Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Lao PDR
Page suivant
INTRODUCTION
Background
Following up with the World Conference on Education for All: Meeting Basic
Learning Needs (Jomtien, Thailand, March 1990), in August 1990, the
Ministry of Education of Lao PDR, held a national meeting. The meeting was
attended by representatives from the Ministry of Planning and Finance, the
Ministry of Public Health, the Ministry of Information and Culture, the Ministry
of Agriculture and Forestry, the Lao Women’s Union, and the Youth’s Union.
The meeting set forth the needs of the establishment of the National
Committee for Education for All. In December 1991, the National Committee
for Education for All (NCEFA) was established. The Chairperson of the
NCEFA was the Vice-Minister of Education with members from concerned
ministries and departments. The NCEFA set up goals and objectives to the
year 2000, determined the strategies and the National Action Plan for EFA.
The NCEFA also set up guidelines and main measures to be undertaken by
the different concerned parties to participate in the EFA action plan
according to their respective responsibilities.
On the 4th February 1997, the Prime Minister issued a decree on the
establishment of the National Committee on Basic Education for All. The
National Committee on Basic Education for All composed of:
Central Level:
Provincial Level:
Provincial Governor as Chairperson.
Central level.
Provincial level.
District level.
Country Profile
The LECS sample divided the country into three geographic areas: the North,
the Center ( including the capital of Vientiane), and the South. Although the
population of the Lao PDR is diverse, the North and the South both have a
generally high proportion of ethnic minorities.
Two separate poverty lines were defined. The first is the basic poverty line,
which measures the household’s ability to purchase a variety of goods
beyond food and dwelling needs. The second is the extreme poverty line,
which measures the household’s ability to purchase only the most absolute
necessities: food, shelter, and clothing. The headcount shows the
percentage of the population falling into the categories of poverty and
extreme poverty. The poverty gap index measures the average transfer of
resources that the poor need to escape poverty. It measures the depth of
poverty but does not put any special weight on the poorest of the poor.
Using the poverty line, the national incidence of poverty is estimated at 46%,
while for rural areas the incidence is 53%. The incidence of poverty is 53%in
the rural North, 47% in the Center, and 66% in the South. Extreme poverty is
especially prevalent in the South. As is common in most countries, poverty is
far more common in rural areas than in urban areas. Indeed, the level of
urban extreme poverty is quite low.
The poverty gap index confirms the general trends in the head count ratio.
The South is the poorest region, with especially heavy poverty in the rural
areas. Since the survey did not identify poverty by ethnicity, it is difficult to
make many inferences about poverty among ethnic minorities. However,
poverty is highest in areas that also have a large proportion of ethnic
minorities.
POVERTY
Region Head-Count Ratio Poverty Gap Index
EXTREME POVERTY
1. Often the most serious limitations to access, and hence the most
severe forms of poverty, are economic in nature. On the supply
side, the scarcity of funds may result in entire communities that
lack basic services. The nearest social service may be
prohibitively distant.
2. Even where services are available, members of ethnic minority
groups may face severe economic constraints, caused by low
income. This may manifest itself through the inability to pay for
services or through other effects of low income, such as
malnutrition.
10. However, economic conditions are not the only factors that
influence access. Many other factors contribute to the constraints
of access and the use of social services by ethnic minorities.
Some of these factors have a very definite economic
interpretation, whereas others are more clearly related to cultural
and political barriers.
EDUCATION SYSTEM
Formal Education
1. Teacher Training
Non-Formal Education
those between the ages of 6-14, who are not attending schools;
those between 15-25 years of age who do not have definite vocations;
and
those between the ages of 15-40 who are illiterate and have not
completed primary school, or those over 40 years old who are
interested.
In conjunction with its activities to raise the education levels of the population
with some basic education, the non-formal education department of the
Ministry of Education maintains an equivalency program for adults (Table 3).
There is an accelerated program for senior officials. This program presents 3
months curriculum for each grade and is not intended for university
enrollment, but for education equivalence purpose only.
Informal Education
The definition states that HDR is a life long process, intended to create
citizens who live good lives(i.e. enjoying health, having access and quality
education and opportunities for employment, and contributing productively to
society). The definition involves the whole Services Development, which is
not in the list of the seven priorities of the national socio-economic
development plan.
Education Strategies
2. Education Policies
Overall targets:
BASIC EDUCATION:
The following are the general principles stated in Chapter I of the decree:
Strategy and Action Plan to achieve goals and targets were formulated
during the National Meeting of the Senior Education Administrators in
1990 and officially published by the National Committee for EFA. The
Action Plan were implemented by concerned departments and
ministries from central to grass-roots level. Annually, the progress of
the implementation of the EFA action plan were reported at the
National Meeting of the Senior Education Administrators and the
adjustment of the action plan were then formulated for the forth-coming
year.
The main roles of the NCEFA were to determine the strategies and
National Action Plan for EFA as guidelines, and main measures to be
undertaken by the different parties concerned in accordance to their
respective responsibilities. Coordinate with the different parties
concerned in order to encourage, support and facilitate their action.
Supervise, monitor and evaluate the annual progress in the
implementation of the programme and projects.