Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A. Concept Design
1. 2-D drawing /3D drawing/conventional model/ Rapid Prototyping/
VRML (virtual reality) model
2. Form/ Function
3.Targeted customer.
B. Prototype to sales department.
(Alfa-Prototypes, 5-10 in nos.(form and function....Just shape and Function)
1. To get feed back from customer /client.
2. Market survey.
3. Feed back from Critical customers.
4. Market trend/demand analysis.
5. Comparison with existing similar product (Cost and features)
C. Prototype to production department
(Beta-Prototype, 20-25 in no’s (form, fuction, fit...Near to shape, function)
1.Form /function evaluation
2.Ergonimcs considerations.
3.Manufacturing /Production process selection.
4.Process for Mass/batch production.
5.Team feasibility (In house production).
6.Vendor development (Out sourcing /suppliers availability)
d. Design department.
1.Design a product with considering all data or feedbacks.
2. Design for Easy manufacturing.
3. Design for mass production.
4. Design for Easy assembly.
5. Design for Easy maintenance.
6. Designs for Durability. Functional (static & dynamic)\ /Structural
&Thermal optimization /FEA Methods/simulation)
7. Redesign, Review, Re-evaluation.
8. Product optimization.
9.Production part approval.
E. Production part approval process (PPAP)
Introduction
Production parts are manufactured at the production site using the production
tooling, gauging process, materials, operators, and environment and process settings.
E.g. feed /speed/ cycle times/pressures/temperatures. Parts for production part
approval must be taken from a significant production run. This run would typically be
from one hour to one shift’s production, with the specific production. Quantity to total
300 parts minimum unless otherwise specified. Parts from each position of a multiple
cavity die, mold tool or patterns are to be measured and reprehensive parts tested.
Process requirements.
1.Auxillary drawing and sketches
The Part number, change level, drawing and supplier's name shall be
shown all on all the auxiliary documents i.e., supplementary layouts results
sheets, sketches, tracing, cross section, CMM inspection point results,
geometric dimensioning and tolerance sheets or other auxiliary drawings
used in conjunction with the part drawing). Copies of these auxiliary materials
are to accompany the dimensional results according to the retention
/submission requirements table .A tracing shall be included when an optical
comparator is necessary for inspection.
2.Part specific inspection or test device
If a product, whole or in part, requires that a part specific inspection or test device
be used, the supplier is required to provide it with submission when so requested. The
supplier is required to certify that all aspects of the gage, etc. Agree with part
dimensional requirements. The supplier must have documentation showing that all
released engineering design changes, up to the level being submitted, have been
incorporated in the gage. Suppliers are responsible for maintenance of such gauges for
the life of the part.
Measurement system variation studies (gage R&R, accuracy, linearity,
and stability studies) per customer requirements must be conducted.
3.Customer Identified Special Characteristics
Customer may use unique symbols to identify important characteristics, such as
those that affect the customer safety, compliance with regulations, function, fit, or
appearance. These characteristics are variously termed as "Critical”, key”,” safety" or
"significant".
4. Preliminary Process Capability Studies
An acceptable of preliminary process capability must be determined prior to
submission for all characteristics designated by the customer or supplier as safety, key,
critical, or significant, that can be evaluated using variables data. The purposes of these
requirements are to determine, if the production process is likely to produce product that
will meet customer's requirement. The conventional procedure for estimating process
capability is described below.
Preliminary process studies are short-term and will not predict the effects of time
and variation in people, materials, methods, equipments, measurement systems, and
environment. Even for these short-term studies, it is important to collect and analyze the
data in the order they are produced using control charts.
It is necessary to perform a measurement system analysis (Gage R&R,
accuracy, linearity and stability studies) to understand how measurement error is
affecting the study measurements.
6.Material Tests
Material tests must be performed for all parts and product materials when
chemical/physical/metallurgical requirements are specified. The supplier must perform
the tests by the material specifications and control plan.
If the supplier cannot perform the required tests services must be procured from
a qualified source or, upon special arrangement, form customer’s laboratories. When
third party laboratory services are used the results must be submitted on their letterhead
or normal report format. The name of the laboratory that performs the tests must be
indicated.
7. Performance Tests:
Performance tests must be performed for all parts and product materials when
performance requirements are specified. The supplier must perform the test required by
the performance specification and control plan.
If the supplier cannot perform the required tests services must be procured from
a qualified source or, upon special arrangement, form customer’s laboratories. When
third party laboratory services are used the results must be submitted on their letterhead
or normal report format. The name of the laboratory that performs the tests must be
indicated.
It is the suppliers’ responsibilities to meet all applicable specifications are cause
for the supplier not to submit the parts and/or documentation. Every effort must be
made to correct process so that all design record requirements are met.
8. Part submission warrant
Upon satisfactory completion of all required measurements and tests, the
supplier must enter required information on the warrant. A separate warrant must be
completed for each part numbers unless otherwise agreed to by the customer. Since
the warrant has been developed as an industry-wide form, certain customers will not
require entries in al spaces.
9.Engineering Changes
For submissions due to engineering changes, the inspection and testing
requirements are determined by the extent of change. For example, if certain
dimensions are changed, the dimensional evaluation may be limited to those areas
affected by the change. For guidance on specific changes, contact your responsible part
approval activity.
10. Multiple Cavity molds, Tools, Dies, and Patterns
If production parts will be produced from more than one cavity, mold, tool, die, or
pattern, a complete dimensional evaluation is required on one part from each cavity,
mold, etc., The supplier must identify the specific cavities, Molds, etc., for which parts
are being submitted on the "explanation/comments” line of the warrant or in an
attachment.
Steps of APQP
1.Plan and Define a Program
This section determines customer needs and expectations in order to plan and
define a quality program. All work must be done with customer in mind, providing better
products and define a quality program. All work must be done with customer in mind,
providing better products and services than competition. The early stage of the product
quality planning process is designed to assure that customer needs and expectations
are clearly understood.
Inputs
Voice of customer
Market Research
Historical warranty and quality Information
Team experience
Business Plan/Marketing Strategy
Product/Process Benchmark data
Product/Process assumption
Product reliability studies
Customer Inputs
Fig: Product quality Planning Timing Chart
Outputs
Design goals
Reliability and quality goals
Preliminary Process Flow chart
Preliminary Listing of special product and process characteristics
Product assurance plan
Management Support
Inputs
• Design Goals (Derived from the output of Planning)
• Reliability and quality goals
• Preliminary Bill of material
• Preliminary Process flow chart
• Preliminary listing of special Product and Process characteristics.
• Product Assurance Plan
• Management Support
Outputs
• Production Trail run
• Measurement system evaluation
• Preliminary Process capability study
• Production Part approval
• Production Validation testing
• Packaging Evaluation
• Production control Plan
• Quality Planning Sign-off and management support
Fig: Product quality Planning Timing Chart
Output
• Reduced Variation
• Customer Satisfaction
• Delivery and service
6.Control Plan
The purpose of this control plan methodology is to aid in manufacture of
quality products according to customer Requirements. It does this by providing
structured approach for design selection and implementation of value added control
methods for the total system. Control plans provide a written summary description of
systems used in minimizing process and product variation. The intent of control plan
form displayed in this section is to provide an example of how this information can be
documented.
An important phase of process for quality planning is the development of a
control plan. a control plan written description of the system for controlling parts and
processes. A single control plan may apply to group or family of products that are
produced by same process at same source. Sketches, as necessary, may be attached
to control plan for illustration process.
In effect the control plan describes the action that is required at each
phase of process including receiving, in process, out going, and periodic requirements
to assure that all process outputs will be in a state of control. During regular production
runs, the control plan provides the process monitoring and control methods that will be
used to control characteristics. Since process are expected to be continually updated
and improved, control plan reflects a strategy that is responsive to these changing
process conditions.
Control plans should be maintained and used through out the product life cycle.
Early in the product life cycle its primary purpose is to document and communicate the
initial plan for process control and subsequently, it guides manufacturing, in how to
control the process and ensure product quality. Ultimately, the control plan remains a
living document reflecting the current methods of control and measuring systems used
and it should be updated as measurement systems and control methods are evaluated
and improved.
Control plan development
For process control and improvement to be effective, a basic understanding of
the process must be obtained. A multi –disciplined team is established to develop the
control plan by utilizing all the available information to gain a better understanding of the
process.
Such as
• Process flow diagram
• Systems /design /Process failure mode and effective analysis.
• Special characteristics
• Lessons learned from similar parts
• Team’s knowledge of the process
• Design reviews.
• Optimizations methods
Severity
Provide description of what ramification of the failure could be often ramification focus
on safety issues especially in higher ratings.
Occurrence
If possible use objective and measurable description for each rating.
Detection
Use the definition of type 1,2,3 detection control to help distinguish between stronger
and weaker detection ratings.
On basis of RPN (risk priority no) action to reduce or to mitigate the effect, and should
be based on priority.