Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Jayakrishna.A.V
Introduction
During the nineteenth century there was a development in
commercial law through the common law and the process was achieved by
codification of certain defined area. Sir Mackenzie Chalmers drafted the following
acts Bills of Exchange Act 1882, The Sale of Goods Act 1893 and the Marine
Insurance Act 1906 and out of these The Sale of Goods act was amended
particularly by the Supply of Goods Act 1973 and then the law solidified the Act as
Sale of Goods Act 1979 which came into existence on 1st January 1980 1.The 1979
act has itself be modified, mainly by the Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994 ,Sale of
Goods Act 1995 and Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002.
“In a contract when a seller transfers or agrees to exchange the belongings in goods
to the buyer for a financial consideration called price” 2
Alternate definition is given in Subsection (3) and (4) for two transaction as
(3) “In a contract of sale if the property in goods is transferred from a seller to
purchaser the contract is called as sale”
1
Sir Gordon Borrie ,Commercial Law ,Sixth Edition [1988],Butterworth’s & Co Publishers,Pg
50
2
L S Sealy & R J A Hooley, Text and Materials in Commercial Law,(1994),Butterworth’s & Co
Publishers,Pg 211
International Logistics and Maritime Commerce 11 Nov 2010
(4) “Where under a contact of sale the transfer of property in the goods is to take
place at a future time or subjected to some conditions later to be fulfilled the contract
is called as an agreement to sell”3
Condition and warranties are the two important terms used in a contract
and Sale of Goods Act draws throughout distinction between the terms “condition”
and “warranty”.
The classifications of condition in English law are generally considered as
imperfect and unsatisfactory but if a condition in a contract is breached, the offended
party can repudiate and claim damages. A violated condition gives an automatic right
to reject. Any implied terms from legislation or statute are conditions.
A warranty is ancillary to main aim of contract and its meaning was
considerably widened in the law of contract but if a warranty is breached, the
wronged party can only sue for indemnity but no right to reject the goods and treat
the contract as repudiated.4
2. When a sale contract is subjected to be fulfill by the vender the emptor may waive
the precondition, or may elect to consider the violation of the condition as a breach of
warranty and not as a reason for repudiating the contract.
3
P.S. Atiyah,Prof J N Adams & Hector Macqueen, Sale of Goods(2005),Pearson Longman
Publication ,Pg 8
4
Sale of Goods Act Chapter 54 section 11(3)
2
International Logistics and Maritime Commerce 11 Nov 2010
3. if a term 'condition' is stated in a contract sale , the break of which may give the
right to consider the contract as repudiated, or a warranty and the violation of which
may give right to claim for damages but not the right to refuse the cargo or goods
and treat the contract as terminated. This depends on the building of the contract on
each case and a precondition may be a stipulation, though called a warranty in the
contract of sale.
4. If the buyer has acknowledged the goods or part of them and if a contract of sale
is not dissociable the breach or violation of a condition to be fulfilled by the vendor
can only be considered as a breach of warranty and not the right for refusing the
goods and to repudiate the contract. This scenario is not valid if there is an unstated
term of the contract to that effect.5
5
ibid subsection (2),(3) & (4) of section (11)
6
Toepfer V Warnico Lloyds’s rep 569 at pg 576..
7
http:// www.ilaw.prod.informaprofessional.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=148529
3
International Logistics and Maritime Commerce 11 Nov 2010
"Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Limited v/s Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Limited"
(1962).11
8
Dobson: Sale of Goods and Consumer Credit Fifth Edition (1996) Sweet & Maxwell
publication Pg 102(7-04)
9
Boone V Eyre (1977) 1HB 1 273n
10
Michael Mark ,Chalmers Sale of Goods (1981) Butterworths & Co Publishers,Pg 111
11
[1962] 2 QB 26
4
International Logistics and Maritime Commerce 11 Nov 2010
Innominate terms, though necessary, are not without their disadvantages. The
two main difficulties are the trouble in identifying whether the term is innominate, and
knowing how serious the consequences of the breach must be to allow repudiation.
12
http://netk.net.au/Contract/Hong.asp
5
International Logistics and Maritime Commerce 11 Nov 2010
This case involved sale contracts to trade citrus pulp pellets on GAFTA
terms. Bremer sold 3,313 tons of citrus pellets to Cehave for 100,000 pounds.
Clause in the contract said that the shipment was to be in perfect condition. The
buyers were to use the product to manufacture cattle food. On arrival in Rotterdam ,
there was major impairment to 1260 metric tons and minor damage to a further
2053 tons. The buyers disapproved the cargo and claimed the return of the price
which had already been paid. People holding pellets sold for 30,000 pounds and
14
they sold them to Cehave for same amount.
13
[1975] QB 44, ALL ER 739,CA
14
http://www.usyd.edu.au/lec/subjects/commercial/topic_notes/md02_commercial.PDF
15
Michael Furmstone, Sale of Goods Corner publication LTD (1990) Pg 2
16
Roger Brownsword an article on A New Look at the Right to Withdraw for Breach of
Contract, 1992 Pg 57
6
International Logistics and Maritime Commerce 11 Nov 2010
concern to the consequences of the violation rather than the character of the term
broken'.17
In this case the ruling went the other way. A contract was signed
by the buyer and seller to trade fifteen kilo tonne of Soya bean meal from the sellers.
Three shipments of five kilo tonne were ordered to be done from a seaport in the
Gulf of Mexico to be listed by the vendor. The parties fixed that one shipment would
be completed in June 1975 and the buyers would supply a vessel in the scheduled
port. The contract between buyer and seller assured that the buyers were to give a
minimum of fifteen successive day’s notice of their probable willingness to load the
ship. For the goods to be transported in June, the intimation should be given by 13 th
of June. The buyer failed to provide the notice until 17 th of June and the sellers
claimed that the delayed notice was a violation of contract amounting to a
cancellation of the contract. They claimed compensation from the buyers on the
basis of depreciation of Soya bean price in the market to the minimum at that time.
The buyers argued in the court that the term in the notice
should be treated as an innominate term and the effect of the violation was not
sufficiently severe for the sellers to treat the contract as terminated. The appeal court
in this case stated that the term in the condition was not an innominate term. 19
When a party is in a breach of a term in a contract for the sale of goods he/she is in
a position as follows
(1) In the circumstances of violation of terms in the contract the other party has
unrestricted right to cease the contract or in the case of buyer, rejection of
goods.
17
Ewan McKenDrick, Contract Law Text, Cases and Materials (2nd Edition), Oxford University
Press, 2005 Pg 959
18
SA [1981] 1 WLR 711
19
www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=148547
7
International Logistics and Maritime Commerce 11 Nov 2010
(2) Even if there is no express provision to that effect ,the other party may still to
be so entitled upon the proper construction of the contract
(3) If the party is so entitled because of the term “condition” in the contract ,the
term entirely depends on whether the word is used as a code for “shall be
entitled to repudiate the contract or reject the goods”
(4) In all those section in Sale of Goods Act the term “condition” is a code word in
which breach of this term results in repudiation or rejection of goods by the
buyer, subjected to other relevant provisions of the act
(5) Breach of some specific terms in gives rise of itself to a right in the other party
to repudiate the contract.
(6) In some cases the consequences of the breach are assumed to go to core of
the contract and to justify repudiation20
Under the sub section (4) of section (11) of the act, if the buyer has lost the
right to reject or claim for compensation he still can go to court for breach of
condition not for breach of warranty and will not be banned by the clause in
the contract which provide against actions for breach of warranty.
Here at this instance i.e. at the time when the buyer has to decide how to treat
the breach of condition, the contract should not be severable and if this is the
scenario then it is irrelevant that it could have been severed at an early time
20
Chalmers Sale of Goods act 18th edition Butterworths publication1981 pg 110
21
[1965] 1 W.L.R.1117;109 S.J.553
8
International Logistics and Maritime Commerce 11 Nov 2010
separate documents and hence the buyers having accepted one part of the goods
could not reject the rest.22
Conclusion
Between 1893 and 1969 it was widely believed that all terms in
contract can be categorised either into condition or warranty but It is not possible to
precisely classify, all contractual terms into condition and warranties. The
construction and addition of innominate clause into the act changed the entire
perception of the act, but still it would not be functional to classify all contractual
undertakings into intermediate or innominate terms. This is because of the difficulty
in predictability of the innominate terms. Flexibility of innominate term is needed for
fairness in some situations because we all are humans and it is not possible to
predict every probable breach of a given term.
Word count:2468
References
Books
22
Dobson: Sale of Goods and Consumer Credit Fifth Edition (1996) Sweet & Maxwell
publication pg 185(11-08)
9
International Logistics and Maritime Commerce 11 Nov 2010
Articles
10
International Logistics and Maritime Commerce 11 Nov 2010
Web sites
Bunge Corporation v Tradax Export SA (1981).
www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=148547
(Accessed on 01/11/2010)
11