Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
National Annex to
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures -
Part 1-4: General actions – Wind actions
_______________________________________________________________________
Foreword
In connection with the incorporation of Eurocodes into Danish building legislation to replace the
Danish structural codes of practice, this National Annex was prepared in 2006-2007 to implement
Eurocode 1 in Denmark.
Scope
This National Annex lays down the conditions for the implementation of the Eurocode.
Contents
This National Annex specifies the national choices prescribed in Denmark.
The national choices may be in the form of nationally applicable values, an option between methods
given in the Eurocode, or the addition of supplementary guidance.
Page 1 of 10
EN 1991-1-4 DK NA, 2007-11-12, 2nd edition
Clauses where national choices have been made
Clause Subject Comment
4.2 (1)P NOTE 2 Fundamental value of the basic See below
wind velocity
The fundamental value of the basic wind velocity vb , 0 should be taken as 24 m/s everywhere in
Denmark apart from a border zone in Jutland with localities less than 25 km from the North Sea and
Ringkøbing Fjord. The fundamental value of the basic wind velocity in the border zone is taken as
27 m/s at the coastline decreasing linearly to 24 m/s at the other edge of the border zone. For
determination of the border zone, local orographic conditions, e.g. the inlets of Western Jutland,
shall be taken into account.
2
Table 1b – Seasonal factor squared c season
Month Jan Feb Mar Apr Ma Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
y e
Page 2 of 10
EN 1991-1-4 DK NA, 2007-11-12, 2nd edition
2
cseason 1,0 1,0 0,9 0,9 0,8 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0
For structures where the characteristic maximum displacement determined in E.1.5.3 of EN 1991-1-
4:2005 is less than approximately 10% of the cross-wind dimensions, the fatigue action should be
determined on the basis of E.1.5.3 of EN 1991-1-4:2005 using the constants C c and K a as given
below.
Page 3 of 10
EN 1991-1-4 DK NA, 2007-11-12, 2nd edition
The dependence of the constant C c on the wind velocity ratio v m / vcrit ,i , where v m is the 10 minutes
mean wind velocity and vcrit ,i is the resonance wind velocity should be approximated by:
3/ 2
v 1 1 − vcrit ,i / vm 2
Cc = Cc (Table E.6) m exp −
vcrit ,i 2 B
Cc (Table E.6) is given in Table E.6 of EN 1991-1-4:2005, and B may approximately be taken as
B =0,1. The 10 minutes wind velocity v m and the resonance wind velocity vcrit ,i should be
determined at the height above terrain where the movement of the structure is at its maximum.
The movement of the structure is not underestimated if the dependence of the aerodynamic damping
constant K a on the wind velocity ratio vm / vr and the turbulence intensity I v is determined by the
following simplified, approximate expression:
v
K a = K a ,max h( I v ) g m
vcrit ,i
The function h( I v ) is defined in E.1.5.3 (4) below. The function g has its largest value equal to 1
for v m = v crit ,i , and is assumed to decrease linearly from the value 1 to the value 0 for v m = 2v crit ,i .
g is assumed to be 0 for v m < v crit ,i and v m > 2vcrit ,i .
The occurrence of mean wind velocities up to approximately 15-20 m/s may be determined from
the European Wind Atlas, see Troen, I.; Petersen, B. & Lundtang, E., 1989, Europæisk Wind Atlas,
Risø, Roskilde.
For wind above terrain with a roughness length between approx. 0,01 m and approx. 0,05 m, the
occurrence of different turbulence intensities may approximately be based on a normal distribution
with the mean value given in 4.4.(1) of EN 1991-1-4:2005 and a standard deviation gradually
decreasing from approx. 0,06 at mean wind velocities less than approx. 5 m/s to approx. 0,03 for
mean wind velocities of approx. 10 m/s. The probabilities of the normal distribution for negative
arguments are here assumed to correspond to a turbulence intensity of 0.
For fatigue analyses based on the specifications stated above, the coefficient of variation of the
fatigue loads should be taken as 30% when the partial factor is determined, see the national annex to
EN 1990.
Page 4 of 10
EN 1991-1-4 DK NA, 2007-11-12, 2nd edition
E.1.5.3 (4) Influence of turbulence intensity
The effect of rhythmic vortex shedding depends on the turbulence intensity of the wind. For 10
minutes mean wind velocities larger than approx. 15 m/s the turbulence intensity of the wind is
determined from 4.4 (1) of EN 1991-1-4:2005. For 10 minutes mean wind velocities less than
approx. 10 m/s account should be taken of rhythmic vortex shedding in wind without turbulence
which occurs under certain, relatively rare meteorological conditions.
The movement of the structure is not underestimated if the dependence of the aerodynamic damping
constant K a on the turbulence intensity I v is determined using the following simplified,
approximate expression:
K a ( I v ) = K a ,max h( I v )
Page 5 of 10
EN 1991-1-4 DK NA, 2007-11-12, 2nd edition
Overview of possible national choices
The list below identifies the clauses where national choices are possible and the applicable/not
applicable informative annexes.
Furthermore, this National Annex refers to additional (non-conflicting) information that may be of
assistance to the user of the Eurocode.
Page 6 of 10
EN 1991-1-4 DK NA, 2007-11-12, 2nd edition
displacements and be used
accelerations
7.1.2 (2) Asymmetry and torsional The recommended procedure should be
effects used
7.1.3 (1) Effects of ice and snow No additional guidance
7.2.1 (1) NOTE Force coefficients for loaded The recommended procedure should be
2 areas between 1 m² and 10 m² used
7.2.2 (1) Reference heights The recommended procedure should be
used
7.2.2 (2) NOTE Force coefficient for walls The recommended values should be used
1
7.2.8 (1) Force coefficients for The recommended values should be used
cylindrical roofs
7.2.9 (2) Openings in the building No additional guidance
envelope
7.2.10 (3) NOTE Force coefficients for walls or For zones denoted "A" in Figure 7.5, the
2 roofs with more than one skin force coefficient stated for the permeable
First bullet outer skin may underestimate the wind
force. This wind force is not
underestimated if the force coefficient is
taken as -0,9.
7.4.1 (1) Force coefficient for free- The recommended values should be used
standing walls
7.4.3 (2) Horizontal eccentricity for The recommended value should be used
signboards
7.6 (1) NOTE 1 Effects of rounded corners The recommended values should be used
7.7 (1) NOTE 1 Force coefficients for prisms The recommended value should be used
with sharp edged sections
7.8 (1) Force coefficients for prisms The recommended values should be used
with regular polygonal section
(m>4)
7.9.3 Force coefficients for vertical Table 7.14 may underestimate the wind
cylinders in a row arrangement force for a/b < 2,5
7.10 (1) NOTE 1 Force coefficients for spheres The recommended values should be used
7.11 (1) NOTE 2 Reduction factors for No additional values
scaffolding
7.13 (1) Reduction factors for free-end The recommended values should be used
flow for cylinders or prisms
7.13 (2) Slenderness and reduction The recommended values should be used
factors
8.1 (1) NOTES 1 Wind actions on bridges Not relevant for building structures
and 2
8.1 (4) Substitute value for the Not relevant for building structures
fundamental value of the basic
wind velocity
8.1 (5) Substitute value for the Not relevant for building structures
fundamental value of the basic
Page 7 of 10
EN 1991-1-4 DK NA, 2007-11-12, 2nd edition
wind velocity
8.2 (1) NOTE 1 Dynamic response procedure Not relevant for building structures
for bridges
8.3 (1) Force coefficients for wind Not relevant for building structures
force on parapets etc. on
bridges
8.3.1 (2) Reduction factor for wind force Not relevant for building structures
on bridges
8.3.2 (1) Force coefficient for wind Not relevant for building structures
force on bridges
8.3.3 (1) NOTE Force coefficient for wind Not relevant for building structures
1 force on bridges
8.3.4 (1) Force coefficient for wind Not relevant for building structures
force on bridges
8.4.2 (1) NOTES Wind effects on piers Not relevant for building structures
1 and 2
A.2 (1) Inhomogeneous terrain Procedure 1 should be used
E.1.3.3 (1) Air density The recommended value should be used
E.1.5.1 (1) Choice between procedures 1 Procedure 2 should be used
NOTES 1 and 2 and 2
E.1.5.1 (3) Choice between procedures 1 Procedure 2 should be used
and 2
E.1.5.2.6 (1) Number of load cycles See below
NOTE 1
E.1.5.3 (2) Air density The recommended value should be used
NOTE 1
E.1.5.3 (4) Influence of turbulence See below
intensity
E.1.5.3 (6) Peak factor The recommended value should be used
E.3 (2) Stability parameter No additional values
Page 8 of 10
EN 1991-1-4 DK NA, 2007-11-12, 2nd edition
Additional (non-conflicting) information
Troen, I.; Petersen, B. & Lundtang, E., 1989, Europæisk Wind Atlas, Risø, Roskilde.
Page 9 of 10
EN 1991-1-4 DK NA, 2007-11-12, 2nd edition
Bibliography
List of all National Annexes
Page 10 of 10
EN 1991-1-4 DK NA, 2007-11-12, 2nd edition