Sei sulla pagina 1di 6

Technology Review

Vacuum
interrupters with

axial magnetic field


contacts
Dr. Harald Fink, Dr. Markus Heimbach, Dr. Wenkai Shang

Vacuum is a proven switching medium with numerous advantages over


acuum has today largely alternative media, especially for medium-voltage applications. In the

V replaced other arc-quench-


ing media, such as oil or
SF6 gas, for many switching appli-
past, ABB has fitted its vacuum interrupters for circuit-breakers with
radial magnetic field contacts. Newly developed interrupters with axial
magnetic field contacts enable short-circuit currents of 63 kA and more
cations in the medium-voltage to be reliably interrupted.
sector. Among the advantages of
vacuum interrupters are a com-
pact design, maintenance-free
operation, long service life and
excellent environmental compati- 1 Some of the vacuum interrupters available from ABB

bility.
ABB Calor Emag Mittelspannung
GmbH has been developing and
manufacturing vacuum interrupters
since the early 1980s 1 [1]. At the
company’s R&D center in Ratingen,
Germany, engineers use state-of-
the-art tools and powerful comput-
er software to optimize the design
and functionality of the inter-
rupters. The most recent results of
this work include a new family of
vacuum interrupters for contactors
and switches [2] and an innovative
process for the in-house produc-
tion of contacts.
New production facilities com-
pleted in 1999 underscore the
company’s commitment to high
quality and cost-saving while
also adding to its manufacturing
capacity.

ABB Review 1/2000 59


Technology Review

The contracted arc moves over the


contact’s surface at a speed of
70–150 m/s [3]. This high velocity
ensures that there is less contact
I I erosion and also significantly
improves the current interrupting
capability [4].
The switching capacity of vacu-
um interrupters can also be
increased by using contact sys-
F tems which generate an axial
B magnetic field (AMF). When a
B magnetic flux density is applied
parallel to the flow of current in
the arc, the mobility of the charge
carriers perpendicular to the flow
is considerably reduced. This
I I
applies especially to the electrons,
which have a smaller mass than
the ions. The electrons gyrate
around the magnetic lines of force
2 Working principle of a radial magnetic field contact (spiral contact, left) 2 , so that the contraction of the
and an axial magnetic field contact (right) arc is shifted towards the higher
B Magnetic flux density I Current
currents. The arc burns with a dif-
F Azimuthal electromagnetic force
fused light and the supply of
energy to the electrodes is
reduced. This is also indicated by
How interrupter contact around 10 kA the vacuum arc the arc voltage, which is lower
systems work begins to contract, being initially than with RMF contacts.
When contacts through which cur- noticeable in the form of anode The advantage of the RMF con-
rent flows are separated, the spots. The contraction, which tact system lies in its simple physi-
explosion of the last ‘metallic partly depends on the contact cal structure, while another advan-
bridge‘ causes a metal vapor arc material, causes more energy to tage of the spiral contact is that in
to form. This arc, which consists be supplied to the contacts, there- the closed state the current can
exclusively of the vaporizing con- by reducing the vacuum gap’s flow through the contacts directly
tact material, is sustained by the capacity to extinguish the arc after via the stem, thereby ensuring
external supply of energy up until the current zero-crossing. One lower power losses for the vacu-
the next time the current passes way in which the switching capac- um interrupter at nominal current.
through zero. At the instant of this ity can be improved is to change In many AMF contact systems
zero-crossing, the arc is finally the contact geometry. (The elec- the axial magnetic field is generat-
extinguished and the vacuum trode geometry generates magnetic ed by a coil located behind the
interrupter regains its insulating fields, so such changes influence contacts. As a result, the resis-
capability, ie it is able to with- the arc’s behavior.) Until recently, tance of the interrupter increases
stand the transient recovery volt- ABB has always used spiral con- and the additional resistive losses
age. To ensure successful quench- tacts in its vacuum interrupters for occurring in service reduce the
ing at the current zero-crossing, circuit-breakers. These contacts nominal current performance. The
the contacts are not allowed to generate a radial magnetic field only practical way in which a vac-
suffer more than minimal arc (RMF), which causes an azimuthal uum interrupter can dissipate the
erosion during passage of the electromagnetic force to act on generated heat is via the copper
strongest current. At currents of the contracted vacuum arc 2 . conductors, since convection is

60 ABB Review 1/2000


Technology Review

not an option in vacuum. As applies particularly to currents of non-linear material parameters,


already mentioned, the diffused 63 kA and higher. In this short-cir- such as the permeability of the
arc of the AMF contact systems cuit current range, the more com- ferromagnetic material.
results in an excellent short-circuit plex AMF contact systems are
current breaking capacity. This superior to the conventional RMF Bipolar AMF contact
contacts and are definitely to be system
preferred. Networks with a rated 3 shows the principle of opera-

frequency of 16 2/3 Hz, eg for tion of the bipolar AMF contact


traction power supplies, represent system. Behind each of the con-
another area in which it pays to tact plates are coils that generate a
use AMF systems. Due to the two-pole axial magnetic field in
I extremely long arcing times, vacu- the contact gap.
um interrupters with AMF contacts The magnetic flux density in the
have to be installed in these sys- middle of the gap with this
tems at current levels as low as arrangement is shown in 4 . The
31.5 kA. surface is divided into two sectors
in which identical conditions
Newly developed AMF exist. The only difference between
contact systems them is the direction of the mag-
ABB has developed two innova- netic flux density. On the line
tive AMF contact systems for the separating the two areas from
interruption of high short-circuit each other the flux density is zero,
currents. Both of the systems whereas it is relatively high
B
were dimensioned with the help towards their outer edges.
of modern programs based on
FEM. Steady-state and quasi- Quadrupole AMF contact
steady-state simulations as well as system
transient simulations were per- The principle on which the newly
formed. Consideration was also developed quadrupole contact
given by the R&D specialists to system is based is shown in 5 .
I Unlike the bipolar contact system,
this contact system does not use a
coil to generate the axial magnetic
field, creating it instead through a
hybrid arrangement that comprises
a magnetic circuit and slots in the
B contact plate. The magnetic circuit
is made up of the ferromagnetic
I I
material through which the flux is
B guided. The field poles are
arranged in such a way that the
flux crosses the contact gap four
times during one revolution,
3 Working principle of the bipolar 4 Distribution of the magnetic thereby generating a quadrupole
AMF contact system. Coils behind flux density in the median plane axial magnetic field. Slotting the
each of the contact plates generate between the contacts of a bipolar
contact plate forces a portion of
a two-pole axial magnetic field in AMF contact system
the current to form a loop when
the contact gap.
B Magnetic flux density the contacts are open in order to
I Current supply energy to the roots of the
arc on the electrode. The forma-

ABB Review 1/2000 61


Technology Review

tion of this loop strengthens the same in each of the sectors, but field. Since only the areas
magnetic field. their directions are different. In enclosed by the eddy currents
6 shows the magnetic flux the case of the quadrupole contact passed through in one direction
density in the middle of the con- system, the magnetic flux density by the magnetic lines of force are
tact gap of the quadrupole contact at the ‘cross‘ separating the four concerned, they are smaller than
system. Four sectors are visible; sectors is zero. As in the bipolar in the unipolar contact systems [5].
the conditions with respect to the contact systems, the axial magnet- Thus, the eddy current losses are
magnetic flux densities are the ic field is relatively strong in the also lower. The undesirable effect
outer areas of the contact gap. of the eddy currents on the value
The main parameters consid- and phase relation of the magnet-
ered when dimensioning AMF ic flux density is therefore
contacts are the size, distribution reduced in the case of both the
and phase relation of the axial bipolar and the quadrupole con-
magnetic field. In the case of the tact system.
I latter it should be noted that, ide-
ally, the goal is to have no phase Experimental investigation and
displacement between the high tests
current and the magnetic field it Besides theoretical studies, optical
generates. However, because of tests were also carried out in
the inherent losses in the contact order to observe the arc behavior
system such an ideal case will of the contact systems. 7 shows
B always be out of reach. An impor- the metal vapor arc in vacuum for
tant parameter is the eddy current the quadrupole contact system,
produced in the contact plate by recorded with the help of a high-
the changing magnetic flux densi- speed CCD video camera. The arc
ty; this eddy current is responsible is shown close to the peak value
for both the phase displacement of a 50-Hz half-wave with an
and the reduced axial magnetic rms current value of 31.5 kA.
The diameter of the contact is
I 68.5 mm. An ultra high vacuum
test chamber was used for the
tests. As predicted by the theoreti-
cal studies, the arc is in a diffused
state. Consequently, the thermal
stress caused by the vacuum arc is
distributed relatively uniformly
I over the contact plates. Contact
B B
erosion, which considerably
reduces the breaking capacity, is
significantly lower due to the dif-
fused vacuum arc. The initial
stages of arc contraction are visi-
5 Working principle of the quadru- 6 Distribution of the magnetic ble on the upper electrode, ie the
pole AMF contact system. flux density in the median plane anode. However, this effect
The axial magnetic field is created between the contacts of a quadru-
remains marginal due to the well-
by a hybrid arrangement consisting pole AMF contact system
dimensioned magnetic field.
of a magnetic circuit and slots in
the contact plate. A similar arc behavior is exhibited
B Magnetic flux density by the bipolar contact system,
I Current which also shows a diffused
vacuum arc up to the higher cur-

62 ABB Review 1/2000


Technology Review

7 Vacuum arc under the influence


of a quadrupole axial magnetic
field (I = 31.5 kA; photo taken in the
region of the peak current value;
contact diameter 68.5 mm;
anode at top, cathode at bottom)

rent values. It was observed dur-


ing many of the tests that the vac-
uum arc originates at a single
location – the last metallic bridge.
During the next 2 to 3 ms it prop-
agates over the entire surface of
8 Oscillogram of a three-phase short-circuit current interruption
the contacts, independently of the
of 12 kV/63 kA (symmetrical) with the bipolar contact system
polarity of the magnetic flux den- (contact diameter 100 mm)
sity. This behavior is the same for TRV Transient recovery voltage I Short-circuit current
both types of contact system. U Arc voltage
It is the arc behavior that makes
AMF contact systems best suited 20
for high short-circuit currents. 200
50 TRV
8 shows a short-circuit current

breaking operation for


I [ k A]

T R V[ k V ]

U[V]
0 0 0
12 kV/63 kA according to IEC
60056 [6] with the bipolar contact
U I
system. The diameter of the con- – 50
– 200
tact in this case was 100 mm. The – 20
smooth curve of the arc voltage
indicates that the vacuum arc
20
remains in a diffused state in spite
200
of the very high peak current val- 50
ue of 90 kA. The vacuum breaker
I [ kA]

TR V [kV ]

U [ V]

interrupts the current at the earli- 0 0 0


est possible instant. Both of the
contact systems (contact diameter
– 50
100 mm) are able to withstand the – 200
– 20
switching tests at 12 kV/63 kA.
Vacuum circuit-breakers with the
described AMF contact systems 20
were subjected to currents of 200
50
63 kA up to 25 times. In every
case, they extinguished the arc
I [kA ]

TR V [kV]

U[V ]

0 0 0
reliably.
9 and 10 show the contact

surfaces after more than 20 63-kA – 50


– 200
current interruptions for a bipolar – 20
and a quadrupole contact system,
respectively (contact diameter 100 0 5 10 15

mm). Just a slight melting of the t [ms]


contact surface is noticeable in

ABB Review 1/2000 63


Technology Review

is further proof of the accuracy of References


the theoretical observations. [1] H. Fink, D. Gentsch, G. Pilsinger,
Comparing the bipolar contact W. Shang: Vakuumkammern für zuverlässige
system with the quadrupole sys- Mittelspannungsschaltgeräte. Elektriz-
tem, it can be stated that the latter itätswirtschaft 96 (1997) 13, 749–752.
is able to generate the axial mag- [2] H. Fink, D. Gentsch, M. Heimbach: New
netic field without any need for vacuum interrupters for contactors and
coils. In the closed state, the cur- switches. ABB Review 3/1999, 32–36.
rent flows directly through the [3] E. Dullni: Motion of high-current vacuum
stem and the contacts, resembling arcs on spiral-type contact. IEEE Trans. on
the flow with a spiral contact. Plasma Science, vol 17, 1989, 875–879.
9 Contact surface of a bipolar Thus, the rated current carrying [4] H. Fink, D. Gentsch, M. Heimbach,
contact system after multiple capacity is comparable. However, G. Pilsinger, W. Shang: New developments of
short-circuit current interruptions
the resistance of the interrupter, vacuum interrupters based on RMF and AMF
(63 kA; contact diameter 100 mm)
assuming the same conductor technologies. XVIIIth Int. Symposium on Dis-
dimensions, is higher for the bipo- charges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum,
lar contact system, so that for Eindhoven, Netherlands, 1998, 463–466.
each case, indicating that the elec- numerous high-current applica- [5] B. Fenski, M. Heimbach, M. Lindmayer,
trical lifetime has not yet been tions the higher rated current W. Shang: Characteristics of a vacuum
reached. A look at the melting requires a more costly system for switching contact based on bipolar axial
shows that the arc follows the dissipating the heat. The advan- magnetic design. IEEE Trans. on Plasma
field lines of the magnetic flux tages of the bipolar contact system Science, vol 27, 1999, 949–953.
density. The contacts of the bipo- come to the fore in applications [6] IEC 60056: High-Voltage Alternating-Cur-
lar system exhibit two regions involving rated voltages of 36 kV rent Circuit-Breakers. 1987.
where stronger melting has and higher. In the case of the
occurred, in the case of the quadrupole systems, the larger
quadrupole system four. Compari- contact movements these applica-
son with 4 and 6 , which show tions require do not allow the
the axial magnetic flux density in magnetic flux to be so effectively
the contact gap, demonstrates guided through the contact gap.
clearly that the melting follows This is because the flux is also
the flux density distribution. This able to flow, via the gaps,
between the field poles behind
the contact plates and forms a
closed circuit.
10 Contact surface of a quadrupole
contact system after multiple short-
The development of axial mag-
circuit current interruptions netic field contacts enables vacu-
(63 kA; contact diameter 100 mm) um interrupters to be used for
interrupting very high short-circuit
currents, eg close to the generator
terminals. Since the arc remains Authors
diffused even at high current
intensities, the contact surface can Dr. Harald Fink
be utilized efficiently, which Dr. Markus Heimbach
makes the interrupter compact Dr. Wenkai Shang
and competitively priced. ■ ABB Calor Emag Mittelspannung GmbH
D-40472 Ratingen / Germany
E-mail: markus.heimbach@de.abb.com.
Telefax: +49 2102 12 1118

64 ABB Review 1/2000

Potrebbero piacerti anche