Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
APRIL 2011
COMPASS provides this newsletter to alert California-based marine scientists to relevant policy developments and
opportunities. If you want more information, have items to contribute, or have comments about the newsletter,
contact Toni Mizerek at tmizerek@compassonline.org or 831-648-7988.
KEY EVENTS
Upcoming Recent
May 4-5 - Fish and Game Commission April 6-7 - Fish and Game Commission
Location: Ontario Location: Folsom
http://www.fgc.ca.gov/meetings/ http://www.fgc.ca.gov/meetings/
2011/2011mtgs.asp 2011/2011mtgs.asp
History
The California Legislature created the State Coastal Conservancy (SCC) in 1976 to use non-
regulatory, entrepreneurial techniques to purchase, protect, restore, and enhance the state’s coastal,
marine, and San Francisco Bay Area resources, and to provide access to the shore. In concert with
two regulatory agencies, the California Coastal Commission and the San Francisco Bay Conservation
and Development Commission (BCDC), the SCC implements California’s federally approved coastal
management program. The SCC also administers and supports the Ocean Protection Council
(highlighted here in Feb).
Vision: A beautiful, restored, and accessible coastline
Who
The SCC has a staff of about 75 people with training in law, science, policy, finance, and project
management. The staff is led by an executive officer and two deputy executive officers.
A seven-member board of directors governs the SCC. The board consists of the Secretary for Natural
Resources, the Director of the Department of Finance, and the Chair of the California Coastal
Commission, as well as four members of the public, who are appointed by the Governor, Assembly,
and Senate. Six state legislators participate in and provide oversight to the SCC’s activities.
Responsibilities
The SCC uses flexible grant-making, contracting, and property transaction powers to pursue
California’s long-term coastal management goals. Unlike the Coastal Commission or BCDC, which use
regulatory powers to achieve these goals, the SCC serves as a creative intermediary among
government, citizens, and the private sector. The SCC’s responsibilities include:
• Protecting and restoring coastal and marine water quality and wildlife habitats
• Enhancing coastal resources that “have suffered loss of natural and scenic values”
• Developing public accessways to and along the coast and around San Francisco Bay
• Protecting, restoring and enhancing coastal agricultural lands and land uses
• Using grants to facilitate the restoration of areas that are “adversely affecting the coastal
environment or impeding orderly development”
• Restoring urban waterfronts
• Reserving “significant coastal resource sites” for public use and enjoyment
The SCC may award grants to public agencies and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations.
Examples of recent projects include: supporting wetland restoration in South Coast watersheds and
San Francisco Bay; coordinating local, state, and federal agencies in joint projects that eliminate
invasive Spartina species from San Francisco and Humboldt bays; funding the extension and
improvement of the California Coastal Trail; and funding and overseeing a sediment fate and
transport study for the Tijuana Estuary.
Thanks to Matt Armsby at the Center for Ocean Solutions for research and writing support.
STATE LEGISLATURE
State Parks: AB 42
Assemblymember Huffman
March 22, Referred to Appropriations Committee
This bill would authorize the Department of Parks and Recreation to enter into contracts with qualified
nonprofit organizations to assist with state park operations. For the bill description, search for AB42 at
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov.
Five regions in California are working to establish a statewide network of Marine Protected Areas
(MPAs). Each Regional Stakeholder Group designs MPA proposals for a study region. Once MPA
proposals are completed they undergo scientific and policy review, and are ultimately approved
or denied by the California Fish and Game Commission, which is the final decision making body
in the MLPA process. Regulations have been adopted on the central, north-central, and south
coast. The planning process has just been completed on the north coast. San Francisco Bay has
yet to embark on the process.
MLPA staff addressed shortcomings identified in the DFG feasibility analysis and reported at the April
Fish and Game Commission (FGC) meeting. During the June meeting, the FGC will select a proposed
project and the regulatory and environmental review process will be initiated.
The MPA Monitoring Enterprise (a program of the California Ocean Science Trust) and the California
Department of Fish and Game released the Draft South Coast MPA Monitoring Plan (Draft Plan) for
public comment.
The Draft Plan, prepared by the Monitoring Enterprise in collaboration with DFG, and is designed to
ensure that MPA monitoring in the region will meet the requirements of the MLPA. This includes
evaluating the performance of the South Coast regional MPA network against the MLPA goals to inform
future MPA management decisions, thereby facilitating adaptive MPA management. The Draft Plan was
developed through a consultative process with scientists, stakeholders and the public in the south
coast region.
The Monitoring Enterprise is seeking public comment to improve the Draft Plan. The Draft Plan can be
downloaded as a pdf file from the Monitoring Enterprise South Coast webpage. Copies are available at
a variety of locations in the south coast region. Limited print copies are also available upon request.
Comments are due by 5:00pm PDT on Friday, May 27th and can be submitted via:
1. An online comment form
2. Email: mpamonitoring@calost.org
3. Mail: MPA Monitoring Enterprise - Plan Comments
California Ocean Science Trust
1330 Broadway, Suite 1135
Oakland, CA 94612
CONGRESS
Coral Reef Conservation Amendments Act of 2011. S. 46
Jan 25: Introduced by Senator Inouye (HI)
Referred to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
This bill would amend the Coral Reef Conservation Act of 2000 to direct the Secretary of Commerce to
submit to Congress a national coral reef ecosystem action strategy. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/
query/z?c112:S.46:
Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary Boundary
Modification and Protection Act. H.R. 192
Jan 5: Introduced by Representative Woolsey (CA)
Jan 26: Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, Oceans, and Insular Affairs
This bill would make certain adjustments to expand the boundaries of the Farallones National Marine
Sanctuary (NMS) and the Cordell Bank NMS . http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.192:
Commerce, Justice, Science: The Commerce, Justice, Science section of the Continuing Resolution
(CR) contains a total of $53.4 billion, a 17% – or $10.9 billion – reduction from fiscal year 2010
levels, and a reduction of 12% – or $7.1 billion – from the President’s fiscal year 2011 request.
• NOAA’s Operations, Research and Facilities line is reduced by $119 million from FY 2010
enacted levels, and the Procurement, Acquisition, and Construction line is reduced by $23
million. It also prohibits funding for the establishment of a NOAA Climate Service and the
approval of new fisheries catch-share programs in certain fisheries.
Energy and Water: The Energy and Water section is funded at $31.8 billion in the CR. This is a 10% –
or $3.6 billion – reduction from the President’s fiscal year 2011 request, and a 5% – or $1.7 billion –
reduction from fiscal year 2010 levels.
FEDERAL AGENCIES
Additional Updates
Ocean Acidification Task Force - Report released
The Ocean Research and Resources Advisory Panel (ORRAP), Ocean Acidification Task Force
(OATF) released their “Summary of Work Completed and Recommendations for ORRAP to
convey to the Interagency Working Group on Ocean Acidification”. The report adds to the
National Research Council’s report “Ocean Acidification: A National Strategy to Meet the
Challenges of a Changing Ocean”. Some of the OATF recommendations include:
• Improving effective communication about Ocean Acidification research and its relevance
to society
• The need for more science should be focused on the development of sensors for
physical, chemical and biological variables. There should also be an explicit goal for
observational, experimental and modeling studies to include entire food webs and the
biogeochemical cycles that support them
• A permanent, national, interagency cyberinfrastructure system that ties together, or
stores in a few places, all relevant data archives relevant to ocean acidification
To read the report including the other recommendations, visit: http://www.nopp.org/wp-
content/uploads/2010/03/OATF-REPORT-FINAL-4-21-11.pdf