Sei sulla pagina 1di 7

THE CONDITION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT IN

ROMANIA
Assistant PhD student Lucia-Monica SCORŢAR
Professor PhD Ioan LAZĂR
Assistant PhD student Diana ZAGAN ZELTER
Babeş Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca

Abstract:
The present article approaches a very important and actual theme and
that is the problem of generating waste in Romania which, on one hand,
affects the environment and human health, and on the other hand it
reflects the inefficient way of using the natural resources in society.
Probably the majority of us have thought or hoped that the natural
resources are inexhaustible, but we can see today that the unwise
exploitation of these resources is threatening our future.
Waste management is a difficult and complex problem in Romania which
is far from being solved according to the environment rules of the
European Union. The worsening of the waste problem, especially of the
domestic waste is generated by the significant increase of its quantity, as
well as by the inappropriate way of solving different stages of waste
processing.

Key words: environmental protection; waste; waste management; reuse,


reduce and recycle waste

Introduction uncontrolled accumulated waste would


The environmental problems are create major problems that must be
part of the very serious problems urgently and permanently solved.
mankind is facing and soon no activity Consequently, they should be managed
field from any country will be able to in such a way as not to become a
avoid solving them. Mankind is called to burden for the community by imposing
contribute at reducing the impact selective collection, reusing, recycling
caused on nature by its activities, by and treating it, and finally ecological
promoting sustainable development, storage of remaining waste.
which takes into account : economic
development, social welfare and Waste management in
environmental protection. The Romania
environment represents all the elements On the list of Romania’s ecological
that surround us on which man leaves priorities, waste management is placed
his blueprint most often in a destructive on the third place, after water and air
way, hence the necessity for the pollution.
intervention of the state bodies in order Adequate waste management
to protect and conserve the nature. We supposes the following hierarchy of
can easily notice that even where only priorities, according to the strategy of
one man lives, he causes changes to the European Union
the environment and implicitly creates Preventing waste generation– by
waste, especially domestic waste. The applying “clean technologies” in the
bigger a community, the bigger its activities which generate waste
quantity, so that the existence of (especially in the industrial sector), but
also in the campaigns for raising operators for warehouses and
awareness in educational institutions incinerators.
and private households; The quality of the data about waste
Reducing the quantity of waste– by management is greatly influenced by a
applying the best technologies in each series of conditions existing at the level
activity field that generates waste; of the reporting units:
Valorizing the waste– by reusing, • the availability of technical
material recovery (recycling), conditions for recording the waste
energetically recovery (incineration) and (mainly the lack of weighing machines
biological recovery (composting); at the waste warehouses);
Final waste elimination– by • organizing waste management;
ecological storage, in safe conditions • registering the enterprises in the
Preventing waste generation, as a Statistical Register of Economic
strategic element in the European policy Operators;
for waste management has become a • the competence and the
priority. Acting in this direction, the engagement of responsibilities for
following results are obtained: completing the statistical questionnaires.
• reducing the costs for raw Generating significant waste
materials quantities without considering the
• reducing the costs for waste possibility of recycling them or
elimination recovering the energy, does not comply
• conserving the natural resources with the principles of sustainable
• improving the company image development. At the moment, in
Generating, valorizing and Romania, there are limited possibilities
storing waste must be a subject of for sorting and collecting different useful
interest for any person, for companies fractions from the waste, to which we
and public authorities. can add as an important factor, the
The first information about limited number of economic agents who
generating and managing waste in are willing to recycle these sorted
Romania dates from 1991. Starting with materials. In order to reduce the
1995, The Ministry of Environment and negative impact on the environment for
Water Management has owned a data sustainable development, Romania
base about waste management. Yearly, intends to reduce the volume of waste
through the Agencies for Environment which is not stored appropriately from
Protection there are reporting activities, the estimated quantity of 3.75 million
the data being centralized and tones/year to 2.2 million tones/year until
processed by The National Institute of 2013.
Research and Development for At present, The Ministry of
Environment Protection. Bucharest. As Environment coordinates the
during that time there was not a preparation of 30 projects for integrated
systematic weighing of all the collected waste management, which will absorb
waste flows, the waste quantities from entirely the sum allocated to Prioritary
the data base comprise also estimated Axis 2 „The development of integrated
data. Since 2005, the data collection for waste management systems and the
the data base has been done by using rehabilitation of the historically
questionnaires that are addressed to contaminated sites”. The projects will be
the waste generators from industry, finished gradually between 2009-2011
mining and agriculture, the sanitation and will have an important contribution
operators (waste from cities that are to the fulfillment of the obligations
collected and managed), economic Romania has in the waste management
agents who recycle waste and the sector. The budget allocated through
30
the Operational sectorial Programme sanitation and transport companies and
„Environment” for the projects referring the firms specialized in recycling.
to integrated waste management has a The economic agents who adhere
value of 1.17 billion euros. to the Green Point will be able to insert
Eco-Rom Ambalaje S.A. the Green Point symbol on the
represents officially in Romania, starting packaging of their products. Thus, the
15 October 2003, the European System buyer will know that the manufacturing
for Package Management „Green Point”, or importing company is responsible
in this way Romania is joining the other from the social point of view, because it
26 states from Europe and America wants that the package of its products,
where this system is working. The collected from the population in
license was granted to Eco-Rom separate containers, should be recycled
Ambalaje S.A., for Romania, by the or valorised.
European Organization PRO Europe, Waste generation is the indicator
who owns the rights for the brand which best illustrates the interaction
„Green Point”. between human activities and the
Through the „Green Point” system, environment. Waste generation usually
the economic agents that have follows the consumption and production
obligations for valorising and recycling trends. For example, waste generation
the package waste, can transfer through (quantity/inhabitant) increases together
contract, the responsibility to valorise with the income level. The increase in
and recycle the package waste to Eco- economic production, but also the
Rom Ambalaje S.A., which closes, at its inefficient management of resources,
turn, partnerships with local authorities, lead to the generation of big quantities
of waste.

Table 1
Indicators for city waste generation in our country
Year City waste
(kg/inhabitant x year)

2000 355
2001 341
2002 384
2003 365
2004 378
2005 398
2006 410
Media 376
Source: Annual report concerning the environment condition in Romania for the
year 2007

In comparison with the EU states, is based on viable statistical data. It


the quantity of city waste generated in leads to the identification of the
Romania between 2000-2006 problems and to prioritizing, insuring
expressed in kg/inhabitant is situated sufficient basis for SWOT analysis
under the EU average – 27. (Strengths, Weaknesses,
The analysis of the current Opportunities, Threats). The SWOT
situation reflects the condition of the analysis is a synthesis of the current
waste management in Romania and it situation in the field of waste
31
management and presents the internal must be annulled (the weaknesses),
factors on which we have to as well as favorable external factors
concentrate (the strengths) or which (opportunities) or unfavorable (threats).

Table 2
SWOT analysis for waste management in Romania
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
• the elaboration of the National • big waste quantity which is
Strategy for Waste Management, as generated and uncontrolled storage;
well as the National Plan for Waste • the rate of valorising the useful
Management; fractions is very reduced;
• the elaboration of regional and • the reduced quality of soil and water
county plans for waste management; because of pollution with waste which is
• waste management has a complex not stored appropriately;
legal framework; • precarious infrastructure for
• the elaboration of guides for the collecting, transporting and eliminating
implementation of suitable systems for the waste;
waste management; • the limited capacity of the local
• the experience acquired by certain authorities to elaborate viable project
local authorities in developing proposals;
investment projects financed through • low level of awareness and
European programmes; responsibility of the population and the
• setting up organisations which are economic agents concerning adequate
oriented towards promoting efficient waste management;
and lasting solutions for the waste • lack of competent staff for waste
management process; management activities;
• the existence of a big number of
historically polluted sites, as a
consequence of past economic
activities;
• low degree of implementation for the
environment legislation;
• the bureaucracy in obtaining
financing for waste management
projects.
OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
• accessing EU funds for improving • The pressures exercised by
the environment quality in Romania; domestic waste on the quality of
• developing tourism in an area environment factors;
where there is an efficient waste • Unstable legal framework;
management system; • A mentality of indifference
regarding environmental protection;
• attracting foreign investors by
• High costs in the implementation of
improving the sanitation services;
„clean technologies” and of the best
• the advantages offered by the available techniques for waste
public-private partnership in sanitation; management;
• developing long-term investment • Irrational exploitation of natural
projects in sustainable development resources;
conditions; • Inappropriate use of EU funds;
• Developing a viable market for • Problems encountered by the small
32
recycling waste respectively a market communities regarding the investment
for valorising the products resulted costs that are to be borne in the waste
from waste processing; management projects;
• Encouraging „clean technologies”. • Delays in approving the waste
Which are less polluting; management projects;
• The possibility of partnerships with • Difficulties encountered in
other city authorities for waste financing income-generating projects;
management; • Difficulties in choosing the right
place for building the waste
• Promoting the production of energy infrastructure;
from sources that can be regenerated;

In order to comply with the management is concentrated on


requirements of the European Union, fundamenting the strategies, the
Romania will have to take the action plans, the strategic planning of
following measures: urban systems for waste management.
• Make serious efforts for Romanian research in the waste field
achieving a modern environment is making progress gradually having
infrastructure; the role to support and fundament the
• Provide quality sanitation actions of the local and central
services at reasonable tariffs for all the authorities in order to adopt and put
citizens, in order to protect the health into practice those waste management
of the population and of the systems which are similar to the most
environment; spread European practices. Thus, at
• Invest in workforce training in the level of central authorities, there
the field of waste management, a are two national research institutes
scarce segment at the moment; subordinated to the Ministry of
• Valorise at maximum the Environment (The National of
useful potential from domestic waste Research and Development for
by developing a waste market, as Environment Protection – ICIM
secondary raw materials; Bucharest and The National Institute
• Create an efficient collection- of Research and Development for
transport-valorisation-ecological Industrial Ecology – ECOIND) which
storage network for waste; include laboratories and special
• Encourage a sustainable sections for research in the field of
consumption (by promoting eco- technologies for waste management.
products), which means using The role of these research institutes is
efficiently the resources involved and to fundament scientifically, based on
a reduced impact on the environment; national statistics and national
The SWOT analysis confirms reference data bases, the
the fact that implementing an governmental and local adopted
integrated waste management can strategies, as well as to monitor the
have a significant impact on improving implementation of of the
the quality of life and of the engagements taken when signing the
environment in Romania. The treaty for joining the European Union
improvements in the field of waste (through the corresponding monitoring
management in Romania will lead to plans).
the promotion of sustainable
development. Conclusions
At the level of Romania, the In our view, successful
present research in the field of waste implementation of a sustainable waste

33
management system requires the sanitation problems along the known
active involvement of citizens in flow: collection-transport-valorisation-
sanitation services by minimizing the storage-reintegration in nature;
quantities of waste generated waste, • At present, the reduced
by supporting the actions of selective valorisation of existing waste
collection of useful fractions of discourages the authorities in finding
household waste and encouraging good and urgent solutions;
their recovery. • The high costs of the
We consider that the present implementation of a feasible
problems with which waste integrated waste management
management is confronted can be programme;
summarized as follows: • Lack of interest on the mass-
• The existing storing places are media side for this subject
often placed in sensitive areas (close Starting from the problems
to towns, surface or underground caused by an inefficient waste
waters, recreation areas); management, the sustainable
• The majority of the current approach to waste management is
warehouses are not operated vital for a community out of several
correspondingly, there isn’t a strict reasons:
quality control and a control of the • The capacity of the warehouses
quantity of waste entering the decreases continuously, while placing
warehouse; there aren’t facilities for and building new facilities is a difficult
the control of the biogas; the and very expensive process;
fermentation processes with gas and
leach are not controlled;
• Many materials which are found
in waste are rare natural resources
• The fields occupied by waste
which must be recovered in order to
storage are considered damaged
reduce the impact on the environment
grounds, which cannot be used for
and to increase life quality;
agricultural purposes;
• The collection of domestic • The useful materials from the
waste from the population is not waste volume can be an opportunity to
selective, in general; they reach the start a business;
warehouses in a mixed condition, thus • The majority of waste are
losing part of their useful potential recognized by the EU legislation as an
(paper, glass, metals, plastic materials) important source of energy that can be
• The lack of an adequate regenerated;
infrastructure in this field, but also the • A system which is based on
absence of the machines and the more than one alternative is more
installations for waste processing, flexible to economic, technological and
insufficient transportation capacities, legal changes;
reduced number of containers for We consider that reaching the
elective collection; objectives of each direction of the
• Lack of ecological education European Union must be based on a
and citizen spirit to be seen at many very important evolution of selective
citizens who mistake the public space waste collection. Their success is
for the place where waste can be based mainly on each citizen’s
thrown; behavior, and the efficiency of the
• Impressive increase of one-use investment depends on making the
packaging in the consumption circuit; public aware of the necessity of
• Insufficient involvement of city selective collection. The first step for
halls in approaching and solving the the implementation of a sustainable
34
waste management system is would be looked upon first as
represented by a change of education, resources and only then as something
culture and mentality so that waste that must be removed.

REFERENCES

Câmpeanu, V. (2007), Dezvoltarea durabilă şi managementul mediului, Editura


Pro Universitaria, Bucureşti.
Gavrilaş, A. & Doliş, M. (2006), Ecologie şi protecţia mediului, Editura Alfa, Iaşi.
Gavrilescu, M. & Nicu, M. (2005), „Reducerea poluanţilor la sursă şi minimizarea
deşeurilor”, Editura ECOZONE, Iasi.
Găzdaru, A., Rolul, acţiunile şi rezultatele obţinute de sectorul privat în
colectarea selectivă a deşeurilor solide urbane, „Revista Salubritatea”, nr.
2/2005.
Lazăr, I. & Scorţar, L. M., (2008), Environmental education-basic rule of
sustainable,“Quality access to success” Journal.
McDougall, F & White, P. & Franke, M. & Hindle, P. (2001), Integrated Solid
Waste Management: a Life Cycle Inventory, Blackwell Publishing.
McHarry, J. (1993), „Reuse, Repair, Recycle”, Gaia Books Limited, UK.
Negrea, A & Cocheci, L. & Pode, R. (2007) Managementul integrat al deşeurilor
solide orăşeneşti, Editura POLITEHNICA, Timişoara, Colecţia „Protecţia
Mediului”.
Petrişor, D. (2007), Mediul şi sănătatea publică, Editura Sitech, Craiova.
Rojanschi, V.& Bran,F. & Diaconu, G. (1997), Protecţia şi ingineria mediului,
Editura Economică, Bucureşti.
Rusu, T. & Bejan, M. (2006), Deşeul – sursă de venit, Editura Mediamira, Cluj-
Napoca.
Scorţar, L. M. & Lazăr, I. (2008), The Recycling of the main fractions that can be
revalued from the household waste, “Quality access to success” Journal.
Stomff, T., Rolul utilizatorilor în recuperarea materialelor secundare în cadrul
serviciilor de salubritate, „Revista Salubritatea”, nr. 2/2004.

35

Potrebbero piacerti anche