Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
How???
Author – K. Ravimurthy
Industrial Automation Advisory Services
Table of Content
MIGRATION WHY, WHEN AND HOW???? .......................................................................................... 3
WHY TO TECHNOLOGY UPGRADE OR MIGRATE? ........................................................................ 3
OPTIMIZATION FOR BETTER PERFORMANCE ................................................................................................. 3
MAINTAINING THE LEGACY SYSTEM AND CATERING TO OBSOLESCENCE ISSUES .......................................... 3
COST AND AVAILABILITY OF LABOR ............................................................................................................ 4
INTEGRATION OF VARIOUS SYSTEMS............................................................................................................ 4
MEETING GLOBALIZATION CHALLENGES OF COST, EFFICIENCY AND TIME TO MARKET ................................ 4
WHEN TO MIGRATE................................................................................................................................. 5
HOW TO MIGRATE? ................................................................................................................................. 6
PHASED MIGRATION .................................................................................................................................... 6
COMPLETE REPLACEMENT........................................................................................................................... 6
SYSTEM UPGRADE ....................................................................................................................................... 7
KEY TO SUCCESSFUL MIGRATION PROJECTS ............................................................................... 7
PROJECT EXECUTION ................................................................................................................................... 7
TRAINING AND IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................................................... 7
GUIDANCE FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION........................................................................................................... 8
RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 8
RECOMMENDATION FOR MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY ................................................................................ 8
RECOMMENDATION FOR SUPPLIERS............................................................................................................. 9
Today’s manufacturing industry should have solution’s that integrate plant process control and
information systems with both plant and corporate business systems. Instead of a traditional
information system, it is very much necessary to recognizing the value of a unified information
and application software system. A unified system reduces the problem of data exchange and
synchronization and houses information in a central repository shared by all business
applications.
In addition, integrated system architecture allows operators to connect to other systems and
applications external to the plant in order to get the business-type data and information needed to
maximize investments and deliver the most competitive end product.
Many of the technologies which were installed 20 years back is obsolete and hard to find supplier
who can maintain the system and which may even lead to unplanned downtime. One must realize
that the shutdown cost of any plant is $600,000 per day and which amount to millions of dollar
loss in a year. If a boiler goes for shut down, it would take any 7 to 10 days to restart and same is
true for reactor shutdown also.
It is very important for plant owners to decide whether to work with the legacy system and face
obsolescence issues or migrate to newer technology.
Disruption Point Cost and availability of the labor is one more major issue
d
in the manufacturing industry today. Limiting the
an
rk e
td
em discussion to a pure cost analysis for a moment, a plant
Ma
must weigh the cost to acquire, train and retain labor
gy
lo
no
ch
gy
olo
nt
hn
rre
t
tive
Reduced time to market is also a challenge in the current economy. Proper production
management and production planning system must be in place to meet the pent-up demand.
Many manufacturers are using contract and distributed manufacturing practices to be locally
present. However, to maintain quality manufacturers need to have automation technology, which
will bring consistent quality globally. If the quality is not up to the mark then organization will face
wrath of product recall, which could cost them millions and also brand image will also take
beating.
When to Migrate
This is a big question, however last section has answered the need for migration. Clue for
migration are;
• Increased maintenance cost
o High Cost of Legacy System Operation and Upgrades
o The legacy or the upgraded environment does not facilitate flexibility and agility
• Difficulty in getting or retaining resources who can operate, maintain and enhance the
system
• Reduced plant efficiency & productivity and eroding margins
• Increased number of unplanned plant downtime
• Obsolescence issues
• The vendors future strategic roadmap is not conducive to the manufacturers well-being
• Integration issues while plant expansion
• Manufacturing process control system integration with the business system
• Long time to market for new products
• Increasing energy costs
How to Migrate?
Once need is finalized on when to migrate it is very important to understand various migration
strategies and its pros & cons. Key to successful migration and best strategy to be adopted
depends on product, age of the plant, age of the System, upgraded or not etc. this could be
ascertained during assessment phase, it is recommended to engage third party assessor for un-
biased assessment.
Phased Migration
Phased migration approach allows system migration in gradual steps, replacing the HMI or a
particular unit first. Once this is completed, the end-user can take advantage of solutions for
improving operations and safety. The rest of the system can be replaced over several years.
Phased migration approach demands high level of system, industry, and project management
knowledge. The supplier must have detailed knowledge of legacy system and new offerings and
also have good knowledge of the industry and domain knowledge.
Advantages Disadvantages
Complete Replacement
Complete replacement allows the entire system to be replaced at once during a planned outage.
In some cases, hot cutover can be used to minimize system downtime and ensure seamless
integration of current control assets.
Advantages Disadvantages
• Allows the system hardware and software to be replaced
totally • Larger shutdown period
• New functionality for entire plant • Higher training cost
• Advantages of enhanced technology • If functions and features are
• Increased efficiency and productivity totally different then operator
• No integration issues effectiveness will reduce
• Lowering Engineering cost • Large total cost of ownership
• Faster adoption and elimination of technology bottleneck
System Upgrade
System upgrade allows an upgrade of critical system components at the end-user’s own pace.
The automation contractor must be committed to retaining the value of existing systems and
continuing to offer parts and support for the legacy platform. Replacement of the legacy Plant
Automation with a new hardware and software environment happens generally from the same
vendor. Care must be taken to ensure that the new environment is downward compatible to the
legacy control applications. This is usually a run-time environment change.
Advantages Disadvantages
• Discomfort in terms of integration issue of one
• New Hardware and software
unit to other unit
environment is created
• Operators will require to be multi-functional
• Provides time for end-users to get
• Parallel operation of various systems in the
accustomed with newer platform
facility with different tools and tackles for proper
• Allows gradual path for technology
operation
refresh
• Ensuring downward compatibility
Project Execution
Project execution methodology plays a critical part in determining the success of such programs.
Capturing the requirements comprehensively from all people at various levels forms a major part
of the strategy. The methodology adopted needs to provide means to extract “years of knowledge
base” present in the user community. Having captured the requirements, these need to be
presented in a way that is easy to understand and validate by the plant. This document (generally
documented as Functional Design or Requirement specifications) many a times turns out to be a
living document when the value of documentation is realized by the plant.
However, today with simulation and other operator training facilities training tools have become
easily accessible. The dynamic simulators virtually validate any plant operations and control
philosophy. Today’s simulators it is easier to perform design validation and improvement on the
actual design. Similarly training of the operator is also more effective and efficient in the system
and technology upgrade. Virtual training exercise allows the operator learn quickly on operating
the plant in safe, reliable and effective manner. Simulators allow operator to create abnormal
conditions also and solve the issue, by doing so operator will learn on how to manage the plant in
emergency situation. Greater exposure to such simulators will help operator to gain confidence.
Recommendations
Recommendation for Manufacturing Industry
Effective migration and upgrade philosophy requires greater deal of understanding of legacy
system, good program management and effective planning, without which migration will not be
successful. Manufacturing industry leaders must put migration strategies as part of their business
goals and achievement plan. Migration strategy must be built based on the open system,
interoperability, good industry & domain skills and re-use engineering practices.
Manufacturers must realize the optimal timeframe to keep the existing system and up-keep to
provide optimal performance levels as desired by process technologies. Manufacturers Need to
realize that every electronic and technology has its own end-of-life and end-of-support period.
Rather than prolonging the stay of aging asset need to look for technology refresh in most
optimum way enabling production equipment to provide maximum benefits.
While strategizing migration manufacturer must look at collaborative approach and having a
independent automation solution partner who could transform the business goals into reality. The
large pool of instrumentation resources that used to be available in the plant is no longer
available. Plant leaders need to work on the core competency and improve the product quality
and cost efficiency in this era of globalization, competitiveness and ever-changing market
dynamics.
Manufacturers need to validate the design by using right simulators that effects corrective action
and prevents any productivity loss or disruption due to migration. Thorough validation and training
is very important function of any system and technology upgrade strategy. An important factor is
that upgrade works as intended to prevent any waste and untoward disruption of the plant. Proper
deployment of upgrade strategies is incomplete until the training and validation functions are
completed.
Migration itself is a tricky solution, question of TCO, ROI and Lifecycle benefit will come along the
bid stage and answer must be convincing at each phase of migration plan. Suppliers should
engage third party consulting organization to ascertain that the right strategies put in place in-
terms of customer centric value recognition tool, object oriented assessment tool & reporting tool
and also the lifecycle benefit tool. These tools will provide educate the manufacturing industry
leaders about the benefits of the next-generation products and solution. While selecting the
consulting organization they must do due diligence on whether or not they have required domain,
industry and solution skills. One more shift from the conventional sales methods would be to
engage the consultants for site assessment and report, this paradigm shift in the sales approach
will bring reaping benefits to both suppliers and end-users.
Some of the suppliers are engaged in solution-centric selling approach; however, end result is
promoting their products which meet customer’s minimum-bid-specification. While, providing
best-in-class solution suppliers also need to understand challenges of the manufacturing industry.
Suppliers should put considerable effort in knowing the actual pain points of the manufacturing
industry and prior to providing solution.