Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CBI has not made any formal charges against the Swiss Timing
company.
The tender procedure and the bidding procedure have been totally
transparent and Swiss Timing has at no time tried to illegally
influence the tender and bidding procedure.
Before, during and after the Games, the Swiss Timing experts had
to work under disastrous, chaotic conditions. Despite this
situation, Swiss Timing delivered an impeccable service to the
athletes of the Commonwealth Games 2010.
The pricing has been totally transparent. The difference between the
price of the Commonwealth Games (CWG) 2006 in Melbourne – which is
frequently misquoted in the Indian media – and the price for the CWG
2010 in Delhi has of course been discussed during the tender procedure
between the various Committee expert groups and the departments of
the Organizing Committee. The Organizing Committee (OC) was of
course informed about the Melbourne offer, as well as the
Commonwealth Games Federation. Both offers and contracts are
transparent and comparable. Various employees working for Melbourne
in 2006 were also working for the OC in Delhi and can confirm the facts.
Facts and figures:
The timing contract for the CWG Melbourne 2006 amounted to 10.2
million Swiss Francs. The contract for the CWG 2010 Delhi amounted to
24.9 million Swiss Francs. Similar contracts were concluded also with
the Asian Games 2006 in Doha, and the PanAm Games 2007 in Rio de
Janeiro.
Here are the main elements of the price difference between the two
CWG events 2006 and 2010:
1. The scope of work in Delhi was much bigger than the one in
Melbourne. The OC in Delhi requested additionally: Games
information system, virtual TV graphics, CIS (Commentator
Information System which contains all relevant information for
media); tennis was an additional sport in Delhi 2010.
These are only the most important elements, but we could list many
more.
Contact: