etc. may be posted differently in the
accounting areas where needed.
standards
2 Componentization Companies must define significant Componentization can be handled through the use of
of assets components of existing assets as asset master records (main and sub-number, super-
individual assets. These numbers) to define each component uniquely. Depreciation
components must be depreciated rules for each of the separately identified components can
separately, depending on their be configured for its estimated useful life.
individual useful lives.
3 Change in asset’s If the estimate of the asset’s useful In SAP Asset Accounting, each asset is assigned to a
useful life life changes, the depreciation depreciation key (that describes the depreciation
charge must be adjusted for the calculation rule) and a useful life. Depreciation is calculated
current and future periods. automatically according to the depreciation key and
remaining useful life. One of the options for adjusting
depreciation is to change the depreciation key or the useful
life of the asset component.
4 Change in If the depreciation method changes SAP asset accounting allows for adjustments to the
depreciation due to a change in the expected depreciation method and adjustments to the useful life of
method pattern of benefits, the depreciation an asset. Changes to either of these values will affect the
charge for the current and future depreciation calculations on a go-forward basis.
periods should be adjusted.

5 Updating fair value IFRS provides an option to use Fair value cannot be determined within the R/3 system.
of assets either revalued amount or historical The amounts must be determined externally at every
cost as a basis for measurement. reporting date and updated in the system.
Revalued amount is fair value at the
date of revaluation less subsequent
accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses.

Impairment of Assets
IBM Global Business Services 7

Key Differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS Accounting and Calculation of Reversal of Impairment Losses
Systematic Identification of Impairment Losses Subsequent reversal of an impairment loss is required for all
If there is an indication that an asset may be impaired, then the assets (other than goodwill) under IFRS. Reversal is limited to
asset’s recoverable amount must be calculated. [IAS 36.8] the extent of the written down value of the asset, whereas
under U.S. GAAP, any reversal of impairment loss is
Accounting and Calculation Requirements for prohibited.
Impairment Losses
Under IFRS, impairment is recorded when an asset’s carrying Identifying Cash Generating Units
amount exceeds the higher of the asset’s value-in-use (dis- IFRS introduces the concept of a Cash Generating Unit
counted present value of the asset’s expected future cash flows) (CGU). The CGU is the smallest identifiable group of assets
and fair value less costs to sell. Under U.S. GAAP, impairment that generates cash inflows from continuing use, and is largely
is recorded when an asset’s carrying amount exceeds the independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of
expected future cash flows to be derived from the asset on an assets. U.S. GAAP does not prescribe any CGU concept.
undiscounted basis.

The Impacts
Key Difference Impact How to address in SAP
1 Systematic Identify indications for impairment Impairments can not be determined within the SAP system.
Identification of and determining impairment loss. The amounts must be determined externally, and manually
Impairment Losses updated in SAP.
2 Accounting An impairment loss should be Depending on which asset is involved, the appropriate
Requirements for recognized whenever recoverable adjustment must be made in the applicable module
Impairment Losses amount is below carrying amount. (intangible assets in FI-AA, securities in CFM). Posting
would have to be done manually in SAP.
3 Calculation of Need to calculate the recoverable Net present value of assets is calculated on planned future
Impairment Losses amount, which is calculated from cash flows. SAP offers functionality for this purpose in
net present value of assets. Investment Management (IM).
4 Accounting Subsequent reversal of an Impairment reversal cannot be determined within the SAP
Requirements for impairment loss is required for all system. The calculation of impairment reversal amounts will
Reversal of assets (other than goodwill) under need to be performed outside the SAP system, and then
Impairment Losses IFRS. posted manually in the SAP system.
5 Calculation of Reversal of impairment loss is Need to keep track of the impairment loss recognized for an
Reversal of limited to the extent of the written asset and track written down value of the asset in order to
Impairment Losses down value of the asset. facilitate the reversal calculation. This can be managed in
SAP with the help of transaction types to track the nature of
transactions. The calculation of impairment reversal amounts
will need to be performed outside the SAP system.
6 Cash Generating Under IFRS, assets must be SAP suggests using profit centers to approximate CGUs,
Units assigned to Cash Generating Units since sales and expenses can be collected at this level.
where required. CGUs will likely be
different from the current reporting
units in use, and will need to be
defined separately.
8 Supporting IFRS Compliance with SAP Enterprise Resource Planning System

Alternative Approaches towards IFRS Posting Local GAAP Adjustments to IFRS Approach
Compliance This approach helps adopt IFRS by making top side adjust-
ments. It is potentially cheaper and faster to implement than
Although embedding the IFRS changes into the ERP (transac- the other two possible options for SAP systems, as no software
tional) system is the preferred option in the long-term, there upgrades are needed.
are other alternative approaches that involve managing IFRS
changes outside the ERP system. A challenge in this approach would be to maintain the GL
Close process timing. It also requires extensive manual
These alternative approaches may not be optimal in the long compilation outside the SAP application to determine journal
term, but could be considered in order to reduce complexity of entries. There would be a need for controls to pass audits and
change or to meet tight timelines. The approaches are outlined customization of the SAP system in order to create and feed
below. data at an accurate granular level.

Consolidation Layer Approach This approach entails overall high costs in order to sustain
An additional alternative to consider is to post IFRS adjust- reporting and reconciliation processes in the long term. The
ments into the consolidation application. IFRS adjustments can quickest option, it is difficult to sustain longer term as it is
be calculated and posted directly into the consolidation tool. mostly manual, impacting close processes and reconciliations.
Data in the transaction system would reflect local reporting, as
IFRS adjustments will not reside at this level.
IBM Global Business Services 9

IBM IFRS and IBM Ascendant SAP Method Ascendant provides a full set of management tools and accel-
IBM’s Ascendant methodology augments SAP’s ASAP method- erators for SAP implementations. Beyond the basic require-
ology with IBM intellectual capital and reusable assets. It ments to configure, test and implement the software, Ascen-
allows flexibility to incorporate the associated IFRS building dant also provides tools and templates for key project processes
blocks as per the specific project needs. such as:

• Documentation templates

• Issues and escalation management process

• Risk management process and templates

• Project change request process


10 Supporting IFRS Compliance with SAP Enterprise Resource Planning System

How can IBM help? • Auditor independence: We are independent from audit firms,
IBM is a Business Services Partner with unmatched breadth so can help our clients throughout the project lifecycle
and depth. We bring unique benefits to our clients, which are: without being restricted by independence rules. We can also
work effectively with your professional advisors.
• IBM’s IFRS transformation: IBM’s own IFRS transition is • Flexible solutions and delivery model: We can handle a
generally accepted as the gold standard for adoption, and our complex IFRS conversion as part of an overall Finance
intellectual capital leverages this experience. So, IBM can offer Transformation Program, or as a more straightforward
a unique perspective to companies interested in how IFRS will individual program tailored around the very specific IFRS
impact them. requirements. We have flexible delivery models, and leverage
• Asset-based accelerators and tools: Numerous tools and offshore resources to achieve higher cost efficiency and value.
accelerators to support assessment and implementation • ERP market leader: Unrivalled strengths in technology
phases. IBM can leverage a toolset developed to address and transformational consulting, while being the preferred
adoption and implementation issues during its own IFRS partner for large ERP vendors’ IFRS solution. IBM also offers
adoption. This allows IBM to offer much more than just a marketing leading ERP Points-of-View, of which this paper
technical list of IFRS versus local GAAP differences, and it is the first in a series on the subject of handling IFRS impacts
can take advantage of lessons learned. in SAP.
• Global scale and reach: We have teams based in over 40
countries and more than 4,100 specialized business and
technical consultants worldwide.
IBM Global Business Services 11

For further information

Contact us or visit

ibm.com//gbs/finmgmt

John Ingold
Partner, Global IFRS Leader
jingold@ca.ibm.com

Siddarth Agarwal
Associate Partner, IFRS Lead
sagarwal@ca.ibm.com

Grant Rutherford
Senior Managing Consultant, IFRS Lead
grant.a.rutherford@ca.ibm.com
© Copyright IBM Corporation 2009

IBM Global Services


Route 100
Somers, NY 10589
U.S.A.

Produced in the United States of America


September 2009
All Rights Reserved

IBM, the IBM logo and ibm.com are trademarks or registered trademarks
of International Business Machines Corporation in the United States, other
countries, or both. If these and other IBM trademarked terms are marked on
their first occurrence in this information with a trademark symbol (® or ™),
these symbols indicate U.S. registered or common law trademarks owned by
IBM at the time this information was published. Such trademarks may also
be registered or common law trademarks in other countries. A current list of
IBM trademarks is available on the Web at “Copyright and trademark
information” at ibm.com/legal/copytrade.shtml Other company, product
and service names may be trademarks or service marks of others.

References in this publication to IBM products and services do not


imply that IBM intends to make them available in all countries in which
IBM operates.

Please Recycle

GBW03089-USEN-00

Potrebbero piacerti anche