..

--------------- 1
MORl DoclD: 1451843

I ""I~' .
. ~l'f:, ';' i e: r (, l, .-! t. . .
~ ~ • . D, . ...I'·J ,.if
u LJ COliH 'HIAl
:"J , .... '-: .......
J._.......... -
c:
._' ........~._ .._.:- ..- .-...-••_ ,,-- .--..:...----- - ._- ....:....-----.- ,,0#.-.. . . _-_._-
.}_------~-__ \l~~UnNG AND R~C~RD SHEET .
, .'
UBJI:CT: (Optional) 6
(_ ..
... I
-'-"- .. _~~- ... - .. - --" .".'r===:\--" .--_.
....- .
., __..... - _.-_
EXTENSION NO.
.. _.-.-. .-......-..-.-.. _--------_.-
FROM: Howa r d J. Osb'or n (
;( ·Director of SCCUl'i t~) f--.

I 0
DATE
I , _...-.- I _._-r---~ 16 May 1973'
TO: (Office, delignolion, ((.10m number, and DATE
.-_...-
\\ building)
~EaIVED fORWARDED
OfFICER'S
INITIALS
COMMENTS (Number each comment to .how ftom whom
to whom.Draw Q line across column ofter -ecch comment}

n~~5

-
C'P!'"lI {j
1. Executive Secretary,
CIA Management tH: u U~·~ ... I

Cornmitl.e..e....-. ,"_00 f--,

2.
.i
- - - - --_.- _._-
i
J
I
J. "

I
I

4.

J (b)(1)
";I
(b)(3)
5.
(b)(5)
j
.. J (b)(6)
!
! 6.
l
0

,
7. APPROVE))' FOR RELEASE
DATE: JUN 2007

8.
" .
. .

,
9.

10.

•
11-
00001 .:

12.

i
,
13. ,.

;
,
14.

15.
,.
~1
I
\
" ~
\'

o U~ClASSIHED

..
 ---------------- MORl DoclD: l45l843

,'.

16 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary,

CIA Management Committee
SUBJECT "Family Jewels"

1. The purpose of this memorandum is to

forward for your personal review summaries of activities
conducted either by or under the sponsorship of the
Office of Security in the past which in my opinion con-
flict with the provisions of the National Security Act
of 1947.
2. These activities cover 'the period from
March 1959 to date and represent as accurate a record
as is .ava i Lab Le in our files. Those activities which,
took place prior to the date of my appointment as
Director of Security on 1 ~uly 1964 have been developed
to a certain extent through the recollection of the
senior people in this Office who were involved or who
had knowledge of the activities at the ~irne they
occurred. .
3. I have gone back to March 1959 because I
believe that the activities occurring since that time
st'ill have a viable "flap potential" in that many of the
people involved, both Agency and non-Agency are still
alive and through their knOWledge of the activity repre-
sent a possible potential threat or embarrassment to the
Agency. I would be glad to provide clarification or an
explanation of any of these activities if desired. You
have my assurance that unless otherwise stated each of
these activities was approved by higher authority--the

'00002

r..'
 - - - - - -.... _---------- MORl DoclD: l45l843

."

Director of Central Intelligence, the Deputy Director

of Central Intelligence, the Executive Director-
Comptroller, or the Deputy Director for Support.

Attachments

_. "00003

I
. I
 ------------------ MORl DoclD: 1451843

..,
-. .- ~ -.- .. _-_._ _.- - \ .

'; ..'
.s r ,

00004
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

Attachment A

"FAMILY JEWELS"

1.

2. Johnny Roselli -- The use of a member of the

Mafia in an attempt to assassinate Fidel Castro.
3. Project MOCKINGBIRD -- During the period from 12
March 1963 to 15 June 1963, this Office
installed telephone taps on two l\Tashington-
based newsmen who were suspected of disclosing
classified information obtained from a variety
of governmental and congressional sources.
4. Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenko -- A KGB defector who from
the peri"6<t 13 August 1965 to 27 October 1967
was confined in a specially constructed "jail"
atr I He was literally confined in a
cell oenIllU oars with nothing but a cot in it
for this period.
5. Various Surveillance and Support Activities
These are briefly summarized and range from
the surveillance of newsmen to the provision
of specialized support of local police officials
in the Metropolitan area. I believe that each
one is 'self-explanatory and, therefore, no further
comment is needed here. .
6. Equipment Support to Local Police -- Attached is a
iist provided me by ~he Director of Logistics
(he will simply report these items in his
report) which we have provided local police in
the Metropolitan D. C. area over the past four
or five years on indefinite loan. During the
period when the Agency's installations in this
area appeared to be a target of dissident elements

____·~O~0005
Sf ET _ _I
E! S 01JlY
 -~------------.-
MORl DoclD: l45l843

a conscious decision was made by the Agency to

utilize the services of local police to· repel
invaders in case of riot or dissension as
opposed to utilization of our GSA guards, who
are not trained in this type of activity. This
equipment has been issued over the years to
local police, principally Fairfax and Arlington
County Police Departments. I do not believe
that this is totally illegal under the provisions
of the National Security Act of 1947, but I am in-
cluding it since I am sure that it would be con-
sidered as such in light of the recent congressional
fuss over our police training activities.
7. Audio Countermeasures Support to the United States
"Secret Service
8. Test of Specialized Equipment in Miami Immediately
Prior to the Political Convention There

00006

"- ..
 ------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

'.' •• ;r It!
,.~ n' t IF
'-'- ... ;;;~ ~ '<,
....
MI •

•
. ~. -,
,/ '.~

"./' ."
/~ .:,....:~..
. ..:;
~

':"",
::.

00007

- •• ~ -". -."-.-.::-:.::, ._. _0 • • • ".·., • .: •• _ _._

 -
MORl DoclD: l45l843

00008
SEC T
t~£S ~~t~
 --......-----~-----_.-
MORl DoclD: l45l843

I '.' I ....
_,
~;,.{
.; ..

00009

I.
I
I
 ---------------- '117 H; 7 nn mIi., WSPS'E' P
r Ii'5 nusn 1 i_ N"l!; .,
MORl DoclD: 1451843

HU ; 5
! ,,, .. ,
... .. "~'~"'a 0 .: •

\
~~\;'. .'
..:.;

¥"
-r-
;ii.(,;
'i"
'.

0001.0

3
 ----------------- ~~~---_._-_.-_._._ .._._._ .....-
MORl DoclD: 1451843

'.. - .... " -- ...

\

">.

r:

..
. ' ~' .. : .'

000:11.

"," ~'., .: [
....... .
' " . ..
,.:. ~':
.. .._.;; 1I

. ~.*G.ki:;;4S¥ ¥4g,,;n;y,IQM.;;:MlitU~~S4((JI U_I!tWli~~··f"t.r'~.o+·.~

_ __
 I J' .... l' ....
-
.MORI DocID: 1451843

SUBJECT: Johnny Roselli '

1. In Augus t 1960, Mr. Richard M.. Bissell

approached Colonel Sheffield Edwards to determine if
the Office of Security had assets that may as~ist in a
sensitive mission requiring gangster-type action. The
mission target was Fidel Castro.
2. Because o~ its extreme sensitivity, only a
small group' was made privy to the project. The DCI was
briefed and gave his approval. Colonel J. C. Kin~,
Chief, WH Division, was briefed, but all details were
deliberately concealed from any of the JMWAVE officials.
Certain TSD and Communications personnel participated
in the initial planning stages, but were not witting of
the purpose of the mission.
3. Robert A. Maheu, a cleared source of the
Office of Sec~rity, ,was contacted, briefed generally on
the project, and requested to ascert~in i£be could
develop an entree into the gangster elements as the first
step toward accomplishing the desired goal.
4. Mr. Maheu advised that he had met one Johnny
Roselli on several,oc~asions while visiting Las Vegas.
He only knew him casually through clients, but was given
to understand that he was a high-ranking member of the
"syndicat:e" and controlled all of the ice-making machines
on the Strip. Maheu reasoned that, if Roselli was in
fact a member of the clan, he undoubtedly had connections
leading into the Cuban gambling interests. , .
5., Maheu was asked to approach Roselli, who knew
Maheu as a personal relations executive handling domestic
and foreign accounts, and tell him that he had recently
been retained by a client who represented several inter-
national business £irms which were suffering heavy financial
losses in Cuba as a result of Castro's action. They were
convinced that Castro's removal was the answer to their

l
 MORl DocID: 1451843 -
problem and were willing to pay a price of $150,000
for its successful accomplishment. It was to be made
clear to Roselli that the United States Government was
not, and should not, become aware of this operation.
6. The pitch was made to Roselli on 14
September 1960 at the Hilton Plaza Hotel, New York City.
Mr. James O'Connell, Office of Security, was present
during this. meeting and was identified to Roselli as an
employee of Maheu. O'Connell actively served as Roselli's
contact until May ~962 at which time he phased out due
to an ov e r se as assignment. His ini tia1 reaction was to
avoid getting involved, but through Maheu's persuasion,
he agreed to introduce him to a friend, Sam Gold, who
knew the "Cuban crowd." Roselli made it clear he did
not want any money for his part and believed Sam would
feel the same way. Neither of these individuals were
ever paid out of Agency funds.
7. During the week of, 25 September, Maheu was
introduced to Sam who was staying at the Fontainebleau
Hotel, Miami Beach. It was several weeks 'after h:i;s
meeting with Sam and Joe"who was identified to him as
a courier operating between Havana and Miami, that he
saw photographs of both of these individuals in the
Sunday .supplemental, "Parade." They were identified as
Mama Salvatore~Giancani and Santos Trafficant, respectively.
Both were on the list'of the Attorney General's ten most-
wanted men. The former was described as the Chicago
chieftain of the Cosa Nostra and successor to Al Capone,
and the latter,' the Ces a Nostra boss of Cuban op e i-a.t i ons .
Maheu called this office immediately upon ascertaining
this information. . .
8. In discussing the possible methods of
accomplishing this mission, Sam suggested that they not
resort to firearms but, if he could be furnished some
type of potent pill, that could be placed in Castro's food
or drink, it would be a much more effective operation.
Sam indicated that he had a prospective nominee in the
person of Juan Ort a , a Cuban official who had been receiving
kick-back payments from the gambling interests, who still had
access to Castro, and was in a financial bind.

000:1.3
2

SEGI..: T
Eyr , ONLY
-------------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

9. TSD was requested to produce six pills of

high lethal content.
10. Joe delivered the pills to Orta. After
several weeks of reported attempts, OJ;ta·appar~l.1tly got
cold feet and asked out of the assignment. He suggested
another candidate who made several attempts without
success.
11. Joe then indicated that Dr. Anthony Verona,
one o f the pr Lnc Lpa L officers in the Cuban Exile Junta, had
become disaffected with the apparent ineffectual progress
of the Junta and was willing to handle the mission through
his own resources.
12. He asked, asa prirequisite·to.the deal, that
he be given $10,000 for organizational expenses and requested
$1,000 worth of communications equipment.
13. Dr. Verona's potential was never fUlly
exploited, as the project was canceled shortly after the
Bay of Pigs episode. Verona was advised that the offer
was 'vi thdrawn, and the p Ll l s were. retrieved.
14. Of significant interest was an incident
which involved a request levied by Sam upon Maheu.
-:'
. . - ,. At t he height of the proj ect negotiations,
Sam expressed concern about his girl£riend,
Phyllis McGuire, who he learned was getting
much attention from Dan Rowan while both were
booked at a Las Vegas night club. Sam asked
Maheur t;o put a bug in Rowan t s : rbomto deter-
mine the extent of his intimacy with Miss
McGuire •. The technician involved in the assign-
ment was discovered in the process, arrested,
and taken to the Sheriff's office for questioning.
He called Maheu and informed him that he had
been detained by the police. This call was made
in the'presence of the Sheriff's personnel ..
Subsequently, the Department of Justice
announced its intention to prosecute Maheu along

3
. 00014
s£cJ16
}YES ONLY
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

with the technician. On 7 February 1962~.

the Director of Security briefed the Attorney
General, Robert Kennedy, on the circumstances
leading up to Maheu's involvement in the
lviretap. At our request, prosecution was
dropped. .
15. In May 1962, Mr. William Harvey took over
as Case Officer, and it is not known by this office
whether Roselli was used operationally from that point on.
16. It was subsequently learned from the FBI
that Roselli had been convicted on six counts involving
illegal entry into t.he United States. Our records do not
reflect the date of conviction, but it is believed to
have been s9metime during November 1967.
17. On'2 December i968, Roselli, along with
four other individuals, was convicted of conspiracy to
cheat members of the Friars Club of $400,~OO in· a.rigged
gin rl!-mmy g<;l.me.
18. Mr. Harvey reported to t.he Office of Security
of his contacts with Roselli during November and December
1967 and January 1968. It was his belief that Johnny
would not seek out the Agency for assistance in the deporta":
tion proceedings unless he actually faced deportation.
Roselli expressed confidence that he would win an appeal.
19. On 17 November 1970, Maheu called James
O'Connell, Roselli's first Case Officer, to advise that
Maheu's attorney, Ed Morgan, had received a call from a
Thomas Waddin, Roselli's lawyer, who stated that all.
avenues of appeal had been exhausted, and his client now
faces deportation. Waddin indicated ~hat, if someone did
not intercede on Roselli's behalf, he would make a cOmplete
expose of his activities with the Agency.
20. On 18 November 1970, Mr. Helms was briefed
on the latest development in this case, and it was decided
that the Agency would not in any way assist Roselli. Maheu
was sp a?vised of the Agency's position, and he was in

4 00015
 -------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

' . ' ,.

complete agreement with our stand. He further adVised

that he was not concerned about any publicity as it
affected him personally should Roselli decide to tell
all.

21. Subsequently, Roselli or someone on his

behalf furnished Jack Anderson details of the operation.
Attached are two Anderson columns dealing with" this
matter.

22. The last known residence of Roselli was the

Federal Penitentiary in Seattle, Washington.

Attachments

00016
5
SE T
i·f.rS ONLY
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

'"pm TRUW 'q un tt tlI (' , 1% 't $1 $ S'

. , "" ...,

.~-~-~ -,..-
':~'.,"

;" ..: -" ..

,-,"

, ~.:. : jt;
.......

.»

~ '. "
 ~-----------_.-
MORl DoclD: 1451843

,',

Tlf .u
i:' 'c._'
".-~.:::,rrr.'-(,·'[O'
_, rosr
• .: .''f Nl d"). ~.:;.
• 1~
", I'?"l
•
----------'. "

i
I
I
I
I
i B)' J(!t:k A nderson. . (or
before the motley invad- iate 4,gabst President .r-n- \;nmp;ele wil h secr-et ;'Y~~5 at
i ers ];Ind"ci on the island. Their' ned}'.
' . ~ gmteri~g :'Iiiami Beach hotels-
! Locked in the darkest reo ~ arr-ival was expected to touch! To set up the Castro a~, \, ;j.: and rn i d n i g b t po... ~;boat,
i cesses oC the Central Iotelli.! oif a general uprising, which i nation, the CIA enlisted h 0': dashes to ;>;>cret landin~ spots _
!;enre .-\gency is the story Of: (he Ccmmunist militia would: ert :i\I.:!heu, a former ;', '1; on l'::e C:.:~a:J coast, Once, no- "
:six assasslnarlon attempts: have had more trouble ut"n"; agent with shadowy contac , I :~e;!i's boat was shoeout fro:>:! _
. against Cuba's -;"idel Castro. I': _. , . ,- ~ '"'.''' who had handled other undo \ : under him.
.
! For . III ve ars onlv ~;: a 'e
m key I' aown without the charlsmatlc : cover asslsnments for the Ci \
i _ o f... For the ~:r.t trv
J.;... ..." ' ~.
t'ne C"J.J"\..~.
Ipeople have known the terri··Castro to lead them.
Co ..... \1, .. , ... fl' - 0 • .1 '.L J.';
L

:out of .his Washington public "urnlshed Roselll ';ith s'C~ci.!.l'~

I
l~le secret, Th~y. hav.e sworn After the iirst attempt jrela.tions oiIice; He ~ate~' '.'lison. capsules to ~!lP 'intO::r
:ne\'er to talk. let ....e have] failed, iive more assassination jInO\:d. to .Las Vegas t o .r:ea~ ! astro s.rood. The porson was . T

[learned the details from! t _, t t C b 'I'h ; up billionaire Howard Hughes ' :pposed to take three i:'.ays 10
i sources whose credentials are! earns were sen o. u a. ".e: );i' v ada operations, '. \', By the time Castro died.
i ~eyond question. ~ last team reporte-dly made It! :-'Iabeu recruited :!.~£:..:.h', system would t~row off all
i We spoke to John :'IIcCone,~lO a rooftop within shooting;sell!, a ruggedly handSQmp.:;t; \ -es of ~he- poison, so he
Iwho beaded the C:~A .at the! distance of ~astro b'efo~e they ;==gamo1er ,,:,Hll ,contacts In both l\'>. \ -d appeal' to be the victlm
l time' of the assassinatlon at- I were apprehended. This hap·: the American and Cuban un·lo! ~, natural. if mysterious ail.
tempts. He acknowledged the I pened around the Iast of Feb·; derworlds. to arrange the a5-1 me, \ :
I I
idea had been discussed inside ruary or first of March, 1%3. i sassinatlon. T.ne dapper, hawk-j R.-; -Tl arranged with a
[the CIA but Insisted it had, Nine months later, Presl-: faced Roselli, formerly rnar-. Cub» '\ related to one of Cas.
i been "r e j e c ted immedi-] dent Kennedy was gunned! ried to movie actress J:une: tro's " "$. to pl.ant the deadlv
! atelv," He vizorously denied: down in Dallas by Lee Harvey [Lang, was a power in, the !pe.lle!' .. the dictator's food.
i1hat the crx had ever partici·l~swald. a fan~tic who pre·in:o\:ie ;n~usrry until hi~ _~0!1'!0!1 :'ILl ,., 1,3,1961, Roselli de' _
I
I paled in any plot on Castro's: v iously had agitated fpr Cas- vtction with racketeer '.\ Ill ie ] llvered ',. cansules to hlJ .con.'
I I
iffe. Asked whether the at·: tro in Xew O:leans f3nd J:ad BioCf ina mil1~oc:-d~lJ.ar HollY·l tacl at : . ,.:ni Be3ch's lilamor.
Ilerr.pts <,ould ha"e heen madelmade a myslerIous trIp to ,hepvood labor snaKeaown; The1ou3 ?01l,1 nehle:!u Hotel.
! with his knowl~dse. he re'l C~ban Embassy iIi l\'Iexico crA assig!led
i plied: "It could not have hap., CIty.
I t:v
o of it~. ~osti A cou~:' ,·r ·... 21:1<:; later, just
I truslt>d operat.lves. WIllIam! about ,!::' ,·:;:tl lime ior the
!pen;d." .1
Among ~hose privy .to .the' H~r\'ey and••TaI?es (Bi~ Jim)! plot 10 ,.'... been !..!l-;-;l'd out,
~ 1,\ e have COlll.:Jl't:te conIl': CIA conspIracy, there IS still a OConnell, ,0 Lie husn.hush; a r;~po": '::1 oi H:a·.4~1'1 l'aid
:dence, howe I; e r. in ourl nag gin g suspicion---:-unsup· murder mission. using poony: east~() • H ill. El:~ i,e reo
!sources. !ported bY' the Warren Com· names. theY accompanied RO'/coven'd "~':ore the,Ra;. l)i ?igs
; The plot to knock off Castro !r.1ission·s iindings-lhat· Cas- ,.elli on trips to Miami to line ;im"asion .', \prilli, i!i~:I.
'began liS ;Ja,t -(;[ the Bay of! lro became aware uf the u.S, up the assassination teams. i Four n'·" att~m:l~~ '\',;ol't"
;Pi:;s HP~:·.li"n Th~ ;nu·nt.,,·as~rh)t apon. h~ ... U~·~ ~'!~c! .... t:':1~ The;f:zll story r~~ds ~jkl? t~p i:l3dp en .· .. l\t':"o·.~ :;~.a .
. tv .t,,·ii:n!:l·~:"~ L~~e '·uoan CHeta·· huw :·t·t :-taH~r! l).. . ..A,a~ i ~~f a··la·.. ':.'j 'f": ::: ~1 Ja:nes ~)onC1 i:10".tJf? :: :':)';~. a...::. :.' 1::;-. ::,..:::-.. ::s.• :::.c

00018
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

<..
.-
"
•

---_ _------ - - ~ _ . -_.-.-.~ .- --_._---

Blt
_-_.- ._-
. ..
'1--1 ..
.r: ."/ .........- -...'1-:\
;i
l........,.i./·:':,·f
._ .... 1...I:v ;j'; :.......'J

'0001.9
---------------
rl til! III W::: ras I

m Pl. . . ::osrrmq!:
5 we. I 1;
MORl DoclD: 1451843

I nnr
~,.
v'

.: -. : :'-.~::'"

00020
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

~ ....... '-... ... ... '..

, ...• ,

PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD

Project Mockingbird, a telephone intercept activity, was conducted

between 12 March 1963 and 15 June 196'3, and tar geted two Vfashington-
based newsrnen who, at the time, had been publishing news articles
based on, and -f'r eque nt ly quoting', classified 'materials of this Agency
and others, including Top Secret and Special Intelligence.

Telephone intercept connections were installed at the n ew m e n s t

office and at each of their homes, for a total of 3. The connections

were established with the assistance of a telephone company official
who responded to a personal request by the Director of Security, Col.
Sheffield Edwa r d s, Col. Edwards' authority for the activity ~vas Mr.
John A. McCone, Director of Central Intelligence. The latter conducted
the activity in coordination with the Attorney General (Mr. Robert Kennedy),
the Secretary of Defense [Mr , , Robert McNamara), and the Director of
the Defense. Intelligence Agency (Gen. Joseph Carroll), In addition to
Office of Security personnel directly involved in the intercepts and
research of materials acquired therefrom, only 3., other Agency
officials are on record as witting of the activity: the Deputy Director
of Central Intelligence (General Marshall S. Carter), the Inspector
General (Lyman Ki r kpa.tr i c k] and the General Counsel. (Mr. Lawrence
Houston).

The intercept activity was particularly productive in identifying con-

tacts of the newsmen, their method of operation and many of their sources
of information. For example, it was determined that during the period they
received data from 13 newsmen, 12 of whom were identified; 12 senators
and 6 members of Congress, all identified; 21 Congressional staff m errrb e r s ,
of whom 11 were identified; 16 government e mp Ioy ee s , including a staff
member of the White House, members of the Vice President's office, an
As s i s ta nt Attorney General, and other well-placed individuals. A number
of other sources were partially or tentatively identified, but the short span
of the activity ,precluded positive identification. It was observed that through
these contacts the newsmen actually received more classified and official
data than they could use, and passed some of'bhe stories to other newsmen
for release, establishing that many "leaks'" appearing under other by-lines
were actually from the sources of the target newsmen.

S~v.
--------------
n '1' .r.IRW as
MORl DoclD: 1451843

P HE n $;0; ;W"RS".,. I 17mll"l

00_ ....0_ __0\' 000 ....

!..

_. : ~ •• • R •

\.
r

....... "

.r

00022

..'
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. c, ,. ~...'

SUBJECT: Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenko

Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenkq, an officer of the KGB,

defected to -a representative of this-Agency in Geneva,
Switzerland, on 4 February 1964. The responsibility for
his exploitation 1vas assigned to the then SR Division of
the Clandestine Service and he was brought to this country
on 12 February 1964. After initial interrogation by
representatives of the SR Division, he was moved to a safe-
house in Clinton, Maryland, from 4 April 1964 where he
was confined and interrogated until 13 August 1965 when
he was moved to a s:e ci all y cons tru~t~d . "j ail" in a. r erno te
wooded area atf ~ I The SR Dlvls10n was convlnced -
that he was a dlspa ched agent but even after a long
period of hostile interrogation was unable to prove their
contention and he was confined at
to convince him to "confess."
I lin an effort

This Office together with- the Office of General

CouIT?el became increasingly concerned with the illegali~y
of the Agency's position in handling a defector under
these conditions for such a long period of time.- Strong
representations were made to the Director (Mr. Helms) by
this Office, the Office of General Counsel, and the
Legislative Liaison Couns~l, and on 27 October 1967, the
responsibility for Nosenko's further handling was transferred
to the Office of Security und~r the direction of the Deputy
Director of Central Intelligence, then Admiral Rufus Taylor.-
Nosenko was moved to a comfortable safehouse in
the Washington area and was int.erviewed--under---friendly,
.sympa the t Lc conditions by his Security Case Of-ficer, Mr.
Bruce Solie, for more than a year. It soon became
apparent that Nosenko was bona fide and he was moved to
more comfortable surroundings with considerable freedom
of independent movement and has continued to cooperate
fUlly with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and this
Office since that time. He has proven to be the most

00023
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

• L • ,".

v~luable and economical defector this Agency has ever

had and leads which were ignored by the SR Division were
ex lored and have resulted in the arrest and prosecution
e curren
lvorce from his Russian wife
and remarried an American citizen. He is happy, relaxed,
and appreciative of the treatment accorded him and states
"while I regret my three years of incarceration, I have
no bitterness and now und.erstand how it equId happen."

00024
T
tS Ol~lY
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

.*
. . :;. •

/'
<1 1
I ,
.. . ,,:~. :
' .. ~
" -..
\
.. '
. , ..
' ., \.. , \
,.....~: ,_: .", '

l.

"
'r-

00025
 ~---------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

, "'
t. ~. t

'1. SURVEILLANCES

A·I__
During the periods 1-20 February~ 12 April-7 May~
and 9-20 Au~ust 1971, a surveillance was conducted of
la former staff employee~ and
Lrl-----------,."a".-r-;-;LJu-J..oan na ti on a1 wi th whom
[be come professionally and emo-
~t~~~o~n~aTl.~lY~l'-n~v~o~IT~-v~e~ca~.~Surveillance was predicated upon
information thatl I had beeri seeking from
employees information ln Information Processing Division
fi1es~ and that em~loyees were visiting a photographic
studio operated by L - ~n Fairfax
City, Virginia. In addItIon to phYSIcal surveIllance,'
one surreptitious entry of the photographic studio was
made, and an attempt to enter the apartment ofl I
was aborted because of a door lock problem.
B.
Pursuant to a request from the CI Staff, approved
by the DCI, surveillances were conducted ofl
and her associates "at various times from May:--:it:-;o"":-'S"""e"""p=-=t""'e=-:m:;:-br::-e=r:::-
1971.
ad long been a source 0 IV~Slon an
'-,:;-....-::l.....,;;--:;--.~..-J information re.garding a, plot to assassinate
kidnap Vice President Agnew and the DCI. Surveil-
lances included coverage of the activities of Miss King
during two visits to the United States; technical cover-
age of debriefings of her by WH Division representatives
in New York City, and surveillance, including mail cover-
age, of several American citizens a.l Leg ed -to be part of
the plot. Although most of the surveillance occurred in
New York City, surveillance of one of the individuals
included extensive coverage of a commune in Detroit.
C. CELOTEX I
At the direction of the DCI, a surveillance was con-
ducted of Michael Get1er of the Washington Post- during

SE ET 00026
EY~ OlJLY
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

the periods 6-9 October, 27 October-IO December 1971

and on 3 January 1972. In addition to physical sur-
veillance, an observation post was maintained in the
Statler Hilton Hotel where observation could be main-
tained of the building housing his office. The sur-
veillance was designed to determine Getler's sources
of classified information of interest to the Agency
which had appeared in a number of his columns.
D. CELOTEX II
At the direction of the DCI, surveillance was con~
ducted of Jack Anderson and at various times his "leg
men., II Britt Hume ,.' Leslie Whitten, and Joseph Spear,
from 15 February to 12 April 1972. In addition to the
physical surveillance, an ob s erv a t i.on post was' main-
tained in the Statler Hilton Hotel directly opposite
Anderson's office. The purpose of this surveillance
was to attempt to determine Anderson's sources for
highly classified Agency information appearing in his
syndicated columns.
E. BUTANE
At· the direction of the. DCI, a surveillance was
conducted on Victor L. Marchetti from 23 March to
20 April 1972. The purpose of this surveillance was
to determine his activities and contacts both with
Agency employees and other individuals in regard to
his proposed book and published magazine articles ex-
posing Agency operations.
II. POLICE SUPPORT
A. During 1969, 1970, and 1971, on se.veral occasions,
the Intelligence Division of the Metropolitan Police
Department was prOVided a communications system to
monitor major anti-Vietnam war demonstrations in the
Washington area. This system consisted of a radio
·receiver and an Agent at the Intelligence Division.
Headquarters and several automobiles from the Washington
Field Office equipped with radiQ receivers and trans-
mitters and manned by two WFO Agents, as well as a
representative of the Intelligence Division, Metropolitan
Police Department. The benefit to the Agency was, that
the communications over this system were monitored at
the Headquarters Building to provide instant notice of
possible actions by the dissidents against Agency in-
stallations. .
0002.7
..
 -
MORl DoclD: 1451843

'.

B. During the period from 1968 to 1973, several

items of positive audio equipment consisti~g pri-
marily of clandestine transmitters and touch-tone
dial recorders were loaned to the Metropolitan
Police Department, Fairfax County, Virginia, Police
Department, Montgomery County, Maryland, Police
Department, New York City Police Department, and the
San Francisco, California, Police Department.
III. GENERAL SUPPORT
A. SRPOINTER
Since 1953, this office has operated a mail inter-
cept program of incoming and outgoing Russian mail
and, at various times, other selective mail at Kennedy
Airport in New York City. this operation included not
only the photographing" of envelopes but also surrepti-
tious opening and photographing of selected items of
mail. The bulk of the take involved matters of inter-
nal security interest which was disseminated to the
Federal Bure~u of Investigation. This program is now
~n a dormant state pending a decision as to whether
the operation wilL be contiriued or abolished.
B. AELADLE
For several years the Office" of Security has pro-
vided support to Anatole Golitsyn, a Russian defector of
interest to the CI Staff. I

c. REDFACE I
In July 1970, this office made a surreptitious
entry of an office in Silver Spring, Maryland, occu-
pied by a former defector working under contract for
the Agency. This involved by-passing a contact and

3
00028
SEt; tC T
ONLY
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

".

sonic alarm system, entering a vault, and entering

a safe within the vault. The purpose of the opera-
tion was to determine whether the individual had
any unauthorized classified information in his
possession.
D. BUREAU OF NA~COTICS AND DANGEROUS DRUGS
In January 1971, the Director approved a request
from the Director, Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous
Drugs, to provide covert recruitment and security
clearance support to BNDD. This has been accomplished
through the medium of a proprietary of the Office of-
Securit known as and 0 eratin as I
'----rS..,.u=p"..,p~o=r.."t-
~l'-n~c::--'"u::-:!d-=e-::s:---::c::-:o=-=v-=-e=-r=t---=y:-=e-=c:"::r::7u"""l"""t';:m=e-=n"%tC-,----=l"""l::-:w:-:-e=s=71 -:::g-:=a:"=-::1'-'0=-=n=-----:!,p 01 Ygraph ,
medical clearance, and training. It has been divided
into three phases: (1) A CI operation to place indi-
viduals in BNDD field offices to monitor an il1e a1
activities of other BNDD employees; (2)
)
ecru1tment 0 an 1n 1V1 by BNDD
but actually employed by BNDD, although this fact is
known only to the Director and Chief Inspector, BNDD.
In this case, arrangements were made for all pay and
other employee benefits to come from CIA on a reim-
bursable basis.

E. I

F. MERRIMAC
From February 1967 to November 1971,f I an
Office of Security proprietary, recruite~ anu nallulbd
several -Agents for the purpose of covertly monitoring-

00029
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

r ~ • • r
F~f \' O~:l.Y
_ .\l
dissiderit groups in· the Washington area considered
to be potential threats to Agency personnel and
installations. One of these Agents so successfully
penetrated one dissident group that she wa~ turned
over to the FBI for handling. In addition, during
this period, the Office of Security field offices
were tasked with collecting available'intelligence
on dissident groups. All such information was in-
cluded in a periodic report distributed to appro-
priate parts of th~ Agency and to certain outside
Government agencies.
G-.~ F.I
.----=======:::::::-_------'-----------,

5
00030
 ._1> .
.~ . ,

.. , " ..

" ". ~ ,

... - ~ .'
....
.<- ~~. :. -

.... !'

",' .

. .
.,
:.'
.,
, . .. ::,.
[I . " ...

.- >:.>::~! . . .' 00031.

..
.
 ------------------ MORl DocID: 1451843

MATERIAL REQUISITIONED FROM LOGISTICS

BY SECURITY FOR ISSUANCE TO
LOCAL POLICE

ITEM gUA_NITY
Gas Mask M-9 200
Gas Mask M-17 196
j
Steel Helmet and Liners
I 2'31
L Vest and Groin Protector 96
Vest, Flak M-52 34
Vest, Protective 46
Vest, Grenade 105
Execuvest 6
Emergency Flashing Red Light 22
*Searchlight, Tear Gas 36
*Chemical Baton 6 1/2" 36
*Chemical Baton 12" 24
"*Chemical Baton 26" 24
*Mustang 35 Pistol 6
'~Searchlight with" Shoulder Strap 36
*Stun Gun 3

*NOTE: Various quantities and types of replacement chemical

cartridges, loading kits, and batteries were also
ordered for asterisk items.

'--- 1032
MORl DoclD: 1451843

..1....

00033
------------- MORI DocID: 1451843

SUBJECT": Audio Countermeasures S~pport to the

United States Secret Service

On 2S July 1968, and at the specific request

of the United States Secret Service, this Office pro-
vided two audio countermeasures technicians to the
United States Secret Service in connection· with the
Democratic National Convention held in Chicago, Illinois.
This was not an official detail although both men were
provided with temporary credentials identifying them
as being affiliated with the United States Secret Service.
On IS August 1968, we detailed the same two men
to the United States Secret Service to cover the
Republican National Convention in Miami, Florida~ On
both occasions, the team members were debriefed upon,
their return and it is clear that their activities were
confined exclusively to.sweeping the candidates and
potential candidates quarters.

00034
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

00035
'--
 MORl DoclD: 1451843 -
..

I
15 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Howard Osborn'

Director of Security
SUBJECT Identification of Activities with
Embarrassment Potential for the Agency

1. In responding on 7 May by memorandum to the DDO's

request for the identification of any incident which might
conceivably have an embarrassment potential for the AgencYt
I cited the equipment test which is mentioned in the attached
memo. The test in uestion was related to the development of
,
~~~~~were in and out of some four hotels in Miami, with
radio equipment. This was shortly before the political con- ~:1:~·:1 :
. :":.,:"_":
ventions, and at least one of the hotels was within a block
of the convention hall. h::,'l·: '.
2. Although this completely, innocent--although sub-
ject to misconstrual--activity may already have been drawn
to your attention by your ,own staff,~it has occurred to us
that we should ensure you are awar-£ of it; given the involve-
ment of a Security officer,

Att:
M/R dated 7 Ma: 73 by
I SUb]: I qU1pmen ~
~
Test, M1am1,la., Aug 71

-r. 00036

<--I.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. ,.
~ I

7 May 1973

.1'ffiMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT : I IEquipment Test, Miami, Florida,
A~gl;lst 1971

, The following details concerning ther'~ ~ -=~

ments for Subject tests were provided by
I I during a telephone cO·~n::;;v':;"";e::::r~s~·a=-;;---=-:::-='"":l=i.
the unaers~gned, 7 May 1973.

r- L- ~--~~~~~~~r~e~t~i~red, formerly assigned to

for the August 1971 Field
l.c;;;r.:::===r====:::;:==;::::;::;::::o=:rL--------I.----------J--------~S ecurity
arrangements or e es an e on ehalf of 1....---"'-----
and the2vis~tors b~1 llin conjunction witli the
~ _ ecur~t~ Off~cer r :vnq w§}s
at the DUe. [ nas in daily contact ,-nth I
I ~
I
duties.
IMiami ~OI ce ntthe course of his officiaI IXaXSo

Iwasreluctant- to calli at home I

~=-==~~t~e~lephone line. to inquire about the specifics
arrangements at this point, and suggested
·1----.----ld'======iiSeco.rity Officer by', this time might have
ack to Headquarters and be available for

I
l
f
{
a.ons e

- . -~I,---_-----,. _ _I,
The aboVe details were provided by telephone tor--l
_______, Chief, Division D at 1650 hours this da~
C.signedJ.1
Distribution:
Orig - : ! File
00037. 1_-
S--~,..... T
L ~i

. 0._- __.-.
._~
 ---------------- MORT DocTD: 1451843

LJ (OI~fl
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
-sU1ljEcr:lo;~:~ii--------------------·----·---------·------------1

-----.-..----.--.-------------..--EY.Tit.,S~Ot~:.~~.~..==~~===~~_-_-_
FROM:
"--" .. . _
_[.j
.__._---Director of Securit
._--_
DATE
----_._---_._---~ I+----------_---.:_------~
TO: IO!i:<~r cI.,is-·"tion, teem ••umber, cOO DATE
building) OrtlLtiC. COMMn.nS (Number "och comment 10 :how From ...hem
! - - --r-r-'- _ . - INIT!ALS fa .",hom. Draw a [ine ccros s column after each c"mment.)
REalVEO fO~W AROEO
~------ ------------jf---.--- - - - - --.---+--------------------1
1.

Ex. Dir. -Compt.

-.. _ - - - 1
i 2.
t
J.

I
t
4.

I
! 5.
I -
I
~
6.
/
!

7: c

B.

,r
ri 9.

10.

11.

12.
- 00038
13.

14.

15.
_.
.w" ""UI \(
: t ,)I.'
"
~:: 610 us~Dr:.~~~us~ 0 CONFIDENTIAL o INTERNAL
o UNCLASSIFIED
L. . -__ .__
.!

~&.~i!~{L-~:;::; ;__ ._.'~ . _ ~~_ , "._ __ . .., __.'

USE ONLY'
 ------------------- MORI DocID: 1451843

, " .. j (

. '.

15 FEB ';:372

MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director-Comptroller

SUBJECT ROSELLI, John

1. This memorandum is for your inforU1ation only.

2. Reference is made to our recent conver s ati on regarding

the Agency's participation in political as sassinations. Attached
hereto is a memorandum dated 19 November 1970 which was fur-
nished to Mr. Helms setting forth the circumstances of the Subject's
activities on
behalf of the Agency. Initially Roselli was unwitting
of Government interest, but as time went on, he suspected that the
U. S. Government was involved and specifically the CIA.

3. Roselli is presently serving a prison sentence for con-

spiracy in a Federal penitentiary in Seattle, Washington and awaits
.
deportation upon completion of his current sentence •

4. This Agency was aware that Roselli intended to exp9se"

his participation in the plot should we not intervene on his behalf.
The DCI decided to ignore his threats and take a calculated risk as
to the consequences that may occur with the disclosure of his:" story.
This was subsequently done by Roselli or someone on his behalf fur-
nishing Jack Anderson details of the incident. Attached hereto are
two of Anderson' s az-ti cl e s dealing with "Roselli. Anderson is also
Editor of the Washington Bureau of the Washington Post, Sunday
supplemental "Parade. "

5. Individuals who were aware of this project were: Messrs.

Dulles, Bissell, Colonel J. C. King, Colonel Sheffield Edwards,

00039
 --------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

.... ,":
"" .

William Harvey, and James P. O'Connell. Also include'd were

Robert A. Maheu and'his attorneys Edward P. Morgan and Edward
Bennett William s.

6. On 26 February 1971 arrangements were rna da with

Immigration and Naturalization Service Comrl1issioner Raymond
Farrell to flag any action that may be taken hy his o,rganization
regarding deportation proceedings against Roselli. On26 January
1972 James F. Green, ASSociate Commissioner for I&NS, advised
that they were deferring' any deportation action for another year
and would again call it to Our attention upon expiration of the
deferral.

Atts

SEC ET 00040

ES OttlY
 ----------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

!
.'

MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director-Con,ptroHer

SUBJECT ROSELLI, John

..
1. This rnernoz-andurn is for your _i.nf~rmation only.

z. Reference is made to our recent conversation regarding

the .Agency's participation in politic;!.l assassinations. Attached
he r-e to is a rn errro r-a.ndtrm dated 19 November 1970 which was fur-
nished to Mr. Helms setting forth the circumstances of the Subject's
activities on behalf of the Agency. Initially Roselli was unwitting
of Government interest, but as time went on, he suspected that the
·i U. S. Gove r nrne nt was involved and specifically the CIA.
I ,
3. Roselli is presently serving a prison sentence for con-
spiracy in a Federal penitentiary in Seattle, \\Tashington and awaits
deportation upon completion of his current sentence.

4. This Agency was aware that Roselli intended to expose

I . hiB participation in the plot should we not. intervene on his behalf.
The DCI decided to ignore his threa.ts and take a calcuiated risk as
to the consequences that may occur with the disclosure of his story.
This wall subsequently done by Roselli or someone on his behalf fur-
nishing Jack Anderson details of the incident. Attached hereto are
two of Anderson's articles dealing with Roselli. Anderson is also
Editor of the Vlashington Bureau of the Washington Post, Sunday
supplemental "Parade. It

5. Individuals who were aware of this project were: Messrs.

Dulles, Bissell. Colonel J. C. King. Colonel Sheffield Edwards.

'00041

l
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.....

WilliDm Harvey, and J'arne s P. O'Connell. Also included were

Robert A. l..,.~C'\.heu and his attorneys Edward P. Morgan and Ed-ward
Bennett Williams.

6. On·26 February 1971 arrangernents were made with

I:mn:.igr~tion and N<:ituralization Service Commissioner Ra ymo nd
Farrell to flag any action that may be taken b}r his o r ga ni aa tf on
regarding deportation proceedings egainst Roselli.. On 26 .January
1972 James F. Creon, .A ssociate Commissioner for I&NS, advised
that they were deferring any deportation action for another yea r
and would again call it to -ouz- attention upon expfr atl on of the
deferral.

nOWa ro J lXJsborn
Director of Security

Atta

-
00042
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

-. -.- - ..- .. -

Atts
... ~.

-.

I'
i
I

'.

00043
' .. \.
,
r
 -------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

e °

Co.

MI:n'fORANDUM FOR: Director of Centz-a l Il1i;elligence

E-:UBJ.ECT ROSFLLI, Johnny

1. This memorandum is for inf'onuation only.

2. In August 1960, Mr. Richard 1v'!:. ,Bissell approached

Colonel Sheffield Edwards to determine if the Office of Security
had assets that may assist in a sensitive mission requiring
gangster-type action. The mission target was Fidel Castro.

3. Because of its extreme sensitivity, only a small group

was made privy to the project. The ncr was briefed and gave his
approval. Colonel J. C. King, Chief, \YH roivision, was briefed,
but all details were de lfbez-at.el.y concealed from any of the
JM\VAVEofficials. Certain TSD and Cornrno personnel partici-
pated in the initial planning stages, but were not witting of the
purpose of the mission. ,

4. Robert A. Maheu was contacted, briefed generally on

the project. and requested to ascertain if he could develop an
entree into the gangster elements as the first step toward accom-
plishing. the d~sired goal.

5. Mr. Maheu advised that he had met one Johnny Roselli

on several occasions while visiting Las Vegas. He only knew
him casually through clients, but was given to understand that
he was a high-ranking member of the "syndicate" and controlled
all of the ice-m.aking m.achines on the Strip. Maheu reasoned
that, if Roselli was in fact a member of the clan, he undoubtedly
had connections leading into the Cuban gambling interests.

00044
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

6. Maheu wa s asked to approach Roselli, who knew MahC'u

as a personal relations executive handling domestic and foreign'
a.ccounts, and tell him that he had recently been retained by a
client: who z-epr e s entcd several international busines s firms
which were suffering heavy financial losses in Cuba as a result
of Castro's action. They were convinced that Castro's rernoval
I
I wa s the answer to their problern and w e r e willing to pay a price
of $150,000 for its successful a c cornpIi shrn errt, It was to be made
clear to ,Roselli that the U. S. Gove rnrrrent was not, and should not,

I become aware of this operation. '

I 7. The ,pitch' wa s made to Roselli on 14 Septernber 1960 at

the Hilton Plaza Hotel, New York City. His initial reaction was
I
i
to avoid getting involved but, through Maheu's persuasion, he
I, agreed to introduce him to a friend, Sam Gold, who knew the
"Cuban crowd. II Roselli made it clear he did not want any money
for his part and believed Sam' would feel the same way. Neither
of these individuals was ever paid out of Agency funds.

8. During the week of 25 ,September, Maheu was in~roduced

to Sam who was staying at the Fontainebleau Hotel, Miami Beach.
It was several weeks· after his meeting with Sam arid Joe, who was,
identified to hiIn as a courier operating between Havana and Miami,
that he saw photographs of both of these individuals in the Sunday
supplemental "Parade.' 1 They were identified as Momo Salvatore
Giancana and Santos Trafficant, respectively. Both were on the .
list of the Attorney General's ten most-wanted men. The former
was described as the Chicago chieftain of the Cos a Nostra and
successor to Al Capone, and the latter, the Cosa Nostra boss of
Cuban operations. Maheu called this .office-immediately,upon as-
certai:ling this information.

9. In discussing the possible methods of accomplishing this

mission, Sam suggested that they not resort to firearms but, if
he could be furnished some type of potent pill, that could be
placed in Castro's food or drink, it would be a much more effective
operatton, Sam indicated that he had a prospective nominee in the
person of Juan Orta, a Cuban official who had been receiving kick-
back payments from the gambling interests, who still had access,
to Castro, and was in a financial bind.

00045
 -
MORl DoclD: 1451843

'/····;·~
l..
~

JO. TSD was z cque ate dt o produce six pills of high lethal
content.

11. Joe delivered the pills to Orta. Af'te r several w e elcs

of reported attempts, Orta apparently got cold feet and asked out
of the a s s i gnrn errt, He suggested ariothe r- candidate who made '
several attempts wi thout suc ce s s s

12. Joe then indicated that Dr. Anthony Verona, one of the
principal officers in the Cuban Exile Junta, had becorne disaffected
with the apparent ineffectual progress of the Junta and was \viIling
to handle the rrri s s'io n through his own r e sou r ce a,

13. He asked, as a prerequisite to the deal, that he be

given $10,000 for organizational expenses and requested $1, 000
worth of cornrnuni ca.tions equipment.

14. Dr. Verona's potential was never fully exploited, as

the project was canceled shortly after the Bay of Pigs episode.
Verona was advised 'that the offer was withdrawn, and the pills
were retrieved.

15. Of significant interest was an incident which involved

a request levied by Sam. upon Mabeu.

At the height of the project negotiations, Sam

expz-e s s ed concern about his girlfriend, Phyllis McGuire,
who he learned was .getting much attention from Dan
Rowan while both we~e booked at a Las Vegas night club.
Sam asked Maheu to put a bug in Rowan' 8 room to deter-
mine the extent of his intimacy with Miss McGuire. The
technician involved in the assignment was discovered in
1.
I
'the process, arrested, and taken to the Sheriff's office
for questioning. He called Maheu and inform.ed him that
he had been detained by the police. This call was rna de

i in the presence of the Sheriff's personnel.

Subsequently, the Department of Justice an-

nounced its intention to prosecute Maheu along with
the technician. On 7 February 1962, the Director of

3
~:: •• ! '{.:
:.t'
~ ~
00046'
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.' i"

i .
/

Security briefed the Attorney Gene r a l , Robert

Kennedy, on the ci r cum stancc s leading up to
'Maheu's involvement in the wir etap, At our re-
quest, p r oa e cutdon wa s ch"oJ?ped.

16. In May 1962, Mr.· W·illiam Harvey took over' as Case

Officer', and it is not known by this Office whether Roselli wa s
used operationally £1'011.'1 that point on.

17. It was subsequently learned f'r orn the FBI that Roselli
had been con.victed on six counts involving illegal en.try into the
United States. Our records do not reflect the date of conviction,
but it is believed to have been sornetfrne during November 1967.

18. On 2 December 1968, Roselli, along with four other

individuals, was convicted of conspiracy to cheat members of the
Friars Club of $400,000 in a rigged gin gummy game.

19. Mr. Harvey reported to the Office of Security of his

contacts with 'Roselli durfng November and De'cernbe r 1967 and
January 1968. It was his belief that Johnny would not seek out
the Agency for assistance in the deportation proceedings unless
he actually faced deportation. Roselli expressed confidence that
he would win an appeal. ~

20. On 17 November 1970, Maheu called James OIConnell,

Roselli's first Case Officer. to advise that Maheu's att.orriey, Ed
Morgan, had received a call from a Thomas Waddin, Roselli's
Iawyer , who stated that .alLav:eriues of appeal had been exhausted,
and his client now faces deportation. Waddin indicated that, if
someone did not intercede on Roselli's behalf, he would make
a complete expo s e of his activities with the Agency.

21. On 18 Novernbe r 1970, you were briefed on the latest

development in this ca ae, and it was decided that the Agency
would not in any way assist Roselli. Maheu was so advised of
the Agency's position. and he was in complete agreement with
our stand. He further advised that he was not concerned about

v- •• _ - ~-': ~f

t t '. : _ ~_., ~
~'!"'r:
. _~
, 00047
..
\
~: ..,' _.' ~
•
L
 ~ ..... ,
----------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

,
."

. any publicity as it affected him personally s hou'ld Roselli decide

to tell all. He stated he would advise us promptly of any develop-
rnerrts that Ire may become aware of in this rnatte r ,

Howard J. Osborn
Director of Security

~
5
... ...., r' . J
~":'. "";'.... .. __1."
'.. ..
;.,.,..,.- .:...-.
~..
00048
.. .... ~
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

THE WASUIXGTOX POST ,~foudar, .1111I. 18, 1?:1 B7

------------_.....:.....:....:..._----- - , I.

It: . J{i n .,.,,,.~ i n .fl.~ -rr7 "111 I(" 1f),7 f:l;A_ If). 7J ~ 7? .n: ~ (fr-x J.J t;1 .
~ fil.Sd.,<GlJl!itIYltCl
-"'-1't
to li~7L!l ~u~tL!f UI fU([JL{U!J!, u» 0Jil-1. ~
4

Bj' ] acl: A lI(r.er.~on

,
ers landed on the island, Their' nedy, . - I
: t(or before the motley im'ad',iale 'against President Ken-: complete wth secret trysts at. _
gllttering :\1iaml Beach hotels, ':
Locked. in the darkest re- arrival was expected to touch To set up the Castro assassi- and mid it I g h t powerboat ~

I I
cesse,s of the ?entral Intelll- off a general uprising. which nation, the CIA enlisted P..Qfl: I dashes to l'....crct i::ndln;: !;;lots :-
.gence Agency 15 the story of I the Communist militia would,....e~~~I~ a fc,rmc.'r -r~Bf\on the Cuhan coast. Once, no- :
'\SiX. nss:.ssin:.t!,?n attempts ~ have had more trouble nulling l agent witn sh?dowy contacts, ~ sef li's boat was 0110.t out from:.:
,ilg:unst Cuba's 1'ldel Castro. i .' , _"
I
who had handled other under-lunder him.
For 10 years, only a few key I down WIthout the chartsrnatlc cover ass,lgnmen';S for the CI.A For the finf. try. the CIA:,;'
people have known the terri-I Castro to lead them. out ?f hls Wa.shmgton public furnished Roselli with :;pecial'(
. _:,

ble secret. They have sworn After the first attempt relations office. He later Ipoison capsules to sllp IntO: ~'.
never- to talk. Yet we have-lfalJed five more assas~ination moved to Las Vegas to head I! Castro's food. The polson Willi
learned the details from '. . t C. b T' up billionaire Howard Hughes' supposed to take- :!lre:c cloys to
sources whose credentials' are teams \I ere sent 0 u a. ne Xevada operations. act, By the time (';,:;1,0 died
'beyond question.
.We spoke to John. McCone, to. a rooftop within shooting Iselli, a ruggedly handsome traces of the polson, so he I
jlast team reportedly marie it. Maheu recruited John ne- his system would t hrcw off ali

~ho headed the CIA .at the Idistance .of Castro befo~e they I gambler ~ith contacts In both would appear to be the viclim

I
bme·of the assasslnation at'lwere apprehended. ThIS hap:lthe American and Cuban un"lo! a natural if mysterious ail-
tempts; He -acknowledged the pened around the last of Feb· derworlds. to arrange the as- ment.
I !
':Ie CIA .but insisted it had I
lldea had been discussed inside ruary or first of March, ]963. . sassination, The dapper. hawk-

I
Roselli arranged with . a - .~
Nine months later, l>rcsI'.lfa.red Roselli. formerly mar-] Cuban, related to one of Cas. ' .
..een fir e j e c ted immedl- dent Kennedy was gunned! rled to movie actress JUne tro's .chefs, 10 plant the deadly'
!
L

:'
l at ely," . He vigorously denied1down in Dallas by Lee Harvey'Lang, was a power in the pellets in the dictator's food.
that the CIA had ever partlcl- Oswald, a fanatic. who pre- movie industry Until his con'l on 1Ilarch 13,1961. Roselli de. : .
I
pated in any plot on Castro's viously 'had agitated ior Cas- viction 'With 'racketeer..Willie livered the capsules to his con: .
life. Asked whether the at' tro in New Orleans and had Bioff ~n a million-dollar Holly-] tact at Miami Beach's glamor- ,
r'.
tempts could have been madelmade l a mysterious trip to the wood labor shakedown. The~ous Fontainebleau Hotel. : '.: r
with ~is knowledge. he re:lcuban Embassy in Mexico CIA assigned two of its mos t A couple of weeks later just
plied: "It could not have hap- City.
l
trusted operatives, William about the right .tirne !o; the
Among those _priv~' to thelHar\'ey and James (Big Jlm>!'Plot to have been carrled OUI
I pcned...
I
We have complete contl-] CIA conspiracy, there is still a O'Connell, to the hush-hush fa report out of Havana r.air/
'I'dence, 11 0 we v e r, in our'l nag gin g suspi~ion-unsup. ,murder mission. Usin/(. phony Castro was ill. But he r I I
i
r·
r-
~.
sources. ported by the \~arrE'n com'lnamE's, they accompanied ne- covered before the Bay of P;i~ V
~
! The plot to knock off Castro : mission's fin.dings-that Cas- selli on trips to :Miami to line jim'asion'on April 17.1961. i'
; be:,:an as part of -the Bay of i tro became awa~e of the U ,5. up the assassination tea~s. I Four more attompts \. I. to r-·
i Pi~s op"I'::IiI'/1 The intent was, pld upon hls !l!,. aru! ~"m('ol The full story reads hk(' thp 'maet" on Castro's lire,
,III {'lhniu;.;" 'Ih(' Cuban clit'ta·Jllllw, rC'{'l'liitrcl (),\\:lld :.., :I'I;.!. s\'l'i·p~. of a ,lam{'s Bond movie,' ,'; 19~.,Brl:·M<Cluu;;) .. ~.. Llt /..r
1. ,. _._
__ ....._--_.. _-._- -----------
.

00049
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

, A
(
(
THE \\'ASH1:\GTOX POST TUI'$aa.,.,r~b,23,19il B 11
--------------- ---_._-----.:-
rfY1TA:
VJi
I 1", Jt,.,·
~'.I'
:(,l,T'~I"M-
Il~
l,~oh 1'" R':>0 "'r!. :,~;;ii':'I!.;; jnr·, ?("~,:,:li v·-;:h ~('ac;y ?~:~(\;;'!;::
~ ';"_t'_ -·i-:· .... r· to 1"'. - .:,..: .... ~~
;::~i:l on the CIA payrcll,
'I
I
- he 1\
""
.,. ,"'IL
o' • t n"-"
.,t.
I
j='\"':'l
.. J
'""- "-r \t..•..",;
~1/.t.". .,
r,."\
• ":·-~p~ri· c·.·..... t::~.s
C· ••• ll"'- .... : t. :,."t .'.
• •
;:,·1..
,
•
j -..,:,a zs-r H .1#•••• :.. -' u. I
. - . . . .... 1"..... . •• 1 :1
jf t
,
_ t,.
,t •• ,.!·

tlo" he l'-d j;--rlll'd un-t throuah a :,c: arive o·~ Castro's .,.l:". \',_,,:1 ':(... , •• : .Jl• • • ~:_ •• :f.....
.:" 0 "::" .:,. ....
oQ. • •

I. Ccnt:. -al J my;::lfry Tt•.i n ·'\/101il,hc'.0 15

},ol " ' - "",' :,\"1' .: \. I. IC1L H:I let..... I L.. .=-" . . I
•. to d:.".:c:..:~s f:1':':r CL\. ;:..·: .. ·.·H1.··S.
".f', 1~f' ••C(' • ~f'nc~ .t!"l"Co\·C'r asslcnmonrs for the chef to plant In the d;cta~ors:'1'rv ev said he \-'Id ,;,',1-;-;' re-
I ,('tIU"rn
_ .. " - ...
t ·• • l "I"C"';\''''
0 ~.".""'~ .~."1
-" :. • !
_{r't:"'~ '-"I'o'-V,:t,- io l'lP-
, G '.'. ~
ar:ned'O'-"cr- ,;c~,..-
.
TInt-cpti'ij;s:- ...·~r"';::r.n
rI ror ~ -r-, ..J r"" · r-
i. in~"irll'ltheC3:-' a r. .s hC":':l i~:<1
t
;'i, .3.("'': \ 'fl"t 't

ri:·~.:~:;';" ~ r:" '(i~: rt·~i:;:rT;:~·:. i.~ ~ ~:~ ~ O:.:.~J\h" ;~~~:;.;:lj'''''' I~ :·;d B"("i;ia~ rl- ~ ~;t; Frk:r-',S ci';;!)' c;~~:~·~u. ·:J1;;:in
It;·t
sick ward Qf the Los; same ::\!;,J1CU, inclclt'nt.;;1i:;. who; flcs au ernpted to inliltrate [rap." Said Harvey: "The
Anzelcs County jail. ! is now involved in a IC':'31 Dat-: close enough 10 bun Castro I Friar's Club incli\:t:-:,('nt is
Ire is har;(:~fi:-nc. h,1\',·k.f(s~(*rl: tl~ o ..· rr phantom hiii~rJIia~rC ;co\l,:n. '. _. :r,!:r,ny·. RfJE~lli had no more to
John Rosclh. once a (~a;:;hln:::: 1Ioward Iiughes' ~·~\"oca opcr-] ..\,~l t·):d. :.~x n:;"~"·.~i:"~lr.:l at"·d.) ..I:Hh t;;~~ than Lb ad."
figurc. "round Hollywood .:in~lllillions. II;rr,pt5 :-n':-e .-:l;'I.:. t~e~~:'l !:li ·H~.:.~:;i's l::'.'Tilrs :,r~ now
Las '\ e;;ils. now a gray, 6er Tlo!'clli was so Ilattereri overltne sprmz of l!lo3. Ihrou;n.·:lrying to 2':r c:li:mr::::::: ;!"ti"
:rear.o}d inmate with a resPira'l being asked to perform a
tory llllmcnt.
se'l'
out this perio? Roseili wo~~ed! their client, citing our storie:;
eret mi~sion for L'1c U.S. gO\" under the d\:"ect supen'\slon!about his secret CL\ sCl'"\"kc•.:
Co;;fid.~ntial FBI mcs idC'n-1 crnalent that he paid all his loi two SCCT(~t CIA a;;ents. Wil·' •
tify him as ":,I top Alana fig-I ('xpc'IlSCS out of his own I:<1r:l Hilr:e-)' i\:Jd Ja:nes' (Bi,;1 i Fl~'L':Inns Fi:l::'co
urc" who \'::llc-hed oyer "thc! porkC't ;md risked his neck 10 :Jim) O·Connell. I 1,; I .' f
concealed illlNC'sts in Lr.s; I,lnd the assassination teams i I)C er ;Jrcssurc Irom lie I
Ve~as casinos of the Chicago Ion the Cuban coast.
undcrwo!"!d." ..' I
Tn Jamcs Bond fashion. he
IRo~cili's Rm..; arel

~~osclh has admll(cd to held whispcred meetin~s in the assassination plot. haS!force a vilal section of the
I . ,firearms lobbr. the Treasury
Th'e FBI 'which got wind ofiDepartment., has failed to en-

, friends ~b:t ,~c \~t1S a. r~m ~un'l ,\Iiami !3~ach hotels wilh, cu-l
tried t·o pum;> Roselli for in- .lllGS federal fire;;rms act.
I ncr d\lrln,~ ,oe l\O;)rlll~ T\\('n·! bans wllhn~ to make an at·,formatir.n. But he was sworn I _.
ties. Opel""tin:: :alon:;: the Eal;d tC'mpt on Castro's life. Ont·C'.lto ~j:ence by the CIA and uo i H,e law was 'I'<Jsscd af,er
Coast, he IC'arnec! ho\\" to evade; he called on Chiea~o racketj 10 this mcorrient he hasn't bro. i\i;e murders of Sen. Robert
,

Coast Guard culters and po· hoss Sam Giancana to l!:le up iken it. • :r;:er.ned~· and Dr. :.Iartin Lu· !
licc patrols. a contact. The confidentiall )I~anwhile. the Ju~lIce De.! ther . King: It authorizes ~hc
His name later becCime files report. t.hat Giancana had par::ment. as part'of its crack-I Tre;,sur;: Secrcta~' to rcqUJTi'
linl_cd \\'it!t the bi;t:cst names "f:ambJing interest and an in-'ldown on pr"anized crime.liull r"'P?~ts of allllrearms and
in the ChIC,l~O and Los Allec· tel'est in the shrimp businE'ss tried to nail Roseili. The FBIiammunlllon sales. .
les underworld:::. He also de- in. Cuba." Howe\'cr the' Chi· di~co\'ered that his Chica.;o I :Cor the ".\'0 years that ~;;c
veloped contac.ls in ,lhe CUba~ I ril!=O gar\~ste'l' tOOk' no direct i binh records had been jorge-d, i law i~;js hcen in for~e._ :~l': it

Ullden\·oTlcl br,lorc Cas.tr.o tOOh:lpilrt in the assassination plot. that his name was reaily Fi.ITrC'a;u.~·. ~epartmc::t, Ila~_:=-'
O.\'C\· the lIa\"iwa ~itmLillllg ca·; Hoselli
smos. ' I
·made midnit;ilt lippo Sacco and that he had 1J1()r('~ t'll1>. ,:;,c.y prO.... 51On. :;. :~:
dashes to Cuba with his hin.'d come to this country from ~un Jndu~try has cQmi'la.~('n,
He. }lad the rir;ht back- assassins in twin powe.ooats. Italy as a child.' He was con. it . would be a bookkcc;Jlll~
I
ground {or a 11ush·hush mis'! Once a Cuban patrol ship victed for failing to register as Inightmare. .
si,on~ t.hal 1.!le CIA was rlan·lturncd its !!uns on his, dark-Ian alien. .. I ..~h.e ..federal. . gO\'et:nm;~t~
ntn ... m ID.l1. As part. 0. thn!C'ncd boat. t(\re a hole :n thel He was also cl)n\'lct"d for,"n.rn \\ollici ha\(' to com",
. B.3Y (1[ P;:5 j~\":::::;(\n. fhe CI:\ i h':l:lQ:n and ~:.tnk t:-:c 1'Qar. Ro.. '(,,(\::Si11rac~: t:j ri=:- card :jrJ~s: c~l the . ~:i:ps CHI::t" hn:\ :: '.,
t hopE'ci ':0. ;"i'~"~;':.Off C:lSirO and: f't'Hi ''''as- ilShccl OUt oi the ~ nt LO$ .-\~;eles.· £xi;l:l~i\'l: . ~~~~i r:~:u\."'~c~~: ,"~O .,sT'"!~~.....:~ ..~
1c:-:... .·e Ll!::~1 j~~~.:.~JE: ..... c~s, 1\\·~IC'l.;.,\,.,.·""lI'\.:"\ . ~ . . .....
-;..:"".~t \I·f·.:c·n:~rl·~l"·~ C',~,~ :,,,,.1.") mu.:on 1...... :..')t.~(. (Ci.'\. I ••

1 ,. .
o .... "'•• "'''.14"

I
I cscapr.ct' imo the shadows..
a • "'.1 ..
~

I
''£' ••• . , . .. ... , .

Of Rt'lieUi's two CIA n!'.~O.!c(lmr~:r.~~ ;';ud Sl~;:: to 1'r.:.,:;.

. ....

\.
H i':- k ~ .;~e('k. In p.ar!it'T ,roltlml1s. w~. Te·. dalC's, .H3nTX has ~(l••: r£'tirt'~~ 'lain the lIrc",rm", fl ..e.;;. .
r.O~(!ill \t";l,S tecrllllrd fot' the I poned how t,1e Cl.\ furm:·ned I to Ind:ana;.~o;;s ana 0 Couac.l! ~ :~~!. S!::-~.:,~(':~r~ s:·~~:c:" •.• ,.
. -' -.... _... . -- ~

• - >or' - - •• ' •• - - "'7-.

.": - .: ·····:.;~"t"'.:-:~-:.--·-r.- ,",~.-~ . ;'"';:'-"-"':' ,. '.--~--. :--:;-." ..-.. _--:-.:;"'~"--_ _ - :: :- _.. :'l..----:'.~ ---- '-'7'- _.-.
' .

.I
00.050
,
,"
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

O·--(. '£RNAl [J CON( ~NTfAl

.. i. ONLY
ROUTING AND RECORD
_....
SHEET
-
SUBJECT: (Optional)

----
FROM:
__
_. ._._-~--_ .... . r--'--- - - - -
EXTENSION' NO.
-
Howard J. Osborn . 0 .-.
.r>. -.
D~rector of Secu~ DATE
;':-

I IHqs. CJ 17 December 1973

TO: [Officer designotion room number, and l DATE
building) OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each commenl 10 show from wham
INITIALS to whom. Draw 0 line across column after each comment.)
RECEIVED FORWARDED
- ./ ..
1. IG Staff -&,/
Attn: I
- ..:zE= ?
OMV
T'
2. \

.~~
r>:
\"'~' ~ ' I ;.t1,.1 :
:, }':.._L.':-'" ...-.I. ...,.~ - ~ ("I ,
.~-:. ".':,/.." ." _!,~:~ ....
~, " .--

V T)(-p;77 e&L~ ~
4.

<).D~ J~~ \ ']'-( .~ ~.l~~c..~~

5.
"
i
-·'0
4 ~L~ ~ ,*lf~
~,~
~.
'l " ,l .
~ t
~-'.. ~

6.
-~ LA
7.
.,- -rv ~ ·Wu~
~d

~
8. - ... 0" • .

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

"-'}
1.... L;
00051:
15.
,

~~::' 610 Us~Dm~~~us ~ 0 CONFIDENTIAL D INTERNAL

.... _. - -. -- ...... -_ . - .. _ ...... - " -~~ .... _-~_ .....- ..
' _.-..::.__...;:.. .. _..
~.. , ~_.
USE ONLY...,
._.---... - --_....;.._---_ .... _-.-
. ,. -'--.'_00'-------------
 --------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

, .
" f!o r:" 1:"1 ."'" ....,
S;;''-9r;~ .' 'i.iL~;,;;i ri~.ft.
'r"

...'

17 Deca~er 1973

MEMORANDJM FOR TI1E RECORD

SUBJECI': Recent Activities of the Watergate Special
Prosecution Staff

1. Early in the evening of 10 December 1973 I received.

,..;=a::...-.=:cte=l=eOF~h~efu~;~n~~e that he, m tum, had'receJ.v: a call from
ntelligence Division, Washington
'K1f.i1Fi"Rnnr~ffilPrIT~r-n;~'T"'rTl~

2. It SO""" that
conversation at his home WI:
5 /had just spent an hour in
in the WashingtonMetropo1itanoll.ce DepartiTient Who had reportJ
to him on his inteIView that afternoon wi.th a Mr. Martin and a lvfr.
S
Horowitz'lrosecutors of the Watergate Special Prosecution Staff.
t:>
had been subpoenaed for his appearance and he indicated
Ithat the two prosecutors were princ::ipa1~y concerned
WJ. h twO matters: . . .
\ a. l\11at type of training had. the Agency given
I
members of the Washington Metropolitan Police
I Departmentf how long were the courses? and
how often were they given? .
I b. What support did the Agency provide to the ,
II Washington Metropolitan Police Department during
demonstrations occurring in the Washington area
I in late 1969 and early 19701
I
I 3. I I
said that he had been shown a long list of
i names and asked if any of them had been involved either lilth the
training given the Washington J-;Ietropolitan Police Department or the
support to the Washington Jo.fetropolitan Polic~ Department during the
demonstrations. L lcou1d ranernber only three names on the
~ist! They werefl I

00052
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

4. The three individuals named by I I

did in fact
participate in both the training and support during the demonstrations.
They are only three among others of myl Ispecial
support group who were involved in these activities. Of extreme
sensitivity is the fact that these same individuals were engaged in
other highly sensitive activities which could cause :the Ag6J."1.C:Y severe
embarrassment if they were surfaced. today in the current l'l\"atergate
climate. II
s. I briefed the Director personally on this development
and he indicated that if the training and demonstrations surfaced that
he would' simply acknowl.edge that this had occurred but as he had
assured members of Congress J we would not engage in this type of
activity in the future •. He agreed wi.th my suggestion that we have the
Legislative Cotmsel brief Congressman Nedzi and Senator Stennis on
this since they have already been briefed on all activities of this
nature undertaken by the Agency in the past. I briefed Mr. Jo1m
Warner, Acting General Counsel., and areed with him that we would
make no effort to brief members of my tootH
and if they are subpoenaed. }Vfr. l\Tamer or members of his Sta f will
1:;I1en cautdon them to only answer questions asked and not volunteer
additional infonnation. I am making a copy of this memorandtun available
to I lof the Inspector General's Staff at the suggestion
of the Inspector General, who I also briefed on this development. '

j
I
!
! Howard J. Osborn
II . Director of Security

.......-~c: IG Staff Attn: 1"- _

00053
 ---------~~- MORl DoclD: 1451843

:. .. - .:. -: ~ ..... :.,

..:: ..

7.
. -- . .. .
"

...... -. -. -
B. '; ":". ~ --
~

. "

9.

i~
·~1EMORANQUN FOR:
I10.J -.- - - - : T _ \

f~
I
1:.
,! ' 11- - - - - - - - T \
--
~

12.

13.
-
14.
I
15.
(DATE)
-
FORM
61 0 rxl
USE PREVIOUS ~ 00054 j
J-62 EDITIONS ~ •• _.
REPLACES FORM \0-10\
FORM NO.
I AUG 54
101 WHICH MAY 8E USED.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

..... - '-- . . .:: . ''":.- .... -_ .._...:-.: .. __

..
.~ ~ ~ ···~r :'''-:-~ ~h.. ~' • • M_ OM_

'. '~" :'; ;" :.

0: 'UNCLI\SSIFJE'D' .
o J'''?~At
t ~. IlY . '., D .emn (-_'H_'A...,..l----.; .~'
--::::;.~_---.
r ROUTING AND ~ECORD SHEET '.
Ii---------:---------:--~---------_._r
SU5JECT: (Optional)
. - ,

I
-
. .. " ..
I
L
fROM:

Howar~ J. Osborn ·d,fo

EXTENSION
..
".
NO.
,
.
. ..

i
i Director of Security
TO: (Orr;co, designatio,n. room numb.,. ar>d
77
L:.:...:...--J
L
D.;.rE
I
:
I
DATe
. .
.»

25 MAY 1973 ..

bu;lding) . 1-----=':,.....-----4 OFFicER'S COMMENTS (Numbe, 'each camme,,1 to show from ""ho""
INITIALS Icl ...ham.
Ora", a line across calum" aff&t eoc" com",,,,,'.)
; : ••.• ReCEIVED 'fORWARDtD

}.----..:.-:---,.,-,----~--_t_---+_-'-.:..:...-f_---....::_j
! 8.

!
9.
" •••••

:":~;:i"
..'

,
-

<
'," .-. '0'"

t: ..,
.-::: ."

:" J
-.

,.,:' ~ Q
r-- .'.. _
1--------------+----l----I----t
.. ... '.
110. - ... ." ..::.
.,
.:»

.
.. . ...... "

I 11.
II
1 -+-_ _i - - _ - I -_ _-1
/12.
i
~;..=----------------f_---f_---I_---_1
! 13.
I
I,
I • --1- -+ -+ --1
14.

,
I

1-..
lb. .00055

n CONFJDfNTJAl o INTE:lNAl
.1Il;F O)JIY D UNCLASSIfIED
;
 ----------------- MORl DoclD: l45l843

MErdORANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary,

CIA Management Committee

SUBJECT Project TWO-FOLD

1. This memorandum sets forth a recommendation for your

approval in paragraph 5.

2. For the past several years, this office has been support-
ing the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD) by spot-
ting, assessing, and recruiting personnel to form an internal
security unit whose primary mission is the detection of corruption
within -the BNDD. Subsequent to the recruitrn.entand" training stage,
the individuals selected are turned over to the Chief In sp e cto r of
BNDD for operational guidance and handling in their various dom-
e stic as sigv.ments.

3. Recently, this Agency has e xterided this activity by

supporting BNDD in the covert acquisition of individuals who are
hired as Staff Agents utilized under nonofficial cover and directed
against the principal international drug traffickers •. These indi-
viduals are true employees of the BNDD and, although all admin-
istrative details relative to their employment are handled within
the Agen cy,' they' are: unaware of any Agency involvement.

4. It is ~elt at this time that a reaffirmation of our support

to BNDD in Project TWO-FOLD is necessary and desirable.

5. Therefore, it is recommended that. appr-oval, be granted

for the continuation of Project TWO-FOLD. as originally approved
by the Director of Central Intelligence on 12 February 1971.

~,9~~
Director oa;:rity 00056

~I
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.° E
(
'-'y"
'-: .....
• "'. ' . '•
.···1· .
~
,;:.
' ;~ .• JJ

SUBJ.ECT: Project TWO-FOLD

>0"
APPROVED:
------=---------..,----..,-----

DISAPPROVED:
----------

Di stribution:
Orig. - Return to OS
1 - ER
1 - IG

*
.0

Per Mr. Colby's recommendation and

DCI concurrence, terminate para~raph
2 activity and continue paragraph 3 only
as the -activity pertains to foreign assign-
ments to collect narcotics intelligence
abroad. Copy furnished IG.

00057
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

,. ,~r
r:J - I ' _.
. -'.
J .
- .- - -IJ
.. _ ,
~..
~ _
.._
- ..·l
(;'.lY
'~ " , - --. - ._ - . ~.
1.1 - _.-- ,.
.. i t.l
_ ~--_ _._ _...
\~.,.
-~. . ..-
ROUrfNG AND RECORD $HEET L _: . . ... ;
J-----.---.-----
SUBJECT: (Op!;onoll
....------..----------------. --------.-------....,_. "'--'-

.__ ......
FROM:
_-----.-._. '- .._._ ....---.._-----_ .... _- -_. __ .... ---- - --..,-
EXTtt~S'ON NO.
.-.-._. -----_._._._----...._-
-00 _ ..._ . _ . • • _._ . . . .- - _ . _

DATE

1-_..!=========::!'-- "r" f - - _ _ f- l~::....:o.;M..::..a_<..y_"1:...:9...;;.7..;:3 -..,

TO: (Officer d.';9MHon, 'Dam number, and DATE
building) ___ .__.._ r ......- .____ OffICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment 10 show I,om whom
INITIALS to whom. Draw a line aero .. column after each comment.)
RECEIVED FQ&WA~DED
J----------------.-----t--- +------+----+----------------------1
1.

Broe
-----------_._----_._- ------+--_.- +----~

00058

ro.R¥.3~ 6.1"1 Oiu'S!: PREVIOUS

~.r<i2 ....: i ." ,.... :EOITIONS
..
~.
....
'tor' S;~ET
• o CONFIDENTIAL o INTERNAL
USE ONLY o UNCLASSIFIED
 MORT DocTD: 1451843
i, ,..
"".

., . .,~'May 1973
'.'
. .
MEMORANDUM FOR "THE RECORD
., " ..
SUBJECT: . G~neral: .. Office of Security Surv.ey
. ·1. ,.
.." ..
'j '...
:
.. --:;.~."
-:--......-:--:- -:-." ",--:-",--:-..~'.--:-~~---. .
=!
-:-:::-.

. ;':,. . "'" ..'f"···· •.. - . . ' .'::'. ".". '. . ., .

1. At the Director's instruction, and with the concurrence ..
of the thenDD/P, the Office of Security devedopedInfozmanrs in : ".:::~:...
RID to report on the activities of RID er.q.ployees on whom security .. :':'~
questions had arisen.... This program, which included upwards of a ... ·· .'
dozen informants at its peak, has declined to its present level.of
three, only one of whom is reporting regularly on matters of ~urrent .
l.:. interest. . ':': .~; ....: /..,~~;".:., '. ; ..' . :':' ' '.:. :':'>. '. . .. , ....
. '0 ":'.' "'.: •• _. '..._ •• • ~ .. ,:; . . . . . . .: • • • ~: • :, ••• _~.~,. ";' .' ••••• /~ ". -",

f Z. 'The principal object of Security's interest. through this .~~.-"":"

j informant is a female who was em.ployed in RID for..a nu.mber oi'yea:r's .
1 until she r·esigned in 1969. Her r~s~gn?Ltion coincid~d with the iniq.ation
j of a security review on her by the Office of Security, but Security does .-
_c. t: not know whether the e:m.ploy~~ waa aware of tbis..~:eC:~t.Y review Jat.,",:.: '.'
-i the tUne o_~ber r~Si;:::on•. '.,,, ~ :'~~':r~.;~~~:~:~,;;--:.:+:F'
I 3. Securit y ' s interest in this em..ploye~ was··occasionedby,. '" ... :
.

I reports that she had developed an increasing~y in'f::iixiate a.cquaintance,.,.;:>.::

1 with a Cuban na.tional. .Reporting. by one in.form.ant~ who Was also.~;·.;. ·¥":;;:~:· .
.:. ::1 be~g de:elope~ bY.the-·~~b~; suggested that. the· ~.uban·migh~h~~e::~;~:~·::),L~;.:.·,. j;
'. '.;::~! an mtelli'gence lIlteres~.lD. the fem.al~.~.T~e .s~.~. ~~~mant·a~so.;,.s.ub- ~.;·~kY: .' ..",
· :~~:!...;.,... sequently reported that. the Cuban had nl.J:l?3.eroq,s· other:contacts aInong . ;:., ," ".

. . ~;::
.c. ~.-::;::'~;'.
:.'.
._.. :: ';'.
.•,: .•
:';~~}~; ~; ;::_;~::;;~;;t:;;::~e;;:::::~;~:;:C:::::~~~iP~!~Wilf~~~:_
.. ,'. Subsequent~:to.herdeparture
:4.::
':: . •:.::...' ••. .,,:.·.: c
. . . . . :.... lrom . . the. Agency,'"
.
. .·employee entered' into a common-Law :marital relc:tion~hip"with.~he~
the ex-IUD -..1':;:;'''';';,'.;.:.
".~~.".''':.'

',:" ;¥"';
~... r '• • " .• ":, .. 1 '."
.,.
· '.' :-<. ;. •
Cuban and jo~ned hini·a'S. parbier in' photographic..· b·usiiess.<. :r.n thi~:·';;':i':~:C··.
• • ·.·.1 t • .1" ";.:- ':. •
a. • '" ,_. ' . . . ,. •••• .... :" ~... ~ :r.,,:'; ",

• ->, .,: -.. . capacity. she s.oli.cite~ .busin~ss.. ~mong ·CfA- ~:t;lployees; ·"especi.ally; ;i.~'-";·~·:·:::·; ::..... :.'
· ~i . I'·', .:.those requi;ring'p<:tssport photos.:.,' Recently, $he! "
'and
".
the' Cubansought':-.;·;:;<.
. '.. .' • • .\. '! • ~I' •• ' .,

:.~ 'f ..:..;. . t.o eznp.loy Security~s informan~ in. this busine;ss 'on ·a.part-tim.e b.asis; ';. . :.~:~ ..

- :_~'"
~.·~_.,~",-:.,~._:. 1,·.: ~. ~;'
.- :--.' .::.:~--
.. ... ':.,
· '., ~. ;' ':.: ".'.': .·.;:.~E; :t.; .~ ·.'[:~ :.~ , ;.: ' ;.: ·~ . · :. ~.· :'_ ".~ ;.i: > ~:. ;:'. ,~O:.~ _ :."'.t.';_i';~.l.~-·~.;:~·':~ • :~• • 'li::~;~": .' ~~-
- ~-.
~ ~.. ....- ~ :. ~ '. ..
.. :.·:. ..._.·: . -:;.'•.:.-t
rc

- -
••

-
.
. . . :. -~~:. "'..;:.... :-:.
. ... .' ..... '. -, ".' :; .• :.,~-':::;>;;~~.;), 'SECa ..--".",,:~,
.": , .. ":.' .'

;.~

-.~-~~;.',.,.:_: ·:::;"i~~~·t~~;¢~i~1~:~i:i12~:~;;~~~h;i:~~t:.,.c~~rJff~:;.:~,., . .:
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

'. .
yJ".
I.
, .~
• .:.• ~
~ (

5. Inforrnation on the backgr oun d of the Cuban is fairly ex! cn s iv e ,

but it is inconclusive. He is known to have been a rn crn.be r of anti-
Castro organizations in this countr y, There are also reports that
his' rno the r was i mp r i son ed in Cuba at one time, There are other
episodes ·in his life that suggest intelligence Involv ernent all. his part
with some hostile service, but this is not yet definitely establi.shed.

6. The Office of Security has had at ti me s a second informant

in this case. His reporting has tended to confi r m reporting by the
principal info r mant,

8. The Offi de of Security has been running this operation for

over two years, in an effort to obtain conclusive proof of its intelli-
gence nature. CI Staff has been kept informed.. The FBI, which
was informed of the case at an early stage, has declined to take re-
sponsibility for it, on grounds that it concerns CIA's internal security.
As a result, the Office ofSecurity has been inhihited in the actions
it can take against the: Cuban susp-ect. On the other hand, Security
has not taken any action against Agency em.ployees for fear of com-
prorni s ing the operation.

9. It would appear to me that the, Office of Security has dallied

with this case long enough. Apparently unable through positive measures
to resolve doubts about the case, O/S has followed the course of watch-
ful waiting, hoping the Cuban would take precipitaif action himself that
would give us the evidence we seek. In the m.eantim.e, our knowledge
of the relationship between the Cuban and the several other current
Agency employees with whom he is known to have contact continues

- 2 -

00060

~ .
.. '
.,',
~ ,
.
......
.
~ ...;
 ~~-----------_.-
MORl DoclD: 1451843

,
• ."'- r..... ~ . \ .

The possibility that the employee. In t)J:) DIVISIon may oe passIng

information on CIA's Soviet operations is too great to warrant further
delav in moving against her. I I

- 3 -

.;;:zr.
,.....-~
, '. ".:
t.. . __ ,_" ..
,
.
00061.
 MORI DocID: 1451843

i· . "' ....

Hemorandum to:
Subject: Offj.ce of Security Survey - Office of Security Support to B~DD

1. In D~cember 1970 Robert Ingersoll, head of the Bureau of ~ar­

cotics and Dangerous Drugs, asked Hr. Helnis if the Agency could give
him scir:-e ass ist.ance in shoring up the internal integrity of the BUDD.
According to Ingersoll, the old Federal Bureau of Narcotics had been
heavily infiltrated by dishcnest and corrupt <elements, ,~o were believed
to have ties with the narcotics smuggling industry. Ingersoll w~nted us
toh~lp him recruit some thoroughly reliable people who could be used,
. not only as special agents in his various office~ arotmd the country,
but also to serve as informants on the other BNDD employees in these
offices.

62
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.
~
. ,

... ... --: '" .....

,.
~.
'
"'" -.. ;

/
.. ',o.,f':' / . .

JOLawrence

00063
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

r'

----_. """" ._--------

[J CO.. DtJHIf:\l
.. ---_.
o SECRET

/
-_.
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)

FROM,
_--_.__._--_.-._---- '--_:'----'---._--_.' _._-- _._----.-_.-.------
..
EXTENSION· NO.
._--_.-.

Howard J. Osborn -----------------------

Director of Security D"TE

._-~ I I 9 May 1973

TO, (Offiter desJgflolion. room number, and
I- DATE
.'
--
buildin!!l OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment 10 show from whom
INITIALS to whom. Oro .... 0 tine octose column after eoch comment.}
RECEIVED FORWARDED
._---
l. Deputy Director for
Maria g emen t & Service'

2. I
---,..
3.~c;
,\ ......---
4. '-" r

5.

6.

7.

8. "
., .. --;..-::: ;;"_-r::..;;..' '-_._-"....... _. ...... -

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.
-
15. 00064
ADMIN -
JIll'
61 0
.~Al
FORM
3-62
USE PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
0 SECRET 0 CONFI DENTIAL I!J E ONLY 0 UNCLASSIFIED_
. - '. -..... "- ..... ". - .....
'.' ' M ...... ... .,.. "0" . : .... - ..... _ .... , .~..... • • _ • __ ._~.....""'i,.."• .;;.........:.i:c...,I'W.._:.w....._~:.H::a.·.:
 MORI DocID: 1451843

9 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Management &' Services

SUBJECT Press Allegations re Use of, Agency
Polygraph

1. This memorandum is fOT'youT information only

and confirms a report I made to you by telephone earlier
today.
2. On 22 July 1971, an article was carried on
American proposals relative to the SALT talks in The New
York Times over the by-line of William Beecher. It was
devastatingly accurate and contained direct quotes from
a Presidential advisory memorandum the White House had
sent to Mr. Gerard'Smith, Director, Arms Control and
Disarmament Agency, a few days. earlier. The President
was alleged to be furious with this unauthorized dis-
closure of classified information and directed a. sweeping
investigation within the United States Government to
determine the source of the disclosure.. Investigation
"., , . was conducted under the. di.r,ectton. ..Q~. Mr. Egil Krogh and
Mr. David Young, Staff Assistanf~ fo·Mr. John Ehr1ichman,
Counsel to the President for Domestic Affairs.
3. On the basis of investigations conduc~ed by
State Security and Defense officials,' four' Tndividuals-"'-
one individual in the Department of Defense and three
individuals in the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency--
were tabbed as leading suspects. Mr. Egil Krogh contacted
me on 26 July 1971 and requested' that we arrange to polygraph
the three suspects in the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency
and volunteered the information that the Federal Bureau of
Investigation would be asked to polygraph the. one suspect
in the Department of Defense.

0-0065
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, I ~ •• \; ,:\ 11
JJ( bi~Lf

4. I informed Mr. Krogh that from time to time

in matters involving the national security the Agency had
detailed to Mr. G. Marvin Gentile~ Director of State,
Security. a polygraph operator and a polygraph machine for
his use in polygraphing State Department employees '~10
were recipients of allegations concerning their loyalty.
I emphasized that this procedure had the Director's
approval and that State 'clearly understood that the examin-
ation was their total responsibility. I further informed
him that this was the only way we could undertake to enter-
tain his request and that even then it would require the
specific approval of the Director. Mr. Krogh asked me to
obtain such approval and work out such arrangements with
Mr. Gentile.
s. Later that same day, Mr. Krogh called Mr. Gentile
and inquired as to whether the arrangements had been made.
Mr. Gentile indicated they had and suggested that the same '
polygraph operator'be used to examine the Defense suspect.
Mr. Krogh informed Mr. Gentile that he considered this an
excellent idea and that he, would instruct Defense officials
to make their man available to Mr. Gentile for 'a polygraph,
examination.
6 The' four individual~ werel

I The polygraph
'" a """1-:::n:----';c:'-.:tr:,e=a=r=1""'n=g=-~l:rn'""'e'--=""
'--..e""x'""acwm"'1-:;:n....anl:=-=.1,. . ,o"'n""""'s==--"'r"""e=sU.....l. . -:r:.tl:'",e""- :ro"'udr men and th e
resu~ts of the examinations were forwarded over my signature
to Mr. Gentile on 29 July 1971. A copy of my covering
memorandum is attached.
7., Mr. Murrey Marder, a staff writer for The
Washington Post, in ,an article dated 3 September 197T,
stated that a State Department spokesman had acknowledged
at a news briefing that agents of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation had polygraphed State Department employees
suspected of leaking information on ,the SALT talks in
July •. Mr. John Edgar Hoover, then ,Director of the Federal

,SE ONLY
 MORl DoclD: 1451843
•
(
. .... r •
' .

Bureau of Investigation, denied this allegation in a

letter to The Washington Post and said that the polygraph
examinations had been conducted by another agency. Specu-
lation centered around the Agency, but after a day or 50 7
press speculation in this regard died away_
-S. Mr. Marder apparently has never been satisfied
and has been pressing Mr. Charles BraY7 State Department
spokesman, for confirmation of Agency involvement. Mr.
Bray learned today that Mr. Marder plans to use a press
conference to be held at 2:00 p.m. this afternoon to press
this point further. Mr. Bray has been given guidance by
Mr. Gentile to avoid confirmation but if this is impossible
he will indicate the examinations were conducted by State
Department Security officials utilizing an operator and
a machine detailed to the Department for this purpose. I
do not know whether or not the fact that the government-wide
investigation was directed by Mr. Egil Krogh is known to
Mr. Marder but I suspect that it is and that this is the
reason why the matter has been raised again. Mr. David
Young was instrumental in pushing my office to conduct an
internal Agency investigation of this disclosure and the
·White House was satisfied that no Agency employee was
the source.

Directo.r
Attachment

00067
 -'1C
------------- ....
... -- ..
MORl DoclD: 1451843

.....- ..- _
..... .... -- _-
.. ..
. - ...-.-- .._-
_._.~._ '"

.. j, " I .... '

• o.

c.

,. ..'
---.

. ' ...
::

. ''';:'

. '.' :'.~"
( -:'.:

I i'
1

-,

00068
-- -.- - ..

.\ ..
'\ . .. ".- ..
......
"
,.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

:;'~:?",)i.:y ..~~$i·5t3.;1t, 5.ecret;::.ry

io: ::)~.c';..1=l~y
~". '_""o_i .:...:.-:-.
J_''':.;':.::::1.:':~_~;:-::'.~.L.~
.-. -... ':0 ~_ ......... ::::"'
_~:..:

'2.... .:=~....::: !.:::t o;:£le.r c a s e-s i;n.~;nl-vl·2.:5 1::'1.2 1~3e o ; P0~Y~;:"~?~.1' i::;'3
i=r:.Fi.~::.-ati7·e ~":O I::£.:;:::~nce~:e rna de to r~ls ";\:1.~.llCY'3 1:l:.:,::)1··:".::1::1:~·~t i::l
~:~~3e .a ct i on s ,

3. 1\.5 you i;"?"il1 not a, the :L3?O~t.:J 3.Z"-:: not ~1.:::t3:;i£i.:;d :2::!.U I
3;"'..a11 de.f.er to jrao.: j~dJn:t~nt i::l !'''e;ard to tb'~ l~·J~~i of cla':;3iiic~tio~.

- - "'" -- .... - -'" " = -. ;: ....-

...". ~.;).

. ....- ..- ......

00069
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

5 June 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General

SUBJECT Items in John Clarke Me m o r aridurn

to the Director of Central Intelligence,
dated 9 May 1973

I. Two items in the attached rne mo r andurn had not

previously been reported. The first: "_- Use of CIA funds
and facilities to for FBI and pro-
vision of technica equlpmen s or use
against a l.-.. ----'

2. In a follow-up meeting with Mr. Clarke, he advised

that involved here was the use of funds appropriatedfor CIA
bein iven to the FBI in cashiers checks for the ur ose of

There was also

gency help given in Further, other
CIA ~ cashiers checks were given to NSAwho. with
some ssistance, was working on I
I Mr. Clarke said he thought the only problem
here was in the use of funds, not in the operation. He thought
the only source of additional information on this subject was
Mr.1 lof the DDO/CI Staff. .

3. The second item: "_- Use of CIA funds to help

State Department defer Presidential representational expenses
of President Lyndon B. Johnson's trip to Southeast Asia. II

4. Mr. Clarke said the total amount of TIlOney requested

by State Department was $3, 000, 000 but that the Director would
not agree to this amount. The Director did supply funds in
tho s e instances where some operational activity was involved or
could be inferred, I, e , , I
"- ...JI Mr. C larkL.e-w-a-s-n-o""t-s-u-r-e-o'f:-;-;th;---e-a-m-o-u-n--;t-o"f-A"'--:-g=-e-n-c-y--

00070
S[CRET [YES QNt¥-
------------- MORl DoclD: l45l843

funds used. He felt that only Colonel White could" supply

adrlitional details. He said Senator Russell and Repre-
sentative Mahon were advised of this Agency activity but
asked not to be briefed in detail.

Inspector

Attachmen t

00071.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

..../
\: __ J ..._ A "-; I._I.

9 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

SUBJECT Per your instructions

1. I have no recollection of specific contacts with the

Ellsberg c as e, Watergate, or Young. Dick Helms' instructions
at the time regarding discussion of Hunt's previous employment
s h ou'[d be a matter of record.

2. Other activities of the Agency which could at some point

raise public questions should they be exposed and on which Bill
Colby is fully conversant are:

-- CI act ivftyof Dick Ober 3 DO/D.

j I., I
investments and
accumulation of Government capital.

Use of CIA funds and facilities to acquire U. S.

real estate for FBI and provision of technical
equipments by NSAI p o r use against
I .
Use of CIA funds to help State Department defer v', t'
Presidential representational expenses of L. B. J . ./'Y
trip to S E A . . G

L . -_ _ f~....-----..--\
dhn M. Clarke

0007Z
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

5 June 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General

SUBJECT IteIns in John Clarke Me m o r-aridurn

to the Director of Central Intelligence,
dated 9 May 1973

1. Two items in the attached memorandum had not

previously been reported. The first: It __ Use of CIA funds
and facilities to acquire U.S. real estate for FBI and pro-
vis~on of technical equipments by NSAS ~or use
againat a ',-__
. _
Z. In a follow-up meeting with Mr~ Clarke, he advised
that involved here was the use of funds appropriatedfor CIA
belo iven to the FBI in cashiers checks for the purpose of
\
'11ere was also I
L..-_.------. ~ _
\ Further, other
CIA monies in cashiers chec s were given to NSA who, with
some ~Ssistance, was working onl . '.
Mr. Clarke said he thought the only problem
here wastnte .us e of funds, not in the ope rat ion. He thought
the only source of additional inforxnation on this subject was
Mr. I p£
the DDO/CI Staff.

3. The second item: "-- Use of CIA funds to help

State Department defer Presidential representational expenses
of President Lyndon B. Johnson's trip to Southeast Asia. n

4. Mr. ·Clarke said the total amount of money requested

by State Department was $3,000, 000 but that the Director would
not agree to this amount. The Director did supply funds in
those £nstanceswhere some operational activity :vas involved or
could be inferred, i. e •• 1
I I
Mr. Clark-e-w-a-.s-n-o-t'--s-u-r-e-o"'f the amount of Agency

00073
 --------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

">".

funds used. He felt that only Colonel 'White could supply

additional details. He said Senator ~ussell and Repre-
j
I sentative Mahon were advised of this Agency activity but
I asked not to be briefed in detail.

I
,i

I J.nspector

Attachmmt

i
I f

I f
I

I
I
. I
i

I I

I
i
I
!
r
i
I
I
I
I

I - 2 -
i' '."

I 00074
 MORl DoclD: l451843

,
,

I1 rt:,i:Al . r ;~H -
.__.. ------ -.. -....-.. . .-LJ... ._ -- -_.-<..- -----.-_._----
:.H:(L',SSlfiEO LJ (llN IL~ f! t:.L
_------- ........ _... _._--_._.. . __.OlilY X " ,

...
dE
1"'0 ..
ROUTlNG AND RECORD SHEET
SUSJECT: (Optional) "-

f- - - - - - - - - -.._ - - - - -
fROM:
..... _._._-.. ----_._-- ----._,-- E).!ENSION NO.
----- . --_.... .. ---- -"--"-' ---_ .. -
D.irector of Finance - ,. ---""'-'--' ------
1212 Key Building I DATE

7 ~1973
-
TO: (Ollicer design02fion, 'oom number, and . DATE
buildingl r---
OFfICER'S
INITIALS
COMMENTS (Numbe, each comment d.ow (,am whom
10 whom. Drow a line acron column afler each cemrnent.]
'0
RECEIVED FORWARDED

1.
Deputy Director. for
Mana ement &Services
~.~

.- ---
3.

-
4.
Director of Central Inte 1igenc e
I I Headquart€ rs
5.

6. .
.. ..

7.

8. . . ..
-
9.

10. .. ..,.' . 0>

II

...
,

11.

..
12. ~.
" .. .v: ....
. . .. '"
..
.. -,
... 0
: ., -". ,.
~}
v-, -.
13. .

I
....... .,
1.4. .'
" -. - : : ...
" . ..
, .- , 0

"'-

, ..;.:. ............ .. -,:..:._.

.' ":'.
0.
0>
......":
~.~ .. .'
~ ~: _~; :.~ . , ; ..:~
"
,-'
..' -c-

f .. .. .. ..
15.
~ i~fF8a ~,-
0 "
p:·I'.rl'i'i .

00075.. ... ....

"

.. .' .' .
~

..
"

..
....... .., -.11 liG0 .tt-'~
~ ~i';:~i:s
r'"- ~;

':.,c.· ...... .. :
';';4 •

~::"
..
" .....
'
: -, 0
.~
,
: : * ....
MORl DoclD: 1451843 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII

-;"

' .
.~
?
s:

..
;
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

'..

orl MAY 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director·of Central Intelligence

VIA Deputy Director for Management and Services
FROM Director of Finance
SUBJECT Special Other Government Agency Activities

1. I IColonel White, Executive Director-

r---_--'2~.'--1,-------...:....---------------=--..:

. 3. Detailees - The Agency has reimbursable and non-

reimbursable agreements with the White House, Department of
Justice, Defense'Agencies, etc., based on signed memoranda
between the Director 'of Personnel and the various Agencies.
4.. pro~ect TWOFOLD - Reimbursement from Bureau of
Narco.tics an Dangerous Drugs' for ·training of BNDD agents by
a domestic Agency Security proprietary.

5. I

l...-----I]
00077
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,! ......

- 2 -

SUBJECT: Special Other Government Agency Activities

6. Payment to White House - Reimbursement to White

House as approved by Executive Director-Comptroller for
$33,655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and
addressing of replies to letters and telegrarn~'received
by the White House as a result of the President's speech
on Cambodia in May 1970.'

Ie
inance

00078
 MORl DoclD: 1451843 -
.'. ..' ...i": -'. . . '::. '~."':: <: ::':.:: '., ::';'~'g~"
;

-
.
.
4
." '0'1 MAY i373 .:.. .
:-:.'

. .
. J.{Ej·l0r~'mm,1 FOR: Diroctor of Ce~tr~l Intclli~cncc

VIA •• Deputy Director for Ha:l<li:e::l.Cnt and

: Director of Financ~ '. ~.
\ ;:..,

.~ .• .,.,.:.1" .'., .: ~_
.......... _~ .... 1...•• ~ •.,

'.

2. L
I I ~

-, . "

~ ~3. Detailees - 'Tho Agency 'has reimbursable anu'non-

rel~btirsablc a:;rcc:ncnts \-li t!l the i'lid.tc r:ouse, Dc~)nrt;:lcnt of
Justice, :;~fe~sc Ag cnc i e s , e tc, , based on s i~~~led' r.i~;.~~r:m;,!a
be twe en the Direcr.or of Personnel and .t he various Agencies.
4. Proj oct :r~JFtlL!) • Reimbur-s ement; fron sur-eau of'·
Nar.cotics---ailJ. Dangerous Drugs for traini:lg' of B;iDb agents by
a do~estic Agency Security'propri~taI"y'~

s.

..
.

't ..:.

. -...:..
s£Crrtl
•\
-,,=-~ (l:\H V
(1[\1... ~.
-L-_'-- ---'

-----_... _-.-_..- ---- --_._:,-_.-_. --.----_........ __ ......,.-_ - _.. _._.,.._..

." .
.. :~ ".:.'- _.," .- --
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

- 2 -

SUBJECT: Special Other Government Agency Activities

6. Payment to White House - ReLmburs eracn t to \'fhite

House as approved by Executive Director-COl:lptroller £or
$33.655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and
addressing of replies t~ letters and telegrams received
by the White House as a result of the President's speech
on Cambodia in May 1970.

(signed) Thomas B. Yale

Thomas B. Yale
Director of Finance

.....

.00080
Sf
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

I. 7- ::J.- ;:\ ~ f..; '_' i 'J

! ., .'..••
-
I 07 MAY 1973

~lEl·:QRA"iDU}.1 FOR: Director of Central Intolligenco

VIA Deputy Director for j·!anagemcnt and Services
FROt·! Director of rin~nce

SiJDJ!;CT Special Other Government Al;ency Activities

I Colon0l l';hi te. Lxecutive Director-

2.

---------------------
3. Detailees - The Agency has reimbursable and non-
reimbursable ag reemen t s with the 11hite House. Depar-tment; of
r
Justice, Defense Agencies. etc •• based on signed memoranda
between the Director of'Personnel and the various ~gencies.
4. Pro~ect tWOFOLD - Reimbursement from Bureau of
Narcotics an Dangerous Drugs for training of BNDD agents by
a domestic Agency Security proprietary.
s. I

L- --;- _ I~·, 00081.

 --------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. .

- 2 -

SUBJECT: Special Other Government Agency Activities

6. Payment; to White House - HeinburSGHcnt to h'hite

Iiouse as apl)TQved by Executive Director-ColJptrollcr for
$33,655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and
addressing of replies to letters and telegrams received
by the White House as a result'of the President's speech
on Cambodia in Mdy 1970.

(signed) Thomas B. Yale

Thomas B. Yale
Director of Finance

,,

00082
 -----------------_.. MORI DocID: 1451843

p ." .u~~lA~SSI FI-ED

~---.-
0 --:IlAl
._-----
U ONLY
1lI~
CONFI" ''lTIAl
--.'
[J -. ~'ET . -----~
. ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
I
./
- ._---_..... -----
SU8JECT: (Oplional)

*----.._--_.-,----_..'------ .---- EY.T~NSION ·rNQ."-------···-------·----··_- -

FROM:

l
Deputy Director of Finance I I IWE'-'-~'-';--'- -.
1212 Key Building
I 24 May 1973~
'..''"0'.... 0"" - - -~~"
TO: (Officer
building) room "0';;'. ----- OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment ,how from whom '0
INITIALS 10 whom,Draw a line ocross column af'er each comment.)
REalVED FORWARDED
. ,-
1-
I . .\
~
\
IHe a4qua r t e r ,s J

2.

3.
"'---
__J Attached are pertinent
d ocumen ts and papers r e La t mj

to Para 6 of the Director of

4.
Finance I S memo to the DCI
dated 7 May 1973, Subject :
5.
"Special Other Government
-
6. Agency Activities tl
..

7.

8. .
. -
I Warren D. MagnussoI
I
......
9, Atts
-
'.' - :
.. .
10. ... : .. ., . ...
--. ., .
"

n. .'
.,'
.- . -.: " .
.' .'
.. .."' ..;. ..
12.
~ .. -: ~~. . ··':/t~. .
~:"' :: ·~~~~2"::i:i~.:~
........
.. .
.' '. -;

, ~ .. -, '. ':.;-
;. -;'

.
13. .- ~"

. . . .. .
......
-
:
..
:
'. '
...::.. ~

14. .. ; .
' : :-
. '
:.; ..... .. ., ~; :-I;-:::.~:' ..': .. :.:.. -::::...'~ .'.
:... ~

...'.,
,
",
t- "'"
.- ." ."
.. '

- .- .' . ':;:}" ~\: ~~:;.:i .. - r' ~~"" ;: .~:~':,~?~.:~~.: ~..:;~>;.-;;:~. ·~·Z ~~":'.~}".". \~~;~~~:. ~:i~}~?~;. .
:

15. -, ..
.
"
-; :" ,. :. ''''''0008 03';;:'

\<

7~~: t. !!~~':I n""'f1J"1T

.-:-" .
..
.,
r;;~'~
. ' .~- /~~:~~g~~ ;'~~1~!j: .~ .
r ,

~\: fl
"
..
t.; .'
/
"

, .. r- - .::.:.....:
.- : '.'
.": :. ' ..•-~" \1 '. ... ;."

~~~o ~10 u~Jft~v~~us

.' r7t'.' . 0 CONFIDENTiAl ~ D' INTERNAL :,' . D'-' U·NCLASSI.FIED·?:~;':.~ .
~~~~,..:~:'t~,; .;-:.i.:~~"._~·.::,:~~LL;l;...:.c"":::~...;i;~:2>,,:;;-;~U?;~!'it-~:.~t;i:.~."'"_; ....,:.,.,,'~~~:;;~~~I:~<·~,~:..r~V~~1~ 2:~~~t.~i\·dt
..
 ------------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

..,. '.
'.' '/
/
141'. Nagnusson' s phone conver satzlon ,'lith ;.~r. John Brown at approxfmat.e.Iy 10: 20
on 26 May 19'10:

13: Guess we're back together again!

M: Got more problems?

B: Yes, don't know how much Watts told you.

M: I didn't talk to Watts. Think he called Colonel vJhite.

B: Let me explain background. As a result of the Cali'lbodia speech, we I re

getting relatively inundated with correspondence and normally all of
this is sent to the Department of state for answering. What we're
doing -- we're continuing to sen~l1._c..2.!:~ co:r.r_e_i:!pg!!.cl.~!!£~_t.9.~at~
However , the President made, determination he'd like to answer support
over his signat~re here and 'we asked the Department of state to
support us on this effort. They're in' a position wnere they can provide
only limited support at this time. They're committed for $10,000 which
would probably handle' in the area of maybe 60;00~ r~_~ponses.' -

M: How many responses altogether counting pros and cons?

B: The cons are quite a large group tha~ they're handling themselves also.

M: Are they going to be handling pros too?

B: ....>-$.10 J 0Q'?2:.s .J'~:r:.. J?r_o.s-=- They're doing cons. On pros they c~n pi ck up only
~10,000 wort1i-;-We estimate it will be arounCL~&g.Q....~E 50,~d it
looks like at present time we've got over 100,000 responses in and it
could go upwards of -150,000 or greater. Looks like we'll need a minimum.
of another $l(),c)6o;:p:rotra01.yrnareaoF $15,000z additional. This covers
cost of printing, :postage and addressing:- '

M: Just printing, postage and addressing? Not any overtime for any salaries
or anything like that?

13: No, the posting of the things we'll do ourselves -- by hand. No problem.
We're talking about physical costs of job _..:. cost of stamps, cost of
envelopes and cards, and cost of having them 'addressed by outside firm.
We'll handle putting stalllp on, inserting, and sealing and mailing. Only
talking about cost associated with three aspects of the operation.

M: Postage, address~ng and printing.

C'
B: Yes, reason I asked NS/f. to see if they could arrange -- depending on
how volume goes -- probably another §?10,000 to £],000 ... _

M: T.i;l.ese are just pros? state is handling all cons themselves?

(continued)
00084

I • _ ...
 MORI DocID: 1451843

• e,
.
I
, -,
. ~ .... -.
Messrs. Magnusson and Bl'OiVU (continued - Page 2)

B: Yes, this is just portion of pros we're talking about. My understanding

get in touch -,d.th you to vlOrk out mechahics O!~ how we woul.d l1cuid.le the
.billing to make sure it's straight and we do i t properly so it fits in
with your accounting system.

M: This is only portion o:f pros. State doing some too?

i
B: Th~~re~QD~'ibuting~~lO.OOO to the pros as well as doing all the C~S.
They're picking up quite a load as a 1~t-ofth1S:-0neh-eu of a lot
of response c~ning in on this.

M: Bound to be. Tell you, John, let me give you a call back later today
if I may. Have to take a look about where I would fit this stuff in.
Al'e you going to be in this afternoon?

B: I'll be around. 1f I'm not in my of:fice I'll get back to you as soon
as I come back.

M: I'll give you a call then.

B: Can't be real definite -- not sure how we're going to peak out. Not
sure what backlog is. I'll check into that so When we talk this
afternoon I can be little more def'inite. Probably run into that are~,
I think.
111
M: Okay, 1 get back in touch'with you.

B: Okay, thank you, Warren.

, End of Conversation

00085
I .; !.. ,.'., - .. ~ ~
 ----------------- ".
MORl DoclD: 1451843

-'
,J •

Nr. Magnusson's phone conversation with Col. vJhite at 15: 40 on 26 Hay 1970:

M: I talked 'vith John Brown today and it seems like -- as you mentioned --
as' a result of Ca:rnbodia, inquiries going 'into 1'r'11ite House. The state
Depar'tmerrt is doing 'all the work on the, cons -- there are pros and cons.
The state Department is going to answer all the cons and the President has
determined that he warrt s to answer personally all the pros. However, the
state has agreed to pick up some of those too in the amount of $10,000.
That. will cover maybe 60,000 of' the arrswez-s, They estimate there I s going
to be from 100,000 to 150,000 answers that will have to be put out by
the lvnite House. Estimate it's going to cost about $8,000 per 50,000.
Think it might go to 150,000. $10,000 to $15,000 additional which the
White House will have to pay for. The charges are only going to be. for
printing, postage and addr-easd.ng by an outside firm. No salaries for
overtime or anything like that. They're going to lick the stamps in the
1voite House, paste the stamps on and insert the message into the envelopes.
John Brown said he had requested NSC to see if t.hey could arrange, .
presUDlably with us, I guess, for another $10,000 to $15,000 depending on
volume. He was tailing as more or less foregone conclusion we would do
it. I made no commitment. Told him I'd look into it.

W: How would we do this?

M: We would do it by asking them to pay amount and then send over 1080
to us with bill for the postage, bill for the addressing of the envelopes
and bill for the printing' accompanying this and we woul.d just send check
back. They would send short memorandum lvith it certifying these are the
charges. . . .

W: I think we want to know what we spend our money for but I 'don't think we
want tlfe public records to' show' that we paid for it.

M: What we can do, Sir -- I can ask them to send over a 1080 with certifica-
tion that these are the charges for classified services per our conversation,
and if you're willing to take that we can certainly do it that way.

W: Will this be an outside firm? CouIdn't we just pay the firm? What would
.be better? 1 1m not sure.

M: I think a short memo just saying attached 1080 is for charges previously
agreed to between this Agency and themselves and that's all and then we
send them. check for that. otherwise, there's always chance that an outside
firm might rea1:ize it was us paying for i t ~.

W: I guess it I s the best way to do it. I'd like to have in our records --
nobody else has 'access to -- exactly what it was for -- all about it;
their records, which are audited by the General Accounting Office, as'
little as possible.

(continued)

00086
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

" .

Mr. l'1a;gnusson and Col. vrnite (continued - Page 2)

. M: Think I can taJ.k to them and arrange that so he just sends unclassified
1080•.

W: Go ahead and do it. I'll have to sign off on it, I suppose. You go
ahead and arrange it in way that will give us full record. As far as
any records of their's are concerned, I would prefer to have minimtun.

M: I can write memo and John Brown can refer to this and our phone conversa-
tion in a memo accompanying the 1080.

W: Okay, go ahead and do it. Put limit on it. vlhen they talked to me they
said $10,000.

M: He said $10,000 to $15,000 because they're just pouring in. Might run
above $10,000.

W: Approximately $10,000 but in no case will 'it exceed $15,000 something

like that. . Okay. .

M: All right, Sir.

W: Thank you, Warren.

End of Conversation

r ",·f b7
/t-/11 -

00087
 MORI DocID: 1451843

.. ,:
'.
'- ......
~-
:.
\
~.~
) :i
..: ;..,

gr. 1-1agnusson' s phone conversation with Kr. John Brown at approximately 17: 00
on 26 May 1970:

M: Think we can go ahead and do this. Have' to be careful as to way this

is documented -- that I s the only thing. Would like to suggest that I
ivrite memo for the record -- kind of co-sign it -- agreeing to amount
and so forth and the vlay vie do this. Memo would have in it what it I S
for and then you wou.Id send us a 1080 for this, referencing this memo
an~ our conversation.

B: You're thinking in terms of reimbursing us aga.i.n? i'iouldn't it be

better for us to have direct charge ~o you?

M: No, because of public record. In order to have all the things in our
hands. It wouldn't look good for us to pay the bills direct for this
sort of thing.

B: It would not?

M: No, if you people pay the bills

B: (interrupting) Even to pay a large postage fee? Bulk of expense will

be postage.

M: Bub we have to document what it's for if you people can just pay it,
. then we'll give you money for. it.

B: What would our memo say?

M: Say attached is 1080 referencing memo dated such and such.

B: . What does the memo say -- that we're making reference to? ..

M: I'll write that up and bring over to you.

B: What, basically, are we going to say'it's about? .

M: .Have $10,000 with limit of $15,000 and would be for printing, of these'
things and so on..

B: Just wondering if you have direct biliing it seems to me that serves

purpose of memorandum.

M: The direct billing from, let's say, the printer, the addressograph
company or something like that, to us might raise questions ?utside
and I think powers that be don't want to have fact that we Ire paying
for this sort Qf thing anyplace where it can be dug up. Easiest and
cleanest way to do this is you people go ahead and pay and we' 11
rei~burse you immediately.

B: Do we have to have this memo?

(continued) 00088
.' .
tb ".
~ ----
.. I i.. -'1 L
 MORI DocID: 1451843

."

Messrs. Magnusson and Brown (continued - Page 2)

M: I'd keep in rr~ safe here.

B: vlouldn I t i t be adequate to send 1080?

M: Don't forget, you people keep copies of 1080's -- you have to by

law. 1080· would have to cite what billing is for because of that,
then that would open up to GAO or somebody else as to who I spaying
for this sort of thing. .

B: 1ve have to cite what, it's for?

M: Let I s say it 's "XYZ Printing Company" and you pay bill. This looks
like you're paying it. You send us 1080 which says nothing and we
give you money for this. We ourse.Ive s have to have on our records
what we're paying for for our 01-vn ~uditors which doesn't get outside
of our Agency.

B: It's for your internal auditors? It wou.ld' not ~et outside? Okay,
that sounds all right.

M: Illl draw the memo up and bring it over there and you can see it.

B: That sounds good, Warren.

M: Would next Monday be all righ:t with that memo?

B: Yes, we'll go ahead and order.

M: You can get going and so on.

B: Don It know what final cost is going to be. Hate to restrict ourselves.
We figure total cost is going to be around $25,000.. Got over 100,000
already that are just pro. 200,000 that haven It been analyzed yet.
Of 200,000· ·they estimate possibly upwards of 50,000 or 60,000 could
pertain to Cambodia. Of the backlog of 200,000, 60,000 could be of
.type that will be answered in this mailing. Our best estimate would
be it. may run over.

M: I Ive got instructions, John, to indicate in memo that it I S for

approximately $10,000 but not to exceed $15,000. If· and when it
exceeds $15,000, we'll start over again and 1'11 inquire further as
to whether we can cover the other -- okay?

B: Okay.

M: Open to negotiation if it runs higher.

(continued)
F;:~ r-» • :

5
1. " 00089
 MORI DocID: 1451843

"' • • t

-~,~-----.~---

Messrs. Magnusson and Brown (continued - Page 3)

B: It rr.ay run higher. If' 60,000 letters come out being pro, will taJ~e
. ~s ,to $26,000 or somewher-e in that vicinity.

M: Then I I d have to go back and inquire to see if' powers that be will
cover the other part. I think it's best to wait I til that happens ,
B: Okay, good enough ,

M: '''nat time Monday?

B:Wny don't you give us call here Monday? My secretary will line it ,up.
M: Okay.

B: Thank you', Warren.

End of' Conversation

--i: Y' ::--';')

j . 7 '"'.
r - . .,\-':,.
~-:

00090
 MORI DocID: l45l843

\"'L:.I' .i~L., i,\j-j .:..,_;_iG._, ... \..-;::: hl:>..:. • ., ..... I

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505

8 JUN ;970

MEMORAi'illl.jM FOR l '} fE RECORD

SUBJ"''&CT: Reimbursement to the White House £or Certain

Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses

.L, Reference is made to the telephone conversataon between

14r. John Brown, Staff Secretary, Wnite House, and the undersigned
concerning the accounting and the reimbursement procedure ~or
\fl1ite House expenditures in connection with the printing, postage
and addressing of replies to certain mail addressed to the President.

2. It was estimated and agreed that these expenditures would

amount to approximately $10,000, but not exceed $l5,000, and the
request for reimbursement to this Agency would. be based upon receipt
o£ a memorandum categorizing the expenses.and certifying to their
validity. The memorandum Will also transmit a Standard Form 1081
and copies of the vendors' invoices where applicable.

3. Upon receipt of the above memorandum, Standard Form 1081

and copies of vendors' invoices, a. U. S. Government Treasury check
will be drawn and forwarded to the Wnite House.

~'-~-rr---------'
Deputy Dire·ctor for Liai'~on and Planning
Office of Finance

CONCUR:

..
0009.1
 -------------------- MORl DoclD: l45l8~3

-
- 24 I~UG lQ/ u"
. v.

SUBJECT: Re~nbursement to the ~fnite House for Certain Printing,

Postage and Addressing Expenses

1. On 18 August 1970,' the undersigned received a telepl10ne call

from Mr. John Brown (145-2167) advising that the mailing had been
heavier than anticipated (increased to 250,000 pieces) and that the
dollar requirement for subject purpose had. increased from $15,000 to
$25,000.

2. I apologetically advised 1'IJr. Brown that since our records

showed that 'prior approval was limited to $15,000 I would have to
advise and confirm with my superiors that the increase to $25,000'
was acceptable, as I was sure it was.

3. In the absence of Col. White (on leave), Mr. Bush immediately

contacted Mr. Clar.ke, r--l who was not in his office. On 19 August,
Mr. Clarke telephonicaI:ty--approved the increased level and Mr. Brown
was duly informed. .

Chief,

0009Z
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

l ~ I ... ) •

THE WHITE HOUSE

WASHINGTON,

September 10, 1970'

Dear Vrr. V~gnusson:

Pursuant to your telephone call to V~. John Brown regarding the

breakdown of costs in connection with the mailing of the Acknowledgement
Cards concerning The President's Speech on T!1e Situation in Southeast
Asia, the following costs were incurred:

Computer Marketing Industries, Inc. :I> 12,7 46.15

Acknowledgement Cards 3,185.07
Envelopes . 1,,051.20
Total - :I> 16,982.42

Sincerely yours,

Carson M. Howell .
Administrat~veOfficer

Mr.. Warren D. Magnusson

Deputy Director for Liaison and Planning
Office of Finance
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D. C.

00093
 -----------------. MORl DoclD: 1451843

tlf..

.. ·
f
'. .
• •
~
0

1-..._ o I • . .. .. .
,.

."

i:e::10l"i.:".~:I.-:.1 :~~).&.~ t:).:: ;\ . . ~';(i:."'"(~) (i~. . t..:::d.· 2'~ /.U.:;iJ.:. t l:./r,:,~

t: :-\;a~ :-;1.':) ~ ~ct

1. ki:;l;'v::hed h'.::ce-co is
i'tW m::l.iling exponncs ,
"

2. It is l"Cc:':.t1CS.lc£:d t~l::~l; tIle' o7:."5.~:~naJ. voucher- be l1~l:r:ir~L:·i;:""~.. "~~i~i!,,'l.:t

r'l')l"ov-::d and ~~.~rt.i:rie(l ac ..co t!.10 <:'Y':;':L:i.~~bili".:.;:r oJ: i'u~::(J.G fli~ u rctu:;'-IlCtl ~u')
~o;;lfi o:.:'.fica 'J::Ol" pC.yrr.ST!'{;.

;
i ;,J'....i....:.~..Ji e • .1) • .l L LV. .~: ":'.\..'""f
"

DG]iu'~y Dircet:o:r 'fo.. •. Jsinif;Oil ,md :·l::.."·l1r.~

I or.rice: of' Fil'l:lm:e
I

t l l !)!1=:) fi·or.1 I\!r. Ibi.. .e ll

O

(ltd. 10of;cJ:?'~ 1970

f..Ii' 1001 (oris and 2)

i o~
I
I.

00094
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

1 5 SEP :070

JV.iEMORAI\'DUM FOR: Director of Planning, Progrmruning and Budgeting

SUBJECT Reimbursement to the Vlhite House for Certain
Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses
REFERENCE Memorandum for the Record; dated 24 August 1970,
same sUbJect

1. Attached hereto is accounting submitted from the Vlhit.e House

for mailing expenses.

2. It is requested that the original voucher be administratively

approved and certified as to the availability of fUnds and returned to
this office for payment.

HARREN D. MAGIIJlJSSON
Deputy Director for Liaison an lanning ~ '. i,l
Office of Finance
Attachments
Memo from Mr. Howell
dtd 10 Sept 1970
SF 1081 (orig and 2)

00095
 MORI DocID: 1451843

"
..
Sh'nl,iHI~: I'" 'r,u""r.. o, lutil V~LC:':;:fi '::.:~D SCHEDULE
7 I; \0 WIO D. O. X o..... ' . .__
1/'')·101-}0

'100 I'AID DY
\0 iSDUiSWi: OGJCCL (D. O. 0i'mbo!) .

You are authorized to effect tho withdrawals and credits indicated below,

-=o.m..... .,"•.Jo~01L·
300
1&0'Om
-----L-,':Du'P.iI.:tl101rJriiSJ1SiilTl: lllm
cc:r
i - (D, O. Sj"llbol)

.•. ------~--_._-_.

DEPARTMENT DEl'AilTl.!ii:NT Executive Office of the P.... cs i.

DI,;HEAU i Bunr..r..u The vrnite House Office

I 11-01-0001
Hashin!3 t on t D. c. 20500
AnDRESS
I 11.;>;)1:1:88

- - - - - - --_. -
nUiiltAU
RlITi:RENCI:
SU~UURY'

ArrllOPRIATION OR FIINO SnlBoL AIolOUNT I

I
BURE&l1
REFERENCE
ArPROrat.a.TION OR. Fusn
St;UiIAR\' :

S't"UBOL . A1l0UNT

II ,.
1100110.001 ~a6t982 •.

.
.
.
TOUL TOT.LL sis, 9(12.
Dctails of charges or reference to attached supporting documen~

For the printing of ACKnowledgment Cards~ Envelopes, and to Keypuncn names & acidl'
and place on magnetic tape ana the preparation of heat transfer labels and affixi
to envelopes, in connection with the acknowledging of mail concerning the" Preside
speech on the Situation in Southeast Asia.

For use of office billed: For use of billing office:

I certify
F.\N

FICATE OF OFFICE BILLED

I certify that the iI.ellls llsterl herein arc correct and proper Cor p,t"'UJ.t:JJ..k...LIJuw'-!o.!!!<""!ll!.Io!..!:.!!I!!.~:!.!!.!~v:.~!!i!..!~::!.!:._...,

(AUlhorized admlulstrativc or ccrlll)'iD~ olticer'

Paid by check No. _ C/D :!\o. .dat!J0096

* u: s,
I - ---- .._.-. _..__.-.. _.~~
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE' 11161-607821
~~ .. _~_ __ ~._-- -------".--

I
 MORl DoclD: l451843

i'· .~ ,,\..
C"'....1.,.... .L :t
I _

1. It j.n :l."(.':.1:::~r:~":·." ·~:·I.:-.t \-~ r...::-.---. iT~ ~.~' . c; r .,: :,':,:tc e,r ".ltJ,:·').;l.!iz:' ~~ .
l~~~; ..i:~;ll l\··::.,·~n'".~l·:; ~:I.) t.~i.0 ::e..:.·..:::.:.~l~'-· .:1.· oi .~: ~: :.-·{.::.. -:.d :··t,:-:~.t;:;.

2.

I D
"

FAH l·iC::;; COI;~·Il.- _

3. Isll(1oc·l:r.:G;-"l C1xt ·;.·:',.:l CG:j·::'~::i:"'=1::.':1': -::.;lir; tI': l~f~:1ct:Lon in 1)0'111:" ~",::""lL:

P

in t.llis CJifica fo:.... soc..-.:,~·i:~:/· :i.'W~~~:::C;l:; t~:::l iz ~~-lll~:i:r::;.)la to tl\c Ar '_~lCY

CH.l!}i '(,or Il •

4. Flc~~~ fOl"'tiard. "th.::! c11C':ck office for to

n?proD~~utc c~~iciaL.

Kl\r:r.:: ::r D. l·:AGI-;U:':::',CCi

D:.;r:l:rt,~r DiTcc.l,,-=>r :rc~ I'~uif;Ci"l r:r.d 7·J.rr:.. ni';~r:

00097
'.
.I

':;zt-.,
. . ..,.'
.~;.~ ••. :' -t ::' ~.
,'Po. •••••• t...... of ..... ,•• _~_.

I
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

...
!"
;

i.·~r. John Drown

,S'L"U S~~cretal'Y
The Y/liite Ho u s o Office
"!ushingt-on, D. C. 20500

"
z.-- Enclosed is U. S. Treasury Check No. ' - 1in the a rn o ur.t

of $16,982.42 wh ich repi:cse:1tG rcii1-;bursemcnt of nUl"CaU Schedule

I
I
No·IL__-.:..._I.copy enclose~./ThiS sC!lcdule wa9·.fo~·warded to tilis
·1

10 September 1970.

Your-s very truly,

.1JAHREN D. 'lv!.A USSON

Enclosures

OFI ll Oct. 70)

·1----I 00098
 MaRl DoclD: l45l843

e.
."

THE WHITt: HOUSE

WASHINGTON
Decem.ber 7. 1970
l'

CONFIDENTIAL

MEMORANDUM FOR: WARREN MAGNUSON

We have finally received the cost breakdown for acknowledging

the mail in connection with the President1s speech on the situation
in Southeast Asia. By copy of this InemOrandUlTI I am requesting
our administrative office to forward that portion of the bill applicable
to you.

If there are any p r obl.erns in handling this, please let me know.

Thank you.

.:::InA.
JOHN R. BROWN III

cc: . Carson Howell

00099

..... ... *--

~ .._'--.-
._'-~" "~' -._.~ .... ..
~_ ~.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

- ...... ---- .- ......

~ _--~_ _- .. __. . _-
..
Keypunch names, place on magnetic tape
prepare 'and affix to envelopes heat '
transfer labels, and furnish printout. $7,410.35

, Print acknowlecgment Cards 2,244.27

Print Envelopes. . 728.00

Postage 6,290.64·

$16,673.26
.. .. . . ... .. -._--_..._. __.__ .._-_ ... - ..... _---_._-----~_ ... --- --- . _------------_._---_ .. _.. -

--
-, """0'0._. __ 0_" '"_' _ _ ••. _ ••• " _ ._. _ _ •
 MORI DocID: 1451843

'"

5,'

I>iEJvJORAl'IDUM FOR: Director of Planning, ?rogramming and Budgeting

SUBjECT Reimbursement to the wnite House for Certain
...
~
Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses
RE7iRENCE Memorandum for the Record, dated 24 August 1970,
same subject

1. Attached hereto is the second acc0U11ting, in the amount of

$16,673.26, submitted from the vfnite House for mailing expenses ..
Ciieck for the first accounting in the amourrt of $16,982.42 was
forwarded to the White House on 2 October 1970.

2. It is requested that the or'Lgd.na.L voucher be administratively

approved and certified as to the availability of funds and returned ~o
this office for payment.

~ GN
Deputy Director for Liaison Planning
Office of Finance
Attachments .
SF 1081 (orig & 2 wiatt)
Memo from the White House
»<.
dated 7 Dec 1970
Memo to D/pPB, transmitting
- 1st accounting, dated 15 Sept 70
I
~-
Copy of 1st 1081 c:J, 7/
Memo from the White House
dated 10 Sept 70
Memo for the Record dated 24 Aug 70

..:,.

-,

001.0.1.
_","0 ~ • • •- . __ ~_. ~._• • • • • _ • 0 __ • _.. ••• _ _ •••••• _._ .~_ • • __ • ~ • • •_ ••• _ ••• _ •••
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

....." .' )"11.';'

... :~t I .usu
.'n. j(lhl \:~UGi":~.{ ;~.:·:ZJ SC;·,;::['~i..E D. O. No. ~ ._
JO·II-lt'~·U
C? W!TI-I;jRAV.'J::S .~i\D GREDlrS
n«. No.
--.--·-t(}:·~::::J.;i!i~:i;-·

au. No. 3:-~.j ..

-·---CiJ:r;;~~(:n:;;;-
)I).)
PAID BY
(D. o.•;;·."bo)
You are authorized to e/Teet tho withdrawnls find credits indicated below,

300__._
(D. O. ~jllIl'lJ-o-J)----

L
Dr.I'..... nTllENT Executavo (jf.,.·ice o.c blrc ."n::;L,

The ~';h'i t,:! ilou s e (;;.:.::.c';

1.L-01-0~)()1
Annneas
SumIAR"
..... rrnorRI...nON OR FUND SnlDOL APrRorRIATION OR'Fu"" SVltlJOL

110 1110110 0001 -,; 16,6·.. .:;02/,

'j

Ii

TOTJ.L TOT4L

Deto.ils of charges or reference to attached supporting documents

For the prtintdng of Aclm01'1lecigement Cares, Envelppes and PO;3tage f'oz- mnilin:,;,
and to Keypunch names, place on magnetd.c t.ane , prepare and afl.·ix to envo Lt.!)OS
heat transfer LabeLa, and ;furnish' printout,9 in connection tvi th· the .ad\.noW'led,~;:;.;'Ji...
of mail concerning the President1s Second. speech on the Situatton in ::)ou"neast ;'.3iE
See attached list ;for breakdoYI.n of cos~s~

For use of office bllled: For use of billing office:

'- '1" ~ fy funds

- j" • Cl);)E

ERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED

J cortif.)' thnt tho il.cms lister! hereln are correct and proper for payment from tho appropriation's) designated;

~ , l,.-,Yi-U.:-O""'Ili-Cl:-rl----
I

I· Paid by check No. _ C/D ~o, • dated 001.02 _

* u. S. GOVERNMENT pAINTING OFFICE: 1516\-60782\

I I
I J
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

...

..-,
"

1. it i6 l·cql.C~~"::~ ~~l;:~t a cllcc:~ 'il:" ~b.c ;·.r..n our.t 01- ~~lo, &73. 26 be
dr-awn paynbl c to the "Erc;::.;.. Ul"C:;: of t:1C t.r:'''iitcc~· Si;~tC5.

CuJCI _
3. .1\11 t1oC~·.1'lC~·r~2:~io).. c c . .icc~"~i~";.~; ~~ji:, tl.·:Lj::.~.;.~ctic,.n ia l~ci . ·&; i;'I.:j ~ ~:'j
thl s olfice-fol" s ecu:.. . ity ~(12::;G:.10 c:=-. .d iz r,_"\'~il~blc to the t,~cjJ,-;~r ru.:.. ::..rJ:·~;.

4. Pl.ca ne £or\·~ard ti"~e' C}-iCC~-;' ~.o ·~:1.i::l o~ri.~e .for tr~nGn1it!;f.~i tl:'; ·,i'l
ap?l'opl"iate o':liciC:i.l.

OF 1 _

00103
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

.'
...

Mr. John R. Drown III

St;l£[ ,S( c r ctar y
The "'{hite House Office
W..• s h ington , D. C. 20500

-,
Enclosed is U. S . TTeasury Check No.1 fn the

amount of $16,673.26 whi ch represents r e irnbur sc mcnt of Bur e au

Schedule No. D c o py enclosed.

Yours very t r ulv ,

I
Dt' If)ir~~t~rfor Liaison and PI .nn inn
Office of F'In.i nc e

Enclosures

l"-" .
001.04
. ,
I '.' _.__.__..
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

- .• \' ;.')7)

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Management and Services

SUBJECT Special Report

1. This memorandum is in re~ponse to a request to

provide information on situations or associations that
might appear to be irregular on the surface.
2. Details to the lVhi te House and Government Agencies -
Background: For many years the Central Inte-filgence.AgencY~as
detailed employees to the immediate office of the White House
per se and to components associated intimately with the immediate
office of the President such as the Council on International
Economic Policy and the President's Foreign Intelligence
Advisory Board. We have furnished secretaries, clerical
employees and certain professional employees on a reimbursable
and non-reimbursable basis. At the present time, we have no
clericals or professionals assigned to the immediate White
House office, but we do have one young man detailed to their
Communications Section. There are detailees to PFIAB and CIEP.
I might point out that we had detailed to the White House as
late as the fall of 1970 couriers, telephone operators, a
laborer assigned to the grounds and a graphics man who designed
invitations for State dinn~rs. By October of 1970, more funds
were apparently available to run the White House and most of
our detailees were hired as bona fide White House employees.
'CIA is not the only Agency furnishing the White House with
detailees. ·Levies have been made by this Administration and
others on Defense and State and other Government entities
whose employees have Top Secret cLeazances •
Professional officers have been and are at the present
time assigned~ the National Security Council and we have seven
clericals on detail to NSC on a reimbursable basis.
In addition to the above, we have technical specialists
detailed ,to NSA, an instructor at the National War College and
security officers detailed to the Department of State to

001.05 .
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-G-\Q' ~! 1--IIJ1_1-'r . I~~ ",' '18."\

__ 1.\, I
I ( I ..
I _
_J"",il-l.l~;:'

protect foreign visitors. Recently, lwas detailed

to the Secretary of the Treasury alohg With. IO r other Agency
I
cmp'Loyee s . We have cven, in rare insta.nces, detailed our
people to Congressional Staffs for short periods of time.
3. petails to the White House and Governm~nt Agencies -
Discussion: Details to NSC, the White House, NSA and the
National War College are probably qu~te defensible. On the other
hand, there may be those who would ques tion Agency employees
currently working at the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs
and Mr. Peter Peterson having an Agency employee as·his .
secretary when he was the .Secretary of Commerce (she also made
a trip with him tb Moscow). She is still with him in his
present assignment but we expect that she will report to NSC for
a new detail sometime this month. r I served for
over ten years as Director of the Offlce of PubI1C Safety for
AID. This information has been kept "close to the vest" during
that entire period of time. He has been approved for disability
retirement and is presently on sick leave and will retire
automatically at the expiration of this leave.
Each detail of an Agency employee to the White House or
other Government agency has been carefUlly considered and
approval at a higher level obtained when professionals were
involved.
4. Project TWOFOLD: I believe the support we are
providing to Project TWOFOLD is an activity that should be
reported under your guidelines. Since this is an extremely
sensitive Project and the Office of Security is reporting on
it, I will not repeat the details in my memorandum.
5. Individuals Engaged in Domestic Activities: In a more
general sense, Contract Personnel Division prepares and executes
contracts with individuals engaged by the Agency to carry out
domestic activities. We also process Staff Agents who are
domestically assigned. None of these assignments are decided
in OP. I really have no way of knowing with any degree of
certainty what the specific duties of these individuals will be.
6. I

00.10G
 ------------------ MORl DoclD: 1451843

(
~\L

7. I

8. Hunt Requests a Lockpicker: This is a record of

External Employment Assistance Branch's action,on a request
from Howard Hunt for a lockpicker who might be retiri~g or
resigning from the Agency.
Sometime in the spring of 1972, Frank O'Malley of EEAB
received a call from Howard Hunt who asked Frank if he had a
retiree or resignee who was accomplished at picking'locks.
Mr. O'Malley sent him a resume on Thomas Amato who retired
31 July 1971. Mr. O'Malley did not document his EEAB record
to show the date of this eichange, but I ~who
also works in EEAB) opines that it occurred sometlme between
March and May 1972.
All of the above information was reported to the Office
of Security on 4 October 1972 following the FBI's contact with
the Agency regarding Howard Hunt.
9. Resume Sent to McCord~, I k contract
employee who retired in September 19/I, was a client of the
E~ternal Employment Assistance Branch in his search for a job
after retirement. One of the leads given tol ras
James McCord's security business. EEAB sent a Iesume to
McCord, but I Iwas not hi~ed.
In mid-summer 1972,f ~telePhoned EEAB from
Chicago. (He had a job there wlth t e Hallfax Securlty Co.,
a lead provided by EEAB, but until this telephone call he had

00107
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

• ·A
'

not notified EEAB that he had the job and had moved from
the D.C. area.) He said he had been. visited by a Special
Agent of the FBI who told I ~hat his resume had been
found among McCord's papers. Ine :Agent wanted to know if
I pad any connection with McCord. I Expla.ined
how the resume got to McCord. After the Agent left him,
Ios were notlfled I
~el7P~lOne~ EEA~.
lmmedlately.
lof OP and I lof
... :'

Harry B.Flsner
Director of Personnel

001.08
 ------------------- MORl DoclD: l45l843

-_...._.. ...-_ ..........-- ......- - ._ -- _-_ ....... --_. -_

~ .., ... .... ..... _.~ .~. __ ... ...... __....
'
'" .. --- .----- ... _--_.__ .. __.._.- ,
.__._ _ . _ .._ ...._
SUB.JECT: (OptiMol)
ROUTfNG A~'~D RECORD SHEET
.._ _._ ...___..__..__.._r __.___
----- ._---_. __._----
i t ive Activities Perfor.ned by the Office of Logistics
---Sens
.. ---..
_--_._-~ ..._- ...... - .. ._-- -'- _ . - _.._.. - r------ ---
._.-.~-_

EXTENSION
_ _ _ _ • _ _•

NO.
_ _ _ _ . _ ._ _ _ _ _ 0- • __

-_._.. --
fROM: -
f-.-------------
DATE
..-------------
Director gf Logis!j.cs . 2551 14 MAY 1973
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and DATE
building I OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number e oeh comment 10 s.how from whom
'----
INITIALS Draw a line acton column ofleor each comment)
10. whom,
REceiVED FORWARDED
--------
'f!/ ;.:~:
!j;c/- f]II./.
1.
Deputy Director·for Hanage-
ment and Services .-- ..-.... I
--_.-~_ ..-
. "
i_ ..,'---' EYES ONLY
2.

----- ---- ----

3.
Director of Central
Intelligence -
4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10. c·,

.
11. 0

12. ' .. : -
,
-
13.
_.
.'

14.
.,.
..
- 00109·,
. '.
15. .,' .,

- '.

. -. , ' . I . L
I .~~~ 61 0 U5~Dr~~~~us D. . _....._.
1. _.. .:..... _....-........"'. _. __ ...
~_ ~~_
SECRET
_:.. ...;;..:;...
0
:a..:-..:;..__ .••
.CONFID~NT,IA~... 0 ~~lE~N,ttv 0 UNCLASSIFIED .
.

_~""'-I;;....::",...;4.:···_·;.:.3'J~;;c......~.:.::::·._J :::_;:.r.,;...:....:...~.~:;...... .._ ... .;L..,;,;,••~,.".:..::~::.._~,-..... ~~-

 MORI DocID: 1451843

" ' " .!

14. MfW 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

THROUGH Deputy Director for Man agemen t and Services
SUBJECT Sensitive Activities:'?erformed by the
Office of Logistic~

1. This memorandum contains information for the Director

of Central Intelligence.
2. This memorandum is submitted pursuant to advice given
by the Deputy Director for Management and Services on 7 May
that Office Directors report on activities, either under their
cognizance or otherwise known to them, the nature of which
could possibly need explanation or justification when viewed
within the statutory responsibility and authority of the
Director of Central Intelligence. The responsibilities of the
Office of Logistics (OL) are such that in all matters herein
reported, except two, the actions unde.rtaken were at the re-
quest of another Agency component. We have prepared a brief
description of each action involved and then have included the
name of the sponsoring component. The substantive reason for
the requests for action by.this Office will have to be deter-
mined by inquiry to the designated sponsori~g component.
3. Facts pertaining to both actions undertaken at the
initiative of this Office are as follows':

00:11.0
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-1)
it.... l"t
·{..Jl tl..,.-

-f¥fS '-'l-IL"I
- . Un
SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of
Logistics

\ Il T 1\ \/

CJ CJ .VlvLf
~ 00:11.1.
---------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of

Logistics

'the DD/O, we will not honor any requisition for surveil-

lance equipment unless it has been approved by the CI
Staff of the DD/O.
4. Within the,area of contractual responsibilities, the
following items ara p~rtinent: ?:
a. In February 1971, Colonel L. K. \'fhite, the then
Executive Director-Comptroller, called me to attend a
'meeting in his office, also attend~d by Mr. William Colby.
Colonel White explained that the Technical Services
Division (TSD) had been requested to provide assistance
to the FBI for a sensi ti ve proj ect designated I I(cur-
rently designatedl IColonel White did not dis-
~lose the purpose of the asslstance bei~g provided by TSD
but did instruct me to assist TSD on purely contractual
matters. Since the Office of Logistics has no information
conce rn.irig the mission or pu rpo s e of Proj ect I I sub-
stantive questions concerning the subject should be
addressed to TSD. Other procurement actions accomplished
for the FBI are re orted below. Specific, ment i.on ,is made,
however, of ecause of the dollar. magnitude, ap-
proximately mll lon, ,and the complex technical equip-
ment that h~s been involved in the undertaking.
b. The Procurement Division, OL~ currently has two
requisitions in hand from TSD which would involve reim-
bursable sales ,to the FBI. One such requisition in the
,amount of $36,900 is for two Westinghouse television
cameras. The second requisition in the amount of $11,200
is for two wide-angle surveillance probes manufactured by
Bausch and Lomb. 'No action is being taken on either of
these requirements pending further' instructions which
. will be sought from the Deputy Director for Management
and Services.
c. Over the years, this Agency has often supported
other Government agencies from a contractual or materiel
standpoint. Upon the. submission of an officially approved
request, supported by a transfer of funds, the Agency
would either enter into "accommodation procurements" for
the requesting agency or support the requesting agency by
the issuance'of'materiel from stock. Such actions are
legally accomplished under the Economy Act of 1925. This
Ac~ authorizes one ~gency to support the needs of, or pro-
vide a service for, another Government ~gency when such

001.1.2
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

.i" ~
~r"
t J [0 lJTTl:"t--
SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of
Logistics

action would be more economical and eliminate the need for

one agency of the Government to duplicate facilities
readily available from another. A typical example of this
procedure is purchasing photointerpretation gear for the
Defense Intelligence Agency element located at NPIC. In
connection with the current repor;:.!:;ing requirement, however,
I have had our records researched for tha past 2 years and
Attachment 1 reflects those transactions which appear to be
relevant to the subject of this memorandum.
d. In connection with the disclosures during the sum-
mer of 1971 that the Rand Corporation was not properly
safeguarding classified documents, this Office undertook·
two acts. I directed the Security Officer from our West
Coast Procurement Office at the Moffet Naval Air Station
in California to visit the Rand Corporation and satisfy
himself tha~ classified material furnished them by the
Agency was both properly safeguarded and accounted for.
His report was affirmative. On 23 August 1971, the senior
Security Officer assigned to this Office forwarded a
letter to the Rand Corporation stressing and reaffirming
the procedures Rand must follow in safeguarding classified
information furnished them by the Agency. Of residual
interest in this matter, there is summarized the contents
of a memorandum of 2 July 1971 to the Executive Director-
Comptroller from the DD/I which is in our possession.
Th'is memo r'andum reports that FBIS regularly
disseminated reports to the Rand Corporation
but that instructions had been issued to cease
distribution of classified reports. While no
'other direct diss~mination went to Rand, other
USIB agencies, primarily USAF, were passing.
"many" copies of DDtI products to Rand as' au-
thorized under USlB regulations. The memoran-
dum also states that Rand personnel had
requested searches and document retrieval from
the CRS facility.
5. In connection with action taken for the Office of
Security, there are three relevant items:
a. The Printing Services Division, OL, was requested
by the Office of Securi~y to print a book written by
Harry J. Murphy, Office of Security. The book was pre-
pared by Mr. Murphy under a Brooki~gs Institution Federal

0011.3
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of

Logistics

-Executive' Fellowship. The book is entitled "Where's

What -- Sources of Info.rmation for Federal Investigators. 1I
It is a full treatise on the existence of sources of in-
formation that may be useful to an investigator. The
book's £irst printing of 300 copies was made in June 1967.
Due to demand, a se~ond printing~Qf 600 copies was made
in September 1968. The title pate of. the book gives
attribution to Mr. ~furphy, Office of Security, Central
Intelligence Agency, and the Brookings Institution Federal
Executive Fellowship. The book is classified ,Confidential,
and it is our unde~standing that the distribution was made
to appropriate agencies of the Federal Government. A copy
of Mr. Murphy's book can be made available for review if
desired.
Sometime in 1972, a representative of the Law
Enforcement Assistance Administratio~ (LEAA) requested
that the Agency give consideration ~o our publishing, at
LEAA expense, an unclassified version of this volume. It
was the' intent of LEAA to make broad-scale distribution
to Police Dep~rtments throughout the country. The Director
of Security and I consu1t~d on this matter and jointly
determined that the LEAA request should not be honored be-
cause the AgenGY should 'not put itself in the position of
publishing law, enforcement material for,g~neral and un-
classified purposes, and it would be an abuse of our print-
ing facilities.
b. On 5 January 1971, the Director of Security re-
quested that I approve his leasing up to eleven motor
vehicles for use in connection with a,specia1 support
.operation which would last approximately 3 months. The
Director. of Security informed me, in his requesting memo-
. randum of 5 January 1971, that "This support. activity has
been undertaken at the specific instruction of the Director
.and has his personal approval. II The request was app r oved ;
c. From 1968 to date, the Office of Security has
requisitioned from this Office a considerable amount of
materiel which we understand 'was to be given or loaned,by
them to local Police Departments. In certain cases some
of this materiel was issued from Agency stocks and, in
other cases, direct procurement of the materiel was made
by funds furnished by the Office of Security. A' complete
1i~ti~g of such materiel is found in Attachment 2.

_.. .u+'.f.- 0011.4

 MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of

Logistics

b. This Office is aware~ although it had no cognizance

nor responsibility, that -an apartment was rented in Miami
Beach~ Florida, during the period of the Democratic National
Convention, 10-14 July 1972, and the Republican National
Convention, 21-24 August 1972. The apartment was used as
a meeting place I_---.-__---,;-,_._---,=---~_=_-__._--___._--_.____;_---­
in liaison with members of the Secret Service and rendering

00:11.5
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of

Logistics

"assistance in connection with the political conventions

that were qeing held. l\'H Division is the cognizant
operating component on this matter.

7. The above recitation of facts represents, to the best

of my knowledge and memory, those ma'!:tf?rs \Vhich appear to be
relevant to subject tasking given by Yhe Director.

I~-=-=--=---
2 Atts

cc: DD/M&S

001.:16
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

c.

',: ~ .

•• • ::. M

." ..: .~...

<;; ~-

... -~:~ -: .
. .~.

.-

OOtl7
'~""- ... __ .

- -... ... -
\, ~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ . - -._-_ ...• _•..... -_ - . ...... . ... '-""-"--'-' ._---

--stttrr
I YES 0f\H:-¥ -
Receiving
Requesting Date of U.S. Depart-
Office Request Item Quantity Unit Cost ment or Agency

as 3/23/72 Telephone Analyzer 1 1,350 BNDD

TSD 5/16/72 Transmitters, Radio Beacon 8 313 BNDD
as 3/23/72 Telephone Analyzer 1 1,350 White House
Communications
Agency
as 3/23/72 Telephone Analyzers 13 1,400 'Air Force
.
as 3/23/72 'Te1ephone Ana1yzer~ 10 1,350 State
as 3/23/72 Telephone Analyzers 2 1,375 AEC
TSD 11/16/72 Camera Sets 20 656 FBI
TSD . 4/17/72 Camera Sets 10 zOO FBI
'1. '
TSD 11/18/71 Actuators, Recorders SO 488 FBI
TSD 4/19/72 Tes s i.na Cameras 3 700 BNDD
~
TSD 12/ 7/72 Camera, Video 1 18,045 FBI 0
.~

H
TSD 10/13/72 Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, 1 4,639 FBI
0 t:l
Equivalent6f W L 30691 0
.. 0 o
t:OJ TSD 3/26/71 Tubes, Image, W L 30691 2 ·4,607 FBI
H
t:l

TSD 4/20/73 Cameras, Television 2 ~

18,300 FBI f-l
~
lJ1
f-l
00
~

_J
w
EnS 8*LY
o 0 f;T I I
L----
I.
l-f"\ _

_ • ~_ M_
 ~Rg, .-
UW::' ~~L _

Receiving
Requesting Date of U.S. Depart-
Office Request Item Quantity Unit Cost merit or Agencr
TSD 12/14/72 Transmitters, Radio 3 313 BNDD
TSD 10/20/72 Actuators J Recorder 25 591 FBI
TSD 10/13/72 Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, 1 4,639 FBI
Equivalent of W L 30691
TSD 5/26/71 Tube, Image, W L 30691 2 4,639 . FBI
TSD 4/22/71 Transmitters 3 '1,372 FBI
TSD 4/22/71 Module, Plug-In 1 1,247 FBI
TSD 4/22/71 Power Supply - UWP-39A 1 568 FBI
OL 2/25/71 Telephone Analyzers 2 1,350 Treasury
as 1/30/71 Telephone Analyzers 22 1,4 50
1·'1; ;
Trea~ury

OL 8/12/70 Cable, Special-Purpose

Electrical 5,000 ft. .42 White House
Communications
Agency :s:
0
::cJ
TSD 1/10/73 Ink, Special Formula 1 lot 1,825 Immigration and H
Naturalization t1
Service 0
o
H
TSD 6/28/72 Ink, Special Formula 1 lot 3,700 Immigration and
Naturalization
..t1
Service I-'
0 !Po
0 U1
I-'
~ TSD 7/26/71 Transmitteri Radio Beacon 1 728 U.S. Forestry co
~ JP.
c.c W

•
- _._,._-- . --
-------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

'C .(

t'I
'.

. .
001.20
. \
,.
 ----------------- \ I
-lJ 1··..1\L" . I
.". I
MORl DoclD: 1451843

EYES

MATERIAL REQUISITIONED FROM LOGISTICS

BY SECURITY FOR ISSUANCE TO
LOCAL POLICE

ITEM QUANITY'
Gas Mask M-9 200
Gas Mask M-17 196
Steel Helmet and Liners 231
Vest and Groin Protector 96
Vest, Flak M-52 34
Vest, Protective 46
Vest, Grenade
105
Execuvest
6
Emergency Flashing Red Light 22
*Searchlight, Tear Gas 36
*Chemical Baton 6 1/2" 36
1iChemical Baton 12" 24
*Chemical Baton 26 rl
24
*Mustang 35 Pistol
6
*Searchlight with Shoulder Strap 36
*Stun Gun
3

*NOTE: Various quantities and types of replacement chemical

cartridges, loading kits, and batteries .were also
ordered for asterisk items.

00:12.1
 MORl DoclD: l451843

14 MAY 1973

!·fj;i'·IOHAMIUH FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

TiJJ"OlJGH Doputy Director for !'·fa;I!'l[.ement and Se rv i ce s
~3UBJECT Sensitive Activities Performed by the
Office of Lo~istics

1. This memorandum contains information for t he Jiroctor

of Ccn t r a l In t c L'l Lg cn ce , ----------

2. This mer.'oran.dulllis submd tted pursuant to advice g i ven

by the Deputy Director for Management and Services on 7 t.iay .
that Office Directors report on activitiBs, either under their
cognizance or o t.he rwds e known to t.hem, the n a t ure of l.rhich
could liossibly need explanation or justificati.on \f:)en viewed
\d thin the statutory responsibility and author! ty of the
Director of Central Intcl1i~encc. The responsibilities of the
Office of Logistics (OL) are such that in ~ll matters herein
reported, except two, the actions undertaken were at the re-
quest of another Agen~y component. We have prepared a brief
description of each action involved and than have Inclua~d the
llama of the sponsoring component. The substantive reason for
the requests for action by this Office will have to be cleter-
r.lined by inqu1ry to the designated sponsoring component.
3. Facts pertaining ti both, actions undertaken at the
initiative of this Office are as follows:

001.22

I
 --------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

&UHJECT: Scn5itive Activities rerfnrw~d by the Office of

Lo g Ls t Lcs

1
.,

00:123
 ~------------_.-
MORl DoclD: 1451843

~y
SUBJ~CT: Sensitive Activities Perfo~m~d by the Office of
Logistics

·.tho DD/O, 1V'O will not honor any requisi tian for surveil-
lance equipment unless it has beeri"approved by the CI
Staff of the DD/O.
4. Within the area of contractual responsibilities, the
following it0ns ~re pertinent:
a. In February .1971. C91one1 L. K. Khite, the then
Executive Director-C()mptroller, called me to attend a
meeting in his office, also attended by Mr. William Colby.
Colonel White explained that the Technical Services
Div·Isian (TSD) had been requested to provide assistance
to the FBI for a sensitive project designatedJ I(cur-
rent1y designated I ICo1onel White di not dis-
close the purpose of the ass1stance being provided by TSD
but did instruct me to assist TSD on purely contractual
matters. Since the Office of Logistics has no information
concerning the mission or purpose of Project I I sub-
stantive questions concerning the subject should be
addressed to TSD. Other procurement actions accomplish~d
for the.FBI aTe reo orted below. SpeGific mention is made,
however, of ~ca~se of the dollar magnitude, ap-
proximately m1 10n,. and the complex technical equip-
men t that has been involved in the undertaking.
b. The Procureinent Division, OL, currently has two
requisitions in hand ·from TSD wh i ch would involve reim-
bursable sales to the FBI. One such requisition in the
amount of $36,900 is for two Westinghouse television
c ame r as , The second requisition in the amount of $11,200
is for tlVowide-angle surveillance probes manufactured by
Bausch and Lomb. No action· is being taken on either of
these requirements pending further instructions which
will be sought from the Deputy Director for Management
and Services.
c. Over the years, this Agency has often supported
other Government agencies from a contractual or materiel
standpoint. Upon the submission of an officially approved
request, supported by a transfer of funds, the Agency
lV'ould either enter into "accommodation procurements" for
the requesting agency or support the requesting agency by
the issuance of materiel from stock. Such actions are
legally accomplished under the Economy Act of 1925. This
Act authorizes one agency to support the needs of, or pro-
vide a service ·for, another Government agency when such

001.24:
-------------- MORl DoclD: l45l843

SUBJDCT: Sensitive Activities rarformed by the Office of

Logistics

action would be more economical and eliminate the need for

"one agency of the Government to duplicate fac.ilities
readily available from another. A typical example o··f this
procedure is purchasing photointerpretatiol1 gear for the
Defense Intelligence Agency element located at NPIC. In
connection with the current reporting requirement, however,
I have had our records researched for the past 2 years and
Attachment 1 reflects those transactions wh i.ch anne ar to be
relevant to the subject of ihis memorandum. 0-

d. In connection with the disclosures during the sum-

me~ of 1971 that the Rand Corporation was not. properly
sa fe gua r-df.ng classified documents, t.hi s Office undertook
two acts. I directed the Security Officer from our West
Coast Procurement Office at the Hoffet Naval Air Station
in California to visit the Rand Corporation and satisfy
himself that classified material furnished them by th.e
Agency was both properly safeguarded and accounted for.
His report was affirmative~ On 23 August 1971, the senior
Security Officer assigned to t hLs Office fo rwa rded a
letter to the Rand Corporatiop stre$sing and reaffirming . .
the procedures Rand must follow' in s afe guardIng classified
information furnished them by the Agency . . Of residual
interest in this mat t er-, there is sumnar i aed the 'contents
of a memorandum of 2 July 1971 to the Exec~tive Director-
Comptroller from the DD/I which is in our possession.
This memorandUm reports that FRIS regularly
disseminated reports to the Rand Corporation
but that instructions had been issued to cease
distribution of classified reports. 1\'hile no
other direct dissemination went to' Rand, other
USIa agencies, primarily USAF, were passing
"many" copies of DD/I products to Rand as au-
thorized under USIB regulations. The memoran-
dum also states that Rand personnel had
requested searches and document retrieval from
the CRS fac~lity.
5. In connection with action taken for the Office of
Security, there are three relevant items:
a. The Printing Services Division, OL, was requested
by the .Office of Security to print a book written by
Harry J. Murphy, Office of Security. The book was pre-
pared by Mr. Murphy under a Brookings Institution Federal

OOi:z5
 -----------------_. MORI DocID: l45l843

SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of

I.. ,
Logistics

Executive Fcl101~·sh.ip,. The,book is entitled "Where's

"WIlat -- Sources of Information for Federal Investigators. II
It is a f~ll treatise on the existence of sources of in-
formatio~ that may be useful to an inv.estigator. The
book's first printing of 300 copies was made in June 1967.
Due to demand, a second printing o£ 600 copies was made ,
in September 1968. The title page" of the book gives
attribution to Mr. Hurphy, 9ffice of Security, Central
Intelligence Agency, and, the Brookings Institution Federal
Executive Fellowsnip. The book is classified'Confidential,
and:it is our understanding that the distr,ibution was made
·to "appropriate agencies of t he Federal Government. A copy
of l>Ir. Murphy's book can be made ava i LabLe for review' if
desired.
Sometime in 1972, a representative of the Law
Enforcement Assistance Administration (bEAA) requested
that the Agency give consideration. to our publishing, at
LEAA expense, an unclassified version of'this volume. It
was the intent of LEAA to make broad-scale distribution
to Police Departments throughout the .courrt ry , The Dd r ec t or
of Security and I consulted on this matter and jointly
determined that the LEAA. reques't should·not be.hollored be-
cause the Agency shoul d- not put itself in :the positLon of
publishing law enforcement material for general·~nd un-· .
classified purposes. and it would be an abuse of our print-
ing..facili ties. "
b. On 5 January 1971, the Diractor.of Security re-
quested that I approve his leasing up to eleven motor
vehicles for use in connection with a special support
operation which ,...ould last app roxfmatiefy 3 months , The
Director of Security informed me~ ,in his r~questing memo-
randum of, 5 January 1971, 'that' .HThis .suppor-t; activity has
been undertaken at the specific jn~tructi6n Df the Director
and has his personal approval." The request was approv.ed.·
c. From 19'68 to date, the Offi~e of Security 'has ,
requisitioned from this Office a considerable .amount of
materiel which we understand was to be given or loaned by
them to local Police Departments. In certain cases some
of this materiel' was issued from Agency stocks and, in
other cases, direct procurement of the materi~l was made
by. funds furnished by the Office of Security. A complete
listing of such materiel is found in Attachment 2 •

. ONLY
~[(\.:-"'" 00126
v l·r"··
0L"':' u,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of

Logistics
·1

b: This Office is ~qare~ although it had no cognizance

nor responsibility,· that an apartment was rented in Miami
Beach, Florida, during the period of the Democratic National
Convention, 10-14 July 1972~ and the Republican National
Convention, 21-24 August 1972. The a~artment was used as
tnm~~;~~~nP;~~~ II~eilloe~: OJ: tone 5e:re ;~e: v::e :IlCl l:l1UelollIg

EYES 001.27
HEY
 ------------------ MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Petformcd by the Office of

Lo~istics

assistance in connection with the political conventions

't ha t wer e being held. WI{ Division is the cogn i aan t
operating cOl:lponent on this matter.
7. The above recitation of facts represents t to the best
of my know'l erig e and memory t those matters wh i ch appear to be
relevant to subject tasking given by the Director •.

JOlll1 1'. BIaJ_e '

Director of Logistics
2 Atts

cc: DD/M&S

:.; :

i•
I
j.

:I1
I
i
-i
1
I
~J
, I
:: I
.,

..j
00128
I ONLY
: I
SECRE
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. .' c (

-.

,.
.
I
11"
J,!

..il.l .·. -
:
i .
~!
~l
a,~I
~l'

i'.
:t
~,

~
:;

'1
,i I
:i
.J
.1 ~
,;i
•
001.29" .~
........ _-_ -
.. __
.... -... .
..... .. .... -
;:!
;
.';
........... "1
\ . .. :~".'
 ---"---------------

.;

Requesting Date of • Receiving

Office Request Item U.S. Depart-
Quantity Unit Cost ment or Agency
OS 3/23/72 Telephone Analyzer 1 1,350 BNDD
TSD 5/16/72 Transmitters, Radio Beacon 8 313 BNDD
OS .3/23/72 Telephone Analyzer 1 1,350 White House
Communications
Agency
as 3/23/72 Telephone Analyzers 13 1,400 Air Force
OS 3/23/72 Telephone Ana~yzers 10 1,350 State
as 3/23/72 Telephone Analyzers' 2 1,375 ABC
TS,D 11/16/72 Camera Sets 20 656 FBI
TSD 4/17/72, , Camera Sets
10 700 FBI
TSD 11/18/71 Actuators, Recorders 50 488 FBI
TSt> 4/19/72 Tessina Cameras 3 700 BNDD
TSD 12/ 7/72 Camera, Video 1 18,045 FBI ~
0
TSD 10/13/72 Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, :;0
1 4,639 FBI H
EqUivalent of WL 30691 t:J
TSD 0
0 3/26/71 TUbes, Image, WL 30691 o
. 2 4,607 FBI , H
0 TSD t:f
~ 4/20/73 Cameras, Television
I
I
OJ 2 18,30,0 FBI "

f-l
C ,
fl::.
U1
. f-l

J
co
fl::.
w

I I I
 Requesting Date of , ~

Receiving
Office Request Item U.S. Dep ar c-
. Quantity Unit Cost me;nt or Agency.
TSD 12/14./72 Transmitters, Radio 3 313 BNDD
TS1) 10/20/72 Actuators, Recorder 25 591 FBI
TSD 10/13/72 Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, 1 4,639 fBI
I Equivalent of W L 30691
I

I TSD 5/26/71 Tube, Image, W L 3Q691

I 2 4,639 FBI
I TSD
TSD
4/22/71
4/22/71
Transmitters 3 1,372 FBI
Module, Plug-·In 1 1,247 FBI
TSD 4/22/71 Power Supply - UWP-39A 1 568 FBI
OL ·2/25/71 Telephone Analyzers 2 1,350 Treasury
OS 1/30/71 Telephone Analyzers 22 1,350 Treasury
'OL 8/12/70 Cable, SpecIal-Purpose
Electrical 5,090 ft. .42 White Hou s c·
Communications
Agency
TSD 1/10/73 3:
Ink, Special Formula 1 lot 1,825 0
Immigration and ~
H
Natural.ization
Service 0
t:J
TSD 6/28/72 Ink, Special Formula o
1 lot 3,700 Immigration and H
0 t:J
0 : Naturaliza.tion
~ Service I-'

...
C'J.) TSD 7/26/71 Transmitter, Radio Beacon 1 728 U.S. Forestry
fi:>
U1
I-'
00
fi:>
W

-- ---_. --- --------._----------

 MORI DocID: 1451843

\. .. ...
(

','

I
/.
I
t

"

00:132
... .. . ... .. . ... ... - '" ... ~. ... " ..----.- . . "
• ---'-" _ - . . r- -:
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

· ~
~~TERIAL REQUISITIONED FROM LOGISTICS
BY SECURITY FOR ISSUANCE TO
LOCAL POLICE

ITEM QUANITY
Gas Mask M-9 200
G~s Mask M-17 196
Steel Helm~t and Liners 231
Vest:and Groin Protector 96
Vest, Flak M-52 34
Vest, Protective 46
Vest, .Grenade 105
Execuvest 6
Emergency F1ashi~g Red Light 22
j
*Searchlight; Tear Gas 36
*Chemical Baton 6 1/2" 36
*Chemical Baton 12" '.
24
*Chemical Baton 26" 24
*Mustang 35 Pistol 6
*Searchlight with Shoulder S.trap 36
*Stun Gun 3

*NOTE: Various quantities and types of replacement chemical

cartridges, loading kits, and batteries were also
ordered for asterisk items.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.._- . ~ ..... _-_ .... -.- -LJ ... 5E

~_ ..
:.~.:;Al

_--------- - -
Oi~lY
... - . - ...
LJ .. crh..
_-- ;;HHIAl
- ---------- _. - -... _---~-
--
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
--_ ..__. ----- - .. _-._------ ---
SUBJECT: [OP':",·"II

------ -'-"-- ---..__.. - - - - ---_.-- _.- ..... _--- - ' ,-----------_

~1.TENSION NO.
.. ---.__ . ------- ...
FROM:
OJC~
I !Hq. ~ -- - .J ._._-
~
D!OJCS,

TO: (Officer de-s;gnofion.. room number. and DATE

I PATE

11 vs« iS73 - ._-

building) OffICER'S COMMENTS (Numbe, eoch comment 10 lhow f,om whom
INITIALS 10 whom, Draw Q line eeross corumn o'fer each comme-r1f.)
RECEIVED fORWARDfD

1-
--
nn!M&.S
I IRq.
2.

3. ~CI
I Hq.

~,
5. 0

6.
~?"'bo- tPf'1 ~l.o,MI J'U (
7.
ft-or ,Je;..t. ( ~e\ &s\:-

8.
fu (,\.~........) \~ vJ 01\1- t"--r
\It C. ~t"- ~ O\CS

9. ",b,N~ ~ ~I\J~~

< ~~-t . .
10.

I 15 m:fil,*" .~ '1..3
I
11.
.
12.

13.
.
14.
• f

! .
15. 001.34
I

., tl ....... ~~ 61 0 ~J&OUS.... 0
_.. . . _-..-....-_ .. 4 _ J . ... _
SECRET o CONFIDENTIAL' O INTERNAL
USE ONLY o UNCLASSIFIED
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

orcsl "
11 r\~AY 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, Central Intel1i'gence Agency

THROUGH Deputy Director for Management and Se rvl ce s

SUBJECT Activities whichrnight be considered sensitive

issues.

I have listed below computer processing p roj ect s which the Office of
Joint Computer Support has participated in or is aware' of and which
might be considered sensitive issues. -

Most Sensitive Projects

OJCS Project'Officer Nature OJCS
Project Organization, & of Reason for
Identification Telephone Project Listing

HYDRA Richard Ober A specfa.l pro- Type of

CI Staff ject initiated data being
'I I. by DCI collected.

SANCA Machine Type of

los Ind'ex to data in

[L.....------L.- security files

Information
index.

Type of
uRn sto.rage & re- data in
I I trieval of drug
related data
files.

(ORO's project
OFTEN)

Sensitive Projects

.I Computer file
of drug data.
Type of
data in
file.

00135

·1
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

Sensitive Projects (Continued)

OJCS Project Off'ic e r Nature . OJCS
Project Organization, & of Reason for
Identification Telephone Proj~ct Listing

Statistical. Source of .
'I'SD analysis of data. Con-

1---1 psychological
data.
tractors are
involved
with project.

Sensitivity Unknown, but Pos sibly a Matter for Concern

Nature of
data. Tech-
niques of
system dis-
cussed with
FBI.

SPYDER Data on

I---==---
OS
radio frequen-
cies used for
1- support of Irr-
Place Morrito r-;
ing System, a
system to identify
unauthorized
transmitters.

DMVREC File of auto- Nature of

as mobile license data.
I I numbers.

File of Agency Nature of

applicants who data.
were not
hired.

00.1..36
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

Sensitivity Ul1kn~~.!._~ut Possihly a Matter for Concern (Continued)

OJCS Project Officer OJCS
Project Organization, & Reason for
Id Cl1tification l' el~hon_CL_ Listing

Association
with the
named
organization.

fq.....
JOHl'r D. IAMS
Director of Joint Computer Support

I ."
Ii
I

}EYE§ ·ILY 001.37

~Ell
 MORI DocID: 1451843

(]
... _--- . -_....... _. '''-' __
_.. . .. --_.- I J..-.. cc:
-'._
ROUHNG f.·J'\~O rU:CORD SHEET
.,. f'l
,:.. ' ',L
l.J ...iE .m:LY .......... _---.........
\;t.l.t·t..~j .;
... _--. .. ...._........ - .- ... --- --'-'''-- ----
., ---_ _
---_.,- -- -- _._--- --_.... _-- --- ----_._.- ---
SUBJECT: \C',:.I::,-.ol)
--_._--_... .. - ------ _-_
-.-. _. '---'--" ---c-' ._-- -'-'--
fPOM: EXTENSION NO.

Director of Communications 1---._-----_.__..__....

0
DATE
.\ Hqrs. I_.. 10 May' 1973
TO: (Officer c!sig",ofion, to~rn nl.l~Le" ond DATE
building) OFFICER'S COMMENTS (N"mber each comment 10 show f,om whom
INITIALS 10 whom. O'OW Q line ouoss column af'er eeeh comm~n'.1
RECEIVED fORWARDED

1.
\DDM&S
.
IHq r s ,' . ~Ref SCi 1- The
-- 2. attached ~s ~n further
response to your request.
. _ _ 0.

3.
,

.c. ..

5.

6.

7.

8.
. . ..

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.
, .
-
u.
..
15. 001.38

FORM
3-62 610 U~J~~~US 0 SECRET
...... _'0 _~ _'0 _ . __. ._ •.•• _ _ ~ ~
o CONFIDENTIAL
-. __ . ..1-:.-.._ "
O
-~._-
INT£RNAL
USE ONLY
.. _.# - ._" .. - ~.
o UNCLASSIFIED .
.
_ .........__.. .
#.~
.
. . . _------
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION . REGISTRY

SOURCE: oci \ CONTROL NUMBER: SCI I

DATE OF DOCUMENT: 8 May 1973 OATE D.OCUMENT RECEIVED:
COpy NUM8ER (8): LOGGED BY:
NUMBER OF PAGES: two DOCUMENT NO:
. f

NUMBER OF ATTACHMENTS: one

FROM: Special Programs DiVision, OC DATE: 10 May, 73

TO
.
OFFICE NAME SIGNATURE DATE

t IIAtl
'DICO Mr. Jack J Kei'tb
2
I\n""t ~ o
3 .'

~
..
.

o Approval
o Action
o Comment
o Concurrences
o Information
o Direct Replv
o Preparation of Repi y
o Recommendation
'0 Signature
o Return
o Oispatd1
•

o File

.00139
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

·~

-_ ... .
~

..

SCI _

8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Summary, Special Programs Division (SPD),
'Office of Communications, Operational
Contacts with Other u.S. Government ~gencies

o
1. Prior to 1969 the OC COMINT.. intercept unit,
which was then in Miami, had relatively frequent contact
with the Miami bureaus of the FBI and FCC, Miami Police
and the Miami Beach Police. The staff provided support
to these activities in monitoring, identification and
DB of specific illegal agent transmissions conducted by
foreign nationals and American citizens in the greater·
Miami area. Arrangements for' this support were made
thro~gh the. DDO' s'l I
2. In late Septe~ber 1972, NSA, through Division DI
DDO. 'requested that the Special Programs Division initiate
a hearability survey of certain HP' long-distance commercial
telephone circuits between the U.S. and South America.
The circuits carried'drug related long-distance calls of
interest to the BNDD and other U.S. agencies. Because of
the availabilit of ersonnel and technical ca abilities

....
·3. The Chief and Deputy Chief. SPD and SPD/Special
Electronic Operations Branch· have been engaged in·informal
technical liaison with operating components 'of the FBI .
for a.number of years. Initial contacts and arrangements
. for support ·of. specific activities have been made by the
Division D/DDO. Support has been provided in the form of

'~JiB""no SECRET
~!e\TllL OF ATTACHMENT

.: 1----. _---JI .' -

JJJHft1lfi , .·:'~~'b~i40
 MORI DocID: 1451843

. .".

8 May 1973

-
exchanges of technical information on techniques, technical
assistance and training, and the loan of Agency equipment.
In t~e.past sever~l ye!:;
sens1t1ve FBI proJects
:::nnr r bJS been r~nd;rjd to
_andl ~ _ Si:port-,
has been and is ·presen D g g1ven to FBI pro ects
I I These projects are'described in the attache . ,
sealed envelope. (
4. An operational test of an F/DF
system was r~ Iconducted n DO and
OC-SPD pers nnel 1n the earl ar.o the summer of 1972.
A location in Miami Beach, Florida was selected for the
tests because of similarity to the actual' target site and
environment in Saigon. Receiving antennas were placed on
the roof of the hotel being used as the receiving/DF site.
A hotel employee asked why the materiel was placed on the
roof. A team member in effect told him that the group
was an'advance security s~gment for the Democratic National·
Convention. No further questions were asked; the tests'
were completed and the equipment was returned to the
Washi~gton area. .:

Att •

••

------'".~-----,
'00"14'1
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. ..-.

. ~.
..
9 May 1973

I T~ .
•

. I --.Ji S~ .001.42
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

~ ... ...- ..---------------,~..A

....

9 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SU~JECT: Organizational Deali~gs with Activities Inside the
United States
o

1. This MFR records organizational dealings with activities

inside the United States known to this office.
z , In September 1972, I . Irequested secure communi-
cations in the Miami Area w1th local offices of BNDD

~ ,~~~e commun1cat10ns 1n was never 1ns a e

advised in April 1973 that there were plans
4un~~e~rw~aY=-1"-n~.·MEi~a~mTi to combine various Federal agencies anti-
drug efforts under a new Justice Department Division, and at
this time' it was not known where the new anti-drug office would
be located. I

1_ _- - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - -
3. During :he Democratic and Republican conventions, -
I Jsupported requirements levied by ~he Secret
Service concerning name traces and other intelligence infor-
• mation relating to subversive influences which might affect
those conventions.\ provided some'technical advice and
procedural assista~ce 1n establishing a useful means of com-.
municating between the two correspondents. WHD should be able' ,.
to provide a detailed resume of activities supported in' this
matter.
• ~E. /f/7I
. Thomas s: 5'~~11
'5J
.
"Chief, America$ Staff, OC
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,.
-.. .......
.'. "
,.. f...
......
. .
.
_._---_ ..... _--_._
SENDeR. WILL CHECK CL"'.SSIF1C<,\TICN
.... _-----------_.-
'rop
.__ _-----.---
;·ND ~jO"i'OM
•..
- r.... ~ :~.~~ ... z: ;:.;-.. ~;-;::-.;:;:-- . '--'-r' -;':-.~::::--:-".:::-- -"-r~'" j ....: •.-.:-.--;.:' --.
.- - - 1 ... -.- ...,. _.... ..- ...J._.::::...::.L: .• ___ • .'---
-~_. _L.. _.....I.
-- ..
f
OFFICIAL HOUTI;,\G SLIP
- ._--_._----
TO NAME ANb ADDRESS DATE ~.~!"I~.~
7 1 '
....
1 Mr. William E. Colby
-_._- ..
~ (\ \:\1;..1.)\ .
_. _ _ _ a~~
- "-

~
2
_0_-
: ...-- ------------ &11 W.- ..
-l'=-'~
! !

3
I .."...
" C/ 7 r:
f·,.A
.) I
t: -----_ _----- ---- ---
, -; _-
( .. .. ;' --
..
.. '--'r':""~
5 'A
"'"
_'-...~..:..._..~-.".9' '.,
'. ~J -, .r-,. r: -
:; . .. /"-
- 6 .' .... : ~-
...
~ ..._ ••" .~ -7"- /:,;..

c
..
s: ~ ...........-
,.
-
ACTION
APPROVAL
"- .
... DIRECT
DISPATCH
REPLY , •
PREPAlIE
IlECOMr~EHDATIOIi
REI'lY
l
COMMENT
COliCURREHCE
. filE
ll;fORMATlon
RETURN
SIG~ATlIRE
----;-
. -
. ..
-'. r.: • ..t. -'

.'
.
.. Remarks:

Bill:
··r
... '
". ~:~J:. -_ ....-- --
t, '-
....~,,-~v- .,.--
.....
'--- ---
..........\.
""'''"

. f
The attached memorandum identifies ~
j

the funds referred to in Chuck Briggs'

notes of 13 and 20'January 1972.

~
.r

.' FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER

FROM: NAMe:, ADDRESS AND PHONE NO_ DATE

"

Inspector General 30 May 7~

,.
"
-- '"'~ . . . £L· ... t ' .
rORM NO,
1-67
237 Use previous editions (40)

** "$ince-these note ss ar e on a' tctally' separate -sensit.ive subject,

• pl~"pull'then) from this file '-_: :vEC." CNo'te t9 C!MPS),'
p'

"
c. '.': 001.44
~ . . .'. ,

\,
-
 MORI DocID: 1451843

,I
I
!

29 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General

SUBJECT : Mr. Colby's Request to Inspector General to

Determine Subject Referred to by Two Notes
. in a PP/B Memo to DD!M&S

REFERENCE D/PPB Memo to DD/M&S dated 23 May 1973,

Subject: Watergate Principals - Direct or
Indirect Involverrrent

(
I
I
Ii

001.45

i.
.
- '----r-'--
 •• ' ......:.. ... ~ :. • I _.....
....... ~ _ 0 ' " _• •:
MORI DocID: l45l843

_ _. , _ . _ -~ _ _ w. ~ _ _ ••••
-
••••••,

........ --' .-. _.. '-' _._~~. ---"---"--":,_ -_ . .. _

c: ~

b£:"'\fOER. WILL CHECK CI..ASSIF..

l ~l:L.4.SSIFU:D I I CONFiDENTIAL
nON TOP AND BOTTOM
I r. SECRET
I
i
I

TO
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP
NAME AND ADDRESS
-
• -/.
DATE
I
INITIAl':::
I i
1 10 :
. -'..... 1';" , :OC'";·:.,~~ #l ... :; t : ... ~ ..y~~./
r r~7..,')
" :;>

2 .~ /:;2.. of
-3
'- I
I ..
... .
.
.
S

6·

i--
ACTIOH DIRECT fiEPlY -
PREPARE REPLY -
APPROVAl DISPATCH' RECOMMEHDAT1Olf
CO'MMEHT fiLE RETURN
CONCURRENCE IlfFORMATIOH SIGHATUIlE

Remarks:.
.
'A..J..A c-. . fl,.t4 c,.l-, ~n r- .e;.,;" .., . ~~"J

~ J Ii. - .

I 7- "6 1
·l-·
00:146
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENOER
FROM: N"MIi:. "ODRE:SS AND PHONE; NO. DAY,.

w. E. Colby Z3May73
U:,\CLASSIFI ED I I CO:'iFIDENTIAL I SECRET
Us. pr,v;ous ,dilio/ls (40)
fOllM NO,
.
1-61 237
-,

"

..... ; .. , ...... ".

','
" '
\ ~
."
.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. 1.,_. • .It ....

" ,. i
"

- . -
..
..
.'
I
-, - fJ , " ... " ."... !.. "
\'
.... L
.
~ .:
.. '" •
.' 'r : _•
~ ~
.....
,-- .
~.,
; :.

G
"
.__ .... _-
• ._ .....•
'.'
r "'--'---- ~
f ,
,,
-MEMORANDUM FOR: 1- ~ gt-
~ ILJ
I •

'. q)-0J

-.~ ...

......
'
I
·1
!
,i
. Co. _
-. -"~23 MAY 'i~73
I

I
(DATE)
'f
I

FOR"! NO, 101 REPl"C~AY

WHICH 5 _
_ FORt.! 10-101
._, USED:•.
BE '.•" . ,_,.,_ .•• _~ __ '.~'_'_ -(47)

_.... .... _~.'~ I'~ ',-r- ...., .

1
•
l ~ ... AUG
~"
_J'":'
54 , .
." • e.

r
" ,....

, .

"
, .'

.!

. ..
:"', .

." .. ' \. ...;-:

" .. .........
~.
.- ,
.. . :"
,,-. '" ", .
~ "

. .. "
..,.
\
... :.

-
 MORI DocID: 1451843

"
, .. \
~~
• ." ..
. ---.- . ' '<;.
•r

c--·'--------·-.~·--'-----·------·· .:....i
"'...._L..._.
.'. ·-::1~(j:-~~~1·ii~~7,E~T-S:J:~7:i~·;;{iii~~~?i~i:
._____ ..... _._._.._. _ ...__.."_.' __._'_._.~I-'~:r~~~~ii-El:'
_. __._____.
OFFICIAL nOCTI:\G SLIP
-'- .. . --
. -- .
.....0
_-_._--_._-_ NAME AND ADDRESS
..
~-- _.----------_... ~-~--- 1--._---
DA.....E _._INI
. ._----
..... IALS

._ V\T!.-E!~olby _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ti~~
·~~U
I

2
-- ------ - --
3
.-- --_.~_.- ._---- -_.
4
.. -----
5 ......
_ 6
.. ._.. _---~---
,........•
l,CTlON DIRECT j·:EFLY
"-'- ._- PREPl.iIE REPLY
APPROVAL OlSPt.TCli RECOMMENDATlOI{
COMMENT fILE RETURH
I
COHCURREHCE IHFaRMATIOH SIGIUTURE I
.t

Remarks: t
S-Ul- c:;..e C. <.'V' ~ ')l-, e .t\- . 6~ - Y\O \ J-::>
. -
.....
rJO-,

.'
. lj et..\,.'(' c..~'j c::4;
(c,-\:- Q<' ~(V-(. v, Q)
·.A
v.::. . " . .\ r k""".. . . . :C
n.~J lI..Jb-l t""(..IQ-k \ -
Lu..
O-A-.....
'"
v.J4· lolj .(.

~-.),! ""'0 ~~.\J -

.- Or r s cc..
11-..;

:pc. \ - A.'f '(' ... (;1/ e, l. J!..¥ r ~ ~ .'-\.u..t'"~ .

FOLD HERE .....O RETURN TOSENDER

.,
FROM: NA",e:. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO. DATE

Charles A. Briggs, n/PPB 5/23/73 ,.

.'
UNCLASSIFIED I I CO~FI[)ENTIAL I SECRET
• . fORM NO,
1-67
23", Use previous edilions (40)
"
.:

r -,
.-
jJ-

. .. , ·00:148
.... , .,
"
. .'
'
. ... ,

.. .-
\. I

• : ........ a- -: ....." -r
.,
. ',NT

-
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

~LI

23 May 1973
Do -76
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director ]01' Management and Services

SUBJECT: Watergate Pr-incipnls - Direct or Indirect

Involvement

. 1. This memor-an durn responds to the Director's request ~or

i a r epor t of any Involvement in ;my c apucity since 1 .Iarmar y 1969
I
iI
with Messrs. Hunt. McCord Liddy Young. or Krogh.
I I

2. I have had none with Hunt •. Liddy or Young.

I
.I 3·. My McC~rd contact was indirect and occurred sometime
during the late 1960's when I ws s Director. Office of Computer
·1 Services. I opposed plans .for Technical Di viaion , Office of
Security (under Mr. McCor d) to acquire a separate computer f(;r
1 . its In-Place Monitoring System. r pf DD/S&T (then ORD)
I
1
W<.1.S the computer individual woLcmg wIllI Ib ClIld,· I think, would
have details. .
j.
4. The Krogh contact also was indirect and involved his
request. first through 6MB, that CIA fund foreign travel on behalf
of the Cabinet Committee on International Narcotics Control. Indi-
vidual phone discussions are noted in the attachad , The Agency
{oecil points werel land I I
I ras I understand
forwarded relevant documentation. Copies of
memoranda. from :Messrs. Krogh, I land Colby are attached
also •

.j 5. I held a staff meeting yesterday to pass the request to

I all OPPB employees. One officer who was attending a funeral will
not be available urrtll vtomor-row ,
i.
I·
O\bhB\Cv·p"q88'z\l:n:.:r: ':~2~(S3V·i!J.i\.1~)
i J - D\:&bb' EJ,G;:O OJJJJ~ SHG lsI Charles A. Brisgs
J - N.' E' COLO)...
O~;a f J - ~qq~Ga2GG
Charles A. Briggs
D! 2+x..~p.;Hon: Dn-ector of Planning.
Programming, and Budgeting

Attachment
As stated
00149

•
 MaRl DoclD: 1451843

.'J-
~
., .. I
",. "

~ I
Attachment
23 May 1973

4 Feb 72 Call [rom Jim Taylor ~ OMB r-e If Bud" Krogh arrd his deputy,
\'h.ltCl~ Minnick. of the Dorneatlc Councfl who p lan foreign
travel in connection with thetr nar-cotics interests. Jim was
alerting us to their Intention, to ask us for funds for the
tr avcl ,

7 Feb n Follow-up from Taylor: Plan 3-5 trip s fer 3 individuals--

all in FY n. Cost probably $JOK. Minnick ready to make
first trip. I lis plugged in. E:-:Dir said OK r-e 'I'chrxn
visit.

7 Feb n See attached memo frcm Egil Krogh. Jr. to Bill Colby and
follow-on memos from I 1(21 Jul 72) and Colby
(2 Aug 72).

12(?) May n John Hurley, 01',15 called. menticning possible Krogh/

Minnick attendance at a Latin American (Station Chief?)
conference on narcotics. He a)50 said eif ~he}herd.
\ 'J"h'tte II. ouse , was l '
ayrng .£:¥~~ WIt
on a-t.v,' .h • . ror
r
hi:nself, Shepher-d arid Mark Algor. OM to Europe.

'23 Jun tz I Icommented on Krogh/Minnick interest

in getting CA- activities, including large-scale PM,
on narcotics front. I Ipu&hing small-scale PP.

6 Jul 72 I Ic<l1led. Notes say only: "Minnick-Hurley film.

We will send. If

~ Aug rz I Icalled re Colby letter (attached). Said,..tra-vel

onders ready; need money this PM (No record in my
notes as to who was tr aveltng when, but have faint
recollection of its bein{; to Mexico City). I
and I Icontacted by I I ------
1 Nov 72 R._:ilated1 r.
JCall. Again notes are cryptic:
b1~~;braceL I Survey BNDD problems/

001.50

-
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

... .. \

~DC".
.' '. vL~
"

13 Jan 72 Ex])ir (Colby) said DCI had approved $30K for sensitive
CS proj ect - no details.

20 Jan 72 Reminded ExDil" r-e $32K,he said DCI OK'd.

I
!
I
I
I
!

'-.c::::. -.
.... _-~-- --~
-::::::

00:151
. ........_. __ .. _--
---~._ ~._ ..-
... -._. . .
 -
MORl Doc1D:1451843

THE WHITE HOUSE

-,
1,"/
,
-:
:
VIAS H I'NGTON

J.tcbruary 7., 197?

MEMORANDUM ~FOR }31J..,I~ COLBY

,.
SUBJECT: BUDGETA..."tY SUPPORT FOR THE CABINET CO£vlMlTTEE
ON INTERNATIONA;L NA.:.'\.COTICS CONTROL

The Cabinet Cornrni.tte e on Lnbe r.nat.i.ona.I Narcotics Control was created'

Sep~e:.nbbr 7) 1971" by the President to centralize hi~ attack on the in-
ternational drug; traffic. ' ."

The Cornrnrtt e e do e s not have a separate budget.

, .
Salary and administrative support for its small) full-tixne staff has been
provided by the Executive Offi ce of the :Presid~nt. Other experis e s are
being. charged to the constituent agencies and d~partments., .

: The Bureau of Customs" BNDD, and AID /Office of Public Safety have

!<. -,
provided support to date.

The CIA should be prepared to' defray not more than fifteen thousand'
" , dollars in overseas travel expelfses fo; 'Cabinet Co:r.runittee staff during
f". the remainder of FY-197Z. '
I.
I Walter C. Minnick,,' fh e Cornrrritt.ees a Staff Coordinator, can be contacted
r
I
I
I
for further details.

I Than;k you for you~ assistance.

I
-I r;y~0~
I.' EgilKrogh, Jr.
I, J;:xccutivc Dirccl:or
Cabinet Committee on
International Narcotics Co:n,trol
cc: John Ehrlichman
Assistant to the President for Domestic Mfaixs
Mark Alger _
. QMB) Chief l 'General Govermnent Programs Division

colA KcpreLntanve; CCINC Workipg Group.

00:152
....
----'0:--'
...'._'" .. ' ... .
~ ,.:.~ --
,..~.- - .~- .. .... ••• • _ -, '" ,.., .. , _ ,._

, -
~ _ '": ••••••••• 11" .
. ,': .
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-. .
PPB 72-1063

2AUG 1972

. (lou-AT I
i- '. ~b-I
I'
a
·MEMOR.A.L"lDUM FOR: Deputy Director lot: Plans
. . .
<; Fbc:al Year 1973 .Budgef:ary Support {or
SUBJECT:
:1
~ tne C:1blnet Corr>..miHee on International.
Narcotics ContJ:.ol (eCINC)
l-
~

Me~~ to E~lr {rm.&lr:rDP/NAB..CO~did

,I
J
.i
i',I . Zl J'uly 1972; S:ilme ~ubject
: .

1. This is in response to tha- referenced znezno rega.rding

use of CIA funds to cover travel e~penSle~ ior the Whits House
Cablnet Committee Staff for Fiscal Ye4.r 1973.
J
2. : You are authorized to obligated up to $15.0nO Cor the use
.. of the White Hou$e Cabinet Committee Staff tor travel expenae s
durlng FY 1973. Oblig:l.tion ~bould be r ecozded against the O/DDP
allot.n1ent and trAvel order" issued aga.inst yO':lr own :ttppropria~e fan
i number~
•
it

. i
:
3. To the' e~tent that. jou t!.re unaotc. to <9.9orb this .requirement
··f within your preoen~ allotment.. we will h4l.ve to arrange some repro-
!
g·ra:cnming l:lter in the year f.o ccve e ~his 1J.l';lbt:egeted item.
!
to

I--r==================:;--I ..
w. E. Colby
. Executive Dlrector-Compt.rolle1"

O/PP~ .rhg 2 Aug 72

Dis tribul:ion:
Orig &' 1 - addressee
1.- ExDir
1 - ER
'00153
1 - PPB Sub} (EMS

. .
I 1 -
..LlrlRear;rono
OIF
i.
 ~--------~~~- MORl DoclD: l451843

~ . 21 July 1912 i
.- .•...•. .
I
!
..
.'

t \
. NEHORAUDUN FOR: Executive Director -' Co~troller .. . • I
I
:
'. "

VIA
': ".
i!-,
SUBJECT. . ... Fiscal Year 1973 BUdgetary Support for'·
.... .. . the Cab:fne.t ComIilittee on International
Narcotics Cant.rol (ccrsc) .." . . ~ ..... ,... ..~.. . : .:
.. ..... ~

. . ~: .........
• .J'''' ':.._ .... :

"
. . .."
'.
., . . .
'.
. "'"'. '.
. At our- invitation;> i1i: .. '''alter C.. Ninnick;, sta:fr
. 1.
or
the CCINC> is scheduled to attend anc'l-~Jlrtic1pate .' .
• i.re!i'.her
•f in. the Regional Narcot-ics Seminar sponsored by L!fH)DivisioP. .....•
on·2r-28.Jul71912~ ., .... ':"'~ . . >.. ;... :....., : .
I . . .
4

2; . '. In accordance 1'lith procedures adoptied :for travel :-

.j or White House Cabinet Committee Staff' in FY 1972;> it is .:
.,
'!
,
.' requested that funds to cover the cost of' ~~ .. MinnickJs :
.,.~
" trip' be relec.s.ed. Attacned herewith is· a copy of' a f'ormal .
.request :fror.l j·ir. Eg!l Krogh dated 7 February 1972 to Nr. "
1 Willi~~ Colby. requesting travel· fuhds.for the balance of
. FY 1972. Hr .. Krogh is now preparing a f'or.:naJ. r-equasf :for '.
t.

!
.~ .
$15,000.00 to cover travel expenses for vfnite House Ca~~net
COlilmittee stc.f':f for FYi;.1973.· I will fo:r:ward this request. '..
.. e ,

.. to your .office as· soon as it arrives. . :.

\./
~

il.j .. . ~ .- ......
II
Ii II
'\
.
:1
:! L--...-rrrrnrTT.r!n'ff'nrr----
Cj ODP/ HARCOG
!
"'~tachmen.t:· A/S
.---

1 L
. 001.~4
.,
.i."'. -
..'""- ......
....... -. )J'~
-=-\~-t . J ~ ·1
• • _J"

r
.~
{

-£:"'-~
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

\~'i :.,~.;
• : t ' ~~' t

DD/M&S 73-1809

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Management and Services

SUBJECT Contacts with Individuals Named in the Watergate Matter

1. I am addressing this to you instead of to the Director of Central

Intelligence since I doubt that the information contained herein is of such
signiftcance to warrant his interest and because it has been on record with
the Agency since July 1972. However.. if you feel that the information is of
such interest that it should be forwarded to the Director I shall put it in the
proper format to do so.

2. My only contact with anyone named in connection with the

Watergate and related matters was through] la former
Agency employee now retired and living in Winterhaven, Florida. In
December 19711 Icalled me from Florida and advised that he
wanted to get in touch with Howard Hunt. He said that he did not have Hunts
home phone number and that it was probably, unlisted but that since Hunt was a
former employee, could I contact Hunt and ask him togivel la call.
I had only met Hunt once about 10 years before but I agreed to relay the message.
I called Howard Hunt at his home and told him that] I did not have his
home phone and requested he caUl
relaying the message and said that he woUld ca 11
little consequence to me in December 1971 but in July 1972
C
~ Mr. Hunt thanked me for
This seemed of
lof the
.

Office of Security contacted me in regard to the FBI investigation of the Watergate

situation. At that time I Informed] lof the telephone call from
., . lin December 1971. Attached is a copy of a Memorandum for the
.Record prepared by I [as.a result of our conversation.

3. In the summer of 1972 I took my family to Disney World in Florida

and took that occasion to drop in to seel· .~ I Itold me in
a private conversation that he had been interviewed ree or four times by the
FBI in connection with the Watergate affair and he related to me his contact

..,;;.

____------JI-EYES Bill SECR£I [_. IU01.55

 MORl DoclD: l45l843

- '
L, to .. ,3 L j
::
\, I.. I 'I.; t.
JU·.~·:i \L
I
-
. (2)

with Howard Hunt. On 19 July 1972 after my return from Florida I reported
this conversation to the Director of Security and made it a Memorandum for
the Record. This memorandum was sent to Mr. Colby and a copy of the
memorandum is attached.

4. Other than knowing Mr. McCord through his employment with

the Agency and meeti.ng Howard Hunt once in about 1959. I do not know nor
have I had any contact with <.lily individual.s named or knowledge of related
matters now receiving attention in the press.

r> 0 :~ ..
. __
/~/~. -::.....-../ "_.«:.»...../ . -<".::"?,~.-.l..._
. .:..·Charles W. Kane
Special Assistant to the
Deputy Director ,
for Management and Services

Atts

00156
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

".

"
..------------'--'------,,.-------_.:-
: t~'
....
\
NH10RANDUtwi FOR: Executive Di r e cto r-, Comptrolle

i
I
Per ou.r. cozrve'z s atio n on Mond a.y, i
I
!
i
i
1
j

I,
I
I
i·
,.
j
t
!
I
20 July 1972 j
(DATE) !
,.
j
I
!
FOR" NO.
1 AUG 54 101 REPLACES FORM 10'101
WHICH MAY BE USED. ( 47)
.,i
I

&

00:157
 --------------- MORl DoclD: l45l843

19 July 1972

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Conversation wi th] ---.J

1. While on leave visiting Disney 'World in F'Io r ida, I

dropped in to see I Iwho lives in Winterhaven, Florida.
c = J retired from the Agency about five years ago on disability due
to a serious heart condition. He was with the Office of Security for
about 20 years prior to his retirement.

. 2. During a pr-ivate conversationc=Jtold me that he had

been interviewed three or four times by the FBI in connection with
the Mc Coz-d Hurrt affair. I asked him why he had been interviewed,
c

andIre told me that in, late 1971 he had been contacted by Howa rd
Hunt who suggested that he consider an assignment as Security
Officer for the Republican Party. c=Jvisited 'Washington in
January 1972 to discuss the' proposed position with Howard Hunt
who apJ2arently was acting on behalf of the'Republican Party.. c = J .
furnfshed a resume to Hunt and discussed the position with him.
Ultimately, he decided not to accept the position because he felt
that his heart condition would not allow him to become involved in
such activity.

3. According to I I
during the meeting with Mr. Hunt
they discussed some, of the r equi r ernents of the' job. At that tirne
they discussed a need for both a positive and a c ourrte r-aud io program
and a need for a good security sy-stem both before and du r irig the
Nation~l Conven~ion. c=Jindicated that he sincerely believed that
the Republican Party did need a security officer and a good security'
programmer but felt that he could not afford to accept the job even.
though it was a very lucrative offer. Apparently, money was not a
problem.
.. IO~:15a
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

, .. ,.1': . , • ,. ..••. I 4 • " :.. •

..
' ...

4. Whc n c:=J declined, he indicated that Mr. Hunt a sk ed

for any other rccornmendations he might' have. Ac co r-d ing to c=J
he told Mr. Hunt that most of·the people he knew' were still in the
. Agency, but he did furnish the name off Iwho might be
possibly ready to reti.re from the Agen6y.

5. eJinformed rn e that he as sumed that the' Bureau

obtained his name due to the r e s u rn e h e furnished M'r , Hunt. He
said that the Bureau had talked to ·him on three or four occasions
and that he had written up about a 40 page statement concerning
~--
his dealings with Mr. HUl1t. Wilen asked about Mr , McCor.d, , _ - -
said that he really did not know McCord that well and declined any.
knowledge of Mr. Mc Co r-d l s technical capability:
...
6.1 lindicS\-ted that he had not been in touch
with Mr. Hunt since the early part of 1972 and knew nothing of
the Watergate operation. He stated that he had gained the impres-
sion from the Bureau interview that the technical devices were being
removed at the time of the arrest and were not being installed as
c;>riginally reported.

7. All of the above information was volunteered b y D

c--~---I and I really did no t get involved in any discussion on the
matter other than to cornrrie nt that I hated to see the Agency's name
connected with such an incident in any way. The above conversation
took place during a 10 oJ; 15 minute period and no other discussion
relating to this incident was held. It is being reported for the record
and for information of the Director of Security.

00159
 ~------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

..

17 July 1972

, ,
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Charles W. Kane

I I

1. Last week Special Agent Arnold Par harn of the FBI cop.-
ta c ted the Acting ,DD/OS. He a s ked whether or net the Subjects
worked for-the Central Intelligence Agency. Pr-e viou s Iy, requests
of this nature were followed up by the FBI with a.n interview of the
subjects.

2. I briefed Mr. Colby who is the Agency's focal point on

the "Wa te r-gat;e " case and'the Acting DD/S of, the FBI inquiry.
Mr. Colby suggested that "we determine the extent of Lnvo lvcrne nt
a nd indicated that we advise the Bur-eau of their employment.

3. 'When Agent Parham was again contacted and advised

of the Subjects' employment with the Agency, he bdicated that
the -Bureau does not wish to interview them. r. ;') ,
6J!-J"~~""v" Co
;j
'4. The office of the DD IPS win inter vi ew I_-.--_ _._--O-........JI i n/4-:v ~..t..P- -
the same fashion as I Iwas previously interviewed.' I· t;i
7('2,1
5. I called Mr. Kane both at his office and his residence
. and learned that he is in F'Ior ida and will return to dUty on 17 July.
I called Mr. Kane this morning to advise him of the inquiry.

6. Mr. Kane stated that he has no firm conclusion as to

how the Bureau obtained "his name. He stated that he has seen
Mr. Hunt' on only one occasion in 1959. At that time Hunt was
the Chief of Station~ I
The m.eeting wa s occasioned

00:16fl
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, .

by the fact that 1\1r. Kane

Mr. Kane stated further that around
I
LC=·';"'h-:r---;i,. . s""':t·-n-1-a-s-t--;'i-In-e-o"",:£""""I--;9;-;7"""1:;---;]-,e--'· r e c eived a call fr 0 In I
who wanted to get ~n touch with Mr. I·I~nt. lasked I
Mr. Kane how J:1e could get in touch with him. Mr. Kane obtained
Mr. Hunt's telephone nu rnb e r through telephone i nfo r ma.tion channels
whereupon he passed the number on tol I
7. Mr , Kane stated that he has infonnation that 1 _
has talked to the FBI on several occasions in connection with the
current investigation and that he su rrni s e s that the Bureau may
have obtained his name from him.

Deputy Director of Security

"

00:161.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

r: .. : .. ;: ...

.. Ir··~···· ._. _-~~=--'-

, t·

. _. . .. -_ .. ._- ._-.- - . -- ----.---- --_._--

- __ - - _
;r.rHI<."'-
.... ..WILL ..
.. CHr::'-'lo( ,., .'\55 c...... ,..... ;~rION·J

.r ,-----
J :1'JrrOM

.r ~

----- - ....... _..

l ":,n.\~"If'/ED r-_I~<..u-xnj'II':~ f•.i \' J.'- 1 - fr.iiIT
s

OFfICI \L HOCTI:'\G SLIP

-- .-. - --_.-
.0 -- NAME AND·,
-
._-- ..........#;''·''is
... -- ... --" ------
DATE
--,....,----
INITIALS
~.

1
. --_. - _.- --
DDM&S.I Hqs.
"

~~ rq~·
%
-, ... _-- f-.

3
-, - .
,
f-

, ,. ~

.- .M:no"
APPROVAL
!JliiECT REPLY
DISPATCH
PREPARE REPLY
RECOl;1MEHDATlOH
COMMEHT fiLE R£:rURH
.. - ... CON,CURRENCE
. lKFORMlT/OK SI.GHATURE
.. ..-:. .. :

Rcularks:. ~l'""~'.a.~
~ .. .. ,.
-
-.
..
. ' .
.
.
.
.,
'.

:... i
Ie.
. .
."

.' ,. '.
- ,.
'~~:fi
.:~:.;
...~-..
I
J
;

.. :.:..:;.
..,
e , ,
..
"
:

.:.'-
'

t' ~
.
.'
.. -:"~' ... ~ -,
...
"
.
I 00162
,. r .
FOL.D HE~E.O RETURN TO SENDER
FROM: N ...... E. ACDRESS "'N'o ~t-<ONE: NO. CATE:

P/PPB~ I 8 May 73
II FlED I ,-v...a-sIJE!'frIA L I SECRET
fOl_ 110- (40)
Use previous editions
1-67 237
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

,.. ~ .

8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of CentraJ. Intelligence

'.
THROUGH: Deputy Director for Management and Services

SUBJECT: Involvement in Sensitive Domestic Activities

, "';4

1. As chief of the~DDP Systems Group{prior to 1969, I was involved

-=- ~ .:..<' .,.
iI1 providing data processing suppqrt for the following sensitive projects:
.:. ,.~

a. ter
Staf{(, Mr. Richard Ober's program for processing data,
of U.S.-citize~~ beli;;ved to be militants! subversives. terrorists',
etc.

, .
c. A Systems Group sponsored program of common concern
listing travel of U.S. citizens to and from Communist cou.ntries.

2. In the same capacity my staff and I briefed police officers from

New York State and Chicago at the Del's reque;:;t (Admiral Rayborn) on
data processing techniques related to biographic intelligence (unclassified).
I -,
3. As a member of O/PPB, I have been aware of five programs with
\ possibly sensitive domestic overtones.
i
a. DDS&T/O~'s contract with theJ '. .
I
i5ystem •.
. r- VIP Beth and BehaVior Predlcfion
b. DDS&T/ORD's Project OFTEN which involved the collection
, • of data on dangerous drugs from U.S. firms. I believe Mr. Helms
• ter-minated this' program last Fall.

,I
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

.,. .
, ~,

5EGFU;T/SENSlTNE

C. DDS&T/ORD's D~oiect r

Q. ' lJJJ~&T/ORD's use of ERTS-A data to analyze Soviet wheat

.)fields.

e. ,DDS&T Special Projects Staff - t~ ~~ogram.

.---........::=====::::::..:-_----,

bClence and Technology Gl:0Up

O/PPB
.. ,

'I
II \
I,
I
'.
i
i
! '.

- 5E6PET'SEN§ITIVE
- 00164 I

_ ••• _~ _ . _ M "".~_'- .'_

 MORl DoclD: 1451843

t
I
i .fJJS ONt-¥-r--

8 MAY 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

VIA: Deputy Director for Management and Services

SUBJECT: Watergate /Ellsberg and Like Matters

1. No personal Irrvokverrierrr, direct or indirect to my knowledge

on my part or my s taff, with the Watergate or Pentagon papers cas e s ,
with Young on security regulations or with classified releases to
RAND. I was awar-e , many years back when in the DDI, that certain
classified papers were released to RAND from the production .
offices. One staff ~ember, I Iwhile a member of the
IC Staff, did have a RAND contact which he is elaborating on
separately.

2~ . There are some sensitive activities .or projects of which

I am aware, which are ~ghty close to the borderline of legality
in terms of Agency rill.s s ion, including:

a. The CI Staff COber) project

b. Th1 .lpropr;etary,IL' _

c. An Office of Security narcotics cover project

d. A CI Staff funding-channel project with the FBI

I ·1

~~j ~rNSfTIVE
'lYES ONL. 00165
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

I
3. One of my staff officersj JWI,ile in OCI
was .the briefing officer for th~dAttorney
A
General, bu can recall
nothing in his dealing with Mr. Mitchell whi ch would have any relevance
to the current is sues. A couple other staff officers are reporting
separately on some sensitive activities in which they were involved
prior to coming to this staff.

Director of Planning,
Programming, and Budge i ng

00:1.66

..: ..
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

W
... tJ ..... L " J J I I I L.IJ
-- L.J J.)E OULY
- • • 0 ._. _

ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET

SUBJECT: (Optional I

FROM:
9. V. S.
Roosevelt
Chairman, TSCC r---'I~E-------------·----

I IHqs 8 May 1973

TO: [Officer de'ignation. room n"",ber; 000 DATE
building) OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number eoch comment to ,how from whom
INITIALS 10 whom. Draw a fine ocrcs s ~oltJmn of tor each comment.)
RECEIVED fORWI.RDED

1.
DCI
-~
2. L....-
~---1---t---..r ------I
-'

3.

4.
,
5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

1...
:,'.:.::. ... ..
'

~ :
15.
.'.;: ".:\ .;\
00.167 . ' ~
.~.f ,t~ '~':~. ~
 MORI DocID: 1451843

UNITED STATES INiELLIGENCE GOARD

TECHNICAL SURVEILLANCE COUNTERl\1EA~URES, COitHIITTEE

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

TSCC-D-386
8 May 1973,

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

SUBJECT Support Furnished to .Elements of the Gov e rnrnerit

Outside of the Intelligence Community

The Interagency Audio Surveillance Courrte r m ea su r-es Training

Center (ITC) was established at the instigation of this Cornrni tte e and
opened in late 1968 under the executive management of CIA. The
need for such a school had been recognized by the National Security
Council's Technical Subcorrrrnittee as far back as 1962 and was re-
ernpba sfaed by the Security Committee of the USIB in their October
1964 report titled "Damage Assessment of the Technical Surveillance
Penetration of the us Embassy, Moscow. JI

Membership on the TSCC has been confined to agencies and

departments who are represented on the USIB. F'ro.m time to tilne
othe r elements of the Government have indicated their concern over
the audio surveillance threat and asked for membership on the
Committee. In all cases they have been turned down with the
sugg e s tion that they take advantage of the TSCC's product either
through liaison with the security organizations of the Cornrrrit tee l s
members or by nominating students to attend the lTC. During
CY -72 the following students were trained at the ITC:

Central Intelligence Agency 10

Defense Intelligence Agency 5
Department of the Air Force 25
Department of the Army 50
Department of Justice (BNDD) 4
Department of the Navy 5
Department of State 3

00:168
 MORl DoclD:_1451843

Depa r tmerit of Transportation 3

Internal Revenue Service 3
National Security Agency 1
United States Secret Service 6
White House Communications Agency 2
117

The ITC has furnished training only to ernploye e s of the

agencies and departments of the Federal Government. State and
local police departments have not been detailed to the lTC.

-
Cornelius V. S. Roosevelt
Cha{rr.nan

-;..

00169
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

Retiremcnt Infonnation - E. HO\vard Hunt;

1. Date of retircment: 30 April 1970

...
2. System: CIA Retirement and Disability System

3. Grade and salary at time of retirement: GS-1S, Step 8 - $28,226

4. Creditable civilian service used in computing annui.ty:

17 ~hy 1948 to 8 June 1948 - Economic Cooperation ArunDlistration

9 June 1945 to 19' February 1949 - State CECA)

8 NOVffinber 1949 to 30 April 1970 CIA

s. Annuity:
At retirement - $1,020 per month

At present - $1,181 per month (which includes cost-of-1iving

increases since date of-retirement)

6. At the time of retirement Mr. Hunt did not elect survivorship benefits.

This meant that upon his death, his wife would not draw a survivorship

annuity; By letter of 5 April 1971 he raised the questio~ of changing

his election but. was' informed by the General Counsel on 6 May 1971 that
this could not be done. By letter dated 5 May 1972 Mr. Hunt asked Mr.
Houston to raise with the Director the possibility of being recalled to

duty for a short period of time, after which he could retire again and

elect survivorship benefits. By letter of 16 May 1972 Mr; Houston advised

Mr. Hunt that to call him back to duty solely for the purpose of pennitting
..'
him to change survivorship benefits would be in violation of the spirit of

the CIA Retirement Act.

00:1.70

-
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

..
1-

22 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General

Bill-~
!

i
Attached are the reports Bill Colby asked to see:
, .
1. Restless Youth (September i968), No. 0613/68,
Secret/Sensitive/No Foreign Dissem (Copy 78).

This document was produced in two ver.sions--one

with the chapter on radical students in America (pages
25-39) which was sent only to the President, wa.it Rostow,
and Cy Vance (former Deputy Secretary of Defense); the
other version without the references to the American
scene was disseminated ~o twenty people outside the
Agency. This document without the material on the
US was updated in February 1969 and copies were sent
to the Vice President and Dr. Kissinger. A still more
abbreviated edtt ion was sent to the Attorney General
.in March 1969.

2. Black Radicalism in the Caribbean (6 August 1969),

r,T;:18i9/Ei-g':- Se~r~t/N~-F'orcig'~'I)issem
(Copy 142).

3. Black Radicalism in the Caribbean--Another Look

n?'·i~i·;;8-197D~N~·~-·0517T70:·-S-~ret./NoFor~Tg~-·
])i:..;::;Uf.l1 (Copy 98).

L'Ie as o note tha.t these are our record copies and should
b o t"l·:·j ~'t't{c ~l.~·- .~".'---" .- -..- - -.- - -------- --,.-.- ----- - ' -.----.--- ...-

),U'~ .. ILU V'i. I LUeL,,)(

Deputy I )in:du!' Io r Inklli.>.. . r1;:·(:

A ttachm -: Ill:.:::
001-71..
Ot::::~·~ n
I
.. 1
 MORI DocID: 1451843

. '-.. _..

«
I c.
5.ENDER WIl.L.CH: • CLASSIFICATION TOP AND BOTTOM

.
I
I
I
OFFICIAL ROUTI~G SLIP

I
TO NAME AND AODRESS DATE INITIALS

1
',; .... ..-;.=1,.,.""
M..-
-
2

3
. f
I
I

..
of

6
I

~.
ACTION DIRECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY
APPROVAL DISPATCH RECOMMEHIlATIOH
CO~EHT FilE RETURN
CONCURRENCE INFORMA'(ION SIGNATURE

"Remarks-:... . - ' .

. ' .

. r

.
001.72 .'

FOLO HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER

FROM: NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO. D"TE

J .,"'..... OIDCI
Us. previous editions
I ,
•
12/24/7L

FO./II 110.
1-67 237

..
'

.\
 MORl DoclD: l451843

,
'i

1. 1)i'>::$(·!~in;-·,th-·u t o t bc C~:b'i.li0t ~!'~d \d.thir; ·chf.'

.o:~~·i~:~·~~·:~Cl·;~'"i-~· . . . _1;: fllf.1 i';~P:" 1- E~:::.: i1·fSS--r"'::'t\.~ tfi is !:.I~rl~·.1. t
I ~~ t ( 11 t~ i vo
[-~··~~,·~~i:;f··--rt ~;--~·,,:·t:··~·(.:·ct l~.~ t t. ~"l" t t.;:·':2 i~"~~;-0:r'-"t:i:: l-:i}~·~;: 1·!. t:c")(}d
~')\:::~::Ui"~~ o f ttH.'.: A.l;'.:·";.:':.:1 t:, tLt·.~:<r·?:-:t in t.h~~ IlrCit:l~'!;1
t..h:.\t i"\ul}lic o
of 8tud~nt diEsidcllce ~ould r~~ult in cO~5idcx·ablc r~Qloriety)
part~c~la~l~ in the unIversity world, a~d b~cause pursu~nt to
~!r. 110:3tO'i:'S illstructloo.~" the author Lnc Ludod in his t.er.t
a :<:t~d:r cd': btUGNlt. r~dict:ls in t.he Unite-a Stnt~:<:, tl\\.'reby
L~:.ce!:c'ir·.~; tEl'" l'ig:{>OCy'!;l c!Hl.:rt1".:r. WD h av e Sr\.l":.itb.ea th~ pnpei"
1r>r ci~·.~:;:'Dil:ttt-:on to th.e r..J{;J<>o,'rs of the Pr~:;;i~lO'!jt "s Cab Ln e t
a r.d ~.>. th il: t he IHt~~lliG(H}ce Oj~~unity by elit=ir.n t'ing Zilto-
ft?th.::.r" t he ('h~ptf!r \Yrd.c:h dh.cuss,es Students for·:\ Deraoc r a t Lc
Soci~t~ (5DS) ~nd by ~trikillg from th~ Prosp~cts s~ctto~ all
. on 0:[ :-:[;5.
;~.:.:: t

2. the- COl1l;~lAt1ity but. within tb;:: G:...... ,:'n,l2,trit··-

Oi.,t.s~(e
~Te hel i~ V~.:
t.n a tv l:l'e bf}.sic t.e;:t sho\ilo t;e 1urtner .i:~Cl 'tpCi for
tht- ptn·p~}:-'.e of. € 1 imiml.ti~g ev en tho !!&OS t c aau e L r<:f~r::: nee
l, to tb~) COl::,'stic sc~nc--1E':;;:t SO~eonc i:r.ier fron SUch a c na nc e
rFfereDc0 th~t
tbe originsl p£por h~d contai~~d ~ ~~ctio~ on
t uden t:::. Tbo n i.uo tc e n c oun t ry ('h.-:ptt'~S ''d.iic.h form
l'.!~i:'r i.C!:H1 ~;
F:n-t: II o I f":'::'f.le!~~ Youth c an b,~ di~;~;--'",;il:~d'.'.·d v Lt h i n thf.l
CoYernm~nt, prcvlded.that th@ cODtrolti nppro?ri~t~ ~o th~1r
cln.s;~Uicat.ton ~re ob$erv.~d. To do the f'di.tin~ ~no rcpripting
r~·uir~d would take several Qnys at l~a~t.

_>. n£,l\' .£s~ to the ~cs.dcmic ;;'or) a Dr to tlH" pUbl ie--

For th~ reR30CS,9~t iorth.abo~e. W~ b~~~evp thaL rcIeasp of
tb~ vnsic t~~~ ~ould harm the A~ebcy. The country chgpt~rs
cou Ld no t be relea~ed 'Wi'thou't first be'ing rc:'\;:ritter: ·to
~liminv.t{~ e.ll cla$eiiied inform~tiQn. Once this. ...as done,

001.73
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

I ...

: l.c y ":'.J~\ 1 d C:L< l)l.tca te1::.1" t)D·::'. t. 10 n r, h'", r tty t v a i l~; L le i 1'. tb::
(:'i) 1; ~'.1.";'~~;q. 'rr;'i':.f'(J is }·.O 1::{";~ (":if c ve r.. t lit{~r:-~t~~r(~ l."n "tl'.:4~
~: ~\ ~:,;'-' c t c.•f. :::- t l)f~ rw t CiSf, uit,; v b: t.u ~.1l:)' ev er y pL: Ll:t sh.. . l' ~!;-
.. ~J:;.:;~~":, ~.:t InR~t O!>:::~ title en his c u r r o n t; lh:tiI;~_~. i,;:~;:j':<"V{:t~,
. ::L,i~::-l' n.:;('·~·.ci{;s (,Jf 2~~·v·~. .lrnJ~;ent, auc b t:,.s Ih:t:..1th, -:·'::1~.:C~4t~:"·~d ~ l\d
ti~~lf;'-:.re, Il£l·e ~Vl).nS:i!4C=d la.(:~C:E..rcl3 o n f.,l.e E"u17j~·. . c t :~.nc i·.1."C
r~r·t·r~r;.rr.·(! t o r)\.~t~l t s h tb(-ir·.1 1 r~diJ~Js. C~.:.rt~~r-:!.t~~.ntly I \ [~ r't~:-t"C-;I~­
':".~""pd l..:.:.::~.~.i:!·:t f,.>':.:t1;1f.c J>:"lE:g~·n ..

OOl.74
\.
\ ,
\,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

(
"
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

., .

Restless Youth

SEPTEM BER 1%8

No. 0613/68

00176
..... ---~ - 78
~
 MORl DoclD . 1451843

... ,..-_""'-'r~_ .
, .

~.~• •

~ ~ .: .:....::::~! ':. .:
• • I

'~'9

·{3·1/ q 1
,' .. _._~-------:...--~~_ ..

. r '.
. ~ ~
rs Lt. r.. «: !\ ~y i If
I~. ~:
:;.

I- ''..
j
.

• <
~ .

001.77

. -~": ' .
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

14 Hay 1973

r~40RANDm1 FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Research Project on Robert Vesco

1. On 16 October 1972 Messrs. Ereckinridge andI

in the course of a Survey, were briefed on activitie OJ: Glle
Atlantic/Pacific Division of the Office of Economic Reoorts. One
project cited was a query from the Director, apparently at the re-
quest of Secretary Shultz, to the effect, ""../ hat do we know about
Vesco,," the man then running lOS. Two of OER's analysts were assigned
to the project and; working through the Do~estic Contact Service,
spent a day going over the files of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. There apparently was some contact also with EUR Division
of the Deputy Directorate for Plans and with the Office of Current
Intelligence.

2. The in:formation above is based on rough notes and obviously

is sketchy. It is cited now not to suggest any wrongdoing but because
of the current publicity about Vesco and the probability of continuing
probes into the "subject by the press and the courts.

Scott D. Breckinridge

00178
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

..

Director of Central Intelligence

Please handle in this channel due to classification of attachment.

WARNING
This document contains classified information affecting the national
security of the United States within the meaning of the espionage
laws, US Code, Title 18, Sections 793, 794, and 798. The law prohibits
its transmission or the revelation of its contents in any manner to.
an unauthorized'person, as well as its use in any manner prejudicial
to the safety or interest ot the United states or for the benefit of any
foreign government to the .detrirnent of the United States.

THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE KEPT IN COMMUNICATIONS

INTELLIGENCE CHANNELS AT ALL TIMES
It is to be seen only by US personnel especially indoctrinated
and authorized to receive COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE
information; its security must be maintained in accordance with
COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE REGULATIONS.

No action is to be taken on any COMMUNICATIONS .INTELLI-

GENCE which may be contained herein, regardless of the advantages
to be gained, unless such action is first approved by the Director
of Central Intelligence.

00:179
TOP SECRET
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

..

8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

FROM Deputy Director for Intelligence

SUBJ:ECT Activities Possibly Outside CIA's

Legislative Charter

1. This memorandum responds to your instruction to

report any activities which might be cons ider-ed outside CIAt s
legislative charter.

2. All Office and Staff chiefs in the Intelligence Directorate

have reviewed the past and present activ.ities of their components.
I have received responses from all of them, and none reported any
activities related to either the Watergate affair or the break into
the offices of Ellsberg's psychiatrist. Although contacts with
three of the people allegedly implicated in these incidents were
reported, these contacts were on matters other than the two
improper activities:

Hunt: Col. White, Richard Lehman, and I talked

to Hunt in late 1970 regarding his preparation
of a recommendation in support of the Agency's
nomination of R. Jack Smith for the National
Civil Service League Award."

Mitchell: While Mr. Mitchell was Attorney General,

an ocr officer was assigned the task of
providing him with daily briefings on
foreign developments.

00180

~ET
CIA INTERNM>uSE ONLY
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

..

Young: Harry Eisenbeiss an¢1 ~f CRS

had frequent contacts wlth Young during the
summer of 1972 in connection with Executive
Order 11652 and the implementing NSC
directive. This involved visits by Young
to CIA to discuss information storage and
retrieval and several meetings of an inter-
agency group dealing with the implementation
of the Executive Order and directive.

3. In accordance with mytnstr-ucttons , several Offices reported

domestic activities which might appear questionable to outsiders.
Their responses are attached. Most of these activities are clearly
within the Agency's charter. but there are a few which could be
viewed as borderline.

DCS accepts information on possible foreign

involvement in U$ dissident groups and on the
narcotics trade when sour-ces refuse to deal
with the FBI and BNDD directly.

DCS. for six months in late 1972 and early 1973,

was acquiring teiephone routing slips on overseas
calls.

NPIC and COMIREX review satellite imagery

from NASA programs to identify photography
too "s enarttve" for public release.
-,
"

.= " SE
-2-

ET
CIA INTERNA USE ONLY
0018.1
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

..
NPIC has examined domesti,p coverage for special
purposes such as natural catastrophies and civil
disturbances.

ocr. in 1967 and 1968. prepared intelligence

memoranda on possible foreign connections with
the US anti-war movement and world-wide student
dissidence (including the SDS) at the request of
the White .Hous e,

FBIS has on occasion supplied linguists to work

directly for another agency. e. g .• to the FBI to
translate Arabic in Washington.

FBIS monitors radio press dispatches and reports

covered by copyright. These are circulated. within
the Gover-nment and stamped "Official Use Only" •
. This has gone on for three decades without problems.

FBIS has monitored and reported on foreign radio

broadcasts of statements and speeches of US citizens
such as those by US paws in Hanoi. "Jane Fonda.
and Ramsey Clarke.

l::JD WEnD VV. r n o c 1'0""1\'---

Deputy Director for Intelligence

Attachments "

-3-
" S~ET 001.82
CIA INTERN~USE ONLY
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

I·
I
\
., I
I

00183
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for IntelligelJ.ce

SUBJECT: DCS Domestic Activity

To the best of my knowledge, DCS has not engaged in any

activity outside the CIA charter or ,that could be construed as
illegal. Some of the functions that we perform under HR 1-13f
(i) of providing operational support within the US to all
elements of CIA and to the USIB-member agencies, however, are
perhaps borderline or could be construed as illegal if mis-
interpreted. For example:

5. Collect information on possibl~ foreign involvement

or penetration of US dissident groups, but only in'a
passive manner and only when the source has ,refused
to pass the information directly to the FBI.

6. Collect information on the narcotics trade, but again

only 'in a passive manner when the source has refused to
pass the information directly to BNDD or the FBI.

001.84

I
 MORl DocID: 1451843

·'

SUBJECT: DCS Domestic Activity

10 • .Acquire routing slips recording the fact of overseas

telephone calls betwe~n persons in the US and.persons
overseas and telephone calls between two foreign points
routed through US switchboards. This activity lasted
for. approximately six months but has ceased.

. 00185
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. I II'"

.
\I
I
i
!
,i

00186
 "MORl DoclD: 1451843

~T
EYES~

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

VIA Deputy Director for Intelligence

FROM : Director of Current. Intell~gence

SUBJECT Activity Related to Domestic Events

1. OCI provided current. intelligence briefings

to John Mitchell as Attorney General~ With the approval
of the DCI, this practice began in the pre~inaugural
period in New York and continued until Mr. Mitchell's
resignation as Attorney General; The OCI officer
assigned to this duty had a daily appointment with Mr.
Mitchell in his office at Justice;

2. The briefings provided were strictly on foreign

intelligence, and were a legitimate service for CIA to .
provide to an official advisor to the President. who sat
on, among other bodies, the 40 Committee. It must be
presumed, however, that our man's daily visits were
known and speculated on elsewhere in JustiQe. The
problem come s in the potential p.re s's treatment: "CIA
Officer in Continuous Contact with Mitchell."

A:L:CZLdL U nellllldil
Director of Current Intelligence

00187
 MORI DocID: l45l843

. SEe~':f
CTA INTERN;!, rISE ONT y

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

VIA : Deputy Director for Intelligence

FROM ; Director of C~rr~nt Intelligence..

SUBJECT Activity Related to Domestic Events

1. OCI began following Caribb~an black radicalism

in earnest in 1968. The emphasis of our analysis was on
black nationalism as a political force ~ the Caribbean
and as a threat to the security of the Caribbean states.
Two DDI memoranda were produced on the subject: "Black
Radicalism in the Caribbean" (6 August 1969), and "Black
Radicalism in the Caribbean--Another Look ll (12 June 1970).
In each a single paragraph was devoted to ties with the
US black power movement; the discussion primarily concerned
visits of Stokely Carmichael and .other US. black power
activists to the Caribbean and other overt contacts.

2. In June 1970, Archer Bush of OCI was asked to

write a memorandum with special attention to links be-
tween black radicalism in the Caribbean and advocates of
L
black power in the US. The record'is.not'c1ear where
this request originated, but i t came through channels
from the DCI. The pape~ was to be treated as especially
sensitive and was to include material provided by the
Special Operations group of the CI Staff .. The CI Staff
material was voluminous but did not provide meaningful
evidence of important links between militant blacks in
the US and the Caribbean. This, in fact, was one of
the'conc1usions of the paper. The memorandum was produced
in typescript form and given.to the DCI •

.'

00188
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

SECMJ':l?

3. For several months in the first half of 1968

the Caribbean Branch wrote periodic typescript memoranda.,
on Stokely Carmichael's travels abroad during a period
when he had dropped out of public view. Our recollection
is that,the memoranda were for internal CIA use only"
although a copy of one was inadvertently sent to the FBI.

L<ICIlaLU nelllUdlI
Director of Current Intelligence
.".

' ..

00189
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.:r .. ~F.T
EYES~
..... ~

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Inte11~gence

VIA · Deputy Di~ector for Intelligence

FROM
· Director of Current Intelligence

SUBJECT : Activity Related to Domestic Events

1. In late spri~g of 1968 Walt Rostow, then

Special Assistant to the 'President for National Security,
Affairs, tasked the DCI with undertaking a' survey of
worldwide ,student dissidence. Confronted by ~mult at
campuses like Columbia and mindful of the violence
accompanying student outbursts at Berlin's Free University'
and elsewhere, Rostow sought to learn whether youthful
dissidence was interconnected: spawned by the same causes;
financed and hence manipulated by forces or influences
hostikto the interests of the US and its allies; or likely
to corne under inimical sway to the detriment of US interests.

. 2. The paper was p~~pared byl 10f OCI

with the assistance of the CA and CI Staffs. -The DDI,
D/OCI, and I ~et with Rostowto elicit the reasons
for his or cue FLesxueht's. concerns and to agree on the
sources to be examined,'the research methods to be followed,
etc.

3. Written during the summer of 1968, the most

sensitive version of' 'Re's=t:le:ss- YO'u·th comprised two sections.
The first was a philosophical treatment of student unrest,
its motivation, historY, and tactics. This section drew
heavily op overt literature and FBI reporting on Students
for a Democz'a't.Lo Society and affiliated, groups. . In a. sense,
the survey of dissent emerged from a shorter (30 page}
typescript study of SDS and its fore~gn ties the same
author had done for Mr. Rostow at ,the 'DCI' s request in 00190
December 1967. (We no long~r have a copy.l .
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

4. Because of the paucity of information on foreign

student movements, it was necessary to focus,on SDS which
. then monopolized the field of student action here and .
abroad. , A second section. comprised 19 count.ry chapters--'
ranging from Argentina to Yugos1avia--and stood by itself
as a review of' foreign student dissidence.
5. Because, SDS was a'domestic organization, the
full paper' 'Re's't:l'e'ss' You'th~ including the essay on world-
wide dissent went only to nine readers. A copy may be
in the Johnson Library. .
6. Following the 'pqper's favorable reception by
the President. and Mr.' Rostow, the DCI briefed the NSC
on student dissent. The sensitive version 'subsequently
was updated and sent to the White House ,in February 1969.
7. The less sensitive text was disseminated in
September 1968 and then updated and issued again in
. March 1969 and August 1970.

Rlcnaru Lenman
Director of Current Inte11~gence

OO:l91.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843
r

.'" l '.

.'.

WARNING
This document contains classified information affecting the national
security of the United States within the meaning of the espionage
laws, US Code, Title 18, Sections 793;794, and 798. The law prohibits
its transmission or the revelation of its contents in any manner to
an unauthorized person, as well as its use in any manner prejudicial
to the safety or interest of the United States or. for the benefit of any
foreign government to the detriment of the United states.

THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE KEPT IN COMMUNICATIONS

INTElLIGENCE CHANNELS AT ALL TIMES .
It is to be seen only by US personnel especially indoctrinated
and authorized to receive COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE
information; its security must be maintained in accordance with
COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE REGULATIONS.

No action is to be taken on any COMMUNICATIONS INTELLI~

GENCE which may be contained herein, regardless of the advantages
to be gained, unless such action is first approved by the Director
of Centr,al Intelligence.

001.92
TOP Se;CIXET
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. , - TOP SflSP~
EYES ON .

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

VIA Deputy Directpr for Intelligence

FROM · Director of Current Intelligence

SUBJECT · Activity Related to Domestic Events

1. In late: 1967 OCI participated in the preparation

of several short intelligence memoranda aealing with the .
foreign connections of US organizations and activists·in-
volved in-the anti-war movement. The main purpose of
these reports, prepared at the request of the White House,
was to determine whether any links existed between inter-
national Communist elements or foreign governmen~s and_the
American peace movement. The conclusion reached was that
there was some evidence ox ad hoc contacts between anti-
war activists at home and abroad but no evidence of
direction or formal coordination.

2. In October 1967 President Johnson expressed

interest in this subject and ordered a high level inter-
departmental survey. " In response to his personal request"
to the DCI, Mr. Helms. asked the CI Staff to collect what-
ever information'was available through our own sources and
through liaison with "the FBI and to pass i t to OCI, which
was directed to prepare a memorandum from the DCI to" the
President.

3; A book mess-age requirement was sent to all stations

to report whatever information was- on· hand relevant to this
subject. Although ·agent reports on Communist front opera-
tions overseas were-of some value, the prlmary source of
information on the "activitieS of US activists--and that was
quite limited--was sensitive -intercepts produced by NSA,
which had been similarly tasked by the ·White House.

~TD
EYE"S~

00.193
 MORl DoclD: 1451843
r
.. ~~RETII
EY~

4. A draft memorandum was jointly Prepared by

OCI and CI Staff. and forwarded to the ·DCI. He passed
this typescript memo, dated 15 November 1967, to the
President personally. The White House copy is now in
the files of President Johnson's papers at the library
in Austin.

5. Brief follow-up memoranda were prepared and .

forwarded to the White House on 21 December and 17
January 1968. According to our best recollection, no
further finished intelligence reports on international
connections o£ the peace movement were produced.

XC:::z:; 1L;CC:: c:c .

Director of Current Intelligence

TO~PRRT/I
EY .
ON~
. '.

00194
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

00195
- --.-......-
..... ,.~......
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Intelligence VI.,:f

SUBJECT: Contacts with David Young

,
1. In the summer of 1972, I had frequent
contacts with David Young. He was in this
building under my control once. These contacts
related solely to Executive Order 11652 and the
NSC directive concerned therewith. Young was
apparently at the time in the process of drafting
the NSC directive. The visit to the building
un~er my control was for 'a briefing on CRS processes
for storage and retrieval of documents. and is
apparently reflected in the paragraph of the
directive concerned with the Data Index. I visited
him in his White House office at least twice in
the company of an inter-Agency group concerned
with the Data Index.

2., In August of 1972,f lalso

visited Mr. Youngfs office ill cae company of an
inter-Agency group to'discuss CIA compliance with
the data index instructions. To the best of my
knowledge no one in CRS had any contact with
Mr. Young in his role as a "plumber."

,R. c. EISENBEISS
Director, Central Reference Service

00196
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-,

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: O/DDI

SUBJECT~ Involvement In Domestic

1. This memorandum responds to the DDI's

request for a listing of any questionable
involvements in domestic affairs. I do not believe
that CRS is doing anything that a reasonable
man could construe as improper.

2. oGRS does, of course, have several programs

to acquire still pictures, movies, videotapes

. 3. CRS files do not generally.bear on U.S.

citizens or organizations. The biographic file-
building criteria specifically excludes u.S.
nationals unless the person has become of such
major importance in the political life of a foreign
country that the file is essential. To m knowledge,
onl 2 ersons so ualif

have no way to
U.s. defectors

00197
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

1
)

SUBJECT: Involvement In Domestic Affairs

4. The CIA Library has several informal

snag files intended to aid the librarians in
answering the kinds of questions that they .know
they will get on a continuing basis. An
appointments file is a collection of ' clippings
on appointed federal officials: who holds what
job when and what is his background? The extremist
fil~s are a coll~ction of folders on a variety
of organizations and a' few p~ople with intricate
organizational links. Any sort of extremism
is grist for these particular files., And a fe~
persons, e.g., Rap Brown and Eldridge Cleaver,
have dossiers consisting almost exclusively of
clippings from public media. These files are
unclassified and consist mostly of clippings
from the public press: U.S., foreign, underground,
scholarly.

5. I am not aware of any other kind of

involvement in domestic activities that is not
related to development of techniques or logistics
or legitimate traininr of CRS personnel.

n. c. EISENBEISS
Director, Central Reference Service

00198

. '.
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

/ .' ~
/
,

00199
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ,.:.'.:,
.. "

,. Ie tionable NP C Pro ects

I ! ,
"
..
I
:' :.. ,"0

.:. /' . 1. Leaks of Jack Anders ....

. :
I
~ '.

In January 1972. NPre erformed Im ze enhancement techniques on~'IV

tapes of" a Jack Anderson s 0'1'1. The· P se was to try to identify .
serial ntiIPher's of GrA do ents Jn And rson' s possession. The request
I . . '' ,-'
0"

. ".
:'
was. ~evB1.,on WIG through he Office 0 .Security.·"
" .
'.
." "0

-,;'
: •• f. .•
,2. The PoppY. Project .;
,~ ~IC .I~' p;oVi.ded the' ernces" of ne PI ~sis,~ an interagency' , .' ~ .
. to
effort to dttect poppy cu1 ivation. II addition the Center has provided
the QIDtractual mechanism support 0 the Bureau of Narcotics and
Dangerous Drugs for a mu~t spectral c:r p study by a private company. "
','

• 1

. :

..
.. .
'! ..

I : ~ "0

': " '.:, ,;" ,NPIC has been request to provtde nunber of 1001<5 at domestic
:: , coverage for special purpo es •. F.xc:--upl - Include:
".
.,. ,', ,
. :
. ,

':f" ' ' ~ Santa Barbara 01 Spill . , . .' ":"

, - Los Angeles Earth ake " ,I'·.
" . - Sierra Snow (£10 threat),
'

- Current Mississi i Floods

~ :Hurricane Cammile Danage on· t e' Coas·t of the Gulf of Mexico
-. Civil Di5turhan~e in Detroit .
- 0El? u. S. Data Bas

I' ",
I ••

~" '; -:!: .-;.... '. . .

.
; .. .
.~" ':
"
..
:."
.t ,
.•
. -,
"':
I .
. .'
00200'
"
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

~.

oozo~
 MORl DocID: 1451843

8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: DDl

SUBJECT Sensitive Activities

1. FBIS has been engaged in no activities related to the Ellsberg

and Watergate cases.

2. FBIS operat~ons occasionally extend to the domestic arena. From

time to t~e, FBIS linguists are made available to DDO or Office of
Communications components for special operations (usually abroad) involving
close-support SIGlNT work or translation of audio take. On one occasion '
recently DDO, on behalf of the FBI, requested the services of several
FBlS linguists skilled in Arabic to work directly, ..for the FBI on a short-
term project here in Washington. The arrangements were made by Mr. Oberg
of the DDO Cl Staff~ He said the project was very highly classified and
D
that FBIS participation was approved by Mr. Colby and the Director. FBlS
participation was approved by the Director of FBIS after a check with
the ADD!. Other examples of sensitive linguistic support work are help
in the handling and resettlement of defectors, the recent assignment of
an employee to the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs to transcribe
recordings in a rare Chinese dialect, and the detailing of another
Chinese linguist on two occasions to assist in the U.'S. military training
of Chinese Nationalist cadets.

3. Within its responsibility for monitoring press agency trans-

missions for intelligence information, FBlS publishes and distributes
some material which falls in a "gray" area of copyright protection, libel,
and privacy of international communications. Pre~s services controlled
by national governme~~s and transmitted by radioteletype without
specific addressees, e.g. the Soviet TASS service and the PRC's NCNA,
are monitored by FBIS'and the material is disseminated without restric-
tion. The legality qf this has been affirmed by decisions of the
Office of General Counsel.

00202
~'
SftJSiTIV£
, \
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,! ~ -. ':~..

4. The routine FBIS monitoring of foreign radio broadcasts often

involves statements or speeches made by u.s. citizens using those radio
facilities. Examples are statements made or allegedly made by American
POW's in Hanoi~ by Jane Fonda in Hanoi and by Ramsey Clark in Vietnam.
At the request of FBI and the Department of Justice, and with the
approval of the CIA Office of General Counsel, we have on occasion sub-
mitted transcripts of such broadcasts to the Dep~~tment of Justice as
part of that Department's consideration of a possible trial~ In such
cases, we have been required to' submit names of FBIS monitors involved,
presumably because of the possibility they might be required as witnesses.
(In one case in 1971, an FBIS staff employee was directed to appear as
an expert witness in the court-martial of a Marine enlisted man charged
with aiding the enemy in a broadcast from Hanoi.) FBIS views all this
. with misgivings. Monitoring of such broadcasts is incidental and we
ru~ attribution of their news to FBIS, and we should not be considered
policemen maintaining surveillance of' traveling Americans.

1
·1

I J!;. !i.
I
Director
Foreign Broadcast Information Service

-2-

'SfCBET 00203
SENSItlVE-
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

..
~-, ..
....J ". _:- .,
••• _ _, ". •• •••• 'OM,.. ,.: -:_....... ',_. '" ......
.
~ ~.~.

I .... j ' \ '.

o if j l:;" .) f ..
":~,., ");Ji c~ 1 q v J r':" .1 I r';:;~TE" - _-.__ - _-~.- -.. _.'"

L;~~~~·,:~=:~~:;;;"~';;~;'·-j~~~=1;~~~~~~~Ji)~:=~;-;~~-'::~i: ~.::-';;~;;~~
I-- .'~7
J
2
r.
,..., .uDO
S.t > :~.,
-------.--- .._-.. ..-:-J..- i j C- -- ••....•. - • . . -- ----'f"-
'J i
L.
'.;"'"
I 1{j\ J :-.r. I.~··l_<.
Y " ~1j: ~:' : .·' ; -/..-/'. ~
__ :..-<.;... :_.~";
. ." _ _ /1
.......: j ../.--~.
-r-r.;»
.
;/
. 'r··...
I :;;~".:..,
4" ':-

-,:7./.-
' ...

. -. \ . /~~
J.
1 I . .
I
I 3. 1(; -, IY--;'jl--l
•. I

.:

--------------,.,.-,-._---,;-------
_:_..:::. .;':,. i._

----------'---
, '.

: ..

.... . ,

i_

T
14.

15.

. .:' .'., ....'.

fORM
61 0u~oir.~~~sD""""'S"!"'E,.CRI'PIE~i---El· COIUIDEnTIAl INTERNAl
3-62.
____ • • .. n ••• _ •••• _-:--_ ;-._. ;. _ .. _ h " ' . . •• ••• • ••• ".' '." "._ '''' ....
USE.ONlY
• • _ ._. _, _ •••••• _ .
~ .... - --.... -_.... -~....-...~ ---;-~---
 MORl DocID: 1451843

.. '"

1_-
SUBJ}~CT : D:x;u::Jen t11. 1.:10n S1.':..:Fort for Use in the
, Un.l t e d Stv.tes

:.1.. As you ;,:1,:;:0 awace -I.:h:1.8 c;: Jic:; pl'ov:Ldes docl.::::<cnt

support for a variety,of covert activities.

L.-~-----;-:;--:;-:;----;---~-:-----;;-;:;-;-------c;---'
Specif i c use is 110 t
always available to this office a.nd should pr-oper-Ly com.e from
the requesting office who' can provide the details. U.S.
alias documentation use in the United Sta~es is approved by
the Office of Security and normally -ha s the concurrence of
.. Central Cover Staff or FI and.CI Staffs. Requests received
by this office 'from outside the Cls.ndestin.e Service are
approved by an appropriate office q:f' thaDDO.

2. A r.eview o£ this Officers document support files £or

'the period 1 January 1972 to date,indicates that the following
number- of U.S. alias document r-e que s ts wez-e fulfill,ed for
'probable use in the United States. ''l'he statistics below are
broken down by requester:

OOZ05
".
\
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

f..

2
·-oozu~
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, .
-

·.A ft 0'£.1.'","'
:,.\j V tr~\:'J<Jif
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

" ..
. .'

! '.

0020'8.
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

.-
-

~~' , Director
I'
Off5 c.e of ·Tt;:chnie2.1'Sf;:1.'vice

cc : lJD/Sg:T

-:..:.

5
 MORl DocID: 1451843

O'IB/D

' . ! .-;.

,
1
, :

.r·.

". -, :

8.

,.
9.

j 0 \
10.' LTSD"]MPS:FUer----'--'--,·· I faJ \.'V\.t

11.

I-
12. L- -->

13.

14.

15.
-'-...
002.10'

FORM
3-62
___ R ._~... ••• _ •. , ••• __.• '. __ 0'._ ••_ ...... _ .... _ . _........_ ...._••. _.
EJ C8fiFiBEliTIAL O INTERNAL
USE ONLY r. D UN(lASSIFlED
"
 -
MORl DoclD: 1451843

IL.--_ _I

. . .
" '. '.:'.:. ::. ,1.•.: .J;..a.1;'?~~i:n-·197.1· (;DeG~m:9~r > .. r. q-#li~v:'e) :fh,e; ]J;eputy -, Dire,ctor
.. ."":. f0i.::~(~B:e ;,~p.a;s,~itt2b£fice > ~Be;J?a4~~nt;"O;(State, (lYfr•.RQbertJo!:U::'s;on)
....: . - .:~.iP£~~a).l:Y~;~~;~~.e., o.n.~~he;#i~~~I;rat ~Q:ffi.c~ ·.;mignt..D.o:r:ro,v.a ;'sr:!1all
c·' ~~{~:~ ~ ~~~:~~'~i~
·:I;i~'ff;,.:s;~tativ.:..e's:'of,.a£oreign:,goV'e~.nnl:ent~ .' ..
.. '":. '.
: :'" . ....
, .' . ", '2. I conv,eyed this. requ~st to the.the~~hief>D
I . I
and.subsequently held severa s i on s
.V4:1;~_1z~~esenta.tiv.es of QUI' I Pf£t:c~. 'It was ~~cided to loan
:f:tI;e:':iJ?,;a;-~~P.'o-J,':t.Qffi.·ce.', a- small cornrne-r ci.a'L.r ecord'er . (N oraleo
. c.a·.s·s~tte·Re·corder> Model.150), which we had in stock.

.. .... A' ·r..e;'p:r,~s~ntati.ve"-Qi"a~r Train~ng B~·an~h. [

,:0,.
,I: land I·'de:1.i~r:e.d);be·'::Ij':ecorder. to ',lyfiss J$1:'1igh~ ~ :=zx.!.lce
~ ; I·:iiemonstxa:ted. the recorder I 5 capabi.lrti.es
and::instructed ~r in its us e, -She did not seem: too pleased at
tl:re:"J.?~kcirding quality; however> the :recordex Wa's."lett with her.

. 4. On ..t his date (21 May 197-3) I asked Mr. Johnson. to

.qh:e:ck:.0p.the:status of.~,the r;e,~o:t'ii~1:':. He said it Was.never used
i'n. any 'way. I ,therefor-e . retrieved it from.. the-Bass·port Office
'arid c;i:elivered it"to Tr.aini:qg Branch I I

0021.1.

•• I
.. .... :"f-:.. .. _.. __.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

".~
~ ~.-' .. .....\. "'.,

, .'

-- .

.' -', .' ',.... ~' ..

". .:.; "
"; ~ . .4··.·:.
-r-.

-r, " . .5A ;~./ _.';', :;;.

. .... ~

::.:: "

. ..-:...... : '.:'.'.,:..
-.~
'.,
. ~'.
s.

t:
'r: . . " .....:.
"," _t .·t ... · "

,. . -::.
.," , ':.~.'
··~:~7
.~-' . .~ .

.._-~_._~-_._-.~------'--~" ', .. " .. "---'-.,---_ .

(~ •• >
.
._----_...._. __ .•. "'-. .... -._-'C---,
1·

.. -- ......

"ORM NO.. It.:;PLACCS P"O"M :lSot

1
.:-=--..-_- ...
I .....Y "" 238 WHICH IS OQSOI.ETE

... 'I~EC'-C'-rORIGI';'-
R_'. ._ ...

I .

CONTROL NO,
... _

,t
I
DATE: OF DOC I DATE REC'D I DATE OUT S U S P E N 5 E .O A T E 'CROSS ~EF'~RENCE:
.·POINT· 0'1" 'FILING
OR
I
I \
I
TO
FROM ROUTING.
DATE:
SENT
I
I.
'i1
SUBJ. l!

00212
\.
COURIER NO, I
'::::==:::-:-:-:::-----;.:....;-,~=~~--.-=::-=-:==-=-----I-----I----
NO"REPLY ANSWERED
3
... 1
 MORl DoclD: 1451843
.. .,
./
,
"",
.' ....
»: : " MEMUriMWUM FOR: .\ .
' .
. ,
..).

'Cart" Duckett brought this up and ~.aid. he is

very uncomfortable with what. Sid Gottlieb is
I. -reporting and thinks the Director . w ould be ill-
advised to say he is acquainted .with this pro-

'd
I gram. Duckett plans to scrub i.t down with
Gottlieb. but obviously cannot dOft this after-
noon.

1
I ..

II
BeJi"'t'vans
.8' MaX 1973
(DATE) .
:1 FOR... Ho.
0021.3 :1

I I ·AUG 5C '01 REPLACES FoORM fO'IOi

WHICH MAY BE USEO~
I {C7. "

. ,'.

e.
.. ....

. 'I .',

. ","l,..:~ -;~~.::~:;-.:.-
.,: ;}: . - ..- _.-.. __ ,,_ "_ ,;. .
. ... ' , ' ..
~.. .. ,; - . . ..• .._ ....,~ , ..••.:....:.:...-- : c '~~~f/~-:-"'" .,-
-. ", . .....
\ .'
:, ':',

~-"; ., : ~ '.
~'"

, : . ~ '"

... .,
•
'. ;.:i·::~!~:··~·~:.:.:t '.:'.' .
... ~
.. <.. ;...
L. ",.
z
:,::_~:.,
...

'.
-. ~.~/~ ..-:-
----------
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

...... _-_.-._-_._-
S:dr;c¥ G,~;_tlieb .- ... - . _.---. -.-.. . -------. .-- .-.-.-...---------
C:1':fO'f, TSD
'---- I :'.~E

------------------+-------J---------.---

-'-

12.

13.

14.

15.
'. 00214
FOIfM
3-62 61 0 us·io~:.~~~us 0 SECRET o CONFIDENTIAL o INTERNAL
USE ONLY ·0 UNCLASSifiED
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

::,,;,,~
~ i •• t;

11EMORANDU~
. .1 }"OR: . De puty Di r c c to r for ,Science & Technology ,

1. 'I'e c hn i ca.I Services Dlvi s ion.l s charter (CSI 1-8) requires

that it provide technical assistance to both CLl\. operations and
other activities as may be directed by tl-..c Depu tyDi r e cto r for
Operations.

2. Over the years the chief non-CIA recipients of this

support have been the Depart:ment of Defense, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous
Drugs, I:mrnigration and Natura.lization Scrvi.ce , De pa r trrie nf
of State, United States Postal Service, Secret Service, Agency
for In te z-na ti ona.I De've Iopm errt, and the 'White House.

,_, 3. 'While vary-ing widely among the,different recipients, these

services have included training and rn a te r iaIs , and in a few in-
stances participation in the fields of audio and visual surveillance',
secret writing and related cornrnuni ca ti orrs , .pe r sona.I protection.
aHas docurnen tafiou .and questioned docu:ment exa:mination, di s gut se ,
conceahnent de-vices;' electronic beaconry, illicit narcotics detec-
tion, and counte;r-sabo'tage!ter;rorisln.

4. In :most instances requirements fo r-fhi s-rsuppor-t are

"re cerved by TSD through higher echelons (Office of the Director'
or Deputy Director for Operations). Uril e s s the service involved
is a t r i vi a.l or. continuing one, the request is referred to the
Foreign Intelligence Staff Departmental Coordination Group for
coordina ti on and approval at the app r-op r-i a.te Agency levels.
Approval within TSD 'by the Chief of Operations or Development
and,Engineering and the Chief of TSD or his Deputy also is re-
quired.

5. The .attachment lists the primary services provided to

the organizations named in Paragraph two.

E2 IMPDET
CL BY OS909~

002:15
 ------------------- MORl DoclD:1451843

L" ...

-. 2 -

6. J::.::;::::tl)CC of f,,);.~;;,:·d ~-l:·:t.~o:1:!.lldr:..;ntity '·~~lt"tz!r:\.:1-!t:11~{)11 by

'),3D):; c or' l i..r, olI -,/,1
' ..... t .... ,-"""-';'/"';"'.f
..... ~, 'J i . t I..':;) '0
1. 1''/0
.. b
~.ro ac d cr;",-·,·;.,l.·
~ - J . . . . ., . " {V-,-.
J i: C of
<11H:1 ty pc of d C'C"t.il :'li": ~:: La ti(,. -1 r (":tl;':(:3 i·(~d..
z,:(: i: C ~ ~ I': J.; .:\ r ,;,;r.1 ~.! » s t
for dl~n;. c
d ar ca dO(,,1l1Ylerd~i.t~ollf i crn a. D})O Avc a j)iv·1:::::")jl1.;;
(/; .; -r , !10110r(~d ;:t[t:er p r cp e r vaIi-Ja ri on. }""'rec . .v o r Id (~I.}-.-·t.~:"C(·:'l!'..\i.?.Ol1.
Ina>," l'equil'c ~OD'le extra coo:c('E~~ation !loWGver. \

7. Unless ordered o rhc zwi s e by higher Agency au~~".)rity.'

no U. S. do curriezrta ti ori is issued by TSD Headquarters without,
prior coordination with the Office of Security. and the Central
Cover Staff. TSD Regional Bases require at least the va.Iida-,
tron of U. S. documentation requests by the COS. or his
designated r cp r e s en ta ti ve , of ~!lC requesting Station. Because
it could be usedl . ' : lno
U~ S. Birth Cer'tiflcate 'IS Issued WllhOOL approval 0 me uud, '
via Central Cover Staff. Backstopped major credit cards are
issued by Office of Security, not TSD.

8. Provision of forged documentation to non-DDO requesters,

whether they be CIA or other Agency requesters. a lways requires'
approval of rrori-v'I'S'D offices. Support to the military for instance
would be validated by PI Staff/Departmental Coordination Group
at HeaCiquarters or by the COS overseas having responsibility"for
coordination of the operation. BNDD requests a r-e coordinated'
with DDO/NARCOG. Requests for documentation oflnimigration
and Naturalization Service is coordinated via the Alien Affairs
Staff.

9. Authentication items are is sued on .a loan basis and must

be returned to TSD or acco~nted for. After any documentation has
been issued. TSD'retains photographs and records of such support
until the documentation has been returned to TSD. If the material
is not returned 'after a reasonable time. the requester is z-errrinded
of the outs tand-ing documentation.
r" '
I
/ -. /,;'
/.., '
",/
A
1- 1'/
'/:
,
,~i.('
>:/---
':-
, -7"";'
." --I, I...: . . -. ..' .. :,.,... -:;
,K..../_ .: . , '
~ ~
","...,

Attachment .; SidneY,.,Gottlieb
D'istribution: " Chief
o & 1 - Addressee,w!att Technical Ser'vi ce s Division
00Z1.6
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

-.

Do o urrre rrt s , di s:bu1.se, '~O)1Ct:·;:r.J.11·~._~n.t dev-!.ces 7 Se';:l·c;t "\.vr . i ti ng ,

f~~lr.~S a r . d sC1.!.lSi c o u n t e r ir.:... i r g e r i c y (~{:(l CQ1.1:r:.tl';X ~~2:.bo!:~.ge c c u r s e s
j ..

have be eufurni ahe to all

d i.nt c Il.i g en c c t=10111.i;~11tS of tl1e
De pa r trnorrt
of Defense and certain e Lerrre nt s of the Special E'o r c e s , All requests
are eoordinated wi th the FI De pa r-trn ent.al, Coo r di.nati.on Group' at .
Headquarters and ,...r ith the Chief of Sta t i on s ovez s e a s , In turn
these elements fur ni s he d TSD wi th e xe rnpl.a r s of foreign identities
documents, foreign cachets, foreign intelligen.ce secret writing.
systems, foreign' intelligence .concealment devices. SeleCted
audi o r equi r ernent.s have b e err.fu r ni s hed overseas for CI -t yp e
cases.

Fe-de-ral Bureau· oi Investigation

.At th~··r.~quest of the FB(we cooperate with the Bur~au

in a fe"\v audi.o-, Eiu:n-eillance ope r a ti on s against sensitive foreign
targets i~ :t;b;~·.United States.

BU:i:".eau of .Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs

Beacons... cameras, audio and telephone devices for

ove::seas:op~r.ations, identi.ty docurr.ent s , car-trailing devices,
SRAC, flaps and 'seals and training of selected pe.r s ormeL . .
responsible for use thereof has been furnished this Bureau.
All.requirements are sent to DDO/NARCOG for coordination
with area divisions and for action by TSD If appropriate.
Requests Overseas are coordinated wi th the COS or his
designee before action by TSD is taken.

I'rnmigration and Naturalization

CI analyses of foreign passports and visas, guidance in

developing tarnperproof alien registration cards, I I
I. Ihave been furnished the SerVlce.Requests
are forwarded dlrectIy to TSD for coordination within TSD if
technical, with the FI Departmental Coo rdinati.on Group if oper-
ational.

00217
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

',;;.

D:;])arhilel'J!;
_ _ ••
of S:,a~:c
_ OM "'_ '_'_'h _ _ " _ ••. __ ....... • _ ._

~
. "erl;cJ~r:l'''';·:.l :S!:·"1:1·.; •. .s :~·:.1.i:.I:..;..n~·:~ f;~l dr-;'Ij·:.·}.oi,;1r.tg a nC\\t.TJIli~\;d.
:~..:~: .. ",I::!; J.'?d.:~ ~·l)Oj... t
J i.~... .. ~ 'J n f.::3 L,f :G T ,-: j :~ 11 :-.;:-,\ -s ~:t) 1. ;:5, I,.::::. r ..;;1. I ?::.'l,);:iug
:1 J .,1 ~:ler ~I onnc c I.:>::~ ~ L·:'" :';l (~)f~;'> .::011 s) f(JL ../'-,:U":~~':::,s S ;;.do s
l : r h a v c b e e n

:;: i.."i~)~)lietl tb e St.:? ~:e D':·:e,-:..:rf"::1:1c::ut. In a(~c1it.:i'011 ,a:naly s e s and

(;;:-~posure of
b l a c1, l:..:.d:.t(:r f)l:-e:L"'=1i:io:.ns a 6 c.i n s t tIle Urii.t e d States
:,.l.b:r.o~~d rria
a r e d _~~.11 gj:~:11)11ics j:";''';':;!:Le:rflJ::::.ts
e , ~o:r~::."2_:L"'(!r::d
a r e

to J.'SD fo r f'ur tlve r ":;.::()r'~~~;';·.·:t~.!)11 -·,,::!:'·.~rl 1}1e :81.,.:-is10n. 'I'h e

Depa r-trne nt of St.a.te i\Lt:nish~s (::i~j:'-;2h:,l'S of ,foreign pass?orts,
fo r e i gn visas andintl-:eFast passports orr.a priority basis.

Postal Seryice

The Offi ce of Chief Postal Inspector has had selected

personnel attend basic surveillance photographic courses, has
been furnished foreign postal information and has been the . r
recipient of letter bornb analyses, furnished I I
t==]typewriter a na.Iy s e s , Re qui r ern ent.s are coordinated with
the DDO and ~DDO:lEA. The, Post Office 11:as furnished TSD '
with exempl"ars of letter bornb s ~ird I
, . ". IWe al~o have
an arrangement wrrn crre l .... OS~ Uillce 1-0 eXdHlute .'J.nd reinsert
a 'lo,\y yolUIne ~f certain foreign mail arriving in the United Stat.e s.,

Secr'et Service

Gate passes, security passes, passes for Presidential

campaign" ernbl ern.s for Presidential vehicles; a secure ID
.
photo sys tern have been furnished this Serv-ice. Blanket. approval
'

for graphics support has been granted to the Deputy Di r e ctoz--fo r

'Operations. In each case TSD requests approval from the noo.'

U. S. Agency for International Development

We furnish instructors to a USAID-s onsored,Technical

- Investigation Course (Counter Terror) at

- 2 -

0021.8

\.
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

(. ~, .'
; • • I

White E·..r us e \ .

Statioll l :: r y , spedal H1ClllOrarJcla, 11"101d5 of the Gz o at

~31::;;"1 have b e e n f·\:.: r}1.i.:=; lJ !:;Q th I:: ~?oci2..1 Sec r\~ta~r'/. r:Plj ~ }:'.; ~!1.lt)r
J)i.cecto1.'" for Ol).:~:r:~t~C:)l1S 1::; '.~·'~)J~1.~i·;d of -;"b...;~eMrecr.::.i:L""(;1"(ft'3nts.

Police Respresenting Washington. Arlington. Fairfa~ld

Alexandria .

During the period 1968 -'1969 a series of cla s s e s

reflecting basic' and sui:veillance photography. basic audio,
locks and picks,' countersabotage and surreptitious entry
were given ~o selected rn erribe r s from the ab ove rrie rrti.on e d
cities. Overall training was approved by the' Director of
Centeral Intelligence and -in turn validation was required for
each course fr-orri the Director of Security.

00219·
 ---------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

. • OJ t .... .. ...
.' i
~
>
I. i, ..
~ ~

:...j .. ,}
i ..l ':; . : :.'{ l• I
I ._~ .. ~. '., '" . / :'.i
, ... ~. '"- - .. ~ ., - , ~.. .' .

.,... -.. _ ... _.. -.. .-,. ..- . -.- _ _- _-

j :0':
• • •_ • • _.~._ .0 _., ..... ~._ •••• _ ... '" ..... ••• .'" .,. •• 4' :<. _ •• ';:-••• .' '--'"

':'(T: :'::-•.•... '::1) '... '. .: f

I.

r.:~}~::.1.?~:1:-tti·Jl1.S of rt'SD su;)port to

other U. S. Gov e r nrn errt ag cnc i es ,

-.tr.r !'Crt rr
. 6~~-Ut~LIt
.. ~ -

J-------------+---f----=-j,--:---t -
14.
00220
15.

fORM
3-62 o CONFIDENTIAL o INTERNAL
USE ONLY o UNCLASSIFIED
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-----,-- .. - . . . .- . _• • • - •••• • • • , , _• • _ _ •• _ . _ _ A •••• ... _ _ . . . _ . _ .. _ _ • • • •_

~rSD has h.ad a close ·.~/orking r cta ti on ship w ith the F~:I e-:f;r
tl:.e IJi!·st levY yc a c s . ·.r~1e i:",l:·I is' the on.l)r organj:;~;)..tit)ll that ha s
been fully b r ie Icd on. TSD aud i o techniques a nd e qu i prn cn t, The
fo How i ng are situations where TSD equipment and guidance we r e
involved in operations:

..

OOZ21.
 MORl DocID: 1451843

,.
• ; ...•.. i:
- '."

i
I'

I
I

- 2 -

0022Z
SteRR- .-
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

"';';DD,.::;:o P.33 ..-rs

8 ; ~·0.y 1:973'

EXGcu~ive Offic2r

SUBJECT: .Contacts with Dome s t Lc Police Organiza:t.ions

1. In Dec. ,:ber 1~63, July 1969 and December 1970, SDB

provided ba.sic countersabotage familiariza.:tion training for
selected members of the Washington metropolitan area police
departments. The traini?g vlas. given at the Fairfax County,
police pistol and rifle range. Authorization for the train-
j,ng carne from mjp and Ch:tf~f, Office of Secur-i·ty.

2 •. o~ occasion dpring the 'past few years, under the

auspices ·of ~he Law Enforcement Assis~ance Administra~ion of
the Departmeht of Justice and with the approval of CI Staff
and Office of. Sec-uri ty, SDB provi.ded -c:raining and familiari-
zation ~o police officers of several domestic police
deparDuents'in the uses of the Explosives Residue Detection
Technique and Trace Metals Detection Technique. These tech-
niques had been decla'ssi£ied and are ·currently available to
the law enforcement community. The National Bomb Data Center
pUblishes periodic: guidance in their uses.
, ..
3. In order to augment the SDB mission responsibilities
in. the field of countersabotage and counterterror, .SDB offi-
cers have in the past two years visited, under appropriate
covers, the explosives disposal units of the New York City
police department, Dade County (Mifu~i) Florida Dept. and the
Los Angeles Police Dept. Also, in March 1973; two SDB offi-
cer.s attended ·.the· Explosives' and Ordnance Disposal Conference
in Sacramento, California, sponsored by LEAA~ When the
recent letter bomb menace began in September 1972, our liaison
with the NYCPD bomb squad paid off in that we had complete in-
formation on letter bomb construction in hours, 'enabling the
~gency to make worldwide disseminatio "thin a da .

00223
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

Ij.1 ::'1.d(1it:ioJl t'J r)l'tillt:~n:.,{ o f ' ':: . . .1. 1C·1.15 r~G.s:;.:cs n nd

1

i f 5. c a t:: t:~ 11. r> :.:~ b J.. (~!:1~3; ·i\~)·}) : .. ::~:; ill :-:'1) s~11:'1) 1.5- rd -~;:e
cT.:? 11 t, j.
s ec i-e t S (~j." v 5~ c o \\:i t h SC~~:'1 e 1J. S. ,1.]. :.::.s ;~:o c u ·t:J;l.-~ :1.. t i .:-1i1 :

00224
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

... .
. ~

f"d:C

L . '.P::.:! r.i.:.·~.t :'(';;-',::11: of ';~:':(;]:);:i( ;,1 "i.·!i~~(:';l;B hy r:r:.';·i).';g ?.r~!"h::h

1\·~~.:.; ·~::~":.!:.:cte(i (1.1,.:c5 i:a =.. ;le ·t-·\,.....~~,::.l ""j' Oc t ob e r - 26 :-~:.". ,.::::G.t':I"·
J.~16'8. 'fhe J"oJ.l,c:·:ij·ig sch\:I:~tl:J,.] ,'}lfl ::::'i)jCi.:ts :·.-(;l'"C i.~~·.C;tJ iiI
the.tniining of s Lx pc::,lJc:::.:s o f the 2';c:t:c:(~polit;li1 Po Li.ce '
Dcp artr-cn t ,

A. 7-].8 OctobeT - Sljr~·,~ptitf~\Js Entry .

C,:· .. f."t e~n t 0 1':· ~3 ub ~~ :.:: :Lh. t :
j c: c t

1. Familiarization and identity of American locks.

. .
2. Hetho·d of :il2.nipulatioH of Loc ks .
3. Methods and techniques of conducting Surrepti-
tious Entry Survey.
~~ 21-29 October - Photo Survei11anc~
Content of Subject taught:
'I. Fimiliarization with cameias: 'Pentax Spotmatic,
Leica, Nikon F, Robot and Polar~id.
2. Lens, telephoto and wi de angle.
3. Exposure Meter, Tripod~; Bowum, etc.
4. Film, film, processing and print processing.
S. Document copy exercises.
6. Night Photography and nigh~ exercises~
. 7. TV· Surveillance.

C. 18-23 November - Audio Surveillance

Content of Subject taught:

1. Microphones, wire Lmp ed.arrce.s and line amplifiers.

(Shure MC-30, Sennheiser "MM-22, RCA - BK - 6B and
RCA BK-12a all commercially available)
2. RF commercial transmitter. (Research Products,
Tracer Inc., Scientific Research Corp.)

00225
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.:s. :~. t_,_ i . ..: :S. (:.;~; 3,:.. i)~ ;. :.d (>.', .. '~ t.'j;~ l ... I. ~}~ -'l
···.t1 >.~ ;. L] '.' ~" .c t , ·:·~",::\:t r'i~ll):-.)

.1
"r • :r C 1. r ',P!: :'..•~ 'r': ~)s. ((~~.":~'I)J0·~.C ;:··-'·t~~::l :::.},,-- 2 l~"~:j 1. :!t .l,' ".

r: 11
v-: 11:i f:\':·.il:·1;]e ~'l) .~,..'\.:c~;·":~:·~\;r1t '~'."7{.l l· . . c -,:~:'.
fo)."c.- :"Ilt .: ~ ... ~ i.~ ",1...: 5) .

5. RC:C: ....· :rI?!..: .. ::; (:!\':r,c:x.-GOl-2 Stereo, ~~_.:;; .)TC 'T-~:04

?,~(}',a, :":~','_:1' "~OGOL, all CGTi:J;1(;.rd.al1y obt,:-,5]'~:.~.:)J.~).

e n d i\'all t,,::s t or f: t5. on.

1. This prDblem entailed an operational cicrcise

ag a ln s t t h r e e of our S;:,fc-sties. The StUr}(-71tS had to
s urv e y , case and pe e t r ot c t1~,(:se Lo c a t i cn s using surrepti-
tious entry, photography and audio surveillance,.

- - - - - 2.
-, All

been terminated.
atl- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
. .
II. After this first NPD group other police departments
personnel trained using the identical safe sites and
enp Loy Ln g the s arne s ub j e c t matter and commercial cqu i p -
merit as i.ndicated above were taught on the f o Ll ow i.n g dates'.
The Fairfax Police Department and Arlington Police Dep~rt­
mente Date - 21 October - 10 December 1968. Six officers,
4 from APD and 2 from FPD.

III. In 19~9 additi~nal offi~ers from the Metropolitan POlice

DeparL~ent, FaIrfax PolIce Department and Arlington Police
Department received identifical training as that stated
• abo~e: .In total 24 police officers were trained in our
facIlItIes.

OOZ26
 ---------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

.J, .
J .,-/
,I '.'
. : ·1 ..J >" ·C: - . .i
. -.;.
• • •• i." ~ ... . . . ~.,; .: ~.:.".
~ ... , ,. . ',' .:" ,.' ,.", ",: l

... ........
7. '- 1 .. '~J.' ~- \., '\
,,- :
Ia:---:--~---J-------l---+-,-..---l _. -'- ~ '.
__ ---- -__ ,-_ ~ .
l ..'

.--_.~~-

r.' ._-- c. " ...

( \ ~-;:~. \, ,--..;.
1. ... \:... .

-' "---.
cI '-; --,-
-C~,-,.,

00227

~
~ o
'610 USE rRfVlOUS
CONFIDEHTrAl o INTERNAL
UNCUSSIHED
.. '"noH' [xl USE ONLY
 MORl DoclD: 1451~43

~.;::.:~.~:-- ·~.n~:):··I F(jR.: . ~~;.~:,~jtl ·':i:t·i...~~:t.c·.t" ~:Cl." Sc·j '·.J.;I.~.~ z"._~li

T(;t.:!·;.:' 1,:: Ic,sY

SUBJECT Repeated Survey of ORD for Non-

Foreign Intelligence ~ctivities

The, 7 May survey has been repeated and refined

with respect to all ORD services or dealings with
other'a~encies on domestic, non-foreign matters. In
~ddit~on, this report covers all our'acti::rities.deal-
lng wlth the research 2n~ develop2ent of lnteillgence
eq~ipment for foreign ~se Khich has been tested in
the United States and mi ghz have collected d omes t i c
information. Again, each-member of ORD available
today was asked either. directly or "through his super-
visor to provide the above requested information,
vhe the r he wa s directly Lnvo Iv ed OT not. 1\'e have
used'all diligence to search our records available
to us during' this' time period to. ensure this is a
complete and factual :list. .

I.· I
~ayre .,5te3enS .
Director of Rese.arch &- Development
Attachments:
1 Contacts with Other
Government Agencies
2 Domestic Tests

00ZZ8
 ---------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

-,

CONTACTS WITH OTHER 'U.S. GOVER~~ENT AGENCIES WHICH

COULD OR HAVE RESULTED IN USE OF CIA-DEVELOPED
. TECHNOLOGY IN ADDRESSING'DOMESTIC'PROBLEMS

Executive Office of the President

ORD represents DD/S&T on the R&D Sub-Committee
. of the Cabinet Conuni ttee for International Narcotics
.. Control that is concerned with research support of
'the narcotics control problem.
(Dr. Leonard Laster, OST)

Office of Telecorrununications Policy

Techhiaal surVeill~nce. cotintermeasures and
phys Lca I s ecur Lty .i.nfo rma tion \·r a s exchanged ,d th
them.

,
Bureau of Narcqtics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD)
1-
Techniques and equ Ipmen't for n av i ga t Lor; and
tracking was discussed ,with BNDD.
IBNDD)
I

IDi'it,_')

we r e p r cc e s s e d t n• _~l'liJ .......
n ,.. l.'1 .'",
. ..... _ r> Lr
't}t
'-I.

Th e 50 1.1: ( ( > . ' 0 ~ t, I.'::: t c'l.irC ~ \.;a s u t°i.:·::(L!J ~·ti:..

L- \ BNDfij

~, ..
002.cg
, ~ I
 MORl DocID: 1451843

' ..
-
iJ. S. (',. ;-.:; ~'."-"':'lt
~~ I.; :;,!..i 11 c; d .;;1 1.: s C of CTA-
D:.:: "~.-.:~ 1 C iii,.:(1 '.1'_' c ': J: (~ 1 iJ S=, y'" .; 11. '\ ·.~,~1 :t' .... .: ::; .~ ~1.S D c=--:~ t: st.: l:
i"', ,.. . ]-;1:::(;1$

r.:-:T:n (cG::lt 1 d ) \

::~hDD ··.·e.5 given ·P~·"'TI.i-:,S.\C':l i.n tho L,J]. of 1972

°t.o :c"~r-(:i\"'(~ r~1.·~·:1)o::::'1.1s ':E'}~(::1 ,:. t:~i~I:· .. r::,:.' . c, Tn c , , c:c:i:.(:(::Ti1l11g
a. Ra d a r Pc o p Le Dct e c t o r d~::\ ,·;J.t::i}(·~l for (;:~o.

IBNDD)
I I

~NDDJ
'-----------,-----'

USIB Technical Surveillance Countermeasures Committee

Continuing contacts wcire maintained with the
Lnt e l t i gence COTIIIi1Unity regarding technical surveillance
countermeai~rs and physical security. This exchange
of infol~ation, reports,·and equipment has been con-
ducted und e r the auspices of USIB TSCC and involves
State, FBI~. Secret Service, NSA~ DIA,. Army, AF, and .
Navy.

State Department.
Two contracts for development of countermeasures
techn~ques were funded jointly. with the State Department.

00230

-.
------------------ MORl DoclD: l45l843

~~
: .
. ~. .
.

~iJ 9,:;J:r:l': Ccn t:~ I •. : s L' 3 ~:1 (~"i..!: or t,r S.

It G~:'·& ':.";0 __, ::::",It' ;"..~.g '.:;"'11": j ,'." S
.:;r~'l:lr:}l (~·~··]f.1 ~)'l~ :Ii~\"e l".:(,.:.~:! ";-,:::<} TIl ;.~~e of (~J.:\'­
])C:..~~\:·l,:,i."jcll ''cq<.;;",.;1f)}.I,:g>r j 11 . \·~~!:r~s s ij:.i l)C';j~~;.:.:;t -;.. c
P;'I~' 1". .1. ..:) S

S{):::e of rhc l\n(~ I.:l1:.:)·~·~~."COL :L:.~~) e.:;. ~ S~:..-i.·c.~~~l~~]l

a r c ~~·l.~·;~l;i)·.ctc~(.l =---=y t~l,,:\ to c.... ·~~Je.]. ou
~~i\""er L,zl:··_~.i.;.~,:tory·,
radio nuclide sampling a~d detection techniqu~s ~nd
devices. These Laboratories have used sampling
techniques developed fOT CIA to mea sur e cems nuclear
p l ant; r0J.(;3.Ses.

, . (Ivlr . B. Bens on, ABC)

At the request of.AEC Security Officer, Mr. Richard

Cowan, the walls of the office of the Chairman of the
ABC (then Mr. Schlesinger) wc r e X-rayed. The operation
occurred,one evening and Has an attempt to resolve some
anomalies', .created by the us.e of the )
I . I < - - - L- - - -

(Mr. Richard Covan, AEC) . I

--------
Lal" Enforc'ement Ass 1.stance Agency (LEAA)
Reports and information about the ORD-developed
Adhe-sive-.Restraint, Non-Lethal Incapacitation System
we re- made available to Department of .Jus t Lce , .LEAA in
Augus t 1.97"2. If zhey developed the sys t em , it would
be used for civilian cr owd and riot' contro.l.
(Mr~ Les Schubin, LEAA)
Technical surveillance countermeasures and physical
.securi ty infcrma tion wer e exchanged wi·th· LEAA •

.I '--------

3
00231.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. '. ;.,
... ,. ~ ~'~'::. '.'~:' .'. . ,.....' - ..
- -: .,' ~ . ' .. :";:'

" :;-..:.... : ':. ::':'. <:.<-: '.; .: '.

.: . .
' . .', ;'::,:' .' .. , '.
". " ....
. ". _.-:;,.-- '"

~~: . .;:~:fJ ..:f:·r: (~,:·l1i:,;C1.:; ~.'::;·;~11 (.J;.~_,:.~.. iJ.S. t'~\~':·..t·\r:::·~i.";~1.t ..\i::".~:·~cIcs

1'.1dt:h CC:i)J.tl -:>1" E:.,·,-e ~~(~S:.TItJ·<l In Us e oC.CIA-·
T~ Co ,:-C! Lc 1"': d. r~; C" ;:.TAO1.:..1 ~~}- '; ~1 ~\.: ~ ~'.! :,.. . :.;S S 1.;1 g DQ;:1C~ t ic
. Pro bJ.'e:',.\S

~~~:::~:.~1 ~:.\lEl.
,:: :. :. : = =--- - - '.·15·
......
1",,,';',,,, ~·:.1·;J]·""-·d
.: '::.:" ",~L"? _.C"-:i
. -. J
"0
\. . C.
'1""(';1~1l"V
..\..!.' .t
"'·~n·"'1--j·J'\"'~'.A.
';lll. J \.. • .1.'. t._ .•••••••• •
a .5,.,....,..,-~"'J.7-s...,.t~J".n-'---=:~7'{)).· }:1'1,.1 J. a t :~ -:1 g t 1'1 e J_ I" ::~ ~ D 1) '.t." t~.: g i' ~t::1 :-:_11 d o '1.' £; t;: n 1. Z r1 t
-;:0 1 (111
in arrtLc i.p a t i on of JL!,C c s t c b l ishncn t of the 110\'; dr ug
enforcement administration. The request for his services
was made.byl Narcotics Coordi- I.th:· Agency's
na.t o r. I\Jr. j
tdlSC1.J,SS(~(i tEG r c qucs t and cleal'cd the
detailing tnrougn ''''. COlby. I
'------------

Customs/Treasury De~3rtl~ent
Technica~ discussions i~eTe held ~ith'Customs relating
to detecting illic'i t n i gh t.t i.me aircraft intrusions over
the Il , S. -Mex Lco border.

(Nr , Ha.rtin Pera, Customs)

I
Alc'ohol' & Tobatc'o "Tax DiY/IRS
, .
. .
. " About five -years ago, assistance ,,,,as ,..r eques t ed in
doraes t.Lc'<s.ear'ch of "mocns hd ne" stills using:.·.~IA infrared
s canne.r-s;"...·This '...as turned down. , ..
.-~-------

Secret .Servi'ce

.. We ·have had numerous discussions ivi th .the .'Secret

Service" .r e ga.rdf.ng navigation and tracking- ~.:t.echniques
and ·equipment.

I- --;---..,..,--------

OO~32
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

".
,',' ..... :' ':,'
. ::.:..: ..
-:.. ,', ..
:
.~
_ ..
.:

~., •
~. ~ : .
01 • • _
"
.,.'
..

~ .., : .,. '. . :'

:.~LrB.]j:(~~r:· (:o~j,t.·'\:1:s ~·:.i ;~';l f)lflU): "!J . S. rt;· ...i .. ·!·:.!.~(:r'l.t· ;\~:~(:l:C.·i.cs
~·th.5.,.:.h C,,:'·,!l<.l O£' i'I~::\:-c' ~;::·)t.lJ.tj':(.1· Tj1 Use o f Cl~\-
. Jlr··,;"':.~
• t ..... \ ~ .... '" 1" -"
.. T ..:•.·.1.... :..,_.()1
.·····(:·(·1 _ .•. .I.".l.·,\.r
_.I
.i n ..:~"~/1'J"i""()"SJ"'1'fr
, ...... ~ .... , - "-'-0 .•1~P"I·it··"·.1·';C
" -: : .......... - ... - .

. p:.:.(.hl,.... ls· ."..

. '. ~ .". .'

. .

. The xe s u l t s of our r r-s c o r ch \;'Yfk in the d e t e c t Lon

f -,
t,o (.. c; Is
:.-,,<>
jJ~4:: I':'e"l';';
v
I
·)·:-,·.:-,~·,~<-r.(] ','0 ...'(:,\.!\
._ J! ..} . . \.. _ 1 . , -l.....
t,
.!=,,-,-
•.... VJ.. -"'S :.:.~
i::'!"'/" ':'.-, ~ us
:"}':- •.• e
v_\-'
in the de te-"C-~-'~l:-l-0-n-of h i.j e.cke:c i·;'.:-:::'_pc;~ls.

National Institute ofJIe~lth'r~~H)

: ",At the -requcs t of O~D, . oes as s i.gned 'avs t af'f ··.technician

to unde rtake to wr i t e a compute r program for·th.e: Wiss,vesser
·Line."Not.ation·CWLN) chemical notation method; -: , 'This wo rk was
d one cf.n co op e'ra t Lon 'Kith NIH.

(Ms,' ·Coniver·
. NIH)
.

.... ',:
.,)
"
,..
1----'-'-----
AT·ms ClintI'o! and Disarmament Agency (.~eDA)

.. D ."ORDmet frequently lvit]~- ACDA pei-so'n~el i~ order

to . ture ORDfs "~1YCW research p r ogr amsv t o 'Support
_.ACDA ,ne eds , .

.. '. ":·'1
;" . :..... ..
• :. o' '.
• 'j
.
-:---------
Environmental Prot-ection Agency .(EPA)·
.·Technical 'information relating to detection· of
radio nuclides 'in the environment was exchanged with
them.-
. -..... ~.

(Mr ~ .· ..Char-Les 'Weaver) EPA)

' ..

...
..

".
.. ~ ... ;::::.. . .,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

I:· . . .,.
. ~ .. . ... : ... ' . ~;,".;.
," ".
... ". '" "

::~:'StJr:.(:'l'9: . (~\~;:.J.t:,:,"·;-S :;·j.';·11 .C:·;.:~:;.JJ." U ..S. O.~;\i:-;,~·.:·::lt ,:".~:';;:·(:·;.t:·:5

1,'h.1Ch C':··.l:l.rl 1.11' ;r,iVe n.:~s\)~'i:f;d In r~,c 0f ·C1.:\-
,! "\./C.-.~ \.;'· i.•• "',' ; ••••_,.,!._ \·1 '1'1..
~ .. ' ..;-: c'.... ')r ..'i;l
_ ··,·1·:
f' ' .
~:. _ _ •.~ S] :".' _j:.! ....
_ ,.~. d(.3y.(~ ~{.
~ _ -,..···5 t r._"--
. .,... -1,.
P:co:)} c;;;S

."
·trf~ ... h·1·1r·31 d I sc.us s Lon s ·........ J·.. t.!··lg t o lJ'--i-lg TH~ Sc .. ·q ... )-;·pg'"
: cqu i~W~!~~~J t:;' :~1 e';: ~:.;~:t.'·~'~;li~~, 2·J.-:':·~~";d· 1;5.:::•• i~/~J S';3~~ ;i. t<l~-;"7 ';;~d
. fill have been conducted. .
" "

. '. (Mr. ·Gene James, EPA)

'. I
Federal Bureau ~f. In~~~t}~~ation
At their r-eque s t , we described .. -Image ry Enhancement
·..t echn.i ques ge rmane to removing dd s t o r t Lons from some
.·photogr·aphy. they had on an alleged' ·bank robber •... Request
for specific support in processing . the .imagery ..,·ras· turned
down,

'. .: Secret Se~:vice

'. 'FBI ':
lJ:S. Customs
.... .1. ItO't~l contact ..with oth:r. agencies
an terms' of assl.stance 'In th d ome.st Lc ope rat.t ons has be-en
. ;·in. the ;field.. of audio su rve i Ll ance -c.ourrt e rme asures ~ arrt i.>
hijacking~ or drugs. ." .
.. '(Mr. Robert Burnell, SS) .' '1 I'
(Mr. Thomas Allen~ FBI)
(Mr. Martin Per a , Customs)

.. NASAand USDA 1 ,.- :---,==========;- _

We have an on- zo i.na DrOQ"ram .' Ito

I I
ear tn resources as s'essmen t s ~

····IL..--~
,"

6 00234

.'.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

j- .: : .•.. :; ':

:, .

.... '.: ". '.

. '-.,

'1'1.,,:> _i.::>
"')("7"'{""
.... J ..."" .... _ .. ) - -J:.; a
,y,···'··-,
i,- 1..
.~~:> ..... r in z a.. ·"I·!·(,-"·''':~.J
•. .. .:> I'o r an
1·· .. l . . v ..... "'" - --, \:~
_..- ·e·'-u":';rl·-·
.......

mental program to aid in 6st~fi2ting·the Sovi~t wheat

. crop. A part of the .information would be obtained fTOfu
a satellite Lau.ich c d for o t he r an·uo1.iJ1ced"p:cograi;Js. Ground-
t rut.h data h'ill be collected 0]1 No r t h Ainer i can c.rop s ,

'u.s. Department of Agriculture' a'h.'d".Bureati 'of Narcot:ics

a~a :gan.,gerOll.? D~'u~s

.CIA has requested the e s t ab'L'i-shmerrt o.f a t";o-acre

'plot of opium poppies at a USDA· r esearch site in Washington
... ". s t a t e , to be used for tests of pho to-tre cogn.l tion of opium
poppies ...

I--------------------------~--:-::-------:-------:~- "., ."

·.·.:·Army~ MilitaT'~ Police Agel'!5:YLJ-t~ ':Gordon

. Air Force, 01; ice o:t. the Illspe'ctor Ge':ieT3l
. '.:..:Army, Offlce: of· Prov'ost Marshall General
.. We have exchanged technic·al··:sllr\n;illance . c~untei.·-
measures and physical security information with them.

_I
. ·U. S.· Army
Rocky' Moun·tarn Arse'naT, Ne\\rport· Army AmTIit,'ni t'io.n Plant~
.ToeIle Ordnance Depot
Do'RD tested environmental' samples from testing~
sto~age,and production £acilities in the U.S.
-_--:.-_--:.---:.-_---

.1_-
00235
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,~rj;~:! . .';. . ._. -.'..' .:. " {'"

< ... :. .. '•

. .....-:~ .. -:;:': ...~ . . ~ . ',' :.::. ~' .
.: . . . ",' .
. . : ..; ".' -;.'

(~\~I; \ f. ~ ~ C. i s ' ~!l: i t.11 t.~ ';, : i c r . L1 S. f? ov .:j " .. : ,"\ ~_''':: t
ff
,
"::'."j i:.~)
.
c :~ c s .
-,--'. ·,':'}1-i.CJl t\·~~;.1.l1 IJ'l' f!\l1,"~"·Fr~,~';~;.J'rc:J In LT$(: : j [ (YA-
;)(.v (.~ Ij;,:.\··(l 'f"~'l~I~~lolog}r .i n . ~:1 ,"'1 ~;~·.s~·ng ~;}:)l::stic
F10!:Jl,::,.jS· '."
.:

u.: S.._~~E~~_LB_~_$.,~:~:_~~.:?_~.. .h_~:,:?~~:~~ l~.! ..

__~Do;:UJ i~:; .';!Jilr5.:1g' ,,::,·.;':-;j·?SCS 1,;:i.th :Cii~ld

u. S._ Navx,

I
u.s. Coast Guard
. Abnut six years ago, CIA infrared equipment was
made available for USCG tests t.o evaluate IR as a means
£Oar night search of life boats. . .
(then-Lt. James McIn t osh ," USCG)
I
Sa.n Mateo County Sheri£f's' Of£ice
ORD conducted polygraph tests qn.a11·app1icants.
Polygraph security findings were compared with the
Sheriff's own security f~ndi~g5.
(Sheriff)
A study was. 'made on .con-men techniques and assess-
ment methods in 1967-68.
(Sheriff)

-,
8
00236

'.
 MORl DocID:' 1451843

/ "," .
':. "'.: ;:: .

;>;.~ .., ~:Cl': (~i>'L:.I:::=; ;:J t h JJ-':]}':;l" 1J. ~~ (',_~ '.: ·,-::·;·:"pt "'~::;':':11;.f.,::s
·>·1~11:..Jl (~.:·~!]<.l o r 1:::·.. 0 Rc~;~:ll·~··rl T 1 Us c o f (':1;\-
:')' .'.·t·; :.t';. -,~.il ~r'I:'CJ~!1 (lJ.I;~:)T' ~7 11 .' :.::.~i."': :~::,;··j.~lg 1~ :~!::: ..'~::~: .ic
::~.~. ,)h! _. ~s

li ()1-- s ccu r it y :c,:,rso;:1$, the Cl1i:~f ~\:~s :.~;':(·]r.'~ ;::-.',:'iil'''C of r.:

:1
.-
...... I (' Y
·':.it·!. L_
J.
L.
') '.> .... , ':j i' e
"'\'.,J'._~_
.... ' , .)
J_ J. ~·~'I"
J. I
•.,I.l.C.,.!-,L... . ' ~ '
<:: o ,.. 1"'"'' J.
.e".:.L';t..<.tL;,.
J'" .•. e
~ Isocial groups. (1967)------------~-_--------- ~_
(Police Chief)

0.0237
 MORl DocID: 1451843

":.': :... ;

.... " ~•...• : •• _. I

. "
. ~ ",

.'
:~:. '" .
':' .. ..: :~., "

DOMESTIC. TESTS FOR

. ',. -,
',': .:.

AGENCY RES~ARCH AND'DEVELOP~ffiNT EFFORTS:

1. ,As a normal part 'of ORD f S efforts in the

research and development of equipment and techniques'
.Eo r Agency" app Id ca.t i ons .Ln foreign intel1igence~ we
:''f~,
conduct experiments 'and tests in the United States .. '~:" . :.~.

-: Clearly, the design and development of our intelli-

gence equiprnents can .be done more economically and
more securely in this country. Although most of
". the tests of our R&D equipments are performed in
.closed laboratories or, in secure areas simulating
the foreign environment, some. of the te s t s and expe r L-
merrt s, 'of' necessi t y , "reveal dome st i c information.
. .

2. A revlel,,"of··.t:he' surve I t Lance equipment or

-t e chn i.qu es which have at some' time or other been
exposed t.O domestic ~.tes~ing is as f'o l Lows : . • ',1.- ••

,:,'
,'"

.', :.'

a. Laser Probe ~ About 1967, ~he laser

probe' developeCft.)}r~-ORD was tested by TSD in
San Francisco under "very c l o s e-Ly controlled . :', .'
conditions. '. The: .OR}), Proj eC,tOfficer lvi t ne s s ed
portions'" of the "t e s t." 'Recordings that we r e
made of La se r probe ;·ou·tput were -c a'r e fu Tl y
controlled' as c Lass Lffed material and. it is
believed. ·that the.:.tapes. have long since been
des-trayed ~';.:.' ..

- About
"r-----'-~---'---=------'---'------J

e-
III tercepts we r e " ..\ .. r: .;:.
,~""-""""""""",,,....,----l des t r oye d ·s8\'-.eral
y car s ago ,

" I'.
.t').. -l'.'l·'j\_ \('1'-"'\
. r~-·.':"'I'·?
~~ .• ! ... .-
"i...l. . . . . . <, ~.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

··..· · · · · ,:<.!~\;:;:~:~~~:,?:;.:: . '. -;: '..~..:.':' '. ,

I
. .

'.'
~, "",."t, :.
-
.:"
."
:; .....
. -': ;'" -,:
.. , . , '..:
..... '.:.r'
'.:"
.: .: ,'. v • •
...::.

~) C:'::" t'; 5 i .i.C. ~.:.':..;: t 5 ' f t) 'f' ."<; '..'! 1_ Y

Jti\~i~l;. :F::·· _·".i i: ;":f.F U .t"t s
9

. "'::"; . . .
\'".

". ":' -,:

C. . ';-',~
.. 1 L' <,;;
J_.: ...:: .; ,0, ll.
r-, i"\ 1· •-. ~.... "'), . ¥ . ~~
J. .L)(.I •. ~

.'
t_ese are patterne
f o r "-lli S ..1.·,.''''1
... L.~. _.\,.._~O]l , ". .
t lie op e r a tion of
United Statcs is

Message content 1.S -;. .:' '.

L.-...,-"--n-o~1.~n-.t-;-.-e-r~e-s--'t;-.-a-n--,---
...........,.----lnot be r ec orded ; . .Ove r> : ..
seas testin~ is planned at a subsequ~nt date.~: .
To dat·e~·:·;,soVle domesti.c tcsting of this concept; ','
h.as .bcerrvcar-r i ed 'out at the' contractor' s ·plant~::'-.
No recordings have been made of such data.·->Ex'-··.
t r eme Ly.. .b r Le f tests .exercising U. S. and foreign
t e Lephone is y s t.ems I
....n"""'?-"""t~l.a....
~ ave. b een ""c""a""'r""r""1.·.""e""'d""··. ,. ,o·"'u"t."..---~t""'O"""""'\i""'" e"""'r.....l""'f"yrr -1. . I.---~-­
o=n,....,c"""e"'p=·t=.=s ~ .i:...The dura t i on of 't.es t i.ng was less . ·' .
'-=c...
;than -one- 1+a.lf hour. . . .
'.' :'" .' .
..,~.".<i.~' :~~Dther Sensor res ting Examples of"\':.S'~: ..: '.
engirieering',development test's of special' s erisocs.'.
't..ri th'I1i. th~· ..Uni ted states 'include and ...· ..

n a ese cases, ~ e
testing has been used for engi.ne er i.ng deve Icp-
merrt .andthe content .has been restricted t.o : ."
dissemination to those in Government involve.d
wi t h rt.he '~mgineering d e sLgn , :i ...

~ .. '

.. ':.: .

"
/ "
00·239
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

". '.,'"

"':,~'~.:, ., ::._-~ .
", '

, '

, .. ";.-

" ',,' £. .Pe r s ona Ld ty Structure of Defectors

Study - :-per-
(m:D-W1(reT{o-oY-:;c-o-"dcTci-nlIll~-fhe
sonari~y structure of defectors dur~ug the'
period 1966- 69.' The -wo r k primarily involved
an analysis of the open literatpreou', known .
. defectors. An ancillary effort'was concerned
w:ith' a, 'study of the phenomenon of .def'ec t Lorr
its~lf~"i.e., leaving one religion,fo~ another,
or changi~g one set of political belief~'for
anot.her,' The 'Kork ",'as conducted' at Stanford
Un i.ver s'Lt.y , I I
, :~/ J

, '

"h~"'" Communications Link Loadin

n eT care u y contra e con 1t1ons~ some U. s.

microwave communications were recdrded and passed
through the intercept system under, test to 'prove
, .quality of performance. All intercept:material
, connected wi t h this was destroyed wit,hin a few weeks
of'the,ti~e of intercept and the material was never
'~hecked for ~ubstantive content. \

I--,----_--=------:--~-:--
'~.
:; 00240,

. ~ -~_ .. _.._.- -" - '. .

,
 --------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

/ . . J~:
,.. t. : ;:": . . .
,'l ••

. . ' .....
.-~:..::.:...;' :.~,\'.,; /':, ::' " .

,
.C I.·:~·.:) .:: y j) i L-t';C t o r {en" Sc i.cn ce
Technology
,
SUBJECT Survey of ORD for Non-foreign
Intelligence ~ctivities

. , ,

At 11 a.m. todaY,eich division and staff chief

or his representative was ins.tructed ·to que ry all, of

his people, and report back by this, ~f.ternooll Khetller

orn.o.t· t.hey had provided any services or de aLt; wi th

.any', o.ther .ageric i e s on domes tic, non-Tor e i.gn matters.

The..a.t.r ached 'list is an inventory o( ..ai r items we

were', able "t o uncover. If addi tional 'information on
a:~y:·''of' :th~~e t.op fcs is desired, we,"c·aD. ,.proYide either

a .verbal'-or a written report on very ·short.notice.

SClentlI1C AUVISOI
'.',·to.
Director of Resea'rch '& Development
Attachment:
ks: s t a't'ed

00241.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, ,

I ..
"
:,' ~ .. : •... " ' . .'~. ,

. ... ~;.: .. ..'

:.,,'
.'.:.'

"I·
~;
'C) ••
rJ.vJ' " ';-
.. 1..,-",
. .'
.l.'lOllLt,., • i
D
....
"j ~,.: •... ; •... "!
.. ,
"'1
- .
-,

. . I.~\._. ~ i
r: " 'i ..,'.-r
"'1" oJ')·:Jl,::,
' ... s:
. ~ (.",
be

1"~' v~ g.','
A p r c-pc s cd {JFH. ·.":;'·eat e s t imat o r1. _ c.am 1) ]' c_J'1
\0.oJ,.,.
pnlitical1y sEnsitive.

~arcotjcs--our fo~cjgn activities ar~ Kell kno~n

~ .... in Dl;lS&T.

A negativ~ report from the Support Staff.

ORD's I
wor k I l~as r?P?rted to the-.,·FAA abou~ .
t.hre e years ago. No ac t a.on was t aken,: to ~ur know'Ledg e ,

~ Performed intelligibility enhanc emerrt

----".,o-,f-·-a,-u-d..,..l~·-:-o--:.-.t-::a-:-:p-::e-::s for BNDD. Source of. tapes unknown;

'\ .' 1- At .t h e r~q~est of FBI, we described

.imagery bhhancement Techniques 'germane to: removing,
distortions from some photography,theyhad'on an
alleged b~nk robber. Request for spe~ific support
in processing the imagery was turned
. .
down •

L. I,
I

I
I
I

.,' "
.-'
 ----------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

j. :.;...:<.,
. .
-'
, . :. :'. :, .
~.,
-.". .., " ...?:: .":.
.~.
.' .
" ; ...' .' ": ~.:.; ~~.::.
, . : ','. ~ ',', "
.
. ,,:-

."':
..
I
'.

.. .. ..
' .' :.~ "
1,"
.: ',:-' -. .
" "; ......•....:

. 'I ~~:~y. 19/3

,:,. '.'

;'lY total contact with o th e r ag enc i e s 5.n ~C'~Tr.JS o f va s s Ls t a nc e

'- h.
.'".r~ .i•.;. '"-~. (.y..••, ,':> 5 t; _i. C"·
t .. "J... ..."-,'
\. "
»:
.L.~l- -1 0 n <:"
~ 1) q '" . 1,
J_~,.; U."e e "1 _ . ;
./-._.;1. . _. h .",
.'.,,_:, -c i
_. __ ~., 1 d r»
v f 'n -
t._U di
_ 0 ". i I r -
.

veil1anc~ countermeasures, anti-hij~cking,' or drugs. Speci-

.fically, I participated Ln TSCC and R&D Sub CQi':i;:J it t e e me e t ings

which included technology exchanges and some equipment ex~

changes. on a temporary bas~s ostensibly ior testing or trial'.

:1' also- a'ssi.sted in x-raying t he vo ff i ce Halls of the Chairman

~f . the AE.C '.(then I'll'. Schlesinge.r). at ..t he. request of Mr. Richard
.. ,'.

Cowan of AEC security. The op e r a t i on occurred one evening

. (date unkno:m). and 'HaS an attemp.t to resolve. some anoraa.Li e s

created byvt he 'use of th~·1 I.

Other.persons·contacted over·the·years have· been:
:. ' .
.. Hr. Robert Burnett, Secret' Service

Mr~:Martin Pera, U. S. Customs·

Mr. Ma-rvin Beasley, DASA

Mr. Thomas Allen, FBI
. Major Jack Nelson, OSI!US~F
Major John Langager, ONI/USN

Mr. 'Richard Cowan, AEC

" ......
00243
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. -:'.
·····<.',;J;>;"I~?\;::·>~';·\·~:··
~
'.~'

;,.:. -.:
'.:.:.\
,'.';
:
.....
. . ~. :., . '. : -"." : ..
.. ' :. r , :' . .'
....:.:< ,:
"',,-'.::~.<., ....
5/7/13

..... '.

,': .'
: ... -: ..
. .
c:;·~(:jl':'='~1ge of .inf(~'t~r:-i':it:i.ol1 .'> •

State Navy II
ld.r Po:cce us Secret· Service
i
i

Army NSA
.'.
DIA
:. ",

FBI

2. Joint 'funding o'f'two ·contracts ''lith State Depart-

. .
rnent (TR~·l/LLL). Two elec.tret microphones were furnished"

to. State Depa.rtment for .test pu.cpos e s ,.' Joint funding of '.
'. one contract with NSA' (Sandia). Participation in ~NA/DQD'
", _. ~ . _..:. ..~_.: .",.-:=<: . ',C'_ :.~~~- - _'" , • '
. "~~~
.~~''''!

contract .(Bureau of StanFtards)·.

. . -3. Other DOD and Governnlent contacts for information

collection or exchange .on'Ly.•
..
ARPA

LEAA/Dept. of Justi~e

DNA/DOD

O£fic~ Tetecommunications Policy

Office of Army/Provost Marshal General

Army/Military,police ·Agency, Ft. Gordon

Air For~e/Of£ice.of·the Ins.pec.tor General

Air Force/Electronic Systems Division

 ----------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

J " .. " '. ':. ~.

","

":"': .
:'
..•.- .'.
,"

.:~:·!cl -i·"r.r::c~~~:; .i"J"!.

.'.

'- -.

o(lZ45
.:' :t.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

...J•••• •:
.......:;.J.~.)~(. ." .
.. ',"
. :.. :: -, ~.;:

, ,

:~.~)- c ~}~;L J1g o

o f ·;:-f' C~: n.:L f~ 8.1 :~': ~ .~~):. .:.1 at i o.i ~r C}.. ~1 t: l'.::1.g *t f) clctcC-· .
ti611 of J:2.dio nuc l i drs ;"1 ';,l,,-, 1"7n·'i ... n·~·' ·.nt "
., ~.' ~ .'. - v •• -',--'_'_'t:_._. _

'f, .,J)Jl-J. C <11 d f~,; Cl :',;S i c:n s ~.;: '\ :;i, U, j1 g t () :.lS ~':lg ] R s c:'~TlI1j,ng'
equ 5.1);:: CJ'i t to (.Ie tee t . ",:. ':l~ ,; ':::,; :'-0;,)7': d- fi .c.c s in a s an i t<:iry
land fill. I
~-

ENDD

Exchan~e,'6f techri{cal information relatirig'to

developmen't of I

I :'~ -. .

USDA & BNDD

CIA has l:equested the establishment of a'tw'o-acre
plot of:6p~um,poppies at a DStiA research site in
Washingto.~ state, to be used' for, tests of pnoto-
r e cognd t Lon of opium poppies •

. f~. :',;:-

US COAST GUARD " :;,. ::

I ,

- About s'i~ ,:,'years ag o , CIA infrared equipment was made

available~for USCG tests to evaluate IR as a means
for night search of life boats.

- ALCOHOL &TOBACCO TAx DIV/IRS

- About 'five: years ago ass i s t ance was r-eque s t ed in

domestic search of "moonshine" stills using CIA
infrared scanners. This ",as turned, dmm'. ' ,

I
S~T T '
JLVli~ I. O(j"?46
------,..,----
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

Ii ' / ....." :<'

, i . ; .
-v -f' •

~
'" .... : ......: "
'·'.t..
- " .-
:-: ';,' <~; ~;, r::;':f-J:U:".•__ Y"0".:'liE i)'i.'._ •_•
.'. .
'-'."
.
'.,:

.. ..' . ':.
. ': ."

. '. .. _.. . - *- . . ·.0· :": ~ _~..

.; T··{ hn~l:aJ.· (.HS;·:::·:·::7·:,:S -..-::,'1.-..;.:;.:-.; 1.0 -.~.~t;.:\::-·;.'·! .: 11~(.j.::

:.;.i:.;lltt:;.:e :.;:L:I·.;:.;:t .;!l~:,,·,.;:;J.:.:~; ::-"'1;1' 1:";,; U.S.'· ":::':-:"'0
~) (j.l ,1\'..: 1~ •

co
,;,omc f
0- - e
'l_"}) ./\_.;.~C
- T·, t.. ... ...... , .. •
....:-I.,,)).:.l.f.CI1CS I~..:) .• [;.
c:·~ -, "'.'.~ ~ .. :.. " . ii\.lvl~r
'';<~''",u.l1,.1l l e , _...

L~boratory, sre supported by CIA to Jevclop radio

1

nuc Lf d o Llg ~o:.:d detection 1:':cjmi(i.~'ti-s nrid

S.::1D,p]
(}.;\rices. T11E:Se L;;:00T<·1 1: c: :d . c s h:::ve us e d s;3:::p}i:i1g
t(;chni.q.i.lcs dc"\-cloped for CTA '::0 :ill:~,;suxe COXUS
nuclear plant releases~

----'--__I..

:.'

:-::.: .
.'.:. -:. .''.:.: :
•' " h

.::. '~.: -.

2
00247

.....
\
 ---------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

/ .: ~. ( .
"_.

, ...... '
.. ~ .. ~ . ,'. ", ';"'~
. -, .: v.'
", ,,' . . . '.
.. , : . ~. ,"

. .....

1. :SliDD(C::e.:cJ.,"S Cc;;;~d.!1) :'::':.:3 iL-,.'11 ;-"-:2::,dssi.en to l".;c..:eive

p r olx) s al s
developed from Aerospace, Inc., concerning a Radar P~op1e Detector
DjOPJ). _. for ORD. TiI;:Je: Fall of' 1972. Action vas app:wved by

J
. .". .
. 3. Dei...~loped Adhesive Restraint, Non.,..lethal II:1capaci tation System.
Reports and inf'or.mation was made available to Department of' Justice, LEP~
in August 1972. If·they de-..:eloped the system, it would be use<;l f'or' .
civilian crowd and riot control.

'.,

-,
 ------:-:-::::-- MORI DoclD: 1-451-843

,.",

......
.
~

/ :': : .
.'~ "
'.', .

.-:.- .. ,

"

",:,. _. .... ".. ..

.-:,' ~

~....-...
••• ~
'1
..':.0 :t:J 7]. I ::::-- ~ :::~·;2..:-:-1~:~:·; f;!.:-.;~.f..;::..'5" ..::~~ ~_:~..-.2; :::~~~: ..:
!:;...:t:;~;;.:::Gn::: r;;':.~_~:J :"':i."~-.~_,~:t;::·~·~ "::';~!_l==:d .~~:) ::"'::~~:.":::--~.;?it. :..:t~~
::.- .:~ ...: .:..,:} t::. ~".:':~.; J:';,:: ~~;t·:-:;,/ :~.:"" ~/, .:'~. .: :j .~.: ';J ~.:"~·:::;?:··::;-i _~ "'::::;.:l in. t:?> 1.!.i ,.::5.. ::J;'L].i t7 .:;:-c
.:-::.;.";-;' "';;~::::~;i ~.:i·-;:::1::» •
.:::i:"£)loy:::c ::.-:::'- 7:.>;~~ ::-·].:.J.u::::.y ~ .. n t ..:J~ 7-::c~:':li':::3;1 5-£:;:uri·t.y Ci"t;::t,::3i.an ':ind
;1a4 l:.(~~:i..::r::..~ ,:1:';ia::e ~.f ~~e :3;.1eat:~h prccf'::..;si~~q' =.a-?t?~L.il:t·ty 5. .:2." ~~-:~~~~
SJ.. :.q ~.:~-.') .: )r;; tC.tr}.l" t:.!:l):o·u~~ ~1..t:.::;, :t:·;4.:;ncy ::~{~:\;;~.. I :;t~S"";£;:;";~~f~ ·t~;.s::' .~1;~
j)~±~lg 1:::'0 t.~:':':;:~:"3 ~:o ~.::~~.~ l";;}::;f:;;:-,:~{;:.Jry ·:;0 /;~:;,i:;::;:3i:1".o·t:1C £{o;'Z:~;i'::'i:i.i~:j
()i! ';~:l;1a~~~\.::i.~!~?- t:..:-:..\;~ :::;i_~!JjZ::1.G-t c.;c~:-~~.;~.::r..s4;5.-::;_~~:.t"",

!
! 2... en. 2 Iro"!;o~::ber l~ 71". l·~t=
G;~5~in.:" .;icpear2.u fJt t!le 8:'.J;1 9'.
- 'I ~ . :_~ • .: ,..... ..: _
• .,t." ~.' ~ 't..~'S... ...... . . : ... .a J~ of -:.. ......,,_
. t-n.. . ~. ·~. .c.pe crJ"'~
!.~:,jc:::.,~:,.\-o;:-;l ~';2.
-¥"
~_::l·..:...".,:...l~Y ~ .1Ut.~;;-:.-'t'::';"': o~ '-c.... ~ t"~.:-.;:-:..a ~·.. t;__ :.~
- .......... _ _ • •k

I
f .z:.~~orc:3d th.rongh l~·6al '·Jir.;::tar?i:;g ~ . ;r~~ ~:~?e ~;;:"tS 'CO l:? :":5-G-tl
i'n ~l"!.:s Ej:::"O~~cut'~c·n e,f ,:=:~:e..()~: ~.i-:.~ ··J·n::;--!.~:...;-'J~ s:::-eu:,:;!:;,1.:"'~ on ox: 2.~10U·C
./ .:. :~Gv:;:::.!.:(~r 1971~ j~. C:::':'--:;C7.:'f .~.n;~l:t~~s"'·L':~:.:c,='-::'.30d t:~at ~03t of
i
I L1.-e t:Ci'\~~.9r3atic!ls G::::~..11·t: bG' .r:r~:aG~ ~o;:.e ·~:~;ltc:-lli§i;:'le t~~::;u-:;h t~a
II ~p-rc~s3i;'lg' ~:r;tai.lzibl;3 in t:="2 l~~Qrato-::-.! ~ .l:l ~i8Vl cf t'j,e -ci~.;:
I
! ..:~it:icai ~3.tur= of ·t.~e :c;;q.t:.~stl ;J'::::GC~~.s5.l.'ng -;,·rag· ~.:::sg~~ j_~:=::;:31:.;~:~::
I
: ··Eo~~"\7'ers: .1:~r~· C~'1Sk.iz~3 ~;.q3 i.r-~fc;~-:"~::(l. ~::1;:.t fIlt.:.:..::a IJ:=OC$~35,i~-.,:-; :t1il~r-J.t
!, :l::~'ud cO JJ~ ;"tZ£T:.C1."2C. I'~_Oj:--J i,.Jr!~c.lly! .1."1" ~. z .: -:.,.;it:h E~?r.Q"t;a'l f~om
l~'i.]e:!..:-;
;:;i·=:;:.e-,r ~:':.it.:1in t.~e J=.ge:nc:1_ Xf .s5_:.:;il.u.r '!:'~qt:a':;i::; ~.,oul'::: be
j otccri~q
~
en a
c.c~l~ t')e -t=ai..~a·~1 in ~~ :lse
fr~G~e~t uasis I 3u~a~st~d ·t~at AJ~
_

os:
t~~PD ~A~c~~~l
......

"£11a
~. "~-7
-' _ , •

:i?rQcssr;~n9' .s~lstej;1 ..
- ;;;- -

00·249
I"
,,'

. -.. -" .. ,-
'-

• -
 ------------------,. MORl DoclD: 1451843

!
!
: :'.
. ."':
.
.-.' . . ". :,' ··t
."
.' .

.: '~
. ...
.' . ", ','

S ~JJ3Jj~:':CT: P r o c .;:~:;::;,!r:g of ..:\ u d i 0 T ;.{?;~ for DllZ-,::?U. "~f N a r c o t . i c s

J::\:~:·:b.::ro~'. 3 }..J:"*·'.1.Z ~)!~/i~li)n

.'.

On 13 i\pril 1972 .r.h.' CharlesGa~kins of the Bureau of

1.
1·~2t:rcoti(:;3 arid D~·:.·l~~g~.l. . O\.lS D r ug s l04~q1,.:'C ste d SJ:._ \'t..,,! I:":. n / C'.:{D 2 s s i s ta nc e
to, imp::o-~c tl~e inte!ligib!.lit y'" of a n Zltldio tape t!~'at had been ac qu i r e d

by BI"IDD 2gC:n~:J ..

.:.

00250
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

/ . ',
:: t.'.• :/
<,;: ";':" .....
...........

.'
"
- ';" .
'." .

,'--'"
f ,. cf

. ...

.~. '.,:. ~
,"I
v '

0025:1','
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. .. ....,

l
~.
'"
.; ..... ' ',
.•. .:< :->'.; : ( .,.,:: •...:
-,.. :-. -."
" ",
.....
",

. '.'
.........---...:...:
I
!

" - .: ..

f'" '-
~ :":£J

l~_S!::.~ ~:r;'i:;~~.~G t.o ~~:::f.".'~l.l. of :\i... ~·(:c-t;~c~:

1-. . : =i. 0 #1."";: i"' e ::. ;:.~: c Z"C1.7.::[, E:
t

):e:-~e;:r.~l Sci.:~nti.fic Ccz p,

'(rsc)
1.
~:F.~q'U~:st:eG. the
)··~.rc R_
.
cc:ope::a1:.:to:,l· of S..l J.( :~.:r.: t.:·tf;"~ ·p71.)r.J;;:";:::::_~·:f.; c::: :::. :-::·.:-.~t.-:;r
~ .
~i,~~o t..s.pe lie r:cG. rS:::Ct..:.i"'ifed fro;!! tIH?_ Bal-t::t.1'::,:;:C;
l~fr. .John 'Bulla.rd, RegiQn.c.l Di-;e:c tor, h6.G. CO;.~t:ac: t.ed 1-:::-. hcisG to .eid
El\DD i.n the i:Zl:.encenent of the, -conve r.se t Lons on thr:; .tepa ::-e.co!:"cing "hich
"rere t"-",_sked b:r backgz-cund ' music. The r€s~lt s of thep::-oces6ing ,,"':l.1.1"he":
used in e. g:=8t'.d jury inv~stisa.tion a n 4 2,:"!s"sihle follo,>\'-on -trial. }fr". ';.'
:-.. 1.. d· . • .. ~. ..". t. ' . , ... 1-' .c ,,(. 1
Jjtll.:.i.~:;:· c.~c. not J...n:J2cate ~·~OYi '·ne !12:U veco~c aWG,!:e c~ :·..r .. t·.e~ss s expez--
T'1" •

tise in t'i:i.5 ar ea ,

"",

rs C) Fi , II f Po" (i 7..\ : •
00252
.........
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

~: .:
..... .:.:"
.;"
:
', .....( t":', .. ; ''3

.. ::::::-, :>'..;~l: :":t: (~.~~ !;.:.:.~£~)_ .

.. ~ " .
• • : "•• <

...:
L -_ _--JJOKD! DDI ss'r
:~~
., .J:

'.:-

...
•:c .

".
'0025.3.'
$7=r-.. •• __ ......

-
.j ~·
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ...•.,
/::j:.:-..:. '.'

.'.'"
• f
:'.,
."',

.;:...'. .'
~':. . :
if:····· . .
. ",;,
:.,
.' ~

f
: C'.~.~ ji' I'
.'.;

,"::.

(OP-~J""(~T
',)'.'),"'), .i':.. J :
. oJ'_e_(:("I)rl
1 t'DIS
. . .... '-,' ··'1·"rr "~.d)
J:.:O . .:;!J.,;~; CO:.iC'_:.t"d_:,..[;, , r O·~ ... ·
.'l";"-1..

a c ti.v it.ie s \\·11 ~CJl (·c''llld.l)U.t 1':1e J.~gl~rlCY· in.to an

erriba r r a s sing s i tuat iorr,

1•. There 'are no rrri s s ion s wh i ch we have flown. during the last four
years with.which.I:Can associate the result di r ectlyto any activity' .' .
po terrti al ly ernba-rr a s s Ing to the Agency. There were a number. of rrri s s ions
flown that indirectly:hav~ the potential for this. ernba.r r a s srn ent,' .' Bear. in
mind th at, once we tu r-n the fiII11 over to NPIC or any o thc r- agency, we'
have no ·con:tr~l ov:er.subsequent distribution. .
'. . ...:', '~':~ ~ :.'.

2. The .rr:d.~~{o:~.s listed on the 'attaclnnent are in three ~ategories:.

. . .;' ... :~: .;.
~~'-"¢~'t:egory A: These Cire rrii s s i on s flown in the U.S~.
that' aF.e ve:ry -sirnf.l a r to the pot en ti a.Ltlaat you discussed with me
u smg the example of the Santa Ba r ba r a oil disaster.
,.. . . ...... - -: . ~

. ,';,.b<.::::<:;:~.t~~<:lr;·. B/ The
. popPY 'gr~~;}'i-s.a-separate c"a
I
~detection illicit .
. .t""c"-;·g=o"'r=y=-b=-e=c=a"'='u""s=e~of the h~gh sensitivity
of'
of Q.lis supJect.: ."

. ',,~" • ::./ '0:-:,.:. - ',

c. 'Cc:t~g6ry C;

cnowl edge not mg sensitive was pre ce

this :activitycould be labeled illegal.
.. :'.- .'"
. .... "': .
3. Lhave-spectfical ly looked to see where our U'~2'·s.were
operating du.r,ing the Watergate break-in discovery.. Democratic National

, ;pgp Sli:cp ET
:'i'
 -------------------- , .., .
.
' , . :. ~ ....' t. ~ '.. •
MORl DoclD: 1451843

..
~'
t' '"' ..... ~ •• :>' . ',"':.
"

(~OJ1\. C.lt·r(:;n 3.?;(1 Rer' ~1)Jj';,"n l\.r;:.t!I·IU~J. C...···.1\ r:· ~i~J~,n .. 1"'s.!1 th.c·al)t)\.·t~ ~:",·,.:nts
oc cu r r cd i'n the l:-:i:l.::t: ;:ll"~r1 o n r ::.j.l·f.~r:·:.ft f.~·! ~"']cj'r :'}!i~;slon's di.. trJ:~g :J!i:j t im e
~.fJ;l'5.t"(.1 \'::-i$~.u the ";:1·\·~~.~{,.lorn l:-:",.. j·t I,ll fhe I} .. S.

Brif,::.-:1iel- G'eneJ:al, USAF

Director of Special .l\ctivities

. At ta chrn.ent - 1
As n ot ed above

',' ,.;', .
.
"
..

TOP 6EOftEY
I~I
....

00255
 l:'~'
TOP ~~CRB:f

·.r ~
"

"

, , '7'ASK POS'SIB'LE' IMPLICA;'i':~ON"'

e
"." ;.

.-- CATEGORY A

Santa Barbara Oil Dept. or'Interior.; Fe'1;>' 1969. Potential for pr-ovi.ding ba.si s iOl'
Disaster criminal law surts , Pj.;e~ suse 01.
oil company to change ope r a.. t i or..

HILLTOP (. : \..' ) ORD/NASA Eal~th Resources , Po s s ible 1.1:';(; £01' i;.-.d-.:.. ::;t:;:ic=.. L
,.
Programs.', Spring/Fall 1969 explo itauion. Crop' P:::OL~..~ct,~or.
control & e s tirn... a.t e s i"'""·~\.t:~...c 'rr··Id.:i.·,itCl:. j' :;

Snow Survey (Ii ;, '.'i Environmental Science Services
Admfni.s tr-at.ion (ESSA), Dep~.
of Commerce th ru COMlREX.
Spring 1969.
I
Induet.riaf ex:?::'oita"i:ion,. 'WC:L"~Cl'
r e s cur-c e a.Il.ocatio n,

Hurricane, Bas e bince b"! Econom:ic'Pre,pC\.red- PQli~icalleve;L'age'£01' di.sa stea-

Line ness. Spring 1970. .' a r oa funds '.
8;;
Earthqtlake Darnag e 'Self generated, NPIC processed. Political Lcvc.cag o, '(::'l·il~!~li:"i~il ..-:' o:;d
r.!.' 'J Ii '-', '._ l ~
•
Feb 1'971. neglig.ence suits. ~~<.: C-:'l~.S;;:..·l~ctiv. . . .. -;.~ H
: :
cxpl.oi.tafion, tj
o
....... o
, Mi~neapo1is - OSI/.A:EC Division. Jan - Mar En.viJ:o'nmcntal apllli.ci.I,t.i,.)i::.s, H
tj
o ;', .Kansas 'Gity 1972. uzban planning; e xpl.o it., l,~0i'1.
o I--'
~
N In

~ .... I--'
ill
~
TOP SlrCRiiT
I' . [iii:
W
 '~~
yOP snORE'%'
',,' ~
".
~

\',
, ';' ..~.
.; . ," .~

TASK "
BY WHOM/WHEN
. . POSSIBi..E Ii:VIPL:::Cl\.TIO:'\

CATEGORY A (9 0 n t i nu e d )

"RIVER
'>
BOAT(~\~""""jll"
~
1 '.. t
~q,
NRO -.·IeRs. April 1973.
.
i
Political leverage. Lclu<';l;l"i<.;.l
exploitation, civil d:a-r..- iCi;;O suits.
West Virginia Dam
NRO - Army Corps of
Site Coverage Pot~l1tial fo:: :;:cal·c::,J;.:;.ti::
Engineers. Jan/reb 1973.
exploitation., wat c r cent:..'ol.·.
r;
CATEGORY B 'j -.

I (Puerto. Rico) , Multi

I BNDD, DDI/CIA, NPIC, ORb.
erA extension of clOi)'~ t.i·::,...~·t~cldnb
Dept. 9~ ;Agriculture. Fall 1972.
Spectral Sensor fl'om SEA to CON1:,s. 3d;t<::::t'
'techniques to avord clot.:::ction or
growth.
CATEGORY.C

. LONG SHAFT
NSA/ CIA COMINI' collection.

I I o
~
::u
H
I
tJ
'. ~ o
:.
o
H
tJ
c
o f-l
N fl:>.
In
CJl
.-J '];'0'2 S];CHTi'=C r::····:>.
'. . .~. ;'.
f-l
co
fl:>.
W
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

:" ..
.' -.
:. .:'., . .; .
'.:
...... ..
· ,'. ":' ~~ ..:..., .>-- ... " . :. .

-, ~: .

(-C~jltr~.c.:t,;·-;d. :311 i n ,)ffic'c' . wi t h e.:\1:Cllt.l:)11 "i-E r:',Ul" (!~1 "fDY--

1- e So U 1 t s ~: t? S d t 'i_"",' C

L-_~--I- contacted all but t wo who were on leave-·-n,:;gative.

Parangosky negative on those he could contact. FolloKing ar~

people he could not reach:

said FMSAC:has negative resul~s.

00258
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

• '110 . :, . : '.:':

_.
..
. . .'
~
~~
,.'
..• . .
'''':, -: '. '.' i:'. .: ,"Ot C 13 0535' '. . ,:··r~ '/i
:"~' :'<. •~ • •' " :'. .: .1. - .... '. "" :•••• :'';' .:. :' .::~:{~\'~ ~'iL~r
.. ... .;.••• '"<"
. .. ,
'

~ :.- ..' :

.' ......
. ::.;
.':' :.. .' \. ,
... :., : ". " . .. '.' .
• •,. • • -'to _' • •:.... • .' ~ ' . . • • ~ ••., ::' ;

.: .. '~.'
.,......... .
.::.: ..' .'. ".::'.:'" '.,

. . :i.;::::,~~:~UM "
FOR:-. :::::~?;~:~;:~:~:l~~r::::1:beL:,:./,g~~1".}.'.'
. i·io'l;~sC Arme:d .Se.i.v.l'ces .Con>.mittee,. Conce-:rning' . ~?;:./.<;:;.
.. ., ·'-:.:'·:e·;· .... .... ",1
.~. '. .

... .,.. ,....,.... :.:.. ----,..,-------....,...,..,~=--=~

·••• c • .,.'::•
. .., ': ':.. . '.'-;.,

.>, ; :., :;. -;

~.' -"

. ··f~i. ;t\~;;.·t.)-~olut~ry no res·po·~T~'~. t-o··i-Iebe·J.... t',~ l ..~~·t..:··r·~is ~l')i:acted . ...,' t: :-.-.::::~';... -~.~~~"~. .
." - ,.• ~, ~ . - . ...~. . ' C'- ~ ..,.- ':j(f;!:~~~"

.. ,. . ;::~';'

. . .... .;.' .
·.i\.i:t:: .... . :'," .

. ..: .... ..
: " .

'".' '.':

':.' -, . .' . ' . .

".;' : r: :

.".:' .: NOTE:" . Thi~ '~mo 'dt~ ~.' June' ;3:tn)Lc'::73-0635).(pgs:;;.~·~9·

thru .265) was"" .
...._ sent. to the IG for hi 5 i nforma ttgn ",and was 'not ·.~onsid~re<I: a part of the.'
. DDSg.r components," slibmissions··:to')'[,the :lGin response to the. Director's'"
requ~st on "Questi.onable Activi·:e,'e~',r:and, therefore,' it is beli.eved .
\. /
.. tha-t""these. documents should
,,":
not
.... . lle'::included in .
the Halperin
... "
request•., '."

: 0··. . ..'-..

.:"'
;,- ": .... ;:·OOZS5i:.·
\
; ". ''''-..''
.. -....... ~.-. "~ ._ ....... .-.....-:.- \.,......-
'_., .
...... ....~_ --..... - -
 MORI'DocID: 1451843

.. .
~ ,,'

'.. "OLe- 13-0935·.. · ..

..... '., .
,':
~.,.
.
'" . .....

'.' :. ".
..~ .'}: . :,'
.......
~.:.:' .
. .'. :~ '", .
. ~.:. ';.' . " ." e .• .... , .. ; .:'

. -, . :." ":" .

. . ....
·.l\..~t:: ,,' . .." . . ;.>

.' ....

'.,:

~ " .'."
;.'

.'''. ,: NOTE:" .memo June Thi~ 'thru .265) 'dt~ ~

. ;3·_:(O·i.C'::73~~635f·(pgs:~~59 ~as:.·
:...._gnt to ..the IG for his informatiQn:.,and was not.canstdeeed a part of the.'
. DDS&T components' sObmissions·-:'l:o:~th:e -IG in response .to the Director·s ...
requ~st on IIQuestionable Acti"itj't!s·...· and, therefore, it is beli.eved. .
. thp-trthese documents should n~~ J:)e<iric;:ludedin tQe Ralperin request•
. '~',. . ::::. . .
... •..
- "

' "

.::.. ..
..: '~ .. '

.. .. '..
\

•••
. •••• .
_ • • ' 'N, ............. -.....:_ •• lJ>....._•••_ ... __ • • • • _. __ •• _ _,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

........ ~" ;i..:t".'1:...,••~".,_>(~. . .".' ~. ;", ·1'7r:.DlIVARb H ....a... R •• CHA!~.dAN " .••.. ":._ •. ,.: • ;.TN"l!J<7lot~S-""""1:'"N:lc.:' :.: .

'.. :. ': ..: ';: ... ~..:~::. ~:' :'.: .. ,

•• ".4
." . .'!

-':': ;..:
~ -::.; :.:...:.:...... :~. ..
':~;.. . :. :.. /:[.?.~,·~!~\, ~:,.:·.;~.:i : , - ~-~.: ......,:.:,~, .-;~
-
;,··. /.'
,..
..:.'
..
...~-. .:
", ','
'.'...~:-,~~~:.~.:. ," . -7 :-..' :/

. ~ .-- ':~""",~, .•~.- '~-..

"":-;-;i:;'':'i<:;~~tlt:~1;~i~E~ft{€'~~~{~i~~~,
;'.. Cen.l.ral.··TntOUJ.genr-.,. Ar.onMr :.' < ..•••, -c. " , <'<"''''.,.

. "i';'; f:<T-~~~
~
;"·;;';"'~~::i,;.i.G~;~ ..tib''''~'
,.,~."
';l>.at:e"e:..-';,e&;;. ~~:f;!:\,,";,*;,; .'i
::.':....-'.::-;. .-:. :, ..
t:, -.

-:~ ...... ~-" ,.'

r, ',_:' .':.~ .:.

•.:......:•••• ':••t.-.

• >:

':: . 't . . "

• -t -
-:'-- -.:..
..•. .:'.,.:.: .. .:.. ::". :';:';";::::.'
• ••~ •• 1

".:.:;~'. . -
",
"- . --'-

-.. ..'~ ..~.: ~.: . :' :·~':..l..·.~:

. ~' ...':::" ":.: . ·..F.Eif:'t·:hb·· ..

. .,
.t . ; \~ .. f:' •
. ..':_' ..~ .",
.....
.;

.....
al • .,.'
'. "•• : ·,"r ..

:.: : ...,.... - ..
....
-r. :. : .
. ' ..:
"." .,. '::' . :
'.;; ~ .

:,';' '",
. ~:.,: /.

.
. ·"t; ,.:::.,".; . .'.~ ::. ~. .. '. ..', .
......
~.'"

'. :
. ..:.~. '.
. :.... , "

' ..
. ... "" ;. .'-
..... -:... , .....
.""
":'
"".\
:.:

.~ '.
".,- .;'"
,:: .
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. ~'.

'.,
' .

. ',
.:: ....
~ .'

-. ";

"."

... r
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. '. -',

:<
" " ":-.;
 MORl DoclD: l45l843
.: .. -: •• t

00263

,
\.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, ....
::'" ~!;~i
.;':::: i':!' :"';:..
':::'" ;," :<
:}:;. "

" "
..
~.

"

.'

"

.
.

. )
. '.' '..~ ; " ... .

,',
00264

...... '.
"0 ,t "0

\
 MORl DocID: 1451843
.----------'-------------,,--~--~~~"'---""-'-----'-----'-'----"-~'--------'-----'-~-~I.~:'f
·:c,:~.;' .

~/f-:'

'00265
.. ..-.

., - ~'.
:.". ..
~

\
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, .:: .

.: "

: .>... ' .:
". .' .' ,. : ...... ,.,'
,:.' ' ': .'
.'
" .. : .
. .:::"

:'lE·10R..,;~·m\JM FOR: Deputy Director for S,:ic11'ce an.d

Techn.?l()gy ..
: ,.'.
SUBJECT: Policy Rega~·d.ing Ass Ls t an c e to i\gencies "

Outside" the En t e Ll i gen ce" Communi ty on

Spe9ch Processing .Proble~s
~.: .
':'

. .... : .. :;,::: : .

1. Re cen t putilic':f'6:~;~~rn over ",Age.ncy . af£i~iatio:ns .:..... :

with law enf~rcement activities has made me warf of offeririg..
-' ,::" '. sp.ee ch p ro ce s s Lng as s.I s.t ance .to various other governaen t .....
. agencies. :My concern herevis restricted to government .. :.
I.
I
act i vi ties .cu t s Lde the' 'int:elligence' communi t.yio· . Because !
. of a'. scientific commun i-ty .awarenes s vof the' expertise. of .
.memb.ers of..O:pL in speech -p'r'oces s Lng .p r.ob Lems , we are .often
. as ke d by individuals in .g ove r'nmen t for help o.n various .
speech·problems. The.requests are 'usually informal on a
person-to'-person basis. lvhile most' iof these contacts
',.:".
involve only' an exchange. of 'unc l as s Lfd ed Ln fo rmat.Lon ,
:-r' ':. .
.severa.l, 'have ~nvolved. th(t.use .,of laboratory r es our-ces,
, 2. cO'~~acts hav~·::,:~'~:he ':£~om t~e FBi, A~to;~~y .
.. '.' .
General's office,. Bur eau.iof .Nar-co t Lcs 'and Dangerous .". ~.-
.. ' ,:'... prugs (BNDD), Post O£fic~".:'a.nd ·the .Treasury Department •
. Of the above , assistance' ·.toBNDD had been. spec i fd caj.Ly
san.ctioned by Mr. Helms. In one recent instance wher-e a"
noisy tape was· to be used ,.. in a cour-t case, care was t aken.:'
t o i.nsurethat -t.he vp ro ces sLng of the t.ape was idone. entirely' '.'
by. a BNDD .employee:even·:t:hough it was done' in an Agency,", ,'. .
laboratory. 'us in.g the.:·Ag:en.~y's .Coherent Spectrum Shaper ...
equipment.- ' ." .
". '.'

- . .......~: .
.. . .... ' :
. ..
,~'.. '

. s:.• -,

" -, ". ; ..
, I
~ltTIf\ll
GU.i:H .L
l~---"---------'c------_.....J
. ';"'~'
. .. , . '.'

. ..i-
.. 00266
\
 MORl DoclD: 1451843
~~~;:~::( :;- . ......
..... <: '.
.. :.' ...... : .... . "'.;. .~. : ... ", ~:

"

OEL-OJ.Q-73
r... gc 2

f ~ l' J • . .
1}·OV.i.('J.ng S(;YVJ.i:.:::S 0: r n i s ;\1.;i(~ to ()tn'er';:'~::'e:nc:Tii;~
"? ') • " • • l'
.s ,
has no t (IS Y0t .irq:;o$f;d· a si~)!if5.c(~i1t i';orkl'~&d on.. ~saii~."':':"_:
there is a benefit to us in t ha t such ccn t ac t erHioles .:
the staff' to test tec;hFliqilGS an d t::'-t1.1ipr,wnt en avariet.y' .
of speech pr-oblC'::ns. InFt.)l'j;l:Jl '.ntc;-;::cU.cms at the tcch!Hc.i!l' .. ~
l.. e_,veI. ,~~
7
':1. ' ;> [1'1"1";-:)"ll]
.'. J n ~L-("l';;'S
_., o f ;'I(,1r';"'~J
\_. "'--' •... ~~ .,'\'5" t
- o ;'('C('~"'"'-T-'i<,;:'ll'
-- 1'-,.,,- '.'
~gcncy goals. Hence we ~ould be ~il1ing to continue.to .,
support other departments on an ad hoc basis ~ . but ',-"oul,d":' .
appreciate your guidance re the wisdom of OEL's involvement
in ltdCl:lestic" activities. .' .,.....'

. '0 OnN IV. MCMAHON . ...::

Director of ELINT
DD/S&T

:.-'; .
. i

' .. ..
\

I.

I
'.
 MORl DocID: l45l843

·i
\.

:
;" f ,
_._ f&~. kj:,?1AI£j:Ze'7""~' •• ~::~~:.t'~·.'j.~,;.<.: "'. ~. -'.
{. ~ e .e.._._-_ ~.~. ~e-.-:~- .-_ _~_.~--_._ .,'; :~.-._._ . . .: -, t' .v • ~ -. • •

f1J;jj{i _,<ud On tc-o~j?f47-"AY-

·.. cJ1"f:.:r lC--tt,t1 :£'f'I.1,? 6. I /-iI'V?f:'·A'4::.. _~ .., ...... fO .. l.JUrl~'7-::'· ,,1'2
. S-e~t-:CI~<-( -Jo' I I
. '" " .., ; ;..,.,-- .: -,. " " . ...... ~.. - '" ::~ ~:

. '. .. . '-

.~. -_..-. -~ _.-::' ... ':.. : ...~.."'.- .. .~ . :....- .. ',... ~ i;·'~..:······ .-.'..."...

.~_...:..-_ --_... -------

..

Co,'

.~._._ .. ---_._~ ...,.,- ._,.' ..-

. '.' ...
.. -""'~"~~"-' -.-., .,' ..-: .. ,._.-~_ ....:. .. :._. . - .. _.......':': ._.

_... __... .. :'.-.~- "-"'" .. :... ~.

-' .

. ./" ..
... _•••••••_. _ ••• 0":' ''''._:.'' ',_.:__.. _._._.;_.•_ .• _ •• _ ••• ••••• -r .••• '-,,':.';"'. '0', ·':.-----:7 -:-.:...._.....-:-.... "', '; - .'._...-
",-... '~.:., ." '." .

._ ~ ._,-_._-~. __ ._-_ .. _ . .. ' ~ .... ,~ .~ ..

--~_ _-_. __
.. ._---.-------~.--
... _....... _-. _._.:.-..- __--_.
. ."--------_..-.--------_._- -

.__ .- ._..-"'---.';" ... :.. ~.-.._.....:.::.. :.-' ...

-- -'-"~' ..,,:....--,.. . --._---,....... _... _.~ .. --.,

.: ~>' ~'.;. ....
'.:
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

r '.~;'
.,.<.: .

:Jt " .,
..
: . ' ;:'
. : ~~ .-:.'. ~-.:' ::-..l!.
.,~.
-. ,.'
. '" ..'
".~ ..':. '.: .,<. ';'.: ..
....\ .. :'~

\ ,I" f.~ :'Ag~inst whom '40 theseag~.nt~· ;b~~; '.cin,.wh~t:··C1~··thei·. .>:..

.... ~ report.1 . arid' ~o whom? .':: .
. '.

, IGe.t copies. of' the repcrtis 'on "Restless Youth'.' :aIia. black radicalism. .....~:--..

I ~, How. is the cryogenic magnetometer used, on whom, and f'or'what

~.
..
<c- '. purpose?
..,"2-: ;'Get copies of the reports on ros, ..---
lr Why
I I What is done
does DCS:collect information on
with it? -----,-----------
I 1..:.----
'~Y is DCS. getting I l.f.O~.~~.Om.1 and for.·what c-:
.' '.purpose? . . ". .,
_.(:de~·a· ~cio~'onl I v " .'::
:;~~"'G~~e me a c.6uple of paragraphs on TOfte •. ~.

..3 Inc~ude the: submiSsion of FR Division.~. '.

c.. . ..:-~. Get ~he ful~.:story on providing a~ias dOcu.m~~tation to 'the 'Secret
'/. servi.ce , ' .. . . '
1..--.....-

t~.'
... "WhY did :we' pay. the costs of" the respon~es:·.to letters received
I~r-.l:!-bout the PresJ.de:o,tls .speech on CambodJ.a1

';:{i{~tipPiying ~e~c~~s 'to Ambassadors

:.:'. seems ~i~;~.:~·.gOOd idea. Eowmany ---
.'.' ', ~
~ are' ..t here in use' and where? '. ; ~i -',

'..,':~y.' is' 'Logistics procuring~police-type-_equi.J;Jinen.t·f 'or local .police v··

, -forces? '

.·.I!r What is' .a. telepho~e .analyzer?' ,,/

~ ~-":::"'-"':'_---'--
:·j;~:t./,f.hY is it necessary Ii! 'to continue L.._~
. . , . ' - - - 1

:":;4' '~ore on Vesco. How did it get started? . What.·was done? Why was ,..--
:.: it. stoppe~'l
. .....
v- ,':

.'- :.;.::.2 What were the .mUltiple channeis to CIA .on: .the .. IOS matter? ~
.... . ...

»:.. :
. :.
:.

...... ~. . .~ ...: ;.,

....

00269
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, ',~'. ~. .:.' .;; :":" '.,;

'~';:;'t::~~;:;-''::' .
~ '!..-

.: . :.(~ j) : .~ -~:., ,' ., . _... ..

---"---.~~lf1?-: ~.0c~~'::i.~~ ~ . _ . _..~, :__~..
. "" .. _.- .- ~"~'- ...

. :::.£.. L.bo;J-"..•
.... ... ..... . ~cf-(> r-erf ~......,-y, '" e@)~·. .... • . .
. . . . ._. _._ . _.:_~. .... .Br;;;.~(!.~ n~.s -Ill}' A-/11- k.·~i r.~r"·d.d-Y--S· LL_ _-

ips" ...;....
.. ...~S-N()
-..... ," .... ...tJ.(b~:S
........ _.~.:
o..-.C!..g'-"~' .~,;;., 'fjl~.J,p·e, ~~?- -
. .. ... .~ S. - '-1/ lv-...i-
I ~ 1(...... ..j-.. ~I't:#l.-~ ... ,. ., ~ 4'!A.,L. CL'/ (.~~7' ,,---

I
!.
J).lJ.. I -

d-~n.-f ..". ~
,
- .. '~.... .,... ... .
<.< 1 ----'-- _
'.'
.. -- D. ~
_.~ R:.'
~..:.-:._-_. c::;;:;.
._.~ .. N ~ . _ •• _ . • . . . . . .~_ •• • ~_. ._

._- ..__... _~.- . --.... --.... V ~

~_. ",
s
...C!' 0 , I-f.~
. . '"

. _.
. . ~/t
~- \ .. / .

I/t,j!L.r;;f
! ._.....
, . -.- '. :.... '" ...

r··':-.' ."''.'
:" . . ./-.Q:. u5 ~
LV·c-/ "(}
. .
A<\.~<-:.({ ;~/e.; (I-·tt~f~~·'~··l1 e ..f~
!,: ':. ~ . . :'. . .
'.' .. c./ ~ ,:.t6'fll # -; ~ ; G."
I. -~"-'.'._ -
...... :.. :.. -.:.- _.
'. ~I
~. "~-~ ~.,
i ; (
!-:......r-' (, " '. '- c::> 'f!' l"VI. tl h .....
"
.............
::;
_- '. -_. '-_'-" ...-._.-......_._.. :-- ..
----- .._----_.- - - - ------_..... _~----~-------_. __._-,..._---,.
..;S:.: ~. . .. . .. .~..
.- ._ __ .- _.- _- ..
.} '.

. ~.,.- ..: .... -". - ..

J_"":'" '" :.
- .~,
;
[: >""'''- ......-- . .

F·
L~·-
f ..
.....-- . .
f.": . ._ ~ ~.- .. ~_ -.~.

i~_·_"'~ ,_i.
- - • '" •••••• _ ~.,- •• _".~ -'-"-~' •••. "--~" M ~. • '_'M_~ •• " • •_ .:_. __,_"__ ,,._,

- - ..... , -"_' '"_'M,••• ~"~" •••• ""._.~.

. ..
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

:": l~;':\'
...:._--..-'-.. - ..; ....-._ ...--_ .....:. _.- -- "" .....

fl$~
: :: · --: ·,·,: ,
. .
, .
.. ';':
'.

.'
.

~. ' •....• ,I ~. .
r-".",...,
.
", ... -' ..... ~

- - ......-.. ...__..._..
. ... ~ -'-"-"-'.~.- ...._----- :i:'

----~- ".... _",;,-.~:_..·_..C_~;'\':- •.

~:: .

"."

._-------._---.--_.... _._._._. __ ..-- '--"-~- .,------_.~ ...~ -'--'-;----.--.--'-

: '; . ',,~ .
'" ,"~ ' .

.f:" :~',., . . ..;..,- .... ~ - ." :-:.

,
. ~ .,
..
":-,"-':' ..
• ' ~;. t

-- .--:-.~ .
.. _.:..- .... _..... -... _..... -

.-._- _. -._-_ .. '-:-'~'''''-' .- ...-.-...._--.. _._----_.....- ------_.._. __ ._-~.;-._:. _._._._._~ ~._.:,,-:,. '.",-,

, (':"
..-,"
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.
'~

.~
1
..

...." -.
..
.-- -- -----_. ---_._._._-=-'-..:.:,"'.:,-~~--~_ .._--_. -----..._-----_.._---- ,-~...:2-.....,.':;:7:"--:-:-'
v l:.'~·:: .: . :.,~ .:;

-.- ~.'

Ir
I .
..
".' ... ~ ,',- ,..".. • -0.- .

! :.,

,------_....._---.----------------------_.._---:-.- --...---- -.---------------_._---...,-----....,.

~ _.~. '" "." _.~ .. _-.. --
~ _- ~ ---- :.

~
~. ..:

,
.,
l- ...... - .... _.: .... ". ~ ..... _' .. _....
{

_. _ ". - - '--:;,r.' ""

'._.".'-- .....
..,.- r -v

...... -... _..

_-.~ .._...
00272
~ ... .:.--:--:~ ... :...: ..... _~. __ ...--
{ ." -,

------------·---------c -------.-:-.-:::-----'
.- '"
.----~--~-_.---
;.,
..----- ..- . ----
~ . -'- ,__ ~ . . . :_
J'
1
------ -_ ' - . _.' ;. .. .:..
 MORl DocID: 1451843

'.

,:',.1· '.:: ,· ·,.:,·;~ 't.(~: t':.: . ·."".l;

....:

,. '.~.

-.1
.'1 _ <2.'''''
.'. _.
....:..,. --.-------- -.----.- -'''--''''''- --'-;'-:~·=-."""+-t~':_'_'__:"_··-"_·--
.

o.s (( e.-~ ..~.e-.::

". ~.

da-u-~ {]~~~~-
~-ed

.._ _.- -- -.,- .. .._..-.- . ~

.- -------_..._._--- - --.__._- "'"''''''---''' - _._ _._ _ . _....,._.,.,..C',_+_.:-:__.;__ .-.._ __ .

-- ..
' :.. _~ .

--------..,,------.---_.- ... _----- __._ -.-

. . _ :---------'--.-
.-
__. --------:-.
'.i 1:

.1:, -;::
... _. -~.' - '- -
-, ,~'

...
~'

:.-.__ ._-\i
•• _ . ~ 4 •• _,. ..... __ ~ . . ._ ... _ •• __ ~ _ _ _ " ......... ~ - _ , .

i.. :-----:---
:,j
---.. . --.. . ----.------..---.--.---.-.. - .~.:::·~'h0273·
-..... .. ,
. .-:.._",';,-,- .~
 ------------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

. . . '' .. ,.' ~

••..'; . '. r".

.__._. _._. _k .r:...

.: :' '.

I
.f
I .-

: ..~ :.~. 1;:.· .. , .

• • _. ;~ •• ,_",L~-: ._ • • ' • _ • •• "

. _ .. -...... H'// .
.
.;;,;;...* t.O
....

:.. :~'!.' ..
.,

e.-- '"
t.--- ..
/DoL.
.. _ ~ oJ
.a./-:
"-'" '"
Cf

'- -'- -,~~-_~:~-~-f-'-~~~:J::c-:~- -;; -i~ ~~':.~~~ --,

J:h ':>
I 1;'V",-~.J1Vt- lv, ~}4 'e'i-+/~cz.-r;.
." •

...- . ... . "~ .... -..

F.¥41.:-r:q~~.··/)~~_. .·.
, ..;\: ......

• Op • ":.". : .M' :" •••_ . ; . ": _ ,•••

" .. "

-:--

:. .~

\. .. :

.. ..
. -": .
- t{),~ Q- -tr C -t PJ.·:.:··r-.:6lpS,.5. .I
.::....... .. ..

I/:Vt~t "''ffo.t/~ 7~ '" ;,;,

i .. .- -. .. '-.'
..
;"
: .... ~".;'
" .'

;L~~I"
U
, ,

-,
f1.,

..: - -
, (;:>i-f -rJ,-U
I-~. Q·~ .ti_,-~---c-k: ~ --;~~~J---:-~=-:;..----'ll
.
/ """'y

...' .....
rn " ' "

: 00274
I

>1 _ . .••_ ..._ _•• __•__ ••.•. . ~._ '_0- _. . • •••• ~ •• 0 •• __ • • •••• _. ••

.: rr
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

'. ~~

·,···..,.;0.'''··· .., •...

. ..... - -.,_ .
. ,~ -, ....,:. ' ...

.. ; ,,':,,- ..
~_ ~ __ ..~ .. _ _., .

~_. _ ~_._ ..__ .. ~ _.. ~ .._ '":":::.:.~::~c::-~ _..:.,' -;--_.__ _,._ ,. . _

'. ":'l>::t"
.:.:."
.... -.-.... - ..... ~_._..-:.:;~'"'I'-..,,- .. -"::"_., - - "." ~ . . .,_ ...,..~.
-',' " _,'- - c- ;.-. . --...... . .. .

.• _'::•• .• v- ' •.
~ ........ ' ..
-- .. -.."
. ,

....... -_','-.- ...::'..:'-. ,;

" .. -.:.. - ...

-------.-- -.. ---------:-----""7'"-.- ...

------_._-...

._ -:-.~- .
....
•. ·P.... _....0- ...._..... _
.. _ ; _.:

. ;
I'"

._-~ .._~_.'._--- ..- _..".-.--._-- ..:.- .....;"'.....:77:...:,._:...._-:'"....

t . ',.. " '!'~,\~:.::;,~. :~

_._-_. - '~-".'~ --~.~ , - ,~" "" .~ : .. ;- ~ ~ ,.. :..
. _...
, }t~:"
---:--"(:7"~?; ..,... _--
...._" ..-. :.. ~ ':!{".;.:: .
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-
·~~. __T;~i--; ': 71:;_ .UJ~~~~':';~ -c<!'?~ c-~ .... • ...

("\1\. ... . /::,;.:..~Il U ~~(tG" .(i)~:.~ ~"Q./'~)\"-'" .r:

.;
i'J'~~Q- tvpu9'f-:> I d(.~, '. .. . '.' ..

./ ~ ..., . _..... :...-: .-.- .,

.~ -: -: " . " ..
. .. , .
. - .... ;..;.~ .._... :. ..

':".

_--------,--_ .....-_.- ..__ ........ _-_.- ....._--_...--------_.-....

. ---~---_ ...-_.-.-.- - " " ' ' ' - - ' ' _ _- --'-"-'-'---'-- --'"
......

" :

...... -
.. "":."
• • • • • • • • :. • • _ c , : ••••: - . . • • • • • • :"" _
.. _.-~ .. ..:.. ~...

.-... _----.~
.1'"
.•:-... ::-.:.,-..- .. ..' - ~'-
 ---~--------------
MORl DoclD: 1451843
..
..._... __._-------'--

. -.:'.

.'~. '.: <

." '.. ;.: .'.'.- . -.::, .......: ',.

, ~

. '. ..
.; _.: -"'- ,~ _ ~ .. : ~ "'': - " .
• : • ".1".'• .; •• "._ ' ••_ _ '.~._.~. . . . _ .,·u. _ ' .•__ .._ ._

•. ~ - -t ~ .- - ' . . ." .• _ '" ..•~.. .. <. 0 OM • •• •• ••

-. , ••• "':." _. 0' ..... _ ~., _ " . ' _ _ , " _ ' • • _ _• • • .' • • • • • ' _ ' " _ •• _~ ._ . . . . . . . ~ • • _ ." ••••• _ . . . .'

.......... _
•
:-.$'.
-'1"
~.
•
-"'-..~ ~"" •
_ - .. _- _.- .,.,. ~
. '~"- -~ - ..- -'.. ..- _ .- ._.- ..
'; -~_. (~~".~';~=:'_
..
__ -. --_ _._ :..-.._. --_._- . "'-' ._.~--~._._ .... ~-- .._'----... -.- -- ."" - ..... ...0. . ~_

. ',

.'
>.

..
"'.

.
'.

-.
-

-_:_'---'-:---.- ...... __..- -_......- ...._,- ...._- - ----------: ---'-"'-- ... - - -

... ...:..
00277
. ,.t.::
'-'-'-
.~-----~--._ .. - .. __ ..-..
_-_._-.....-.._~ .
i .
I
_.~-::---~. __.--:--~ ..- "'.--'
.............. F
 MORl DoclD: 1451S43

:..:....-._-:-.---:--•.... .. _, --:;.._~ ~. _.__.-.... -.._..... ~.

_._--._. .. __.__ ..;_. -------.
. ~. ,-"-
. ._~._. - ""-
.._------. __ _ ,. _.. - .
· · .".· __._..,._h , __ .."__.._
.. -. -;- ..... ~"""- ... - - -. -.- ... ..

,.•..: .' . " . .I • . ....

., ......

· .
. .'. ;....... .. .
~";., -. . ,"' ,.

..............., . -." _. . .

•: •• : ->,

. _.' - ..- -_.. ' - ~- :-'._',.,.:.., :-.. _,," '-'-"~" _. . .

.
.
·_.'.- _.:.- _.. _-- .'----_.- -"-- .-..-._ _-_ --_._-----:. -- -.- _ -- -.•_ ~._ _ .. --.'.--._._- --- ..
" _---_ _-- _--------

.'-

·::l--..
• OJ.. "
.:
;.t
".

~.,, .. .: .:..:~:~_ ~. ".-_.. - .- _, -, -"-' .. _ -.-~ . - ••- •• R_ ••••••• __•••• _ •• ~~,,_'. R._.. R"_' • ••• _
.- .... ...• . .... ... . ... _.
- . ~:L.. :: .
;
;~ .••i , ~ • •

.:} -
v!
"."
•

.~i .'. :'.. ,r",. . . . .

,!:--"~,.,.l. ,"" . ... .. .. "_". _ :- .. ... :: : . ._ .. "

;I ':' ..., ,
.:1--- -. . "'._--.- .._-._----_._ --_._..~._- --"-- --_.. . "' __ . __ ,..:.. _':.. '00278
. :. . .
d',,·:·:·' ~_ .._. " _ _. . .~~"

. rr--
• J'_
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

:":.:

. :'~

·_-...._ ......~-,~;."":--r •..,----_•.• ,.•

(J).,'~/¥,.'$. ~-e;:i-~;"

:.;
'Cl~~-?- '~6c/,.-',&;/./" 4~'
" '. . " .... "" .

~'6-.; »sr: :';~-.£'e-

n'.,'L.t<
, --~"'-:~,;__ ,'e: ~~

k~: ",
:i .."..;'•. _•...
- .'~': .

..- .. ...
:, '"~.- .
", .:.-.~ .. " :..-•.. ...... --. ..
,

:~: '.
,!

.c '::'

.-
.: '--.-----------'--.-'-'------------'~------'--.--~----:
,-------,--- .. _----~--.~--.----,,-- ---. -------- ,

.... , ' .
. ,....:.. -",

-,,'.;,:_~/".:';,.' -.:..-._ _-,,. .." :..'~ -:... -" , .... ' .

J;:~ .. ',;:1"
.'J./ /' ,_. ~-

::-:).. ... :"- ' -,.~-_. ---------- , :,-----, --,------- ._--.. '-'- -.---._,--

l:;~c-c=-,; .~---'-_..:-.__._"- :-:- .-._- : - ---- .- -. _. - - - - '. .~_-:- - - -,:.c.

t··..:·":·_;-·-.... ~ ·--:-~·:-··-:':.7·~··--:~··,·.':"·,· ,.
__; .. '._..• _..._ .. ~
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

'n'" ~ :::Afl··a;u·~.-:·
l' ~X .·"~-~;;}'\k~~ ,.
. ~"". il1.-~, k 1'7~,
~/..~". q.#'F'. d C-I jJ;iJ~~ , ;.. .
.---''' : __ .: ..- .~~.-I!.~ ~ .. P.,·f~~ ;;£tlj4i~·;;_ . _...~ _ .
r
,:i-:-::f.~'~:'.'~~..',""' ' ' ~':",
--"'--e:::z:a...

~.

:,1
.-. 'i
'~VY( 14..-~.f( ULJ
·.,1·· ·.., ,..: ~.,
, ·1 " \ /",. .
. :·;··t·~·;-~·····-.·~-~--"':f....:....._._t;:5_;~ ;~.-.~.- . --
•• t-

;C.~~:~;; ::,(;...e:
' - . t.u.,; tl
~'#'~' .. '

.~J.4"~~
.-.' .' .. '()-::~ C> (;).i 1l9~1 (/l vs '71... _
----.-.---.. .~.,-:..-."_;.,Jr:.:.-~~£t:l- II ~~<>::.r-.zL-etd: 4-+~/l:l_~.5!LQ .. .;.'

." Col ~,f,}f£yif,tfr---~-"~i~}fl~~~J~:

. :~'>~::'~::,~~~;;~;k··:·lt-: ',
,'
'" - . " - ••.• - • .•...,._ .• ,0_,'0_- •
·::';~/~~~.d(~;~~· .'
~

....•"--;:,. . ,.:.-." .
! ; --- ......- ..... '~" _.: .
:,:.'~ ." '. ", . ...•. ..• . . .-. -.,- ,....• '" ••;.,..,f;';o"
,.'-.: :-/

.. _-~. ~~-:-.-.~_._.--.-: .. --.

--,---.."--------_._-- ~.,.- _..

:_.~ .•. _-.- _.
'.' -,~7_."-: ,.. ,-._ _'r-r- -. '. __
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

....
I
.j
I
!
.(

," ;.

i
• j

·-1
:" :

':.

\ "'~ ..... .'

r "

i,~ ....
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.'.'

<.: ." ~.,

9 July 1970 .: . . ..~ .,,," :...:..: :..... ' :$

" . The Di·~~tqr. ~civised

the' .DD/I "tha'tWbite House ·~taii~;'~!;~~i~·~~:~ . ':
and .Pres:Ldentia.f"COl.;msellor·Pat Moynihan' thought well·,.of ·t4e.: ...-. )'
memorandum' on "Black Radi'calisniin the C!3-ribbean~II '

10 July 1970 -.

.;".. ". Mau~i'bl'i~'~e~"'6~"hiS meeti~ yesterday wi thC6ngreS'sm~n' ·Richard.

Ichord"Chairm~n of'.th~. House Internal Secur~ty Commit~ee, .wbo.had
asked woot' Me are doing "to .investigate "securf,ty Leaks." .connected with
press, accounts' of .Lon Nol's having sold rice to the Communists and
having engaged in .an attempted deal with Hanoi. Maury briefed on his
explanatiop.of .why we are doing nothing, since such reports are not
exclusively·,confined. tio ..o ur information.
. ·t·, .
.......
1 September A1970
: "';'.
-:.,.;.-

MaurY :~bted. that the Director sent a letter to' C~ilg:reBs~an

Moss on',~tet~p'hone monitoring practice;3 •
.. ' :' ;'"

The Director' noted a 1 'Septembermemorandum from' Jphn .Bross on. .

Daniel E.ls~rg '·(sic).· He:~sked the. DDS ·to lift his cl~~raiJ.~es and ".
to make this';;f'act mown in security channels. <':{}t'..· ",· .
15 October 1970 ." ,. "'.. .!"
'. :' .'.:. . .• :.:i:j;~·"·~:<· ~': .. :'.... '. : ';:~~::~{~~1:i~~;:'· ."" -; ~
DDS ··reported that· the Weathermen have declared" tn:tsiilonth for
their falL;"offe'n:sive and have.' ~entionedthe Agency' as;;~at?ta:rg~t .for
bombings ·ap.d.·'.kiaD.apping. He briefed on precautio~ri\m:easures
adopted' ~nq:<aske'q,<senior:officers to :vary their route/,tQ::~nd..from
work, 'and .to·:rep.ort· any pecuLiar telephone calls oruriusual"events
around their residence.

28. Octo~r' '1970' . -:-:'.2.

·D~P.:::·~~o·~~ed
that the FBI desires to check for'·.ii~~rprints
on all·: ci;'Yptogram messages .mailed to high Goveznmerrt officiaLs.
The messa~~6.~11 then be passed to ·NSA for exploita~ip§~1 DDP
requested;·:that Agency:personnel 'who receive such messagl?$ pass
them to him :.for transmittal to the FBI. . \./.'

/'
'. . \ r

·OO~82·
...

~
. .. .
. -.:....
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

c- ....

...'. . ~

/'.... \
. ': :":;\'.~.;., !.i:.~.'.~.:.;.~:.'..~ .:'.:" " , .,/:\" .,:·,:;:~!'~ t~ i-?;: ,',
~,; ..,'
,":_~ "'~. : ,~ : .~:, :~.:
I .'
r : \ !
I,
"
.-: :.. :;<;~.}?<> : : - - , " .:.'.:',",' ...
:'.:.'
..• ,:':.:• ,•: .... ...•:....:.. .•.' ...:.
'.,:.,;.. ....

. - . .',
". 10 ;De~emb~r·:1970·:.- '. ·····;···\:>;i!i;i~:;·:;;/:/:·
.:...: ~ .' ':.. Db±.. preas accounts Of' ~I Direct~rJ,-"E~~g<ko'over ,;'s··· "
nbted.·
19 No~eni~r. statement that th~ Biack .Panthers are·s1ipp~rted:.by':
terrorfst:9rg~nizations. He said. th~t ..we have: e~:i,*~d:the" F1;iPs
related"ffles-, and .our own data Q.nCi find no indicatton::;'of',.any. '.
relation~h:ip be.tween .the. fedayeen and the Black ·Parithers. ·He
provided:.. th~ Di'rector"with a memorandum on' this t9pic~.

. '

':Exe.cutive Dire:ctor called attention to the President's .21

December memorandum on "Discloaares of Classified:Information .
~ . -' .
.an~::q9.'?;t'c;ination .and.·CleaI/(tce at· Official St9.~e~~~~~i-!:\;which i~ ..;,:', .
"

be1ieve.d·..: to.be the result of'. represemtations by'.'t;l;i ";; Trector and.:'
A~~ra:W.wA~~erson~.:::.;E?,~.cutiveDirecto:( said tlia~;T:;"'~\' '4,~~km~et~:~i:i;:, -. '
,seJ.ected::··EXecutive·.. Committee Members next week.:t ;. "s'cuss the '..' .'c' ..:':
memoraridUin's·inlplfea.tions and to- develop' recommen~tions.f6raction .
bY:.tb;if~.D:i:~ctorin: :view of' the special :ies:ponsi:bi:ii;Bi~~>placed':on:: '.
'hi1n'?~:~~~~eV:resi~~:nt·•. '., . . "<';~";;t;t~)~1~~~'?\::':"";' ">:::i::::;'~':',: ,
.. ",
r 29 December 1970 ." . . ;. ;::>:"-~,: ,.. . ~": .
.,. . :~:::.: .-., : '.' "

····ji?x.e·c~ti'Ve Dire~tor reminded Executive committ~E1;~·,participa~ts·. "

. about··::.-t1ie·":in~eting· involving most of them this mor:i:tlng' 'on: the '.
Prwsident. 1 sdirective .on disclosure of classified::,:hiformat10n. ,"
.3o,.~:i~~~·r,. 1970 ..... :'. ,.' '. .. ~·):i«t.;.:.::~:.
r"'>:' ":'
'. .•... .'
:~:~:.Ji~~'~~~ive Director ·briefed·on the re~u1ts '~t~'~st~'rdaY's
meet:irig--; on.":what the . 'Direct~r now .needs to do in' .~ur§uab:ce of' the: . ":,
Presidenc,'s: directive .on disclosure of classi:fi~d;:i:iri.form~tion..'.:-.He:~ will'
outliri~ 'in the pirector I s brie:fi~ book actions'·-wid.ci:r:iare to' 'be .'-;.. .'.
taken. '.'< . .:.

:."

-:
.: -, :
..
',.:.
~....,
..'
,
.....

. -.~ .. '. .....; ....

• •..0:
,~

.' . (.
....
00'253'.'
 MORl DocID: 1451843

.' .f~ ~':'~:'.'."'.'

.... ~
':;,!"'i.;.': .'.. , , ",-
II ,,,.-
j .
..'....

\
., "~:: :'':1/

':·.(>,:;;;l~;.·~:({:·;· ': .
·;·.:::i4',>January 1971, .
.. '. ~~' :;:f :' ~ .. . . . .'

., . Bross said·.that 1;l~.and· Bronson Tweed~r.wii;t},h!i:ve.:lunch today with .

. :aen.eral Bennett, Director of' .DIA. The Directoi":said that 'he might ask
.: 'Bross to take along a copy of' his letter .and guidance on the Dis'closures
,. ::o£::Caassified 'Information and Coordination and :Ciearance' of Official·
.. Statem~nts but :that he firstvdshes to ciarify' with: the Exe.cutive
. "Director 'some of the' -Language in the guidance ·section•

.' .: ·-. is "Janua'ry 1971 .' -,

.. ,'~'."
~
.

. Maury said.· that he antdcfpate a-a number of' questions from the
..Hill on the .at.tached article by Jack Ande rsondn today"s,Washington
, . ::..Post, "6 Attempts .to Kill Castro Laid to CIA." .
'.'~.:~:~; ;,<:;: :.' '~~uSt4~re4tted
that 'he .will havel~~~\;~~~;::wit~
Assistant
:':.>Attorney 'General Robert C. Marclian to discui;is~~j;ii~>riirector.rs.guide-
.', :.'(tiJieson the disclosure of' classified inf'omai:lpn. .

". ;,:i~:i~i{~;;:::'B'r6ss
·rehted. that Pa;rott met wi~hG~ri~~~:\~~~hnett re~iew
to
.·.: ..) :'¥'€/:',Director'S 'letter on dis'closu~ ?f c~£3~'iti~~.~nf'o:rI+lationand
·:said that. Gene.ral Bennett will now d~scuss '.~ t·,:w:J;t.h. Deputy Secretary
. .'J;lackard, who may in turn 'review it with Secre.tary~ird. .The
/'" ·.;Directorasked to be·.advisedof' Secretary Pac~rdrs. reactions and-
. :. ["6~~d:·that he 'wants to -check the. final guidance.:w;ith .Secretary"
. · ··::Laird and with someone in ,the" White Housebefore:it
. is issued.
"i••

·.·. :~ir:f~~;:~:~e.~rua~ .1971 -. : :: .:.~":.~;:;~;}/

.: :,;::.::i:~.:. DD/P C!llled attention to' Jack Andersoni~'~"~o:iUmn'in'today"s
.::: ...
",Waspirigton
. : ' ~
Pos t , "Castro Stalker Worked For.··.The- .CIA. 1f
. :.
. •

: ;'; ,,:'.:.",. < • ' . , ' " "

'.": . ,

:
.. ,.
..
. .,'.
, .~
..
. ~ . .'
. . . . .: '>: •.•.
. .
. ".~ '" .... : ..
. .: .. -. ~
' :". :."

.," .

~: .

.oo~B4.~
.'
:~.. ~ "
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.J~g~;R;91j:}~
f : ,:~:. ~ •
; ••• ':' .~ ... : : •• '; • • • •::::."':,.....: . , . : . .- . • :~,' :"~ ••• #' " ~ ••

(-- "'y' .,,··:t·july·1 971 ...' ,.. . .

.' ~ .....'~...;: :.'. . ..... '. .' . . ,.':;:;!~:~:(':::'" . ..' . '., "'::"::' .'
::.; :\'.J;;:;:.::.:.~:.; (,:: . ~'Ca.rver noted that SecretarY Lciir4~'tR.'ad·:re.quested: thatour printi.ng;·;>: .' .
..'. :.. ·:\.pl~nt .as sist "iIl reproducing .the.forty-s·eVb~Y~lUi.nesec~e{ Pentagon ~~dy'''<:,
. '. ::. on: :Vietnam io'r distribution to the'.' pre.s~·,:aI{a·: ~t~ rs ~his .m.or!;ling.·, This -. , : .
. . )r.equesf:.. was aborted by the Prbsident. 7'.: " ....." .. ' . ·'''''''''lD,.l?C?~~:ht':t1i.e 'chair) .

'. 2 July 1971

said that in the abse~~~,.ofl . :>'~p~

.. "':;":' . "I:!D/S .•...

..... 'arne etingat the White Hous e ye:sterday.ofthe interagency group which is',·
lat~end.eq< I
reyiewing c la s sdffca rion and de c Ias sffication policy. The President spent'
an hour with the group and said that he wants': ••• and (6) the revocation
of all c leaz-ance s and the retu·rn. .of all classified rnat e ri.af held at.Harvard,
·Brookin.gs~· Rand, and Cal Tech r : as :well. ·the' withdrawal of Q' clearances as
.:.heldby·the Regents o:f'the U;niversity··o{Ca,lifo·rnia. A brief discussion .. .: .
:.··fo~t.ow~d~.?~ni:f the Exe4=utive Diredoi'·nottid·.that DOD bas asked' us to provide
.. inform~tion on all our cont racrs With: Rand,'. as well'as all clearances held ' .
; . .' <·by,·Ranq. p~rsonn'el for our Pu~pos.es.·. ·Ading.'Dir~·ctorasked that we asse~ble
....: ... .:·data.:pe·J:tainmg,to the ~reside~tls:r'~ma.rks,btifi:~twe'tai;te no action until .
. "
: .the President's guidance bas. been confirmed, andthe DDls:ha.s provided a
.memoxandum on it. I I " ' .. (DDClin the chair)

. : -:' '. '.'Carver 'reported that they will; probably complete their detailed reView
'..of. the secret Pentagon
. . papers by 6 July. .
II . , . -
. .

...'. "'Viari:t~r,:.called attentio~i:6:Seq;¥.'eta:~i·R~gers'·requ~st that the p:res~:

. " . .:··:·,pe·rm.it the. Govermnent to. review i.n~civahce p.otentially daInaging documents
;":" .£rom,the ~entagon papers." "., -, ' : :,;.' ..... '.: ..... ' .... .
. . - . .'''' ". ~ .: '':'.'
:"..
" . -. -" .

. '"
6 JUlv 1971

.'.' ... '. ' . .ItCa'rve.r said that their re.vi~w:·o~.Jhe se~ret Penta on stud 0
.' ..... .: . : .v1.et~a~ has a lmo st been completed•.'.'::', . . . . g y. n

... :. ~'.," ' .. " \.'

':' ..
, .....

00285
:. )"'":"
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

"
v; .•.....
..". ~.": .~."' .... , .... :
'. '.' ., ...
. " ':~.: ': ~ -. ;" r: :

'I
_ .... .t ....... ,"

7 July 1971

r, ,JlCarver' said that he will be atte~ding a meeting toca.y called by As. sist~nt
Secretary of Defense' for Public Affairs Dan~erHEmkin. He added that· he' . -, :
',: as surnea it will concern the de~~assi£ic~tiono~ some' of the' secret Pentag6zi. '. '
papez-s andfhat, if it does, he will s e ekehe DirectorJs advice•. " (DDCI-'in c.:hai

"At the Executive Director's requ~st, the DD/S.aareed to 0aet too-ether , (;> Q

. with the DD/S&T and General Counsel to prepare a briefing paper for 'the '
Director on where we stand with res'p~C~ to classified rnatez-ia'Is at Rand
~nd, efforts to' safeguard t hezn, Ii ".

., . :
" ','Maury reported .that CongresBm~n Mahon would like to meet with the"
Director on 9 July to discuss t?-e Pentagon papers and various world hot's'Oots
Carver said that he will prepar:e a briefing paper fo!:, the Director. on the •
Pentagon study. II

.:.)', . . "Carver briefly notedl . the ~oncern ov~J:

revelations in the Lansdale ~z:n=-=e=m=-=o-=r-=a-=n:-:'d!:'w:n==-.
-,~w.:::;hi;-'·;-:,c"h~.-\V-a-s-s-u-r£"'aced·as part of
;d'··
" -t
the Pentagon p~pers. "
I..-
: .
.
8 July 1971
,
iI 1.IDD/S.reported that a DOD s ecu rdtyEearn is goi.n.g to Santa 1vlonica
' ..! , to repossess classified De.fense·ni.a~aria:ls held at Rand, He 'suggested that,
,,
." ..... _4 __ .' ~

:
<11 ....: ,}. . '.
... ' .."..: . .
I'- '. '. , ..;:. .,.~ .:~. ~

'...:1 .. ',' , . rather than take, parallel actfon; .we s end ,a' Security Officer to observe
.'1, .. the' opez-attouand inventory Agencyrriatezia'Is thepossessiori of Rand• in
J
:
•
:
.In response ta the Director's question he expbined that we have seven
contracts With Rand; only oneLs .cl.as·si:fied, and it is with Randts Washing-'
bon officer although some material could have been sent to Santa Monica•.
The Dire.etor concurred and requested a review todete rrntne the essen- .
tiality of cu'rrent prC;;posed·.contracts w-ith.·Rand. Houston commencedthat;
according to Dab General Counsel Buahardt, DOD.~s technically under
instructions to lift 'the secur;ity clearances of Rand con.tractors but has .
taken no action. nDCr repo::-ted'that John E}l.l"lic~":nSE:...heg.J~~~s.~~,P-'.~g:
~dviS~_':.~.Jl:;!!..!h2...'tThi!~!!9~,~~ __!tL~.P.2..m!}P:gj'R~~~...f1-1:...~m'p',lHY~~-.fi92.~~d , ,,:
·Hunt as a securipl cons~~tE':.I!-.t., .Lat~r·in the meeting the Director a sked a'll
Executive Committee members to review their .lists of consultants to de- .
termine whether each is really needed•. Ii

. ,/ "Garver briefed: on his rne'etmg'yesterday with Assistant Secretary . ' .:

/ . '0£ Defense for Public .Aifairs Daniel Henkin and noted that any further
exc~sions from the text of thes ecr'et Pentagon' papers :rp.ust be p.rcvided
: .
i· by ,Monday. He added that no. decision .has yet been made on wherhe r ..1:o
f..... 'f'

release to the. public the volumes .o·r a version fhe zeof; The Director noted
;.':' that we should oppose any such course of act'ion, II '
. I:. • .
00286
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.:-.,:.:~ .... -::': .r: . .

;~~~0m&l~tr~Wji[;;i;lt~;.:.;~J:~g~;~~1~t~~*;:;!;~J", .'",'. . .',. -'

'.. ..•.
.,

t·•.

'16 July 1971

Ca~~r said that (""'.'Y' "..)fu~ most ,a~:Pre·ciative 0:( the -tim~
'which Houston SIlent WJ.thhiril"yesterday•
.::.. r·

.' :;.

.
'~.

,.1"•

... '",

... ' '.~

·...

'.

I, .~~I' ••••
,:'\.
.~.:

~ ..: ::

00287:
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. '. ~-:

,. ,R"~ '0.
~ ..
.._.... ,..--'" ~ ~.~

..
",

,' . "
I . .' .

f . .f.,,:"
. l, . '9 July 1971 .
'. ; .,,::~).

"In 'respo~se't~'1:h'~:~pi;~ctO~f~'qu~st~o~ Carver r~ported'i:li~i~:~one:,:~:(.~·..

I';' ';e;ew xork:!;!:t::~!iZ:&:t ~:~:~e~~~~'7::;::~\1~:~'!'fs~e~'
.. a complete copy of the..:for·ty·~seven volumes .
I I . '.. .
16 July 1971
- ,

"Carver reported that the book which General Lansdale has 'been ,-
writing for a year and 'a,h~if is now in:- the hands of the publisher. With' some

I
minor changes being made.in light of .reve1ations resulting·from. the publica-
tion'of the secret Pentagonpape re , In 'response to· the PD/P' S question
Carver said that he mig:Q.t·',be: able ·to· ar:l':ang~ for ua to read the teXt;~!I.. ';".", .f
(DDCI in the chair) .,.,.· '.'
. ·i·";~/ .'.;:-:' ....
. .' "\,' .
trTweedy noted th~t:~twiute Hci~se ·~e.quest a PFIAB co~itte·e". com:~
posed of Franklin Linc;p~;:d)r. William Baker, aid Frank Pa~e wiil'~~:fer";
tak,e·a damage assessni~nt;rifthe publication of' th~ secret Pe~tago.n··~~p~.rs•
. He added that the committee will.want to -near from. us and spoke of plaIts
for Houston and Carver to unde.rtake this .task. II ,
~'.: '" ..
."
.." ... ,._~:.~_ ..• _.. ,'--
20 Julv 1971
" . ,',';. ";

'ITweedy repo;t·~.d}6.~.~.telephone c'~ll' from. 'AndY Marshall a~d;1~~Jid.:

that Marshall and Ran&.i?~~:side~tHe~ry., Rowen are brooding ab6ufth~~~:: .. ,:.
::

secur ity pz-obl.em in Rand/;' Marshall exp re s s ed a. de s'i r e to talk ·Witl,:(bTfe.. :-

of our senioi- security.oI£lcers when he next visits Washington ~n or9:e£·'t6
get. a feel for securitjr':p*a::ctites in' general.' Executive Director .~4Th~:~d
a'gainst our getting out front in. term.s ofadvi.sdng a major DODconf.r;;Lctor
I
. on security. The Dir~ctor approved and requested that re ze apond to ¥.r'.
Marshall's request in loVi key and that 'the meeting be held.in,thi.,~· 'b~i1qing~l\
~. . ..' ....
, ': '.. . . '.',' ."~: .' .
........
'. ": ." .'~' .:' . .

... ' : , : , . ,
...
. : .. ....
. -. :.. . ~

.' . '

.?2 J-u.ly'1971 (the dayHowa rd Hunt came to see· General Cushman) 1

II ca.r,ve;::...highligh~·f;'d. bi s., s."':3 I'd r)P~~eJ:da,.Y_\Yitb..li§..Q s:taiie r ':D~:rid . j
.-·...,..Yo-u.ng, ·~~ho is ~s s iatingJ o'w}_lfht!J.EJEp~~!-..i~_~Y.i,"~g,J,~~~~:s-:;:.~.t;~~nt:;·gon
./ papers., II : : ' < .

~ ..--,. __ .._. ... .. .:, ": "

...":.' . :

,. ,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.:.:;..
.:' ',-'-'

i;,.-.. ·· ......
.: '~;""~M.'~':':~~ ,:
;~:~.;:,.,

;. ~ ~

"",\" " ' '«t ','

, riCarve.: high,l~~hte~ his, .Houstou' 5,: and I
1se s ston with. t1i'~~:"'" .
~FIAB cor.r.unlttl\'~:.:~p.i,<;:,h
13, undertaking a damage as s es srnent. oithe publfca-

,~~;:1'~~ th~ ~ec~et.:~;~~~'7go"n,papers., (See, ~~orn~ng Meeting M~ut~~ of, ,~6 July
!'"

I
6 August 1971

The Directi;):l' cai1ed attention to the article by Michael Getler in t odayt s

VTashil+gton J:>o~t" "CI:A,patrols'Into China Said Halted, ", and di z-ected (1)
that Maury write a letter, io» his s Igna.tur e to Senator Stennis making it clear
that Senator Case wa sb rf efed on t~s topic and obViously leaked it; (2) that
Maury brief Carl March 'on the background, including the fact that these opera-
tiOU$ were not te rmmatedbecaus e of the Pz-es identrs projected trip. to Com-
:munist China butl;>ecau's~,certainaspects of the:m were preV:iously exposed in
the press; ,(3) that theD,ll.·ector';of Security (who was present at the Morning
Meeting) get additional backgr-ound from Maury and see White House staffer'
David Young;(4} ,thatGo~dWiil.,rep1yto 'queries by saying that we know nothing
about ,this ~atter; (5 ):,th~t,,~ousto,riand Maury utilize this incident in any
rnat.e rfal p repaz-ed for his' u se in,opposing the Cooper biil; and (6) that the
ODeI brief Dz, Ki s s irige x or .Gen era.I Haig on this :matter today.

-.
'''--''-.'' .... " .....

.::* 13 Augus,t,'1971
:<' '.,

, Knbch'e'cail¢datteriti.6n:to the .artiCle by Tad Szul~,in. todayt s New York

Times, "Soviet Mqy-e,:t6,Ayert ,War Is Seen in Pact with India, II and 'said that
the material contained' therein' on the reason for Foreign -Minister Gr.omyko's
visit to New Delhi is ,cleariy,froIn highly c1as'suiedCS'materia1. 'TheA-DDP
noted.hi's concern ove.r this breach of security.

..; .
16 'August 1971
,
i
!
-1 \ 'A-DDP n~t~lthit"~hearticl~ b T ' " '. . .
"Attempted Pr6-'SoVi~t Coup in y Y - ,ad Szulc In Sundayrs'~~ Times,
from a TDCS. Th~:Diredo
.' '

k e;en 18 Reported, " contains information ',-

,

~o~se stafi~r ~a-rid~oung•.r as, e that he call this to the"attention of vVmte ,

!t .: ." "0

..... , ,

00289"
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

i.:.:' ." ,,-

.... ,'.

18 August 197'~ -: ,~.:',:

··1 < A-DDP riot~d that. he has
reported to 'l,v-hite Hou~e :sta£f;;~
.:..<:;.

b:~vici'YounO'
r "

t
" .'. . ",;,:,__/
'on the re-:>ults,().£th~,Deputy'Directorof Security's'survey of'~lio-s'~,~,W};o saw'
. - ".'~'
0
\
the classified, a ss e sament upon which Tad Szu.Ic, based ,h\s'13;::i\b.g~i#:,:article.
(~ee Morning Meetbi.g Minutes of I? August 1971}.· ** ,'::."((;:::;:i:' .: :. "
: '.:~: ",' .
~,~; ..
" '." r-..
19 AUQ;us't 1971,'

'IIMaury hriefed Qn,.vynite House s~ai:fer Jo1:'.:1 Leh..-na~'s::~equ'est'fo::' ~~r

'. ' '. d" t . . a"W'on'a t four volumes of the secret .Pentagcn paper",
aSslstance ln e errrllnm o , ,,' ° • H
' . G 1'" t dly provided to Beacon Press, for pu,bhc,atloll· e,
Senator' rave ,repor. e , , ' " b
noted thatP~u1 Chretien pf'o.TR,is an acquamtanc e ()~'t4:,'S.en.at~r~n~ n:~y .e
able to assist. "Carver said that the four v'oluro.es probao~'y pertal:" to e1!or~~
to ne otiate a sett,lement and outlined the sensit~ve ~aten:l'contaln,e~ther~ln.
L Hous;on re,"ommended against our involvement ln, th7.: rn.at..e~, a~d su:gested
that t h e D epar
' , tm nt of Justice que ry Beacon PresS • .',Ma:ury sa:~d that.Fhe ,
e ~ , 'It' "'th Cl k
. 't ;""l'ni:itructed that we dc),nothing unti11Jlaury c.(;m~,u ,5 ~ ar.
D ~rec 0 .... , - , ' .' dC' ional
M O"e;or' CoU:nsel,to' the, Presi.dent for Legislat1ve"a~,' ongr-e s s ,
::teo ~,c, h" . ,,' 't £ town 'and will not return until the first;9 f next week.
Affalrs W 0,15 OU 0 ' hm
In the ~'~ariti:m:e" :Mau'ry noted tp.at hl:: will dete~ine,..f.ro,m, !ohn..Le a~.,
n
whother,'th~y have considered consulting the Depa:r,tment of JU5tl:e °h ~!l!.hs. )
-, '0 , " ." , ',',,(DDCr l.n t e c alr
' ,',

rnatte r ••.
..' ..

20 'Augusi:' 197 1 ,
. ,~
' : ' . 4.' "

",rM:aury safd that he called '\V4ite Hous e stafI~'r ,J 000 Lehman yesterday
and cite4:;~ih'~.Code :which would' p ezmit the Justice "D~p'~:r:tnlent:i:o go 9-fter' the
four' vohlines':,?£,the, sEicr~t,Pentag6npapers report~'d{y:'gi:v~n:~oB'eacon Pres s;
Lehman "s', reaction .wa's .that, since there is an, exi.stingpoiiCy',preventing the
use of su~po~nason this matter, he'stiU hopes we wntass,ist ,{n'det'erm.ining
'what Senato:r Gra:\reI may have given. Beacon Press~:":Th-e,DDC(a5kedMaury
not to ut~lize,' Paul:Chretien's entree 'to the Senator ~th.out prior consultation
With the Director, and Carver commented that he is' opposed to our'involve- "
ment (see :M~rning,MeetingMinutes of' 19 August 1971. it '" (DDCr in'the chair)
" '

~;)~< . .
'::' .'

23 Aug'.l,st'1971 ,

\ " ' t:TiwDirector reviewed ior Houston a conversation he had with a'
<o,uug la~\~'Y:er who has reviewed the secret Penta,go,r(,pap'ers' -in'response to'
,..-_tIle Jl~stlce Department's efforts to pzo s ecute, Ace'ordina :to' thi'· tt '<:a..
,

J .... did ' . ' 0, sa o rney,

. us ..rce ,,1 .. ~ot c ibe the: approprlate proVJ.sions of the Code audhaa ze sent d
lots case poorly. /-I , p e

~: i·
".:-.,;;:
00280'
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

r • ,:" . .~. . .' .

,. .... '
• -.~ :,;~:, I"~

l:~~=,::that thi.i."~aaY;.in the~lti'~itand

called:i:l.tt·~rition·to the foiloWing article's: .I1Maci".li?Hedi, Linj - '_",i- ,.,-
Apparently Out in Powe·r·,shuffle" by Stanley KB.rn9i,1}'."Nqrth·Vi'etnam's·
Next MO~e" 'by Evans/Nova,k,' and "lin Piao 'is iFinisli~41.':'1,JY Joseph
Alsop (a ttached}. He noted 'that,while the artic:i.e:J~y':Stanley .
Karnowprovides good coverage of the topic, it· has :'8, 'State. Depar-tment;
flavor. He also recalle'a that on 25 October we'dis'seminated
in~ormation simiJ..8.r to that corrtadned in 'the EVel!lf!/}lo:va~.article •
·He.·tnentioned that .the Alsop .article is ·probably.the m:ost damagin'g,
since' it inciudEii!3.,materiall . ...... '"

IThe..Director noted.. :p;JJ.:l.~,s,.to. do S.omething t,

La--'b·o"""u-:t·.-.t"h--'i'-:s::--C::pC::-r:-::o'i:b""l-=-e:-m~:b=u:Lt-a=-d3':v~ised the A-DDP to . cope ':Wi th any adverse..

..re~ctionT -. fbY
'noting ~he la:ge··~~()~~e.:01'. repor;ts
onithe·pol1tica:I",situation in Commum.st· ChJ.na~:·,::·· ';'.: ..... --::. .",
. ."

11 _,November 1971

. .
±~, .response ·to the. Director's .question . ca;;~·~::~~~d'.~hat~some work
. requested. by ·.John 'Ehrlichman is pending. The Director asked to be
.' ·filled in later .on the detai1:s. . ..::'. . '. : ..
. '.~ "

. ;.'
... '.. 'Lehman . said. tha;t Jack"Anderson' s column inj;o~y' sWashiDgton
:. ~pa:t;::-J!Hu·sse:l;tl.:·.;:I:S;elp . or I'll Go on' a:' Ghazol1.~~~;~~LcC!ri:tairis. ver'bS;tiin .
. . ')~il.guag~. '!'rom ),Ul:': ExDis mes sage 1'rom'King' H}ui,~,¢;p.ij~~cf:the.·,~s 'fdent·· ,
·.and adq.edthat.:
'~ ~.' .
he ~ d.s 'looking into the' distri:Du'tiori Qt'. this message •
'. ':" .', " . - ,'" '. . '<':.: '.-.
.. . ~

,'. ;

. .... . . , :: \ ..
. . A-DDI ca].led attention to Jack Anderson's columns .inyesterday's
'and today's Washington Post (attached). Henqted .th~t the 27 December
.- piec~ .contained material frc:lIll.three SALT ExDis. .memcons and added
·.tliat·toaay' s column contains quotes from a state.: Ltiillis. eabf,e and
:\~:~Q::'~CSS. 'A bde1'.:'discussion 1'ollowed, ..th,~>P.R;;'[()bs.erving that, .' .
.;.:. if·'.these security.breaches continue, we wil~·:li~ve·.t·o· limit severely
'" ·the·. distribution of sensitive .intelligenceinformat1on.
• ' : .' , • : • '~~.:..:: • t' • •

.. :', :'.,.;''.,~ -': '. . . '.

,.',', .'

..... ..'
,.~

?ct":#'., • • ' ,',

~.,,... .

0029.1.
 .MORI DocID: 1451843

.. :.__ 1
. !;

. . . . . . .t•• ' · · " ' '1 • . : ". ';(

. ·'i,.· .
',' .
.l. : -,' . ' •
<.:!" .
.'. " "~i" January -1972.
.", ; 1:
.....::::.: .. Maury said that "acc::ording to Frank Slatin;she·k,.·Cha'~piJan .
. ':Nedzi' will rely on' us ratb.e;r::heavily forsuPPol;t· dur.ing his.hearings
'. on the problen"t.of classification and handling:'.of.Governtnent·.· .
. "'1rifprmation (see Morning Meeting Minutes of 6' January .1972). . The
. Director encouraged Maury to ,see Chad.rman Ned·z.i next.:week, and
." nouston suggasted that. the Chaiman be provided with ·the Rehnquist
.study.

': DDP briefed on .work under ,~y to limit··distribution of. reports

~and\noted that· C/FI ·is completing a review of
---=s""'t-=-e=p-=-s-w"""hL:J.""'·c="h=-=m...-:li""'g=Ulfi=t:--t::Q=e--=t/iken to re strict di sseminationof sensitive
reports from ·all·sources.
,
..' .....·.Ll.. January .1972

,,:,: . Maury: ~'lated' that Frank: SlatinsheK' ii;;;~~'~Sing for.'';~Ckground

. '. . ;:·materials pertaining to Pas:t efforts or.·studies·: related' to :the
classification and control of informatipn~.:{',1Ie added that he and
.>, !':'HoU!:Jton will meet with' the .Director later' ~¥aY ·t9 discu~B the
,.' '.' availability ·of .the Rehnquist. study. ! ' '. '

i2.January i972 ...::', ;:.

": .r:';.. :-.:
'....." Mat:t!y)tBriefed: onhis·anf!. Houstontssession with Frank ' .
. ' ' :.:". SJ.atinshek and their provision of a. large ,volimJe of material on
. '. .. .. past eiforts tq develop ei'fec-cive espiona:g~·:!(·laws.
,0. '.' ' . • • ',"0)",-';;"-;"',' '"

Hou~to~ ri6ted' the Pre'sident t ~ nOnii~~ig~,':'~f HenrY E~. ". Peterse~

., ,.:: '.>'.
..... : : ·tobeceme Assistant Attorney' General in ;:Chlirg~·,o.f.,the diminal ..
_ . 'Division ot the Justice' ·Department. He ol)se'rved ,that ·Mr•. Petersen
:.:..... ..' :has 'been ,m-os~ helpful to the Agency in:the",:~~t~:,~r.ticu;I.arly
, . on: the Itkin case. .

13 January .L972 .

. , , :'. Maury .n~ted ·.that the draftrevision,'bi 'Executive .Order 10501,

,: ...: ."Security.Classification Procedures," .whicp.::'iB 'be,ing circulated
'. '. by the .NSD staff fot comment, isa follow:on to the Rehnquist study•

.::00

'. .: ·DDI calied'attention to the article: intOday's New YO~k:.Times,

.. -."Nixon 'Acts to End' Security Leaks." (Excerpt: "last ·July,.. two "
'. 'members of the White Rouse 'staff, ·DavidR. Young of the Ne:t~ona.i "
. . ~ .8ecurity councr), and Egi.l Krogh Jr. of the. ;J;)omestic Council" were
/., " asked to investigate 'earlier leaks and prevent recurrences.") .
,.~·I~ . '. ..

O.o.29~
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

I>·
,
!
,~ .
...... ; ".

/!~. ' '. ,~:" ~: "'~'., . '

"'. . -~ ,
, "

, ":"
.;.':'
.: . ~..
::'~.' ..
_ .. "
·1, February 1972 ..;- "
." :>-.. . '
...;A/DpS reported "the Rouse ;Appropriatio~s COl!JIll±ttee "re~uest :for "
a finance of'fi·cer ~oa.ssist them in }lork':."0Il: .tne budge t, '''-'~~ added "
that we have provided such assistancein·tlie past l and the Director
interposed no objec:tion. . .

7 February 1972

.' . "H9ustonexplained that no actzton wi~1 be taken in the near

future with "respect to 'the Rans Tofte" case I" since the Judge! has
been 'stricken with hepatitis.

tl February 1972

DDI noted the article by Michaei·:·.c¥:t~er in 'Today'S Washington

Pos~.; ."New Spy Satellites _
Plan.ned.:;:idr'C1ea"rerl" :rnstluit Pi~tures."
Later 'inthe meeting the Director. asked: the DDS to advf.se the
,.' Director of Security to undertake an·~nvestigation at this leak of
•'
:;.,'
'.::'.
'EOI-related
•
information "and
" .
to convenerthe USIB "Security
' .• '; ->, - . ' : ' ....
Committee •
. ','
: 11 February 1972

Carve.r -noted his hand.Hng of Wbii;e"' H9use staffer Sven Kraemer I s

,
ze quesf to' .FBIS f'or material cQncerriing;""U~S. FOW's.". The Director
"

..'
reminded Executive Committee members of'"Dr. Kissinger's :reCJ.uest
that any inquiries. from elements" of'the Wbiteo House staff. be re:ferred
: ..
to .his staf'f'
,.
for conveyance to :the Agen:~y
. . .,
~ ,,'
"
" ,., Houstonhigbl:ightecithe:meetirig.~i~.JOhn Ehrlicbman on the NSC
.. '. : "draf't Exec~tiveOrder on security Classifi~tion" "He" noted the
_ 'related articLe by Sanford Ungar in today'sWashington Post, "liSe"
." Urges: St;tff'er. raw On Secrets.". ".. ."

16 February 1972

. .. '
Lehman noted plans to continue' briefing Attorney 'General
'.".: ", '. '
Mitchell, .whose resignation is :e:t:fective 1 :March". :" . .
..
Houston related that Wbite:Hou:~e'~taffer David Young has
',':

invited him to review another ~ draft of the 'new Executive

Order on security classification.::.. .

" .. . ,.
,. .
r..
"

.'

.... ..,,' . ~

. "t"."·
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.,:. ./
..::'.
".:.

:.,
~. .. ~.. ." ..: .. .. .. 2e February 1972 ". :i,:·;:,:::,: :
... -A: . . ~o~ston. SS:i'd th,~t he. andJ .:,;::.'.,::.... , DePuty Director ?:f
I
Security, recommend the DJ.rec-f;or;concur ·.J.n·.the M new ExecutJ.ye
Order on classification, in light "pt tbeir under'\and:Lng with NSC
staffer David Young, that some of the ':features df the' Executive
Order may not materialize. A bri~fdiseussion followed and th~
Director asked lIouston to 'review the matter with him.

;~
2 ~rch 1972
Houston reported that the draft Executive Order on classif'ication
has undergone a few minor changes•.. ~e noted Director's letter to John
Ehrlichman, dated 7 December '-19.71," wit~ respect .to our position on
problems related·to declassifica'tfon:and, suggested that a .copy be
....j
provided David Young, NSC stiffier~';.After a brief discuss1:0n, the
d
. .i D:l,rector Lrrte rposed no objection~:< .
:: .'

." r •
b March. 1972 .: ~
.:.. ' .
, .,.. "-

The Director noted his memorandum fo ·the Deputies' and Independent

Office Heads, subject: "Allegations: of ·Assassinat.ions." He asked
that it be mentioned at. Staff'. Meetings. . .

". : 21 March 1972

" '!

. '. The J)irector said tha:t.:tb~",~s.ident he-so seen his 17 February

memorandum on reducing: disclos:\.tres v.of: classified 'intelligence and
~.,
directed the White -House staff to pre~re.a memorandum urging ·that all
agencies comply with pr<;>per'di·sclosl1re·.procedures.

22' March' 1972

Houston reported that he fS·.scheduled to meet with John

'; ~ ;" .: . Ehrlichman this morrdng •
. : ":.-

.:):~:{~<: 23 March 1972

-"':' ~":':' .. Maury reported that, after' checking with 'Egil Krogh of the
Whi.te House staff, he has .nia.~earrarig;ements to brief Congressman " .. '
Le~r Wolff' of New York on·tbe:·AgenGY's role in international ' ...•. ~.. '?

narcotics control. .,: ... '. . . ' .

,; .'

.
.....(:
'

.....:, ...
~.

00294'
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

1 May 1972 ':..::,.y

"~' DDS 'related that t~e~i::~;~;o~':'~:~ti~ity

has received a requ~st···· ..':
from the· .Becre t Service 'tC).provide .two .technicians Ln .support
of . . ..... -.
the Vice' President' s trip to ::TokYo. The Director concilrred.

2 May 1972.

DDS reported that the..Director .01' 'Security has received a request'

from the .Becreb Service fPr'c,otinteraudiotechnicians to support
the President's trip to Mos"cd>W:The Director concurred, .

11 May 1972

!. Houston noted his.~orre~ponderic~··Wit h White House.' staffer

t. .:
! . David Young' pertaining' t.o,:'::·.C>jJ'r.propleJ;lls.:With Exe cutive "brder li652
and addedvthat; Mr. YOllDg',:lias.accepted :bUI- position on about 90
percent of our problems :w1:tp· the. ·impleme:q.ting draft· directive.
!, " :

i
!
2LJ. May 1972 ." ... ....

. Houston explained that'he bad obtain,ed vlhite House. Staffer .'

. David Young'·sunderstanding tbat'wewi;Ll not meet the l.:rune deadlio,.e/'
for producing internal Ag$ncy regulations .implementing the NSC' .. ' .
directove on Executive .:Orq.er: 11652.'. A~brie1' discussi(>ll.foliowed on r ':
the cumbersome bookkeeping, and 'declassif'ica·tion a'uthbrities which· .
may be required. The Director obserVed ·that the topic: was
6uff'icien.tly .i~portant.for.~. uq:;:t.o,be in .no great rush, to meet a 1:
June 'deadline and Houstb#::~ssui'ed hfm thai; Mr. 'Yo:ung understands .:::'.

b June 1972
0.;'

TllUermer explained..,thafhe.will continue._working with the" ..... r •

. . -" . ~

. General Counsel in response to Charles Nes'son' s efforts to serve a

subpoena on him in connectaon with tbe Ellsberg case. He noted the
related article by Rober;t.,A. Wright .Ln tqday's New XorkTimes,
"Hearing Is Asked In Eli'sperg Case. It . .

."
7 June 1972 . . ~~i~1~tI'~'~::::' '. '.' .
;":
.'
.:

. Houston noted a.:let~r. from the Just:tc~ Depar-tment; conveying a .. ,

subpoena dire.cted to ·Ariiu.s: Thuermer .iIi connection ·with the Ellsbe:rg'::;:·::'·:·-·:
case •. He highlighted tbe'~schedule of documents .requested, most, of ':":::'"
which' were mentionediIi'·,:footilOteS·.to the Pentagon papers. He ncted :...'; .
. 'plans to ask Justice to :decJ.B.re the materia~ i,rrelevant to the ease ;;:'.',; .

.- . ':'}. ...~:
' .. -

"

; • •0
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, ' , , , ."

-,..i".·: r;
M June 1972

. Houston said tha~h~,1ri.ll,~~attending a meeting called 'by~'

DOD General Counsel 'Buzl1ardt;"wlib"'ls recommending ~ba~ Justice drop,'
. the' case against Daniel ·.E·llsberg.

19 June 1972
<. ~. . . .

The Director noted ·the -17 June arrest of James W. McCord and
four others who' were apprehended at the Democratic National Committee',
headquarters at the Watergate~. With·,the Director .of Security presEint
to prOVide biographic details,· the Director made it perfectly clear
that responses to any inquiry with respect to. McCord or Howard Hunt,
who may be implicated, ~re to.be limited to a statemen~ that they.
are fomer employees: who. retired in.MMill1 August and ~il 1970 .: .... :.: ,:.,
respectively. The. Director asked·:th.at this guidance, be
dissemiDEl'ted
via ·sta.ff meetings"·'~:'·:a;'l:ie.Directorasked that any inquiry from other·.:.:;":
e Lementis of" the gov~~E;nt"be ref'erred.to the Director of' Security::'"
who is to be the f'ocal.·point. InquirieE? f'rom the press are. to be'; •.
ref'erred to Mr., Unumb)Who"may say that·"McCoxd worked in the Of'f'i.ce~.\,··',::·,-
~~:e~~~~~t t~:nD~~~:~~g~~~~~:~~:piet~a~::s~~:~~~:i~~l~~r:~.L};':\\';\:· .'.
EM FBrrs request f'or name .traces. It.vias' noted that Howard' Hurrt. ;. . ' .
may have done some "\fork since retire~eJ;lt in connection with the'. ... !
preparation of' supporting -, material f'or'some awards. The' Executive ..."" \.
Direct"or was asked·'··~9 ,review this topic 'and .repo.rt to the Director'~ '."

20 June 1972 , .....

.'ii~:·.:.~:.~:. . ..".~ ... ~~-~.; . ~'." :
In response to·.;:the·Director' s. request, the Director of' Security.·
highlighted deve Lopmentis over the .past twenty-f'our. hours .with ' . .
respect to 'the McCord/Hunt·, et ale, situation. He noted that the·,,:-...
late edition of'· the ;Ne'W' "Yqrk. Times-car;ries a dif'f'erent story. by. Ta(i': -. :··~: .
. Szulc than that wh~ch~ppe,ared in the edi.tion received here 1-~ .:' .:" .,_
. (attached). The Director ·of. Security anticipates some inquiries on···.'·
Bernard L. Barker's. situation, and it was noted that Mr. Barker. .
was hired ·by the Agency in 1960 andteminated in 1966. The .DirE~c'l,;oi·· /
r

complimented Unumb on':'his handling of' incil1iries and asked that.:f\iture .

inquiries be met::w:Lth.;a .response confined to the f'act that,now::·,t~at .
we have acknowledged that .bo'th 'McCord and Hunt are fOrnier Agency. '. . .,
employees, we know" n,otid.ng more ().bout the case and the caller 'should I
be referred to the~:FBI
. .
-. as appropriate.
". .

"' ..
'.'.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.'

.. ::'.

;~
:, .'

mr
20 June 1972

The Dir~:cj;q;r'noted :recei,pt. of a. papar on a safehouse in· :.:,

Miami which isoeing made avad.Lab.le to the Secret Service :tn'. support
of its work in connection with the Republican and Democratic'
National Conventions. He asked the ADDP and the DDS to make. i t
absolu.tely . cl;~~r.1 . I. that ou: coopezatd.on in ~~i~:;:_J"-' ' ..
undertakingis..::~.o beconf~ned to. provfsf.on of the sa:ee40u~~:r~.~n~·:,· ~
·that it. is not:·;to.1?e. used as a site for investigations, inMti;ogations,
or llwa lk- i ns n , ··:e't¢;. . The·.Direc;:tor added that 'we will not 'ioan>~',:;::;," .
people to the'F!3± or::Secret Service in connection with thei,:r:.'::':.·.' .:,
responsibilit:i;~s;,at .the Conventions nor will we provide.:eqii:lpme,·nt
unique to t~.~::G\:~~ilc,y" ::_::~:~1~{;:::;~' :'..:.
. .';: :';'~;. ~~'."
21 June. 1972
. . -t- - .:', .

'In view: of.>·the:. coverage in todayJ's New York Times and wa:shirigton
Post, Maury re~oimne'nded. that Chairman Nedzi be, briefedontJ:i~"McCord
affair and that'·this briefing include all our information abouf the
c@-he,rs inv()lv~Q.~· "The'Director as;ked Maury t.o touch b~se ,wi~h·the .
'Director·pf.Se.c'grity,and.prepare·El. briefing 'paper on t.his·t9P:i.c'for
his review~"Citing '-the ·numbe;r.·of distorted rumor~ about;;tli~'fiY\:'<.
matter, the'Exe~tive:'Dire'ct'or said that. during the couis~o:::q:f~the
day he hopes .. 'to:.,proi.'ide a .sugge,ated Headquarters Bulletin 'fQr'lali
employees fqr. ~he 'Director's review.' " :' ..... '. :
,-. • '~'~I~

Unumb 'hoteda ·U1.iIiJber of inquiries from the press witli;:;~spect .-

to the Cuban-Americans ~volved in the bugging atte~pt.atthe .
Democratic Natiopal Committee headquarters and their alJ,.eged· . .
involvement· in the.:Bay of Pigs, etc •. The Director as~ed',that.such
inquiries 'pe met With an explanation that we are not prei;>aredto be
helpful ori.·'this··matter. ' ' .::; .. '-: '.
. ':':. .: ".

','
. -, .-,:"

.. -,.".:

;.
. '" .~. "" . ,...... ':'.::.'
,/

.....
-;' ;"
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

........ .~ .
'.' .....
.._..~~;.,;~~~".; .., I':

-;"" . .
linUmb'obse~ed that 'inCluiri~s on the'~;Mccord/Htintsit~~tion
seem to be::~la9kening off. ' '_

The Director called D/oCI I s attention to coverage of the McCord

affair in .the Metro Section of today's Washington Post and asked that
future issues' of the "CIA Operations Center Morrting New$paper
Highlight~" inclUde press items on this topic. ' '

Maury noted that he briefed Chairman Nedzi on the McCord/

Hunt situation and on a security case'•
."':.:
26 June. 1972
,Houstonnote.d the Fenst'erwald Freedom{Of Irif'oi'inatiori: .case ,
1"he Dire'ctor' endorsed his plans to concur an the FBI 's'. release of
three 'photOs;.one being of' Lee Harvey Oswald, which wei'e..'B,cCluired
in Mex:lc~',and;: .previously :f).lInished..to the Warren comiIiis'sion.

'. '~ .
, .
' ..... . :-:.,,,.

", -,

0029S,
.......
J"-,'
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,.

',,' '.

'5 Jtiiy<i9't 2 ' .'...:.__. : .~'.,. :-.:·k~~~~:~;.;\'.~~ ...:; ... -t'. :

.. ,
'. .·::ibtis~~n.~cal1E:ld
atte'ntionto the judge;s rul,irii{{ii :ih~':EiJ,sbergl
Russo ..ease de~zig the ~ defense motion for):l,??-:~yidentiary
hearing~': as.. are'suIt of which ·the subpoena directeq.:.f!.tCIA:·ls ..
euspended , ..... ".
. '-,

: 1.1 July 1972

. DDI noted-presa attention atrtached to $ecre~:r::Y of ,Com~erce
.Peter/?,?n~s.·planned trip to the .. Soviet Union and observedvthati r - - - - - ,

secre ry'ass~gne

'-nr~JHE""""'SS-J:"Sl=n:;-'to the..Pre siq,ent

for
Internationa;t. "Economic Affairs, continues to,wo:r1'\:.•.f.or,.him .andmay go
td'.:the·. Sonet·:tJnion". She will be in a LWOP sta,tu.s::during "the.
remalnder:·of·he·r:tenure
.':= ,". ' . ,. . .
with .
the' Secretary•.
' .
:-,:. ·;:·:i,'t:;:
'.
..
?:":".'.~: :: ~: ",;
........
.l4'July; 1972' . " '

''- '... ·.Jca.rver-"re·called that we have providEid some ~~.:[e~nis· t~·Senator·

Eagleton ·:on,::Vietnam. The Director .saf.d that in tiine ·.we will' receive
instructions . from the White House on briefing Sena.tors McGovern'
~~~~. . " ,I
.: :".~I ' .' ."...':, •. . .' ,~ . .
... ' .

".
..... .-.
. ·...Houabon, reported that the Justice'D=partment is anxious that
,·no>~ommen1l.be,.made· on the Ellsberg/Russo trialand.tliat any '.' .: :
.inquiries f1hoUld be re ferred·. to the Justice', DePa~ent"s ·.PUblic
Re1S.tions .Office.
. . ", ..
. .... "'" '

24 July i972 't' '. .

.,'':., ,Hous.ton noted that he' had called David 'YoungI s 'attention" to
the. fact that the White House (NSp Stafi') is not'\.ltilizing the new
~~ssii'ication
.. - :
procedUreS
.
•

.i,:,~25·\ru~. '1972 : ('::;~~~'~';:/ '{' ..: .

. :. :5lr·.·.\~~·rep~rted
that according to WhiteHous~,Staffer'John
. ·'.;·:~bn!an" DaVid. Young is of the opinion t~t EstiImites.-are subject to
'. declassi'i'ication after ten years. Houston wi:ll :'see, Mr. "Young to
strai~ten him out on this t o p i c . ' "
:-:-" .
.. . ' ~
.. '.' .. ",.
.."
., "::".
; . ~. :
'

.~i\ ._ .. ' ::: .' ... ' . ,.....

iI
II., .,.j .'
~.b.. " ' . \ :": ' : .

\ "I';'/.'

' .
00299• '. '.~ ;0 ••

.....:.:
 MORl DocID: 1451843

'.' "

l' '.

..... . ,.:.'::.•... ...

.~'. '. "~l Juiy .1972 .: '.~ : ~ ~
... -" ".

,
The Di~ctor ..••• went on to ask:th~·DDS.:i'or .theba.'ckgrqund
a
'01' decision to have I 101' the Off:Lce'ijf ·Se·C~:ity.'.accompany
. Fred Flott on a White House survey of the . di:'ug scene -an Southeast
: Asia.'· The D~rectorsaid that in the fu:tlll7e'J;li·~·.CrthePDCI's
. 'prior" approval will be required in all caseswhere rthe Agency
.. 1s asked by the White House or any other element of the G<;>vernrnent
.'to·send an Agency officer on anarcotic~-co~ected mission.

27·July 1972

. DDP reported :that Cord Meyer advised Bud Krogh of the White
House .~~~f of. our unwillingness to h~vel. .Ia~com~ny a new
narcotics survey team to Southeast ASJ.a . and·;:thepossJ.bihtythat
. " "'..Krogh .may' call the Direttor to reclama. '. ,ThEr. J)irector b;riefed on
. -:,:-.. '- ··the backgroUnd of this .deci·sion·and notea::;ilis ·~conver.sati'on with
..... Al :Haig on this. topic. '. .' ';"

.1 August i 9 7 2 . . 0 , " "<"... ,' ..

. '. DDS related that MrJ-----lclfthe· ':di:g~ffrec~'i~ed a call

fr~ the Se'cret Service re~ our. training film on ·defensive
drivirig. The'Director interposed no obje.ct10n. to 'zriakini?; this
.. film available •

. 8 August 1972

HOUS'tqIl reported that· Judge McArdi~;~~~hted'amotion for

: summary juc1gPJent in the Tofte case". .... ;;>~i:;\.; -: :.. . ."
:>::.-.,•

.'21· August 1972 ..

.:: ",

Houston 'noted a tele.phone call fr~~"'tt~~d~~i~~:~\explained

that his atrtorney 'Was with him and had ·a·question about, a friend's
.' . past affiliation with the Agency. I JD1?/sec, .has .
. . reviewed the. employment, and Houston reporte.d '{;at he replied
.'::':'.. directmyto: ~unt' s friend, Mr.1 .
thaf-l:li s old I
. >'" affiliation should create no·probl~.ms·iri:;co~ectionwith· his
" .... :' appearance' before a grand jury. . ':. :.:.... , ...
' .. ;::. '
. . '~.(.; ~: .
... '.
~;: .. : .

00300
'.. .
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

I:
I
.. '
: I':
"
-:: .'
I .. :. .r:.....
i
-'-
" ,~_.~

\
.J,
. :'.

22 August 1972
'~ ", • <. •
"; . ~

Thuemer reported on a call from a ·Mr. Crewdson of .the New York

Times who said he was Ilfomally re'luestirig" a photograph of Howrd
Hunt. The DDP observed that we are unde;r no obligation to provide
a photograph, and Thuenner said he had de c.l.Lned,

23 August 1972

DDI noted a letter from the McGovern campaign headquarters

reque atdng the FBIS ImMliI ditily white book and any recent studies on
Southeast Asia. A. brief discussion followed and the l~ter will be
disregarded. .~ .

14 September 1972

Maury reported on his conversation with Messrs •. 'Flug and Epstein

of Senator .Kennedy's staff in response to the ~Senator's 18'
August letter to the Director alleging impr.~r ~ontact.r
I Memorandum I or the Record) • . '
J{ for detail~~s""ee""urrL\jT"T'"""n'
5,,----

Thuerrner noted that WhiteHouse staffer David Young will hold a

meeting today to brief the press on the .implementation of Executive '.
Order 11652 •

.21 September 1972

Warner reported that Marchetti's la\f.Yers have been in touch with

Justice in connectzton with ACLU's. fil~Iig' a. secret oriefwith the
. Supreme Court and said that ·the Office of .Securi"ty wi.ll· pick it up
as a convenl:tence to J u s t i c e . , . .

Warner noted that the Director is one of severaf, defendants in ~

.
I
a civil-case filed by Ellsberg and Russo.
. . .
Unumb Illoted a re'luestfrom the National Observer for biographic
data on Howard Hunt and James' McCord. inconriection with a. story they
are doing on the Watergate incident. The Director endorsed his
... having prmcided only the dates these individuals left' the Agency.

25 September'1972

The Director noted a caJ.-l from Assistant Secretary,of State

_S{sco/

-: L--l ---;---_

-,.
·00301.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

...
./~. ',' -l.. '
( '.

_.. >.
'.
'.

, 18 October 1972

Maury noted his response to a request from CSC General CoUnsel

Anthony Mondello, who was reacting to a' request for the personnel
files of those former Agency officers involved in the Watergate
i~cident from Senator Kennedy's Subcommittee on Administrative
Practices and Procedures. He added that we are exempted from
related CSC regulations, and the Director endorsed his plan to
p~ov~ only the ~ates of their departure from the Agency in the
event'the Senator's office calls us-on this matter•.

3 November 1972
Houst9n recalled that last August he reported on·a call from
Howard Hunt and his subsequent, ~idan~e~ Ion how
to handle affiliation with the Agency, .1 t, I

The Director highlighte<:l his conversation with: David Kra;ldw

of, the Washington Star News and his flat denial of a proposed 'story
thatih~,'Agency was asked to rellort on •.t he Democratic' :Party which
led to'the Watergate incident ana others. The Director' noted his.
plans to issue a statement of denial if such a storY,were to appear
and su~g~stedthat Thuermer consider drafting one for contingency
use. ','

15 Novembe:r 1972

DDP noted a report from Chfef, WE Division that on.9 October a

. Mr. Harper of the New York Times 'WaS working on a story which tries
, to link the Agency with Cuban emigre s , the break-in at the Chilean
,Embassy, action against Daniel,Ellsberg, andrthe Watergate case. ,
Tbbermer, observed that this,is the first,he has hea~ about this topic,
and the DDP concluded that such,a story could have no Oasis in fact
and it would be i'nadvisabletotryto straighten out 'Mr. Harper.

20 November 1972
_. . .
"DDjI called attention to Jack Anderson r s column in today· s
Washington Post and the quotes' contained therein from an Agency
report .on a famous singer. The Director highlighte.d his brief
conversation with Jack Anderson and explained that ,the Director
01' Security is looking into .this.matter.

· .

00302
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-.,'",

r· ,
. ;:."-"

r·
>
.
., .'
r:
.... ~ .

22 November 1972.

Warner .related that accordfng to Assistant Att~rney General

Henry Petersen,"U-,S. Attorney·Earl Silbert has several' questions on
the Watergate case. The Director indicateihe will review this
matter later •

. 12 December 1972

Thuermer noted ,~n inquiry from. Dave Burnham of the New York
Times, who appears to be writing a story on the twelve New York
Police officers who were briefed by the Agency on information
processing. A brief discussion followed, and Thuermer will advise
Burnham that we have occasionally provided briefings at the request
of various police organization~, but theie are exceptional cases.

13 December 1972.

The Director noted the' article .by Thomas B. Ross in yesterday's

Evening Star-News, "New Watergate Dhnension?," and the impression
.j" left therein that the Agency wa~'involved'in the' Watergate incident
because a passport bear-Lngrthe. name Edward Hamilton was found on
Frank Sturgis. Any inquiries from the' press or elsewhere are t.O be
met With a "bhf.s is nonsense" .reply. The Executive Director noted work
under way to identify the genesis of the passport st.ory,' .

29 December.1972

Unumb J;'eported that.. SeYmour Hersh of the New York Times, who
is preparing a story on the Watergate incident, had asked. if
Martinez had been emploYedoy th.€! Agency. Acting DC! recommended
that 'the Agency not assist Mro"'Hersh's efforts.

,
. ~":"

.-
-,

00303
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ~ .,.~.. - : .' ._".. "... ~: 1._;

4'

10 January 1973

Maury related' that we will be on firm ground in respon,di.i:Lg 'to

Congressman Koch if- we indicate' that our assistance to the NY Ci.ty .
Police Dept. 'WaS not training but a' briefing on an essentifj,lly
unclassified basis undertaken in response to the suggestion of a .
consultant to the N.Y.P.D. Thuermer reminded those concerned that
_____________--'1 is a former Agency employee.
12 January 1973

15 Janua ry 1973
Maury noted.press. st~ries that. Watergate defendant Martinez'·
was on the Agency pay roll until 17 June and anticipated some .
in~uiry on this topic. The DDP endorsed his view that'M Whereas
Martinez was inten;oittently used as a .source to. report on Cuban
exile mateers,' this relationship should cause no serious difficulty.

17 January 1973
The Director. called .attention to the .article by James Reston
"The Watergate Spies,.r: contained in the New York Times, and won.dered
how Reston .got the errOfteous impression that Hunt was " •.
Operational head .of the' CIA":;; Cuban Bay of Pigs • •• "

18 January 1973 .

~~ry reported that when he and Dave Blee, Chief/SB, saw

Chairman Nedzi with respect to the Chairman t s forthcoming trip ::to .
-
Finrtand, leningrad, .Sofio..and Aghens, Chairman Nedzi briefed
.'
his November conversation with New York Times correspondent Seymour'
Hersh. MaurY went ()n'to highlight the several t.opics and allega:-tions
on.'· :..

Hersh claims he has wi.th respect to Agency activities,' .

particularly allegations tha.t we. are' enga,ed in extensiye dOlllesiic'
operations. 'Maury will circulate a .memorandum on, the information. ' .
Hersh claims he has. ." The. Director explained that we should assemble
.a ~senior team ·to meet with Chafzman Nedzi and clearly outline what we .
do and do not do i.n the United States. The Executive Director. ;:,'"
called attention to his 29 February 1972 memorandum to the 'deputies,
<~~
••.• :Subject: Allegations of Agency involvement in the US, and ·suggested.
that it might serve as an outline for 'ma,teria,l to be covered with'
Ghairman Nedzi. . ",

" ... ::00304

~.. :. '.
 MORl DocID: 1451843

. ;L8 January 1973

Maury·noted .that·in response to Tom Korologis' (Special Assistant

t1l1M to the Presiden:t for"IBgisl.a,tive Affairs (Senate)) request·for
materials on instances where classified information had been leaked
to the press, he assembled a paper on this topic and provided it with
a nqte than an examination of most. leaks reveals that ~ the White
House and Executive Branch are the guilty parties.

19 January 1973
Maury reported that Chairman Nedzi would like .the full
Subcommittee on Intelligence Operations to hear a presentation by
us on Agency activitity .in the United states sometimei~ mid-February.
The :Director noted.:that· his decision of yesterday to tu:-n out a senior
team for ·this briefing stands. .. .

22 January 1973
General Walters noted Howard Hunt's appearance on television
last night. Tbuermer wj.ll obtain a transcript of the program, and 'tbe
Executive Director noted his concern over Hur(;.t IS suggestion.that he is
no longer bound by his secrecy agreement. . . .
,
23 January 1973
.
Executive Director noted that the termfnal secrecy agreement
which Howard Hunt signed said. that he will be· a cknowl.edged as an
Agency employee. ·His· ass{tion that he is not bound by "the· agreement
because we dd.d in fact acknowledge his employment here is therefore
ill-advised.

The Director noted a call frbm Elliot Richardson asking about

some Lnf'ormatdon that Seymour Hersh has developed to the effect that.
HEW automatically provides the Agency.with travel orders on its
.employees and that this agreement was made in Secretary Ribicofi" s
time. The DDI ·will determine what this is about and advise. .

24 January 1973 ...

. }.'.

MaUry noted that he met with Congressman Koch on our minimal

assistance in briefing the .New York City pCl)lice officers. The.
Congressman ·would like something in writing on this, which Maury will
prepare and sign:.

'.~

00305
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

," ... ;:.-: "-.:__.~~ ..: :-:;-- ..__.:.,. .... .

-: .
,
.' "., "

,24 January 1973

, .
,,"'Thuermer noted advf.ce from a former Agency enipf.oyee that' ';~""'-'"
Seymour Hersh has been assigned full time to the Watergate story, but
in the meantime" Mr. Hersh claims he has evidence of Agency interest
in an arsenal in the Midwest, a map-making facility in Vermont" and
in Camp Peary.

26.January 1973,

The Director noted he has'ao-vised the Director of Training of

Mrs. Lyndon Johnson's request for Marie Chiarodo to handle the
large volume of mail she has received.

DDt reported that he lias been unable to turn up any information

which would·:).ead·8.eymour Hersh to allege that we have a map-making
facility in Vermont.

30 January 1973

Thuermer reported' that the Vi:rginia Gazette seems rto be .

persisting in its efforts to embarrass cale Peary and has. been in touch
with Victor Marchetti and Patrick McGarvey" who have' tended to confirm
allegations t~at the Phoenix. program was supported by contract assassins .

. Maury noted that Mr. Helms, is appearing before the Senate

Foreign.Relations Committee this morning on police tI'i:iining" KJfIH
ITT" and the. Watergate incident. He also noted that he has
solicited the, support of Senators Humphrey" McGee, and Scott .tio
make appropriate public statements following Mr. Helms' 'appearance .

Mary advised that in response to Chairman Holifield's

investigation of Agency training pf policemen" he will meet with
Herbert .Robaek; Counse L of the House Government Operations .
Committee" ·to explain our briefing c;>f various poli,ce depar-tmerrts ,

8 February'1973
~

The'Direc.tor noted his scheduled meeting tomorrow:with

Defense .secretary Richardson and asked Executive Committe~ members
to give him.·a, note on any item they' wish him to rai,se with the
\ ..
Secretary. Canq,idates are •••. Secretary RiCbardsons' earlier
.co!1cerns'·With respect to HEW providing the Agency with travel plans
. of officers going to Communist Bloc countrieS. On the ,~tter item
the DDIexplaineq. that since Secretary RiCthardson,'s .inquiry -to Mr.
... Helms (see niinutes of 23 Jan 73)" a survey had been 'undertaken and
reviewe,d'with H:EW; which had no problems with these old arrangements
but is shiftirig the point of pickup to its J?ublic ',affairs s'taft
where such information is available to anyone.

()0306
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

...." . M; "", ~~M~ •._ ._ ." _~

,.-c,_._,~ ..,-,;.-:--._ _ __.
•.: r· d. .'::.1 .. .~

.: ....'.. . .. " -v.:

e " .:.:- .' ~ •

.~ .'

~ "-:": .• <";:'"'" ••• -, • • •

".-.
. ':.,
. .' . . . . . ~
Ma~ry· noted :the statE)ment. by Senator Full.light follOWing Mr.
Helms' appearance yesterday before the Senate Foregin'Relations
Committee' in which the Sentator expressed his opposition to·the whole
concept of the Agency getting involved with the. police 'even Lnan
innocuous way.. Maury added that he will 'see Chairman Holifield's
staff assd.starrt Herbert Roback today. Maury said that a stement had
been transmitted to the White House yesterday for John Ehrlichman's
possible' use. (a:t~ched) • The Dire ctor asked that ',a .contingency
document be prepared along the . lines that we will cont-inue to comply
with the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 which
approves of·our assistance to various police forces when ~
authorized~by the Justice Department. In' response to the·DDI's
suggestions, . the DDS will review what assistance to.police.··.forces
had been giyen pr:lor .t.o 1968 and advise. . ,... .' ,

Manry concur-red in the Director's judgment that·, it· is' ;Dmpossible

to keep all·:congressional elements happy and that we :face a period
of increase.d 'cri"ticism from this quarter which must· bernet with
firm aasurancea.itbat; what we are bef.ng criticized for··is. fully
authorized ·andjustified. Unless the facts justify such a 'statement,
we would be well advised to terminate .the $tivity in ques'td.on, .

,Maury.~eea,lled· that we are obligated to sit:dowD. ·W:f.th .

Cha,irman',Nedzi and review what we do and don't do 'in the 'U'-S. (see
MOmling Minu.tes of ill9IvlM 18' and 19 January). The Director"
concurred':' .·,The DDI suggested that we undertake an-In-house review
of what .it.::t:s·we are doing wi thin the U.S. and·. identify. and.
eliminate :the :ma:r;-ginal.· .

9 FebruarY 1973
, Maury, said he spent an hour yesterday with C'ong~ssman Holifield
- arid they decided to have the"ir re spective staffs work' on a letter for
Holifie~d to send to the Director suggesting restrictive,' but not
prohibitive,..guidlines regarding such activities "in .tne future.
Maury noted Chairman .Nedzi ' s cur-rent- concerns. about.' ,this .·topic and
said' 'the 'proposed. IlOOifM letter may satisfy hiswo:t"r~e·s.•

14 February 1973
. Thuermer noted advice from Hicholas Hor-rock-of' Newsweek that
a '.'soft 'story'" is floatihg' around Newsweek On the"gEme~l topic of
.pq;Litical espionage and' e~-CIA agents. Mr. ·Horrock asked what
. constraints .we. have-on former empioyees •. A . lengthy '-discussi.on
followed, noting in particular that the onlY·leg~lconstraint
imposed is the terminal secrecy 'agreement as' reinforceq. by the MMMMM
co~s:tn··the Marchetti case. Other than this, there are no constraint
except moral ones. Th£rmer m.ll advise .Horrick that .thous~ds of .
employees have gone through CIA, and it is a.matter .01' consJ.derable
T1ridethat only a: handlllul have deported themselves imllroperly. . ,
~ . . ~ 00307
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

... .'. " • i •

... (
~ .. ' ." ."
r. ",

i5. Februai:x..1973
~ . .
• • • ~:;,\.,.,~aury added that he went over (With' Nedzi) Seymour
Hersh's chargee with respect to tlte Agency and.our position oneach ,
DDI recalled our obligation to brfJe~ Chairman Nedzi on Agency
activities in· the US.

20 February 1973

Maury re·J.ated that Herb EM Roback of Senator 'Holifield's staff

is being asked. by David Burnham of the New'York Times for the names
of those city police departments we have briefed in the past. The
DDS called attention to our obligation to clear with these police
departments any merrtd.on of their having beerr-br-Ie.fedv .!n response
to the Direct6r's sllggestion that the AgencY'issue'a press release
on this ··.topic,a lengthy discussion· followed"and the Director
asked the'DDS ··to report to him oil wha"t our undezatandfng .with..
various 'pOlice departments ba s been prior to our .agreement to
brief·!3ame.•· He also asked thai:; editorial comment .on any past
.Agency briefing. of the press or press reI.eases be aasemb'Iedvand
ex:PJ.ained. that in principle we should from time to time im.ke it known
tli~t we" are part of the U.S.Government.

23 February 1973'
. Ho" .
. '. t'!-hury 'noted that Herb Roback of "Senator ;llifield is .staff and
Chairman' Nedzi have concurred in'a letter for~the Director's
signature~which.will indicate that we will undertake training of
U.S. pibli·c~".~nly for the most compe.t.Lfng reasons. ltJ!brief' .
. ·.discussion followed and the Director .observedthat it is' important
for us ·to de.cidt:: what we do and then advise' t1;l.e Rill accordingly.

21 February j973

The Director noted a call from· Senator Jackson, who asked him
to meet :with Senator McClellan sometime next week with regard to
'. Congressman Holifield's inquiry.concerning Agency training of U.S.
.. police 'departments.
. .
.
:',.
r .

1 March 1973 :. I

. Maury related that· former DirectorRicha~d HeJins has been:

asked by Senator Fulbright to reappear before the Senate Foreign
Re~tion~ Committee. Maury said that Mr.: He~s would .pr~bab~ 'be
.... "queried on the Watergate incident, Agency .t!'ainirig· of police, and
_ITT and w~nt on to describe Mr~ Helms' anti~ipated.reponse •.

.- ....

00308
 ~-------------------------------~

MORl DocID: 1451843

i7~-'-
._~ .... _'_' ' M •• _,. . . . . . & _ _ ' • •
: .... -._..
_.~._-.- ..-.- .. ,",.-:"-.
I ' -v-

j,
l'

.:'
or, :
" , ",'
".". ','
,
':.:.:" ~\ /.: -.
r '
i " .

.
~ :.- .......
-

1 March, 1973
Maury reported 'that' Congressm'8.!f~Rolii'ield's staff is anxiously
awaiting a lett~r from the Director in response to the Congressman's
written inquiry on police training. The Director noted plans to'
foward it.

2 March 1973

Maury highlighted yesterday's LIG meeting at the White House,

and his recommendation that we not provide .examples of Congressional
leaks of' classified information 'for Wbit~ Rouse use in reacting to
Congressional criticism of the Administrmtion's "indiscretions."
The DDS advised that the Office of Security is keepfng .a reasonably
complete record of obvious leaks of intelligence information in
, the' press 'and elsewhere.

5 March 1973
, ',Maury highlighted the statement Congreasman Rolifield, will
introduce, into the Congressional Record today on Agency briefing
of ,U.S. p&lice forces. He also noted a'related news release that
will be issued by the Congressman's office.:

6 March 1973,
Maur'y highlighted Congressman Koch's reaction' to our~sponse to
Congressman Holif;i.eld's letter concerning poliCf;J training, as reported
in today-'s press. MautrY' noted that Congressman 'Koch plans to ask
',GAO ;t'or a ruling on this matter, and the Director suggested that
Colby provt"de 'same guidance', to Comptroller ,General Elmer Staats.

The Director noted /C\Iviee

that Hugh Sid~y of Time magazine
plans to write a story alleging that Howard Hunt -was employed by a
cover organization, ~., Robert R. Mullen Company, when he left
the Agency. Colby noted 'that this company is a completely private
concern but has provided cover for one or two officers ovesseas ,
," The 'Director asked Thuermer .to be prepare~ to co~ wi th'any
inquiries when the story appears.

00309
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. 9 March 1973
DDI called attention to Joseph Alsop's article in today's
Washington Post, "Analyzing the CIA's Analysts," wbich erroneously
refers to Sam Adams as a former employee. later in the meeting,
Houston explained why the allegation tbat the Agency bas tried to
muzzle Adams is false. He went on to brief onJ I
communications wi tb Justice and tbe fact tbat ne Juuge rUlea
Adams' material was not exculpatory. In response to tbe Director's
question, the DDI reported that Mr. Adams bas not been placed on
probation. The Director found" this unsatisfactory.

Houston explained tbe legal illplications of tbe subpoena

served on Tb~rmer
-. for documents related to the Ellsberg case and
advised that the Director may bave to claim executive privilege.

15 March 1973
Houston said that tbe judge squashed the subpoena served on
Thuermer (see Morning Minutes of 7 March).

0031.0
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,.
/"

Included in this folder are miscellaneous items, including the

following:

Chuck Briggs' submission, including support of the Committee on narcotics

Review of Minutes of Morning Meetings

Agency funding of heroin st~dy.

Tom Parrott's involvement with David Young

Cary's memo on briefing of Special. Subcommittee on Intelligence

Of House Armed Services Cc:mnnittee (this relates to the McCord
letters to the Agency)

Brae's report of his and Colby'smeeting with Nedzi

0031.:1
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

1:1 ONctAssl~leD . ~ CONFr '-\'TIAL t;] SECRET

,
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
f
SUBJECT: (Oplionoll
-
: e of Disguise Materials and Alias Documentation Within the U.S.
, EXTENSION
FROM: NO.

Director of Training \ I
I{
. . ! ..•.

\,'
, room number, and DATE
buildinll) OFFICER'S COMMENTS [Number each comment 10 show from ...mom
INITIALS to whom. Draw a line aero.. column after each comment.)
RECEIVEO fORWARDEO

1.
Inspector General :'/;~
,- I
I ) ~ C\'Stv'\':p
~r1 \-"\

\~ J\,J r.J. ~'..€ •

j....

\, --", ,
I

• , l~·-,
-- v,

4.

5.

6.

7. .

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

loC.

I---
If
,
0031.2
,

FORM INTERNAL
3-62
USE ONti
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

I,

,1 S JUN 1973

MEMJRANDUM FOR: Inspector General

SUBJECT Use of Disguise Materials and Alias Documentation
Within the u.s.
REFERENCE Memo dtd 30 May 73 to IJfR fm I ~ubj :
Issuance of Disguise Materials for Probable Use
Within U.s. ' or It's Territories

, 1. The Associate Deputy Director for Operations has asked

that we give you a detailed report of the actual use that the Office
of Ttain:i.n,g has made within the u.s. of all disguise materials and
alias docUmentation we have obtained for our staff members and students.
2. Disguise ~~terials

,OTR has obtained from ars disguise materials - including

glasses, wigs, mustaches , and special shoes to increase height - for
. 12 staff instructors at the Domestic Training Station. The purpose of
these materials is to increase the difficulty that students in the Basic,
instructors during problems and exercises conducted r:
Operations Course and Advanced Operations Course will have in recognizing
lnear
urs. Exercises include surveillance, countersurveH ance; Drusn passes,
and dead drop problems in which instructors monitor student activity.
These exercises are run under carefully controlled conditions only in
areas where adequate liaison exists with local authorities to avoid any
flap should difficulty arise during an exercise.

00313
~
uu nnU[.l1llML
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

...
.

The sole use of disguise materials by .these instructors

has been or will be in support of the training exercise noted above.
At no time have the materials been used for other purposes.
3. Alias Documents
u.s. alias documents ,consisting primarily of busmess and
social cards, but also including drivers' licenses and social securi
cards, have been used for more than a year by students

e cone US1.on 0 e course, tea aas

cumen s are co ecte rom the students and returned to ars. Again,
these documents are used only Under carefully controlled ,conditions in an '
environment I It:rhere adequate liaison With local authorities exists
to contain any flap; and the docenents-areused only for the purposes stated,
4. A thorough canvass of all elements of OTR discloses no other
instance in recent years in which we have used disguise materials 'or alias
documentation within the U.S. or obtained such materials for that purpose.

I~~
Duector of Tra~g

cc: ADOO

-2-
0031.4
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

t . -" '.
. '-'

.: ...

.',

40RANDUM FOR:
..

0031.5
(DATE)
rORM 1(0. 101 REPLACES FORM 10· 101
I AUG 54 "" I CH MAY BE USED.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. J .
DUNCLASSI FirED
.- o IN
US
.~ ~Al
JNLY o CONFr .TlAl o SECRET
~-
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
r"BJECT: (OpiiollCll)

FROM: £XJfNSlON NO.

I Deoutv Chief WB Division

I OATE
20 June 1973
TO, (Offieer de.ignalion, room number. and DATE
buildin;) OFflCerrS COMMfNTS (Number eoeh comment to $how from whom
INlTI-'\lS 10 whom. Prow 0 line aer.,.$ eolumn oher eaeh comment.)
REClIVEO FO~WAROEO
J
1. (lAWrl,YJ i:,v JUN 1973' !j..J:;:/

IJDDO ~i J IN 1973
2.

DDO {J\1Y \J\

i~V:/
3. 1:/
'- .'

10 /7..- /.). '> ____- . .--.--0

4. / '!
Executive Secretary, u
CIA Management Commi tee b/~ ):/
--
..

0M .i. I
5.

VVC {- :;\j
I..
~

dol
h./ 'I
I
Return to O/IG .~ ~":~.I c:::.i t
r.:>; !
·tt
7.

~€:W~\...~
8.

9.

10. 0
11. .

12.

13.

14.

.~.
00316

fORM
3-62 61 0 u~Dr~~s 0 SECRET o CONFIDENTIAL n INTERNAL ..
~."'P
n lIurl ACCII:,rn
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. '

' ..
Executive Registry T

'7'--< -' /. ~,) /

20 June 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: John Dean Allegations to Newsweek Magazine

1. Mr. William Jorden, the Latin American referent

on Dr. Kissinger's Staff, called today in reference to State
cable' No. 1'12189, dated 11 June (attached). He said that he
had specific reference to paragraph 2 of that cable and would
like to have "everything and anything we know" on that subject
in the Agen cy.

2. The undersigned indicated to Mr. Jorden that he

had checked 'out the allegatiqn that some low level White House
officials had considered assassinating Torrijos when the story
first appeared in Newsweek an~ despite checking outside WH
Division also, could find flo 'one in the Agency who could
recollect or find anything relating to such a plan on the part
of any poz-Hon of U. S. officialdom. I told him that I felt sure
that nothing of this nature had ceme to WH Division's attention
because f~r the period in question I had been Deputy Chief of
WH Division and had heard nothing about any such plan. Mr.
Jorden asked if the Agency knew anything about Howard Hunt
having had a team in Mexico. "before the missfon was aborted"·
and I indicated that as far as I knew, the Agency had no infor-
mation on Hunt being in Mexico on such a mission. I also
indicated, however, they could have been and the Agency might
well not know it simply because he could have used an alias and
he is an American citizen, which is outside the Agency's
province and really the FB.I's business. I suggested that it
might be best if he checked the FBI on that particular angle.
Subsequently I checked with Mr. William V. Broe, the IG,
and Mr. John Horton, recently returned I
'-----;================----

0031.7
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, .
.. r r'
•

and .both indicated that they had not run across any information
concerning this latter al.lagatton of Hunt and.a team in Mexico
on a mission related to Panama.

3. It was apparent that Mr. Jorden was under some

pz-e s sur e to refute these allegations and was casting about in
all directions to make as certain of his ground as he possibly
could before he. tried to do so;

Deputy C ie
e ern Hemisphere Division

Attachment:
As Stated Above

00318
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

NG 027.76'-.
• '. .' r" ."
.. " "

. :.
::' ::... ..
..~ .
'. TOR:·111326.i: JUN 73 : ~ :'

.
--::---'------::--....---...:-----.--.---~-----------------I.~: ...
RUE AI 18 '." .:
'. '.. .~
....~.:.~.: _.
' . '.' '., .' . . ... '. .'" .
R UUUUU.toc S1 ATE~.1!H<:;: -, ' .... ,~ .. ':.',' :. .'-:. _:. : ': .
.... " . ',"
. . " . .- .;: .
RUESVA .RU,LPALJ,.'.:..:, .:/,:,:..,:: '. ";',." ~ ~
. :' , . '
..
RUEHC r.:2189~ 162·1.3'22:.·:·· . '::.. ~. ":.:'~.:.~' .: .~~
"R UUUUU1!1:H '. '. " ,
l11312i:.·JUN 73 ,;.'. . . .' '-.:: '.: ,
. . .... '.": -. . ..
S::CST A'T.E HASHDC' --, .' ,': . - . "~ .-
RUESV;\II~}J~HaASSY .PA·NAHA' "1 lit-tED!A TE 2592 -
;:-0 f)tl~PALJ/P t.NCANAL .II-HiED! ATE '. :.' : a" ".

LPA.... iUSSOUTHCOH ItiMED.tAT-e.: . . • . : .: , .... .• ~ :~ .

• .. ," ,_ :•..• '..::' ~.,. N:. ''';: _; . '. . . .:_ . " . •

ct AS- ..S TATE . 1 12189.· .....':.' , .". . .. ' .

.. : .. :.·· .. ·.. ·.· . .... .
. "' .... I.

.
..
.. .. ~.
.. . •
~ -~ :::~.:: ":: ... -' ..
.4 -

o 11652 r Nt A . ·..· . .:'..:..... ,:':.: ~'. .:. ,..• ' .. . ....

';".
-I •

.". ..
..

.. -, :.".
.
.'

.
.~

" . :.' .
;,

•. ..,; '.'
~..

~~~~~~~~ LE ~~ TI ~1I§}~ti,; ;~!"A~~_llE'\~'·TOllEW$WE~K riA G~~:1~2·::.

THE' F'OLLOWIN'G rs··:e:<c··ERPrED··fROM.A FRONT PAGE ARTICLe'::::" .:,.. :~... ,:;-;.:;.
O~1 TODAY'S NEW YORK ;T:!·HES ·t-HHCH REPORTS 'ON ALLEGATIONS:"":':.:' ,'- : .i!
Dc BY JOHN DEA:N TO ·NEWSWEEK. HAGAiHNE.

"SOME "LOW~LEVEL"
.

HHITE 'HOU'SE .OFFICiAlS CONSIDERED';;S-:'

SSINATING PANAHA'S RULER OHAR TORRIJOS. BECAUSE THEy···.:' '.· ni"
SPEC TED iHE INVOLVE~'E~r.OF' HIGH PANAHAN tAN AU·p-tOR I TI ES: . . ;:I?,l.
n~··:,:..
ri . .:. .
~.:
'" .. ,....
.v r:
i ,

~OIN TRAF'r'IC AND .BECAUsE TH~Y tELT iHE GOVERimENT HA"D.· .·.:·,···~·:.·'ti .' '.
::i:': UNCOQPERA T i VI: ASOUT. RENEGOi! ATI:-iG THE PAi'lM·t.\ CANAL.':' -. ::': .~~i·
::ATY • . E, HOWARD .HUNT.JR.~.·. A L.EADER OF THE l~A·rERGAiE. :'::>'l:-~'.' ./
:~Q.LARS. HAD A TEAH .IN HEXICO·· t1 8 EF QRE THE MISSION HA?.· ,,,::.:-t 1 -·-/
Oil TElD. 11 NEwS WE EK.SAID. 11. RU SH:.;}':~ ..
..fii;v t;···~fi:l t r_

"J: 003:19
. ,
"
" ..
. "'.'- ,.'~' , ,. ... . . ' ....... -.~.I· " ... ",".,'. ~·-·-····-7·-'·-:.-· "
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

( .~.

.j

.:",-

,': .
DIREct REpLY
DISPATCH
.FiLE· .
INFORMATION

·r
I·r

~ .~'
., .

j.

., . •. '. .
~ ,

. r

.: " .,~
: ' .
1',

. FOLD HERE T.O RETU RN·TO :~E

FRQM:NAM£. ADDRESS AND PHONE·NO:';

. Ul';"C,LA$!:!IFIED .

-; ...,' ....: ...i '.

I ..;
':.,

\ " "

II .' ,.1. .': ••

",
.)
.~. -.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

..~
, ,
• "~."'P .• _ ' - ; . ; "

,--
, :,i;7';;, :,{:)~;; ..;:~", .;
I
"
•••
' .i":.:~:;. ~ ....;:~:: . I , . : . ~.

. .:. ..'.
;g:'~~t~(:, .:"?k". :\ :::,~,' ,;~;:;' "' ,,'"

MEMORANDUM FOR:
l

.'
rCe··
~
L/7/71

(DATE) r:
!
r
FOR'" NO.,
I AUG 54 101 REPLACES FORM 10-101
o
WHICH,NAY BE USED.
,'471
• • ~.~. ~ • • , . "y ••• .,; " ••••

....lo.•

• ,y ••••

. '.

, y' y •• ,-
, . ....
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

_. . ~ .;.... ... _.-..':':..-:._-,-. _._-':--,~ ~

'. .

__..r'::....~
liEW,......YORK
......... ' ' .. ,.:.
'
:rms ..- . '" ~ ..• "

"
I ,
, 2 9 'M4v1973" -. "'>"" .,t'" .::.::~• •

·l . Brea· 1:'l...['ns.Puzz
C'{.: ' Ch lean
-.-~ ".

,. '-l's» !r
. ' ..... • ~. t .,

No evidence has turned up

•

I
, · ...... ·I diat members of the team that
broke into the Watergate were

~, ;.W
'. a'.terga:« I nuesiiuators . .., ",-to to
involved in the
'although hints that s?~e of
I them may have participated
entries,

~ . • - '. . ./ have come. from the' authorities

~. In Florida.. :
, ~ By MICHAEL. C. JENSEN . First reports about a break-
'One unsolved puzzte that!' The next break-in was saidli" at the',Chilean ~n1ba~sy .be.
Watergate mvosugators are! to have taken "lace' six da 'S gan to Circulate In Miami a
!tttd)~ing is the jdenti~y of in-! later at .the E:/st 38th Strc~e~l'veek.?r so after W~er?;ate .tile
·truders who ...!>rokl' mto the; apartment in :\Ianhaltan of Ja.1 break-in of June I? 19!2. and
. ' . off.ices ~nd res!dences. of; vier Urrutia•. resident of thet there \~'as sp('cula.tlOn tnat the
Chilean diplomats In Wash!ng.! Chilean De\'elgpment Corpora.' t:\'o mlf.hl have oeen related.
s- " ,• ••,J!>" and New \,prk at least lOur:_t-icm and a close ..economic ad.ll,h~} link nevcr. ~as. been
.. ..
1972. .,
Four. break-Ins aaalnst 'Chile-
. Salvador Allende Gossens. .
• ' .
I
.times from April, J971 to May, viser to Chile's' president, Dr.l proved. and. son~e tn\ esugators
doupt that It..ex!sts.
One .explanatlon. offere.~ for
ans took place in the 14 months Pistol Stolen the Chilean break:m was t~~tl
Immediatelv preceding the Mr. Urrutia told the police if cU~Y Cuban-Americans p.arttc\-i
break-in at the Democrats' 1hM a .:?5-caliber Bernardelli pared, as was the c~se in .the'
Watergate headquarters last pistol had been stolen. How- :Wat'~r~ate,. they might have
June. Thev also occurred at a ever, a fur. coat in a closet been 10oklO~ ~or, aocume!lls
I
time when the Chilean Govern- was reportedly untouched, Gov-. that would ~n~lcale. coltuslOnl
ment was 'negotiating with the ernment papers were said to' between the Chilean and castro/
International Telephone and have been disturbed. and chew- governments. .
Telegraph' Corporation over] illg gum was edged into the' Shortlyafter the spec~
compensation for Chile's take-l apartment's Iock, a. familiar Ilion began in :'-·liami. Chilean]
o\;er of the hu~e .conglomerate's practice of .pl'ofes.sional .intrud-' oificia!s acknowledged the i
telephone subsidiary, CI'S that. gives tnem time to break-In and reported it 'to the!
. Ileca\15e or far more scn~a· e5c.~lre ,If they arc surprised 'city·, pol!ce, who started an in-l
;
:1.
tional disclosures, Watergate m· dut mg the course of an entry. vestigauon that has been
vestlgators have not actively The third reported break-in conclusive. .
in-,
pursued the Chilean case ·in took place on Feb. 10; 1972, Earlier this month, a Cuban:
recent weeks. beyond asking a investigators said. at the New/ nam('d Felipe de Dieao was'
luestion or two. about the, York residence on East 46th Interrogated' by State Attorney
.ireak-ins rl!lrin~ interro;~ationsl Street of Victor Rioseco, for- Richard E. Gerstein in 'Florida
,..- ...: of theWatergate burglars. mcrly a Chilean official atthe regarding participation . in -the
\ . However, Senate investigat- United Nations. A radio and al
break-in at the offices of D:-:
'." ers have informed both the! television set were ,reportedlYf Daniel El!sberg'S psychiatrist
Senate Watl'r;late committee] taken and papers' disturbed. in Los Angeles.' . . '
;: and the Watergate prosecutors] Tile fourth and most pub. He and his allorn,,\' indicat-
[. In' Washington "bout the dctailsl Hclzed break-in took place over ied that, if' granted Imrnunltv
r,
! .
of ,the four break-ins At the 'the weekend of :Vlay 13. '1972, Mr. de Diego might Shed l1e:;;'
offices and residences of t:he at lim Chilean' Embassy in ligh], on other surreptitious op-
Chileans. Washington, Files of the Am- eratlons in Washin;:lon. Inves-
3 Occurred In New York- bassador and his Jirst secre- tlgators in Miami hiler indicat-
. tary, Fermm?o Bachelet, were ed that these operatlons might
Fl!rth.C'rlllore, a member of t~e reportedly rifled and two -ra- !.:Jclude the Chilean break-in
'specl3:1 tntelHgcnce Unit of- .tne dios taken. . or' break.ins•.
New Y?l:k Police Department Chilean officials have been i '.
was scud to have, con,c1l1de~ ordered by their Government;'
" that the, three break-ms loat OC-I not to discuss the maUer, bud
curr~d tn :'I1an!13ttan w,ere n?/ snurces close to the case said'
routme burg lanes. And. mve:;lI- that the former Chilean Am-l
'
~ators in \Vash.ington s,aid that. l>ilssador, Orlando l.eteHer, had I
t:le .four brf.'ak·ms had lOl/OWed confirmed that the Washington!
slOlIlar pattern.>.
l inlrliders ap'llarently wer~ seek-!
The~' were arparenliy done ing sensitive Govern'ment noeu-,
b~' rroff:'ssionals. \\ill! a' irwi ments. ".
Hems tak!.'n to make tll(! .bre~k.i .spl,culatiClll b" III\'e~tinators
.. ~:
Ins appear to he burglarlcs. 10·1 ~."
"
\,estigators said. Olht'r ,'aillablej . Capitol Hill investi;;:ators
itcnlS w('t'e left 'behind, how. have spccul<Jted that the in·
f~ e\'er, and sl"nsitivf.' papers were I trudrrs might haye been seek·
dislurbed. .possibly in tile ,: ing p.l'idcnce. of links b~tween,
course of being photu<,raphed Cuba and Chlle. or lookmg for
]nvestigatQrs '1eronstruct
break-ins a.:; fc,ilows: I
'II)(;! pnHt!cally sensitive documer,ts
mlallng to the take-over. by
Then, first known b.:eak-in oe- Chile of J.T.T. properties•
. curred' on the afternoon of
. pri! 5, 1971 3t th<: :'Ilanhaltan
asidence on Lcxin~ton Ave·
nul' of Humberto Diaz·Casa.
('. . nuevll. Chile's J\mbassador to
. th,e Uniled Nations... The Am·
bassador reportedly tolc! the
police that the intruders hildl
stolen such iems liS a hair·drver
and a nair of hOlliS ami tli~IIIl·.1 00322
 MORl DoclP: l45l843

-,'
...... '

'4

...5

ACTION". OlREC.T REPLY·

:fILE R.ETlJRH.·.'",:
. INfmiMATlOH ·SlliHATUaE:

,
;.,l'

-. -•.•. .;,,':
re >
••

%If~:j~S:.~~~~:;·:'l;.:.~.:'~.,':· ',~ .
";." }\/'::·::.·:;\l~otli~'lig,·startling.1 but something
: .•' . ". pe~f.;I3.:PI{should. be aware of'.

~-:{;~.:::.' ,: L:~,_._,x..~·~~·:·
.'.-'..
.:L.:' - :'.. 0~v ....\.
. . ~. ,~J.:'
:'
"
.~~,t>
. ;.
s-

)., . -' '~:.

.,. .
-'_.' ---'-
~,

FOL.O HERE. TO RE.TURN TO S::NOE:R :.

FROM: N""'E:. AOORESS ANO PHONE: NO.

COl"FIDENTIAL " $:ECRET

Use previous' editions
. fORM NO.
". 2-61- 237

: ....

.:
(y
j.- . J
r
"'.

.A.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. . .·~~t~{,.; " . •.
. MEMORANDUM FOR.T>HE..R};:CORD
,.
:·:·)D:';:(l'~: . ;'.:· '.",/"
SUBJECT: Di spo s a.l- 9.r~Cla·ssified Ti-a,sll for the :i'I-a.tio~al Security,
. '.

,- C~~;f:~~~~ .'~- .' "~j,;~;ir

:.... .' ~.
,";:1. Amemor.<:uid,Uin·for the record by the -Executive Of.ficer,·:.:'::·i'·:~;<-."
o{the. Office ·of L~gi~Jt~:~'i>oints out..that this Agency isdisposing-:;::~;:':,::~:::/{,;.. .' .,...
.,.;.. : -. o.f·cla:~sified .tr-a s '.' " ·'~S:C. :>:J::h¢(m,aterial. contams doc'.l'· " .. , ' , . ' .,;;::< ·:i".~(~ .
.'

~~~2:~~:·.:~::!f~::~::~;E~:~:;~,
is made each Thtir: .
';'~;~ft
. .' . ' . .~.i~
~h~
'. ,:- :," " '. : ,"

.: ·'2. Under"~d e~a:ri'a.; c1;rcUm.stanc~~ such a: ':routiii~:

matt&r would.;"~t}b i, .. but iiv~ll: the recent furor ca us ad.ib
:. :. the ·ci€s·tru~tibkbf3;"
.;. - • !" ",'
t,s by·the'::.fS.'~t~ng 'FBI-Diredor Patr{s,'
Gra·Y:.W·is· felt'·tif~. :ler: shouil:i~at·least be' highlighted
" ' : . . .
foff. -

further consid~r:at " ..

......' . :~.1. ;~. :'.':;.::;:
r :. .

.""
.. '.
.'.~:

.....

,,~: .'

'. .... ."

~ ..:,':......
". '.~

.\
. "
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.r .'URCE·

·O/IG·
DOC, NO.
DOC. I1":TE 30. Ma
'l~
HUMBER OF ~AGES .1
NU""B"ER OF' ATTACHME/(T'S ·2 ...... () "
fTS 18sZz.aI7Z!Z .&:: .': _, .t')·;\I·
'.. .,,' c.' . • J' . ', ,.... . . . . " , ::
~.TrENT10N: T1<I3 ·/ON/l.· uri blt pIeced oit,,·,top of end :iJtt4ched to e'a.ch ,Top Secrt;t do ment, I't:cl!.!"e<t till" th'e.Cettti'et' Irtt.eIl.:VIlTCCI!.' AI1~J: .
or Cla3$i,'1(<! Top Secret· lllWtin . ·the., .CI" ,aild will remain attache:! to, 'the :document !Lntfl "",7'., ti""e 'oU it b .. t!~t;':ng>'<l<!~c!. c!es:r~~'. Of'
-, tr4n3"t!:led oUI$it!~. Q"l.~., AC::.tfu, '(~'l'~,S7ert't .ml%t.t~~ lfmitt'd:to To'!Jl,irli/tcrt't Control 1l1l~~.. (!1: a~ :tn,··61~,~..<t!$-Ulho.ie c..1fclat
. dU2~el"t4 to th4l ~'m'U-•. ' 'Top S4lf,r'e'f''(fO'n'traf. Ot/tcdr3,' who" rl!.ceiu· and/or. release .the 4ttadU<! ·T0p, ·~~cr~t. m;4t"ii<t! ,lCill· ~ thl$· form ..
.4nd (ndlcat.· period.: of ..custod1ld1l. ;·t~.lt""Il(~~Jt..='#d col,.mn" ·lIro7l£t!et!. Each. fndhildu4Z . who . 3ee~," the '.TOp, i·St;~r:.ct..:' ~~. lQUf . .ng ... : ~rut .
indicate the dat., of IllJni!.I:~".S1·.f..; til'. ::'':,fg,~f~~q~IL~o~.. t,nn3. . ' .' ,_ " " ....:';- ," .;.....:.'.' '.: .
': . Re:le::A~e:O " SEEN.,BY·
S I GPO. T.URE OF,F tCE'.fo I'V •

. :.)( ··l··

l---:_ _ b-:-t~_1.:.ttJ_~". ' .1: -'.-'

• .: / : ( ".!: • • ,'.",

'.' ~~~}:Z~~E .;~~~.-:.. ('.

______
• __
0 _'_ _
'. _ _.;.-:

!~ • ~ ,-' ,. ,
...
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

". ~.

• ... ". •• ,' 0'

'( '.' .. '.~ "-

'},O, ,May 1973

:::t?~·:::·: '.' .
. ~. ..J. . . ';'-".~' '. " ."" '0 •

.. ..' ~.~;_.' .:.. ~ ': :;,~ . ';. : "

MEKi.6t(ANriUM
. >'\ ;' .~ FOR: : Mr.
v ,,~ /"~:' .." ',' ~ .~ "" . William E. . -~.
........
,"
:~;. ." ,,'. .e-
" .., f'

.1,

,'.r;'""" :!call . .:t.p....Y.pur attent!pn..!7 ~ atf;Q.~4ed sensitive annexes to our

~ 972, r!'!po:rt, '~6~ survey of{EUR:'Division:~, ,y bti.h,a:v,~;',seen,them:before,
but a fresh:16ok .:\.t, th~m mi ht' be in order in
developments.
Ii 'hb:>f ~tirrent me
e recent revelations about the activities
, uati<?n Committee a,Z:~,c,getting clos;e):o,our
~':;HAbs program. vr« are' particu1arlY'~6h6't;:diedabout:~'tHAOS ,!
'~'~,9;a~~~,:.,~~,::;t~~::highdegree of resentment'\~o/~~Brie:t:.:a,mong"~any ,!.
Ag~~cY:'~mpl~yees at their belng expected',~o:pa.·i-ticipate
• c' .:' : ; • ~ • ".
init... •
, .i,
i,
f
t
,"
~
....
, , ;,
I

I '
)
.r ... ",

~...t
: I' ,": .'. . • ""; I • .

, ,.~~~~.~~~,~,~~~"t5"c=.c~r;.trr::.~~
"

" F"OI-f)e-;e)
'::'';TS,'18,S4:28?7'ZI2,~' 9 Nov 72 ' .'.""~: ~. .. ,"
, 'j "."

. . .52
.:.' TS'l8. l,8/. 72/.. 3, "9 Nov 72 . ......
',' I
.... ..

-,

.•..

- \",1.
. ···.;·1 ,.:
'" -.' ",
.0.0326
!
,"Y~~:::7~':-:-~""-'-' "',"?,, ,7-'' ',' ~,~:, '.. ':~'<._ . .
-e..
,
~'~--"--.~
.~.~;. ,".;4.:: ~ ~·",,:,t;-~~· . : .. _
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

: f" .:.. ~:'": '.:..;;.'

..
·'""ilir.,;..o...Q& ';;..- ·I.vu..;; .-- ~;<"':
". .' . ' ..

~ . ~ ..

,.,
....
. ':1'-"':'" '. ':(:: :

..

:~l<h?-,lt{~~~.r.~.:.[',i.:.
~.:: ~ ...
'.'

~~ ':~'Ii'-f'''r' '~~ .
. '",

.I-------'-'--~-+__:....:...r-_:_l . ..•. '. .C<., " ; / ' ::,:,,,:~, .' ", c:

.,' . :1f:;t..
,;.
. ~.

,':'

-.
'-.

,
,,/.

~1~.::-:::~L9.",'f"
\
\
.~
'\"
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.:.... 8 JUN 1973·

. '.'

. .
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy. Df.rec'tor for Managemen t anc1Services.
FROM ... ·Di,recto·r. of Security.
.,~'\.

SUBJECT : 'DD!M&S ·R.eq~irements:"·;i~: lVa:tergat.ej,..l.ncid~nt '

.' .....:,"'~~

1. This memor-andum is for in"f'o'rm'a't'i'on only 0

2.' In Juit
1971, t.he' .NeW' YO'~k Tim·es. featured an.
article under, the by-line otl1illiam Beecher whdch .
contained an' expos i t.Lon iof 'the then current status of·"
the" Strategic Arms Limi t at-i on. Talks '(SALT).' It· was .: ': ",
evident ',from rhd s: de.l.dneat Iori of these' talks that ',.,,: ':.'. "i-,"' '.'
William Beecher had obtained. the information·froni:hJ.ghiy":
classif~ed u.s. Government documents or from a person or'
persons' havfng had access' t.o.vsuch documents 0 • •

. 3!"' In this regard, Mr, Egil E. Krogh"Jr o f the.

White' House ,.tele.ph6~ically contacted the Director .of
Se'ctirity::of:this' Agency. and. requested that this :Agency
provide a polygraph examiner to' conduct polygraph' t.es ts
on 'four Depar-tment; of State. employees. In conjunction.
with 'Mr~' .Go: ~Iarvin Gen t i Le',; Deputy Assistant Secretary.
for Security,'. Department' of' Stat e, this Office 'arranged
for' a polygraph examiner to" conduct these. examinations, .
but :with no CIA.' involvement to be acknowle dged ..... In ' ..
othe'r words, .thds Office loaned the polygraph: examiner"
to: the,:'Department of St.at.e. and the 'polygraph. examinations
werec~>nducte,d 'for -,Mr. Go Marvin Gentile. .
~\ .
'4;. This. Of;fice Ln 1970,-. requested app rovaI 't o have
disguis'e ki·ts", issued to approximately fourteen people.
The"di~guise kits, were never 'issued for operatdonaf

. :"'..-.
,".
:

...... ....
• 1-
"""'-~"'""-;:"'''-'''''~
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

& " ... r·,:.h_

',: . .."
c ··: .. ".
..', '.
" ' .,"

I. •
. ,
".", ....

. ;.' .' ..
".:.- ... . ':.,-.' . . -', 'N" _ _ ' . •••••••• • •

. 'purposes' ,': .but. :.they were. '~ssued. for, pract.i.ce 'sl1rve:hiahc~ '.",
. to'. train local ficHd office' ersomiel' . in' th'eir·,Use',· ,.
/,,"oJ<.

L"...,~~~----.,,--=---..;;---------~--=----,Of tihe.se our teen

isgul.se its,' .four were returned to the Office' :of
Technical· servd ces.
•;,"'1-.'. • ••#~.,: ~"'"* \l:~~ • ~ • ,'"
. . S.~ . In regard to' otheracti.vitiestrrat ·.this Office'
has conducted' domestica11y,'the following two' projects: .
are· sUbmitte.d: ' .' " , -. ,. . :
A. ' P'ro'je'ct; WESTPOINTER: In September 196.9,
February 19'(0., May 1970." and october 1~71, a·,··
proj'ect,: si~i1ar to- Proj ect BRPOI1.1J'ER,.·, was
. conduct ed ·bY,the Office of' Secur Lty.," Ea.'st·Asia· ..'.
Division ~ 'and' the Office of Te.chnical: Se rvd.ces in -"
, the San Prancds co, California, area. The tiarge't :'
.. wa's','inail to, the. United States froaMainJ,and China.

. :: 6; ", Tan Office of Secur i ty

emp Loyee ; who will re t rr e e±fec-cive ,29 'J~e'1973, had a
chance .mee t Lng with Mr. James W. McCord, Jr •. on Z4, M~y ,'-' - -
.:- 1 1973:near the Senate Office Bui1ding~ ,A~cording to: Mr •
I 1
t he :ubstance of the. chance mee.ti~g.' ~~s 'an exchange
of 'pI~a antra.es , ,
J
I :
L

t
~
~
..'

{
1
',- . 00329
1
. ,t.,

e-
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

(
f~·~..--
f·
'
..
. ' ' ., 7
L '~' .•

SD3 and other student activist groups

s
, ',0;1 :p.roduced in December- 1967 at Halt RostOt-l'i. zeques't -a
30-page·t~r'pescript study of the SDS and its i'oreign: ties. .

I~ the StU'!l!:er or.~ 1968 eCl produced-o-agaf,n at. RostOi{f s request--

a pape~ on,Restless Youth. ~~e first, and most sensitive section,
':las a ~'J!li1C1s'.)!lhical tree. t;nen-t of studen-t unre su, its trotivaticn)
'" ,.;~. ~"':-"'~ ·~}1istor~{.
. . anu'~tac·tics.· :.#It· dre~'i l"1ea~:il"!r :;~l overt lite:-ca.
" ' . . ture and .
FBI· reporting on SDS and affiliated groups. Toe second section
comprised 19 chapters on foretgn student dissidence.

Fages 11 Z: 12 Black radicalism

ocr began i'ol10·rTing Caribbean black radicalism i::J. earnest in

.1968. T';/O papers' were produced on the subject; -one in August 1969
ana the other ~n June 1970.

ocr was
asked in. .rune 1970 to write a memo t~ th special'
attez:lt~on
to linlts be-tween black radicalism in ,the CaribbeC!.n and
advocates of black power in the US. 'l'he memo. 'tYas;produced,: in
typescript and give~ to the DCI.

ocr in pe~iodic type3cript meoc~ 'on. .Sto}~ly

1968 wrote
C~rrnichaelfs ·travels abroad during a p=riod when'he had dropped
f'rom public view.

"

00330
 MORI DocID: 1451843

~., ....
','.'

: <. .' . '.., ...;-- ......

"
, \
•
.'.'

Page 23 .Frohioition 'against cor·ITNT vs. US ci:ti~ens

.... In Se~tember 19721 Icoomo to' conduct hearability

tests of certain H? 10:t1..g-uJ..si:ance co~ercia~·:te1ephon.e circuits
. bet~roell the US and South k!;erica. Tne circtiits' carried drug-
,t"
related trai'fic. I
I :. =
...... _<,.}la.s ter.:.!:Lp,.a.veg: en
'..
..'viere
30
illegal. .

\fe conduct an !targe'ted

radio telephone

ci-tizens.

.: Testing 'in the US of' O?";)-d~veloped elec.t.ronic· colle.etion.

...s ;ystems occasionally result in the collec.tion of
domestic t.e1,e-::?hone
..' conversations. 'i'men the tests are cOr::Jplete"the inter:::epted .
' ..materialis destroyed. .

. .'. crs! lteChniCians c~ndu~ted t~s~s).n the. Miami 'area in

.August i971 aI' D,f gear intended :for use against a Bovf.e t agent in
.Boubh Vietnam. ~'lhile whol;Ly' Lnnocuous, the tests preceued the
'holding' of ·.the converrtd.ons there and could. be. construed as
being somehow related to them.

: Ln Februar'J 1972 CIA asked an ofi'icial of AT&T :for copies of

.,tel~phone" call:·slips
relating· to US-Chit::a Calls. The· o'Oeraticn
lasted foi' three or four months and then d:i:-ied up. CGC stated its
belief' that the collection of' these slips did not.violate·tbe
COIZlUnications Act since eavesdroppfng ws::noti.?-lvolved.

Page 29 Mail coverage

. Since 1953, CL~ bas operated a mail intercept progra~ of

incoming. and out~oing Ru~sian:l!!ail and, .at various tbes, :other
. selected mail at .Kennedy Air:Port in 1'Ie~·r .YorkCi~y•. 'Ynis progran
- ,. ;':. is nov dormant pending de'cision on ,·rhether. to continue or to
. abolish it. '

:: .'

.' " , .

.....
~
,..

.....
, e . 'J
.~ '1 . 0'0331.
vL·,:: .:. ~
 MORl DoclD:1451843
.
-:4<.~' ~.;:~.' k"c{:;t ~:[.:~.;/'
'
.... ;.~ ':~~" "
'., .eo'
~: :
..~ ',_':. ..
'.: ••:, .» ':":.',

....
",Z., ,,:'" :,'
"~' ..:;.:..::.....- .. ' " . :. '.'~ ....... ~ ",

. ':.. ,
~ '.
' .
. :. f "

""" .. :.:-.::... .. "

.,
(:::',::"
...... ATTACH~1'ENT '" ., .'

" " ..f.:.. ".

.t....
. . ..
~
'
. : ....

i . ; ,':.
.':":,'.
. .- "~ ",,, ~ .. .. . .....
~ ~::.'-'.~ '.-::.;X.~:·
.'

r:- --." .....' . ,. :"." . :':" :(.... ..::.;.:::.;..-?'.:. ;' /: -.

TSD ~~s had a close worklng
. ;~l?-tiOrtship: .,~:.:.;
z ..... ., .' :.-::. •

. ....I-.. •. with.
. the. FBr ove
"r-,
the past few years:' . The .rEI is .t~e only-organizatio.n.thathas
' .
' '"

... ,.:' :: . ,', ':..;..

". . . ""'. be!''; fullF.l;>riefew.-l!:S§; a uqi6~£~~eS'~ equipin:ent. "Thilr.• >i:\.,
. . :. .follo'vV:ing a're si:tuations 'where tfS!?leqt4;j..rn~tand· guida.n.~ w~re . \,:.{ ~:; i'. ':
involved.in ope'rations:' .' ~ i'~·:" ~ .r ;. ;.... .- ;~.'
,:

... "'.... • ' . . '

_. ::....;::::
.,~ ' .
" . ..;,' .
.. : • • t , -", ':- •

:.":'. '.' . ,"

r : .:: .':'\ ..., .

.,
..l•

" .:: ~ -.
,:",:=.:'
" ....,'.: ' ..
.' . ,.

. ,.
~

, " ,~~, ".' ; ..

:. -:.... ;
1
I
i .'.
t " ...

" :. '.::'
-.' .. ",

.:,,~: ~,'"

"~ .
..
c

: '. ~.~

:"; .:.
-r , ":'

~ .. .... ..
,~,:

00332'
. ". :;.....;.
... ~ "

': -, .....
~~
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

.:~(~~:""."'?""fT! f"~~'I~~0~~;l;F.~:,~0:j~:}~i~0fT," ".

I.:..,..... :.•..~;
. ' "
"-:', " :' ., " '.

", ":-

.. "
....
:'.'

, .'

"".,

.. ' ",:." .~~.\. ..

", .... ;
i· ...•
f '.
i-
f ~ ':.,: .
.1 . -./"
! .' " "

, j:
.'O •
:,,:>~.:: .;
1,
f"
t
." •• 0

.: ";'::
.. ' -~
. .~.: .... ;,-
:. ~. ..... "••. "•.•••:' :-.eo:.
".': .: :'7. '..: ': .•°:'7. ~.. ..;~

.~"
.0 ... "

....:..•:- . ..". ':,

':..:=... "0 .. ::...
...
.
:
, .' ," .. -".'" .
,

':' .... ,

':.

:-':-, .
..:. '. :-
" v , s:
.' '-.
7·.~·· .•
'.~
-.2
$
... ~'.

... ~. :.,

'00-333
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

• ·f '.

. :." :: ...: ....... :. ..••.

: .:'
. :; •. .'
." .
'I:

i
(
"

l
• 1
I

I
i

I
I
i

\
\,
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

~ .,"
-.: .'
,:
.. ~~.
.. -
: ....
.. ':.

,; ."

r
'0... '.'

~j;:;"""~
t:~..-:~:.
.
~'r~:~_=

.,

. :~"

'."

. -

{
~.
<. ,
,. ,.. ..
~.:­
:{
~ .....

.-
I '.,
L" ~
-
. : '." _--.-..,-_:_.~.;.J
. .
--:'..;
',:

..........
\
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.' :
\.:-.~;--::: ::- .
....• .:

~-;~
.";-- .
... .
~

2 .

. . ::.,...r:

~~ '.
_-"
.

.~.l.t..

32.i:c;~ radi~2.1~sn~ . li
-.',: .;.,

.r:~~!. 't~;ar!' ±"'~ll6~';:l~:~'" C~·r"!.:~jb-=:~n... c2..2:~::

r~;":'i..~a·l:;3~ :'.:1 (:9-r:c~st. in-: .. I"~
::.. :.'. '

~.j68.: -::;c ~~jers' ::el"e;·.pr~::lu(:~d_ on t.i';e 5U":)j.-=C7t~ one in ;'\1.lgust .·l969 :::
~:r:J.' ;-;,.;.' o'~:,-"-r
~ .,~-"':"
-; ..-:-
......"- _ _ (\ .- :J .:. "10',.",
\,.1. ..."....,.

OCl <-ras aSkel,·i.~ ..j~n.e: 1970 ,'rritg a menlo '"iit)ls:pecial:5,~. '::.~.':

to .
a-ttent~on. to Itn.1tS;~!1);i;i~ieen, :black. radicali'sm .Ln the Carihbean:':~hd .:> .
~~~~~~;to:~~~:~~\~~ ~~ .": TIle neno "asprQduee<l i\:XP/< ,: .., .'·i·
'.' P:"""

("',~I :La ·.:i-9~3jfi~ji~;:::9.::~io,iiCi~'::f:=3cri:Yt :·:e~-::;; en ;-):::.,-.}~~iJ:::·:3";~~;: ., t' •

0:/ ·..:.· ..
:~. ~

t
::~. . n:i ~l.:l.:ll s "'G!"a1:-j~<.~·s~ ',a:prcs:a.. cb.ll"'ing a p.;r:'c-:l ·;r:.1~n 1'\~ h-..,,1. drOp~~:d.:· ,'-..
'~~ro.:n 'lJublic -.;i~,.,~"~;I:;-,,~~.· .:.... . '. :.- --_.. . -.: :- "".. ';-;-,,;-,',' -.

.': .·--;':.f
-, :~.

.:." r >:
v-' :-;
.: -, :'::~
" .1 .

·;~;;~(i~~3.6
», :-

/
- ......: -.

'--...... _-..-.... s>

:,1 ..... "--.-"::.: <::---._-:.

1
/:' ....
\
r> ~."
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

'f
.'.. .. : ,·.;~:~~;:>:;;~~~~:;i:~~:::··:·!t··~.::;+~~;·\Y;·.~·~:/; :.'~.' '.,
••• # •••• 10 ::., :. ; ":' .: •

....';,;. -'.'
. '-'-'-" .'

-'.. -
~ 10 o .. ~
~ ..
..•.' M'" :>.t:.;.;,,#-L~.\l
-...:·:... - :::.:;''::::;;''...57:
_# i;':.~:·~:,#:'
_# ~."~. ".1 :';.. :.:....
_ #__ #.._ __ . _ .#0 #~ .._~.:

a ·.:t·i:~!i t.~i
1):.3. t t::r: J

-;'. .. 1,'·

~e~t~ng i~ tn~ US of (?d-a~velop~d electro~ic collectia~

~7~t~~3 Qccasio~i+y r2sul~ in t~~ ~~llection 0: a0~=s~ic tel~phone
c;:;;:l.':ersations.~·
. :~iileh·the tests are cor.::plete,1 the il!.tercep£ed .....
l:J:3.teriai:is .destr?3·ed:~ . . '..
.. :
CL4~ . ]t~~""~iciU~S ccnduc ced tc.:sts. in the ;·;iani area in
AlJ.511st -1. :r 1 OI', ;0-,.,' g-=ar. inte~ded :for use against a Soviet· 2.gen:t in
SOt.lt!! '''C:; et,..,~~ .. r.r~'i" .=,
11'..,("\1 1~:, i n~'-I""POljS tee tes t:~ pr,ec~,c~'?c1.: .......,h~
:":'l:li:l~ - a-:·~.;~ .- ~·~.~.~~;~~~~~-tc; r~ -;!~~. c~111o. C·? c.):,::;·~r:;·:d C!.:';"
'c-= Lng sO:!~hm-1. ·~e ~a.' ~'e~: to the:~.
:'.'

Iu ·;~~':':<',~~/"J,9j2 cr.:;, as}:-.:Q. an of:ficial of ~;7&T for co~ies of: L

'teler;lO:l::" call 51-1:99' 'relating to U3-Chi::::a calls. The oDer:ition. . ·.
- .:.
'.~

b.s~ed ·'fo!" .three· or_·~~our !:l0::lths, arid tee!! dried up. cae stE;.ted its
belief that. the "col'iection of these sliDs did n':}t' 'Vio.late the',
C:)::;Junicatio~s·.Act.·.~inC'e:e?Yesa.roPPing ~"3.S not in-.,rol'fed.·· .' ",
. . • • : : ,.' ~. "#., :....... -: • •
~' ~:

2)
/ # •

S;i.ri-::e 195;3, CIA. has ogerated a mail Lrrte r cept; p::-ogra1: .o;i'·,..
inc~~in6 a~d o~tgoing Russiau;cai1 and, at varioJs t~~s~ other
f.::~l~cl;e\:l :"1~il !(:r_~ec1y
.4ir2?·,jl-.t· in 1;-.:\·( Yorl-: City. ?r·his E!"ogrc.t=l
a"t ·,
is ItO';; do==~.c.t I:~~ding de cf.s Lon on ':i1:cf.,~ler to c(:::t-:ini·.i-: or to .
a'b')li::;h it.
I
I
·
-L
t
i
L
.:
Po
i
..
,
",
.- I
00337
·
;,

_.' 10....
i._ !

·1·..· -, , • •\ ....*., #_.---;r~- .."

".
t
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.- .

-:.,
.F~ I~' I) ;!: r·tj'_ "Lr
------_._--_._--~---_.
e f~;I:. ~.~: .:\ (.1""_..,_)~, l?',t· t/ ~;:'5~t[(; l\",;rI t")':~' .
,. ..
"

,.,.. .... ",

.' .
·;TSD 11<>.5}-:;:;.,1 a dose ,.,.'or~;;:n~ r e Ie.t i oriship \,:,~:th th c FBI.o"iler
. . ."..;... ,. '. . . "r.... •..--,-. . . &." .. ,. .........
tne. pa s tTew ye a r s . _ !~~ . .1: £:1 1S u.e b~1J.~r 01"'g2,n'l'za1:lon t;:1.2t.. !1;aS
l' ",. 1 '.. • "..

. ~~:~.
'
. been fully b,,~,r ie fe d on
.' "'.. . ,. "r
tech..rri o ue.s and eoubr;:tent. The
TSD aud io .~~.
·~r_. . · ..... 4. "''''.' "... _ • " ~. --
. f~iloW:ing' e s i tua.ti ons whe e TSD and -gu.tda:i<:e were ~

..·~~~~·olv··ed __...
_.u.·~._
a'r

.;'::; , o ...oe r ",n

~1.·
.... _-u . . ::>-:
~.c::
-1"--, r equiprnerrt

'.. .:\ .

-.:..

....-

.. ,
~~. ". ~. "

...... ':' .
'~':" .... .:. .
~-.s ,: ...
. '

o::~r
..' ,--
.......s :.

. .
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

".._' ...

.....
..
\.

'-" :
~

:"..::
.. ..;.,,~
-:"."-.....

L -t-r- ---------------------------'t!1'~ ..
!
(G) T5D has fuzni sh e.d. equipment It.e-n s 'which constitute
. an on-the-:;h,clf ca-pabilify to erlgage in photo and
a udi o s u rv e i l ian ce op:eratiofls which rn ight not be
kriown to the Agency., In one case it is known that a
t",
r e Ia five Iy un s ophis ti ca te'd device wa s us e d against >-
t
c...,
..
a dorrie s ti c target.

-
"
v',
.-.,.
. :....!

2 - .....
< •

00'339 ,I•
i
----.
.. ' ...... .- -' -..:- ---. .-,---- •
L
..":;":"v-.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

" .... 'P:'- •

.,'
./ ,
·0'<'"

,r~..
,,' . "

J -....'\
- ..,;- :",,':;;::T
".:
..
,~ ,
" " : ... --_._.~:.
._--'---'. ---,--"\:
-' .' .,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

on

section vou Ld ':c~v:r ':thOS~"';'i;~:in~;tnot

inCIUc1Sd -;
He got -:the .~ough.;.no.tesdic~~~;by:)1r. "CoIGy On
~n+a~~.h:. _.:rn::~t~r·.:~. .n~;'.~c-~.J.J.·..:ge·d~o:~" -': j:., :,.; ~.·,:. :.;: .~i.';,i:".: ,~. :._~; :._~~L, ·_:. -~:
u .... _ - l.i __ hI. _ ,'.
__ .:'.;

. _.
....:,::'.. ...;.,_.,:.:•
. ••.

• \·~'i.':' . "...., • "\:.' ~ .;:~., ,".

I 1'ls.d xerox copi.~s ...;;::c and.r:-~:t..j·~.~;':~-:3 7.he ;7,::-:'5inals -:~ I'- --~
,,~': .
l,,~~n , 1¥.~1~!~y;ed the C61by nqt:etl~ i+. became
Dppa!'e~t' t;;a't ::he' ~as i"uif\':15' :~h~·:t:f:'u.tticn~
.';:
on una t to do 'with::- he

; -V?lr~ouR" it~~s·~:··-~:'7n:!.~:,. iJt.\.7:~~~'~~;:( pr~-£·~lptad th'e status.r"eport we

• " t .. •: .':' '.' / :',~

.-'

• l' ~

SDB

• ~t.. . ':-' '.:~ : ',:_

;.: \; \.: :;.:~.~ ;. ~;,.,

'.
-I .:,'~'" , ::;
" .a '

. ~.
v
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-';
: .. ,

.~: 'f'

.: .

. ..
~ ;'

. I

.,»,.
:'.' ~ ..
'"".: .~ ,. ~ . '.' ~.
'.",
.....
..: ".
;, .

t, "

' ... :

,.'

/. " .~ .".

"t..'; .
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.'. ".: .; . ..
.' .j. .{ : ~ ' .. .: ..... :.:;.
.....
'(
/.
. ',. ":.,./ . i -, :·';~.!'-':.:~ ..~:· __ :'~.~D J..~:,]
! .• I "..J
: ;. ~ ~" ",.~;
r .,;
i
I
"1
I
1__-_ ' -
"1 i .:»./ '_" .... ...~'.'..... '. :':< ... '": .... :
I
I,
,
: 1. /. "i ~~ (- '. ';"'\~
. .-;:1':' ~'. s: .-. ''',.
J L. -__-
I
.
.J ~~_ J~_ '. _ _~__.._..
j ,
..__ ._. r;" .

r1. . --- . .~.'

4
.. -'- .. -.. "-' __ -- L:"
l
. . . ----------------------------1-------
I· -'~
---'-- I
"

.rl-.': ." .
. ,._._

I.-
d~~~~.\'·:?ErIYE
""'r'g__
~CTJO/f.
f - -...._ - _ . . .
CO}/,l',:EiiT
_HI) .,.
~...._J.E.~~.gI... RE~!_ .._..__
··-i-····------·.··
•.___ .._•._.L~i.!-~..._ _ ...._.
I :"""" ..- · ..._.._L.:...:::'':::''-':'~:::''--_
"'0""""_,"''',
_.=t1:::,;;;RH
.)~~!:!:.:.:.!~~:=r:.=
J:-,")' .... -,"')"
. pnE?~E

S:i~E
• '" .. ,-_,
REPL'L.:_ _
r •
!
r"'-

!( . .

II
,.
.Remarks: .
"
.. .-
... ')~ .;242-~ cC-' Y\ul ~_ ..:_."~-- .
'.' ~.':' :,'
'. _ '~S
-7•_
. _<::'--?' f.:_~
~
:?________.._._____.... __ -o,_

(.-;....t ~:-._~r"-<- \ v .<) .'

...' :';,.;t
.'
"-1.......,. c..-:y j -c. " 1\
Dc.
.
"'I.e"\- .k",-.,,-...v'"
....
:c.
.... .: .. 1 :
:.".". .' ,
:
.'
.. ..
:;}""h:)
-,.1

'-uC-\
-
r"t-k-\-t.. ~ -
Lv.. Q..t.'-'1 ~~4' t.U~:

.. . Ct- - n..)'
., .. L"o..~ ~.
.. ~"'O s: \~.\J ~ ... cf'? ;:s
rE- .'.. . -. .. .,,.- ..
... ~.

.-.:yc..\ - ll..r '.'

'(' "'(.~-l. 2- ~ r .u..L ~ : 4u-('- L ..' ., :
,
-,
..
~·: :~;: ~;~!~\;i: ·: -
J .. .. - ... <. .. "

-
00343 . ..

. : : .. FOLD HERE TO RETUR'N TO SENDER ..

-.:. ~....:. :'.' , FROM: NAME, ADDRESS AND PHON!!: NO. DAn;:
"

;:tCh~'rl~~
... -:;.'.: A. Briggs, n/PPB ". .'5(23/73
~ '..
' ..
I UNCLASSIFIED I· I CO~FIDE!'iTIAL I SECRET
U:!. pre',ious tdilions .......
~
. (':0)
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

i. : . : ". :.;,., .r .;:' ,",

.",l~>i:~,,~;~;:,~t:i-

. ; ..
SUBJ'SCT: \·::·'I{~·:;:~~;.t(; r)~·::'e~~)~ils - ~:~;l'i;ct t)l' .J.::·c:i:.... ect
:'T'"l ': ,";!"lo- (:"/'·::.':-t t

~ .......-

- .~

1. ~his ilH;l:lor;-,ndum r-eaponds to the Dircch>j;"'s req~~st fQi-

a .....,{·-~,-t ,.,.F
£~:-I'... _""_ -; ,.-.l.r'·'''''r··,..,t
...y ;,...,
......_ ..,..1....... _ ..
'to _ ......'.... in -.,..---
CL __ J -'''',d'';~';'
- -. - " J
'-".~ "':',,1,·'1
.. - ..... - ... ..T·· a_ ... :to 1".;!··9
,·:·.,·-r
J:: _
,,:::-ith }~r~ss.rs. Hurit , !.f;:Col'"d~ :r..;i·~(~YI Yourig , "e:t- ;::-r:~gl1..

2. I have had none ...vi th Hunt. Lidcly 01" Young •

. ",
1 . 3. ,My 'McCord contact was indirect 'and occur-r-ed sometime
during the late 1960's when. r WE-<S Dil"ector, Office of Computer
Services. I opposed p laris .f01" 'I'echrrical D.i•.'i~ion., Office of
Security (under Mr •. !-.fcCord) to r.c.qui~e .a soparate computer [C.;l'
its In-Pla~e.: !"f0nito:ring Syste=~'1 DD/S&T' (th~-,n ORD) 10£
was the coroputer- individual wOl"Rmg \'lltll ID and , r. think, would
hav e c1etail~ .. · . -

4. The Krog h 'contact also ..v as rndir-cct arid invoived his

request. fUtst through O}!JB I that CIA fund 101.'"(:i.[:n tr~vel on bchalf :
of the Cabinet. Committee on Jntcc-national Narcotics Control. Indi-
vidual phone discussions. are noted in the atta ched , . The Agency
I=:~or
.
w~re I land I
has ~ci:rward~d n::le\.'ant documentation ,
-II under-stand
Copies .of.: .
. n 3..:from Messrs. Krogh. I land Colby 'a:rc:_iltta~bed
• also. .

5. I held a staff meeting yestea-day to ?;;.:;:s· the r-e-que-st to

<.Ill OPPB employees , One officer- who was attending a !uncl':"Ll will
not be avaflab'le untfl tomorrc.w •
.:J\bcB\CV-EF-lB5'=V-::r.. ti: r!-:;~~ (:)3:;:i~j·~3)
J - ::'\1:::'2 El.G2 CUT;~ ::.:TJG- lsI Charles A. BriZ~5
J :-. 1°'-1. E· C OTP1--
Charles A .. Briggs' .
Director Planning. of
Programming. and·~udgeting

Attachment
As stated 00344·
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. '0'./:. ':! : ,
~:. <::: : : .... .: o'
". " ','
....; . '.'
r ••• •••••••

, ..:'~' ... :

'.
,1 r'''::~:l 7.2:... :G~lJ·f:·:·:·~1 ':·!.1·1 '11; ..y!(~.t·, (:~~~~:3 :-.:: l'T:t~~'i~~ r·:~-~-:·:";l1.:~::::~i ;'.~~ -:i\'.;~~~iJrJl
~Otr:':.1~~~l~ '~:~1~0~~ . ick, ;.;( iO~1e L)!·;;·~:o::tic C:j:"\.:.l-:il o
\l;:.. 1:,~0'11 ·;;~::"(..ir.~n
: tr o vr-l i!l 'L.;;r.:ni".-:ct~(:~n '..;:i!11 ~;L::il"' r1Ercr,~i('s. i:&:tt~:1·"':5tS. Ji}:Tl was
p!",":'r°t:ing us to tl.,e:il" ir:tt::l-:tir,..Jl"i. to ::'!:..:J.t trs . fe,i'" ;Ul'lOS [(:11'" ~:~e
1.1.-;-:.'''1:".1.-
".-':':

7' F,,:b .72 F011ov~-U'Ft 11·Gln 1'~~y·l(,l.-;

,;':'I:_n 3-5 b.-1i)S fer 3 in(!i~;-i(!ounl=.-­
a11 hi FY 72 0 C~st pr-obably SiCK. Mtrmick r-eady to m:tke
first t-ipo I lis p9ugGcd In , E:·:Dir said OK l"e t(::hr~l1.
'/'i~it •

7 Feb 72 See attached' raerno fl"c.m Egil KroSh, J1', to Bin C"lby and
foltcw-cn Tr.t=;10S !rC}m·I'---
(2 Aug 72). -
I(~l Jul 72) and Colby .
12(?) ?·..~o.r :7~ J'ohn Hurley, O:\f2, celled , z:wntiv,,-hlg possfbl o l(l-Cgh/
~ Minni.ck atterrdanco itt a L;:;::i:l Al~.....;ric:tn (St<.tiorl Chid?)
I
.~ ~:.' :~;.:,f.i?~e!<::ncc on nar-cofics He ,ds~ said .Jei! .Shp.}herdl'
I ..(.:.
. . '. "·hOt
; 1 e _'~I ous e , wa.s 1nYlng on a-t~
~f ';(1 'th or 0
0

I •
i . hfmself , Shepher d and l','oal"k Aker. Ol.1B to Euz-one ,
" ~ 4

23 Jun n ~__-:-:-.--_-=.-_Icolnmcnt(:d on ¥0..ogh/~;H·11~iCk:interest

in g cttirig CA activ'itl es , including l;;,,:>ge-scale PM,
~n :~arc.C?tics f;ont 0 I .
6 J~i..7i"· !'I--;'::-;-_-=:!~al1~do Notes say only: ni·,lin~icl~-:"l~·Ul·l€;y film.
'.'
. '. T~'
,.l~e '';'i!l send. II
'. .:~.

1 Nov 72

•.e:-:1CO.

."
,"
-,

00345
'.
.'.
 MORl DocID: 1451843

.. '

. . .. ....... ...
. :... ~~:.::: : ~ .• j .
• ' I •

". ., '.:" ~ .
.. :" ..... .-.
",
"

. . : .:. :.~ ; .....

:'.
. , ':' t -, '" ..
......-, : ..
',. '

'.

20 Jan .72· RLn'hlded ExDh" r e $32K he said DCI OK'd ..

-.-: ....

.j:

-
..

..
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

'.: .. ~ :

., ':' .

.
CO";~ ,-,...,) s:»: ce ")11 17,'[· '·"'n::-, r'~'''1~''(N~· ':COJ'iCS' CO·,)·f·...1;. CJ.-~;) r.... d.
.
Th'· ".L
y.c\ bi-'et
.' . \::. 'j=,".,. ~"'.--.-""-'_.\ t ro L
' .•. I •• <.o.. _ r: 1.. _ '.'.!;> ,.'
: .. ;:>. '. _ ••" .

~~.:,~)L-·.,.nb<.r·7 P1-"'<'';:~';'111- ~'-O'

0
"I 1 ~ ·},c·.!."·/e
...... '1·11.t.:_ '""" 1
•.-)"1Ll_ ....... - t: ........ t.J__ ~....
.I ..... ..:..<._:-_ ...... __ .~'11'"i:> G.~
C':'-";['r':>l'i';"" ··,;-[· ...
__ r:_ C'-. ,~ J.1,,.,,
_'"\" ori LL':'~ ~.;:..,
..l4-.
...te·l::rHl.tio~lal drug L.-affic.

·.'The' 'Col'mnittee

..
Salary and ad~inistraHve.support for arna'Il , full-time' ':;;taff ha s b e eri 'its
:: provided,·by.the E,.:ecutive~£Hceof the J?residenf;~: qther.expens'es.aie
.' ':.., being..ch;;p;ge·d to the 'constituent agen.cies.:.i:tnd d~partments. '. .'.:'
. ..~..'. . '. : '. .... ''',,~:'' ...: e,
":':' . <.. :.:.: :. :,;' I ••••

-
.i '.: Th~ ·.Bu.rea:~ of CU5tO:mS~ BNDD J
. .
2.':nd:f\..iI;j 16f.fi-ce. of. PUbiic S;:...ie·t:i have
" :'.'
.
pro\7.ided.'l?-upport~od~te. .' .., . ' .'.
... ....
.. ',: ",....
~ . ::,:~'.~' ~""
' :
. '.' .,,':: .,/ --
.. '. :The. CIA. s!t ou1d. bep.repar·ed to defray, ilot more than ·.§ft:een t1:lous and .:
' " ..dollars :in 'over e'e'as fra vel' e:>:.'P en s e s .fOJ;'C ab.inet . Go:m....--n,ittce staff'du.ring
···..~··;}j;e-remainq~r of FY--1972. .. ., .:". ,'. . .
" '.

. .: .1V~lter C_· .1vfi1U"'-i.ck,. the Com.mitl:ee's Staff..Co~T.di:ri.ator,.

.. . .'..::..:£01." furth'ex- details •. -. :..'. .. . ., .:' '..' '. .. .
:..' .': ' ..
".. "'~"'''~ L~<·
. .
....~.: .'
~:. ~ ',.,
'; ...: .::' " . . .' : :. . . ~.: "

- .. :::'" ". ,.'

.-
:-.:. .. ... '.
c.

"
:...

',. .

.fjYq9r:
Egil·:E{rogh., .r-;.
B.xCC~ltivcD.lrcctor· .
.. ,
'Ca:bi~et Gommitt.ee on:
',
,',.
~ , :

.Int:er'riatio:nal Narcotics Control

..:GC:: :John Eh:tlichman .-r:"
.' .... '. ". Assi~tant· to the President for D~:m:e;stic '.lufa-irs. '
' ..
.. ;:.
;:Mark. Alger . . ". ":"'." '" . .
___ ....•..•. ·1 .. OMB; Chie(, General G6Vernm~~t.:ro~"am:$Ilivjsion
.....,;: ': .':: .... . CIA I cp~'esenf:ati-vel CCINC v/b~id.tig·. drm~'p "'.
.. ,,-:-.
I, ; v, • • '.,: ." .

r; ',-:.
/.
003-41
:)~I ', ~

••••• ~' ;' .. : - - •• : -. ". ~ "0

 MORl DoclD: 1451843

". " -:
·t.,
. :,.,
'", ~ ,

, "'...:

::::"""\l~c:".f. .-~~~:.:... :c: 1~):':3 l};.J~;Z;:;~:~~':'~1'· ~:~:J~)L:~.)~~t 'f:-j"i:

i..!:i;z C:.'.".:: :;:~:;t (:O:::2.r:-~lf:t~~) ':::;1. 2:::.t:t.:: ;;.... r~tr.~·;:~al

_
.•.•.1!,'.:~
"' .• r-._...•~" ~:
-__ •. _.,., t.
·7...~
.:.....,
t~
~.J]....;..
~
_ ·k....L.m
• ....:: ,:..... :.-..-J.... n/~.1'!t
..... ,_..}.,..al,.
"'" R£-,-:;-:
,;.".... -.;:.. ....-.-~ ..._ ~~!"1
t"
••
._"""

21 ;rt.~I.y 1972; s arrie .~u'bj:?:ct

"., .
... -
. 1" Thia is in l"esponse. .t()·:tha.refe:t'ence~ rnezno r~g.a.rdin,S
-us e. .0 !' vJ..,i;
..... ,. '\ .:;.U}~·1S.
r' ,
to cove-r .' . '
trave'.l . - '., -H" • -';"
e:~pe~5e$ lO~ tila \1- n.lte l.-:ouse
Cabi.n~t Comr,,11ttee Staff fo~ .z""Iscal ).~r::.;.\r 1973..
.: "

:'.' 2~
You~.r$ .::.ut:.~o;i.Zed .iQbbligate~f lJP !:o $15 .. O!iO for fb.e 'Use
··,of the \Vhit.eHouie Cabhi~t' Committz.e
. StaHfor ~r~vel ex~enses
.. clu~in;g 1:"'Y 1973~ O.bl!g3.tton.. ~bo:}ld tl~' Lecol:'d~d ,-;;.g-~!'n.3t 1~e O/DDP
.
: ~al!6~:-=1~D.'t and 'E:ra'V~l order3' is.Gu'ed "~b':::"'.'
--.. . . inI4·~·"t.,..O· ..,"""' o--n
~ ....... ,T.~ ..:p~
"'~-"":"'at-Ory~;::>!-..::a
<C:""r'::- l.-L ......
fa.n lr'_

number-,
-~ '\

.. ~ 3.. To.U\c· e~~eMt i:ha.~y~~ are .tU1a~Ie:·G·ab~o!:hthis requl..l"emcnt

'wlthin'yourpi;e:senf: aUotmetit;::'vie\::"lU hav&·to,·a.rrange some 'repro-'
g·rah:-..rnbg b.ter-· i::1 the y.~ar:··f:o:cove~ :'his unb.udgeiea item. o

W.·E. Colhy
Ezecu1:iye' Dlt'ecto:"'-Co~.."pt:ol1e~

....i! o IPPB~,-:-=-- !hg ·z A~~'72

~ist~ibution:
-I
.j , . ·Or.ig &.1 a:ddre;;se~
I 1 - ·;ExDir
.!
'.
.;*,"'
1 :Ir:R
0
_
0034-8
:1
i : '1. -'PPB Sp.bj(~MS
I ./
-,. 1. "'OlF. '.'
i
~ ..., .. .:. Readinz :
b--. r - l - <:> ,
:'j'
i
l'~hrono,
.1·

, ,.' ,~...;
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.....
'. '-;'.. '.:"
........ .- - .:. ~ . ,,/ .~ ...
i::.~ :.,'.~'"" ....
:.: :r~:~;;;~:~:~;:;-:~.~·
r{:i~~_~:~:0~!·
. ,....:-.. :;.
.(

EXt"': ';ll-;:;·.~.v·~'·t)~~.t:,..:(:t~l~ <: ·C(;~;;ij·;';.~:·():u.cr

'<

VIA.
:

Ha:ccotics '9<;m"t:r'oT (GCINC)

.j
, ..:. .: .' .

-.
At our ii:.lvit·ation·:> I.-Ii:. ~'T21t~r C.. Binniek:> Sta.:fI'"
1'.
'Merr~er of the CCINC:> is;s~heduled to ~ttend and participate
in the Regi~n2.1 Narcotic~·.:Senrl.nar sp.onsored ·by l'lH Di1Ti:;:;ion ...
on' 27-28 JUly' 2972.: ':'" i·._ . '. . .;
'. , .... .-". '. ,... '- . . . -' : ... .; .
2. In accordance with procedur~s adbpted ror irave1
..
." of ·\rnite Hou.se C2binet Gommit;"tee StafY in FY 1972.) it is ...~' ..
r~quested.thc.t runds to·. cover- t.he·cost·.·of'Jilr. NinnickJs - ' . : ."'i:.
trip be ·rel~2sed... Attached:.lierei'lith is. a copy .0Ta :ro:rma~
requ~st :from r·~.,...~ Egil Kr~ogh·d·ated '.1' February 1972 toNr •. ';.
U:l"lli&'i1 Colby requesting' t~2.vel fU:hds. :for :.the balance' or
:py ·197:2'. r;Ir,;. K(~0gh is' riow preparing a formal reque.st :for. '.
$15,000.DO to cover tra.vei' 'expenses ror \fnite House Cab.inet .. :
GO?ihl1itte.e sta.fr "par FYi:.,19.73.~. I.. will TOI';1ard this request.~ .. ~.
·:r to ~·ou1!o:frice:2.:5_ .s.con as -.i1;··a·rr~ve5~ :. ' - : 0 , "_.
. " ~ - .-
0.: .

.:... "

., ' ..:

Attachment:

....
.003;49'
• ......»

. .... ,.~ ~-; .....

HElJuRIJ f}BPJ .... ! . . .
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, '. ' ,::~er yo,i>"C~~'~'

" ,:~.:;.\i1.,~.~t~s·o£ the .Dh·e';
"~\ " :::1·J'w.y:J970 through,
.)·:~~:~~r::; in; ~~Y'jiv.ay tP·:'~Vf.~~~' ;:,":"?:",
:;:,;.;oo;;"<":\.:"Jf:,: .. .'
" : :"'i,!\:~~~,nonnn~tm~ con ve,n't~~, .0

: ;:. b~~Jn;~~rand~ ':ii"

:~l~h .He asked the DDS';
~th(fi 'lact known insecu ,Z
.. . .~~;;&i:,:.:;:.':.- ·.. ';:,H';.:·~:N.;;;~;;~·:,!: .>:.,,'

-: ','"
:::~:.7;{1::~'~;<:;E;c~~·i.
rl-~l':': :;fl(~;5 ~!\S;~:;':tt~~ti';n
.~. ;.,..•-:.,:.~,E.~_. ~:. :~.:;~.; .:.;:.,:~ .:,-i.~;.:_,.·~.: f.·~:.;~·\~.: ,~;.,L.: : '
to tli'¢ )?resid
. :. . .:

;'21 Deceml?'·:. :JDi's:closures>o[·Clas·s'f

::·::·Iit:f'ormatio·· ifa:'Cl~ar'~nh~'oiOff{cii
. Staten1en:t'~~'\"":':'7"'_ . ~" "., .".'" ':f16>~e' tfi~· re~:.111t:bf ~~~t
".sentations by::t~e;~~:Dlfe~·i:or.·a:n}i·.,Aan.;.iral Ande·rson.... Exec.
:,. :.: .u~ve 'Dire,ct4r:~~~¥'~d:that he y,rill:~~~t withsel~~tecl.Ex~4;'
.f -: " .::·.;><.CoD:1niitte,~~ ";'''':''''~:'~~:¥.:~~~~~, w:e:~'kto'.4is~uss~:t~~·mem~~ -: ·:·:
'.::." :::'-, .' ,·,:/:j.m:plic~t·:;~."c;i~(a·e'Velop':~·ec(jn:inlend~.ti.oiui for. acti'
.' '. ,':;::",::' the ,Dhect: .of.the·:sp~Ci~l resp.onslbiiUies.pl
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

t·····":··· .; .. " .r, ' , - .. ~ .'. ee-..... '~l": ~.: -:.~ . : ... ~ • • .

;.,li0:;~'(1t;:~:-":;:';l~$:~l~~W"'" ,,'. . ,: !t~$!t~~~l~{t);',~~l~~~~~~?~~~~'i:j.·

>. :;-, ",}?;Q.Cf~eported· t~t Jo1mEhrllchma~' had telephoi:1f~a.';to·:adVise.':·".~:/.,-, "
usthat·the.:,Wh1.te House' is appobiting fOrxner CIA e~pl~yee !-towa.rd ..... :":.

H~t:':7 . ~t;f~{~dty ~o~~.~tant •. : -:. ". . ,:' .~.~: .i-, :... ,. ::~~.S,;:·;,~~!,~~~~}},~~·:::::::'·::·:.·... ".::'~::: :':
, :>··.:·':·~4~pth~r account of the Mo.rrong .Meeting Qf.tb.!~~j,~1;~;'·~ea.ds: .: '..

I~:'~·~~.:~i·~~;n~~tin~'edt~t~~~rdH~-~~::;'~~'l~:~~~~'d:"s~'~~i~':<. :"
consultane to the White House. GeIier~f.Cu~hma.n:told "Ehrlicmnan' . '-"
......
that :Mr~ ". Hunt would have full co?peration. from C~.,· '~. '~:, :.:' .:.'
:~~.~ • '.:,.'. .:; .' • ".::. • • • • :.' • • • ••• ' . '....; l·'· :.

. .. "-' . . .' . . . ... ~.~

16.July.i9·71,. .. . ..' _," :" ':'::':~. _., . ".....

. '. C'a;~~~":~~idth~~l'
Was. .. mo·~t'~~?~eci~ii~~-::~~.th~·~~ :;; -':
which HOll.ston spent W1th nun yesterday.' . ...... - -. "':,' .... , : .\.
~~ . . ".~
.~: :
22 July 1971 (the day Ho.\Va.td Hunt came t~ see: General·CI,i·~·hm.cin)', ..':
.: -. :~"~/.~::'<. '-,: .',.. -,: ';:'"
...:.. .' . - . ...~\: .... , >' • " • •' ~ ... :'-::::!~~::')~{::'.::{-::::.~:.':..~'.:. ," ....
' ..·:Carver'highlighted his session yesterday with'~~Cstaffe:r. >.. .
David Yo'uug,:';who is a.ssisting John Eb.rlichman in ~'¢~ewing -':he·. " ;:
· secret..P entagon papers . · . " ':: ,;~::;~,;:,>~~,;::}~?-::'. . ".:>.:..":
18l~E~;~~71·. " , .": .: . . .1it~I~f:ft;:~'~:':'
. A.J?DP noted that he' has reported to White, Housestaffel' David' .... -
Y0l;lng c)nJhe results of the Deputy Direttor of Securi~yls':'surveyof ,;,,:, ":: .
those w"ho ·sa.,V-the classified a s s eaernent upon whid~··Tad.Szuk b~aed'.··"::~,.

-~ ': .~..- ," •. ' t·',-

·:;~~::tl::Cle.:: . . ..,:,." ., ,<?i.J~~I~~t;i" '. -. .r" .
,. I~' ~~;~~ns'e ~'. the 'Directo~' s 'questio~ ca~v~~'~~#~{~~{~~~e ~:.: ':-:'
';. '.
t
er
::::ff::: on ~e ~U..·, :',;,;if~{t~.., '.'
workr'equested by John Ehrlichman is pending;' . X1ie;plr~ctoJ," a.sked :.':

: .
7

· '. :<,:",DD;l:~lled attention to the article in today's·New York Times, .

',' "Nixon Acts 'to End Sec'urity Leaks.. Il. (~ret!'t '£'r()~ the'.~rticle: :. "
. IllAst J'uly, two rnembea-a of the WhiteHouse s~ff.· -,ba:vj.d R. YoUng.:·':.
:.of the'Natio~l Security· Council and Egtl Kroghr.Jr~:~. of·~he Domesti¢;.,
. CouncU~:-'w,ere asked to investiga.te.earlier leaks .. p~ev:ent ·recur:- :~:::-:'
-. renc~s.·'.') - . . . . . . . '. ···c.. : .,...,;:,-..
~ . ~ . '. . ',' '~:,'
... ~.: . ~ ~ "'.
~ " "

;; .. '
r. .::
; .,
.-
p"
:. .. 2 .. I:..

..
• :: : -• • ' :• • • • d U'::- • • _ ... t ... ~. • •• _ ..... _ •.__ .. ~.'- ~"'"....; .: .•;;: __ ._, ,'_.

L,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

i;~~i~i{~l'i~~j{f;:'1);~~!J,1~f~~i~~I~~~;~~,:;--i?-g;~'-;!\,;:';'1't~lt~~rl~r~:t:$I~~iC<'
:.:;.:' ;~'."':'!::.' ~"'" . i:: ::: s'
.,'
::. :':;''-:', .:.::' .;.DP~ noted. 't}ie :artiCle by-Michael G~tler in tod~y' Wai'lhi~g'fon,,::····: ....
'..</ \.:;.,. ,. <: ~ ·.Post,. ·'.'New SpY·$a.tE:il1ite$ Planned for Clearei"~·.;'InstantPi¢tures.·I~ . ' ..
.:.. :~:. Lat(;i:'in the meeting the Director askedthe PPS'to' advise the":'. .
'. :-:;"Di~ector of Sec~rity to' under-take an ln~estiga,.t~.o~ofthis leaIi of .
':··/;EOI-re1a.ted info~matioIl: and to convene the ~B Security::'.' '''..

: ·':· i·.·lCl·'·~F·~e: ·':b': ·;r:·:~u·'~a·:er':_;9": :7{ ':_'0.l".~.~.;.;~.··.:~.;'-t--_/ '-''-.,.:--, ,

' .
-' ' -,,'.,"
.!.. J.: ~ '". . ' ;;~ :: •. ~~ , ;=.
. .: :.... :. :""::~.::~:: ·""i :.:". .•.. '." .. <>

" '. .: :··::::::·;':;'h~:'n{·~~a~~ re~i~d'eci Ex~cutive 'co~~i~e '~~~~e;:s ~f

: .":'" . ..:
'. ~::.:: :. '. . :'.:. '.:': D~:~ ··Kissi.nge~ls r equeatthat any inquiries fr~:rh elem~nts the .' c;i
,. :~:~'~". ., .White·Hotis·~··sta.ffbe referred to his staff for .conveyance to the
. ". -Agency,
,:.,::; .. -, . .... ... ,. , .'
.
" :.: ,;.. .. . ·5····· .
-,'
.:.: : ..... .~ ..... ".:" .
. ' . "': '. i6: Febrriary '1972 . ,".-

• I :...",.. , '. '.:', ::': '<Lelunan:''noted plans to continue briefing Attb'~ne'y G'~~er~l
I
r:
..' '.,:::
:.....
>·Mi.tchell,':."'
..~hose resignation-is efiective i :M:ar·c;h.·.·:,~.
.' .. ".
',:- ',.,::' i:..
' • • • -.
'", ': , ' . '::, • '. .' .t· • _. • ;~
. ", '.~" .': . 6 March"197Z ..' . . ':~l /~-' -.( .~
. ..,~
l'

.. , .r. '.' .: .'-, , "!'~.' ::~.T~iD~re·~tor noted his memorand~··'to·:·the.ri~~rit~es ~cl, .....
.
'/ ..:.' hidepe~dent Office Rea "s, subject:. "AllegationS .of Assas~in~tio:ris~II
."'. ~ .>~
'.'
' ', .
••".
'He 'a~ked .that it be mentioned at Staff Meetings~:'·::'.i·," .:' :.. ' .
.•••. • . ' . r.r . _ .' .:-: •
:. ,
:.. ';

.'
:"-.,'
~ .." -t..
. 7, .:.'
...... ".
.
...... : ... "

. :.:.:: .:: ~.:.:: The l:>irector 'said that the Presi~e~t has '~e'~~ his·.17., ~:..::
"':':'.. ' '" :,~ .::-::::'February rnernozandum on reducing disclosures of clas~ified. '. :.
, .... :. . 'intelligence .anddl reoted the White Hous e stafrio pr-epar-e ·a'.:
...memorandum urging that all agencies comply'·with proper dis-
'; :.c1o·~ure procedures. . ',.. ..... '. . .....
: ... . ':-'
" : . .": ..... ::.~ ,:.. ,:
". \ .", " .
....... • • . • ;. "'~" : / . :•• ~::' . , ' • • '. "::'~:" l' •

: .. ', 8 ·.rune 1972

.,: :....::: Houston, said that he will be attending a meeting called .

·:·i':/by 'DOD General GOWlsel Buzhazdt, wno is recominending that
.' Jus~ic(;.,drop the case against I?aniel.'.~l1sberg.· . -
:' . . '
" '. . . ~'.

" . ,. '.\':::'.:J:.... ' "..:

',:-.-~,;o::( , ',: '- '. . .'.' :.
:', .. '.
'

. '. . ~:.. '::. ~.';:". . . . .. '.~ . '.'-' : .... ::.

. .. . .. . ~ . .... . ...
'':'

.
. . :.:: . . ':
...
:.... ;.~.: :,.~, ..,: ..: .... . ..
."

;•. 1.' .•••.

:.':..
,,' J •• , .~ "' • • ' '.' :~. :.'.) ",
" . .' ...
00.352'" "
"."

. '
.. I"
.'
• "

"'-~' >: :.,:::,:;:~~:::~.:~~; ::L::~-~o ,~~<:~

:, ':
. .... '-';'"
;,.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

1?~'·/:,:",;.'. ':~~9S~~'i9~~;0'i"";,, .:' ., . .-;;:;~~~~~~~i~l~t,

:...:;. . , ,:." .''. Th~ Director noted
the 17 June arrest ot James \V. MeCor.ti' ~n~:t:\ ,~l":. :,
.' .. '":>: .four others who were apprehended at
the Democ:rati~ National Cori1·.·::;it:,~~:~(r.:{.
. ' . :-./. mittee he2.dquarters a.t ~he Watergate.'-:i··'W.ith the Director of SecUritj':.~~;:;i-·:;::'·::;.
....:-, ":' ;':'. presel;lt ·to provide 1?iographic details~ theDire~tor made it.perfectly·'t~:i:.'S:··..
.' . . .i. c~ea.r that ·l'espC?nses to any- inquiry..w?-th, .r~speCt to McCord or .Ho~rd:.:?{:.:·:::'

·ltUnt~··.who maybe'lmplicated, are to be lirpitec1 tc? a.. statement that.>t~·XH(·

, . '.. they a~e fC)rmer employees -\vho'1"etired in August and AprU·197.0 re•.::':::.;;~;?·:'.;
spectively. 'r~e Director asked that' this gl,lidarice be dissennn.ated:L::·· .>~"'::"
......,' .-.:'. via.' staff meetings•. The Director a.sked that any inquiry ii-om. other ": {.,:-.:. ~
:". .' ;:.:-',: elem.ents of the govermnent be referred to the Director of Secllrity . ~: : ,.: .
......: : who is to be the focal polrtt. Inquii-i'es. from the pres s are to b~' re- . "; . :~ ..
'. '. terred to Mr. Unumb who may say that McCord worked. in the Office.·. L .. ,

.. "')'''0£ Security. The DirectQr noted ·trui.t we. have no responsibilitY·with·...:,,·::;·:

resp~ct to an investigation except to be .responsiya to the FBlt's re- ...• ".:: :
quest for name traces.. It was ncted that Howard Hunt may have done": ".:':.
. '. som.e work since re.tircment in .connection with the preparation of : .
'. :":,": <, ">supporting matedal!or some awards.:' The ·Executive Directorwa:s: .
. -: /:··.··:::~skedto review this topic and repo~to:the Dir~ctor" ::. ;
. . .. , . .~ :. . . ;"'. . . , " . . ; .
•~ ~'., .. -z .
. '.....20 ·Jlme 1972 ~ . . :" -..
:::':" '. t:
.... , .... , : .....:." ~ . : .

'. '. .:.': .::.' .:..' :' ':- In response to the Directorf's r;ci~est, the Director of Se~urity:· .
'. -. h1ghUghted developments over the past twenty~four hours wi~h resp~ct '" ;~.
. 'to the McCord/Hunt_ et "'.1.. situation. He noted that the late edition .'.'
.' of the Ne\v York Times carries a difier'ent story by Tad Szulc than ",
-. ·that.whiehappeared in the edition..received here. 'The Director ot : .v-;;.: :-,
Security anticipates s~m.e. ~nquiries on·B·ernard.L.. Barker's situation,. .. · .
. and it was noted .that Mr. Barker was hired by the Agency in i960 and .~/~ .
~. ..... ~: .~" '":. terminated in 1966. The Director complimented Un~b o~ his han~g" ~ .
.. ' ':, .:.... ::. <: :: ofinquirles and a sked that future inqUiries beznet with'a; response :~);?:.;,
.. ' .. '.. > : .>.;'::' confined to the. fact that, now that we have acknowledged that both "... ,:.~::.:
""': . .'. McCord and Hunt·are former AgencY employee~,. we know nothing: . ::.:-:':;".
. ". "'." . ' '. . ': more abolit..the-~se.and the caller should be referred to the FBI ~~ :.::; '!<~.::'.:
a p p r o p r i a t e . :.- ; ...'

~ ..
, 20 June 1972
-: : ..: .,~' :.' ~....
';' , ' . ::. . '... .' '::

. . ' T~e T:i:rectornoted receipt o!'a'Pal::e;- on a safehouae in Mia~ :;:':'.

which is being made a.vailable to: .the 'Secret Service in support of .:' .
. ":;". ..' .: .. '. .... its work in connection with theaep.~bncanandDemocratic Nationa..l . .
.... :. Conventio;ts. lie a..sked·theADD~a,.ndthe DDS to ma.~e it absolutely,' :':.:"';'
. '.~' . .

"," ... ;...

.:4 ....
!.
' ... ' . ";'~ .

... ,. ;
• :" ....-.7"-.-.1 •.-~•• , .....
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

k!{;·<:ii;f·'·:!::~t<~::)~::1:,\;:~:>gl~~~J.' ." ,', .'. ". t.·th;~~.H·.~2::;~ggg;~.~f:~~9.tf:~.5t!,:y~,i?~~~%·{8~~·~5~~.lq~g··, .:"

I.: 3-, ~ .:.'.: ~l..:. :'::.:;.'( ,!;.: ;".•):~. :.:1 S"
tc);'be 'corifltied tQ' P rovts1o~~\Qf·:·~h'«·.:: s.afehp.us·e·::Ci~~::t.h~'.t:):tlS .not to .
rA;-:t>:;f;'<\~~ '::::."::.~.~,::·'·)::':;~{be\ '~~'~'ci:'~~ :~k:::~1t.~j~r 'inY~$~ig~'~i~~~/"i~te~rog~H:~~~):'~Vyw~l~:-in~!'~.
! ;":.:'.' ;~: ....::. :. etc." ·.The ·Director..added 'that we. will not 'loan people to .the .FBT or'
1·::·'· ....,.·.: ..· / . '.' Secr.erServic~.ih connectton With i:.h~~r· resp~msibilities.at-the:' .
:. :'.:\.'(. .',.: , .. Gonvenfions nor wjll we provi4e.:e·q~~pmeritunique to the .Agency;

;::;."~': . • n.d:e ~:: Offuecoverage' ~i~~f;SN. ; and·; Times

..... . .....: '. '.' .... 'Washington Post;.... MCJ-ury recommended that Chairman ~edzi be
. : .,. . briefed on the McCord affair and that this briefing include all .I I )1::

. .... . our information'about tile others···involved•. The .Director asked

.'. :::~.. :.;:~.:' -:
,::: .. ...... .Maury to .t.onch base with the Director of Sec~rity' and prepare .
.·ilf.il··· .' ~'.'\""'Ii"'.::' .·:·a ·~iug<papfril.-~on this:·:topic.,for hisr~yiew.· Citing the 'nurnbe r
. of distorted rumors. about this matter , the Executive Director
. /".: .:.:: .: ::' ..: ': ' .: said that during the co~rse of theda y he' hopes to provide a .
. ': . suggested Headquarters Bulletin fo.r all employees for the' .
. ' Director's review.' ' . '.: .... :'. '. . :;: '. .: .' .' .
. .
..
'. '. Unumb·nofed a number of inquiries from the press with .
.: ;espect to the 'Cuban-Ameri'caiis'tnyolved ui the'b~gging' attempt
' ~'"

.... at the' Democratic National co~i.ttee Iieadquaz te r s and thedz

.' '. ::.alleged involvement in the Baio[!)igs, etc. ,.·The Dtr ector asked
.~~':.' ..:.,;--: ;":: :. :. 'that such inquiries be met with anexplanati~n.that-we are not.
• ,:",., I

.prepared to be helpful on thism#ter•.· .

. • : . . ' . ;. .":. ·::~'r··>:· .::'. '.,~. ". e ': t

23 June 1972 . ...:.. -/.::, ::: .... . '

. . :':-'Maury noted that "~ 'briefe(fCh~irmanNedzi··on the McCord!

. ." .. Hunt s i t u a t I o n . :.''... c.; ~;,:,:_: -,,:_ :
"
"

.:- .
: .t", '.', • • :.;
' ..... 21 August 1972
,
.. ..... Houston noted a tel.ephone .·call.from Howard. Hunt who" .. :.
.;.: ':.' .' . " ···e~pbiined that his attorney. wa$ with hirn a:nd had a' question' '.
. .. ':
. ...
.
. ":'.::". '. '.: . . about. a· friend's past affiliation, ~th the Agency•.1 1
.... .. .... DD/Sec,~as reviewed the employment, and Houston reported
.'" . .'~.)':' '. .: .: that he replied directly to Hunt's friend, Mr.1
e • '. thatthis old affiliation should create I!-O proble~i:n~·-s~.i;-"n-c-o-nn-e-c~t:-;i-o-n---
v • with his' appearance before a grand jury. .
. ;..
18 October 1972
Ma ury noted his response t6 a r.equest [r.om CSC General
Counsel Anthony Mondeflov'who -wa s rea~ting. to a request for the
personnel files of those ·forme~ :Agency officers .involyed in the
. .;
... :." . , "
'.'

..'., - 5 .. · . ' ..
,

• • • • J.
,i.:.:': ..
..,.-: ;': -. ,:.

,~~I.:" ~'.:. ., .. .,',

.:.... "': .
• . '00354
..: :':::"
" ,"

. -r·-_:---.. . -· .
c
:"

.::.~ :.:.
:' -. 1-

.i· ::,;/..(.1 ..:. :,:.

 MORl DoclD: 1451843

1;~{Jt~~;'i"i!r~!;;~tlj:'(~~~11i\h~1~t~:~:r8~g~rf~~~~~~:i~~:~~f}~~;\'1\:!:;;
!·::t i .:· ','.',:";'.'.;./ ., ,.:'. ·Administ~ative Practi'ces'~nd Procedur~s .: 'He added that ~~·:.::;:~~·.,:··;'.··;:J~L(~>·
'.:;' .';.... are ·.exempte~rfrom relate4 t::.SC regui~tions, and the·.Directo~<.::.~::i:~G.~i;::~~~::{~·
.. ',. ' . endcr.sedhfs-pfan to. provide only the 'dates of their d·epartur~.:··>:::·~~:,:~;;t~~~~:?f;,:
"N~ t ~"' .•
.. • • • • ' . ','" •• '., . . . . . . .

from the Agency in}he event the Senator's office ca.Il.s us. .on this:::·;~;:·Yf~fgl:~U:\.
" '

: -.
: ":"
. . -, :::~ . . ' '.: ..' .::'..... -'; '

.:. 3 November 1972 .. ", . '.

. . ,

..:..' .;
· . ::'~.' '. '. ~ .:

,- '.' ".
:". ' " Houston recalled tliatl~stAugu~t'he'repO'rt~d'ona call (
'. ,'"" . ',~ :'from Howar(l' ~un~ and his :s~~se~ue'nt~guidance to)
" ...~ pn ho'W t9 handl~"afflliahonWJ.th '~he 'Agen~
......:.:

"".
.:-;': . . .'
....
"

: :.'

. ·Th~ Di.rector highlighted hi~,conver.sationwith David K~~sio~

· .of.the Washington Star News and his flat denial pi a pr'op~sed:" '..
, .
:' :. ' .. story that the Agency was asked to report on the Democratic .: ; . .~
, . ~
\.
. Party which led to th~ .W.atergate incident and others. The ";"."'..,
.~ .; ..:':.:'
t· .
'
Director 'noted his ·plans·t~.Jssue.a statement of denial if such:.:,:'
:
!
.' ..
a. story wereto appeaz-andeuggeated, that Thuermer .considet.:,'·:,:}'::::~:~;;\t~l;~;~;:~t:,
"l
'dl:afting one for conti:ngency:use., ' ..... -, " .
.. ,~ .", .
.15 November 1972 .,. ".:.
...'. ,

: '."
-' :#

. DDP noted 'a rep~r~ from Chief, WH Division that on 9 .', ('~:".'
.October a l\.1~. Harper of the New York Tinles was working on a. ..
'.:: . -.: ,'. :,:'" . story' Which·tries to link the ·Agency with Cuban emigr es ; the "}:;,:",,:~\;,,,
i ::'::.: .' ,: ...... .... ..;' .. "break-iii at the Chilean Embassy, action against Danfel EUsbe:~'~}1j;::
:.::: "
~. ··i -',
...... ". ;
theWatergat'e case•..'·Thuermer observed that this and
the'first'" is. :>',:<.',;.',,",T.'

!. ;~'.' " " : he has heard about this topic', and the PPP concluded that such';;!.,:,:'
story would have no basis in fact and it wouldbe inadvisable ·~o. "{:
try to straighten out Mr. Harper. . " . ;. ;"

2Z November 1972 ' . .;.

. .., .. :: .. . ~'", .~

'Warner rei~ted. that according to A s,sistant A tto rney G~~~~a:l" .; .-,' ".
\: ..:.', Henry :·)eterson,· .U. S. Attorney Ear1Siibert has several questions :'.
........ . ". , . ., ~ ".
on the Watergate case. The Director indicated he will reviewtms
.' .:' matter later'. . ,'., '. ',..... . .,;. :,:
.. '; . .
. '. " ~. '.

.. ....
, '-
';', ..... .",.

- 6-
. - ,"

"
l' .

. ..,: .

.
........... :.~._-
~':
...:- ~
, .
._,. ~,.~ ....: .. .'~ ...... :- ~_. .... ~. .. .'- ....•' ,- .,...: '."'.~ , ~ '.--~' . _.. c,:,.••..,",,:,.;,.:.. """._' ",:,;,_..,.;.~_ r ..
. ' ..
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

!1~:1:~~~c;~~~1~~~i~i1~~:1:ilI~~!~tt~;;·!:·~j;~:1~~~"~;~~1~A';rtit~1i!-m~~~~MJ~~~'
. . / . . ~.;.::: ..... ' "<:".', ':'. 'The "Directo;"~oted the a~ticle by Tho~~s. B.' 'Ro~~ 'i~"": ..:·.:,··..i:\,.=-.. ': -'.
, .: , : .'. ',:. yester'day's Eveniiii Star-:-News, "~New Watergate··I)imensipn?·~~:·:\..~ ..·· . ..:- .
1'.'. ..... and the Impr es sfon left therein that .the Agency was involved'·':·\:> ,:",:: ..,. .
r:.; .: ".:' .. in .the ·Watergate·~nc.id·ent-beGausea i:assport bearing' the na!ri~.···.'.(~···:.:..
, f:::~:;.: :.... :' :' .:., .: ~EdwCl:~d Hamiltmi\va:s .found on Frank' Sturgis'.' ..Any. inquirie~·.··< . ':'.
" :: ."; ., :. '.:.' :..,'.,: '. . from the press ·elsewhe.re- are to be met with a "this is ··:···i.:·: .-:' :.:. :~ ';, . or,
. '.:'::. ~.:' '. '. . ...: nonsense1'·.r:ep'ly.·· The: Executivei Director noted wozk under .:.:'
-: -v-

. .:, way to i.dentify the genes'is of the passport story.

.. . . . , .. .. . . .~: . ~.~ .': .: -"; ,::' .' . ". "
'.:' ~.'
~.~~~~::~. ':""~ .~
.. .15 Jan~a:ry 197.3" -, ::": -. .. ; "',:: ~: . ", .... ~ .. .,
.::~: ..:j~;. '.. : • ·l ....~.. • ·t.:~i ':. ".. • " ".....':",.~, ... ' .' .. ;

. Ma~ry noted.pzeaa storie.s :that Watergate defendant;.,'::·.·.·,:

Martinez was on·tl~(;fA.gency:payrolluntill7 June and antfctpated .5. :' . . . . . .
some inquiry on this topic.: The DDP endorsed his view that, . ". '.
whereas Martinez wa's-dntez-rnittently used a~'1(ource to.report .. '.
. ,,: '. ... on Cuban, exil.e matters,thi-s .relationship should cause no ..seJ::~ous .
.... .
:

.....
difficulty".:.: '>", "'. . "., "':". ',' ,.?:~:~;·1-.J~J~:i:};": .:.. .
.' .", 18 ·January 1973·' . .. : ,:-." :'....':', .'.',
• i-: .' \': '\~~:.\.~..~'.".;'.': .: ".'",,: ,:'. ,',
. .' ~ . ::':.
' ;,.; . : . .
:' ~ Maury·.rep·oi:t;ecfthat·~enhe and Dave Blee, ChieilSB~:?'~~w:
.p '. .
i _.~~ \. .
Chairm,an Nedzl·with.respect to the' Chairman's forthcomfugtrip .
to Finland,. Leningrad; ·:«5o£ia., and Athens, Chairman Nedzf ',: ..' ., .....
briefed on his' November conversation with New York Times:,;:.,,:" r.·,
. : ~.: .. ::-: . '. .:' . . coz-zeapondent Seymour Her~h. Maury went on to highlight;the ;:'"
sevez-af topics ~ and allegations Hersh claims he has with re:S:p'ed -:: '.';" ,. '. '.
~. . to Agency activities, :particularly allegations that we ar~ engaged'.:"
~ . .: .
' ... ' : .....' ; ........
.-:.
·in extensive ~o-mesti,c: operations. M~ury will circulate atmi3mo:-.: ':::;: ~\
', : .... -randum onfhe information .Hersh claims he has. The 'DireCtor .' :.:<" ~ "
explained that-we. should assemble a senior team to m~et With
'. :'. s,
.... :'.:. ..
..... Chairman N edzi a:hdclearly outline what we 'do and do not do ip." J .' <' :
':' =.. :' the United States. ':.:: :..c.... . :. ";:):.:.' ", ..
~ •• ":'~ .... '.:r :,;

19 January 1973
'. : ~ -'i :>'" .-.~.
Maury reported' that Chairman. Nedzi .would like'the full' :.: . ,
:. . Subcommitte'e' oiiIntelligence Operations to h~ar a presenta~on·
by ·us 0ll Agency-'activity in the Unitet: States sometime mlci- ." in
February.:.'-The Dir·eCtornoted that hi's decision 'of Yeste'i·daY-··i'.~·.'
to turn out a 'senior tea:in for this briefing stands. . . . . ... :....
. . :.~. ... . .
.', .. :..
' :....
...:....
;

~ . :;. ..~..:.:..
- 7-
'

.
. '';'' . "'::'.,
.. .. :.'
"
.....

~r.N?~~ " , ~ :'"

--~ .... -~--'-":-.

.... .;.~
~.:. ~ -- . ..:
...... ........ _ . .'.., .... . ... .v.._
~ .~
.- _,=~'~:.:~;'~ 1··:1~: .::'-- ;-.-
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

·ft;ii,'{!: •. <·~~::.·\'f1;Vj2~~~Jt;~~9~;A,;' "

... ::~':.:.' ~: ,:-, .:....~..... : :·:t~·~····:l;:~· :".~ '.. ':. ',.... . .. ' >.'.:.: /.~:: "':';,::".'~ .:(:')': t:·:·:··~ : : . : " " , ;...

!.:': ~:.' '.': .: :. " -, ':: .: ":'.~. >: ~.; ::. d'e~~~~l :W~it~'i'~ 'ri~~~'d ;{o~a:rd ir~t' s appea~~~ce '~n l:e.le···:>
...' :'<":'visi'~n 18,st,rdght. :'. 'l'hue'rmer will obtain a·tran's·c;;.iptoi.. the " .'::: ..
, : ;<>, pr·ogram.. · .and the Exec·\:!-tive 'Director 'noted his concern ·over.·' ':' '. ..'
. : 'H~t's"sugge'stion that he is.no Ionger bound by his.:.sec;,~c.Y.· : ,;c' '.\ .' ;;. ,'.

::r;:~:;;1973';\ ", ,', ',.. ," , :;:"'<~;'~1;tl1f;-~:;,-<:.

" E~~cutiv:e'.Director noted that the terminal secrecy·agreement·· .
: :,,:.. 'which Howard Hunt 'signed said that he Will be acknowledged as an '.
:Ag.ency 'empioyee.:Hi.s
,,' '~",,~,~, .'.. -...•
assei-tion that
. .
he is not bound by the ~gree,..
'" :.~,.;..

: ment because we·di.d iri"fact acknowledge his employment here is ',:

.' therefore
.
. i l l - a d v i s e d:.:... ~'. :',
. . .-: . ,: . :.
'..
.... ". ., ' . '.:'
. , . ..
-: ,,:.' . .;: :
"- ~'
: '.,
'_.,,' _:,

'.'~
7 February 1973 ,'" " .'
-,

;.:. . .... ~
, .:
"

; :.' M~t.lry noted.tha:.t Mr. Helms is appearing before' the 'Sen~te f.

:.,
For~ig:n'Relations .Committee this morning oil po~c'~'training; .~' ....:.
ITT;.and the 'Waterg~te incident.' He also noted that 'hehas .:.: :'.'
soliCited. the suppor-t- of Senators Humphrey, M~Gee~:"a~d .Scott ..
to makeappzopz-Iate pubfic statementefolfowing Mr~'i:Ie1ms:' :.
~ppear.an¢~. . '.' .' . .,' . .
:'f
8 February 1973
.:. -.'
. .
.'
-":':
': :~ : ':'.
' .•
,.'., .Ma·U:ry recalled that we are obligated to sit down, w:i,th.,,;· " ~:" '.
·.. Chairman N~dzi and review what we do and don't dotn' the U.'S~·:". "" ..... ':::~'.
Th: Director co~curr.ed. T.he. DDI sugges:e~eund~rtake .::-... <>:
~.~n .1n-house r evtew-of what l.t 1S we ar:e domg ),!rth~: ~~ and, -', . 1.1:'. :'. .y.
. ,.'
identify. and eliminate the marginal•. ' . . {-~~'\;:h::-:'~:; •. .., "': '.
.' . " •...' ::>-: .... :.,~.~'.'::!~ ;': ";':'.': . ,".

~::zt:~:1:oted advice from'Nicholas H2~2L~iws;e]·.";.·';;·

14· . ' . . ,

that ~"soft. story"

is floating around Newsweek on the general ... :. . '
topic of political espionage and ex-CIA agents •. ":';"\>..: ·.'i , .. ' ". ". ;'; :" .....

,',
:. ' . ',..
e-
~
.;.'.i~;,t'.• / · ' .
'. '.
.' . .. ' '
. :, ..
:" ::' '; -: . . ;".
. ,',' 8-
....
: ... ' .', '"
" / '. : , ..
• e- ".'
~ ..
cti'
.0 ~1il.l«
. ----:--- ;~.. _ - - ,- •• 7" - ...... '.'::
.....;-.':..: ....
. . ......-:.
','
. -." .~:'.{' . .'
. ,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

: :.:. / t··:. ';.) ;, : '...: C:[:..:Matiry 'related that former Director Richard Hehns·. has been"
~., .:' ....' ':. :.: ~ ·.·~~~eaj:>y Senator' Fulbright to zeappear before .the·S~nate 'Foreign '.
.. .: .:: ' •. ' ->,' . : - Reia.ti~>ns 'Committee~ Maury said that Mr. He4ri~:Y.'oiiJ.d..probably'
.. '" . be"'4ti~ried ontheWate.rgate incident,' Agency trathiiJ.·g.of polfce, ':.
. .... .':. :and~i'T:and went: on to. describe ¥r•. Helms'. a~ti~.ip#e4·.r:~spons~.
". r~a~~ki~73
" .~.
r.

.
•••.....

. .. .
} '
·.;:t.X~··' ;.;. .' "

'. .... .'.. ::~:'~::'''.'. '".....;.. "::':"'M~~r'; highlight~d yest~rday's .~IG me~ti~~·~tth·~·::White··;
.. ' ::.:(. ;... :~;; Hous'e.~nd·his··recomrnendatiol1- thatwe not provide 'examples of
•••• • ". ':" :"":I;;lJ;_~1
"":;"":':0", • .....:t· -':'<..,.,.... .. . , ';"":f;::r,,," -. " ~. ~.,

. . Congr.essionalleaks of classified information for ·Whi.te House'

-.:.. , . .: :"us'e 'hi reacting to Congressional criticism: of the Agministration's'
. ,. . IImdisc·r~tions. 'II The DDS advised that the Office ~f Security is·
.' keeping.a r easonably complete record of obvious 'Leaks ,of intel:r~...;
, gence information in the press and elsewhere.. ..: :... ,: ',:" ..:. " -.
" . .. ':.: .' _." ...

6.~f:~·:i~ctor noted that Side;':1~~l:~b~~me

., ',." .

. ....
advice Hugh
'pl~nf; .to write; a' story alleging that Howard Hurit.was.:eriiployed .
, by.;a,.: cover. or.ganization,. i. e., Robert R. Mulle#.::CoD:1p~ny,'when
"hel~ft the Agency. Colby 'noted that this companyfs 'a,. completely
private concern but has provided cove.r for one or.two tifficers '.'
, .overseas. .:The Director asked Thuermer to be p~ep~red to cope
wi,th.. any inquiries·whe.u. the story. appears. . .>" ..., '::.' .. ::', :.
. .: . ::. :";"
":."/~.~
~, ;
.' ~ .
:
"
"

.....'.'
'::\~;':~J;.:;~/t.:'·... ..;.~. . : ... ,',' '
0 .. ' ; .....

(Si/in'od) WilI1e.m;·:V /:B~oe .'.: .• :.:, >:": .'.':. .. .. . ;

. . . .:" ". ~

William V.' .Br~e··:.;·· ;." ..". ..;' ~. ,.

. ......1.;.
..... .-.
Inspectpr. Genezaf -"-:.' .. '. .. .- .
. . '::::·<..~.F~~/;:; .:": . " .....-
. ",

'. :
. "
. -. ',' -".: .
.:~ . :"::.
..... . .
:.'
.. e, • ...':
.' . . , '.
.. "
. -: .-
... ... '
~ .~,.,

" . :. ", ", . . . -: " ,

", "

...... ." . ~.:

".
" '
• •,':., '"f ' ,...
. '.' '.:: ~:'. " :.. - 9-
.. -' .. '" ...... '.;., ",':,
' ::
."", : "',- ....
,.,. '
. : ..
..- '.,
-, .... : .. : ..:
• ,J
. ," . ~

"
.' ..
e .' • • ', t ...
..
•• I' ;.'

.. ." '., ....... ......... ..:...,..: :..,.... ......,.. ,_... .'" -,' ""~.- ......... _....:...__ .:-
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.:\~?~~~~e~ '.' ..
I:: ,:( \,~y:::::.~;;~~~~~!~~y., :'.: "".. : ,.~. :. .,;;-"
I ;~~l~~"¢~;,j,"Pt~. WVJ3:I)aily Log of 30 May 197·$(' . ".

!·"::.·K~'~':l.~•s:.;fs·: .;l~:n .lg. ·.·s~·.k· e·

d.' folCr''alslo'emd .L.~diii~·s1-lmrn·e:r:··0{:';i:9i7;(ft
'e"'1" h'a·.·.s·.-.'t:.a
. . •,. . .. \tention .the . eWpVa:Bp·.~e;';.~ts:o ;hbe.·~.·~·. . 'fa:'ct.t~~~,
. n'Ow·.wants.;to·s~e·them again. One;.. Restl~~f§ lith:,' june: .1:970'). 'OOI;:'1'rote
a~,wh~le:set Qfcolintr.y·bhppters; and ofthe GS'(sin¢e1eft
;q'IA):;.~;:r.'oteamq.re
,.:.il. '. < •.
"sensiJiv:epiece
"0-':;:.';," "'.
drawing.:~ t"~y..
.....
other countr-ie.s for
• • • ". ~ • _ .... ,,~. _'.,"~"". '\.tr(.. ~. ~ .

..' exan1:p-l:e,s 'to'mak~"its point. l'jOCI balke d-' ...·~n ,"w~nt to do arryth'ing on the r

.,:..1~..
'·::)l,,'J·U~ sid~":":'~he wh~le~roject'ev~~ual1YI w'a~~~eci.·o~:e"t·~to CA. 1......- 1.
'..: w~~~e.d. u~der I
Isupervi~ion "" J~t.~.,?,1eft--in Boston).'. ,
", ::'. ;,;o-y' ~.';: .

The reafter ~KiX. in August 1970~ bec~i.1i~·e we had done so much work
we· publfshed a' aepaxate paper "Student UnresfAlJroad"-'::.-compilatiori of the
coun~ry, S t~9:i~ s •

I:
.;'i~~~'~~~;::".i
..-WV:B'iis':famii'iarwith the 3---but
a3rd - - -on the.Caiib~r
, ' . ' . . . dIdn't'
. .. '"

. ,a~p,.~#;ts'.
,··.~':"';·;~·;':(:f:~:·~· ". :, " .

'<~~,~'~I had IKis·.s·~ger

. me paper; tOlciL~t~¥5::.,..\tys.sent a.p~
\.... I s:¢nt it 6ackwith' some nice words on. it-:-.-.\V;0 ',.. .ike to see. again" .. (not a
.' di~:ect q~.oter~::"wv.:a·said' he had' the DD·~.~,i;::~<?:~YK'~Whitm.ansays' Lat.irne r
~a~ .copies ofbothzepozts •. His .'rec·o~~~f~~~~'~!.r.t;.th:at pa:pAr::~ as I
·ca.r;riedto San ~1.'ementeperhaps by Gen·:~:t~',·.ushman;but·.'ga,.the,red
" .. ·.<.O:!+~ij,.rn.an· had-been u'nable to deliyer 'it t,'''':< ".. :.:~.: Could be thatt·{iss:inger.
,: : '~/':;':{~~~~~~!~' seeA lonly the other. " ( f o : not confirin~ this:;iri' '
·2 .. c:·de~t3;il~ La·hmer 1S struggling with Kis.s 'est.
.'
.
:· t,
. "'..
'.~ . . .. '

~ ..
'. ;"

-".? .r...' ," :,: '; " e'

 MORl DoclD: 1451843
-
.. .~._ ,~ ···1·- :
..:.

"'~ ': .. ......-._,

~

!-----------,--------+---~------
3. ..-
"

..·.1
. - _........
"

4. :.:.~:---_ .._..-_ .

5.'

6. .-
..__ •. ----:-..:--,...----~~-_. -.-----;-
7.
. "," _ ..
1----------~-:----.,.__-+_--~+_,__--7__:_- ..-
8.
. .. 1
9. " ... ":"
"

~:.\ :. - .. "
I
10. ,.. .' . .:.: "
..-r •
~

.:
11.

12.

13.

I------~-------_l,.._---+---+_--__l ..
1.4.

15. ".0036.0
.,
• 61 0 USE 0
FORM
3-62 . . : .
·PR!vtOUS
!DITIONS SECRET'
~ ' ...
o CONFIDENTfAL. :'.: 0
•• ; '.t .,
INTERNAL
USE ONLY 0·. UNCLASSIFIED
.. ~ .......
 MORIDocID: 1451843

'. . ~"':"."
,
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

,,,' ..
. ';,.1::" .
'. '~. :.....:. ..., '.
." '... : . .: ::.
~

":"~ i;,. ;.~:::.. ;~.. .; .

';.',.
-;

',r' . .~ ". ;' .....'

';

........
..... ::,,:. :.:

I :", .

.. .
~ ,

.1.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

f/ ', . ',
....
.: . ..: .
" ,
..
~.
~ ,
"
.;:.
: "
..
':'.,
'
:' ..
,-"'.,'
"
:. ::..
; .... .~ .~ ,;.' ':'"
',.: .
, '
' ......... .....
, . ..... ,.'. ','.:

- Z-

",

~- ..
h
r
=) _ -·F. OQ363
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

~".
• 0"
".'

1.

,.
./

.{-o ":'_ .... _eo.' •••••

\,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

'. ,~

,.
'f ',', .
.~ .
'I

".,'

DO.3SS·

L-_..,...- ,.
- - - - - - - - - - ' , ~,"
, ~ ." "',,~
. "' .....
. . . . .! •

I,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

'.: ..- .... :.. ". ....: .. ":'.

:'.' <: '~','
. ~:. '.:~'.! ~ .'::..:'.. . . ~ ... ': ..
" ..
" : ...":: . ::.

"::

.
I
i.

I'

00366

. I
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,-: ....
:."
.

....;
.. ,~ .

,
. ,:.'"f·· .\ .,,.
:\ ...•

..
",
v-;
'.'''0
. '"",
2 - ~ .:

, "
- 00367
I
.~
.:.: .
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

0'036:6..:
....

......
.. .... .
~

. .. ~.

":.:": , : ..

. ~.

• if
>" ".
..».. / .
. ...

'"
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

" ....
,.

.
'

o. " •
.";

.::; ......

;.

'. .;..

"""'"
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-. ;: ....
. ..."..
:.r .:

.. ~

.: .
......
:.;:"..
,. ~:

"
 MORl DoclD:.1451843

'.:
:,'

. . ~.~.
. ,
".:.
..•. <:> .
..•..
'.- .~ ~

.,' f

r "" 00371.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.,....
",
.- ..... --...- ." I •

.. .,":
I e

~
.' "
".

" ','. ~t ." ~ .. :::...~

,. -, :~

"\," ..

.'

, .' ...
'.

-t:'

00372
;.~

.' ..... i.-:.~~ j ~

~:-:-
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

.....
t .....',.
\.

r. :?
...t:.

. . - .
;~',:.:[ :~-:1,,::~:1.=:'!1·~:::; Ci;.1 :.T·"L~:;~ _:~'. 'i(~.':-:~':.;(}j,' ~~~jl:.; ..: !D

·:::.. . . . :.'...:;.. 1 C:,.)i.:.~:~l·;l <).l ~~ '::::"'~·:.::~~1 l·iJ't:.~:

~~..i"~:::!..l.:.- 5. ~:3 :~:)~:: I::J :~ t .;:~.:; '.':1:.:~:.rt~=·f

1. l"ilI Di'ifisio'!.l 11:lS r ev Lewed i:ll~ i"'2:(:e.i":~~;~;f~tl !.:::)It:.:''lll

(C~)P:l n·ttrt(;ll~,:i) by ·J~cl{. .t!.11d~==.!.~;30n and fii16s t~;,rrt j_Jc CO~l­
taii1S no new info.l:':natio!l.•· '£0 -;;·.h~ bes't 1::no'.'710G.ge. of' th·~
Divi.zion, there is no' fm,me,.a"t-ion to the all€gn.tion that - .' .. '
'E .. EO'\7:\l"'d 1-{tlht' wa s }etlgng~(~ on baha Lf t;:>:f ITT in b-l"a~l{ing::
i!ltO Chj.]_eSln (liplorn~tic insta~l~;tiO!lS ill ~Vas~lj..!1g·~0!l a!2<1
I"~:~·~N YO!'j-c.

....
2. Any conn2~~ion between ITT and these br~a~~ins' :

~s pnrely'conjectural ~nd.th~ column tak2S care t6

p';:d~t this out.

_.:.....:...- - -'"-' ... - .~---;. -..;;-

, on this or any IT~. r:l,.;\ttel:'o He had anticipated
~~' that Anderson. f:1i:~ht .·imply such a relationship in his .i -.

:1 column and ~ad assured us 'that this was not true.

," . . '.

Theodore G. Shackley
Chief
Weste~~ H~mispbere Division

.'

.,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

" . ' . ...... ", .

I
I
,:.: I
00374
F~OM; NAME, AQP o. OATS:

A R .~
12M1·973
u;-tCLASSWI£D. I I

,~O
f(ia;:, ·~O. Use previous editions
1-07 237

.':.

7
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. : .... "
,.;
"'.'=. . •
• • ,P"

. '" :t'
: ".... :': ..,-" ': :.. : ~ .: •..• :.: :....;..
. :~.:~~'~
! :
",:r ••••

i '. ~
.' '::
• ~
:J';
I :; .._
••: ~:) 'i :
l
. ;1'

It ·l•• ..
,I;
l '..:: -.' ,'.,
,:~ ;',1, .,'.' ..i,:· ._fr _)';; ;(..{_~:~ / l.iS Z:1 :~. ;':J "1

i
I, ":. \0 ,:t:::)." ....;l ':::,.:·~r"I\;!.
.• ., ,,::",,::,·.~i:-:·I~ ;'"t't.-:':: .:;.~.. .. ::~~.. ,:1~:'t :::.-; {,;' i:;v~'~: ~! 't::... ;::~!~~.:'~~t'"

I, '/,' "";: :~,:~:\ \? ;,~' :U:i;):/;:t:;~+:,~~;'~f:i';,;::::; ;c, ,I. ,," !~!;~ ,;;,',: :;~''',~~

vr
-: r-....
1° ..-~ . ,: . .oz::'11uie~r l',.t._.! I
I·.. ·-~·· .... - .
I,,-:···'·"1l'lS . 1. <",. ( " . States, -ron. '. ~. C'" ~
~ 4~.~.....- ....... l. I ..l;;'~ rU..~an .c.:n:':!E.i.!:b:..::-..
In a 1:':(';';10 lnt€'nd?d for the. 1:' "'·of.. _,.1 (',.,1,':'("< ,,!t.. 1i"""" 'i y,.,. , . 1,:1;:.-; \,:,5 ":>'t:~~;"":''''~ ~:: .;;'"
!~:~~i~)~::'I;ri!~~ S;~~;;;~;'~::,~~~~i; !fl'~~;,:~~~;a~~,l:~ ~~01~~:~~~~~;~::~f~!~ i.e ~T~~ :;;~;;)~r~:=~' ~:'~:l:':t'~ on I~;:~~: ~~;~cl~t~;~t:1~~.~,i~~)~.~:~
f
'I ;''I :\~(,aC-z director
::-'" --,,,,,,~ .. ".-
L~\:"·r·:l ,\~..tU.:"
Jerrv -
- ........
'~"""V -"-"~:
. .l ~1"~nr.~ l)·~L'\.'~":.n f('p':3:",r0~
-I- a!.nl:t..· .· ·l ... ~~:,.&. .u':.I~·n .... t:"'\·...·_:i'.I~t._l _lll ..• ;::t_
"I) l. ..•._ 1\.1'&<'00_ li-"--
.:_~;;) ·t,.. ..... r .- .:."J
::.t.. "'·....·1.·.. ·.:- ':" . -- ..... : .. ::. t.. t..;.'-.~.f,.-
ln .....:: ... .. . ,

'''':'fln r·'\:lo~€'d· u~ ~r:·irf"A!:S""'..1 assembled 6..... ".> , •• ,1" "' L ..._ L \ •••• .::> I q .. ~ I rr and "{\:Oaf ~- ....... ~ ;;r':-ln t'or: o· t,'1:'11o c~-etl-.:::l"':"),"""'--'-
or

....... -: -.. .. - - - -...~f\.··f::-C to- onera . . 11_ a.I" ...'_.=:<:".;,.. ..... hl·! ..... -.:.h._~... _....~~
wlth excellent contacts in tn..~! r. . . . . " .::::-e .. ;.~ .Ja' - ':. ':.._u"It!;#!S. \re noted, for- exr:mn!c.tle~~I.'.4..i US'" to th~ conclusi;ln,n
A. .... - .:. .....

t' ·1-1...·" Hans. only on'! or perhaps two ! '~-a' • c"ln;" -::-BI chief I ~.I l'~_ ,.,.,,_
'v '-:..-:;'n·--c·::l-n-rn:;n-·!'t·\-;..
u.... VI •• t.. ..
·t·;·lt
..
I -- b k ....
SUb(OI:i~)t.t~ef:~sfi:il!Tii;rFran!.qmeL:l. ers cnew ~:no J"~<!Cl :;e. ri::k G.ay· and convictedl n ot l'otltine.
v - ,1 \. ....:> ... : L~. ~L '''.:.l.
p'... Levinson
..." _ ....
wrote
• ... _ ,
"[""'"
.___
.' ......
J"~'::'
.'
Sturgis IJ:!d t~id Citl:<.>r· :P~Ol;lc'lqt:c:ste~ ar.d waS'.Ima~.eing tna 1""ilt~r-!'2te [(·Ion E. HDwiircJ i. "Vl!lu;:ble o:Ilc'1 "";';'I:>m<'nt
-~n;tt·..· -t..... --~~· .. -~r ..- -... • G - uoet',"i~10n.· . f 'Pr .~. ., ~_ .. - I d" .. . i - ... -- ..
n~ i:rUl ':\:.:lIL!neZ \':rl:"J ::In-;....... •. :i':unt f:i1d o-::::1jn·1'-;)~\:::n. H! ;:~liar:_ (":;i;.n '".c:=e !e:'l ~"'~CJ!.~~h~d..
• -
I ..'
!g~il~~ti~~:~';;~~X~{~~};;;j-(:~~i~~'~i ~};;~~i.~~t~~~~~e~~~~;~;~ 'l:;{~'~ i~~::~l~:~:'/·~f~~~ .[~.~;.~~r<:;'i:.~,:~;:~~ I~l;;:~::;i~~'~::;~:l~~~\.~~~~s~~~:;,
!c:;-:!Jzssy to yJ!otU.;;:·:rPil daC~~'lldbO.~\. !:"!;Jh:. mo~~n;), be.:o~e t~~ h.:;J:1 r:h lzed [! :';ooo£oOO.Ot:O POI!tu~:lll·t;l::-Y' t,:er~' o·oth s~arch~d' :ll!d

l
lrr.r.. n.t ~... . . . .. " . V;at,c:1·Z,lte :'lITes•.E. HO~\'a!"d j pirG~~ from ITT wHh a. settle· .!il~:>" 'wen~ ::-:sll~c~ea.. . 'The
l . !:~·l::!$r,a ,r.2S c::-tUtiO':.l5, ~10·.~~-~}I~n~~Jet It b~ ]~nl)\vn ,araJ~nd.:;i;eni: (if its ;tntitrust trol~hle5 i~11it:'t'es \.."a.l::cd .p::st sc;:c:-.3.t
l~l';£:r, "O;)i:t impi1c::,ting ITT inFhe.. clty that he hnd .a 'lear::' I Th':l .".~'nshi~:::~on Post re./ mo,',: :ttt:,)!:.h-e of::Ce.ii to get
":·~l:. :;;~J.r~~f .h~.!~~;Lc.~~}~~~~i~~i-!!:~;~,~~;~.;~i~~;;;~ n~.~?~~~ 1~r~~~;~~set~~~!~ ;;t:~~~:~~~}~~!J~'~'i~: I;~.:~~~~r;~S\~}:;-~~~~·:~·~~:i:~~
I O:J'::Q :'1
! ~il.:,: Jl(: C.:l·'-i:·I'r~e)Hn_~':i)uld1:;<:
l'':-i;:'rted •. In:!S ,wo;-k: wt:n~
nttr.1ue, of .k2~~'; strg-iIo.r p.r~\'.lte c!ien~s.
wuhng '.0 !'th.~y w~!'e
.•
·f.~e
to D?i:v<':!" to talk to 2\rr5. g.)!!:;;."
f Be"rd rro'.lut rer:on;;cb~ !h~ l izmg 'of the ':-:"'01.' Y"r'k :lpart.
nu:.-,f::OH:-

I ~C 3ti !.~; a :r:~!~~io~::hip :H·::"Jve~.n I ..~~' is p05si:::!e th~t E. 1To".;- r:~::n:o. \rca .!"epo::t~·d !~;!t. G!'~y. nl:=ntS £if C!.il-:2a:a. (H:~:,:vr..a::"~:;; i i
. I1-T :tnd _the te:lm \t-hich ~\:as tard i{unt, ~ctL'"!g :lS the Con·. :rnean'.vhHe, turned- th~ ori;Ji:'i\\:erc· d~ECrn)~d hI t:1C 111C:':'o
arr~st~d at .the l}jl1~..r~~1~.~~t'tr:!.ctor· for the :.'team.' had! n:il .memo o\'e, to IT!' for· itS/'·as "simi!2.1" c!ei!ll brea,k.!ns."
I Btjt he s!rc::sed "that the easel'more' than: one' dient 21~d t!mt le:;;pe:!s to try to discredit.
~lu~1i:Jt'd h~ -this. n1~I:'1O:~cl~i:rJ:l.$·r;:ona ciie-nc ~'a~, l°r-T. \\hicn! "G:-ay r~fused to cC~!l:nE:nt! r4!r~.s~:i ~~ .C't~l;:'lei\~_ on . h!s
JJ~ c!rcums~:lnt!tll .z:nd' tnnt·!""·!2S i;"~e-.:·:;+~d in o:;-,u"ijp'1 'r:: _ v..O.. . ,t'e ('''1lTcd t;,n. FBi ior hts! n1~,;.r:sQ. "-'."!llCit n~ ;:-:ni1 •.' ·:!S:t t
• ~ll~'~'e is ::0 h::rd e\'j,~~;;!:<: ,,1' li~t:l:;ti:,;~~';:jO"lt· ~~:J~ti:l~; r~5;~n;e. 'Cl~!!~ti(;~-ed b~' sCt:~.; i~:l(;i:d
it;'
o
" Footl)otc: Jcrrs . LC\:!ll;;on

':"I

pll;;:i;:-~~i'cn.. ..\ n P:":

'!1'T i:wcl';(:ment;· ,'tions·o.,er.tbc f~te or its ir.·itor:s :mder oath. !lowi!\'er, hail i.,!. .. ~;:>?"~~I:1;;n c::H~d. t.~e
q·.·."p;C~ .... ~lS £"Ll_';~ \"estment in the Chiluan 'fel",·ltestified that' be . tr.d'· J~ot!·nI~~g'ttlcns"'1 -,..,1 . . ~hout
. . . ..11 ht.::!~ •... "'::'0•.
~ iphone Co:n!'::lny.. 'fhe mem.iturned the nero!> 0.£:1" to ITTI~' ;:''''::-' _~:-'l .,0,:1 :l-"'. u::",=:.:e,.
I 'L
oJ • v, ...
• 'f
H;:"e. howflve:--, is the dr- lbers of the' team mil)' ha;;e Idirec..! j· but had delh'ered it to' rIc s~ld l1r nad n~;.·. :'. In.y,
,..'!~~t"'l···("·l ""\".~ ~ .. ~ 'l\·;1·1'·~ _ . u......
"h""'!;"~~It _.::"'l·l.~C1
··t... l~.. . li,r...,t..
:;],,.:'t ",l'l"
~ ""£." · ""}lHe lrol.;~
..... .1.. I _ ... _ 2idn . , . . . . . .i.Fiuni. !0:7 :i!l)"' ..our;lose•
• _ John. . D(a,'1
................. • l to. ....... •• \;,;:. l
I • .....
,. ... ••

'1 S\I·::>t'(J:"r::nrit·~e stnii h::; p~?cec. =werc coin~ ri p.:lt:riotj~ thili';; to 'n WJ3 lhe V;hitc House. in' ~ 1;<.3. t..::~~~ F:-'~::~"S;:r:~:=,,~~
1.:--------_·_---- . ,.
1 -
._-----,--------...;:.......;'-----------~-~--- -:........_ ..

"
00315
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

s•
.1
.t
.... :
i
-, ~

.j"

} :.'~

~.
/

'.
.': ....
'
. .. "

. ;: ~.: .
...........:
-,
:,.:
: ..

FROl'r': NAME. AOOrtgSS AND PHON=: NO. OAT€:

-r i""\
,/,.)(.
;....,)
CO:-;FIDE~TIAL SECHET
r:..pof ::').
1~c7 237

"
.....
.

..

",

"
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

; I •. ~• ..; . ::.: ..~"

" .. '
n ••• ••• ..... _

r../iJ.! <":

, . " - r
.... ". _~. ".w'
'0
, -;,h-
:
~ -..-~-- __ :.~~.~.:.:.. ·___'..··h_
:i!A
"

::~Y1.~~'
};fA I·11
___..urs icsJlI''''
!:..-__._'.
s e : ~-
» "'~-
e,

--
.1.20. ws
ia,
. Wil NESS
, 19. "j~RCSS xc...e: f'~::"£

n/A . [\ ~-"'C-
~r~~i~
-r.~s£-""
-i:?~ILs OF' l!iCIDE/'tT 16i<l£fL.... C(5;~NC-,;EST. cc;;-ru;u£ ~.~~, . r rr EMS"...5
'H/A
~ECE5.s,l,!lY' i!oi)~c ...nliG. IT::M}
•
-_._-----
1.
. 1.\
_-
I
At"apnrox;7T;atehr IDO hours, l';ond~\r ,1.fa~y· 13". '1972,. Forc;gn }i'j c.R-T Q~S myi~1cn-

;
Control Cpnfeer xas pdyjRPd b~T 'M. P,D,C , 3D, that' a b~:1J:'[;l~ry- h::fd-t:;!~g~~e ::t J,;h-e-
Chancetv of: Chile,-1736 Has~::!'chn.ful.tt.s Avenue". tJ.Jo~ 1 Rnmp.t.ime bptri'EfID llO-,,(L~":-:~ ~
. Friday, Yay· 13 ' 1972, and on 0855 1:on1'3 this dabe ,
,J .. ,
------. --
-
. B.ez:gnan t Ri1 sY,}of. Pi chazdaon anrl the )}'nd~Tsigned ;!:,:err.> dj spaf,ched Cl,t Gp~rori;,.,;>-!:C\);y,
.-
133$ hours in Cruiser IfJ.!. 2~. -
.
The un d er-sxcne
.' d ,l~2.S' :?t10,"J.se
~ .' d
_bv· 1~;£.~ rL0l~.rr.r:J1._(l'J·ro·· !~.\.-al~:roL_l;.c~~ini.s.trat~1@~Ql:n~~~ -,9;",~.:...
~
of'the Embas sv of' ChiJ.e, that'the Chc.;"!cer:;-- of .. Chile Has entered and ~l .:th2 of.fi~~s
.... ,
v:D..S, -tiffie the Eev[;OQ of' ent.roy or ite::;.~s· taken i.s unknown;
·riCra ransacked.. At -'-1,."
- l-rr. ,lIavarro"adrises that he ..rill 'contact the. Foreign}~iss;ons Di'td..s ion-;·...a 'tch . C01;T,iOlnC ,
.
'llhen deteriniuati on otmJ:::sing art.i c) AS j::: made, (cont.i nn Ed) 23. PHOTOS
: . ;

-r--.
-.' ,,' ! ~
o YE.S ~
jam O.M O
. IIISE: I:P~ FO!:M 10-2 ; SUPPLEMENT fOR Ao::aTl.l;l'lAL DETAILS) FS:

2'1. SUSPECT'AI'Il~/C?RARRes.TEe PERSONS. I051lTIfT OY IIAIoI;;. "'ODR£SS. SEX. fiACE. SOCIAL. SECURITY IIU"'SI:R. DOS. E.YEs~ ETC.

LAST NAME
•
FIRST ""IDOLE I ADDRESS
..
..
-r.../A

P'r
L"'Sl' I1A.ME
ACE
rEX fEIGilT

,IRST
.
,WflGHT ("'IR
.
~IOOL£
~rH"
"'~~F.ESS
"." :
rSOCI~L SECURITr HO. 1.....T10,; .. I:.I~T

~2) rA,C£
rEI~~T I WEIGHT I~"'IR ,I EYES 'I DATE O~ ~"F~ .: I,SOCIAL SECURITY NO. ,I Ii,l,T1CNALlTY

25, ARREST PO
:
. rEX

-I Ui. ,l,R'IO;ST NO. r" ,l,P.REST CHtC-~R ':"AM~ MID a..~GE 1<0.1 28,.. D"TE OF J.P.!!E.ST 129~H;;;-it -

3D. INCIDENT STATUS

A.~OP£H . B.}{ CLOSED ...- c~ 0 UtlFOUNDEO O. 0 C(.EARED aT, "'''?EST

APP~OVIlIG ~~S'GN"'TURE)~A1.\
::;;;;Jr:;;/GNAT~H°tri
DATE; 0",1'1:
Or:;-·I.~-?2 ,.,:. -:' . ' \t\ \\'1(1\
32.
,
'
l~~<:;;'1 <?: -
)l~, ,1 ~ J"
• r,l;.'\" HOUR
,.{~L HOUR
,Ot;:..it;,,7
. '~'l'ffeant stevens E. Butler l~OO hrs , Cal tain Pete N. Hanthos 1~
33. $TAT~D[PI. OFFICIAL 110TlflEIi
"
- -
DATE': 34. usS$-ID CASE so,

003~
f-"
N/A N/A.
'0,

~ ": ";
JlOUR:
"
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. . .. -
" "

: . '.
'.~~J":: ...• ern,
::',,";1--1 (", ~.::i n i~ ";·.. c=:z... ,J, l:-'J"t:'··::' :': ~:,I:r C~J ':".;:.:; r:-..: .:: ~ ': :~~: I~ ('j:'Ci~;~!":t C} 5.:Ct::""1 () ~3·.:::r;C FI".... ';......-e
},'"
:;
" ~
•::> ;) C,
. •1:h~(:2;'
.s», s:
!,D'!d C::~·:t '1. :'; i .z- ~.:.~ r;h<"ieJ.. .. ,:,: ;~.~: :.. \-~ '~~.1. J;'1. s 3:"'(';i~C it 3(' ;'0 J ~L,:?.J~.G.,
c.: .:», ~;;.} ;;"\"~ 1·:~.P .:
~:·.t·~:.~~~ .~:.
~,
t.',,::
~
if T:.:i5, '.,":_' ,- . .. .., . . - "

..
~::/~ I· FC'·O..~TD c' .
• --"-1 _ _ J,. ••••• );Ckr,;i~~l ""--"~h) ,
1..,;.1. . .:_~1..
1-":'.....,..
vr ...>.~ :.... lcri:.:Lfiod ,
.
:
. "1
.
. "

.. .
.
.
, ..
"
. - "
.. ,
:
;
" , -. ,
"
: . .. "

, - .
:..'
. • .
;

, - .. .
. . . ,-
.. -. "
. .

. , '

-,
"

-:"- e . , ,
.. "

..
..
.
.
. .'
- 1
, --
-~

ri)'
"

.. ,
jam "
' , ,
8. SUSPECT AND/OR ARRE~~EO PERS,OHS. IDENTIFY BY "AME. ADDRESS', '.EX, RAC[. SOCIAL 'ECURITY "U~BER. DOB, [YES, ETC.'
.... n/«
.. r.:~5! 'lAME I
. FIRST'\ " MIDDU:'\
,±ES,:";'
ell: '
I SEX IIEIGHT I ' ,WEIGHT ,I' HAIR
~ EYES 1 .' D~T& 0':, BlllTH l • SOCIAL, SECURI:l'Y 110•• IIA'i'lO"Al.I'
.. . '. " , - I
RA,CE
I, ,
1'.
.LAST IIAME
I FIRST ADDRESS
I
t . t
- 121, '\ MIDDLE' :
, '.
. " .

,I ._E,~E,SJ I'!i,n Of. ~1li.'j'H I ,

ItACt
..I ' SU.'1 Ht~~HT \
I,:'; I' ,HAIR :SOC!AL S'ECURITr HO. ,UATlD""'t. I'

I.
W.EIGH!

9. ARlltST'PD \
I,
. , 10. ARREST NO. ,I
I I
.
11. ARREST . ...{""ME
OfFICER _._
J
_- .,A 'BADC:,E
___,'No.1,
__ , ,•.1•
"
t
12. O"TE
I 13. HOUR
, -
. .. .
"

.14. CURR(NT CASE D.lSPOSTIOH I ,IS.'USSS-ID CASE NO.

~.. "'8.tjCLD~ED ~ I
y

" ' . Wj!£H j '

.CJ::J~"F~UHD£~ \ D"oh[",R£~ ,ii~ ~,;~E~T !
lilA
16. F'II1AL CASC'DI$PC1S1T10H
1 . . .
,; . . ..
-
Ji)PEN' . .. ..
'00377
~

17~~~'IS?TUREI
. z«, ,NZjI" " &(~
'It;
C4 ."o.:,-f'
18., DATE \ 19,. APPROVED ISi)~"'TURE A TITltl
. ,., \~\'\ \'\'\~'\ ;\.~L
.~ i 20. DATt

, ' uergeailt Stevens

,-
E. Butl~r 0~-15-72 Captain Pete N. }~anthos '05';'15,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. i .- r»
. '

:~ .

, .._.. ' , ../ .... ,'.. ,

,'.' , , ·":,5

~. _ .. _~.. ·!:tC;';. _~: ~

"

,',

.'

jam
.:" -
a, SySPEC No/OR-'''RR,e~.E.O- PERSONS. IDEHTlFY BY llAME, ADDRESS, S.EX, RACE, Sue'Al SEcilillTY "U~9[R, DOS. EYES. ETC.'
N!A·
FIRST 1. ' .. MIl!DL't'\ .~IlOR·tsS' \
r .
~, .
•< 1 ..(

EYES ., D~lE Of' BUITH I • SOCIAl. SECURITY 110•• , llATIOllACl1'Y

ADDRESS
" .. I
(2) • .-
. ~------------------~---,---:,.....-----:--,,---------:,---------~----,:-------
RAce I HEI.~HT \ '::"'ElGH! \ . l!A1R,·l .~ [y.ES. \ • DATE c~. ~lilHI l .SOCIAL ~ECURIT7 riD. .IiATIOliAl./n

9. ARREST PD I 10. ARREST NO. I 12., DATE 13. HOUR

I".'CURRENT CAS[ 015;>05110H , ,IS. l,ISSS-ID CASE se,

A~fr.N 1 . B~05ED • t , NIA

OPEN '00378,
~8. OATE.\ 19. /.P?ROVED IS{'~,''lATUfi\& TITLE) } 20. DATE
fJru {\ \I\'\Q.. . .\ W-'.
'05-15-7 Captain Pete N. Manthos 05-15-
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

(1) .'.
l>.
I (2)
I
... __.--_._---"----_._-_....;,----._--_.._._-------------_._----
"\'l l?
._--------_._--_
): 26. ;\::D
t;.":.7Ur:~ OF U":;J..::::tES lOCAT:O~ ON B~D-Y o J,D:,~

I P: /7/ / .0 RELf.
I 28. TRANSPORTED BY , .....
I"
!
•
/A
I'
I
.j
I
: I !
·'1
·I
,. I~EMI, r"J I
· 1.0. I (I~

j;
:

~/-7/[-e~ I?Ad.5A-Xf>/ /J/f/~/f./du/:.r/ ~ r/,&Z;v;J5 Z;; /(-ed ;;TTA,.s

'! FuAL ;f'~&,.,T )~ ~L, 1.0LV. .4dJe.r",
-. 'c.At/ ;;.yy s~TO:-:L.t. /7J /1/ ..S'·c·e/r/e/.

; OFfICE USE· O:-ilY

Q.~ , IT. T. NUMBER· . IDAT:'.:&.TIt.~ THIS REPORT·· . .37. DATE/TIME TYPE NO. 35; f(EP~ODUCE /';0,
) s:» 7'/ ... ·1 S -/~ '.7~ . /5dtl
39. REPORTINGOFi'IC::R UNIT l. SADGE: NO. :';0. STATUS (Check. Onel 0 UNfOUNDED ~l. UNIT REFERRED TO 42. UCR DISPOSITiC
/125. /-(l j r/'~ZLA SL! :Y77C. ?-(OPEN.O CLOSED 0 SUSPENDED
<:3. SE~Q~O OfFICE'R UNIT t.. BADGE NO. 44. SUPERVISOR'APPROVING • 45. REVIEWER
O·!..
Q.. ,.
/J"
UU/!/;"(///1/6- .c"'U~ &J!;DG~J"O/I'
~ v
/ . / I,Ll?
c». cr: s; (..,,7 .00379
. PO 251 REVISED 3111 .....
~..,I·

-,

\.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

--- -~-------------_........---------------~

PAGE ~I SANTJA 02473

UNCLASS I F" i'EO 154 ~~-----,----~------r::.,....-
FlLE
, .
, :i,- \
G ',
I c:
7~ 'oJ
-,CTlON ARA-db }-'

S5.14 CPRv~2 SY-03 uS5S~e0 I

I
; 1

INR.:06 NSAE"e:::'l F' .. e s RSC v01 USIA .. 1.2 PRS ... ~I,
DODE·0~
...
'.J<~ /070 W 016973,
~1622~4Z MAV 72
rt1 A~1E;!!?, 01, ss Y S A.NT I AGO
TO SECsTATE WAS~DC ,123~
I

I'
I
i
i ' ... aLLC\~! NG I S OUR I NFORt1AL TR,h IfSL A T I ON OF ST ATEMENT, ·.t UN.:-IECESSARY
l":O~r.S OM I TTED I FoNM iN UNDERSECRC' ARY PALMA GA V.E ,PRESS EVEN! ~G
MAY 101 ,Q\.IOT:: r . CHILEAN A~1BA'SS,d~OR IN lISH!\S INFORMED ra i s
'MINrST~Y THAT OVER WEEKiNO CHANCERY OF 2MBASSY IN WA5~rNGT~~'
WAS ErTE,~ED lLL~GALLY.~VIOLADA) aY UNKNO~~ INDIV[DU~LS ~H~ p~0~
tE(D~~ T3 ~ORCE' OPEN DESKS AND KARDE¥ES OF EMBASSYIS'POllTICAl
Aj:"~.td RS OFF' t cE·. ..: i ~
CG~~ER.C~A~ciERY ~FFJCES~ tN' ILLE~lL~~
>,'
ADDITION, WERE ENTERED
A(SEIT ON LE;SER SCALE. PRELI~I~~RY iNVESTIG~TI0N,OlSCLOStD~E~
HC.':IAL OF DOCl:MENTS.I BOOKS' RAD 108 , ETC. AS' R~sUL TTHE:'SE SERl iJUS
~crs; CH;LEA~ Ar.B TO US ADVISED STATE DEPT WHICH EXPR~SSED
;!T5 DEEp REGRET' AT WHAT HAD,OCCUREO- , '
II Hi 1S .l\FTf.RNOO'N _ UNDERSC:C~ET AR\' CALLED iN US AMBASS'ADOR
~Q EXPRESS,GOe'.s 'CONCERN AeoUT SEcURITY OF iTS DIP~OMATIC
~rS~IG~ IN US3 ~EQUESTING RAPID ~ND RIGORCUS INVESTIGATION AS,
t.. El..I. AS csr A6L I SHMENT OF POL I CE GUARD TO PREVENT REAL,I !AT I O~ OF

THES['LAMENTM3LE.ABUSES lOESMANESlo ' '

'u~OR ITS PART OUR'G6VT HAS ADOPTED MEASURES TO SAfEGUARD
THESc;:';ORITY OF OlJR"COI-lMUNICATION$ AND OBLIGATORY :J.NV1:SrrGATTON
".~ CSUMAR!OI HAS BEEN ORDERED. UNQTE. . ~ ..
. '.'

, , ,

2 .. _viPTlJ,A,Ll.Y ALL SANJl'iAGO DAILiES ,THI'$ HORNING CAR.R" .TEX.T OR

CD" ~AIT~F~L SUMMARIES' PALMA

..
STATEMENT ~ITHOUT tOM~ENT ~R FANtiFUL
.......•.....
,
: . : ...-r' .UN CLA.§.SiuE 0 ,'. :,', 00389
'
. ..on" ._ ,,." .. ':. ...~.
......
- ._-----
I ~ ~, •• , •• :.: •
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,~ ..
.... -_ .
~

.. " . . .
, .' .. '''. .

Departme1lt of State

p;\.GE 02 SANTtA 02473 \623~tZ

~o 6,_, NES. S1 a RV BANNEREO:\CRGS S 'FRONT ,p AGE' ';. ~Cil'EV E,R , , e v
cO~"UNISTNEWS
~ETWDRK LAST EVENIN~ RAM ANNOUNCEME~T AGAINST BlCKDRdP
EL .SIGLO AND, INDEPENDE!lT LA TERcER.; GOV'r"f'v

GF 1T1 ExpdSE pos~ER~

'DA~ IS

.. ... ~ ,
. .
It
'
• . "I

'. ' ..
, .
• ...
s: :
. '

#~ ••

.
.\ , .. 003~1

\ ____ :"r.-r\
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

'.' , ·~.~:·.··f5,~:7?·-a:p···;.·:US
' .. ...---.......
....- . -~--_
. ...

JYepartment Of State YELEG~A~~

71
ACTl"'N t.~A .. 1':"
Cl~~-e~ DODE-~P INR.-~6 .(

PQS.~i 55-14 NSC-10 .R~R~~l·

l..-..•...;
008831

R It;?3~6~ MAY 77-

FM A~FMRA~SV SANTIA~O.
TO ~ECsT~TE ~ASHDC 1218
.... -:

c.b ~ F I ~ ~ N T I ~ L SANTIAGO ~4t;0

SUBJl="TTs I.I N Ad T HOR l l ED ENTF" ·TtJTO cHTLEAN E~BASSY
I" I='f'PE.1G"" !.q"~·ISTRY SU::1·.Si:i:RETAl:?)' PALMA. AGlttD ME.·TO CALL ON
.HIK TnOAY AT ~:~~ P.~~ ' .• 'r ~UST.R~AD 4P ST~RY FROM ~A~HINGTON
ABOU: V!!"lIn'~)RI7.;.:r ~;.: f;:?'f t":-r~ CHILEAN EMBASSY - AND KNE.'·r .WH . . T TO
EY.PFCT'. ~P.Ai..~1;' EMP·H!:.'~ _,:n Tk.\· At,c BA5 SAOI') R' S OFFICE SHOW:;:f) SU:NS
o~ HAVl~G' BE~N .C~RrF~LLY S~A~CHI='D ~0R PAP~RS WHILE VALUARLE~ ~AD
NOT ~fE'" .TOUCHED.HF SA!O CHtLFAN GOVERNMENT ~SSUME~ MOTTvr
HAD cCE~ .. POLTTICAL. FRO~ HIS OWN RE~ENT tXP~~IE~CEl~ WASHINGTON;
P~LM' S~ID, HE ~NE~~ROTECTr0N GIVE~ C~1LEAN'F~BASSY WAS L~~S
EFF~rTIV~ T~AN IT ~TGHT BE~~~E '~A!ID CHIL~AN ~nVERNkFNT MACE·
. SPECJAL 5FFh~Tp TO PRnT~CT u.Se. OFFI·CES AI\ID RESI;)F~CES p~ SANTIAGO ...
. It" ?,',RT' 3FC A;)SE ~~F DELICACY ·')F nUR' QELAl !n~S - ANr} HE THOUGHT USG
SHOlJl.D ·ALSO. ,STRIVE TO fiIVE CiJILFMi ,)FF~CE'S Ai':;) H':r~£S E\'E'TTER THAN.
RUN-~F-TH~-MILL ~RdTEcTICN. PALMA ASSURED ~E THAT.GOC HAS ~~
. DFSl~F T~AT THIS I~CI~I='~T Bf ~AGNI~!ED. j~,FACTI H~ AP~CARE~.
SLIG~TLY tA~~N ABACK WH~~ 1 ~ENTION~D THAt'lNGIDENT WAS ALRI='ADf
.O~ P~FSS SERVICF WIRES. . . . . '
2. T FXPq~SS~D PEGRFT T4A~ l~CI~ENT HAD OCCURRED AND THANKED
PAL~~ FO~ PR1TECTICN U.q. OFFICES A1~ QECEIVING. 'CARA8I~ERn~
3 'I)?' OE"-I';NST~A1 fON I N FR'"l~H 0;:' :::ON~Ut,A"TE" A ·80URS Asn.,
FEW
N
I SAJO' ! WOULD PASS C'IJ fiOt:: ~;:'QUFST ~OR INC RE' .6 SED pp.orEcTI.o. •
QO;<r.

. ~'''.C;TftTE ~46C;5 ARRIVS') A FEW Mo~ENT~ AGO~ F"AV1A

MENTION OF P~OPEQTY DAM~GE oR THEFT OF RADIO •

.. (iyAVIO. \ . ' ..:

....... ' ··00382

-
._~ c01<!F I BplT J AI
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. .") . :~.
..... . . .
. . .I. , '. ,."
ARA/2C/C;:·LGIR.D.L£R ... ·i·· -2> :}.~;::.
. 5/15/72 EXT.' 22575 .;.'
. ,ARA/8 C :'~JWfTSHER
., .. .. .~:
....~ ", :.~~ .
I
! ,,;.. S/CPR: HDAV,I-S ", '.
I

iI
i,
i
.!
. ... • -.....,.:... -
i ..:;.. .. :' .~ :~."
. .
• • &

-. ;". ;~r
. .
" ~ . .. ... -
; ~

.~- - . ' . '... . .. :~}/.

~ ":":". .··:·)3.~·::::~ . , ' . ,'. ~." '. '., '.<. '. J':".::~1t{:f~~
.,:U~~'~·,;:··-.~;;.~t~:T·,.~;~:;. :·~SL~~r:~.AN" CHANCERy.... .. , . . 't.~ jK . I
1.···~: CHILEf.;N ·t1I:~COur~s :VALDES. PHONED DEPT {FISliERlf'iORNING. '::'..
. MAY '15 T.O,.REPORT ·THAT UPON ARRIVAL .SAME 110RNING THEY
DISCO.vE·RE:J}:.;PE'RSO~J,:or: PERSONS UNKNOl:m HAD nrr'ERED CH'ANCERY,
-•. ~··.:iAPP.AREN.TLY'''·SArUf~D·A·Y.:~·:·NI:GHT. OR. SUl'mAY· .NIGHTi-··AND··HAD SSARCHED i , ~ ·;.t,:~
.,:. ·:'SEVERAL .. Of.fJ.:CES· Mnr' :TAKEN sonc RADIOS ANl} scoxs. DE~T. .: ., ":".
, rlttlEl>IATElY N·OTIFIED: APPROPRIATE AUTHO~ITIES THROUGH' ..• ., ...."-: -.'
~::

.. " PROTOGOL'. AN'l)·.·SY CHANt'llELS:1' AND, J)EPTOFF {GIRDLER} VISITED' ..,

'. CHANCERY' T.O·: vSXPRESS . CONCERN AND REGRET." ' ...::... :: .: :. '"
• • ". • '. .;'. • • • • '. .. • • .. 10 > ~ • '." • <', • :.' • ' •

.' 2. ·;·'i.: DURING' V!SIT, . Ati8' LETELIER AND EMBOFFS DISMIsSED· ..

ROBBERY.AS POSSIBLE MOTIVE, STATING IT IMPOSSIBLE CON-
. CEIVE TH~T'fOR~IG~ CHANCERY LOGrCAL·~ARGET·FOR STRAIGHT ..
ROBBERY. AND 'CONCL~DING THAT REAL PURPOSE WAS SEARCH FOR' -
r::;, ·.{UNSPt·ClfIED} DOCUMENTS. WHILE TERC'1ING INCIDENT ·':DISAGREE-. '. . "..~"
~'. A9LEn . THEY MADE NO HIN.T Of, OR REFEf.E~JCETO'l POSSIBLE
PROTEST' OR tLAIM FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE. YY ; .~:
. :"
. .. ..
. ,
..,:"
.
'

. .. .. "

r ,
. ....•
r:;'
::..
.. ;' .

.-
~ :."
i"J'./ •

.)~'" . 'S'IAT£ j)~;J;: .,

.,. :'~ .
"

DOCUMENT
. .-'
AS REFERRED'TO
~
~
., '·00:;83 . ':':.:~

-,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.;~ ..
':. ',:

:.:~~~;~·13.~0930
"~;~~~~~r1.973 .

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD"

SUBJECT: Chblean Embassy Break In on 15 Ma.y.1972

1. On 24 May 1973 I telephoned Mr ~. James Robinson,

Gene xa.I Cz-irne Section, Department of Justice and asked if he
had ·any information as to c r im.ina.l, In~6secuti6'n>:di persons involved
.·in' abzeak in at the: Chilean E:qlbas~y:,:.~j:i:W~l:1.J:lington,D. C. on
15 May 1972'. Mr.' Robins'onstated'h:e had.:rl6:.kriowledge ofthis but
suggested that it would be betterfo .~h~ck,with"·Mr. ·G. Marvi~ Gentile,
. Deputy A-ssistant Secretary f6rSecurtty,·~:;t>,~Eartrnentof State,. and
..,.:' :·.'the Secret Service' s Inc e they hadre'~p(;)ffi3;t~t;tltie's'fo r the .Executive
.: ::: :Pr~tective Service' (EPS). Itelephoh'e'a:14~":JGenti1e.and he identi-
fied. two. State Department cables re:!ative:·to:'the in~identj one .from
the embassy in Santiago' to the Depa:#;n.1.e~~,...No.·2450, ·d.3.ted·
. ~ .15 May 1972, Subjects Unauthorize:,j:{Entry Outlining. the ~rotest
, 'of the Chttean Goveznment pres'ent~¢;to theAme'rtcan Embassy•
. and the State Department reply to:Sa:~iiago, No .. 084655, dated
.. ' '.'15 May 1972 •. Mr. Genti1e·als~ide#~t'fie'd\tJ:ie.:E;PSnepoz-tof '., ..
'.:. investigation and suggested thatt~Eie:a:GbPY:';fromthe Sect-et Servlc·e.
.'.' . ' ~'I then. calle41 ~t'Secr:~t·S.etv~:ce and he had his liaison
. man deliver me a copy of the EPS'report of. investigation.
• .. •• ".' 'i" :;_. ~ • ••
. • .1

. . 2:On 25' May 1973 I recetveda-caflfz-om FBI Agent .

.-1 lstating that he had received

about prosecution: r
a- telephone call f~om Mr. Janies.Ropinson:.relative to :my inquiry
f~gJc:at~d that. the·.FBI Washington. .
:Field Offi.c e-ha.d reoncC;tctea tue i.,~~ropolita:n Police D.epartment (MPD)
·on 2",1: May and reviewed therepo.;;;:r:No:~ 248:"4l4'xiled with the 3rd
. District. MPDo whi.ch states. ·that· ac;,bxEicik,i.n:-occurred the Chilean at
Emhassy between 5:00 'and '~:OO a~;iri~' on 15 May 1972;·
- ~ '~"',,~:, ...•
.~

,
.
......
.",.

..
'/
, -._... ,',
. .
\

: .: ~,,',

00 38fl:.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.~ '.,.
I:.:~" t '-.: ,J":
'" . . .J . ';:

Repoxted loss' at that· tirne consis"t~:4~~i£O,ur·am/frn 'radios

chid one electric razor. The·po1i:c:~}~ifi.Yesttgationidentified
... .some late'?-t fingerp;rints' but no
·i·d"etit~fibaiion:o.f·tho5e. prints'
was made; . Since the reported lositw.as .unde'r $~J 000 and there .:. <».

was no ev.idence. of a crossing of stcite'boundries, :the FBI did"

.
not make an inve.stigationof the incident.' The MPD reported
th.iit:~1;J.ere had been no pros~cutionandno' suspect wa~ identified.
';';

'.
"
" ""' ..
,

.., .

. .":;1jts;tarl t ~~n~r~ .co~sel "." ':::.1':

..
c~: 'L.egislative. Cou~s~l' "
. ;
"'0':

. In5p~ctor General
:,. .'
i .-

!
'.' .~. . -, .
i.. .:
.'
,
r ,

r .
I,·:

~
j. '<; .
. ""

I'·

I· .
t '.

. " .
';.,'

.. -'.
'.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

: ..;.",
-,;"" -, ".;'.: ','
.: .....
..~ ..:
." .':',:
. .~' ._,.-:--
.... ~;" . 1'"" . ./ v-, ~•.
r.:..) .~~ ~:v.~ i"J ,=J,

..:..... 1..1
.~

. : .: -.
.
\..~~ .-Qo

(no v .01'S)

L.....---_ ·
1

Ne..'"aes revealed in Office of ..:Security repci"'1:

p. 'Retiring .Tune 19"7~, referred to.~Cord for job

~I ----------,--
I- Wanted 'to :i:'cise ~.cnd for EcCo:ro.

Whe:ce do we stan& \(1 th:

......... '

steve .Kuhn )
. )
. Bruce Solie) "rere to have been. interi"iewed
). .
I
PaulG9.ynor)

I think 'WVB' has' int.arvie·wed follo.!:ing:

,I
. John 'Hart . ).

'rlhose names appear itj,my notes .to see

. . ~ " .. ,
Ed Ryan
.)
)
~ord l.feyer )
SDB OO~g6
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

".,,'" ~~,:<:~;?;t".:-
"

!
I 26 Mll.Y1973 ;- ~" ..
MEMORANpUM FOR. TIm RECORD'

", . SUBJECT: ",DPI"Tra:p" . on 'Le~ks ofNarcotics Intelligence,

.,.' . :~:,.,j ,\~,:*}r'~" ',:.':~"f:~';'

,1. In materiiil:I'rovid~d by the DDI on contacts with c~rtain'"

persons on the White House Staff. there is a 9 September 1972
memorandum from Mr •. He1ID.s to Dr. Kissinger relating the
identification of a 113;:..1<: to, th~ press as having been 41 the BNDD.
The memorandum st~tes'in .part:
. . ;,,;';)~';Z~:,.; ~ :", . 0,' ,- ~ ,
"After notingll:ha't,J'ackAnderson had a continuing
source for classi£ied documents on narcotics, we
arranged a:tl:,~p,so that recipient organizations
of CIA Intelhg~l:e-Memoranda',(IM) on narcotics . '".
".' ' .
. -/' ,.. could be ietentifie.d. ": . '
,---------------~--'----~-------------.
,, 2.

3. This cour~~o'{'acittonwas at the' initiative'of theDirecta~a;e'f:

of Int~lligence, without. consultation with persons elsewhere In' the
government, except in reporting the results to Dr, Kiss.inger. It
represents a welt-concetved aetempt to target on a possiblesoul'ce .
of leaks. We doubt.that:it would be susceptible to miaunderstan,Ung
if exposed to,!>ubllcYlew. 'but the fact is that it was something ·o[:.lin',
attempt to trap 'so1'heon:~,.an:dit was. a part. of the gen'eral attempt,to :
seal of[ a leak sinill,i'r to those 'leading to the "plumbing" operation.,
Because of the latter',con6ideration it is noted for the. record•., -,,',

Slclltll' \,.; ..- "

j
.\
<: CJ .'.
oc: '
S. D. Breckinridge"';' ... :
~:":l~L,~'
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

i"

......

• ' ~ '0' £···._1 ~

",' .' '-.' .'" ~I,.·.i 1·:,-:." •

. ~;e l.~i.Y~-;: l.::'w~;r e,:~:.\.,:,:·,~£.:·~.::Q ~'::;r;; ~;.'oJ.:~C",.4 .• ~:::,:; l·'='O;:::"~..~:l 1.,:;-- : r.(.~.l all,.], "i;.y
C::~!i::';::'~';SG.:::;;~·l I;,:;;:h:.i on. ,OU1" c:j::t.:;::r":::11 :·;·.·.;·t..:.::.5ic'4 ':.~:;-:; ~,~:·:L~:!.::-.:.s. ~1,'y::..;.:!·;.::lal
i'1a:9 ,3 c~:::t vi.:t.:;.I~ s • 20.. tb~ ,;fc,1.:>,::-'';t-··!.Z:f':'J C··\··:·n. j'"':'-..l 0'::'1 ':::':J-~ e i"~;':'::-:'';:~::1"Jn .
. l ) f 2':':· :·~:;:.~f 1 if·,: e ,:.;.,.=:;::.a: .,"'(~ie .:~·o·i.1.:.:, '5..:..::; 0"~ ':"::"; ;J :.;:-'~: ".?-'"'.·'·':'.::1 DJ? ;'25 ;'::..:r ~

II

I ?.:!c 4: A E.;:(:·:':'U::l p:l·a3::""2.r:~! (·!.1 ~,~1·3. I~;::·:~:.::.~:·.:;:...e L lc.::::c..t c2'S

(b.:=ac0:'ls) to '!::a};:,e it ICC::;"a: rd~pcr...'~~:!.ve to C0n,,;;r'~f:S:~~:;;u

!, Nedzi's que5ti~~.

:L<?J) 16: J.."'::l e::::":liJ.o.21.9. '~:iOl1 cf -ti~3 :;::':1e;:l3;tl':'.'.:-;;~"i."

I making car:iiog::-al?hs.
i
Tab.1T: .1m r~-initiated :follo,t-up onl----::===='~hicb
vas merely nc:-red on p~ge' 17 of t.b~ origina1 sellsit:Lve

I
i
s~ary.

rrab 18; T\;o IG-irJ..t·iat.ed i'0110;-:-u?s on itel!1s t~;at lle::L'~

\
I included in :tbe in:i..tial Directo~'flte subwissions" but 't-rel."e" t'oa
f:ragEenta ry ~or·inclusion· in 'our c;;iginal s~a,:xY..
7
I.

I 2ab 19:
th'2 cour..a e of
'On~
.C:... rr
cO::JplE(tely nex it.em that su!:"'feced in
inq"ui:!'ies.
I Tl:::e tabs are not arranged in anY' logicel Cl"a-:?r, because w~
chose to place' the bulkier' i teros on tha bottom o:f the file to

I,
I
I
!:lake :for easiar. llantlling of it. Tbe fo1101iing is a breakdown of
the tabs by initiator of :follmr-up. (Both you and. l{edzi. asked:
:for-a follOW-Up' on.:th~ item in Tab 2.) . .:

-I
Dolby-initiated - l1edzi-initiated IG-initiated !,ew submis.sion
I 1
2
2
4
~7
18
19
3 10
I' 5 II

I 8-
6
7
12
13
14

I 9.
16'
15

-I If:l,llism V-; Brae

I
1 .:»
Inspector Galleral·

00388

I
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

ji.~.:·:·~,;t <:.~.'::~.) f~.:_,·;~ .... :··t} : . , ' .:-; I'::':. ~·'''~.L1··.·d ''',s j.....: >'lf..~.:... $ -t~) ~.~
;;',~~~.1 ~,. ......) ~:"~:·'5 ..:~·~ .-;',1. ::.._...... ..: -...: :'::1 ~3 ; ~,'~. ::·.· •.,,:l~ ~:_ ....;...).

G/DGI )
OS-~ )
OW )
WO' ),

DfiO

DDI

( 1J.l r.s.t.erlal is to bg reed by- COS 'tc1a:r.

"o .- ;
It is reluest-ad that material be cBroad on 3 x 5 cards 1"01"
future possib1.~ USS o It shcr.11d shev (1) the nane or the e:-:ployea"
in upper lei' hand corner,- (2) nane ot person bain!( reported on ,
(e.g. lfunt, ~ord, ete.)m (3) event raported, i1' significant,and
the word wrouU.., e· if' not signif'icant, (4) identi1'T...n~ referen03 .
wl:2mo ill which i."lfomat:l.on is reccrded. ' .

If an &YnJlt reported in this material is siginfica."lt,. please.

,report it ir.:olediately for handling (either a "jevell Q or !lO~.thing
connected with l-atergate and associated events) . . .' . . ..•

l'lease reisEI any questions that o~cur as yO'.! gat into the
material. Especiall~" as you get ideas as York progresses,pleaso
put them for.mrd.

..,.\-".
"
SDB

c:

.. ,.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

'"".~ 1;.
"
.~.~:it:r.,;,;:'~"
.,
, ti)··:·

. ,-
"~ .
•
···f
~ ,:'~~, .'
t· ~,

-. ,~
.. ,;j
'" : ".' ~
~ 1

.: , .$
.-.~ . . "

i
.",-
\ ... ,~': ; I

25 May 1973
.; ~~f,'
BRO ,','-,

·:/:~;J1:"
-»,
. ,

:~..
.i
c
.,
".' ,From: .SbB~eckinridge
.c ,
R!!.turn
ooa~~::~;

;.. ,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.:
!
,/
i
...
/ .' '. , (
- - c
25 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Broe -,

SUBJECT : Reported Agency Fundixg of Heroin Study "

..
. ' ....
'

• " .,', I. 'ORD, in reporting 'association of employees with Egil

: Krogh in connection with the gcveznmeat narcotics program, . ;..
.. ;:
referred to an Ag~ncy funding ,action on 30 Jun~ 197~ whereby
-,

$37,500 was transferred to OST (the Office of Science

l '
Tech- and " .
nology under the E:~ecutlve) from ORD's budget. The money was
: 'to fund a study proposed by IDA (r" am told this is the ID.stitute for.

1
Defens: Analysis), and was approved by, the DDI. ADD/S&T,
rcting for the DDS, and Mr. C,.olby as Executive Director- ,
1=,.----,' " ' "
Comptrolle:r:' , ' ,'. ' ..... ..; ' ..:..- .
" ". ~" -, - ..

"., .

S. D~ llreckinrldge
.
" ". 0',
" ," '
.. -,
. -
; -~.,
.'
" .: .' -
. .
: ,
, " " "
.
'.
/
,;
.. ,.,~, . :-:. -. \.
. '"; " '.':.:..
.. ...~-~. -:':"."
. -",. .. ':
..
"
~
" ' " "

. ~'.- .. .
.".
. ....
'
"
.'
.. - ."
.'
'
• ,'f

-.
. ,: ~,.., " '

" " . :
:, ,,

. ' '
".' .'.

",
I

'! .' ':' . . . ' ..... ~. ., ,

-,_.-. ,._. - ":;"'-=---"._--..:..~"-'-'-'..:-.-"" -.~=::~.-:
\,: .. ".
.' .. .- .-..-c-v- . '.
, "
 MORl DocID: 1451843

. :-. I
- - 'I . _ ';; •• '1_

,. I
,': . : ro
", 1.. 1 ! I i\

." '.;;: !.,

:;1..:",), J \i';' ',("
.•. :1.1·).·) ,." , ...
...... ,'.:; __ ,.:','"'1-
'.jfi:f E:.... _.-2. 4..i< ~y:_
rn
~ . 1.1':;1', ,,,) .......__.."
~ tt .~~ 4

HLF : ;;0. ._._

'j·RfP,:J-ll0 I,!.
'J ;1.~' _ I I

»cr
,J\)':I Ji'I155
DCI/IC (CIA)
DDI \~J\5HHIGTON (UP!) -- CIA OFFICIALS TESTIFIEiJ wEiJtiE::iUAY THEY FORGOT:
;)~
.. VI :~, r-
•• :t;::) 'J"O f';) I \"rv.,
1:. ........ .• i\c,oJ..;J O·L>
-'-'f'i"""''''~ i\ TH;- "'''''j'."y'
_I ~ •• 12I:. tV c 1.1' ••,<-'O(;T[';_
oJ :1._ ..... ' •• , ",:..
~ ••• I',_~ ",'''1
;:,-, .~ .... n'__ '.,J_.l",,"l:., A"'QUT
;;-""H;'~"R' :..J

DiJO (2·AiiGNY;·iGU:i r":AiHjIi':GS riiEY HECEIVED TH.'\f THE ::HITE 1!OV3£ ;~AS TttYltlG TO
:,)D5/'1' PII~ BLAi'iE eN THE AGE,ICY fQH ml,: IvATER(jitTE SCAliiJAL.
D/OCI fiEP. LuCIErl I~Ej)t::1, D-l'ilCH.,G,~LLED·THIiEE OfFICIALS OF.THE CIA TO
ONE EXPLAllJ wilY THE LETTERS -- WHICH HAVE BI,:EN TRACED TO WAIEiiGATE ~%'
OSR ·CON.3PlilATGR JAi'JES j'JCCORD "- DID NOT SURFAGE UNTIL TWO DAYS ·AGO. c:~:,.
':i!.::"
OSI (2 "OIlE Of THE REA~OriS THEY GAVE WIlS THE FANILIAR • I FOh60T,·" NEDZI ~'"
Ch/O",,,,SAID. "T!1;;:y ALSO SAID II h'AS A foJ!lTTlCR 01' rU,WH4(:j IT ovrs TO SOl'iEONE t·:.':,
"DB ELSE MIiJ AS:;Lii'iItJG HE lIOiJLD Pl,SS II O l i . " · · · . r
INDICO THE SIX Ll;.TTERS -- ONE 01' THEN_SIGr.ED .. JIl'l' AND THE OTHERS .I.'
000/00 ANONYi'iOU,5 -- WERE SEH TO FORi'iEK C·IA DlftECTOR RICHAfW HELi'iS BETWEEN •
r: JULY 1.972 AiW LAST JAI;UARY. !
~ .J>" 1:.":;;,,1 SAID II HAl) bEEN "?i\'~TTY Dl::FINITELY ESTABLISHED" THAI i
OSO i'/CCCiiD, A FOii~;ER CIA AGEiiT, WAS IHE AUTHOR OF ALL THE LETTERS. NEDZI ~,~.::;
mea iJECLINED TO SAY WHAT WAS IN THEN, EUT REP. WILLIAI'i BRAY, R-IND., SAID;\~~
THEY wERE "CO~:FUSEiJ~ Arm "DISJOINTEO" WARNINGS IHAT THE WHITE HOUSE ~.:;:!
~~ WAS TilHNG TO NAKE THEbiA H':RGATE BilEAK-IN AS 'A CIA PLOT.
eur ijOTH NEDZI AND BRAY SAID THEHE WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT CIA WAS 'IN ANY;
r-
WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WATERGATE BREAK-IN. I
TESTIFYIIlG AI THE SESSION WErlE PAUL GAYNOR, HOWARD OSBORNE.AND I
,-huermer WILLIAi'1 5RAUX, TO? CIA OFFICIALS WHO HAD CUSTODY 01' THE NCCORD .
~egco
tous ton
i-EHERS AI VARIOUS STAGES AfTER THEY WERE SENI. .
NED~I INITIALLY SPELLED SRAUX'S NAME AS BROE AND SAID.HE DID NOT
'.
:
I
)sborne KNOW IF II WAS IHE SAME MAN WHO TOLD THE SENATE COMMITIEE ABOUT .
~roe NE2TINGS HE HIID WITH I II PRESIDENT HAROLD GEI/EEN IO DISCUSS THE
.aynoz- CR-EATION or
INTERNAL ECC1W1'IIC STRIFE IN CHILE.
IIP105-24 05:12 PED' I
(
Comment:
h
< ' ...
.... ~
. ..
~

0039Z .,

\ These comments represent the initiaZ 'and tentative .reaction of

the Office of Current InteZligence to the attached item from the
news services. .
... , .... - .. _...-._-_ .._...- ._----_..... _.. _--_ ..__.- ..- --'.---.-. --~--
.. _~---------
~
........,. .
;.
f
:.
•
. ,'- "~:. . .'
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,-" r:;"- '....;'. t

,,.'
»>
L '
,·,0, i

I,
:~

,~'
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

r.....-.. =:;;<.J
,
( (

'.'. ~:'I'
.
I.
h
Ii
'I
I

.1

'j~

.
' '.

.'

Ie
I
. ~ .,'"
-2

L .-'._•... _._-
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

r:

00395
 MORI DocID: 1451843

. .
' ,
!

'l

i
,!
I
, I

I
I

i
I

, ,

.." .

2
00396
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

:,0.'.' " ,'...

.",,',
,", . r o,
.' :'"
,
.... 24 May 1973 .'. c"',(''';;:<:-:' '. "

'.'
-t ' ••
=::~::Z~·::::.~:= ·.•. . ·;III?t;:~l;"
Specificl,)l'om Parrotti.s Involvement with David YoUiig')~':,';:'i '.
':":,' .,.::....'.; '. ':.. ' . ..' '. . ·:!":f:.';~~J,);~jii·:::.
We met with Tom Latimer this morning·toget from him the .only
existing copy of the sens.itive attachment to our family jewelsi'ep9rt·:··, ' "'"
". in prder that wenughtiriake a temporary stayback burn copy~·'·.:·.I\i·that'/, "":',"
.time', Latimer said he had a call 4do Broe to repa'rt that when >.:.... , 'Tom: :.:;'"
Parrott was DCI dutY'officer some time in September 1972 he rec.eiyed ..:.'::..'
frQm·'~~r..~d~~ung.;,:." ,:,~:~~§:;,fj;:.... ';:.':
'.
if;>' . some calls .'
':' I called Par:t:Qt.t's .home.(FE 7-35l2} at 0925. ,The perso:q; '.'~,~ ._ .
answering, presumably Mrs. P.arrott, gave me his telephone.:hWhber '
at the EnvironmElntal.Protection .i\.gency (755~0533) •. I called :parrott;' .....
there and told him that I would like to meet. with him to debri~{.Ji~ "/:C ':":' '.
on the sabstance .of .calls he received from the Whit e House :v-.rheii.:lr~·::.:5: .,'., r:
was DCI duty offic:-er in 'September 1972 •. Tom 'said he would'.. b~'ha.ppy'·· ..
to meet with me but that he saw. no reason why he coUld not give JP,e'
the information. over the telephone, f::~i}f·;l;'·.· .
,. "~ . :":;->.',.' _. """ .,, ." ' .
~;~'.:i;;:Y~:\,;~~:;t:::; .":
.;' . Tom received'a call from David Young at about rniddayori a.:::·-. :. ,,"

Saturday. Young.was ~alling about that .morning's program oy:Dail:. ':.

Rath~r .in which. i~ther Incfuded inaterial from a classified l:;~~'o.,-:I:.),;:.
Young wanted to come out to the headquarters building to' see Pi!::t.:;r6tt.
Parr'ott started ~hasing it down, <l:Je spoke with Bruce Clar~El:~hohad '";:;'''
the DDI duty, ··It,turned out that'Rather's comment wastnade;ori;his.:.·
.program of the pzevlcus day and that it was based on a repo:rJ ·th":{.i'::':
carne out of George Carver's .shop, The report was distributed in ",'
..
' only seven or eight copies, and only two of them had gone. outside the
.Agency-> both' to Kissinger. ." . .... . . ' .':: ,)t;i;..\,::·...
" , • / " , / '(. i", . " • .• .,\~;:~(1·~~:';'·:~{:·~
Young gf'it lost trying to find the build' ng and did not 'arrive until .:
about one. By ·then,. Parrott had identified the Carver report :and, had .
a copy of the. distribution list. Young was shaken upon discovering..': .
that the only e':tE;rn~l distribution was to Kissinger. He was. ''!'Xtremely .
,. '.
.,
.. .,':<,;'i:;:OO:m'7~'::
". ,.""

. , ,"
"
'. ~.

<'-f~' '.. '";.'

.:... 1

.'.
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

q'
',I'
,!

d'
r.
'i
~.j,
C

"I '
r,I~'"' . , ' , I,
'"
d ,
,""
I
!
j i
··i·
i"!, '
t i
1'" ..

'. : ' . ':

.. "::-,
"
,
-, ..':. '

.
1
. !"
~"~
"
, "
4" ~ \
, "" . . .' ~

" ,

..':i '., ,""

t:: j
;;"ti.
~"
~;)n
·V~.fJ:~
2·'" po;

-. ~,,-": ~
",-~.
...:._",~'--;_. ,. ,- , " , .. ,~.; --
.. -,~,' 7~" -.": ..
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

". -,

: ',

',',::

..
.'",:.2~;+:· ,.
MEM6·RANn6M;:~Bi;THE.RECORn·,
-, '~. ,;'. : !.:,.?,}:'.~,('.: ',.;~ t.· ~.r ~,~ ~.:..<' ~
'c .•:.•:. .' .•:.".;:.;,.:.....
,.-"

..
SUl3J~~~:: :,~::j~f4~ Ofth~~peCia~ SUbco~ttee 6n:;~t~~~enc~"
o'

; .-
of ii!d'~S'e ~rr.n~d Services Conuirl.ttee . ". /:
" .-
, ,
"
• . . ""':';" ',,-. ,
",
.~
. 1. :Thi8inohiing:Messr~. LaY/renee.HOuston, G.epel'al·Cpun.s.el:'
. WilliaIn Broe.,'·fuSpeCi:~:rGen:era1.:,Ho~ai(iQsb~rn."Di~.e:cto;":o£·S~6ilrity;:
. PaUl. GaYilor~,,;,q~~~!tS.:~~?~f~ty,~~e~earch Staff; aJi4\ ' 0 . . ' . ,'1'.. .: ,.
Secretary:,to)Gen;e~ti .;a.~ers .. appeazed bc£ol."ethe~a.':!i~",e'S'ci11.eq~ttee
·ab.out, A.'g.in.e.
• '" ',"',,, • '"~''' cti.ii' '··e.••:,.,.it: on·.y.1,e·
';,;.;ii."·irJ·'}-l'~' .•. ·.e.. 1:S .r.·e
..,~,:.,'t.~ .,\.. .ce. . l.'V.",
:-"',',
·t. "':ifd.fu:~.'
ed...'*t. ,..,·.~·,·J,_.. '~'...".:,'."'.l:-.:::-'~·,,-,.:~',.:}".:'.:'··.,~
~.~.':"i!!l.';§M . ;.o..6b.\i.•:~.}_
....' :p. .·;,.'.;•..•-_.
.'."t!;he .
meeting las,ted~,#ic) . . .. ~'hOUj,.f{-i:or2)j,5 ..h(jtiJi'$~· ::.'rh~~;~~VI'l-~«r~;;t~'c1jnic'al. . .,
sweep 'o(thll:'l:oQ:mi"¢"Z:l?'Raybiwt Houae O£fic~ BJill.iWig;i~:·aIta;the·,rQom, , .
. Was;;no·~~ept'~9~~<}~~~:&~IqalfgP;iliti:lring.:'iDiS cus~~S ,:' ". :;;j~~~;r#a.s,e 9i~~, -.
~eve~~ '..A.ti.an;!i,9,~I\~~*~~>t,jil<;El;~.~.nIl,3:Sonfi1.e Ul' :thEl: . J?t\'~;~gi,sl~ti:V-e.:·.
·Counsel. . . ,.. ,~. ,'"',:.. ;, . " . J . ,",,": .... o' ...

" .'
. '.
t··· .•
", i

...... .. ~

3.Pres~nf from the staihvere; '.'

'I.
-v ",
<-

, Ji'ral\k Sh.tins~ek•. Chief Counsel

. ~W.illla.m":Hoian '.
y .
. ,

"t'- •• ."

r: ."" " .. .
...
'~

..,". ,
"'~":':<"'
~ ' "'~',~' "

" ..-, . ':"':

.". . -. ..

; . ,,-' "," - "

.
.. ... , ..
.... 'j
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

....

"

.. " '.

'. '

',,:
.'!I '
. "
' .'

"
'. ""
:-'
.

: .. . '
: .,~ ....
..... ;. ". • <' •

"'-'. : -: .:'. , .." .. '

.•. :"'7
: .
.; .
'. -

..;
" ,
, ....'. :. ~

" ..
-,

...... ','.' : :.

",
-',
)004'00'
...... • >•••

',' ',' ..
 MORI DocID: 1451843

! ( \.
;
«rl-r:
....
.:,J..>. . -,1
I\~~' '4;
~...

23 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE- RECORD

On this date Mr. William E. Colby and the writer held a

meeting with Congressman Lucien N. Nedzi. The reason for the
nleeting was to review with the Congressman material sent us by
,-I"
the Directorates describing the Agency activities that had flap
potential•

. At the outset, Mr.· Colby advised that the Director had issued
instructions to each directorate to come forward with descriptions
of activities (especially involved in the domestic scene) that had flap
potential. In addition, in a memorandum to all employees of the CIA,
the Director had instructed all employees to report to him any
activities the Agency was conducting that they construed as outside
.the Agency charter. Congressman Nedzi requested a copy of this
Agency notice be furnished to him.

The full report, including the sensitive section, was: discussed

with the Congressman item-by-itezn and in most cases he actually
read the text. This took two hours .and the Congressman followed
the material with great care.

With regard. to the it~m concerning Mr. ·McCord's letters to the- .

Agency iti July and December 1972 and January 1973, he expzesned .
.astonishment that the material took so long to be surfaced and when
. surfaced took so long to get to the Director. He was very outapoken
in :l:S criticism of the people involved. .

I will not try to set forth all his reactions to the material, which
I believe he found sobering, but I will set out herel.,aIter the items in
which he showed special interest:

a. Alien documentation furnished to the Secret Service.

He desired more information concerning the reason why
issued, the use, and how controlled.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.;
~.
.- ," . n.) ,",,,,
.",,,,. (
! •

b. Financial support to the White House in connecticn

with the replies to letters and telegrams as a result of the
President's speecb on Carnbodia in 1970. He requested
more information on this subject.

c. Beacons furnished Ambassadors. He was interested

in the number issued to Ambassadors and the position the State
Department took on the use of these beacons. He was interested
if the Department of State was pushing this program, as he
."" believed tlJ:ey should J;j,~.. ,'t. '"if"" .<
d. Logfsttcs" acquisition of police equipment. He
questioned whether LEAA, Department of Justice, should
not be doing this rather than the Agency.

e. He noted LogisticS furnished telephone analyzers, and

desired to know what they were and how used.

f.

I I
g. OER's crasb project concerning Robert L. Vesco
requested by the DCI. 'The Congressman was interested in who
outside the Agency instigated the project and why was it stopped.

h. Several ORD projects indicated research done without .

knowtedge of the host system or on unwitting subjects. He was
of the opinion that this was risky and recommended' it be
terminated. He stated he would like to see a directive go out
to the researche:rs concerning these practices.

i. John Dean's request re Investors Overseas Service.

He reviewed the six reports that had been furnished. He noted,
however, that the item stated "there were multiple channels
to the Agency from the White House" and request~d informatiol\
concerning these channels.

j, Alien passports. Mr. Colby advised that he planned

to review this whole subject and the Congressman agreed with
the need to do so.

- Z -

00:402
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

"j'" " .• "

, I
e
(

The' Congressman noted that in connection with .Tohn McCone's

consultative role with the Agency the Director had stated some time
in the past that he planned to take action regarding individuals in this
category. The Congressman requested a report on what had been done.

Mr. Nedzi asked Mr. Colby if the Agency had considered how
much of the information just reviewed with him could be made public.
Mr. Colby stated this had ,not been done yet, and spoke to the question
't"'" ",~ of s'~u"Ces, meth~s. an,d"t~'impacto,y,,~e instiftl,\1»Ii>n. The'~ngress~,.~,
man stated that in the current climate he felt it was necessary to open
up more information to help clear the air. Mr. Colby stated the Agency
would give the matter deep consideration. and added he had been thtnk-
ing of a general statement along these lines to be used at his confirmation
hearing.

The meeting ended at 1Z o'clock noon.

,(Signed) William V., Brae:

WUliam V. Broe
Inspector General

Distribution:
Director of Central Intelligence
Mr. Colby
Office of Legislative Counsel

NOTE: The above listed' items, except for item j. are being pursued
by the Office of the Inspector General.

- 3 -

00403
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

" .
. .. '.

, I.: ; :

"if5'404
23 ~:ay 1973
iI·;·.·.:iT
-- -[!5"ArC>-'--
Directo rity
~-_./
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

\. t- :.: J. q ;\ V I T

"

dsposes and says as follows:

J.; I n;n the Dil'ector of Security of the Ccnt.r-aL
Intelligenco Agency •.
2~ The purpose of this s tut enent; is to r-cco rd ,
\ •.

. to the best of my knowledge and l:ccollection, circui!!stafices

irtvolved in the receipt of a series of unsigned. co r r e spon-

denco raceivod by the Agency during the period from 1 August
/,

1972 to 7 J~nllary lS73~ Tho si2uiBlcance of these lcttor~

is that by th:}ir conten.t and by the handt'lr'iting on tHO of

them, they ar-e believed to have becn'wr-Lt t en by James W'.
McCord, Jr~,. one of the de£cadants in th-e Watergate .trr inj.,
3.. By £ir.st involvcment in this matter occurred

on t.he 2nd or 3rd of August 1972 "hen an envelope addressed

to ~lr. I~eln\s > then Director of the Central Intelligence
Asency, with no return address, and postaarked 30 July ~972
;
was routed to my desk fro~ the Director's office as a routine
piece of "crank mail".. The cnve.Lope contained a carbon copy
of a typewritten letter signed "Jim" j·lith the nane in the',
salutary address excised .. "Dear" ..
the letter as .a piece of crank J>lail" I had second thoughts
and r~-cogl1izCcl the handwriting .on the enve Iope and the
signature "Jimlt on the lat:ter as beina similar to that of
}'fr. McCord) Hho formerly worked fOT me as a security officer
before hid retiroment fro.m the Agency ..
 MORl DocID: 1451843

.'.~.

"\'
,1.. C;1.:'-;-.h;:J: s;-:::";: J;'/JI \ .. ':~ '.d ~,,;',,:: :/;;1.:. ,: ':.:>

a ~tl"t"i!..~ ;.n~Q!)~.~b3.;.·;.:_y

.}·~)r .. .......
l':I~''':'''''d...
"'~ ~r _.1"
.0' --

OV~l~ to tho Fcde ra.l. BUl'u,iU of ~n."""c$tisatioil.. Hr. ;:~l.L1.$,~ aitor

"
sone reflaction, doc i dcd that he r,'ould. like to have" a .l!ogal

GC'n~)Ta.l Counsel of the Agency to his office and hud hia

t
roau tha letter. After he had finished reading the letter
thO) ensufrrg 'di~eussiunJl to t.he bos t of a}" rt1colloction,.
centered about whether,the A&oncy had any legal obligaia Ofi ,
to forHaI'd tho letter to tho Justice Depa'rtment; or the, Fc(!~·cal
DU1"cau of -In.vestigation. Both ;·jr. HeLms and Nr. Houst.on
f
decided th~t there NO.$ no such obligation and I was to~d' to
hold t)le let:1:er in a secure file in my office and take. no
further action on it. Mr. Balms instructed t10 to restr;ict
t...
knolflcdge of the existence of the letter to an absolute
mini:aum number of poopke ,
5. The next envelope received was addressed 'to
, ,
, Nr. Paul Gayner, a staff chief in 1,1y office and a former,
close friend of Mr. McCord's, on or about tho 23rd of
Decembe-r 1972. The next envelope received was addressed
to Mr. Gaynor's residence and \ins undated but posttlurkod
27 uecenber- 1972. The t,.,o envelopes contained one or 130re

uns Lgncd typewritten pieces of correspondence \'Thich appear-ed

, 'I'
to relate to Mr. }fcCord's involvement in the 1:fa.tC:Fgat~."nff::\irli.
Bot h of these letters were handcar-rIed by rna to/Mrs. Elizab"ti,

) 2

" ::00406
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.....

"

,.-
'.;'.: ~:::J)·s(,.lt"'il11y bYe-n."s ..
. -.

(1. ·~;l!~~;;;~iH"mt:ly, '.):1 Z:J ;;..~I:cr,jb..;r J.972 M". t ! on ~.

<) .r:l:~~::ary J.973 ::.:v1 ? .]':;.::1:11'Y J.~)73) thl--.!!e .'li.dit.~. 'Hol .::n~-{.~J.0;''2:S

by t,ir~ Ga>'Tlor at h'is resi.donca and pro;;\ptly ·.~clivarecI t~o

ne for roJ:view and subs equen t Lnc Ius Lon in the SCCl.1ro: file.

but a week or so later dolivered to him a folder uith all

copies of the lotters we had received. As I recall, my
l·UQUOS t to him was for guidance us to l:nnt action SilOU1,1 .

be taken with .egard to them in the light of his depatmlre

,frma the Agency incident to his nomination as United States
_';"r:'!.bIlSSD.clo:'";,,dasigna.te tp Iran.. After rcviCH¥-ing .t.hem, lie-

i.nformed'me that he did not sed any. reason t.o ta.ke any ~ac1:ion
at that tiLle, but asked that I show them to Hr. Houston
and if Hr-, Houston, had. no obj"ctio~, I "as to retain them
in a Secure fi1'e and take no actio::> ,t!th rogard to t.i:.am.·
As I recall, Mr. Houston ,.,0.5 out of t01ffi at the time and
it was 'severnl day,s before I had an'opport.llnity to give
him the fOlder· with the copies of the letters in it for
"
review. After rov.-iewing them, he informed DIe that he had
no objection to the instructions loll'. Helms had given me and
I so informed /.Irs. Elizabeth Dunlevy, secre1;ary to Mr. Hel.ms~
7.' On 14 f'lay 1973, ~{r. William Broe, Inspector
General of tho Agency. and his Deputy, lolr. Kenneth Greer,
met ,with me in my office in connoction with an investigation
i
thoy \.;ore undcz tnkdng at the'direction of .Mr. Schlesinger
to uotermine if anyone .in the Agoncy had any contact ,I}ith

()0407
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

. '. '.~.

:':", :', C·..·,:l. .::; ,';} ~;!.j -v • : ••: • • • ~ •••• : '.',·:',1~"":~t

\,
.::c ':'$:.
'

~:,,~ ..• ·I.,,::.i

•. : •.. :: ,-;;.:.3 . :,:.,"::' .:"1 :~,~

':.. 1 .; ,,':~ .';:'1:1 ::~-_ ;'."':,~ •. j.' ;. ·~.··~:·~:';t .... ~ !'t tv ',: ~..,,)

j,~r. McCord since tHe Watcrg;,.to 5.:;~cldc!1t.. (I )iu~scqm:::1tly

dctI31·r.\iiled from Nr .. Gaynnr' th3.t he l'H1S not seen or talked.

to 1.1r~ McCord since his retireL.ent from. tho. Ag,r:;iH:y on 3;' ':\U2-ust
1970.) ,I 'also told them thl't a Hr. Leo Rosenbaum, an e,"ployee
of tho Agency) had requested an ar>pointma:at t'1ith me to ,discuss
the £:msibility of contributing to llr. r..!c:Co\'d's. defense. fund
,;
and that'I thought I had' convinced him that this wou'ld be
inimical, to the best interests of himself 1 the Agency and
;-,;1". :·!cCord." I also stated that ;.Jr. Rasen~aum. lw.d calle"'d. -me

several weeks ago to say· that he was well kno~l as a clpse

friend of Nr. r.icCord t 5 and r.!ight be called to testify at the
;'

current Senate Hearings. I advised. him to seek gUidanJ~

in this regard from the Office of General Counsel. I,do not
'know that he did so. I then romembered the envelopes and
correspondence purportedly origi~ated by Mr. McCord. I briefed
Hr. Broe and,Hr. Greer on the circumstances involved in the
recoipt and SUbsequent Iland1ing of tlleT.! and made a cop~, of
each of them and deliVered them to !-Jr. Broe the next day.
I 0.150 gave a copy , at the same time, to my i.nme.diate supervdsor ,
1-ir. Harold B,ro.....ruaan ,
8. 'A £el< days after this, I nas contacted by
Mr. John Gren,ney, Office of the General Counsel of the'
Agency, who asked me about any official or unofficial ~Qntacts
anyone in the Agency had had "ith Mr. HcCord. I'mention"d

00408
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. '.~.

,
\

On this S:1J.:l:l date; I wns instructed by !·lr. Jnim~s R•.Schle:;iazer,

Dlructor of tho Central IUf;elligcru.::a Agen.cy,.· to partic:t:p,iltc
.).
in certain Congressional briefings on this matto'i" and tb
prepare this affidavit.
9. Up to the 14th of f.ray 1973 when I infol·m·~tl.

1·i1t , Bl·oe and l·fr. Gre(:r o~ the envelopes and their cont,Jilts"
the only. p~r50ns knov l edgeab Le of the existence' of thCD t
in addd ticn. to J:le ,,. t"'t.l:r~: !··ir. He1:,15 , Nr-s , Eli~abeth Dunl'evy ~
, 'I'
his. secretary, Mr .. Houston, Mr .. Paul Gaynor of my staff,
. < ,
Miss Kathryn Aldridge, my secretary ,.,ha prepared the £':(le,.
i
Mr.. Leo J. Dunn, my Executive Officer,. knew of the fil" If:.
I
envolope and corrospondence but not of subsequent enVe ~pes.
I'
10. The ,only other matter pertinent to this··l:
particular matter was tho fact that an intennittent '50 .rce
. of this Office, who vas a close personal friend
·r
of ~lr. 'McCord' 5

has relayed "to Mr. Gaynor and his staff certain information
,.
concerning the poxsonak situation of Mr. and Hrs. McCord during
and after the time he was. in jail and since he has been
released on bond. This source has'boen utilized by thi~ office
for many yoars :,nd by "ly direction, no effort was r.lad".'to solicit
info~:i:'Iation frOp.l h lrn about: Mr. HcCord and the information provic1ed

HaS done so purely gratuitously.

lImfa:rd IlY. Osborn

Subs c r i.bed and sworn to before me) a Notary Public, in and for t.ho
Couat y of Fairf.ax, Stato of Virginia, this ;13 day of '-2'!~'f--­
}.!y coramLs s Lon e~pire9 ~_& %< ..!s"'~ /11'--- -i?'
, . 00409
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-
-

Bill ?~d"", \l,"'tl

;c·o.;.l .·,j ,;,,' i·;·1·:·.I.:: to .,;,,;,.::
had told h irn thatl ] at the t irne he w as In chargo:= of
narcotics rnat t o r-s for the DDP, knew Lid~y and w as priJ~)a::':ly
:·~~·ol~··d \,,:~1, I ou CO''''''';'l'''~S
['unt- -, .. ·-··,1'""" t
;~~Vth'~;Vh~t~~ r-i;Ui;:a 2.l~~~~V.:-2~~Ae; t~ n1eet~~~"'n.~~~~ r~ ~~ ~
t!.. :"lo .... •.. irue cinc .
wc r

... .
_ _~_~lund"'J:stq.n<!i.ng~t may have introduced
to Conein.
I _
.',

I Iqlleried as to what would be thj b:st, prrcedUJ:e . .

The w it r advised that we should interview
e r c c n c e r n i n g

his :-e!.a~ions with Liddy, Hunt, and Conein, an that this office
would do so.

0041.0
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

As!. .1 STRATPlii I NT!='RNh! USE ON! Y

23 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: All Employees

SUBJECT Ag enc y Involvernent in the Wa te r-gate Case

~ ::.~ ,L: .
.,
" ."- "," . . . . ., ' •• L ..

~~:.~ -~~

1. The leadership of the Agency continues to make a deter-

mined effort to investigate all aspects of Agency involvement with
the "Watergate" case or any of those persons connected with it.
The results of these investigations have been given to the appro-
priate legislative, executive, and judicial elements of the Govern-
ment investigating these rrre.ete r s , Each exnployee has been asked
and is directed to report to the Director any knowledge he or she
has of the Watergate affa i z- and related matters, any persons con-
nected with it, or any other illegal activity in which they believe
the Agency was' involved in any way.

2. In consonance with the foregoing, anyone who has had

any connection or contact wi th individuals on the attached list, or
anyone in their offices or anyone purporting to act for them or
acting pursuant to their authority, should report these contacts
fully. Activities of these and other individuals include not only the
Watergate affair, but any investigative work on the Pentagon Papers/
Ellsberg case and any contacts relating to the Executive Branch and
White House efforts to locate and stern leaks of classified informa-
tion to the press starting as early as July 1970.

3. Any work done by anyone in the Agency on any of these

subjects, or any knowledge related thereto, should be reported to
the 10 through the appropriate Deputy Director, or directly and
personally to the Director.

kB111111 STRoH I'IE I HTI!iJUHL !lS E ON' Y 0041.1.

,~ ...
--------------- MORl DoclD: l45l843

,
INTErNAl "SF (. (

4. It ~s imperative that every piece of information

bearing on these matters be reported immediately for evaluation
by the senior rnanag ement of the Agency. The public interest
requires that all information be produced and reported to our
,,,pversighl:<M;.ommittees,,,(on a clas~j.fied basis;)!,necessar;yJ so ./;';'"
that the Agency's actual role will be clariIied with respect to
various charges and speculation.

W. E. Colby
Executive Secretar:
, ' ,/ .
CIA Management Commlttee
Attachment
(

APPROVED

_~Rj~~
C..James R. SChlesinge
Director

ADMINISTRATIYE - INTERNAl "SF oN' ¥

 MORI DocID: 1451843

.,
At .Hf3T~ATlr/E Itl·rE~)I\b Uf E OW'Y'

Attachment.

H. R. Haldeman
John D. Ehrlichman
John Dean
Egil Krogh
David Young
Et"1i:oward H.i'rll ,,';;"
r-,
:,~
O. Gordon Liddy
James W. McCord
Charles W. Colson
John J. Caulfield
Eugenio Rolando Martinez Careaga
Juan Rigoberto Ruiz Villegas
Bernard L. Barker
Virgilio Gonzales
Frank Anthony Sturgis

'NfIMI£TRATIVE 'NTERNAI USE aNI y

OOl.(. 1/ b
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

./

MENORA!Jl)UM TO :;
Exflcutive eOI.'1' olitar :r
CMA ¥~nagement C~ru~ittee
SUBJ&~T
Lean of Televiei,m System to Secret Service
for Usa at De!l!01)X'atie and Republican National
Conv'3ntiolls
".....
in 19'12
. ::. ;~-...
o~ .
1. The attaehed;\suJnmary reports the loan of televisim
equip'/,lent by the Agency ta the Secret ;;ervtM for Use durIng the

Domoeratia and Republican National Convent Ions last year. The

equipment was for use in helicopter aeriel survo1l1ance, primarily f:r<

CI'OW control. The assumpi:ion is that i t was used for that purpose ,
The eqUipment vas recovered in .l\~vember 1972.

2. The transaction seems a straightforward arrangement,

.
related to tho legal responsibility of the Secrat ~ervico.

I1owever, the fact that the, AKeney proMdod th~ equipment for: usa

in a domentic political situation c~~lrt be presented in a different

light.

004:12
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

: Executive Secretary
CIA Joilnap'ement CQJJlmittee

SUBJECT Drue TestinR Program

1. The attached sum~,ary trom ORO descrIbes research

:t'i' ...

indicate that the repol'ted drug was part of a larger program

in whioh '
~ ,th" Agenoy had l."e1ation.~ ,rith com:nercial drug manufaoturers,

WhereBY they paaaed on drugs rej ected because of unfavol'ab1e eide

effects. The drugs w~e soreened with the Use of ADP equipment,

and those selected for experimentation were tested atlL- ___

IUSing monke~ end mioe. Materials

---'na"'"v"'mmog~--------~-----------
Df/further interest, as dem0!1strated by this testing, lIere then

tested at Edgewood, usinR voltulteer members of the Armed Forces.

2. The program WiS ter:nin'lted last fall. nie computer progran

remaine in the machine, its final disposition not yet ha.ving been

decided.

3. Carl Duokett emphasdaes that the program was considered

as defensl'7.6, in the sensa that we would be able" to recognize

certain behavior i f siJnilar materials were used against ArnerlcanBo

WVB

00413
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

ORD-2550-73

23 May 1973

',:~.
...~'
.. .:.,. "'~'
..~.

MEMORANDUM FOR: . Deputy Director for Science and

Technology

SUBJECT: ORD Involvement in Domestic Affairs

\ In surveying all of the people within the Office of Research

and Development in search of specific contact or knowledge of .
, . Messrs. Hunt, Krogh, Young, and Liddy, an additional incident
in which ORO supplied equipment for domestic use was uncovered.
It is attached. I have also provided the additional information you
r-equested on Pr-oject] land project/, I

I~~~-
Sayre Stevens
Director of Research and Development

Attachments:
As stated

l .
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

22 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUJ3JECT: General; The Family Jewels Sxercise

Specific: Meeting wi,th Colby This Date

-Broe and Il
met with Mr. Colby at' 1115 hours today. Colby
asked that ve ~e him with fuller infonnation on the following
items:

pt"'-6l!'b copieJi,.of cer's reports ou .!!.Ree-t-3::e13"5-¥eu+1:l 11 and Black Raaiea3:~

:p e-r-:
't> ~ ~ ¥ , -r t6~i -
.Get d"ta;l,j;:r::pil
--sub-je-c-nr:- o h;J
C1'yogaii£C04i!aSae4;Gma-t<w that is used <in unwitting
":>

lone fotte: case .

..
./ .Give ColOIY eo copy of FR Dtvlsiuu's eentl?iba-ti-en;o

.'
0041.5
 MORT DocTD: 1451843

...~ . • .
'1
" ,

f';",\.L!O!;/v,
~
~ A .'
C'~
'>!
fJ: .-
:-:
ffi ""z::
~ ....QZ
~I~~ o~

t: ~ ~
BULLETIN
,

No. 359 21 ~Iay 1973

i. -. -"'<r>

ODCi STATEf-lENT ABOUT THE N,I-\TERGP1TE CASE

The fo11 ol'ii og statement was made by Li eutenant Genen 1 If ernon ,~" Ha Iters
i. during a recent appearance before a Congressional COlWlittee .
.~"
On 23 June 1972 I was ordered by a phone message from my office
to be at the White House at about 1300 with Director Helms. I had
lunch with Mr. Helms and we went to Mr, Ehr1ichman's office at the
"Illite House. Present \1ere Nf'. Ehrlicr.;r:~!~~ ;";t. ~~~·1·j~';":"!1, :~,;-, :{·~'i.t:5
and myse l f , As I recall it, HI'. Haldeman said that the Hatergate
incident wes c<1'.I5ing trouble and was being exploited by the opposi-
tion. It had been decided at toe Hllite HO'Jse that I ,,;ould go to
Acting FaI Directo":'" Gray and tell hi'~: t':~": n0:'; that t:··~ f'!v~ ,::,I:~:".:.C'~."i
were arres tsd, Yur'Cner enquiries into the I-lexican aspects of chi.>
matter might jeopa'rdize some of the CIA's covert activities in t.hat
area. An appointment was made for me to see HI' •. Gray at 1430 tlJ~t
. same day. I \'1001; .over and told ili;n that I had been directed by top
White Houseofftc t al s to tell hlm that fu)'th~i' in'!esti,:,~.l:ic~ int·~ th~ ,
Mex'kan aspects of the Watergate episode might jeopardize some of the
Agency's covert actions in th~t area, He said that he understood the
agr.::'tment between the FBI and the >lganey regarding t.heir .sour-ces but-
th;l t thi s ':JJ, ~ CCiliP 1 i catud case, H2 v.OiJ i d not 'I i OJ a te tile agreemen.t
with CIA regal'ding sources. On my return to the Agency I 'checked to
see whether there \1aS any danger in the Agency's covert sources if
the 14ex i call part of the invest i gati on conti nued and ascerta i ned tha t
no one bel ieved that this was the case. No one had any knoHled!le of
the plan to bug the Democratic National COlr~1ittee.
On June 26 the Counsel to the President John Dean called 'me and
asked me to come and see him about the matter I had di scussed with,
Haldeman and Ehrlicl1man. He si\id I could check with Ehrlichman and
I did. He said I could talk to Dean so I went to Dean's office at
1145 on June 26.
I informed Dean that I had checked careful ly to $"~~ ;"h"ther
there was any jeopardy to the Agency's sources by a further investi-
grltion of thRfh:dc:!~ SOlP"C,?S of tri:- ;-;~.~A.''''' :~,i I.. ::,.! '~"":.:'J :;.,::;":. \·;E:.3
non€:. l.;:.~;:dl J: i 1e:<1 es 1(0:'.1 Nnether ;:l;:~ erA ,:-;-:-:t·:t have t~:!~.::;'i y.:.rt iii ti:2
U,ltergate episode without my kno',ling it. I said that this was not
00416
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,If,

" . I ... '

1='

-2-
r-

possible. I knew that the Agency had had no part in the operation
against the Democratic National Cowmittee. I therefore could not
say that further investigation would Jeopardtza Agency sources. I
felt that someone had bungled badly and that the responsible parties
should be fired. He asked, whether there was not soma way ia \'Ihich
the Agency might.have be"n involved. I said that I had checked with
.' Director Helms and was convinced it was not. Any attempt to stifle
j this investigation would destroy the effectiveness of the Agency and
th o CRT and :'\,'r'HI"~-'
' ·\"-'!';(.r~ (I .. r..~.• ,..:rtlr\:",,, ... r-.:-r's,":\yll!
:f;~~ _~11 ':S ',,/.< • • 1.\ ..... ,.... '")~0 til.:".
'.'~_ ~.',,_ ?'·:.'\~1'·;:-·~··
__ • 1 t t"'~l'lrl
.,~,I
.,- .• ,"".. • .1

r··::·.~ ',',; ~ .;':'.. i:~ f",... :. . -i- '; ':-':-:~..'3-.

Ha a~;~~J ~hltii~r I h~t! f:> 'r i ,~:;:. s .....
","

th,}~' ~:l, ..; ~.E" r",:sp{':l~';'i~11:; 5;·';'.11d ~~

Ii.';; c.

The fol1owing day I sa'..! Dean ag:<in in hi s office at his :'quest.

He again reviewed the Watergate Case saying that some witnesses were
get t ,i ng scared and were "wobhling", T ~,;<:! that no metter how scared
they got, they could not involvs CIA because it was not involv~d in
the bugging of the Haterq~te. He then asked if the CIA could not
furnish bail and pay the suspects' salades while they were in jail,
us1r:~: ;:·:n'~r't act i en fl1i":'.1S for 'i:rd s ri"I{[:C S0.
I repl ted that this was out of the question, It would implicate
the ;).gency in something in which it was not implicated. Any such
action D.]" the -Agency wou'id imply an order from the hiqh0St level and
r '".:dd :,C;'; :'~2 a ~h':~·~,Y ~c (.,'~)' S=.i;.:j'j ,~'::'~;)i:. i.t ,':0djG 08 a 'grave d i s-
service to the President ad the country and would destroy the CIA's
credibility Nith th2 Congtsss and tne people. I Houid t~e$ign rather
than do this and, if o:"':",:r:~d to do -it: : '. ~.:'.ild·~~,-;:: tc ':'2:: t;i;~ ?r'QsiJs;·,;..
to explai n the reasons for myrefusa 1. fur-thermor-e , when the Agency
e;~;::;,:d.:.d fl~nd5 ~n t:12 U.S,:> ',.;,~ had ;;) (.:!;~~rtc c{ir::) co tile O\f2tsigt1t
Committees of the Agency in Congress. He was much taken aback by thi s
and agreed that risks of iri'!}licating the CJ.1. ar:d FBI in tht s matt€r'
\'lould be enormous. r said that \':hat ~.J~O:; n.rv ~" ~\.:.dfA"·:l '."~!.'~~ cJ)lJld
becene a morta l one. ~Jhat \'iaS now ~; "conve.it.ionat explosion could be
-turned into a multi-magaton explosion". I again advised him to fire
the ~'espoI13ib'le parties.
Again Dean sent for me on the 2ath of Jl!'~e,1nd ! saw him at hi s
off lee at 1130 that dey. H~ iH~qi.i1)~e·': ~·;i·::::t;;st' I "had learned anytil'ing
more about CIA i nvo 1vement , I rep 1 ~ ~'Q ·th<:t tb.?"2 was no i nvollfe",,",,t
of the Agency in the bugging of the ;':,'l'C8i'9·}te, He then asked ~Iiiether
1 had any ideas and I said that I had none which CQuld be.helpful.
Perhaps the Cubans who were anti-Castro might have had a hand in it
but the CIA did not.
GIl July 5 I re:eiv2d a call 1.;~ ~Gti~g U!~·2c~or of th~ far Gray
sayir.r; i:h;t he coul.l f'!'"):: ~h":: . . :.Trt"-~· ; ..... ;?"~f~':":~'>-': ::;..:: :~:2 =:2.~~:::;;~
aspecus of this matter ur.Iess he hf!d a fOi'.1ial lett€H' from th~. Oirector
0:f ~y~ .~<, :"': :,..• : ~-~ .. ,. . '..: . . ", :;'... "'<. I;':;'
D';:';:':\::, !:;'-:j r 5';;;:: :i':;;; :~:t ~ "'~.1 :::l~' i"G;; ...... ,.:; .;;.}, {~ .. ,j.
 MORT DocTD: 1451843 -
...... .. 10:

"
'. ' I
r
"

, "

-3-

I told him"'that I could not tal1 him that further investigation

would jeopardize the Agency's'covert sources. I had checKed on this
and it was not so. I had ascertained that General Cushman had initially
authorized the issuance of some equipment to Howard Hunt without knowirg
its purpose other than it \'jZiS ClS I understood if, to shut off lllec.ks '
j ! .

This was 'long b'1fore the Hdtergate bugging. Since then I had caraful Iy
checked and there was no other i nvo 1vement of aliy sort by the CIA in the
operation against the ~}atergat~.. L sai.r,l",t.Mt r felt.tpat attem.?"t,;.,t~,n
CG'/~i" t:f~i:s u·: OJ'' r>,": 1 "',' ;," .,::-: :~,,-: C::\ 1:' ":.'::! :'.':';~.~ '.>:~ ~'.;;,':. !.'~ ..' ."? <:
tL::~;- ·ll:·~?;:, ..':':J ::,,,.:; ~. ,.;,;:: '.;'.{;:(: ('~.1 (>.: t\-~::-';'j\k;nt ar:c '~,,;l:":\ ce':!:.:··'I, f
~'mv'id h:::"i8. 110 ~"~:''l. ':n ,.:·.i:~ 't"': l~~ ~'!';;~:-: :_:uj~J:' p::;:;rHited t~) res';qn (,; , ':'i::
i5'~t:~ .. ' '\".: <..... : _
H':~;'i"Li . . i t:.. i:,;' '.'i~~ .~ :',;:;._; . . \ l;:-:: .;':', '.' ,_",_,:,.1• ."~.: .• ;
i.:~":'~J~i':j ct ~\'.:r ,-, ~i:.L":i·",:; :::~ •....: ;':~ ';:c::.:. ~;~:5 prt;::;:~r2Q to rcS}~;1: on :.n1-:;
issue. I geve Gray a l'fst of t!ic 1?(";i.d;';r~e!1t the ligenc.y 'Jihl glv??1 Hf.H:~:
and the account of our deaiings with the former CIA employees up to the
termination of their employment with the Agency long before the ~!atsr~,t?
epi sode , .
I saw Gray again on the 12th of July and gave him one additional
memorandum regard i ng t.he r:ont~ct fl)r'p- i shed !-!ur.t. l'!2 rs'!i T';~C t~:.:! r;~.:.·~:: ·::r
reib:::,.~ting the posi tlcn i,'~: l: .::d ;:~;'~-::;i }in:'Iiously. r
said -;:[l?tt I had t,::-:c
Dean that the best solution 'IOU 1(: b0. to "fire those responsible, GI'ay said
he had made the same recofmliendatlQ!I. Once again we a9reed that anythtno
that migl)t damage the integrity of th.:- F3I and CIA ~...ou ld be a grave d is-
$c:r"/i~e to 'l:h~ ;:r'~:3idr~r.t :F.d "'::...: :,: ,.~:.:-:;::C:r;-~ .•

In February 1973 shortly after ik. Schlesins~r beca~::2 fJ'ir<odor I

tcld him of my conversat ionswtth Ha1c!eman, Eht'lichman and [)~an. In
Febru(lry Deiln called Dr. Schlesinger 'Co see if the !,gency couid get
back from the FBI the ma tsri al it. !'.:r!. se~t to ·t~-e ~~I.:S:i·':2 ;~::-·.1r'~;.-:·:-::r~
concern i ng our con tact ~Iith Hunt. Or. Schl esi nger and r agreed tha t
this could not be done. I attempted to contact Dean but he \'las ·in
Florida. On his return! saw Dea'(j at his office on February 21 and t~ld
hir~ ~~~~t \.;~ CGu':d {tot esk tj",,::.: F2; J~0r' ~:j"Je material back. "(flat wou lo uniy
serve to
impl icate the CIA and L'coul d not and would not do it. I had
seen Acting FB! Director Gray that p.crning and to'le him of :Jean's l'eQu2st
and our refusa l , He agreed sayin9 that he could not do such a thing.
Si nce that date I have had no fur-ther contact with Dean. The abJ"2
represents my recot Iect ion of ~Ihat occurred and the dates are checked in
my appointment book.

DISTRIBUTION: ~.LL HIPLOYEES

 MORl DoclD: 1451843

"X"C
I ~
Ii"
)':
" i

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

WASHINGTON .. D,C, 20~O~

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

'. 9"May 1973

',-
'
MEMORANDUM ' ' ' ' ALL CIA EMPLOYEES
FOR

1. Recent press reports outline in detail certain alleged CIA

activities witfi respect to Mr. Howard Hunt and other parties. The
presently known facts behind these stories are those stated in the
attached draft of a statement I will be making to the Senate Committee
on Appropriations on 9 May. As can be seen, the Agency provided
limited assistance in response to a request by senior officials. The
Agency has cooperated with and made availa~le to the appropriate law
enforcement bodies information about these activities and will con-
tinue'to do so.
2. All CIA employees should understand my attitude on this
type of issue. I shall do everything in my power to confine CIA
activities to those which fall within a strict interpretation of its
legislative charter. I take this position because I am determined
that the law shall be respected and because this is the best way to
foster the legitimate, and necessary contributions we in CIA can make
to the national security of the United States .
3. I am taking several actions to implement this objective:
I have ordered all the senior operating officials of this
Agency to report to me immediately on any activities now
going on, or that have gone on in the past, which might
be construed to be outside the legislative charter of this
Agency.
I hereby direct every person presently employed by
CIA to report to me on any such activities of which he
has knowledge. I invite all ex-employees to do the same.
Anyone who has such information should call my secretary
(extension 6363) and say that he wishes to talk to me
about "activities outside CIA's charter."

ADflINI5TRYrrI'IE INTERNAl IISF ONLy

 ---------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

ADM! Ro.TI'JE HITERIMl ~3E tlllli

-4. To ensure that Agency activities are proper in the future, •

I hereby promulgate the following standing order for all CIA employees:
Any CIA employee who believes that he has received •
instructions Which in any way appear inconsistent
with the CIA legislative charter shall inform the
D.Jrector of Central .In~~lJ.igence)"diatel.Y:~.;;"'1.ili"": ,i;>~; ;":''':'~{~~!
;.t<-

~I~J~'
~~ James R. Schlesinger
Director

ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAl "Sf ONI Y

 MORl DoclD: l45l843

. .'

OCI STATEHENT
BEFORE
SENArE APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE
ON INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS

9'NAY 1973

004:1.9
 MORI DocID: 1451843

, .

OPENING STATEMENT

Mr. Chairmarr, I am here to discuss the questions which have.arisen

." over CIA's real and alleged role in events that occurred in 1971 and 1972 .
I have opened a detailed investigation into the precise nature of that role.
,'fit, I canreport to you on what..Agency records, now being intensively reviewed,
reveal at this juncture. However I do not yet know that I have all the
facts in the matter. Nonetheless, I am pleased to present to you such facts
• •
as are now available, arid I will certainly provide you with any further
details as they come to my attention.
let me start. with the Agency's relationship with Mr. Howard Hunt,
whose testimony has recently been made public. Mr. Hunt was a staff
employee of the Agency from 8 November 1949 to 30 April 1970. At that time
n~ retired from the Agency. He performed one editorial job of writing up
a recomnendatlon for an award for one of our officers. in .November 1970.
He ~IaS not paid for these services; although the Agency placed the sums of
$200.00 and $50.00 in two charitable~rganizations for. the service performed.
. .
In early July 1971,.General.Cushman, then the Deputy Director of
Central Intelligence, received a telephone call fro~ the Hhite House. He
was informed that Nr. Hunt had become a consultant on security affairs for
the Hhite House, and a request was 'made that Hr. Hunt receive assistance
from the Agency. The minutes of the Agency Morning Meeting of 8 July 1971
indicate that the DDCI (General Cushman) reported a call by John Ehrlichman
stating. that Howard Hunt had been appointed a Hhite House security consultant.
On 22 July 1971 Nr. Hunt visited Generai Cushman at the CIA building.
According to the records, Mr. Hunt stated" that he had been charged with a
'highly sensitive mission by the White House to visit and elicit information

00420
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

..
,.
"

-2-

from an individual whose ideology he was not entirely sure of, and for that "
purpose he said he was asked to come to the Agency to see ifhe could get
two things: identification documents in alias and some degree of physical
disguise, for a one-time operation. He stressed that he wanted the matter
~. '.11;" .... . • • .' - " . •• _.J:;~V> :?11
to be held as closely as possible and that he would like to meet the Agency
people in an Agency safehouse. Agency records indicate that, in, the course
of the conversation, Mr. ~unt referred to' Mr. Ehrlichman by name and General
Cushman acknowledged an earlier call from Mr. Ehrlichman to him. The
Committee may desire to query General Cushman whose knowledge would not ,.
come from such secondary sources.
General Cushman directed the appropriate technical service of the
Agency to be of assistance to Mr. 'Hunt, based on the above request. On
23 July 1971 Mr. Hunt was given alias documents, including a Social Security
card, driver's license, and several association membership cards, in the
, ,

name of "Edward Joseph Harren" simHar to material he had been furnished

for operational use while he had been an Agency employee, under the name
of "!,d\~ard V. Hamt l ton;" The same day Mr. Hunt was also given disguise
materials (a wig, glasses, and a speech alteration device).
By calling an unlisted telephone number given him, Mr. Hunt arranged
several a~ditional meetings with Agency technical, officers, the dates of which
cannot be provided with precision. In these, he requested and was provided,
a commercial tape recorder (in a typewriter case) and a commercial Tessina
camera disguised in a tobacco pouch. He also brought in a then-unidentified
associate (later identified from press photos as Mr. G. Gordon Liddy) and
secured for him a disguise (wig and glasses) and alias documents in the name
.of "George F. Leonard."

J
 -------------_...- MORl DoclD: 1451843

.
-3-

The Agency""technica1 officers met these requests despite the absence

of the procedural steps and approvals normally required by Age~cy regulations ..
However, they became increasingly concerned at the escalation of Mr. Hunt's

... , . stance , These finally included .. a

requests for.. assf
~,~ ,
request from Mr. Hunt to
be met on the morning of 27 August 1971, upon his return from California,
to have a film developed and returned to bim. This was done the same day.
·He also asked for a New YOrk mail address and telephone-answering service
for operational use.
The technical officers raised- their concern with senior officers.
who noted the possibility that these activities could involve the Agency in
operations outside it~ proper functions. As a result. again according to
Agency records, General Cushman telephoned Mr. Ehrlichman at the White House
on 27 August 1971 and explained, that further such assistance could not be
'given. Mr. Ehrlichman agreed. The request for mail address and telephone
answering service was not honored. On 31 August 1971, Mr. Hunt contacted
the technical'Qfficers again. requesting a credit card.·but this was refused.
Mr.·Hunt had also made 'a request on 18 August 1971 for the assignment of
a secretary he had known during his Agency career. This was also refused. The
earlier-furnished alias documents and other material were not recovered, however,-
except for the Tessina camera which was returned on 27 August as unsuitable.
Since the end of August 1971. the Technical Services, Division has had no
further association with Mr. Hunt. As a point of reference, I would note
that the break-in of the office of Mr. El1sberg's psychiatrist took place
on or about 3 September 1971.

00421.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-4-

The Agency ~utlined the above events to Mr. Patrick Gray,< Acting
Director of the FBI, in letters dated Sand 7 July 1972, and a meeting on
28 July 1972. A series of questions were asked the Agency on 11 October 1972
"" _" by'l:!w Earl SilbeJ;<t, princ,.~l Assista:~. Unite~ ~~tes At,~w;JJ,ey for the .
.. - - " " .' •....
District of Columbia. On 24 October 1972, Attorney General Kleindienst and
,Assistant Jll:torney General Petersen revie1ied the Sand 7' July transmittals
together with additional, more detailed but undated materials, that had 'been
provided to Acting FBI Director Gray on 18 October 1972. The Agency is<
aware that this material was reviewed on 27 November 1972 by Mr. Silbert, who
asked additional questions'on that date as well as on 29 November 1972.
Written responses to the foregoing questions were provided on 13 December 1972.
, An additional, submission was made to the Assistant Attorney'General Petersen
on 21 December 1972. This material was discussedat a meeting held with
Assistant Attorney General Petersen and Mr. Silbert on 22 December 1972.
All of the foregoing materials can be made available to the Committee if it
so desires.
As a separate matter, which was not known by those \-,ho prepared the
material for the Department of Justice in the fall of last year, the Office
~f Medical Services of the Agency prepared and forwarded to the White House
two indirect personality assessments of Mr. Daniel Ellsberg. The Agency has
had a program of producing, on a selective basis, such assessments or studies
on' foreign.'leaders for many years. In July 1971 Mr. Helms, then Director,
instructed Agency officers to work with Mr. David Young of the Hhite House
Staff relative to security leaks in the intelligence community.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843 -
• I .,

-5-

. Hr. Young requested a study on Hr. Ellsbergin the latter part of

t July 1971, which Agency activity was apparently approved by Mr. Helms.
At that time, i'lr. Young supplied ra~1 material consisting principally of
newspaper and magazine articles together with some State Department and
Justice Department papers. The fi rst assessment delivered to the Hhite House
dated 9 August 1971, was judged insufficient. As a result, there were
several meetings between pro f1a1loy, Mr. Hunt, and Mr. liddy, in which
classified information of the Justice and State Departments was introduced.
One such meeting occurred on 12 August 1971. Additional material ~~s

transmitted by Mr. Hunt on 12 October, and another meeting was held on

27 October.
" . These meetings led to a second version of the assessment, ~

dated 9 November 1971. This document was delivered to the Executive Office
by Dr.,Malloy on 12 November 1971. Agency records 'indicate that Mr. Helms
had previously communicated with Mr. Young indicating he had read both
reports.
~
In another contact "about October 1971," an Agency officer arranged
to provide Mr. Hunt certain unclassified materials from CIA files relative
to a 1954 French case of leakage of Government documents. These were
delivered to'his office at the White House.
In closing, I would like to stress several conclusions of my
investigation so far:
a. CIA had no awareness of the details of Mr. Hunt's
activities. The Agency's impression was that Mr; Hunt was engaged
in an activity related to identifying and closing off the security
leaks that were so much a preoccupation of the GQvernment at the time.
00422
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

....
,

-6-

b. The Agency clearly was insufficiently cautious in the

initiation of its assistance to ~Ir. Hunt. later, when the nature of
Mr. Hunt's requests for assistance began to indicate a possible active
involvement by the Agency'in activities beyond its charter, the
Agency terminated the relationship and refused further assistance.
c. The preparation of a profile on an American citizen under
these circumstances lies beyond the normal activity of the Agency.
~

It shall not be repeated -- and I have so instructed the staff. This

shall be made a part of the regulations governing such activities.
d. As Director, I have called for' a review of all Agency
activities and the termination of any which might be considered
outside its legitimate charter. In addition"to requesting this
review from my sUbordinates, I have directed each employee and invited
each ex-employee to submit to me any cases which theY may question.
I am determined that the Agency will not engage in activities outside
of its ~arter but will concentrate its energies on its important
intelligence mission.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

t r (~
......

8 May 1973

DCI:

Sy Hersh's provocative teaser for the day:

"I have information that Cushman
knew exac t Iy what he was okaying when he I
--~~aut~tentioned
'g ave approval to assist Hunt ..• "

__ Sy H. again to the
statement 'e had given to the Times already,
,C 0 im I "noted" what he had to say
I
i
today.
He has calls in for you, Hous t onj
and Colby. I
))T I
I
. AMT

I
eCI.OGe
('If'
'lJ*. Coll>}:-
I
I
I
[
I·
I
!

u· ..•.... .,..,p_
.~ ~"","-"-

00423
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

t :
•

,.

, "
RESPONSE TO PRESS INQUIRIES CONCERNING MR. HUNT'S

GRAND JURY TESTIMONY

THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY HAD N9

ADVANCE NOTICE OF ANY SORT WHATSOEVER OF THE

BREAK IN BY MR:' HUNT OF THE; OFFICE OF MR:

ELLSBERG'S PSYCHIATRIST OR OF THE WATERGATE

INCIDENT:" THE NEWSPAPER REPORTS OF THESE TWO

EVENTS WERE THE FIRST NOTICE TO ANYONE IN THE

AGENCY:" ALL AGENCY INFORMATION ON OJ R CONTACTS

WITH ANY PERSONS INVOLVED IN THESE INCIDENTS HAS

BEEN REPORTED FULLY TO THE DEPARTMENT Ol!- JUSTICE,"

AND AS INVESTIGATION OF THESE MATTERS IS IN THE HANDS

OF THE COURTS AND THE GRAND JURY, ALLINQUrnIES

SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE:

"

00424
 -
MORl poclD: 1451843

8 May 1913

MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary, CrA Management COlIllIlittae

SUBJECT: Potentially Embarrassing Agency Activities

The Office of the InspectDr General has records on the

1'ollD;ring sensitive subjects tbat either have been or might in
the" future be tbe source of embarrassment to tbe Agency.

The report of the Board of Inquiry in the case of Han~ To:rte.

The To:rte affair ;ras fully exposed in pub.H c , of course, but
the report itself is e.LoseLy be1d w:i:thin the Agency. This
office ;,as designated as the' custodian of the report, and we
have the onlY·S1.1rviving CDPY.

An annex to the Izispector- General's "report D1' survey D1' the

Technical Services Di visiDn done in 1963. The annex deals
;ritb experiments in influencing human behavior thrDugh the
administratiDn oJ: mind or persDnality a;Ltering drugs to
un1<itting subjects.

An InspectDr General repDrt D1' investigation of a11egatiDns

that the Agency vas instrumental in bringing about; the
assassination of President Diem. The allegations ;rere
determined tD be 1<itbout foundation. "

An Inspector General report of investigatiDn D1' al1egatiDns

that the Agency was instrumental in bringing about the
assassination of President Trujillo. The investigation
disclosed quite extensive Agency invDlveme~t ;,ith the
plotters.

An InspectDr General report of investigation of allegatiDns

that the Agency conspfred to assassinate Fidel castro. The
story first appeared in Drew Pearson I s column and has since
appeared in Jack Anderson's column. \"1bile the columns
contained many :factual errors, the allegatiDns are basically
true.

00425
 MORI DocID: 1451843

Page 1 SDS and other student activillt groups

OCI produced in December 1967 at Ua1t Rostow's request a

30~page t;y:pescript lltudy of the SDS and its foreign ties.

In the sumn:er of 1968 OCI produced-o-agat.n at Rostmr'g requeab-»

" paper on Restless Youth. The first, and most sensitive section,
, "Wa's a phi'll1:>S"<!iphical· ti:ei:it'ment of' student unrelit, its m()j;i~tion,
history, and tactics. It drew heavily on overt literature' and
FBI reporting on SDS and affiliated groups. The second section
cOmprised 19 chapters on foreign student dissidence.

Pages 11 & 12 Black radicalism

OCI began following Caribbean black radicalism in earnest in

1968. Two papers uere produced on the subject, one in August 1969
aud the other in June 1970.

OCI was asked in June 1970 to urite a memo with special

attention to links between black l'Eldicalism ill' the Caribbean and
advocates of black power in the US. The memo was produced in
t;y:pescript and given to the DCI.

OCI in 1968 wrote :Periodic ty:pescript memos on Stokely

Carmichael's travels abroad dur-Ing a period whell he had dropped
from PUblic view. .

00426
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

........... ".- .~,-- ~_

~
.. .
...: ~ _~---_. __ .--_.-.
..:..~ ..::,;: _.- ........:-.-~~ .

" (,
(

Page 23 hobibition againat CCNIllT vs ~ US citbens

In September 1972 I
tests at certain RF lorl-g-w:scance c
J = o to collduat hearabill:ty
ercial telephone cirauits '
circuits carried drug-
I
•
between the US anr=d,--S::.0:cu:c~::::..cAm=e:.:ri:.::..::ca=-. ---==---"'=c:.::..::-'-'-_=::..c.:c....:::::..::::"-_
T'ne _--,
re1f.lted traffic.

was no
1Iere,i~1. . '

: .~. :~".~. " .. '.

"
,lie conduct an intercept opera,r-=t"'io=:n=--.:,in= --L====---,
tergeted' ' "
"

"....
'on radio tele hone conversations ::.
.,;~'.
e' "

:.:' : •.t· :: .
t' ~

Testing in the US of ORD-developed electronic collection

systems occnsion1!U:r result in the collection or domestic telephone
conversations. When the tests are canplete.. ~e intercepted
lllaterial is destroyed. '

CIa. r
)echn1cMns conducted tests in~e Miami ares in
August :r.9(X or'IIF' gear il:rtended f~r use against a Sartel: agent :I.n
South Vietnam. Wb:lle l1hoUy innocuous, the tests preceded the
holding ot the conventions there lind could be construed as
being :sGmeha/:'related
: . to them.
, ,

In Fe~ry' 1972 CIA asked, an official of AT&T :t'or cop:l.<:s of

telephone call slips relating to US-Chima' calls. The operation
lasted -:for three or four months and then dr:l.ed up. CGC stated its
belief that the collect:l.on of these 'slips did not violate the .. '.
CC!mlUI11ca.-::iOIls'.(Ic't since eavesdropping was not inVOlved.
v-
Page 29 Mail coverage "
\\~
\, \
-- ,,:
Since 1953, CIA bas operated a maii intarcept programot
, incOlIiing and outgo:tng Russian lllail and, at various times, other
selected ma:tl at Kennedy Airport :tn Irew York City. This prog:ram
is now do=nt pend:tng decision on .'hether to continue or to
abolish it.

'"
/)J\~
, ,
-,
" .: 'QQ4Z7
I': i

I' <,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

CO~IPIB13HYIAL

8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. W. E. Colby

Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee

FROM Director, National Estlmates

SUBJECT Co~n)ents on Proposed DCI Statement (Hunt Case)

Since you are aware that 1 have no facts bearing on the case, I
.'take it tliat you asked fQr comment from the following point of view;
w111 the proposed statement be well received by the committee?

The main questions in the committee's mind will be: Did CIA
'cooperate wittingly in activities which were both illegal and outside its
charter? Or did it only respond supinely to higher authority even though
it had some reason for suspecting illegal conduct?

"
Tactically, I think there would be advantage in coming to grips
frankly with these questions in the statement itself. The text in its
present form could be taken as a minimum factual response which doesn't
quite get at the heart of the matter. I think it preferable, in the interest
of the Agency 's reputation on the Hill, to proceed to candor directly rather
-than to be drawn to it by subsequent questioning.

Key follow-up questions which can be anticipated would include

".the following:

Why is there no record of the initial Ehrlichman-Cushman contact?

If Cushman recorded the conversation with Hunt, was he not already

suspicious of the latter's purpose and why didn't he ask? At a
minimum, could he not have inquired Whether "the individual whose
ideology we aren't entirely sure of" was an American citizen?

00428 •

T
 MORl DoclD: 1452843

· .
e6 If FIB E H TIt- :r.

When Cushman told Ehrllchman on 27 August 1971 that -CIA was

suspending support to Hunt, was it only on the ground that the
latter had become "too demanding"?

Why was the personality study on Ellsberg provided when it

was obvious that this action transgressed the Agency's charter?

Obviously most questions which will be raised can only he answered

hy Helms and Cushman personaily• Nevertheless, I think the DCI would be
well advised to provide a candid evaluation of these proceedings in his. initial
- - statement. To do so voluntarily would make more persuasive the assurances
the Committee will want that nothing of the sort will be done under his
direction of the Agency.

-I
:J..II
JQliI}IJ1n~enga .
\'Y ---.

00429
- 2-
CONfiIBEUTIQ T
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

1 . ',.
~.. .... , ". ---:. ~ ........
-: : , ,:
iJhll',d .i1

MEMORANDUM FOR ALL CIA EMPLOYEES

,vt"'i- f /
1. Recent press reports implicate CIA in certain il~ .
' .
I
activities allegedly committed in the United States. Without going

into the details of these allegations i' I can assure' you that I intend

to cooperate fully with the various law enforcement and Congressional

investigations of these matters.

2. All CIA employees. should understand my attitude toward

matters of this sort. I shall do everything in my power to confine

CIA activities to those which fall within the strictest interpretation

of its legislative charter. I take this position because I am determined

that the law shall be r-espected and because this is the best way to

foster the legitimate and necessary contributions we in CIA can make

to the national security of the United States.

3. I am taking several actions to implement this objective:

I have ordered all the senior operating officials of

this Agency to report to me immediately on any

activities now going on, or that have gone on in the

past, which might be construed by reasonable people

to be outside the legislative charter of this Agency.

00430
CIA HF£EHI!fAIs UiiiF aNI y
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

Gift IN'£ERffAL,,T:fSE Ctal' 7f

.'
,I
I hereby order every person presently employed by

CIA to report to me directly on any such activities

of which he has knowledge. I invite all ex-employees

to do the same. - Anyone who has such information shall

call my secretary (extension 6363) and say that he wishes

to talk to me about "questionable CIA activities".

I intend to name a highly respected person from outside

the Government to review, investigate, and prepare

reports for me on any apparent violations of the CIA

legislative charter which are 'brought to his attention

or may be uncovered on his own initiative. I shall give

this person complete and unrestricted access to all

records and per-sons in the Agency.

•
4. To insure that Agency activities are proper in the future; I

hereby promulgate the following standing order for all CIA employees:

Any CIA employee who believes that he has

received instructions which in any way appear

inconsistent with the CIA legislative charter shall

inform the Di.rector- of Central Intelligence immediately.

James R. Schlesinger
Director

0043:1
 MORI DocID: 1451843

Retirement Information - E. Howard Hunt

1. Date of retirement: 30 April 1970

2. System: CIA Retirement and Disability System

3. Grade and salary at time of retirement: GS-15 , Step 8' - $28,226

4. Creditable civilian service used in computing annuity:

17 May 1948 to 8 June 1948 - Economic Cooperation Administration
9 June 1948 to 19 Februa~ 1949 - State (ECA)
8 November 1949 to 30 April 1970 - CIA

s. Armuity:
At retirement - $1,020 per month
At present - $1,181 per month (which includes cost-of-living
increases since date of retire~ent)

6.' At the time of retirement ~fr. Hunt did not elect survivorship benefits.
This meant that upon his death, his wife would not draw a survivorship
allflUity.· By letter of 5 April 1971 he raised the question of changing
his election but was' informed by the General Counsel on 6 ~lay 1971 that
.tlii'-s 'could not be done. By letter 'aated 5 May 1972 Mr. Hunt asked Mr..

Houston.to raise with the Director the possibility of being recalled to

duty for a short period of time, after. which he could retire again and
elect survivorship benefits. By letter of 16 ~lay 1972 fu. Houston advised
Mr. Hunt that to call him back to duty solely for the purpose of permitting
him to change survivorship benefits would be in violation of the spirit of
the CIA Retirement Act.

00432.
 MORI DocID: 1451843

." :'.
,,-
Sl;:NOER-WILL. CHECK CLASSIFICATION TOP ANa BOTTOM
I I I I -'
'-:
I UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET
?

OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP "

TO NAME AND ADDRESS DAn: INITJoAls

.. •
., " '

,1
Inspector General 1571-5:
, t>
II? ~.. .".

3 'j
";.,
. '. ..~~~_ .. ,

" .. ' ~"

, ,
:
5
I
•
6 I
ACTION DIRECl REPLY PREPARE REPLY ~
'.
'~.
APPROVAL DISPATCN RECOMMENDATION
COMMENT FILE RETURN
CONCURRENCE INFORMATION SIGNATURE
.
.
~.

..' :.
Remarks. "

, Attached in, chronological order is that

which MAG has produced and papers related
".:' .,:.
to Management's reac~':>n thereto on :MAG's
concern re domestic activities. It is provided
for your review and conunent to Mr, Colby,
This is our file copy and t would hope it could
" be retrieved if required,

, ,
:
"

"
.. • J
,

./7 .. ;
!
I
FOLD HERE "1'6. .RETURN T9 SENDER i
"
FROM: N,Il,ME. AC01.RSS AND PHON'e NO. O-'l,TE

......;:;;1-' • .~;
• O/ES/CIA MClBen Evans I I 18Mav73
.. :
,
I UNCLASSIFIED I 'I <:ONFID , I SECRET ~

,o~:o.
..
237 Un previous edit/anI (040) "

. : ....
.. .' ' .
•. , -. .. "

... :
"

•
, ..... ., '.
r
"

• .... C
"
. : ~~ .' ,.'..
. .. ",
" " ,
....•.
,
'
'
: ....
~ ~.~.~ "
,

~ ,

p.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,-_..... ... ,.~.~ _,... '"'::~__.s.::.:...: . . . .:',,:: '.~'

,.
(
-,

DIARY NOTES

Executive DirE.ctor-comPtroller~ 4.ranuary 1972

1. I met with the outgoing and Incoming MAG Cochairmen. We

discussed a number of topics but concentrated particularly on their
two most recent memoranda·concerning domestic activities. I ex-
pressed slight irritation with their second memorandum, which is a
shotgun approach to the problem, and asked them to be specific if
they have anything in mind. I said I understand they have heard that
we sent a surveillance team to the Democratic National Convention.
Mr., . Isaid that-he made this statement because an Office
of Security employee' reported in his presence that he personally was
a member of a team which went to the Convention.' (I subsequently
raised this with Howard Osborn, who after investigating reported back
that the Secret Servil;:e asked us for two technicians during the Demo-
cratic National Convention. These technicians were formally detailed
to the Sec.ret Service and went to Chicago, where they did RF monitor-
ing under the superVIsion of the Secret Service. The Secret Service
apparently calls RF monitoring "audio suzvetf.lanc e , II· and it seems that,
during the discussion whichtcok place at the Senior Seminar, those who
heard this assumed that "surveillance" meant actual surveillance of the
candidates, when actually the meeting rooms were' being checked to
ensure they had not been bugged. I have reported all this to the Director
and shall discuss it with MAG when I have dinp.er with the m on 11 January.)
---_ .
: ..
.,

... : ,
-r,

~ "'",

00434.

"
 MORl DoclD, 1451843

ab" • _. ? I, I t

.,

23 December 1971

MEMORANDUM FOR: The Executive Director-Comptroller

SUBJECT : CIA's ·Domestic Activities ,
REFERENCE : MAG Memoranda on same subject dated
March 1971 and November 1971 .

As requested, MAG met with the DDP on 21 December and

discussed with him the referenced memoranda on CIA's covert
domestic activities. Our.exchange consisted primarily of .
the DDP responding to the MAG memoranda as they related.to.
activities of the Clandestine Service alone. The DDP made
it clear that he spoke only for his Service. Since MAG's
initial concern over covert domestic activities extended to,
while not being restricted to, the Clandestine Service,
it recommends that the .referenced memoranda be also .brought
to the attention of appropriate senior officials in other
Agency components.
i
-I
i
The Management· Advisory Group

00435
 MORI DocID: 1451843

U USE ONLY
~'.-
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJ'1cr, (Oplianall

FROM. IXTENSION NO.

DDP 0...
22 Dec 71
TOl to'ffiear dui9notio." r/)(lm numbar, C1nd. DATE
building) OFFICER'S COMMENTS IN"mb'::_!!"~~ to ,hOW' ('om who..
INlTlALS to wh~ a ~no cetos'S mn ofr",.oddJ cornmlll\lJ
kECfIVEO fORW.AADE[)

)
1.
-I.
Executive Director
/" BY HAND
2.

3.

4.
17 -
.
-

5.
/
6.
.
7.

B.
,
' -
.
9. "
. -
10.
.
11.
0.' " .: , . .

12. , . , . "

13.

14.
-
- 00436
.
fORM
3-62 E3 EQIIFIBEtlTlAL o HHERHAl
USE OlllY o UNCLASSIFIED
..
 ---------------- MORl DoclD: 2451843

i
j
'I ~.
"

" , .
t
!
I 21 December 1971

.lv£EMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director-Comptroller

SUBJECT: Meeting with lvrAG Group

I
1. I met with the MAG group this morning for little over
an hour, and I set forth as candidly as possible those counter-
intelligence and counterespionage responsibilities of ours ove r s ea s
which make it mandatory for us occasionally to take an interest in

j American citizens overseas. I explained the r equd r erne nts placed

on us by the Department of J'us ti ce for over s ea s checks, and also
I the fact that our normal oversea's operations against Soviets and
I
.I others some times produce leads, to Americans in conspiratorial
contact with our Communist targets.

1• 2. I was asked about our having sent Agency representatives

'j to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in 1968 and I
explained that I never hear.... of such a thing and did not believe it.
I I pointed out that, as they knew, the press had reported fully on the
Agency I?articipation at the beginning of the 'sky marshalling program
and I assumed they saw nothing wrong with this. They agreed. I
also pointed out that, at President Kennedy's funeral, with scores
of important foreign personalities here, the Agency lent some assistance
to the Secret Service, and here again the group understood that this
was a legitimate function.

3. The group made it clear that their concern was over the
Agency image if the g eneral public were aware that some of our
activities, 'wherever they took place, were targeted against Blacks.
I said that we did not target against Americans of any color in this
country, and that the 'Clandestine Service was color blind when it
came to carrying out its overseas .CI, respunsibilities and it would
continue to be so.

~
~" ....~-."
\,~t.j':
t,;
';
.1 .... 00437
------
 MORl DoclD: 1~51843

, .. .
~
'. >
•

4. . I agreed that the Director should be asked to speak a

little more fully and clearly on whether we "target against American
citizens" so that there is no am'biguity.

5. I told the group tha-t we must expect all kinds of irrespon-

sible accusations in the press, ,such as the one in the January 1972
issue of RAMPARTS magazine in which Bob Kiley and Drex Godfrey,
it is suggested, are still in the "lmploy of CIA working on a' crz,
plan to improve police organizations in this country. I said that this,
was palpably false as anyone who knows Kiley and Godfrey would .
understand. The group mentioned Dick Ober's unit and said that
there was a lot of scuttlebutt that the purpose of this unit was to keep
book on Black Power adheren!"£". I denied this saying that our interest
was as I had explained it previously.

6. I do not know whether this is a fair as sumption, but

Dick Ober's machine program is 'not handled in the Clandestine Service
and it is possible that someone is misreading and misinterpre~ingthe
intent of Ober's program from fragmentary bits and pieces that may'
be discernible from the handling of the machine program. I do not
state this as a fact because I have not examined it that closely.

7. I told the group that: I had offered to enlighten it candidly

on what We do so that they v "ju1d at least have the facts and I said
that I assume you would take it :from here;

TlH~ ~.
Thomas H. Karamessines
.:::-:-.
Deputy Director for Plans

00438
..
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

"

JJEMORANDUM FUR: The Director

THROUGH: The Execut~ve Director-Cbmptroller
SUBJECT: CIA's Domestic Activities
REFERENCE: MAG Memorandum, "CIA's Domestic Activities,"
March 1971

1-. MAG is seriously concerned about possible reper-

cussions which may arise as the result of CIA's covert
,domestic activities •. Public revelation that CIA has become
involved in collecting infonmation on U.S. citizens would
likely redound to the Agency's ·discredit and jeopardize
overall Agency programs;
2. MAG first expressed its concern-about' CIA's covert
domestic activities in a memo for the DCI, transmitted
through.the Executive Director-Comptroller in the Spring
of 1971 (Attachment A). 'MAG's concern has increas~d
recently because of such ar1::il.c,le!S 'as Vic lfarchett,i' s UPI
interview (Attachment 'B). and the 10 October New York Times
article concerning rupture 0:£ FBI-CIA relatiOiiS""(Attachment
C). Both hint at extremely sensitive Agency involvement in
domestic activities. ,Additionally, 'the DCI.addresses to
the American Society of Newspaper Editors (Attachment D)
and to the CIA Annual Awards ceremony (Attachment E) make
rather categorical denials OI Agency covert targeting on
U.S. citizens. Agency'employees aware of the various
sensitive operations in question know that there is,
qualify"ing language explaining CIA involvement. However,
lfAG believes that in the event of an expose, ·such esoteric
'qualifiers will be lost on the American public and that
there is probably nothing the Agency could say to alleviate
a negative reaction from 'Congress and the U.S. ,pUblic. It
15 MAG's fear that ~uch a negative reaction.could seriously
damage our Chngressional relations, effect our ,work against
priority foreign targets and have significant impact on the
viability of CIA. '
,"
3. There are indications that the Agency, in responding
to'CE/eI requirements, is collecting information on selected

,00439
---,---_. .. _.-.
,"

...
 MORl DocID: l45l843

,,
"

7't)~l
.1..
" ,

U.S. citizen; both at home and abroad. In operational areas

which are highly sensitive and potentially explosive (e.g.,
domestic radical or racial groups) this Agency must carefully
weigh the needs and pressures for collecting and maintaining
this information against the risk and impac~ of revelation "
should the operation become compromised or public knowledge.
We therefore urge that all domestic collection and action
programs be severely reviewed so that only those be continued
which are of the highest priority and which absolutely cannot
be undertaken by domestic agencies. CIA should not take on
requirements.of this type by default.
4. Not all of the members of MAG are privy to CIA's
direct or indirect involvement in domestic activities. Those
who are aware probably know only parts of the whole picture.
But our increasing concern and our intense interest in
maximizing the Agency's abi1ity to do its proper job, impel
us to bring our "serious apprehensions to your
,
attention. .
"

,THE MANAGE1IENT ADVISORY GROUP

"
": ~ .".

" "
-:

.....
, ,

..
"

" ,

, "

. . ,. .
'

. .," .,
• ".l.
~ . ,.
2 .. '"::.

00440
 MORI DoclD: 1451843

..\
Attachments B, C, D anq E
. . .
'Attachment J - Vic Marchetti's UPI Interview, from U.S. News
ana-Wor1d Report, II October 1971:
- -
. , .. '~Fear.ing: .today .that. .the .CIA may already have begun
going against the eI)emy wi.thin '. .t ha..Unit.e,d. St.ates as they
I
may. conc.eive .it.,...-ctha.t. .is.,.. .d issident student groups and
civil-rights organizations ••• "
"Because the men of the Agency are superpatriots, he
said, it is only natural for them to view violent protest
and dissidence as a major threat to the nation •.. ~he inbred
CIA reaction,. he. said,..w,ould .be..t.o. .Launch a clandestine
. operation to infiltrate dissident groups.
That, said Marchetti, may already have started to
happen.
'I don't have very much to go on,' he said. 'Just bits
and pieces that indicate the U.S. intelligence community is
already targeting on groups in this country that they.feer-to
be subversive.
'I know this was being discussed in the halls of the CIA,
and that there were a l't of people who felt this should be
done.' "
Attachment C - New York Times, 10 October, '.'FBI-CIA Relations:"
.~'Information generally exchanged .bet.w.een ~he FBI. and the
CIA might concern such subjects as offic.ers of ..t he .Black ...
Panther party traveling overseas ••• and American youngsters
cutting sugar cane in Cuba."
Attachment D ,.. DCI Address to the American Society of Newspaper
Editors;
"And may I emphasize at this point that the statute
specifically forbids the Central Intelligence Agency to have
any police, subpoena, or law-enforcement powers, or any
domestic se~urity functions. I can dssure you that except
for the normal responsibilities for protecting the physical
sec~rity or our own personnel, our facilities, and our
claSsified information, we do not have any such powers and
functionj we have never sought any; we do not exercise any.
In short, we do not target on American' citizens."

00441.
.- ---_._;.." -_.. .... ,,-._-
~ " .
.. ..- ~ ...
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. .- •.. \
-.

,
Attachment E - DCI Address to CIA Annual Awards Ceremony:
"1 gave a talk to the American Society of Newspaper
Editors last' winter, as you know, and I did it for only one
. purpose. Th~~ was to try and put in the record a few of these
denials that we've all wanted to see put in the public record
for some time. And you can rely on those denials. They're
true, and you can use that as any text that you may need to
demonstra.te. .that .w.e.'.r.e.. no.t. .in .the. dr.ug .tr.ai.fic., .and that
we're not..tr.y.ing to do espionage on American citizens in the
-, Unhed States. II

-, / ,. •

j .r

I
-1 :.

Ii ,
,:," ...

'.

0044Z
.----- r--0' . 0"" ,.,
"",-
".
 MORI DocID: 1451843

I ,~ ,. '.(
'0 \- .'''._
+
25 March ~971
I
I
,
. "
'I
-v.:
j

.,
-: -.\ .
'nffiO'J(;l-I :
'.' ."
,.
, SUlJJECT ..,
WIG is concerned tho';:; CIA avoid 1nvolt";Jr;;:1l,"v 1n tIl<! om-rent
C:tpODO or the (]o~5'~!Q in~1l1~1l~ cct1v1.ticll of t2~ ,A."-'..r!/ and
H~ b::;liev.~ t~t t..lJcl~~ C,;,.~ eli\.
. othel" "fel1c.l:a.1. nzenc·lc3. .
.activittes s1r,:d1.e.r to tho.:=.;:] turr l;j"el~ -CCl~r:.iny il~C:l cou.ltl
~nt ct:ib<l.rrasG~nt ..~ \ib Jl!'~\)nc'J"
.. eauso C""- u 01
U:!ccu.ao ~h;::.lu
J
~\..oc.z
...
to
. . cJ:caed tho'scapo o'Z the CLtl C}10r-~~. ~p~ ZO~ ~ Aeo~:r'o
",' statuto;ry Cr:./CI l:'€lSpoll':l'lbilit:tO:J. Jo".i!,G OP-p:JSall ,0..."7 ,!10~:;
i act.ivity which could be con~:rt~..:,:)a as ttU."~\:d o.(;:2~...at a:a:! por-
I 'P • son 'Who enjoys the .P:;.<Otcc"~ion cft tr.:t US C~13tittr~:!CJ."1. -- , .
,! 'IIhcthor or no~ he :reo1dea m 'i;3o li<1i~d Sto:'1lO0. E;-.cO);i~,in' ,
;. I
I , t.',03G callas cJ.eorly J.'Olate:!. to n:;'i;:!,on:U. G=ity. r..o US
, c:1t:t~cn sho'.LI.9- 00 tho ob.,cou c:? CIA OPOt'O~-:tCl19. l-To t'cclt!:O
I
! tho!; on ccceeton tho Jlscncy 'tim (iC'J'Ulop fm'o~~"::\;1cn 01:04";;
i SOr09 citi::c!n '",ho is ()!!~Il ill cc"(;:lvitioB in'Laical. 't~ too
-j !
l , interests of: 't!P Unit:::f S'~:t. Su.c..":1 infortz.:::l.",ic;} C~,,"l qu1olt!J"
, I l~ tUl"':'~ ove~ to "~ha pl"o~r C!&3l1C~05 o~ €pv'"a~Ii'~ '£O~ flJ.?-
, !
t~er n(ltton~ even 11: So'/: IllOa::lO tUu'l; co=tiroa on occ;on1;:!,~
i
home--ol'iom:ad nzerlcy may b nol::Jd to ,psI.-i'= in 0 llmttcd op- I

erllttolla.l cll!?=1'1:.y OVO~·3CM. I,

:r:e t~e
do not puroua suell Q 00"....;'00 ~ <ma' day ~ pu?;>l1c "
I'! '
end the 'Cono;ro.s5 ",il1c:a~ 'to have (;l'OVU oau'l;l;s obou:';; cw,"l'Olo \ '
in (;OVCJ:'ll:,1Ont~ arrl ,.my lJovc:;;;JIy NlT.:,d.at C1ll" obU1t7 to pCl"-
tort I thoso to'll,,, p.-olPl-1y =<li~d 'to CIA.
,
,
""
'-"

SEClli:,'X/SEl':SI'!'
:t'
" '
'".':.. )1
,
L
I

:. :..":.. ; .

",
.. !
:..~ :
,
..
••ro, • •

to :.,' ~

i 00443.'
",~,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-, " Ie (
.,
'
"
'. ' .

21 j\PR 1912

ME.:vroR.!\NDUM FOR: Depubf Db:aclor lOA Intellizencs

Deputy Diredor for Plans
Deputy Di.:ractar £01' Sttpport
De;uty Director £o:r Science and Xechnolo,gy
Hea,h ot ind"penden1: Offices

(For Distribution to ome"/Division Chief

L"v~l Only)
~ , . .
SUBJECT : CLI\. ~'1..ctivitias in !:he Unit..d States

1. Fro= tbna to t:i:ma S . = e of 0lU' employees express cOlJ<:ern. over

various alhgatioJ:1s or :rumors of CI.'I.. activities b 1:>'l.a United States. Tile
attached =-e=o:ra.nd= is designed to clarL'Y this subject 8-0 thatllU?"r-
-;isor", can aul:horita.tiV'~lyreply to any employa<>s ind,icatU1.g such conea=.
It is 3. state=ent of the facts 01 the siJ:ua!:ion. Ii incidents or activities are
reponed wbich app.aar to ~o.n:flict w.tfu this' st:Lt:a~',. they ~hould be :ra-
por~ed to appropria-ta.senior aUth.ority lor :;:esolution (or correction if un-
authorized aeti'Vi!:i..s· r.night have occurred). " . '

2. Because of the" pos'sible 3=sitivi!:'.! oX-this dailc:dption ox ilie

Agency's m.ethcdology~ this m~=r=d=is not being given the usual broad
clrcula.iion 0.£ ilia "FYI -- Al.lagation3 and AnsWers" se'des. Ollice and
DivLlion Chie!s are urgad, :however. to usa it to Worm Branch Chief" so
tha.t its pOints can be ~ea.di.ly,available to supemso:rs to ~eact' to expres:-
ai ona of e=ployee C011~am. . '

w,E. Colby'
E:;:e-eudve Director-Co=ptroller

At'"..ach=ent

wEcll
Distr~n:
o DDI .
1 Each Other Addressee:
DDP D/DCI/IC' A/DCI (Thue.rrner}
DDS n!PPB SA VA
DDS£<T ONE USIa Secretary
aGe OLC IG
1
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

;... :~.;,
. ;' j
. .: v .....· ~_""

(
.
< ....
~ "
. p •

ALLEG'\TION:

L'1 a va.riety of ways it has been alleged that CIA is working within
the United States, with particular attention to,e::d:remist groups.

FACTS:

1. Section 102 of the National Security Act of 1947, subparagraph

D3, states, liThe Agency shall have no police, 'subpoena, law-eniorcement
powers; or internal Steurity functions." .'

In his speech to the American Society of Newspaper Editors on

14 April 1971. tha Director stated:

"l can assure you that excapt for the no=! responsibilitias'
for protec~g the physical 'securi~ of our own personnel; our
facilities, and our classified inio:;:m.a.tion, we do not have any
auch powers and functionsj we have never sought ~ny; we do not
exercise any. In short,. we do not target on Arile:rican dHzens."

In the Dire;ccor l s t1S1:a.te of ina Agancy1J speech to employeea on

.17 Septel'Ilbe,r. 1971, he sa.id: .

"I gave a talk to the AIneri= Society of Newspauer Editors

• •
last winter. as you know, and I did it for' only one purpos e, That
was to try and put in the record a few of these denials that we've
all wanted to see put in the publie record for some time. And
you can rely on those denials. They're true, and you can use
that as any text that you = y need to demonstra.te that we're noj
in the drug traffic. and that we're not trying to do espionage on
AmezIcan citizens in the United Sb.te3~ and we're not tapuL7lf1
• _.. 0

telephone lines, and that we're not doing a lot of other things
which we're accused of doing. One of the things that tends to
perpetuate some of these silly ideas are jokes t..~at a:;."e rnade
about the=. particularly about dom-estie. espionage. Although
the jokes have no ba ai s in fa ct they neverthela33 give us a, nama
which we don't de s eeve, I don't say that that rnakes all tl--.-a.t much
diff~rence, but it does ~ke some differenca,: and this tends to
spill over, so I would like to suggest that if you have it in your
hearts to do-ao that you speak up when the occasion arises and
try and set the fa.ct~ straight. II

00445
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

" . '
,J.. .
" 'j~l:j'
t........

•
J
(
'"

2. From ti=a to r;..=e aozne e:mployees have been concerned that

.A;:s~:ncy activities mlght: conOid: vrith th.esa at.ataments... They can be
a s sur-ed fhai: Agency activli:i:as do no~ For cla.rific3.ll01l? some a cti:vi. tie a
~vhicb m:a.y have bean subject to ~SU!lda:t:3tandin.gare listed as follows;
-,
a, Do=~,..!:ic Contact". The Dome"tic Conb.ct Service
establishes discreet but overt ralationshipa "\mt..~·.Arn,ericanpri-
~l?t~ citizen,:" cODXalercial3" acad.em.ie and other organizatfons
and reslde:u:- allena for the pu.:rposes of collecting on a voluntary
basis foreign ln~e11igenc", iniorrr'-ation OJ:' soliciting fueir coopera-
tion in asslating the Agency to perloot"""" its mission. oversaas.
Records of the ih.dividuah and o2'ganizations cooperating with the
Agency are =a.intain-a4 as a necessary practical el==t o£ this:
procesa.

b. Security Investigations." SeCtU"ity investigations are con~

duceed on prospective e=plo~es, contractor", and consultants,".
and on se.cu.rity p:robiem3 which arise, These investiga.tions in-
vol..-e a wide :ta1'..ga of investigative pzccedus-ea; inc1ui!ing neighbor-
hood inquiries, checks with othe.:l." ·Gove:rn=.ent agencies, renew of
credit report.\!, and int==rviews :with .ronner employers and business
a.ssociates. This is eS3ential to aS3tU"e that ouz- pe:t"son..""'lel po aae s s
a high degree of pe::-sonal..integrity, sensa ot ·responsibillty~. and
compet<mce and t~ protect classified iniorn-.ationa:ud sensitiv.. in-
telligence sources and :methods.
. - The resu1l:in.g'illea ara held seo-
arataly by the Office Of S0Cu..-i~/ 3J;ld are not merg';ld with omsr
.
Agency files.. .

c.. Forei.g'U R-eaourcag. On some oc-c:asions.. f02"eign citizens

·of interest to CL.~ are contacted and :recr'llited in j\~-erica for '\VO:i:'k.
abroad. The pu...-pose of this a(:tivityi~ entirely restricted to the
AgenC'"f's foreign ~e:rati~3. .,

d. Recruil::::nent. CIA. recruit<>rs maintain a wide vane!;!; of

contacts within the Unibad States, assisting indi,,'idui.ls interested
in employ:=ant ,nth CL"'- to 1"""," :more about it and. to jo1., its e:m-
p'loye e force.. .

e. Contractin:;t. b the course of CIA bualnes s and operations,.

a nu...1'llb~r 01 con~racts for'p:;:,ocurement", resea1:"ch, or analysis az-e
made with a ',ari.ei:y of U.S. companies and individuals. This in no
""flay con3tltub~3 operations in the U. S. but :rather secures t-~e assist-
ance o! fh ese groups i.::l carryL~g out th~ Gr.-\. mission ag3.insl: foreign
targe~s.. .

-2-
00446
 MORl DoclD: 1451843
r
..... <~
,
•
-, • ....
( i.
....... "' ..

i.. Operati.:Ju3.. The 1967 Katze":1bach Cornzni.tce e report -was ",

a.pp::oved by the Dh-e:;:to't' in Ma'rch 1967 and ig.bind;ng on any of
our :tala:tio!ls willi American organizations today, It specifically
proHbi~s ccvez-t :f5.narici3.1 assismnce or support. direct or L'ldil:"ecl;,
to any U. S. educa.tional or priVate voluntary organizaHon•. Any
reIa . l-'
. tlons..t.J,.J"p '"
or ope:ra~on th-e·A geney.nas
' 'f' an _A
w:u:a '
me:r1.can orgam• ...
za.Hon :m.ust be and is within these guidelines..

g. Details or Loans. On rare occasions. details of technically

qua1;6ed CL'\ personnel, technical advice , Or loans of CIA equip-
ment have been znade available to o!:her U. S. agencies at their
reqrn>st to as sis! them to carry out their responsibilitie,s. An
example is the skymarshal program, in which. some CIA personnel
were te=p<>rarUy detailed to th5 FAA in 9rder.to assist in a rapid
init'l.ation of tha~ program. SUch personnel al:td. equipment are under
the ope=til:>na.l control of the receiving agency. Assistance of this
:nature in no way constitnl:eil an assumption of responsibilit>f or
authodty by CIA for the progTa=.
. ,

h. Counterlntelliqence and,Drll,lls. To C3:t'ry out its responsi-

bilities Ior counterintelligence. Cr.... is interested in th.. activities
of foreign nations or intelligenC'e serric·es adznad a.t the U. S. To
't.':le ''e:<:l:ent that these activities lie outside the U. S•• including activ-
ities ai=-a<i at the U.S. utilizing U.S. citizens Or other a, they fall
within 'CIA's reapo=ipilities. Responsibility for coverage oE the
activities within the U. S. lie3 with the FBI. as an inte:rnal security
function. CIA's responsibility and authority are limited to the foreign
intelligence aspect of the prob1=. and any action o:f a law emorce-
ment or internal security natm:e lie" \vith the FBI or local police
fO:t'ces.· (CIA's, assistance to"the U.S. Gove:rnment p:rogr='agaj~st
narcotics and drugs is handled in the sarrie fashion. )

i. Operational' Support.' To support Cr.'\. operations, 'arrange:-

rnents are :made wi~ various U. S .. busmess or other entities to
provide cover or othar support for GL;\ personnel or activities
abroad. Tills can include propriel:aries,formed Or conl:1:o11ed by
CL-'\.. While these = y e..>ist wi!::bin tile U. S•• their purpose is to ,
conduct or s1..'ppon operations abr-oad,
.. -.' .
j; Defectors. As provided by le.w8~.o<5iiiio~giresettles
in the U. S. defectors and other foreign individuals of opeJ;'ational
interest. This rese·~l-emen'c:tnayinvolve' a new identity, relocation,
ernployrnent,P etc. Alj:hough this 'activi.ty f:q.kas place in this countr-y,
its pU:-pOS6 is t:he support of operations abroad.

-3- 00447'
 MORI DocID: 1451843

j'-'('.
'-;;.
c' F~"w
., .\. :•.-V"SIFU'O
_.-.r- .. ~.-
'10::' • C
"
,l)E<-;TlAL ,I I S}:Crn:T \.
l " OFFICIAL ROUTIKG SUP
,
D.~TJ;" INITIALS
I 'ro NAM=--' ANO ADDRESS

L MAG Co-Chairmen

r 2

I 3

i ,~
'I

I "
I 5 "

(, I
. I
DIRECT REPLY
,~CTION
DISPATCH
PREPARE REPLY i
APPROVAL
CO:riME~T fiLE
RECOMIolEHOATIOII
RETURN
II
I to:iCUlHtEiiC~ INFORMATIOII SIGIIATURE
f
Remarks:
:

,
For MAG review and ret~rn·. Please

do not reproduce.
I II .-:

, . ./
.. I
I'

,. ,
I
:j
I

FOL.D HS:RE TO Po:

I FROM: HAMe. ADOR~SS AN ",,..,'
'O/Executive Directo "i?
I U~CLASSIFIED I I CONFIDENTIAL I I SECRET
u~~ (40)
237 pravio'Ji editions
I
..i

00448
.' ,
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

· .. .'
(
.. :; .~,
.< ;...

J,).;}PUty D1 t"·~ctor io--:- In~-alli.'J~nc ..:!

.2~!Juty DiJ":::c~or for 213::\3
D:'lpr.lty Dl.?~ct.,~ :lor Su?"por"t
Deputy Di:i:':?:c'z':)r for Sclenc e and ::rechnotoSj
Ganeral COll.n3al
I:ls'fH!ctO? Gene,rsl
As ststant to the Di:cector

SU.3JSCT .i\.llag3!:ion of Agency Invoi:vem-enl: in the \1. s.

1. The~ran;og"=,,nt Advisory Group, =008 oth"r:>,. has'

creport'Od on ilia concezna of aorne employ"'''" t1:at tha Aga=y is vul-
nerabla to the cr.a.rge of having an operational inter'3'st in.U.S... citizens
or organizations in viohtion oi fua National Sec=ity _'\ct. A~..3,ched ° °

is =y bast ~de r"t3:nding or the £acts. I! it is in ",;:ror 0:r)iicomp1"te.

I ask tha.t you let-·m.!> know orally or in wrHiog..· 0 °

2. ! h.,we d.."'afted til" attached with two pu~';;e9 in'mbd: First;

·::ts a basi:s tor some type o! Is suance t..~t 'J7ould ad"li.:le the command
li:!e and senior sup~rv!ao:rs of policy and £ac-:a "and, se cond;" a"S a !!:.t~re
i""ua 01. "FXI -- Allegations an;d .=\:::!.s·~e:ril."· 1 look lorY-lard to your
co=enl: in tha not-too-ill sb.:J.l: futura befoxe it is fo.=lly <listrib.uted."·

.JiVE:C

vr. E. Colby
E:'{e<:unve Dir·ector-Co~ptrollel"

At):;\CC,.-;:icN
() I .!5XUI:r I .0 Evan.s
Dis ,,,ibution:
D
O-DDI
1 - Each other a.ddz-e s s ee
(]I- £.:·:Di_r ~~~ -, ~ ~~l... vv--' ..:r
1 - ER y<: v ;. l>-<- It.. 0.. v-. ~
~ "" 0"., v--e. cI. .,'" J;'~ \roc;.1
~"...v---' Cs"'-.,

";;)-. \. \-\ <11, v"\ \"'- \. ),-

.... ....
" ~ ••.,• .. . . . " - .
00449
~.I
 MORl DoclD: 1451843
•
(
';!
- .
YI --

~;iarch 1972

.AL 'LEGA 'TIO:N:

1."1 a --l'a.:-iety of ways it haa be an all.e.:5ed that Cl.'\ is worki.ag ·vvithin the
"U~"'I.it-ed
States,) \vit~ par ctculaz- attention to ext:'amist gz-oup s, A :cacent
axam -cl.e wa a in the O..lick3ilvar Times of. 20 JaRUa:i:;'(
. 1972 (attached)*.
'.

F.ACTS:

1.. Saction 102 oi tha National Secu:t"ity Act of 1947;t 3ubpa:ragra::>A D3,
states, "Th·~ Agency shall have no police, subpoena.. law-eruorczmen't
powers, or interr.af secFity func:t~ons. "

1nhis speech to the American Society of Newapaper Editors. on 14 l\prU

1971, the Director stated:

"I can as;iu:;:e you that except for the normal reaponsiblliti,es
for protaciing the physical secu:dty of our own pe:rilonnel, our
. facilitias" and our clasailiad information, we do not have any such
powez-a and functionsj we hava nevar sought any; we do not ex·arc:\ae
any. 1.7], short.,. we do not targe"c on AmezIcan citizens. fI

Ln the Di:;:ector 1s '~3tate of tha Agency-II Speech to ernpkoye e a on 17 Sep-

tember 1971. he daid;

"r gave a taLl,; to the American Society of Newspaper Editors

rast ""inter, as you know, and I did it for only one purpose, That
was to try and put in the record a few 01 these denials that we've
all wantedto 'see put in the public record for some ti.--ne. And you
can r~ly On thosa demafa, Th'ey're true,; "and you can use that as
any te:tt that you may need to.d~r.non$trate tha.t \va1re not in the drug
tozaffic .. and that .\ve'xe not trying to do espionage on Amez-Ican. citi-.
zeus i:l the United States" and \v'e're not tapping telephone lines,
arid that \~elre not doing a lot of other thing3 which '\ve.Jre accused
of doing.. One of the thinga that tends to parpetuate some 01 thsse

::;CO~/i~!E.NT: The two gentLerrren cited a r e foz-rnez- CI:.~ employees..

::T..:).\~:ter th·~r nor the organizatiou3 with whtch they a r a cur z enrl.y associa.ted
~'::.l.,;.... :~ any operational cormect ion wtth the £-\~~nc1..

".00450
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

• (

~i~~y :.c.l:af; a r e jc.:,..-:.1 t:tat et~'L: =~-~':t.c...~ i:.~';jt:.i: th~:"J.1J· p:::'i.-::ict:b.1.7:1r about
do me st l c e spio na ge , Altho~1gll ::h~ joke s ha.vo .1.0 ba s i s in £G:.ct· t~ey ".
i ... ,~\··~::·~h~tC:ss give us a narr;e '\;:'!.... iCi.1 \ ..:~ con't dC:38:!."Ve. I coc t ;: ~iar
::hr.l~ th;.t.~ mak cs a.11 .thn.:';; d.ifi.:.::=~:l"'..
much c e , i;:
bat t:\ak~
d oe s so m e

c:H:£fereace l , and 'this t e nd s to spin 0\"(;:-, 50 I would like to S\.1gg~3t

tha.t if '/01,.1., have it in your he;;l..ri:$ to do so that you speak up when
the oc ca s ion arises and try and S6t: the fa.ct s straight.. II

z. Fr-orn time to time some: e:nployca:3 have been. conce rn..e n that
..~\gi};".CY' activities might conflict vJ-ith t-:tc Nationa L Security Act. ana the
Ag13ncy ls staterne nt s , They can b e a s s ured that Agency activities do not ,
For clarification~ 50n1.~ activities wb.Lch may ha.v~ been subject to mi.a-
understanding are listed as £0110\'/5:

a) Security rnvestigatio~s. Security investigations are conducted

On prospectiy~e employees" contz-a.ctoz-s , and consultants. They in-
volve neighborhood checks on the ba.ckg::-ound of th.ese indivich,lals.
This is essential to.meat
.
the se cuz-Ity r-eou.iz-erne nte of the Agency,
0 ~

The :resulting information is held in separate security office files

and not m.erge.~ in other Agency :iiies.

b) Domestic Contacts.. On a n overt ba.sis the" Domestic Concact

Service m ako s visits to Arner ica.n pz-Ivat;e citizens,) firrns~. and othe r
or ganiaat'iona, soliciting tr a.nsmts s ion to the Govern:ment of iciorma- °

tion they ha.ve learned ab r oad , The purpose and content of the infor-
mation are restricted .to,for:eign intelligence:) i ... e ... ,) inte~ligence on
devalouments
. ~.
abroad. The records. of the firms and. individuals as
.
sources are mainta.ined as a purely practical element of this collec-
tion process.

c) Foreign Re s our ce s , A VZ11.·lGr.y of .foreign citizens of inter~'st

to CIA visit 0::: on oc ca s ion reside in Amez-Lca, Occasionally they- a;e
contacted and rec~uited for woz-k abroad in th.::: course of travels to
their homeland oz- for continuing collaboration w ith t4e, Agency in
t~eir homeland ct.Eter their return from the U. S~ Tha .purpo5e of this
c.ctivit:y is entirely r e ste lcted to the collection of fo r e ign intalligence ..

d) Rc c r uitrme nt , CIA recruiters maintain a \vicic. ·-.. ·;:~:.·iety of con-

tacts v/ifhin the U:-.. itad Sta~es end..::avoring to assist individuals inter-
ested in. employment w ith CLI\ to Lea r n rno r e about ir. and to join its
e mp'loyc e fo r c e ,

-2.-
00451.
 MORI DocID: 1451843

"
, "
" ,
. . ( (
~) Co.:':tr;l(:1:i:n.~.. In the CQU.:;>3a oi CL\. busine s a ~}.nd o~~:::ai:l:>n3"
.:!. :1~l:nba:r'oi c o nt r a.c t s £0:- p:tocuri:tma,n.t, ~e3ea.rch, or ana.ly::l13 aze
lnai~ voJith a va~iety o.{ U...~~ companle a a~d incli·,.idua.13.. 'I'hi3 in no
t,VJly ~:::Jrt-=Jtitute9 o~~a.HO!!3 in the U.5. but :t'n.t;le~ secuz-e a tha L133i3t-
:).":'l.:a oi the ae ~p·OU?:; in ca'CI'yi.':l:~ ouc tha CL~ rn i s a iori of ior~ign i:1tel-

i) Ope::atlona.. The 1967 X<atzanbach Com::n.ittee rep0:l:"t "';:Fa:)

.=3.??.l~o...,~d by the Dt~ecto:r i:l i'Aarcb. 1967 ana is bi~ding on an'! at ouJ:
:raln:tio.n.s '.vHh American o:ga.'-';·,t;atio·na today, It speciiic?lly probibiG3
cover t financial .r),-33i.:;.ta,"ce O~ support;, direct 0::: ir::.dlrec1:" to anY' U .. Sa
ec.ucational or priyat.a volunta.ry o:gacizacion. A-:ay ~el:?.tionsbip o»
op-e,,'"ation. the: .Agen.cy has with a!?' _!\r:lal"ican orga:::.i3a.tion rnust be and
is \vithi.:l these guicl~li:J.es~
~
g) Details 0,," Loaeaa, On rare occasions, details or technically.
quali£bd CIA par'3oncel or loan" oi CL~ equipm.em have bean rnad e to
othe~ "GO' s. agenci~3 to a'Sais'l: ilJ. the ca.~:ryi:o.g out of ~~ai:r res"p<>::t.sibili __
tiS3.. .An ej(~-nple is the skyr;::.arshal prog:rmn to which some CL-\
personn~l ,,"V"s·re detalled in order to assist in a :rapid initiation· or ,t"P...ai: ..
prog!:Xtn.. A~si3tance of this nature in no ';:lay cona.titute9 a..n
a3sump-
tion. of respo.tl.3ibility or authority by CLt\ io::: tha p:rogl"anl'~

h}. !":.ounterL'ttelligence. To carry out its respon3ibilllia 3 :for

cott:li:::1rini:alli:,z-a;cca'. CL~ i3 intaxa3ted in tha activities of ior.ei"7D. na.-
- ,
~ion3 or intelligence saryices a.L-nad at tha U. S•. To the e:'(tant that
'"
the acth-itias Ii", outside the' U. 5., including adimid" ah;aed at the
U.S..." utiliz.ing U. S.. citizan3 or oi:heJ:s, it :fall3 wit'hin CL.~ 13 :respon-
sibilinas. Re3pon"ibiUty fdr cove rage of L'le <\ctivitias wil:1lin the
U. 3.' lias with the FBI,. a3
it iJ:!.-;01v33 an int:ernal· gecu:dty function.
CIl\ 13 :respc.n3ibllity and authority a2:'8 limited t·o tea: foreign int.alli-
gence a apect of tha problem and any action or
a law enforcement OJ:"
interu.a.l $ecu~ity na.tuze lieSl \vith the FBI.or lo_ca.l police fOl"ces ...

i) .Deredo.ea. As provided by law,' CIA occ:aaionall:r >:esattle"

in the U. S~ d~fector5
and othar forei3n individual3 of operational
ip.ta~ast, Thia r8:.:rettleme!lt m.ay in-.,rolve their aS3ump.tion of a new
identity, loca-tion of employment, e tc; Although thi3" activity takes
place i:a. this country, its pUXp03.03 i.:; the suppoZ't a! ope-ratio!la abroad..

3. -

00452
 MORl DoclD: .1451843

"

r:
- (
-
j) GOY"~. As a pal"t of GLi\ o:;>al"i.\tions abroad, a>:rallg,.m~i1t~
are l\1~\cla vJit'b. a numbe z- of U~ 3 .. enti.i::e.a to Se?v~ as tha ost:.::n.3ibl.a-

"

-,

..,

·.00453
,.
....
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

"'.... ,,!.;...."'•• .u.i-l.l., J;:';;'\ .l,..J.....~

!
",~'="'" •
.C
j ....~_.J:._. -.- "'--":.'""r~,";''''';~'!"'''•. ~ ..... - •
20 Jan 1972 (

..e ~'.:

..-.}
•
. ......
..-..... r

" :'-.

.:;;
of

. .;. ~....:: ...

." J
" '-.
~.,:

D
baC(~
.

l
I"~
1 yalL (ld \\',,-f1A) I
They I:l'!:l: aher-e tlith·Hel::\s. cere
shown around, a:;d ::aken to the secret .cited by agency peo?le to boHt
t~aining cn~rs. ~~at was ~he beginni~g fronts in the US, this time, ~v
of 'rumor-s \oOlthin the agency that; "the
po lie';: Bct.h pe!.·so.:nel shifts a

into lias given a nev :i.:le z-ecc

CIA ha~be~n.gi~an ~ne go 3h~~d to oa~ing hi~ head of ell intelli~

CIA\
srove into dcmes t Ic police operntdons ... end p resunab Iy pro\:'idtn2, htr.: Hi
~~ile everyone d~ni~d it, th~ t~eor/' ~lc~iti~~tc interest in in:arn3!
W3S that l:he.CI~ was told to get the .opc~ations. But such sugges=ic~
xadl cnj s , -bd arcr-Iy denfed all around,
The .. Central ihtellige;:~c Agen- . Two recent personne l changes "_. .
cy c lvays insists its non. aren't in- . inc:c~scd s?~culation. Onc.in~ol~ed

wotved in dceest Ic police work. But in. t-es Ignat Ion of flr:lr.!.'s spcc lu.l es s l s-
Chicn~o CIA nZcn~s have b~cn ~orking
tunr , f.:abert Kilo:l:Y. Kiley hand led the
v i fh the r:nr and -Trusury. men in an studc~t operations through N3tio~~1

effort to pin the bank bo~~inis on Scudcnt ASSQci:ltio~ fnc:ldes ••fa re-
r.dical grot/pi. .. . cently turned uc as assoc l ate director'
Ilcrct ofo recc.lundes t Ine CIA pot Ice of the Po l tcc f~ur:d<!t.i.onJ nne..., g:rOU:l •I
lmrk ~i thin the us was center-ed e rcund Idunched ~ita n $30 cillioa F~rd ~
Fo~r.ci~clo~·gr~n~~ ~ne c~ncy is neant
counter csp.ion:.l.~c .~f'fOl·t~ ~!;'\.~-!- at~
to be u,ud ~o,i~,rovc local p~licc.
301:i:::t ~Gi;.C tA l.~ili.ntains· sccre e bases rna second p~rson'nel shift ·lnv.;)!v~d
in .a1!·:.I~~jCt" US cit.ies.ThP.' agency a.l$Jo nrexe l G~:dfrt!)·: who ,7:l.s. bud' of the
has t:-air::r:~: cunps {n Virl:":l~ia and ClA's Ofrtcc cf Cur-rene In:t.:Uir:.::\c~.
the C.:\I·o! i nas , T:;~~~ at-e e.askcd as reg-
u lc r nl tl::tr:-· b:t.5~$.Sp~okS nee
He quit this hif.r. r.:;;;dn~: jo~.• turuc.l 00454
~~? 1:1 the nar-co t Ics bureau of the
tl"1.i:l~,1 f;")1' <!:\!;j' at h'llli:l.::$h:q:.:"3.
.rcs e tce Co:::~t~5if)i~ at l!J.tTio:b"I::~.
T:..:() rcar s :l$:v etA C;:"~I\Ort!::'$ ....cr.c
I'u , T!:~ co:,:·::t~.,t!l:-l i.~ .\::(,l:~cr ncs
":'''·l";"i ';,' l ',.1::;: ;::~·::h:.:r~ of til c r:hlc:;\~~:a _..,•.•.. : 4'" _; .... •••._ ~ ;_.~ ...... 1 ... __ 1
 MORI DocID: 1451843

TABLE OF CONTENTS

East Asia Division Placing Agents in Leftist Milieu _

Cleared with FBI

Central Cover Staff Statistics on Alias Documentation and

Other Cover Support

European Division Research on Vesco Case

Soviet Bloc Division Relations with FBI and Local Police

NARCOG Support to Law Enforcement Agencies

Including Information on American Citizens
Division D International Telephone Links

Foreign Intelligence Security and Exchange Commission and

Staff Vesco Case

Counterintelligence Agency Funds Made Available to FBI

Staff
.... Vesco Case
t· Intelligence Evaluation Committee and Staff
"',MHCHAOS

CI!Police Group. International PoFce Academy

Foreign Resources .Lcc a.t i on s , Recruitments, Use Alias

Division Documents

00455
-
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

B Y HAN D

5
t---+----~------------- -----.- - - - -
6
ACTION PREPARE REPLY
APPROVAL RECOMMENOATION
COMMENT 'FILE RETURN
CONCURREHCE IHFORMATIOH SIGHATURE

Remarks:

00456
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER
FROM: NAME. ADDRESS AND PHON£" NO_. DATE
1 Jun
1973
SECIlET
rORI{ HO.
1_0
237 Uso ~" ,u"'...... , ""' .... """, ••• (4<
 MORI DocID: 1451843

,
"
" . , ' •. - .- ;' ~ "'1":· -- ~-.

f- ';'1} -It.·... ~·._,,~ ''':-

\ ; $ l I L' _- .. \. i.t~.: ~ e II b i:'R

... , .... i

1 June 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. William E. Colby

SUBJECT: Special Activities

1. Following our recent conversation, I have

searched my memory and Mr. Mc Coriet s files for examples
of activities which to hostile observers or to someone
without complete knowledge and with a special kind of
motivation could be interpreted as examples of activities
exceeding CIA's charter.

2. First, as we discussed, on 7 March 1962,

DCI McCone, under pressure from Attorney Genera 1 Robert
F. Kennedy, agreed to tap the telephones of COlumnists
Robert S. Allen and Paul Scott in an effort to identify
their sources for classified information which was appear-
ing in their columns. Because 'the primary source appeared
to be in ·the Department of Defense, McCone ordered me
personally to brief General Joe'Carroll, Director of DIA,
orally, which I did. I understand more complete information
on this operation is available from the Director of Security.
I, personally, managed to avoid gaining any knowledge of
what precise actions were taken, what information was gained,
what was done with it, and when' the operation was terminated.

3.

- 00457
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

..
. ' ."

n.~t'?
f· ~ OiU l'
2

4. Although certain activities never got beyond

the planning stage, there are, I believe, three examples
of such planning which could be subject to misinterpretation.
One involved chemical warfare 0 eratiohs againstl I
. A e on i vo ed
a param1 1 ary s r1 e aga1ns
I Outside the United ta es overnmen, enera
~&~1~s~e~n~no~w~er was briefed on such planning. A third, which
assumes a new significance today, involved a proposal by
Angleton and Helms for a greatly increased intelligence
collection effort against foreign installations in this
country. This planning also involved a scheme for selected

00458
 MORI DocID: 1451843
•
.. .' ,. ,.
.
.... ~-~ lot.',
c
3

exposure of KGB activities and counteractions against the

Soviet intelligence service, The reasons are still unclear
to me as to why the FBI chose to brief the PFIA8 to the
effect that CIA was planning to wiretap extensively and
indiscriminately' in this country, to greatly increase
the Agency representation in the Moscow Embassy, and
generally to use KGB-type tactics, also extensively and
indiscriminately. This led to a heated exch'a nge between
DCI McCone and Mr. Belmont of the FBI, one s~ch meeting
taking place in the presence of the Attorney General.
It is clear that the FBI was opposed to any such proposal
then, as now, 'and the plan never went forward.

5. During the period when Des FitzGerald was in

charge of the Cuban Task Force, DCI McCone's office
learned, quite by accident, that FitzGeraid had secured
the cooperation of several prominent US business firms
in denying economic items to Cuba. There was no question
but that the businessmen were glad to cooperate, but know-
lepge of this operation had to be rather widespread.

6.

1.0 connec ~on

nnnC;s"1Cin'--'r<h'1"'-"e'.-"7Tnn-"'''''''''a''y''---T<1cmJHt a mee tin g 0 f
';;.WU'1rF"1'0l0i>F1'o
the 303 Committee, it was decided that the offers of
American business could not be accepted, it being neither
a'secure way nor an honorable way of doing such business.
This declaration of policy at this time bears on the recent
·ITT hearings, but I am not surprised that McCone has
forgotten thathe helped to set the prec~dent of refusing
to accept such collaboration between the Agency's operations
and private business.

7. At the direction of Attorney General Robert

Kennedy and with the explicit approval of President Kennedy,
j McCone injected the Agency, and particularly Cord Meyer,

00459
 MORl DocID: l451843

.
,6', r; r~ ~~, ~'T'
t.!I.·=.~yj;li...<l L
r! '",:i .~ ~•. ;::' :'",; !i;
6 . . .;·;"M... .: .....,...:.. b ~ ..... '1
f

l;:~":"!~ C ~. i 'r'
. ' .. 5 _ ..

into the US labor situation, and particularly to try

to ameliorate the quarrel between George Meany and
Walter Reuther. Cord Meyer steered a very skillful
course in this connection, but the Agency could be
vulnerable to charges that we' went behind Meany's back,
or were somehow consorting with Reuther against Meany's
wishes,

8, There are three examples of using Agency

funds which I know to be controversial. One was the
expenditure of money under Project MOSES in securing
the release of Cuban Brigade 'prisoners. Details of
this operation are best known to Larry Houston, Mike
Miskopsky, George MacManus, and James Smith. Second,
as you well know, when Lou Conein received his summons
to report to the Joint General Staff Headquarters on
1 November 1963 a large amount of cash went With him.
My impression is that the accounting for this and its
use has never been very frank or complete. Th~rd, at
one of the early Special Group meetings attended by
McCone he took strong exception to proposals to spend
Agency funds to improve the economic viability of West
Berlin, and for an investment program in Mali. His
general position was that such expenditures were not
within the Agency's charter, and that he would allOW
such spending nnly on the direct personal request of
the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Defense, or
the White House.

9. r raise these issues of funding because r

remember the Agency's being severely criticized by the
,House Appr opr-La t Lons Subcommittee for having spent $3,000
for stamps in connection with a program to buy tractors
to secure the release of prisoners from Cuba.

10. Under the heading of old business, r know that

anyone who has worked in the Director's office has worried
about the fact that conversations within the offices and
over the telephones were transcribed. During McCone's

00460
 --
MORI DocID: 1451843

. .

tenure, there were microphones in his' regular office,

his inner office, his dining room, his office in East
Building, and his study at his residence on White Haven
Street. I do not know who would be willing to raise such
an issue, but knowledge of such operations tends to
spread, and certainly the Agency is vulnerable on this
'score.

II. Also under the headinlr of old business,

I Sh or t Ly after the Cuban missile cr i.s i s , there was

~a~a~:~~s~p~osition in Washington to reexamine the Bay of Pigs,
and the fact that several'Alabama National Air Guard
officers lost their lives in the Bay of Pigs was surfaced
with surprisingly little excitement at the time.

12. During my stint on the 7th floor there was

a special arrangement with the Office of Communications
whereby the Director's office gained access to non-CIA
traffic. This surfaced eriefly at one point shortly after
Admiral Rayborn became DCI. He had visited the Signal
Center and removed a copy of a telegram from the Embassy
in the Dominican Republic for Under Seqretary George, Ball,
Eyes Only. He returned to his office and proceeded to
discuss this telegram with George Ball who was naturally
quite curious as to how Rayborn knew about it, and also as
to how Rayborn had it in his possession before Ball did.
Ben Read in the Secretary of State's office and I spent
several weeks putting this one to, rest.

13. Finally, DCI McCone, as you and I well know,

operated on a very lofty plane, and I think certain of
'his acti vi ties could be misunderstood. One example was
his decision in July of 1964 to have Aristotle Onassis and
Maria Callas flown from Rome to Athens on Air Force KC 135.
Their arrival in Athens in this airplane attracted the
attention of the local press and in due course Mr. John

......,." ...
-~ " ,
00461
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

t._ I .. , I 1. "
. . . , 't'",
1t'''*'h'l!\'.,'
I' j' r.
1::•• c Io:!
• .' I. -~"h
,:11.....:. , ,"rr. .'t.' r~. f~
,

Hightower, Chief of the Associated Press Bureau for

Washington, came to see me to ask about the propriety
of this action.
14.

15. McCone dealt quite extensively with newsmen

in Washington. In fact, they gave him a gift and a
luncheon when he left Washington, which is perhaps
indicative of the press's relations with him. However,
in the case of the Ross and Wise book, The Invisible
Government, he did try to bring pressure on the publisher
and the authors to change things. They did not change
a comma, and I doubt that this old saw will ever sing
again.

16.

17. The above listing is uneven, but I have a

sinking feeling that discipline has broken down, and that
allegations from any quarter which cast these things in
the'wrong light would receive great publicity and attention,
and no amount of denial would ever set the record straight.
If I may be of any assistance in 'tracking down further
details, r am of course at your disposal, ,but I would point

00462
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, • If'
\-
~
~>:~ ••• ..l\:... t{ ·...;'f\l~·~ ~,~ ;1
- ' \ • -: ;" ,.. _ :• • • '/ 1"" \ ' " ;' .. "• • " • ." A
i:I .. ,-" v ..

out that I was very much in the position of the

enlisted man who knew that the commissioned officers
were aware of these activities and better able to
jUdge their propriety and possible impact or misinter-
pretation.

ELDER

i
-; I . ,

~16llu~\\1k W v~U dt!'U Ii Ii li'

-

00463
 MORT DocID: 1451843

1-. '.
--lJ
...
:--. '-~ ..- .."..., ... .., ...;. -\
. I • . _. . \
, I

"
J ; ..
I--'::'::"~
!: .
..: '-'. '-"
•
-
l-fE:llORANDUM FOR THE RECORD:

In November 1962 Mr.! ladvised Hr. Lyman

Kirkp2trlck that he had, at one time, been directed by /1r. Richard
Bissell to assume responsibility for a project involving the assass-
ination of Patrice Lum"f'ba, then Premier, Republic of congo.,'
According tol J)oison was to have been tJ.1e vehicle as he _
made reference to having been instructed to see 'J!r. Sidney GottlieJD.,
in order procure the appropriate vehicle.

\ '".'.
"

.'

00461/: I
{
.~ ," . 0_.. ..~,, 0 __._,. .. , ,, _
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

BALTll.!Cf1E 1::::I\,S A~.!ERICP:i1

12 APR 1973

...-."
. The current imbroglio over- the role that" -"ShoUlo 'we protect democratic. (or even un~'
"1he Central InteWge!ls:e Agenr;X tI.rli{ih~ in;' democratic) nations "from toralltarian inva.
ternntlcnal Telephone -and Telegraph Co. sian 9r subversion? Should we utilize cun-
played (or considered playing) in trying to. foreign aid to nourish d~rnoctai!~ po!itic-al
block, ~he.' election of Chilean President AI;', development :"..as is provldedrn the. Fraser
Jende ~as jrs tanlalizj~z and perplexing as-: .•" Amendment·.tu· the" foreign aid -blll - or
pec~:'Was the erA's cash balance so low' it .' should .we "take astrkrly hands-off ap- J

needed a million dollars from rr.~·T? Did the'.. proach? • , i

efA and l!S·Y r~alry. think. they could pu.ll : ',,' . It. asat this point that the lT8·T fracas
off some of the stunts contemplated without. . ~ comes -back Jruc focus, and as Ileological
the word genlng out and working jnasstvejy- ,'.. shambles- occurs. Let us suppose for a "mo~
in favor, of . ,AJi.t·nde? But unde:rlY.ing this>.':. >-rnent ·th.a.Clhe Chase "'fai1hattan Bank. influ-
brawl are a series cf very difficult questlon, . enced by.the World Council of Churches and I
o.r.pr.incipl~, to say nothing ?fdelipltiol1., : . ~~;, black ~i1!(ants•. decided 10 pr01,:ide a cnndult
First" of .alt. -what consntutes. American- . - rc black-Iiberatlon mo v emems m SOUlh Afd··
0:
(publ~c. priyate) lnrerventton In thE.-ioter..,::,. ca, using- itS.busin,:ss connections [~ pro,·ide.;
t.d-1 .
e
nal ' affairs ,of .anorher state?· Obviously.,,·' . arms and ether- aid to the revolutionaries, ,
sponsoring a-revrilutlon (as.Tfddy'Roosevelf. :: ;WnuJd this .be. a·' ebad'' thing? Was it. a -'" .-:------
did to break' Panama loose froni Colombia)'· : "bad" (hmg. when the efA, using a business ~L _ '7
Isat one pole. B,u~ b&!,,":(:en"s:pon~t)rjng revc- . ·.cover. sl!!Pp~d~·i~[O Santo· Domingo the. 1-~
juuons ~n.d tOI,allf eJim. il)ati.n~ ~Il~' Ame.ri::_ .; . ~ea ons use.d to kill the ~rutal dictator. J ru., ~
tan acnvny outside of"the UQHed Slates;" ')1 ~.. (1 don t ·now oW'ne feels about It to. ~
there is a long line on the spectrum, a line . day, Dut m 1901 inc Dommlcan stClt('sman '
-"lhat geLS fU~l:i~r and fuzzler·the- fimher 'you '. ;TUan Bosch thought that intervention was
go. ' . ,',' . . - . -'. .' :. tfie greatest -thlng since the discovery DC
. Moreover, even doing nothing can be. can:': Amerlca.L" . . , - ",
strued as, Interventionr .Egypt's President ",'. . What this comes down to is that Inrerven-.
Nasser throught that SecretaryDulles' te:.· , tibn is a "geed' thing when yo~ happenjn '
Iusal to help finance-the "S\~'d; Dam was a"· . Javor the cause Involved, but is noickf:'d ,and
form of: intervention. and Some years 'ago ' :.: :!ffi.m,?ral.. if )'O.U disappro\'e:of tlie goalS-. A-'.
six confee-prccuctng rrations in Latin Amerl-:" . perfectly human response; but hardly one on-,
caprorested to the Orgarnzanon of Amerl-' ... \~'hich souryd pubiic policy can be Iclmuiat-
can Slates that our refusal to )i~ .coffee. . ed.The thought of :lT8·.T losing its Chilean
prices Intervened in their iJifernjl ~f(airs. .'. assets doe-s"~ot bring tears to my eyes at"
I would 'argue 1hal Ih~ very eXistence o~ . - lead me to. Wish noe sufi had a supply of ~uil­
the United SlateS as the ·most powerful" n.a:' poafs in stock. Capitalism. I'm told. invol\:es
Hon in Ine world ,aucomatlcallr imervenes·jn '. lakihg ris~s. and Ihe corporation may in the
the affairs of every other sHne. N<i5Ser and . end .be re)mbutsed by ,a federal agency set
the coffee producers ucre- right: Inaction an op to proride imurance for·such conlingen.
our part can hal;e as great an impact as ac~ des. .
tion. To take a vivid inslal)ce, if W~ had not 1'\0, ,"-hat bo!he:-s me is Ihe wholh' ad IlflC
~hipned military equipmeAt ID Brhain be~ reaction or Ihc Se:-nme- committee in~·esti,ga[-
. rore Pe3r.f Harbor, the war for EuroP.e.~ouJd.· ing the maUer. We' would be far beuer'
:havf been lost. served by Sen. Church and his col!('a~ucs if
f: If wt: accept (hat proPosilion. the futile they spen·t less time b~mg oU[ra~('d "ilnd a
arRument over whether .we should intervene little' more :rying to fommialC gC'i1entl
..<-lmom,Hkally goes by Ihe boards. Then W~ guidelines. guid~hn('s Which \~'ould apply 10
,turn to the hard one: To what (:-nds should South·l\me-rica and SO\llh Africa. to the: just
-we (oubliclr ;md privatel)') inrernne? ·and the unjust alike, hqwc\-er defined. '

00465
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-0 t;NClASSIFIED O I~ .NAl
USt ONLY o CONFIL.H1Al o SECRET
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJeCT: (Optional)

E>/E-fJ o IU'L' 7 I
FROM, re "'0.

j) rY/ WHj) DA:7,0~'

v,h£,
, /
1i7
TO: IOfficor dClignolion. room numbe" and DATE
building) . OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Numbel eoch CQmment 10 show from whom
INITIALS 10 whom. Orgw 0 line across colVnln ollcr each commenl.)
RECEiveD fORWAlfOED

l.-LG.
!-L--~4--t~~
(Jaw
2.
..-

-:J.
---.:- J..~ ~) 11 '1 ~
4.

\ n1',IO! ~afi"
.
~'~b rI-
5. E1es ~
"
6.
Th7$. I\o\.~ht I.A,llU
.
..!(t. ...-....J e "J,AJ 1."\ \) C/t.vlt
7.

.,
~l II \::.t;et. "'- ~ ~ \f\V 7
8.
(C-. .l....... .lQ.WQ.("3 .
-t./t. a..-n:.~ \~f>\.- i " u - h
9.

, \.ok ch c:l .....l: }:.."-6..... "

10. ~ lt~.( ~
S ....\,_~~ ~l- l~
11.
~, ~lo1.~ ~J

12:
-po~\.0ir\Js. '; .
,. ~ Va,s c.o-. lv-t..
13.
.t..o:.\: ~~ I.~n
V'(.CA,., ~..l- .H'W'--
'M,.~·."1tl ~~~.
14.
"t.. C\.t ~~ "\ vet~
~~~~.t ~~
IS. ft 1.Vv..~~~
OO~ 66 r l' ltec-~
w-.. IWU.~
;;.
FORM
3-62 61 0 uSio:~~"i,~us 0 SECRET o CONFIDENTIAL O
~
If/TERf/ Al
USE Of/lY·.
....

o -
UNClASSIFIED
 MORl DoclD: 1451843
-
: ..... ,;
. '. ,
.' . , 1.,. •

- I

-~ :-
f
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Bobert L; Ve s c 0

i .
-

I. r: -
I. 'On 31 JUly 1972!'y/wHD]was contacted by Mr. Jorden •
Latin American referent at the NSC. by telephone in order to
•

determine if@KHERALf?!hadany information on Vesco. Mr.

Jorden was advised that a check would be made. A file review un-
covered I \\Q/WHi:'Jcalled Mr.
Jorden (31 July 1972) and ihformed him of the rollowing:

a) Vesco was known to us as head of IDS. had re-

cently visited Costa Rica and expressed a desire to settle there.
Iii addition. it was known that Vesco V

\'-----------------------~
- b) 19/w1m7also advised Mr. Jorden-that Vesco had
come to the attention of1 - ~nd they were aware that

'l
field. N.J. [:.!ubsequently
NSC was making inquiries DDne ve~co.
_
he was President of the International Control Corporation of Fair-
~as advised that the
-

\
\
\ ---

3.\
k-/-----==-----~-----~---
--

!
;
00467 !
 ---
MORl DoclD: 1451843

o.
....
00-

..
t,
I
i I
. ..
0

, :01
;

~o I

". -

... 00468
,
:..~ . .... -. -.

•
 ,
MORl DoclD: 1451843

',:.. .;

~
.".
_.
.', ~
- YL-Vi\L-1
•. r
L __ .......... ~J!.c -.
-2-

I
i °

00469

.: ~~- _0-
 MORl DoclD: l45l843
•
.. .'.-.. .
.->.-
~
I . . Ttt
. . ......

<L.·.;...H
:' ).

-3-

,,
,.

•
.,
\

~~--

~-'-

.'
.j
!
!

--

00470
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

'. . -' .
..
SEC II E T
•

--

0047.1 /
-I
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ..

J.. 'S "-\" h "" \.e..... H' 7 J

DATE

CHM-f££RbkIN""

.~REGK1NRlDGE-O A 'S.;;"'~\II e- t '~~-t1:,

\;"", l."".t - ~l>\ .... 1:: :;~"~ \

s\::vJ.'1 I "'rr~.,J L\ \.U~ (

""" ..,- o.v..~ "'-ON . \.~ .......'" ~~c.{-

. 'C::{-·::'C.,",,"'·l~ ~
!'"..... t
1)vo,,'
U J) A.\&.s ~). 1) J) SKI I..'l.>
<:to W4.> .r~..A""b--et.-.. .

D
RETURN TO: St!,fI( :,

~~ ~'7 '~,dL

~+-~,~~

00472 L - - _ - - - '
 MORI DocID; 1451843

--II
21 AUG 1973
!
I

MEMOR~qDUM FOR: Director of Central I~telliGence I

FROM Inspector General

SUBJECT Use and Control of Disguise and Alip-s Documents

Action Reouested:
--_._~---

1. 2~e attached report resulted from our general inquiries

into Waterg~te-re1ated issues and contains recommendations in
paragraph 9 for your approval.

Background: . ,'.

2. In the course of collecting information on various activi-

ties of the Agency with flap potential, we received a number of
reports on issuance and use of disguise and alias documentation.
The Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee noted on the face
of the ,sUlIllIlary submitted by the Office of Technical Services (OTS)
on materials issued by it that it would be interesting to check the
reports of other components to see if they matched with OTS issu-
ances. In fact, OTS is not the only compone~t to issue alias
documentation, and the review was broadened to include the other
issuing components and their procedures for controlling the
materials. The attached report summarizes the findings. .

DOnald E. Ch8!D.oerlaln
Inspector General

Attachment
As Stated Above

APPROVED; &-r£dl, DATE; 24 AUG 1973

DISAPPROVED: DATE:

00473
/
 ---------------- MORI DocID: 1451843

.. . ~ .
,\ :l:...--t-

USE AND eO,/TROL OF DISGUISE AND AlIAS DOCmlE:HTS

1. ~1e policy~ responsibilities, and procedures concerning

U.S. docamentation issued to authenticate a f~lse ide~tity used
in the Directorate of Onerations &re set forth in CSI (now DOl)
240-)1 dated 23 AUgtl"t 1972. Tnis instruction, a revision of
CSI 220~7 dated 12 J.:sy 1959, repr"sents an extens ive uPbrading in
the definition of responsibilities a~d in establishing procedures
ensur-Ing that each r-equesf has the apj__ roval of a dcs i gnat.ed senior
oi'ficial in the component. The current instruction" rur-thezmor-e ,
requires that each request be routed through Cover and COh'!!ercia1
Staff, Official Cover Branch (eeS/OCB) for concurrence, "Which, in
effect, makes CCS/OCB the one component retai~ing complete records
and details of eve~ request. There are no other regulatior.s
applying to this subject, but i t currently is observed by all
compcnent.s ,

Issuing R~§]?onsihilities and P)'oceoures

. 1 2. Three major componenfis are responsible for issuing alias)

doc~~entation and/or disguise. The specific responsibilities are:

t 18 of lee ssues non acrs oppe acumen S In

L-----"rl;naOs-Uw~l~C·h are used exclusively for flash identification
purposes. Birth certificates in alias are considered to be
a special document and require a uniquely prescribed approval
procedure and control. This Br-anch a.l so responds to requests
for.disguises.

b·1
issue S ""U"l"'l"v"'e"r>'T'So-'.L"l."c"e"'n"s"e"s'---'w"'n"l"'cb""ar""'e.,t'u':rrryrv-o"a""cJ(v.os'<'tro"'p'"p"'e"d,---;a"'S.--..w"'e""ITlr--
as fully backstopped investigative credentials!

c ./

00474
 ~----------_...-
MORI DocID: 1451843

3. P~l requests to any of the above three cOF.ponents for

ali as document.at.i on or disguise must be by memorandum end must be
s~[.lled by one of t,m authorized officers designated by the request-
ing component. The inst.ruction requires that this approval author-
ity be confined to the chief of the division or staff, or to a
senior operations officer specifically designated uy the division
or staff chief to exercise this function. Tne request is routed
through CCS/OCB for concurrence at which time the requesting
signature is verified as being on the approved list and a1.l of the
doclli~ents requested are recorded in the OCB file. All requests for,
documents to be used in CONUS are then routed to Office of Security,
Operational Support Division" Special iictivit.ies Branch for approval
and then are forwarded to the componel't which is to issue the docu-
ments. I~suing components are required to maintain "controls on
ac count.abdLi ty and establish conditions for use of documerrts that
they issue. OTS is developing a new computerized system which is
scheduled to bec~ne operational in November 1973. Every six mrnlths
each component will be given a complete listiQ£ of all documentation
and disguises issued to them and they will be required to either
justify the continued retention o~ the docrunents or return the~.

Compcnent.~on~rols

4. There is no established procedure prescribing how each

component is to control the documents issued to it. The instruc-
tions do require, hovever-, that the documents will be h""dled as
controlled aocuments from t1~ time of issue until thefr ultimate
disposition. The general practice is to maintain a record of all
doc~ents received within the component, but to issue the documents
to the appropriate officers who assume responsibility for hand.l i.ng
tbem'properly. There is no evidence of periodic spot checking. At
least one area division of the Directorate of Operations follows a
procedure which requires that the documents be retained in the front
office until needed for an operation, being returned a:rter the
operation is completed. On the surface this may appear to be a
strict control) but in actuality the documents are retained in
"individual packages for each senior officer, and are never Lnspect.ed
before they are issued nor after they are returned; in effect, no
record accoQ'ltability by the officer is required.

Ultimate Document Retrieval

5. Every employee using alias documents is now required to

process tbrough CCS as part of his exit-out process for either
resignation or retirement. It is at this time that he is given
a list of all alias documentation issued to him and is requested
to return all such documents. If there are any of these documents

- 2
00475
 MORI DocID: 1451843

vhi ch ho is unab.Le to produce , th~ employee mus t. sub:..j t a signed

vritten statement describing, to t.he best of his abiUtJ', the con-
ditions under which the document or documents l1e::t'e either lost or
destroyed. ~11e controls that now exi.st were not in ops r-atd on when
Hovar-d Hunt was an employee, which lliay explain how he vas ailJ.e to
retain documents issued in the 19605. Nor do these controls o:pply
effectively to non-employees over whom the A3ency has no con~rol.
Most disguise material -- other than docu.lTIent,s -- is a-ege.r-ded ee
pE:1'iehable and non-s ens i tdve and OTS is not too concerned if
dis~~tse material is not returned.

6. A new coinput erd zed system is being readied ca'lLed CEliBAD

(Gentral Badge m1d Credential System). Initially this system will
Lnc.lude al.l of the Lssuances of the badge office, CCS, Central
Pr.ocessing 811d the motor 'pool. . The system will provide a monthly
listing to these four components of all credentials issued and
could b€ used to request outst~nding credential.s at the time of
checkou-t. As a follow-up the sys t em will provide a weekly creden-
tial status of all employees who have s epaz-abed but for whom Cm'IBAD
still shows outstanding credentials.

Q.~nc]usions_

7. Since the issuance of DOI 240-4 there has been a very

defini"t.e ir~iDrovement in the controls exercised over- alias documea-
tation. B)·- requiring that every request be routed through CCS/OGB
for concurrence, a veri COIQ1.~ ete file of all alias documents issued
has been compiled. The probability is sJ,ight that an Agency employee
could resign or retire without having been queried about all the
alias documents which had been issued to him. 'This procedure, "hile
cur-rent.Iy observed in the Agency, has no standing as a general re-
quirement arid exists only as an administrat.ive instruction in one
of the Agency's directorates.

8. The OTS ~omputerized system, "hen operational, shoul.d tend

to reduce the number of outstanding documents since-oa justificatio.n
every six months will be required for their retention. The CENBAD
system will not only make the CCS/OGB control even more effective
by mechand zd ng the up-to-date listing but in the rare instances
when an officer might depart without turning in his dOcllillents,
CENBAD will provide this ..data weekly to al.Lov for a follm·l-up .

.'

- 3 -
00476
 ---------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

, " .. "

9.

a. That an Agency Headquart".,.s Regulation'

be issued ~ormalizing the requirement for a
central ft-fJ,ency control over- issuance, account_
ability and recovery of alias docuroentation.

b. That each component designate an alias

documentation control officer ~ho would retain
ell docmaents, issuing them only for specific
operations and institute a policy of signed
receipts a~d return of documents upon the com-
pletion of the operation.

. •.

- 4-
 MORl DocID: l451843

..··cl· U'~ClASSlmD [£] . SECReT

,

SUBJECT: (Optional)

ACTVITIES OF
FROM,

D....TE
25 May 1973'
TO: IOffiur designation, room numb.r. ond DATE
building) ~_~ _ _-I OffICER'S COMMENTS (Humber ecch comment' 10 show fro.rA whom
INiTIALS 10 whom. DraW' 0 line octon column ofte, each commen'.)
REQIVED fOAWARDfD

l.

SIlt.
2. I

'"

\
"

,
~-rl:
1',3/
/

;'\ I
"''I

•
';
I
i

12. il...<. LC·o.,.? Is er ' '-r-..~J

13,
~,ORj)(D,ilSdiT
.,..\.'l-<,~l~ 0 f- 0
:;",-<{ c.. >tl"'I l::b

14.

00478
''; .~ 10 U'io::'b"~~U' 0 SECRET 0 CONFIDENTIAL 0 INTERNAL', o .. UNCLASSIFIED
r
'{.._ . '" ........~ _, •._-:.........._.: _~~':"~" •• '._ - 0- ~"' __ """~' •._ .. __
USE QNlY
-,_•.__ ....- ..
:,. ..
.... ~-. . ~ ' ...•.
 --------------~
MORI DocID: 1451843

7-' l')C>~
.'. - t-_
CD/O.!.;)...........
.--....- / - {./
•...•._-.----
--

24 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Acting Chief,I _

SUBJECT: Activities of Possible Interest to the
Director

1. A few years ago thel ' !Branch was asked to

support a test program and feas1b111ty study being conducted
by DD/S&T/ORD.

en 1S
proJec conc u e , e was g1ven permission
by DD/S&T/ORD to retain-Dm",=m~'ra and TV image transmission
syst~m for further experimentation. lr--------~------------

I_~-----:--~;::::::'==========;~~------:--
2. In early Jun~ 1972
I lDD/S&T/ORD, who
had been the Project OfficeI' Xli evaxuacxlig cnis TV data link
system, phoned thel I Branch. He stated that the U.S.
Secret Service had a requ1rement for this TV camera and data
.Li nk system. It was our understanding that the camera would
be carried in a helicopter and would be used for crowd sur-
veillance during the Democratic and Republican Conventions
at Miami Beach, Florida. Mr! _ rsked that we make the
equipment available for the per10d desired by the Secret
Service and indicated that the equipment would be returned to
us when no longer needed. On 19 June 1972, Mr. Michael T.
.1
Cas ey, accompanied by Mr I
lri sit ed ~o pick up the
equipment. Mr. Casey Of Secret SerV1ce was not made
witting of t~e fact that 's an Agency facility • .--------,

~. On 13 November 1972, the equipment, as a result of

a phone call from~I~ lwas picked up at Secret Service
Headquarters by 1 1 A few 6f the system's

'----_I 00479
 MORI DocID: 1451843

., I
{
I •

components were missing when it was returned. These components

w~re . the
handle, tripod and electrical adapter. Later the
m1ss1ng components were returned to us·by the Secret Service.
4. A few months ago, Mr. ~called me about this
equipment and said that S&T wo~ to get the equipment
off its books since none of it would be needed in the.future
b S T. He offered to transfer the equipment at no cost to
ranch. A short time later the necessary paper
, ormed to reflect the receipt of this equipment
into the Branch inventory . .

\Ja.L.,.L, I "" an-en

Special b.~~.~~.~.~uy~ Division
---------------
MORl DoclD: 1451843

00481
 -
MORl DoclD: 1451843

...

6EGRiT SENSITIyE I

SUBJECT: I ---.J

prOjectl liS a Headquarters initiated program

which has as its fundamental objective the long term rnanipu-
lations of s.electedagent assets operating against EA Division
difficult targets in the leftist and communist milieu in various
parts of the world. Although targetted overseas these agents are
often exposed to and directed against American radical, leftist,
and communist targets to gain a practical'\nowiledge of the leftwing,
radical, communist world. There is a possibility that an asset
might become suspect and be accused of being an employee of the
Agency or the Bureau; or it might happen some asset would, for
some reason, become disenchanted with his role and expose-his
Agency relationship and his activities, with resultant embar-
rassment. To minimize potential problems, therefore, each
case is cleared with the FBI and through CI/SO the Bureau is
kept informed on a regular basis.

~BCPFT SENSITIVE

00482
-----------.......-
MORl DoelD: 1451843

!~.
()'
ll>
"
1:",
""'j
1". Ii ,,)
.} e"
"! o0
,,.
~.
<:
~.:.
!:
l'Jl
~

'.
r;
~

"

00483
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-'SbSR;;;T
.
- EiES AIsi'bw ~
-
Subject: Cover Support

Bill:

1. In addition to the matters listed in the CCS memorandum on

CCS Cover Support Within the United States the follo.ling bigoted cases
should be noted:

7 May 1973

00484
 MORl DoclD: 1451843 ----
r:- ...·(i~.'(l'\SSIFIED
.'~
rl
. - - ------ - - - - _- -----
"
H'IAL
.. 'J)[ O::LY
IJ CON. ,f'l TI ,\l
------ --_.- - - -----
I!J SE(;:ET
'--'-~

flOUTII'G .\ND R::CO;W $HECT

.--.,. .. --.."-- --- -- . . - -'-"--- -- .,._- .. ---- ..
'~JEcr. lOp' "QIJ
Al ias P.l:-;. ..· :,.'rt:-:

-----_.
FROM,
.. - - ._- ._- _.- r .i..:;ENSIOI"" r"'.'
.. ---. ---
C;~T ;"~F' I GCS I'-;~Tf ..
8 MAY 1973
-- - ..

-10,
I .. . -_.- .-
(ORice, deligl'lotion. ',"'l'I • .
..
"lit'. ","" DATE
...... :li,ng) OffICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment '0 shoW' hom , ,:
INITIALS w"orn. O'OW 0 linlt ceron cotuml'l of,o' .oeh (e... r,t".' •
RECEIVED fORWARDED
-" -- ..... ---- --- -'_. ..
I. ..!
..1;:,'
Mr. Colby,
2.
-
- .- bflif~-
i'tl//:
'.f../
- - .-'_." -
3. •

.. '" -,-~-
.... -' - .. - ---
~.

5.
- o'

I ~~~'!'o.~,H-;;:.

I! _._-_.
'6.
- --'_.,-
•
i
-- ._-- - -- -
7,

8.

9.
, ..
- '.

10.
"
,.
II.
.
' .
.

-
..

12.
,
. ..
:
13.
- - . -
..
1~,
..
----,.-----
15. 00485

forM
I •

l ., SECEf R CQi:rIQEiJTlt.L
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

)j

8 May 1973

1.1E), ~ORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT: Allas Passports

villeI, Centr'at L:over;'!all .

-,

1
i
J'

nil L U;.',T GQ?¥ 99 NQi" R!!:LEASE

00486
,
\t,
':,.
'~~
\ \;
\ .i'J;.
 -----------_....- MORl DoclD: 1451843

."

8 May 1973

MfMORANCUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operattons-

SUBJECT: Alias Paasporta .

IChief., Central Caver Staff

I \

-,

,"
1:'1" I "~',""
00487
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ! ..J, ~"II·."-""'.·"ll ,....... 1.J U~l L:~l' •

._---._- , -- -. __._-_._------_._--- , - - - ----_._---~--
. ' 0
ROUm~G AND RECORD SHEET
-.
SI".l!l,r(Y
,- -.- ----
,Or' "011
--.. ---- -- ----- - ----
-'~-- -_.~- --

- ._.. .- - ._--------
COttJ\i-J- -- ..
I. UTlNsiO'N'"" NO•
fROM,

I I ptJ-- -/ I -
- C/CCS
I
CAolf
, 'Z r.~AY -;''"':7~

TO, 10!lice' del;gnolion. '~m numbar, ond U~ E

building) OffiCER'S COM..v.(~TS (Numb.r ~""ch commenl 10 show r'Qm
INITIALS It) ....hom. O'OW 0 Ii", acron column ohol .och cor.
R~CElVED fO.l:WAliOfO
--_ ..-
J. '; ,
o' . 0 t · • 0
DDO
--_ ...... _.. _. - ,-; :
2_ './

-'-,---"
3_
f---- ---' --
o'
,
- ---- - " - -
~-

.
S_ , •
-. '_.
'~~'i'C,
--
.4 _ _ _ _ _ _ ,

6_

-----, '---'--,-- - - - -
7_
--
'- _.-
B.
.
9_

,
10_
-,
"

11_

12_ er AI.
t: -H7
kdVJ....
IJ.(.- , ."", -
--1J V v

,- .
Ppnyctf[) (tir'»
13_ o-
f

1~_

IS_
004eB
o

a'10
- "" ",,,ou'~ ,
FOP""
a-e, r.;r'4-l;.\,~+- __ n
(OIlIONr. r:::r COrlfl DIi:UTIO' O INIERIIAl
. USE ONLY o urlClASSlr
~
\

.; ~ .
---------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

-
7 May 1973 (Revised)

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJEcr : CCS Cover Support Provided Within

the United States

1. ~he following specific information regarding dom-

estic cov~r support ,provided by Central Cover Staff is
submitteq in ,response to your request;
Aliases Used in Conjunction with Documenta-
,
"
.

.
,

NOTE:
I
~he al>ove figures are based on the CCS record-
keeping system initiated in April 1972.

'f I I
{!J04Il83
• , , » _:" ,~~: 'J

.. ....• ..-
.~ - ._,. . . -",,- ~-" ...
I .
,
I
I
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

c. Alias U.S. Birth Certificates.

d. Alias Credit Cards.

-2-

~te1ift--- 00490
 MORI DoclD: l45l843

e. Alias Social Security Cards.

-3-
00491
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-4-
- 0049.<':
 ------------_....- MORl DoclD: 1451843

( (

1. Support to Bh~D Activities.

2. The following general information pertains to

domestic cover support activities outside the purview of
CCS:
a. Alias U. S. dr.i vers licenses \

b. Alias erA credentials \

-5-

00493
 -----------_....- MORl DoclD: 1451843

7 May 1973 (Revised)

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations'

SUBJECT CCS Cover Support Provided Within
the United states

1. The following specific information regarding dom-

estic cover support provided by Central Cover Staff is
submitted in response to your request:
a. Aliases Used in Conjunction with Documenta-
tion.

NOTE: The above figures are based on the CCS record-

00494

I
----------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

. c. Alias U.S. Birth certificates.

d. Alias .Credit cards.

-2-

00495
~_--------_ ........-
MORl DoclD: 1451843

e. Alias Social Security cards.

"
r----.......,..,."...,..,~--------------------"

-3-

00496
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

v,

..

00497
 MORI DocID: l45l843

... ~ . -

1. Support to Bh~D Activities.

2. The following general information pertains to

domestic cover support activities outside the purview of
CCS:

a. Alias U.S. drivers licenses I

. ..~ ..,,,, I

Chief, Central Cover Staff

-5-

~ 00498
 MaRl DoclD: l451843

CSI240-4

COVER
'-- --'1 CLANDESTINE SERVIL;);!,
INSTRUCTION 240-4 23 August 1972

ALIAS U.S. DOCUMENTATION

.'

i
I
uv. I,
I
I
. t ,.•_~
_... ------:-----------_._----- ... ._..-_. .._~,_.
 MaRl DoclD: 1451843

..
SE~
'

CSI240-4

CLANDESTINE SERVICE COVER

INSTRUCTION 240-4 23 August 1972

.~

.-.
'--'

.. --- .

.-----

00500
 MaRl DoclD: 1451843

,.

SE~ II
CSI 240--4 I
CLANDESTINE SERVICE COVER
INSTRUCTION 24()-4 23 August 1972

I !

Ij
I I
I !,

I .~I

3
s~
0050.1. "
i
. - ....- ..----- ._,---,-_._--_._-------_ ... . '. 4 ••• ~ '. _ .. , •• _ ..... -'
 MORl DoclD:' 1451843

- SFQR'Bf -

CSI240-4

CLA:\DESTI1\E SERVICE COVER

Il'iSTHUCTION 240--4 23 August 1972

rr>

r:-.
'......

Thomas H. Karamessines
Deputy Director for Plans
\
.,
-
- 00502
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

SEC~

CSI 240--4

Attachment 1
23 August 1972

,
1
I r

I ,
iI
I,
!
!
i

D0503 1
!
..........- 00_.-"_' L .. _
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

CSI 240-4

Attachment 1
23 August 1972

~"

-,

00504
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

CSI NO. 220-7

jO CLANDESTINE SERVICES
INSTRUCTION NO. 220-7
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
12 May 1959

. U. S. DOCUMENTATION I
IN CLANDESTINE SERVICES OPERAT""I""O""N"S..--------

o
o

o
o

o 1

S~
00505
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

o \ o ~.

CLANDESTINE SERVICES
INSTRUCTION NO. 220-7
CSI NO. 220-7

TECHNICAL SUPPOR1\
12 May 1959'
o

o
o
.,

o
o
!

01
. , , I ..
~.
oo-s(
_._--
6
r
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

i , .. \ ' - SfCPBI ~

I . '. Q
10 :CLANDESTINE SERVICES
INSTRUCTION NO. ·220-7
csr NO. 220-7
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
12 May 1959

RICHARD M. BISSELL, JR.

o Deputy Director
(Plans)

Released by:
Richard Helms

o Chief of Operations

o
rI
10
I

10
I
I
I

o
00507
\
----....,...,-,--..._.........:......,...~------------
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.•

7 May 1973

~mMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT CCS Cover Support Provided Within·
the United States

1. The following specific information regarding dom-

estic cover support provided by Central Cover Staff is
submitted in response to your request: '

ar:._..:A:::l:::i:.:a=s::.:e::.:s=-U:::s=e.::d'-=i:::n:....;:C::.:o:.:n;:,J~'
u::n::c:..t:;~:,·o:;n:::..w::.:::i,:;t.::h~D;;:o;;;c;;;u;,;m:;,;e;;;n;;"t;;a;;- -,
tion. I
I

00508
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

b. \

,
,

;,
I

c. Alias 1=tir-l:h ('..,.... -1: i 1'i P." +O~ I I

I
tT R

I
d. Alias r.redit f'arc'ls I

-2-
'~
.....i .,.
..
,- : 'I
00509
.. _.',. '-
 MORl DocID: 1451843

e. A1ias Social Security Cards. I

I
I
i

f. I

g. I

h. I

-3-

Sf11f[T ·0051.0
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-4-

0051.1
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.'

k.

1. other Special Arrangements.

(1) Alias U.S. drivers licenses

-5-

.~ 0051.2
~'~.'C'
 MORI DocID: 1451843

..

(5) Alias CIA credentials I

Chief, Central Cover Staff

0051.3
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

CORPORATE COVER

0051.4
 MORI DocID: 1451843

DEVISED FACILITIES COVER

-I
00515
 MORI DocID: 1451843

( i

S~r.l
\

PROPRIETARY ENTITY COVE~

005:16
~-------

[
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

'J-

I,xJ
. ' ...<::
0
,.
'f;. '0
f('. '"
Il'
l'
~
t:!
i-, <:'",
... '
'- m
... '
,~,. 0
it 1:l

0051.7
 MORl DocID: 1451843

, .
\ ~ .... .. #' '. -r ',' ..
• f· •

, -
\

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT Research Project on Robert L. Vesco

1. In mid-October 1972
Office of Economic Research a~"~s~e~r-------------------~~~~~

par ~c~pa e 1n a me~t~ng with a=Jumber of OER officers.

During the meeting,.~ _ explained that the
Director of CentralnteII1gence had levied a crash
project on Dr. Edward Proctor, the Deputy Director for
Intelligence, to produce a paper on international financier
Robert L. Vesco. Since the Director had specificallY
requested contributions from the field.l ~sked
our Division to help in procuring them.

I 2. We thereu:cn cabled various questions suggested by

i OER to~: ~~ ~nd asked for replies by
""" 19 Octo e£. ReL~V nt answers were turned over to OER in'
memorandum form. i-In the case of a brief reference in one of
"' the field messages-to an earlier high-level American
intercession on behalf of Mr. Vesco, we asked Mr. Helms
through his secretary whether this was relevan~ information.
The response, again,_received through the secretary~ was that
it was not relevant. 1
. 3. Soon after our memoxanda "had been submitted,
I ladviseel ~hat the Director wanted
everyone to forget the Vesco project. This was communicated
to.all DDP Headquarters personnel who had had a hand in the
project or had been made aware of it.

\\

/
0051.8
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

- 2 -

4. We never had any indication as to the reason for

or the purpose of the project.

5. We understand that OER has recently written a

memorandum on this matter for the DCI.

Archibald B. Roosevelt
Chief, European Division

i'

005.19 .'
0 •••••••• _ • • 0. _ _ o~ •• 0_ _
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

., CJl~
0.'
....CD
..;"
e-t-

00520
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

r" " ... -

-
7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT: Items for Possible Use in Briefing
the DCI
,

1. This Memorandum is submitted in order to

identify to you for possible briefing of the
Director activities which in certain contexts could
be construed as delicate or inappropriate.
2. At the request of the Director of Security,
from appro~imrt::: ::':-.:Jtober
1973 safes~te
1972 t? mi.d-Januar y
k'as made ava~lable to the
U,S. Marshal' v I~ use as a secure residence
by an Assistant U.S. Attorney wao reportedly was
under threat of assassination by organized criminal
elements. .

3. I

4. I

S. Since late 1972 CIA has taken part in seven

FBI training courses at Quantico, Virginia in
response to requests from the FBI. We have shared
with them through lectures and discussions lessons
we have learned which are relevant to their counter-
espionage responsibilities.

I
'-------

0052.1
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. I

- 2 -

6. As a means of sharing more fully our operational

experience we have invited three FBI officers to be
students in ourl '.' _ ' Icourse from -14 to '25
May 1973.
7. The Soviet defector Yuriy NOSENKO was
,confined at a CIA facility from April 1964 to
September 1967 while efforts were being made to
es tab lish whether he was a bona fide defector. _
Although his' present attitude toward the Agency is
quite satisfactory, the possibility exist~ that the
press could cause undesirable publicity if it were
to uncover the story.

I DaVId n. Blee
Chief
Soviet Bloc Division

-,

r. _ ___•

.:..- .' __'. : _ ~ J

00522
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.'.

ro,
1~: ;

r l:d~
;~;

.':1..*<
':, 0
....:' 0
.- Cl
-[-

00523
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

00524

---
 MORI DocID: 1451843

:I
7 Mfr'; ,. \,.,3

MEMORANDUM- FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT: CIA Narcotics Activities Having
Domestic Implications
1. This ~emorandum is in response to your request
for a review of activities and relationships that might
have domestic implications.
2. We occasionally report on the activities of
American citizens involved in narcotics trafficking
abroad. This information is normally-disseminated to
U.S. law enforcement agencies and other recipients of
our reports. We also- occasionally request U.S. law
enforcement agencies for name traces on U.S. citizens -
who are known or suspected to be involved-in narcotics
trafficking abroad.

00525
00521 r
 MORl DocID: 1451843

•. '

~ffiMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT: CIA Narcotics Activities Having
Domestic Implications
1. This memorandum is in response to your request·
for a review of activities and relationships that might
have domestic implications.
2. We occasionally report on the activities of
American citizens involved in narcotics trafficking
abroad. This information is normally disseminated to
U.S. law enforcement agencies and other recipients of
our reports. We also occasionally request U.S. law
enforcement agencies for name traces on U.S. citizens
who are known or suspected to be involved in narcotics
traffickin g abroad .

I··

: 5. We have occasionally received reques1:s Ior

enforcement
alias documentation for U.S. narcotics law ,I
I
I

005ZSGI-
~
 MORl DoclD: 1451843
-
,..
•

officials working abroad on foreign narcotics investi-

gations. The present method of handling such requests.
is for us to request the approval of the Deputy Director
for Operations prior to asking the Technical Services
Division to comply. We insist on knowing the true
identity of the persons to use such documentation and
limit them to staff officers of the U.S. 'Law enforcement
agencies. We also require that we know the purpose
and intended use of the documents. Finally, we require.
receipts from the headquarters of the agency involved
and the individual, and also require these documents to
be returned to us for destruction after they have ful-
filled their use. We have turned down requests from
BNDD for alias documentation for domestic use. There
are some indications in the files that there have been
requests from BNDD for domestic documentation in con-
nection with their domestic investigations. These
predate NARCOG, and we are unable to determine how these
requests were handled.
6. We periodically receive requests for technical
assistance in the form of photographic and audio devices
or guidance for use of such items by U.S. law enforcement
agencies in connection with their foreign investigations
of illicit narcotics activities. We require these
agencies to adhere to' the same procedures we require
in our own operations. From time-to-time we have honored
these requests and have provided sterile equipment when
the requests have been properly presented and approved.
Our records show evidence that Several such requests
were made prior to. the existence of NARCOG in connection
with narcotics law enforcement investigations in the .
United States. We are unable to determine whether the
requests were fulfilled.

ehlef, DDO/NARCOG

.,

00526
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.»
·,

0052'7
 MORIDocID: 1451843

.. I I 'r'"... 1. t ,
, .. . , -_0_.
.
T~RET
•
i - ", 0
• )
, ! . ' ;ft'
t :C;:D'
.'1.', ~ ~ ~ •
CRET

- k~
,J
'-l'!.o};

",l. '"~
", "7"•••.• :'.}
CONF ENTIAL
~ ' I

DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION REGISTRY

1 i-
SOURCE: ~ '1),,,, 'J:) • CONTROL NUMBER: _ "-

DATE OF DOCUMENT: a C\, 'f\rI,~ \ q 73- DATE DOCUMENT RECEIVED: S-1,;;,9 /7~
COpy NUMBER (5):
NUMBER OF PAGES:
\eI, ')..'
;). DOCUMENT N
\
l.OGGEO BY: 1 I/ I

NUMBER OF ATTACHMENTS: hD'"e...

I
FROM: Division D/CIB DATE:
,I I
29 Mav 197::1
TO
OFFICE NAME SIGNATURE DATE

'vJ V ~9<-'
1 Inspect r General Room '5oe.e" - 6~
,I ' ,
• 2
I
3 I
.
4

5
, .
o Approval REMARKS
o Action \.
o Comment FVN ONLY
q -~
o
Concurrences

Information
·B
o Direct Reply
o Preparation of Reply
o Recommendation
o Signature
o Return \\ - - - -
o Disp~tch -,
\
o File
,I
'~005~8
""'" 'c.. __, . _" .,. J_. "
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

; . ,r ' . •
, .

i UP 5ESRI;+-.

FYeE GnUI
,.

"

., ,

I
" ~

I
t

29 May 1973

i'nT>
I
EYES
3EEiRFT
ONI Y
- I
'.
~'"
I"/~" ' - ~
. ,,~ .........,
_,-, ~.n"'l

- •
00529
._. --- _
.... . . .. _--
.,,' .~ .
.
-, .. - - ._-_.~.- --,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.' . /,.,

.-

-,
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

,.
.. .. •
.
~ . ..

29 Nay 1973

I
I

[ :
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, .... •
"
."
•

~
.

2Jl Nay 1973

'''' ... """~~,, I

00532 t
 MORT DocID: 1451843

- -
REGISTRY
..---.-_.
-
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION

SOURCE: CONTROL NUMBER:

DATE OF DOCUMENT: DATE DOCUMENT RECEIVED:

COPY NUMBER (S): LOGGED BY:
NUMBER OF PAGES: DOCUMENT NO:
NUMBER OF ATTACHMENTS:

..

FROM: DATE:
Chief, Division D - 7B44 Hqs - RedO 7 May 1973

TO
OFFICE NAME SIGNATURE DATE

J
-
2
I--
3
--- ._--
4

o Approval REMARKS
o Action
o Comment

o Concurrences

0 Information -

0 Diract Reply

0 Preparation of Reply

0 Recommendation

0 Signature

0 Return

0 Dispatch

0 File 00533
 ----------------- MORI DocID: 1451843

7 Ma'y 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

FROM Chief, Division D
SUBJECT Potentially Embarrassing Activities
Conducted by Division D
REFERENCE : Your staff meeting, 7 May 1973

1. There is one instance of an activity by Division D,

with which you are already familiar, which the Agency General
Counsel has ruled to be barred to this Agency by statute: the
collection [ lof international commercial
radio t e Leprrorre COllversa [lolls De tWeen several Latin American
ci ties and New York, aimed at the interception of drug-related
commu~ications. The background on this is briefly as follows:

ere ore on
1 Dlvlslon D would take over the
coverage, and on 12 October 1972 we agreed to do so. On
14 October a team of intercept operators from the~ I
I lbegan the coverage exp rlmentally.
on :tJ <Jalluary J:5'1 J, NoR wrxit;e to say that- the test r e su Lt s were
good, and that it was hoped this coverage could continue.
Because a question had arisen within Division D as to
the legality of this activity, a query was add!essed to 'the
General Counsel on this score (Attachment A hereto). With the
receipt of his reply (Attachment B), the intercept activity
was immediately terminated. There has been a subsequent series
of exchanges between Division D and the General Counsel as to
the legality of radio intercepts made outside the U.S., but
with one terminal being in the U.S., and the General Counsel

00534-
-"-----I
 MORl DoclD: 1451843
,

'-

has ruled that such intercept 'is also in violation or CIA's'

statutory responsibilities.
Z. We are carrying out at present one intercept activity
which falls within this technical limitation--i.e., of having
one terminal in the U.S.

a arge number of totally unrelated conversations, the oper-

ators do intercept other traffic, frequently involving U.S.
citizens--for example, BNDD staffers talking to their agents.
I have described this situation to the General Counsel, and
his informal judgment was that, as long as the primary pur-
pose of the coverage is a foreign target, this is acceptable.
He suggests, however, that it might be desirable to inform
the Attorney General of the occasional incidental intercept
of the conversations of U.S. citizens, and thus legalize this
activity. We will pursue this with Mr. ,Houston.

4. An incident which was entirely innocent but is cer-

tainly subject to misinterpretation has to do with an equip-
ment test run by CIA\ ~echnicians in Miami in August
1971. At that time we were working jointly to develop short-
range agent DF equipment for use against a Soviet agent in
South Vietnam. I . land
a field test was agreed upon. the Mlaml area was chosen, and
a team consisting of Division D, Commo,1 lPersonnel went
to Miami during the second week of ,August. Contact was made
with a Detective Sergeant I lof the Miami Beach Police
Department, and tests were mane nOli! four different hotels, one
a block away from the Miami Beach Auditorium ~nd Convention
Hall, A desk clerk in this hotel volunteered the comment that
the team was .part of the official security checking process of
all hotels prior to the convention. (The Secret Service had
already been checking for possible sniper sites.) As the team's
report notes, "The cover for the use of the hotel is a natural."

{)0535
 MORl DoclD: 2451843

5. Another subject worthy of mention is the following:

In February 1972, I
on t a et..s,......,lnn"'Orr-.,,~.----"C""e"I"e"'C"'O"'n"'Ill"'lan!'r[lnc"'a"""-c"'-ro7'm"n""S-"C-"O"'U"i-"---
or copIes
tete ep one ca SIpS per-
0
~~~~~~o~~.~~ina calls. These were then obtained regu-
larly by Domestic Contact Service in New York, pouched to
DCS Washington, and turned over to Division D for passage
to FE/China Operations. The DDP was apprised of this activity
by Division D in March 1972, and on 28 April 1972 Division D
told DCS to forward the call slips to CI Staff, Mr. Richard
Ober. Soon thereafter, the source of these slips dried up,
and they have ceased to come to Mr. Ober. In an adVisory
opinion, the Office of General Counsel stated its belief that
the collection of these slips did not violate the Communica-
tions Act, inasmuch as they are a part of a normal record-
keeping function of the telephone company. which does not
in any way involve eavesdropping. .'.

Atts:
A. Dt v D memo to ~GJ 26 Jan 73
B. 0 C memo to DIVD 29 Jan 73
I I
~--------
lL_----- 3 00536
 MORl DoclD: ,1451843'

r«

26 .J-snuar.r 1973

),!E~!ORANj)lN FOR: General Counsel

SUBJECT : Intercept of Communications in the U. S.

1. CIA is j.ntercepting at our comnunications s i t e D

I righ frequency, international radio te_~-
phone calls or1g1naLingJ~ :l~ New York and being
broadcast to South FBer!Cd UL UC1 b directed to ~ew York
fra~ South America. Some calls are relay calls througb
New York but not originating or terminating there. The
calls involve both U. S. citizens and foreign nationals.

2.
e epnone '"' .:>
the traffic from
o n
CIAl1n

I 3. I would appreciate your very early vie~s as to

where this intercept activity falls wit3 respect to U. S. law.
:/ Even if it is legal or ~e can secure the neccssar/ authoriz3-
J tions, it seems to me there is ex t ra flap p o t . e n t La.L associatec
I with reports going into the BNDD mechani5m~ particu12rly .
since they may well becpme the basis for executive action. \

:f.Signed.l.

Acting Ln t e.r y

Distribution:
Orig & "- Addressee

, t!1Ll j (is I COPt ... DO NO) RELEASE

00537 r
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,I
/ I
,;

./
- ".
t:
I
/
'- ~C~r',.,.J: f':cy:>.!.-O:=?~, 2'-~ r-
I
I
29 .Ia nu a r y 1973
''1.'
r
. MEMORANDUM :E:"OR:- Acting Chid, Division D
., . . '-. .: . '.
SUBIECT, Irrte r c ept; of Co mrnurrications in the U. s.
REFERENCE: 26 San 73 Me rno for GC fr .... ;.C/Div·ision D,
Same Subj ecj

I. In referent you request 01.1r v.i ews as to the legal

aspects of a radio telephone intercept activitv carried on 2.t
our communications site I .. ,
- -
2 .. The basic Ie-\V is conta.i ne d in section 605 of the
Communications Act of 1934, 47 U. S. c. 605, \vhich prohibits
intel;ccption of any radio cornrnurri.cat.lon without the a.uthoriza-
tion of the sender and also prohibits di.vuIg irig the substance
the:ceof to any person. Chapte r 119 of Title 18, U. S. C., rna.k e s
the interception of an~l wire or oral communica.tion a crime
punishable by $10. 000 or five years' imprisonment, 0'0 both.
There are two exceptions to thes e pr ohibi.tions :

.a.. The fi z-s t provides for application through

the Department of :rustice to a Federal court for a
court order authoz-lzin« o s uch interc~ption for 5 pe.ci£ic
_

purposes in c orme cci.on w i th Law-ce nfor-c o ment du tt ea ,

Since this Agency is prohibited by statute 'from any
police or Ia....v -enforcement activities,. obv ious Iy we
.. ' . , ., .cannot ope rat e under- this ex cep'ti.on, .

b, The other excep!:Lon is containod in section 2511

of Title 18, U. s. C., at subsection (3).. TIlls pr ovidcs
that tho pro1~l"bH\on cited above On intcrceptio:a shan not

005 38
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. ",' ir' ,.

.
Limi.t the con stitutiona.l o ow e r of th e President to b~ke
such rrrca s u r e s as he d e c rns !H;cC:~;5a.:ry to protect .;-~~~ftiI!st
a ttn.c k, to obta.i.n foreign in::ellifr?ne~c: information d e c me d
essential to the s c.cuz it y of tee United Stn.te s or to protect
s u c h Lnfo r-rrta.t i.o n , a n d <to protect t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s a g a i n s t

, ove r th r ow hr fo r c e o,r' ?th'er UP~2.\,,;!fu~ rnea.ns or against any

.,,:.,'.'\ ';":;:"othEn;- clear and p-re's'ent Clang-cr'to'-ihe'strUCl21r'e or :esl'stenc-e-
of the Government~

3.. The type of i:.1.£orlu2.tion ;"01.1. de s c r ib e in your rne mor-andu m

do es not appear to .fall wi tlrin 2.ny of ~hest=; c2.tegories and since its
ultimate destinatio~ is BNDD 7 it appea.r s to be collection for law"-
c nfo r c e rrrent; purposes 7 wh'i ch 2..5 noted above ;is barred to this Agency
by s ta.tute;

4. For your i.nfo r rna tf orr, in most c'as e s wb e r e there is a

criminal p cos ecutrcn for violation of the narcotics Law-s J the Depart-
ment of Justice queries us 25 to \vhe.the~ vre have engaged in any
interception in c onne ction with the d eferrdarits , If a case should
involve the intercepti~n b~ing m.ad~ I ~t would
be deemed to be -un a'u tb.oz-Lz e d and an all P.l.OOC:::U1.LLCY LJ.!e p .... osecution
w ouId have to be ~ropped by the GO,vernment.. It is our vi.ew, there-
fc r e , that such interception shculd be carried ,on by app r opr iate
12:\I-;r-enforce~entagencies in a c c cz-darrc e w ifh th.e authority of
chapter 119 of Title 18, U. S. C.

·~r-'2.LL('i:..~~=C=:-
!
.~ LAWRENCE R. HOUSTON
G erie z-a.I Couris el

Dis tribution:
,. ,'.
COP}' -I-Addressee
Copy 2,;"Gener.al Counsel .,

,.

0053S
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

... ; '" ,

005110
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.' . , (

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT: Item for the List of Delicate Matters

The Securities and Exchange Commission has asked CIA to provide

information on any foreign connections with organized crime in the
United States. The record indicates that Mr. David Young, of the
White House Staff, asked Mr. Colby to set up a contact for Mr.
T. C. Barreaux, of SEC. Mr. Barreaux discussed the matter with Mr.
Paul V. Walsh, of 001, and on 4 April 1973, Mr,.Barreaux and Mr.
Timmeny came to a meeting at CIA with Mr. Lawrence Houston (General
Counsel) I fChief, FI Staff, 000).

Since that meeting, we have received no specific requirements

from Mr. Barreaux, but have provided ,him Wijh one Pilce of infor-
mation involving a banking transaction of, a associate of
Robert Vesco.

Cruet
Foreign Intelligence Staff

-.

00541.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

00542
,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. ---.~_ .. )
"
)TTQM
I SECRET

OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP

TO NAME AND ADDRESS DATE
:-r
1

:"~:.
l.
~
Inspector General
"Je.~ h

..
.'-~,:
-.:":"
.
'./.. ~:".';'{. :.
':,
'~'''7~l.;. .... -- ..
.:.
"i
.,
" ~>:~,If') .
,":;~:.
4,
--

, ~.

-: s ..... : '.
I--+-~----------+-----I~---
, "t..~: " ,',

A.CTlOH OIRECT REPLY PREPARe REPLY

• ,APPROYAl DISPATCH RECOMMEHDATl.OH
" COMMENT'" FILE RETUR.H . . ,., ..
CONCURRENCE INFORMATION SIGHATURE
, . .. , .....
.~.
... ,~
..;

"-,, ••?
, .",',

'.'r -~"
.;:
, .. ':.~-

.....
.,-'-,< . - '-'
.\, _:;:'-,t?:.~.. " -::::.'.
.~,".. ' f.;"~' .-,
, '.

·,·;;~~;~:;t'§i::::
~

, '.
I. "

-, :"r,,: ~:,~~:
'. ,': ."<~~4:¥~\', "
'.
.7.', _........."';:....
~, '

..c'-"-------'-;
, \- ~~~;: '
::.
".I' "

., .',,":
FOLD URN TO SENOER
FROM: "'AMI; DAn:
..: , .. ~.
,...."
. '- .; ,
. O/ES/CIA
-r UNCLASSIFIED
MC/.I!.-=~~...,.J
I 11
6J'une73
SECRET
Us. previous editions (<to)
:~ FOlliN NO.
1-61 237 . .,,'"..
,.. -'.',--

: .

..:,,-,
,.
......
 MORl DoclD; 2452843

l$ May 197J
rear Bill) f''';''''~,::,::"",,;:::-"""11;;1$1:1

Prior to my assignment to Nha Trang I was assigned to the OI Starr ror

approximately 20 months. IRJUe I was with the Starr 1 was led to believe

that one or their "Group's" on the ground noor,Dwas involved in

I
domestic CperatioM. I believe tl,eir t"'get (e} .were minority group (e),

The ~hi.f ~d reputy Chie!' of the Group at that time were Dick Ober and

espectively. One o~ their Case Orricers, I ,I

spent aver 50% or his tim. TDY Within the UnHed States. It was my under-;
standing they reported onl" to the White House and to Dick Helms. Other
members or the Starr, including myseU, had limited acce'ss to t h e D

area, only when neceasar,y and escorted at all times. Perhaps you Were Or

are now aware or what the operations are. However, I believe I would be
remiss in not responding to the book cable (hO?l90). And perhaps their
operations might have been outside the legislative charter,

~~,
_ •• ".~
m• •e 0 _ ' ( ' ' ' ' " ' ' " ' ( " _ .• ~
launched someone into Vietnam while you and were there. I

believe this was without the kn,owledge or approval or Ohier,D (rr I

recaU, the Case Orricer was I I I mention the lotter Cnly

because or the rOUOWing: When they learned thatOas being reassigned

rrcm Saieon to Ohier, Operations, FE, they also learned that I was a rriend

or 0 end rrom, the same ar-ea I

me not to discuss any or their operations With
I i
As result, they ceutioned
This I did not do.

o 44
--\ Sincerely.
-

. ",
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. '. - . :' . .j
r-:
- L --
.

TRANSMITTAL MANIFEST

TO
Chief, BKHliRALD
FROM \ No.446603
I
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTiON USE

1. . " envelope under separate From r lin responser:...

·1·· cover for Chief, BKHERALD to DIREX;TOR 40;7190 (BOOK CABLE)

. '.

00545
<,
.S~ ;~I{'l
;~M 1236 uSE PREVIOUS EDITION
I --~
I (13-47)
 MORI DocID: 1451843

-.

. ,

I
I
I r -----------c--
r'

ME/40Rn .•DUM FOR: Mr. Colby

Attached is the material we requested of Di

_

Ober:
"
•
i, A. Ten Reports" Subj: Foreign Support for
j Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the
Republican National Convention'
. B •• Five Reports, Subj: Foreign Support,lfo.,
Activit~"JClannedto Disrupt or Harass the.
Democratic National Convention .
C. Two Memoranda re Agency support to
Secret Service for Democratic and Republican
Conventions
Ober advises that the only ~'~an we report
on to the lEC is Rennie Davi (14 May 73)

DATEb ~
OS4'@
I FORO '00,
t AUG 54 10I REPLACES fOR~ 10-101
WHICH MAY 8E U$ED.
,
'.
\-

.. _--_ ...... -.-._...

~-------_.-
MORl DoclD: 1451843

SEND~~~
lJN(;L :SIFIED
CHECK c,l,sSlFlCATION TOP AND
"F'- r CONFIDENTIAL I
~M
SECIlET

OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP

TO NAME AND ADDRESS DATE INITIALS

1 Inspector General

3
. .,
:
, , ..
• .

6
ACTION OIRECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY
APPROYAl OISPATCH RECOMMENDATION
COMMENT filE RETURN
CONCURRENCE INfORMATION SIGNATURE

,',
,Remarks:
Mr. Broe:
Dick Obe r- has been advised that this package
is being sent to you. Since knowledge of the
existence of this Committee has been strictly
limited, I've asked that it be delivered to you
unopened. Although it has an ER number on it,
it has not been sent through that office - - I gave
them only the day, subject, and originator.

I I
00547
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER
FROM: NAUE 0, DATE

OIES/Mcl 5 May 7~

I UNCLASSIFIED T I CONFIDENTIAL I SECRET

Use previous ed.!lons
.. (40)
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

i ~. ;:~I Al
[1 J~[ O:IlY .. " "T
-~----. -
. ',.
... ._0 _,__ _, ______
~
_._-----_. __ .- ._- ...--- -
r.OUTING AND Ri:CO;;D S:·jEtT .. . •
-~t .. -_. - _."- ..... - - .--------_.- --'-'.' .._-- .... - .- .. ~

3JECT: to;.·.·~n.,11
.. ...
-_FROM:
... _-
ExTENSION ~O.
-

Richard Ob e r
TO, IOffie", delignoHQn. ,oom numb.t, orO DATE
l OAfE
14 May 197"3
.--- - 'i {J

OffICER'S COMMENTS (Number eoch commenl to Ihow rrom who

bvildi"g}
'"
'---- -- -
1.
._._-_ _. ..
aecaveo fQRWAIIDfO
INJnAtS 10 ",hom. O'Q"" 0 line aCtoSS CQlumn ok., eoch commen'·1

Hr. Evans
_..
2.
~" --.o/ncr
.- .... "-_. - ldiZ'l }{~k,
. ----
Attached are:
-
~J -' I
h\ .;, ~" r b.~_._ S.l,,-! .=~~:>
1. ground note on the
.L ! --<::ommi ttee per your request
--- -_.. of this morning.
3.
. ..•
2. Copies of memoranda con
- - - . -,----- - - - - cerning Agency support to

-'
4.

s.
'[(; - .. ' ..
Secret Service (7 April and
23 June ].972). .
,
.-..r...~~'Ii"k,

6.
- - ..- .
EYES ONLY
.. _- '.' ' - 1.-----. ---- •
7.
!~ ,-\- -h ~ -\ \.-- "'" v ~ "-

8. . Cl.\·... '"\ v-c ~ ;~'\ .....-. e..I..

'9.

.. \
10•

.'
11.

12.

13..

I~.
.-
. :. 00548
il t
5,
etk • 4
"'f>t9d
Vi

61 0 ustfi:o:I'ONS r..:J
" ..'"", l.:J
I E3 (QjJ~1 QrJiTI n,L
•
IImRllAl
o Ull(l~.SS(F.P
.
SECRET OV._ousr O:/lY
.. p""-..--:. •
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

."
C()IM1+1
-,' 14 MAY EiI3

Do -c2~
'SUBJECT: Intelligence Evaluation Committee and Staff

.,
1. "Background: Formed December 1970' to produce
fully-evaluated national domestic intelligence studies,
including studies on demonstrations, subversion, extremism
and terrorism. !.rembership: Department of Justice (Chair-
man); Federal Bureau of Investigation; 'Department of
Defense; Secret Service; National Security Agency; Central
" In t e l Lig en ce Agency; and as ne ce s s ary rep res en t at i ves of .
other Departments or Agencies (following have partici-
pated: Treasury and State). Staff: IES, Executive
Director John Dougherty and later Bernard Wells supplied
by Department of Justice with title of Special Assistant
to the Attorney General reporting to the Assistant Attorney
General for Internal Security Robert Mardian and later
William Olson. IES has received re uirements directl
from and delivered re ort d trec.t
lfuite House. The lfuite House"n~s.insisted that the
e x i s tence of this Commi tteebe kept s e c re t , J!J~areness
of its existenc wi in this Agency has been limited ,to
1[C~-DDO .JDDPr; eTC"!:ana: four ofITcers of this office:

2. CIA Participation: Contributions on foreign

aspects (by memorandum with no Agency letterhead or at-
tribution). Contributions occasionally include foreign
intelligence provided by FBI and NSA. The Chief of the
Special Operations Group serves as the Agency 'representa-
tive on the Intelligence Evaluation Committee Staff and
as the alternate to t~ Agency representative on the ."\.
Committee (who is the~ief, Counter Intelligence Staf~) \
3. Special Report: The Unauthorized Disclosure,
of Classified, Information, November 1971. Tlus study
was lnitiated in July 1971 by' the White House as a con-
sequence of 'the President's concern about the release
of the Pentagon Papers by Daniel Ellsberg, Both Robert
Mardian and G. Gordon Liddy initially involved in tasking
the IES to produce this evaluation. Drafting done by IES
Staff members from Justice and FBI. Only Agency partici-
pation was editor' yiew.

00549
'''
 MORl" Docl"D: 1451843

,r .,. ._,-'
, C "1 11 I
C '
..

t f. 2)
4

4. Republican National Convention (21-24 August

1972): At the request of the White House, a series of
estimates was prepared by the- lES on "Potential Dis-
r'uptions at the 1972 Repub 1 i c an National Convention, 1"'-;.: , -: ., _.
L'..::.. I·
Miami Beach, Florida." ,The Agency provided from
", .'. February through August 1972 periodic; contributions for
these estimates concerning foreign support for activi-
ties planned to disrupt or harass the Republican
National Convention (copies attached).
5. De~ocratic National convention (10-13 July
1972); At the request of the White House, a series of
estimates was prepared by the lES on "Potential Disrup- roO, ~
tions at the 1972 Democratic National Convention, Miami ~
Beach, Florida." The Agency provided b e.twe en Nar ch and
July 1972 contributions on foreign support for activi-
ties planned to disrupt or harass the Democratic
National Convention (copies attached).

Attachments: a/s

\ '.,

-s-"

OOS$O

"

I
 ----------_.~
MORl DoclD: 1451843

"•

',.

\
\

,,'

00551
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

( r------"'-'='-'=~--- ~I

.:IL---~- 'Do J-4

...
' ~

.,
':"
~ 3 FEB ;972. ."

SUBJECT: Foreign Support For Activities Planned to Disrupt

or Harass the Republican National Convention

1. There are only limited indications thus far of ..

foreign efforts to inspire, support or take advantage of
activities designed to disrupt or harass the National
Convention of the Republican Party in San Diego, 21-23
August 1972.
2. Some American participants at the Soviet-controlled
World Assembly for Peace and Independence of the Peoples of . I
Indochina, held 11-13 February 1972 .i,n Paris/Versailles,
attempted unsuccessfully to include a call for international
demonstrations to take place at the time ,0£ the Republican
National Convention. A representative of the San Diego
Convention Coalition (SDCC), one of the domestic action
groups targetting on the Republican Convention, requested
the American.Delegations' Steering Committee at the World'
Assembly to include. a specific call for international
support of activities against the Republican convention
in their proposal to the Action Commission of the World
Assembly. This request·, howeve r , was dropped as too
divisive by the Steering Committee, despite initial indica-
tions that the proposal would be taken to the floor of
the Assembly.
3. John LENNON, a ·British subject, has provided
financial support to Project "YES", which in turn paid
<. the travel expenses to the World Assembly of .a representa-
tive of leading antiwar activist Rennie DAVIS.. (DAVIS' r epr-e -
sentative is tentatively planning to assist in preparations
for disruptive actions at the San Diego Convention.) .
Project "YES" is an adjunct to another LENNON-supported pro-
ject, the Election Year Strategy Information ~enter (EYSIC),
of which Rennie DAVIS is a key leader, which was set up to
direct New Left protest activities at the Republican
National Convention. In Paris Rennie DAVIS' ';representative
to the I'lorld Assembly met at least once with «iff i c i a Ls of
the Provisional Revolutiona~y Government of'South Vietnam;
it is not known if the Republican National C~nvention was
discussed.

' .
.'

00552
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, '

~·I_-
'" :.

"
",',

:
4. The SDCC is planning, for 'foreign support for its
harassment of the Republican convention. A working draft
plan of the SDCC includes proposals for (a) the use of a
specialte~evision network to broadcast video-taped messa~es P,
from other countries, including coverage of sympathetic
demonstrations elsewhere; and (b) broadcasts over public
address systems of live telephone calls from, the Vietnamese
in Paris and from the Communist Chinese and others at the
United Nations.

,.,

,',
i

. ~.

:-"

,"

00553

I
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.
L
, , ,

.
I
i
~.

Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt

~r Harass the Republican National Convention

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION:

Indications remain limited, thus far, of foreign efforts
---to' inspire, support or take advan t age of act ivi ties designed
to disrupt or harass the National Convention of the Republican
~~rty in San Diego, 21-23 August 1972. The concept of coordinated
international support for domestic activities in the United
States was generally endorsed at the Fecent World Assembly for
Peace and Independence of the Peoples of Indochina; however, the
Conference issued no specific call for internatfonal support of
dis:uptive actions at the American national po~~tical conventions.
J3ACKGROUND:
At the Soviet-controlled World ..Assembly for Peace and
Independence of the Peoples of Indocb1na~ held in Versailles
.from 10-13 February 1972, there was mention of American plans
for demonstrations at both the Republican and Democratic
National Conventions. The final draft resolution from the
Conference's "Action Commission" contains an append ix submitted ,
by American delegates whose goal was to secure. global coordination
£or domestic actions in the United States. It calls for inter-
national support to six weeks of domestic antiwar.actions and
d~monstrations, from 1 April to 15 May 1972, and concludes wit~
the statement: "This campaign will lead up to the Democratic
Party_Convention at Miami on July 9, 1972, and the Republican
Party Convention in Sa~ Diego on August 21, 1972." .
The final "Resolution of the' Paris World Assembly for the'
\.
f---P"'eace-a:nd'Independence of. the Indochinese People" of 13 February
1972, drafted by the "Pol itical Commd s's i on " states:
:' "In the United States particularly, the protest against
the war is voiced more and more strongly, under various
'/. forms, such as draft evasions, desertions, resistance, demon-
-,' ---.-strations which now affect even the soldiers. The Assembly
,~alls for support to these progressive and antiwar forces in
~he United States, and asks the governments to grant asylum
·to deserters and to support their right to repatriation. ,
All together, the peoples of the world will efficiently help
to impose on the U.S. Government the restoration of peace,
and independence and freedom in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia."

00554
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

"
"
..
I =
-'
DEVELOPMENTS:
The San Diego Convention Coalition (SDCC)', one of the
t·
:
'domestic action groups targetting on the Republican Con-
'vention; is planning, in addition to demonstrations, for a
"large exposition in the campsights (sic) called Expose 72,
which with movies, exhibits, displays will portray the struggles
of people allover the world." Plans for activities at
.R~pose 72 are believed to include (a) the use of a special
television network to broadcast video-taped messages from
other countries, including coverage of sympathetic demon-
strations elsewhere; and (b) broadcasts over public address
systems of live telephone calls from the Vietn~mese in Paris
and from the Communist Chinese and others at the United Nations,
In addition, the SDCC has suggested that, in order to "outflank
NIXON domestically and internationally," international opposition
can be expressed "by obtaining the authority of other countries
and liberation movements to carry their flags in SDCC demon-
strations." ' . • 'r ,

•y~ ·"I';~'V·"·t

, .

, ,

.. \ '.,

' .
.'
"

.. .
00555
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

....... ", 2·4, APR 1972

cowai-I
Foreign Support' 'for Activities Planned to Disrupt
or Harass the Republican National Convention
bo--'J
SID-L\IARY:

There is lit't'lEl<cnew evidence of foreign plans or efforts

to inspire, support, or take advantage of actions designed to
disrupt or harass the Republican National Convention in San
Diego, 21 to 23. August 1972. The Students for a Democratic
Society, in joining the ranks of domestic groups, planning
I. acti ons at the Republican Convention, has adopted a proposal
i
I .
to cooperate with Mex i c an workers and students in a demonstra-
1 ·tion in Tijuana, Mexico, during the Convention. The San Diego
Convention Coalition (SDCC), another domestic group targetting
I.
I.
on the Convention, has received a letter.of solidarity from
the North Vietnamese. The letter is of interest as an indica-
tion of North Vietnamese contact with the SDCC; such contact
will be required for the SDCC to implement its earlier-reported
, , 'plans for broadcasts over public address systems during the
! ' ,Convention of live telephone caLls from. the Vietnamese in ,,
Paris. •
-f'''''~"'!'(:(

DEVELOPMENTS:
. At its recent convention in Cambridge, Massachusetts, •
held 30 March to 2 April 1972, the students for a Democratic
,Society (SDS) adopted a proposal to hold demonstrations at
the San Diego-Tijuana border during the Republican National
Convention. The proposal included a call for SDS to cooperate
with Mex i can workers and students in an action to occur during
a fiesta in Tijuana, where Convention delegates will be
entertained.
The North Vietnamese have given their endorsement to \
the San Diego Convention Coalition (SDCC) in the form of a
letter from the Vietnam Committee for Solidarity with the
American People (VCSWAP), a'quasi-official organ of the
North Vietnamese Government. The letter, which has been
circulated by the SDCC and is dated 27 January 1972,
-expr es se s "great delight" with the formation of the SDCC,
and conveys the Committee I s "best wishes of militant soli-
, darity and friendship." The VCSWAP requests that the SDCC
.1 write often and "send us materials you have. n
:".

, ~,'t:'S~
. f'{ " ae liM fleet.'
~ " •
J -nil:'"
- !.E.~TJ6 ,-,- ,r-----------,--------,
00556

!:';'::;o-, , ...-
--------

MORI DocID: 1451843

,,
"./
j.
'!'
!L,---_I
-.
';". :
Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt
-----------no~l'~H~a~l=·ass the Republican National Convention
-}..+, ,
~ ,,,~, ' . . ",

i SUMMARY:
.1
I
I. ----
Indications remain' limited of foreign plans or attempts
Ii
I:
.',to inspire, support, influence, or exploit actions designed
to' disrupt or harass the Republican N tional Convention in
i!i--- --.. .~ami Florida 21-2 Au ust 1972.
I
i:
!'

he British-based Interna-
e er on or lsarmament and Peace (ICDP) has
distributed a
IISpring Offensive Calendar" of activities
'._.. in the United States against the ,war based on 'a submission
i ----oy-ffle- Peoples' Coalition for -Peac e and Justice (PCPJ). ,i
It The calendar includes actions'~lan~ed in' connection with
Ii the Republican Convention.
i:
I..
DEVELOPloIENTS:
!.

L- --;- -----------l\
"
, The International Confederation for Disarmament and
'~--------~P~ace, a B~i~~sh-based antiwar organization and one of the
more prominent member organizations of the Stockholm Con-
ference, has attached a IISpring Offensive Calendar ll to the
." . . April-May 1972 issue of its regular international publica-
.1 tion Vietnam International. The calendar had been furnished
.by the People's Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ) and
I. ---i_Q~l~ded the following entry:
, .
il
.(
August; 21-23 'Republican Convention, San Diego.
Demonstrations organized by the San
II Diego Convention Coalition, Box 8267,
San Diego, Ca. 92103.
;1
F~LLnXT_~BPY_88 NQT im EASE
OOSS7
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

1
j
, .,
I I
• ~.I
'Co-
---- I

.;
:I
_ . The ICDP commentary on the PCPJ calendar urges demonstrations
in support of some of the dates listed but does not specifically
I call for actions in connection with the Republican Convention.
,I
',/

,5: ..
,I

II "
,.

.- .

r
I
.' . . ,.•
..
,
'
f
I
I

-
I
r,
~~.:;.~>i,i'
.- ~.:i·
.'
•

-.-
.. '
"

'.
~.
'.

_.-
HILL TDlT ~ :!-=-
",

00558
-- ~'-'-',"' ..... •.-- ··v_ .. ,_......_ .
~
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ,
••••• - • • • • _. &..: ....

14 JUN 1972
.,
..... ....
."
. CO~t1/~l
Foreign Support for Activities Plan~ed to Disrupt
. or Harass the Repu~lican National Convention Do-3<
SUMMARY:
'The only new indication of foreign plans or efforts
to inspire, support, influence, or exploit actions designed
to disrupt or harass the Republican National Convention in
Hlami, Florida, 21-23 August.1912, is an expression of
i int~rest by a member of the North Vietnamese Delegation to
t the Paris Peace Talks in the plans of the major antiwar
organizations in the United States for demonstrations in
connection with the political conven t Lonsiof both maj or
parties. . .
DEVELOPMENTS:
In mid-May 1972, a membe~ of the North Vietnamese ,I
Delegation to the Paris Peace ·'1'alk.s invited a visitor to
contact him again when the visitor'returned from an imminent
trip to the United States. The North Vietnamese official
gave the visitor the New York City addresses of the People's
Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCP3) and the National
Peace Action Coalition (NPAC), and asked the visitor to
inquire at their offices regarding their plans for demonstra-
tions during the coming summer. The. North Vietnamese
official stated that he was·especially interested in plans
for actions in connection with the Democratic and Republican
• National Conventions •

\.

.'
.;.
ii
•
"
.' .
l··~'t·
tLe

.. -, 00559
;~1~~{TJ
. I
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

•
<0'
----,;.';-.,-------'
..
---,--.-----j' I~----~----c--.~. -.-c.:;-:-!,.
Ir---, " ,Z 8 JUrn9i2'
,

~1
·t>..:<.; ~I/:".:'::': ..~-:~. ~'.
.
...!:, :. .• ~~~.T ••
~ -.~ ~, '.

"
~

::.~.~;~ .~. '; '.:::: . : ·••.;l:;;~1:-"~~ : :~. "~:';~;.:.j:::' :~::::'~~".:~:.::7~~~': "'::"'-"-:::-".:- '". : -... ; .. ~.: -"

. '

Foreign Support for Activities Plannec(to'Disrupt

.- or Harass the Republican Nati9nal Convention
-.".
.
• •
I There are no additional indications of any substantial
I'i foreign plans or efforts to inspire.'support, or take advan-
tage of,activities designed to disrupt or harass the National
"Convention of the Republican Party in Miami, F19rida, 21-24

I
August 1972.

" .. ';
,

"
.
'. .,.~""
'.".""
, "

.•...: ~ .. '

,,

"

\
\
• ' .

.'

.
.
"

,.
,
-.,~I

-
00560

,. ---".--,.- .....- """,-.,. .,"'-" .

 MORl DoclD: 1451843

"
j
. '.
•
. . '..
,~.
~ . ,
-C()(,l;'+1
26 JUL 1972

t».. . ,I
Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt
or Harass the Republican National Convention

, ' S1J1.lMARY:
! -".- . .'
Nell indications of foreign plans or efforts to inspire,
support. influence, or exploit activities designed to dis-
..upt or harass the Republican National Convention in Miami,
Plol·ida. 21-24 August 1972, consist of the Fo L'low ing t A
leader of the People's Coalition for Peace and Justice
(PCPJ) has stated that demonstrations will be organized to
take place at United States ,and allied military installa-
tions abroad during the period. immediately Before and 'during
the Republican Convention. The PCPJ leader also stated that
representatives of the Stockholm Conference'on Vietnam will'
,. "participate in activities in connection with the Convention.
"'The Anti-War
. Union (Al'iU), a domestic organization which has i
been active in planning demonstrations in connection with the ,
Republican National Convention ..·.J1,as,.sent a delegation to '
Paris, France, to meet with officials of the Democratic Repub-,
lie of Vietnam (DRV) and the Provisional Revolutionary Govern-
ment of South Vietnam (PRG). No information is presently
available, however, indicating that actions at the Republican i
Convention have been discussed at these·meetings. .
L DEVELOPMENTS:
In an early July 1972 m~eting with prominent members 'of
.• foreign antiwar organizations, a representative of the People's
Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ), who occupies an impor-'\
tant 'position within that organization, discussed the plans .
of thePCPJ in connection with the upcoming election campaign
in the United States. The PCPJ representative stated that
during t.he pe r i od 14 -'23 August, a :"Peoples Campaign Against
Bombing" would be waged in U.s. cities involved in the manu-
,,' facture and shipping of materials for use in Vietnam, and
that similar actions will be organized at United States and
allied military installations abroad. The PCPJ representa~
tive further stat~d that "dramatic demonstrations" in protest

.0056.1

,I
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, ,
..
J
~

?" " .-:. " ,

~

r.:.=;:;: ----===
of the bombing in Vietnam are being organized by" the "Repub-
lican Party National Convention Coalition" to occur on
21 August 1972. In an apparent reference to the 21 August
actions, the PCPJ leader added that representatives of the
Stockholm Conference on Vietnam will speak on the subject of
the alleged ,American bombing of dikes in North Vietnam.
(Comment: We have no present information concerning plans of
Stockholm Conference representatives to travel to the United
States during the Republicnn National Convention; nor do we
have any aqditional information concerning plans of Stockholm
Conference representatives to pa~ticipate in activities con-
nacted with the Republican Convention~)
The Anti -War .Iln ion CAI'lU), a domes tic group engaged in
organizing counter-activities at the Republican National Con~
vention, has sponsored the travel of a delegation of activists
to Paris, France, to mee~ with officials of the Democratic
Republic of North Vietnam (DRV) and'the Provisional Revolu-
,::tionary Government of South Vietnam (PRG). An advance party
~'has already met with DRV and PRG representatives to discuss ,
the agenda for meetings with' the ,full AWl1 delegation. Although
no information is presently ava'N"ab.~e indicating that actions '
at the Republican Convention have been discussed or are sched-,
uled to be discussed at meetings between the AWU delegation
and the DRV/PRG officials, it is known that members of the AIIV
advance party have asked for advice from the PRG officials I
regarding the stance the AliU should take on certain questions'
relating to the presidential elections. It is also known
,that the DRV officials have questioned the AI'lU advance party
'about the political mood in the United States. One of the
AWU delegation members has s ta t ed that upon their return to
the United States about 26 "July 1972, soae of the members
"-, will speak at rallies, over the ra'dio, and on television, \
,to "educate the 'American people about the consequences of
'voting "for Nixon, and the need' to end the' war and defea t .
'Nixon." The del ega tion member added that the demonstrations
at· the Republ.Lcan Convention ,will 'be "unique."
!
.. '
,"
-, I
,I
" '.
!
"

00562
"
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

" . . ,

'2 AUG 1972

.
(l8~nrJ
,

Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt

or Harass the RepubHcan National C~mvention
Do -,:3c1
i

SUMMARY:
, .
There are no new indications of specific foreign plans or efforts to
inspire. suppor-t, influence. or exploit activities designed to disrupt or
harass the Republican National Convention in Miami, Florida. 21-24 August
1912. Although meetings have been held recently in Paris. France, between
American antiwar activists and representatives of the Democratic Republic
of North Vietnam (DRV) and the Provisional Revoluttonary Government of
South Vietnam (PRG). currently available Infoi-mation indicates that the
DRV!PRG officials made no efforts to encourage or give guidance to the
American participants with respect to the upcoming Republican National
Convention. Private discussions, separate from the meetings with the entire
Ame:rican delegation. 'were conducted b~~!f the DRV and the PRG officials;
,at present. we have no information regarding the substance of these private
,exchanges. A second group of activists. considered' more important than
the first dcl.egation , is scheduled to travel to Paris on or about 1 August.1972 _
for further consultations with the PRG and DRV representatives. i
.I
DEVELOPMENTS:
, ';i
'!'
In recent meetings in Paris, France. with members of an American
delegation sponsored by the Anti-War Union (AWU). representatives of
the Democratic Republic qf Vietnam (DRV) and the Provfsfonal Revolutionary \
Government of South' Vietnam (PRG) were very guarded with respect to dis-
cussing activities at the Republican National Convention. Although the Vietriam-'
ese repeatedly questioned the Americans concerning the mood of the antiwar
movement in the United States. they made"no direct reference to the Repub-
.' lican Convention. except for one instance when PRG Deputy Chief Nguyen
Van TIEN accused President Nixon of using the private and public sessions
of the Paris peacetalks as "propaganda for the Republican Convention.'"
TIEN then urged the Americans to promote and propagandize the Seven
.Polnt Plan offered by the PRG. The Americans. too. for the most part.
~efrained
, from discussing the Convention. other than to esfimate that demon-
I
,
strators will number about 10.000 at the Convention. '.
r--,.. . 00563
, Fl:JLL~T COPX gQ Nef RE~EA8t"
~.~"
,..x-
,. -
.•
..."._.- .__.- -;' ..- ., .. .. -_.~,.,-

'/
 ---------------- MORI DocID: 1451843

. "

.,

Following their meeting on 22 July 1972 with the AWU delegation.

the PRG officials held additional talks with sub-gr'cups of the delegation.
Additionally. at least one of the American participants was invited by
the DRV officials to return for further discussions. At present. there
is no information available concerning the substance of these private
exchanges. . ~
. ,
.
.- A second. more important delegation of Americans connected with
the Anti-War Union is scheduled totr avel to Paris' circa 1 August 1972
for further consultation with DRV and PRG representatives. This second
group is scheduled to be led by Rennie DAVIS. founder and leader of the
. AWU. Thi~ will be DAVIS' second trip to Paris within recent months for.
discussions with DRV and PRG representatives. Upop his return from
his first trip. DAVIS publicly stated that the AWU would demonstrate at
both the Democratic and the Republican Convention, but that the AWU's
chief target would be the Republican Conve:>tion.

'.. "'~ .

,
t

. . ..
'. . •

. ,
.'

.,

._'nJ!:IJQ~T-
. eBf" - 138 1461
:-L--' "ttO?sr
-,--__ . ---,
00564

. -------
"
-",-'" _
.,.--_ •........,.....,'_..... .....
~
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

J==:--~~_I
"('t>t.a n-'I-r I 9 AUG 1'372

bD- 3'3
"Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt
or Harass the Republican National Convention.

There are no new indications, as .of this date. of foreign plans

or efforts to inspire, support, or take advantage of activities designed
to disrupt or harass the National Convention of the Republican Party
in Miami. "Florida. 21-24 August'1972.

..
.
"

'~1-f'.'
~. ,'" '

•
, \
....":

:
i' .'

",

·00565
- -- -
. .'
 -----------~ MORl DoclD: 1451843

"
. -.
'u \ '--------=~__.J b 1 6 AUG
Co "'It f I
1::>~ ...
1972
"y
" .
':. ..
Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt
or Harass the Republican National Convention

, There are no new indications, as of this date, of

foreign plans or efforts to inspire, support, or take
~dvantage of activities designed to disrupt or harass
the National Convention of the Republican Party, in
IUami, Florida, 21-24 August 1972.

. " . .'
, ~

,
..
"
:: .

-..
, "
.... : r~:. . r . :. ~

.. '
.', '

"

'f
!

,- ... '

I' .
" , ,

•
\.
-."

.'
"
.
" .
....... . ...
"

~
" '

- 001:"'66
oJ
r

I - .Fl!bb' tEx:I" e8~'(· - ~

l')~ 1m RECEPSfJ
! "

.. ...... ".~ ..• " . ' - .. _.~.-

_._ . .,.---_.. 0.r::f'QfT -~.'- . - ' '-,- , - ... - _.-. . - .. - ...!·...... w". .'. ',-,-- .. ...
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

"'c·' ··r- )
. ...
, '
) ...
T
to.: '.. ..~." 1
_.~.~_

~f.S' :U.Y

.. .... '::"';.'.
; .'.-

,
"

,
/
I

f'

\.
",

..

00567
 MORl DoclD: 145184~

"
,
'
-.
.
~

.....:O'
. , "'' ~
. r .'.
"
,I---;-----,-------,---o========:r-I,' .'. '0 6"MAil i972
• . . . . . . ': .'O'"
.. O'.. • •• ' ,"
Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt
Or Harass the Democratic National Convention

" S~mARY AND CONCLUSION:

I' There are no direct i~dications thus far of foreign

efforts to inspire, support or take advantage of activities
I designed to disrupt or harass the National Convention of
the Democratic Party in MiAmi"10-13 July 1972. The concept.
I,
I
of coordinated international support,for domestic activities
in the United States was generally .endor3ed at the recent
World Assembly for Peace and Independenc~ of the Peoples
of Indochina; however, the Conference i?sued no specific
'; . \
call for international support of disruptive actions at the
American national political conventions.
"

.': -
BACKGROUND:
. :""t"~...,\.;.t:.,

At-the Soviet-controlled World Assembly for Peace

'and ,Independence of the Peoples' of Indochina, held in
Versailles from 10-13 February 197.2, there was'mention of',
American plans for demonstrations at both the Republican
and Democratic National Conventions. The final draft
resolution from. the conference's "Action Commission" con-
tains an appendix supmitted by American delegates whose .
goal was to secure global coordination for domestic actions
,in the United States. It calls for international support
to six weeks of domestic antiwar actions and demonstrations,
from 1 April tO,lS May 1972, and conclude~ with the state- '\
ment: . "This campaign will lead up to the Democratic Party ,
Convention at Miami on July 9, 1972, and the Republican' .
Party Conven t Lcn Ln San Diego"~>n August 21,1972."
i r

" '
The final "Resolution of the Paris World Assembly
for the Peace and Independence of the Indochinese People'.'
of 13 February 1972, drafted by the '.'Political Commission"
states: '

,, ~ "In the United 'States particularly, the protest

, , "
-c-:.... =.
against the war is voiced more and more strongly,

,. . '" fltl HOi RELEA~

·.Io~ __
Ell! .'._l~~rr 88l:> a - - .--------~------
:.;~;. ~
J 00568
 -----------~
MORl DoclD: 1452843

". ~·~·..:·"'-·-·"·~·--·~·;·:·~-t~--==---t
., ,
, .. ... .. '. - . .. ', .

................... , •• : ..... ~i ••••••••••• " "0. .•.• .•.. . • . • • . ,..... ••.••• • •••
'.' ,..,
under various .forms, such as draft evastcns ;_.. -- .
desertions, resistance, demonstrations which
now affect even the soldiers. T~~ Assembly
calls for support ~o theseprogtessive and
;',- .
antiwar forces in the United States, and asks
the governments to grant a~ylum to deserters
.' and to support their right to repatriation •
. ,....... . .: . . All together, the peoples of the world will
::~ : . 'efficiently help to impose on the u.s. Govern-
:". (,;,: ..: ment the"Testora tion of peace, independence
.:..... and freedom in Vie tnam; Laos and Cambodia."
. : -." • 0' •

I
",:: ".: ., ',:: .
;', '. . .-. -; .
"

I i
:.". .
...:~..' '
" ','
::'
., ':. ,- ,.• ..
i " ',' ~: .. . . ;" . 'j'

",;-, ~
" ~

.. .:.' .. '. '. . •••- 'w • -" .•.:.-.. ;...... ,": -:i .-
. ~
'.'
' .
0' •• "

"
i: . ."', 1 • :'.
0'

,'_•
"

... ..
. ,. : "

"
II .- .. ;.,' .. .
II .»--,
'
:'
, .
" • • ,t
I: r , ',': •
-, :
,. e,
:
.. ' ,

r ' .. :. "
,..

,
r •
If
• ..
' .'
,. .. : .. .'
. -.: .... " . ':
. \.
• '0 ..

" ~
"
.. '

.'

• •
I.
•
.'
", .'

i'
! r
. . • ........v
' . i-...•

I·! '.

' . 00569

. '.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

_ .--"_,-.-'-,---_._-- M.'~' ,
'. 09 MAY i972

.... . : . , .C()(). " t./ .

.
, : : . ':': . l'" •
. l>d·_·.;;1b
Foreign Support for Activities.Planned to Disrupt
or Harass the' Democratic National Convention
"
SUMMARY:
!:
.~,.

i " '. " .{ .

New.indications of foreign efforts or plans to inspire,
support,. influence, or exploit actions designed to disrupt··
or harass the Democratic National Convention in Miami, 10-13
July 1972, ~re limited to a reiteration by a member of the
Secretariat of the Stockholm Conference on Vietnam of'a
statement previously issued by the World Assembly for Peace
and Independence of the Peoples of Indochina. The Assembly's
'prono~ncement generally endorsed the concept of international
support to a campaign of anti-Vietnam War,'activities in the
United States leading up to the Democratic and Republican
Conventions, but made no -sp ec Lf i c call for support of dis-
ruptive actions at the conventions themselves.
r
•
DEVELOPMENTS:
.... .-.~ . J
I

-
>1

The World As~embly for Peace and Independence of the ~

Peop l e s of Indochina, of which the Stockholm Conference was \.
a major organizer, had earlier enunciated a similar s t a t emerrt".,
in an appendix to the final draft resolution'of the Assembly's
"Action Commission." The app eridLx' called for international
support to six weeks of domestic antiwar 'actions and demon-
stration~, from I April to 15 May 1972, and concluded with
-. ~ ·the statement: "This campaign will lead up to the Democratic
" Party Convention at Miami on July 9, 1972; and the Republican
Party Convention in San D.ie~o on August 21, 1972."

I.

""1'..
'0.f:.';.':
00570
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

'.. ..
23 MAY 1972

C~t\+ I
Foreign Support for Activities pianned to Disrupt 1>0-,:37
-,,(IT Harass the Democratic National Convention

SilllMARY:
Indications remain limited of foreign plans or attempts
to inspire, support, influen~eJ or. exploit actions designed
to d~srupt or harass the D3mocratic National Convention in
ul 1972,

The British-based Interna-

~t~~~o~n~a,-rr~~~e~r~a~t~i~o~n~~o~r~D~~~s~a~m-amentand, Peace (ICDP) has
distributed a "Spring Offensive Calendar" of activities
in the United States against the war based on a submission
by the Peoples' Coalition for_ Peace and .Jus t Lce ,(PCP.:T) , ,i
, The calendar. includes actionsttPJ.~~nned in connection with I

the Democr a t Lc Convention. '"

DEVELOPNENTS:

The International Confederation for Disarmament and

Peace. a British-based antiwar organization and one of t~e
more prominent member organizations of,the Stockholm Con-
ference, has attached a "Spring Offensive Calendar" to the
Apri1-?>laY,1972 issue of its regular international publica-
tion Vietnam International. The calendar had been furnished
, by the People's Coalition for Peace and .:Tustice (PCP.:T) and
included the following entry:
"

Ju1y.9 - 12 Democratic Convention, Miami Beach. '

Demonstrations organised by Florida
'/ People's Coalition, Box 17521, Tampa,
Florida' 33612.
1

0057.1.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843
;: ..... .;-.
'. • I •

The'ICDP commentary on the PCPJ calendar urges demonstrations

in support of some of the dates listed but does'not specific~lr:
"call for actions in connection with the Democratic Convention,
' .. .. .
. ,-

"

..
.'• !

-,
' .. ,
,
...."
'
.. .
'
i

, "
I "

I
'., •

'" \
"

:., .• "

..~ '-.

.:
;

0057Z
D
 MORl DoclD: "1451843

..
-----_
: . -' ~,~
...
. ~---_.

.
~--
.
.' . .
~
- .. ..' ....

Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt

or Harass the Democratic National "Convention

S{J1.1J'.IARY:
The only new indication of foreign plans or efforts
. to inspire, support, influence, or exploit actions designed
to disrupt or harass the Democratic National Convention in
. ,Miami, Florida, 10-13 July 1972, is an expression of int~rest
. by a member of the North Vietnamese Delegation to the Paris
'Peace Talks in the plans of the major antiwar organizations
:in the United States for demonstrations ip connection with
the political conventions of both major parties.

"
DEVELOPMENTS:
In mid-May 1972, a member 'of the. North Vietnamese DeLe >

gation to·the Paris Peace TalK~~'invited a visitor to contact

him again when the visitor returned f'r om an imminent" trip
to the United States. The North Vietnamese official gave
the visitor the New York City addresses of the People's
Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCP3) and the National
Peace Action Coalition (NPAC), and asked the visitor to
inquire at ·their offices regarding their plans for d emon-
strations during the coming summer. The North Vietnamese
-official stated that'he was especially interested in plans
for actions in connection with the Democratic and National
Conventions.
\
\

"
•

j '.
. . 00573
.'~tf~~' ;,t ~
e-
 -------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

~.. ~" ~
----'--.-.--'-------. '~l = ~~()~~"t .1..
«-,C ... , ' ,
. ."
2 1 :lUN 1972
• l •.
. '-
7 ' ',;':':'~~ ".~!.o~ --~•• :..
.-#' •.•..
...- ,....:. .. \ :.. • • • •.., ,</"._ -""'
~

, ,

Foreign Support for A~tivities Planned to Disrupt

.:
,
!
-
or Harass the Democratic National Convention

There are no additional indi~ations. as of this date, of foreign plans

or e1torts to inspire, support, or take advantage of activities designed to
disrupt or harass the National Convention of the .Democrati~ Party in Miami,
Florida, 10-13 July 1972,
' .. .; ~ ~ .- -:' .

;.". .

./

\
;:
,.. "

"

.-iULb T~FJ!Q¥1;.Qg ~IQI R6br-E_i\O"'.•~- ---,

t f.e.._
..... 00574
'-_.... .,..--....-~ -._ . .~- ----- ....
'-""'-"'-.~'" ,~
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

005'75
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

"
'.
-
,...
\.,.,.
. _. . 1
a:z: - )
23 J197Z
UN

l·JE.klOR.\~lDt.il-f FOR: Executive Director/Co:l:ptrollcr

VIA : Acting Deputy Director for' Plans
,,
SUBJECT Agency Sllpnort to the ti.S, ~ccrct Service'
(USSS) for'l,ationai"'!)'c'!'locratic (iO-14 .Ju l y
1972) and ~;ationa1 Republican: (21-24 :\Uf,u::;t
1972) Conventions

1. This ~'1cporl1ndu<l is for the Ln fo rraa t Lon of the Executive

Dircctor/Co~ptrol1er_

2. Authorization for CIA sunnort to t~c U.S. Secret Service

for t he Dcnocra t Lc and ':c,:,u'Jlic:.m· ~;aticnal Convcn t i ons is con-
t'llined in a PlcrJornndtO. 0[" 7 ,:'\nrll 1972 frolrl Ch Le f , CI Sta.ff to
the ilCI "hiC;l \,'3$ concurred in hy t he ADDl> and approved .by··the
ncr on 10 April l!J72 (copy attac!-.ed). .'.
3. On 13 ,.I.l'ril 197Z the mei; r.iththe "iami
USSS r cpr-oscn t c t Ivo and '·;r. ~"3do:larters ro
discuss p'l"cli;:ii::l:lry plnunill~ ° 's~~port to the
USSS [lriOT to :l:lti Ih.!"!,!.::~ ~ ...:b;~~': .... vuW't,;I1L.lUns. t.:nl'l ~'lI!lri! 1~~72
t·!:lo I land I I~~ct \lith "'I". I
!!e.ldquartars
to tr::ple',ll·nt t he prcll:illn:Iry p.Ia.Jl'lir.g a,_:l,"CO uyon in ··!b:~i a nd
lat
to de t orn Lne the cx t e n t of Headquarters support: r cqu Lr ed b y the
USSS. ' . . -

4. The basic 3greeneni ~utua1ly concurred in by the USSS

and Headquarters representatives proviced that:

a. I
all CUh... lS OL .weer-cst t
J'-OUld co nduc t name traces on
tho USSS.
b. CIA Headquarters would conduct TI<!;r"e tr~ces on
all other foreign born persons.or interest tQ the VS5S.
c. CIA ~ou1d keep the USSS inforncd Ot a~y events
in the Caribbean and Latin American ~rcas thnt ~culd
have any !Je.1rin?; on the IlSSS. pr orcc t Ive ,"iss:ion dur Inz
the convention Dcriods. This would incl~de briefin~s
on Cuba and Cuban no LLc i es toward the l!nitet! Sta t e s and
on actiVities of c~~an intclli~cncc op~r3tiocs which
could affect the socurity of the conventions.

00576
. .. .-.- ...
~
. .
.... •• • .... M

.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.
.. v v

d. Coverage of Latin Ancrican exile ~roups in the

United States wauld be tbe responsibility of the rBr
since CIA had c;,ased the extensive coverage for::Jcrly
targeted against thC$C Rroups since it ~a5 now con3iuercd
', .1lP. internal security function. , ...
s.1

6.1 I has a r-r anz ed the r e n t a L of a s a r e nous o

abou t five n i nu t e s f r oei convention center ti:licn ~;ill provide a
and.
s e c u r o n f.leC''tin::r i t
e a r b v for t!SSS and ~~cncv
s e n c r s c n n o L ,

This safchou$o w~ll be 3~ai13~lc just prior t~ an~ ~urin~ ~otJ)

conventions. :\ Headquarters officer ,.,-ill TDY to ~'i.::si nr Lor to
the conventions and rC:;:,J.in until the cOllvention5 adjc~l'n to
assist I lin p r ovLd Lng the suppo r t dc sc'r i.bcd in pa ru graph
four anave.

7. . Station 1I1V~4ia",i is in daily contact with tho iJSSS ion

~lilU.,i.utilizin.:: J:iFi\LCb~1 as a ne e t Lnc site wl~en ncc c s su ry , ';le
Lnca't Lon of Stntian ''iH!r·:ial!1i (J:'CO::1'"A) has not b e e n r cvca Lcd to
the tiSSS. (J:,;C0l;RA is located s orae distance fro::: J:lJ:.\LCOS.)
Additionally. t~e !!iami Security Fiold Office gaintai~s nornal
l1nis9n wi tll the local liSSS -"liami' unit.

8. Th{
at the conVCli<XC .... Jil. toat tJ~cy
Imder~tand~ tha~ no p!'::rsonn7~ ~ill
bo':>rosent
"'111 not p rov i o e any
c qu i pracrrt
unique to the Agency. nor "ill it provide the use of any o t iie r
facili tics o t hcr than the saf'ehou se described in pnragraph six.

• 00577
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

..
•• •
-3-
."f....

, ,....,

5Lr·
TNt-odore G. Shackley
Chief
Western Ilc~ispherc Division
At t achmerrt;

Distribution:
Orig & 1 - EXec. Dir/Comptro11er
2. - Acting DDP

r/ I
_________________________tTYPed 23 June 1972)

00578
•
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.' ....
..
"....
,I
. \. J .
V ..
.-;. ...
,
•
7 APR ut:
• • •
•

•
~lI::NORANDUH FOR: Director of Central Intellir;ence
VIA: Deputy Director for Pla~s

SUBJECT: CIA Support to thc Secrct'Service

for the Democratic Uational
Convention in i·jiami, Fl·orida
... JUly 9 - 15. 1972 .'

1. This memor-andum describes the support wh Lch

the Sccret Service has r-ecucc t ed rrom CIA ~litll r-cr.ar-d
to the Dcnocr-at Lc liationai Convention. It is rec":
ommendod that the A::;ency l'urnish the nuppor-t; out lined
in paraGr<!pn 3 of this memorandum and :four ap9roval
.1s reques ted. .
2. By memor-andum 1-30-610.53 or 30 i·jarch
(attached as rcr~rcncc), toe 5ec~ct S=:~ice b~3
requented a GeetinG wi~h ap~ropri~te AGency cflicc~z
to discU3~ the A~cncyrs ~upport to the Secret ~~~vic~
prior to ann durin.; the Der.;ocratic ;·jational ccnvcnt Lon ,
The Secret Service plans to send an aGent to ;·11':',,11 on
11 April to cO~~cnce 9rep~rations for the conven~ion
and wishes to have the meeting with AGency Headquarters
. :
officers prior to the agenis depurture lor Ni~~i •
3. : While details rCGardinG the type of Gupport \
Which the Secret Service will request OL the A~ency
will not be known until. there hao been·a ~ee~in5
• with the Secret Se:ovice.on thiS,;;;.:l;;~er, it is evident
from the Secret ;;ervice memor-andum and 1:00m our
experience in s upp or-tLnr; t ne Secret Service at the
Repub Ldc an Convention in Nia.'01i in 1968 that the
Secret Service desires:

'. A) BriefinG3 on Cuba and Cuban policy

\ towards the United Stateu. Counterintelli~ence
\ information on Cuban operations asain3t the
A United States Which could affect the security
\ .\ of the convention.
\., \ .
\ ',i

\ 0579
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,
, ,
•
.. (, _.' \..,
'. ; . ,

• B) Bricfin~~ on CUban exile a~~ivitie$

in the United 3tate~ •
"
j
• . C) Name checks on hotel and convention
employeell; na,";;e checj~::; on tho:;e peril ens in
the Hiar.:d area l'lhom the Secret Service
considers a threat to its protective mission~

D) ./twatchliot of oer:wns \"Il'iOJ:l the Agency

considers
or a potential threat to the security
the conVention.

I r----='-'~L=i-=a_=i_=:;'_'o""'n~with a dcsisr:ated officer I I

I,
I 11
"~~;J~~=:r--;;C:T.~;-;f::-:f""er:c:~;O-""~-;;~::::~C:;i-=~;-::'~~for the Dur~05e of con"u~
' Ifi ) e ~ ',n d I
4. 'Agency SUpport tr the Secret Service 'for the
converl;ion ,;~ill be ':cn4ra~,ized at nc:;~doua!'ter:;'ttl;':
wi],], be contl'olleC: by iieau(Juarter:;. [f5hief:
under the cc:neral Iluoerv!:;lon of '.he@ Sta r:;:s will
'1
serve as the Cooroinator of this support.

ames Anr;leto;',
. Chi:ef'. cr 5~~,lT
J. Attachment
co: DDCI
•
\

,,'
The recor.~endatiJn contained
1n paraGraph 1 i~ a~proveG:

~ ~ I I \
-'-/'''-I'\..A..",\.",-U-l_'LA ~\
trect ~r Central in~e~libenc,
•
_

5 APR 1971
-
'r etlru l'ltl HSf RELEASE .• ., .,

~..
, '- '
""''- 00580
'...-
..• --~._ _---
.. :_---~ . -~.,

I
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

. ." ./ i I . I.·
T:-:iE j,-"/drr~,iEi'fr OF TI:E TREi,SU,lY

cr n." I>IUCTOIl WASlllNOTO~. 11.0. 20226

omC1l o'

• 1-:30-610.53

Central Intelltge~cc Aacncy

AT'J.'N: Mr IL- '-- --.J

JTJ>IES J. RO;'lLIrr - DIRECTOR

9

Derr.ocratic ;~ational Convention -

Miami, Floridn - JUly 9-15, 1972

In view of our re~!,on5ibilitics rCC;ilrc1ir.<] the protection

of p:..,..os i.d on c i a L c nrici i ci e c e s , we h avo__ ini.ti~tcd --Gccur.l.l:.Y
?reparations to:' -:'!H:~ DCr.iocratic Hntional Convc n t.a o n ,
which w~ll oe neld in Mi~~i, Florida. between July 9-15,
1972.

We request il meeting as soon as possible between repregenta.-

tivc9 of our !n"Cclligcncc Division and your agency to
disc:lsS intell.icc;)ce
- . - . -~rior to and durinq- t~2
StlDoort
Democratic ~';ation~l Convention. ;';e arc sp~cifical~y
inte~es~eci in di~cussinq the npp=opriu~e ch~nncls for
routing na-ne checks of j,otel and convention erap Lcy cc s ,
as well as other indiviauals of protective in~erest to
this Service. We antici~ate·there will be sev~rnl
~~ousand n~~eg to be che~kcd. We would also like to
discuss the current C~Dan situation, p~rticularly any
existi~g reiutio~sh~P5 0etwcen pro-Cubiln gro.~ps in the
Hia~i area s~ci m~i~l~nd eu~a! si~ce we ccnsia~r ches~
~:=cp~ ~o bo a Fot~n~~~~ th~cu~ to ou= prG~cc~~va ~laaion.

•• 00581
.,
~.J "iI. :_
 MORl DocID: 1451843
,
(

7 May 1973

", .t'l[ , SUBJECT:

Request for Information on Sensitive
;,'" .- Activities

You will recall that in Fiscal YeaB1971 and 1972,

I believe, Agency funds were made available to th~ FBI.
These funds may still be possibly held in a special
account for that use. This is one of the areas where
TSD has been very much involved. Chuck Briggs would
"~. -
have the details as this was handled through the Executive
Director's office and of Course Angleton would have
additional information.
_-
'.'
I
~.'
.
••~
{
J._

Edward L. Sherman
Chief
Missions and Programs Staff

00582
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR Deputy Director for Operations

. ", "',
SUBJECT Areas of Possible Embarrassment
to the Agency

1. Sometime in the spring or early summer of 1971, Mr. John

Dean levied the requirement on the Agency for information relating to
the Investors Overseas Service (lOS). The original request was
non-specific but it gradually emerged that Dean was concerned with
,the possible adverse publicity that might develop regarding the
President's nephew, who w~s employed by lOs,

2. There were multiple channels from the White House to the

Agency on this subject:

a. Presumably Haldeman and/or Ehrlichman to Director

Helms.

b. Someone (unnamed) in the White House to the DDC1,

General Cushman (see attached telephone conversation).
Note that Ehrlichman is mentioned, and

c. John Dean to the CI Staff. These various channels

were sorted out in time and six reports were passed by
the CI Staff to Mr. Fred Fielding for Mr. John Dean.
I
~.
3. The telephone call of General Cushman's is of interest since
it gives the flavor of White Hous e concern. It took several days to
uncover the fact that the White House interest centered on the involve-
ment of the President's nephew with lOS and possible adverse publicity.
The reports submitted to De aris office were routine-in nature and were
coordinated with the DCI. After a few months, interest in this sub-
ject died down and we did not pursue it further.

4. Please return the attachments when they have served your

purpose.

00583 '
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

5. I also include a short note on the Intelligence Evaluation

Committee and Staff prepared by Richard Obe r , The original
meetings were held in the office of .John Dean at the White House
and the principal sparkplug for this gr-oup 'activitY'wa-s...t1?e then
Assistant Attorney General for Internal Security, RobertlvIa-1<djan
and then later his assistant, William Olsen. It is noted that M ~
Mardian is »o w appearing before the Grand Jury 'antl"i1:is always ---------______.,
possible that he might draw in the Agency.

6. Before appointing Ober .to the IES Staff as the Agency

representative, I had attended various inter-agency meetings pre-
sided over by Mardian. I expressed the view to Director Helms
that Mardian would require very careful handling due to his inex-
perience. Furthermore, Mardian was de ep'l ydnvol ved in the' split
between Bill Sulli van and Mr. Hoover. On a confidential basis
one or two senior FBI officials stated that Sullivan was secretly
passing files' to Mardian without Mr. Hoover's permission. This.
was one of the important reasons why Sullivan was dismissed from
the. Bureau.

{YaCes Angleton
Chief, Counter Intelligence Staff

Attachments (5)

00584
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

Telephone conversation of General Cuslunan and someone in White House, 23/7/71"

. "'.
Bob, how are you.

DDCI: Just fine; I just talked to Jack Sherwood and he suggested I give you
a buzz•
-
......-..
I deeply appreciate" it. 1 asked Jack to call you. I spoke to Rose yesterday,
.and told her "I had a little project here for John Ehrliclunan and I need very
discreet assistance from the Company, and I should· like to touch base with
Bob. I met him at Jack Sherwood's. ".

DDCI: That's right.

That's right and beyond' that I would like to just establisha relationship because
from time to time we have a few needs in your area. Let me tell you what we
need to know here. yo';r Agency would be the only one to help. I have checked
with the Bureau, Bob, and they have nothing on this fellow. Just a mere name
check but it apparently has some significance, of c our s e. Ray Finkelstein;
born in Belgium about 1940; moved to Brazil about age 12 with his family.
This mightie helpful. He now is working with one" Gilbert Straub, apparently
Straub is hooked up with that Kornfeld outfit: lOS. .We have a need to know what
Finkelstein is all about.

DDCI: We will do our. best, of course; we have some counterintelligence files

which sometimes turn up people but ordinarily, of course, we don't s'urveil
any Americans but this fellow might
, , have come to our notice.

He may not. be an American, just a European Jew; ..that is the problem, the
Bureau has come up with zero.

DDCI: Do you know where he is physically located?

He may be in Geneva; Straub is apparently in Geneva.

_..
~, "" ........
DDCI: Well, let me get on this and I wi.l.Lget 'back to you.

00585
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

J.
•
rlll; WASIlIi'iGTOX POST W,"wJ.r,r,~.16.1m Ii7 !
. , .ft

CJU7!, Il:'Je ar.7t.J[J[i5... Br<!J~her ,

TIl• .Ttlt"" ..LJ,f,'rJr"lI !il\'Oid rl(,:1I:; that. might.. rr-Ilr-r-l hln brotncr- nul of Irnuble, "I have establlshed, are .... lridl"

I -. .
Pl'r·;jII~1I1 XI,nl' 11M 1'1\'('1}
unfnvru-nhly on the I'rcstrlr-nt, want (0 he sure that Don 'has untrue.
Not Ionl: iltl,C'I"Wnnf. Dnn.,jl) no drnlln;::J ." WJLh the federal "
Ehrltchmon
. .
,,1"0 r.;)\'~ Dr.n-
"~irlr John Ei,rJlII .,,\:111 n lh-li· IH'~;)n ,Jlf'Rc-rlm:
I . wllh .lnbn novermncnt," Stud ." ( ::I non, JJOl1illrl Jr. it Jr£". JI
the Proal- II)1'
f',11ro Jlrr:;I II1.11. '0,' 1~:l):l1r:'( In IJiII-.p Itosf nn mnnufnctnrcr or rfrllL "I want to be sure that t.ut:c before the iJOY ~\"':lIl If) ;
J:;rr)l the J'rc-511Irl:I:. II P'l'l -s- }l1:1.\·.~' ound equlnment, who Don b never asked t do any- Swltzcr-lnnd bsl summer If)
~Ihh' In-other, Donald, (lIIL »r \\':'IulC'1I the novr-rumcnt to . 0 work for Jnternntlonnl Con-
!
hoi w;l!rr.. cnnshlcr iml;dtinJ: hi~ prml- th~lI(: thot wo~Jd embarr-ass trola. The company has now \
Donald Nixon hns It weak- nets in urban riot nrcns. Hill thts offh-e," transferred young Nlxun to
I1r~!'; {m' (;'tllC'nlll~ rocds [lilt! told U~ DOl1:'1Jd merely wantr-rl TIH'J1 the Prc::;hicnl added n.'i the Bnhnmas.
C':l}:Y.monC'J'. Itc u-lr-d to ~,1lh;ry 10 he the company's W('!'l:m a O('rlhIJuJ.;i1l: "Don is the' His father, l=lHdn~ 10 a fcw
llnlh appl"lIh'$ in the l!1:iOs hy Coast rcnrcscntntive, ilnll did hr.!'l :-ah sman in the I)ixon vjsttors, inchnllnq my i1~.'iUci.llll'
hMl'mdnc ~~O;\,onO from hll- not want to put'!n the fix for !;llllily." . George Clifford, con~idcrrrJ lh:al
llonalrc Howard Hughes to op- (edernI money. But Eln'llch- The M"rrlof.t~ anrced to Donald. Jr.• was snmcthinq of
crate it rcstnurrmt chnin, the man quietly vetoed the pro} watch over Donald, and they a disnppnintmcnl to the Jam-
BolTIC' or t11(' Nixnnburger, in eel, and the President's have scrupulously kept liirn jJy. He had been 0(£ in tile
Southern Cnllfornla. brother wrote to Hill sJyjn~ away from wnsblngtcn, There mountains associating with hip-
Two months aft('[' the 10:1n he WOlS no longer interested has been only one awkward in- pies before the overseas jOD
W;l5 made, some oC Hu,::hcs' in the company. crdcnt. Dpnnld Jlcw to Greece was arranged,
IClp n~!<:i~t;ll1l~ :;nt down with, T • ,150_'1:': oC the three-man team '!hc boy had said he was
Dnnnld 10 survey the rh;lo:- or No 1.nl1gcr Allnf'cr thOlL orfttrcd,.MarrloU·s airline- gomg to work for Investors
hi .. accounts. NO:lh Dir-trlcb, Donald also made coutnet (':ltninl; service to .Artstotle Ovcrse a5 Service, which has
\' ho then dlrcctcd the rlav-to- wlth Elmer Stone,'), Jawycr for Olln!i:sis' Olympic Airlines. been in Iinanclnl diffirull.\'.
cktr opernllous oC Hu~hr s• em- the fly.-,n Acrnnnutir-al Com' . 1").. "I told him not to say IIt;)l:'
uln-, rnrup! ..tnod thnt Dnnnld p,111~', But in acrcrcncc to hi" Gl'cdts J.1curJ1J~ Glfls said l.?ona)d, a ,nole of eXil~jl('r'
I h:ld ~'lItr thl'ouc:h the money brolher, Donald toolt ::;Iolle Th" Greeks, who!>c fililifilry!.alfon In hJS '·olce. "1I th;tl '~(,l"
\\ i1hnul v.l)·ln&" oft important (hrou{!h the gunnlcd White ~O\'(,rJlml'nt is unpopul;lr in around, he's goinJ; to hI'" in ..
rrrrlilors. House :::..1('5 to :;cc-· Ehrlich- the U,S .• Tolled out the red lot of trouble. I told him h~
Rut it WAS too)ate. Donald's man. Afterward, a ~poJH'$m;tn eill'pel for the President's WilS to say he \\'fI~ IJ'iinC to
rc~laur.1nls w('ot bankrupt, for Ryan Aeronnutical e'x~ bl'olhr.-r. Tom P<lppas. a bi~ work for JnlcrnJl!on,,1 Con·
anrl Iht' KixollburJ:er was lost p)nincd th:1t the pnjr hnd just Republiciln Jnoney raiser with Irok IDS nod Inleru:atioJ1.ll
til mankind. dropped by to Jet it be knllwn oil intC'fC':;ts in. Greece threw Controls arC" illlied compnnic$.
Thc story of the ~205,OOO that Stone \VilS no Jon~cr net• ., J:wi!;h dinner for DoililJd in but h~'s not ~lIP}1o.':;p.d to t.ay
lo..n lrnkC'd nul durinJ::: Rich- iog ns Donald's ler.:ill ildvisr:r. AlhC'ns imd in\'ited members hc's workin,:: (or 'IDS. You
ill'd Nlxon"s ]9GO ('nmpillJ;n for Whcn Donald fin ..lly joined oC 1he Greek mlIltnry junta. know whO'll would h<lllpen if
lhe prc:;lncncY. causing bim the l\Iflrriolt COrj10rilllon in J\nfl Onnssis, the husband of that hot around. ..
lJolilk:11 :p..in. January, ]970. EhrJichnmn thc widow of the miln who de- "ThJt dumb so·and·~o." DOli-
J\t onr. 111nr, Don:l1d Incor. .summoned J. WJl1..rd :i\larrioll (e;llcd Hichard NIxon for PrC's- aId silid or his ::;00. "John Ehr~_
l'tlri1lrd hlmsrlC :mrt bc,::an ~cl- nod his son, Bill, to lhe Whit" itknt in lDGO. sent long· 1Jchm.tn tnlked lo him fo~ a
line _~h..r('..; 10 ('ill7.r.n~ who IIouse for an audience with ~l~mm('d roses to Don:tld's couple or homs nnd lold him
michl h.we nn lnl(,l'csl In his the Prc~ldcnl Marriott h:lrl hold room. .. to beh:\Ve lJimself over lhel·c.
hlnnd Jin~. Ehrlichn1:ln ex- been ch<lirman of the Nixnn Wn:-hln~ton wllIspcrs thnt You know, he told nirn he w"s
pl.'llllf'd !!('nUy 10 Donnlrl thnt Innu:::uinl nnd Is truslcd' by Dnn:lld used his While J[ouse the President's nephew and
."llrh ,,('ntures C'ould cmh;lrrMs the President. . Influence to ,::ot cnlt'rJnn- eon- couldn't do nn),thlnc to emonr-
hi." brother nod thnt, lor his Delicately. the President trncts for :MarrioU'wlth Amer- r;lss Ute Prcshlcnt"
hrolhcr\, snke. he IIhould asked the MarrJolls to keep Jc:m .J\lrlincs and TWA, we • 01912.Dtll.MC~LJI't01"dll'.t •

.!
./
I ~\:IflUE~1 P'!PX -: ;:;,;s UUIJ: h) UU .Jr'~i Ifp)"fY jlJ
·U· :1

!~{tvw t;'f:: :-jc;l7Jf Ii_;~i_~.... Q.~Q ~~~.~1L_:~rl

I
I
J

Jil
I I
.._ . ... '.- _ '.'~~'-o',.._." •
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.......
"

'.

IJIS. .t"J , ...... .

:.~":; . \---==-===.
,~
:7.";.;":. i-r-, -:-""71,.--;:- --;:;_ ;::=<;;:,--".- -; r:;:-~-;':~--::"':":_

Pre
his It
By JAilJES R. POLK Vesco's business hcadquar- lhe ,
i:..roNews 51.:!U l\"rILor ters in Fairfield, N.J., anor scarcl
Edward C. Nixon, brother a helicopter fli;1ht. from New preble
of the President, is keeplnu "York Cily. Hl)w':::~,crl Scars in~ roo
WS silence in the f ace of said" he didn't ~trii'!;njr'f'tb~ value l
court testimony t hat bo mectlug among Nixon, Vesco 11. \",
played a role In arr-anging a and business ossociatca. snbl th
$'100,00 campaign coutrlbu-
0
) The Securities and E:~.. aion 0
(ion in ';<15h Irom a Iinanclse change Cormnlsston 112$ filed Trensur'
accr.ied of fraud, a civll suit a!:,~iIl5t Vesel) ac- Shultz, .
'·No comment (hot Is news- cusing him c; a ~:;:·1 million man A
worthy, 'Thank you. Good- Irnud in Jr.:Jlin:.; ti,", ncsets of ;tgclJ1 nn
bye," NixOD said y-:hen final- his Swlb-:J;.;l'"-:u li]S. L1d.• Ho)' As;
ly reached yesterday at his rnulnnl fund nvtwortc, 1:ln\":\I\O c. h·IXO;'1 bert Sb
unlisted telephone number Edwnrtl Nixon, -; ~IO Saara Eeonemi
In Edmonds, \Vnsh., afler a said is a Iornicr di. -. ':tI':" of a Ilnnk if) N;I;;~il~l_ The rnon:y tcnd--l t
week of calls. Then he hUIl~ vescc (,()Jap:Jl~Y. is Ihc ::-cnnd was Ilcwn to Wil:;~lillr,t:iQ ranz;c ",C
up, member or tin J': ~::oi:knl's April 10, .::lll.houZh t~~ Nj::~n Jli~~l C
A New Jersey campaign family to be Ih!:;!'ri to tho cmnrnign Iailcd to report the closed do
oICicial, Harry L. Scars, has financier. Donald A. Nb:on 1 , donalion under 1J1'3 new dis- bllffclill<:T
teslified he was told tho '3 son of the Prcshlcnt's ctbar closure law. . \p;:;k ill-}
Nixon brother made a call brother, is Vesco's personal A federal court hearing Is mlll"I;"!<;,
to Washington to confirm that administrative assistant, usu- scheduled Monday in New to new ,
the donation by" financier ally bcscd in N:lSSal1J the Ba- York City on the SEC's bid currenci-
.1\('Iberl L. Vesco was wanted hamas. for DR injunction ~Jjninsl vic- Fran 1:ClI
in cash, The S.zC pruhe his JndI· Iation (of sccurltlcs laws,' and To'
.»
Scars sald under oath hg- catcd the. ~;·3CO.r.CO cash dona- Scars' testimony came in a day to
W<lS present when the 42- tlon carne from Iunds at vcs- pretrial deposition in the Iervcr,
year-old 1\L..;on arrived at co's Bahamas Commonwealth SEC case, Nixor-
:)/'ar<- 5.7,73
i-
r ·c>
I'll
ll;.,
r... n.·.-.,r.... uo
·""I 1
jJ U iU .\...~jJ
h
r......'..-.n
"
~cl
r
ll..
r.'iltP~
I
Lo~D n~'·
n !\.P.

., ~
OOS87

·".--
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
I Mr. \VUUams, who eerller- had asked the
i '\'sco A rrest '''arrant
!1.)sllecl by Federal Juche
'For Grand Jury Inqui;y
Finllnder Husn't Been in fhe U.S.
Panel '''ill
For. )Ionths; His Lawyer Feurs
Produce Indictment
I .BY~ ':-ALL 5TRE£~'AL Sttl!J Reporter
_ ?\~\~. '\ ORK - Federal JUdo;:e Edmund L.
i P .. l:1m"ll Issued a Warrant {or the arr-est or e
: ?:!T!!ed N'ew Jerse.y financier Robert L. V(,h~~:
!,n ~.-der to b.ring h.lm ~s witness before a grand.
1r
• .1. ) here In\'eshgatrng his acli\'itil'~ ,\Ir J
~ \ r-sco has been out of the U.S. for :~"';rai I
, rnombs. ~,
J:io crJmlnal charges have been bmu<>ht Ii
I against ~lr. Vesco. But the U,S. Attorney's ~f­
f~~e. which reql.:ested the bench warrant, re-
\ Iously had asked the judge to lind )£r. V~<;co
in contempt ot court lor Jatllne- to heed a sub-
poena ordering him to appear- before the gr""and
Jury. The gcrermnent lI'led to serve the sub-
poena on April 15 in Nassa.u, B:'\hama Islands.
The grand jur)' Js underslood to be Investj,
gating the, c.lrclI.mstances of 7lfr. Vesco's $::50••
o~ in conlrlbuhons to President N'b.:on's lOi2
r.(election cAmpaign. At the time. the Sccurj,
I
ttcs nnd E:o-:chnngc Commission was condncttna
I a well publicized Inqulry into Mr. Vesco's busT-/
n:~s nff~lrs. The SEC 1I1e ~uge civil suit
"~,.!n~~ hUll ;]~~ 4J ether men aiiCfConcC'I'm; on I
. J ov. ._1. T~.1C' !\J:o-:~n finance committee returned
/ ]o.lr. \ es~o s ("ontnbuUol;ls to him on Jan. 31.
t ' Mr.., V("I'>~'O'S .ulprney. Edward Bennett WIl.
Jlams, told the jUdge ~..e sterrtay he had rvescn
I
I to bctievc tkn :'\-ir. Vesco would be jndie-ted bv
J the gmnd jury, Mr. Wiliams said tbnt if forced
10 appear, :;\J)'. Vesco would Invoke his constttn,
tiona! llri~'i1C'ga ngainst sctr-lncrtmrnnuon, un-
]e~~ he ~'~l'e grunted immunity ngulnsr Jll'ose'l
CUtl,on. ].:.1'. WiI!Jams added thdt the U.S. Attor,
nt'y S OUll'C had nJrcacfy rcpllcd to him that it
wouldn't (lfI~r immunity,
MORl DoclD: 1451843
1 May 4, 1973
---5
judge to dismiss the contempt application on
technical grounds. sald the ctrcumstancea
didn't call for :?lir, Vesco'S arrest.
After- the court was adjourned. Mr, Williams
declined to discuss reports that the at-year-old
Mr. Vesco intended to renounce his U.S. eiU-
zenshlp, even though the attorney at an earlier
hearing had said he would raise the question of
cltlzcnshtp, #.
James W. Rayhtll, an assistant U.S. attor-
ney, brought lhe matter up in court, saying the
"I go v ernment had information that :;\(r. Vesco
was "currenUy attempttng to renounce his U.S.,
citizenship in Costa Rica:' where he last year
took up le-gal residence. It's understood that
'Mr_ RayhiU wasn't referring to a disclosure
I ·ma~e late Wednesday by Costa Rica's presi-
dent, Jose Ftgucres,
President Figueres, on e. two-day visit to
this countr-y, said that Mr, Vesco in an audio
ence two or three weeks ago formally an-
1 noun... ed his Intention to renounce U.S. citizen.
ship.
In washtngton, the Stale Department said
Mr. Vesco has: lold Costa Rican authorttlcs that
he already has renounced American citizenship
before two notaries, with his lawyer's help,
However, the U.S. Embassy in Costa Rica con-
tended that didn't count, because it wasn't
done before a consular officer. The State De-
partment's legal experts are checking to deter-
mine whether that view Is correct.
The U.S. has a 1922 extradition treaty with
Costa Rica, covering 21 crimes. including rob-
bery. forgery, cmbezalement, and fraud. 'The
U.S. considers ils 1931 extradition treaty with
Br-itain to apply to the Bahamas, but it isn't
"clear whether the Bahamas agrees. Thc British
treaty covera such' crimes as fraud and misre-
presentation, but the warrant issued yesterday
for a g rnrrd-jury appearance isn't a matter for
which cxtraditton is possible.
Mr. Vesco has a home and family in Boon-
ton, N.J., but has bases oC operations in Nassau
and in San Jose, Costa Rica. Government pros-
I
ecutors d.cclined to comment when asked whnt
steps the)' would take to have Mr. Vesco nr-
I
rested it he were Iccatcd in either of throe J
countries. I
The SEC's ctvn suit accuses :Mr. Vesco J of
dtrcctlng the "footing" of S~2J million in nsscts ';
of four foreign mutual funds mnnngcd by 1.O,S.:
Ltd. Mr. Vesco formerly hcndcd both .l,O,S.!
nnd Jutcrnatlonal Controls Corp" of Fairfield.:
N.J_
I
00S88
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

7 MAY 1913

SUBJECT: Intelligence Evaluation Committee and Staff

1. Background: Formed Dece~ber 1970. Membership:

D~partm~nt of Justice (Chairman); FBI (active staff par-
"
ticipation agreed to only in May 1971); Department of
Defense; Secret Service; National Security Agency~ CIA
and any necessary representatives of other Departments
or Agencies. (Following have pu rt i.c i pa t e d: Treasury,
State.) Staff: IES Executive Director John pougherty
and later Bernard Wells supplied by Department of Justice
with title of Special Assistant to the Attorney General
in reporting through the Assistant Attorney General for
Internal Security Robert Mardian and later William Olsen.
IES has received requirements directly from and delivered
reports directly to John Dean of the White House.
2. CIA Participation': ~~o'ntributions 'on foreign
aspects (by memorandum with no*lig'i!ncy Le t t e'rh e a d or at-
tribution). Contributions occasionally include foreign
intelligence provided by FBI and NSA.
3. Special Report: The Unauthorized Disclosure
of Classified Information, November 1971. Initiated July
1971 by the liffi~te House as a consequence of the Presi-
dent's concern about ,the release of the Pentagon Papers
by Daniel Ellsberg. Both Robert Nar di.an and G. Gordon
Liddy initially involved in tasking the IES to produce
this evaluation. Drafting d~ne' by IES Staff members
from Justice and FBI. Only Agency participation was \
editorial review. "
(Table of contents attached).

__ _ ..:-....0.- _

00583
-,
 MORI DocID: 1451843

"
i
.-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I
Introduction 1

Problems Relating to the Disclosure

of Classified Information 3
,
"
Executive Orders and Related Directives 8 Ir
1
I

Effectiveness of Existing Security' ',-

I
"'t.:gulations.
"
.....f.-"~w.(-\ 13 I

Lessons of the "Pentagon Papers" 18

Ii
J

Conclusions and Recommenda tions 31

i
I
I

I
j .-'-
;
,I'
, "

00590
 MORI DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT: Thel£n$:HAOS 'Program

1. The~HAOS program is a.worldwide program for

clandestine collection abroad of Lnf'o rma t Lon on foreign
efforts to support/encourage/exploit/manipulate domestic
U.S. extremism, especially by Cuba, Communist China,
North Vietnam, the Soviet Union, ~orth Korea and the
Arah fedayeen.
2. The r;;jilcHAOS program has not and is not conduct-
ing efforts ~mestically for internal domestic collection
purposes. Agency efforts are foreign. Foreign-oriented
activity in the United States has been of two types:
a. Selected FBI domestic ~ources who travel
abroad in connection with their extremist activity
and/or affiliations to make contact with hostile
foreign powers or with for.eign extremist groups
have been briefed and debriefed by Headquarters
officers. The briefing has included appropriate
operational gllid1nce, including defensive advice.
b. Americans with existing extremist creden-
tials have been assessed, recruited, tested and
dispatched abroad for PCS assignments as contratt
agents, primarily sourceS offered for such use by
the FBI. When abroad they collect information re-
sponsive toffiBJeHAOS program requirements, as well
as other Agency requirements. They are thus used
primarily for targeting against Cubans, Chinese Com-

~
=
munists, the North Vietnamese, etc., as their back-·
ground and their particular access permits. It
should be note~ that the! .::asp~c~· ?ft~e
/proJe!=t of thb ~5C J\ -ia DIVISI0!iJ IS
5 1~1I at to the Ltlij}::HAOS PROGRAM. .
:3. I\.s indicated earlier, [fr@:HAOS is a foreign pro-
gram, conducted overseas, except for the limited activity
described above. The 'program is and has been managed so
, as to achieve the maximum feasible utilization of exist-
ing resources of the 0Eerations Directorate •. No assets
--.f,LIII n)fUO~ = D° NS)l af! E~E

00591

SE
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

have been recfited and ruJ.! eXc1usi~elY for the lBii'cHAOS

program. Instead, emphasIs has been placed on tfie exploi-
tation of new and old Agency assets who have a by-product
capability or a concurrent capability for provision of
information responsive to the program's requirements.
This has involved the provision of custom-tailored 'cb'llec-
tion requirements and operational guidance. this collec-
tion program is viewed as an in~gral part of the recruit-
j ment and collection programs oflJ;,.l<ina Opelations, Vietflam
0F-erat ions Cuban OpeTations, Seviet Bloc IJi lI'i-s-ron-op-era-
·1I twn s and Korean Ilranch opelatiolls;J Agents who have an
American "Movement" background or who have, known connec-
tions with the American "Movement" dre useful as access
agents to obtain biographic and personality data, to dis-
cern possible vulnerabilities and susceptibilities, and
to develop operationally exploitable relatjonships with
recruitment targets of the above programs. These assets
are of interest to our targets because of their connec-
tions with and/or knol'/l~'!,ge of the American "Movement."
Over the course of the2E~HAOS p~ogram, there have been
-app r cx i.ma t e Ly 20 important a r e a s ,of operational interest"

~
h i C h at the present time have "b e'en reduced to about ten:
Paris, Stockholm, Brussels, Da~-1rs'Salaam, Conakry, Algiers,
Mexico City, Santiago, Ottawa and Hong Kong. ------------
l
4. The~HAOS program also utilizes audio opera-
tions, two of which have been implemented to cover tar-
gets of special interest.
a .1

b I

00592
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

SJiNSITlVr

5_ frUjcHAOS reporting from abroad relating to the

program originates in two way s : Individuals Who are noted
in contact with Cubans, the Chinese Communists, etc., and
1 I' ,'.
who appear to have extremist connections, interests or
background are reported upon. Other individuals are re-
pqrted upon in response to: specific Headquarters require-
ments received from the FBI because such individuals are
of active investigatory security interest to the FBI.
, 6. All cable and dispatch traffic related to the
~n1CHAOS program is sent via 'restricted channels. tit is
,not processed by either the-fable Secretariat or the In-
formation Services Division~ The control and retriev-
ability of information obtained, includin~ information
received from the FBI, is the responsibillty of the Spe-
cial Operations Group.
7. Information responsive to specific FBI require-
ments is disseminated to the FBI via special controlled
dissemination channels, i.e., by restricted handling cable
traffic or via special pouch and specially numbered b Li nd
memoranda. '
8. Information of particular significance, when col-
lected, has been disseminated by special memorandum over
the signature of the Director of Central Intelligence to
the White House (Dr. Kissinger and John Dean), as well as'
to the Attorney General, the Secretary of State and the
Director of the FBI.

~ ..

00593
 MORI DocID: 1451843

" "

00594
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

SFNDER WILL CHECK CctiFICATION TOP AND "SOTTOM

r -bNCLASSIFIED r I CONFIDENTIAL I I SECRET

OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP

,
TO NAME AND ADDRESS DATE INITIALS

1 . /
IIr. Halpern
.
,-
'2

3
t\'l::-w~!.'t·,..
-
"•
4

5
.
6
ACTION OIRECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY
APPROVAL OISPATCH RECOMMENOATION
COMMENT FILE RETURN
CONCURRENCE INFORMATION SIGNATURE

Remarks: "r .
""
,~". Sam:

Attached are the following:

l-hackground paper on TIC #7

2-comments on facts and statisti cs
3..comments on AID by Mr. ~chlesinger
"~ ."
1963 (wh I ch Mr. Colby might find
of Ln t.e re s t )

00595
.. ".' ,"

.. FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SEN.DER

'..'''. FROM: NAME. ADDRESS AA'D PHONE;. NO. DATE:

II UNCLASSIFIED I · f CONFIDENTIAL I
I 25/4/73
SECRET
.. ' (40
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,., ';

00596

\
 ---------------

MORl DoclD: 1451843

, -»

-
.. ~
• ~,~
~'_"Ll>t_J

, .
,

•
~.la,lORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT Counter Intelligence Staff,

Police Group Activities

1. Counter Intelligence Staff, Police Group (CI/PG)

is responsible for Staff coordination within the Office
of the Deputy Director for Operations for activi ties and
programs involving assistance to foreign police/security
forces for the purpose of exploiting such activities and
programs for intelligence purposes.
2. CI/PG maintains Li a i son wi t h the Office of- Public
Safety, Agency for International Develop~ent (OPS/AID)
I"--------iand its training facility, the International Police Academy
IPA CI PG also administers and supervises Project
n a 1.t1.on, coor 1.na e
Central Intelligence
J,.----,--~eeccn.lnn~l~c:;arr_rnnvv'ee;ss:t:1.i:'go;\a
ti ons Cours e . CI / PG Provi de s gu1. an ce
i, and counsel to the Area Divisions in matters pertaining
to police/security functions and activities. Specific
details of these functions are as follows:
LIAISON l'lITH OPS/AI D
CI/PG liaison with OPS/AID and IPA is conducted on a
daily basis and consists principally of:
A. exchange of information on IPA partic1pants, some
of whom later attend I Icourses I I
I '1-,--
B. arranging for inclusion of Agency sponsored partici-
pants in IPA/OPS/AID training programs,
C; arranging for IpA/OrS/AID briefings and tours for
foreign police/securi ty representatives sponsored
by CIA Area DiViSio~ns 00597

~l:'
\Jl.
,r:r
1 _
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

; :
-.. . j
•• 2~ •

- 2 -

,,
..i
,.i
"'!
,
1

F. coordinating the Agency's participation in the.

Tecllnical Investigations Course designed to
familiari2e the trainees '.ith the technique
required to properly investigate terrorist
activities wherein explosives have been utilized,
G.

,,, H.

PROJECT

ln trainin~ forei
ngage prlnclpa~~~~~~~~h-~~~~,
o lce security personnel under
and selling pOlice/sech-rFyv-pe~q~u~l~pun",le~lnlr-~tno"~o~rNe~llg~n
po a ce security personnel and organizations. I 11!lso
provides special training programs and briefinnng~s~t~o'
foreign police/securit nersonnel of interest to A ency
o erating divisions.
las
acqulre e capa 1 1 Y 0 provl
police/security personnel in VIP
for Chiefs of State.

*IL- -----:-__
00598
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

' ..- .

- 3 -

COlUlENT

~does not maintain direct contact or liaison

lqit~w enforcement organization, local or federal, <>",

at home, or abroad. When the need arises, such Con tact is

sometimes made on our behalf by

an r o a »e c au s e a e na t u r e of its activities
(training of foreign police/security personnel at home
and abroad), and its Public Safety programs around the
wo r l d , I Ihas such contacts at home - local and
federal level - hecause its personnel are personally
acquainted with Law enforcement dfficers thro.U:hout the
Uni ted States. fJemhers of the I _
I 1h ave, a ppear e d as guest 'rIl'e'TC-:1L-rurlr1e.-rl"s-"aCTL~S"U=IITI-rll'e'TCl"enI"'a'l"'I'---
Inst:lcutions as the U.S. Park Police, IPA", the U.S.
Secret Service; and the U. S. Treasury Enforcement Divis-ion.

3. In addition to the liaison mentioned in the

previous paragraph, the Agency maintains liaison in varying
degrees wi t h foreign police/security organizations through
its field stations. The existence and extent thereof,
however, is a decision to be made~ Area Division,
and is not the responsibility of ~

4.
wi. t uan
'-;;;;'lcrltt"r"l"o:;;n~e",,,;r,-;;--;="====~='"ffiC"---TT;u"p"'aiiim"a"rr.o"s"-.
--,.\, an !·ii t r i on e ,
an experienced and respected law enforcement officer, was
a bona fide DPS/AID officer assigned to the AID missipn
in Uruguay, and was never a CIA employee or agent.

hllgle LOll
Irt t e Ll i pen ce Staff

00599
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-,...
___ ?i>O-7:5 -(~7,
/
/ ./
n'1 "'f\~1973
, /
2q ILl cu. c..R-:.
.y •
J: ft. ~-<'1n c
"-
- ~lE:·jORA:-IDUN FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

-SUBJEq Joint CIA/USAID Terrorist (T~ch~ical)

Investigations Course 17 (English language)
CI Staff's Project I I

1. This effort is a joint CIA/USAIO'training program

for foreign police/securi ty personnel. The initial phase
of the training will be conducted at the International
Police Academy (IPA), Washington,- D.C. during the period I
2-27 April 1973. The following subject matter is covered
in this phase of the training: investi~~tive techniques,
collection and preservation of evidence, records, files,
and reporting, gathering of information on terrorist
groups and thei r acti vi ties. a student s e rri na r dcvoted
to discussions on terrorist and other hostile activities
currently existing in e'cir rcsnective countries. etc.
This phase of the-training is concluded by a two day
orientation hy the 8oIr.!) Squad of the Dade Coun ty Police,
Departnent in Florida.

of this training will be conducted

durin~ 30 April - 25 l~y 1973.

e t e cnn r c i ans u t i l Lze I
cove. The ob j ec t i ve 0 f th i:~s~prrjnls:ns,-,e.,-,...O....t---...c."ll-"e'-.t"'rAa"l.nn"l"n""'g-,l."s--.t"o----
develop individual student technical capability to real-
istically conduct ihvcstir,ations into known or suspected
incidents of sabotage/terrorist bombings by:

a. P'r-cv'i d i n g trainees wLth basic kn owIe dge -Ln tho

uses of commercial and military demolitions and
incendiaries as they may he, applied in terrorism
and indus trial sabotage operations. ,_.

b. Introducing the trainees to corunc r ci a Ll.y available

materials and home laboratory t.e chn Lque s. Li ke Iy .
to be used in the -mnnuf'a c tu rc of explosives and
incendiaries by terrorists or saboteurs.

00600
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.... •
- 2' •

c. Familiarizing the trainees with the concept

of target analysis and operational planning
that a saboteur or -t.e r ror-Is t must enp Loy ,
d. Introducing the trainees to booby trapping
devices and techniques g i vinR practfcal
experience wi th I:oth manuf'ac turo d and
improvised devices t.h rough actual fabrication.
E~phasize the necessity of alertness for
detecting and countering Dooby'traps placed
by s ab o to urs or terrorists.
c. Conducting several field exercises to give
each trainee the opportunity for detecting I
. and neutralizing various e xp l o s Lve and
. incendiary devices likely to be used by
terroris ts or s ab o te ur-s , Lnc LudLna letter
bombs, packages, attache cases, etc.
f. Conductinr. seVeral investip.atlve fIeld
exercises of exnlosive incidents to alert
the trainee to the need for and manner in
which to colloct, identify, and preserve
legally admisable eviJc~ce for prosecutive
action.

3. The program provides the trainees ~d.th ampLe

opportunity to develop basic fa!!liliarity and use proficiently
through handling, preparin~ and a~?lying the various
explosive .charges, incendiary D.f:ents, terrorist devices
and s ab o t age techniques. t;SAIO, International Police
Academy (IP;\)~las received reports from Fo ree r fo r e i gn .
police/security personnel who participated in the .pr-og ram
indicating that they :<ore ca Ll e d upon to utilize tIle skills
they a cqu i red rh rough this training in the handling of
explosive devices in their respective countr Attnc~ed is
a letter from a particioant in TIC 16
stating that he de ac t i v a t e d 11 letter bkco"'p'"',"-=O"V"l'C"'c"---'=="-!was
'h'.11CI
sent to the I I
Embassy in 1 ----'1
4. Subject course will have 26 participants from ten
(10) foreign countries. ~ine (9) are financed by AID,
cight((e.) by CIA and nine (9) hy tho Lr own gove rnncn t.s ,

00601.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.., .. \~ ,
, . :'

- 3 -

5. Separate end of course reports will be prepared by .

" USAID and CIA, TSD personnell

J .
,, '

James Angleton
Chief, Counter Intelligence Staff
.,

00602
 MORT DocTD: 1451843

•.., ......

't
FACTS k~D STATISTICS

AID/ors TRAINING
~ID/OPS, International Police Academy sponsors some
seven hundred (700) foreign police officers for training
in the United States each year. These officers are selected
from underdeveloped countries. I 1
TRAINING

tra~ns some .
L,.,,---=="T~O"T"'i"~-'z"'e.-rr~aO'Fe""a"s----;o,f 1aw en for ce men t .

During PY 1973r-1sunnorted two of our field

stations by providi~ni~g in VIP protective secvrity
for I'-- -.J~e rs onnel . "
AID/OrS-CIA TRAINING
During FY 1973 two joint USAID/OPS/CIA 'I'echn i cal Inves ti-
-ga t i on s training programs were conducted for Dforeign "
police/security 'personnel representing~countries. The
purpose of the training is to develop ~idual student
technical capability to realistically conduct investigations
into known or suspected' incidents of sabotage/terrorist
bombing or other activities.

______10'06-03
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

:
" ,.
~.. ."-

NATIONAL SECURITY
Political, Military, and Economic
Strategies in the Decade Ahead

Edile4 by

David M. Abshire and Richard V. Allen

Aqrniral Arleigh Burke•. pire'lo~

TIlE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES,

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
"

pubr;sh~J /0' Ibtl

HOOVER INSTITUTION ON WAR, REVOLUTION
. AND PEACE ,'.
by
FREDERICK A. PRA,EGER, Publish~r
New York· London

00604
 MORl DocID: 1451843

• '~'J

Strategic Leverage Irorn Aid'and. T rade"

•~
. .. , •• •
,

-JAMES R. SClILESliYGER

Summary

The analysis' of this' paper rests" on the' assumption. that

American poUcy-inakers should not be so concerned unth: the
purs,,;t of hard-to-obtain ideological objectives that they exhaust
the power potential implicit in trade and aid, relationships.
Rather the trade and aid programs should be managed so, as to
preserve an environment 'in which pressures can be brought to
bear to sert'e the national interest at a later, and perhap« 'more
critical, date. This emphasis on power considerations implies
both (a) that the assistance prottrani ca-nno! be based pl"imm'ily
on humanitarian 0" idealistic goals, and (b) that economic ties
with other nations should not be severed simply because of onr
disapproval of other social systems, including those based on
communism. Thouoh. typically public opinion vastly overstates
the strategic leverage that can be gai,,!ed through economic
, weapons, 'this leverage is still not negligible. One can arguri that
in the past the United States-has failed to take advantage of
the power potential 'implicit in aid and trade through its failure
to develop concepts and mechanisms of dete'''''",ce in ,uays akin
to what has been done in the military field. Much of the
dif]ic;dty 'may be ascribed. to ,a failure to develop sanctions,
,ahich discouraoe actions unfavorable to" olir interests, as well
as incentives, which encourage cooperation, No system of
deterrence can exclusively stress the carrot and itmore the stick.
},fore is being demanded of the aid program than it can
reasonably «chiece, Assltming that the primary emphasis of the
aid program is to encourage social and economic dcreiopment
rather than to' elicit direct SUpp01't for American foreign policy
687
00605
:',':
~.J i,
!'" ~ ~,
'," - _.._---~. -- ----_.
688
f
-.
JAMES R. SCHLESCNGER
MORl DocID: 1451843

---:'-.:--~:.'~~----'-'-'-- --
.-,~

obj~cU1;e8. it is argued that n-e ehonld aftt"mpt 10 dct'd",) stable

~oc;al and paUlital conditions by strm!Jtllrni710 tile "[('gitimacy"
of the del'clopi1/U social order in the rUNI of the rrsuectiee
publics-rather than attempting to (':rIJDr! tlie trappings 01
Amen'can demormcu,
. ·1 Technological change. the easy f{1'nilabilily o!,.::ub,'lfilllf('s. and
the [l!Ugllly prrioc1 for adjwltllll'nt tw It JJrOlollgrd strlt!Jnlf' lwre
all reduced thr impact of th" "supply cljret" J/"Mch 11'(18 at one
time)he lila in wcapon of economic wflrfa)"r. If till' economic
wenji61if' 0/: straltOy are to be at all ('fjrcth:" under todny's
eonditkms, the "influellce ef!rct" mnst rise corr;.~'Potldinl}ly· in
imparlance. This implies that we slumlfl be in a. position to
threaten to do damage to other economies throllgh tlle' curtail-
ment 01 access to lVcsffTn markets. In order to kerp tllis threat
a.'" ever-present onl', tee mustv.luncceer, continue to tredr in
t:"olu.me with other cOllnt)"i('s, inclltdiflf] Communist ones. Partie-
+rlu" in dealing with the tmderdt!vl'loped nations Ihe potential
'i'l'lctiveness of such threats may p'·ove to be cotl$iderable.

00606
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

'. -.
696 SCHLESINGER

One final consideration-it would be unwise to use potential

weapons of this sort for niggling purposes. The balance of pay.
ments has been, troublesome. and is properly an object of concern
in wasbtngton, but surely it is not a first-order consideration
in our relations with the underdeveloped nations. Suggestions
have been bruited about that we should make use of the aid
program to force recipients to bu~: from us in ways that go
beyond tied aid. Under the best of circumstances, our bargaining-
power is limited, and shooting away strategic ammunition for so
paltt')" an economic goal would seem to reflect a poor sense of
-r- _proportion. .
'I\!.
I
Aid
Within an over-all framework designed to discourage hostile
or predatory attitudes toward the West, the aid program may
seek to foster the maximum rate of economic and socinl progress.
In the basic policy of AID. the Kennedy Admlnlstration has,
explicitly adopted this goal. As. has been indicated there are
costs to this decision. Outsiders are not likely to be much liked
even under the best of circumstances, which hardly apply to the
underdeveloped countries, and their Intervention in whatever
direction will in the long run excite antagonism based on' real
or fancied wrongs. Nevertheless, the basic decision has been
made. Let us examine in what war we may proceed so that the
good effects clearly outweigh the ill effects,
There aretwo initial postulates: (1) our bargaining. power
will be limited. and (2) American notions of social reform and
of equity are neither necessarily applicable in the underdeveloped
lands, nor need we assume jthat those whose cooperation we
must win will find them appealing. These postulates are inter-
related. Joint1~· they impl)' that we cannot press forward on
all fronts to create a society in which a good American democrat
will feel at home, but must instead ccncenu-ata our energies on
those social changes which will spur economic growth even ir
the immediate results an; more consistent with the cultural
genius of the peoples Involved rather than our own tastes. \Ve
ought not expect them to make the same choices as we would.
01", if they make the same choices, to achieve in a ten-year period
whnt it look us (!if!hl~· real's to achieve. Finally, in "reaching
judgments on social processes in other lands, we cannot apply
\};'hat are our own-or, in reality, higher.-=standards of purity.
As outsiders, we will be unable to perceive the social function
of behavior which is "superliciall~' corrupt, and will t~nd to Jump

00607
 MORT DocTD: 1451843

'.

697
it together with thal which is purely pnrasiilcal. With respect
to our Q\\'U history, retrospectivelj- we have come to find merit
in what once were r~gal'ded as the disreputable procedures of
an organization like Tammany HaJJ in that it provided a kind
of social security and a welcome for the newly arrived. Im-
migrant. We are accustomed to "the daily dangling of new post
offices. good committee assignments. and br-idges over creeks in
the outback before wavering Congressmen, and warm approval
is given, for its tine sense of political realism, to whatever ad.
ministration is doing the dangling by those who agree with its
goals. Toward simjlar procedures abroad we are inclined tq
take a simple mucklitk'ing"attitude. We look askance at the"
higgling of the political mArket-with a naivete that would do
credit both to missionaries and old-style political reformers, If
we hope to achieve a fairmeasure of success, '\:e,shalJ have to
sharpen our critical fncuIties lind learn to distinguish between
unappetizing social devices which arc funelional and those which
are simple barriers t~ progress.
The statement of objectives by AID is a very ambitious one.

II
The purposes of the assistance program include stimulation
. of self-help. encoul"-:,~ement of progressive forces. and achieve-
II ment of governments based on consent, which recognize the
dignity. and worth of individuals who are expected to participate
in determinirig the nation's goals.: No doubt, a statement of
aspirations is in large part Window dressing; but the criteria
by which self-help is moving toward social and political progress
are more specific: a more ef}uitable distribution 'of Income, a
more equitable tax system "'ith Incr-eased yields, expanded wel-
fare programs, increased political pm-tlcfpatfon and clvil Hberttes,
and so on. Several points-may be made regarding the objectlves r
nrst, there are too many; second, they are to some extent in.
consistent: and third, they ignore the real resources available.
There is, in -the first place. the long-perceived clash between
economic progress, on the one hand, and the combined goals of
equitable distribution of income, immediate. Improvement in
Jiving standards, and security 011 the other. This underlying
conflict spiJIs o...er into a tension between rapid economic pro--
gress and the introduction of democratic processes, On this
issue there appears to have been a revolution in informed
opinion in the Uni~ed States during the past fi v-e years. During
the Jate fiCties. it had become almost an axiom that authoritartan,
if not totalitarian, governments had innate ndvnntngcs in guld-
ing economies toward rapid growth. The prevailing v'jew was

00608
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

698 •
JAMES R. SCHl£SIN~

based. no doubt, on an assessment of the record of the Soviet

regime, and an exaggerated notion of how much the Chinese
"Great Leap Forward" would accomplish. Perhaps the earlier
"pessimism" regarding the relative performance potential of
"free" and "controlled" economies was overdone, but have we
not gone too far in the now prevailing "optimism" that any clash
between economic progress and the democratic institutions which
Insm-e-ths dominance of the t·o~ populi is minimal?
The average clttaen-c-parttcularly when he is ill-housed," Ill-
clothed, ill-fed, and ilI-educated-seems most likely to be in-
terested in the here and now, A government which is responsive
to the desires of the public will continually be tempted to
mortgage the future for the present. The "abstinence" or
"waiting" which classical and neoclassical economics state to
lie necessnrv ingredients in economic progress will be hard to
require, as will be the inccnti v e schemes (and the accompanying
conspicuous consumption) which are likely to strike the a.... erage
voter as inequitable, We rna)' TecNI that the Peron regime was
(and still may be"!) the most popular regime in recent Latin
American history. Or we may observe the economic consequences
of Brazilian democracy. and have our doubts. The tnfto\\" of
American resources may be able to make showpieces out of
several small, recentJ)--demflcrntized nattons like the Dominican
Republic, but we ought nol assume either that demccracyasstata
in economic development, or that the Dominican example is
wid(>J~' applicable. This is not to sa:r that some judicious
prodding in the direction of democracy may not be a wise policy.
but it must be iudiaione, nnri cannot be based on the assumption
that democracy necessarily fosters the political stability essential
to growth.
One of the criteria by which self-help can be judged as justify.
ing additional aid is an improvement in the savings ratio, Some
students of the aid program Would put major emphasis on
cbnngos in the SAYings .l'ntio in tbnt it provides a relatlveb-
objective standard b)' which an improvement in economic, per.
fOI'Ill:mc:e can be ju(J~eCl.· If we apply an objective standard.
complaints about the distribution of aid nnd subjectivity in the
• CharJe5 Wolf, Jr, of RA~D hD.l< been atlempting to drvelop.an eecnc-
meldc model which will pro\'ide nn ohjel."ti\'e measure orthe performance
of air! recipients in terms or sl,"lf.helll. The criterion is the ~a\'jn,l':'S ratio.
In the"rnodel the :Jttt'mpt. is made to t,!limintlte the influence ot other
\,::Iria:'lo:,:<, such as per npita ineeme, income distribution, and dt~ of
urLan';tution. which JJ<;<;ollnt {or a !:'OM IItol of the observed \':lriotian in
the ~avinbS ':.3tla as between naucns nnd bel ween different periods .at Um~

00609
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,.

00610.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT: Foreign Resources Division Oper-afi onaI

Activities with Possible Flap Potential

REFERENCE: FR Memorandum.I-r-' 1 dated.7 May

1973. same subject

1. The answers to your que'stions are as follows:

a. Question: Do we recruit Americans?

Answer: Yes, we recruit Americans to be

used asl ~upport assets and access agents ..
These Americans. are used for spotting. and assess-
ment purposes only and do not perform any recruit-
ments.

b. Question: Do we use alias documents on

Americans in course of operations?

Answer.: Yes, we do Use alias documents when

recruiting American support assets. The great
majority of these recruitments are done in alias.
All recruitments of foreign targets are done in alias.

c. Question: What disciplihary controls do we

have over alias documents? .

Answer: We maintain a current list in FR Division

Headquarters offhe alias documents issued to each Base.

~1. 00611
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

f
( - - U...... 1 r
_ : ttt~t'-,.-

/2/

More importantly, each Base Chief is responsible

for supervising and maintaining control over the
alias documents used by the case officers on his
Base.

d. Question: I::J-'A.-cn=Y"'c~Ie"'a=-=r=a~n~c~e~s~o~r~p~r"'o~h~l~b~lTt~lo"'n~s~?-------
Answer: I

2. If you have further questions, please let me know.

Acting Chief
Forei-gn Resources Division

0061~
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

WIAl
u,£ O:ilY o CQH.·;ENHAI:
ROUTING AND R::CO~D SHEET

1. I /
EA!DDO
I " / ......... ~'Cro::;;":i"'I~~1\~RH7~'.f..::
.. _ ·..__ . _ . _... ... ...c _.... -_.~.. - - - - . - - - - =, J "'"'
,~, ·u'
-< • ,.
••
2. .
1 I
I
3. 000 I . f! ,
'j
Uk.
- - - -..- - - - - - - - - - 4 - - - - l - - - c .. - - -
I
5,
Conversation l FR Di v (R-I I I

He indicated intlroduct ry and "closing' paragraphs

1-
13,
I· -i
1~,
~.
I
I
!

fO~M IHH<HAL
3-62 O IIU ntHY
 MORl DoclD: 1~51843

____I r-

7 May 1973
j) () .1'1

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director"fo,,' Operations

SUBJECT: \2roreign Res~urces Divisio-'i})Operationat

Activities with Possible Flap Potential

1. At thr risk of stating the obvious, almost,all of the operational

activities carried on by<'rR Division I ~un the risk
that unauthorized disclos-;;'re could create erriba r r a s srn.errt to the Agency.
We have accepted this as a condition p r e c e de nttand ha.ve proceeded with
our operational activities in the most professional rrrarin e r- possible under
the circumstances. There are certain r-a th e r- unusual activities in which
'fR DivisioIL.1as participated and/or is participating'that conta~n some-
what greater possibility for embarrassment if discovered. I have listed
these below, not necessarily in brder of embarrassment potential:

a_I ~rovides iairly considerable

. a
amount of support to Dr. Klssmger in his contacts with the
Chinese. This support was authorized by Mr. Ka r arrie s s'i n e s
and Mr. Helms. Thus far there has been no problem other'
than the inordinate amount of time spent byl
personnel, not to mention the fairly sizeable"'a"m'ruo"u"'nn'tF<o"l~------'-­
money that has been expended in support of these efforts.
',.
b. I
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

/2/

c. Alias Documentation: Clearly, FR Division does

the great majority of its operational work by having its case
officers utilize alias documents. All recruitments are done
in alias. Thus, the alias documentation is a prerequisite
for effective operations I IFurthermore,
our case officers have btilized fully backstopped alias credit
cards for renting automobiles, rriot eI rooms, hotel rooms
for operational rrre etf.ng s , etc. These credit cards are back-
stopped by accounts in alias w.hich are promptly paid at the
appropriate time. I see no problem in the continued use of
alias documentation ,and moreover, I feel it fs absolutely
essential to continue using alias documentation wherever and
'whenever possible.

d. I

e. I .

,-"", ",C;& .... - .. I;; 1 .-..... '- ..~~.. .. .

 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,', , ".
, ' " '

/3/

2. Summarizing the above, I believe that all of the activities

outlined are clear! within the acce table risk frame.

The
'--:o~t"h~e~r=-:a~c=t;:;i;::v:;iC;:t7ie::-:::s-,--:-a'1t;:;hco=u-=g:;:h--:c~l,-=e-=a-=r"l=y"'in=v=o'lv-=··in=-=gC-::-s-=o-=m=-=e-d=e-=g=r-=e-:eO-:o:-ifC=r'i-=s"k-:a:-:r.Je
necessary and valuable and in my opinion should be continued.

Acrtng Ctu e t
Foreign Resources Division

_, ....,.,\ ....'"""
'
006i6
~ -" ." f3xp'>tf't' (p)(,!)
( b){1/
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

S E ;.J'E T

DRAFT OUTLINE FOR DDO BRIEFING

T. Statement of Organization and Functions

°11. Official TIO

III .,' Location of Field Units

IV. Cover

V. Targets

VI. Methodology

VII. Budget

VIII. Coordination
A. Internal
B. External

X. Statistics:
A. Recruitments
B. General Support Assets
C. Positive Intel~i~~nce '~eporting
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

FOREIGN RESOURCES DIVISION

I. Statement of organization and. Functions

,.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

, ,
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

S7 E T

S.E~ 00620
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

S E~E T

SE~T
MORI DocID: 1451843
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

err R ......T
-----------
MORl DoclD: 1451843

SE~T
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

SE~T
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

..

~ ..... - ---
MORl DoclD: 1451843

006Z7
MORl DoclD: 1451843

00628
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

s~
-------------- MORl DoclD: 1451843

SJ C !l e- T.

~T
 MORl DocID: 1451843

S~T

S~

O()63j
MORl DoclD: 1451843
MORl DoclD: 1451843
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

J , - : . _............ • ..
•
.' ':F . '(~
/
"
6 JUN 1973

MEMORANDUl\i1 FOR: Director of Central Intelligence •

t
THROUGH : Executiv.e Secretary. CIA Management Committee
,
I;
SUBJECT : Alleged CIA Involvement in the Ballou Cas e

1. .By rrrerrior arid urn "dated 25 May 1973. I informed you of the
results of .an int';rview of Mr.1 Iwho reported that
Mr., rn employee of the Office of Security. had
,stated dunng a diSCUSSlOn period at Adv-anced Intelligence Seminar
No. 6 in Septeznber 1971 that the Office of Security had been involved
in the "Ballou case. " (The residence of Mr. Ballou. an antique gun
collector in Silver Spring. Maryland. was raided oil 7 June 1971 by
Montgomery County Police and Federal law enforcement officers.
When the offic e r s , 'dressed in civilian clothes. forced their way into
the house. Ballou picked up an antique pistol. The officers opened.
, fire and seriously wounded Ballou. He was hospitalized for ·several
months and was left partially paralyzed. I believe he is now sUing
over the incident. l.

2. We inter':'iewed Mr[ Fertain other employee; who

attended the Seminar. arid the DIrector of Security to determine just
_. i what was said at the Seminar and the extent of any Agency involvement
,I in the Ballou case. We find that partitipants in the Seminar were .
encouraged to discuss the details of their work and ,\ssociated p roblerns ,
Mr.1 Fe'ntioned an as~ignment he h~d been 0".
wi~h. the ~' U: ....
Secret SerVl,ce at the 1968 Nahonal Conventions and hIS Ha'i s on acbin.hes
with the Montgomery County Police.

3.I Ireports th~t in .disc,ussing the latter, subject he "

i related a conversanonhe had WIth Inspector ~ 1of
the Mont-
J; gomery County pqlice. sometime in June 197 after the Ballou incident
I'
chad been r ep; r ted in the newspapers. According t o l . . Ithe '
'I police inspector had thanked him for some amplifying eqUlprnertt rne
I Agency had given to the Montgomery CountyPolfce and r ernaz-ked that

I )
00634

II -
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

il U1.G.tet qlo '--..i'~- r

r •
•
this equipment bad probably saved a police=.an's life. The inspector
com.mented that the account of the Ballou incident appearing in the
press was not the whole story. With the aid of the equipment the .: I
Agency had provided, the police had intercepted a telephone call I,

I
from Ballou to a friend in which Ballou outlined plans to "kill a co!'." I"
'The police then staged a raid to forestall Ballou's plan, and it was . 1
dnring this raid that Ballou was shot.

I, 4. I Jsaid that he bas no other lmowledge of th~ Ballou

I case, except lOr wna: he bas read in the newspapers, and that he has
not had any other conversations about the case with any members of
the Montgomery County Police. We learned nothing from our inquiries
1, that would indicate any other Agency involve=ent in the Ballou case.
•
5. The following are related excerpts from the "Family Jewels"
submission of the Director of Security on,16 May 1973:

During the period from 1968 to 1973, several items of

Positive audio equipment consisting primarily of clandestine
. transmitters and touch-tone dial recorders were loaned to
the Metropolitan Police Department; Fairfax County. Virginia,
. .
Police Deparl.Inent; Montgomery Countv, Maryland, Police
Department; New York City Police Department; and the Sal).
Francisco, California, Police Departrnent.

On 25 July 1968, and at the specific request of the

1I
United States Secret Service, tbis Office provided two audio
countermeasures technicians to the United States Secret Service
.

in connection with the Democratic National Convention held in

'Chicago, Illinois. Tbis was not an official detail although
both rrren were proVided with temporary credentials identifying
them as being affiliated with the United States Secret Service.

On 15 August 1968, we detailed the same two men to the

.' United States Secret Service to cover the Republican National
Convention in Miami, Florida. On both occasions, the team
rnembea-s were debriefed upon their return and it is clear that
their activities were confined exclus ive'ly to sweeping the
candidate,,' and potential candidates' quarters.

.. William V. Broe
.I Inspector General
I O I G : I I ( 6 Jane 197'3)
DllSt~ ~ • .\
Orig lot 1 - Addressee _ 2 _ 00635
1 - ExecSccj
. .•.;- M~
. . _CIA ( .. :'~~_'t-.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. .
-', ..

.~.

. , v-,

MEMORAI JM FOR: The Record

Mr. F. P. Bishop is fOllowing up per para 7

of IG memo to DCI dtd 25 May.{ ]

cm/31 May

00636 I-
I
i
(DATE)
fOR ... HO.
REPLACES fOR~ 10- 101
I AUG .54 '0 I WHICH NAY 9£ US£D.
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

. ,. . ~

o UNCll\SSI FI ED . B
rr-;>-
mRET'
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT, tOplional)

fROM, """"'ON NO.

Inspector General om
25 May 1973
TO, (Offiur d.tignalion. room n... mb.-t, and
building)
DAlE
OffiCER'S COMMENTS (Numb.' eo(h commen' ro .how hom whom
.'
INITIALS whom.
l'O Ctaw 0 lin. oClon column oh.r .ach comment.)
RfaMD fORWARDED

1.
Mr. Wm. E. Colby
..
{I~ :. {/D.' L· -
2.

3.
The Director
kL ~'-I \.--\ i0~~ • ~\.)---::

-c \-'l. \ l-·Ll c- ", (!,,-(,-\ \ \ ,t Y.

~(.f
4.

S.
L-G ")

6.

I
7.

0
_.-
8.

9.

-
10:

11.

12.

13.

14.

IS.
. 00637
/

n raut'p'''TIA' NTERNAL
n UNClASSIFIED
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,-' .

25 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

THROUGH : Mr. William E. Colby

1. On 17 May the narne of I

referred to this office as having attempted to contact the Director
~as
concernin "activities outside the Agency." I attempted to contact
on 21 and 22 May, but he was on leave. On 23 May
'--<:-=e'--;::s""t""a·te=,;-::c'e wanted to check a portion of his information and asked
if he could come to my office on 24 May.

2. came into the A enc as a JOT

in October ssigned
to the Soviet/EE Section. He has a'o-:.v::e::-r::::y=-s""t"r""o""n=g-Cp=e-=r-=s-=o-=n-=n=Ceo-l file.

3.1 ~dvised that in August 1971 he attended the

Advanced Intelligence Se rni nar , On the-Hr s t evening of the seminar
the students had a "getting acquainted" session where each one
ave a brief descri tion of his duties: One of the students, / I
of the Office of .Security,. however, c~on
'-;;.,=e"r""t""e"'s"'e""""sos"-l"o""n:-w=a'-'!s over and expanded on the briefing he had given.
He claimed that CIA was cooperating with the Montgomery County
Police, stating that the Office of Security gave electronic and other
support to that organization.

4. He further indicated that the Office of Security had been

involved in the "Ballou case"~ I lescribed the Ballou case
as follows: The residence of Mr. Ballou, an antique gun collector
in Silver Spring, Maryland, was raided on 7 June 1971 by the Mont-
gomery County Police and some Federal law enforcement officers.
After the officers, dressed in civilian clothes, had forced their way
into the house Ballou picked up an antique pistol. The officers
immediately .opened fire and wounded Ballou seriously. He spent
a long time in the hospital and is partly paralyzed at the present time.

00638
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

("
SIA INfEr.:'" "BE SPllY

His case was given much publicity in the Washington Post at the
time. There was additional publicity in the last several months
when Ballou instigated a lawsuit against the raiding officers.

_ _ _ _"'-5~ I
Iwho was
Identified another student,
assigned to lAS, as a friend of
I I
"' :
~fl"e'--"s·t"a.te-.,.--thatl
. lalso seemed to know the Speci1lcs of the barlou
case.

6. I thankedl rnd told him this was just the type

of information we wanted to receive so that it can be investigated
and appropriate action taken if the information is borne out.

7. This office will follow up on this allegation and advise

the Director concerning our findings.

yy Dliam y. 010e
Inspector General

- 2 -

CIA IN+t:llriAt !::leE 8r1lY 0063.9

 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. , (
• :'.; ' ..

.; .
, .. ~-

~,'. • •• ~. :..l.. •

... ~
s" "
'. Nofed
Mr [ called the Director
l6'ay at. ~:u:, re "act~vities outside the
I on~B
Agency". I told him Director was out of the
I office but we would return his call. Mr.
, called back that day and said he was
g01ng J0 Fubini lecture and would call us
ba~k. He never did call back. Mr, Colby
.! sa1d to turn over to Mr, Brae .
I
00640
'~l ';' " , ,""": • •: .. ' -. ~
.- •...
:

,.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

..... .,. ."

t~ .. I ... (

.,

6ll
r0
-----
 MORI DacID: 1451843

,
."0
.
- -' " (

00642
 MORl DocID: 1451843

0, U~(I.ASSIFIED O
It',r AL
U. uNLY
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEEr
SUBJECTI (OpliOI'lQI)

FROM,

Inspector Gene ral 0.,.,

22 May 1973
TO: IOfficl' designation, room numb.t~ ord DATE
I-_~.-_--j
building) OffiCeR'S COMM..ENTS (Numb.r loch commlnl 10 show from whom
INITIAlS '0 whom. Drow 0 line oeton column aFt.r loch comlMnl.)

I.
Mr. Wm. E. Colby

2.
The Director

J.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

u.

0064::

61 0 U~;~Cf·1S R SEERET R EBI/flIlElmAl n INTERNAL

lice nUlv n UHClAS'SJ FJ ED
 MORI DqcID: l451843

. .-
-
22 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

THROUGH Mr. William E. COlb~. e---

. Mr. Colby advised me thatl !extensionO

had called the Office of the Director m rme wlth the Director
memorandum to all employees' dated 9 May 1973, requesting all
employees to report activities which might be construed to be out-
side the legislative charter of the Agency.

I ls
employed as a GS-S clerk in the
Cable SecreLanat. fie Jomeu t e Agency in September 1967 and
worked in the Office, of Security for 3-1/2 years before transferring
to the Cable Secretariat in 1970.

While in the Office of Security he was assigned to a suppor:t

desk, SD3. The primary function of this desk was tol0-7_ _---O- ,.-

During his assignment

L.,,""""l"s"'-'''e'''sOC'-,,-----"s'"'u"'p"'p=o.".r""'e,..--a"'p"'r=oJ"e"c~ enti tie d SRPOINTER- .
I ;-.=;;-r ---'-d_e_s_c_r_ib_e_d_th-,e project as follows. The
.'0 had a unit at the JFK Inter-
national Airport th'=a"Lt-p="oLto=g"rc:accp=-e=-m=a"i"'l-c:'going to Soviet Bloc countries.
This work was done by Agency staff employees. The mail' was placed
in bags by the regular Post Office employees and stacked. After
their departure for the night, the Agency employees would open the
mail and photograph it. Both incoming and outgoing mail, including
postcards, were photographed. A watch list was maintained and
priority was given to the names listed, but generally all mail was
processed.

The results of the operation were sent to Washington Headquarters

where they were handled byl ~e would receive a teletype
advising him of the registry number and the number of items. He
would check to see if the number of items received was correct and
route the material to the appropriate offices. Generally about 1/4 of

°9644
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. (
••

the material was separated into bundles bound with rubber bands.
This portion was sent to TSD for technical processing. The remain-
ing material was sent to the CI Staff,I I
Aboue twtce a month the GI Staff would add names to or delete
names from the list.I Fould send the changes in the list to
the field office. The watch 11st was made up primarily o f B
I tho were in the United States. WHen
lett the UInce 01 l5eeurlty in 1970, the project was still activ

I Iwas in no way emotional or belligerent. He

presented the facts quickly and clearly and said he had no other
Infor-rnation, He stated he would have come forward with the informa-
tion sooner but he had only recently had time to read the Director's
rn e rnor-andurrr, The writer thanked him for his interest•

~/;/fiw {J:~
.~1am V. Broe
Inspector General

- z-

00645.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

6 JUN 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

THROUGH : Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee

SUBJECT : Alleged CIA Involvement in the Ballou Case

..
1. By memorandum dated 25 May 1973, I informed you of the
results of an interview of Mr.! !who reported that
Mr. \ Ian employee of the Ulllce of Secur-ity; had
stated during a dISCUSSIon period at Advanced Intelligence Seminar
No. 6 in September 1971 that the Office of Security had been involved
in the "Ballou case. " (The residence of Mr. Ballou, an antique gun
collector in Silver Spring, Maryland, was raided on 7 June 1971 by
Montgomery County Police and Federal law enforcement officers.
When the office r s , dressed in civili';'n clothes, forced their way into
the house, Ballou picked up an antique pistol. The officers opened
fire and seriously wounded Ballou. He was hospitalized for several
months and was left partially paralyzed. I believe he is now s uing
over the incident. )

Z. We "interviewed Mr. 'I Icertain other ~mployee;who

attended the Seminar, and the Director of Security to determine just
what was said at the Seminar and the extent of any Agency involvement
in the Ballou' case. We find that participants y"the Seminar were
erico ura ed to discuss the details of their work and associated pr-oblerns ,
-Mr. mentioned an assignment he had been on with the U. S.
Secre e r vi c e at the 1968 National Conventions and his liaison activities
with the Montgomery County Police •
.
'

3. I reports that in discussing the latter subject he

related a conversahon he had with Inspe cto r] pf the Mont-
gomery County Police, sometime in June 1971 after the Ballou incident
had been repc..rted in the newspapers. According tol fhe
I Ihad thanked him for some amplifying equipment the
Agency had gIven to the Montgomery County Police and remarked that

00646
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

- .,- - ~

this equipment had probably saved a policeman's life. The inspector

conunented that the account of the Ballou incident appearing the m
press was not' the whole story. With the aid of the equipment the
Agency had provided, the police had intercel'ted a telephone call
from Ballou to a friend in which B~}lR\': ,outlined plans to "kill a cop. II
The police then staged a raid to forestall Ballou's plan, and it was
during this raid that Ballou was shot.

4./ I
said that he has no other knowledge of the Ballou
case, except for what he has read in the newspapers, and that he has
not had any other conversations about the case with any members of
the Montgomery County Police. We learned nothing from our inquiries
that would indicate any other Agency invo1vem=t in the Ballou case.

5. The following are related excerpts fz orn the "Family Jewels"

submission of the Director of Security on 16 May 1973:

During the period from 1968 to 1973, several items of

positive audio equipment consisting primarily of clandestine
transmitters and touch-tone dial recorders were loaned to
the Metropolitan Police Department; Fairfax County, Virginia,
Polic.e Department; Montgomery County, ~rary1and, Police
Department; New York City" Police Department; and the Sal}
Francisco, California, Police Department.

On 25 July 1968, and at the specific request of the

United States Secret Service, this Office provided two audio
countermeasures technicians to the Urrit e'd States Secret Service
in connection with the Democratic National Convention held in
'Chicago, Illinois. 'This was not an offiCial detail although
both men were provided with temporary credentials identifying
them as being affiliated with the United States Secret Service.

On 15 August 1968,we detailed thesa.m.e two men to the

United States Secret Service to cover the Republican National
Convention in Miami, Florida. On both occasions, the team
members were debriefed upon their return and it is clear. that
their activities were confined exclusively to sweeping the
candi.dat e s I and potential candidates' quarters.

Willia= V. Broe
Inspector General
OIG~ (6 June 197'3)
Dis;~ . \
Orlg & 1 - Addressee _ 2 _
.-«:__ I rT A
oor;f7
'I "C" _ _ lvf~
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-.
....
\

'4 June 1973

Date

BRaE'
Follow-up interview re Mr.LI Irequest
xxx to see DC I.
, --_. -- .

, .

FROM: FPBishop
I. l"V13.
RE'J;'U~N TO:..(¥i1e,on Interviews held on behalf of DCI re Wate r g ate Z.Iewe ls

00648
...
" :

'p
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,. \

.'.
. : . :: . . ", " .: ~.>
. .
".
.:':,.'. ~, . '.'

. . . '.'.''., : ':'.:':" " . " :

~ '.: " . .' .': .':,: : ..: .:.... .
.. . .. ". , ~:.. . .',.' ..::
~

. . .::.
~
. . '

... ' . "

1. On 31 May 1973 I questioned labout what he I

had said at the Advanced Intelligence Seminar No. 6 and the extent
and nature of the relations he had had with the Montgomery County
Police. He said that he and others had been encouraged to discuss
their work and the problems related thereto with other Seminar
members and told that what they said would be "non-attributable."
In this context he had discussed the Office of Security's relatio,.s
with local Police Forces including the Police Force in Mp~tgGmery
County. He said he mentioned the "Ballou Case" as an example
of how the Montgomery County Police had used equipment provided
by the Agency in their work, but denied that he had said or implied
that the Agency was "involved" in the Ballou case. He said that he
had-alae related to the other Seminar members the fact that the
Agency had provided assistance to the Secret Service in connection
with the protection of the,President and Vice President and that he
and others had been detailed to work with the Secret Service on
counter-audio activities at the 1968 Democratic National Convention
in Chicago and the Republican National Convention in Miami. I
, . asked I
JWhO was on the Chicago detail, if he was
detailed to protect'e Viceo,President. He said that he was detailed
to Tom Kelly, Deputy Chief of the Secret Service and worked in
effect as a member of the Secret Service under Mr. Kelly.

Z. I questionedl as to whether his relations with I

. the Montgomery County Police was training oriented, equipment
orient.ed, or if he had engaged in any operations or activities with
the police. He said his relations with the Police had been entirely
equipment oriented and had 'been limited to the Chief of Police and
one or two senior Inspectors. The extent of assistance given con-
sisted of the Agency providing the Police w lth surplus technical

00649
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,r

equipment which was of no further use to the Agency" and

briefing them as to its use. He said he would not define these
briefings as training, but admitted that it might be so construed.
'.
I
3. I said that his only knowledge of the "Ballou
Case", except what he had read in the papers, came from one
telephone conve r sa.ti on he had with Inspector I pf the
Montgomery County Police sometime after accounts of the Ballou
shooting had appeared in the press. He said the Inspector called
to thank him for some amplifying equipment the Agency had given
the Police and mentioned that it had probably saved the life of a
policeman. He said that the Inspector explained to him that the
account of the incident appearing in the press was not the whole
story, that with the aid of the equipment the Agency had provided
the Police had been able to intercept a telephone call from Ballou
to a friend in which Ballou had outlined plans to "kill a cop' ."
The Police had then staged a raid to forestall Ballou's plan and it
was during this raid that Ballou was shot. I Isaid
that he had had no other conversations with the Montgomery
County Police on that subject. He said he had mentioned it at
the Seminar as an example of the sensitivity involved in the
Agency's dealings with domestic Police Forces. He said he
recalled that there was quite a bit of discussion and argument
by the Seminar members about the propriety of the Agency assist-
ing local police forces and working with the Secret Se r v icedn the,
U.S., but that he did not recall any extensive discussion about the
Ballou Case and that at no time had he said that the AgenCoas
direct! involved. I jsaid he remembered that
eemed partlcularly concerned about the Agency 0 ve-
L,Tmn.;eTn"--"m;;-;~omestic activities and that sometime later, around

January or February 1972, 1 falked to Colonel White about his

concern and Colonel White in turn talked to the Director of Security.
Since that date, he said, he has not had any further direct contact
with the Montgomery County Police, based upon orders of the
Director of Security.

ox • I • DISlIOP
Inspector

Q0650
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

(
~.

31 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Interview with "' 1Office o! Security

1. On 31 May 1973 I questioned I }bout what he

b&d said at the Advanced Intelligence Semmar No. b nd the extent
and nature of the relations he had had with the Montgomery County
Pollce. He said that he and others had been encouraged to discuss
their work and the problems related thereto with other Seminar
members and told that what they said would be "non-attributable."
In this context he had discussed the Office of Securlty's relations
with local Police Forces including the Police Force in Montgomery
County. He s atd he mentioned the "Ballou Case" as an example
of bow the MontgQmery County Pollee had used equipment provided
by the Agency In their work, but denied that he had said or implied
that the Agency was "involved" in the Ballou case; He said that he
had also related to the other Seminar rne mb e r s the fact that the
Agency had provided a s s Is t anc e to the Secret Service in connection
with the protection of the President and Vice President and that he
and others had been detailed to work with the Secret Service on
counter-audio activities at the 1968 Democratic National Convention
in Cbicago and the Republican National Convention in Miami. I
askedl rho was on the Chicago de ta il, if he was
detailed to protect the Vice President. He said that he was detailed
to TOITI Kelly, Deputy Chief of the Secret Service and worked In
effect as a member of the Secret Service under Mr. Kelly.

2. I questioned I rs to whether his relations with

the Montgomery County Pollce was training oriented, equipmont
oriented. or if he had engaged in any operation. or activities with
the police. He said his relations with the Police had been entlroly
equipment oriented and had been limited to the Chief of Police and
one or two senior Inspectors. The extent of aae iatanc e given con-
.bted of the Agency providing the Police with surplus technical

00651

~
..... I
'"'- -'..
" .• '.. • I
'----:--------
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. . ,
~

equipment which was of no further use to the Agency. and

briefing them as to itll use. He said he would not de!fne these
brieClngs as training. but admitted that it might be 80 construed.

3.1 !sald that his only knowledge of the "Ballou

Case", except what he bad read in the papers, came from one
tel.ephone conversation he had with Inspector I ff the
Montgomery County Police sometime after accounts of the Ballou
• shooting had appeared in the press. He said the Inspector called
to thank him for some amplifying equipment the Agency had g~ven
the Police and mentioned that it had probably saved the Ilfe of a
policeman. He s~ld that the Inspector explained to blm that the
account of the incident appearing in the press was not the whole
story, that with the aid of the equipment the Agency had provided
the Police had been ahle to intercept a telephone call from Ballou
to It friend In which Ballou had outlined plans to "kill a cop:."
The Police had then staged a raid to fo'restall Ballou's plan and it
was durlrig this raid that Ballou was shot. I Isaid
that he had had no other conversations with the Montgomery
County Police on that subject. H" said he had mentioned it at
the Seminar as an example of the sensitivity involved In the
Agency's dealings with dorneatte Police Forces. He s aid he
recalled that there was quite a bit of discussion and argument
by the Seminar members ,about the propriety of tbe Agency assist-
ing local police forces and working with the Secret Service in the
U. S., but that he did not recall any extensive discussion about the
Ballou Case and that at no time bad he said that the Agency was
directly involved. I lsaid he remembered that ~
reem:d partiCularlY cdncerned about tbe Agencylsuivor've-
'-=m=-e=-n=-t...-r£ri=-oar.!omestlc activiliesand tbat aornet lme later. around
'January or February 1972, Dtalked to Colonel White about his
concern and Colonel White in turn talked to tbe Director of Security.
Since that dat.., he said, he has not had any further direct contact
witb the Montgomery County Police, based upon orders of the
Director of Security.

F. P. Bishop
Inspector

- 2- 00652
 MORl DocID: 1451843

31 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJEC T: Interview withl IFMSAC

1. r Isaid he recalledl . Italking

about the 0 flee of Secunty's liaison with the Pollee Forces in
the Metropolitan Area and that the Ballou case was mentioned.
He also recalled that I Ihad mentioned that the Agency
had provided assistance to the Secret Service in connection with
surveillance work against radical groups at the 1968 Democratic
National Convention in Chicago.' He said that he could not re-
member exactly whatl Isaid, but he did recall that
there was considerab e d,Scusslon and debate among the class
members about the propriety of the Agency engaging in such
activities.

r- ~~2;.,.~~Later in January or February 1972, at a time when

Iwas Chairman of the Management Advisory Group
L-.(TMA~~G~),~J:1-e~s~a~ld he discussed these matters, and questioned the
extent to which the Agency should become involved in domestic
intelligence activities, with Colonel White and later with Mr.
Colby. The MAG also raised the general problem in a couple of
their papers, but without citing specific detailed -exampl e s , He
said he understood that Colonel White had taken the matter up
with the Director of Security and that some changes had been
made as a result. . '

Orig - File w jL ~terview

..._ 8Nl'f
00653
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

11" _t' 29 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

- '. SUBJECT: Possible Agency Involvement in Outside Activities
on Basis of Information Provided bvl
I' "L.-.- - -

----

On 29 May 1973 I talked to Mr. who

was a cla ssmate o f l l a n d at the Advanced
Intelligence Semina~hel on - ep em er 1971. Mr.!
said that each student was asked to describe and talk about his-w=o:-Or"k::-~
in the Agency and he recalled that Mr'l ,jhad talked about the
Office of Security's liaison with, and assIStance given to and received
from, the Police Departments in the' Washington Metropolitan area.
He said he could not recall specifically what was said. but to the best of,
his memory Mr. I i d e s c r i b e d training given to either the Prince
George's or Mont~Count.yPolice concerning surveillance methods
and electronic techniques. He 'said that he did not recall any discussion
of the "Ballou case" and that he had no knowledge of that case other
than what he had read in the riewspape r s ,

Of. 1"'. DISIlOP

006~
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. (.
(

30 : .z;," 1~73

1.3::0 CF ~~o~:

'::.:: c··',....~ ti.T :J?:

- - -i-...._.._._-~---"l
c=JR...:~o.rt 'o£' St.::l t€l~~nts r.:g{le

st.2te:::::nts ccnc('.t1"'in~ r3::-:ar!:s Y",;;c~e ~,. . ~-: •

...••c, -h.;.'I"r.~on
... ~-~IUI,. .''.rt=:>~ hr d boon
~\', "'" _~."" '"ed t.o
-.ar.o·..... 1.0 t~· . . .
•• _ •. Ai_ _.~ :<'-"L"'"''
-·.... 7 Ln .l "'r. • .:.; . •~ r. 1 -
CJTPo":'\1 \i:;)

::emo datr,d 16 :"..<y 1?73. o',t t:::.t h", hcd no 1:no"1ed::;e of t:,e ":.o l J ou

cc:::nC'ction :rit:: :,.;....'] CtSG.

:'.,~......:::l'.:,·:n.c:-+.,-:-.",i.
""----_ ... - .!: .....,
.".:."; +... -- -'~'''l~(',
- ...... "\.~'-~ 7.... --.
: ..
•. 1'- +-o'r
.... .. . D"'C~
..._- .........
'''1'':>+

,.r·1- - -~ t er :liJ;self. ::0 rc:'p.r;:eG 'i:.h:.t ;:ro.1- - -I;;:=.s e vel,'

:;000 Crio.fer, ::l:t il:clincd to oe ov:">r-e;~:--.:1Sive 2.1:. tines 2.;.(1. tr.lk
to nuch,
 MORI DocID: 1451843

.,
. 25 May 1973

."
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

THROUGH : Mr. Wl1l1am E. Colby

1. On 17 May the narne ofl }-aa

referred to this office as having altempted to contact the Director
concerning "activities outside the Agency." I attempted to contact
jon 21 and Z2 May, but he wa" on leave. On 23 May .
-':hc::e:-:::,,"'ta"'t"e"'drL"h-=e wanted to check a portion of his information and asked
I! he couI'd com" to my office on 24 May.

2. ClUne into the Agency as a JOT

in October a n " current y sslgned

C
to the Soviet/EE Section. He has a very s rong personne fUe.

. 3. r ladvlsed that In August 1971 he atteuded the

Advanced Intelligence Seminar. On the first evening of the seminar
the students had a "getting acquainted" session where each one
gave a brief description of his duties. One of the students1 I
I 1of the Office of Security, however, carried on
Altor tne 8eSSIon was over and expanded on the briefing he.had given.
He claimed that CIA was cooperating with the Montgomery County
Pollee, stating that the Office of Security gave electronic and other
support to that organization•

.c.
He further indicated that the Office of Security had been
Involved in the "Ballou case"'J Idescrlbed the Ballou caee
as follows: The residence o f r . Ballou, an antique gun collector
In Silver Spring, Maryland," was raided on 7 June 1971 by the Mont-
gomery County Police and some Federal law enforcement officers.
Mter the officers, dressed In civilian clothes, had forced their way
Into the house Ballou picked up an antique pistol. The officers
immediately opened fire and wounded Ballou seriously. He spent
a long time in the hospital and is partly paralyzed at the present time.

OOG56
 MORl DocID: l451843

- ""-v"'* c." -....

,-

aia cue ""a. given much publicity in the Washington Post at the
time. There wa.s additional publicity in the lout sevez-al month.
when Ballou insUgated a laW8uit against the rOliding officers.

____"'5 CL I ldentIIied another student,

toO
1 WhO was Rsalgned as a friend
r
oil
1
r
c=J
----"n...c......llrtt-..alCtaR'i'f"
: that als 0 8 e e med to kn ow the 8 pee un'T!"'c,,-.,--;o"'f..--.-th=e-S=arnl au
case. .

6. t thankedl ~d told him tMa was just the typ<!

o of tn:Cormation ""e wanted to receIve so that it can be investigated
and appropriate action taken II the information is borne out.

7. Thb office wll1 follow up on this allegation and advise 0

the Director concernini our finding••

WUllJUn V. Broe
Inspector General

-2-

00657
 MORl DoclD: 2452843
---
A'iiVI\~ ,( INTELLIGENCE SE'/IINAR 'N, ( .;

~ .-;;2.<{
..
~;V~ ?/. ..
List of Students
.,
.
Na1ne 'Office Room No. Extension

7/

,,r

s
00658

------ ..... ._- .. :-:t- ~;"':-;_. '-".

.. _.~:~ - .- -:"'..
- ._. ....'.
- -- --------...-.":.;~ -.-';'----r.-;:--.~---
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

(
(

v-,

MEMORANIAlM FOR: f\ ve,

O,<,~ i .... bl 0 ~ \.fh.~~

\.,.~W 1)",. C!ta...... ~l~ .....

M «. w l\'1 UJo.. "'-\.~.h.. lk
lA~' Q...> ..... J. ,-,tt;t,........t l~
0«"1 ~k >, b::> I
_l<.o \N~~ <lC------.4!:L======;---

\.;, f\.- G- 11 >

(DATE)
006
rORloI NO. 101 REPLACES FOR\! 10·101
1 AUG 54 WHICH MAY BE USED.
 MORl DoclD: 1451843
-
.. ,. -
"
i. :
"
. (-'
.,

" •

5317 Briley Place, N. W.

Washingt~n, D. C; 20016
29 February 1972 .

Mr. Lloyd Shearer

Editor-at- Large
Parade Magazine
140 N. Hamilton Drive
Beverly P.ills, California 90211

Dear Mr. Shearer:

Thank you for your letter of February 7, 1972, and its

kine! words about rric, As you can Irnagfne, your cha Hcng e set
rnc to work to rn c'et it. As a rcsult I can say, under oath if
need be, that CIA has never carried out a political assassination,
nor has it induced, cmployed or suggested one which oc cu rr ed,
Whether this fully rri e et s your challenge, I cannot s a y (it t a ke s
two to tango), but it is a long way f'r orn the' original s tat erncnt in
Mr. Scott's c o lurnn that CIA "us cs pol iti ca.l a s s a s s ina ti on as a
weapon." Perhaps I am too sensitive, but I would hope yOll could
B,;,t the record straight for your readers. '

Sincerely,

W. E. Colby

00660
 •
MORl DoclD: 1451843

(' i.
(
,
"

Parade publications, Inc. + OL 3·207J

/.40 N.l1olnilton Drive
BntT1v mu«, Calif. 90211
llOYD SHEARER
Eii'w.... ·1Arl' ..
,(.'
February 7, 1972 •
"
\:

.. Mr. W.E. Colby

::
•i
53.17 Brney Pl.
Washington, D.C. 20016
·
I c.

Dear Hr! Colbyi' I.

Thank you for your kind and inrormative letter or

January 11 concerning Operation Phoenix.
•~.
,. I don't want to get into a running word-batt.le \':ith
you on the subject or political assassination in Indo-Ch~na ..
~ .
or the role or CIA and other or our agencies in Operation
"

Phoenix.
,~
. ,, .
"
I am just ~ondering iilr yolt would care to say flatly
." . that the CIA has never'used political assassination in

. , Indo-Chinlil- or elsewhere and has nev;er induced, ernp.Loy ed , or

.' ; s'ltggested to others that such tactics or devices be employed •
.' :
l
r Ir you :will make that rlat statement under oath, I 1-:i11
'. ,j
.~. -- not only apologize, I will tango with Dick Helms in
Garrinckel's largest show ~lindow at 14th and F--providing"
.> i
.... i
of course, Mrs. Helms gives her permission.
i "
"
Again, I thank yOlt for your interest and commend you
,
-,
" for the really outstanding service you have rendered the
"
country. You are. indeed one of Helms l finest.
,~

~P
u e c t ffHr '
, C"LJ~ '.:.a-P<-~
LLO Sl!EARER 00661
 •
MORI DocID: l45l843

(
C'
..
&.
~.
•<'

I· SZoNDER WJLL... CHECK ci.xs 'CATION 'TOP AND BOTTOM

I exec.. . SS1F·I:~D I I ""J:-;FIDE;\TIAL "I S··..·.. ·· .....

.. r~\...n('_J.

OFFICIAL HOUTIi\'G SUP

TO NAME AND ADDRESS DATE INITIALS

1
1)c
T:>'~ .
r
2 77(" f 0-- FVr
3 • <~t1\- T4.ue r/.upr- I
4 •
I

5
f

6
l.
ACTION DIRECT REPLY P~EPA3E ::IEPlY
APPROVAL DISPATCH P'E"COMiiiE:m.tTJOH
COM.~ENT filE . RnUR~
CONCURREHCE INfORMATION SIGNATURE

Remarks:

-I ~APA u.r-e -
fL . S1ln :t.
ex ~
~
".

F
-
FROM: DATE;

.E~c';l:~i·;e I;!.r·:;"~..)r 4 l.!AY i~;2

I U:-;CL.·\SSIFIEO I I CO:XFJDE:iTr,\l.. I SECIt~:T

Un pruiofJl rdilion~
237

0066.2
 MORl Doc l D ; 1451843

(
,r-. :, -,

;
I
I
~.

:.: \n (")
;;;:: , ,
l
lD \.» 0
..... >j' I
[J)
:T
....
0
-.J
ttl
E :>; !
»
IT .... 1:3
I-j

0 I-' t>:I
•

r
P l1>
'<l ~
.o
tl
'tl
H
:0
R"
(")
0
:;:
• lD '<l
o
l1> f.it-'
N
0 :>:
0
.....
z (/)
•
:>;
0-
•
-"">; .-

••
-'- '.
--.. ,I
l\
~''''

00663 .
.' ..
 --------------- MORI DocID: 1451843

, .
.... . ,. •.~
. •
Parade Publications, Inc. .. OL 3-20i3
llO N. Hamiltan D,.i,',
llOYD SHEARER DUf!TIV Hills. Calif. 90211
Eililor.al.LltTg•
..
April ,30, 1972

Dear General Colby:

(1) Thank you for your article. "Should Lesbians Be
Al101~ed To Play Professional Football?" I :found it intriJ:!uinlZ',
and we plan to run it in a :future issue under your by-line, o:f
course.
(2) Thank you :for arran~in", a tan~o with me and Dick
Helms o:f Her ~raJestyls Tel Aviv Rifles. Even At Williams,
Dick was one of the ",reat tan",6-irtists of our time. Garfinkels,!
Wood rop-Lathrop, even Hechts---in fact,any place and time of
your choosin~ is O.K. with me. '
(J) One sad notel Will you tell An~us we cannot use
his ne» car bumper sticker: LICK DICK in "72, because it is
,open to misinterpretation. In addition, wa try to remain
politically neutra~. •
(4) As to your wlllinQness to say under oath tha~ the
CIA has ,never been party to political assassination, If o:f
late, have been 'travellin~ a ",ood deal. In the course of roy
travels r happened to encounter OLe c- Penkovsky--not your
Ole~---but Penkovsky, a bartendeIj in Cleveland ,··Ohio.
Penkovsky told me tha~ you signe~a secrecy atrreement, For~
270, witnessed by Victor L. }~rchetti. Under the terms of
this atrree;nent you are pledp,ed to eternal. silence COl1cerninrr
CIA activities. Unless you have a special Papal dispensatioJl---
the kind ~iven Allen Dulles and Lyman Klrkpatric]c, Jr. , it seems
to me you are lip-sealed.
Perhaps this does not apply to heaz-t nc-s before
the Senate Forei"n Relations Co~mittee or the prestiaious
Council 0:' Foz-et c-n ReLatn ons , lf this is so, please let me
know; and we wilL take it from there.
(5) .r will be in Washin~ton shortly stayin<r. ~t the
home of Jack Anderson out in Silver Sprlnrr. Perhaps ~e can
meet there :for a small suam; t , I will have 1'1i th me severEd
:former Green Beret members Viho want to discuss with you
the subject of CIA imposters in South Vietnam, who lied to
them and me, too.
Let me hear fruw you. Al~the best,
\..( \ ~ 00664
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

." I •
•
•
.'

5317 Briley Place, N. W.

.. Washington, D. C. 20016
29 February 1912

Mr. Lloyd Shearer'

Editor-at-Large
Parade Magazine
140 N. Hamilton Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90211

Dear Mr. She axexr

Thank you for your letter of February 7, 1912, and ita

kind words about me. As you can imagine, your challenge set
me to work to rneet it. As a result f can say, under oath if
need be, that CIA haa never carried out a political assassination,
nor has it induced, employed or .suggested one which occurred.
Whether this fully meets your challenge, I cannot say (it tnkun
two to tango), but it is a long way from the original statement in
Mr. Scott'o column that CI,A "u s e s political a a sa s a lnat lon a s a
weapon." Perhaps I am too sensitive, but I would hope you could
aet the record straight Ior your readers.

Sincerely,

! ~i~ w., .E, J:;olby,

W. E. Colby

VH •.\5

00665
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

(
' .. , "

Parade Publications. Inc. + OL J-2013

l~O N.HamilCon Drive

LLOYD SHEARER
Bl'DtTlll Hills, Calif. soen
EtliJ~·d.Large.

February 7, 1972

Mr. W.E. Colby

5317 Briley Pl.
Washington. D.C. 20016
Dear Hr. Colby~

Thank you for your kind and informative letter of

'January 11 concerning Operation Phoenix.
I don't want to get into a running word-battle 1'1ith,
you on the SUbject of political assassination in Indo-China
or the role of CIA and other of our agencies in Operation
Phoenix.
I am just ~ondering ~f you would care to say flatly
that the CIA has never used political assassination in
Indo-China or elsewhere and has never induced', employed, or
suggested to others that such tactics or devices be employed.
If you ~lill make that flat statement under oath, I will
not only apologize, I wi 11 tango ~Ii th Dick HeIms in ',-
Garfinckel's largest show window at 14th and F--providing,
of course, Nrs. Helms gives her permission.
AgE in. I thank you for your i~terest and cqmmend you
for the really outstanding service you have rendered 'the
country. You are indeed one of Helms' finest. "

00666
 MORI DoclD: 1451843

. , ,. ,
, ..
t··· .• •
1, •

I
5317 Briley Place
Washington, D. C. 20016
Januarr 11, 197Z

Mr. Lloyd Shearer

Editor at Large
Parade Magazine '"1 •••

733 Third A venUe

New York, New York 10017

Dear Mr. Shearor:

In your iaBue of Jiinuary 9th, one of Walter Scott's Per60nallty Parade

r eapons e s ntated that CUI. "\1$e8 political assassination ao a weapon " and
that Operation Phoonix "run by the CIA e etab Hahod a new high for U. S.
political assasoinationc in Vietnam. IJ Since I bave held responsible pos itfons
in CIA for many yeau and was a Is o (during detached service from CUll re-
s pona lble for U. s. support to Operation Phoenix, I believe I arn uniquely'
qualified to testify (a s I have in public session under oath to Senate and House
Committees) that: '

a. CIA does net nnd bas not used political a s ea s s Inatf on as a.

weapon.

b. Operation Phoenix Was run not by tho CIA but by the Govern-
ment of Vietnam, with the suppozt o! the CORDS clement of the U. S.
Military Assistance Command in coordination with severnl U. S.
agencte e Inc ludtng CIA.' .
c. Ope xatfon Phoenix in not and was not a p rogr arn of ac aa s s lna ;
tfon, It countered the Viet Cong apparatus attempting to overthrow
the Governmeut of Victnazn by targettlng its Iea.dez-e , Wherever pos-
sible, t he ae were apprehended or invited to defect, but a c ubs tant la I
number were killed in firefighta during Inilitary operations or rc-
dating capture. There is a vast diHercncc in kind. not merely in.
degree, between t hca e combat ca aua It i ea (even including the few
abus ee which occurred) and the victims of the Viet Cong's synt emattc
carnpa Ign of terroris,ID to which Mr. Scott quite accurately referred.

In order to c.~!'ify this Important queBti{.·.l to the millions of concerned

Americana who read P"rade, I should appreclate your publishing thin,letter.

Sinceroly,

lsi w. E. Colby

W. E. Colby
WEC:blp
• Distribution: 00667
Ori" - Addrp.RRPn t - E1:1t 1 - ExDtr 1 - Mr. Tnue ... ma.,-
I - William Sullivan of Stafe (via SAVA - 12 Janl I - Colonel Farnham !()sn/rS,!'
 MORI DoclD: 1451843
-
,"

5317 Briley Place

Washington, D, C. 20016
January 11, 1972.

Mr. Lloyd Shearer

Editor a,t Large
Parade Magazine
733 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10017

" Dear Mr', Shearer:

In your issue of January 9th, one of Walter Scott's Personality Parade

responses stated that ClA "uses political assassination as a weapon" and
that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new high for U. S.
political assassinations in Vietnam." Since I have held .r es pon sfb Iepos itf one
in CIA for many years and was also (during detached s e r vi c e f'r orrr CIA) re-
sponsible for U.S, s uppo r-t to Operation Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely
qualified to testify (as I have in public s ea s i on under oath to Senate and Houn e
Committe es ] that:

a. CIA doe s not and ha s not used political a a s a s e Inatf on a s a

wea pou ,

b. Operation Phoenix WaB run not by the ClA but by the Govern-
ment of Vietnam. with the support of the CORDS clement of the U, S.
Military Aa afs ta nc o Comrna nd in coordination with e e ve r-aI U. S.
a g encf e e including CIA.
e. Operation Phoenix is not and wa s not a program of assasBina-
tion. It countered the Viet Cong apparatus attempting to overthrow
the Government of Vietnam by targetting its Jea de r s , Wherever pos-
sible, thc e e were apprehended or invited to defect, but a substantial
number Were killed in firefightB during military operations or re-
sisting capture. There is a vast difference in kind, not merely in
degree, between these combat casualties (even including the few
abu a es which occurred) and the victims of the Viet Cong' s systematic
ea:mpaign of terrorism to which Mr. Scott quite accurately referred.

In order to clarify t hi s i:mportant question to the millions of conce rnca

Axnericans who read Parade, I should appreciate your publishing t his letter.

Sincerely,

.... -,
rA)j
W. E. Colby

00668
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

• . ,qUC~H'O. Vo:unu: 01 /I loo'It..'lvt.:u It I.'''''''::' PC,...,IJ' .... n:vuc.:»

. ~ ".-. ,
0

,
,

.., '
'j :

Q. Iour yC',1rs: "'1:0 .1C"C~S ._------, " • 0 ~

.\ HC'dy l:un.lIr hold a m.m

" , I ii,1nwd nomldllly/I. j.ikd t
/
.,
(or itttl'lJJpt('tI r.lpc. lIe
" c1.1imC'd .11 Ille lime ,hift .'
j.
.'
. "

o ~o

O~; .: :~' . :
I kdy Iwl invited Mm 10
sI,mr h"r "ed. Wl",l <:;rr
.,J
..

.~
0 .... ~~;
.
•
.'
c",.,,- '.' ~. : " .... t;.

." - .
."
happenrd /0 11",1
D.L., luMmck, Tex.
'palrman (n~ the los Angeles
, the ch,uRe and sued Hedy
,.
\·\.,::~:0 .'
o
g that she had willingly ac-
vcral weeks ;')~o Miss Lamarr I \ ~.J ': J'~ l:_~.~~.,
urt to answer Blylh's charges, AaOR [RN[ST DORGNINE WITH HIS fOURTH wns,
,.
dered her to pay him $15.000 Q. How many tjmcs hilS aclor Ernesi Borgnine been
lenouncing him as a rapist married, and is he a wile·bealer?-E.T.R., Springfield,
Mass. . , '
aid 01 girls and marriagel- A. Borgnlnc has been married four limes. His last'
'-, C. wife, Donna, has charged him with beating her, Js
ly 100 engrossed in his wok seeking a divorce.

O~ !Jape and doc, he ,rill 1001 Q. Is rhere any agency o/lhe U.S. Covemmcn! whi;;h

I
•

Chicago, 1/1. . , has been aulhorizct!lo include polHical assassination

n in Eliham, England. on July
~ hi' zest (or living it up.
,an is one with whom you on
·k.," Who said' thall-louise
" . if.
~'ery.
'0
in its practices?-M. 'A'ilso.n, Au.slin, Tex. ~
~ A:The one U.S. agency which uses political assassi-
nation as: a weapon is the Central Intelligence
Agency, Many of its men 'in Vic-to am have assassf-
natcd civilian Communists in an effort 10 destroy the
Vietcong infrastructure. Operation Phoenix run by
the CIA e",bli,hed a new hlgh (or U.S. polilical
assassfnatlons in Vietnam, larscly in response 10
enemy terrorist tactics which also include assassina-
tion, kidnapping, terrorism of all sorts,

Q. Does Richard Nixon

'/'
have his m':"n privale goll
,0 course at Key Biscayne-l-
Emma R,cynolds, Orlando,
Fla.
A. Not at Key Biscayne. He
'.' .O ", ~ •• 'owns a six-hole pitch-and-
··0 •• ,
putt course on his San
L:" .
l!r~~.-.-_
Clemente, Calif... estate.

.:....
' ,
Q. How long docs il rake.
In wear lifts in his shoes? And
t:2.. .'
~-
, ..... _ 0 '; •
rth Taylor, rule (he roos£?- radioactive fallout from
• ~'e, Ariz. . Chincse nuclear tests to
;;. " lilt, 10 make him taller, Yes, reach the US.I-M.1fk
• , ., hot, in the (amily. or .the two Cbeseboto, sarsrow, Cali/.
, r ••' Jcr and more responsible. II'is A. Approximately three
• :::; ....: .. : scripts they do, which may days depending on the
" ':', sof recenl naps. ' Wind.
~.

• ,:. ,,0': 0
....:"," ' •
:.....-_ _ .:......_.:..-.-JL~_-'- J

.:: '..::~:o. ':.:.' relldent. DANIEL o, KINlEY edttcr, JESS GORKIN publbbcr, WARUN J. RfYNOLDS 0

0···- or, CAMPSELL CE(SUN IC'niot editor, DAVID PAlEY

'nod.lt" editors, lINo.A GUlSTON, HERO(RT KUPHRBERG, MARTIN ....V.R.CUUES, JOHN c.. ROGERS
-' ) 'F. MllKUHN atl ;iUsociOlIC', At TaO'A.NI
I.ulsl.nll, MARY HODOROWSlI, SUZANNE CURLEY. DORIS SCHOPTMAN .
3, OEMI:TJUA 1J.YlO~ fOOion. VIRGINIA POPE cartoon educr, tA\;"'R[NCf lARIAJt
• BWMfr.HItAL, OP/.l GINN
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

(
.'

5317 Briley Place

Washington, D. C. 20016
January 11, 1972

Mr. Lloyd Shearer

Editor at Large
Parade Magazine
733 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10017

Dear :Mr. Shearer:

In your issue of January 9th, one of Walter Scott's Personality Parade

responses stated that CIA Ji us e s political assassination as a 'weapo~' and
that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new high for U. S.
political assassinations in Vietnam." Since 1 have held respon'sible positions
in CIA for many years and was also (d.uring detached service from CIA) re-
sponsible for U. S. support to Operation Phoenix, I. b c ldc ve I am uniquely. -,
qualified to testify (as I have in public session under oath to Senate and House
Corrunittees) that:

a. CIA does not and has not used political assassination as a

weapon.

b. Operation Phoenix .wa s run not by the CIA but by the Govern-
ment of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS clement of the U. S.
Military Assistance Corrunand in coordination with several U. S.
agencies including CIA. '

c. Operation Phoenix is not and was not a program o£ assassina-

tion. It countered th,e Viet C~t;H=~~~~'i\h~~Cl:a~~lerj~til~~. to ~verthrow 1/.". _ t
the Gove~nrncnt of Vi etnarn OY o--p~B;el.lCPd:ng'~0trllieC:;:j7t-g Its leaders. 6J.... J'..Lr~ 1!
tf,~l~ ...sen~ __ f,t~ were killed in firefights du.ri ng military operations or I
oMU resisting capture. There is a va s t difference in kind, not merely in I
J .L-
degree, between these c ornbat ca s ua lt i e s (even including the few
abuses which occurred) and the victims of the Viet Cong's systematic
eA
- / .campaign of terrorism to which Mr. Scott quite accurately referred.
"-
:,..fl In order to clarify this important qu e s t ir n to the millions of c cn c ern cd
Americans who r~ad Parade, I should appreciate your publishing this letter.

Sincerely,

~69c.(C:i?2-
z.W. = Colby

00670-
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

..•. ('
, "i • •
!
5317 Briley Place
Washington, D. C. 20016
January 10, 1972

Mr, Lloyd Shearer

Editor at Large
Parade Magazine 1",1
733 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10017

Dear Mr. Shearer:

In your issue of January 9th, one of Walter Scott's Personality

Parade responses stated that CIA "uses political assassination as a
weapon" and that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new
high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam." Since I have held
responsible positions in CIA Jor many years and was also (during de-
tached service {roln CIA) responsible for U. S. support to Operation
Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to testify (as i have in public
session under oath to Senate and House Committees) that:

a. CIA .does not and has not used political assassination as

a weapon.

b. Operation Phoenix wa s run not by the CIA but by the

Government of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS element
of the U. S. Military Assistance Command in coordination with
several U. ~. agencies including CIA.

. e.' Operatio!,.Phoenix is not and was not a program of

assassination:btit::..rather .eJJ.deavp.!.~ocounte~,i:he Viet Cong
apparatus lea-d4ng=t~le attempt;to overthrow the Government of
Vietnam by apprehending or defecting its :r1.embers..'
Some of
these were killed in firefights during military operations or re-
sisting capture. There ,is a vast difference in kind, not merely;"-
D. f! " , .,\degree, between these combat casualties (even including .[",' .• , ..,':" ..J,<•.(,j
~~}occasi onn L",..and.ie.w,..",.-.·abuses and the victims of the vree ,
r
. Cong's systematic campaign of terrorism r-ei;e':"',,<>d-to-by-M,r,·:Scott. .
__~ vr- \..-.....l.r- I\,",.~"~ (_."~'\.,,, c..., ,.,., .\
In order to clarify this important question to the millions of.; con- I ,
cerned Anlericans who mig-ht be mjsled...b.y...MJ.......sc.ott!~~luml).JI should ( ' ( ..•
appreciate your publishing this letter. .---,,, ,,-'

(~r~'JLj
~incerely.

..... _-_.---- W. E. Colby

0067.1
 MORl DoclD:' 1451843

, (
•
y

. - -~~ .

I
::;'EN DEft 'IN)

ljNCLASSIFIED
LL CH ECK CLA,
I I
'ICATION TOP AND BOTTOM
CONfIDE:'iTIA., I , SECRET
...... "
OFFICIAL ROUTli'iG SLIP ,
'1,

TO NAME AND ADDRESS DATE INITlAl..S

1
Colonel White
2

~ I

i
5
I
6 L
ACTION OIRECT R(PlY PREP/,RE ~EPlY
I,PPROVAl OISPATCH RfCOr.H.iE1iDAflO/'l
COPf,MEHT filE P.ETUP.1I
CONCURI;EHCE It:fORP~ATI0H SIGNATURE

Rcrnurks e r
~.

. \ I
Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent
to you for comments.
I!
~rtY ~ ~~cJ'UL
~ -/~~~
~~~~
er::- c/l~~
~~c:..r~

FOLD HERE: TO RETURN T

FROH: NAME. A~CRESS ANO PliONt. NO. DATE:

I
O/ExDir
l'i'iCI.AS ''''IY,''. I
I CO:-;VIIJENTIAL I
10 Jan 72
S,:CIlET
Uu p"Y10UJ.
, .I
,d'hlltn
10114 "D.
1-67 237

00672
r
,
 MORI DocID: 1451843

(' (
!
." "'5317 Briley Place
Washington, D. C. 20016
10 January 1972

Mr. Lloyd Shearer

Editor at Large
Parade Magazine
733 Third Avenue
New York, Now York 10017
" .
Dear Mr. Shearer:

In your issue of January 9th, one of Walter Scott's Personality

i
I
Parade responses stated that CIA "uses 'political a s sa e s inat.ion as a
weapon" and that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new
I• high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam." Since I have held
responsible positions in CIA for many years and w.as also (during de-
tached service from CIA) responsible for U. S. support to Operation
Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to testify (as I have in public'
'session under oath to Senate and House Committees) that:

a. CIA does not and has not used political assassination as

a weapon.

b. Operation P'hoerrix was run not by the CIA but by the

Govermnent of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS element
of the U. S. Military Assistance Command.

c. Operation Phoenix is not a program of assassination.

Members of the Viet Cong apparatus were k i Il cd in the course
of military op er attons or resisting police arrest. There is a
vast difference in kind, not merely degree, between these (even
including occasional -- and few - - abuses) and the Viet Cong's
conscious campaign of terrorism referred toby Mr. Scott.

In order to clarify.this important question to the millions of con-

cerned Americans who might be misled by Mr. Scott's column, I ahould
appreciate your pubHs hing this letter.

Sincerely,

Vf. E. Colby

00673
 MORl DocID: 1451843

...
. (
..
;.
.::..

•
c l·' .

-"--.'- "-'--'~~- .. ~~

SENDER WILL CHECK Cl.~S 'CATION TO? AND BOTTOM

'" U,;CLASSIFIED I I ",'-'NFlDEKTIAL I I SECRET

OFFICIAL ROUTI.'iG SLIP ..

-;-:-.
TO IlAME AND ADDRESS OA'f£ INITIALS

1
Mr. George Carver
2
";.. \

4 1

-.
t
5
i
6
ACTION , DIRECT PoULY FREPAr.E REPLY
l
APPROVAL OISPATCH RECGWUNDATION
COMMENT FILE RETUPoH
CONCURRENCE mrORMATIOIl SIGIIATURE

l
Remarks s

Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent

to you for comments. If possible, we should
appreciate receiving. your response tips after-
\
noon. .

F'OL,O HERE TO I:zETURN TO SENDER

FROM: NA ....E. AOORESS ANO P ..t"'\NE Nn DATE

O/ExecuHve Director1 o Jan 72

I UKCLASSIFIED I I COKFIDE:-iTIAL I 5 ECIlI;T

101M)to.
..
237 Un prrvlous edliions
lw61

I
,.
MORl DoclD: 1451843

5317 Briley Place

Washir.gton, D. C. 20016
10 Jm,"y 1 si: ~;:t

Mr. Lloyd Sheare

Editor at Large A n:~.tJ--- ~
Parade Magazine ~, I
-~/<§ATf--O L
733 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10017
{G J . -.,
Dear }..[r. Shearer:

In your issue of January 9th, ne of"\ nIter Scott's Personahty ~~'

tb .' (,<. , 0-1\.'
Parade responses stated that CIA "u e s politi al assassination as a _.- •
weapon,,'a'nd that Operation Phoenix' un by the CIA established a new . ~ J
high for U. S. political assassination in Vietna ." Since I have held / .
responsible positions in CIA for many ears and s also (during de-
tached service from CIA) responsible' r U. S. sup .zrt to Operation
Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to teatify (a I have in public
session under oath to Senate and House Committees) t t:

a. CIA does not and has not u ed political assas

a weapon.

b. Operation Phoenlxwas run at by the CIA but by he

Government of Vietnam with the su port of the CORDS1 ele nen, t~. ~'

",~
of the U. s, Mi1it~,ry !,-s.istance
•
mand.!C ~
uS ~ ...........,.x.~e.tfl', ~ ~ ."L~:L
fO • ~

~ ..,.sA..:.operation.7hoe:,~.,i;'~~~ ogram ~f as~as~ination, f-;,-e(;.'lh

-,rfv·....O-"'"""Murooers
C·JZ...
as----i I
J.P.,
of~';=~g~1 , "'"" :I w e r.e ki lle d m.~llc ee"r~_ .)
'C"i~"'.'~·1'1\,\!{'\ . .·~~C'l./trl.tl·(·_.

,
J vast difference in kind, not merelylJegr.ee., be.~wcenThere
';)::xrl" milita ry op cr-ations :or ,.• s'&Dilg-,."'*'i"'......,.."...::;H;Jr
thes
is
even
Inc ludin g occasional u and few -- abu.eB)and~thc1'ijiet Cobg"
~. ~fe...>.u-l\..il'L~""Campaign of t e r r o r i s rn referred to by'in-. 's,;;ltt.

.1. In order to clarify this important question of con- toft~ns

cerned Americans who might be misled by ~~ttls column, I should
appreciate youc publishing this letter.

Sincerely,

W. E. Colby
- .-"~-

00675
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

_; _-.:.:'~o.:_.". 0.\ 0......0.... ·. ( '----. -oy"'.... ....,:.,.,.

{ "'._-.- _..
,
~- .
: .- ' .
•I
~
•

I
e vc r . (,. f
I.. G." Ct» Ij rI
I
iJ o:;lJ r'~ • .ll·._ oJ ... ·~l1/ult.•/ '\1

~().SSt.1JJf'~'~11." '" .;.re..

•
•
;c~ .. ~~e f- ...., rio e(.rI, ft~lnJ-I" .'>1
Icr ;~ . . u ..., "/'HJ.··/.'J-t Pp,~t ",) ,~....
i
,0.(1)'·''1
I
"",'fl. .. " e...." r..•.t.~I-I'.. v.J t,.tJotvlr ,'" I .. f·

\ C.. 0 I:> ~~ .. p. ~ P<t. t 10,"1 I) l'\.1- .. .,/ Ij pH r ~ ',)

l~t~'1 Ot.. pr'I""'1 .0.(" O.JJ • .fJI'.,~I'~" "P~.t""'l' II

I', ,,, I . . Jtl [-., f-t.t s t., •. r/-'·! Q,,'( (u.rOJ

I11-~'.;~t. v.>~I'CI, f-~~
C.", ......... t ...t «>
~ h."
~V,'r~'4c~
'?"dt •. vut ,/
ltv ·CO(JI,!,\.h t-v« '''dr..'",'/-,,,) ",r: e...11 ",R

.Ii'{') c ....... "O ... I .. ~1 -- 1'o\1'I.'t.,"\o P.. t"teo 0\1/ C.I\VI""'~

1"'\I'VI"do'Nl __ w~o ~rt ~ .... t Vo1tuJI>'" t> P
!~JfC>"I,'Jr'\"J..1 f·t CI>.f""J WI'/-", Vo..~,'" r:...ce{.J
~<>{: 'f-~t V ,'to J.. .......'H (. NWi <>"'; f f·.I'/.1 '.J c /I'~ I> " ; "

i~fl.t1- t. e- Vlr-'-e. .. "'" f-'rt (;.'" vt • ., '" I'" t' t 1 /0 ~(e

I
1(> (. , 6. r""s ' T ,,~ i'I-I e ""! t,.,I C> oF- f 4<:. ('6 "'7"..,\ ,'{l-
"-~~ Vtt!-C,.,? -- - ..,
:P.. t~1
I
~l'c,. .. ~t~t
!-\'L
~I'("''''~''J ;.. ",,"I,.d I"~ ..
,.. .
o
o.,'{ ..... ,

:r~~ t .. ~ .. I.j. \) I:. .... kc.l>v...;y· 'f-<> ff~htl-

i It It IF o./"'''J'f. I'.. VI> ..' .. HI c~ .. t a.:~...,; 0-,,'/ 00676
! 1-10\ I\tH' !~'1I\H I'.\t"'lhVJ Q r! , fit- l).t tiS v~ 1/1
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

~~~... "ltl (.t "-t\ ~"'",f / '(Vj1""~·'1 ~S 1.. ,1- Or-

\ ~"~'f(\I.ttl Ul.l.'!-, S"~'f ~'f o./{.I"I~f. fo

· .: 'e>-t-rcsf. P..
r-~1 (Yl<:"Ilf~J <sI', f,,!-,'IV{,r1'1, fo.,Al
; \,' II~b"r~t,11
: b 5fi'tt '",rJ$ o.-\v')eo t II\Jlo ,,'ll! ')' 1Cr./-..,'/J ~Q..,to
:~I'nr/ .,.f' (-"it J
V~?.1 t\'le .... ~~.J 0 f. f-~l..
iVI't ~
I
Co "'d ",.i o",
0..(> f ,\., J '01 V ,'0'0)'1 :>
I" H.. ll..,'\ If ~ ,'''\ t-~~ <=0. oe e f- w..' "'/-,-;.
ff~j"O.~\'H~ 0,... w~.'I~ t-tJI';?"V p~{llle o.nfJJ.
~ \'"~t"
I
.'l J.... Ii .. J!= . 41'- !lhj~ vOJ 0... VoIJ I-
:~,\fi.tf"tMt .\ k,',,'1 J h~1- ""'t~'y r:/tj rre-) L\twlI~
!h~t ~"'I ...... I~"tJ ·.t1'<1..t,\Y""'/ f, •.,. Q..,...."tt! Cf;1w,1,d-

;Cevt,\ .1'.ttlVC{"KJ 0 (("J/~ ... ql -- Q.lt{ .[.tw- G."vIVH>::,I"J-

1()"~uJV) <J."~ ht t,j,\i- c.. ~!J COli! 0;. I'''":,

:!:'{il-t~\/.I'fr CI>.."I/''''J'' of rU1oflJ"';' ijClI1HJf

I o- 'I e, "!VI f<! (\0 fl • C" M h n·.." ~) I' c.f. t r I'"j fell ('I
! ft1r,
!
!:t<>(-/-·

00677
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

c !: .., '
.~.
., .~ .

,..._-_._--.-.-_ ..__ ... _------ ._- ..... -.. ----~---,

'.
I C.:::NOC~ WILL CHECK eLM ICATION TOP AND BOTTOM
I UNCLASSIFIED I I ,-ONFID~YfIAI.. I I SECIlET ,.

JFFICIAL ROUTli\'G SLIP

..
TO ~.NAME AND ADDRESS DATE

1 D~/I ttP JAN 1972 /0 9"...J

V
:I !/
3 ,M A , (~.(}v-1
• )
S ( _ "- .__ . ,
i
6
ACTIOil
AFPROVAl
COII).IENT
COHCURP.£NC£
OIRECT REPLY
DISPATCH
FILE
INfORMATION
PP.EPARE REPLY
RECOIIMENUATION
RETllRN
SIGr:ATUR£
l
Hemnrkar

Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent

to you for comments. I! pos sible, we should r
appreciate your--==.
response this
. . . . . . . _,,'».l':...... aft er noon,
........... ~ ..
t,. ...... __
~~ ~~",
~

••• . ~~
ICQ:I>
" 1
!

---

FOL.D HERE TO RETURN TO SE:NC£R

FROM: NAW,E. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO. DATE"

O/Executive Directorl I o Jan 72

I" UNCLASSIFIED T • .L I SEC1U:T
FOIlN NO.
1-67
237 Us. previous tdilions (...0)

,
/
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.
"; .. ~ , .... ( (" I L;!Jir LC.Y~",!,:'
.' 5317 Briley Place - - - -
Washington, D. C. 20016
10 January 1972

Mr. Lloyd.. Shearer

Editor at Large
Parade'Magazine
I': -
733 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10011

Dear Mr. Shearer:

, In your issue of January 9th, one of Walter Scott's PCTsonality

! Parade responses stated that CIA "uses political assassination as a
.I,, weapon" and that Operation .Phoenix "run by the CIA established a.. new
high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam. II Since I have held
l· responsible positions in CIA for many years and was also (during de-
i
'/ tached service from crA) responsible for U. S. support to Operation
'l Phoenix, I believe I a1UG;niquely]qualifi~d to testify (as I have in public'

i session under oath to Senate and House Committees) that:

a. CIA does not and has not used political a s s a a e i n at i on as

'-i a weapon.

b. Operation Phoenix was run not by the CIA but by t

I i
Government of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS el
of the 11. S. MilitarY,Assistance Command.
r--"'"'- ' --
' .
,,--.

!
! . c,. Operation Phoenix is not a program of a s s a s sination.
I
i Members of the Viet Cong apparatus were killed in the c ou r s e
:I I)
vast difference in kind, not merely degree, between thes,o/ (even
.....--
of military opcr atton a or resisting police arrest. 'I'he r eLs a ___
. , I

including occasional -- and few -- abuses) and the Viet-Cong's

oonscious campaign of terrorism referred to by Mr. Scott.
,
In order to clarify this important question to the millions of con-
cerned Arne r icans who might be misled by Mr. Scott's column, 1 should
appreciate your publishing this letter.

Sincerely,

E.
-
W. Colby

00679
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

(- -',
.-.,

.- ~~

Mr. Houston
. Mr. Warner

£\
::b
°
I
over and g~h1SCOmens .•
I ha ve as k;.9-j 10",0,.,..-_..,5
1 L.
..
.
r
I

·00680

!
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

e,
, ,
" ' (
"
" ,

I. :::ENDER WIl.L CHECK eLM ICATION TO? AND BOTTOM

I UNC'.ASSlfiED I I ...ONFIDE:\TIAL I I SECRET

OFFI~\L ROUTI.:'\G SLIP

TO NAME AND ADDRESs O....TE INITIALS

1 Gene/al/OUDs el

: 1/ ,

. _.. _.
5

l
6
~CTION OlP.ECT REPlY PREPJRE REPLY
~FPROVAl OISP~TCH RECOrr~M£tlOA.T10n
COMMENT AlE RETURN
" ~
COHCURREf.CE INfORMATION SIGNATURE

Hcmurkar

Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent r.:

to you for cornrnents. If possibl<:.......Yl.~'!llL f
appreciate your response this afternoon.
. - ---- I

FOLD Hr::.RE TO RETURN TO SENDER

FROM: NAM~. AoonESs AND PHONE NO. OA,TE

O/ExDir~ 10 Jan n
I U:-;CLASSIF'I!;O coxrtnzxrt.u. I SECln:T
fOJW MO. Un PltYIOUS
..I
tdlhons
1
("0)

''''' 237 "

, 00681
I
 MORl DoclD: 2452843

.... ~.. .r _.: (

" .,
5317 Briley Place
Washington, D. C. 20016
10 January 1972

Mr. Lloyd Shearer

Editor at Large
Parade Magazine I. "_ ' .
. 733 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10017

Dear Mr. Shearer:

-:
In your issue 01 January 9th, one 01 Walter Scott's Personality
Parade responses stated that CIA "uses political.assassination as a
,j. weapon" and that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new
J
high 10r U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam. II Since I have held
, responsible positions in CIA 10r many years and was also (during de-
tached service from CIA) responsible for U. S. support to Operation

I
I·
'Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to testify (as I have in public
session under oath to Senate and Hous e Co.:nmittees) that: .
I
a. CIA docs not and has not used political assassination as
.1 a weapon.

b. Operation Phoe ix was run not by the CIA but by the

Government of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS eleme.ft .
• 1:.[\o£the U. S. Milit;c'?o,;;ssistance Cornmand~·L..., LOc.rrJ l'~\ ,I~
~ C.(17 ~ ,,-.. os O-o~. .
c •. Operation Phoenix is not a program of assassination.
Members of the Viet Cong apparatus vres:e killed in the course
'- 01 military operations or resisting police arrest. There is a
vast diHerenc'e in kind, not merely degree, between these (even
including occasional -- and few - - abuses)" and the Viet Cong's
conscious campaign of terrorism referred to by Mr. Scott.

In order to clarify this important question to the millions of con-

cerned Americans who might be misled by Mr. Scott's column, I should
appreciate your publishing this letter.

Sincerely,

W. E. Colby

·00682
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

.
(
.,.

. SENDER WILL CHECK CL.. FICATION TOP AND OOTTOM

I U1\CLASSIFIED
,
T 1 CONFIDESTIAL I I SECIlET

OFFICIAL. ROUTING SLIP

//
TO NAME AND"ADORESS DATE INITIALS

, .
1 Mr. Andqhhuermer
,

i.
A"
10 JU7a
2

3
PI ILea-fRv
4 7
5

-
.
I
6
i
ACTIO II
APPROVAL
OIRECT REPLY
DISPATCH
Pr.EFARE REPLY f
L
Kt.C{m.MEHDAlIOIi
COMMENT FILE RfTlI;lK
-
COHCURREHCE IHFDRPIoAllOH SIG~ATUP.£

Remnrkar

Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent

to you for cornm., .it s , If possible. we should F
appreciate receiving your response this after-. f
noon. . I•
I

.~: :.
. ".:'
I
I
i FOLD HERE TO HETURN . 0 SENDER

I
FROM: NAME:, ADDRE:SS Af.lO PHONE: NO. DATE

a/Executive Director 10 Jan 72

I USCLASSIFJED I I l-O:\.'JIH:.\ j), L I SE(;IU;T
(.(,O)
Ust pltvi:luS tdilions
237

I
00683
./
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ,
. ';' ~, (0
e-
(
;.. ~

The noted phrases should, in my opbion;;.

I
•
I
.----:-7
be cut out. ~ They arc the kind that lead to the i
italticized "Editor's Nobn't "t the end, of the letter l
which rebuts ~e whole ~oi~~ being made by
the letter writer.

"R<lsisting po ':c" arrest "will get

you, with thr- pre~s, nothing but sni",e ~llickillg

cracks ••• and as we're really not going to :II win

too much in ruch a shor-b letter anyway. "Ihy not skip

~he occassional abuses bit.

Them's my thots.

ANT
Al\
.n

00684

!
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

-.0 . .,.'. . .. (
! !>H7 Briley PIa';"
Washington, D. c ..:: ~';)
10 January 19"12

Mr. Lloyd Shearer

Editor at Large
Parade Magazine
733 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10017

Dear Mr. Shearer:

In your issue of January 9th, one of Waller ScoU's Per~ona.!.i!Y.

Parade responses stated that CIA "uses political assassination as a
weapon" and that Operation Phoenix "rnn by the CIA established a new
high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam." Since I have held
responsible positions in CIA for many years and was also (during de-
tached s e r vi c e from CIA) responsible for U. S. support to Operation
Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to testify (as I have in public'
session under oath to Senate and House Committees) that:

a. CIA does not and has not used political assassination as

a weapon.

b. Operation Phoenix was run not by the CIA but by the

Government of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS clement
of the U. S. Military Assistance Command.
...
e. Operation Phoenix is not a program of assassination.
Members of the Viet Cong apparatus were killed in the course
;'f military operations i(,J:-l'es isting-p' olice~arr·c.J·;:t:J·
~ _ ..... "':;.0, There is a

vast difference in kind, not rno r ely degree, between these (£y.c.u.
~l\\ding.:}.oQ.cag.iona.l ..........-e.:and.-:fewA-=:'".:..abuBe~ ana the Viet Gong' 6
conscious campaign of terrorism referred to by Mr. Scott.

. In o nd e r to clarify this important question to the mi.\!ions of con-

cerned Atnericans who might be rn i s l e d by Mr. Scott's col~ I should
appreciate your publishing this letter.

Sincerely,

W. E. Colby

00685
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

,
. . :- .' ."--. ,"
 MORl DoclD'. 1451843

,(
'., . .' ..
"
~

~. _ • • _. 4""; _ _ •• ~ .'-:., , __. _ . _ . _ . _. ..., .. _- .. . .-

~ ..

,
 MORl DoclD: l45l843

, .,. ' ".. { !

, ..'

rr-»:» --~---'-I-~--'~--'-..-.-.-.- - .-.- - . -.-. - - .- - - .- - - . .-.- - ,-,- -'--.

; .' 7;f~(~
, .~&~(
<
 MORl DoclD: 2452843

. . :, . " : f
I,

-r~' '._'.' - ,- . , .""' •

.'

~'.

"

. .: I ./
 MORI DocID: 1451843

'. ' . !," . .. I

!'.
/
 MORI DocID: 1451843

· .. '. . I~
,
I • ,.
\ ". .,
I .

; .
 MORI DocID: 1451843

,
: ::: '. \
'-
.: . • -<.. - .-'- ••• •_......",- •

e
o

,
•
 MORl DoclD: 1451843

' . ./' .... . .

• ~- .,~ .. <-

r.
.Ct..-<-A-
()-d-V\'

o.-"-'-'....u..~A...<.,

q9

_. - . ..