Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Project Goals: To identify the mechanisms responsible for the observed advantages gained by
employing ultrasound in textile wet processes and to access the relative importance
Abstract
The use of ultrasound in textile wet processing offers many potential advantages. Previous work
has shown that the use of ultrasonics in dyeing provides the following benefits: (1) energy savings and
reduced processing times, (2) environmental improvements, (3) process enhancement, and (4) lower
overall processing costs. A fundamental understanding of the operative processes are needed so that
meaningful application of ultrasonics in textile processing may be made. This project is directed at
determining the phenomena responsible for the effects of ultrasound in textile wet processing and the
relative importance of phenomena occurring in the bulk solution and in the fiber. Our studies show that
ultrasound increases the swelling of both unmercerized and mercerized cotton. Although the beneficial
effects of ultrasound are also observed to occur in polyester, no effect of ultrasound on the glass
transition temperature was observed. An experimental approach has been developed that will enable a
direct determination of the effect of ultrasound on the diffusion coefficient of the dye within polyester.
Research including modeling is being conducted to determine the effect of ultrasound on the partition
coefficient and enhancement of dye transport to the fiber surface by reducing the boundary layer
thickness. The effect of ultrasound on the particle size of insoluble dyes is being studied. Ultrasound
C95g-13 2
reduces the average particle size of vat dyes in their insoluble form suspended in water and eliminates the
larger particles.
Introduction
There are many potential advantages offered by the use of ultrasound in textile wet processing.
The following benefits due to the use of ultrasonics in dyeing were shown by previous researchers [1-4]:
(1) energy savings by dyeing at lower temperatures and reduced processing times, (2) environmental
real-time control of color shade, and (4) lower overall processing costs, thereby increasing industry
physicochemical processes have been conducted, the mechanisms responsible for the effects of
ultrasound on textile processes have not been established. This project is directed at determining the
phenomena responsible for the effects of ultrasound in textile wet processing and establishing the relative
importance of phenomena occurring in the bulk solution and in the fiber. The mechanisms under
investigation include: (1) increasing swelling in water, (2) reducing glass transition temperature of the
fiber (dilation of amorphous regions), (3) increasing the diffusion coefficient of dye in the polymer, (4)
increasing the fiber/dye bath partition coefficient, (5) enhancing transport of the dye to the fiber surface
by reducing the boundary layer thickness, and (6) breaking up of micelles and high molecular weight
The swelling of both mercerized and unmercerized cotton fibers with water alone and with
ultrasound has been studied. Ultrasound causes significant fiber swelling compared to water alone.
Since cotton fibers are very nonuniform and hard to measure, the tests were repeated numerous times and
the results averaged. Several methods of measurement were used to confirm the results.
C95g-13 3
For unmercerized cotton, the swelling with water alone ranges from 10% to 20%, but with
ultrasound the range is from 25% to almost 50%. For mercerized cotton, the swelling with water alone is
only about 3% but with ultrasound is about 35%. Remember, the mercerization process causes
permanent swelling of the cotton fiber. Of interest here is that ultrasound still causes additional swelling.
The fiber swelling is observed for at least an hour after the removal of the ultrasound, as long as the fiber
remains in water. When removed from water and allowed to dry, the fiber returned to its original
diameter.
Vat dyes were examined in their insoluble unreduced form suspended in water to determine if
ultrasound changed the dye particle size. Five different vat dyes of known structure were examined,
most of which had previously been used in ultrasound dyeing trials. A 5-g/L solution of each dye was
prepared, then divided in half to give two samples for each dye. One sample of each dye was treated
with 20 kHz ultrasound at 25oC for 60 minutes; the other sample was used as a control untreated sample.
The dye samples were measured with a Honeywell Microtrac Particle Size Analyzer. This instrument
measures each sample twice and averages the results to produce an average particle size and a particle
size distribution. The results of the particle size analysis are shown in Table 1.
Vat Violet 1 was effected most by ultrasound. The particle size distribution was initially
bimodal, but when treated with ultrasound, became unimodal (Figure 1). The large particles were
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
Percent of Whole
5.0
W/O US
With US
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
3
5
6
3. 9
11 2
14 0
70
0
4
13
17
22
28
37
48
63
81
31
99
54
48
0
06
37
78
88
04
.0
.2
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
2.
6.
8.
1.
1.
1.
5.
Ultrasound reduced the average size of the dye particles for each of the dyes tested. The effect
ranged from virtually nothing in the case of Vat Black 25 to greater than 1.75 microns in the case of Vat
Violet 1. The effect of ultrasound on particle size is most evident when examining the before and after
graphic distributions drawn by the analyzer. Ultrasound had the greatest effect on vat dyes with a
bimodal particle distribution. After these dye samples were treated with ultrasound the large particles
were completely eliminated. Without ultrasound vat dyes may contain particles larger than 14 microns,
but when vat dyes are treated with ultrasound the largest dye particles are smaller than 2 microns.
C95g-13 5
45.000
40.000
35.000
Total % of Particles In Each Size
W/O US
30.000
With US
25.000
20.000
15.000
10.000
5.000
0.000
3
11 2
00
70
0
4
13
17
22
28
37
48
63
81
31
99
54
48
06
37
78
88
04
.0
.2
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
2.
6.
8.
1.
1.
1.
3.
5.
14
Particle Diameter (microns)
Figure 2. The Summed Particle Size Distributions of the Untreated and Treated Dye Samples
Figure 2 shows a combined plot of all the untreated and treated samples. The solid bars are
untreated dyes, and the open bars are the ultrasound treated dyes. It can be seen that ultrasound
completely eliminates the larger particles (> 2 microns). Treating vat dyes with ultrasound shifts the
An investigation into dye structure and the particle size change with ultrasound was conducted.
The vat dye base structures are given in Table 2. Using the vat dye base structures and comparing them
with the diameter differences in Table 1, a pattern can be seen. The two dyes which had the greatest
change in average particle diameter, Vat Violet 1 and Vat Green 3, are both benzanthrone derivatives.
These two dyes also had bimodal particle size distributions before treatment with ultrasound. The two
dyes with the smallest change in average particle diameter caused by ultrasound, Vat Black 25 and Vat
Violet 13, are both anthraquinone derivatives. Vat Green 1, a dye between these two extremes is a
C95g-13 6
violanthrone derivative. Samples of Vat Orange 9 and Vat Blue 19 were unavailable for measurement.
Benzanthrone derivatives are effected the most by ultrasound, then violanthrone derivatives, and then
anthraquinone derivatives.
One proposed mechanism responsible for the effects of ultrasound in textile wet processing was
the possible dilation of amorphous regions, i.e. decreasing the effective glass transition temperature in
synthetic fibers. Before dye can penetrate into the amorphous regions of synthetic fibers, the fiber must
be heated above its effective glass transition temperature. In commercial dyeing, plasticizers are often
added to lower glass transition temperatures. Since ultrasound allows fibers to be dyed at lower
temperatures, it was thought that ultrasound might lower the glass transition temperature. A dynamic
mechanical analyzer was used to obtain tan delta loss curves for polyester films in a water bath exposed
to ultrasound at 20 kHz. The results reveal that ultrasound does not affect the glass transition
temperature.
Diffusion Coefficients and Partition Coefficients (S. Michielsen, W. Carr, P. Das, and E.
McFarland)
We are investigating the effects of ultrasound on the diffusion coefficient for dye diffusing into
fibers and films. Previous reports [10, 11] have suggested that ultrasound increases dye diffusion
C95g-13 7
coefficients in cellulose films; however, the model used in the investigation assumes that ultrasound does
not affect either partition coefficient or dye transport to the fiber surface from the dyebath.
To measure diffusion coefficients, we first attempted to use a water soluble fluorescent disperse
dye in combination with Raman and fluorescence microscopy to establish the concentration of dye in the
PET film as a function of position. Once the concentration as a function of position is determined,
diffusion coefficient is then calculated from the mass diffusion equation for one-dimensional diffusion
through a stationary membrane. The film was dyed for times ranging from 0 to 24 hours with C.I.
Disperse Blue 79 in a 1 L aqueous dye bath containing 10 mg/L of dye, 10 g/L benzoic acid carrier, and 2
g/l TritonTM X-100 at 100°C. After dyeing, the film was rinsed with water and dried. Then the film was
potted in a PMMA casting resin. Samples were cured for 24 hours, microtomed, and examined under a
Zeiss Axiovert 100 microscope fitted for fluorescence measurements. A 100 W Hg lamp was used as the
light source. Incident light was filtered so that only blue and UV light were transmitted. The sample
fluorescence was filtered, and only light with wavelengths greater than 510 nm was allowed to pass.
Since fluorescence intensity is directly proportional to the concentration of dye in the polymer,
fluorescence intensity was measured at various positions across the film to give a concentration versus
position profile.
encountered with this technique. Previously, we reported that the C.I. Disperse Blue 79 appeared to
degrade. Concentration measured with a SpectronicTM-20 decreased with dyeing time. Through
discussions with a dye expert, we learned that disperse dyes should not degrade at 100°C (12). One
possible explanation for the apparent degradation of C.I. Disperse Blue 79 was that the dye was actually
aggregating. If the dye aggregates, the solution will not absorb as much radiation in the
spectrophotometrically after diluting the sample with water. If we instead dilute the dye solution with
10% dimethyl formamide or ethyl alcohol, the dye aggregates should break up. Another possibility is
C95g-13 8
that the dye solution degraded due to a pH that was too high. The dye solution should be held at a pH of
5 when dyeing polyester with disperse dyes. If the dye solution is held at a pH of 5, the degradation
should be prevented.
Another problem encountered with our technique is that the dye did not reach equilibrium even
after 24 hours. When measuring partition coefficient, the dye-fiber system must reach equilibrium.
Possible reasons for this have been discovered. The benzoic acid carrier used previously is a poor
carrier. Pres-carTM carrier is a much better carrier and allows for faster dyeing times.
The Raman and fluorescence microscope did not accurately pinpoint the concentration at each
position. Calculations reported previously have shown small errors in measuring concentration as a
function of position can cause big errors in diffusion coefficient. Even bigger errors are encountered
when exactly the same position can not be determined for two different times. Unless the Raman
technique can be further developed to include improved accuracy, this method will not be useful for our
measurements.
New techniques for measuring dye concentration gradients in films and fibers are being
investigated. On a current NTC project [13], a Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope is being used to
determine dye concentration as a function of position. The technique is promising for our application
A technique is being considered for estimating diffusion coefficients and mass transfer rates.
The method uses solutions to Fick’s Second Law for diffusion through cylinders and slabs. The
diffusion coefficient and mass transfer rate can be related to average concentration of the dye in the
substrate. The dyed substrate can be dissolved, and the average dye concentration
spectrophotometrically measured. The validity of this method depends on how well the boundary and
errors generated when the same position can not be established in the fiber/film for two different times.
A method was reported [11] in which a polymeric film was placed between two sides of a diffusion cell.
One side contains a dye solution held at a constant concentration, and the other side contains a blank
solution. As dye passes through the film, the rate of dye diffused through the film is monitored until
steady state is reached. If mass flow rate and the dye concentration gradient in the film can be measured,
the effects of ultrasound on the diffusion coefficient and mass transfer coefficient can be determined.
The method requires that the effect of ultrasound on partition coefficient be previously established.
We will determine the effect of ultrasound on partition coefficient, which can be measured by
Once the best method is established, the effect of ultrasound on the diffusion coefficient and
mass transfer coefficient will be measured. Work has already begun on establishing models for several
approaches.
[Other Contributors: Pronab Das, Post Doc (Georgia Tech); David Klutz (NC State), Elizabeth
McFarland (Georgia Tech), J. Zhan (Georgia Tech), Graduate Students, John Good, Undergraduate
Student (Georgia Tech)]
Industry Interactions: 12
Other Interactions Outside NTC: 10
References
2. Thakore, K.A., Smith, C.B., and Clapp, T.G., American Dyestuff Reporter, 30, October, (1990.
3. Thakore, K.A., Indian Journal of Textile Research, 13, 133 and 208 (1988).
4. Shimizu, Y., Yamamoto, R., and Shimizu, H., Textile Research Journal, 59, 684 (1989).
C95g-13 10
5. Suslick, K., ed. Ultrasound, Its Chemical, Physical, and Biological Effects VCH: New York, (1988).
6. Liu, L-S., Kost, J., D’Emanuele, A., and Langer, R., Macromolecules, 25, 123 (1992).
8. Cost, M., Mills, G., Glisson, P., and Lakin, J., Chemosphere, 27, 1737 (1993).
9. Riesz, P., and Kondo, T., Free Radical Biology & Medicine, 13, 247 (1992).
10. Thakore, K.A., Smith, C.B., and Hite, D., Textile Chemists and Colorists, 22(11), 21 (1990).
11. Smith, C.B., Clapp, T.G., Thakore, K., Cato, M.J., and Hite, D., EPRI Final Report, TR-101379,
13. McGregor, R., et al. “Fundamentals of Dye Diffusion Variance in Polyamide and Polyester Fibers,”
14. Gilbert, G.A., Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, A183, 167-181 (1944).
Presentations/Publications