Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Stock Idea
Price chart
Attractive valuations; Buy recommended: Given its niche positioning, de-risked
business model and strong growth outlook with an improving core RoE, PTC’s valu-
ations are quite attractive on an SOTP basis. Its core power trading business is
155 valued at Rs54 per share (at 15x FY2012E earnings) whereas the investment in PFS
140 (valued at Rs20 per share based on 1.5x post-issue book value) and in PEL (valued
125 at Rs16 per share based on 5x FY2012E earnings) cumulatively add Rs36 to our price
110 target. Moreover, the company had Rs709 crore of free cash on its books as on
95
September 2010 (Rs24 per share), which takes the price target to Rs114 per share.
80
Even on a price/book value basis, the current valuation of 1x FY2012E book value
is a huge discount to PTC’s mean average multiple of 1.4x one-year forward book
65
value. We initiate coverage on PTC with a Buy recommendation and a price target
Mar-10
Mar-11
Jun-10
Sep-10
Dec-10
Volume assumptions
With the power trading market undergoing a great growth phase, PTC with its leadership position has also seen a
substantial rise in its volumes over the last decade from zero in FY2001 to 18,233 million units (MU) in FY2010.
Power trading volume assumptions (million units) Spectacular growth in trading (million units)
Particulars FY09 FY10 FY11E FY12E FY13E 45000
40000
Short-term 7572 11814 16041 19249 23099
35000
Short-term trades 56 65 69 62 53 30000
as a % of total 25000
Power exchange 1369 1830 2790 3488 4359 20000
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
% YoY change 2114 44 285 143
Source: Company, Sharekhan Research
total traded volume from FY2012 only. Please note that Rising share of power exchange
the power produced by this project was already being Particulars CY08 CY09 CY10
traded via PTC in the short-term power trading market.
Trading licensees (BUs) 21.6 24.8 29.2
The dispute on Torrent’s Sugen power capacity is also
Exchange volumes (BUs) 1.7 5.8 11.6
expected to get resolved in the near term.
Total volume traded (BUs) 23.4 30.6 40.7
Karcham Wangtoo Hydro project can be a game-changer Volumes traded via exchange (%) 7.4 18.9 28.4
in FY2012 Source CERC, Sharekhan Research
The biggest project under litigation is the Karcham
Wangtoo Hydro project, a 4x250MW project developed Core RoE to improve to 9.9% in FY2013 from 4.5% in
by JP Power Ventures. The first unit of the project would FY2010
be commissioned in March-April 2011 and the rest would PTC’s non-operating income (mainly from its investments)
become operational by June 2011. Please note here that formed around 63% of its PBT over FY2007-10. Driven by
the project is in the advanced stages of negotiation and an exponential growth in its traded volume, the
if the dispute is amicably resolved the project could contribution of its non-operational income to its PBT
become PTC’s largest operational power project. While would fall to 30% in FY2012 and to 20% in FY2013. We
we have not factored this project in our projection, any
feel that the core RoE would accordingly improve to 9.9%
favourable development on this front would boost our
in FY2013 from 4.5% in FY2010.
long-term trading volume estimate for FY2012 by 75%.
Core RoE—set to improve (%)
-Short-term trading also expected to post robust growth
12.0%
Power units traded have increased by about 24% year on
10.0%
year (YoY) and by 39% YoY over FY2007-10. We expect the
short-term trading volume to grow at a compounded 8.0%
annual growth rate (CAGR) of 25% over FY2010-13, driven 6.0%
by the rising power generation and merchant power
capacities of the company. Also, better penetration of 4.0%
Scenario analysis for trading margin with the core business of power trading. The company
As per our analysis, every change of 1 paisa in the average has limited knowledge of the lending and power
generation businesses and this could prove detrimental
trading margin shall alter the FY2012 net profit estimate
to its growth prospects.
by about 34%, ceteris paribus.
Valuation and view
Sensitivity of core earnings to change in trading margin
Given its niche positioning, de-risked business model and
Margin (paisa/unit) 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0
strong growth outlook with an improving core RoE, PTC’s
Core EPS (Rs) 1.1 2.3 3.6 4.8 6.1
valuations are quite attractive on an SOTP basis. Its core
% chg from base case -69.0 -34.0 0.0 34.0 69.0
power trading business is valued at Rs54 per share (based
Value unlocking starting with PFS IPO on 15x FY2012E earnings) whereas the investment in PFS
In the last few years, the company has made substantial (valued at Rs20 per share based on 1.5x post-issue book
investments in various new areas like power project value) and in PEL (valued at Rs16 per share based on 5x
financing (via PFS or by taking a direct equity stake), FY2012E earnings) cumulatively add Rs36 per share to
coal trading and power tolling. PFS has been generating the price target. Moreover, the company had Rs709 crore
good returns but PEL, the other major subsidiary, has of free cash on its books as on September 2010 (Rs24 per
recently started generating revenue and its revenue share), which takes the price target to Rs114 per share.
contribution would significantly jump in the subsequent Even on a price/book value basis, the current valuation
years. This subsidiary alone has a profit potential of over of 1x FY2012E book value is a huge discount to PTC’s
Rs90 crore by FY2012. We expect value unlocking to take mean average multiple of 1.5x one-year forward book
place through either public listing or private placement value. We initiate coverage on PTC with a Buy
(whichever route PTC chooses to exit its various strategic recommendation and a price target of Rs114 per share.
investments). PTC has an equity commitment of over One-year forward PB(x)
Rs200 crore for its various subsidiaries and strategic 3.00
investments over the next two years and this would reduce
its cash and cash equivalents balance. 2.50
2.00
Key risks
1.50
Delay in power projects: Any delay in the commissioning
of PTC’s power projects would adversely affect our 1.00
May-10
Jun-07
Jan-08
Nov-06
Dec-10
Oct-09
Aug-08
Apr-06
Mar-09
Jan-10
Jun-10
May-08
Sep-06
Dec-07
Nov-10
Oct-08
Aug-09
Apr-06
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
(Apr-Dec)
45.0 120
Falling share of PTC led by
40.0 rising competition
Deficit (MW) Deficit as % of peak demand 100
35.0
Source: DRHP of PFS, Industry
30.0 80
Why power trading started 25.0
60
Power generation projects have traditionally been planned 20.0
10.0
they were meant to service. These projects also depended 20
5.0
on the availability of the fuel/natural resource required
0.0 0
to generate power. Various factors like the long gestation FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 CY09 CY10
period of these projects and the difference between the Total volume traded(BUs) Market share of PTC (in %)
actual growth in demand and the anticipated growth at Source: CERC, Sharekhan Research
times resulted in surplus energy for some of the
Regulation environment encouraging power trading
constituents but an energy shortfall for the others. This
led to an exchange of power among regions and gave rise According to the new regulation, the licensee shall not
to the concept of power trading in India. charge trading margin exceeding 7 paise per kWh in case
the sale price exceeds Rs3 per kWh and 4 paise per kWh
Modes of power trading where the sale price is less than or equal to Rs3. The new
PPAs and PSAs: Currently, a power trading company can regulation also removed the cap on the trading margin
trade power by signing long-term PPAs and PSAs or by on the power traded under the long term PPAs. As PTC’s
selling power in the short-term market. portfolio is tilted towards long-term power, we believe
the new regulation will immensely benefit the company
Through exchanges: A power trading company can also going forward.
trade power through power exchanges like Indian Energy Trend in market share of top five players in power trading
Exchange (IEX) and Power Exchange of India (PXI). 110.0
Others
100.0
Power trading—a growing sector in India 90.0
Lanco Electric Utility Ltd
80.0
In CY2010 the total electricity traded stood at 40.73BU 70.0 Reliance Energy Trading (P) Ltd
as against 30.6BU in CY2009, indicating a year-on-year 60.0
Tata Pow er Trading Company
50.0
(Y-o-Y) growth of 33.1%. The total electricity traded as a 40.0
(P) Ltd
Adani Exports Ltd
percentage of the total power generation increased from 30.0
20.0
4.08% in CY2009 to 5.14% in CY2010. Power trading in 10.0
NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd
India accounted for 8.7% (5.1% excluding UI) of the total 0.0 PTC India Limited
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 CY09 CY10
power units generated in CY2010.
Source: Company, Sharekhan Research
Financials
Profit & Loss statement Rs (crore) Balance sheet Rs (crore)
Particulars FY09 FY10 FY11E FY12E FY13E Particulars FY09 FY10 FY11E FY12E FY13E
Total traded 13,825 18,221 23,191 27,458 42,361 Equity cap 227.4 294.5 294.5 294.5 294.5
volume (in mn) Reserves 1,309.1 1,801.7 1,882.4 1,971.5 2,093.9
Net sales 6,528.9 7,770.3 8,947.1 10,063.0 14,746.2 Net worth 1,536.5 2,096.2 2,176.9 2,266.0 2,388.4
% YoY 67.1 19.0 15.1 12.5 46.5 Total debt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Operating 6,503.8 7,706.6 8,818.4 9,910.5 14,512.2 Net deff tax liability 9.5 9.0 8.3 7.5 6.4
expenses
Total liability 1,546.0 2,105.2 2,185.2 2,273.5 2,394.9
Other income 97.3 74.2 64.9 61.6 57.8
Net block 47.5 42.6 37.6 32.7 27.7
Depreciation 6.2 5.5 5.7 5.8 5.8
Investments 799.4 876.0 966.2 936.2 1,036.2
Interest 2.5 0.4 1.2 1.6 2.0
CA loans/Adv 999.5 1,576.6 1,594.5 1,768.1 2,003.5
EO before tax 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Debtors 354.6 531.0 735.4 827.1 1,212.0
PBT 113.4 131.8 186.7 206.7 284.0
Cash & bank 625.6 994.4 801.1 873.7 713.3
Tax provision 22.6 37.7 50.4 55.8 76.7
Loans & advances 18.3 43.6 35.0 42.0 50.4
Adj PAT 90.8 94.1 136.3 150.9 207.3
CL & provisions 300.5 390.0 413.1 463.4 672.5
% YoY 86.5 3.6 44.9 10.7 37.4
Current liabilities 256.2 346.6 356.5 400.6 586.6
No. of equity (cr) 22.7 29.5 29.5 29.5 29.5
Provisions 44.2 43.4 56.6 62.8 85.9
Adjusted EPS (Rs) 3.1 3.2 4.6 5.1 7.0
NCA 699.0 1,186.6 1,181.4 1,304.7 1,331.0
Total assets 1,546.0 2,105.2 2,185.2 2,273.5 2,394.9
Key ratios Rs (cr)
Cash flow statement Rs (crore)
Particulars FY09 FY10 FY11E FY12E FY13E
OPM (%) 0.4 0.8 1.4 1.5 1.6 Particulars FY09 FY10 FY11E FY12E FY13E
NPM (%) 1.4 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.4 PBT 113.4 131.8 186.7 206.7 284.0
Core RoE (%) 1.7 4.5 7.2 7.6 9.9 Depreciation 6.2 5.5 5.7 5.8 5.8
RoE (%) 5.9 4.5 6.3 6.7 8.7 Interest 2.5 0.4 1.2 1.6 2.0
RoCE (%) 7.5 6.3 8.6 9.2 11.9 Others (86.3) (61.5) (64.9) (61.6) (57.8)
Int cover(x) 48.4 368.6 161.4 137.2 143.9 Operating CF 35.9 76.2 128.8 152.5 234.0
Debt/Equity(x) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Change in WC (106.0) (111.8) (188.9) (51.8) (188.1)
Gross FA (x) 108.1 127.5 145.3 161.9 235.0 Gross operating CF (70.1) (35.6) (60.1) 100.7 45.9
turnover Direct taxes paid (17.4) (38.2) (50.4) (55.8) (76.7)
Debtors days 20 25 30 30 30 Net operating CF (87.5) (73.8) (110.6) 44.9 (30.8)
Creditors days 15 17 15 15 15 Investing CF 615.8 (12.8) (27.1) 89.4 (44.8)
P/E 25.7 24.9 17.2 15.5 11.3 Free cash flow 528.3 (86.6) (137.7) 134.2 (75.6)
P/CF per share 12.3 12.0 8.4 7.6 5.6 Financing CF (26.6) 455.4 (55.6) (61.8) (84.9)
EV/EBDITA 47.1 21.1 11.9 9.6 6.9 Net change 501.7 368.8 (193.3) 72.4 (160.5)
CEPS(Rs) 6.5 6.6 9.5 10.4 14.2 Opening cash 123.9 625.6 994.4 801.1 873.7
P/BV 1.5 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 Closing cash 625.6 994.4 801.1 873.6 713.2
Annexure - I
Company background Business profile
Incorporated in 1999, PTC is the pioneer in developing PTC is the market leader in the power trading industry
and implementing the concept of power trading in India. with a market share of 33.33% in CY2010 in the short-
Over the years, in order to ward off competition the term power trading market. PTC’s business includes short-
company has diversified its portfolio and is now a term, medium-term and long-term (including cross-
complete energy solution provider. The company has two border) power trading and trading of power through the
wholly owned subsidiaries, namely PFS and PEL. PFS is a IEX and PXI. The total power traded by the company has
non-banking finance company (NBFC) mainly engaged in increased from 1,617MUs in FY2002 to 18,233MUs in
providing both equity and debt financing (both short-term FY2010, indicating a CAGR of 41%. Going forward, we
and long-term) as well as structured debt financing to expect the company’s traded volumes to grow at a CAGR
power generation, equipment supply and fuel source of 32.5% over FY2010-13.
projects with focus on power generation projects. PEL is
Break-up of volume traded (million units)
engaged in coal trading and power tolling arrangements.
Under power tolling, PEL provides power developers with 25000
Management details
Name Designation Background Joined
Tantra Narayan Thakur Chairman & He is a Bachelor of Science in Engineering and a former 11/10/2000
managing director member of the Indian Audit & Accounts Service.
Deepak Amitabh Director, Finance Alumni of St. Stephen’s College, Delhi, he is a Master of Science (Physics) 3/9/2003
and belongs to the 1984 batch of Indian Revenue Service.
MK Goel Director, PFS He holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Technology specialising in Electrical 08/08/2008
Engineering from Kanpur University. He oversees PFS’ human
resources functioning, information technology and legal activities.
*Shashi Shekhar, erstwhile director of PTC, had resigned on January 17, 2010. Source: company
3500
During FY2010 the company supplied total coal of 1.07
lakh MT towards fuel intermediation. Going forward, the
3000
company plans to provide 1.5 lakh MT and 3 lakh MT in
2500
FY2011 and FY2012 respectively and 7 lakh MT in the next
2000
five years.
1500
Q2FY09
Q3FY09
Q4FY09
Q1FY10
Q2FY10
Q3FY10
Q4FY10
Q1FY11
Q2FY11
Q3FY11
Purchase of Purchase of
coal fom PEL power after PEL
Indonesia paying the
PEL financials Rs (cr) generation projects. In order to diversify its portfolio the
Particulars FY10 FY11E FY12E FY13E
company plans to venture into renovation and
modernisation of power projects, electricity transmission
Coal traded (lakh tonne) 0.1 0.15 0.3 0.7
and distribution, fuel supply infrastructure including
Profit in $ per tonne 2.4 2.2 2.0 2.0
storage and pipelines, and associated logistic
Profit in Rs per tonne 104.7 101.2 90.0 90.0
infrastructure like ports and railheads.
Total profit from 1.1 1.5 2.7 6.3
coal trading (Rs cr) - A Other income would fall due to the investment
Power tolling (Rs/unit) commitment
Conversion charges 1.2 1.2 With its debt-free core business, the liquidity of PTC has
Fixed expenses 3 3.15 been robust and it has invested the free cash flow in
Realisation expected 4 3.8 various short-term market instruments, subsidiaries and
Profit made 1.0 0.6 power projects. The other income mainly constitutes
Power plant (MW) dividend from the investments, interest on deposits and
Simhapuri tolling project 200 200 profit on sale of investments. PTC’s trading business along
Meenakshi Energy tolling 150 150 with its fund-raising activities has resulted in a sharp rise
project in cash over the last three years. However, we believe
Profit made that its investment commitment of over Rs400 crore would
Simhapuri tolling project 69.1 89.9 bring down the other income component over the next
Meenakshi Energy tolling 20.7 67.4 two years. Accordingly, the other income would fall from
project 56% as a percentage of the PBT in FY2010 to 20% in FY2013.
Total profit made from 89.9 157.3
Trend in other income as a % of PBT
power tolling - B
Net profit from PEL (A+B) 11.2 15.2 92.6 163.6 120.0 90%
Source: Company, Sharekhan Research Share of other income 80%
100.0 would fall in the next
Athena Energy Ventures Pvt Ltd three years 70%
80.0 60%
Athena Energy Ventures Pvt Ltd (AEVPL) was formed with
50%
the objective of developing power projects (generation, 60.0
40%
transmission and distribution) and associated
40.0 30%
infrastructure. The total power project portfolio of the 20%
company stands at about 7,000MW. Incorporated in 2007 20.0
10%
by Athena Power Projects and PTC, AEVPL plans to achieve 0.0 0%
a project portfolio of 10,000MW by 2012. The current FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11E FY12E FY13E
portfolio of AEVPL covers hydropower and thermal power Other income (Rs crore) As a % of PBT
Annexure - II
Equity investments
Particulars Status of the Capacity Equity Outstanding Proposed Share Expected
project (MW) commitment investments shareholding holding as of date of
as of as of pursuant Dec 31, 2010 commercial
Dec 31, 2010 Dec 31, 2010 to equity (%) operations
(Rs cr) (Rs cr) commitment
East Coast Energy Under development 1320 133.39 125.00 8% 15.12 Unit I-Dec 2013
Pvt Ltd Unit II-May 2014
Ind-Barath Under development 700 105.00 105.00 21% 20.55 Unit I-Jan 2012
Energy (Utkal) Ltd Unit II-Mar, 2012
Meenakshi Energy Under development 900 99.68 60.341 26% 26.00 Phase I-Dec 2011,
Pvt Ltd Phase II-Mar 2013
Ind-Barath Phase I of two units 189 55.63 55.63 26% 26.00 Phase II-Jan 2011
Powergencom Ltd of 63 MW each is
commissioned and
Phase II of one unit
of 63 MW is under
development
Indian Energy N.A. N.A. 6.939 5.76 26% 21.12 N.A.
Exchange Ltd*
RS India Limited Wind Farm: 39.60MW 99.45 53.9 53.9 37.00% 37.00 Phase I-Oct 2010
Wind Energy of Phase I has been
commissioned and
Phase II is under
development
WTG Manufacturing NA 7.37 7.17 Under
facility development
Solar farm 3 9.80 Nil Under initial
phase of
development
Varam Bio Energy Commenced commercial 10 4.39 4.39 26.00% 26.00 N.A
Pvt Limited operations Feb 2009
PTC Bermaco Under Development NA 6.645 1.37 26.00% 26.00 NA
Green Energy
Systems Ltd
*Liquidated holding to 21.12% for consideration of Rs13.5 crore Source: DRHP of PFS