Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The indifference curve indicates the various combinations of two goods which yield equal
satisfaction to the consumer. By definition, an indifference curve shows all the various
combinations of two goods that give an equal amount of satisfaction to a consumer. The
indifference curve analysis approach was first introduced by Slustsky, a Russian Economist in
1915. Later it was developed by J.R. Hicks and R.G.D. Allen in the year 1928. These economist
are the of view that it is wrong to base the theory of consumption on two assumptions; (i) that
there is only one commodity which a person will buy at one time, and (ii) the utility can be
measured. Their [point of view is that utility is purely subjective and is immeasurable. Moreover
an individual is interested in a combination of related goods and in the purchase of one
commodity at one time. So they base the theory of consumption on the scale of preference and
the ordinal ranks or orders his preferences. The ordinal utility theory or the indifference curve
analysis is based on four main assumptions.
Various Combinations:
a) 16 Kilograms of Rice Plus 2 Kilograms of Wheat
b) 12 Kilograms of Rice Plus 5 Kilograms of Wheat
c) 11 Kilograms of Rice Plus 7 Kilograms of Wheat
d) 10 Kilograms of Rice Plus 10 Kilograms of Wheat
e) 9 Kilograms of Rice Plus 15 Kilograms of Wheat
It is matter of indifference for the consumer as to which combination he buys. He may buy 16
kilograms of rice and 2 kilograms of wheat or 9 kilograms of rice and 15 kilograms of wheat. All
these combinations are equally preferred by him. An indifference curve thus is composed of a set
of consumption alternatives each of which yields the same total amount of satisfaction. These
combinations can also be shown by an indifference curve.
The consumer’s preferences can be shown in a diagram with an indifference curve. The
indifference showing nothing about the absolute amounts of satisfaction obtained. It merely
indicates a set of consumption bundles that the consumer views as being equally satisfactory.
In fig. 3.1 we measure the quantity of wheat along X-axis (in kilograms) and along Y-axis, the
quantity of rice (in kilograms). IC is an indifference curve. It is shown in the diagram that a
consumer may buy 12 kilograms of rice and 5 kilograms of wheat or 9 kilograms of rice and 15
kilogram of wheat. Both these combinations are equally preferred by him and he is indifferent to
these two combinations. When the scale of preference of the consumer is graphed, by joining the
points a, b, c, d, e, we obtain an Indifference Curve IC. Every point on indifference curve
represents a different combination of the two goods and the consumer is indifferent between any
two points on the indifference curve. All the combinations are equally desirable to the consumer.
The consumer is indifferent as to which combination he receives. The Indifference Curve IC thus
is a locus of different combinations of two goods which yield the same level of satisfaction.
An Indifference Map:
A graph showing a whole set of indifference curves is called an indifference map. An
indifference map, in other words, is comprised of a set of indifference curves.Each
successive curve further from the original curve indicates a higher level of total satisfaction. In the
fig. 3.2 three indifference curves IC1, IC2 and IC3 have been shown. The various combinations of
goods of wheat and rice lying on IC1 yield the same level of satisfaction to the consumer. The
combinations of goods lying on higher indifference curve IC2 contain more both the goods wheat
and rice. The indifference curve IC2 gives more satisfaction to the consumer than IC1. Similarly,
the set of combinations of two goods on IC3 yields still higher satisfaction to the consumer than
IC2. In short, the further away a particular curve is from the origin, the higher level of satisfaction it
represents.
It may here be noted that while an indifference curve shows all those combinations of wheat and
rice which provide equal satisfaction to the consumer but it does not indicate exactly how much
satisfaction is derived by the consumer from these combinations. It is because of the fact that the
concept of ordinal utility does not involve the qualitative measurement of utility.