Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Egypt
Emerging markets are nations with social or business activity in the process of rapid growth
and industrialization. At 2006, there are around 28 emerging markets (at 2010, more than 40
emerging markets) in the world, with the economies of China and India considered to be the
largest.
In the 2008 Emerging Economy Report, the Center for Knowledge Societies defines
Emerging Economies as those "regions of the world that are experiencing rapid
informationalization under conditions of limited or partial industrialization."
The term Emerging markets is used by investment analysts to categorize countries that are in
a transitional phase between developing countries that are just beginning to industrialize and
countries that are fully developed.
The main significance of the use of the term is that investments in emerging markets are
assumed to carry greater risk and offer less safety in investment. The term is often used
interchangeably with developing markets, though this is somewhat inaccurate. Examples of
emerging markets include the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China), several
Southeast Asian countries, Eastern Europe, and parts of Africa and Latin America.
Emerging markets generally do not have the level of market efficiency and strict standards
in accounting and securities regulation to be on par with advanced economies (such as the
United Stated, Europe and Japan), but emerging markets will typically have a physical
financial infrastructure including banks, a stock exchange and a unified currency.
Emerging markets are sought by investors for the prospect of high returns, as they often
experience faster economic growth as measured by GDP. Investments in emerging markets
come with much greater risk due to political instability, domestic infrastructure
problems, currency volatility and limited equity opportunities (many large companies
may still be "state-run" or private). Also, local stock exchanges may not offer liquid markets
for outside investors.
There are various ways in which a country risk analysis can be performed. After going
through various country risk reports, we understood the one common thread in all of them.
They take into consideration several factors as mentioned below and according to certain set
parameters they give each of the factor a rating which is then evaluated and incorporated in
the risk analysis report.
C. The outline risk analysis for any one of the emerging markets,
Reason: With the current political risk hovering this country and keen interest in
understanding the economy of one of the African countries, we have selected Egypt.
Egypt is one of the most undynamic economies of the world. The Nile River Delta is not
navigable at all, and it is crisscrossed by omnipresent irrigation canals in order to make the
desert bloom. This imposes massive infrastructure costs upon Egyptian society at the same
time as it robs it of the ability to float goods cheaply from place to place. This mix of high
capital demands and low capital generation has made Egypt one of the poorest places in the
world in per capita terms. There just has not been money available to fund development.
As a result, Egypt lacks a meaningful industrial base and is a major importer of consumer
goods, machinery, vehicles, wood products (there are no trees in the desert) and foodstuffs
(Egypt imports roughly half of its grain needs). Egypt’s only exports are a moderate amount
of natural gas and fertilizer, a bit of oil, cotton products and some basic metals.
The bottom line is that even in the best of times Egypt faces severe financial constraints — its
budget deficit is normally in the range of 7 to 9 percent of gross domestic product (GDP)
— and with the recent political instability, these financial pressures are rising.
The military leadership — exploited the population’s deposits in the banking system. This
military elite — or, more accurately, the firms it controlled — took out loans from the
country’s banks without any intention of paying them back. This practice enervated the banks
in particular and the broader economy in general and contributed to Egypt’s chronic capital
shortage. It also forced the government to turn to external sources of financing to operate, in
particular the U.S. government, which was happy to play the role of funds provider during the
final decade of the Cold War. There were many results, with high inflation, volatile living
standards and overall exposure to international financial whims and moods being among the
more disruptive.
Mubarak’s son Gamal sought to change the way Egypt did business in order to build his own
corporate empire. One of the many changes he made was empowering the central bank to
actually enforce underwriting standards at the banks. The effort began in 2004, and early
estimates indicated that as many as one in four outstanding loans had no chance of
repayment. By 2010 the system was largely reformed and privatized, and the military
elite’s ability to tap the banks for “loans” had largely disappeared. The government was
then able to step into that gap and tap the banks’ available capital to fund its budget deficit. In
fact, it is this arrangement that allowed Egypt to weather the recent global financial crisis as
well as it did. For the first time in centuries, Egypt’s financial position was not entirely
dependent upon outside forces. The economy was hardly thriving, but economically, Egypt
was certainly a more settled place. For example, Egypt now has a mortgage market, which
did not exist a decade ago.
Some Indicators:
Robust GDP Growth – Egypt weathered the recession well. But it is still below growth rates
recorded between 2005-08
Inflation has come down but still remains at double digit levels.
Slowing Reform speed – Rapid Economic Growth is needed to fight poverty and provide
jobs.
These changes and others like them earned the Mubarak family the military’s ire. With the
constitution suspended, the parliament dissolved and military rule the order of the day, it
stretches the mind to think that the central bank will be the singular institution that will retain
any meaningful policy autonomy. If the generals take the banks back for themselves, Egypt
will have no choice but to seek international funds to cover its budget shortfalls.
Yet Egypt cannot simply tap international debt markets like a normal country. While its
foreign debt load is small, its total debt levels are very similar to states that have faced default
and/or bailout problems in the past. An 8-percent-of-GDP budget deficit and a 72-percent-of-
GDP government debt load are teetering on the edge of what is sustainable. As a point of
comparison, Argentina defaulted in 2001 with a 60-percent-of-GDP debt load, and it had far
more robust income streams. Even if Egypt can find some interested foreign investors, the
cost of borrowing will be prohibitively high, and the amounts needed are daunting. Plainly
stated, Cairo needed to come up with $16 billion annually just to break even before the crisis
and the likely banking changes that will come along with it.
The megalopolis of Cairo which has more than 20 million people is literally punctuated by
fighting and protests, whereas usually it runs at full speed. High inflation and high
unemployment [especially among the youth] mixed with frustration over widespread
corruption and feelings of disenfranchisement make for quite a toxic combination. Moody’s
said Egypt suffers from ―deep-seated‖ political and socioeconomic challenges, including a
chronic high rate of unemployment, elevated inflation and widespread poverty.
Lets see what ratings have been assigned by different rating agencies.
After degradation done by Moody's and Standard & Poor's, Fitch as at Jan 2011 also
announced the degradation of a notch on the long-term rating of the country, to BB, while
placing it on negative watch, which does not exclude a further deterioration in the next three
months
Revenue from tourism—the second-largest foreign-currency earner (after oil and gas)—will
be hit hard by the ongoing political crisis. The protests have presented Egypt with a cash-
crunch problem. At $13 billion in annual revenues, tourism is the country’s most
important income stream. The recent protests shut down tourism completely — at the
height of the tourist season, no less. The Egyptian government estimates the losses to date at
about $1.5 billion. Military rule, tentatively expected to last for the next six months, is going
to crimp tourism income for the foreseeable future. Simultaneously, the government wants to
put together a stimulus package to get things moving again. Details are almost nonexistent at
present, but a good rule of thumb for stimulus is that it must be at least 1 percent of GDP — a
bill of about $2 billion. So assuming that everything goes back to normal immediately —
which is unlikely — the government would have to come up with $3.5 billion from
somewhere.
Banking Sector Risk - Stable. Banking sector risk is revised to CCC according to
FitchRatings. Egyptian banks are plagued by high levels of non-performing loans (NPLs).
The decline in economic growth as a result of lower exports and tourism revenue will make it
harder for banks to recover NPLs, which are likely to increase in 2011.
The biggest economic worry arising from Egypt is that the unrest could disrupt oil supplies,
triggering a spike in fuel prices. But given the fact that Egypt’s role in oil markets is limited,
that seems unlikely too. Egypt produced just about 1% of the global oil output last year.
There are fears that shipping through the Suez Canal, which accounts for 10 percent of world
trade, will be disrupted, which would not only strain the Egyptian budget, but also raise
commodity prices. The Egyptian army has stepped up security near the canal, and South
Korea's Hanjin Shipping re-routed some containers to avoid Egypt. However, human
resources needed to handle ships has diminished due to the demonstrations, and the ports in
Alexandria, Damietta and Port Said are manned by a "skeleton workforce."
Another concern is that the 220-mile Sumed oil pipeline will be "sabotaged by protesters or
terrorists," even though the government doubled the amount of guards along the pipeline. A
disruption of oil flow in the pipeline could raise oil prices; a barrel of oil rose over $100 in
the US on January 31 due to concerns over Egypt.
However, despite some jittery trading in global markets over the past week, experts believe
the fear that Egypt could destabilise the global economy looks premature. The markets have
also signalled only mild concerns about Egyptian risk.
Egypt’s economic growth is expected to remain in the 5% per year range through 2011.
While these growth figures represent a decline from 2007 and 2008 they are relatively strong
given global economic conditions. The global slowdown and falling commodity prices have
helped to ease inflationary pressures which mounted in 2008 until price increases peaked at
over 20% in 2009. This year inflation has come back down to high single digits.
Following are certain points of interest about the Egyptian Economy
1. The Egyptian economy has been evolving from a highly nationalized, government-
controlled platform to a more market-driven model.
2. While the Egyptian economy is relatively large and diversified it is heavily reliant on
world economic conditions due to its large export and tourism sectors.
3. This vulnerability led to the economic slowdown during this period of global
recession as many of Egypt’s trading partners are experiencing an economic
recession. Therefore the positive outlook for growth is predicated on a global
recovery.
2. The government's overriding concern in the forecast period will be to maintain
economic activity and job creation in a climate of slower economic growth compared
with the boom in 2005-08. The government will continue to press ahead with
economic reform and liberalisation, although concerns over political unrest are likely
to slow progress in some key areas, such as reform of the public administration and
the implementation of the new property tax.
3. Measures introduced so far include sharp cuts in income tax rates and customs duties,
which have successfully led to a widening of the tax base. In the second half of 2010
the government will resume its programme of incrementally reducing subsidies on
energy prices in a bid to align domestic prices with international prices and minimise
the fiscal drain, and it aims to have eliminated all energy subsidies by the end of 2011.
4. The government's consolidation programme in the banking sector means that Egypt's
banks face little risk of contagion, and domestic liquidity will remain at comfortable
levels. The government will continue to tighten regulation and to work on improving
access to finance for the private sector. The government is aware of the risk of social
dislocation if liberalisation moves too quickly, and reform will remain gradual.
5. A new public-private partnership (PPP) law should facilitate the implementation of
PPPs and thereby speed up the ongoing government programme to improve Egypt's
infrastructure in areas such as hospitals, roads, railways, ports and wastewater
treatment.
POLITICAL RISK: HIGH
Egypt’s government has strong political ties to the United States, Israel and the Arab Middle
East. Egypt often serves as a mediator between more radical Arab states and the West.
According to the World Bank, relative to the rest of the world, Egypt made the largest strides
in improving its business environment between 2007 and 2008, albeit from a relatively low
base.
In the last general election, which is widely perceived to have been fraudulent, the NDP won
the vast majority of seats in the People's Assembly (the lower house). The opposition
movement that has sprung up since January 25th has demanded that parliament should be
dissolved, but this will be resisted by the new vice-president, Omar Suleiman, who has in
effect taken on the role of interim president. Mr Mubarak and Mr Suleiman have agreed to
consider amendments to the articles of the constitution specifying conditions for the holding
of the next presidential election. This election is scheduled to be held by end-September, but
it may well be brought forward. According to the existing rules, any presidential candidate
must currently either come from the leadership of a recognised party with at least one seat in
parliament (this was due to increase to 3% of seats in the lower house and 5% in the upper
house in 2017) or obtain 250 signatures from members of parliament or local councillors,
which would be virtually impossible for any independent candidate, given the NDP's
domination of all the governing bodies. The constitution also places no limit on the number
of terms that a president may serve.
Egypt's future continues to hang in the balance. Egypt’s political direction could have
profound effects on regional stability—potentially involving, for example, the Israeli-
Palestinian conflict and efforts to contain Iran’s nuclear ambitions—with broad economic and
financial ramifications. The recent economic and political developments do not bode well for
Egypt’s debt, and this contagion could continue to spread within the region, leading to the
persistent underperformance of local currency debt and equity markets. As we highlighted in
a recent MENA Focus, political stresses in Egypt have pushed other vulnerable governments
in the region to promise political reforms and increased government spending, which some of
the oil importers, like Jordan, can ill-afford. We believe, though, that investors will continue
to give special treatment to the region’s strongest economies, such as the small GCC
countries, where wealth and government resources reduce some of the economic stresses.
In Egypt itself continuing unrest implies extreme downside risks for domestic growth, even
under the most optimistic political scenario. At a minimum, we expect growth to slow
significantly in the first quarter of 2011 from the 6.2% year-over-year pace of the fourth
quarter of 2010, due to factory and bank shutdowns, a decrease in tourist inflows and ongoing
curfews. As such, we expect growth for the year to come in well below the 5.9% as almost all
components of domestic demand will be adversely affected.
SWOT Analysis of Political Environment
Strengths
Egypt has no serious disputes with neighboring states, although its relations with
Syria and Iran are relatively tense.
National Democratic Party's rule appears broadly stable.
Weaknesses
Internal divisions between reformists and conservatives within the ruling NDP may
threaten stability.
ƒ There is considerable domestic opposition to the government's relations with the
US and Israel, and, increasingly, to recent economic reforms.
ƒ Tension exists between the government and banned Islamist groups, including the
popular MB.
ƒ Egypt's poor human rights record and limited democratic participation creates
internal and external pressure for reform.
Opportunities
Threats
Although the level of militant attacks, particularly on tourists and Western targets,
appears to have fallen in recent years, sporadic incidents should not be ruled out.
There is uncertainty over political succession, given the lack of a clear-cut successor
to the president and the controversy over the political role of the president's son,
Gamal Mubarak, with rumours suggesting that Hosni Mubarak might have cancer.
The presence of Hamas in a position of power just over the border in Gaza could be a
boost for the MB, especially if the government is seen to be acting in Israel's interests
on its Rafah border policies.
The reported presence of Hizbullah operatives in Sinai, apparently planning to attack
tourist sites in Egypt, has highlighted the lack of effective policing in the region and
added to security risks in the area.
FINANCIAL SYSTEM RISK: HIGH
The financial sector in Egypt suffered over the years from public sector dominance.
Public banks did not adhere to international best practice, financed state-owned
enterprises, and accumulated non-performing loans. Private banks operated in a non-
competitive environment that resulted in inefficient banking practices, that limited access
to financial services, and created a lack of suitable instruments. Non-banking institutions
did not have a suitable regulatory environment in which to develop.
The General Authority for Financial Supervision (GAFS) became operational in July of
2009 and will regulate all non-banking financial activities including insurance. The
mandate of the GAFS includes supervising all non-bank financial activities to develop
and maximize their competitiveness to attract more local and foreign investments.
Though slowly diminishing, the role of the Egyptian government in economic activity
remains significant.
The government has made some progress toward divesting its ownership of public banks.
Banks in Egypt could record a wave of cash withdrawals when they resume their
operations, such examples have included companies among the hardest hit violent
protests against President Hosni Mubarak.
EGX 30 index decreased by 16% for two days until January 17, Commercial International
Bank Egypt shares, representing over one fifth of the index, falling by 12%.
Insurance companies will also be affected by a wave of claims for compensation for
properties and businesses damaged during the protests. And foreign direct investment,
which fell by 17% to $ 6.8 billion last year, could continue to decline as a result of violent
protests.
D. Factors that are considered important in determining foreign
exchange rates and the various ER regimes in operation
2. Differentials in Interest Rates: Interest rates, inflation and exchange rates are all highly
correlated. By manipulating interest rates, central banks exert influence over both inflation
and exchange rates, and changing interest rates impact inflation and currency values. Higher
interest rates offer lenders in an economy a higher return relative to other countries.
Therefore, higher interest rates attract foreign capital and cause the exchange rate to rise. The
impact of higher interest rates is mitigated, however, if inflation in the country is much higher
than in others, or if additional factors serve to drive the currency down. The opposite
relationship exists for decreasing interest rates - that is, lower interest rates tend to decrease
exchange rates.
3. Current-Account Deficits: The current account is the balance of trade between a country
and its trading partners, reflecting all payments between countries for goods, services, interest
and dividends. A deficit in the current account shows the country is spending more on foreign
trade than it is earning, and that it is borrowing capital from foreign sources to make up the
deficit. In other words, the country requires more foreign currency than it receives through
sales of exports, and it supplies more of its own currency than foreigners demand for its
products. The excess demand for foreign currency lowers the country's exchange rate until
domestic goods and services are cheap enough for foreigners, and foreign assets are too
expensive to generate sales for domestic interests.
4. Public Debt: Countries will engage in large-scale deficit financing to pay for public sector
projects and governmental funding. While such activity stimulates the domestic economy,
nations with large public deficits and debts are less attractive to foreign investors. A large
debt encourages inflation, and if inflation is high, the debt will be serviced and ultimately
paid off with cheaper real dollars in the future. In the worst case scenario, a government may
print money to pay part of a large debt, but increasing the money supply inevitably causes
inflation. Moreover, if a government is not able to service its deficit through domestic means
(selling domestic bonds, increasing the money supply), then it must increase the supply of
securities for sale to foreigners, thereby lowering their prices. Finally, a large debt may prove
worrisome to foreigners if they believe the country risks defaulting on its obligations.
Foreigners will be less willing to own securities denominated in that currency if the risk of
default is great. For this reason, the country's debt rating (as determined by Moody's
or Standard & Poor's, for example) is a crucial determinant of its exchange rate.
5. Terms of Trade: A ratio comparing export prices to import prices, the terms of trade is
related to current accounts and the balance of payments. If the price of a country's exports
rises by a greater rate than that of its imports, its terms of trade have favorably improved.
Increasing terms of trade shows greater demand for the country's exports. This, in turn,
results in rising revenues from exports, which provides increased demand for the country's
currency (and an increase in the currency's value). If the price of exports rises by a smaller
rate than that of its imports, the currency's value will decrease in relation to its trading
partners.
6. Political Stability and Economic Performance: Foreign investors inevitably seek out
stable countries with strong economic performance in which to invest their capital. A country
with such positive attributes will draw investment funds away from other countries perceived
to have more political and economic risk. Political turmoil, for example, can cause a loss of
confidence in a currency and a movement of capital to the currencies of more stable
countries.
The exchange rate of the currency in which a portfolio holds the bulk of its investments
determines that portfolio's real return. A declining exchange rate obviously decreases the
purchasing power of income and capital gains derived from any returns. Moreover, the
exchange rate influences other income factors such as interest rates, inflation and even capital
gains from domestic securities. While exchange rates are determined by numerous complex
factors that often leave even the most experienced economists flummoxed, investors should
still have some understanding of how currency values and exchange rates play an important
role in the rate of return on their investments.
Various ER regimes in operation
The exchange rate regime reflects a longer term commitment of a country’s national policies
to have a certain behavior of its exchange rate vis-à-vis the currencies of other countries. The
system is expected to persist over a more extended period of time in order to provide a stable
atmosphere for business to make decisions and thus make the economic system function on a
sustainable basis.
But fixed and floating exchange rates are only the polar cases.there are many types in
between. The IMF categorization of exchange rate arrangements identifies the following
eight types of exchange rate regimes:
The foreign exchange reserves of China, Russia, Brazil, Vietnam, South Korea
and India as at 15 February 2011.
The foreign exchange reserves of the Republic of China amounted to US$387.11 billion at the end of
January 2011, showing an increase of US$5.11 billion from the figure recorded at the end of the
previous month. The market value of securities investment and deposits held by foreign portfolio
investors at the end of January 2011 reached USD254.4 billion, equivalent to 66% of foreign
exchange reserves.
BRAZIL:
International Reserves
(Total Official Reserves) - daily million dollars Feb/25/11 305,709
data
International Reserves
million dollars Jan/11 288,575
(Total Official Reserves)
VIETNAM:
Planning and Investment Minister Vo Hong Phuc’s comment was reported on Wednesday in
the state-run Vietnam Economic Times. Phuc provided no details, and it was unclear how
much above $10 billion the reserves may be. The exact current level is guarded as a state
secret. Foreign banks have estimated as recently as late January the figure to be around, or
even below $12 billion.