Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Cash Flows
Project Co C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
A (1.000) 1.000 - - - -
B (2.000) 1.000 1.000 4.000 1.000 1.000
C (3.000) 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000
a) If the opportunity cost of capital is 10%, which projects have a positive NPV?
$1000
NPVA = − $1000 + = −$90.91
(1.10)
Remember that: Payback period of a project is found by counting the number of years it
takes before the cumulative forecasted cash flow equals the initial investments. So:
Payback A = 1 year
Payback B = 2 years
Payback C = 4 years
c) Which project(s) would a firm using the payback rule accept if the cutoff period is 3 years?
The firm would accept only those projects with a payback period < 3 years; in this case
only projects A and B would be accepted.
e) Which project(s) would a firm using the discounted payback rule accept if the cutoff period
was 3 years?
a) “I like the IRR rule. I can use it to rank projects without having to specify a discount
rate”
When using the IRR rule, the firm must still compare the IRR with the opportunity cost
of capital. Thus, even with the IRR method, one must specify the appropriate discount
rate.
b) “I like the payback rule. As long as the minimum payback period is short, the rule makes
sure that the company takes no borderline projects. That reduces risk”
Risky cash flows should be discounted at a higher rate than the rate used to discount less
risky cash flows. Using the payback rule is equivalent to using the NPV rule with a zero
discount rate for cash flows before the payback period and an infinite discount rate for
cash flows thereafter.
Exercise No 10. Calculate the IRR (or IRRs) for the following project:
Co C1 C2 C3
(3.000) 3.500 4.000 (4.000)
For what range of discount rates does the project have positive NPV?
Exercise No. 12. Mr. Cyrus Clops, the president of Giant Enterprises, has to make a choice
between two possible investments:
The opportunity cost of capital is 9%. Mr. Clops is tempted to take B, which has the higher
IRR.
(a) Explain to Mr. Clops why this is not the correct procedure.
Taking a decision based only on the IRR is not the correct procedure because Project A
requires a larger capital outlay; it is possible that Project A has both a lower IRR and a
higher NPV than Project B. (In fact, NPVA is greater than NPVB for all discount rates
less than 10 percent.) Because the goal is to maximize shareholder wealth, NPV is the
correct criterion.
(b) Show him how to adapt the IRR rule to choose the best project.
To use the IRR criterion for mutually exclusive projects, we can calculate the IRR for the
incremental cash flows as follows:
Given that the IRR for the incremental cash flows exceeds the cost of capital, the
additional investment in A is worthwhile.
(c) Show him that this project has the higher NPV.
$250 $300
NPVA = − $400 + + = $ 81.86
1.09 (1.09) 2
$140 $179
NPVB = − $200 + + = $79.10
1.09 (1.09) 2
Projected
Year schedule Accelerated shift
1 (250) (550)
2 (250) 650
3 650
The IRRs for the incremental flows are (approximately): 21.13% and 78.87%. If the cost of
capital is between these rates, Titanic should work the extra shift.