Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
trouble.
Temperature(0C)
75.0 ΔT=11
65.0
(2) In the case of production of large and heavy 55.0
ΔT=17
epoxy unit, production is performed through various 45.0 Electrode
processes, such as baking of the conductive layer, 35.0
Portion”D”
25.0
with variety of equipment. During the course of these 15.0
Portion”E”
Portion”F”
processes, appropriate measures are taken to avoid 5.0
external damage. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
Time(hour)
(3) In the case where operation is made in a Fig.3-1.Thermal distribution of epoxy unit
manhole, YJB suffers sudden temperature change (40→0 0C)
as shown in Fig 3-1 due to sudden drop of ambient Portion D, E, F:Refer to Fig.2
4.0
air temperature when the manhole is opened during
Mechanical stress(MPa)
3.5
3.0 Portion”F”
winter season. Through thermal stress analysis, it 2.5
2.0
1.5
was then found that large stress yielded on the 1.0
0.5
surface of epoxy as shown in Fig3-2. 0.0
-0.5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
-1.0
(4) At the time of screening various defects during -1.5 Portion”E”
-2.0
shipping test of epoxy unit, there still exist the -2.5
-3.0 Portion”D”
-3.5
following issues. -4.0
-4.5 Steady load Ambient air raped cooling
・ There are processes having high probability that -5.0 Time(hour
Hot air
3-2 Measures against external Damage on the Epoxy
Hot oil Cold oil
surface during production of epoxy unit Cold air
Epoxy Epoxy Vertical placement jig
To improve reliability of YJB which further demands are High-Temp.bath Low-Temp. bath Cooling bath in the air(open)
expected, the following measures against external →Epoxy placed horizontally →Epoxy placed vertically,
damage is to be taken during production of epoxy unit. Necessary to move between baths No need to move
(1) Draw a plan to prevent external damage and to
dissolve rolling during transportation and vertical Fig.4.Outline of heat-shock test for epoxy unit
placement work of each process is aimed by
applying the vertical placement jig dedicated to Table 1 shows the stress generated at every heat-shock
epoxy unit as shown in Fig. 4, and performing test. Air-filled method showed crucial result on the surface
machining with the equipment of various processes where external damage can be detected. On the other
on an integrated jig installation. hand, oil-filled method showed crucial result inside epoxy.
(2) For the heat-shock test, considering the following But the stresses revealed are sufficiently larger than that
points, studied to change the test method from a generated during operation, and the high-voltage
conventional method which is carried out in oil-filled electrode side can be screened with PD test. It was
circumstance to that in air-filled where products with confirmed air-filled method was substantially effective as
less possibility to cause of external damage: shipping test.
・ As a verification of thermo-mechanical actual
value of epoxy unit, perform heat-shock test with Table 1. Stress created at every heat-shock test method
a sample in a conventional way to evaluate of epoxy unit
under oil-filled circumstances. Cooling conditions YJB (Unit:MPa)
・ On the other hand, for a shipping test, apply Oil-Filled Air-Filled
larger mechanical stress than the stress 20→← 80℃ -30← 90℃
→
generated during actual service due to ambient Stress created section each 1H each 2H
temperature change onto the epoxy unit to D: At electrode
perform screening of all units. 1.88 1.70
On the side(inner layer)
・ Using thermo-mechanical analysis, it is epoxy E: (Middle layer) 11.4 4.95
confirmed that they are equivalent, the stress electrode F:At surface
generated on the surface of epoxy under both 6.62 8.94
side(outer layer)
oil-filled and air-filled circumstances as shown in
Fig5.
Return to Session
Oil-Filled Air-Filled
Temperature(℃)
D
F D
E
E
Time(hour)
Time(hour)
Mechanical stress(MPa)
14
12
10
E
8 F
6 ①
E
4 ③
②
2
0
F ④
D
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-2 D
Time(hour) Time(hour)
Fig.5. Thermal and stress distribution of epoxy unit during heat-shock test
small manhole for the existing SCFF cable, the following Fig. 6. Cable layout in existing small manhole for SCFF cable
issues were raised and studied:
Step 1
XLPE cable
Pulling back
Epoxy Unit
Pulling back Fig.9. Appearance of carrying test of the epoxy unit into
Oil-filled cable the simulated narrow manhole
Fixed
5-3 Verification of 275kV YJB construction
Bending raiuses of cables was
lower than permission value Verification of construction of 275kV YJB was conducted
Step 2 Inserting
Epoxy Unit
Inserting at the simulates environment and construction space of
XLPE cable Oil-filled cable
the site. Fig.10 shows the YJB construction condition. As
a result, it was confirmed that both two-mouth (XLPE) and
Fixed
one-mouth (SCFF) sides can be constructed without
problem.
Improved method in narrow manhole for this time
As a result of analyzing construction period, it was
Step 1
XLPE cable
Inserting
Epoxy Unit
confirmed that two-mouth at XLPE cable side will take
Fixed
about 12 hours and about 13.5 hours at SCFF cable side.
They are used to work schedule, permissible hours of
road-use, and other plans for actual line construction in
Bending raiuses of cables was fixed at
more than permission value the future.
Step 2
Epoxy Unit
XLPE cable
XLPE cable Epoxy unit
Step 3
Pulling back
Epoxy Unit
Step 4 Inserting
Epoxy Unit
XLPE cable
Flame
Oil-filled cable
Fig.8. Method of constructing YJB Fig. 10. Condition of YJB construction (at XLPE cable side)
Return to Session
Entrance of manhole
Simulated manhole
5-4 Long-term loading cycle test and lightning
impulse withstand voltage test 275k SCFF
1500mm2
After construction of YJB, long-term loading cycle test and
lightning impulse withstand voltage test were conducted in temp control box
accordance with JEC3408 [2]. Table 2 shows each test EB-A for YJB
0℃~40℃
temperature winter season
Table. 3. Maximum conductor temperature at loading (ΔT=40℃)
change
cycle test Rapid cooling Longer Time at which thermal
under rapid cooling
20
More than 4 hours (240min)
10
0
-10
-60 0 60 120 180 240 300 360
Elapsed time(minutes)
Fig.12 Results of sudden cooling test
(an example of the 10th cycle)
Return to Session
XLPE
SCFF 2
275kV XLPE 1×1500mm
Phase-C 2005 KEPCO Manhole 3
275kV SCFF 1×1500mm2
XLPE
Phase-B SCFF
2005
XLPE275kV XLPE 1×2500mm2
~ TEPCO Tunnel 9
275kV SCFF 1×1400mm2
2007 SCFF
New XLPE , New SCFF, Existing SCFF
Phase-A
Fig.16 Installation recode of 275kV YJB