Our connection to Her Majesty

Any term associated with the wording “Her Majesty” is underlined for easy referencing. For the
purposes of this text, Her Majesty does not refer to the human being who sits on a throne over in
England, but to a legal fiction entity. It is neither good nor bad. Through cause and effect, Her Majesty has
become a confusing symbol within the construct of commerce.

As we know, a Statement of Birth (SOB) is a primary foundation document. It represents the

beginning and the end. It is the private document which is not recognized in the public.
- - - A Birth Certificate (BC) is an extract or copy of the SOB.
- - - The Province, who holds the SOB, appears to act like it is the owner of the vessel.
- - - As recipient of a BC, you are the captain of the vessel.
- - - Everything you do in the name of the vessel (the name appearing on the BC), is done for
the owner of the vessel.

As the captain of a particular vessel, you and only you, have the authority to bind Her
Majesty's agents to perform the interests of Her Majesty. Thing is, if you are using the name of
the vessel to buy yourself something, then it is not for Her Majesty. In the bigger picture it
always is, but if you believe that it is your assets you are buying, then this is the only reason you
bear the responsibility of ownership. You are not the owner - - - but for the belief you are.
It is good to serve, is it not? The BC is Her Majesty's valuable token for you to play her game.
Her Majesty regulates commerce, not you. You do that by how you play the game. Accept
responsibility. You have the choice to serve either self or Her Majesty (public/all). You decide.
This is the free will aspect in play. In other words, this is the CHOICE.

It is mandatory by law that births are registered, and that Government Identification (ID) is
required to play Her Majesty's game, COMMERCE. That act is not voluntary, but all others are.
There is no law requiring anyone to be anything, but one may voluntarily make application/beg
to be, say a doctor, or for a permit/license/etc. So whoever holds the SOB holds an interest in
everything done in the name appearing on the BC. This means: “This is the party who is
responsible to manage the financial and legal aspects associated with your use of Her Majesty's
vessel/token, with you as captain/recipient. In other words, it appears to come down to this; you
are either serving yourself or serving Her Majesty when acquiring assets with her token. Serving
Her Majesty means serving the public - - - - - which is people. Anyone that has taken an oath
to Her Majesty, is serving Her Majesty, the public. Do you agree? Webster's: "public", of or
relating to people in general.

Do you agree that it is good to serve others? If so, then we need to stop making it appear that
we are serving ourselves through Her Majesty's token/vessel, and serve Her Majesty. Lay the
foundation document in front of an agent in service to Her Majesty. Show that you are the
recipient of the BC, issued, signed, and sealed by a representative of, and in service to Her
Majesty. Express how honorable it is that the agent is serving Her Majesty, and make it clear
that you want to do the same with her token. Whose cargo is it then that is on Her Majesty's
vessel, that you are captain of? Captain has the right to receive and dispose of property.
Why, he is the only one with the title/BC with the name on it that matches the name associated
with the goods/cargo being received or disposed of. The home is the warehouse where the
vessel and its cargo are generally docked/ berthed.
You hold the warehouse receipt and again, the authority to receive and dispose of cargo - - -
the goods you are presently buying and selling. Now that you and the agent are serving Her
Majesty (the people), you are on equal ground.

What it appears this is coming down to is this: since you are the one and only recipient of the
one and only certificate/title to the token of Her Majesty, you are with the authority to delegate
representatives of Her Majesty to perform transactions in the name of the token for Her Majesty,
and your authority to accept delivery of the goods. Now, if the representative agent refuses to
believe you can do that, they are in dishonor. You can because the truth/proof is that the token
is Her Majesty's token. It is issued by a representative/agent of Her Majesty, and so the truth is,
whether you know it or not, everything you do in the name appearing on the BC is in fact
being done for Her Majesty, the people that you are part of - - - the collective one.

So given the truth, an agent is in dishonor whether they know it or not, if they refuse your
order to perform what you want done, that serves, not you, but Her Majesty. Thus, the final
conclusion is that you cannot be called upon to pay or perform. Jesus did say that all power and
authority was given unto the people. God gives us our power, as does Her Majesty's token.
When serving self with it, OR, as what appears to be self serving, perhaps for lack of evidence
to the contrary, one is not of God. Thus, one has no recognition under the Canadian Bill of
Rights. One is not spiritual, if one is serving self, OR not known to be serving all (the people),
under the heading “public”. If one is not of the spirit which parliament recognizes, then one is
recognized as “not of it”.

See, it is the law that the party that is in dishonor, will loose. Therefore if an agent is to refuse
the truth and prevents you from serving Her Majesty, a very honorable thing to do via her token,
the agent will loose. He may not be aware of that outcome due to the ignorance at street level. It
is not my duty or purpose to figure out the agent’s job. It is however, in my best interest to
know who I am, and what I have (the tools available to me, what they are, and what they are
for). When I spoke to the lawyer about surrendering the estate of the name on the BC, he
did not hesitate one iota = did not resist the idea. The BC, as Judith Hartman (Deputy
Registrar General) said, “is a valuable token - - - but not in the hands of Government”. Since it is
desired by government that we use Government Identification (do not resist here), clearly it is
valuable in our hands, but not if we use it as something other than was intended. If used as
personal identification, it is then assumed, for instance, that the house is your house, and so
you are subjected to and responsible for all aspects of legal ownership. The BC is Her Majesty's
token so you can play her game. Her game is commerce, as that is what Her Majesty regulates.

It is good to serve and so serve.....Not self, but Her Majesty's vessel, and you as the captain.
The SOB is title to the BC (copy of title), and means that everything you do in the name on it, is
for the holder of that title document (representative of Her Majesty). However, as per free
will, it is accepted that you may believe, wrongly of course, that what you are doing in that
name, is owned by you. In other words, we have adopted a notion that we are owners of things
in the game of commerce.……. You can clearly see what ego gets us.

The truth shall set you free. As the recipient of a BC, you are with the power and authority to
determine your fate = free will to make choices. You can use Her Majesty's token for your
benefit and assume all responsibilities associated with legal ownership, OR you can accept the
truth and serve ALL (public/people) through it, in the stead……………“People” is singular,
and includes ALL as one. People are of the spirit, but if people partake in, business, lay
(argument), secular, activity in any way shape or form, or is known/recognized to act for self
gain, then one is controlled by the spirit of ego, and that is not God like. Thus, how the heck can
the Bills of Rights apply to you? There is responsibility and duty. Your responsibility is to make
the truth known, so that the agents can do their duty. The agents are not responsible for your
choices, but they do have a duty to serve Her Majesty. You hold the power and authority to
make it so that everything you do is KNOWN to be for Her Majesty, so that you too, like the
agent, are serving. Genesis; "It is good". “Your will be done,” and the BC gives you the authority
that ensures that “your will be done”, no matter what your will is. Serve self - - - or serve all.

By making it known you are using Her Majesty's token to serve Her Majesty, you have in
essence, surrendered to the treasury. Her Majesty/CANADA is the treasury. Build up your
riches in heaven. Heaven is everywhere, thus as well the treasury is everywhere that falls within
the territory of CANADA. CANADA (full of treasures), is a ship being steered toward
prosperity, and those that fail to assist in that endeavor for the good of all, must be prepared to
be tossed off at anytime. When you serve Her Majesty you serve all, so make it known you want
to serve her majesty with her token, as does the agent with his title and oath. Your act of serving
Her Majesty (your estate) by recognizing the assets are in a name of Her Majesty (us), and not
claiming BS or damages, but accepting the facts, has far more meaning/value than an oath
taken by a paid agent.

There is no need for you to become an expert in bills, bonds, notes, procedures, because
there is no money and that is the duty of the agent, once you make it known this transaction is
being done in the name of Her Majesty's token for Her Majesty. The agent is there to fulfill your
desires as long as it is for Her Majesty. If it is for you, then you pay, because that is the cost of
doing business as distinguished from spiritual.

There is no money, so get your head steered away from all things/concepts/analogies that
have anything to do with money/currency and the flow of it. Contracts must be paid in money
and where there are contracts there is no love and so if you are paying with money it is because
you got onto the wrong boat/path. Landlord tenant matter was cancelled for no contract. It
was known in that matter that the token was Her Majesty's token, and that there was no human
to back it, so a representative of Her Majesty stepped in to intervene and the matter was
cancelled for no contract. This suggests that if what you do in the name of the token is for Her
Majesty, there will not be any contract born. Serving all is an act of love, and there are no
contracts where there is love, and playing with bills, bonds, and notes are contracts/promises.
Let the agent handle such matters and therefore you are not a party to any contract, nor need
you be. See, everything is prepaid/free, so for what reason does one need to contract to assure
performance, if the thing is prepaid/free?

The BC is what gives you control of your life and assets, in the name of Her Majesty's token.
It is also what identifies Her Majesty as the party to pay and perform, but not before you make it
known that everything you do in the name of Her Majesty's token, given you to play HER game,
is done for Her Majesty. It is good and an honor, to go in low and serve, is it not? There is
no money, and I doubt therefore that Her Majesty believes there is money.
Two worlds……. World 1: money and contracts = accounting for debts and obligations, duties,
etc. World 2: unconditional giving = love

Love is the way and as part of our being, we have to accept that we are the source of credit
to the entire system. We have to accept that not one corporation brings value to any table.
Corporations are debtors. This is the end of story. People will challenge you on that and we
need to stand firm on the truth. Corporations exist in name only. They lack moral or financial
resource.
 We know that as per the Bank Act natural persons do not issue evidence of debt. Entities do
and as per the same act her majesty is an entity. We know that God (1) made us (2) in his
image and that parliament of Canada made banks (3) in our image. We know that the Supreme
Court, Bank of Canada v. Bank of Montreal, makes it clear that the people are backing the
obligations of the Fed to the BOC that back notes issued by the BOC and that tax receipts (fruits
of labor) service those debts. We know then that tax receipts result from our labor and so we
are the ones servicing a debt we did not enter into.

In other words, the government issues evidences of debt that obligated it to perform, not us.
If you obligate yourself to a debt and I service it, what does that make me in relation to
you? If I am servicing your obligations I have performed and as such I do have a claim against
you dollar for dollar. Same as when a bank pays the property taxes for the registered owner.
The registered owner owes the bank for the amount the bank paid for the registered owner. Her
Majesty's agents act as though her majesty is a creditor and she may be, but not to people. Her
Majesty is indebted to the BOC so money flows. Her Majesty, an entity, cannot service the debt.
There has got to be a performer in the picture that is able to perform. Otherwise how will the
obligations be met?

See, if I perform for you, I have a claim against you and you'd know it. If part of my
performance is that everything I do is yours (pledged) then you are in fact holding the remedy,
the gold so to speak. I could pay to cover for you and then recover from you, which is a waste of
paper and time, adds to the costs, or you can just pay in the first instance. There would be no
excuse in this case for you not to pay. It would be a blatant dishonor. You accept what is mine is
yours and you withhold. It is better to give than receive.

Interesting is that a synonym for Angel is SPONSOR............

Love to all…….